Your Biofield Is the Antenna for the Internet of Bodies | Chris Crutchfield (Biopsy of a Psyop)

They trying to connect Joe Ashton Internet. They want to call it the Internet of Bodies. They might as well call it the Internet of Boodies at this point, because everybody asks us connect. I think it's because there's a group of people going for global domination, trying to take over the world, turn everybody into a transhumanized robot. This is Chris Crutchfield, and the concept he's mapping out for you is called the Bio-Digital Convergence. They are literally trying to put the Internet inside you and fuse all biology with the digital realm. Once you see what's turning this technological wheel, you just can't unsee it. How many for you are to understand? Okay, this is not a theory at this point. We are talking about industry, market share, business. You've heard Cloud Schwab refer to it as the fourth industrial revolution, same concept. He said it himself, "You are the technology." [Laughter] Full spec from dominance, that's the US Army's stated goal. Not my words, they're words. The human body actually emits an electric field as part of your central nervous system, the extension of which goes out about six to nine feet around you and is called your biofeed. They've been knowing this for this whole time, so what they've been doing is building out systems, network processing of human biosimals in real time. I had to talk to Chris because I'm a biofield tuner and I come through human energy fields every week. And there's a layer to this that no tech R&D department will ever be able to explain. Your biofield is not something emitted by your body. Your biofield is something that forms your body. If they could put a gatekeeper between your body releasing insulin and whether or not you have a diabetic coma, they would put that gate there. They would do that. Yeah. And they would try to do a subscription fee. Oh yeah. They trying to fume your brain and booting to the cloud. The question is, are you gonna let them? Welcome to the one within all to the universe podcast. We got an episode long overdue collaborating with the one in only six foot seven, Chris Crutchfield, ex Hollywood producer now turns documentary maker. He's got this incredible project called biopsy of a siop see. And I have known about it since we were together at the elementals gathering where he played a bit of it for his talk. And it totally blew us away. The production quality was through the roof, especially in comparison to most people who talk about conspiracy related topics. But beyond that, what was so amazing about Chris's work is how his elevated perspective being so tall both physically and spiritually, I would say. Allow him to create like the grand, what do you call it? The grand unifying theory of conspiracies. And that's what this biopsy of a siopsy is really all about. It brings together all of these compartmentalized aspects of the fariest doings that we can see quite clearly happening in our world. Some of us have known about for a long time. And it's reds the needle to create one cohesive argument for like why this is happening. What's really going on? And I just loved it. Enjoyed rewatching it again last night. And I'm super excited to mix up with you Chris. Welcome to the show, dude. Thank you, chance. Thank you for having me, man. Happy to be here. Yeah. Tell it. Can I get a little bit more of your background like you know, I've heard it in the brief, but let's introduce you better to the audience. Yeah. So I am Chris Crutchfield. I am from North Carolina born and raised on the playground as well as spent half of my days. But I was the tall kid who played sports and who soon when I was finished playing sports, I set up playing video games, except for Gold and I and Mario Kart. I was geeking out with motherboards and computers and trinketry and electronics and things like that. So I was kind of like, if we're talking high school archetypes, I was the nerd pocket protector by day and the athlete by after school, you know, by evening. And that love for creativity and technicality took me into an engineering college where I got a bachelor's of science and telecommunications, which then led into some engineering jobs and then that spun into digital creativity, which gave me the confidence to start my own business making videos, producing, editing, directing, for film and television. That gave me the confidence to hop on a one way car ride to Los Angeles where I spent from 2010 to 2020 working in the film industry, working in the entertainment industry in Los Angeles and developing all kinds of perspectives and understandings about how that really works. But at the same time, it helped me kind of like, you know, I was going from home for the first time was helped me was me defining who I am and what I care about. And that all came to a, I won't say a grinding halt, I definitely took the the burner from Max to simmer about 10 years ago, 11 years ago now. When I began to learn how the industry that I worked in really worked and how the brotherhoods and societies and frameworks it was connected to, spanned beyond just the entertainment industry and how it dipped into the religious industries and adjacent industries of politics and the funding source of pharmaceutical and I got to kind of see all that without really having the details that I know now about why. In the last decade has been spent me learning why what win, where and how and I'm at the point now where I enjoy communicating and open into discussion with people such as chance as well as honestly anybody strangers and friends alike. Because I think everybody kind of gets it they just don't know that they get it yet. I think you can walk into any bar and blah hey is the government corrupt and they'll be like I mean well you will get more yeses than knows but like that how in what to what degree are they corrupt and how long has it been they can't answer any of those questions but they we all have this general baseline of like I don't think the people in charge really have our best interest at heart. And so this was my attempt at casting a pretty wide net to try and bring some of the more difficult, heavier niche more conversations into a more mainstream understanding with a lot of glitz and gloss using the expertise I had gained in Los Angeles for a decade working for giant brands big artists like top songs and stuff on the Super Bowl like 13 or 14 years ago. So I've done all these things and I was a great experience but at the same time it was very unfulfilling especially when you find out that the industry I spent a decade enriching myself and burning myself out for most of the time was was about some other other other M.O. And I was an unwitting perpetual perpetuation of that motorcycle around I without really knowing it and you know I kind of just decided I wasn't going to be about that life I still work with big clients I still deal in Los Angeles from time to time I just been more of my heart fire my energy and my direction trying to use what I've learned to actually help and not just sell a product or make a person laugh because I can't do that. You can make someone laugh but if you can make them laugh and teach them something or help them while making them laugh to me that's that helps offset the for velvility for volunteer whatever of what I felt the last decade of my life was spent in Los Angeles doing and I have great friends and experiences I just wanted more out of life I wanted more out of my talent and that brought me to developing this documentary series. I really like it ultimate goal with this because what I don't know if slash when but maybe I'll try some sort of like ladle tv style or when style daily show thing I just hate the scheduling of it all but my point is I want to make it like I live music I build projects I do drums I like record little sound boards in my loop pedal I've done all that in the past on lives I just want to kind of like bring it into like a package deliver thing and keep it about. The biopsy of a side of the will be a whole season of information conversations you know posts comments and then at some point all hop to a new documentary and then the second season will be all conversations around that concept and I just want to be like I want people to be like download or subscribe or whatever and be able to get an a to Z of what I mean and I think I can do that because I think soon as you tell people start with absolutely one and we're going to be a lot of people start with absolutely one and watch it like a season they do a lot of issues come up when I think people catch half of your conversation or they don't catch last episode where you set something up but they catch in this episode and they're jumping to all kinds of conclusions so that's just this is my creative ways to be like okay how can I get through and around the censorship because this mess is crazy make the the bingeable thing yeah exactly this other you know big boy streamers exactly like a bingeable in like if you had a whole biopsy of a siopsy mini series that's essentially I'm going for is three volumes maybe four where I complete the map I spent