Go back

What an Insider Told Danny Jones About the Anthony Weiner Laptop...

61m 23s

What an Insider Told Danny Jones About the Anthony Weiner Laptop...

The transcript explores a range of interconnected geopolitical, military, and intelligence issues, focusing on the expansion of Israel’s space-based defense systems and the potential for escalation in regional conflicts. It questions whether Israel possesses ICBMs, suggesting such development would require international supply chains and expose them to detection, raising concerns about covert military escalation. The conversation critically examines global power dynamics, highlighting how nuclear capability serves as a survival tool for authoritarian regimes like Iran and North Korea, while also pointing to the misuse of political and intelligence power by elites. There is strong skepticism about the transparency of global institutions, exemplified by allegations of hacking, deep-state manipulation, and cover-ups involving figures like Hunter Biden and Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion also delves into the dangers of biological weapons research, which is widely hidden within civilian labs and masked as vaccine facilities. These technologies, combined with poor nuclear defense preparedness—including low accuracy of interceptors and lack of crisis drills—create a scenario where a single event could trigger catastrophic global consequences. The narrative concludes with a sobering warning: while nuclear war remains a theoretical risk, the more insidious and hidden threats—such as biological warfare and elite-level corruption—may be more immediate and dangerous, underscoring a deep systemic vulnerability in global governance.

