Go back

Why Billions Won’t Save Trump from Crushing Defeat

1h 3m 9s

Why Billions Won’t Save Trump from Crushing Defeat

The transcript explores a growing consensus that Donald Trump is widely viewed as a deeply corrupt and uncontroversial figure, with public contempt potentially overcoming Republican financial power. A major turning point is the release of a Democratic report linking Trump and Jeffrey Epstein to a network of model exploitation and lies, which underscores a broader pattern of financial impropriety and power abuse. This narrative is amplified by allegations that Jared Kushner, a key Trump ally, used Middle Eastern wealth to influence foreign policy, and that figures like Elon Musk are using vast resources to shape elections. The political climate is shifting toward a new era of "assholeism," where aggressive, divisive leadership dominates, seen in Trump, JD Vance, and Bolsonaro. Events in Venezuela, where opposition leader María Corina Machado returns to demand free elections, further threaten Trump’s control and suggest a broader unraveling of his influence. The Democratic Party is poised to use investigative power to hold Trump allies accountable, with investigations into figures like Comey and Londowski revealing systemic corruption. Meanwhile, the public’s awareness of these issues—fueled by media exposure and documentary-style reporting—is growing rapidly, signaling a significant transformation in American politics. The overarching narrative is one of moral and institutional erosion, where power is increasingly tied to money, personal connections, and spectacle, rather than governance or public service.

