Whistleblower Reveals the Largest Mass Surveillance Operation in History and the Coming Slave State

Perustin pyöräilyvää teitä valmistavan ornotin vuonna 2013. Mielestäni parasta Shopify saan se, että voimme harjoittaa liiketoimintaa ilman teknistä osaamista. Voimme hallinnoida yrityksen taustajarjestelmiä ja frontendia sekä myydä verkossa, vaivatta. Jos Shopify olisi pyöräilyvaruste, se olisi mielestäni itse polkupyörä. Sillä asiat hoidetaan ja meidän liiketoimintamme hoituu Shopify-sa. Aloita ilmainen kokeilu Shopify-piste-com-sivustolla. Siinä on järjestelmä, että niillä on järjestelmä, jota järjestelmä, niin jota on 1984. Not written 1984, written 1949, jota on järjestelmä, jota on järjestelmä, jota on järjestelmä, jota on järjestelmä, jota on järjestelmä, jota on järjestelmä. Jota on järjestelmä, jota on järjestelmä, jota on järjestelmä. Nähdellä on toivottavasti tärkeää niitä, jotta pitäisiä yhdessä sitä, että jos on uudelleen niin, että noin voidaan yhdessä, jos on yhden yhden yhden yhden yhden yhden yhden yhden yhden yhden yhden 1984 on tietenkin järjestelmässä, jota täytyy lämpäisiä, se on tietysti. Se on tietenkin järjestelmässä, on tietenkin järjestelmässä. Se on tietenkin järjestelmässä, se on tietenkin järjestelmässä, se on tietenkin järjestelmässä. Ja se, että se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman. Ja se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut faalia. Ja se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman, että se on tullut maailman. Ja se on tosiaan vaikea, koska se on tosiaan jälkeen levynyt, että se on 1984, ja se on jatkeen jälkeen katsomasti, koska se on jatkeen jälkeen katsomasti. Eikä se, että se on jatkeen jälkeen jälkeen jälkeen jälkeen jälkeen jälkeen jäl Katsomasti, kun se on jatkeen jälkeen katsomasti, että se on jatkeen jälkeen katsomasti. Ja se on jatkeen jälkeen katsomasti, että se on jatkeen jälkeen katsomasti, että se on jatkeen katsomasti, että se on jatkeen katsomasti. Ja se on jatkeen katsomasti, että se on jatkeen katsomasti, että se on jatkeen katsomasti, että se on jatkeen katsomasti. Ja se on jatkeen jälkeen katsomasti, että se on jatkeen katsomasti, että se on jatkeen katsomasti, että se on jatkeen katsomasti. avaihtaisiin reveluusnari-thoughts. Se on jatko jatko jotain. Strippi jälkeen their privacy on jatko jatko jatko jatko jatko jatko jatko jatko jatko jatko jatko jatko jatko jat on jatko jatko jatko jatko jotain. Se on jatko jotain. Se on jatko jotain. Se on jatko jotain. 2016. Se on jatko jotain. Se on jatko jotain. Se on jatko jotain. Of course, and that's the trade always. The problem is it hasn't worked that way because safety has never been a priority of this ruling class. There was a time when big city mayors and police chiefs and governors and even presidents said explicitly, "Look, we're going to crack down, but in return, you're going to get the kind of country that is clean and orderly, safe for your daughter or grandmother to go to the store. No one's getting raped in my country and we may need to crack a few heads, but you will get safety." And for years, a bipartisan Republican and Democrat agreement remained in place. That the first order, the first job of government was to provide safety for its citizens because without that, what else do you have? It doesn't matter what your GDP is, if I don't know, the downtowns of your biggest cities are open air drug markets or hundreds of people are getting shot to death. It doesn't matter. The first half to provide safety, but somewhere around 30 years ago that part of the deal ended. And big city mayors, governors, members of Congress sort of forgot that their number one duty has to provide safety to the population. And this kind of reaches most obvious and hilarious point five years ago when those same people, members of Congress, governors, big city mayors, even police chiefs, were calling for some version of defunding the police. How about no police at all? Oh, you think it's dangerous now? How about we just don't enforce any law? How does that sound? And they told us that they were not embarrassed at all. Opposing funding the police was a prerequisite to being anti-racist, so it was really a kind of moral test. Anyone who's for the police hated black people, obviously, in case you weren't here when that happened, but this was a widely understood principle in every channel, including Fox News, told you about this, anyone who's for the police, particularly white police, is just a racist, first cousin to a Nazi. What's interesting is that some of those exact same people, literally the same people, are now telling you that you have to have cameras everywhere in drones, unlight poles and buildings. In fact, now, even in your car, thanks to an act of Congress, a law passed recently by the United States Congress, mandates cameras in all new passenger vehicles that assess the face of the driver, whether he's eating or yawning or who knows what he's doing, having a private conversation, well, there are no more private conversations, even within the confines of your own vehicle. Why? Because safety. There are drunk drivers out there. Of course, it was only two years ago that Joe Biden explained, well, actually drunk driving is not a big deal, when illegal aliens do it. Somehow that standard has been revised, drunk driving is such a big deal that you can't have a private conversation in your own car anymore, according to the U.S. Congress. And in fact, that is a law, and it's going to happen. So how exactly has this brand new, but already incredibly widespread phenomenon, flock cameras, license plate readers, and virtually every city in the United States, what has it done to crime? Well, it has not eliminated it, despite what they may tell you. So one of the cities that has the most license plate readers in the United States is Houston, Texas. Harris County, Texas, which is a huge place, but 4.7 million people in Harris County, Texas. It's about the size of Oman or New Zealand. It's a lot of people, and it also is a famously high murder rate. Lots of different kinds of crimes, but murder is the most straightforward, because almost all murders are accounted for, because there's a body in a missing person sometimes. So murders go reported. So we know pretty much precisely how many murders a city has. Harris County, Texas, has over 3,000 license plate readers in it, in the county. So you would think, think about 3,700 actually. You would think with 3,700 license plate readers all over the city, when you look at a map of where they are in Harris County, I mean, there's nowhere you can go where you're not being watched, you would think it would be the safest place in the United States. But weirdly, Harris County, Texas, had over 500 murders in 2025. The murder that aggregate number of murders, the total murders in Harris County, Texas, has risen dramatically over the past 10 years. Even as surveillance has become so intense, there is literally no place to hide. Now, how does that work exactly? How is it that we increase the surveillance past what 1984 describes, and we still have 500 murders in one US county? Hard to know how that happened, but one conclusion we can draw confidently is that the point of the license plate readers and the facial recognition software, which are integrated, probably not to keep you safe. So if you're looking for a shortcut to decode everything that you're hearing about almost anything, discount the part where they say it's good for you. Because that is not a relevant component to the formula. Should we do this? Well, let's see. Does it save us money? Does it increase profit? Is it good for us? Those are the three main criteria. What it does to you and your family, it's kind of not on the list. It's not a variable in that equation. So it is clear, in fact, it's proven that if you turn a city into a panopticon, you still have, well, in the case of Harris County, Texas, hundreds of people getting murdered, but you have no more privacy, which is to say you have no more intimacy, which is to say you have no more freedom. Because privacy is a prerequisite for freedom. You cannot be free unless you can have independent thoughts and privacy and independent thoughts are impossible without privacy, which is why when the US military wants to train its pilots on what life in a prison camp must be