Transcription

11450 Words, 61874 Characters

English
Hey, guys, if you're not following me on Spotify, please hit that follow button and leave a five-star review. They're both a huge, huge help. Thank you. Like she had it. And so when I see her talking about something like this, it's like, "Deef, what did you just pull up?" "Jerusalem Post." All right. Can you go up to that headline? "Jerusalem Post also told me that Monica Lewinsky was Mossad." Oh, that's who told you? "Jerusalem Post." When did they tell you that? I don't know, a couple of years ago. Where before we did that podcast? Yeah, you remember that when I called him a murderer? I go, "So how does the CIA commit murder?" Oh, wait, that was before our podcast ended with Andy and Jim. I think so, yeah. Oh, yeah. I think I looked it up before that podcast. One of the funniest openers of all time. Oh, yeah. He's walking. So yeah, me and Julie, we're talking last night about whether or not the CIA kills people. Do you do that? And he's like, "How do you guys murder each other again?" Yeah, that's where you said murder. He goes, "Well, we don't call her." I was like, "Wait a minute." Tomato tomato, Andrew. This is from the Jerusalem Post. Israel plans development of space weapons capable of striking targets on Earth. Defense Minister Israel Kat said space capabilities would provide the IDF with an advantage in future conflicts as Israel seeks to become a leading space power. You don't have enough of an advantage. You've been a fucking carpet bomb on city blocks for the last fucking three years. Israel is set to develop offensive space capabilities as part of defense ministries multi-year budget plan for the space sector, including systems to divine design to defend Israeli satellites from hostile spacecraft and weapons capable of striking targets on Earth from space. The plan includes upgrades to existing capabilities, including expanded intelligence collection from space and improved communication systems. A dedicated budget will be allocated for offensive space activity as part of a broader effort to strengthen their position in the space domain. The first is the expansion of IDF intelligence collection capabilities from space through multiple layers. This is where you're cooking, Danny Jones. This is what he's talking about, allowing operations around the clock in all weather conditions and across multiple locations simultaneously. The second area involves establishing broad resilient and continuous communications capabilities for the defense establishment. Yeah, these guys are just trying to get rich, bro. They're getting rich and they're keeping their power and they're creating some sort of a fucking who knows what breakaway civilization. They're going to go to, I mean, what's it called? Patagonia is probably a great place to survive a nuclear war. Have you ever seen the Jericho map? What's the Jericho? Oh, no, is that the fucking, is that the ancient, the new Babylon? Steve pulled this up with Palm. This goes to be part of Israel. These are the places on earth that are safe. Oh, yeah, look at that. Look at that. Israeli Jericho, the Jericho missile. Yeah, look, Argentina. Look, Florida's almost in it. Florida's almost in it, but not quite. And then Australia, New Zealand, where they're built in the, the billionaire bunkers. So basically like teals in Argentina, and it's in New Zealand. And there's no coincidence there. No, yeah, that's perfect. Right. That's what he wants. Yep. And fucking Artica, it's way too cold there. There's too many polar bears. Argentina is great because you're right there in the middle of Chile. California is going to live apparently. Part of, yeah, Southern California, right? Yeah, the cartels are going to be all right too. Cartels are good, but China's done. So why, why is it this though? Why, why is it, I mean, if you made, maybe if you made this round, it would make sense, but like looking at a flat like this, I don't get it. Why is that? That's the range. That's the range of the ICBMs. Yes, that is that would the Jericho missiles, right? And these are, oh, these are Israel's missiles? Yeah. Okay, that's the range. I get it now. Now, how far can he Ron's ICBMs go? Not that far. But they like that thing like you're up sitting there like what the fuck? They're ICBMs. Yeah. Wait, why are you saying it like that? Because they don't have fucking ICBMs. They don't think they have. I mean, I don't think they do that. All the people that I've talked to said they don't. We told you that someone who was just telling me this. Fuck, I had someone really smart telling me this recently. God damn it. Who was it? Somebody very credible. If it came out that they didn't have ICBMs, that makes this somehow even worse. Somebody was telling me that they basically maybe I was watching. Maybe this is on my podcast or maybe I saw this somewhere. But somebody was telling me that like when they start to create build ICBMs, that requires a lot of collaboration industrially from come from Russia. They were saying like they were going to have to get a lot of technology from Russia to build that stuff. Then you start getting into like shipping stuff and like the intelligence around that they have locked down on Iran, they're going to be able to like one it's one thing to basically enrich the uranium to a certain level, right? Like they can keep that kind of compartmentalized to a degree. But once you start trying to build ICBM rockets and shit, now you're building in shipping channels, shipping lanes. You're moving shit in on roads importing it from other countries and all this stuff. So the layer of intelligence spreads out more. You're having more fail points because you're exposing yourself more. So you're saying they would have been like bombed or something? They would have been caught trying to do that kind of stuff. And they probably know they would have been caught trying to do that. And for people who told me that and no one does anything about it because it's not a nuclear situation so they're like, well, we can't bomb them. I don't know. Yeah, I don't know how this would work. Look, if fucking nukes, it seems like nukes are the cause of all their problems. Why not just go to fossil fuels? If I run Iran, I'm burning gas. I'm going to go back to I'm going to just drill oil and run on my energy on oil because it seems like this nuclear shit seems to be the cause of all their problems, right? And they're in the middle of all this oil everywhere. Why not just use oil? Yeah, but they also since this regime came into power, they've had a target on their back from a lot of Western governments. And obviously, then Israel is fucking banging down America's door all the time saying, "Oh, God, I take them out of power," or whatever. That I think the nuclear thing came up out of like a survival mode. I mean, you look at this war. One of the most vindicated guys, I hate to say this. But one of the most vindicated guys in this war is Kim Jong-un. He's got nukes and he gets to keep running in a totalitarian regime. And we're not bombing him. In fact, he's trying to meet with him. He's probably going to die a quiet death in his bed all alone. Not probably. Not getting blown up by a helicopter rocket. And there's something to be said for that that now you are proving that guy's point. It's like, you are making the broken cloth. Yes, you have to be a lying cheating sociopath to survive in the world. That's what Kim Jong-un's dad did, right? He fucking lied about not doing a new program with Clinton. I think he promised Clinton that he wasn't going to have a nuclear program and then he fucking did it. And that's the thing. It's like you do have to look in the mirror, though. You got to do the old Central Park Zoo thing. What's the Central Park Zoo thing? They used to have a mirror and above it, it said the world's most dangerous animal. And you'd look in it as a human. Oh, really? Yeah, wow. It's like a fancy level. Yeah, but you got to, I think, especially now with all the erosion of the institutions and seeing the rot that's within them. You got to look in the mirror and say, you know, are we really the good guys? Like, let me put that a better way. And this is how a lot of countries around the world could put it. Because governments are not their people. Are our governments really the good guys? Right. I don't think there's a lot of good evidence to show that right now. It seems like, you know, when you are, and I've said this since the beginning, when you are giving me a literal intellectual reason to have to defend an action that the Iranian government's taking, you have dramatically fucked up and you've lost the plot. Yeah, because I'm like, people are like, well, why are they bombing bases? And I'm like, oh, I don't know. Maybe because their whole fucking country got bombed. Like, what do you want them to do? This is how war works. Like, you can't just go fucking try to say, yeah, we're going to, we're going to use the biblical prophecy to bomb them off the base of planar. Oh, sorry about the girl's school. And not think your bases are going to get hit. Like, this is warfare 101. Yeah, an idiot at home knows this. Yeah. You know, but like, then ask yourself, well, why is that not? We fucking did it. One of, if not the most common DMs I get on Instagram are many of you asking me what my favorite books are. Well, today's your lucky day, because if you use the link in my description below to join my newsletter, I'm going to give you my top 10 book recommendations right now. Also, if you'd like to join my clipping community for a chance to make money producing content from the show, you can do so via the Discord link in my description below. And finally, you can join my Patreon for early, uncensored releases of the full episodes via the Patreon link about a subscription below. As always, please take one second to hit that subscribe button. If you haven't already, I really appreciate that. Also, the like button's a big help. And you can join my newsletter via the link in the description below. You can't just fucking invade whatever time you want. And now they're trying to merge the Iran War with the Ukraine War. Did you see this stuff? When you say merge. So allegedly, this is what I heard from, I forget who told me this, but what's his name? Zilinski? Bomb some ship in some fucking waterway. Jank told you this. Yes, Jank told me this. There you go. He bombed some ship that had something to do with Iran to try to get drawn into the Iran Wars. We can get more funding for the Ukraine War. - Oh, Treada