The podcast explores a range of politically and socially charged issues tied to the Trump administration, beginning with the symbolic significance of Natalie Harp’s access to the Mar-a-Lago golf club buffet—an act that reflects broader tensions about loyalty, visibility, and the role of young women in Trump’s orbit. The discussion delves into Donald Trump’s apparent weight gain, health concerns, and lifestyle, contrasting it with the public’s perception of him as a reclusive, indulgent figure. A major point of outrage is the administration’s plan to slaughter protected wild mustangs and export their meat, framed as a chilling example of political stupidity and cruelty. The episode also critiques internal White House dynamics, such as a controversial meeting between Jared Kushner and Hakeem Jeffries, which underscores political disarray and a lack of strategic planning. The narrative extends to historical comparisons, suggesting that while George W. Bush’s policies caused long-term damage, they were more informed and thus more easily rehabilitated, whereas Trump’s administration appears chaotic and irrational. The tone is both critical and satirical, highlighting absurdities like the potential end of football due to brain damage and the lack of real policy behind political rhetoric. Ultimately, the piece conveys deep concern about the direction of American politics, the erosion of cultural values, and the lack of accountability in the current administration.
The Mar-a-Lago golf club, which is not at Mar-a-Lago, it's in West Palm Beach. The golf club every Sunday has a buffet, just over the top. And people talk about it, especially the staffers like, I mean, they get teary eyed. Their eyes roll back because they're actually not allowed to go to the buffet, Natalie, always allowed into the buffet, not just Natalie, but Natalie with her mother. And among the staff, there was like, is she allowed to do that? Should she be doing that? She says that the president says she can be here, but can she be here? That became a major moment within the campaign, Natalie at the buffet. It wasn't all you could eat buffet, and you know the all you can eat. The president. Michael. Joanna. We're back in the studio, our favourite place. Every Tuesday in the studio. I think reliably. Our safe space, Michael, is it a safe space because we have a lot to discuss. Not least, Donald Trump's weight gain is that why he's posting so many pictures of himself and Kim, John, because he looks slim by comparison. We're also going. A contrast gainer. A contrast gainer. Your favourite phrase, contrast gainer. We've got Natalie Harp. Is she enjoying this moment? And why did she disappear from official White House photos? We may always have Natalie Harp from here on in. I hope so. The Natalie Harp presidency. Oh, what is it? Be still my beating heart. Let's hope. We've also got why the Trumpers are killing America's wild horses. The Mustangs. That's a fascinate. Totally. I've almost cried when I read that. I mean, how can you. Brilliant. Let's go kill the wild horse. I know. What is wrong with these people? Obviously, we've got the ballroom. We'll always have the ballroom. And we've got Canada. And we've got. I think he's officially now the thinking woman's grandpa in Mark Carnie. And he's the leader that Americans want, and we're saddled with Donald Trump. And we have the dumbest meeting in political history. I want to get to that because it's like a head smack. Are you talking about Scott Bessond? No, I am talking about Jared and Jeffrey. Oh, Jared and Hacking Jeffries, yes. We have to come to that. But I also wanted to just do a quick mention. We're recording this on Tuesday morning. And Gillen Maxwell's appeal that she did herself from her Texas prison camp where she was moved after she had that polyadgenous interview with our now Attorney General Todd Blanche, who went to see her in Florida and rapidly moved her after she said the president was a wonderful man, and she wanted to just say congratulations to the president for getting elected again and he'd, you know, been a great friend of Jeffrey Epstein's. Not only did she have her appeal thrown back at her, which I'm sure is of great disappointment to her, but the judge said on the contrary to the extent it is relevant, far from exculpating her, it incriminates her or reinforces the correctness of the legal rulings Maxwell challenges. That's what the judge said. Sorry, Gillen, you're still in there for your 20 years right now. You can have to wait a bit longer for a pardon. Michael, before we go forward, that sounds ominous. I want to stop. Go a little off topic, but to acknowledge what I think is a story of enormous consequence. Actually, possibly far greater, um, far greater, what did I just say, consequence. Far greater consequence than possibly even the Donald Trump presidency, which happened, which happened today, go on today marks the end of football and the NFL can't go on. I mean, football, football and NFL and the NFL have been at the center of American culture for two generations, transformed the media