like, very often it puts them in a glass box naked in the center of the faux prison camp. That is a form of torture because you are stripped entirely of privacy. There is nowhere to hide. Everyone can see you at every moment and what is that due to people, it tends to drive them insane. And yet the US government, state, federal and local has now constructed exactly that, a glass box at the center of a prison camp and we all reside in it. So what do you do about that exactly? Do you go to your city council meeting and complain? That's been tried. And if you're interested, go online. You can see video after video of concerned and very kind of forthright and reasonable citizens asking their city council members, like, why are we doing this? Why am I paying for this? And what about my fourth amendment right that prevents search unreasonable search and seizure without a warrant by the government? And in every single case, we could find they're just blown off like some annoying crank. Oh, shut up. Safety. Safety. Eliminate cigarette smoking. We all live forever. It's not like the life expectancy is going to go down if we do that. But it did. So the point is license plate readers are safe and effective. And if you don't believe that, you're obviously anti-science, shut up science, denier. What are you for the drug cartels? Oh, no, that would be the government. They're in business with the drug cartels. But normal people cannot get a hearing on this question. Congress has made no effort to ban it or even regulate it to protect, say, images of you or your conversation with your wife and or girlfriend or anyone else from being sent anywhere, no law preventing other people from stealing your conversations and your image in the most intimate moments of your life, like in your car, and sending it to anybody or selling it to anybody. Now some of these companies like Flock claim they don't, okay, hope that's true, is it? We don't know. And how would we know? So it's not an endorsement of vigilante justice or vandalism, of course, which we are not for the record endorsing. But is it out of the realm of possibility that if you set up a system like the one just described that some people will say, I've got no option, but to take these cameras down myself, well, in fact, that's exactly what a lot of people will conclude, including this man. Watch. You have plans to continue to take down these Flock. Absolutely. No, absolutely. They are a clear and present threat to public safety. 44 year old, Javan Martinez is facing larceny property damage and tampering with evidence charges. After police say he destroyed three Flock cameras, costing Rio Rancho thousands of dollars in damage. You call me, but I am here. I'm right here. I stood up. I walked up there. She wanted my name, but I have a right to not bear testimony against myself, giving my name consults as testimony. And so I just chose to remain silent. Oh, guy in an American flag shirt quoting the Constitution. He must be a dangerous radical, better kill that guy. He knows his rights. That's not acceptable. So there are a lot of people like that. And if you go on the internet, at least as of yesterday, and this may change in the age of AI, who knows. But as of very recently, there are dozens, maybe hundreds of similar videos of people destroying the license plate readers, cutting down the poles running into their cars, spray painting them. There are how-to videos and how to disable them with high-powered lasers. You can buy an Amazon.com, which apparently fried their circuits. We're not endorsing that, of course. But there are videos, in other words, of people who don't feel they have any other recourse whatsoever. or making one last ditch attempt to preserve the one thing that makes them free in this or any other country, their birthright, by the way, and it's called privacy. They don't have it, they'd like it back. They think the Constitution guarantees it to them. Their lawmakers don't care, their leaders don't care, their police departments don't care. They don't think it's to make them safer. They understand that it's to strip them of their most basic humanity, which it is. And so they're doing the only thing they can imagine doing, the only thing the powerless really can do in a situation like this, they're taking matters into their own hands and some of them are being punished for it. So you don't have to endorse vandalism, of course, and we're not to understand the impulse behind it. And if that guy is any measure of who's doing it and judging by the videos we saw, he definitely is a measure of exactly who's doing it. It's not the malcontents, it's not drug-addicted kids, knocking down flock cameras for fun. It's sober, decent, patriotic Americans who believe the promises of their country. They're mad, not because they're trying to get something from flock, but because they want to be left alone by flock. Because flock was not part of the country they signed up for. No one asked their permission to steal their images and to spy on their conversations, to read their license plates. So any person with any capacity for reasoning and with any empathy for other human beings may not endorse that behavior, but can certainly understand it. And enlightened people might work to some kind of compromise. Maybe there are ways we can use technology to lower crime and make it safer for your grandmother to go to the grocery store. That would be good. But maybe we can do that without eliminating your humanity by taking away your privacy. But that's not, of course, the posture of the billionaires who run flock safety. Safety. Here is the founder of flock safety. Garrett something, doesn't look like he's even 40. This is Garrett, the billionaire flock guy, describing how he feels about anyone who disagrees with his project. Watch. Corporal was looking at citizen projects where citizens concerned about the rise of flock and flock cameras going up everywhere and increased surveillance everywhere. There's an organization called DeFlock who are semi well known. Now I guess if you're interested in this stuff, who take a fairly aggressive approach in terms of counting the number of cameras and having a discord channel where they talk about potential activities to move against flock and stop it expanding? What do you think of that organization and the way they go about their business? Yeah. So I mean, I think there's really two groups of activists. You've got organizations like the ACLU and the EFF who take an above-a-board approach to fight for their point of view. And thankfully, we live in a beautifully democratic capitalistic country where we can fight in court. And I have a lot of respect for those groups because they have reasonable debates and we follow the law. And then unfortunately, there's terrorist organizations like DeFlock, whose primary motivations chaos. They are closer to Antifa than they are anything else. And now I think there's unfortunate because we don't want chaos or I don't want chaos. I like law and order. I like a society that has a bedrock of safety. You'd be interested in to know where the douchebag factory is that turns out billionaires and t-shirts who run our most powerful companies. What, who is that guy? He's a billionaire. Where did the money come from? Oh, from state and local governments. That's, it's tax dollars. Mr. T-shirt guy, Garrett, Garrett Langley or something. He just described a group called DeFlock as a quote, "terroristic organization." Well, what's DeFlock? Well, if that's the only knowledge you have of DeFlock, you probably think it's, as he said, it's like Antifa. Guys in black mass spray painting things and beating people up the head with flag poles and shooting bear spray into the faces of cops. And Tifa, they want chaos. Uh-huh. Well, actually, unlike Antifa, DeFlock has a website. So you can just kind of go there and assess for yourself. What is DeFlock? Well, the answer was in the question and it was accurate. DeFlock is a group on the internet that tells you where the flock cameras are. That's what they do. They have a map. They're not for flock cameras or any license plate readers. They think they're violation of the Fourth Amendment. They think they're an invasion of your privacy. They think they're dehumanizing. All true, by the way. So what they really do is keep track of where