Parcy wrote this. - Oh, is she legit? - No, no, that's, that's, he's a guy. He's on my show. - Treada? Oh, he's on your show. - Oh cool. - That's a 3-82. - What's his story? Where's he from? - Treada was from Iran and his dad was-- - Oh, that guy. - His dad was in prison there. - That guy was great. - I saw that one. - He was four and he's been outspoken against it, but he's also been one of the few in the Iranian diaspora who has advocated hardcore against intervention there. - Right. - And therefore, people try to then say, like, oh, he works for the R-A-G-C, which I do not believe he does at all. I think he's very against those guys. - So what was the ocean or the little tiny sea over there? It was by Azerbaijan. That there was a ship there that Zelensky bombed. Maybe you can find that. - All right, so wait, is this the article beef? - We're already on it. - Okay, so he attacked a ship. Let me just read it from this. We'll start there. At Ukraine's, as Ukraine's volodomir Zelensky arrives and Washington much indicates that he's no longer merely trying to draw greater American support into its war against Russia, increasingly it appears to be pursuing something far more consequential. Mergering Ukraine with the U.S. or Ron conflict, which by the way, this is an obvious point, but this is the stuff of world wars. Like this is literally how it happens. You merge a bunch of places, different conflict zones, and suddenly boom, it's everywhere. But into a single strategic theater, the distinction matters if the two wars become one or Ukraine ceases to be merely a recipient of American military assistance and instead becomes a direct participant in Washington's war with Tehran by this meaning like a literal ally in that way under the terminology. By the same token, the United States would no longer simply be Ukraine's principal arm supplier. It would become an active belligerent against Russia through a conflict that stretches from the black sea to the Caspian. Now, can we find that sea that Danny was referring to that he popped today? - I might be a Caspian. - Today, however, to do, let's see. Can we search the word attack? Is maybe that's in there? Israel attacking around the. no, no, no. Okay, but they attack something by the, we say it's by the black sea. - Near Azerbaijan, to Azerbaijan. - Near Azerbaijan, see. Maybe that's the sea that's right there. Little tiny waterway. - Yeah, where did Zelensky. - If you just pull the map, I can pull it. - Bomb. - Okay. On March 5th, 2026, to Iranian one-way attack drones struck the Azerbaijanian enclave. - Oh, so this was a while ago. - No, that's a different one. That's Iranian, Zelensky attacking Iran. - I might be throwing you off with the Azerbaijan thing. - All right, so Zelensky attack near Iran. Try that. - Okay. - Yeah, 'cause maybe it wasn't Azerbaijan, let's get it. - Right, yeah, so in late July, 2026, Ukrainian long-range drones struck military supply lines and vessels in the Caspian Sea. - Okay. - Resulting in a direct escalation and sharp threats from Iran on July 25th to 26th, 2026. Ukrainian drone strikes hit targets in the Caspian Sea, including Russian missile boat and sanctioned cargo vessels. Zelensky confirmed the operation. - We did it. - So Russia, Iran friends, Zelensky or Ukraine, Russia enemies. So if he punches Russia who is helping Iran, now it's like, hey, look, I'm a part of this triangle. Right, does that make sense? Is that the other thing? - Yeah, it does make sense. - Okay, so. - You see, we're sending, we just sent Ratcliffe over to fucking Russia. - I saw that this morning, yeah. I was on the plane vigorously reading all the news. - So CIA director goes, he didn't meet with Putin. - Trump said it was semi-standard. - Semi-normal. - Of course, he said that. - Meeting. - Yeah. - What do you think that was about? - I don't know. How long was that meeting? Do we know that? He met with him. I want to say it was like an hour. - Yeah, I said that he didn't meet with Putin, but he met with the FSB or whatever, some of the intelligence folks. - Mine. - How long do we keep this going? - First of all, that's not standard at all. - Oh, the secret trip to Moscow. - All right, well, we should make of CIA boss, the secret trip to Moscow from the BBC President Trump said Ratcliffe's trip was a semi-routine visit, but there was nothing routine about a CIA chief making a secret 10,000 mile return dash to Moscow. He met Russian intelligence officials on Tuesday. Notably, his opposite member in Russia's overseas spy agency Sergei Narishin, after arriving unannounced on a US military plane, the Kremlin confirmed. It's been nearly five years since his predecessor, William Burns, made this trip, and that was at a similarly tense time. Just as Russia was drawing up plans to invade Ukraine, so this is probably serious. But the difference now is it's an active war, and we've been in funding the other side of an active war that's going on there, which this could be really bad. It could be what the BBC is saying here, which is like maybe some shit's about to go down there. Like please, like cooler heads prevail. It's very possible. My head more goes towards like, the fix is in a little bit here. Yeah, like all right. Let's you show with some of those missiles. We'll show with some of these drones. We're gonna do next. We're funding 13 billion. We're gonna make it two. Little fucking men get over here. We'll take care of him. Don't worry about it. You know, just stop, stop letting Iran use that, use that supply line right there. Yeah. Would you? Yeah. Yeah, sometimes I just wonder like if it go, you know, you know how at least in local politics or in American politics, it's like, we kind of, everyone kind of knows it's a unit party. It's like the same guy's got both puppets in each hand. Like a guy on the left, the guy on the right, the same guy controlling both puppets, the Bill Hicks joke. It's like, maybe it's like that with countries. Maybe there's these families that have tons of money and maybe they run banks and maybe they also can simultaneously control one country with the right hand, another country with the left hand and try to use these world leaders as their own puppets to achieve whatever goals that they have. While you have their little do boys like Jeffrey Epstein running around trying to make side deals and hustle and blackmail up. You got to turn on the vent before you cook like this, Daniel Jones, temperature's going to get too high. I think you're over the target. Oh, God. And they can put on their ropes with Steve Manin and do say I'm starting to think that your babies there are a very unnecessary hedge. You know what I mean? Yeah. No, it seems like it's just seems so crazy to say that and actually be, you know, actually feel like you're backed by evidence and not just some crazy cook because this is like cookie shit two years ago. Yeah, you've had to watch me re-evaluate my reality on phone calls, be like, yeah, remember I used to think that. Yeah. Winds are pointing in a different direction now. Right. You have to be able to do. You have got to be able to change this things change, which by the way, you know, if that means like we find out some things that are less as bad as we thought in the future, which selfishly, I hope we do, like I'll change with that. But right now it's been one of those years where you're like, oh, so the fucking I need them now. It's like, what the fuck are we doing? Yeah. You know, it's just like, there's been a few times where I have to go like this. And it's like, look at deep and I'm like, are we still here? Is this thing on? Yeah. You know? And there's something really darkly comedic about it and just being some fucking asshole talking about it on YouTube. But then the stronger feeling is that there's something darkly for boating about it that it is this open. And like I was saying, 20, 30 minutes ago, nothing's being done about it. Yeah. Which suggests it is so deep rooted that they just don't care or they know what's coming. Right. Yeah. How many more fucking Jeffrey Epstein's are there running around the world right now? You know, like he was the one that was like offered up to us on a silver platter. That is kind of like, oh, god damn it at some level. I feel like that could be like holding the shiny object somewhere like, hey, look at this evil monster that existed. We're going to give you these files the ones we can give you. And we're going to keep some of them. But you're going to really get to see who this guy really was. So go throw a fit about this. Talk about it on YouTube. Talk about it on X where we're not going to throttle. That's shit at all. In fact, we're going to push it. Remember when we couldn't put it in. I remember when you were you were literally telling me don't put the word Epstein in a YouTube title. Because no one will ever see the video. And then in the last couple of year, last year and a half, it's been completely off the rails. Like shit about Epstein going complete everything on YouTube. I open up my YouTube app and it's just video after video, after video about Epstein, million views, million views, million views, reels with hundreds of millions of views about this stuff. And everyone's talking about it across every single social media platform. So why is that? And crazy. It's insane pendulum swing. So it's like, is it trying to show us the monster to disguise some sort of fucking evil machine monster machine that's still operational behind the scenes? Because that's what it seems like. It seems like the society in the cultural culture culture, easy for you to say, in this global economic world that we live in with, you know, all these billionaires in world leaders doing these backdoor deals behind the veil just enables people like this guy to exist. So I mean, just from the research that you've been doing on your show, you've exposed all of these crazy people like the fucking that Spanish guy who had the wife he deported, who has some fake title in the Trump administration zampalo or whatever fuckers name is like people like this guy like the fact that it enables people like that guy to be real, you know, and I'm not, I don't think that that people like him are. I have no reason to believe that that guy's any more innocent than Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah, I, to an extent, I'll agree with you. He, he seems like a prototypical really just not good guy in every way before you even get to some of the things that he could or could not have been allegedly, you know, for you're on