The transcript details a growing crisis in U.S. media and national security institutions amid Donald Trump’s aggressive attempts to control the narrative by banning coverage of CNN and MSN. This move, allegedly driven by his chief of staff Natalie Harp, triggers a major backlash from the White House Correspondents’ Association, which now refuses to cover the president indefinitely. The decision strikes at the core of Trump’s identity, which depends on constant media visibility—highlighting his deep paranoia and obsession with being on television. The story is further amplified by absurd proposals, such as a 250-foot triumphal arch with snipers and drone launch pads in Virginia, which experts dismiss as dangerous and illogical. National security professionals, including military and intelligence officials, express profound disdain for Trump’s leadership, citing rampant misinformation, particularly about war casualties, and a decline in professional standards. The media blackout may signal a broader institutional resistance to Trump’s influence. Meanwhile, foreign policy moves, like withholding aid to Saudi Arabia and failing to support Yemen, reflect strategic missteps. The narrative culminates in a satirical yet serious critique of how absurdity and incompetence have permeated government operations—from bestiality-related hiring to AI-generated memes—revealing a moment of profound institutional crisis. As Trump prepares for the UN General Assembly, the lack of coverage and growing professional disengagement suggest a potential turning point, where the country may face not just political, but existential challenges.
>> Hi, friends and fellow students. Americans living abroad can legally vote in the US election. Register or get tailored support at votefromabroad.org. Look, state deadlines are super close, so don't waste another second. Go to votefromabroad.org now and click "Request My Ballot" as to receive it by email. All you got to do is fill it out and send it back in. Don't miss this chance to shape the future. Don't delay, votefromabroad.org. >> The president decided that he was going to ban what he called "fake news" networks, including CNN and MSNOW. He felt he could get away with this and apparently Natalie Harp was behind it. Bad idea, right? He's done this before White House correspondent. They finally said enough's enough. This hits Trump where it hurts. He's about to go to New York City for the UN General Assembly. He wants to get credit. He wants to be the center of attention. All he wants in life is to be on TV. It's his obsession. If Trump stopped being covered, he would start wondering about his own existence. I think he doesn't believe he exists unless he reads a receipt about himself on TV. >> I'm Johnny Coles. This is the Daily Beast podcast. It's Monday, so we must be talking to David Rothgot for about what else? Beastieality. What an earthish cash betel doing, letting people who've been, well, accused of and prosecuted of beastieality into the FBI. We're going to be talking about the new triumphal arch. Why is Trump turning into a military installation with snipers and drones ready to launch at any moment? And we're going to be talking about the Washington bureau chief of Fox News coming out and saying, guess what? All the other networks are joining with solidarity with CNN and MS now. And they're not going to cover the president. How is he going to get out of this? What is Natalie Harp? She's going to tell him to do. Well, let's get into it before we do just a reminder to subscribe to the Daily Beast podcast if you haven't done. And also subscribe to the Daily Beast if you want moment-to-moment updates of what an earth is going on in this increasingly crazy world. Smash the subscription button wherever you get your podcasts, apples, Spotify, YouTube. And don't forget to leave us a comment on YouTube on your favorite part of the conversation. There were so many favorite parts for me talking with David today. So no time to waste. Let's get into it. David Rothkoff is back with us. And David, you have a new body part. And I'm not telling you what it is. I'm partially bionic at this point. So people will get the sense I'm improved. OK, well, you're new and improved David Rothkoff with a bionic hip. I'm going to tell people in case they're confused between hips and knees, but congratulations. Just like you, I like I emulate what you do, Joanna. And I think the fact that you're turning the whole crew here at the Daily Beast into bionic warriors is kind of amazing. I'm making everybody have a hip replacement. It is the most incredible surgery. I do feel like I have two new legs, even though it's a bit of an effort. But I, it's amazing that you had it done so fast. He were back with us. And we're recording this on Monday morning, where the Fox News Washington Bureau chief just announced effective today, the TV pool will not be covering events designated as pool coverage of the president. A significant ease of Fox news, David, can you explain for people what this actually means and why it came about and then don't let us forget the Natalie harp of it all. Yes, well, that ties to everything these days, but you know, the president decided that he was going to ban what he called fake news networks, including CNN and MS now. And he felt he could get away with this. It was a fit of peak and apparently Natalie harp was behind it. She was playing for him some coverage and he didn't like the coverage and somewhere in the conversation cooked up the idea that he would ban them. Bad idea, right? He's done this before the last term you did it to Jim Acosta of CNN who went to court and got his pass really and stated because though, you know, there is the first amendment still. And but nonetheless Trump has done this and it finally moved one of the slowest respondering most sort of pusillanimous organizations in Washington to the action, which is to say White House correspondence because they have watched week in and week out as he is abused women, particularly with Caitlin Collins of CNN and others and they haven't done anything. But finally, this was a straw too much CNN is one of the pool reporters and so the other pool networks who are involved with providing coverage of the president throughout the day. They send camera people around and then they share the video from that with the other networks and then with the rest of us. But they finally said enoughs enough. I think it's very interesting that the organization that announced it was Fox because of course it's got this long association with Trump. But the, you know, the most important thing is this hits Trump where it hurts, he's about to go to New York City for hunger, the UN General Assembly. He wants to get credit, he wants to be the center of attention, all he wants in life is to be on TV. It's it's his