What Nvidia's Megaspeed Scandal Is Really All About
from Odd Lots
1h 4m 36s
The scandal surrounding Mega Speed, a major Southeast Asian buyer of Nvidia AI chips, has ignited a global debate over export controls, technological sovereignty, and regulatory oversight. The company, spun off from a Chinese gaming firm and operating through a Singapore shell, purchased $4.6 billion in Nvidia hardware under a partnership with Alibaba, a leading Chinese AI firm. U.S. and Singapore investigations have focused on whether Mega Speed diverted physical GPUs from Malaysia to mainland China—allegedly bypassing export controls—despite the company’s claims of compliance. Reports reveal significant inconsistencies in Mega Speed’s data center footprint and hardware inventory, raising questions about transparency and due diligence. Meanwhile, Nvidia faces growing criticism for its role in enabling such arrangements, including its internal partner whitelisting and reported influence in the investigation. The case underscores a broader policy conflict: while remote access to AI compute via Southeast Asian data centers is legally permissible, U.S. regulators are pushing to restrict it, especially amid geopolitical tensions with China. This debate is further complicated by Huawei’s limited capacity to challenge Nvidia’s dominance in AI, despite growing domestic use of its chips in China. On Capitol Hill and in the Trump administration, there is mounting pressure to strengthen export controls and enforce cloud computing restrictions. The situation remains fluid, with ongoing investigations, political debates, and shifting regulatory stances affecting global AI infrastructure investments. Ultimately, the Mega Speed case highlights the intersection of technology, geopolitics, and the evolving rules of digital trade.
Finance is increasingly being built on digital rails, but as the adoption of
virtual assets tokenization and stable coins grows, can regulation not only
keep pace but help accelerate it, find out more later in the podcast.
For big business AI opened up a world of promise, but that world of promise
turned into a world of pain, cost spiraling, data trapped, security and
governance risks multiplying, and ROI out of reach. That's why enterprises
turned to Boomey to connect data, apps and AI helping them operate
securely, efficiently and at scale. Boomey turns a world of AI pain into a
world of AI gain. As Boomey says, we got you head to boomey.com. That's
B-O-O-M-I dot com. Small businesses are the pulse of every community.
They bring people together, create opportunities and drive growth.
Chase for business helps business owners like you with personalized
guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place. With that guidance and
your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter
future for your community. Learn more at chase.com/business.
Chase for business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available
for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply.
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JP Morgan Chase and company.
Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news.
Hello and welcome to another episode of the AdLots Podcast. I'm Joe Weissnthal.
And I'm Tracy Allaway. Tracy, I gotta say like this gents and long story.
I think it's one of the biggest stories ever. Yeah.
Just as a new story to bow to as big as it could possibly get.
It has everything. It has everything. A ledge, Chinese, spies, chips muggling.
It's exciting stuff. Also, it's birth like 5,000 memes. Some of which are quite good.
There have been definitely some good memes. But actually, so on a serious note,
if you think about the AI trade, I mean the sun around which it all revolves is in video,
both in terms of providing the actual chips that powers a lot of this technology.
And also providing a lot of the financing and investments for these companies.
And so any hint of a scandal has big implications for AI as a whole.
No, I really like the way you put that. They are the sun of the universe.
Both from it, they have the crown jewel technology, the chips, they have the financing
to back all kinds of partners and neo-clouds and everything all around the world. Everyone wants it.
And it is a technology that is both commercially, intensely in demand,
and geopolitically in demand. Yeah.
And so in addition to the fact that the tech is good and they have the financing,
there are all these fights about who they could even sell it to, starting, you know,
there are all these things of the Biden administration, lobbying of the Trump administration,
how liberal should the policies be about who gets to buy them, etc.
And that is why this story is just like so, it's huge.
Yeah. And just on the geopolitical, automics, good word, on the geopolitical angle itself.
I mean, there's this tension that we've seen more and more in recent years,
where some people will argue that, well, you want the US,
you want a company like Nvidia to be the backbone of like the AI tech stack, right?
And so maybe you want lots of people you totally, totally.
But on the other hand, you know, you have people in the Trump administration who
argue that we are in this existential AI race with China, and therefore it's really important
that China does not have access to the most advanced chips.
And so we're seeing that sort of play out in a lot of the discussion on what's going on
with Nvidia right now.
The other thing that's very important, and this will allow us to get into the guest,
is that in some sense, there's actually like the story is kind of old news.
There's been a lot of reporting on this company, mega speed,
and it's CEO and the company's closeness to Nvidia and Jensen, specifically where they know.
So like in a way, like, what is the new news here is part of the question, but whatever,
you know, the, I guess on some level, the new news is just specifically Jensen,
long admitting to Nvidia that he had this relationship and affair with the this executive or someone
associated with mega speed and the investigation into it.
Anyway, that further ado, we really do have the perfect guest.
Someone who I think is like the best beat in the world, whenever we get a chance to chat,
I'm always learning more about both the sort of like politics, the geopolitics of chip flows
around the world, someone who's reported on chips all around the world from DC to San Francisco.
And now based in Hong Kong, we're going to be speaking with tech reporter here at Bloomberg News,
Mackenzie Hawkins. So Mackenzie, thank you so much for coming on Adlots.
Thank you so much for having me quite a week. Staying up late and coming on Adlots,
because you're based in Hong Kong. So thank you. And you were just in the US,
you're probably still kind of jet lagged, so and it's the biggest thing.
Actually, like, I think I've gone back to working US hours. So I feel like I never left the US.
I finally got over the jet lag and Jensen Wong is jet lagging me.
I can't believe how fried you must be. So again, thank you for taking the time.
Let me start with this question. You know, the reporters always think they know a little bit more
than what they can write at any given moment, et cetera, because you're not waiting for verification.
Let's say we were talking a week ago. And so based on only what you're allowed to report,
let's say this conversation is happening sometime in October, and we say, Mackenzie,
what's the deal with this company mega speed? What was the answer? Give me a week ago.
Just that you're totally about who is mega speed? And why should we care about this company called
mega speed? So pre-affair admission, mega speed is the single largest Southeast Asian buyer of
Nvidia chips. It's a major supplier of AI computer Ali Baba, which is one of the most important tech
companies in frontier AI leaders in China. It purchased $4.6 billion worth of Nvidia hardware
after being spun off from a Chinese gaming company passing through a BVI shell and incorporating
in Singapore, then becoming an official Nvidia partner four days later. It's executive had a close
relationship with Jensen. We didn't know quite how close. And it had been under US investigation
and Singapore investigation for if we're talking a week ago, at least a year.
So why did this raise eyebrows in the first place? So mega speed renting out GPU capacity to a
company like Ali Baba. My understanding is like, okay, that's allowed. People know that this is
happening. But at the same time, if you're worried about Chinese companies having access to
technologically advanced Nvidia chips, it seems like a pretty big loophole.
