Go back

Why We Remember the Great Chicago Fire

11m 21s

Why We Remember the Great Chicago Fire

The 1871 fires in the U.S.—particularly the Pesh to Go wildfire and the Chicago fire—were not just natural disasters but significant political events embedded in broader societal anxieties. While the Pesh to Go fire was the deadliest, the Chicago fire gained widespread attention due to its urban setting and media coverage, fueling public fear. This fear was amplified by the recent Paris Commune, which American newspapers sensationalized as a violent, anarchist revolt. Republican leaders and media used these events to stoke anti-labor sentiment, portraying both Black Southerners and white workers as unruly, lazy, and revolutionary. This narrative linked labor activism with threats to property, order, and democracy. The political reaction included opposition to Black voting rights and calls for property-based suffrage, as seen in statements from figures like Robert Tooms. The fires thus became symbolic of a deeper fear: that organized labor, especially among marginalized groups, could disrupt the existing social and economic order. These events illustrate how natural disasters can be reframed in political discourse to justify conservative ideologies, reinforcing class divisions and social control. The aftermath shaped public perception of labor, contributing to a long-standing stigma around working-class mobility and political participation.

Transcription

1446 Words, 8986 Characters

English
(upbeat music) - October 8th, 2026. On October 8th, 1871, dry conditions and strong winds drove deadly fires through the Midwest. The Pesh to Go fire in Northeastern Wisconsin and parts of Michigan's Upper Peninsula burned more than 1.2 million acres, or 4,860 square kilometers, and 17 towns claiming between 1,500 and 1,500 lives. The great Chicago fire burned 3.3 square miles or 8.6 square kilometers of the city, destroying the wooden structures that made up the relatively new town, killed about 300 people and left more than 100,000 people homeless. The Pesh to Go fire is the deadliest wildfire in U.S. history. The Chicago fire is the one people remember. The difference is in part because Chicago was a city, easy for newspapers to cover, while the Pesh to Go fire killed people in lumber camps and small towns. But the great Chicago fire also told a political story that fit into an emerging narrative about the danger of organized labor. It was not clear coming out of the Civil War how Republicans would stand with regard to workers. After all, the U.S. government had fought the war to protect the right of every man to enjoy the fruits of his own labor. But immediately after the war, workers had started organizing to demand adjustments to the wartime financial policies that favored men with money. By 1866, the Democratic Party had begun to listen to them and leaders called for rewriting the terms of the Civil War debt, which had been generous to investors in the days when U.S. bonds were a risky investment. After the war with the U.S. secure, the calculations changed and Democrats charged that investors had gotten too good a deal. Republicans horrified at the idea of changing the terms of a debt already incurred, added to the 14th amendment, the clause saying, "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." They were also concerned when more than 60,000 people came together in August 1866 to launch the National Labor Union, calling for the government to level the playing field between workers and their employers. They asked for an eight-hour day and end to monopolies and cooperation between black and white workers. In 1867, in what was almost certainly a misquoted comment, stories spread that Republican Benjamin Franklin Wade of Ohio had told an audience in Kansas that property is not equally divided and a more equal distribution of capital must be wrought out. Also in 1867, Congress passed the Military Reconstruction Act, which divided the 10 unreconstructed states into five military districts and required new state constitutional conventions to rewrite the state constitutions. For the first time in history, the new law permitted black men to vote for delegates to those conventions. When former Confederates preferred to live under military rule, rather than share political power with their black neighbors, Congress amended the Military Reconstruction Act to permit the military to enroll voters. In 1868, Congress passed and then states ratified the 14th Amendment, protecting the right of all citizens to the equal protection of the laws. In 1870, Congress passed and the states ratified the 15th Amendment protecting black male voting. And then, when white reactionaries organized as the Ku Klux Klan to keep black men and white Republicans from voting for the constitutions the conventions had written, Congress created the Department of Justice to prosecute the Ku Klux Klan members and protect black rights in the South. Attacks on black political rights on grounds of race were now unconstitutional and the federal government seemed prepared to back that principle up with the law. So, reactionary southerners took a new tack. Beginning in 1871, they argued that they had no objection to their black neighbors on racial grounds. What they objected to, they said, was that these folks newly out of enslavement were poor. White leaders claimed that the South remained in a recession not because Indian Egypt had taken over the global cotton market during the war, but because black southerners were lazy and hoped to use their new political power to redistribute the wealth of white landowners into their own pockets. When South Carolina voters put into office a majority black legislature, white South Carolinians railed against the black voters plundering taxpayers. One observer commented that a proletariat parliament has been constituted, the like of which could not be produced under the widest suffrage in any part of the world, save in some of these southern states. Democrats organized a taxpayers convention to protest new taxes levied by the legislature. While Republicans were unwilling to bow to the Ku Klux Klan's violence against their black colleagues on racial grounds, this attack had legs, thanks in part to events in Europe. For two months in spring 1871, in the wake of the Franco-Prussian War, workers took over the city of Paris and established the Paris commune. American newspapers plastered details of the commune on their front pages, describing it as a property Americans' worst nightmare. They highlighted the murder of priests, the burning of the Twilleries Palace, and the bombing of buildings by women who lobbed burning bottles of newfangled petroleum through seller windows. American newspapers portrayed the communards as a wild, reckless, irresponsible, murderous, mobocracy, who brought to life a chaotic world in which workers had taken over the government with a plan to confiscate all property and transfer all money, factories, and land to workers. Republican's fear of workers grew. Organized laborers are agrarians, levelers, revolutionists, inciters of anarchy, and in fact, promoters of indiscriminate pillage and murder, the Boston evening transcript charged. The Philadelphia Inquirer insisted the redistribution of well-through law appealed to poor, lazy, vicious men who would rather steal from the nation's small farmers and mechanics than work themselves. Scribner's monthly warned in italics, the interference of ignorant labor with politics is dangerous to society. Turning first against black southerners, Republican newspapers began to claim that African-Americans were radical levelers. They were ignorant, superstitious, semi-barbarians who were extremely indolent and will make no exertion beyond what is necessary to obtain food enough to satisfy their hunger. To these lazy louts, Republicans had given the vote, which gave them absolute political supremacy. They elected to office leaders who promised to confiscate well-through taxation and give it to black citizens in the form of roads, schools, and hospitals. The most intelligent, the influential, the educated, the really useful men of the South, deprived of all political power, wrote the New York Daily Tribune, are taxed and swindled by a horde of rascally foreign adventurers and by the ignorant class, which only yesterday, hold the fields and served in the kitchen. After the Paris Commune, Republicans began to sweep white workers into this equation as well, taking the lead of former Confederates. An article in the New York Daily Tribune quoted Georgia Democrat Robert Tooms, the first Confederate Secretary of State, who explicitly compared formerly enslaved people to the Paris Communeards. He called for a property requirement for voting, without which the lower classes, the dangerous, irresponsible element would control the government and attack the interests of the landed proprietors. According to Tooms, only those who owned the country should govern it and men who had no property had no right to make laws for property holders. When Chicago went up in flames in October 1871, some Americans blamed the great fire on communists or socialists eager to take over the country. Even those unconvinced a deadly fire in a wooden city was part of a deliberate plot, blamed the fire on stupid immigrant workers, careless about fire. [BLANK_AUDIO] She blamed Mrs. O'Leary and her cow, claiming the animal had kicked over a lantern near straw, and even children knew not to put fire near straw. The great Chicago fire spoke to politics, as the rural peste to go fire did not. It fanned the flames of fear that workers were trying to destroy America. Famous reformer Charles Lorring Brace wrote, "In the judgment of one who has been familiar with our dangerous classes for 20 years, they are just the same explosive social elements beneath the surface of New York, as of Paris." And for those determined to make sure workers didn't have a powerful voice in American society, the great Chicago fire could be framed as an illustration of precisely that. Brothers from an American was written and read by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dead and Massachusetts, recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The Pesh to Go fire of 1871 was the deadliest wildfire in U.S. history, burning over 1.2 million acres and claiming thousands of lives, though it is less remembered than the Chicago fire.
  2. The Chicago fire of 1871 destroyed 8.6 square kilometers of the city, killed about 300 people, and displaced over 100,000, becoming a symbolic event in American memory.
  3. While the Pesh to Go fire killed more, the Chicago fire gained prominence due to its urban setting and media coverage, making it more visible in public consciousness.
  4. The fires occurred amid growing political tensions over labor rights, with Republicans viewing organized labor—especially after the Paris Commune—as a threat to property and social order.
  5. Republican newspapers portrayed both Black Southerners and white workers as radical, lazy, and dangerous, linking them to revolutionary ideologies and social upheaval.
  6. The fear of worker-led redistribution of wealth was intensified by the Paris Commune of 1871, which was widely misrepresented in American media as a chaotic, anarchist event.
  7. Political rhetoric framed labor movements as inherently destabilizing, using fear of revolution to justify resistance to voting rights and labor reforms.
  8. The Chicago fire was exploited as a political symbol, with some blaming it on immigrant workers or communists, reinforcing stereotypes about urban labor and disorder.