obsession and I think as a result, you know, we're on the taco timer, right. It's how long before Trump folds on all of this because they didn't say they're not providing coverage today. They said they're not providing coverage indefinitely and there is no plan for replacement coverage. So let's just back into this a moment here Natalie Hart are sitting there and she's repeatedly do we think playing him clips perhaps she's got a little loop of all the negative things that MS now and CNN have people saying about his policies. Where do we think his chief of staff is in all this because Susie while she's back happily she's cancer free. I mean this this was a really bad move to try and ban CNN and MS now and we know that the president has or we told the president has walls of television wherever he goes as you say he lives to be on television. His his cabinet meetings the televised even when he falls asleep we know he finds them boring so I'm not sure why you would think they would be good television but nevertheless the cameras are there pursuing him wherever he goes. Do you think there will be internal a fury at Natalie Hart for for not seeing around the corner of what banning MS now and CNN would actually do that it would amazingly as you say it's a piece of anonymous organization but actually prod the White House correspondence association into responding in kind. I don't think the response from the professionals such as they are in the White House is going to be good notably from Susie while particularly if she reads the daily beast piece on the background on this on the Natalie Harp and as we know the White House reads the daily beast all the time they're obsessed with the daily beast. Possibly because of Natalie Hart but you know I you know you can just imagine late at night Natalie Harp is there saying I am your only true follower I'm the only one who loves you here is some nice AI slot pictures of you with your shirt off you look very attractive and these mean people out there coming to get you and they're they're in the bubble the Natalie Don bubble of how he wants to be perceived. How he wants to be loved and she just plays to all of his worst impulses and of course Susie Wiles and the others you know they get phone calls from members of Congress all the time and members of Congress are going folks there's an election in 40 odd days you can't be doing this you can't be making life worse for us every day that way that I saw a story this morning some place that was talking about how. You know republicans are starting to say well Trump is toxic because his approval ratings are down in the 30s they're falling on some issues they're in the 20s this is bad bad news coming up to an election and Susie Wiles is the shock absorber who gets those calls. And so I'm sure she is super unhappy with this I can't imagine she and Natalie are besties but frankly the other sycophants in the White House all want to be you know up in Trump's drawers like Natalie is and and and I think they're jealous you know I think everybody's jealous of the fact that this. Of 35 year old woman has found the inside track to the president by playing to his absolute obsession with how he is covered in the media I think if Trump stopped being covered you know if this media blackout.
out this boycott kicked in. He would start wondering about his own existence. (upbeat music) - You've probably heard us talk about one skin before for their best selling skincare, but now they're bringing that same breakthrough longevity science to their scalp serum. OS one hair, whether it's stress, hormonal shifts or just getting older. Hair changes can happen to everyone, and that's exactly why one skin built OS one hair. It's a daily serum powered by the proprietary OS one peptide that actually works on the scalp where hell health begins to nourish it from the roots so your hair looks and feels better over time. Many hair treatments can leave your scalp irritated or greasy, and others require a prescription making them hard to access, and they can have some pretty unpleasant side effects. OS one hair is different, it's drug-free, so you can use it alone or alongside any other hair treatment without the irritation, and it's water-based, so you can actually use it every day without disrupting your normal routine. Born from over 10 years of longevity research, one skin's OS one peptide is engineered to support your hair to look visibly fuller and thicker at any age. For a limited time, try one skin with 15% off using code beast at oneskin.co/beast. That's 15% off. Oneskin.co with code beast, and after you purchase, they'll ask you where you heard about them. Please support our show and tell them we sent you. (upbeat music) So we know from previous appearances at the UN, and as you said, it's the UN General Assembly meeting this week where all the heads of state come in, or not all of them, but most of them come in and discuss issues of world affairs. This is not usually Trump's finest moment. We'll remember from last year the elevator sticking, then his teleprompter broke down, and he blamed the teleprompter on some kind of conspiracy when in fact it turned out to be his own team. So it is possible that the Republicans out there fighting for their seats. It's better for them if Donald Trump isn't on television 24/7. - You're so right. But who's gonna tell him that? Trump goes to England, gives these speeches that evoke sort of late stage more Mark Qadafi, where they sort of go on and on, and the teleprompter is really that important 'cause he's making stuff up, and he likes to say things like I'm the best, and you all know I'm the best the most, and they laugh at him. - Right. - I mean, the audience and the you and General Assembly laugh at him. And as far as the teleprompter breaking down over this past weekend, Mark Carney, the prime minister of Canada, had his teleprompter broke down or something like that, and he made fun of Trump. He, he, he, he ducked. Carney does not miss an opportunity to make fun of Trump, but Trump, I think, saw this week as an opportunity for him to gain some points. Like, you know, he'll, he'll meet with it, you know, Net Yahoo, and, and that'll give him some points, or he'll meet with Zelensky and, you know, put more pressure on him to stop attacking Russian. - Diesel facilities, yeah. - Yeah, well, I mean, they be put out of true social tweet this morning saying that Ukraine has to stop this, because, of course, the price of diesel is gonna continue to go up. In fact, Russia has now announced that they're gonna continue seizing shipments of diesel, past the end of September, which will probably take them right up to the election, very bad news for Trump. Needless to say, the Ukrainians are not super sympathetic to Trump's pleas that they stop on this, 'cause they realize they have