business, made sports essentially in sports programming, the center of American media, of American culture, arguably has a fine, a very precise relationship to the atmosphere, to the idea of masculinity, to Trumpism, arguably, um, to a certain kind of toxic masculinity. Yeah, I mean, I mean, in the center of American culture is this incredibly violence sport, so violent that anyone who plays it will get their brains knocked out. We now know this, a definitive study, a minimum of 25% of the people who play, um, major league football, um, we'll have brain damage, substantial brain damage. It can't go on. And this is more dangerous than smoking, um, and so it literally had, at this moment, this today marks what will be the beginning of the end of football. And this doesn't feel new. I mean, it's both new because the survey is, or the study is definitive, but, you know, my kids are in their late 20s, there was no way in hell I was going to let go. Well, you were, I mean, this now becomes, I mean, it is kind of like smoking. New smoking was, was, was bad. And then in 1964, I think the surgeon general released a report which, which then began the end of smoking. And, um, and this is, this is definitive. You will, if you play football, the overwhelming likelihood is that you will get brain damage. So people won't play it. They won't play it in high school. They won't play it in college and they certainly won't play it professionally. So, first of all, this is going to kill, um, 60 minutes if Barry Weiss doesn't kill 60 minutes. The fact that the American football lead into 60 minutes will kill 60 minutes. Yeah, no, no. And remember, remember the profound effect that the end of smoking had on the media business. Can you, can you even remember the days when you used to go into a restaurant and people would be smoking all over you, all over your food, you would take a plane, people would be smoking the absurd idea that you would have smoking and non-smoking rose. I understand this makes a sound like we're from the Jurassic period. I, I was very enthusiastic smoke. I'm sure you were. I'm sure you were, but I'm, that you're glad you don't smoke now. Oh, of course, you couldn't possibly smoke now unless you're emotionally disturbed. Although it's making a bit of a comeback in, in movies and television, actually, but it's amazing how we went from people protesting the ban, especially in New York, to knots of smokers outside office doors to, you just don't smoke. Well, everybody, I mean, you got, I mean, the message, the message was a very powerful one. You will live if you don't smoke, you will die if you smoke. And with similarly, that is now the message about, about playing football. Did Donald Trump play football? Is that possibly why he's such a neurotic president? Oh, no. Not a bad segue, come on. I'm not a bad, very good, and I'm just trying to think of Donald Trump that, that, that fat fucker out on the, on the, on the, on the play. On the football team when he comes barreling towards you, except he wouldn't because he's got bone spurs and we've never actually seen him run. He'd probably have his own little golf cart on the football field. I've never understood the rules of it. I've gone to the Super Bowl. I've, I find the whole thing as sort of spectacle, but I've never enjoyed it because it doesn't seem very sporting. And you know, someone's going to end up with brain damage. Well, it is an, an American, it is America, the football field. The football field is America. So what's going to happen? Not my America, but I'm a sort of, what is your America? Well, what is your America? Yes. Martinis, the Hamptons, eating fresh produce picked by your beautiful wife from the garden. That's your America. I'm keeping my swimming pool open until the end of October, so I can swim every day America. The gay life. It's abundance, Michael. It's a life of abundance. All right. Well, Donald Trump does look like he's put on weight. I mean, he definitely looks like he's put on weight. Well, no. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. We haven't even talked about Natalie Harp. Yeah. I can't decide which I want more. Donald Trump's weight gain and understanding his food intake more than I already do. Or Natalie Harp. And the fact that she removed herself from the photos this weekend at the Indy Car Race also American. Well, let's go to Natalie, because I happen to have a new theory about Natalie Harp. Go ahead. Which you can see in my Instagram, getting getting a lot of attention as of two hours ago. Go on. Which is. Are you sitting on that nice chair, that nice cream chair with the blue stitches? Yes, I am. With the foot stool. I am. Yeah, I think I watched it. Yes. There's so many of them, Michael. Every day, almost, although I find I can't, if we're doing a podcast, it gets it gets in the way. Yeah. We'll be able to prioritize the podcast. Anyway, prioritize. Anyway, you know, I was asking that question, which I asked of myself all of the time. And I think which the question so many of us asked, how is it that any sane person could have in fact.