the monitors are, where you being surveilled and you can go on the map. It's deFlock.com and find out where they are in your neighborhood. And by the way, it's overwhelmingly likely that you have them in your neighborhood. That you're being watched, you didn't even know it. That's because the people are supposed to be protecting you, actually protecting you, like the mayor of your town, the chief of your police department, or your member of Congress or your governor. They should be telling you, but they don't, because they don't care at all about you or your privacy. And so deFlock steps in and says maybe you'd like to know where these cameras are. And in some cases, because the information is out there, the guy in the American flag shirt and the sombrero made disable the camera, okay. But most people would like to know. And so providing that information is terrorism, really? So think about what T-shirt douchebag guy is saying, the billionaire, they got rich on your tax dollars, is saying to you, he's saying, we get to know everything about you, everything. Well, you don't even know we're here. Actually, we have a drone overhead that at the distance of hundreds of yards can see everything about you, just like a military drone. And that information is going, well, we're not going to tell you where it's going. I mean, it's proprietary information that's going to the client, but what's he doing with it? He could be selling it to insurance companies, to other governments, to companies, to data brokers who can sell to all the above. That's not happening? I don't know. Mr. T-shirt billionaire, is it happening? Show up. But in other words, he's reserving the right to use tax dollars to know everything about you, but if you want to know anything about their company, Flock Safety, you're a terrorist. Oh, you're a terrorist. It's a terrorist organization. Are they kidney acts of terror? No, they're actually disseminating knowledge that he's not contesting as factual. He's not saying it's wrong. It's accurate. That's why he calls them terrorists. How dare you? You get to know everything. This is sort of the deal the government has with us, or federal law enforcement has with us. You lie to an FBI agent, any federal agent, go right to jail. And if you live long enough, you'll know people who do go to jail for doing that. So of course, the FBI can't lie to you, right? Oh, yes, they can. So in other words, your employees that you pay, who work for you, an FBI agent works for you, hey, get me cup of coffee, son. That's the posture he works for you. He's your employee. He's your housekeeper with a gun. You're paying his salary. But if you lie to him, you go to jail, but he is absolutely allowed to lie to you and does all the time and faces no penalty 'cause there's no law against it. Well, that's called asymmetrical. That's called unjust. And that's been true for a long time. But now you have a so-called private sector company, a defender of what he described, the T-shirt kid billionaire described as capitalism. Capitalism, oh, it's really capitalism, huh? Taking money from the public without their consent, spying on them. And then if they try to even know what's going on, their terrorists like Antifa, who are against order. Yes, so that's not a sustainable system, by the way. And across the country, these very obvious and clearly identified on deflock.com. God bless them for doing that. Cameras are under assaults. Hard to know how many flock on their website says not many, well, it seems like a lot. But pretty soon it won't matter because they're gonna be in drones. And unless you're an extremely good shot with a tightly choked 12 gauge, you're probably not gonna knock one down and if you do, you're going right to jail. Just charging a firearm. So they get to like hover over your bedroom window if they want, there's no law against it. Watch you and your wife and listen. But if you take any action at all, even complain too loudly or tell other people that it's happening, you're a terrorist. Okay now. So while we can, in other words, while these surveillance devices, this whole North Korean setup that we're building here in the United States, is still visible to us before it's all airborne. And there's literally nothing you can do about it. You might not even know what's there at that point. There'll be no way to identify. There'll be no deflocked for drones because they're mobile. So during this moment when we can talk about it, it seems like maybe it's worth talking about it. We're not big undead, but there are times when you have to take a loan, can't put it on your credit card and be 30% interest. You gotta go to a bank, but going to a big bank is a very unpleasant experience. That's why we recommend Cardiff. Cardiff is a small business lender. America's favorite and for good reason. 20 years of experience, $12 billion loan. Cardiff has a simple way to secure capital for your business without the endless bureaucracy you're gonna get at a massive bank in New York. Process is fast. Application takes three minutes. Proofles can happen just as quickly. The barrier to entry is low. If you've been in business for at least one year and make at least $20,000 a month in revenue, that's revenue, not profit, just money in. you could qualify for up to 500 grand. Those funds could hit your account the day your loan is approved. Small business is the American economy. Always has been, we hope it always will be. So if you want to build something real, you need a partner who wants to help you succeed. Cardiff could be that partner. Apply today at cardiff.co/tucker. Cardiff 2Fs.co/tucker real growth fast-funded. Cardiff borrow better. So Ben Jordan has thought a lot about this knows a lot about it. It knows a lot of the details about where the data from these cameras are going, which is worth knowing. And he joins us now. Ben, are you there? Yeah, I'm here. How are you? I'm great. Thank you for the work that you've done on this. So why are you concerned about license plate readers, flock cameras? We're told that, look, it's for your safety and unless you want to be a terrorist, you should probably shut up about it. And there's nothing to be worried about at all if you're not doing something wrong. So I'm not doing anything wrong. Why should I be worried about it? Yeah, I mean, there's a lot of reasons to be worried about it. One pushback, I always get is people saying I have nothing to hide. And I feel like that is one of the most inaccurate statements ever. When somebody says that to me, I always ask them to hand me their phone and unlock it and let me go into the other room for a while and just, you know, why do you have something illegal on there? Let me look at it. But yeah, anybody who's ever been stalked, who's been falsely accused of a crime, anybody who's ever been hacked, who's had their identity stolen, they all have stuff to hide. And it's when those terrible things happened, when you realize, oh, I actually have a lot to hide. And this is really important. As far as the first thing that I always, when I talk to like a police chief or something like that, the first thing I always tell them is that this is a third-party tech startup. They're not even a public company. It's a private company that has venture capital investors, but one of which is on the hook for Cambridge Analytica, by the way. And they have one job and that job is to make as much money as possible. So they're going to tell you whatever it is that you need to hear to put as many cameras in your community as possible. They're going to tell you that it helps self-crime, that it'll increase your clearance rates. And the fact is, is that they don't have any evidence of doing any of that. So the crime thing, it does seem like, we tried to find the numbers, crime stats are complicated, cross-referencing them with what we know about these cameras and where they are. It didn't seem like they, well, they certainly had an eliminated crime in like Oakland or Houston or places that have a real problem with crime. But it seems intuitive that like if you spy on everyone all the time, there'll be less crime. Like that doesn't seem like a crazy claim. Yeah, well, I mean, criminology and sociology are incredibly chaotic. We actually, as a society, don't even know if increasing police reduces crime. Right. That can go