around there watching, you know, involved with, but it's crazy. His place is like a mile from here. Oh, that's right. Like we're sitting like a mile. We could go knock on his door right now. Right. I'll stay in for a while. That's what's so weird. It's right in the middle of us and everything in this whole underworld. And by the way, that part that I couldn't, when I talked with Amanda for an hour and then she gave me permission to go public with most of our conversation, the part that I couldn't talk about, one of them is actually now public. Oh, okay, well, so while I was on the phone with her, I was here in a mail. She would talk in Portuguese to a mail voice once in a while. Oh, no. And I was like my boyfriend, my boyfriend, Steve. No, no, no, no, I was like, I was like throughout the conversation. I kept being like, yes, so your husband, the doctor that they threw in jail, pending trial with this thing where they arrested you, you know, what's the story there? She goes, I'll get through that. And then as the conversation is going, like, why do I feel like she's talking to the husband? And she goes, so anyway, you know, he's here now. And he was there with her. Now it's come out like he literally just jumped out of the US. And I'm like, you know, and they're acting like it's now causing a problem with Trump and the Brazilians that this happened. I'm like, they let a guy I'm guessing he like cut off his ankle monitor and just bail from the US who was married to a woman who's directly tied to the reason that Melania Trump came out to talk about the Epstein files at a White House press conference. Right. You know, they're they're saying they can pick up heartbeats in the middle of Iranian mountains and they let this guy to go go to Brazil. Get the fuck out of here. And you just wonder why that is. But yeah, yeah, I don't. There are a lot of people like that that exist. The thing I've equated it to with. And it's always existed. It's always existed. The thing I've equated it to with just Epstein, like just think about him for a minute. No one else is you've seen those videos before where someone's like you just see the it's like a satisfying video where someone's hand is in the side of an embankment, you know, and some pond or something and they're pulling on a weed. And then and they keep pulling and it gets longer and longer. And there's a trickle of water coming out, trickle a water or trickle a water and then like a minute in they finally pull the whole thing. Oh yeah. And it goes and the water comes out like crazy. Jeffrey Epstein is the weed. He's just the weed. Yes. Yes. Yes. Exactly. The water behind him. Now, now here's the part I can't square though. Here's the part I cannot square to this point. For years, it was like if you ever mentioned the word Rothschild. Oh no, you can't say that. You know, and there's other families too. Like Rockefeller. Why am I forgetting something right now? They offered him up on a silver plaque. The Asteroos. And here's exactly. Why did why did less Wexner go out of his way to mention them? Why did Bill Clinton go out of his way to mention them? Why did all these other people start to the Jeffrey Epstein's account and go out of his way to mention them? Like what? My favorite moment was when Bill Clinton was looking at the photos. Give me that back bitch. Yeah. Oh, he was fucking reminiscing. God damn. I remember that. That was a great time. We actually stayed out till about four or five a.m. He doesn't give a fuck, dude. Listen, bad guy would love to have a beer. Fuck and be able to imagine that podcast. Well, I mean, now I don't even need a podcast. I don't want to do that. But like we'd just love to get him six sheets to the win one night and just light it fucking. You know, he's also one of those guys that karaoke talks about how he could just charm the pants off you. Yeah. Anybody. He walks into a room and people just fucking their jaws. They melt. They melt. They melt. He has them in the palm of his hand. Yeah. I told you what is one story I won't tell you because oh yeah, she get pissed. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, not him. So someone I know who's like the most Diet Coke Republican of all time. I'm good dog. And like she liked them. And then the other story I will tell is my grandfather who's now deceased. He his whole life. He was just like pool red, you know, whatever the Republican was running and anything that's all he did. Like that's it. And he fucking hated Bill Clinton when he was in office because it was like that was the thing. Yeah, Bill Clinton, he's a Democrat. He met Bill Clinton at I forget what it was that maybe it was like they were opening his company was opening up a new plant or something like that. I don't remember don't quote me on that. Yeah, unfortunately, he's not here. So I can't ask him, but he met him and he said the thing happened. He's like, he was walking up and you know, he's being respectful. It was it was I believe he was the sitting president at the time. So it's the president and you know, I'm like, hello sir. Good to meet you. But he wanted to leave it at that. And then they got to talk and he's like, this son of a bitch, you can't help but not while you're in his presence like him. Right. There is just the riz on that guy. The riz the riz is a moxie. Him and Charles Manson both that but yeah, yeah, actually, that's not a horrible comparison. Right. In weird ways, the way you can just manipulate people to do anything you want to do. I want to know what I want to know where the break moment was for someone like that. Like think of you mean great was it when he was nine and you know, someone beat the shit out of him. Was it when he was 12 and he witnessed something horrible? Was it when he was 15 and someone kicked him off the dodgeball team at recess? I like, I don't know. What was the moment where he went dark? Like, you remember. I don't think that's how it works. You think it's a slow descent. I think it's a very slow burn. I think I think your toe gets in the door. I think, you know, maybe you get an opportunity to get this job in government and whatever. People see your charismatic. Maybe you're good salesmen. So, so well, you know, then you get a job, you know, it running, you know, in Arkansas and then there's like, hey man, you know, we got this guy. He's a firefighter pilot. We caught him flying all this drugs, but you know, we can use this stuff to make black ops money and do all these illegal activities everywhere because no one's going to trace the paper trail. And we'll slide you a million dollars for every shipment. Like, fuck, dude, if I'm how old he was when he was running Arkansas, maybe in his 30s, like super young, I don't know if I could say no to that. Does that mean you're morally bad? Does that make you morally bad? Like, just because you, I mean, there's really, there's already tons of copian being shipped to the country with an ask a bar. Now, you know, which one? What, what, which, what, what do you mean Pablo or Pablo Pledge, yeah, oh, you got to, I don't know about this pledge to bar. You got to, you got to tell me all about this. Penn State Cochrane. Yeah, the Penn State Cochrane sounds fucking wise. And this is the government, big government picking on small businesses. Once again, I can't wait to hear about this. But yeah, dude, like, I could be if before, I don't know if he was married back then. But like, before I was married, before I had kids, there's a lot of shit I would have probably done for a million dollars. Well, I would, a lot of shit, I would have done for a hundred thousand dollars, you know, and it's not like how immoral is it to fucking let a little coke come through the airport? I've done, dude, I mean, when it comes to drugs, I don't know. I mean, I draw the line at certain, in certain aspects of life, there's blinds you got to draw, right? I'm not importing fucking underage girls from modeling agencies to traffic them to my friends. But when it comes like a little coke, and then that gets to a little bit, a little bit more coke. And, you know, before you know it, you're fucking tying kids up on train tracks and you got a kid, and this guy committed suicide by shooting himself with a shotgun in the back of the head. One of the shipments gets fucked up. You got to kill the guy. Now you did a murder. It's like breaking back. It goes off the rails, you know, at some point you lose the plot. And it's just like this. Everything ties back to Skip Bayless. You know, he started out as a good sports journalist reporting part as one of two people I've ever blocked on Twitter. And he starts to, you know, he criticizes LeBron once people start jumping on. He starts to get a little bit more attention. And now it's his whole persona is hating LeBron. That's what happened to Bill Clinton. So I agree with you. I think I think it can absolutely be a slow descent. I think there's examples of both, though. I wonder if Bill Clinton was one of those where there was a breaking moment. And he suddenly was just like, fuck this. I'm the man. I'll do what I want. It could very well be where you just point it out. I could see that. Then again, it's like goes to Harvard. You know, Elite Circles, if you will, makes that marriage with Hillary, which isn't real. It's a business relationship. You know, she doesn't play for his team, obviously. It's like, and then he's this huge dog. That's early on. That's early on. They did that. He, you know, dude, I had this guy speaking of Hillary. I had this guy on my show a couple months ago who was telling me some insane shit. And I want to ask you back because I know you know a lot about this shit. The Anthony we her laptop, this frazzled drip conspiracy. Have you heard of this? I know you've heard of this. Yeah. Some really sick shit. And apparently it got into the hands of the law enforcement and they saw it. And it was so disturbing that they committed. I've heard, I've heard that there were people who viewed that from law enforcement. Is that, is that a real thing? They did off themselves. I have heard that. Do you think they off themselves? So I don't know. Yeah. I think there, it's been a while. I think there's something confirmed their deep, deep will find it to where you can point to people that were involved with it who did off themselves. How someone wants to poke holes in and say, well, you know, they had other things going on in their life. But like, well, if these cops accidentally came across footage of Hillary Clinton doing something illegal. Yeah. I mean, that's