leveraged. But he thought he would have all of these things, and then, of course, later this week on the heels of this meeting or on the fringes of it, he's meeting with Xi Jinping. His most important meeting of the year, where he will see the most powerful man in the world and hope that that was somehow elevating. Well, what if that doesn't get covered? Or what if it gets less coverage than it normally gets? He's gonna hate that. So, my guess is, you know, long before the Xi Jinping meeting, that we're gonna have an accommodation with the White House correspondence. - Yes, I would assume that very possibly before this podcast actually goes out, which it does on an eight o'clock on Monday night on YouTube that it may have already been resolved because, as we know, Taco Trump always chickens out. The idea of him not being on television is interesting, but it's also one of those things that many people who comment on YouTube on our podcast often say, why don't the TV correspondence just get together and say we're not covering you anymore? We're not gonna cover you when you lie, when you make things up on the spur of the moment. So, it'll be a very interesting standoff. And I wonder if there are conditions that the White House correspondence ask for other than CNN and MS now being allowed back in the pool? - No, because you see, this is a two-way street. Yes, it may be pathological that Trump doesn't think he exists unless he can see himself on TV. But it's a pathology that's shared by all the people on TV. - If you're a TV newscaster and you're not covering Trump and you're the White House correspondent, you don't exist either, you're not relevant. And so, they all wanna come to an accommodation on this thing because that's their bread and butter. - So, in the intervening hours, what do we expect? As you said, Trump is coming up to me to Sora Mamdani at Gracie Mansion, the New York Mayor. Do we assume that doesn't get covered or does it get covered by citizen journalists with their cell phones? I mean, what are we expecting here? - Look, that's all gonna get covered, whether it's citizen journalists or it's Michael and Dell's people, pillow network, or it's, you know, New York one, or one of these things. You know, there are a lot of people out there of video cameras. There'll be a lot of people covering the stories. The stories will get covered. The question is whether there will be as much video of the president as there usually is. And there's another more serious consequence of this, right? The reason that the pool covers the president 24 hours every time he's out when he's moving is what if something happens, you know, that, you know, this, it sort of creates a public record of the president's events. And if there's an attack on the president or he says something dramatic or something, it doesn't get covered. So, you know, yet another reason for them to try to find an accommodation for all of this. And, you know, I suspect all of this will get covered. To be honest with you, I mean, you look ahead at the UN General Assembly. What's Trump gonna do? He's just going up there to thump his chest. You know, he's going up there to say, "Hey, look, my economy's doing great on Wall Street." And everybody goes, "Yeah, but not anywhere else." Or, "Hey, I've solved a lot of wars." And you say, "Well, actually, you've started a lot of wars "and the ones you've solved aren't actually over." You know, or, you know, "I'm the greatest president "who I've ever lived." And look, there's a picture of me in George Washington and they're like, "Mr. President, "you smell a little funny, go change your diaper." I mean, it's, this is, it doesn't work for him in the way that he thinks it's gonna work. And so, as you say, it may be better for him to have less coverage, not more. And do you think at this point, Natalie Harp is his sort of Rasputin/Fengarly figure? - I don't, the idea that Natalie Harp is the Rasputin of Trump is a beautiful twist on this whole thing. I think she's more like his binky. You know, he's, more like his comfort blanket, where, you know, the world is being mean to me, Natalie says something nice and she go, "Well, you know, that new darker brown share "of his shade of hair, you know, so very manly." Or, you know, you know, Mr. President, is a true that you won your club golf trophy for the 17th year in a row. You must be an incredible athlete. You know, and she provides him with sort of confirmation that the bullshit he is spewing is actually true. And that's essential. - She does the work of a spouse, actually. Traditionally, she does the work of a spouse, but the-- - Of a tradwife. - Of a tradwife. - Not of his, not of his spouse, who, you know, as far as I know, you know, they communicate, you know, via their staffs. - Which is the perfect, I think that's what we do too, David, isn't that we communicate via our staffs? - We're a constant contact, Julian. I'm constantly getting emails from you, revealing new insights into the world. Text, David texts, I don't email anymore. Nobody does email anymore. All right, so the other thing I want to ask you is, does this mean that Trump's refusal to help Saudi Arabia, what's happening with all that? Can I take your foreign affairs lens and focus it on the Middle East? 'Cause A, we're hearing that more people have died in the. bombing on Iran than we're being told. And we know that the Pentagon has new accounting for deaths associated with Operation Epic Fury. But also now Saudi Arabia finds itself dragged into the margins of this conflict. They've asked America for help and Trump has said no way. I'm very curious about what's gonna happen to Jared Kushner in all this with his affinity partners, which is, as we know, invested in largely by the Saudis. - Well, I don't know. I think Jared will come out okay. Jared has been a failure at everything he's done and he's now worth billions of dollars. That's a nice kind of life, right? You don't do well enough to get in the college or father sends Harvard to check, you go to Harvard. You would come and advise her to the president. You can't even get a security clearance. None of the things that you initiate really pan out and you get to set up a $2 billion edge fund. You say you're not gonna work for the president again. You become this principal diplomatic advisor more money into the edge fund. Jared falls, fails upward, right? That's his thing. As far as the Saudis go, I think it's quite interesting because they thought, you know, the first trip Trump ever made as president was to Saudi Arabia. They feel that they have this super close relationship with Trump and I think they thought, well, they can translate that into him stepping up and helping them when the Houthis start targeting their oil pipeline that goes to the Red Sea, which is kind of their way around the straight-of-war