Transcription

9277 Words, 50596 Characters

English
I think the Democrats are gonna win the Senate. Trump is gonna lose the United States Congress. I just think the feeling has coalesced into quite a consensus that Donald Trump is a seriously bad guy. Finally, interesting when the obvious becomes obvious to everyone. The velocity of the contempt for Donald Trump. There really is a chance that it will overcome all of that. The Republicans have limitless money. It doesn't matter how much money you have, the contempt for Donald Trump overwhelms that. Michael. Joanna. Your Michael Wolf author of four books on Donald Trump. Your Joanna Coles runs the Daily Beast. Thank you. And we are here to go inside Donald Trump's head to figure out one earth is going on in the president's head because it's all become about him. So please like, share and follow this podcast with your friends, with your frenemies, with your colleagues, with anyone you want to talk about politics with. And on election night, election night, we are going to be live. We're going to be live in our studio. So please send us your comments. Unless we're dead. Well, don't say that. Well, I'm just saying the same. I mean, think I mean, you never know what these elections go. They could, I mean, it could be, I think it's going to be actually a very good night, but it could be bad. I'm slightly more cautious because I've thought previous elections were going to turn out better than they did. So I'm now much more suspicious of the polling and so many of the races are so tight. They are so tight and well, we will, we will be here talking you through them or talking ourselves through them. We're going to start at 8 p.m. on election night. Easter and time in the studio talking for hours. Obviously, we'll have constant updates from our newsroom, which is right outside the studio. But we'll give the news, but what we want to provide, obviously, is context. Then what we want to think about is what's in Trump's head as his world possibly collapses as his world implodes. We are back in the studio from Los Angeles, from Los Angeles. That was so much fun having a live audience. Now it feels here we are in the studio, but where are, where, where is our crowd? No, I could do that every day. It's embarrassing to say, but we need an audience as much as Donald Trump needs an audience. I can see. Listen, I can see the attraction. It's intoxicated. Anyway, thank you. Big thank you to all of those who came out. We had so much fun and I love the meet and greet where we actually got to meet people. It was so fun. Yeah, no, and it's really nice to look out over a sold out crowd. Yes, it is sold out. Those are magical words sold out. Yes, anyway, we've got six days now until the midterms. Jesus, what are we going to do afterwards? Oh, we're going to wait. Actually, I think it may well be a totally new world. Let's not go there yet. Okay. Well, let's assume that by the end of next week we'll have a sense of what's happened in the house and what's happened in the Senate and the candidates are off. It's really the candidates are on the starting blocks because this is the beginning of 2028. Yeah, no. I mean, and it will be the candidates on the starting block under the thumb of Donald Trump or not or not or not, and also it will be JD Vance Marco Rubio, Hexeth, RFK, Jr. Plus another crowd all beginning to pull away from him or no, or I think they will be trying to separate. Well, I think, I mean, let's what do you think is going to happen? So I was in Texas for the weekend, admittedly Austin, which I was in Texas for the weekend. Yes. Is it an old one? I don't I think I've never said those words. Before anyway, I was in Austin, admittedly a blue dog, but I will tell you the people I talk to who are who are living and working in Texas said Texas right now is kind of great. And nobody thought that James Talleriko was going to win. So okay, there you are on the record. We're going to remember that. I think he's going to win. Okay. I mean, I think Talleriko is going to win. I think the Democrats are going to win the Senate. I think it's going to be that the United States Congress is Trump is going to lose the United States Congress. Does that mean that suddenly the most important man becomes John Fetteman? Does John Fetteman hold the balance of power? I don't think so because I think it will I think it will be I think the Democrats will get 52 seats. Who really do you think Susan Collins is going down? I do. You think Troy Jackson is going to win over Susan Collins. I do, but but so you don't have to they don't have to there are so many seats now that are up for grabs that they can lose that seat. Okay, they're going to fall to lose Susan Collins. Do you think that Abdul Al Sayed is going to win a Michigan? I do. I do. I actually am not sure he's going to win. No, okay. This is so you don't think the Democrats are going to take I just want to want a record here. You don't think the Democrats are going to win the Senate. I actually don't think the Democrats are going to win the Senate. I think obviously they'll win I do think they'll win the House by serious majority, but I do not think that they are going to win the Senate. I think the Senate hangs in the balance. There it is America. Log that. I will probably be completely wrong. And it will be a massive lose to not a girl from Yorkshire. Yeah, who doesn't think the Democrats are going to win the Senate. I don't know why I do. I don't know why I'm feeling this this way because because it's a beautiful day outside. It's a beautiful day. We are feeling optimistic. Finally, it's always interesting when the obvious becomes obvious to everyone. I agree that he's a bad guy. I am just concerned that people aren't. I know what you're hearing. I think Elon Musk has put an enormous amount of money into people getting out the vote. You know, the operations on the ground for the Republican Party are really extensive. All of that, absolutely. But that's the velocity of the contempt for Donald Trump. That it is that it there really is a chance that it will overcome all of that. That money doesn't. There's basically the Republicans have limitless money. So if the Democrats win, that is against. I mean, that's a marker. It doesn't matter how much money you have. The contempt for Donald Trump overwhelms that. Yes. And I think that James Talleriko has done very smart thing to pivot to say he's running against Musk. That Musk has poured over 250 million into Texas alone. And Talleriko is now like, you know, Musk is trying to buy this election. I think that's all very effective messaging. I just. I just didn't hear it, actually. You haven't seen the Musk movie yet. No, I'm dying to see the Musk movie, and I promise it to you is that I will see the Musk movie before Saturday. So we can talk about it on Saturday. Does that mean that I have to see it for four hours to sit in the movie theater? Of course you do. You can settle into the East Hampton or the Sag Harbour movie, houses both of which are delightful and let it wash it. Unless my children are ready to sit with me in a four-hour documentary about Elon Musk, I'm not going to be able to do it. Well, it depends how good the movie is, right? At 11, your daughter's 11, right? Yes, and she could do it, but my five-year-old. Why can't you? Why can't you? Five-year-old watch Toy Story 5 and the neighbouring in the adjacent. Because you get arrested if you. I suppose you do. Well, anyway, I actually am dying to see it, and I think this election has become about Elon Musk. We can vote Donald Trump out. We can't vote Elon Musk out. His money is everywhere. There's now rumours that he's invested a billion dollars into David Allison's new Warner Brothers studio. He's popping up everywhere. I think later on in today's episode, we're going to talk about a book about the Amorades, who did exactly the same thing. With unlimited money, they set out to use that money to influence influence American opinion and Dubai America's leaders. - Well, to buy Jared Kushner specifically. - Well, they would have bought anyone, yes, but Kushner was the easiest to buy yet. - Staying informed of what's going on in the world is overwhelming and with good reason in a time of media bias and mistrust, it's tough to know what the truth is. That's where our sponsor, Straight Arrow comes in. Straight Arrow focuses on the facts and context behind the stories that matter. Without manipulation, bias or an agenda, you're able to compare coverage across the political spectrum and get a clearer sense of what's actually happening. Instead of getting pulled into another media echo chamber, you can also start your weekday