Yeah. So I mean, the arrangement that mega speed has with Ali Baba is extraordinarily common
across the Southeast Asian data center ecosystem. You know, in some ways the backbone of Chinese
compute is like jahor Malaysia. So it's not actually the remote access cloud computing arrangement
that got mega speed sort of looked at by the US government later in Singapore government.
It's the suspicion that the company has not just rented compute to Chinese off-takers,
but actually diverted those like the physical hardware into mainland China. Right. So that's the
focus of the US investigation. It was looking at whether mega speed had smuggle chips, which the
company has categorically denied having ever done. And also looking into its ownership structure,
because even if mega speed is a Singaporean entity, if it were owned by a Chinese company,
it would also be illegal to sell advanced Nvidia chips to mega speed without a US license.
It is 100% Singapore owned, but by a shell.
Let's get into like, there is this question of, you know, what do chip restrictions even mean
if you could still just access a cloud in a different country? And like, is this the mother of all
loopholes? But let's actually just start on the smuggling question. Why might investigators have
been concerned that mega speed was literally smuggling chips or not? Like, what are the details
that we know around this question? The actual, the physical movement of chips from say a delivery
address in Johor Malaysia to an address inside of mainland China. Yeah. So I mean, the US government
has a handful of export control officers overseas, including in Southeast Asia. And when I say
a handful, it's really a handful. It's like a dozen. They're going to more than double the number
this year to 25 for context. So you know, when we did our, our investigation into mega speed last
year, I think I was on singular email chains that had like 50 Bloomberg people. So the, the,
the capacity all of us in this room had been on email change with 50 Bloomberg people, a little
inside baseball here. But this is a real phenomenon. All right. Keep going. But no one else
serious. This, you know, the US government has, has fairly limited enforcement capacity overseas,
but they do checks. And, you know, I, there's unfortunately not a ton that I can say about the
initial trigger for the proven to mega speed. Okay. Through the course of looking at shipments
through Southeast Asia, they thought that this company was worth digging into more. I can talk
a little about why I started looking into it. Sure. That would be helpful. Yeah. So in April or
of last year. I had sort of recently arrived in Hong Kong and I was working with a couple of
colleagues here and in the mainland on a story about this cluster of data center operators in China's
western deserts that had issued procurement orders and you know the local government tender notices
that they had fulfilled to build data centers seeking 115,000 restricted and video ships.
This was you know in order of magnitude larger than what anybody thought might be in China.
And so a big question that we were trying to probe is you know it gets one thing for them to be
constructing buildings you know Chinese companies love to construct shells I mean I mean that
physically in the sense but obviously that is the case for shell companies as well but you know
it's one thing to build the buildings it's another thing to put the chips inside and so one of
the big questions that we were trying to tease out that we were unable to answer in that investigation
was whether these particular operators had the supply chain the black market supply chain
necessary to get the GPUs. And you know when I was asking around in South Asian supply chains
everyone just kept saying like look at this company called mega speed. And so we started looking
at them a year and a half ago maybe a bit over a year and a half ago and found out you know
several months actually into our own investigation that the US government had been looking into them
as well. The US investigation remains ongoing in a sort of complicated way which you can get into
a bit later. In our reporting we didn't find concrete evidence that mega speed had smuggled
any GPUs to China we found an extraordinary number of inconsistencies in their data center footprint
that neither the company nor Nvidia have been able to explain. I want to ask about those inconsistencies
but before we do can you just describe how chip smuggling typically works like how do people in
the black market actually do this? Yeah so you know we have enough examples of you know public
allegations things that are being actively prosecuted to sort of draw some thematic conclusions.
There is a secondary market for Nvidia hardware but you know most Nvidia chips get to customers via
official allocation from Nvidia. And Nvidia doesn't sell chips directly to the end user like
they wouldn't be selling hardware directly to mega speed or directly to core weaver whoever
they sell to OEMs original equipped manufacturers server makers like super micro or Dell or HP
those server makers typically sell to distributors those distributors myself another distributor
then they go into a data center and then they're often rented to another company so it's this
extremely vast distribution network for Nvidia chips but ultimately in order to place an order
and get your order approved by Nvidia you need to say like this is where they're going like this is
the customer this is the data center location and a consistent theme across you know what's now like
half a dozen cases being prosecuted and this is certainly the case in the indictment of super
micro is co-founder earlier this year the stated location of where the chips are going to wind up
was not the intended location you know it's not that there was some sort of rogue person at one
node in the supply chain that was like yeah I'm just going to grab them. You have companies or
individual actors that place orders that are purportedly for a destination outside of China with
the intent of diverting that harbor to China the entire time is at least the allegation that's
sort of laid out in several indictments and then it's a question of well how much work does
Nvidia need to do and do the server manufacturers need to do to make sure that the actual state
destination of the chips exists and there are some cases where prosecutors have alleged the data
center like literally didn't exist there was never a place for those chips to go they were just
always intended to go to China wait can I just I'm a little bit disappointed are there no like chip
mules out there are people who are just like I don't know I have this vision of someone in a trench
coat and they like open it up and it's lined with like probably not eight 100s with black wells or
something well you know it's funny that you say that because you know in one of jensen's many
denials of chip smuggling as an issue he said you know the grace black wall system waste you
tons you're not putting that in your back back in your pocket anytime soon we reported a couple
months ago that the u_s_ government has been investigating a single for a court of logistics
company that a special like literally specializes in tech hardware transportation through complicated
the logistics these are fragile systems and transported or is believed to have transported
restricted hardware and then it's a question of like okay if you're a logistics company then
how much is it your job to know what's in the package so a lot of these cases also involve fall
speculation allegedly involve fall speculation you know putting on customs forms that it's just
a computer server ambiguous what type of computer server sometimes random electronics there was one
case where and this is a case where one one person actually put guilty already where they declared
restricted in video hardware to be quote unquote adapter modules this is a category of electronics
that includes like the thing you used to plug your phone into a foreign phone outlet like really
adapter modules that weigh two thousand pounds so there are lots of cases where it's like
really that's an eyebrow raising declaration but it's you know I get there are lots of colorful
characters in broker markets it's actually a very sophisticated black market there are contracts
you know brokers go and solicit hardware on behalf of specific suppliers there was one broker who
complained to us that you know so like the trade is so good and so many people are trying to get it
on it then now you have these scammers in the black market who are like purporting to have hardware
it's not like a good honest black markets for like legitimate honest black market brokers no it's
a pretty extraordinary and sophisticated of sprawling the system what's next for virtual assets
I'm Jacob Grease host of economy scale a series exploring growth in key global sectors
and this episode we're diving into the digital forces shaping finance Sean McEw from
the by-base virtual assets registry authority has this to say we're seeing a lot of
in social players come in digital asset dedicated hedge funds high-frequency traders and that's
what I think in folks who service in social clients as more capital enters the market adaptive