booth. And Trump has decided to lean away from that until today. Now, this morning, Trump, and this is Monday, as we're recording this, Trump got on the phone with the president of Yemen. And I think you need to remember that Yemen, very poor country, has been in a civil war for a long time. And the president of Yemen runs a government, which is sort of favored by the Saudis, but the Houthis, which are supported by the Iranians, control a lot of the land and have a lot of power. And the president of Yemen essentially said to Trump, please step in and save us from the Houthis. Now, why would Trump take this call just to say no? He could just as easily not have taken the call. Taking a call like this gives you the predicate for some kind of action. I don't know if the action is public. Maybe it'll be some kind of covert action against the Houthis. But my guess is he will try to give something to the Saudis for all the reasons we know, which is their pain off his in-laws, they treat him well. He likes the way they're treating him, et cetera, et cetera. - Well, Grizzly, your dog seems to think that it's very much in the public interest for America to go into to help the Yemen, the Yemeni president. - That is a such a brilliant segue, because I love my dog, but not in that way, Joanne. And I know you want to get to the Beastie-ality story, but you're not going to get there through my dog, Grizzly. - I do want to get to your dog, but just before we do, if a chef came out in a restaurant and said, "I've never actually cooked this before, "but how hard can it be?" You'd probably head to another cafe, because when something really matters, experience isn't a bonus, it's the whole point. That's why so many people turn to Morgan and Morgan, which is America's largest injury law firm. Morgan and Morgan has a proven track record of fighting for the people for over 35 years, with over $35 billion recovered for their clients. Morgan and Morgan knows a thing or two about fighting to get you the compensation you deserve. So if your car gets totalled, you get hurt at work or someone else's bad decision becomes your very expensive problem, you can check out Morgan and Morgan. And their fee is free, unless they win. To see if you have a case, you can go to forthepople.com/dailybeast. That's forthepople.com/dailybeast. (upbeat music) - So do you think that Trump will come to the aid of the Saudis with the, you know, with the hoogies? - I think they will give them something. It is very bad news for Trump for this pipeline to be shut down for too long. Does that mean Navy SEALs, does that mean some other kind of support? I don't think Trump wants to go with some big public military action, but he might. And again, the whole point of this call this morning, it's usually one of those calls where he say, well, the Yemenis asked me to step in. I could hardly say no, right? That's, you know, that's why I think at the end of the day, he'll do something for the Saudis, something to strike out against the hoogies. And look, you know, he has people in his orbit on his cabinet saying that this war might last throughout, not just the election, throughout the rest of his term, you know, that the current thinking is that this will just fester on, possibly for years, as, you know, one of those forever wars we were never going to get into again. And, you know, at the center of it is fighting Iran and her proxies and among her proxies that is most important as the hoogies. And so, sooner or later, this will, the Saudis will get some satisfaction. Okay, well, we'll watch this, watch this space as we were watching John Kennedy last week, the senator from Louisiana discussing with Kashpatel, Kashpatel reducing the qualifications to join the FBI for those who haven't seen this clip. Well, what can I say? It's kind of magical. It's what these committees are supposed to be like, I think. And John Kennedy is proving to be one of these committees best players at this stage. He's a bit of a national treasure. Let's play the clip. What about the bestiality? Same thing, because the regs wrote it up in a fashion before I arrived that addressed prostitution, bestiality, and trafficking. They were there before I got there. They were like, tell me what it should before. It automatically disqualified any individual who participated on either side of it. Obviously, we were never going to hire the criminal. - Just out of what? - The bestiality? - Yes. - So you disqualified the animal? Well, I don't think we have great canines, but we're not going to disqualify. - I understand. I'm trying to understand why you did this. - Where does one go with that? Where does one go? Kashpatel's eyes, if it's possible, got even wider, even wider, so that I think somewhere their vision sort of crosses over. I don't know how the man sees, but those were big eyes. - Well, first of all, you know, I think you captured it perfectly. It is kind of magical. I mean, you know, we're going through a rough time. And, you know, here is this Southern senator with his, you know, - Fungsy accent. - Fungsy accent. - A draw, right. And he's like, so what about the bestiality? It's like, you know, words you'd never thought you'd hear in a hearing. And then, you know, Kashpatel comes back with his lame excuse. Well, they used to prohibit people who were gauged in bestiality. And we wanted to undo that. And it was like, why? Why did you want to undo that? You know, somebody came to Kashpatel. And, you know, while the press is not covering the president, maybe they could spend their time finding out who this is. Somebody came to Kashpatel and said, you know something boss? I think it'd be a good idea if we allowed people who were involved in bestiality into the FBI. And Kashpatel said, oh, yeah, that's a good idea. He said, well, they're going to question you. It's okay, we're going to stand up for this. This is a good thing. Now, that's a good story. Like, who wasn't? But there's an even better story, which is who went to that guy and said, you know, we had to kick Bob out of the FBI because of the bestiality. And that's just not fair. 'Cause I want to know, 'cause there's always approximate cause, right? There's somebody who, because of relationship with a chicken or a duck or a sheep or a donkey or something, you know, didn't get to be a law enforcement officer. And in Kashpatel's law enforcement operation, if you're in a barnyard, you happen to fall in love with one of your co-workers, you get to be an FBI agent. I mean, it's so out of its mind, it's sane. And yet, inside the FBI, and I think that, you know, there is actually something serious here, right? Normally, in a bureaucracy, everything gets vetted by lots of people. So normally, when you're like changing the regs on what gets to be an FBI agent, something goes through many layers of approval.
