The transcription contrasts two main themes: modern business automation tools and the historical rivalry between Netflix and Blockbuster. Vanta simplifies security and compliance by automating evidence collection, reducing audit preparation time by 82%, and helping over 15,000 companies build trust. Similarly, ODO offers an integrated business software platform that replaces multiple costly apps with one solution for CRM, accounting, inventory, and more. The core narrative then shifts to the Netflix vs. Blockbuster story. In the 1990s, Blockbuster dominated video rentals with a massive chain of stores, generating $6 billion annually, but relied heavily on late fees (managed dissatisfaction) and poor customer service. Netflix, founded by Reed Hastings, introduced DVD-by-mail with no late fees, initially offering convenience and a wider selection. Blockbuster’s CEO dismissed Netflix as insignificant but later attempted to compete by copying its model and launching "Total Access," which combined online and in-store rentals. For a time, Blockbuster succeeded, even causing Netflix to lose subscribers. However, Blockbuster’s underlying business flaws and investor pressure hindered its long-term adaptation. Ultimately, Netflix’s customer-centric innovation prevailed, leading to Blockbuster’s decline and the end of video stores, illustrating how established giants can be disrupted by agile startups.
Security program on spreadsheets, new regulations piling up, and audit dread, it's time for Vanta. Vanta automates security and compliance, brings evidence into one place, and cuts audit prep by 82%. Less manual work, clear visibility, faster deals, zero chaos. Call it compliance, or call it "com-pliance". Get it? Join the 15,000 companies using Vanta to prove trust. Go to vant.com/com. Support for the show comes from ODO. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing ODO. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part? ODO replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try ODO for free at odu.com. That's odo.com. One of the analysts asked John Antioca the CEO of Blockbuster, "What do you think of Netflix?" And he was furious. He's like, "Do not ask me about that stupid little company. They're a nat. They're nothing. They're nobody and people are never going to give up their video stores." It's almost impossible to imagine now. But not very long ago, if you wanted to watch a movie at home, you had to leave your house to go rent a movie from Blockbuster. Ridiculous, right? Read Hastings Thoughts O2. So he created Netflix which lets you sit at home, hit a button, and have a movie delivered to your living room. We all know what happened eventually. Hastings was right. Netflix won and Blockbuster went away. But sure didn't seem obvious back then. Blockbuster was the giant that owned video rentals. It should have squashed Netflix. Just ask Hastings. There was 20 times larger than us, which is not a good place to be. Okay, so in many ways, why I feel like so randomly lucky to have survived. They were the dominant firm in video rental. And we were this tiny little up squeakin' normally as you grow. There's lots of ways to get beat. I'm Peter Kafka. And I'm Ronnie Mola. And this is Land of the Giants, the Netflix effect, the podcast about how Netflix disrupted Hollywood, changed the way we watched TV and movies, and how it should have been squashed by a giant competitor. But ended up turning the tables and killing the video store. Okay, Peter, let's go back in time. Long before we had Netflix and chill, we had Blockbuster nights. Remember this? Tonight, make it a blockbuster night. In the 90s and early 'Outs, Blockbuster was the world's largest video rental chain. It was a huge part of American culture. At its peak, it was bringing in $6 billion a year in revenue and had more than 9,000 stores around the globe. It was the place to rent movies. It was a social place like teens would meet there, you know, people, you know, because that was one of the few things that you could always do. As a high school student, you know, you could get together with your friends and rent a movie and go to the cool parents house and watch it. I remember there's a copy of the wizz that I would like hide in a corner at Blockbuster because I always wanted it to be there when I would come back for it. And we would go in their car, then go into Blockbuster and we'd pick out a movie and then we'd get a little treat, you know. I don't know, we'd pick two, two, three movies, a scary one, a funny one, and then an action one. Nobody has the movie I want. Hey, if it's a video, Blockbuster probably has it. I mean, we have over 10,000 videos. Wow. Five, six o'clock on a Friday night phones are ringing off the hook. It's never what do you have that's good. It's always what do you have that's new. That last voice is Jason Bailey. Nowadays he writes about movies, replaces like Vulture and The New York Times. But years ago, he used to work at a bunch of video stores, including Blockbuster, which he says wasn't as great as we might remember. I have much more nostalgia for the video store than I do for Blockbuster in particular, which really in a lot of ways killed the video store, flattening it into the sort of McDonald's version of the video store. Right. That's what I remember about Blockbuster. It