regulation is likely to become increasingly key risk miracle ripple says a lot of regulators
globally would like to keep the industry at arms length that's the opposite here I think
also what you'll find is that regulation and frameworks can come out but some of them are maybe
a slight iteration on some 80 year old policy and not actually in line with what the technology
can do and offer and again that's very different in Dubai listen to the full episode wherever you
get your podcasts the series is brought to you by Bloomberg Media Studios and the Dubai Department
of Economy and Tourism when you own your own business you need to keep things moving
need to book a last minute flight earn a three hundred dollar travel credit to cover that
need to take a meeting before takeoff do it from the comfort of the chase sapphire lounge by the club
need to get your breath before you board huh done chase sapphire reserve for business the business card
that gives back all you put in visit chase.com/reservebusiness to learn more cards issued by JP Morgan
Chase Bank and a member of the IC subject to credit approval terms apply this podcast is brought
to by Navy Federal Credit Union kick off unforgettable travel journeys with Navy Federal's flagship
premiere card you'll get four times points on all travel yes all travel so if you book a hotel
you'll earn four times points if you book a flight you'll earn four times points even if you
book a ride share you'll earn four times points plus you'll earn three times points on dining
and like other cards it doesn't require you to use any booking portals and has no rewards limits
so earning points couldn't be easier it's all the travel none of the baggage so whether your next
journey takes you hiking through a national park relaxing on the beach staying at a resort or
visiting somewhere on your bucket list you can earn four times points on all your travel with
the flagship premiere card visit navy federal dot org slash flagship premiere to find out more
Navy Federal is insured by NC way terms and conditions apply for rewards
wise is the smart way to manage the currencies you need around the globe if you've ever sent money
internationally using a traditional bank there's a good chance you've paid more than you realized
hidden fees exchange rate markups and extra charges can quietly add up before your money even arrives
there's a better way try wise wise uses the exchange rate you'd usually find on google
helping you avoid the unwelcome surprises that often come with international transfers whether
you're sending money to family overseas spending while on your holiday abroad or paying bills
across borders wise makes moving money simple transparent and straightforward wise offers 24/7
customer service and runs over seven million daily checks to spot and stop fraud and most transfers
happen in under 20 seconds which means your money arrives in less time than you've been listening
to me join millions saving billions be smart get wise visit wise dot com or download the wise app
today season sees applied
just one slight detail you said that technically a entity like a mega speeder even a core wave
does not actually buy the chips from Nvidia directly is that and that actually the first
buyer of the chips is the server maker yeah typically speaking Nvidia is not selling directly
to that but what the end user gets the allocation or the so the and user a corely of a mega speed
whoever will get some allocation that is
and video decides, okay, they're gonna get this many,
but the actual chain first goes through one of the server
makers like Adele or Super Micro or something like that.
- Correct.
- Okay.
- Yeah, that's what makes Nvidia King Maker of this.
- All right, explain, as you said,
there's this question of smuggling is not locked down,
but you said inconsistencies discovered in your reporting.
Let's talk about these inconsistencies.
- On Megasphere?
- Yeah.
- All right, let's get into it.
So, you know, one of the sort of first ports of call
that I look at when I'm investigating a company for smuggling,
which has now become the big part of my job,
is do they have the requisite data center space,
like literally just the physical space in the building,
the power supply to support the hardware
that they have purchased?
- And we learned at a point in our investigation
the number of GPUs that Nvidia found when asked
by the US government to go and check Megasphere facilities,
which they did several times.
You know, they tabulated all of the chips across
were 12 data centers owned by eight companies in three countries.
They added up all the chips, they reported to the US government,
and around this time, you know,
we got a statement from them in mid-November last year
that said, everything that was shipped to our partners
is where it should be.
We compared that number to Malaysian
and Indonesian trade records that we had gotten,
and found that there were about 50,000 chips unaccounted for,
which is like not a small amount of compute.
And most of them were blackwall chips,
which at the time were Nvidia's best hardware.
And so we went back to Nvidia and we said,
you know, we're not talking about one or two chips
that are missing, we're talking about a significant proportion
of the overall hardware that Megasphere has purchased.
And after we asked about that, they went back to Malaysia
and they said, oh, we found these warehouses
that contain what's missing.
And I said, okay, great.
So we're gonna subtract from the amount of hardware
that we found in trade records,
the number of chips that we know you guys told
the US government you found.
And that should be the amount of hardware
that's like in these warehouses
that we didn't know existed until we could go.
We have been talking to Nvidia about this
for a really long time by this point.
This is the number, right?
And they declined to comment on whether that's the number.
It was like, okay.
And then they eventually, they submitted an updated statement
that said we've identified quote unquote substantially
all of the chips that Megasphere had purchased
via its hardware partners.
And we'll do additional checks in the near future.
So that was December of last year.
I've probably asked Nvidia 10 to 12 times over the past year
whether those additional checks have occurred.
I'm interested in particular in a handful of data centers.
One, which is Megasphere's largest data center,
dropped the company as a tenant a couple of months
after our investigation and a story by the New York Times
that first broke the news of the US investigation
into Megasphere.
I don't know the reason that they were dropped,
but if they're no longer a tenant
and that's where a significant portion of the Nvidia GPUs,
that Nvidia told the US government have found,
we're located, that raises some questions about
where that hardware might be now.
We've not gotten answers to those questions.
And then, so that's one of the eight data center operators.
Two of the others directly contradicted to us on the record
in video's account of the hardware
as described to the US government.
And so that's of the hardware that Nvidia said
it found in the data centers.
And then you have this stuff that's in these warehouses.
And we asked, OK, so Nvidia's policy
is we prioritize customers that are
ready to put their products to use.
They don't want GPUs sitting in warehouses
for months and months on end.
We asked, what is Megasphere's plan with this hardware?
When are we going to see it installed in the data center?
We didn't get answers to those questions.
So that's just on the hardware allocation piece.
Then we look at what Megasphere has represented
to investors and its data center footprint
as the company describes it.
And on its website, it had three data centers listed.
We know that's an undercount of their total number
of data centers all in Southeast Asia.
But in a presentation to investors in 2024,
Megasphere described five data centers across three countries,
two in Indonesia, two in Malaysia,
and one in a specific area of an unnamed third country
that on another slide of that same investor deck
was the only one described as not in Southeast Asia.
And the rendering that Megasphere used
to represent that data center is of a sprawling project
in Shanghai, where Megasphere's Chinese corporate twin
has been hiring engineers to work
on restricted and video hardware, companies
that Alice, who has become infamous in this scandal
over the past couple of weeks, companies
that she has longtime business ties to have been investors
in that data center.
And so we asked, what's up with this product in Shanghai,
why is that the rendering that Megasphere
used to represent this facility on its investor deck?
We never got answers to those questions either.
- It's such a weird decision to talk about,
oh, and we also have this project in a country
that we're not gonna name,
but here's an illustration of Shanghai.
- Okay, and just so we're clear,
can you outline, what exactly are the responsibilities
of NVIDIA here?
So if it sells chips to a server company
and the server company declares that the end user
is definitely not a Chinese firm,
is it incumbent on NVIDIA to double check
those claims or investigate?