and one by one, these people said, yeah, peace deality. Good idea. Good, we'll get the peace deality ground. Fantastic, great. But this is, you know, bad management, manifesting itself in a ridiculous way. - And who's advising, Cash Patel? Why on earth couldn't they have seen this coming? I mean, you would have thought that word would trigger everybody. It's pretty fascinating that they're encouraging agents who frequent prostitutes. They're not hiring the prostitutes, but they're hiring the men that frequent the prostitutes. I mean, that seems pretty crazy too. But the FBI is now going to stand for the federal bestiality investigations. I mean, who could have advised Cash Patel on this? It's just unbelievable. - You're a genius. And if you are not selling federal bestiality investigations swag on your website by tonight. - I know we should be. - You're missing a huge. - And listen, this is what maybe, maybe actually Cash Patel is hearing those rumors that he is going to be fired. He was a t-shirt salesman. That's what he did. He hawked t-shirts before he joined as the director of the FBI. Maybe he's setting himself up for a whole new line of t-shirt sales. Earlier in this process, somebody said, well, why would you do this? He said, well, sometimes people go to countries for sex tourism where the sex is legal. And I'm like, this is who we're opening the FBI. - Right. And those are the people we want joining the FBI. And of course, he fired what was it? 1200 agents with average service of 22 years. So, and we've mentioned this before. But, and he fired them for following the law, right? I mean, they just were doing their jobs and enforcing the law as it is written. And instead of them, he's replacing them with the bestiality patrol. And, which is like holy shit. But this is what happens all the time. You know, they get rid of air traffic controllers. And so, first, they bring in this wave of air traffic controllers who are video gamers. But that's where we'll get them. And they hired them all because they were good at video games. Today, if you lived in Washington, DC, and I got to tell you, my wife is freaking out 'cause she travels so much about this, they announced that they are instituting AI assisted air traffic control in DC area airports. So, they're just getting people out of the picture altogether. And so, one by one, you know, dose, dose cup. So, they're bringing in AI and animals, AI and animals. But because those, you know, the problem with people is they have their own opinions. If they have their own opinions, they might be opposed to Trump. They're not loyal. So, what do you want? You want people who will be loyal to Trump? Well, if I let you in after your bestiality, you're gonna be loyal to me 'cause I know about your bestiality. And if you're an AI and I can get you to be written the right way, you're gonna be loyal to Trump. And so, we are, I mean, talk about the race to the bottom. We are ending up with a government of bots and bestiality practitioners because those are the ones who are most likely to be loyal to this rapidly decaying president. You sent me two very funny memes that for those who haven't seen them, we should just flash up on here, inspired by Senator Kennedy and Cash Patel's exchange. Obviously, 50 shades of, hey, hilarious. And then, who are friends to the Coldplay concert, the couple that got outed by the camera? I mean, again, just hilarious. And the way they've made the goat look shocked, so clever. So, props to AI for some good memes. Well, there's a lot of good, I mean, we have to admit. I don't know about you, but every once in a while, I'm going through Instagram or TikTok or whatever. And I get some an AI video of Barack Obama beating the shit out of Donald Trump or, you know, world leaders playing tricks on Donald Trump. And it's funny. It makes my day. So, you know, AI Slop is one thing. But, you know, this is, we're living in a remarkable moment that nobody could possibly have predicted. Even, you know, this one changes one of the big memes of the Trump presidency, 'cause it's always been said that Trump doesn't like pets, but apparently. Apparently, he's welcoming in the Beast reality crowd. And, of course, the Pentagon brought in Logan and Jake Paul, the fighting brothers, to talk to the Pentagon, to talk to soldiers this week and giving them, giving them a sort of bracing kind of, there's nothing better you can do than die for your country. Each one of you matter, take this moment and be proud of yourselves for what you do. This is the greatest country in the world. Truly, we are blessed to be born here, come here, and we should never take that for granted. That's what God created us for, is to lift each other up in the hard moments, to be there for each other in the hard moments, and to come together as a collective and fight for good. That's why this country was formed. We should never forget that. Yeah, and also this is all a part of Pete's problems with his own masculinity, right? I don't know what Pete's masculinity problems are, but they're deep, right? And so he wants a super masculine military, and there's some reports that he gets input on this from his pastor, who says we don't need to have women in this and let's be tougher, and he wants everybody to work out, nobody to be low-tee, and everybody to be muscular. Do you think, David, do you think that's why he doesn't appear to have been able to replenish America's munitions stash? I mean, we've run out of forms, but maybe he's so obsessed with warrior status, he thinks it's just gonna be man-to-man combat. He hopes it's man-to-man combat, what a, you know, Jake Paul and Logan Paul, these are fake fighters, right? They go into a ring for a few minutes, they fight. This is not what you do in a war where you're there, slogging through where the collective technological genius of nations is devoted to your destruction, where geopolitical issues are at stake. These two things have nothing in common with each other, but Pete Hegseth, like Donald Trump, is play acting at being Secretary of Defense. And he thinks he's starring in some, I don't know, hallmark drama about the guy who brought masculinity to the Department of Defense. And the reality is he's not addressing issues that you might, if you were a real Secretary of Defense, like do we have enough munitions to fight a war? There's a story today in the paper about how costly it will be for the military to retool in order to put into place Trump battleships, a technology for fighting wars, which was obsolete a hundred years ago, okay? I mean, it's insane in the same way that the bestiality is insane that we're going and embracing something that, you know, a missile, a drone, a drone attack, a missile attack, electronic warfare attack, any of these things can make a ship like this incapacitated. That's why we don't do it. - Let me just ask you something. Given how long it takes for any of these things to be done, do you think the military is just, or the deep-state military, I should say, is just waiting for the midterms to just push this off? - Not just the midterms. They're waiting for Trump to be gone. - Right. - Because they know these things will not happen. Golden dome will not happen. They will, by the way, they also know that millions, tens of millions of dollars will be spent on these projects that don't happen, but they don't care so much about that. The military happened to talk to a general over the weekend and he was talking to me, not about what we were talking about here, but yet another thing that Trump did over the weekend, which was he announced. And again, this is up on the bestiality scale of lunacy, right? He announced that the triumphal arch, that he wants to build in the middle of a traffic circle in Virginia, next to Arlington National Cemetery, at a height of 250 feet in the flight path to National Airport. Trump has decided, and he announced this weekend, that at the behest of the military, he is going to turn that into a national security triumphal arch where there will be sniper positions on the top, drone launching pads, and it'll be full of ammunition. Now, this is so nutty on so many levels. First of all, what does he expect it? An attack from Virginia? (laughing) I mean, seriously. Secondly, do you want to take your kids to view the monument that has the sniper positions on top? Thirdly, drones?