a whole one talking about the banking and then there's like 10 episodes of several hour long conversations, another 10 episodes of short little shorts of graphics going into certain specific details. You see what I'm saying? It's like 50 videos relating to this one documentary. In the first two or three are the doc itself, then the other 47 are supplementary elements. You can download the spreadsheet with all these links and all these articles and research to back it up, or you can just watch it and enjoy it. There's so many things to discuss, but let's just show the wheel real quick. Yeah, absolutely. I have downloaded it as you generously provided. The whole documentary centers pun intended on banking. That's right. This is an amazing infographic that Chris created that shows these eight industries, pharma, food, education, entertainment, technology, politics, history, and religion, as the spokes of the wheel that is turning society in this weird, satanic direction of the bio-digital convergence and banking sitting right at the center, which I mean, I can't argue with that. I really can't argue with that. We could break down a little bit of the inspiration behind this wheel, but I want to give this top down summary sentence that you said in the documentary that the whole conversation is really all about how we categorized energy and that the goal of the sion is the total energy manipulation across the whole spectrum. That's big. Yep. Exactly. So, this map is started with, it started as a piece of paper. I wonder if I have the original paper. Oh, here it is. Yeah, I got it right. I think I can reach it. It started as me doing a live stream and on the live stream, I'm writing just a little map to say you guys, the way I see it, it's all this careful matriculation into a new paradigm that's very controlled. And I even reoriented on the actual map in some of the areas, but the point was that my mind just, you know, I worked in one of these industries, I grew up kind of mixed up in a different industry. My mother and family worked in a different industry. I was interested in this different industry. I've later come to learn some research about these other industries. To talk about this energy question, I thought that was a really cool unifying thread, the total spectrum domination of energy and how that we've stood the entire documentary. Absolutely. And so the thing, again, the documentary started off as this little sketch. And to be honest, it's like looking back on it, I can tell how this was meant to be from a creative standpoint. I don't know if you've ever dealt with this where you have this grand plan, you spend all this time producing something and then the reception or the kind of like the numbers or whatever is like, but then in other projects, you just kind of like, far down a night day. I don't know if people are really like this and you put it out and it just does all these numbers. And you're like, whoa, I've had that happen professionally and non-professionally. So many times. This was, and I was mostly at the time just talking about tech and formal, but this was the inception of the documentary. This little sketch right here to say, you guys, these industries are actually working together. Y'all don't probably know it, but like y'all wouldn't be able to watch half the TV shows you watch if it wasn't for the pharmaceutical industry paying for it. And the networks know that and the producers know that and the showrunners know that and maybe not the actors, but basically everybody else in the chain. And so if you were ever going to think that this show was going to do anything other than promote the very thing that it's being paid to be created for, you know, that just simply does a compute. So it was, it was my way to say, I, y'all love entertainment and I worked in that industry enough to know, y'all don't really know how this really works. Let me show you. So I said, I've used this a couple times in two or three different live streams. Let me just hop on my iPad and draw it and do a nicer version of it. So I can reference something nice. And so I drew the first little core and I say, you know what? How about I put that and how about I like to make it symmetrical? And then I finished that little inner part and I just remember thinking, you know, it would be cool if you just like zoomed it out and you kind of did that infinity thing or you kind of just talk it. And so I just started drawing. It was just an idea. I had not planned it. None of this was outlined. I didn't like sit down and really put any sort of thought into it other than I started sketching the tech section. And then I started going, okay, I don't know what I would put there, but then I could put that there. Okay, this clearly man. Because it was about a week of me sitting and pulling what I knew and creating it in real time. There were no sketches. The what you see is the first and only draft. And I mean, I erased and redrew it online, but it was really just that. It was confluence, not this past confluence, but the confluence 2025. And I showed a few people this map. And this was, I had just finished it. We're talking like sketching it on the trip on the way. Like putting the last little finish and touches on the way there. And what I found was that once I went to go talking about it, it was just coming out of me so natural because it was a teaching tool. But I just couldn't. It was always hard to wrap it all into one succinct thing if I wasn't already talking about it. You know what I mean? So what it became for me was a the perfect teaching tool to be able to. To launch from because at this point up to now in my podcast trajectory, I was always essentially looking for who I was like, what is my niche? What do I talk about? I started running my mouth about COVID and the injectables. And then that got a lot of eyes and the intention. And then I transitioned to the mass and the technology of it all. And that got even more tension. And then I say, well, hold on now. I don't necessarily want to be a medical commentator, but I'm turning into a medical commentator. Let me go back to medical school essentially and learn how all this technology works and these new off these new, you know, whatever. What was on everybody's discussion 2020, 2021, 2022. And it was after about 2022 and leading into 2023 when I realized you guys, everything is tech, tech, tech, tech, tech, tech, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Bill Gates. That's the only people. Those are the only juggernauts people are really talking about in the social space. It's tech oligarchs, even Richard Branson and people like that. And I realized the solution is mRNA tech. The reaction is a tech managed digital, center for digital disinformation or whatever. And so the problem, I just, it didn't make sense to me that if the reaction and solution were tech oriented tech centric, that the problem wasn't also tech centric. That's all I had going into it. And then when I had what was my biggest video ever to this day go viral back in 20, I mean, I had plenty of go viral with the biggest one. I got my second fact check article and I started doing digging on who, who was, who bothered caring about my opinion that hard, you know what I'm saying? And then I found out I was a former CIA officer who like went to go be a journalist, which to me, I was smart enough to be like, okay, so I'm hovering over the mark because they put their anti spook, you know, there's spook eraser glue on top of my conversation five years ago. And I just remember being like, all right, now I've got, now I know what to look for. And that this last five years has really catapulted why I've had to kind of bring it all to this colorful lollipop of a conversation because it is technical. Some people are just not technical. And I've had to understand those people deserve a chance and I don't need to mock them. I just need to help them. And the more I got the scene where the average psyche could handle, especially as videos got shorter and Instagram stopped pushing anything above three minutes and everything's about reals, reals, reals and shorts, shorts, shorts. It became clear, okay, I'm going to have to like get real. Get me guys look over here. Just to get anybody to like, wait, what? You know, just a look, then you can tell them something, but you may not be too serious or they're like, bro, whatever. And then they just keep on. So this was honestly just my attempt to help. It's my, it's like my creative offering to say, maybe this will help. I don't know. It's like, it's a maybe this will help type thing. But it became important to me to articulate it in a way that could have legacy and that people could reference and that if you heard me today or a year from today, you could be on the same page as everybody else. So that's why I decided to build it into a conversation documentary series beyond just a map that I put out. I mean, the map is available, but like, you know, the map is very artistically inspired and it generally speaking has a lot of terms that most people aren't familiar with. Yeah. And for people who have not seen any of this documentary, I'm going to bring