voted for Donald Trump. I mean, that's just what, how is that? What is it? What is the appeal? What could possibly be the appeal and then I thought, well, Natalie Harp? There is this, this, you know, we look at it, we liberals look at it and say, my God, it's appalling that a cumly young woman follows, follows around this man and is there to do his every, anticipate his every need? And that's appalling, how could that ever happen? But I think a good part of the country says, says, my God, that shows what an amazing guy Donald Trump is, that the young, these young women are just, just fallen line behind him and wouldn't that be great and isn't that what every man wants and isn't Donald Trump? Isn't this proof of concept? Donald Trump is a rock star. - Interesting. So he's the, without having to do any of the singing or the leg thinging on stage like Mick Jacket does, he, well, you're always saying he wanted to be, right, he has groupies, he has fans, he has groupies, he has fans who don't behave like regular people because they excuse bad behavior or they welcome bad behavior or they-- - They just accept everything. - Everything that he does is something to be admired. And also, you know, like like rock stars, they get the girls. - Well, and also some sort of projection, isn't it, that you want other people out there because you don't think you can do that in your life to be doing that. I've always maintained the Stormy Daniels thing. It was a terrible mistake to go after him for that because it's many men's fantasies, celebrity golf tournament, porn star who then leaves at the end of sex and isn't lying around all needy, wanting to be told that you love her. You know, it's, I know a lot of men who would be like, sounds like the perfect weekend. - Yeah, no, I mean-- - And also, honestly, I mean, we were talking about this before in terms of Monica Lewinsky, but a lot of liberals completely understood why Bill Clinton wanted to hang out with Monica. - Well, they certainly didn't punish him for it, as a matter of fact, quite the opposite, which is relevant to the current midterms. The second term, Clinton midterms. And remember, midterms, and especially the second midterms, always go badly for the party in power, except during the Lewinsky moment. When, in fact, Clinton benefited from that indeed quite well during the midterms in his second term. - So do we think there is something about the notion of sex and robust sex appeal with much younger women that works to a politician's advantage, 'cause we've always assumed it's a disqualifier, but it turns out certainly in Trump and Clinton's case. - Oh, I mean, I think it's how you match how the circumstances align. Gary Hart, not so good, as you might remember. - But wasn't that because he challenged the media and said, "I'm not doing that." I'm not, you know, you follow me, see if you can get anything on me. - Well, Clinton did that so I never had sex with that woman. - True. - I don't know what that's after it's been exposed, right? And he was splitting hairs, because in fact. - Well, that was after, sort of, but it is splitting hairs. A why does this work? And it works because, I think partly because, because you already know that that's what's going on. It doesn't come as a surprise that young women are trailing behind Donald Trump. I mean, he spent his career doing that. - Right, right. - And it was certainly not a surprise with Bill Clinton. But I just think that there is, and I think it's this part of the problem here and part of the problem in this entire Trump era is the liberal mind having no imagination about why someone like Donald Trump would be possible. - Right. And do we think, I mean, Nelson Caval asked me this morning, a beast contributor, and also the author of Just the Funny Parts, which is the best book I've read about Hollywood and what it's like being in the writers room, is Natalie Harp, Marla Mabelzing, Melania? - Well, I think, I think, so the reference there is that Marla Mabel's came on the scene when Donald Trump was married to Ivana and clearly by her own sense of presence and publicity, helped push Ivana out of the picture. - Well, and Melania doesn't look like she cares very much. I mean, I was very struck when we saw her at the Indie Race on Sunday that she was all business. Pants, white shirt with a pop collar, which is a new thing. I don't know if that's 'cause she's had some surgery or whatever, but the pop collar is new, jacket, and there was Natalie in a little leather pleplum outfit chattering away with Eric the sun. And then it looked like Melania and Donald were having an argument at one point. She's sort of flicking him with her hand as she does from time to time. And then you see Victor, her father, just to finish my point, looking anxiously in. He can tell his trouble in paradise 'cause he's trying to do the dad thing of like, is everything okay and nobody was paying him any attention. - Yeah, and remember, the facts are, they don't really speak. - Right. - They are seldom in each other's company. - Well, you could tell that when they were sitting next to each other 'cause it looked like they were catching up and it wasn't going well. - And just to remind everybody that at the Republican convention in 2024, first thing there was doubts about whether she would ever appear and then she appeared on the last day and but would not go out into the VIP box until Trump had left the box to go give his speech. - And was that because she was scared of being shot at because this was two days after Butler, Pennsylvania? - Well, I don't think there's any, I think it would be very peculiar for anyone to be shot at within the convention. That would be a real. - Well, you say that, but it's a huge group of people. I could see why people would be like this. - Anyway, no. - Okay. - She just didn't want to sit next to her husband. Not because he was going to be shot, but because she was, she hates them. - Okay. She looked like she hated him on Sunday, but it might have been that she'd literally had to sit there and watch the cars going around 175 times. - So when I. - And it was very hot. Very noisy. - And I say to one of his close aides, this was during the campaign and wondering again, why she had never made one campaign appearance with him. And when I press this campaign about this and this person looked at me like I was a real dummy and said, "You mean, you want a reason? The reason is that she hates his guts." - She hates it. - And I thought, "Huh, yes." - So for spotting the fuel truck? - We get off this subject, which we could go on for some time. I want to tell a story that I reported in my book. - Is this the buffet story? - This is the buffet story. Good, good, good. Go on. - Okay. So at the golf club, the Mar-a-Lago golf club, which is not at Mar-a-Lago, it's in West Palm Beach and because that's the drawback of Mar-a-Lago, which it doesn't have a golf course. So you have to go to the golf club. But the golf club every Sunday has a buffet. - Right. - Now, the buffet in American life has been debased. Now you go to any holiday in and there's a crappy, buffet with those-- - This is a melon, always pieces of green melon. - But in the American, make America great again, there exists a buffet circa 1965, which is, you know, people, it defined the vastness of-- - The more of everything of America. Right, the abundance of America. Those huge sweating hams and those enormous kind of-- - Exactly. - Station, station of-- - Yes, station, station of-- - The Omelette Station after the-- - Yes, the Omelette Station. And at the golf club, there is one such buffet, just over the top. And people talk about it, especially the staffers, like, I mean, they get teary eyed. Their eyes go back because they're actually not allowed to go to the buffet. - The staff aren't allowed to go to the buffet. - No, but they talk about it and they say, a lobster, you get a full lobster and can go back for a second if you're allowed into the buffet on special moments. Natalie always allowed into the buffet, not just Natalie, but Natalie with her mother. Natalie and her mother every Sunday.
