WGA Says Paramount's Threat Proves Their Lawsuit's Point - The John Campea Show
119m 43s
The show discusses several major entertainment developments, beginning with Bob Eiger’s purchase of the Los Angeles Lakers for $12.5 billion, a move that reflects his transition from film leadership to sports and raises speculation about future cinematic tie-ins. While Eiger remains on Disney’s board, his decision does not directly affect the studio. The segment then shifts to a controversial incident at San Diego Comic-Con, where Marvel installed an Avengers arch on a historic landmark without permission, resulting in a $160,000 fine. Critics debate whether the action was a bold creative choice or a breach of public trust, especially given the meticulous planning and design involved. Turning to DC Universe developments, reports indicate that projects like "Waller" and "Paradise Lost" have been delayed or canceled, sparking concern that the studio is over-relying on minor spin-offs and neglecting flagship franchises. This pattern is likened to past studio missteps, such as Star Wars’ project cancellations. Finally, the show highlights the growing anticipation around *Dune Part Three* and *Avengers: Doomsday*, set to release on the same day, with early ticket sales showing extreme demand and potential for a record-breaking weekend. Despite skepticism about market viability, the combination of cinematic prestige, fan excitement, and the rarity of such a dual release fuels optimism about unprecedented box office success. Overall, the discussion underscores shifting trends in entertainment: corporate overreach, strategic franchise prioritization, and the resurgence of theatrical experiences as a cultural phenomenon.
well greetings and salutations everybody welcome to the best stand mover related show on the
planet earth the john campion show coming from right here in our quaint little studio i'm of
course your host john campy it's an awesome honor and a privilege guys to have you our
international friends joining us here today as we talk about our favorite things in the world
movies and movie news tv and streaming and all that good stuff joining me here today on the
discussion we of course got writer director producer mr robert meyer burnett robert how
you doing today sir john the warriors one of my favorite films of all time was screening
at our local local harkins theater last night and i didn't go it's screening at one o'clock
in the afternoon today but i'm here oh wow that's that's commitment that's huge commitment
also joining us here today as he often does on wednesdays the incredible sean chandler is here
ladies and gentlemen sean good to have you back my friend thanks for having me i'm excited to be
here my kids went back to school so finally i'm not afraid kids are going to fly through that door
while we're talking movies and of course most importantly you guys are here thank you so much
for being here making our little show part of your day and here's how our show goes we're going to
start off by talking about a number of news topics we got lined up for you guys then in the second
part of the show well that's the most important part that's when we take your live comments and
questions if you guys have a thought theory opinion
question or an issue you'd like me to address as long as i deem it appropriate to be addressed on
the show go ahead and use the super chat feature and send it in of course you have to be watching
the show live in order to be doing that but if you are watching live and you've got a thought
to send in go ahead and send it on in all right guys with that all down let's get things started
here shall we we're going to start off with this you know this one doesn't really um this
one doesn't really fall under the category of a movie news story per se but it involves
some might argue a top one or two most important person in the world of movies for the last several
decades and that is big papa eiger uh bob eiger who recently stepped down for a second time
as ceo of disney um he's got a new groove apparently because according to cnn and
other outlets it actually initially broke on espn the la lakers have just sold for 12.5
billion dollars to former disney ceo bob eiger and jared kushner who is of course
our jared kushner's brother josh kushner uh josh is the brother of jared jared is married to
one of donald trump's kids and so there's a bit of a connection there which i
find really interesting because bob eiger and donald trump hate each other but anyway so uh
so that's kind of interesting in itself but i guess bob eiger biggest entertainment guy in the
world for at least for a number of decades most important figure in the world of movies for years
has decided to go ahead and buy the la lakers i guess his time here in la of being the head of
disney was kind of impactful on him um this is interesting because for those of you who don't
follow sports you probably don't know this but it was only about gosh um a year ago that the owners
of the la dodgers bought the la lakers they literally just got bought and sold last year
like it was literally last year and then now along comes
uh big papa eiger and buys it again now for note the guys who bought the la lakers last year
bought it for 10 billion dollars and in one year have turned it around for 12 and a half
billion dollars they just made 2.5 billion dollars in one year uh they made what netflix
made off of paramount for breaking off their warner brothers a deal a two plus billion dollars now
i've had a bunch of people writing into me and asking me how does this impact disney
i could be wrong about this but as far as i can tell this doesn't impact or affect or have anything
to do with disney since bob eiger no longer works for disney now somebody brought up a good question
that i haven't had a chance guys to to look up the answer to this too somebody asked is bob eiger
still on the board of disney and he might be i i do either you guys know for certain whether eiger
is still a board member of disney i don't know i know he's certainly not the chairman of the board
anymore like he must be a consultant of some kind oh he might be a quick google search it says that
bob eiger remains on the walt disney company board oh so there you go but as a board member
i don't think there's a senior advisor
through december 20 through december of this year okay now he's going to be on the board
through december of this year or he's going to serve as an advisor until the end of this year
because he is probably he's probably they keep him on obviously to be an advisor to the new ceo
for a while but either either way it doesn't really impact disney at all like that him buying
the la lakers doesn't impact it at all i saw one theory online proposed that this is just this is