killed my local video store and it replaced it with Blockbuster, which I did not like. Blockbusters were everywhere and everyone rented from there, but that didn't mean it was a great customer experience. One of the big things that you always hear people who don't remember Blockbuster through a Golden Globe nostalgia talk about were the late fees. Whereas they tried to rebrand them additional day fees or additional rental fees. They were outrageous. Blockbuster made a ton of money on late fees. Those are additional day fees, Ronnie. At one point, late fees made up 70% of Blockbusters' profit. And along with those high late fees, there were a long list of other problems, limited new releases, long lines, shitty customer service. All of which is lousy for customers, which also made it lousy for employees. I got cursed out of fair amount. Just trying doing what I was told to do by corporate. But yes, I would be told that we were monsters, that we were blood suckers. I had that F&T back on time. I saw you take it out of the box. I was like, I got called out like that. I had people telling me, I saw you in here when I dropped it off. You tell me you didn't check it in on time. I'm not paying that. It got heated. But this was all factored into Blockbuster's business model. The company even had a term for it. Managed dissatisfaction. Disatisfaction is a term that John Antiocho, the CEO of Blockbuster, explained to me. And that is, as long as you give a consumer enough of what they want, they will ignore the fact that they're not always getting what they want. This is Gina Keating. She's a journalist who covered Netflix for Reuters. She also wrote a book and made a documentary about Netflix's history. Blockbuster understood that only 20% of customers who came in would get the movie that they wanted. And they would have to get something else the other 80% of the time. They weren't happy, but they weren't horribly angry. Managed dissatisfaction is one of the great corporate euphemisms for screw you, give us your money that you are ever going to hear. And if you can't remember what it was like to go to Blockbuster, a current analogy would be like an airplane. You want airplanes or like where it sucks in every way. And if you want to improve it in any way, you have to pay additional fees for everything. That is Blockbuster in a nutshell in the 90s. Yeah, customers felt trapped. And with all the smaller mom and pop stores being squeezed out, they didn't really have a better alternative. And then all of a sudden, they did. Again, you got to remember that Netflix emerged in the late 90s when the internet still felt pretty new. Amazon was just becoming really successful selling books online. They were doing it cheaper than the competition and they didn't have to operate stores. So read Hastings and Mark Randolph, two tech guys in the Bay Area are surveying the landscape and they thought, hey, we could be the Amazon of something else. Go to Netflix.com, make a list of the movies you want to see. And in about one business day, you'll get three DVDs. Keep them as long as you want without late fees. DVDs had just come out. And suddenly, there was this new way to watch movies that didn't involve these bulky VHS tapes. DVDs were smaller, more durable, and you could ship them for the price of a postage stamp. So Hastings and Randolph thought, hey, we could be the Amazon of movies. This may seem obvious now, but at the time this was a big deal. Suddenly, instead of having to go to the store and deal with a crummy customer experience, you could stay home, you could hit a button, and someone somewhere sent you the DVD you wanted. Instead of the one you had to settle for, which Netflix customers loved, by the way. They tended to order the kind of movies that Blockbuster didn't feature or even carry it all. While the indie movies and older movies and Blockbuster was focused on what was new. And Netflix had another big advantage. While Blockbuster's business model was based on late fees, the things customers hated, Netflix didn't have any late fees. This was a huge part of Netflix's marketing pitch. Hastings even made a part of the Netflix origin story. Here he is on Charlie Rose. Frankly, I got a big late fee, $40 late fee. And it was no one's fault but my own. And why I remember it so clearly as I paid it and was going home and I remember I didn't want to tell my wife about it. And I thought, "Oh great, now I'm kind of compromised in the integrity of my marriage over this late fee." In the year 2000, Netflix was growing. It had a small but loyal customer base. But keep in mind, this was also right around the time of the.com bubble bursting. And Netflix was going up against Blockbuster, which was gigantic. And tech, anytime a new startup shows up, they have to explain why the big guys who are already there, the ones are supposed to disrupt, aren't going to crush them instead. And Netflix got asked this all the time. This wasn't a dumb question, by the way. Turns out Netflix was making contingency plans for this very scenario. Hastings and his co-founder, Mark Randolph, spent months trying to get a meeting with Blockbuster's top executives so they can make this pitch. They would sell their company to Blockbuster for $50 million. And Blockbuster would keep running its stores, and Netflix would run Blockbuster.com. They basically got laughed out of the building. And keep in mind, Blockbuster is a $6 billion company at the time. This is what it would call a tuck-in, right? $50 million means nothing to Blockbuster. It's a rounding error. So it easily could have bought Netflix if it wanted to, and it's still ignored it. Blockbuster was acting totally unconcerned about Netflix. But Netflix did have some reasons to be optimistic. It was the first to do online rentals, and it was growing really fast. And Blockbuster was underestimating it. Hattie McCord, Netflix's former head of HR. Remember, hearing Blockbuster executives talk about Netflix on a earnings call. Actually, she remembers hearing them refuse to talk about Netflix on a earnings