showing up for the buffet. And among the staff, there was like, is she all out to do that? And then the people at the golf club serving this, are we, should we, she wants this? She says, she says that the president says she can be here. But can she be here? That became a major, a major moment within the campaign, Natalie at the buffet. Which is odd because she doesn't look like she eats very much. And in her letters that we showed last week, that you were given by someone on the campaign, you know, a couple of years ago, it actually says she wasn't eating and she wasn't sleeping in her lovesick language. Well, maybe it's the mother who was putting away the upstairs. Or maybe she was coming with a bag and putting them in there. Who knows. But it was an all you could eat buffet. It wasn't all you could eat buffet. And and you know the all you can eat president. And well, tell us more because he's clearly put on weight. Clearly put on weight. And there was a report that that that that doctors, his doctors are concerned about this. Okay. So it's last checkup he put on 15 pounds from last year. And we don't I mean, actually the numbers here are are fudged. So it was that apparently when he went to when he was booked for his indictment in Georgia, he put his weight, the weight, his weight was listed as 215 pounds. Now that is he had to know what did not. Everybody else has to be weighed, measured, weighed and all that. When you're not. Dited. You have to be weighed. Yeah. Not but not Donald Trump. Right. He got to say what his what his weight was. And clearly it wasn't 215 pounds. No. And within the White House, they actually they actually talk about this and they figure that that on the campaign trail, he was probably 250 to 265. And now they think they would they the estimate is 275 to 290. So and so he is saying that it was 215 in Georgia, which would have been slightly more than then then two years ago. And then I think I think now he is in the last physical it was 238. But these are Trump numbers. Right. So I would say it's much where he is coming on the 300 on a fast. Okay. So he's he's pushing 300 because he certainly looks enormous. I thought he had tried GLP ones. Well, that is the again, when I was when I was writing all or nothing, a set of people, Mar-a-Lago people, people who hung out on the Mar-a-Lago terrorist, big gossip center, was that he was on GLP ones. Well, because he was eating less or how do people know? Well, he was he was he was somewhat. He was thinner. I mean, he was looking he looked remarkably notably, let's say, better. And and that has and but that and that didn't last very long. And possibly the so the side effects or or for whatever reason. Well, because you'd think if he has a young woman in tow, he might want to lose some pounds. Or you could look at the other way because he has a young woman in tow. He can eat as much as he want. Right. Exactly. He can go to his own buffet and he can you get us into we should go to the buffet, Michael. How can we get the Mar-a-Lago Golf Club buffet? I would like to smuggle a lobster out of it. Well, I'm possibly you can get an invitation unlikely that at this point, although you could I've gotten them before. You've got them before. If you do, I want to be your guest. And perhaps you could wear a wig and we could go in disguise. I would very much like to try the Mar-a-Lago Golf Club buffet. You could go as Natalie. Well, in my dreams, I could go as Natalie. I don't really mean that actually. But but it is I mean the the story remains this is a guy. This is a really a fat guy. He's an 80-year-old fat guy who who stuffs himself with junk food hasn't done a lick of exercise other than getting in and out of the golf cart. And has young women running all of them on the golf course? And also could could could could fall over at any moment. Would it be a shock if this 300 pound 80-year-old fell over dead? No, it wouldn't be a shock. Well, and it would also be what he wanted to do on television, right? He should do it. If he's going to do it, he needs to do it on television. It should be at one of his cabinet meetings when he just doesn't. Well, it's one of those things that probably is difficult to plan for. Okay, so also but it is there is an inevitability of it like brain damage if you play football. Also a good segway also a very good segway. Okay, which takes us to what is the White House making of or did they set up the meeting between the Sun in law who's actually very thin, almost concave Jared and Hakim Jeffries who's normal size. Hakim Jeffries seems normal and healthy looking. Jared looks I always thought of Jared looks concave. Ivanko is very thin. Yeah, and actually Trump says Trump says Jared, he looks gay. Oh, he does say that. What does gay look like? But in Trump's in Trump's view, thin, thin. Okay, all right. Well, we can come on to but I can answer this question because I actually I actually had had a had a discussion over the weekend with with White House with a White House source and and this meeting came up because the White House is furious or at least the staff in the White House totally freaked out and furious because essentially this is Jared Kushner, the president's son-in-law having a meeting with the person who will be the Democratic leader of of the House of Representatives if the Democrats retake the House and basically what this meeting said implicitly explicitly is we're going to lose so we're reaching out to you because you are going to be the new leader. And what is the so everybody in the White House is going what do you mean we're going to lose why would you why would you why would you admit that why would you set that up