What do they actually, what are they expected to do?
- You know, this is the central tension
that has been playing out over the past year
is whose job is it to know?
So in the case of Megasphere, NVIDIA told us last year,
we asked the US government if we need to cut off Megasphere
and we were told no.
In the case where super micro's co-founders alleged
to have smuggled $2.5 billion,
so $2.5 billion worth of hardware
to an unnamed Southeast Asian intermediary
that then smuggled the majority of it to China,
we've reported that that Southeast Asian intermediary
is one of the most important AI companies in Thailand.
That company is alleged to never have had the data centers
to install that hardware.
So, you know, a lot of people have asked,
you know, did NVIDIA check?
Did super micro check?
And actually, super micro did check
according to the US environment.
They visited, they audited because the volumes
that this type company was purchasing were so significant,
they audited, but then they allowed the shipments
to continue multiple times.
I think companies are always going to say, you know,
tell us what the law is and we will follow the law.
If you don't want us to sell to this particular company,
then tell us we can't sell to that company.
But I think the question is,
are there red flags that are so obvious
that if you have sort of any competent due diligence program,
you should have seen that.
This is, it's a conversation that's sort of being actively
litigated in Washington, shall we say.
And NVIDIA has started actually in some ways
to self-regulate, you know, they have this like top tier
of NVIDIA cloud partners, these sort of like stamp
of approval companies that are totally, you tell the industry,
like, these are, these are our top tier,
you know, top tier partners, mega speed is one of them.
It's still one of them, it became one of them four days
after it was incorporated in Singapore.
Another NCP, it's CEO is on trial in Singapore
for document false or for defrauding service suppliers
about the ultimate destination of hardware.
And there was like a mansion seized,
that was the alleged proceeds of chip smuggling.
The Thai company was like sort of the initial hardware supplier
for the like national AI company,
sovereign cloud of Thailand,
which is the first NCP in Thailand.
So you have to, like definitely,
this interesting set of connections happening
at the NCP layer.
- The NCP? - NVIDIA cloud partner.
- Oh, yeah, yeah, sorry, sorry.
- Sorry.
- So there's also like an internal whitelist
of companies that NVIDIA has sort of pre-approved for purchase.
And after the Super Micro co-founders indictment earlier this year,
NVIDIA went and cleaved a lot of companies from that whitelist.
And it's this interesting thing
because on the one hand,
this is the type of due diligence.
Maybe that some Washington regulators
would like to see the chip maker take.
On the other it raises questions of on what basis
did you remove those companies?
Why were they on the whitelist in the first place?
And so I think also for NVIDIA,
which is trying in some ways to demonstrate to the US
that it does take this seriously,
but also has so deeply lost credibility on this issue
that it's like a little bit of a catch-22.
And that's not trying to absolve NVIDIA responsibility
just sort of explaining a political reality
the company I find itself in.
- This was gonna be my next question
'cause NVIDIA, I mean, the thing we hear constantly
is chips are in short supply.
Everyone is scrambling to get chips.
There's so much demand out there.
Like it's hard to fill at all.
They can afford to be selective with their customers, right?
Like do you have a working theory for like why would they even
take the chance if demand is so strong
that they could sell to pretty much anyone?
- That's a good question.
NVIDIA's primary arguments on export controls
are about the market share, the global market share
of AI infrastructure that is American.
They sort of view Huawei,
their primary competitor in China
as this sort of existential threat to US dominance.
And there's a lot of demand out there.
Your arguments are basically that Nvidia's interests are US interests and so when you talk
about the question of remote access, companies completely, legally renting the use of Nvidia
hardware that Chinese companies can purchase themselves to those Chinese companies.
That's a policy choice by the US government.
A lot of people describe that as it's a workaround of the export control, it's the loophole of
the export controls.
It's legal.
The US has the ability to make it illegal and it's legal in the vast majority of cases.
For Nvidia, that's a good thing because Nvidia chips are filling all these data centers
in Southeast Asia that in many cases wouldn't exist if not for the off-take demand from Chinese
companies.
It's the same reason that Nvidia wants to be able to freely sell its chips in China, as
we need to be able to compete with Huawei on its own turf.
A question that a lot of regulators have pushed back on Nvidia on this topic is, "While
we can't supply the world's data centers, we're so far off from a world of Huawei being
able to supply the world's data centers, and so how existential is the threat of Chinese
compute on the global stage, or even within China that the Nvidia sales are aiming to counteract?
But I think Nvidia is very focused on these sort of battleground or what could become intense
battleground regions of China build its own AI chip production capacity that they want
to make sure that they're selling in these regions."
I just want to point out one thing.
You've talked to Ian Dunning twice from Hudson River Trading who has said he is not having
a hard time getting GPUs.
He's having a hard time getting GPU places to plug in.
Yeah.
So it's possible, at least it seems possible, that there is not as much like unlimited
demand for GPUs per se, as maybe a video like this video would like to claim, and that
actually like, let's say the bottleneck is in places to plug them in, that if you want
to actually sell the most number of chips for the most number of dollars, setting aside
these sort of broad market share questions that actually like the Southeast Asian customers
are important.
If we believe what we've heard from other purchasers of Nvidia GPUs, that they're available
if you can plug them in.
But before we get into like this sort of Nvidia versus Huawei part, which I do want
to talk about.
I want to just like clarify this remote access question.
Are you saying like, let's say I started data center company, and I'm explicitly like,
I'm going to build data centers in Malaysia, and I'm going to rent them out to deep seek
and a bunch of other like Chinese frontier AI companies technically, and I'm going to
buy a video like technically there is nothing as far as we know like, per se illegal about
that arrangement.
And beyond that, how do the hawks or the people who argue in favor of export controls into
mainly in China?
That seems really consistent.
Like, can you look, walking through like, is that actually legal, and how is that, you
say it's not a loophole that it's the law, but how is that law justified?
Yeah, in the vast majority of cases, this is legal, I mean, this is like literally what
mega speeds businesses, this is what a lot of Southeast Asian neo clouds do.
The exceptions to that would be if you know that the compute is going to be used for intelligence
activities by a foreign adversary military, it's a very narrow band of, band of restrictions.
But they're not there's no restrictions on like selling chips into Southeast Asia to
be used to train the most advanced open source models from Chinese.
There's actually nothing illegal about it.
And deep sea wealth rents from like a Southeast Asia data center, right?
So the US government has said that moonshot rents Nvidia compute in Thailand.
Deep sea by my understanding actually does more of it has more of its compute on shore.
But you know, generally speaking across Chinese companies, you know, this is an existentially
important resource is in India compute in Southeast Asia.
You ask, you know, how is it that the hawks have not restricted this?
They actually did.
They restricted it at the end of the Biden administration.
And it was part of this broad set of global restrictions on Nvidia hardware called the
AI diffusion rule that was set to take effect in May 2025.
And the Trump administration is not enforcing that regulation.
Sorry, just to be clear, these Nvidia still can't sell their most advanced chips into
the mainland China.
