Why Trump’s Hegseth Problem Exposes His Fatal Flaw

US voters abroad. Have you got your ballot yet? All states are now sending ballots to overseas voters. So if you want to vote this year, you should request your ballot right away. Go to votefromabraud.org and click "Request My ballot" as to receive it by email. Questions? Ask our support team directly. Don't miss this chance to shape the future. Don't delay. Votefromabraud.org. There are two polls here. Pete Hegsith is running for president. Pete Hegsith is on the verge of being fired by Donald Trump. Hegsith is getting some bad press. Somebody's got to be blamed for Iran. Pete Hegsith is in this job because Donald Trump is intimidated by competence. He can't deal with people who know things because for the obvious reason because he doesn't know things. Similarly with Pete Hegsith, much of the issue with Donald Trump is a management failure. He can't seek the advice. He can't seek the counsel. He can't acknowledge what he doesn't know. Michael. Joanna. Oh, I want so badly to talk about Tom Tillis' ex-post on Pete Hegsith. I want to talk about what an earth is going on in Iran. I want to talk about, well, a little bit about Gloria Steinem who we both knew. I want to talk about the Iranians retaliating and I want to talk about the Republicans who are terrified that Donald Trump is going to hoard his 400 million that he has in pack money and not spend it at all on the election, but instead spend it on his presidential library. Where should we begin? Well, and I know that interest rates are not your favorite subject, but they are one of my favorite subjects. So perhaps we can drive by the interest rate crisis, which is at the center and reflective of the world crisis that that we are I think that there is suddenly a dawning recognition that the that the crisis that we thought we were in is even more serious than than we have ever thought. And we could talk about Donald Trump asking people if he should rename the Straight of Hormuz, the Trump Strait. Trump Strait sounds like something incredibly unlucky that you would get in a game of poker. Or we could just never talk about Donald Trump again. Well, what would we do? What would we talk about Michael? I don't know, but first let me remind people if you don't have a subscription to the Daily Beast podcast, please press the subscription button wherever you are. We are determined to get to a million subscribers by the end of the year. And we are making steady progress. Michael, it's extraordinary to think we've been doing this. I think for 160 episodes. We're into our second year, Joanna. We're into our second year like Donald Trump, Michael, like Donald Trump. Gloria Steinem, though. Yeah. Well, here's your opportunity to when a cultural icon dies to redeem yourself. Oh, you mean because of my? Dolly. Yes. Yes. Right. Your Dolly Dis. My Dolly Dis, which was sort of an inadvertent Dolly Dis to be fair. Gloria Steinem, well, you should give your story because I was thinking, well, I can talk about Gloria Steinem and then you totally won up to me. So give your story first because it's a good one. Yeah, I think the interesting thing about about Gloria Steinem from a meta standpoint is that she really has in this long cultural era of cultural turmoil, which begins in the 1960s and really doesn't stop and still goes on to now into the into the Trump era, which in so many ways can be traced back to the to the 1960s, either as backlash or development or whatever. You can see it in some sense as all of a piece and one of the people who has been there track that from the beginning until until yesterday has been Gloria Steinem. Yeah, but say the other thing too. She's the first person who published me. So when I was 19 years old, the first piece of journalism that I ever sold that I ever sold to a magazine was to miss magazine. And and an editor there by the name of Susan Brody, a woman who I became very friendly with. And she sort of brought me in. And again, I was 19 years old. I was student at Columbia University. And she brought me into me. Gloria, who seemed very skeptical about why they should why they should be publishing a 19 year old man boy. But nevertheless, they they did. And that was and that was in all kinds of good things actually came out of that for me. And can you remember what the piece was about? I had been one of the first men to integrate a woman's college, which was Vassar College at the time. And and so I wrote a piece about this and they published it. I don't understand. What do you mean you were one of the first men to integrate Vassar College? Vassar College was a woman's college. Right. But I thought you went to Columbia. I then I did then I got a job at the New York Times and left Vassar College to come to New York and go to Columbia because I had a job. Oh, so you were a college dropout? Well, I was a call, but I was no, I was a transfer student. You were a transfers like Donald Trump, who went to Fordham and then transferred and actually like Barack Obama, who went to Occidental and then transferred to Columbia. Exactly. But then that was the so I came to New York and I came to New York because you know, I was I was like I've got this job at the New York Times and I was ready. I don't know. And and I wrote this. I was at the New York Times. I