the least I would say. I wouldn't say that their lifespan is going to be that long. That's right. So the phrasal drip thing, the speculation on it is exactly what you said that it is as dark as it gets and so much so that guys would have off themselves about it. The public has never had a chance to see it though. And which makes sure is there something to hide there? That's where my head goes. And it's like, what if it's also, what if it's worse than that? What if it's not, if you can't be just bear with me here? What if it's not even like the Clinton's? What if it's the people you don't know about? Right. That's what I want to know because I do not to take not to take the owners off political families like the Clintons who I think are inherently evil. Let's let's let's make sure we have that outlined right there so we don't lose that thought. But I do think people like the Clintons have less power than we ever thought they did. I feel like they are very useful pawns on the board, which by the way, if your scenario, which could be right of like how it happens for like a Bill Clinton is kind of how it happened or in that pattern of how it happened. The slow slippery descent. Yeah. It's most perfect candidate ever because you just keep dipping them a little more and a little more and a little more and be like, oh, this guy's got ribs too. Let's put him in. Yeah. Oh, he'll fucking play ball. You know. So yeah, I think I think some of the air quotes here conspiracies around Anthony Weiner are very legitimate questions that people ask. Yeah. And I think it's really weird that that got shoved onto the rug because he's also the most dislikable guy. Oh my god. His interview with PBD was the best interview PBDs ever. I agree. He fucking that guy. Oh my god, dude. It was a bloodbath. The guy's just not human. The guy, the guy, the guy, the guy, he didn't seem like a fucking human. He couldn't. Everything was so fucking fake and measured just like a prototypical politician, but like on steroids with that guy. I agree completely. He was and you're right though. You're right about like the initial story is the perfect conspiracy because it's Hillary Clinton who's tied to Epstein and it's going to be like, oh, they're definitely covering that up because these cops are Hillary Clinton doing evil. And like the fucking thing that really rattled me was when, uh, Joe, not Joe, but Hunter Biden went on Tucker's podcast. For whatever it's worth, whether you want to say he was full of shit or not, he explained the laptop thing. I don't know if you heard what he said. I haven't. The basically what Hunter Biden said was he said, he got his cloud hacked and everything from his digital footprint from the beginning of time, from since he got a fucking iPhone or a laptop, everything from his whole life, his full 360 digital footprint was in his cloud, which got hacked. And he said that that was put on the laptop because he, according to what he said, was that it was way too much information like terabytes upon terabytes of data. That was allegedly on this one laptop that he brought into this computer repair shop where the fucking guy who owned it was blind, legally blind and didn't even see him. Makes Cash Patel looks great. I know. Like, so now you start to think like when that first came out, you're like, oh, wow, this is campaign and they're manipulating the election and trying to hide this stuff to help Joe Biden. But then when you hear this guy's story, you start to realize, oh my god, this could have been a whole fucking counter intel plot where it was the fucking Republicans who hacked his laptop and tried to get all this stuff out there. And it was literally the people on the, on the democratic side who was running a counter intel operation knowing that, no, they hacked him to try to steal the election. So we're going to fucking suppress that and try to run it back, try to push back the other way, you know, like it's a full fucking 360 degree intelligence war from both sides. If, if you are to believe what Hunter Biden said, what do you think of him doing this whole tour? I said, I will not have him on. It's so weird. It's so weird. I don't know. The guy's got charisma for sure. Oh, he definitely he's definitely fun to listen to, but it's just fucking weird. I don't know what to make of it. It's just like there's something about it that is it just again feels like just something very fake in your face. What I will say though is that the laptop scenario that you lay out there, whether or not that's bullshit or true, just the whole thing around it is multi layered and bizarre because you look at the laptop thing. All the guys signed off on or something. I always get the confuse. Okay. So all it was like 51 or 53 high level intelligence people all wrote this letter. Well, someone wrote it and then they all signed it in the build up to the election saying this was a Russian disinformation campaign to be clear. There are some full blown scumbags for short like proven scumbags on that list, like a John Brennan stuff like that. And like the worst of like your deep state kind of people. Maybe they're all that way. By the way, I don't know. But there's a lot of heavy hitters on there and other people who maybe before that, you know, unless you were just doing the as many people probably rightfully do now. One CIA always CIA kind of thing with people. These weren't people that you would have pointed to like the middle of conspiracies or something like that. It was a large list. And so I there were a few questions I asked myself. I said, okay, they knew all of them knew when they signed this. This was not the case. Every single one of them. But whether it's the bad people, the good people, or if they're all bad, they all knew it wasn't real. So why they knew what they knew what wasn't right? They knew it wasn't Russian disinformation for me. Right. Right. Right. Okay. That was bullshit. So why'd they sign it? Well, first on it is, well, they're all deep state scumbags. That's the easy answer. Maybe and maybe that's what it is. Right. Okay. They want to get a job. Yeah. But but the other reason is, this is what I can't square. They're not dummies. Some people are really far gone on there like a John Brennan really far gone. So maybe throw him out, but like they're not dummies. These are smart people. Why would they sign their name to something that's going to that's going to affect an election that is going to be disproven in the future? At least what they're saying about their bodies on there already too. So if they're all going to go down with the ship, you know, misery. But that's from saying, why would you sign that? And this is where I get a little like 3D in my head and I go, what if they know something else? Some of the people on there. Right. And let me pull this back one second. Let's assume they're all scumbags. Let's even assume that for a second. Worst case scenario, these are the all 53 of them are the worst people on earth. But they know something so bad that like they're like, hey, you know, yeah, we can't let this happen. It's the least bad option. Which to be clear, you should never do this. But like that's how what if that's how they rectified it in their head, which is, I mean, you want to talk about slippery slope. I mean, need to go there. But I'm like, I'm just trying to figure out the why. And I've never gotten a great answer to that. But I have some thoughts in my head. Right. Yeah. What if Hunter Biden had some sort of like, this is like completely out there hypothetical, had some sort of like dirt on somebody somewhere on one of his devices. And the opposition, the opposing party knew about it, had hacked his cloud, tried to get it all and then said, well, we hacked his cloud now. Now we have to really fucking discredit this guy and really throw him to the fucking wolves and end Joe Biden's campaign. So what we're going to do is we're going to have somebody go deliver this laptop to this blind dude. And they're going to think it's Hunter Biden just getting his laptop prepared. And he's conveniently going to find all this shit. So it's like, it is this like 3D 4D thing. You don't know how far down the line this thing started. We're only seeing like the tip of the iceberg. But below the water is just so much shit that could go so far. And like, yeah, like you said, they're all fucking scumbags and they're all just trying to fight for power and decline the latter. Like John Brennan types do. Yeah, I just couldn't, but it's just like, yeah, we only get the tip, the whipped cream. It's impossible to think like, like you look at some of the people on that list who were in that for 40 years. It's impossible to think like they think from the worst case scenario to the best case scenario. Yeah. Right. And I'm assuming the worst. But I do want I at least want to know what it was. Like what and we're never going to know. But like what the thing was that they're like, this is so bad that yeah, we're going to openly lie. Who is the guy? Was he? I don't know if this guy has signed it. The guy who lied to Congress about NSA. Clapper. Clapper. He did. He signed it. See? Yeah. I don't think he's a very good guy. Clapper is going right. I'm going left. So I'm with you. And that's what I'm saying. It's like it's there's never that's and that's the thing. There's never a good enough reason to break the seal. Like to break the thing that bound that makes it all possible that makes like the freedom of a country possible. There is never a good enough reason. It's the same reason why we have the quote of like a hundred guilty men on the street is better than one innocent man in prison. It's not fun to think about. Right. But we have that quote for a reason. The job is to put the government to the test on things. You know, so it's not the standard is even higher when you have access to the secrets of this place. And that's why I just, you know, it's just gasoline on the fire. When I see people like that do that. I just want to know why they did it. Right. You know, it's not as simple as like, wow, we just don't like Trump. It's not that simple. Right. Has to be something else. Yeah. Like whenever I see Clapper a tie to anything, I instantly don't believe it. And especially this whole UFO thing because he's like that he is one of the main people pushing this whole fucking UFO disclosure thing. He's in every single congressional hearing. He's right there and like Clapper has been Clapper even seeing that. He's in like the front row behind everybody. We pulled that up real quick. I