But the Trump administration so far has been cool to sell them into Southeast Asia to
then remote access.
I mean, it's the Internet.
I don't even know what borders mean why are like, it's the Internet.
What we talking about.
What does it matter that we are?
That's where controls on hardware don't respect the cloud.
Yeah.
Yeah.
No, it's, it's, it's sometimes a bit baffling.
Okay.
As long as I'm not the only one that's baffled.
Okay.
This is like an active raging debate in Washington to be there.
And you know, one, one interesting thing that happened this summer.
So, you know, after, after Kimmy comes out with K3, it's sort of, it's like seen as
like a second deep seek moment, almost the, the science and tech advisor in the White
House, Michael Kratzier's posts on X that the moonshot team acquired black wall chips,
which is illegal and raises questions of why has the US government not, you know, why
is the Commerce Department not take any action if that's the US government's determination?
And also that they had remotely accessed these chips in Thailand.
And a couple of days after that, the enforcement unit of the part of the Commerce Department
that that handles chip export control.
So the people who are like, oh, you violated, you smuggled, we're going to go after you.
That unit started mapping where in the world remote access happens, which is very interesting
because remote access is not illegal.
And so if you're an enforcer of expert controls, you know, why, why is that your purview?
But these started sort of crafting this list of, of countries where that's known to happen.
And, you know, there have been at a very senior level of the Trump administration pretty
intense at debate over whether to impose such restrictions.
There's also interest on Capitol Hill, there's interesting Capitol Hill in being where
Huckish on a lot of these policies, but including remote access.
You know, this is sort of nightmare scenario for Nvidia.
If remote access were to be restricted, it's also a nightmare scenario for some hyper scalers
like Oracle that counts, you know, Chinese off-takers as a significant portion of its business.
You know, there was great reporting in the financial times recently about Oracle, you know, having
a cloud computing arrangement with Tencent that then the Trump administration stepped into
kill basically, even though it was legal.
And so it's like, okay, we're just going to do this at Huck.
You know, they do a lot of things at Huck, but we'll see, you know, there's, it's an active
regulatory debate.
Like, you know, the answer to this question could change by the time this podcast airs
although I doubt it.
Well, okay, speaking of ad Huck, I mean, part of the scandal here is that Nvidia reportedly
intervened in the US government's mega-speed investigation and said, yeah, it's all good.
Yeah, they're cool.
They're cool.
Trust us.
What do you expect to happen?
I don't even know the status of that investigation now, but like, is it picking up again?
Or like, what's going on there?
Would you expect the DOJ to actually pursue those?
Yeah, yeah.
So I just wanted to clarify quickly on the sort of scope of Nvidia's intervention.
So this is reporting from like two days ago and this is such an active story that I'm
saying what I know as of 1038 PM Hong Kong time on Wednesday.
So Nvidia's general counsel, like I called Tim Teeter, called the head of the Bureau
of Industry and Security like the export controls enforcement and they just see that rights
and enforces export controls at the Commerce Department in late summer last year to inquire
about whether BIS was involved in the detention of Alice who we now know was, you know, having
an extramarital affair with Jensen, but Nvidia says that Tim Teeter didn't know that at the
time of this call called to ask if BIS was involved in her being detained in Singapore.
She had been brought in for questioning and restricted from leaving the country as part
of Singapore's own investigation into mega speed, which mega speed said recently had concluded
this year with no adverse findings.
So Tim Teeter called to ask about that.
He later emailed BIS staff who were working on the case and asked to meet with one of them
and they forwarded those emails to Jeffrey Kessler because Tim Teeter invoked Kessler's
name.
He's like, oh, Kessler said it was okay to talk to you and this was like, this is not
normal practice for an export enforcement investigation.
And Kessler said continue doing things by the book.
You know, the Commerce Department said, or it was still exorcist for this agency within
the Commerce Department said, you know, everything has been above board.
But the sort of nature of the investigation and the ability of expert enforcement agents
to act in the weeks and months after this sort of saga with Tim Teeter was diminished,
you know, and agents or people working on expert enforcement, you know, were restricted
from like requesting information directly from NVIDIA without getting Kessler's approval.
Before hand, or routing it through him, that's a policy that's unique to NVIDIA.
It's not how things operate with any other major tech company.
You were told not to mention mega speed or speed matrix the name of mega speed's Malaysian
subsidiary and external communications.
And eventually the Department of Justice, which typically pursues these investigations
alongside BIS.
So you know, if anything is going to be turned into like a criminal indictment, it's going
to involve the DOJ.
The Department of Justice has been working alongside BIS for a bit on this case ended
up asking BIS to stop its efforts.
So now that case is with DOJ, you know, I think my
My understanding of the status of the case a few weeks ago is probably very different from where things are right now
There's obviously intense interest in this within the Trump administration on Capitol Hill
So you know, it's funny like a lot of a lot of what we're talking about now was known such a long time ago
You know, I was reported on it. We were reported on it
But it's got a new life show me say in the past couple of weeks
I feel like we should mention BIS is the Bureau of industry and security because whenever I hear BIS
I always think bank for international settlements, but yes, and a lot of different type of nerd
You can only only have so many three-letter acronyms, right? And so you're good. You're bound to now DC says every day
We've all went up to new ones. Oh, yeah
When you own your own business you own every decision
Catch the red eye or take the six am make a new hire or promote internally
Celebrate a win with the toast at the gate or unwind at the lounge
Big props to this team
Some decisions are a win-win like earning eight times points on Chase travel chase a fire reserve for business
The business card that gives back all you put in
Visit chase.com/reservebusiness to learn more
Cards issued by JP Morgan Chase Bank and a member of DIC subject to credit approval turns apply
This podcast is brought to you by Navy Federal Credit Union
Kick off unforgettable travel journeys with Navy Federal's flagship premier card
You'll get four times points on all travel. Yes, all travel
So if you book a hotel, you'll earn four times points
If you book a flight, you'll earn four times points
Even if you book a ride share, you'll earn four times points
Plus you'll earn three times points on dining
And like other cards, it doesn't require you to use any booking portals
And has no rewards limits
So earning points couldn't be easier
It's all the travel none of the baggage
So whether your next journey takes you hiking through a national park
Relaxing on the beach, staying at a resort
Or visiting somewhere on your bucket list
You can earn four times points on all your travel with the flagship premier card
Visit navyfederal.org/flagshippremier to find out more
Navy Federal is insured by NCAA, terms, and conditions apply for rewards
Wise is the smart way to manage the currencies you need around the globe
If you've ever sent money internationally using a traditional bank
There's a good chance you've paid more than you realized
Hidden fees, exchange rate markups, and extra charges can quietly add up
Before your money even arrives
There's a better way, try wise
Wise uses the exchange rate you'd usually find on Google
Helping you avoid the unwelcome surprises that often come with international transfers
Whether you're sending money to family overseas
Spending while on your holiday abroad
Or paying bills across borders
Wise makes moving money simple, transparent, and straightforward
Wise offers 24/7 customer service
And runs over 7 million daily checks to spot and stop fraud
And most transfers happen in under 20 seconds
Which means your money arrives in less time than you've been listening to me
Join millions, saving billions, be smart, get wise
Visit wise.com or download The Wise app today
Teasing sees apply
The world of business is constantly evolving
Every day new challenges, new opportunities, new ways of working
Comcast business keeps you totally in step
With secure AI back networking built to power the way modern business gets things done today
In more than 100 countries around the world
That's some serious muscle
And get this, Comcast business powers over 90% of the fortune 500 and millions of small businesses
Behind it all, network engineers, cyber security specialists, support teams
Thousands of experts answering your call at 2am
Like it's 2pm, always on, always ready
That's a lot of coffee
One partner, powering how business gets done for companies of every size
All around the globe
When you add it all up, no one does business like Comcast business
One more question on mega speed
Before I want to get a little bit, talk a little bit about Huawei
One more question on mega speed
What do we know right now?