wrote this. Then I wrote this magazine. I'd have no idea what a magazine piece was. And I remember I wrote like 10,000 words and and then I sold it to Miz magazine and they cut it down to 1200 words. And I thought, okay, that's what a magazine piece is great. Good. Well, I'm so glad that you didn't storm out and say that you refused to be edited because I've certainly worked with occasional 19 year old man who would say things like that or indeed 25 year old man who refused to be edited. But that's good that you took to the editing. I assume that there are some women who might not like to be edited too. Yeah, but it's more men. It's more men and men don't like to be edited by women and actually I'll never forget. My first piece editing for New York magazine was a writer who was particularly irritated to be edited by me and he came in and he put his feet on my desk and said, I hope you don't mind if I put my feet on your desk. And it was such a weird, aggressive gesture. Anyway, there are plenty of men and women who don't like to be edited, but in my experience is more being men. Well, I would like to remind you that your job as an editor is to deal with difficult writers and not my job as a podcast is to deal with difficult writers. Not to resent them and not to and not to get them to leave, to take their articles and go away. That's your job as an editor. Michael Wolfe, I've spent my entire life being surrounded by difficult writers, but I too was friendly with Gloria Steinem. I liked her a lot and we be, I can't. I was trying to remember the first time I met her actually, but I do have strong memories of hanging out with her and she was so much more fun than people realised. Obviously, very glamorous. And when I took over as the editor and chief of Cosmo, I took the entire editorial staff over to her lovely apartment on the Upper East Side, which was sort of gorgeous and filled with all sorts of trinkets and chuchkas from her travels. And we sort of sat and our editors who were younger than me was still absolutely entranced by her. And she talked about the challenges of the times and the pressures on women and the coming threat of Donald Trump, which she saw. And I mean, like Donald Trump, as you say, she sort of was astride the last sort of 60 years and understood that culture was really important. And was so much more glamorous right up until the end. I went to quite a few things. She used to host things at her apartment sort of 20, 30, 40 people. And they were always fun. You always ran into interesting people. And she was very good at just having conversations. And as she got older, she would just sort of sit on her chair. She had one or two chairs that she sort of sat back in. And then she would just point to people and people would start talking and it was a sort of salon, if you like a feminist salon, but I'm sorry that she she's died. To me, she's a figure out of this great day of the magazine business in Europe. I mean, that's the moment in which I came to New York, the moment in which my professional life was built, because magazines were incredibly powerful and incredibly vibrant, and you could just start them as they started Miss magazine, basically from nothing, actually, Miss was started inside of New York magazine, which just a few years before that had been started from nothing, both magazines, which you and I worked for New York magazine, and I actually worked for basically all the magazines that flourished for, you know, essentially, you know, close to 50 years, and then stop flourishing. Not sure. Did Miss magazine ever make money? Was it a viable business concern? I have fear it probably wasn't. I think for a while it was, for then, like so many magazines, it wasn't, although it went on for quite some time. Well, Rest in Peace, glorious dynamite. If you're travelling anytime soon, here's one thing that'll make your life a whole lot easier. Instead of scrambling to find airport Wi-Fi, or trying to buy a local SIM card after a long flight, just use salie, it's an e-SIM from the cybersecurity team behind Nord VPN, and it gets you connected the moment you land in more than 200 destinations around the world. Setup takes just a few minutes in the salie app, and once you arrive, it activates automatically. They also have flexible data plans, whether you're away for a weekend or a month, so you're only paying for what you actually need. I also like that it's more than just mobile data. It helps block annoying ads, trackers and malicious websites while you're on the go, which can even help cut down on data usage. And if you travel often, you can earn credits towards future plans and even unlock perks, like airport lounge access. Unload salie in the app store, or by scanning the QR code on this screen. Use code beast, check out to get 15% off your first purchase. The details are in the podcast episode description box. Here's a question, and I actually know the answer to this. Did Donald Trump ever meet Gloria Steinem, and the answer is he did, and he said in a conversation that I had with him, he said very nice things about Gloria Steinem. Well, he would have appreciated her celebrity, right? And he would have found her fabulously attractive, I think, I'm sure she would have been repulsed by him. I like to hear that she was repulsed by him when she