Go back

Why Oracle's debt load could be your problem

from The Indicator from Planet Money

8m 45s

Why Oracle's debt load could be your problem

Oracle, a major enterprise software and cloud computing company, is now at the center of a growing financial and systemic risk in the artificial intelligence boom. Despite its strong reputation in stable, high-margin software, Oracle has shifted to a capital-intensive data center strategy, doubling its debt over two years to support AI infrastructure. This shift has transformed the company from a cash-generating business into one that burns money, raising concerns among investors. Oracle's deep integration with OpenAI—where OpenAI pays for cloud services and Oracle supplies chips to Nvidia, who then fund OpenAI—creates a circular, interdependent ecosystem. This structure introduces significant risk, as delays or financial instability in one player could cascade through the chain. Oracle has issued a force measure notice due to potential project delays, signaling financial vulnerability. Credit markets have responded by sharply increasing risk premiums and downgrading Oracle to just above junk status, limiting access for conservative investors like pension funds. Analysts warn that if Oracle fails to return to profitability, it could trigger broader financial instability, especially given the tight linkages with key players like OpenAI and Nvidia. While the AI sector remains vibrant, the interconnectedness and debt-heavy model raise concerns about whether the current boom is sustainable or prone to a systemic collapse akin to the 2008 financial crisis.

Transcription

1438 Words, 8316 Characters

English
"NPR." Oracle is not like the other children in the big tech company classroom. Sure, the software giant is investing in artificial intelligence, and the company's revenue is booming, but Oracle has urged the credit market by loading up on loans to make its data center dreams come true. See, Oracle may be the weak link in a criss-crossing, daisy chain of businesses that's holding up the AI boom. My biggest concern in all of this is the circular deals. Oracle's a part of circular deals with OpenAI, but they have one with Meta, and if you look in videos all over the place in these circular deals, Microsoft, and a few. This is the Indicator for Planet Money, I'm Ricky Mulvey, and I'm Adrienne Ma. Oracle is a pivotal player in the artificial intelligence story, and whether you're invested in the company or not, its fortunes could affect you. We'll tell you why after the break. Oracle is one of those companies that you probably heard of, but may not deal with directly. It's a multinational tech giant that sells enterprise software and computing power. Yeah, Oracle Software involves the less glamorous programs that run businesses, the databases that keep track of inventory, health records, and supply chains. The vast majority of big companies use its databases and software. And investors really like Oracle Software Business. It's steady, it makes a nice profit, and about a decade ago, credit analysts viewed Oracle bonds as a safe investment. They were a high margin software company. Now they're capital intensive data center build out. This was a huge shift in business strategy. Matt Sheridan is a senior lecturer in the finance department at the Ohio State University. I took Matt's investing class as a student. He was one of my favorite professors, and this was an excuse to call him. An analyzed credit before working as a professor too. The biggest issue with Oracle is their debt load is nearly doubled in the last two years. They're sitting at 169 billion in total debt. They're the fifth largest investment grade issuer now. I think they're the second largest that's non-financial when the Amazon has more. Oracle went into the AI boom in a weaker financial spot than other tech giants. The company burned a lot of cash when it bought a health records company a few years ago. Larry Ellison is the co-founder, executive chairman at Oracle. He thinks that training AI models is a huge business opportunity. Here's what he said at a company keynote last year. It's the largest, fastest growing business in human history. Bigger than the railroads, bigger than the industrial revolution. I mean, it is a whole new world that is dawning. So why aren't Oracle investors happy? Well, even aside from Larry Ellison's dreams, there's his son, David's dreams too. The senior Ellison guaranteed it $40 billion to support his son's Paramount Skydance merger deal with Warner Brothers Discovery, and that made investors nervous. But back to the data centers, one reason is the sheer size of the debt. It's turned Oracle from a business that generates cash into one that burns money. And another is that the path back to profitability may take some time. Working data centers takes a second. And the third reason is that long path may not be certain. Oracle is relying on open AI a lot. Sam Altman in the folks at open AI promised Oracle they would pay about $300 billion over the next five or so years. Oracle's data centers help power chat GPT. Right. So you can ask chat GPT how to make like a weekend salmon recipe. And open AI's financials come with a lot of open questions. But because you probably can't see them, the company delayed going public and its books are not open. And Matt says if open AI's financials were out in the open, its value would also be based on its actual numbers, not just the story it tells investors. So if you can't really trust that open AI's revenues are going to be growing at parabolic speed, that trickles into Oracle that there is some concentration risk there. Oracle and open AI are not just in a customer seller relationship. This bit has more implications for the wider economy. Open AI pays Oracle to use its cloud infrastructure and says it will pay a lot more in the coming years. So Oracle buys chips from Nvidia to build this cloud even more. And then Nvidia invests money into open AI so that open AI can buy computing space from Oracle, which remembers buying those Nvidia chips. I'm just picturing a circle. And according to credit investors, Oracle is a weak link in this circular economy. Oracle has already signaled that it may run into trouble paying back its loans on time. The company is currently building this massive data center in New Mexico for open AI to use. Oracle told its creditor that it may need to delay its loan repayments on this data center, using something called a force measure notice. And this is when a borrower tells its lender, hey, something totally unexpected happened. You can't make our delivery or payment. It's actually common in the commodity space where you have forward contracts to deliver say oil. And if there's geopolitical risk like we currently seeing with the straight of our moves, I mean, that's outside of your control. It's less common though in corporate America. Oracle issued the notice because of potential delays, but publicly maintains that the project remains on schedule. Now, this notice created some alarming headlines, but Matt says it actually could benefit Oracle. It allows the company to delay payments, though it's still on the hook for the full amount. Still, Oracle's credit investors are pricing in more risk. And this is showing up in something called a credit default swap or CDS. You might remember these from the Great Recession. Think of this like an insurance policy that Wall Street people trade back and forth. If the company goes bankrupt, the CDS contract will pay you out, but you can also use it to speculate. You can use it to profit on the demise of a company. The rates on these swaps are rising. This means that Oracle is becoming riskier. Matt says this does not mean the company is on the edge of bankruptcy or another immediate credit downgrade though. It does mean the credit market believes that Oracle is growing increasingly risky. Right. S&P, the big credit rating agency, they downgraded Oracle's credit in July. S&P basically said, "We'd like to see you make a profit again. Now Oracle is barely above junk status or a status that would force a lot of investors to run away from Oracle bonds." Lindsay Tyler is a credit research analyst at Morgan Stanley. She says to "Imagine data centers is a luxury apartment complex. Demand is strong now, but it may not be forever." The analogy might be you have ten apartments, you pre-signed leases for those ten apartments and you're thinking, "Should I build another floor?" Right now, with S&P rating Oracle just one notch above junk bond status, falling beneath investment grade would have serious consequences. I think it's a medium-term risk, but in that instance, Oracle would have a materially a more challenging time, not only funding the build out, but also refinancing. If Oracle goes to junk status, then many investors in the AI boom couldn't invest in one of its key players. For example, many pension funds can't invest in junk-rated bonds. Matt says these circular deals and heavy amounts of debt could lead to real problems for the economy as a whole. That makes me concerned that if this is a bubble, it's going to be more like a Lehman brothers type event. In retrospect, it's easy to say they were too interconnected to fail because it almost took down the global financial system. Does open AI systemically important? Well, if they get in trouble, and then that ripples through to Oracle, and that ripples through to Nvidia, and then the whole ecosystem starts to collapse, that would be a serious problem, and they're all becoming very interconnected. For now, the wheel is still turning. This episode was produced by Julia Richie in Corey Bridges, was engineered by Cinalifredo and Fact Check by Sierra Wattas, Kate Buchanan is our shows editor in the Indicator's production NPR. Do people say junk bond anymore? I think wheelie insurance, high yield, leverage credit, include loans in there.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. Oracle has significantly increased its debt to fund data center expansion, now holding $169 billion in total debt and facing growing financial strain.
  2. The company is deeply embedded in circular deals with AI firms like OpenAI and Meta, creating interconnected dependencies that amplify risk.
  3. Oracle’s reliance on OpenAI for AI model training—especially through cloud infrastructure—exposes it to uncertainty due to OpenAI’s opaque financials and delayed go-public plans.
  4. A force measure notice from Oracle regarding potential delays in a New Mexico data center project signals financial stress, though the company maintains the project remains on track.
  5. Credit markets are pricing Oracle as increasingly risky, evidenced by rising credit default swap rates and a downgrade by S&P to just above junk status.
  6. The interconnectedness of Oracle, OpenAI, and Nvidia creates systemic risk, where failure in one could ripple across the AI ecosystem and impact broader financial stability.
  7. Analysts warn that Oracle’s path to profitability is long, uncertain, and dependent on AI demand, which may not sustain long-term growth.
  8. The circular economy model in AI development raises concerns about bubble-like risks, potentially leading to a Lehman Brothers-style collapse due to interdependence.