one of the analysts asked John Antioca the CEO of Blockbuster, "What do you think of Netflix?" And he was furious. They're a nat, they're nothing, they're nobody, and people are never gonna give up their video stores." So stop asking me about them. Back at the Netflix office, McCord was thrilled. I'm looking at my CMO and behind her head are our subscriber numbers on a whiteboard. And you know, I mean in that graph, it's just like up into the right, but we looked at each other and went, "They don't know, they don't know." And we got all the people in the company together where we're like, seriously, don't brag. As far as our concern, we're nobody. Lay low, lay low, lay low. The thing is, Blockbuster CEO John Antioca did want to build his business beyond the physical stores. And despite telling Netflix, "No," he did want to get online. He wanted to build his own DVD by Mail Company just like Netflix. - So he tells Wall Street, "Stop asking about Netflix." And then in 2004, he turns to his company and says, "Let's make a Netflix, but don't tell anyone." - To do this, he did what a lot of older companies do when they need a tech fix. He found the youngest person in the room, and he gave him the job. - Hey you, over there, you can turn on the computer, make me a Netflix. - That person was Shane a Vandalist. At the time, he was working on strategy for Blockbuster, and he wasn't even 30 years old. - I mean, the reality is, there wasn't a lot of skilled resources at Blockbuster at the time that knew much about the internet. I like to say that I could spell it, so I got to go ahead to run it. And so basically, John said, "It's yours, go get it up and operational." - Shane was young, but he was also really smart, and he really looked up to Blockbuster CEO, and he loved the idea of bringing Blockbuster into the future. And because Blockbuster was behind, it needed to get online fast. The quickest way to do that was to straight up copy Netflix. - We looked exactly what they were doing, we re-engineered it, and we built it. - Blockbuster copied everything about Netflix, from the way it mailed DVDs across the country, down to its website. Everything but the colors. Instead of Netflix red, the color scheme was Blockbuster's signature blue and yellow. They even sent people to Netflix warehouses pretending to be customers to figure out how they sorted and shipped DVDs. (upbeat music) - Still cannot believe they sent spies. - Yeah. - To the warehouse. - Posing as fans. - The door opens up, the warehouse person or manager is there, and they say, look, we're Netflix subscribers, we love your service, we love to see it, and they invited us in. And not only did they invite us in, they let us take pictures. It's like Mission Impossible, Blockbuster. - Eventually, Netflix figured out what they were doing. - Who are these Netflix fans hanging out in their warehouse and taking notes about our delivery methods? And why are they so interested in distribution systems? (upbeat music) Netflix was a smaller business, but it was better at the internet. It had been working on sending DVDs by mail for years at this point. Blockbuster, in a way, was acting like it was the start-up. - And what we did a very good job on the online team is painted them as Goliath and we were David. They were pretty belittling of us at the time. They believed that Blockbuster had no chance to compete with them. - Van Dillison's team launched Blockbuster Online in 2004. Four years after Netflix had tried to sell itself to Blockbuster. It was basically Netflix, except it had more titles, was cheaper, and it had the Blockbuster name. - It got off to a strong start. Blockbuster Online priced the service at $15 a month, which is cheaper than Netflix at the time, and Blockbuster was good at marketing. They had a great ad in the Super Rule. - I'm gonna take a movie from Blockbuster. - Okay, drive safely. - So in the ad, a guy tells his wife, he's going to get a movie, he gets in his car, he backs down the driveway, and he opens the mailbox, he pulls out a Blockbuster DVD. - Now Blockbuster is as close as your mailbox. Introduce in Blockbuster Online. Choose your movies online, receive and return them by mail. Enjoy. - And I remember when we launched the Super Bowl commercial the first time out of the gate and the numbers went crazy. - McNambrose, touchdown, fill it out here. - This is the 2005 Super Bowl, when Tom Brady and the Patriots beat the Eagles by three points. - And the New England Patriots will be the first dynasty of the 21st century. - It was a great game, which was