On top of the thing, you know where the drones would be launched directly into the incoming traffic at national airport. It is directly on the flight past the national airport. Of course, none of these things are the reason he's doing it. He thinks that he's gonna get legal pushback for forcing through this ridiculous project at a cost of tens of millions of dollars to the American people who can't afford food, he can't afford gasoline, don't have healthcare, and he wants in order to do that, he wants the power to do it. And where is he gonna get the power to do it if it's a national security project. Somebody in the White House is determined, and I think the Supreme Court's given him a little encouragement in this, that if something has to do with national security, then he, as chief executive and commander in chief, can do whatever he wants. And so he's like, yeah, let's turn this ice cream stand, into a national security ice cream stand. And that's why the ballroom, all of a sudden became a national security project with drone launching stations on the top and with all sorts of armaments and defences within it, because he felt he had more latitude to act in this way. - Well, isn't this also, David, didn't he also say that he had been advised by a general, that this is what they should do with it? I mean, of course, we don't know who the general is. He's just making it up, I'm assuming. - Well, he suggested that he had been advised by people in the military, and this general that I was speaking to of retired general said, nobody has said this. That he was willing to bet nobody in the military said this. Nobody in the professional military said it. Did Pete Heggson say, hey, yeah, that's a great idea boss? Yeah, but Pete Heggson's civilian. He's not in the military. Is it possible that some former military nut job, like Mike Flynn or somebody said this? I don't know, possible. But from my friend who's very well respected and been in the military, he's all like, said, he read that and instantly said, this is total bullshit. - Yeah. - This is total bullshit, that didn't happen. And I think it's very, very hard for people to fully appreciate the degree to which the professionals in our government, my experience is mostly on the national security side, the professionals in the national security space, the military, the intelligence community, the FBI, people at DHS with national security responsibilities. How much they hate this president, and how much of their day they spend looking at their watch, counting down the minutes till he is gone. Because he has debased their professions, he has made the country at greater risk, he has made a mockery of what they do. He has fired many of the people they respect the most. And I would say right now that the morale within the U.S. national security establishment, broadly, top to bottom, is at its lowest point since, I don't know, Valley Forge, when they were freezing to death in Pennsylvania during the Revolutionary War. It is just, it is a point of despair and disgust and mockery that runs incredibly deep. And you've seen it recently, not too long ago, Trump went out and he spoke in front of people, I don't know, a NASA or Space Force or one of these places. And he was like, try to politicize the whole event and they're not going for it anymore. They're not going to be drawn into it anymore. 'Cause he lies too much and he's hurt them too much. And you brought up something we didn't talk about really at like a minute ago, which deserves some discussion. Because I think of all the things that he's done. The one that has triggered in a serious way the people I know in the military the most is lying about the number of people who are killed and injured in this war. And he lied about the causes of the war. He lied about the benefits of the war. He lied about the costs of this war. He's lied about everything in this war. But the one thing you don't lie about is this human sacrifices. The young Americans who go off and fight, who lose their lives, the families that are shattered. That's something all presidents throughout our history from both parties have always treated with the utmost respect. And they view this as statistics, PR, disposable, variable. Well, it wasn't a war that day. We weren't calling it a war that day so he's not a war casualty that day. And these stories outraged them. Even if they don't, even if the country yawns, these stories outraged the professional military in a way that we don't appreciate. I don't think Trump fully appreciates it. Well, I'm sure Trump doesn't fully appreciate it. I wanted to also ask you. I mean, his obsession with having snipers and drones everywhere and as you say, the east wing and now the triumphal arch, I totally get why he's trying to claim that they are national security issues. And that's giving him some sort of legal needle to thread so he can get these built without traditional congressional approval. I wonder if it's also that he at 80 years old in his ninth decade with three visible attempts on his life is also increasingly paranoid. I mean, this recalls the sort of America of the 50s and the 60s when everything was about the communist threat, which is an era in which he still lives, I think, in his head to some extent. And his paranoia here, I mean, who wants, as you say, who wants to take their children to an arch? No one would go and see the art de Triomphe in the centre of Paris if there were French snipers on the top. But the idea of these being active military installations, it just, to me, it speaks of a sort of paranoia that comes from someone who understands he is a target. Again, I think his main reason for doing this is to add the legal latitude to do it. I think you're right. I think he is paranoid because in the case of all of these things, what they talk about is, for example, with regard to the ballroom, the east wing of the White House, is this is for the protection of the president. And even the people on the hill will say, well, we can't put our president at risk. There are many more threats today than there were before. He is at risk on a daily basis. We need to protect him. So this is not national security. This is sort of presidential security because, obviously, if we get to the moment where troops are coming up the George Washington Parkway and turning on to the Memorial Bridge, we're in deep trouble, right? We're not going to be saved by snipers on top of a triumphant arch that nobody can remember