either way depending on what cities. Yes. One of my favorite studies was actually a dog ownership. Like does having a security dog, it happened a lot of dogs in any neighborhood reduced crime. And it actually did, and the reason was because people walk their dogs and they walk around and they get to know their neighbors and they might even get to know their police more, you know, if they have police, but I'm foot walking around the neighborhood and that makes everybody safer. But the only thing that we truly know that lowers crime is community policing is people trusting their police officers and saying, hey, there's a gang member that all of a sudden bought a gun. I think something's going to go down. I saw this. They'll have that conversation with their police department and then they could actually reduce crime and they could prevent victims from happening. So it's not a matter of getting somebody's license plate and then arresting them down the road. You don't have a victim in the first place. And I feel in most of the communities that I've visited and I'm literally on the road right now visiting communities talking to city council members and stuff like that. In most of these communities, the public feels like the license plate readers specifically from flock are betraying the relationship that they have with police. They're actually violating that social contract where people expect privacy and they're not being given. Well, I mean, if surveillance created safety, then prisons would be very safe, but they're very dangerous. So I guess that's obvious, right? Now that I think about it, one thing that I, the thing that a lot of people also don't think about it, one of my favorite analogies and this is used by the ACLU often is if you're driving somewhere and a cop pulls behind you at a stoplight, you immediately change the way you behave. You start, you know, you might be really into a song you're listening to. Now you're distracted by the cop. You might be in a conversation. For some reason, the flow of that conversation changes. Even if you've done nothing wrong, we all just have that weird feeling with this person who is able to, I don't know, handcuff us, pull us over, write us a ticket, shoot us, whatever they want to do. When that person's behind us and surveilling us and looking in and saying, "Oh, what's that guy up to? Is he up to no good?" We start behaving differently. And so when you put cameras in front of playgrounds and there's plenty of flock cameras in front of playgrounds, which is baffling to me, nobody's saying, "Hey, doesn't this affect the way kids play?" Like, when I learned how to do a cartwheel the first time when I was a kid or when I learned how to play the guitar, I didn't have anybody watching me. I had to be alone to do that. I needed my privacy to be able to find my own identity and find what I'm so good at, which isn't cartwheels, by the way. It's a really, no, I think that's such a wise point and a deep point. So to what extent did communities have a say in this? Barely any. Most people, up until we started releasing big videos on this and that started going in the news. Most people didn't even know what the cameras were. They didn't realize that they were storing their data every single time they passed it for 30 days. So every single, so it's as if in my neighborhood, for example, in Atlanta, it's as if I had a GPS unit on my car. I can't go to Chick-fil-A or a grocery store or do anything without the police knowing about it despite having not, I'm not suspected of committing any crime. So I mean, shouldn't there be like a period where the town, the city of Atlanta, in your case, says to the public, we're going to put North Korea style surveillance posts all around the city. Are you for this or are you against it? Here's the trade off that we're thinking about. What do you think? There was no democratic input that you're aware of. No, it's very, and most people, out of pocket, I've been paying for polling to find out how many people are for this, how many people are against this, and overwhelmingly Americans are against it. And one thing that I find interesting is you're seeing a lot of people on both sides of the political aisle be against it at the same time, which it's like the only issue in America right now where everybody's kind of getting along and being like, yeah, we don't want that. We hate it. And I think that's that's really important because as you had just shown that video with the Garrett Langley interview, he's very quick to say the word antifa. After some of my videos came out, he emailed police cheats around the country, his client, from his personal email address, telling them that they were under attack by lawless activists who want to defund the police. And I'm like, I've never wanted to defund the police. That's never been the stance mine. And just the other day, he didn't interview saying that people like flock, they don't hate flock, they hate the Trump administration. Like he literally said this in an interview and he just seems to be trying so hard to act like conservatives are aligned with him and that it's the left that's against him. But I'm trying to make it very clear that one of the reasons I'm here right now, conservatives are not aligned with them. Conservatives have classically always been anti surveillance. And of course, starting at Orwell, who was famously a socialist, sometimes identified as a communist, but whose views are like beloved by every conservative I know. So it's like, I don't even know what those terms mean. If you're for America, if you're for human dignity, if you're for privacy, you oppose this. And that partisan crap is not applicable on questions like this. These are human rights. They're not political rights. So I have to assume that kid, Garrett, whatever his name is, just put my tea on it. I think it's actually three, 12-year-olds dressed. I'm top of one another in the whole human costume. That's so good. That's so exact. That's so exact. He figured it out, Garrett. What do you know what's going on? That is so good. Okay, exactly. I hate to be mean to this one kid, but it's like what's his, I mean, he's getting rich from this, from tax dollars, by the way. And then lecturing the people who are being abused by it, or something about that combination that infuriated me. But he said, well, you know, there's the ACLU. Now with someone who grew up admiring, sincerely admiring the ACLU, I wish the ACLU were leading the fight on this, but you don't work for the ACLU, do you? Who do you work for? No, but I am, I'm just met with the ACLU yesterday with somebody from the ACLU. They're a little bit less public on this, but they are supporting people who are filing suits. They are, they are involved in it, but much less publicly, which is part of the reason I was having a meeting with them is because they're like, hey, you're kind of the face of this right now. Do you want to maybe, we'll give you some resources to help. And so, yeah, the ACLU, the EFF, the Electronic Frontiers Foundation, they've also been, they actually, the person who made deflock business will, flocks sent him a cease and assist, and they stepped in and said, we have a legal team, we'll check this out and, you know, told flocks to pound sand. So, they've been very helpful in that regard. How ownership has always been at the center of the American dream is an actual asset, a place people work their entire lives to build, a place of stability, insecurity, and real value. Right now, though, too many homeowners are stuck swiping credit cards to cover groceries. There's basically a survival tax of 20% interest or more. So why keep handing your money to the banks when you can keep it for your family? Interest is what kills you. Our friends in American financing have a better way. They're helping homeowners use their hard-earned equity and they're supporting Americans looking to fulfill the dream of owning a home with mortgage rates currently in the fives. Money financing saves its customers an average of $800 a month, that's about 10 grand a year. It's not just a loan, it's a true financial reset. We recommend American financing, they're called America's home for home loans for a reason. So get out of credit card debt. I mean, it is just crazy to borrow money. No judgment, but it's just make any