really good for Blockbuster because it meant a gazillion people saw the ad. - You know, 40,000 people that signed up in a day. In the first year, we went from zero to a million people in nine months, and that was the fastest growing subscription business that the market had seen at the time. - Netflix took five years to get to a million subscribers. It took Blockbuster less than a year. This was a huge win for Blockbuster. It was successfully fighting back, landing this big punch, and then they landed another one. - No more late fees. No more late fees. (crowd cheering) - This whole. - Blockbuster got rid of its late fees. - Which was the main reason everyone hated Blockbuster, and the whole reason Netflix could exist, it did not have late fees. And now Blockbuster said, "Yeah, we don't have them either." So you see, Blockbuster was doing the thing, the established company is supposed to do when a challenger comes for it. It was responding correctly. It was doing the right thing. - Right, it was acting like Blockbuster was the nimble startup. This big giant company was willing to say, "Okay, we were wrong, and we're gonna turn this giant ship around." - So the big guys are starting to scare the little guys, and while Blockbuster CEO didn't want to talk about Netflix on investor calls, Blockbuster sort of became the only thing Netflix was talking about on its calls. - It would have been the Q1 earnings call for 2005. This is Steve Swayze. He had just started as Netflix's head of PR at the time. I literally went through the transcript the next day, and highlighted Blockbuster versus Netflix. We use the word Blockbuster. I think three times more than we use the word Netflix, we were fixated on Blockbuster. I mean, obviously it's a competitor. We've got to acknowledge them. But let's not talk about Blockbuster. Let's talk about how much Netflix is improved. - But in 2006, Blockbuster did something that everyone at Netflix had to talk about. It made its strongest power play yet, and launched a new service, Total Access. - Blockbuster Total Access, Netflix. Essentially, they work the same way. You order movies online. They come right to your mailbox. You watch them, then mail them back in a pre-payment envelope. But what if you're thinking, let's watch another movie right away. With Netflix, you mail them back and wait. But only Blockbuster gives you the option of bringing them back to the store and exchanging them. No extra charge. - Here's your new movie, sir. - So Total Access was Blockbuster's Netflix killer. Mary Blockbuster online, their Netflix clone, with Blockbuster's huge base of stores. So if you're a Blockbuster customer, you get two services for the price of one that is a very, very strong deal. - Again, Steve Swayze. - Blockbuster did everything. And one of the earnings calls Reed said, Blockbuster's throwing everything out of six except the kitchen sink. And John Alicaco, the CEO of Blockbuster at the time, had a sense of humor because a couple of days later, in UPS arrives a kitchen sink, a huge box, and you all went it up, and there was a kitchen sink. So they literally threw a kitchen sink at us as well. - You don't normally think of CEOs of giant companies having a sense of humor. - You don't, but Antioch could afford to crack jokes because Total Access was working. For the first time ever, Netflix lost subscribers and it stuck plummeted. Most new online DVD subscribers were going to Blockbuster. So just a couple of years after launching online, it was well on its way to catching up to Netflix. - Blockbuster was doing everything right. It was pivoting quickly. It was defending itself from a startup that was trying to eat its lunch. It was making moves that would keep it from becoming obsolete as everything moved online. And this is all beginning to work. It looked like nothing could stop Blockbuster. - Except for one major problem that threatened everything Blockbuster had accomplished, or more accurately, one angry investor. That's after the break. - Support for the show comes from Odo. Running a business is hard enough. So why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odo. And the best part, Odo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. So why not you? That's odo.com. - When you finally find your thing, you want the whole world to know about that thing. So you use a thing called Canva to make it an even bigger and better thing. Whether you want to create flyers for that thing, make presentations for that thing, or design merch for that thing. You can do anything. So people can see your thing, feel your thing, love your thing. The next thing you know, it's a thing. Canva, the thing that makes anything a thing. (gentle music) - Okay, we're back. - So in 2006, Blockbuster had just launched total access. It's new service that combined renting DVDs online with renting DVDs in stores. It's Netflix plus Blockbuster. - And it's cheaper and Blockbuster got rid of its late fees. The thing people hated most about Blockbuster, even though those late fees were hugely profitable for them. - So again, if we're studying this in business school, we say, good job Blockbuster. You are doing everything right. This is how you stamp out a challenger. - Right, it's working out. Netflix was losing subscribers and it's stocked, could take it and beating.