got to piss. I want to hear about it. Yeah. We'll be right back. We'll be right back. We're back. We're going to come right back to the Clapper thing, but a little break in news from the Hormuz letter. Break out news. Joey Deve just found this based on something we were talking about a little bit ago. The US military is now experiencing a beyond critical shortage of advanced Patriot missile interceptors in Europe due to Trump's war with Iran, meaning the US military does not have enough patriots to stop any potential sustained Russian ballistic missile attack. That's awesome. Per US/NATO officials to the Associated Press. In the event of a direct hot war with Russia, including strikes on a military base or power plant, NATO would now have very limited capability to defend Europe and be forced to quote, take punch after punch in the mouth, unquote. This comes on the same day Russia directly warned it could start bombing UK military bases due to UK support for Ukraine, with Zacharoba saying British military sites in Ukraine and beyond its borders could be targeted. Well, that's awesome. So let me go back to that rat cliff meeting, Danny Jones. He walks in there and goes, Hey, no, that's shit we've been saying the last five, listen, we're silly gooses. We didn't mean all of it. It's still posturing. Yeah. Well, to quote, to quote, uh, Putin, uh, on his interview with, uh, what the fuck is his name, Oliver Stone? Have you seen that? The interview with Putin interviews. Yeah. They're asking about Trump and he's asking about we have a great relationship. What about Hillary Clinton? Hillary Clinton, or somebody asked Putin, uh, what do you make of the claims that they've been saying that you're equivalent to Hitler, especially Hillary Clinton said that and his response was Hillary Clinton is a very dynamic woman. Yes. She's dynamic. Yeah. Oh, man. They got to be, I don't, there's no, there's not going to be a nuclear war, bro. They're, they're feel comfortable with that. I don't think I feel very comfortable that I'm glad you're comfortable. I feel comfortable that Russia is not going to launch a nuclear missile. So Annie Jacobson hasn't rubbed off on you with nuclear war. She doesn't think there's going to be a nuclear war either. She seems a little worried about it. Mm hmm. Sort of a whole look about it. Based on her book, I'm very inclined to believe that who in or the United States or China, all the big, I mean, the only one that's, all bets are off is Israel. I don't know if they're going to launch a new, but all of the other ones, I don't think they're launching new. They're not suicidal. Israel's the only one that could say, fuck everyone. We're going to launch the new can bring back the fucking antichrist fuck it. But I don't think it's going to happen. One of the things about her book that scared the shit out of me more than anything, was that these interceptors they're talking about. They're only like 44% accurate. So when they tested these things on other missiles, not, and they're not even testing them against, like, supersonic missiles. They're testing them against, like, generic low-tech missiles, right? Not supersonic shit. 44% accurate. So the thing about nuclear war that Annie describes in her book is that when you launch a nuclear war, you don't launch one missile. You launch the mother load. So we have, if you can google how many interceptors does the United States have? I might be getting that stat wrong. It might be 44 interceptor missiles and the accuracy is like 40% or something like that. The US has 44 active on-base interceptors, GBI specifically designated for homeland defense against long-range intercontinental ballistic missiles. So we have 44 interceptors. Now what is the accuracy percentage-wise of each of those interceptors? The US interceptor accuracy nuclear. Go back, deep. So recent conflicts of drain US defense reserves quickly using a roughly 65, yeah. So Annie, go back to what we had, deep. And then do the, on the ask anything, say what is the percentage accuracy of these interceptors that should probably give it to us? Okay. It's thinking the test accuracy rate of approximately 55 to 57%. That's like one out of two. That's generous for what Annie claimed in her book. She said it was lower than that. So we have 44. Now how many inner continental ballistic missiles does Russia have? And do the math. So if they launch a nuclear war, they're not just going to send a handful. They're sending the fucking mother load. And the way Annie described this to me is we're not only fucked by how many interceptors we have and how accurate there. What is it? 300 something? 520 to 530 for immediate launch. Okay. So yeah, ready to go in less than a minute over 500. So the problem with this is the communication between the countries. So in her war, in her book, the scenario about nuclear war, she's using the hypothetical situation of North Korea launching a nuke. So North Korea launches a nuke and you have something like 17 minutes from the time it's launched to when it actually is. And she hypothetically theorizes in her book that they're going to try to hit Washington with the first strike. And the second strike is supposed to hit the minute men in Montana. So these people, when they're, these people, when they war game nuclear war, they, the people who are being attacked, the second they find out that there's an incoming ICBM, they have to empty the minute men silos because those are stationary, right? We have nukes all over the place and planes. We can get planes off the ground instantly. We have nuclear subs all over the fucking world with tons of IC with tons of tons of nuclear warheads on them, murved warheads. But the ones that are, we have to get out of the silos instantly are the ones that are stationary in the ground in Montana because either have to use it or lose it because we have to assume that they're going to target those and try to render those things useless. So the second our satellites detect a rocket being launched anywhere in the world, like North Korea, for example, we have like within that 17 minute window from launch to detonation, we have like three or four minutes to launch our nukes. And we have to figure out where to point them. So we have to know where they're going and we have to be able to to program on that. That's all pre-programmed, right? There's like, within that nuclear football, there's like launch codes. So we have a certain code for North Korea, we have another code for Russia, another code for China, wherever. Right. So, and what she points out is if North Korea launched an ICBM, it has to overfly Russia. So, and if we shoot them back, which we have to, it has to go over Russia, what is she saying? She says the last time that we try to get Russia on the phone about something very urgent, it took like more than a day for them to get back to us. So we have to, we have to launch our minute-minute missiles and we have to call get Russia on the horn stat and say, "Yo, we're launching these things at North Korea, not for you. Don't shoot your missiles back at us." But it's not very likely they're going to answer the phone on the first call on the first ring. I can't believe that. There has to be, there has got forget a red phone. There has to be a fucking burgundy phone somewhere that it's like, you picked that out. Hey, hey, hey, Vlad. Yeah, yeah, family. We're good. Right. Call Maryam, get her on the fucking phone. Yeah, no, she's over gone here. She can hear everything. Shout out Pegasus. Like, there's got to be right. something. So in her scenario, though, we don't get them on the phone. They see our news. So we got North Korea's nukes coming at us. We're shooting ours back at them. Russia sees ours coming for North Korea. They think it's coming for them. They unload theirs. And then before you know it, the world is gone. It's full on nuclear, thermonuclear war and we're in like a nuclear winter in the world. It's fucking destroyed. And why is this in her estimation? Why is this never happened? Why does she say, I don't remember why she said it's never happened before. Basically, the whole point of the book was just pointing out how poor, how poorly prepared we are for this. And how bad the communication is. And essentially none of the presidents ever practice these scenarios. Like they don't, they don't game out. Okay, we're under nuclear war. Here's the football. What do we do? What option do we pick? It's never practiced with any of the presidents. So she also described this like Doomsday plane that the president has to get on. It's like Air Force one, but it's like built to survive a nuclear blast. So the windows are all blacked out. This thing's like a tank. And it's got this fucking something floating in the air can survive a nuclear blast. Well, not like directly in the vicinity, but within like a few hundred miles. And it's got this crazy antenna that dangles off the bottom. So it has to go into like basic radio mode because you can't use normal like Wi-Fi because everything's gone. It's like an EMP. So this is like it goes like stone age type radio frequencies that drops out the bottom of the plane. It's just it's built to circle the ocean for days and not run out of fuel. And that's how they're supposed to have Stratcom based out of that plane where they have like strategic command running the world from this fucking Doomsday plane that the president's on. And it's like I can genuinely say, I can like there's not a lot of things I can say this about. But because that's the worst known weapon in our civilian heads right now, if that were confirmed to be the case or close to the case, when I won the election and we're going into transition, this would be the very first thing that I'm like stick this on the schedule. We're going to do drills on this for as long as it takes. So I guess her case, I guess to answer your question earlier about why this hasn't been done yet, it is coming back to me why she I she theorized it hasn't been done yet. She believes that like the joint chiefs of staff and like the highest level of military and all of these governments have already gained this out. The Pentagon's gained it. Russia's gained it. China's gained it. They all know what happens. Which is why they all know launching one nuclear weapon is a suicide mission. The other reason which she doesn't I mean, the other thing you could fucking speculate about is all the UFO stuff being around nuclear sites. It's the big Yahoo notice though. I don't think he knows that. I don't think he's the only