You know, you described it at the very beginning
Spun off from this gaming company
BVI, Shell company, etc
What do we know about its owners and its backers
And how they have the money to buy a bunch of Nvidia chips and all that stuff
Yeah, so mega speed on paper is 100% owned by a Singapore Shell company
That has been 100% owned by a CEO who is a Singapore national
We tried many times to get in touch with him last year
We were unsuccessful
In terms of where it got the money
This is a big open question
4.6 billion dollars worth of hardware is not a small amount of hardware
It has a compute rental agreement with Alibaba
Alibaba, the way that these agreements often work is a company will put a prepayment
Sort of a guarantee
Hey, you put a deposit down and it's time to purchase
We are going to off take this in the future
So there are finital transactions between Alibaba via Singaporean subsidiary of Alibaba's
Two mega speeds where the entirety of its Malaysian business was offered as collateral actually
These are transactions that happened a couple of years ago
But don't sort of fully answer the question of where it got all of the money that it did to purchase the hardware
But on paper it is a Singaporean company and I don't have evidence to the contrary
Let's talk a little bit about you mentioned Huawei
And you mentioned that Huawei just doesn't have the capacity
The scale yet to replace Nvidia on a global level
Probably not even at a China level, given the demand among Chinese AI firms
Yeah, you know, Huawei's senior executives themselves say it'll take until 2030
2030 to see a domestic demand
All right, so talk a little bit about where are they on this process
And you know, in AI, we're always talking about like six months behind, two years behind
Whatever, like tell us a little bit about where Huawei is
And it's fine, I guess, to be like a real competitor within video
Yeah, so, you know, Huawei is such a black box
It's the sort of preeminent competitor to Nvidia in China
They're a handful of other companies, of course, that are
You know, a lot of, in the same way that a lot of American companies are like designing their own chips
You have that same pattern among a lot of the Chinese companies
It's just a matter of like whether they can get the production capacity
You know, that's the constraint
In large part because the US and allied nations have restricted the flow of semiconductor manufacturing equipment into China
But Huawei has made material progress on its chips over the past couple of years
And you're starting to see Chinese companies become more interested in adopting Huawei hardware
You know, I remember actually coming on a lot of the years ago and I was like
You know, one of the things that I'm waiting for is like, is Huawei ever going to export
Ascend chips, which are the name of its AI chips
And also, are we going to see, you know, a frontier Chinese lab
Complete a successful training run on Huawei chips
You know, right now, you're starting to see motor releases out of China that have
What are called, like, zero date infringing capabilities on Huawei
Which is like, this is sort of optimized to run best on Huawei hardware from the moment that we release it
But that's a very different thing from doing, you know, pre-training on Huawei
And, you know, one data point for this is
Gosh, then I'm busy and you're like, maybe like a month and a half ago, two months ago
We reported that deep sea cut placed a very substantial order for Huawei hardware
160,000 of Huawei's best AI chips called 950DTs
For use at a data center in Inner Mongolia that deep sea is building
As it's sort of like next really, really large domestic computing cluster
Instantly, this is the same location within China that the U.S. government
Believes that deep sea cousin installed in video's blackwall chips
We don't know what the overall composition of compute in that data center will be
Huawei is not going to be able to fulfill that order for more than a year
Deep sea is actually lobbying the Chinese government to pressure Huawei to speed up its allocation
It would be great for Chinese labs if they had this alternative source of supply
Right, it's obviously the U.S. government
You know, we obviously we talked about their Monaxis piece
But, you know, everybody would like to own their chips
Have the, or at least have them in country
The U.S. government has made it very difficult to use in video
They would love people to use Huawei
It's a matter of whether they can do a training run
And, you know, at the time of our reporting, Huawei was planning on using these 950DTs
For inference rather than training even though, or sorry, deep sea was planning on using Huawei 950DTs
For inference rather than training even though they were designed as training chips
And, Huawei's overall production capacity of that hardware is in the low hundreds of thousands
You know, it's just orders of magnitude less than what Nvidia is shipping globally
But, you still have started to see Huawei make some export attempts
You know, I, I wrote about a couple of months ago as well
That they had submitted in response to a tender from the Egyptian government
To build AI compute for use by Egyptian defense
And, it was a very small amount of compute
It was like 2000 chips
But, they were prepared to offer their best chips
And, you know, it's like when you're that supply constrained
It's like everything they are offering overseas is something that you're not offering domestically
And so, as a company, you know, Huawei has to decide
Like, you know, as important as it is to get more Chinese developers
You know, working on its ecosystem
Because you also get this sort of like iterative feedback loop
When you have AI companies training on your hardware that helps you make your hardware better
They also want to make sure that they like have these footholds in global markets
It's the same strategy that made them sort of the pre-evident telecommunication
provider and that the US government watched that happen years ago when Huawei became extremely
successful in 3G4G and they want to avoid that happening with AI infrastructure.
So actually when they learned of this bid that Huawei had made in Egypt, they gathered
this consortium of American companies and they were like counterfeit.
And a lot of these companies had never really thought of Egypt as an important market but
they had these conversations with the Egyptian government.
We don't know the outcome of that tender process yet.
But it's just sort of an interesting, you know, Egypt is an interesting battleground
for Huawei because they feel a little bit blocked or boxed out of the Persian Gulf because
there were these, you know, big American AI infrastructure deals last year which I talked
with you guys about about a year ago of how controversial those were and Egypt is sort
of an anchor in the Middle East, also an anchor in Africa.
So you're starting to see these battles play out.
You know, the Malaysian government is seriously evaluating use of an earlier generation of
Huawei assistantships for its sovereign AI capabilities, but you know, it's important
to remember that the volumes that we're talking about here are just infinitesimally small
at this time.
So this is very much a live story as you've been emphasizing throughout this conversation
and one reason why you're very sleep deprived at the moment.
But what are you watching out for next?
So we still, we don't really know what the DOJ is going to do and now we have this independent
investigation going into Jensen and the spy affair in video, what do you think is going
to be important?