first met him. When did they meet? Well, I don't, I don't even know. I mean, certainly she would have been repulsed by the latter, Donald Trump, but Gloria Steinem was very much a creature of New York celebrity, New York celebrity life, in the 60s, 70s, and into the 80s, and at some point in the 80s, she became sort of larger than just celebrity life, which Donald Trump would not become larger than celebrity life. He would become kind of smaller until, I guess, the apprentice. Yes, and then he swallowed us all. But, yeah, no, I mean, that is that interesting moment of how many people, how many people during a long period of time, how many well-known lives Donald Trump intersected with? And at any moment, those people could have said, I guess they could have, what could they have done? How could they have, how could they have stepped into history and said this person is evil? But they didn't. They actually said this person is a joke. And that's how Donald Trump gets from point A to point where we are now because everybody thought he was a harmless joke. Yeah, and they thought he was a character, a particular kind of New York character, very self-evidently self-made. I mean, you know, the fact that he appeared in movies like Home Alone made him iconic internationally too. I think I mentioned once on the podcast that when I was the bureau chief for the Guardian and then later for the Times of London, the one persistent person they would ask for was, can you do a profile of Donald Trump? Can you get an interview with Donald Trump? And I never had any interest in doing it more for me because he seemed like a joke figure. But to people in London, he seemed like the real deal, a glamorous, successful New York businessman. Now, it's interesting that that that point, so he had that had sort of sort of jumped to London because at that point, the late '90s, mid '90s, late '90s, certainly, you kind of weren't allowed to write about Donald Trump in respectable publications in New York because he was a cliche. You would say Donald Trump and people would go, "Oh, yeah, forget that." So interesting that he managed to have a life in London. And then he had a renewed life as soon as the apprentice started. Right. Right. He knew. But here we are. And you know, I think that there was, there was, I mean, we're sort of looking at a set of things now, including the ballroom, including all kinds of projects, including the constant deportations and a theme emerging, which I think has always been true about Donald Trump. But very much at this point in the administration, this getting away with it. And you sit back and you think, well, he won't be able to get away with it. Obviously, somebody is going to step in and stop this ballroom. It's obviously illegal. He's obviously building it outside of all of the, all of the, the ways that these things get built, built in Washington, generally a cumbersome process, but a cumbersome process because it is protecting a heritage. I mean, it is, it is about things, things that have meaning and you don't want to destroy that. It's actually being conservative about these things. It's conserving what is worth saving. Donald Trump, however, has scurried around that entirely and been allowed to. And there was the decision this week, the Supreme Court, this decision, which, which lets him go forward with, with, with the ballroom. And I think that there's been a lot of commentary that actually Donald Trump beats the justice system, beats regulations, beats laws, beats rules by moving, well, in a sense, just by ignoring them. Who knew? Who knew all you had to do was just ignore things, move faster than the courts move and, and you get your ballroom and you get so many things actually. You get to deport people, you get, you get your name on the side of the Kennedy Central, though that seems to be one thing that is, you know, now it's just renovated and refurbished by Donald Trump. You get to wage a war, actually, without, without, without seeking approval of war, that, that, I mean, once you've started it, no one can stop you, apparently. And actually you can't stop the war because the war, you've started the war and it is unstoppable. Well, it's the old business adage, isn't it? Get on with it and ask for forgiveness later, except that, let's hope that with the decision to go into this illegal war with Iran, that it may be the single thing that actually beats him in the midterms, that people have had enough of it, they're paying the price of the pump, and they're not going to give him forgiveness, they're going to say, no, you campaigned on doing the opposite to this, and we've had enough. I am intrigued by the fact that Republicans now think that Donald Trump is unlikely to spend the 400 million he's accumulated in his pack on them during the election and that they are anxious. It was very good reporting on this in the Washington Post today that he's going to keep the money for his presidential library, which is to say he's going to keep the money for himself. And the presidential library is, I mean, we should begin to parse this. The presidential library, this is really an excuse to create a, a presidency in exile. So he, so Ed, in 2029, he. will return to Marilago as he did in 2021 and he will then proceed to run the Republican party, proceed to demand