one where all bets are off. We all have an understanding here. Yeah, we do not have an understanding. Right. Right. But that scares the shit out of me. The one thing that is scares me way more than that is the biological war stuff. I just read her biological war book. How was that? That one's even worse. Now that's more we've seen, you know, the preconditions of something like that to see how society adapts when, you know, there's a claim to major biological weapon going on everyone on one inside. Now imagine one that actually like one contact kills everyone. So nuclear war nuclear building nuclear weapons so long as you're in the treaty, it's legal. A country as long as it's a part of the treaty and does all agreements, it's completely legal to build nukes. It is unilaterally illegal across the entire globe to develop biological weapons. Right. No countries allowed to do it. But every country does it. The US does it. We have biological labs all over the US and they're ranked like from tier like one to four. And we also have them in other countries hidden in other countries and other countries also have them all over the place. Is it Ryan with smush main? And she was saying that all of the biological weapons research facilities are disguised as vaccine laboratories. All or 90% of them high number, 90% a 90% towel. You know what's crazy? There's a chance, it's not 100%, it might not be 50. But there's there's a better than 10% chance that someone has in air pods right now listening to this who walks into one of those labs every day and like, oh man, I wish I could tell them about it. Guess they'll never know. I thought you were going to say something about a chocolate outbreak in Hershey, Pennsylvania. I would be stealing John Stewart's line. But yeah, I mean the jokes right themselves sometimes. Right. Right. So her book goes through all this. It goes through a scenario because there was a biological weapons lab in Russia. And she uses Russia and her scenario for this book. That was in the early 2000s, late 90s. I can't remember the fucking name of it was a Russian name where there was an outbreak. That was contained. And it was bubonic plague. So they're they're they were making bubonic plague. Oh, they weren't just making it. They were using bubonic plague, which naturally occurs in Russia. If you if you look at the history of the plague in Russia, there's like a certain area of Russia that's predisposed to natural plague. And it comes from a certain animal. I can't remember the fucking animal in the plague. It's not a rat, right? No, it's something else. All right, well, shit, I'm not gonna try to say that some fucking island operator from 1936 through this cold war until was hastily abandoned in the early 1990s following the collapse of the Soviet Union. This is the primary Soviet facility associated with open air testing and weaponized weaponized, excuse me, weaponization of bubonic plague. Yes, the epistia and also and other lethal pathogens. The 90s context as the site was decommissioned in abandoned in 1991, 92 concerns grew internationally over loose containment on sealed burial sites for test animals, such as 1988 outbreaks outbreaks. If you are thinking of an accidental city leak rather than a remote testing ground, the famous 1979 lab outbreak involved an anthrax release at compound 19. Maybe that was it. Maybe that was it. It's been lost. Yeah. Yeah, Catdenburg, which was fully investigated and acknowledged in the early 90s, you have to wonder how many we didn't know about though when these are the same people that were trying to say, no problem. You do find out the animal that the plague comes from. Remember that like with Chernobyl, I mean, obviously it's an amazing, many series of people haven't seen it where they, you know, go through the history there, but they were trying to say, don't worry about this. And it was like the worst nuclear reactor disaster ever. So it comes from wild rodents and is spread by humans by the bites of infected fleas, the bacteria that can cause yes, Neapestus, live naturally in populations of small mammals, common carriers include rats and mice, squirrels and chipmunks, prairie dogs, prairie dogs. That's what she was in the book, prairie dogs. So prairie, can we pull up a picture of a prairie dog? So she had full, she fully sourced a story of a lab. And she said that this is the, this is the type of thing that a pathogen that has been worked on for decades in biological research labs is plague. They've been trying to figure out how to weaponize plague, make it more transmissible and trying to do this thing called making a chimerivirus, where they make it like a triple headed helix animal, where it's like some, it's like some ancient Greek term where they're trying to like make a bacteria that is indistinguishable. It's undiagnosable because it's also showing all these other symptoms. So as you walk into a hospital and you get the plague, well, you also happen to be bleeding out of your asshole, your eyes, your nose and your skin is melting off your face. So they don't know what you have because you not only have these plague symptoms, but you have all these other fucking symptoms. So you can't really figure out what the hell's going on. And that's what they were trying to do in this one lab in Russia. What was her sourcing like on this? Did she talk, she can't tell you who, but did she explain how she was able to get such kind of yeah, she did. I can't remember though. They're all, you know, high level government people. Basically, some people she uses for other books, all the, you know, CIA DARPA people. They're very honest. They're very honest, incredibly honest. The most honest, someone say, yes. So in this situation though, it was a plague that they were combining with chicken pox to make it aerosolized, to where now plague is not just spread by touch, which is the way traditional bubonic plague is spread. But now I can cough and it's just in the air. I can breathe on you and you'll catch plague. So it's like ultimate worst case scenario. And she also points out there was this really smart neuroscientist who went to MIT, who was Middle Eastern descent, who got radicalized after 9/11. And she ended up going back over to the Middle East and got recruited by one of the terrorist group, maybe ISIS or something. And they convinced her to work on some biological weapon and that's exactly what she was doing. She was trying to combine rabies with chicken pox and she got caught by the CIA. And she's in prison for life now in the, in Texas. Can we pull that up? Yeah, she's a neuroscientist. Find out her name. He already got it. The person you are referring to is Aphia Siddiqui. That's her lady Al Qaeda, the core details regarding her life. Oh, no rabies, rabies and chicken pox and specific bio weapon allegations involved the following timeline and facts. MIT connections. Siddiqui is an Islamic scholar and neuroscientist from Pakistan. She moved to the United States for her higher education and earned a biology degree from MIT. She later earned her PhD in neuroscientist from Brandes University in 2001, pre-9/11, following the September 11th attacks. She became deeply divorced her husband and returned to Pakistan in 2003. U.S. authorities identified her as an al-Qaeda operative, linked directly to 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Muhammad. She became not to be confused. I love how you're confusing now, KSM, and JSM. I don't think just Scott Morgan likes that, but it's kind of hard. Joseph Shagman. Shout out to Scott Morgan. [LAUGHTER] She became the first woman placed on the FBI's most one in terrorist lists. After missing for several years, she was arrested by local authorities in Ghazni, Afghanistan in July 2008, when she was detained or handbagged, contained detailed notes, manuals, and documents regarding chemical weapons, dirty bombs, and biological agents. While not featured prominently in her public court records, investigative journalist Annie Jacobson revealed interviews with former CIA and bio-defense officials showing the Siddiqui's handwritten notes outline plans to engineer genetically modified airborne pathogen combining the rabies virus with a highly contagious virus, like chicken pox to create a weapon with a near 100%. And rabies is more deadly than blood. Thank you guys for checking out this clip. If you haven't already subscribed, please subscribe and hit the like button on this video. It is a huge, huge help. And if you'd like to check out this clip, full podcast episode, that link is in the description below, or right here. And finally, you can follow me on Instagram and X by using the links in my description below.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The transcript discusses Israel's development of offensive space capabilities, including missile defense systems and intelligence collection, raising concerns about escalation in regional conflicts.
  2. A key debate centers on whether Israel possesses or is developing intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), with experts suggesting such efforts would require significant international collaboration and expose them to intelligence detection.
  3. The conversation critiques the use of nuclear weapons as a survival mechanism in global politics, pointing to Iran and North Korea as examples where nuclear capability enables regime survival despite international opposition.
  4. There is speculation about geopolitical manipulation, including Ukraine’s drone attacks in the Caspian Sea being used to draw Russia and Iran into a broader conflict, potentially merging multiple war zones.
  5. The discussion highlights deep-seated distrust in global institutions, suggesting that powerful elites—including political figures and intelligence agencies—may operate with hidden agendas and systemic corruption.
  6. The narrative draws parallels between figures like Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton, framing them as symbols of a broader pattern of exploitation and power abuse within elite circles.
  7. Concerns are raised about the opacity of intelligence operations, including the alleged hacking of Hunter Biden’s laptop, which may indicate a high-stakes, asymmetric intelligence war between political factions.
  8. The transcript warns that the world is poorly prepared for nuclear war due to communication breakdowns, low interceptor accuracy, and lack of military drills, with biological weapons research hidden in civilian labs posing a greater existential threat than nuclear weapons.

