Why are you looking for a new job? Interview Question Answered

It's considered this, where every day we go deep on one big news story. Today, President Trump is trying to change how elections are run. One way is by attacking voting by mail. And hopefully there will be no corrupt mail-in ballots, which if you watched California and so many other places, mail-in ballots are inherently corrupt. That's Trump speaking during a prime time address in July. The president has long repeated baseless claims about election fraud. The spring, he signed an executive order seeking to restrict mail-in voting. The order has been blocked as it makes its way through the courts. Meanwhile, state election officials who are in charge of running elections are preparing for November's midterms. I do not see any competent way that the federal government and the United States Postal Service are going to be able to do what they want to do in a very short period of time. Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar speaking to NPR this week. What we're asking voters to do is make a plan. If you're going to use mail-in ballots, mail them a week before Election Day. If you're going to use a mail-in ballot and wait closer to Election Day, take it to a polling location and drop it off in a drop box so that we know it's in the possession of the county so that it can get processed in time and it can get counted. Consider this. The Trump administration is trying to overhaul key aspects of how elections are run. If the midterms fast approaching, where do things stand? From NPR, I'm Wanna Summers. This message comes from progressive insurance. Insurance isn't one-size-fits-all. That's why drivers have enjoyed progressives and name your price tool for years now. With the name your price tool, you tell them what you want to pay and they'll show you options that fit your budget. So whether you're picking out your first policy or just looking for something that works better for you and your family, they make it easy to see your options. Visit progressive.com, progressive casualty insurance company and affiliates, price and coverage match limited by state law. Support for this NPR podcast and the following message come from Carvana. Selling your car, Carvana has offers so good they're almost inexplicable. Sell your car 100% online in minutes. Visit Carvana.com today. This message comes from Thumbtech. Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start? Thumbtech knows homes so you don't have to. Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin, or what that clunking sound from your dryer is? With Thumbtech, you don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews all on the app. Download today. It's considered us from NPR. Throughout a second term, President Trump has repeatedly sought to upend the U.S. voting system. He's launched investigations into the 2020 election, issued executive orders that have attempted to add new restrictions, and demanded voter data from states. What could this mean for the midterms? NPR voting correspondent Miles Parks and congressional reporter Eric McDaniel, or here to talk it through with us. Hi there. Hey, hi there. Miles, I want to start with you. Could you just help us understand how the Trump administration has tried to change the lay Americans vote? Sure. I will also note at this point that for most voters, this election is on pace to look basically identical to 2024, 2022, basically previous election cycles, even though Trump's actions have inserted a lot of uncertainty. The president notably assigned two executive orders, one aimed at new registration requirements, the other at voting by mail, and both at this point have been blocked by the courts. The Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security are both also investigating the 2020 election, as well as voter fraud more broadly in novel new ways, and that has many experts and officials worried about what that effort could potentially look like as this election gets underway specifically on this issue of potential law enforcement interference in either voting or vote counting. It's not just the election administrators, it's Democrats as a whole. I've been reporting on a task force in the Senate where at least 11 Democratic offices, their staff, outside litigators, and cross ideological, good governance groups are all working to respond to what they describe as active threats to the election process, as well as prepare for future threats. That's everything from issues at a single voting location to Trump dispatching federal troops or ICE agents to the polls. Troops at polling sites? Trump was asked by PBS News back in May, Liz Landers asked about whether he would dispatch the National Guard or ICE agents to voting sites, and he refused to rule it out. He said he'd do anything necessary to protect elections. We should say Troops at polls is illegal, and when I asked the Department of Homeland Security about this specifically, an official told me that ICE agents would not be sent to the polls, and the administration refused to engage with me on what they describe as hypotheticals. Okay, I want to note here that elections themselves, and here we're talking about the actual process of casting a vote to choose your representation that is supposed to be a nonpartisan function of our government. So, I wonder, is that changing, is this becoming a partisan issue? Not at the administrative level, really. There are very few election officials, including Republicans who have bought into Trump's level of election denial. It's just a lot easier for Democrats to talk about the worst case scenarios that they're watching for, considering that elected Republicans have to obviously worry about the