that his influence be accounted for, he will go on being Donald Trump. Now he will have this and now we will have this enormous money to do with which to do this. Right. And he's got his plate, griffed force one from the Qatar and and he has his plane. But this has always been a thing. He has always been it's it's a kind of a consistent issue in the Republican party. Donald Trump has had has enormous fundraising skills and and he doesn't share that money with the rest of the Republican party. This was this was this was true when the 2024 campaign actually it was true in the 2022 midterms that there was enormous pressure on Donald Trump to to to take some of his pack money and spend that on Republican races and and he didn't. Do you think he will give some money to Ken Paxton in Texas, his friend, the ag who's been impeached and running for Senate? No, I don't think he will. He doesn't want to give this money. I mean, he sees this as my money. He refers to it as my money. They want this this is a constant a constant thing. They want my money. Well, at least there's been pushback on him over birthright citizenship again today. I don't think that's the right way to see this. I think the right way to see this is that the Supreme Court as as unambiguously as it could possibly do ruled against his efforts to curtail curtail birthright citizenship. That however did not stop him from then then attempting to find another way around birthright citizenship, which the court has has now blocked that for the moment. And this also will not this this further decision will not stop this. He will go on and this is the way this is getting away with it. How do you get away with it? Even when they say you cannot do this, well, you keep you keep you come you come up with some other cockamami rationale, you you effectively exhaust everyone. You keep rolling the bowl down the hall, I suppose. It is an extraordinary display of not bowing to, you know, to all of the things that we expect a politician to bow to. Well, and you would expect him to bow to competence in the military and to want to have the best possible generals running what is turning into a war that he cannot get out of. And yet he's got Pete Hegseth there as we talked about on Tuesday, the Secretary of the Army, Dan Driscoll resigned his Chief of Staff also resigned in April. And now we've got him till Tom Tillis, who's leaving the Senate. So of course, you know, if only he could have said this earlier, but calling on Donald Trump to fire Pete Hegseth, his Secretary for Forever Wars following Dan Driscoll's resignation. And I want to read Tom Tillis' ex-post. I have never witnessed more inept management of the brave men and women who serve our country. And just reminding you that he is retiring as the senator from one of the senators from North Carolina. He's in, he isn't, this is Hegseth. He is intimidated by competence and retreats to ginning up culture wars instead of soberly attending to the vital work of our national defense and the health and well-being of our fighting force. Note there the use of the words soberly. I think he's using it specifically, right? Because what do you call him, Colonel Vodka, which was Roger Ailes, his nickname, when he was at Fox. And then he goes on to say, if we had a Secretary of War who maintained the same priorities and forward thinking, he would be fighting to retain talented leaders like Dan. And the many flag officers he has forced into retirement. He said he's creating a leadership void at the top of our military ranks. I mean, that's not great to have an outgoing Republican senators saying that about the second. Well, let me, let me, that's, that's curious because let me parse that a bit. There are two polls here, binary. Pete's Hegseth is running for president. Pete Hegseth is on the verge of being fired by Donald Trump. Those two things are very real possibilities. And they kind of exist at the same time. But two, but the, the interesting thing about this tillest statement is that if Donald Trump had the intention of firing Pete Hegseth, and I'm sure that is on Donald Trump's mind. I mean, it's always on his mind for everyone. But and, you know, and, and, and Hegseth is getting some bad press. The, somebody's got to be blamed, blamed for Iran, Driscoll is somebody that, that Trump seems to have liked and seems to talk to. So yes, Pete Hegseth could be fired. And really, it's just a question of what Donald Trump wakes up in the morning and says, is it in his mind? I should fire Pete Hegseth. But Tillis, a Trump enemy calling for, for Hegseth to be fired means that Trump can't fire Hegseth. So Tom Tillis has just saved Pete Hegseth's job. And do you think he's done that on purpose or he's unwittingly saved his job? No, I think I'm winning. I'm sure. I'm sure. Tom Tillis feels the freedom to speak his mind and to say what everyone, a hundred percent of everybody in Washington, Republicans or Democrats, feels about Pete Hegseth. This is not a secret. Pete Hegseth is a, you know, I think of the worst thing, because it's a blithering incompetent, an alcoholic, yes, man, a suck up, a man who has, who knows nothing and no logic would say he would know enough to run the military industrial complex. He was a second lieutenant in the National Guard. That's his military experience. Yes, he