Summary:

The transcript explores a range of interconnected geopolitical, military, and intelligence issues, focusing on the expansion of Israel’s space-based defense systems and the potential for escalation in regional conflicts. It questions whether Israel possesses ICBMs, suggesting such development would require international supply chains and expose them to detection, raising concerns about covert military escalation. The conversation critically examines global power dynamics, highlighting how nuclear capability serves as a survival tool for authoritarian regimes like Iran and North Korea, while also pointing to the misuse of political and intelligence power by elites.

There is strong skepticism about the transparency of global institutions, exemplified by allegations of hacking, deep-state manipulation, and cover-ups involving figures like Hunter Biden and Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion also delves into the dangers of biological weapons research, which is widely hidden within civilian labs and masked as vaccine facilities. These technologies, combined with poor nuclear defense preparedness—including low accuracy of interceptors and lack of crisis drills—create a scenario where a single event could trigger catastrophic global consequences.

The narrative concludes with a sobering warning: while nuclear war remains a theoretical risk, the more insidious and hidden threats—such as biological warfare and elite-level corruption—may be more immediate and dangerous, underscoring a deep systemic vulnerability in global governance.

FAQs

The Jerusalem Post reports that Israel plans to develop offensive space capabilities, including weapons capable of striking targets on Earth, as part of a broader defense strategy to strengthen its position in the space domain.

According to the discussion, the Jericho missiles have a range that extends to areas including Argentina, parts of South America, Florida, and Australia, suggesting a potential strategic reach for targeting locations.

Israel is reportedly developing these capabilities to gain a strategic military advantage in future conflicts, with enhanced intelligence collection and communication systems being key components of the plan.

The speaker suggests Israel could launch a nuclear strike, noting that while it's not certain, the country has the capability and the political will, making it a potential flashpoint in global tensions.

The speaker highlights that US nuclear interceptors have an accuracy rate of only about 44% to 57%, which raises serious concerns about their effectiveness in a real nuclear war scenario.

The Doomsday Plane is a survivable aircraft designed to carry strategic command in the event of a nuclear attack, equipped with radio systems and built to endure nuclear blast effects, serving as a last-resort command center.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.