now before I mean just we're just at the beginning of the midterm election season why well also why would Hakeem Jeffries take a meeting with Jared Kushner because what this will mean without question is that Hakeem Jeffries this was already brewing but precisely now because of this meeting will face a leadership challenge why would he possibly do this what is in it for him or what is in it for him oh he's just stupid I mean just ridiculous it's like so it's going to face the leadership fall out I mean I think that he's you know remember I mean he's the meeting who do we think leads the meeting that I don't know okay because they're supposed to have been introduced by a kind of mutual friend in New York right yeah well they're two New York guys and and I you know and I'm sure that in Hakeem Jeffries thinking through this you know it's Jared knows a lot of rich guys in New York and you know so I might as well meet with him and maybe I'll learn something and so maybe he was doing it to as a favor or maybe he leaked it to say look even the Republicans think that we're going to win well I don't think so because it sets him up yes this is devastating this is devastating for him I mean he's been in a thin ice anyway this is just he just crack through okay so so the White House were furious with Jared everybody's every yes the one both sides are furious with the with their principle how difficult how difficult is it for the White House staffers to be furious with the president's son well they can be furious they just can't control him right they can't do anything I mean and this is the other thing that they're aware aware of that Jared is operating his own independent office so what's inside Trump's head over this meeting is he like I can't control my son-in-law is he like I can't believe that they think that we're gonna lose because I think we're gonna win you never with Trump you can't talk about his family his family is always right or he's always what can I do their family really yeah interesting so it doesn't he doesn't he doesn't pick up the phone and yell at Jared what were you thinking no first thing he's he's slightly intimidated by Jared I mean that's that's how Jared comes by his by his he's intimidated by why because he went to Harvard because he got
the daughter because all of those reasons. And Jared is very good at playing his father-in-law. I mean, it's a very effective kind of. I've seen the way he moves around his father-in-law, never engaging, always being able to refocus the subject on something that is that his father-in-law wants to talk about. I mean, it's kind of artful. And remember, Jared is really the only person who survived the first term and prospered. Right, right. Okay, well, the ballroom is prospering. The ballroom is being built as fast as it can be built as you predicted. Those poor people working on it must be just doing double shifts, I would think. And as in this came out, I think I think there was a Washington Post piece about this that said, you know, the Trump has been selling this ballroom on the idea of that it should be built for security reasons. Right. And then the Washington Post had a piece, which actually we discussed earlier than the Washington Post, and we're on this story, is that that's ridiculous because there is all of those security features are currently exist within the White House proper. Well, and haven't you been into it? Didn't you get a tour of the bunker? I've gotten into it of some aspects of it. There are other aspects which you can't. They don't let you see because it's a high security zone. But what does high security zone even mean in a Trump government? Do you think Natalie's meant the secret zone? Well, what it means is that the Trump is that the basically the political end of the White House doesn't have anything to do with this. This is, and it's really an interesting thing about the White House. The White House is a facade masking a military base underneath it. And it's run by the military. I mean, when you go to the White House, it's one of the impressions, the key impressions that you have is that the military is all over the house. Well, and they're also in uniform, right? That's always struck me as interesting, that you get shepherded around by, they always look like they're about to go on actually on a ship or on on a aircraft carrier because they're often in those kind of white naval uniforms. Whereas, actually, if you go to the equivalent in the UK just because that's the example I know, you're never met by anybody in armed uniform or military uniform. No, well, again, and that was, I mean, this was first pointed out to me by Steve Bannon. And I was, I went to the White House to see Steve and he had himself just gotten to the White House. And it was like, he said, you believe it. This is really a military base. I mean, this is all, you see all this fake. This is the White House, not fake. Like Jesse Epstein, not knocking on the columns. Just the idea that this is a facade and underneath here, something the public cannot see is a very, very sophisticated military installation. So Trump saying this stuff, and he's picked this up, but it's a lie. It's just the Trump lie that this is going to be part of this. And the ballroom is not going to be part of this. The ballroom is just so that Donald Trump has another performance space. I think he's building himself a nursing home. So to your point, when he is so fat that he can't walk, he'll just be wheeled in and out of it. And he'll have a hospital bed that goes up and down and a nice view. But they haven't put that in the architect's plans. All right, can we get to the story that upset me the most, which