All these new subscribers were going to Blockbuster, but the big problem was that it's just really expensive to start an online business. It's something Blockbuster would have to lose money on until it reaches a certain number of subscribers. Meanwhile, Blockbuster had another problem. It had a billion dollars in debt, which at the time was a huge number. Blockbuster used to be owned by Viacom, which at the time was this giant and powerful cable company, but Viacom spun it out and turned Blockbuster into its own public-each-rated company. And as a going-away President Viacom said, "Here's an extra billion dollars of debt. Good luck to you." They were owned by Viacom and Viacom was managing them for a short-term profits. Again, this is Netflix CEO Read Hastings. So they set the company up as weak. And if they hadn't put that debt on them, Blockbuster may well have had enough to overwhelm us, which meant that Blockbuster had to pay down this debt at the same time it was spending money, investing in a thing that's supposed to stomp out Netflix. While all this was happening, Netflix tried a bunch of different tactics, dabbling in in-store kiosks where you rent and return movies, ads on its website, even Facebook style sharing where you could tell your friends what you were watching. None of it worked. But luckily for Netflix, that wasn't what customers cared about. What they really cared about was 97% delivery rate set in 95. Okay, and so we got us to realize, "Oh, we should really focus, but probably now, by '06 '07, on just like manic focus on the core and have confidence." Yes, focus. This is the keep it simple, stupid version of corporate strategy, and it worked. Netflix knew how expensive it was to run a DVD by mail service. Steve Swayze, Netflix's former head of PR, says the company knew Blockbuster with all that debt couldn't afford to keep losing money with total access. Here he is talking about Barry McCarthy, Netflix's chief financial officer. Barry had a team that just analyzed the daylights out of Blockbuster, and we knew they couldn't continue at that pace. It's Unity Economics. You can't spend $130 and make $100. We fundamentally knew that they couldn't continue providing all these services and make money to stay viable. So we just, we hunkered down. The Netflix folks say they had figured out that Blockbuster could not win, and if Netflix could just hang on, it could tire them out. But Gina Keating remembers it a little bit differently. She says Netflix was working really hard, maybe a little too hard to convince outsiders like her that it's strategy made sense, and that Blockbuster was going to fail, and that Wall Street shouldn't give Blockbuster any money. It's kind of funny now when I look back at it, but they were super desperate to call a journalist in and spend all this time explaining why Blockbuster should not be able to access the capital markets anymore because it wasn't going to work. But remember, the reason Blockbuster needed more money from Wall Street was because it was losing money trying to beat Netflix. So they can say that all they want, and in hindsight, that is correct that all they had to do was wait, but they were scared, and it wasn't a done deal. If Blockbuster had continued to get financing and stolen all of Netflix's subscribers, they would have been dead. And Blockbuster also had another really big problem. Activist investor, Carl Icon. So today we call someone like Carl Iconn an activist investor in the old days when Carl Iconn started out. We called them greenmailers. This is someone who buys a big position in a company stock, so we can have influence over the company, and then he wants the company to make changes so the stock goes up and he makes more money. And the reason I made so much money over the years is that you hold these people accountable. He'll say a bunch of stuff about how the companies mismanage, and they should do this, and that, and follow his strategy. And none of that really matters. All that matters is that he bought the stock at X, and he wants it to go up to Y, so he can make money. He does not really care how it gets there. Carl Iconn has been great at this over his career. He's a billionaire many times over, but it doesn't always work. Just as Blackbuster got its online business off the ground, Carl Iconn came in and bought a bunch of shares of Blackbuster and got several seats on its board. So he just busts in Kool-Aid man style and goes, "I'm here! Now you got to deal with me because I own part of your company. Listen to me on Carl Iconn!" Right, and it's bad news when Carl Iconn comes in a game. It is not cool when Carl shares up. Through his shares and board seats, Iconn was able to gain a lot of influence over the company. And true to the activist investor playbook, he started picking a bunch of different fights with Blackbuster's leadership team. He said they screwed up an attempted acquisition of Hollywood video. He said they shouldn't have ended late fees. He said they were spending too much money on Blackbuster online. You're doing it all wrong. I want my stock to go up and I'm going to tell you how to do it. Iconn wreaked havoc at Blackbuster, which was an