sense to borrow money at that rate. If you want out, call 800-685-5696-8685-5696 or visit Americanfinancing.net. So most people don't wake up in the morning and decide to feel horrible, exhausted, foggy, disconnected from themselves, but it does happen, and it happens slowly. You're working hard, you're showing up, and your energy disappears by midday, your focus is dull, your weight won't move, a lot of people are told that's just getting old, that's what it is, but that's not actually true. For many men and women, these are not personal fairs, they are signals tied to your metabolism, your hormones, and nutrient imbalances that go undetected for years, you don't even know, you're deficient. And that's why we're happy to partner with Joian Blokes, a company that was built for people who were all done guessing and ready to figure out what exactly is going on. And that starts with comprehensive lab work and a one-on-one consultation with a licensed clinician. An actual human being explains what's happening inside you and builds a personalized plan, which includes hormone optimization, peptide therapy, targeted supplements. So don't settle, go to JoianBlokes.com/tucker, use the code Tucker for 50% off your lab work, and 20% off all supplements. That's joyandblokes.com/tucker, use the code Tucker, 50% off labs, 20% off supplements. Joian Blokes, get your edge back, slash Tucker. So where do the images and the sounds go? Where does the data go? So typically what happens with your standard flock camera, like the black ones that you see, they're called like falcons, that's the model name of them, they will seal license plate, they'll take a picture, and then they'll send it to the flock servers where the police can access it. So if the police, let's say you had a brown car with a bumper sticker and maybe a broken window. AI actually picks that up, and so not only your license plate, the police can just search brown car, brown car, a broken window, and then they'll be able to find every single time that you've passed a camera. But it gets worse than that because they have something called a hot list, where they could put your license plate on a hot list, and then every single time that you pass a license plate, the police get a notification saying this person is here, this person's here, this person's here, and they don't need a warrant to do this, which is the most staggering part, because it's just, this is no different than putting a GPS on somebody's car functionally if you have a lot of flock cameras around. And pinning somebody beyond one cell phone tower, the Supreme Court had not that long ago actually decided that that was unconstitutional, so I just don't see how this is. What's the status of the drones? Flock is saying, publicly, we have a drone fleet, we're expanding our drone fleet. How big is that fleet do you know, and that does seem to change the calculation? I had just done an interview next to and not on the property, but next to the property of their secret drone facility, which has a construction company name on it, it doesn't have the flock safety name, and they called the police and had me detained for doing an interview across the street for it. Yeah, they have a drone facility, their idea is to have drones that are persistently in the air. That's what some flock employees have told me as of like a year ago. They do have something called emergency responder drones that I don't really have a huge problem with. Like, if my house is on fire, I kind of want to drone to fly by really fast and let the fire department know how many trucks to send. But what they're doing is a lot different than that. They want drones that are persistently in the air, and then when it runs out of batteries, they want to go down, they want to go back up, and they'll be able to surveil every single person in Honduras. You're describing a war zone, I mean, there are a couple hot war zones in the world right to several, and there are permanently drones in the air. So why would our government be using, we're not enemy combatants for Americans, why would they be treating us like we're the enemy? The truth, I want to joke and say, because it makes us safer, but I think the truth is that all up all flock has spent hundreds of millions, billions of dollars on their product and marketing, but their marketing has been towards police, and they have studies that they wrote themselves, that they point to saying, look how good this is for it, look how much safer this makes your community, how much better it makes your job, they have conventions where they invite the police officers and give them freebies. And then there's also a really large revolving door effect where if you even go down LinkedIn, go down like flock employees, you'll find the head of communications happen to be a police officer in Dallas a year before, and he happened to be the person in the police department who signed the surveillance contracts, or recommended the surveillance contracts. Same thing with city hall members, things like that. And so you have something that really, I mean, I call it corruption. I don't know if it's legally corruption, but revolving door, a revolving door between government and private industry, to me, sounds a lot like corruption. So I think that's why you have this massive expansion, and that's why you have police saying, we need this otherwise we can't do our job and city council members saying, okay, well, we're going to have a quick little meeting and then vote this in before anybody hears about it. But in the end, everything that you're talking about, the things that you're scared of absolutely could happen. I think back to COVID, you know, just five, six years ago, imagine flock cameras. You leave the house to go pick up food during quarantine or something in flock cameras are now, you know, you could be arrested for violating quarantine or get a ticket or facial recognition cameras or the cameras that they have in retail stores, sending you a ticket because you didn't wear your mask properly, because your nose was sticking out the top. Like, I think that these affect people across the board from every political aisle. And I think it's really important that people speak to their city council members and their local politicians now and let them know how you feel. And what I'm doing, I know you talked about people taking flock cameras down themselves. What I'm doing is I'm trying to take down the politicians who signed the contract to enable this, because that's literally what I'm doing. I'm interviewing politicians on the local level to find out who's running against the person who threw their community under the bus by signing this contract. I mean, it's very easy to see how military technology, and this is military technology, these weapons of war, could be used as tools to pluck or oppression. Let's say the war in Iran continues. This is not a partisan point. It's just an obvious observation. The war continues. The straight remains closed. We drain the SPR and we have an actual energy crisis at that point, like an actual one. And the government says, "Well, we're instituting a work from home order." We did that during COVID. We're doing it now. And a lot of people like me would be like, "Buzz off." I'm going where I want to go with America. And then drones are deployed to make certain that the sheep are being herded correctly. That's not a crazy scenario at all. No. No. And I mean, it's one of the most outrageous things that we've discovered, a friend of mine, Jason Huniar, who lives in Atlanta, suburb Dunwoody, he has been just volunteering his time. He's not a professional investigator. He's not a journalist. He's been volunteering his time pulling audit reports through FOIA requests of what these things have been used for, where they're located, what they've been searching. And there's a place that are called Marcus Jewish Community Center. It's a private, large community center that's kind of beloved by the community, and they have cameras on the wall there that aren't flock cameras. They're like the standard cameras you would have in any sort of business. And the community center said, "Okay, well, we're a little worried that there might be some sort of anti-Semitic attacks. So we want to share our footage with police in case they need it, in case there's a