mornings with their fact-driven unbiased updates and go deeper into the issues influencing your everyday life. To me, that's what trustworthy journalism should do, help you understand what's happening instead of adding to the noise. If you want a better way to get your news and you haven't downloaded the Straight Arrow app yet, now's the time, they've just launched their subscription. A member's get access to exclusive discounts before everyone else. Go to S-A-N dot com slash daily beast to get the unbiased truth on the stories that matter only on the Straight Arrow app. Let's exit the echo chamber. - So we're going to talk about Jared Kushner and their book, "Princes and Thieves," which immediately sent me down the song, "Gipsies and the Thieves" by Cher, which we can't play sadly because it would just-- - We have it. - Too expensive to play. - We have the book, actually. - We have the book, and Michael's even read the book. - And I've read the book. - I've read the book. - I've spoken to the author. I'm very, I mean, this is one of the most important books of the Trump administration. - Great. - And this is said by a person who believes he has written four of the most important books about the Trump administration. - Yes, that is praise indeed, actually, that he should have that on the paper, Jacket. All right, so we're going to talk about that. We're going to talk about corruption and whether or not the largest story of corruption, whether or not it's a sleeper issue. You saw your friend, Barack Obama, now back on the campaign stage, campaigning is harder. - Finally. - In Michigan, yeah, very powerful. I mean, what a good campaigner. I mean, it feels historic when you see him on the campaign stage, I think. So we're going to talk about that and whether or not corruption is now resonating as an issue, which it really hasn't been. And then, of course, we could talk about Venezuela and the fact that I think perhaps unexpectedly, Maria Machado is back in Venezuela. - More problems for Trump. - Yeah, more problems for Trump. And possibly Marco Rubio, just as he was limbering up to set himself up for 2028, and most importantly, your old friend Jeffrey Epstein back and haunting the president in a report that the Democrats have produced, which is, what is it, 57 pages long? I got through, or 53 pages. I got through 27 of it. - The House Democrats on the Judiciary Committee have issued their own reports, essentially, what would be called a minority report. - Okay, which is very effective. - Well, it's very compelling. Yes, I mean. - You sent me a text saying, read the first page of this. 27 pages later, I looked up. And it's so compelling to read. And it's really a compilation of all the complaints against Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump. - I mean, I think that the effective thing about this is, is it makes the case, and in fact, let me say, it is the case that I have been arguing for many years now that when you, in order to understand who Donald Trump is, you have to understand his life in the 1990s with Jeffrey Epstein as his BFF or Wingman or whatever. Someone, he was all, I mean, they together, they pursued girls and money, and most specifically, models, that their obsession, their mutual obsession, their fundamental link was about models, models, models, they were a cult. It was almost, it's almost a, I think, probably a fetish that they were, they weren't interested in women per se, they were interested in women who were models. - And they had a network of modeling agencies. This is Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, and then three or four characters in Europe, Hallows and Poli, who owned ID models, and who Melania insists in her book, introduced her to Donald Trump. But according to this report, it's highly likely that Jeffrey Epstein, as you have always maintained, introduced Melania. - And as Melania has threatened to sue me, on precisely that issue. - Right, so I'm gonna read from the first page, the, I'm gonna read from the executive summary, and I really recommend reading this entire document, it is really compelling. And frankly, horrifying by the end of it, or only halfway through 27 pages in, I was just like, this is horrifying, I just don't think I can read anymore. The historical record shows that Trump was a close friend and confident of Epstein. Trump flew on his jet with Epstein's victims and made shared references to lusting after young women. We know all that. The record shows that Epstein and Trump worked with other predators like Paolo Zampoly and John Casablanca's exploited the thin veneer of professionalism offered by the 1990s modeling industry to lure victims into their orbit. The evidence, much of it's still hiding behind redactions in DOJ vaults, shows that Trump lied about kicking Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago club and strongly suggests that Epstein introduced Trump to his wife, Melania. The evidence demonstrates that Trump has lied about the nature and extent of his relationship with Epstein dozens of times, incriminating behavior for someone who supposedly has nothing to hide. And it's an indictment of the Epstein fight. - No, I mean, it's, to me, it's fascinating because basically that is a summary of exactly what I have said over now, many years. And this story has gone this way and that way and this person trying to, you know, that the Trump administration has said, "No, it's those people." And Trump has said not him, and then there's the all of the lies that Trump has spun, including that Mar-a-Lago lie, which I have flagged again and again in which the New York Times still always kind of says, "This is what Trump says." You can stop at the New York Times. It's not true. Trump did not expel Jeffrey Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. And it actually, I think it makes this, this report or this version of the story and of course is a version of the story, but it makes it easier to understand, you know, this idea of sex trafficking, I've always thought confuses everything. And what it is is this model thing. They were in business. They were, their network was this model network of these were girls who wanted to be models. They were, they thought Epstein and Trump were offering them something, and then this became the, this became the, I mean, it was for the girls. It was about careers for Epstein and Trump. It was about exploitation. It was about power and a lot of these girls were 14. They were being brought from Eastern Europe and Russia with the promise of what appeared to be a very exciting glamorous future. And they were all very pretty. The thing that they had in common was that these were exceptionally pretty girls or photogenics. So they had an opportunity to be a model. Some of them went on to be models. Most of them ended up either exploited or doing, you know, doing sort of terrible modeling jobs for which they got paid almost no money and then they filtered out of the industry. So again, these stories, this whole story, this long story of Epstein and Trump is difficult to understand. And people say, they've said to me for years, as I've been telling this story, well, you don't mean Donald Trump was interested, was a was a was a pito. You don't mean he was interested in young girls. And everybody goes, well, that's, I am he's the president of the United States. I mean, it seems the leap of understanding that that's required there is, I suspect, too great. But what is not hard to understand is that they were in this world of models. be in this world of models. They made money from it and they exploited it and they did this together. And that was the life of Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump for many, many years. Right. And they were passing girls to and from each other. And there was a premium on taking someone's virginity. That I don't know. I mean, I don't know. You can see it. You can see that, you know, in one, with one particular girl, Jeffrey Epstein is furious that Donald Trump says he's had sex with her and he goes on to rape her according to this document. And we should recommend everybody should read this because it's such, as you say, it just ties the pieces together so you can understand how they each set up modeling agencies. It just creates a world in which once you separate that and say, this is this is the world. This is the environment. This is this is the this is this the climate, the social climate in which they function. It makes sense. And you can say in Jeffrey Epstein is a bad guy and and focus there. But the real focus, I believe, is that should be on that Donald Trump is the president of the United States. He