incredible break for Netflix and read Hastings. They were attacking us, and the shareholders decided to allow Carl Iconn to the board. And it was so great for us and so bad for them. He had these board members who were completely clueless and who were saying stuff like, "Oh, we need to put jeans in the stores to make people come in." Again, Gina Keating. They just had no understanding of what was going on at Blackbuster and the technology change that they were right in the middle of. So John Antioch was fighting those guys. So Antioch was fighting with Netflix on the outside. And then on the inside, he has Carl Iconn. And Iconn was really difficult to work with. At one point, he refused to attend board meetings. So Blackbuster was headquartered in Texas, and Iconn would only call in. And when he did, he's really disruptive. He'd talk over people and just generally be a pain in the ass. Eventually, to appease him, Blackbuster moved its board meetings to Iconn's office in New York City. Oh, man. Can you imagine that? It's an incredible power move, and it sort of shows who's bossing him around. This went on for a while. Iconn second-guessing everything Antiochco did. Things eventually came to a head during a phone call over Antiochco's bonus. He was supposed to get $8 million that year, but Iconn didn't want to pay him. We know this from Antiochco's retelling of the event in an article for the Harvard Business Review. Iconn argued that Blackbuster stock was struggling and shareholders had lost money. So you don't deserve this. And Antiochco's saying, "No, this is what we agreed on. I hit my numbers." At some point in his phone call, Antiochco realized that this was never going to end. And he decided to quit. They agreed on a severance package and a smaller version of this bonus, which, by the way, he donated entirely to charity. So it's not about the money, it's about the principle. Right. We reached out to both Antiochco and Iconn for the story, neither chose to participate. After Antiochco quit, he sold all his Blackbuster stock, and you'll never guess what he invested in next. I'm going to guess. He bought Netflix stock. Correct. So this time it was about the money. Right. So after all that, in 2007, Iconn brought in James Keys to be Blackbuster's new CEO. Before that, Keys was running 7/11. And Shane Evangelist, who's running Blackbuster's successful online business, was pissed. So here's a guy who had never done anything digitally previously. Certainly difficult to deliver a slurpy through a digital connection. He decides that we're not going to go online any longer. That the mail order business is too expensive. He said, we're going to shift our focus back to the stores. We're not going to focus on online any longer. He pulled all of the marketing out of that business. Evangelist thought that defunding the online business would be the death of total access, and maybe even for all of Blackbuster. So when Keys decided to strip down the business that Evangelist had worked so hard on, Evangelist felt like he was left with no other choice. So he quit. Then I just started crying. It was three years of a lot of work. It felt like we finally had him. It felt like we were truly going to pivot this business, and it was effectively dismantled by the new guy that came in. And really, what was dismantled by a bonus structure that Carl wouldn't pay? From Evangelist's perspective, it wasn't just that the project was shut down. It was when his project got shut down. Right when it was about to work. Netflix basically went from having a gun to its head to as much wind behind your back as you could possibly imagine. When former 7/11 head James Keys came in a CEO, he was focused on two things, the physical stores and the debt. This is Keys. When we were dealing with over a billion dollars of debt at that time, I don't think Netflix had much of any debt. The challenge with a company with debt is you have to pay it back. And we had a payback due in 2009. The difference is that when you're trying to manage a public company over responsibility to all the shareholders and to protect the integrity of that equity in that shareholder base and your debt holders, we were growing the online business. Yes, we were competing with Netflix, but we were competing in a very different way with a very different balance sheet. So I'm going to translate that. We had to grow the company and make Carl Law kind happy. And we also had to pay down this debt. We had to do two things at once. And Netflix didn't have this problem. It didn't have debt. It just had investors that wanted their stock to go up. So even though we are the much bigger company, we're not really in a fair fight. That is what James Keys is saying. If we had continued investing in the online business the way we had, it would have forced us to restructure the company. One more thing. Well, all of this was going on. There was a huge recession. This was 2008. Financial institutions like Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns went under. Wall Street guys lost their jobs. They were sobbing on the trading floor. The US government had to bail out Wall Street and the auto industry at the same time.