this image back up. I know it's a lot. In the documentary, Chris does a lot of like zoom in and spin in the wheel so you can read everything perfectly. So for now, unless your eyes just feel like wandering, focus on the middle people watching. And what this really is about, the biopsy of a siopsy is the biodigital convergence. And how all of these eight sectors of industry, education, entertainment, technology, politics, history, religion, and pharma and food are all spokes in the wheel that are turning this engine of society towards this biodigital convergence. And so they're all mutually doing each other's dirty work, you can say. Like you alluded to it earlier that the entertainment industry is completely funded by pharma. And then in their commercials, advertisements, and even the propaganda of the programming that they're putting out, especially at most, most definitely TV. I think a lot of us have like boomer age parents and they have Fox News or CNN on 24/7. And half of the time that the TV is on is a pharma and not even the channel content that they're there to watch or fear the background presumably. So that's an example of how this works or how the fake history is propped up by education, how the politicians are creating the laws and protections for the poisoning of the food. Like we just saw with old DJT making sure that everyone knows that glyphosate is national security necessities. Necessary. We got to keep poisoning all of the food supply with glyphosate. No questions about it must be done. Right. Right. It was just like crazy because like all the other countries on earth that have been here even longer. It's more important that we it's really more important that we poison you than we feed you. Even though there's tons of ways to grow food without glyphosate. And so I'm trying to recapitulate things because as someone that's in like immersed in this all the time, your brain is just always hopping from one thing to another in this web and you're like, I don't even it's hard probably to know where to even drop somebody in, right? Absolutely. So we'll talk about the bio digital convergence and also about how what I think was most compelling in the doc was how you show that these different conspiracies, whether it's the poisoning of the food or the alopathic apocalypse in the health industry, the health scare industry, right? Or the programming in the entertainment industry, all of the things that are making people sicker and seem like it's a conspiracy to make people sicker on purpose, both mentally and physically are not just about depopulation. Correct. That may, you know, we all used to kind of think it was just about depopulation. But it's really about getting the machine in your body. Plug in that ass into the eaters. That's right. Exactly. So let's talk about that this bio digital convergence help people understand what this is. We haven't talked about it on my channel much. I honestly didn't really ever want to, but because you made it such an entertaining circus, I was like, all right, I'm ready. We'll have Chris talk about for us. Well, yeah, it's one of those things that it never, like that term bio digital convergence is not my term. That is a term that the United Nations World Economic Forum, the IEEE, all these different standards bodies and governing bodies decided to coin this paradigm shift. You know, you've heard Cloud Schwab refer to it as the fourth industrial revolution. Same concept. He said it himself. You are the technology. This fourth industrial revolution with this technological revolution, but you are the technology moving forward. He put it into prose as opposed to technical jargon. Not that I admire this Cloud Schwab. But this is the name of the simplest way to explain the trajectory of managed eugenics. So when I say the word eugenics, that's e-u-g-n-i-c-s. Right now, if you were to Google that, you have all kinds of connotation commentary about what you should think about this word and why it was a failed idea in certain people held these ideologies. But the truth is, it was a very popular movement just 50 years ago and 100 years ago. Very famous people of our social history today were very popular eugenicists. It's not a new concept by any means. It's kind of just been hidden and left off the radar. Eugenics is essentially trying to control evolution yourself. So imagine if there's a group of people, families, entities, beings, well, it's a different conversation for what the fabric of these people are made of. But you have a group of people and they feel like it's their duty to manage the world of fairs. And you can call their bluff, but the irony is that they've kind of been doing that in these series of families for several years, decades centuries, even. And yes, they would be the equivalent of what we call the elite, the 1%. These are all just nicknames that we're giving to this nebulous group of people who, for the most part, stay in the background and off the conversation table so that they can actually manage and move solutions forward in the public space. So the bio digital convergence is their term for the planned coalescence, the merging of all things biological and interfacing with all things digital. And just as an allegory, it would be like giving every plant animal blade of grass, air molecule, and the speck of dust flying through the air. It's own little Wi-Fi chip so that it can connect into the internet. Now again, that's an allegory that there's a Wi-Fi chips being installed in plants. That's not how it technically works. But it does work by a series of pervasive grids, pervasive nodes that float in through the air, smart dust as it were. And that the smart dust are really just like dust with IP addresses and MAC IDs and some unique serial number or identifier. That's it. And then the greater system of satellites, relays, giant mirrors that reflect things from the surface of the earth and around plasma channels, electric piezoelectric conversations, galvanic conversations, thermal conversations, all these systems. Again, energy just across different terms we give it depending on how many hertz megahertz gigahertz terror hertz or otherwise it moves throughout the spectrum. These are all just nomenclature were applying to different ways to categorize energy. And as Chance mentioned, and the Department of Defense, now the Department of War, full spectrum dominance. I was like a 2002, I think, Army manual or it was a 2004, I forget the specific year full spectrum dominance that's the US Army's stated goal, not my words, their words. And then as I got older and I learned what the spectrum really entails, the visible light spectrum, the radio for the stuff we know about the electromagnetic spectrum is not even the entirety of the spectrum. So the long and short of it is the mycelial network in the ground, the bacterial network in both the soil and in your gut, as well as the air network, the molecules of relays radar, Doppler radio frequency microwave frequency, gamma radio, you know, the whole zone of the technology that we are aware about are all built to stack like a jingapiece where the bottom middle nugget connects into the radio frequency. So this is the one thing that's into this one centralized foundational aspect of the internet called the arpanet that was always built for the very execution that they're pulling right now. So I wanted I've put it I worded it like that because I don't want people to think that this is some greedy bastards that got into an otherwise altruistic internet created thing and then they just got their brain started a conspiracy. No, it was designed from its inception to be exactly what it is nothing is off script or off book and consumers were allowed to build trinkets on top of this iceberg that was being formed before anybody even knew what the internet was in the 80s. So the bio digital convergence is essentially the fusion of plant life animal life human life into the digital domain with blockchain being kind of this foundational API that kind of translates between the two. There's a lot to this, but if I were to add some more summary to this to help people understand it's sort of like the they're giving us this phrase the bio digital convergence like it's some amazing magical utopian future right everything is connected like the download anything you want. The reason is that everything is already connected through the organic energetic flow of life force and all of its different forms across the spectrum at all times there's this continuous dynamic interchange of energy across the entire universe and no energy is separate from any of the other energy in the whole thing. And when we really look at like what these families if we want to call them these elite families of voice been about it's about middlemanning as much as humanly possible and just taking a little off the top at every. point of exchange. And so what happens when you've already got a fully digitized currency, you've already got taxes on life, death, income, you know, property, food, commerce of all sorts, like, where else can we get a little off the top right? So it's putting another several layers of middlemen, digital