Go back

Withdrawal from Iraq

9m 43s

Withdrawal from Iraq

The U.S. withdrawal from Iraq in 2026 marks the end of a 20-year military presence that began with the 2003 invasion justified by claims of weapons of mass destruction and ties to al-Qaeda. These claims were largely unfounded, relying on discredited or fabricated evidence, especially from UN speeches by Colin Powell. The invasion was driven by Neoconservative ideology, which saw removing Saddam Hussein as essential to spreading American values and security. Instead of establishing stability, the occupation led to massive casualties—over 200,000 Iraqi civilians and more than 4,500 U.S. troops—and deepened regional conflict. Today, the U.S. is engaged in a new war against Iran, echoing the same impulsive, ideologically driven approach seen in Iraq. This pattern reflects a broader failure in foreign policy, where political rhetoric and ideological extremism override evidence and strategic assessment. The military under President Trump has further radicalized itself with a culture emphasizing rigid masculinity and exclusion, signaling a shift away from inclusive, professional military values. The legacy of Iraq underscores the dangers of foreign interventions based on flawed narratives and unproven claims, with lasting consequences for both U.S. credibility and regional peace.

Transcription

1163 Words, 7147 Characters

English
Hello, this is Michael Moss. Heather Cox Richardson is unable to read the letter today, so I will be reading it in her place. September 30th, 2026. A Washington Post headline today read, "US withdraws forces in Iraq as balance of power shifts to Iran." Journalist Mustafa Salim and Alex Horton explained, "After more than two decades, the deaths of more than 200,000 Iraqi civilians and more than 4,500 US troops, the wounding of more than 30,000 US military personnel and the cost of more than $2.8 trillion. The last of the US military forces in Iraq today pulled out of herbal air base in northern Iraq. In December 2021, the military announced it was ending US combat in Iraq, leaving about 2,500 troops to advise and assist Iraqi forces. In 2023, the Iraqi government called for complete US withdrawal and former President Joe Biden and former Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, agreed to a withdrawal plan in 2024, but Iraq allowed a small contingent of advisers to remain after that deadline, when the collapse of Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria led to concerns that the confusion in Syria would allow militant Islamic groups to regain a foothold there." At the time Biden agreed to withdraw from Iraq, Iran appeared to be on the ropes, with this regime isolated from neighboring countries and laboring under sanctions and increasing public unrest. Now as Saleem and Horton note, Trump's impulsive war on Iran has strengthened Iran's hand in the region. The US invaded Iraq in 2003, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks on the United States two years before, although Iraq was not involved in that attack. Under the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, a group of foreign policy hawks known as Neocons were frustrated that Democratic President Bill Clinton was not pushing American ideology overseas as hard as they thought he should. In 1997, political commentator William Crystal brought together Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and other Neocons to insist that the United States should significantly increase defense spending and lead the world. Believing that Iraq's Saddam Hussein was destabilizing the Middle East, they saw removing him from power as key to their "project for the new American century." Iraq had allied with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and Neocons believed the US must challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values and promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad. Saddam was out of reach until September 11, 2001, when Neocons saw al-Qaeda's attack on the US as an opportunity to hit Saddam Hussein, although he had not been involved in the attack. The terrorists, 15 from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Lebanon and one from Egypt, were operating out of Afghanistan, where the ruling extremist Islamic government, the Taliban, permitted al-Qaeda to have a foothold. Although Saddam was not affiliated with the 9/11 attackers, officials in the George W. Bush administration pushed so hard on the idea that the terrorists were affiliated with Iraq that many Americans, especially those who watched the Fox News channel, which pushed the connection, came to believe incorrectly that the 9/11 terrorists were either Iraqi or are working with Saddam Hussein. Bush launched attacks on the Taliban government, successfully overthrowing it before the end of 2001, and then the administration undertook to reorder the Middle East in America's image. In 2002, it announced the Bush doctrine, arguing that the new conditions of terrorism required the government to act preemptively, to first stall hostile acts rather than wait for an attack. It embraced the idea that there was right and wrong in foreign affairs and demanded that America wage a war of ideas by spreading pro-American economic and cultural policies. It warned that there were few greater threats to America than a terrorist attack with weapons of mass destruction, or WMDs, meaning nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons. To convince recalcitrant foreign policy realists that Saddam Hussein needed to be removed from power, Bush administration officials warned that the dictator was amassing WMDs, including nuclear devices. In a television interview, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice warned of mushroom clouds rising over American cities and insisted that Saddam was working to obtain a nuclear weapon. On February 5, 2003, Secretary of State Colin Powell, a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke passionately before the United Nations, providing what he insisted was evidence that Saddam had chemical WMDs and had obtained the resources to create nuclear weapons. He hinted that the Iraqi leader had worked with al-Qaeda in 2001, or that he might, in the future. Powell was well known and trusted. If he said Iraq was deadly dangerous, people thought it must be true. It later turned out that Powell had not personally vetted the evidence he presented, and that it was almost entirely either discredited or made up of rumor. But his speech did the trick. Enough countries to call it a coalition of the willing, although the only major power that participated was the United Kingdom, backed an invasion of Iraq. On March 20, 2003, American troops invaded Iraq with the intention of overthrowing Saddam Hussein's government. The operation would be a cakewalk, the administration thought. Desperate Iraqis who hated their leader would welcome coalition forces with open arms. Like cowboy heroes and often portrayed as cowboys, American soldiers would bring democracy and capitalism to the United Iraqis. Saddam's forces crumbled in little over a month. By May the United States had set up a transitional government in Iraq, overseen by former ambassador and State Department official, El Paul Bremer. On May 1, 2003, Bush landed in a fixed-wing aircraft on the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln. Waring a flight suit, he posed for photographs with the vessel's crew, which had just returned from the Persian Gulf. Bush then gave a speech announcing the end of major combat operations in Iraq. Destuning the aircraft carrier was a giant banner emblazoned, mission accomplished. But of course, it wasn't. Today on social media, Trump took credit to himself for ending the U.S. engagement in Iraq, although we infuse the names of two different Iraqi operations, complaining that it was very bad decision-making that got us involved in this quagmire in the first place. And yet the United States is entering its eighth month of a war on Iran that Trump apparently began with the same cowboy mentality Bush carried into the war in Iraq. Today, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth delivered a state-of-the-force address at Marine Corps Base Quantico. He announced he had transformed the military by enforcing the idea of, "No fatties, no trannies, no beardos, no weirdos, no wimps, no radicals. Just warriors." The ideological clowns are out, he said. The patriotic cowboys are in, with testosterone testing on top. Brothers from an American was written by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dead in Massachusetts, recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The U.S. has withdrawn its last military forces from Iraq, marking the end of over two decades of involvement amid significant civilian and military casualties.
  2. Iran has gained regional influence as a result of U.S. retaliatory actions under President Trump, shifting the balance of power in the Middle East.
  3. The 2003 invasion of Iraq was driven by Neoconservative ideology, fueled by the false claim that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and was linked to al-Qaeda.
  4. Key figures like Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell presented discredited or fabricated evidence to justify the war, which significantly influenced public opinion.
  5. The post-invasion period saw a failed vision of democratic transformation, with the U.S. instead creating long-term instability and sectarian conflict in Iraq.
  6. The U.S. continues to engage in a prolonged conflict with Iran, echoing the impulsive tactics used in Iraq, under a similar "cowboy" mentality of military intervention.
  7. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth promoted a rigid, ideologically driven military culture that emphasizes militarized masculinity and rejects diversity.
  8. The historical narrative of U.S. foreign policy in Iraq reveals deep ideological motivations, often misaligned with factual evidence or long-term strategic outcomes.