why it was built. But the reality here is perhaps it is tied to Trump's own experiences with mortality and these assassination attempts or whatever they were, perhaps that is an element of it. And look, we've seen pictures of him on golf courses with armaments all around him. And there have been just incredible precautions to keep this man alive. Having said all that, they probably would do more to preserve the life of Donald Trump by cutting off the big Macs than they would by putting snipers on tops of triumphant archers. - Yeah, we've got another AI picture here that is pretty good with the triumphant arch. Can we show this? This is by Ryan Teague Beckwith, pretty funny, which is what essentially Trump is thinking of doing. It's just, it's remarkable. It's more remarkable, David. - He talks about a golden age. You know, it's the golden age of corruption. It's, you know, there are a lot of names for it. But I mean, one of the things is we have entered a level of absurdity that is unthinkable. I mean, it is murder for satirists. You know, how do you make fun of the bestiality thing? How do you make fun of triumphal archers that are transformers and turn into weapons? How do you make fun of a president who's only listening to a 35-year-old who, you know, obviously had a psychotic break at some point in the past few years and, and, and, you know, is now the president's personal stalker. You know, he's hired his personal stalker into his office. Yeah, I was kind of looking for a stalker. You know, it's like, is there, what are the traits you're looking for in a partner? Well, I'd like someone who's obsessed with me. Look, you know, who sees me?
me delusionally, I'm sure he's like there on Tinder or Grindr or wherever he looks for these things. And I say, is there a category for stalkers? Oh, no. She's pretty good. But we live in an absolutely ludicrous moment. I know we really do. We really do. Any one of these things could turn into disaster. And, you know, in some ways, I feel like we're all like kids in a family where the father is an alcoholic abuser. And we're hiding in our bedroom. And some of the stuff we hear is him crashing around the living room and knocking stuff over. And we think that's ridiculous. But we also know at any moment he could burn down that. And that's the problem with Donald Trump. He is ridiculous. He is clumsy. He is incompetent. But he's also the president of the United States. And so at any moment, any one of those things could turn into a world war, a global financial crisis, an economic crisis at home, a pandemic. And we would all pay the price. And that's this kind of duality that we have to struggle with every single day. Goodness. And it's only Monday, David. It's only Monday. Well, hopefully by the time this podcast goes out, the press and the president will have resolved their difficulties. And we'll get to see him. Or maybe we don't want that. We want to see him less. But let's hope they've resolved their difficulties by the end of the day. And that, you know, all those world leaders coming to the UN will get to resolve some of the, what is it, 65 global conflicts going on right now? Yeah. And the US is, you know, he's the peacemaker president, which is why he announced last week that we're going to give more 2000 pound, pound bombs to Israel than we've given the country in many years. It's going to be a something we'll watch it super closely. And maybe you and I'll talk, you know, when he meets with Xi Jinping. Yes. What's in theory is happening this week. There may be Xi Jinping doesn't want to come if there aren't going to be cameras that would be very interesting. It gives, it gives a White House press association maximum leverage. This was not the week to ban everybody Xi Xi Jinping comes with his own media. Believe me. But Xi Jinping knows that he's going to get a warm welcome. He's not going to get a, Trump has already said, this is amazing, right? Xi Jinping, China's helping Iran attack Americans, target Americans. And Trump has said, well, I don't blame him for that. That's the way the world works. We do that. It's like, what? He's like, give it him a free pass on this. And I think what'll come out of it is Trump and Xi Jinping will meet and they say, you know, AI is a big thing. We should get together and talk about AI. And they won't talk about AI and they won't do anything serious about AI. But they'll announce that they're going to talk about AI. And that'll be the big deliverable and the hug each other and say, we have great relations. Yeah. Donald Trump just loves to say he has a great relationship with all these tyrannical figures. Well, David, maybe we'll come back and talk about Xi Jinping and the China visit later this week. For the meantime, let's watch the space and see if there is coverage of Donald Trump coming up to New York today and staying that I'm assuming his apartment in Trump tab, perhaps we'll see his wife. And perhaps we'll see him at the UN. You can just a bet. She was on the furt last plane out of town last night. Yeah, she was probably I want to be here. Although she often turns up at the UN. She has turned up at the UN before and she once gave a speech at the UN. Yeah. And she was stuck on the escalator last year with him. That's right. She was. Yep. She was. So perhaps she will be back. In fact, we should see if it will be her accompanying him or if it will be Natalie Harp. Natalie Harp was with him at Camp David over the weekend. Again, a visit that last, do they think less than a day? Well, he hates Camp David. Yeah, of course. There's no gold toilet flushers and, you know, all the kind of stuff that he likes. No, it's the hell of log cabins in a beautiful place. No, no, he does not. He doesn't like nature. He doesn't like history. You know, he doesn't like, you know, moments of silence where he can think about his life and reflect on the future. So Camp David is not for him. I don't know why he's gone there. So he's gone there a couple of times now. Yeah. Well, he goes very briefly and then he leaves, doesn't he? All right. David Rothkoff, let's pay particular attention to what's going on this week. I wonder what on earth will be on CNN and MS now and folks? They will have nothing to play. They will play all the same things. They will say all the same things. They will have video from different sources. It will have no effect on them whatsoever. David, what is it saying on your t-shirt? I can say, I can see your leaning back now. I don't