middlemen between all the different exchanges of energy that are happening more organically and biologically out that have been previously outside of the purview of this technology. That's kind of what I see. I mean, if I were to boil it down more simply, it's like the exponential next evolution of middleman taxation, right? I'm just on like the area you breathe, the carbon, UX hell, and all the other different elements of life across the flow of things. But not on top of that, it's also about quantifying all of those exchanges to an even further degree and empowering what big data sets have always been able to do for people who can algorithmically analyze them by getting even more like ginormous humongous data sets through the moderation and monitoring of all of these different levels of exchange across the micro and macrocosm. Exactly. I mean, I think that's really part of the plan. And also because by having this, it's not just a digital twin of an every living being. It's like, it's like a digital twin of the universe itself is what is sought after. Exactly. And I think that the universe itself, if you're boiling it down to your original point, is this energetic exchange of all these living realities. Plants, humans, animals, love, responsibility, all these things that come. That middlemaning is the perfect way to sum this up because I think they're trying to middleman your cellular functions. And piggyback off the natural processing because you brought up the first half of the endeavor is to surveil and to capture and to identify every piece of energy moving in every direction. The other half of it is to make you and that plant and you and your neighbor responsible for the processing of it all. I think these data centers that are being built right now are stopgap. We need them for the next 15 or so maybe last years, but the point is to get you to be the server that processes your own data and your own willingness to kind of like have your energy rerouted for the system or keep it for yourself is just the next iteration in what we already have right now because mostly I could take lessons savings and what you could learn about how to actually go build your own house and build your own land or like buy your own land and actually survive and thrive without going to work and giving your energy to the system. We just don't know how to do that really. So we work to then provide a roof over our family's house or over our family's head. But you know, so did our grandpa. He just didn't need corporate America to do that. So it's the same thing, right? You decide I need to provide. So I have to go give my energy to this thing in order to get enough resources to provide. All they're saying is you can do all that from the comfort of your own chair. Just let us siphon your resources and then in exchange you'll get carbon credits or dollar bill or Bitcoin, you know, whatever they want to call the current. And so yeah, it's always been the corporate move is to steal the real and sell you back an imitation. Precisely. The modern version that I never really thought of is how like everyone's on social media, you're being sold social experience of being social from your own isolated little cube pod by yourself. Right. Exactly. Exactly. In my house and your house and everybody's on their phone in the subway. Like I'm alone right now. There's no one in the room with me. But I have the illusion of being social with you right now, Chris. Right. And with the audience. And I'm enjoying that illusion. It's a fantastic illusion. Thank you for taking me on the thrill ride. But yes, you make a great point. It's a we don't we've lived long enough in it to see it for what it is. And we also you and I live before it really came around. But I can imagine that your child, my children have not had that non digital non social media social experience as a collective. So they don't have anything to compare it to social is to them, but sitting by yourself talking with other people online. And I don't wonder though about my daughter, right? She's almost two will be two soon. And as a digital native, as they call them, but also has had zero medical intervention of any kind put on her. Right. Nothing no pharmacology whatsoever. Never seen a doctor. So like what what's that combo like? You know, that's a great one. That's a whole new category that hasn't really been created. Mine too. So it's kind of like I think you made it you made the fent you made the point even stronger when you said it's they middleman everything. They take what's real and they reinvent it. They sell it back to you the gatekeep like you said cellular to the level of cellular function. I just want to like emphasize that if they could put a gatekeeper between your body releasing insulin and whether or not you have a diabetic coma, they would put that there. And they would do a subscription fee. Oh yeah. I'm a lot of access to your own insulin. Yeah. You just nailed exactly what's about to happen. Like I give it maybe a year before you start hearing the marketing side of it, meaning R&D was done decades ago. It's been private. It's been military. It's now it's now in the like how do we brand this and help people not freak out that we can wirelessly control their insulin. It's incredible. Right. Now so it like we're just helping you with a problem that you just happen to get because of genetics. Because whatever like they blame it on something, but really it's a problem caused by all these other factors. Exactly. Exactly. Precisely. And even if it's not a direct injury, it's still your mom saw the commercials for coolated and wireless when you were a kid. And nobody told about red 40 yellow five in the rest. And so here we are. You know what I'm saying? It's still bad. Uninformed choices make poor decisions make problems type, you know, link. So yes, we are connected. The Itheric human connection has just been redacted from academia put into R&D, a middleman platform was created. And now that we're 100 years removed from its original redaction, they're fine talking about the bio field and the human electromagnetic field and frequency devices and electronic devices to help mitigate health and pain. Because we're kind of through with the chemical petrochemical derivative era. And it's got enough bad press at this point, especially since this pandemic to, you know, for go any sort of further trust in that system. Now that this new biotech platform is now kind of primed and ready to go. We've got a, you know, couple billion people with some biotech going on. It's just, you know, it very much is about decoupling electric fields from your body and putting an intermediate relay there. Inzyme wise. And having your DNA like instruct your body to keep doing that. Under the guys of like training antibodies and stuff like that, developing antibody titers and things like that. Now, okay, so I want this isn't like a pushback against you because what you're working on is what's out there. You're grounding the whole research in the white papers and the admitted things happening in these research and development open open secrets, right? And it's been going on for a long time, like you said. But as somebody, I've got a lot of experience with the human bio field. I'm a tuner, right? So I'm like getting in there. I'm I'm reading the field all the time. And so this documentary talks about like reading and writing things to somebody's bio field. And when I heard that, I'm just like, I don't see how this could be technologically done. And to explain this, I think we got to zoom out a little bit to the level of cosmology, right? If you're in the materialist framework, like these parasitic middlemen gatekeeper entity, demonic corporations, what else can I call them? They are, right? The age of quantifying everything and reducing it all the numbers. Then of course, it makes perfect sense. Well, yeah, it's just another thing that we can quantify and get in front of and manipulate, right? But if you zoom back out to the like I said, to the level of cosmology, to the old hermetic principle, all is mind. Reality is mental. And as that working bio field tuner, with lots of experience, I can tell you for sure, your mind is not in your body. Your body is in your mind. And your mind is like out here somewhere. Yeah. So your bio field is not something emitted by your body. Your bio field is something that forms your body, right? So that bio field itself, it exists on a level like almost metaphysically. It has it's very much like your soul or your spirit. It's your mind, but like psyche, like the Greek idea of mind that is soul and spirit come all wrapped into one. So you know, I don't think they're necessarily talking about the same thing, even though they're using the same terminology. When the days are talking about biofield stuff, they're describing technologies that allow them to read the minuscule little electromagnetic piezoelectric fluctuations and the very specific almost like IP address of unique biometrics that different electrical systems in your body put off and use that as like a tokenization handshake like authentication system to prove identity and connected to the system