it was suddenly the worst time to have debt. The banks were virtually shut down, not lending any new debt. It was the timing of the payback that was required, which then forced us to have to refinance that debt in extreme conditions. So in other words, if you didn't meet certain performance criteria, the bank had the right to force you into bankruptcy or to take back that debt. And by 2010, the biggest video store in the world, Netflix's biggest competitor hit rock bottom. Blockbuster's business is a flop, so to speak. The movie rental chain is getting ready to file for bankruptcy as early as next month. This really is the end of an era. Yeah, this was a tough day for James Keys. Remember, he'd only been CEO of this company for a couple of years. I remember one day waking up and seeing my full color picture with the Pinocchio nose. In the New York Post, you haven't lived until you've been, until you see your own image with the Pinocchio nose in the New York Post. And I think the big headline was Blockbusted. The same year Blockbuster files for bankruptcy. Netflix hit 20 million subscribers. It also started expanding outside the US. So Netflix's plan to wait Blockbuster out worked. Well, they had little help. It was so lucky. I mean so lucky. And I think that they need to thank Carl Icon every single day. Because that right there is the number one reason why Blockbuster lost. There are two things that Blockbuster could have done differently. First of all, Blockbuster could have bought Netflix for a mere 50 million dollars back in 2000. End of story. Or it could have refinanced its debt long before 2009, when no one would lend the company money. A nerdy note about debt here, but an important one. This whole story is about how Blockbuster was just crushed by a billion dollars of debt in 2009. Today is a recording this in 2020. Netflix has about 15 billion dollars in debt. It runs the entire company on debt. Wall Street seems totally cool that different companies, different times. But I know it upsets the Blockbuster guys to hear about it even now. But this also didn't happen in a vacuum. There was a lot of stuff going on in the economy and the culture that really shaped how this panned out. The way people consumed media and everything was changing. So think about what was happening in 2009 and 2010. A lot of things were really changing in a significant way. The internet had gone from novelty to ubiquity. Broadband was coming to the most people's homes. Lots of folks now had cell phones. They've got iPhones where you can hit a button. You can watch something on a screen. Immediately physical stores were starting to go away because you didn't need to get in a car or go on a subway to get something. You could have that thing delivered to you because you were using the internet. Netflix got its timing right and it got out of a near death experience. It also figured out eventually that it had to stick to what it did best. Getting people videos to watch. Here's Hastings again. And that lesson got seared into us. And then since then, you know, we're like crazy manic. We're going to do the best movies, the best series, you know, global, internet. Why have we acquired 15 companies like everybody else? Why haven't we gone into video gaming and news and sports and advertising, you know? And so it's this maniac focus of let's have the self confidence to believe in the size of the opportunity and that we're going to really help consumers if we focus on doing the thing we do better and better as opposed to a little bit of everything. This is a standard business lesson and it's a standard business lesson that people always overlook. If you want to do something well, do that one thing. But that one thing almost wasn't enough. Not long after Shane Evangelist, the former head of Blockbuster Online left the company. He ended up at a dinner party with his former arch nemesis, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings. And we're sitting across from the table. It's the first time I've met Reed. And it's pretty cordial for the first hour. And then it's what were you thinking when? And we went back and forth and back and forth. And it was a fascinating evening to hear their logic behind what they were doing for him to hear our logic behind what we were doing. Evangelist said Hastings told them that when Blockbuster combined its online service with its brick and mortar stores, it almost tanked Netflix. The thing that was satisfying for me is he said, "You had us in Checkmate. We had no response to the value proposition." Blockbuster had a chance to be that retailer who truly pivoted and moved online and could have been the Harvard Business Case Review story of how you succeed in what would be very difficult headwinds. Instead of being how you get run over by Netflix. In other words, Netflix didn't kill Blockbuster. Blockbuster killed Blockbuster. So, Peter, Blockbuster's not actually completely dead. There's still a little trace element left. Yeah, at the end of last year, I went to a Blockbuster pop-up shop in Lower Manhattan. Okay, this sounds like you're describing a fake Blockbuster store, is that right? Yeah, it's a store that's around for one week only that's dedicated to selling Blockbuster memorabilia. Whoa. We have a 14-foot wall that is 5,000 VHS tapes. We have the shelves made to look exactly like the shelves used to in the early 90s. It even smells like Blockbuster in here. I guess it's the popcorn, but it's like something else here. I don't think it's just the popcorn. It's like, you guys got everything in the movies or right? They're like the look. Before this podcast, I hadn't really thought about Blockbuster in years. But customers at this pop-up shop were full of thon memories of it. Blockbuster videos like My Friday Night. So it immediately brought me back to like 92. You missed the feeling of just going there like at a Friday night and then just like picking out