became the president of the United States. And this is this man. Again, Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump one ended up in the darkest prison, the other in the White House. And that is the story that that's going to confound history. It's very well put together. A lot of women contributed their stories to this and a lot of people have been instrumental in in helping Jamie Raskin, who also the document or under whose Idris this comes out, in making sense of of what is the complicated narrative. And of course we go back to the interview with Todd Blanch and Gillen Maxwell in Florida, where he specifically warns her off talking about a particular thing. And actually I read that transcript and sort of read over that didn't understand the significance of it. I feel compelled. The report is compelling and everybody should read it. But I also feel compelled to point out that this is a report on the part of the Democrats. It is basically a compilation of putting together press stories. Many of them clearly clear in their bias. And so again, this is hard, this is not in any way the last words, but it is a portrait that is certainly worth reading. Well, it's certainly worth reading. And also, of course, the timing you have said for some time, why aren't the Democrats using the Epstein story? Why aren't they using the Epstein files that Donald Trump and all his podcast is Dambon Gino Cash Patel all demanded be released. And then of course, the minute he got into office, they didn't want to release them. And then, you know, this is also, this is, this is also and this is part of the context of understandliness. They were the Democrats have released this in the week before the election. Right. Now, having said that, I'd also like to recall that we released you and I released before in the week before the 2024 election, essentially material tapes from Jeffrey Epstein talking in recordings about essentially saying exactly what this report is saying about Donald Trump. And what effect did that have? No, no, no effect at all. It has taken so long for people to understand the Epstein story is a real story and a real reflection on Donald Trump. It's just taken much longer than anyone would have expected. And again, let's emphasize that it is a reflection on Donald Trump. So the Epstein story, you can go this way and that way way about it. And there's all kinds of important components and all kinds of all kinds of of people are involved in this in doing things that clearly should not have been done. But really, that pales before the fact that Donald Trump, the man at the center of this story became the president of the United States. Right. And we should add that Donald Trump, of course, denies the allegations, but no wonder he has his people running the DOJ. No, of course, he denies these allegations. I mean, it's such a funny thing when people say, well, he Donald Trump denies these allegations when we know that, of course, he would deny these allegations. And of course, he is the world's greatest liar. We're going to flag up the address because I cannot recommend you reading this document highly enough. We will put the address on the screen if you're viewing. And if you're not, we will put it in the description, the episode description box to make sure that you have the opportunity to read it. I want to go to the day after the election. And this is related to the Elon Musk of it all. What happens? Let's just assume that my gut is right on this. And the United States Congress is taken over by the Democrats. What happens to all of the corporate suckups we've met for the past two years, almost two years now? And with Musk leading the pack, obviously. Do you mean what to the Democrats decide to do? Well, I think what do the Democrats do, but I'm almost more interested in what these, these guys, I think they're all, they're all guys. You mean what Mark Zuckerberg is, so Jeff Bezos. Yeah. So in such a, you know, on their belly fashion, what do they do now? How do they? Well, they do what CEOs always do, which is they pivot to the Democrats. And I'm sure that most of them have been playing both sides all along. I don't know, you know, this is a Democrat. I mean, these are, these examples are pretty abject. Remember, these are the guys who show up in the White House, sit around the cabinet table and offer Trump humiliating adulation and praise. What do they do now? They swivel to the Democrats. I mean, they're answerable to shareholders, right? The reason that they're going to. Yeah, it's not because they love Trump. It's because they've got a business to run and they don't want Trump to interfere and say, guess what? We're going to slam extra tariffs on you and China. Well, they have a, they have a credibility problem to say the least that you think you think they just ignore that and everybody just ignores that. I think people look at the stock price of the business and they think while Facebook are better, I think they look at Apple and they think that goodness I bought Apple shares three years ago. And what happens when they are hauled before Congress, which they all inevitably will be? I think they will say, look, we were put in an impossible position. The president made it clear. If we didn't do this, it would be bad for business. And I've also supported the Democrats. And I mean, remember, there's all sorts of lobbying going on in the background that we don't see. But we know that there are all sorts of lobbying efforts going on with Democrats and all sorts of funding of Democratic candidates. Well, and so you think that which is to say, are you saying that the Democrats will punt because they want the corporate money to? Yes, it's exactly what I'm saying. Well, that's, that's an interesting thing. So, so we're at this interesting moment. Will the Democrats want the money? Or will they want the, will they want the, you know, the votes really that they might get for a continuing tsunami of Trump contempt? What is more valuable to them? I think they're going to want to do business with Jeff Bezos. They want to going to do business with Apple. I think it's, I'm not sure that that's true. I think, I think the political, the political money, the political value is on the, will be on the side for months and months to come of, of, of, of damning anyone who was associated with Donald Trump. Well, and I'm sure that you will find CEOs having clashes with their schedules when they're supposed to be seeing the president or when the president wants to see them. I think you will see far fewer of those events, those state dinners where Donald Trump shows off the, essentially, people from Silicon Valley. I mean, it'll be very interesting to see what happens with the wealth tax in California and whether or not that gets passed. That's become a political hot potato for Democrats in California. But I think you're going to see as you are with politicians around Trump a separation. I want to ask you about that wealth tax. Why do you think that's a hot potato for Democrats? Because a lot of unions in California are against the wealth tax. - Yeah, I mean, who do they have to vote for? have Republicans to vote for our friend Steve Hilton is not going to be elected because of this wealth tax or because of anything else. Although I'm very fond of Steve. Well, we both said in fact, I got some criticism in the comments saying you're a friend of Steve Hilton. How could you be? Well, we're both longtime friends of Steve Hilton. And actually, I think he's run a good company. I love Steve Hilton. Both are seeing on the issues that actually matter to people, which is my son who I spent the weekend with lives in Los Angeles. And he came up with what I thought was a very good line because he was talking about the homelessness in LA. And he said, you know, he's lived in the first world. He's spent time in the third world. And he said, LA is really the fourth world. It's like first and third world together, but the level of homelessness and degradation and that there's nothing progressive about this. There is a, and this was a line that Daniel Lury at the mayor of San Francisco used in his campaign. There is nothing progressive. There are no progressive values about homeless people dying on the streets from drug overdoses. And it's a long, it's so overdue to someone. I couldn't agree more, but I want to just find the segway there. The segway there is damn it. I think Steve Hilton's been very effective on focusing on the issues which impact people in California. I don't think he's going to win by any chance, but I think he's focused in on the homelessness and the degradation for people living on the streets. And the