is this terrible story that was in the New York Times about wild mustangs basically being sold shipped across America. And then you ship in foreign countries. Well, I wish they were being shipped. They are. No, they are shipped to foreign countries as horse meat. Oh, as horse meat. Yes, but they're basically being euthanized. Yeah, no, they're, they're, they're, they're protected by the construction. They're being, they're being, let's, let's, they're being slaughtered. Oh, don't, don't, it's such an upsetting story. So just talk people through it for those who haven't read it. Yeah, I, I mean, I just, all I've done is read this story in the times that there are, that there are wild horses have been a protected part of the American West for years and years and years. And these are largely mustangs. Those beautiful brown and white horses, the stuff of Western legends, right? Right. And every administration has gone out of its way to protect these. And why wouldn't you accept the Trump administration? Of course. And it's just round up these horses, which you know, incur a certain expense to the federal government in the process of protecting them. So let's not incur that expense anymore. How do we get rid of that expense? We get rid of the horses. And that's what they, they're rounding up and sent to slaughter. Let's think not just just the cruelty of this, but let's think about the political sagacity of doing this. What are these? I mean, I've said a zillion times. And of course, that, that, that at bedrock, the whole point about the Trump administration or the whole underlying fact of the Trump administration is stupidity. Every one of these people is a subpar, stupid person. And this, I think, how, how could you have a more, a more stunning example of that? Let's kill the wild horses. What? Nobody's going to notice? Do you think they end up? Do you think America is going to say, even even the, even the mega people are going to say, um, this is a good idea. Kill all the wild horses. Do you think that they end up as pate on the all you can eat, Mar-a-Laga buffet? No, we don't need horse meat here. We, we, we export this friendship horse meat. Yes, we export it to other countries where they eat horse meat. So Macron is spreading his morning toast with horse pate. Yes. Now, now we are probably not going to export it to Canada, which has now levied, um, if we do, it's only 50% more expensive. We've, yes, we've levied, they're levying tariffs on the wild horse meat. Yeah. I mean, they probably hasn't thought of that, but they should. So, how does that end? So we've, on the one hand, we've got a Scott Besson saying anybody that does business with Iran is over, we're going to come after you that he was very short on specifics. And he looked like he was just having a great time up there. I've never seen anyone look like he was enjoying himself as much as Scott Besson finally getting a bit of the spotlight to lecture Iran on how they couldn't do business with anybody and nobody else could do business with them. And they would be watching. And then we have Canada that we're deliberately not doing business with. And they're not going to do business with us. Well, let's let's stop on the Iran thing because I think that I think we're at another tipping point in a sense. Well, we can't bomb them because we've got no munitions left. So now we're going after what little money there is. Well, we're going to squeeze them. I mean, let's get this thing. Trump is in his announcement, you know, we're going to squeeze them economically, the worse, the most, but we've already done that. We've already squeezed them to a level that we can't really squeeze them anymore. Can we squeeze them anymore? Well, the only way we could probably squeeze them more is if we got China to squeeze them. But what's in it for China to squeeze them? Well, and China was noticeably left out of Scott Besson's speech. Yeah, no, I think that this is this is again, we have to say we're doing something. What is the headline? We need a headline on this. This is the headline. What will it mean? It will mean the same as all the other headlines have meant. It will mean nothing. It will mean absolutely nothing. We are stuck there. We cannot figure out a way to get out of this. The best we can do is look for the headline of the week that says we have a plan. When the real headline is, and again, this is the problem. The New York Times will give this as a headline. This is the plan. Instead of the real headline being, there is no plan. We're fucking stumped. Well, we're just in a corner here. We don't know what to do. It makes me so sad for America. It makes me so sad. This is also unnecessary. Trump was warned repeatedly about doing this. Well, it's not just, I mean, I mean, I mean, yeah, sad for America. Trump is sad for America. This is, I mean, this is, this is, this is a person who went into a war. God knows he's not the first president who have gone into a war completely uninformed about what he would encounter. So let me ask you something. George Bush went into a war completely informed. And that was catastrophic. It was catastrophic for the region. It was, well, I know. I don't think I think that that's a misunderstanding. He was not, he was not in, he did not know the key things that he had to know. And, and he was not only uninformed, but misinformed by, by, by American intelligence agencies. Although, I mean, he may have, he may have known, he may have been lying himself lying to