political ramifications of opposing Trump, especially at this early stage, where we haven't seen a lot of these interference efforts actually take place yet. Right, Eric. Is there a partisan divide in who is actually pushing back publicly? As far as elected officials on this task force, it's explicitly a democratic effort. When Republicans talk about election integrity, which they do, they're not addressing Trump's interventions, or proposed interventions in the voting process, they're talking about this more or less imaginary problem of ineligible folks casting ballots in American elections, which investigations and research showed and has shown over and over again, is not widespread enough in the United States to shape election outcomes. White House spokeswoman Lauren Bis told me, quote, "President Trump has been clear and he is absolutely right. We fix this now, or we lose our country." That's a call to pass his election overhaul legislation the Save America Act. Separately wanna, it's worth remembering before he was speaker of the House, then Congressman Mike Johnson played a central role in Trump's legal efforts to remain in power in 2020 and 2021, despite losing the presidential re-election effort. I'll be watching to see if Republican lawmakers do take action if some of the big fears of federal involvement in elections like troops at polls come to pass. Right, okay, but elections, they're run by states. How is all of this playing out for the people who are actually in charge of administering elections? It's complicated. They're threading this needle of not wanting to scare people, but also wanting to talk about some of these issues so that way they can reassure voters that the election system is secure and that it is safe to vote. I was talking about this dynamic this summer, with a few election officials at an event hosted by the Center for Election Innovation and Research, and Connecticut Secretary of State, Democrat Stephanie Thomas told me that people approach her all the time who are worried and can't even really describe why. Grandmothers approach me, concerned, and I say, "What are you concerned about?" And they say, "I don't know. I just feel afraid." So regardless of whether or not any of these things materialize, it is taking a toll on voters. You know, it's worth noting, Lana, that midterm elections are already much lower turnout elections than presidential's 2022, for instance, lagged way behind 2020, 2024 in terms of turnout. So there's a risk that these sort of ambiguous worries kind of amplify that effect. And Eric, Republicans are in control of both chambers of Congress and they control what comes up for a vote. So what does that leave Democrats actually able to do, whether than sounding the alarm speaking out? I mean, they're planning, right? They've held tabletop games, so they're not caught off guard by the same failure of imagination, but they described to me as a failure of imagination that caught them off guard five or six years ago, around January 6th. Allied groups are also directly involved in litigation to stop the Department of Justice from obtaining state voter rolls, which they describe both as federal overreach and a pretext to income, to income bar eligible voters. Democrats also have this massive bully pulpit, lawmakers are some of the most visible folks in their communities, and they're trying to be the connective tissue between local officials and these national resources. Vitaly, Task Force members want to emphasize that they feel prepared and that voters should feel confident casting their ballot. Here's Vanita Gupta, a Task Force advisor who was the number three in Biden's Department of Justice. She's now at New York University Law School. Maybe the process of getting from here to a new Congress may be messier than any of us would like, but we are going to have free and fair elections so long as people don't take for granted, they're right to vote. Miles, there are still voting issues before the courts, so what else could still affect this fall's elections? I mean, the thing is we don't really know, right? Trump is incredibly unpredictable and voting officials say, preparing for all the different scenarios is almost like preparing for a hurricane, where you don't know exactly what's going to happen. That said, election officials are feeling pretty confident right now. The law is very clear on who runs elections and protecting voters rights, so now it's just a question of reaching these voters and reassuring them. And here's Miles Parks and Eric McDaniel, thanks to both of you. Thank you. Thank you. This episode was produced by Alejandra Marquez-Hance, with audio engineering by Ted Meebein and Quacy Lee. Our director is Jonas Adams. It was edited by Kelsey Snell, 10-Beat-Aremias, and Christopher and Talyada. Our interim executive producer is Courtney Dorning. And a thank you to our consider this plus listeners who support the work of NPR journalists and help keep public radio strong. Supporters also hear every episode without messages from sponsors and unlock bonus episodes of consider this. Learn more at plus.npr.org. It's consider this from NPR. I'm Wannis Honors. Amazon Prime members can listen to consider this sponsor-free through Amazon Music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get NPR+ at plus.NPR.org. That's plus.NPR.org. Fall is right around the corner. That means the midterms. Hey, it's Miles Parks from the NPR Politics Podcast. Now is the perfect time to calibrate your news diet for the fall. Also our show for short daily episodes that will help you stay ahead of the most important mid-term storylines that you need to follow. Find the NPR Politics Podcast on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.