was promoted to major as people point, point out. But only after he had finished his duty as a second lieutenant in the National Guard. And but otherwise his primary qualification is that he was a, the weekend, a weekend television co-host. So what in the name of God would he know about running the United States military and by extension the entire military industrial complex at a moment. So I'm just going to say at a moment that in, in which we are in the middle of a, basically a revolution in, in terms of munitions, logistics, supply. So the transform, the transformation that is taking taking place now is as great as any in the, in the modern age. And we've got Pete Hegseth on the job. Or is he on the job? I mean, it would be better if he weren't on the job. Well, the wife is on, and then the wife was on the job. We may not be, but Mrs Hegseth. Mrs Hegseth. Mrs Jennifer Hegseth, the third wife, who's essentially moved herself into the Pentagon and her best friend to be an advisor to Pete. And of course, just reminding people that the Hegseth actually did run two veteran affairs organizations. And he was drummed out of both for incompetent management, financial shenanigans and being intoxicated on the job. Anyway, I just want to read that line from Tom Tillis one more time. He is intimidated by competence and retreats to ginning up culture wars, instead of soberly attending to the vital work of our national defense, chilling, chilling words. And then you have. But that can, that can also be extended and should be extended to the other person. I mean, he is Pete Hegseth is in this job because Donald Trump is intimidated by competence. So, when James Mattis was the Secretary of Defense during the first Trump administration, Trump came to loathe him because Mattis had a high degree of expertise. and the willingness to correct Donald Trump. No, that's wrong, he would say. Well, I think all the generals around him tried to do that. Wasn't just that John Kelly's problem too. He was chief of staff at one point after I want to say, "Runt's Prebus is that right?" That it was John Kelly that came in and then basically tried to be a chief of staff and Trump had enough. Didn't want to be bossed around by people? Well, it's not just that he doesn't want to be bossed around by people, it's that he can't deal with people who know things because, for the obvious reason, because he doesn't know things and that's it very, and that's similarly with Pete Higgs said, if you've been put into a job and the people who report to you know more than you do, I mean, this is a problem in omels any executive capacity unless you have a temperament in which you can listen to advice and which you appreciate advice, in which you get along with people who report to you, which neither of these guys do. It is ultimately all of this and much of the issue with Donald Trump is a management failure. He can't do the things, he can't seek the advice, he can't seek the council, he can't acknowledge what he doesn't know. - Well, the last line of Tillis' tweet is, I urge the president to find a new leader at the Pentagon who will retain and empower our military talent rather than diminish it. And he might have done that except for Tom Tillis telling him to do it. Because again, it is someone telling him to do things. Let's move this out because I mean, Higgs is right at the center of so many things that are now going on in the world. I mean, we are at an inflection point and I think a lot of people are suddenly starting to appreciate that the inflection point, the crisis that we're looking at, the world, the global crisis is profound. And not your favorite subject but my favorite subject, the interest rate situation is reflective of this. I mean, it's one of those things about interest rates that they are the real predictor of everything. They are the thing, no matter what you want to do. I mean, that's an interesting thing for Donald Trump who believes that his voice, his executive orders, his will can dominate everything, change everything. Well, it can't change interest rates. Interest rates have a will of their own. Well, and interestingly, even when he tries to put in his own person at the first with Jerem Powell and now with Kevin Walsh, neither of them are reducing interest rates, which is what he longs for. I mean, both of them have pushed back on him. Well, they can't reduce because Donald Trump believes that you can reduce interest rates by saying reducing them. He calls them reduce the interest rates. Interest rates are by their nature are connected to everything else. I mean, James Carville famously said, you know, when he would, if he dies, he'd like to come back as the bond market. And these things, so you have, I mean, interest rates are stand at the intersection of now all kinds of things, including oil, including the war in Iran, and it's not just the war in Iran. It's actually war in. So, this is the Russia and Ukraine, will? War in Iran, the war. I mean, these are pivotal things. These are intractable situations, which threaten to pull so much else into their vortex. Russia and Ukraine, the Iranian war, and which is pulling in all of the other countries in the Persian Gulf, in the Middle East, you have a new war with the Houthis and the Saudis about to, which has been cohescent now