himself lying to the American people, but he went into a rock with a whole set of assumptions that proved to be obviously false. So which is worse, between the two of them, you've got Donald Trump surrounded by arguably the least competent cabinet, certainly in modern American history. And then you've got George Bush with Dick Cheney whispering in his ear, Donald Romsfeld whispering in his ear, Colin Powell standing up and saying, you know, the Iraqis are about to, you know, get a nuclear weapon and they're funneling all these pipes and we've got photos of it, you've got Britain supporting them, it's post-9/11, there's a sort of jingoism in the air. You know, trillions of dollars spent, boots on the ground, terrible for the future of Iraq. What, who's better between the two? Well, if the question is more than rhetorical and directed at me, I would say. Well, who else is it directed at? Well, I could be rhetorical, that. No, no, it's not. I'm being rhetorical questions. But I mean, to me, and obviously this is a, this is a long and historical conversation, which will go on for years and years and years, but I would say Bush. I mean, I, you know, I mean, as much as, as much as I think, Trump is a unspeakable moron. The Trump administration, this one and the last one, is really the gang that couldn't shoot straight. And, and the Bush administration was, was people who did things, did things which resulted in just in, well, first thing, many, many lives lost, but an enormous amount of damage. I mean, essentially set the path for post-9/11 for, for the, for 20 years, more than 20 years, 25 years, a quarter of a century, of, of, of the Middle East going wrong. And every, every aspect of, of, of our planning, of policy, of, and yet he's feeling any effort to achieve peace. Right. And George Bush has somehow been rehabilitated in, as a contrast gainer. I mean, arguably, they've both done an enormous amount of damage to America and the eyes of the world. But George W. Bush has been reframed. Well, it's very easy to do that in contrast to Donald Trump, the, you know, the 300 pound buffoon. I think you're going to, stuffing his face so that you can eat buffet. I mean, he lobsters his teeth on his plate with ham and surf and turf. I'm sure surf and turf is his favorite thing, right, other than the, doesn't eat fish. Oh, he doesn't eat fish. Oh, that was on your list. He doesn't eat fish. Yes, I, I did this list on, on the sub stack of things that Jeffrey Epstein, random things Jeffrey Epstein had told me about his, um, friend Donald Trump. And among those things was, Donald Trump doesn't eat fish. And his favorite vegetable is a potato. Of course it is. Yes. Um, I don't know. I mean, shrimp is obviously a fish. But yeah, that's, that's often people's refer to that as, as seafood rather than maybe he eats, maybe he does eat shrimp in addition to looking like a shrimp. Oh, giant shrimp. Well, and maybe there are shrimp tails left on the floor of the White House bedroom. Um, well, Michael, but that's an interesting contrast between, between, um, uh, Trump and Bush because they now represent opposite ends of the Republican party. And that's partly why, why a Bush, um, George W is now looking rather, um, rather better than he did when he was in office was because he represents a more, a more moderate informed, right recognizable Republican party, whether it's a Republican party or not, I don't know. A classic neocon and also interestingly, both of them have steamy as neither of them drank, um, well, well, George W. Bush did drink, well did drink it. Vast excess, but like Pete Hexeth didn't drink on the job and, um, uh, God up early and went for a run and did all the things that Trump didn't do. And they're the same age, right? So Michael, I have a surprise for you. We have a new artwork from one of our viewers slash listeners, which I'm very pleased to unveil and we'll go with our remarkable. A place in the gallery. A place in the gallery of our video is going to become a, um, a Donald Trump memorial, an inside Trump's head memorial. Garden, whatever studio studio, I think. Well, regular views of the Daily Beast podcast will know that we have a sort of Epstein, Trumpian, monkey face that has become a favorite and people always comment on it when they come in. I've got a new one for you. This is from a viewer called Frank Manson. Here we go. I'm not going to say anything. Okay. But it's Trump as Caligula. And it's pretty impressive. Frank, thank you very much. We're going to give this a place of honor on our art shelf from viewers. Lots, lots of gold. I get it. I get it. You get a Trump. I like this. Kaya's Trump us. Yeah. We should call him Trump us from now on. Heggers, Trumpers, let's get more of these. Let's go. Well, that's a, let's fill up this place. Let's fill up this place. I think there are a lot of people out there doing artwork to express their creative uh, inspo again. Yeah, creative angst. That's a better way of putting it. All right. We're going to go out on a Limerick from Garfreed in the White House sat Dawn in a half who made bullrooms and brands out of stuff while his wife sold her brand and Miss Harp was on hand and Canada's Mark Carney said enough. If you have been, thank you for joining us and don't forget to subscribe to the Daily Beast. And Ryan, John, Heather, Rachel, Neil, well done. Somebody else. We'll be back on Thursday. So the good news is we have so many BB beast tier members now. There are too many names to read out and we really appreciate your support.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The Mar-a-Lago golf club buffet, known for its extravagant "all-you-can-eat" style, becomes a symbolic moment in the Trump campaign when Natalie Harp and her mother are allowed access—contrasting with staff who are barred, sparking debate over her role and the president's approval.