shooting or something terrible happens." And by doing that, they shared it with FOIA. So what Jason had discovered is that over a thousand times, FOIA employees viewed those cameras inside this private community center, including but not limited to the pool, the daycare center, the children's gymnastics room, and nobody had been arrested. Nobody had to answer any questions about it. In fact, they actually made it harder for FOIA to collect an audit or to collect a record [BLANK_AUDIO] who was looking at the camera internally from the company. - Wait, just to be clear, it was flock employees who were not licensed law enforcement officers. - All grown men, yes, yes. All flock employees over a thousand times, and they were all grown men, and they were looking at these cameras at the daycare center, the children's gymnastics room, like, and their defense to this, was that it was a product demo for another client, and I'm thinking to myself, if I had a business and I wanted a flock camera via the police department, and somebody pulled up a laptop and said, "Look how good this works," and then it was a children's gymnastics room. I would call the police or hit them. I'm not sure what I would do, but that's an outrageous explanation that's just delusional. - How many flock employees were fired after that? - None, not one. They took down their LinkedIn though, and deleted their, but one of them was in a band, and removed his band page on Facebook. So yeah, they pretty much got scrubbed from social media, because I released a video about it on Instagram, and it had made the news a little bit, and so they immediately just scrubbed their profiles. - What has Congress done? So I had found some flock law enforcement accounts on the dark web from a Russian vendor, and it didn't have multi-factor authentication. When you sign into Netflix, something you have to say, "Yes, I signed in from Netflix on my phone," or type in a code. They didn't have that, and not all flock gamers have that, or not all flock accounts have that. And I found it for sale on a Russian vendor, and so I actually started talking to some senators, representative Krishnamurti and Senator Wyden from Oregon. They wrote a letter to the FTC saying, "Hey, these need to be investigated immediately. There's a massive national security risk here." And FTC, I assume printed it out and threw it in the garbage. I'm not sure what they did, but they certainly didn't open an investigation. And this was almost a year ago. - Well, there's never been a better time to sign up for Dutch Pat. That's because we have news in the world of dogs, which we follow closely. The return of new world screw worm has shelters debating whether they should euthanize kill thousands of cats and dogs. The new world screw worm is a parasitic fly that feeds on warm blooded animals, and public health authorities are searching for ways to contain the disease as it spreads. One of the stories may take a ways, is that now is a good time to bring your dog to the vet, but a lot of people can't, 'cause vet bills are totally out of control, because private equities buying up all the local veterinarians. Prices have doubled. We did a whole podcast on this. Dutch is the solution. Licensed veterinarians tell a health unlimited visits. As a list from this show, you can start for just $82 a year, total 82 bucks. Visit Dutch.com/talker to sign up. The good news is that a Dutch vet can prescribe a flea and tick medication that can also prevent life-threatening new world screw worm. Again, that's a 10 minute call, no waiting room, no clinic markup, free shipping on products, not owned by private equity, up to five pets, 82 bucks a year. Visit Dutch.com/talker. Use the code Tucker for up to $50 off. That's Dutch dutch.com/talker. Are there any laws governing what flock or in flock is not, of course, the only surveillance company out there, there are a lot. But are there laws governing what they can do with the data, your data, pictures of you and your family? In Illinois, maybe in California, there's some states that are starting to try and mimic data privacy laws that they have in the EU or any other country, really, like the data privacy laws that are superior to ours right now. And the problem is, is that if it's only in one state, then they could just send it to a server in another state and then sell the data elsewhere. Fought claims to not sell your data, but I've literally seen PDF price sheets with an amount on how much they sell data for. So make sense of that. So you think they're lying about not selling data? It's almost as if they have a financial interest in lying to the public to get their company to IPO as quickly as possible. Oh, cynical, cynical. I don't think T-shirt guy would do that. And last but not least, obvious question. Why are you doing this? Why are you devoting so much time to this? I'm going to be honest with you. I hate it. I'm so tired of flock. I'm so tired of it all. But it's been the last-- I mean, we've discovered massive security vulnerabilities and we've reported on them. But the reason I'm doing it is because it's making a difference. You're seeing communities across the country and some big cities canceling their flock contract or refusing to renew them. And I think that everybody needs to be concerned about this. And I feel like there's very few people in America who want to be tracked everywhere they go. And now is the time when you need to let your local city council, mayor, county, whatever. If senators, governors, you need to make a big stink about it and let them know that they're not going to be running for office anymore if they continue to allow this to happen. You actually are making a difference. That's the amazing thing. Everyone wants to make a difference. I think you're actually succeeding. So thank you. Thank you for taking the time. It's wild to imagine that there's a possible thing. It's so great. It's so affirming. Thank you very much for doing this. Thank you. Have a wonderful day. Thank you. So here's your stories like that. You've got to wonder, who would participate in this? A lot of good people or cops for sure. Many more than they tell you. On the other hand, police departments across the country are participating in the dehumanizing of entire populations by stealing their privacy. They can't go anywhere without being watched. So you're not actually a citizen anymore. You are to some real extent enslaved by the government. So most people involved in this process, gathering the information, forcing the laws, probably don't think about it too much. But some of them aren't stupid and probably reflective and they probably have thought of it and yet they still work there. And what's that? So it's interesting that there have been people who refused to participate in them. And one of them is a former police officer from Rhode Island, a decorated police officer called Noel Pichardo, who said, well, I'm actually not going to do this because it's wrong. And you hear that so seldom anywhere for any reason. People voluntarily giving up a good job 'cause they think it's immoral that we thought would be worth talking to him. And he joins us now. And well, thanks very much for doing this. - Hey, it's okay. You do want things to happen. - So can you just tell us your story? So you're a cop in Rhode Island, correct? - Oh, no, I was. - Yeah, I was. - Yeah, I'm sorry. Figure of speech. - You were at one point a police officer in Rhode Island and you no longer are. So what happened and why? - So back in 2021, my department was the Pataka Police Department over here and a lot of other police departments across the state. They started doing these trial periods with the flock. So they were introducing to our police chiefs, our city councils and say, hey, we have this new technology. It's going to help you solve crimes, crash criminals, and I was trained on it along with my other coworkers. And even the captain at the time who was tasked with training us, he was already very uncomfortable with it. He said, look, I was tasked with training you guys on it, uses, but I don't know. This seems a little sketchy, but this is how it works. This is how you get it on your computer. This is how the system works. This is how you find a vehicle on hot list. And there you go. So when we first introduced the training, I was