know if you're doing it provocatively. I am a big deal. What does that mean? My wife had to give a speech in Minneapolis a couple weeks ago and she went to the Minnesota State Fair. And apparently at the Minnesota State Fair, it's like many state fairs, there's a lot of pickles. And she thought that this was a hilarious joke, big deal, like big deal. Right. And I said, anybody who sees this is going to think that it's off color. And that I'm actually saying something else. And of course, the first moment you saw this, that's what you thought. Because that's the way you're mind-run. Well, I think that with the bestiality moment, American sort of pop culture is disintegrated even further. This is just low-grade pickle humor. This is just a pickle and end with a little blue ribbon. It's very sweet. I think more visits to the Minnesota State Fair. And no, that's bad. Everything's bright. I think she came back with a cardiac condition just from visiting. Sounds delicious. Deep-fried funnel cake and mass bars. Yes, please. David Rockop, enough, enough already. It's Monday. Good luck with your hip exercises. I hope you're taking your PT very seriously. Look, I'm doing it. You said do this. My hip was fine, but I thought, well, I'm doing it. I'm going to. You're leaning to one side. You may not know, but you're listening to one side. So I'm just warning you. No, I've been doing that for a long time. To the left. To the left. I've been shifting. Very good. Very good. All right. David, we will see you next Monday. Maybe we'll see you before then. Let's see how the week pans out. Okay. Have a good week, John. Thank you very much. Big thanks to our production team, Ryan Murray, John Romero, Rachel Passo, Heather Pissoro and Neil Rosenhouse. So the good news is we have so many BB beast tier members now. There are too many names to read out. And we really appreciate your support.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Fox News and other networks are refusing to cover the president, following a move by Trump to ban "fake news" networks like CNN and MSN, allegedly driven by his chief of staff Natalie Harp.
The White House Correspondents' Association has responded to Trump’s pressure by announcing indefinite coverage restrictions, signaling a major shift in media relations and a direct challenge to the president’s presence in the public eye.
Trump’s obsession with being seen on television is central to his self-image, and the media blackout threatens to undermine his visibility, potentially causing internal crisis and self-doubt.
The proposed "triumphal arch" with snipers and drone launch pads in Virginia is criticized as a dangerous, absurd, and paranoid project with no real national security justification.
National security professionals, including military and intelligence officials, deeply resent Trump’s leadership, citing lies about war casualties and a toxic culture of political manipulation.
The media blackout may be a strategic response by professionals who feel abandoned by the president and are seeking accountability, especially as his policies and rhetoric increasingly endanger national stability.
Trump’s refusal to help Saudi Arabia over the Red Sea pipeline crisis and his call to Yemen’s president reflect a foreign policy retreat, possibly due to strategic misjudgments and domestic pressures.
A broader trend of institutional decay is evident, from the FBI’s inclusion of "bestiality" as a hiring criterion to AI-driven satire, signaling a deep crisis of legitimacy and professionalism in U.S. institutions.
Summary:
S. media and national security institutions amid Donald Trump’s aggressive attempts to control the narrative by banning coverage of CNN and MSN. This move, allegedly driven by his chief of staff Natalie Harp, triggers a major backlash from the White House Correspondents’ Association, which now refuses to cover the president indefinitely.
The decision strikes at the core of Trump’s identity, which depends on constant media visibility—highlighting his deep paranoia and obsession with being on television. The story is further amplified by absurd proposals, such as a 250-foot triumphal arch with snipers and drone launch pads in Virginia, which experts dismiss as dangerous and illogical. National security professionals, including military and intelligence officials, express profound disdain for Trump’s leadership, citing rampant misinformation, particularly about war casualties, and a decline in professional standards.
The media blackout may signal a broader institutional resistance to Trump’s influence. Meanwhile, foreign policy moves, like withholding aid to Saudi Arabia and failing to support Yemen, reflect strategic missteps. The narrative culminates in a satirical yet serious critique of how absurdity and incompetence have permeated government operations—from bestiality-related hiring to AI-generated memes—revealing a moment of profound institutional crisis.
As Trump prepares for the UN General Assembly, the lack of coverage and growing professional disengagement suggest a potential turning point, where the country may face not just political, but existential challenges.
FAQs
Yes, Americans living abroad can legally vote in U.S. elections. They can register and receive a ballot by email through votefromabroad.org.
The decision reflects a backlash against repeated negative coverage of President Trump by networks like CNN and MSN. It signals a growing resistance from journalists who feel the president has been unfairly targeted.
Natalie Harp is believed to be a key figure in shaping how Trump's image is presented in the media, often providing him with positive, curated clips that reinforce his narrative and reinforce his obsession with media coverage.
The project is likely driven by Trump's paranoia and desire for a sense of security, possibly influenced by past assassination attempts. It also gives him legal justification to bypass normal congressional approvals under the guise of national security.
Trump appears to depend heavily on being seen on television, and he becomes distressed when not covered. His actions suggest a deep psychological need to maintain visibility and control over his public image.
The proposed inclusion of individuals involved in bestiality into the FBI highlights a lack of professional judgment and appears to be a symbolic or absurd policy change, reflecting broader concerns about the government's direction and integrity.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.