fear that people have is they drive around LA. What do I want to say here? I want to say yes. Absolutely. Oh my God, we're not going to agree. No, we're not going to agree because I mean, everybody is focused on that issue. But the problem is no one has been able to solve that issue. So, and as much as I like Steve Hilton and I do, do I think Steve Hilton could solve the issue of homelessness in California? Well, I tell you what you're going to answer that question. I tell you what you do see and what people in San Francisco are saying is that the mayor there has made a remarkable difference. And it's true that you would go to San Francisco five, six, seven years ago, which I used to do regularly. And it was as if you were in the zombie apocalypse. There were so many people. You know that terrible thing that when you've had too much fentanyl, it causes you to do where you basically stand. No, I don't. Joanna. All right. Well, you you basically bend over standing. It's as if you are fallen asleep standing up and bending over. It was truly shocking the level of it in San Francisco. And you simply don't see that anymore. Okay. I hope Daniel Louis runs for president at some point because he seems highly, highly competent at getting that city sorted out. Can we move on to this other subject, which I find totally fascinating because it has been so glaring. And so I don't know difficult to difficult for everybody to grasp. Maybe because it has no clear characters and it's all about money. Trump has made since he came to the White House for this second time between two and four billion dollars. Let's just say that again between two and four billion dollars. You said he had a number which was a hundred billion. He wanted to leave the the White House having made twenty billion and with deals in place that would yield him a hundred billion, a when he returns to Mar-a-Lago for his family that this was his oligarch dream. So for his family who've essentially abandoned him, his wife is no longer there. He didn't go to his son's but they have not abandoned his money. I thought you were going to talk about these pictures connected. We can come back to corruption in a minute. But can I just I want to display these fantastic pictures for those listening. I'm actually pointing to pictures of Don Jr. in full camo gear with a Mongolian guide. He has gone hunting in Mongolia. It turns out this is a trip that he took in August with his friend the oligarch Umar Klemlev who paid for his wedding. Turns out he also paid for him to go on a hunting trip. My friend Umar. Umar Umar Klemlev who didn't attend the intimate wedding but paid for the wedding party and showed up and is inadvertently because he was clearly left out of the official pictures but he inadvertently crops up in some of Bettina Anderson, Don Jr.'s new wife's friends, Instagram posts, the tall man at the back. Okay, this is just we're segue into this corruption issue. And then there is a fantastic picture of Don Jr. here in full fur hat. He's got a falcon. I think that's is that a falcon or is it an eagle clutched on his arm with a man in full Mongolian dress? It's just fabulous. I really hope people can see these pictures. If you only listen, it's worth looking on YouTube for these pictures because they are fantastic. Anyway, let's get back to the corruption. Yeah, the level of corruption. And I think maybe the problem is the word corruption. Everybody hears the word corruption and so that's like, yeah, yeah, yeah. Although you know when when Barack Obama talked about incompetence and corruption, it got a huge chill. I think I think people, I mean, apparently, I mean, the polls are showing that this is finally emerging as a significant issue, which God knows it should. And maybe it is part of Elon Musk emerging as an issue. But this is, I mean, we have a White House. Let's, which is ruled on every level by how much money can be made. This is just pure, pure money. I mean, Donald Trump is the the the rap on Donald Trump is most often and ideological rap. But the truth is that the ideology, what does it mean to him? It is just it is the backstop for how much money he can make. Okay. Well, the other person that apparently has been making gobs of money. And we already know that he got two billion from the Saudis to set up Affinity Partner. His private equity venture investment fund is Jared Kushner. I know you've been meeting that old book. Okay. Here is here is the book, which I think is one of the most important written to date, other than my own, about about the the Trump era. And it's this book, which is really about Jared, Jared Kushner's relationship and through Jared, his father-in-law, Donald Trump's relationship to the Persian Gulf wealth. I mean, and so you can set this in a in a in a larger a larger context. One of the things that has happened in this the past decade or so, probably decade plus is that all of this money in the Persian Gulf, and specifically in Saudi Arabia and and the UAE, the United Arab Emirates, is that this money so much money so much so much free cash has become a central magnet of the world's financial system, the world's the world's commerce. Everybody wants Persian Gulf money. Because why? Because it's available. And it's unlimited. So that became when when when when the when Trump came into office in 2017, bringing along his son-in-law from who with with his relatively scant experience in the real estate business and having owned a a small newspaper in Manhattan. That's basically Jared. New York observer, which was essentially a real estate magazine. Well, it became a real estate magazine under Jared. Prior to that, it was not. It was a it was a kind of, you know, kind of interesting gossip lifestyle sheet on the Upper East side. He bought it for influence and then and then was annoyed that it wasn't making money and so he tried to turn it into a real estate sheet. But anyway, they came into the White House knowing nothing about nothing about nothing, including nothing about about diplomacy, nothing about the organization of the of the of the world order. And suddenly Jared, you received the portfolio of the Middle East. I mean, this is extraordinary. Jared Kushner, a person without any experience whatsoever, receives essentially a mandate from the President of the United States. Go go go deal with this. This issue and he becomes almost immediately a pawn of of the money in the Middle East. And he and can we say a pawn and a beneficiary? Yes, well, then upon and then and then he became obviously enamored with the money in the Middle East, although he is then has an official position in the White House. He is still functioning essentially as a as a person, not without an official position, a, you know, a, a business guy, a hopeful business guy. I need, I need money. I need capital. In that four years, he makes relationships with, with the, with the money in the East, with the key figures in the Middle East, which would be NBC, who runs the United Arab Emirates, and MBS, who runs Saudi Arabia, the two princes. And and then reaps the benefit of when he is out of the White House, starts his own fund, fund wholly based on Middle Eastern Persian Gulf money. And then in this next administration comes back in, but, but even here, I mean, he understands it's much easier to function if you're not an official. So he is, he is within this White House has all the power of an official and none of the responsibilities of an official and is crafting instrumental in crafting the policy in the Middle East, which will benefit him and the Trump family. Well, and one of the things I haven't read the book, but I did read Finta No Tools review of the book in the New York Times today. And one of the things he says in it is that actually it leads up to the war on Iran, because the UAE hates Iran. They also hate Qatar. Jared is trying to play them off against each other as is Trump. And essentially, this is part of what drives Trump's bombing campaign on Iran. Yeah. So anyway, this this book, there's a couple of interesting things now about this book is that Jared has, of course, of course, responded and say this is this is categorically untrue. This is insanity. And in actually Matthew Cole, the author of this of this this book, who I don't know, but who called me when he was doing a research for this book. So so I am a minor source in this book. But he also called me yesterday. And because the book is coming out, Jared is threatening him. And so he called me and said, well, what do you, you know, he's threatening him with legal action? Yeah. And and he is in Matthew Cole said, you know, I just, whatever, because I've gone through