already uncomfortable with it. And then when I finally had it in my vehicle, and I saw how it worked and how it basically tracked vehicles in real time, I knew that it was a complete mistake. I believe that the time, and I still believe now that it's a fourth amendment violation, including the ACLU and the Institute for Justice, who agree on that. And thankfully, my city was too poor to afford it at that time, so they shut it down. So when I got involved and I got in trouble was back in 2023, I'm driving in my district, and I see them up in my community. And I'm a patrolman, and I wasn't notified that we were getting these cameras. So if I'm a police officer, and it's my business to know when things like these are introduced in my department, the public doesn't know. And that was in case the public wasn't notified. The other cities in Rhode Island were not notified. Like Ben was saying to most cities across the country, they were not notified. It was just something that flock had a conversation with the city council and the police chief, and they were put up without notifying the public. And so after a couple months of having a hard time looking my wife in the eye, I spoke with a local reporter, I spoke with the Valley Breeze, and I told him, this is what's going on. This was put up without the public's knowledge. It needs to be addressed. He asked if he could use my name. And because I'm an idealist, and a bit romantic, and a bit stupid, I guess, I told him to give him my name, because I knew people hopefully would pay attention that they knew a police officer felt they're strongly about what was happening. And so once he did the article back in October 2023, I got in a lot of trouble. I spoke with a lot of my local representatives too, try to let them know that got me in trouble. One of our representatives was a really good guy, his name is Joe Solomon. He invited to speak at the government oversight committee in April of 2024 that got me in trouble. So because I was doing all this, I got suspended a total of four times, 72 days without pay, so I lost about $20,000 worth of pay because of all those suspensions. I was supposed to get promoted to detective. I got that denied twice. I was banned from taking the charges exam. Every time I was suspended, they would do things like having me hand in all my gear and all my equipment, which is not a thing that we do anymore. That's kind of an old custom. The only time they have a police officer when he's suspended hand in their gear is when they're arrested for a crime. And I wasn't charged with any crime. I was just being suspended for, well, they will lie and says, no, we're actually suspended because you missed a municipal court day or we're suspending you because you didn't take this for a poor and a roadier. We don't take road rage incident reports in Kentucky. That's a lot. So they would say that's why they suspended me But everyone in my department all my coworkers knew that they were suspending me because of my opinion and because I was trying to address the problem as best as I can so Eventually what happened was in July of 2025. So last year they wanted to terminate me and It was based one of them was literally based on a lie one of the reasons why they wanted to terminate me So I wanted a challenge in Leabor, which is like our version of a trial when you go to Leabor I said no, this is wrong. I'm fighting for my job. It was gonna cost me $30,000 My union was only gonna pay 10 so I needed to come up with 20 grand of defend myself. I couldn't afford that So I had to resign. It wasn't my choice. I couldn't afford it and so since my resignation, you know I decided you know what I gave him my best shot. I tried to adjust his palm best like maybe I'm not articulate. Maybe I'm not Diplomatic enough. I don't know. Maybe someone like then should be dealing with this instead of me So I decided to let it go. I says, you know, I'm gonna let it go. I'm gonna try to get hired somewhere else Maybe I can get a job working campus security somewhere I couldn't even get that because they wanted me to sign and it was probably because they wanted me to sign an NDA Before I left, which I was even though the thing you can do with police departments But they wanted me to sign an NDA and I refused and the the deal was if you sign this NDA That bars you from saying anything about your experience here But in return we'll keep you on our health insurance You'll stay on the health the city health insurance until you find another job and then the chief will promise not to say anything about you when you're looking for another job I thought about that. Oh, it's not a bad deal. I decided not to do that. I didn't sign the NDA And that's probably and that's why I haven't been able to find a job in my field And definitely now that I'm doing this interview. I won't be able to find a job in the entire country That's even but even no offense. I'm used to living around so I can say is even by Rhode Island standards That is very corrupt. I mean you just said corruption That's ridiculous and your behavior was in my view heroic. So thank you eating rights pretty important But it's hard if you live here about half of the American diet is ultra processed foods and that hurts you fake food harms your body your mind and especially your liver so people think that feeling sluggish and foggy and bloated It is just what it is to be older, but that's not true Eating crap makes you feel that way Well, our friends at dose have a solution. It's called dose for your liver This doctor approved plant-based liver supplement is clinically proven to promote liver function and lower liver enzyme levels That means you're less bloated less tired. You feel more like yourself All you need to do is take a daily two-ounce shot tastes like orange juice an easy shot of liquid. It's not the Vax People we know use dose for your liver and they have seen rapid results in their blood work and they feel Much much better the difference is very obvious. Lots of brands claim to support liver health But do so before their products have gone through testing this has been tested everything checks all the boxes Visit dose daily dot co slash Tucker use the code Tucker for 35% off that's dose daily Dot co slash Tucker code Tucker 35% off. You're gonna love it. But I appreciate I've got a lot of questions But the main one is why was the puttucket which used to be a pretty tough town. Is I remember it? It's a lot of town. Yeah, it's a tough town big project there and tough Why were they so Wedded to these cameras. Why was it so important for them to have these cameras? I actually don't know. I asked to speak with my chief Um, because you know She you know she dehumanized me so I was like you know, maybe she speaks to me because I only time I had a conversation with my chief is when I got hired eight years ago I had never spoken to her since I got hired So she's putting all these punishments on me and like you know what maybe maybe I could have gone about this in a better way maybe um You know, maybe if I had a conversation with her first before I spoke with reporting before I spoke The government oversight committee maybe would have made this You know It would have made this back and forth a little more cordial. So I asked to speak with her and she refused to speak with me Or they told me that to not even bother so I don't even know if they asked her not but so I don't know I mean, I asked some of the city council members in puttucket I was like look Don't you think it's a bit of a problem that the public has been notified about this? Like that doesn't concern you And you know their response was the same response that Jordan was saying was like Well, it's for their safety So what's what's the problem? so I I don't know I don't You know look and you know that we're dealing with a battle of extremes in our country and I as like you mentioned in your monologue It was the fun police thing going on three years ago and now there's this another extreme Of mass surveillance. So which one is it and I and I think that's where and when a battle of extremes You know as they say hurt people hurt people you know You know, we put body cams on our officers and when I had a body and look What have you think about body cams? It is a bit dehumanizing to have a video camera put on your chest I best