Natalie Harp’s presence at the buffet and her disappearance from official White House photos are highlighted as signs of deeper dynamics: her role as a devoted, youthful follower, and the contrast between her image and the public’s perception of Donald Trump’s leadership.
The discussion explores Donald Trump’s weight gain, with estimates ranging from 250 to 290 pounds, raising concerns about health and fitness, and linking it to his lifestyle and consumption habits, including a reported lack of exercise and preference for junk food.
A major ethical and political controversy centers on the Trump administration’s plan to round up and slaughter wild mustangs, which are protected icons of the American West, and export their meat, raising alarms about cruelty and a lack of political foresight.
The episode critiques the White House’s internal dysfunction, including a controversial meeting between Jared Kushner and Hakeem Jeffries, which the staff sees as a sign of impending loss and political instability, and questions the administration’s lack of coherent strategy.
The narrative draws parallels between Trump’s leadership and historical failures, suggesting that the administration is more chaotic and irrational than George W. Bush’s, despite the latter being more widely rehabilitated in public memory.
The discussion includes a satirical tone about the absurdity of American politics, from the end of football due to brain damage risks to the irony of selling wild horse meat to foreign countries and the lack of real policy behind empty political statements.
Summary:
The podcast explores a range of politically and socially charged issues tied to the Trump administration, beginning with the symbolic significance of Natalie Harp’s access to the Mar-a-Lago golf club buffet—an act that reflects broader tensions about loyalty, visibility, and the role of young women in Trump’s orbit. The discussion delves into Donald Trump’s apparent weight gain, health concerns, and lifestyle, contrasting it with the public’s perception of him as a reclusive, indulgent figure. A major point of outrage is the administration’s plan to slaughter protected wild mustangs and export their meat, framed as a chilling example of political stupidity and cruelty.
The episode also critiques internal White House dynamics, such as a controversial meeting between Jared Kushner and Hakeem Jeffries, which underscores political disarray and a lack of strategic planning. The narrative extends to historical comparisons, suggesting that while George W. Bush’s policies caused long-term damage, they were more informed and thus more easily rehabilitated, whereas Trump’s administration appears chaotic and irrational.
The tone is both critical and satirical, highlighting absurdities like the potential end of football due to brain damage and the lack of real policy behind political rhetoric. Ultimately, the piece conveys deep concern about the direction of American politics, the erosion of cultural values, and the lack of accountability in the current administration.
FAQs
Natalie Harp's access to the buffet, which is restricted to staff and certain individuals, became a symbolic and controversial moment in the campaign, highlighting perceived favoritism and sparking debate about her role and loyalty to Donald Trump.
The buffet is described as extravagant, reminiscent of 1960s American abundance, with oversized food items like full lobster and a large omelette station, creating a dramatic contrast to typical American dining and becoming a point of cultural and political discussion.
No, staff members are generally not allowed to attend the buffet, though Natalie Harp and her mother are regularly permitted, which has drawn attention and raised questions within the staff about the legitimacy and fairness of her access.
There is ongoing public discussion about Trump's weight, with reports suggesting a significant increase—estimated between 275 to 290 pounds—leading to concerns among doctors and a perception of declining health, which influences public scrutiny of his fitness and vitality.
The story highlights a controversial policy of rounding up and euthanizing wild mustangs, with critics arguing it reflects both cruelty and political shortsightedness, symbolizing broader patterns of inhumane decision-making under the administration.
The meeting is seen as a major political misstep, signaling to Democrats that the Republican Party may lose control, and it has caused outrage in the White House, as it appears to undermine political strategy and reveal internal divisions.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.