this, whatever advice you can you can offer. So I think I offered him a little advice. I mean, I said, you know, this is when when when and he was doing some television yesterday and say, what do I say when when you know, when they say, well, Jared says, this isn't true. And I think, and again, that's one of those one of those things that people say in the the media feels it has, it has it is compelled to give equal weight to that kind of of of denial. I think a cut, you know, he's also been incredibly arrogant about previous layers of diplomats, which we know the State Department has been hollowing out. There are all sorts of ambassador jobs, which haven't been filled. His arrogant sort of saying, oh, these are all experts. They're people who've studied the history of these places. But there's nothing like a business deal to pull people together. That's the way to get peace done as he and Steve Wyckoff, as you frequently pointed out, was Trump's golfing buddy have trotted around the world and consistently failed to deliver. Right. And this is and in part of part of the point of this book is that they they did become pawns. They are being played by all of this money. I mean, the other thing that Matthew Cole told me is that is that when Jared came out and said, this is not true. And I'm going to sue you. That Matthew Cole's appearances on CNN were immediately canceled. So once again, and I mean, that happened that happened in my last book that that's exactly what happened to me. And once again, the media on this runs scared of the Trump administration, they just run scared. They're just they're just cowards there. I mean, what I mean, you just have to sort of shrug which I discuss this with Matthew Cole. There's there's there's nothing you can do. They are going to do the most on their belly things. Well, what what I find interesting is it's published by Simon and Schuster, which is now owned by KKR, right? KKR bought it. What, last year? So I wonder if KKR will come under pressure from Trump or from Jared to either bury the book or and it feels like it came out and so it suddenly came out. Vanity Fair had an excerpt of it. I didn't know about it. Did you know about it? Well, I know about it because I've said because you've spoken to him, of course, but it feels like it came out sort of under the cover of of secrecy. Well, that's how that's how these books do that. That's how you try to publish these these books. So the other interesting thing about it is that there are apparently screen grabs of Jared's phone, right? Which is presumably what gave Simon and Schuster the confidence that this was real. The Dutch intelligence discovered that the Russians had hacked Jared's phone and then had screen grabs of activity on the phone. Yeah, no. I mean, I think the the glowing review in the New York Times today will help the book. I mean, it's that kind of thing. Everybody, everybody stands back and says, you know, I mean, everybody is afraid, especially CNN, especially CNN. Well, what is your advice to Matthew Cole? Because because when you were in that position with all or nothing, you went on to Instagram. I just said, I just said, I can't, I'm not going to do this anymore and and converted myself into and with the aid of my wife, by the way, into, you know, build a social media platform. I mean, you cannot trust any of these traditional media platforms of media companies, which are owned by other media companies, which are in turn owned by other media companies, which are ultimately owned by the Saudis and the Amarades. Right. Right. Well, this might be a perfect time to say we are independent media. Please subscribe to inside Trump's head on the daily beast. And CNN, by the way, it has been acquired by a company. It's been acquired by Paramount, which I think they've changed now to Skydance was the original company Warner Brothers and Paramount. So CBS and Warner Brothers, which includes CNN are now part of the same company and the within within an enormous amount of Persian Gulf money that has that's involved in this investment. So do you think Jarrah does, Sue? I mean, he certainly making noises about it. He issued a very strenuous denial. No, of course, I don't think you'll see. Of course, of course, he won't. I mean, he can't, he can't sit for a deposition. I mean, can't be asked publicly about these these things. So should Matthew Cole welcome his, you know, say bring it on. Let's say, yes, bring it on. Yes, bring it on. Absolutely. Okay, so princes and thieves. And the review in today's times by by also another incredibly good writer. And fantastic writer. Okay. So we're not the only people having elections. It's the Israeli election today as we're recording this. So too early to know what's going to happen. We had the results of Brazil and Serbia on Sunday. What do you think is inside Donald Trump's head about these results? I just want to, I just flag my, my own a sub stack piece that I wrote this week about about what I character, I'm characterizing now as the age of the age of assholes with Vivek Ramaswami being being being number one, a number one example, but obviously Trump is a is a glaring example. And with the thesis being that that it used to be that that politicians sought some amount of moderation and tried to be somewhat sympathetic in their in their in their presentation. And now the opposite has happened. And obviously influenced by Donald Trump. But Vivek Ramaswami doubling down on that hard advertisement. This is the act where he uses Amy Acton, who's his opponent's mother from whom she was estranged because Amy Acton's stepfather had raped her. Right. And also JD Vance, who has tried to transform himself into a, you know, into quite an asshole, but also Netanyahu. Another clear, I am going to be everything, everything that so many people are going to hate about me. I am, I am, I am going to break, essentially break through, brand myself by being hated by so many people. And what about Bolsonaro? You could add him to the list. Absolutely. Absolutely. But Bolsonaro. So, so the question now is, do we see this shift? Is Vivek Ramaswamy going to lose, I believe he is going, going to lose? Bolsonaro or the son of Bolsonaro has lost, surprisingly lost. And I think, I mean, many, many people thought, oh my god, here we go again. But no, in Serbia, the Serbian, strong man, defeated by a student movement. I mean, it's, it's sort of, I don't know, are we, is this a shift? Are we? Well, and the fact that both of them conceded, I sort of feel certain that Donald Trump was on speed dial to Bolsonaro saying, don't concede, don't concede. There was some sort of shenanigans at one point. He didn't concede immediately, but then he did. The Serbian, strong man conceded. What will happen with Netanyahu if he doesn't win? It may not be a conclusive result. No, it will, it will probably not. I mean, there's a lot of, there's a lot of people running. I mean, it very well may be that he will yet once again, that assholeism will prevail. And Netanyahu will still be in place. I don't know. Well, talking of assholes, Victor Urban is now the Americans. Oh my god, lead the UN. And of course, China's choice, and it looks like, well, clearly actually Russia's choice to run the U.N. So he's running for that alongside. I think the other front run is the two women, one from Costa Rica, and one from the U.A.E. That's even, I can't fathom that. This is, so the U.S. is, is our person is Victor Urban to run the United States? JD Vance, do you remember famously, famously campaigned for, and Victor Urban, surprising, still lost, even after JD Vance strutting around on stage, and then paging in Donald Trump. Do you remember the whole performance of that? Donald Trump knew he was going to lose, which is why he sent JD Vance. And now, Machado, the key opposition figure is returning to Venezuela. She has returned to Venezuela. Now, let's remember the setup there is, okay, we, we deposed the leader. We invaded Venezuela throughout Maduro. Maduro, Nicholas Maduro and his wife, who announced sitting in a Brooklyn jail. Yes, and then took over. So we, we have been as anti-democratic as the, as the Maduro people were before us. Well, and then we installed his number two, Delci Rodriguez, to run the country. Exactly, so we, so we, we've just created our a version. It was Maduro's kleptocracy, now it's ours. So, but Machado, a legitimate, a democratic political figure has now returned, calling for elections. Elections will be, will deeply, inevitably disrupt Donald Trump's plans for Venezuela. Well, and does this also pitch Marco Rubio against Donald Trump here? Because Marco Rubio does appear to want elections in