and all that I think is totally plausible and possible but all I could say is like writing to someone's biofield you could influence somebody electrically with frequencies and stuff but at the end of the day and this is why it's important I think your your real biofield is totally mental and psyche based and like you actually are the beginning and end alpha and omega of that thing and how its boundaries are either impenetrable or you know or liquid. Exactly. So I would say I agree with that. So to your point I am kind of trying to use terms that you can look up and kind of like bring into a common conversation but all the people who I've learned the most from would probably agree with everything you just said. I've always learned that the field is really the extension of your like maybe you can even say that your peripheral nervous system and your central nervous system that center in the u-ness of your physical body start the other end of that is your biofield. So you can word it like it's the extension of your peripheral nervous system if you're looking at it from one direction but from the other direction like you just explained your cns and your core is the extension the culmination of your field your mind being yeah there's like a physical physicality like a body part and that's what these white papers and R&Ds are targeting and they're thinking about. Correct but the important distinction here is that I don't believe you can like you just said nor do I believe they're they're trying to write to your field what they're using the biofield for is the antenna the in and out so in the basic computing telemetry of take a basic computer just like a OPC if you're central processing unit if your graphics processing unit if your motherboard Northbridgeing whole like circuitry that connects it all if your RAM that stores everything for fast use you have your hard drive for long-term storage and then you have your networking so that stuff can get in and out but the networking card itself doesn't process anything it doesn't store the information is just the input output the biofield is just the IO the digital twin is what they're writing to and this pervasive in training almost like the two wine glasses experiment from middle school or whatever you put the two glasses of water you take a wine glass two wine glasses of the identical same design put water in them both dip your finger in one of them and running around the rim of the glass and the other wine glass will start humming without whatever touching it so very simple experiment take go to your yeah go to your go to your China cabinet grab two you know champagne glasses the wider ones are better you get your finger a little wet if you're fresh out the bathtub is even easier because it's like super rigid but then you dip your finger in the water you rub it around a wine glass and it'll kind of go create this resonant tone and then that's just with one glass now because the second glass is the exact same glass composition relatively speaking the exact same amount of water and you're in the same physical environment simply rubbing your finger on one glass makes the second glass start to make noise if you don't touch it at all it's kind of like atheric entrainment but this isn't really far away can you be in the room if you have a big enough glass you can do it for forever but it's usually you put a Michael footer sew away on a table that's what we did when we were kids and the point is it's emitting this vibration but because the second thing is so identical in composition it just starts going like okay I guess we're vibrating and you don't have to touch it at all so if you can imagine in this analogy the digi twin is what they try to write to because the digi twin is an in silico copy of the idea of you it's like a genetic expression on us you know emulation of human neurons of you they might even have your placenta on file to literally your physical twin identical genetic DNA material if that's real but you know it's your body stuff right and to you because I caught what you were saying to about we have a lot of mutual friends who would turn their nose up at the idea of DNA but I always try to remind you well I'm sold to the degree that the a in DNA is what that's right and acid is generally solid liquid or gas liquid that's right so a liquid is a wave state of water right of hydrogen and oxygen but it's this permeable homeopathically adjustable for better or for worse medium and the a in DNA is this liquid medium so as far as I'm concerned it's just a nomenclature thing right it's like DNA doesn't exist sure okay I'm fine with that because it's really just acid and that you zoom in far enough you're just going to see waves bouncing back and forth you zoom out and it's called a water molecule you zoom in it's just two pieces of energy kind of doing the tango so it's same thing with DNA and so yes it is I do but I agree with everything you said about the biofile and I love hearing your perspective on it because it helps me clarify distinctions and just help make the presentation even stronger but I would I would agree that you can't write to the field I think that that's part of what these synthetic biologies ingestibles injectables are all about getting your bone marrow your physicality to reproduce other elements than it would normally not produce for the express purpose of being the relay controllers and all the different sensors to create you as this human computer hybrid thing transhuman type thing and it's really about hijacking metabolism and the normal cellular function and instead of moving energy from this red blood cell and decoupling the hemoglobin covalent bonds of the oxygen to get the oxygen out of the hemoglobin into the cell and all the stuff that you're by supposed to be doing with this cellular metabolism is just repurposing that for grunt work and that grunt work is being formed into assembly language that's being formed into code that actually has an API so that I can hit process on some AI compute nodule or some LLM and then everybody in Nebraska is like tweaking because they're doing all the processing of the signals and it's not that the field is doing it it's that the field is just acting as the input output and the cells are doing it and the digi twin is creating this like pervasive like you know it's it's the both finger constantly going around the wine glass so that the other glass is just constantly going and it doesn't really know necessarily why right so we're talking about how what you're describing here and this is the most far out thing and I can't claim I fully understand how it works but it's about turning the body into the processing node right the entire internet the entire digital domain world it is it has layers to it and the foundational bottom layer is the physical layer exactly and there we're we're looking at possible or technologies that already exist that do something to create to use the energy that the body like literally the matrix turning you into this holding up the dursal batter right yeah just like just cross the scale that it keeps you know a little everyone is giving up a little bit of their life force energy availability to do this compute exactly and the compute is a is it's like windows it's open-ended there's not like you can't point your finger in the one thing or person because it's not like I mean I've been told Amazon Web Services has already leased a portion of human bio field processing so you go to your random square space or somewhere in website and it's hosted by AWS and now you're you're getting pinged or whoever's responsible for processing that is getting ping but the point is it's a platform just like the Moderna CEO said in 2020 what we're creating is a platform so that we can get a genetic sequence in two days later we have software written for the platform it's like we've already got all the infrastructure we just plug in this little number hit enter and then now we have a drug delivery platform people just weren't computer scientists at the time they didn't really they weren't picking up what he was putting down so to speak because it was all new and everybody was scared but the point is that's because because a big part of me is you know developing this project is really learning how it works so you have said everything you said I fully agree with I don't think you can write to someone's scale I think they want to think that they can and I think that conditioning and inception is their stopgap way to write to your field where they keep writing they keep putting dreams in your head to the point where you think it's your idea and so they've written something into your psyche but not really you see what I'm saying when you have a whole culture where most people think that my internal state is governed by what what happens to me from the outside. Like, oh, this good thing happened today, so I guess I'm happy, right? Like, we have most people live in that way where they're outer world, governs their inner world. They've been in train to that, right? Not understanding that it's actually the other way around unless you give up the sovereignty. You can let it