about to break out again. This is a moment in which the world has traditionally depended on the United States for being the power counterweight to chaos, really. Well, the policeman really, a global policeman, and you saw what happened yesterday when America started bombing Iran again, and Iran then bombed US Army or military facilities in bases in our allies, leaving them trying to figure out whose side are we on at this point? And, you know, and you have Putin Putin who is in a corner. What does he do? What does he do? I mean, the Europeans are afraid that he is going to deflect the war, the problems and he's having with Ukraine by moving the war or moving his trouble making to Europe itself, to NATO country. Well, he's already been doing that with cyber shenanigans with the unexploded bomb that was found at Leipzig Airport. There are all sorts of little incursions that the Russians have started doing in Europe that actually I'm not sure the Americans are fully aware of. I mean, public opinion is fully aware of, but this feels so real when you are sitting here in Europe as I am at the moment. And then there's, yeah, go ahead. Yeah, no, well, and then I was just going to say and then you have this weird invitation to the G20 that Trump extended to Putin or extended to the Russians. And with everybody going, what's that about? What is the meaning of that? Actually, does Donald Trump appreciate the meaning of that? Or is this just Donald Trump a way of distracting from the fact that the other G20 nations are questioning the US. I mean, basically saying, what the fuck are you doing? I mean, everything is, everything hinges on what the US is doing and nobody knows what the US is doing. Well, and I think the US doesn't know what it's doing, right? 'Cause Donald Trump is where constantly pointing out makes up his mind and then changes his mind and he doesn't know what he's doing. Meanwhile, China is supporting Iran and China is supporting Russia. It's buying oil from both of them, despite the fact that Donald Trump claims that the Trump straight, as he's asking people if he should call it, is fully blocked. Is fully blockaded and no one can get in or out. And then you have this ongoing tariffs things which he cannot get out of his head. Another instance of getting away with it. The Supreme Court went and said basically, you can't, you know, your tariff policy is not legal. Well, that hasn't stopped him in the least. And so we have a tariff, we know tariffs, we know the effect of tariffs is to undermine the economy. We know the effect of tariffs is to raise inflation. We know the effect of tariffs will be to put pressure on interest rates. So Donald Trump wants interest rates to go down but has imposed a whole range of tariff policies, the effect of which will be to raise interest rates. So either he has no idea what he's doing and that is certainly true. He doesn't care and that is certainly true. Or he has some other kind of malicious reasons for doing what he is doing. And let's remember the tariffs, it's not only this ridiculous tariff policies but it's constantly changing these tariffs. Well, and let's also, you know, remember as we spoke a little about on Tuesday and my goodness, our comments were on fire this week, Michael, we had I think 2000 comments against data centers and very much in your corner on data centers. In one person, four data centers, well, Joanna Coles Memorial data centers. I'm four responsible data centers. Well, no one, no one says, no one, I just, no one says I am four irresponsible data centers. Okay, but you're against data. You sit in the Hamptons and you're against data centers because you just are despite the fact that we wouldn't even be able to have this podcast if it wasn't for some data center somewhere helping us. And you should see my little satellite. Right, and can we flash up the picture of my little satellite on the lawn at the moment? You threw in a canard there. It's not, it's not just the internet infrastructure that people are talking about. It's this whole new AI infrastructure, which, which creates a situation in which the number of data centers have to be multiplied algebraically, the data centers are far larger than the data centers that have come before. Eat more power, demand, more water, et cetera, et cetera, and corrupt more communities. Well, actually, I was going to say, and also flating the stock market at the moment, so you say, what else is Donald Trump up to? I think he's trying to make as much money as he possibly can from AI to your point, so he can float his own administration from Mar-a-Lago when he leaves office in 2029. No, and just to add to the general atmosphere of crisis, the world economy now depends on AI, which is entirely debt financed, which could crash, I mean, if it crashed, which is not at all improbable, then that affects everything. No, no, it could be 1999 all over again. I thought you were going to say so much depends upon the red wheelbarrow and reference your fellow Paterson New Jersey, William Carlos Williams. Well, you know, and it's not 1999, it would be, it would be really 2007, 2008, I mean, so the entire were, I mean, in 1999 was just the dot com, you know, the dot com economy crashed. This would crash all economic, the entire economic system at this point is now hitched to AI and to the development of the AI industry, which is, you know, another, who knows what's going to happen there? I know. I was making the analogy to 1999 because it was tech related, obviously, 2000s. But this isn't just tech. Yeah, no, I get it. It's global. It's a global impact. And yeah, is it a better time to be alive now than it was 40 years ago? You're going to live longer. You've got better access to healthcare. Well, 40 years ago was the, got a cell phone. 