Summary:

—particularly the Pesh to Go wildfire and the Chicago fire—were not just natural disasters but significant political events embedded in broader societal anxieties. While the Pesh to Go fire was the deadliest, the Chicago fire gained widespread attention due to its urban setting and media coverage, fueling public fear. This fear was amplified by the recent Paris Commune, which American newspapers sensationalized as a violent, anarchist revolt.

Republican leaders and media used these events to stoke anti-labor sentiment, portraying both Black Southerners and white workers as unruly, lazy, and revolutionary. This narrative linked labor activism with threats to property, order, and democracy. The political reaction included opposition to Black voting rights and calls for property-based suffrage, as seen in statements from figures like Robert Tooms.

The fires thus became symbolic of a deeper fear: that organized labor, especially among marginalized groups, could disrupt the existing social and economic order. These events illustrate how natural disasters can be reframed in political discourse to justify conservative ideologies, reinforcing class divisions and social control. The aftermath shaped public perception of labor, contributing to a long-standing stigma around working-class mobility and political participation.

FAQs

The Pesh to Go fire, also known as the Peshtigo fire, occurred on October 8, 1871, in northeastern Wisconsin and parts of Michigan's Upper Peninsula. It burned over 1.2 million acres and killed between 1,500 and 2,000 people, making it the deadliest wildfire in U.S. history.

The Chicago fire of 1871 was widely blamed on immigrant workers and laborers, fueling Republican fears about organized labor. It became a symbol in political discourse, reinforcing the idea that workers were dangerous and destabilizing to American society.

The Chicago fire affected a major city, making it more newsworthy and easier for newspapers to cover. In contrast, the Pesh to Go fire killed people in remote lumber camps and small towns, which received less media attention.

After the Paris Commune, American newspapers portrayed the event as a chaotic, violent uprising by workers. This fueled fears that similar movements could happen in the U.S., leading to a negative stereotype of laborers as radical and anarchic.

Republicans used the Chicago fire and the Paris Commune to argue that labor movements were dangerous and anti-property. They claimed that workers, especially immigrants and the poor, were irresponsible and prone to violence and revolution.

Southern white leaders claimed that Black voters were poor and lazy, and that their political power threatened the economic interests of white landowners. They argued that poor people, especially Black citizens, would plunder wealth and undermine the economy.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.