be, right? - Right. - I mean, my wife was telling me about the epiphany from parenting that I think is so lost on a lot of the older generations, especially like, you know, your kid might not be being the nicest to you. And you're like, you, my feelings are hurt 'cause you aren't showing me love. - Right, yeah. - But as the parent, you're the one who has to set the tone. Like, it doesn't matter what you're doing, I love you, right? I'm setting the tone of what's going on here, even if I have to be a little tough about it. But I wanna get technical for a second without going too far 'cause I've found receipts on everything you're talking about, this replacing the cables in the OSI physical layer with the human body. It's like, you explain this in your documentary and you list a bunch of the different types of networks, network frequency bandwidths that are able to potentially map onto this. But what we're talking about is called 802.15.6. The wireless body area network standard, this is released in February 2012 and it describes using the living human body itself as the transmission medium. - It's a conspiracy, y'all. This is the second time. You there? - Oh, Lord, I'm cut my boy off. They don't wanna give chance of chance. I don't like this. I don't mind it, but this is, y'all see what's happened. They ain't trying to get chance of chance. Let's see if he texts it. - You there? There we go. - Did it crash the game all the way across? - I've been doing a podcast for like 10 years and I've never had my computer. It didn't crash. It rebooted itself spontaneously. Did it twice now? - Yeah. - In this conversation. - Super weird. - I know that. You wanna know what else is weird is, my wife sent me the chart of Mercury going retrograde today and it actually went retrograde to the minute of when we started connecting. - Man, just saying. (laughing) - I love these types of synchronicities 'cause this is like validation-sauce lately. Just lets me know like. - Okay. - Some is tracking. Some might spend a century. - Well, the tacos get this. - The tacos get tackling. - Okay, but I'm all the more reason why I'm gonna give people the reference to this, okay? So we're talking about this wireless body area network and if you want to look into this concept of the body as an actual data channel, look into Thomas Zimmerman, personal area network work at MIT back from 1995. So just Google Zimmerman, personal area networks. - MIT. - MIT. - 1995. - Yeah, 1995. You'll find it there. And then we also have, it's right out on Wikipedia 802.15.6, body area network. That it's the body area network is trained on data pulled from your social media and online presence and frames the human as having been enrolled into an artificial neural network without consent. Like that's how you frame it in your documentary, right? Well, this is grounded outside by institutional stuff, like the Rand Corporation, the Internet of Bodies, opportunities, risks and governance back in 2020. It catalogs devices that connect the body to networks and the governance gaps, governance gaps, AKA places where we could put a gatekeeper or a middleman. - Exactly, exactly. - It's crazy. So that's a Rand, the Internet of Bodies 2020. Look, you can look at it. - And if anybody knows who and what the Rand Corporation is, you would understand how profound is that one reference is. Rand is like Boeing, Raytheon and Lockheed Martin's older cousin, you know, it's like, the deep defense contract. - Exactly. - They were all deep. - They were all so deep, you don't even hear about them half the time. - Yeah. - Yeah. - I went through the same type of epiphany when I was first learning about this because I knew about the technical have, I knew what the OSI layers were. I knew where the internet pipes go, like the original backbone of the internet, I knew all that stuff. I just had no clue about biofield or about any sort of, I didn't really think about the human body as an electrical conduit. I remember looking up, I had learned about MK Ultra and ritual SRA and kind of trauma-based mind control. And for some reason, I was doing something where I needed to look up. It's not, I didn't even need to look it up. I already knew what the definition of a computer Damon is, D-A-E-M-O-N. I just needed to reference it for some graphics. So I just went to Wikipedia, typed in computer Damon and it has like whole entry Damon parentheses computing. And when I read the little top paragraph on what a computer Damon did, even though I knew what it was already, it, I had never, that was like the nexus implosion moment because it was so many words that overlapped ritual sexual abuse. Just pull it up all you have a tab. Just go to Wikipedia and type in computer D-A-E-M-O-N. And just read that first two or three sentences that come up in the definition. Yeah, in computing a Damon is a program that runs as a background process rather than being under the direct control of an interactive user. And they take this idea from a theory from a physicist named Maxwell who imagined that there was an imaginary agent in physics and thermodynamics that helped sort molecules. So basically it's the idea of it's going back to the Greek mythology. But the full definition, if you look, I don't know if you're on the main Wikipedia, or just like an aggregate on the Google itself. But what it'll say is the init process is created by the parent process, forking the child process. Oh, it doesn't have that on here. See, I got the screenshots to show, but the original-- It essentially is talking computer science, right? It's not talking anything about RSA. It's just saying the parent forks the child and the child process dissociates from the terminal and the terminal. And I just remember being like, what? Why does this sound like-- Oh, here it is. It's under the implementations. Yeah, yeah. I mean, just continue, continue. Explain what this means. I don't understand. So what a computer date, like you have an iPhone or a computer and you get an email and says, "Bloom, a chance to send you a new email." Well, your computer is running a process in the background. And it's usually called, like, get mail_d. In a Unix system, all the Damon files end in underscore D. All the Damon processes, rather. Keep in mind, I was taught Damon, but when you go into Old English, it's just Damon. Not Damon, just Damon. So the Damon processes are computer apps that run in the background to do basic stuff, check the way they check your mail, phone home, whatever. Check that your serial number is not a hack number versus the little Gid number. And then not show that they were ever running. That's the whole concept of a demon in a computing sense. It's that it's doing all this in the background. And you have no clue that it's happening because it's blinded to the terminal or to the user. What was crazy was when you're seeing that the Damon is created by the parent forking the child. Atomologically, you probably know that vowels are a new thing. So facking, ficking, facking, forking, flicking is the same like consonants. It's like the vowel is just the new way that English hides meaning. Well, even if you didn't want to get, like, even to drop the etymological sort of philological thing you're doing there, which I'm totally down for. It's like it's a very similar mouth sound. What is a fork but a split? Right. Right. We're talking about a schism. We're talking about us. This is what this associate of states are as well as psyche splits. Right. One part of your mind is holding some part of you and another part of your mind is holding another part of you. And this is even something that happened on the bio field level. This is one odd due to anings for people. It's about helping them find where they have this forking. I'm using a fork ironically to find where they have forks or compartmentalized life force that's separate from the rest of their flow of their energy. And sometimes not all the time, but every once in a while, that compartmentalized life force energy is literally so much and is from a time in their childhood where they had some very extreme trauma that it's the only way we can deal with it. We can't deal with it just by holding the vibration of a fork in that spot and letting them feel what it feels like and release it. Most of the time that works, but sometimes we get some situation where it's like I have to get them to visualize themselves at that age. They have to interact in their mind with this five year old or eight year old version of themselves. They have to basically convince it to come back. They have to have a talk with it. They have to see it eye to eye in their minds eye. I mean, this is not just some sort of exercise we're doing verbal exercise. This is like they're literally having to talk to a part of themselves that got so separated that it's its own thing now. Yeah. This is not a joke. So like what you're talking about forking, I'm just thinking about it. like this is a sociative division. I mean, even sexual, the sexual reference itself is a basically, I told you, - It's playing shows. - And it's about division. - You know, it's about- - Some's getting divided. - We're uniting, so, but while someone's