say go do your job. It's a bit dehumanizing So it's not surprising to me That now in the police or the city now have the opportunity to return the favorites of the public that they're not gonna think much about it Yeah, like you put body cams on us because we're a scumbag because of some guy did something in Minnesota Well, now it's your turn. So I think there's a Freudian thing going on there where you do it to us Now we do it to you So you know and to defend my co-workers my my old co-workers You know, it's a mix some of them think this is Wrong this is a moral some of them think it's a good idea and some of them just don't care They just want to finish their job and go home and get their pension like you know what what I'll get shot So it's not a it's not a monologue, you know You know, I want if there's one thing I can add to this that's useful other than trying to warn people as best I can Is not people to be too angry with their local police officers like They're getting bombarded with things all the time, you know, some of them are in union fights right now Where some of their health insurances are being threatened So I don't think it's crazy. I don't think every police officer who feels the way I should I the way I feel should be As idealistic as me. Maybe they should. I don't know. I don't I mean if people want to be courageous Instead of expecting it from others. It should just do it themselves. Yeah, but only a small percentage of people are willing to do that I've noticed like a tiny percentage So did it make potucket as safe as little Compton for example Oh, you've been a little confident. You've been around Tucker. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I mean it yeah I know what I own very well, but no, but what I'm saying is potucket as you just said is like it kind of famous is nice town But there's some definitely very rough parts of it. Yeah. Are they now totally safe with these cameras? Oh, no, there's nothing changed Nothing changed Yeah, yeah, because no, well, yeah, the thing is to um You know, it's like Ben you and Ben were talking about if you treat people like prisoners. They act like that Right You know, if people is like you said a prisoner should be ideally safer because of all the surveillance But it's not it's the most dangerous place in the world. Yes, so And criminals through criminals no matter what you do no matter what you input. They're gonna they're gonna break the law You know, they're gonna try to find a way around it like Things like this they only hurt the law-biting citizen, you know, criminals will find out a way to try to get around it You know instead of driving one car through all these cameras, you know, maybe we're gonna do stop points and switch cars like So fist halfway sophisticated criminals are gonna figure out a way to try to get around this You know, but the dumb criminal and the law-biting citizens are not you know, they You know, they're gonna be tracked everywhere that they they go and this is what it is It's kind of a geofence for vehicles It tracks vehicles everywhere that they go and I've heard some really juvenile arguments They say well, we're not tracking people. We're just tracking cars and I'm trying to figure out how that's any different Sounds the same to me especially in the place like, you know, Rhode Island or Minnesota wherever everywhere except New York Every state doesn't really have a proper subway system So if you need to get around in every state in America, you need a motor vehicle You need a car in order to get around. Yes, so if you're tracking people's cars you're tracking people You know, so that's a really stupid argument that was trying to be argued that And like I said, I'll know how that's any better. We're not tracking people. We're tracking cars like okay Well, especially if they haven't done anything wrong. So it's sweeping up everybody into this drag net seems like by definition unconstitutional I mean, I don't want to I'm not alleging any specific crime because I have no knowledge of a specific crime, but Given everything you've said is it possible that members of the city council or law enforcement officials are making money on this? Yeah, I don't know. I mean the reaction to me made me very suspicious Yeah, the smart yeah, it was very suspicious because I was the only officer in my state and at the country at the time that was Volk, you know publicly given my objections So the smart thing to do was just be ignore me and say, you know, he's just some crazy guy in the wilderness eating some honey Exactly exactly. Yeah, but they beheaded John the Baptist He didn't work for him Yeah, so I thought I you know because you know the chief she's pretty smart I thought what she was going to do was to ignore me. Yes, I thought that's what she was going to do I thought she was going to punish me once Suspend me once, you know, and I take that hand. I just move on with my life. You know, I tried you know But when I was getting it was it was it was in a two-year period I was getting suspended suspended and within two years it was in the two-year periods. I was dealing with all that So I did get suspicious of what's happening behind the scenes that I may not I may or may not know Or why they're trying so hard to get rid of me You know, I just thought maybe it was just a tribal impulse that I was kicking in, you know, but now that Ben is sharing, what Ben is sharing is the first time I'm hearing it, that there are some backdoor ideas that looked like that happened. Maybe, I don't know. I mean, it is Rhode Island, so I don't know. - What was the reaction from your wife and your family people you know, your neighbors? Were they on your side? - So my wife was on my side. - Good. - My wife was on my side. She supported me from the beginning. She was worried. I mean, this was a sad thing. Everyone, when I was selling my family and all my friends and my coworkers who really care about me and I still care about them very much. They all told me, they all read the same script. They pulled me inside and they said, "Well, if you go this route, and you talk about this, they're gonna make sure that you lose your job, and they're probably gonna make sure that you don't work again." They all told me this. My family told me this, my coworkers told me this. They all said the same script, so it was really sad that as Americans, we've accepted this idea that if you speak up, you're just gonna get hammered. That was really sad that everyone just accepted that. But so no one really spoke against what I was doing. They were, their argument was, what you're doing is noble, but leave that for some other idiot to do. You have two kids, you have a wife, you have Dilsa Pay. Let somebody else put the neck on the line. Like that was the advice that everyone was trying to give me. And I thought about it and, like I said, after a couple of months, I had trouble sleeping. My first son was born right before I spoke up. And then when you become a father, I'm sure you understand this talk. You're like, oh man, I'm responsible for what this person becomes. - That's right. - So one day I'm gonna have to have a conversation with my sons about integrity, and when I have that conversation with them, I wanna be able to look them in the eye when I have that conversation. So I knew if I ignored this problem, and I pretended that it didn't exist. I wouldn't be able to do that. So I thought it was worth the risk. I paid the price for it, but I'm doing all right, so. - Oh, you made me emotional saying that. Well, for whatever it's worth nothing really, but I just wanna say it, I hope you are richly rewarded for your courage and decency. And I think you did that for everybody in this country, and I'm just, I'm really grateful you did it. And last thing, you were very articulate. So that was not your problem. (laughing) - You know what it is? - It's my, it's my Rhode Island accent. It's disgusting. So, if anybody who's never been a Rhode Island, don't worry, we don't all talk like this. Just blue collar, just blue collar, Latinos, black guys and Italians, with only ones who talk like this. - It's the best, I miss it. Noel, thank you for taking the time. It's great to talk to you. - Appreciate it, thank you, Tucker. - Thank you. And thank you for watching tonight. We'll see you next Wednesday. (upbeat music)