Yeah, I mean, look, obviously Jensen's fate is sort of important for global markets
for the industry, you know, what the board ends up deciding to do.
I think from a policy and regulatory perspective, you know, this is a very unique moment in
administration that generally speaking has, you know, adopted a lot of the policies that
in video would like it to.
There is rage, honestly, on Capitol Hill, and in many parts of the Trump administration
about the overall state of export controls, obviously this, you know, scandal within video
gives people a lot of things to latch on to.
So you're starting to see these voices that have not historically been particularly active
on this issue, take great interest in it, and then you have this sort of baseline contingent
of China hawks, who have been upset by what they see as a lack of action by the Bureau
of Industry and Security, that VIS within the Trump administration on this topic and are
trying to legislate some of the rules to at least like, okay, let's not roll back
export controls more than they already have been.
Let's put additional restrictions on semiconductor equipment shipments into China.
Let's make sure that it's unambiguous that, you know, the executive branch has the authority
to restrict cloud compute access by Chinese companies.
And a lot of these measures are sort of going to be litigated over the next couple of months
as part of an annual must pass defense package.
So it'll be a really interesting couple of months on Capitol Hill.
Obviously, you know, Democrats are taking Congress next year.
I would expect a significant amount of oversight and to not just in video, but, you know, the
major players in the ecosystem. And then I think, you know, for, for Southeast Asia, which
is closer to where I sit, you know, there's been this sort of whiplash over the past couple
of years where, you know, remember like the AI, the Fusion Rule, I mentioned that the
Trump administration is not enforcing.
So this was going to impose, you know, licensing requirements, meaning you need to get the
US government's permission to ship and video ships to Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and
Indonesia, all these places where, you know, we have these smuggling cases happening.
So actually, some of the companies that are, you know, suspected of being involved in
smuggling, like massively ramped up their shipments right before those restrictions were
set to take effect. And then they didn't take effect. And then the Trump administration
worked on a regulation. They were like, "Hey, we're not doing that." But we are going
to restrict to Malaysia and Thailand specifically. This was a draft rule that I read about in June
or July of last year. And then they scrapped that in the diplomatic pressure from the Malaysian
government. And then they worked on another replacement regulation that would have done
global export controls. We wrote about that in March, I would say. And that was withdrawn
shortly after it was sent to other US government agencies. And so, you know, for companies that
are trying to build infrastructure in this region, you know, even the ones that are doing
it completely legally, it's like, "Are we going to be able to get the chips?" I guess
this constant sort of, you know, the US government is a little bit the boy who cried, "We'll
fund this issue." You know, then we have this intense scrutiny and to mega speed, Asian
banks sort of go through, like, ebbs and flows of how comfortable they are with, you
know, financing deals without having a significant amount of Chinese off-takes or like, what if
the US government does restrict it and then are suddenly, you know, left holding the bag.
And this is, you know, one of the fast-scrolling, you know, infrastructure regions in the world.
You know, the amount of compute online right now is, like, it doesn't hold a candle to
what exists in the US, but it is fast-growing. A lot of companies are investing here. And
it's just under, yeah, it intends to peer to scrutiny. So it's, yes. That's just developments
that I'll be watching. And then on the Huawei front, you know, Huawei is making export attempts.
And I think, you know, the US government, it's funny, like, over a year ago, there was an
executive order to promote the export of the American AI stack to basically, like, design
these packages that you could sort of offer to, you know, other countries of, like, adopt,
you know, up and down, you know, from applications to models, to infrastructure, the American AI
stack. And we haven't seen, like, anything come out of that program yet. And now we actually
do have Huawei, like, starting to make these attempts. And the US is sort of responding
to them on, like, an ad hoc basis. And I'm sure that we'll see more of that over the next
years. You'll start to see, like, these battlegrounds in the global south that will be really
interesting to watch, you know, how foreign governments make decisions about their own
sovereign capabilities. And whether they think, you know, the US is a reliable partner,
or they're willing to take, you know, maybe worse chips from China, but, you know, Huawei's
happy to, like, send their engineers there and do the whole data center for you. And, yeah,
I know it was exciting times.
McKenzie, that was fantastic. Get some sleep. Well, deserve. You're going to need it. But,
no, that was great. Thank you for staying up late, catching us up to speed on all this.
And I don't think this will be the last time we check. And I appreciate your coming
on up.
Yeah, thanks so much for having me, always a pleasure, guys.
She's so great. Yeah, you should like, man, what a, there's, these are such complicated
stories, right? They really are. They're really complicated. There's so many different
dimensions to them. Also, there's a lot of legal technicality in what Ken and Ken said,
which I think sometimes people don't necessarily appreciate the journalistic perspective. And
she's doing that all on like, I think she said she, like, hadn't slept for 70 hours.
Yeah, that's pretty intense. No, it's a fascinating story. I keep thinking, like, it feels like
a big tail risk right now for the chip maker. It's not, I mean, obviously what happens
with Jensen and the investigation, but just the idea that as, as a lot of this becomes
more public knowledge, as politicians become aware of it, that, that legal loophole of Chinese
companies being able to rent GPUs via Southeast Asia, even if they can't actually buy certain
chips, like that comes under scrutiny. And you can imagine if that, like, it's such a
weird one. It's so weird. This to remote access. What does that even mean? It's a cloud,
of course, it's remote access. It's like, oh, it's opposed to like the tenant of the
user of the chips walk again to the data. The seven themselves are plugging in a laptop.
It's all remote access. So it's a, it's always been very baffling to me that we have these
intense conversations about, oh, you can't sell them to China. But actually, it's really
not that big of a deal to sell into, and it's not illegal, currently, to sell into anywhere
else who then rents that capacity to Chinese firms. Like, what? I don't know. I do, like,
who couldn't explain this adjustment? Yeah. The other thing, the other thing that I thought
was really interesting, and I wasn't aware of, was McKenzie saying that there's basically
like a handful of US customs officers in Southeast Asia. And you can imagine, like, if you're
going to ramp up export controls and expect them to be effective, you're going to have to
staff up, right? It reminds me, I did an article on the corporate bond market many, many
years ago, and at the time, I think this was like, and well, I can't remember, maybe an
eight trillion market. And there was one guy at the SEC who devoted half his time to actually
like the monitoring the corporate bond market, which blew my mind.