getting divided. But you're right, so what I learned etymologically is that, phonics, the sound, when I say, "Buh, "puh, "puh." Like all those have energetic shape, so, as you can see, it's not scientifically, and all the old languages were built on just taking the actual energy you're saying, when you say a word, and making that functionally equivalent to what the function of what you're trying to do. So, English is this new thing where it's like, we have hominem. You can say, "Son and son," and mean two different things, red, red and red, and you meet three different things with the same phonics, the same physical sounds. And what I learned is that English is hiding some of the older rules. Like it's essentially, "Buh, "puh, "you know, deceiving you in real time, having you say and mean things, "simatically in the world that you don't necessarily associate with the definition of what you're saying." And forking is a good example of that, because when you're talking in computer terms, a parent process is just a primary process that ends up dissociating the terminal and the user into this separate process called the demon. And I just remember being like, "Why does this overlap across human psychology so one-to-one? "Like this is supposed to be a computer stuff. Why could you walk into some SRA counselor's office "and essentially have the same conversation?" And they have no. They're not into composing. That's what's so wild about it is like you're saying this process forks and the thing that splits off is the demon. Yeah. And this is what happens to people's mouth. Because I mean like this stuck energy with their own consciousness and life force that's now in its own little bubble, that's own thing, but because it's so deficient and incomplete in itself, it can often act very demonically. I mean, I think a lot of what people think they have, demonic attachments or demonic possession or whatever, I think a lot of times it's their own, if not all the time, it's their own life force energy, divided inside itself, and creating like an alter ego there that's like got some bad influence on you because it's messed up. And it's got some trauma it's dealing with that maybe it absorbs so you didn't have to deal with. Because that's what I always learned. I mean, it happens for a good reason. Yeah, exactly. It's a function of survival. It's just unprocessed. It becomes this other monster. And so it becomes so that it can handle its process invisibly in the background. Exactly. Just like in the computer. So it was all these several conversations where I finally was like, hold on you guys. If a computer is just energy running through silicon, carbon, nitrogen, wafer, that instructions are derived through programming conversations, then what's different about human body? Just an ancient set of programming conversations and we put food or fuel, it converts it to energy or breath. Oxygen, like literally all these different forms of energy. And we take information we filter it and we process it. It started to basically get me as a computer kid to realize holy smokes. I think that they reverse engineer the human body and built a computer to work just like it. That was where my mind was at first. That's it, dude. It's all technology is a plagiarization of nature of nature. And then we get it backwards. A lot of people are like, it's a simulation. Because they see how similar it is. Their body and mind work to a computer and they're like, oh wow, we're just like computers. No, no, computers are just like you. Even a lot of, again, back to bio field tuning, I see all the freaking time, even a lot of the issues with people's physiology, how their body is handled and stuff in a way that is below its potential threshold. It comes back to these type of beliefs that they've held on in their subconscious and they're very if then conditional statements. And that's how computing is all if the in statements. Yeah, exactly. So you're like all my synapses are firing at all cylinders because I'm kind of going, you get it. Yes, exactly. We are this computer. So imagine if the marketing has just been all about inverting it. Saying computers are better, saying we're faster and better when we have them in our inner on or part of our lives. It was just the personal computer. Now it's an iPad, a phone, a business phone, a watch, maybe an or ring, maybe some Rayband meta glasses. It's like seven, eight different things hanging off your body that all have ability to connect to the internet. And what I realized is that so you're talking about 802-116. These standards bodies, when I say standards, I'm talking about the international telecommunications union, the ITU, the international, like the IEEE. People who have hurt, people might be familiar with the FDA and CDC as it relates to drugs, food, you know, things like that. Most people are not familiar with the AAA, as it relates to electronics. Maybe you've heard of the FCC, the Federal Communications Commission. But that's about transmission of electronic signals, not the physical electronic devices themselves. Yes, they have to interface so that the radios are ratified. But the point is the IEEE deals with stuff that don't even deal with radio frequency. It's just electronics. And what they do is very, very organized. So I remember Wi-Fi learning early on that was the 802.11 standard. And you would see, this Wi-Fi has got Wi-Fi X and Wi-Fi AC. And if I 802.11 A and MENB and G and N and then it kind of kept going. When I learned that Bluetooth, the Bluetooth spec was standardized. And what's called the working group called 802. So the working group, you know, there's other working groups other than 802. Presumably there's at least 801 of them, other working groups. But Wi-Fi is a subset of that working group under 802.11. 802.15 deals with a different subset of wireless communications standards. 802.15.4 being Bluetooth. And I just remember being like, hold on. So you're telling me the wide wireless body area network is 802.15.6. And when they were building out their organized standards, they put the human body network two iterations away from the Bluetooth stand. I said, that's weird because I know how I'm not a Bluetooth or radio frequency expert. But I know enough to know that when you're dealing with like a magnetic coil, you know, attenuating to some field like we're going AMFM standard old school 1995 ship for Bronco type radio right back in the day. You have a FM dial that goes from 881 to 107.9. But the only reason it stops at 107.9 is because it's got a piece of plastic in there preventing the knob from going. If you were to remove that plastic, it might go into 107108109, 1011011. It's not going to go all the way up into the gigahertz because that's disadvantageous for the manufacturer to put all that extra stuff in the unit when it's not going to be used. But you know, they build it as a standard and they block off bookings of where it starts and ends. And what I realized is that they must have had the entire plan to use Bluetooth as an entry or a side car technology because they standardized it so close to the human field. It's just it's almost like Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Wi-Fi and Bluetooth are further away in the spec than than Bluetooth and the human field. So it's like both of both Bluetooth and the human field are in the 802.15 subsection of that working group. Wi-Fi is in 802.11 is in a whole different subset. So it's almost like these two popular technologies that we've all heard of. Your human field is closer in the data standard to Bluetooth than Bluetooth is to Wi-Fi. So I just remember thinking that does that's not a conspiracy y'all. That is a factual data point that should inform why this is a much more serious conversation than just guys flipping off having seen too much on to me, and then you drive it holes on the internet because most people haven't even heard of the B-band. I'm telling you you ain't never heard of ZigBee or Bluetooth but they're right next to this W-band. I mean, so you have obviously heard of Bluetooth, maybe not ZigBee or these other metam networks, but the way they standardized these working groups is very purposeful. So to me it meant got it. Y'all was planning on doing this from the very beginning. It's just a very obvious computer science. I know how this Jenga puzzle is set up. This is obviously not by accident. Nobody snuck into the otherwise, you know, plans that are all on the up and up by the I to you and the IEEE and just say, you know, let's just sneak this little nefarious thing right here next to Bluetooth. Now this was designed from the beginning to work exactly like it's working now. And to your earlier point, they're just piggybacking off of existing human aetheric connective human experience reality. That's all we know this, but when you were 20 years old, would you have known that the human experiences is connected as you now know you know, you know, you know this now, But when did you start learning the deeper parts of life or where you raised like that? I wasn't raised like that. - For sure. - I had a weird kind of like cheat code moment when I was around 23, where I had about a year where I just, I don't know, fast-forwarded, ascended. I had all these abilities like energy, healing type powers and like psychic abilities that manifested for like a year. And then they faded and I had to like rebuild it from the ground up and actually understand what I was experiencing. But I did have kind of an early start in that regard. But then, you know, then that subsided. It was drugs. - Drugs. - Drugs. (laughing) So, at least, let me just toss out one weird thing real quick. 