Venezuela, doesn't he? I mean, at one point, Machado was actually stopped from returning. I don't know what Marco Rubio wants at this point. Marco Rubio, at this point is, is a, it exists only in the shadow of Donald Trump. Does he get out of the shadow? Does he want to get out of the shadow? What has has his entire belief system changed? Apparently, people's entire belief systems can change JD Vance, being changes again and again and again. I don't, I don't know. I don't, this is going to be a very complicated thing for the Trump White House to play, making it more if they lose the United States Congress even more complicated. So, what do we think for Machado's chances of having a free and fair election? I think they're inevitable. Do you think they're inevitable? Yeah, I mean whether, whether this year next or beyond Donald Trump? Yeah. I think they will do everything they can to stop doing that. Absolutely. But, you know, but we're seeing and I think we're beginning to see the Serbia, the student movement and Serbia fascinating. Okay. Well, we'll be back on Thursday to figure out what's happened in the 48 hours between now and then. We do have however, two limericks, one from Garfred and one from edits, from Garfred. With a 50 mil wink, he anointed Alina Haber. While the critics cry foul and the talking heads jabber, I think we might be talking heads jabbering. For his silence was gold and her scruples were sold and the lesson is clear, be Alina grabber. Jesus. Very well done. Very well done. Another point of corruption. There's so many points of corruption here in this image. Actually, I think we can go everybody in this administration is corrupt, is on the take. Well, we have Kuri Londowski finally being investigated by the DOJ for his links to all sorts of contracts, right? He didn't get paid as Christy Nome, who was the secretary or their secretary. But that becomes another, another doubling down on corruption. Donald Trump is, doesn't like Kuri Londowski is punishing Kuri Londowski in order. So his way of punishing him is to prosecute him. Comey, we haven't discussed. I mean, for the third time, the third time being indicted by the DOJ, the former head of the FBI. No, I mean, there is something in this, this goes to this thing. Donald Trump gets something in his head and neither sense nor logic can get it out of his head. What didn't you say it was because he couldn't stand the fact that Kuri was so much all of it. Well, that is, yeah, for whatever reason, it's comey, comey on the brain for Donald Trump. And so in every time they, the Justice Department prosecutes, tries to prosecute him, gets thwarted in this, then they go back because Trump is saying because he doesn't deviate, do it, do it, find something else. Well, and top lunch is doing exactly what he's doing. Todd Lynch, I want to talk about that. What does, and maybe we should do this on, on Thursday, what does a, a Democratic Congress do with Todd Blanche? Well, do they relentlessly subpoena him? They relentlessly, they do relentlessly subpoena. They investigate him. And you know, there's the thing, you know, they, you obviously can impeach your president, but you can impeach all of the people who have are in their jobs because of, because they've been confirmed by the United States Senate. Right. And again, you think of Todd Blanche, you know, if someone had told Todd Blanche at the age of 15, you're going to be a tourney general of the United States. He'd have probably been so thrilled and excited. And then he would never have believed him on his head. And Donald Trump is going to be your president, and you're going to be required to do exactly what he tells you to do. No, I can't get into Todd Blanche's head. That's, that's a, that's a, even for you, it's a, it's a journey. That's a moral confusion that I, that I can't, I can't, I can't penetrate. It's a journey too far. All right. One more limerick from edits. His rallies have descended into purest inality, nonsense and fast, laced with profanity. And when the voters in November, his majorities, dismember, he will kiss goodbye to whatever is left of his sanity. I have something to add, which I've been meaning, meaning to add. And it's about, it's about whatever is happening, the level to which Donald Trump has degraded or started making noises. He's become completely disinhibited. Is that what you're looking for? Yeah. Or whatever is happening, whatever this transformation, which is either rage or age or I don't or stage. Yes, but and one of the things it has been accompanied by is is profanity. And when I was talking to Jeffrey Epstein about Donald Trump, he said Donald Trump, I mean, among his, he had a lot of, a lot of phobias, a lot of things. He didn't like people who drank, he didn't like these kinds of, he didn't like people who didn't wear suits, but he didn't like people who swore and he never swore. That's interesting. Yeah. So it's the increasing, it's the creeping, I think, I mean, according to Dr. John Kartener, frontotemporal dementia that's beginning and this one is far back. I mean, it's also, you know, also rage, frustration and then the theater of it all, does he find that those lines play? But you must have seen those clips where he's just making strange noises. Yes, I have. I mean, I mean, and you can see when they pan the panel, sometimes I feel I'm just making strange noises. Michael Wolfe, I've talked to you at non-stop for the last two years, you haven't made a single strange noise. You may have come up with the occasional strange statement, but you don't make strange guttural, animalistic noises. I feel I do. You actually don't. I mean, you can see the people in the crowd behind him and inadvertently, you know, that it's shown on stage. This isn't good for Republicans and they just look embarrassed for him. I mean, and you see, in particular, there's one guy that the camera's focus on why he's just like, what was that? What was that strange noise? It's Trump said something about, you know, and I pointed the governor and he's like, what? What was that noise? It's the beginning of the end. Is that noise in so many ways? Michael, always good to talk to you. We'll be back on Thursday with more journeys inside Trump's head. Always good to talk to me. Always talking to me. Michael's always talking. I think if I'm not there, you're still talking. When I leave this studio, you're still here just talking into the microphone. Make it noise strange noises. Making strange noises. If you have been, thank you for joining us. Don't forget to subscribe to the Daily Beast podcast, wherever you get your podcast. Leave us a comment. Do you make strange noises? What do you think, Donald Trump's strange noises were actually about? And a big thanks to our production team today, led by Ryan Murray, John Romero, Rachel Passo, Heather Bessaro, and Neil Rosenhouse. So the good news is we have so many BB beast tier members now. There are too many names to read out, and we really appreciate your support.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The public's contempt for Donald Trump is growing so strongly that it may outweigh Republican financial advantages, potentially leading to a Democratic victory in the Senate.
  2. Elon Musk’s massive spending on election campaigns, including over $250 million in Texas, is being framed as a direct threat to democratic integrity, with James Talerico running on a platform against Musk’s influence.
  3. A newly released Democratic report details deep connections between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging shared networks, exploitation of young models, and Trump’s lies about expelling Epstein from Mar-a-Lago.
  4. Jared Kushner, with no diplomatic experience, has been deeply involved in Middle Eastern policy and wealth deals, and his book *Princes and Thieves* reveals how Persian Gulf money shaped Trump administration decisions and policies.
  5. The report and public scrutiny suggest a broader pattern of corruption and financial impropriety within the Trump administration, with figures like Kuri Londowski and James Comey facing investigations.
  6. A shift in political culture is emerging, where "assholeism" — aggressive, adversarial leadership — is dominant, exemplified by Trump, Vivek Ramaswamy, JD Vance, and Bolsonaro.
  7. Events in Venezuela, with María Corina Machado’s return and calls for free elections, threaten Trump’s control over Latin American policy and may destabilize his global strategy.
  8. The Democratic Congress may pursue aggressive investigations of Trump allies and former officials, focusing on accountability and transparency in the face of widespread corruption allegations.