Summary:

S. withdrawal from Iraq in 2026 marks the end of a 20-year military presence that began with the 2003 invasion justified by claims of weapons of mass destruction and ties to al-Qaeda. These claims were largely unfounded, relying on discredited or fabricated evidence, especially from UN speeches by Colin Powell.

The invasion was driven by Neoconservative ideology, which saw removing Saddam Hussein as essential to spreading American values and security. S. troops—and deepened regional conflict.

S. is engaged in a new war against Iran, echoing the same impulsive, ideologically driven approach seen in Iraq. This pattern reflects a broader failure in foreign policy, where political rhetoric and ideological extremism override evidence and strategic assessment.

The military under President Trump has further radicalized itself with a culture emphasizing rigid masculinity and exclusion, signaling a shift away from inclusive, professional military values. S. credibility and regional peace.

FAQs

The U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 based on claims that Saddam Hussein was amassing weapons of mass destruction and had ties to al-Qaeda, despite later evidence showing these claims were largely unfounded or discredited.

The Bush administration argued that the war was necessary to prevent a terrorist attack using weapons of mass destruction and to promote democracy in the Middle East, citing the 'Bush doctrine' of preemptive military action.

No, Saddam Hussein was not involved in the 9/11 attacks. The administration's claim of a connection was widely promoted, especially on Fox News, but later proven to be false and misleading.

Saddam's forces collapsed quickly, and the U.S. established a transitional government in Iraq. However, the country faced a prolonged conflict with insurgents, leading to over 200,000 civilian deaths and more than 4,500 U.S. fatalities.

The U.S. withdrew most of its troops in 2024, following agreements between former President Biden and Iraqi leaders, in response to concerns about regional stability and the rise of militant groups in Syria after the fall of Assad.

Trump's aggressive stance toward Iran has strengthened Iran's position in the region, shifting the balance of power and increasing regional influence, especially after the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.