802.6.15.6, right? This is the human body wireless area network like frequency band, right? You could say, where IP address, something like that. I'm not technical enough to know, but I just multiplied it, right? Eight times two times 15 times six. And it actually gives you 1440, which is, you drop the zero in geometry, that's 144. - Yeah. - 144 is 12 times 12. 12 is the number of order and governance and completeness. And so 12 times 12 is like, you know, the completeness of the one. - Completed on top of the completeness. - Ultimate, cosmic governance and order. - Interesting. - Isn't that weird considering the fact that the whole point of this body wireless area network is like, you know, the exponentially next level of governance and order. - Of governance and order. - Yeah. - And I just noticed. - And I thought I just noticed. - If we're putting it in religious or spiritual terms, I see this as synthetic omniscience. I think God, source, the creator, I don't try to get into the names, but I think that we are connected to the divine and that love and beauty and compassion, all these things gratitude come as a result of that. And I look at what they're trying to do as, from a technical sense is one thing, but from a spiritual sense, it seems that it's like, trying to play God. This synthetic omnipresent synthetic omniscience and, you know, relying on humans feeding LLMs to essentially fake the funk on all knowingness. But it's essentially, you know, I look at this like, yeah, it is a synthetic omniscience. And in that regard, a completeness number that it boils down to geometry wise makes, like it's just, it's not weird because it's weird, but it's like weird right on cue, you know? It's just as weird as y'all are. Just as weird as they are with it. - It's not evidence of anything admissible in a court of law, but for us mystical people, I see that number. And I'm like, hmm, yeah, exactly. - Yeah, and then something to add to that. I mean, of course, with numbers, it's just how do you decide to slice it? But when you say it out loud, you say 802. - 5.5. - You say 15, then you say 6. So you're not saying 802. If it, so I usually like to do my geometry or multiplications or additions based on how do we say it? So we're saying 82, right? Like that's two separate integers. So I'm multiplying 8 times 2 times 15 times 6 to get that number. You get something else if you do 802 times 15 times 6 is like 72,000 and some change. But that's-- - But even 7 times 2 is 14. What I really want to riff on is what you just said, the artificial all-knowingness, because in my experience, and what I've witnessed in others and what I've heard from the spiritual traditions, is the cities, spiritual powers, things like all-knowingness, or the ability to have psychic information or heal people or different stuff, maybe set something on fire with your tea. - Yeah, oh yeah. - That kind of cool stuff. - Pyromassers. - This stuff is all based on morality. To achieve the cities, you have to A, B, in alignment with the moral architecture or natural law, you will lose the cities if you get out of it. And if to use it for your intention to use it has to be for good as well. You can't just be like, it's the whole black magic thing, right? The black magician, folks, they don't really do the black magic they want you to think that they do. They keep it occulted how this all functions in the first place so that when people start to peek behind the curtain and they see the theater that's been put on, like the Epstein files and all that we got to, the main-- - The main thing we got here about. - We got a little taste of that us conspiracy people have known about forever. They see it like, if they keep looking, it freaks them out like, oh my gosh, they're doing some kind of sorcery, right? Most of that I think is theater because when you actually try to use occult forces to dominate or bypass someone else's will, there is a rebound effect on you. Like the Ramos designed to prevent that kind of stuff. There is a moral law architecture, but this whole technological scheme to try to basically have artificial cities, artificial not like cities that you live in, but cities like powers. This seems like an attempt to jailbreak or bypass the-- - The Bayes Band. - The moral rules about-- - Of the causing these abilities. - Correct. - Coming up in part two of this episode. - They're building this digital twin system to run inception on you. You can't just do it by brute force. Let's just say 5,000 or 10,000 of this future human exists. They come through special project, special families. He was talking about what his whole family role was within the structure. It was to hire 13 witches and 13 warlocks to perform a ceremony over the master. He's like, "Yo, the freaking new end is in my living room, "pitch me on the script idea, and they've already greenlit it." - Yes, I'm not even kidding. Fauci, at 85 years old, he just made his acting debut at Georgetown University in Sophocles' play, "Edit Pist the King." - That's right. Showbend is for the ugly. He's the first person who ever told me about a bank account that he's personally laid eyes on that had AT-Z rows in the account. AT is about creating a day using it to exist as a tool to control. - To access the second hour of this episode, book a bio field tuning session with me, and check out awesome Interverse Affiliates. Go to InterversePlus.com. Any closing thoughts? Let people know where they can find you. How to connect with you and all that? - Of course, so you can find me at a six, seven podcast. That's like, thing your kids probably say all the time that you don't understand, but it's actually my height and I started calling myself that since I was in high school, way before the trend came out, but a six, seven podcast. That is at Gmail, if you wanna shoot me an email, on Instagram, on Rumble, on Odyssey, on X, but on YouTube, which is our most active on Instagram and YouTube, but on YouTube, it is six, seven, sorry, the word six, seven, because YouTube doesn't allow numbers as first names. So I am S-I-X-S-A-V-E-N on YouTube podcast. So in closing, I guess I just want people to understand, if you've ever known something about the world, isn't, it's a little off, but you haven't been able to really articulate it or maybe you have gone down several riverholes, you just don't really have good headway with communicating that to your friends and family and loved ones. I have put together what I'm hoping is the perfect shareable tool that they can watch that will not bore them, that will most likely keep them engaged. And if they actually listen, they will be able to hear an overview of what I think is the warfare framework that the human population is in right now. And I think people such as my friend Chance, Gartan here have done a great job of having already done the homework to kind of understand what I'm saying. So for anybody listening who's kind of like, "Well, yeah, I'm familiar with this," but like, you know, so what's in it for me? I think it's technical enough and explanatory enough to keep the technically inclined and not lose the non-technically inclined at the same time. I'm hoping so. And so, you know, I just would encourage people to reach out and share whatever you feel that can be helpful for your neighbor or your family or your loved one, to just put themselves in a place to make smarter decisions. I maintain that not too many people are dummies. We're just working with bad information and redacted frameworks and redacted information. And so if I can unredact some of those frameworks for you, that will allow for anybody to make the smartest choices moving forward and that's-- Redacted and distracted. Redacted and distracted, yes. It's like the distraction is the reduction. You can go find out if we weren't so busy. Exactly. And technically, even when, you know, you hear a lot of people, "Oh, this sounds great, but I don't have the time to learn that." It's like, well, you don't have the time for anything. You don't make the time for it. And if you don't know what you don't know and you don't know why what you don't know is important for you to actually know, you simply just won't make the time for it. I'm just hoping that this will be enough of a worm on the end of a fishing line. That's got enough color and juice and sauce and wrap and hip hop, you know, like, a hip hop technology breakdown that'll make it to where you can get hooked to the idea of understanding the world you live in a bit better. And then Source, God will take you from there. - All right, well go follow 6, 7 podcast and Chris, thanks again, we'll do this another time for sure. (upbeat music) (upbeat music)