Summary:

The transcript explores a growing consensus that Donald Trump is widely viewed as a deeply corrupt and uncontroversial figure, with public contempt potentially overcoming Republican financial power. A major turning point is the release of a Democratic report linking Trump and Jeffrey Epstein to a network of model exploitation and lies, which underscores a broader pattern of financial impropriety and power abuse. This narrative is amplified by allegations that Jared Kushner, a key Trump ally, used Middle Eastern wealth to influence foreign policy, and that figures like Elon Musk are using vast resources to shape elections.

The political climate is shifting toward a new era of "assholeism," where aggressive, divisive leadership dominates, seen in Trump, JD Vance, and Bolsonaro. Events in Venezuela, where opposition leader María Corina Machado returns to demand free elections, further threaten Trump’s control and suggest a broader unraveling of his influence. The Democratic Party is poised to use investigative power to hold Trump allies accountable, with investigations into figures like Comey and Londowski revealing systemic corruption.

Meanwhile, the public’s awareness of these issues—fueled by media exposure and documentary-style reporting—is growing rapidly, signaling a significant transformation in American politics. The overarching narrative is one of moral and institutional erosion, where power is increasingly tied to money, personal connections, and spectacle, rather than governance or public service.

FAQs

The speaker believes the Democrats are likely to win the Senate, citing widespread contempt for Donald Trump and the overwhelming power of that sentiment, even in the face of Republican financial advantages.

Elon Musk is seen as a major influence, having poured over $250 million into Texas and reportedly investing billions in media and film. His presence is shaping the election narrative, with candidates like Jim Talleriko directly targeting him as a symbol of election interference.

Yes, a recent Democratic report details a long-standing relationship between Trump and Epstein, including claims that Epstein introduced Trump to Melania, that Trump lied about expelling Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, and that both men exploited young models through modeling agencies.

These leaders are expected to pivot their loyalty to the Democrats to protect business interests, despite past support for Trump, and may face pressure to avoid policies that could harm their stock prices or operations.

Machado’s return and calls for free and fair elections in Venezuela are seen as a direct challenge to Trump’s plans, potentially disrupting his influence in Latin America and signaling a broader shift in global political dynamics.

The speaker notes increasing profanity and erratic behavior in Trump’s public appearances, suggesting possible signs of frontotemporal dementia, along with rage and emotional instability, which may signal a deeper transformation in his mental state.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.