40 years ago was the 1980s. Was there a appreciable nine? I mean, there's a lot of advantages to having a tech world. I don't know, maybe we should all go back. No, I think you could challenge that. What, what are the advantages of a tech world? I mean, you're, you're on tech boards. So you're paid to say this. But I, I am, I can't, I would, I would say, what are the advantages? I literally couldn't be doing this podcast with me in Yorkshire and you in the Hamptons. If we weren't tech enabled this, we couldn't have done this in the eighties. We couldn't have done it. We would have, you would have still been writing and the world would have been podcast free. I think it would have been a totally, I think it would be, I mean, podcasts now, podcasts like ours have made a significant den in the book business. Would I rather have a book business or a podcast business? I'd rather have a book business. I'd rather be writing a book then, then doing this three times a week. Well, am I going to need something? You've just found such a imagined, such a imagined. Well, I don't know when is stopping me, except that, I mean, there has been a marked change. I mean, we all go where the audience is, you know, a last. So anyway, I go back to 1980. Well, I would not go back to 1980, not least because of the terrible hairstyles and the awful fashion. 1980s was a decade better forgotten taste wise. Or one can argue that all of the problems actually start in the 1980s, that that's when, that that's when deregulation, which would come Trump would come to embrace. And that's when, when, when money, the, the, the very idea of money, of value began to exponentially increase. And Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan raised power. Indeed. So let's go back to the 70s. Oh, I was here in the 70s. That time wasn't so good either. Oh, so terrible for taste. The 70s, absolutely terrible poor Rod Stewart with that kind of throttled collie hairdo. We do not want to go back to the 70s. Let's go back to the 60s, my, my time. Right. Good Lord, really, and sitting on the edge of the Cuban missile crisis. Well, that was the, the world was poised for nuclear war. And the 60s is a terrible time to go back to, you have the president and the president's brother and Martin Luther King assassinated the Cuban missile crisis. You have a Vietnam. What are you talking about? This fantasy that everything was better in the past. We live in a less violent time now than we have done. There was an excellent program on the BBC this week about how actually there were two really interesting things on the BBC this week about how living in modern times is so much less violent than it used to be. And also how Donald Trump's attacks on London going on about how dangerous London is has had an impact on tourism in London. And now people turn up and they go, oh my goodness, in fact, there was a very funny comment, I think, on on another podcast, the rest is politics, US, where Alistair Campbell, one of their co-hosts said that he'd been at a conference in London, where he'd run into an American who said I almost didn't come, but then I figured out I really wanted to come to London, but don't worry, I brought my own security. I mean, as if London is somehow this, you know, God for taken place and the way that Donald Trump is always trying to present Washington, Washington is nothing like that. Nothing like a God for taken place. And people have been going to restaurants happily until he showed up. And your point. My point is it's a great time. Donald Trump is a great president. No, that's not my point. I don't know. My point is that my point is that it's very easy to fantasize the past and think that it was a wonderful time. And we've now established we don't want to live in the 80s, the 70s, all the 60s. You know, you're eating your organic lettuces with your heavenly little children around you in the most one of the prettiest places in the United States. So I really don't think you have anything to complain about. I've had I've had heavenly children around me in other decades to good. I just I just go on having heavenly children. So talking about a heavenly place in the US, what about Maine? Susan Collins now fighting for her seat. She's up against Troy Jackson, who came in to replace the Democratic candidate Graham Platner. Susan, it turns out Senator Collins has got tremors evident in an interview she did this week with Politico. Why don't you be more like Margaret Tay Smith? Because they never would have voted for it. She was very conservative. I mean, listen, there's a very good chance Susan Collins will be defeated. I mean, this is this is as we go into these into these midterm elections each of these. This is this is where we are. This is the drama and and and the reality that these swing elections. We don't know what's going to happen. And