Summary:

Oracle, a major enterprise software and cloud computing company, is now at the center of a growing financial and systemic risk in the artificial intelligence boom. Despite its strong reputation in stable, high-margin software, Oracle has shifted to a capital-intensive data center strategy, doubling its debt over two years to support AI infrastructure. This shift has transformed the company from a cash-generating business into one that burns money, raising concerns among investors.

Oracle's deep integration with OpenAI—where OpenAI pays for cloud services and Oracle supplies chips to Nvidia, who then fund OpenAI—creates a circular, interdependent ecosystem. This structure introduces significant risk, as delays or financial instability in one player could cascade through the chain. Oracle has issued a force measure notice due to potential project delays, signaling financial vulnerability.

Credit markets have responded by sharply increasing risk premiums and downgrading Oracle to just above junk status, limiting access for conservative investors like pension funds. Analysts warn that if Oracle fails to return to profitability, it could trigger broader financial instability, especially given the tight linkages with key players like OpenAI and Nvidia. While the AI sector remains vibrant, the interconnectedness and debt-heavy model raise concerns about whether the current boom is sustainable or prone to a systemic collapse akin to the 2008 financial crisis.

FAQs

Oracle has a massive debt load, nearing $169 billion, and is burning cash to build data centers. Its reliance on AI partnerships like OpenAI and the uncertainty of those partnerships' financial performance adds significant risk.

OpenAI uses Oracle's cloud infrastructure to power its AI models like ChatGPT, and Oracle has agreed to receive substantial future payments from OpenAI, creating a deep interdependence between the two companies.

Oracle’s debt has nearly doubled in two years, turning it from a cash-generating company into one that burns money. This has increased investor concerns about its long-term sustainability.

A force measure notice allows a borrower to delay loan payments due to unforeseen issues. Oracle issued it for its New Mexico data center project, citing potential delays, though it maintains the project remains on schedule.

Companies like Oracle, OpenAI, and Nvidia are interconnected in a circular economy where each supports the other. If one fails, it could ripple through the system, creating systemic risk similar to the 2008 Lehman collapse.

Rising CDS rates show that credit markets view Oracle as increasingly risky. This reflects investor concerns about Oracle’s ability to meet its debt obligations, even if it hasn’t filed for bankruptcy.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.