You know, I really think actually, and I hadn't appreciated this until McKenzie brought
up Huawei's sale to Egypt. That is it. I forget, you know, what is it? We did the story
with Eva Doe who wrote the book, House of Huawei. And what was the story there? The story
there was this is a company that is very aggressive about gaining footholds in parts of the
world that like other companies aren't as aggressive about. So Egypt is like, as she
explained, a pretty good example that's even with a scarce number of ascend chips, that
is sort of like in their corporate DNA, it like go out and like win these global markets,
which then of course, implicitly, as you gain this foothold, then of course implicitly
helps sort of like broader Chinese like soft and hard power, et cetera. But then I was
thinking about, okay, let's say after this mega speed scandal, you're like, you know,
we really, no more of this remote stuff. We really got to like crack down on who we're
selling to.
in Southeast Asia. It's clear that today, you know, it doesn't sound like Huawei could replace
Nvidia today. But if, you know, maybe a few years from now, like a number of these countries
do become like Huawei countries. Yeah. It's going to be very tricky. Well, the other thing I just
want to reiterate is like, again, with Nvidia itself, there's a weird like contradiction here
where if chip demand is as strong as they describe, they shouldn't be very selective with their
customers, right? Yeah. They just like, there shouldn't be any question marks over anyone,
basically. Yeah. Yeah. And so I find that, I find that really interesting as well. And probably
like an under-disgust angle in all of this. Like you can afford to like be discriminating.
Be discriminating and have like the most intense compliance process in the world if you want.
Yeah. Shall we leave it there? Listen to there. This has been another episode of The All Thoughts
Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway. And I'm Joe Wasntel. You can
follow me at the stalwart. Follow our guest, McKenzie Hawkins. She's at Mac Hawk. Follow our
producers. Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Armandash. She'll been at Dashbot. Kale Brooks and Kale Brooks
and Kevin Luzano at Kevin Lloyd. Luzano. And you can share about all of these topics 24/7 in our
discord discord.gg/odlods. And for more odd laws content, check out our daily news that are
which you can find at Bloomberg.com/odlods. And if you enjoyed this conversation, if you like it,
when we talk about chip smuggling, then please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast
platform. And if you're watching on video, then please like or leave a comment or better yet,
subscribe. And remember, if you're a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes
absolutely at free. All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and
follow the instructions there. Thanks for joining.
If you listen to financial news, you know a lot of time is spent thinking about what's next.
The next opportunity, the next investment, the next move. But sometimes what matters most is being
ready for what you never saw coming. For more than 75 years, Cincinnati Insurance has worked with
independent agents to help protect businesses, homes, valuables, and more. Because planning for
the future isn't only about knowing what's next. It's about making sure you're ready for what
you can't predict. Let Cincinnati Insurance make your bad day better. Find an independent agent
at CINFIN.com. Most meeting note takers get the easy words right and the important ones wrong.
The client's name, the acronym, whisper flow note taker is built to get the hard words right.
It takes notes on any meeting platform. Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, even WhatsApp calls, keeps every
meeting searchable and connects to clot or chat GPT so you can ask, "What did we agree to last
Tuesday?" Free to try on Mac and Windows at whisperflow.ai. That's W-I-S-P-R-FLOW.ai.
For big business, AI opened up a world of promise, but that world of promise turned into a world of
pain. Costs spiraling, data trapped, security and governance risks multiplying, and ROI out of
reach. That's why enterprises turned to Boomey to connect data, apps, and AI, helping them operate
securely, efficiently, and at scale. As Boomey
says, "We got you." Head to boomey.com. The world of business is constantly
evolving, and Comcast Business keeps you totally in step with secure AI back networking in more
than 100 countries. They're powering over 90% of the Fortune 500 and millions of small businesses.
That's a lot of muscle. And behind it all, thousands of experts answering your call at 2am,
like it's 2pm. One partner powering how business gets done for companies around the globe.
When you add it all up, no one does business like Comcast Business.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Mega Speed, a major Southeast Asian buyer of Nvidia chips, has drawn scrutiny for allegedly diverting hardware to China, raising concerns about export control loopholes.
The U.S. investigation centers on whether Mega Speed physically smuggled or rerouted Nvidia GPUs from Malaysia to mainland China, despite the company’s denials.
Inconsistencies were found in Mega Speed’s data center footprint and hardware allocation, with Nvidia admitting to missing data in trade records and unexplained warehouse holdings.
Nvidia’s role in regulating chip distribution is under political and legal scrutiny, particularly as it maintains a whitelist of trusted partners and has been accused of downplaying risks.
Remote access to AI compute via Southeast Asian data centers is legally permitted, but U.S. regulators are debating whether to restrict it, creating a major policy tension.
Huawei is not yet a global competitor to Nvidia, with limited production capacity and domestic adoption, though Chinese firms are increasingly exploring its hardware.
The scandal involving Mega Speed’s CEO and an alleged affair with an Nvidia executive adds a personal dimension to the geopolitical and regulatory debate.
Regulatory uncertainty, especially around cloud compute access and export controls, is reshaping global AI infrastructure investments and supply chains.
Summary:
The scandal surrounding Mega Speed, a major Southeast Asian buyer of Nvidia AI chips, has ignited a global debate over export controls, technological sovereignty, and regulatory oversight. 6 billion in Nvidia hardware under a partnership with Alibaba, a leading Chinese AI firm. S.
and Singapore investigations have focused on whether Mega Speed diverted physical GPUs from Malaysia to mainland China—allegedly bypassing export controls—despite the company’s claims of compliance. Reports reveal significant inconsistencies in Mega Speed’s data center footprint and hardware inventory, raising questions about transparency and due diligence. Meanwhile, Nvidia faces growing criticism for its role in enabling such arrangements, including its internal partner whitelisting and reported influence in the investigation.
S. regulators are pushing to restrict it, especially amid geopolitical tensions with China. This debate is further complicated by Huawei’s limited capacity to challenge Nvidia’s dominance in AI, despite growing domestic use of its chips in China.
On Capitol Hill and in the Trump administration, there is mounting pressure to strengthen export controls and enforce cloud computing restrictions. The situation remains fluid, with ongoing investigations, political debates, and shifting regulatory stances affecting global AI infrastructure investments. Ultimately, the Mega Speed case highlights the intersection of technology, geopolitics, and the evolving rules of digital trade.
FAQs
Nvidia dominates the AI chip market by supplying the most advanced GPUs to data centers worldwide. Its chips are essential for AI training and inference, and it acts as a key supplier to major tech companies, including those in China, through partnerships and cloud access.
Remote access allows Chinese AI companies to use Nvidia GPUs in Southeast Asian data centers without physically owning the hardware. This arrangement is legal under current U.S. export controls, as long as the compute is not used for military or intelligence purposes.
MegaSpeed, a major Southeast Asian buyer of Nvidia chips, has raised concerns because it is linked to Chinese tech giant Alibaba and may have diverted hardware to mainland China, potentially violating U.S. export controls on sensitive technology.
Reporters found significant inconsistencies in MegaSpeed’s data center footprint and GPU allocation data. While no confirmed smuggling has been proven, there are unaccounted chips and discrepancies in data center locations that neither MegaSpeed nor Nvidia fully explain.
Yes, Nvidia has been involved, reportedly intervening by communicating with U.S. export control officials and restricting information sharing. This has raised concerns about transparency and whether Nvidia is adequately overseeing its partners.
The U.S. and China are in a strategic race for AI dominance, with the U.S. restricting access to advanced chips in China. However, loopholes like remote access and Southeast Asian data centers allow Chinese firms to still access powerful AI hardware indirectly.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.