they could go she could be defeated. The Senate could go to the Democrats, but equally, equally. The Senate could the Republicans could hold the Senate and the Republicans can do much better, even possibly hold the House of Representatives. And the background of this is I mean, there are there are probably two forces here. The one force is this enormous antipathy to Donald Trump. I mean, his his disapproval ratings that are at the lowest he's ever experienced and as low as as any in the in the modern presidential era. But balance that with his aggressive action to seize any advantage possible in the midterm elections. And and that that that includes a disruption of the mail in voting. And and it's it really is interesting to see how much mail mail voting has has has become a standard in in modern elections. People vote by mail now. Well, the president fights by mail. President votes by mail. If you disrupt that, what happens? And the answer is nobody knows except that what we do know is that it would be some form of chaos. chaos as people around Donald Trump always say chaos is his friend. So, so, so we have we have that. We have another there was a piece I think I think in the times this week, times post about about dark money. So there is more money than ever before and more right wing conservative money coming into these elections. We don't know who it's from, we don't know where it's from. It's just all we do know is that there are staggering amounts. We have the specter of marshals, United States marshals going into voting polling places. What is what does that do? What what is this what is the feeling when you show up at a voting place and it's militarized? Again, we don't know what the effect of this is going to be. They are being, they are being officially weaponized. They are there. I mean, remember, they are not there in past elections. So they are there now. This is making a clear difference, making a clear statement and we don't know what they are going to do. We don't know, we don't know their effect. We don't even really know their intention. What are they there for? What what is the goal? Is the goal to stop people individually to question them? To they are they are there. We can assume not to protect but to intimidate. So we've got the health condition of Susan Collins, which she's kept secret for decades, although it's been clear because she speaks with a tremor. She's got something that she says is called benign essential tremor. I've had it the entire time I've served in the United States Senate. It has absolutely no impact on my ability to do my job or on how I feel each day. I'm sure that Joe Biden's failing in office has led people to think, Susan Collins, she's 72. She may have had enough. 73. Okay, 73 then. I'm I mentioned that because because you had a birthday last week because you had a birthday last week. I do 73. Okay, so you should stand for Senate, Michael. You should stand for Senate. But she's certainly in a tight race up there. She is in a tight race. Who knows what will happen? Michael, as always, excellent to see. We will be back on Saturday, back inside Trump's head. Who knows what will be going on? Will be in a global financial crisis. What will have happened with the war in Iran? Will the Russians have done more to destabilize Britain? Or the world? All the world. Interesting, though you still see this as as British centric. It's good. Well, it's just because I'm here right now. Very nice. I'm here right now. And did I mention I went to a former dark, satanic mill. You referenced them on Tuesday when we were talking about data centers when we were talking about those enormous industrial buildings that symbolized the industrial revolution. And I went to one yesterday that's been repurposed as an art center salts mill, which is just outside Bradford in Yorkshire. And it's now a David Hockney gallery and has a very nice, very nice diner with it. And weirdly, I ran into someone from your town while I was there. So go figure. Go figure. These places can be repurposed though. I don't think anybody's going to be repurposing data centers. I agree. They're not architecturally exciting, but they are possibly essential for a modern world. You see, you can't get away from it. You're just hooked to data centers. But I just want to the background because it's a great line. Dark, satanic mills is from a William Blake poem, which was then turned into probably, could it be the central hymn of British churches? Well, it's certainly the best, the best hymn, I think, Jerusalem, which people might know from chariots of fire. As chariots of fire, the last British movie to win a lot of Oscars. I hope not. I don't that. I don't know, but certainly it was that song that gave that song a kind of a worldwide notoriety. Yeah, absolutely amazing hymn. Anyway, Michael, as always, good to see if you have been. Thank you for joining us and a big thanks to our production team. Joanna Coles, until your back, remind me? Well, I'm back in the US next week, but we're going to be talking on Saturday. We will. Big thanks to our production team, Ryan Murray, John Romero, Rachel Passe, Heather Pasaro, and Neil Rosenhouse. So the good news is we have so many bee-beast tier members now. There are too many names to read out, and we really appreciate your support.