movies. I'm here because I used to go to Blockbuster every Friday with my family and with my brother. And so I was trying to figure out a Christmas gift to get him. And this seemed like the perfect gift because we used to do this all the time. Wait, what are people doing here? Are they renting movies? You can't actually rent movies there. They're buying Blockbuster swag. I just bought a Blockbuster shirt. It's like the LA Rams color, like Maze and Blue I guess. So yeah. And it has a little Blockbuster logo in the middle. So it shows that you're repping Blockbuster. And then they gave me a membership card too. Wow. True nostalgia. It's kind of crazy how this one's huge company and cultural institution has dissolved into nothing but a single thing. All that remains are a few sweaters and tote bags and a membership card you can't use. Ronnie, your trip down memory lane sounds fun, but I am not going to miss the light fees. Peter, they're additional day fees. Ronnie, we are done. That's a wrap. But come back next week because we are going to talk about the Netflix algorithm and how it helps you figure out in an endlessly of content just what the hell to watch. We're also trying to figure out if Netflix recommends shows you want to watch or just shows it owns. We are a matchmaking service, but instead trying to introduce the perfect love story between two people we're making the perfect love story between a person and a piece of content. This podcast is a production of "Recode by Box" and the Box Media Podcast Network. This episode was produced by Bridget Armstrong and Zach Mack. Our editor is Charlie Herman. Got them Shrikishan engineered and scored this episode and composed our theme. Zach Mack is our showrunner and Shot Curwa is the executive producer. Quick to disclose your Vox.com and Vox Media makes shows for Netflix. None of the people working on this season the land of the giants are involved in productions of those shows. I'm Peter Kafka. And I'm Ronnie Mulla. Thanks for listening. [Music] Support for the show comes from Odo. Introducing Odo. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce and more. And the best part? So why not you? That's odo.com. [Music] Support for the show comes from Hostinger. I've never had an idea for a business or side hustle but never actually launched it. With Hostinger you can turn that idea into something real in minutes instead of weeks. Hostinger is an all-in-one platform that brings everything into one place. Your domain, website, email marketing, AI tools and AI agents. You can create websites, online stores and custom apps with simple prompts. Then use AI agents to automate tedious tasks and grow your business. Go to Hostinger.com/vox to bring your idea online for under $3 a month. Plus, get an extra 20% off with promo code Vox.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Vanta automates security and compliance, cutting audit prep by 82% and centralizing evidence.
ODO is an all-in-one business software platform replacing multiple expensive apps.
Netflix disrupted Blockbuster by eliminating late fees and offering DVD-by-mail, while Blockbuster initially dismissed it as insignificant.
Blockbuster later copied Netflix’s model, launched online services, and even introduced "Total Access" combining online and in-store rentals.
Despite early success, Blockbuster’s reliance on late fees and managed dissatisfaction made it vulnerable to Netflix’s customer-friendly approach.
Netflix survived and ultimately killed the video store industry, despite Blockbuster being a giant competitor.
Summary:
The transcription contrasts two main themes: modern business automation tools and the historical rivalry between Netflix and Blockbuster. Vanta simplifies security and compliance by automating evidence collection, reducing audit preparation time by 82%, and helping over 15,000 companies build trust. Similarly, ODO offers an integrated business software platform that replaces multiple costly apps with one solution for CRM, accounting, inventory, and more.
The core narrative then shifts to the Netflix vs. Blockbuster story. In the 1990s, Blockbuster dominated video rentals with a massive chain of stores, generating $6 billion annually, but relied heavily on late fees (managed dissatisfaction) and poor customer service.
Netflix, founded by Reed Hastings, introduced DVD-by-mail with no late fees, initially offering convenience and a wider selection. Blockbuster’s CEO dismissed Netflix as insignificant but later attempted to compete by copying its model and launching "Total Access," which combined online and in-store rentals. For a time, Blockbuster succeeded, even causing Netflix to lose subscribers.
However, Blockbuster’s underlying business flaws and investor pressure hindered its long-term adaptation. Ultimately, Netflix’s customer-centric innovation prevailed, leading to Blockbuster’s decline and the end of video stores, illustrating how established giants can be disrupted by agile startups.
FAQs
Vanta automates security and compliance, consolidates evidence, and reduces audit preparation by 82%, helping companies prove trust.
ODO is an all-in-one business software platform that integrates CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more, replacing multiple expensive apps at a lower cost.
Blockbuster accepted that only 20% of customers got the movie they wanted, and kept others from being too angry, earning huge profits from late fees.
Netflix offered to sell itself to Blockbuster for $50 million in 2000, but Blockbuster's CEO rejected the idea, dismissing Netflix as unimportant.
Blockbuster copied Netflix's DVD-by-mail model, launched Blockbuster Online at a lower price, and added Total Access, allowing in-store exchanges.
Total Access combined online DVD rentals with in-store exchanges, giving customers two services for one price, which caused Netflix to lose subscribers.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.