they weren't being facetious this is delay the groundwork for an la lakers movie of some kind
and whether it's a version of angels in the outfield or whatever i have no idea maybe their
own version of the mighty ducks uh which was the team the charlie sheen sports comedy where he was
on the uh cleveland indians major league so whether it's it's they may be a major league so
i don't know if there's going to be a movie connection this i just found it interesting
that arguably one of the most prominent and most important figures in all of movies
has now stepped into my other favorite world of sports and now owns the la lakers for 12.5
billion dollars anyway rob i know you you're not a la lakers season ticket holder
uh but what do you think about this no but but john you know i come from seattle
where they stole the supersonics yeah 1978 79 i mean slick watch jack sick my downtown
freddie brown i mean changed my childhood i'm just saying they stole that team from us however when i
moved to la in 1988 the lakers i i had i had i had never seen a city rally around a basketball team
the way they rallied around the lakers i i arrived here in june 4th 88 and i was like oh my god the
lakers must have some kind of it was an incredible it was incredible to join a new city that had
such we have so many different
kinds of people from all over the world in los angeles we have people you can eat from every
country here and every one of them are lakers fans yeah so so the the lakers unite and the
dodgers unite the world now with the dodgers but i think this is interesting i think you know
to see bob eiger do this as you know if you read his book and you you hear him talk about like
getting frank sinatra's watch and and i love seeing this as a part of a third act of his
career maybe yeah and um say what you want about the kushner bro or whatever but i think that these
are two guys if there's one thing about bob eiger he knows his showmanship and he understands that
the la lakers is one of the great dynasties in all of american sports yeah and and therefore
of all of american pop culture all of america absolutely and i think they'll be in good hands
with eiger anyway sean you had a chance to hear about this i'm i'm not sure i mean obviously
austin doesn't have a pro basketball team but texas does they have a couple of bangers as a
matter of fact but what did you think about this when you first heard about it i just one of those
pieces of news that you're like wait what where did that come from i didn't hear rumors
murmurs it was just all of a sudden bob eiger partnering up with one of the kushner brothers
to buy the la lakers what did where did that come from but like for all of my thoughts on bob eiger
and maybe some of the things he did with disney like he understands business he wants the best
it doesn't like maybe he has his selfish purposes in why he's doing it but his selfish purposes
would also line up with wanting the team and the brand to be successful
so he obviously did incredible things with disney um over the last 20 years and so if he can work
his magic in this final act of his life as robert said more power to him yeah so guys again this is
not a big movie story i just thought it was really interesting that big papa eiger now in his second
stint having retired as the ceo of disney is buying the los angeles lakers which in and of
itself is interesting because the lakers just sold last year and they're not going to be able to
sell it next year uh so this is kind of a crazy story anyway whatever you guys think about all
this jump down to the comments section below and let us know your thoughts all right guys
with that down let's move on to this shall we
you know san diego comic-con uh just happened and you know i've probably gone i don't know
like 13 of the last 15 years i've probably at least gone for a day usually for the whole weekend
and there's a lot of iconic things about going to san diego comic-con but one of the things that's
really iconic in san diego when you go to comic-con is as you get into the gas lamp district and
you're walking towards the convention center which is right on the shore for for lack of a
better term you walk down the street through this iconic arch you guys know the arch i'm talking
about the big arch that says like historic gas lamp right on it it's it's a part of going to
to comic-con that you will at some point walk under that arch and it's pretty iconic well this year
uh
the marvel took it over and they made it up into a big avengers arch cool looked interesting
but there was a problem they never got permission from the city to do it and as a matter of fact
according to this report they were specifically told not to do it and they did it anyway and now
san diego has slapped them with a fine a fine ringing up to the tune
of a hundred and sixty thousand dollars now if as i'll scroll down here to the image in question
if i can get it on the screen i hope i'll be able to yeah there it is they completely took over the
arch and it did up now the city says that their main problem with it was it was a safety hazard
which they're not wrong like when you just quickly hang all this stuff off these arches like did
engineers test it like it it could fall and it could hurt people so i'm not i'm not trying to
discredit that but i think what the city's real issue was is that hey man this is a big lamp post
of the historic gas lamp district like this is advertising for our city and we did not tell you
you could do this now i remember guys when i walked when ann and i got to comic-con this year
and the first time we walked down the street and i saw this thing i thought well that looks pretty
awesome that looks great and i thought it was very cool and there was no doubt that there was
gonna be some big avengers things when marvel does its presentation so i thought it looked cool
but of course i just assumed that obviously they had permission to do it but according to a city
representative they said no they didn't and we told them multiple times to take it down
and so we sued we fined them ten thousand one day then doubled the fine the next day
then doubled the fine again and then it ended up at a hundred and sixty thousand dollars so
on the one hand i'm thinking just because of how memorable that was and how awesome it looked
disney might have thought and marvel might have thought uh whatever they find us it's worth it
i mean everybody's going to remember this this is going to put this makes everybody who's at
comic-con and walk into the convention center the first thing they're going to see as they're
approaching the convention center is that they're going to see a lot of people and they're going to
is the big avengers logo whatever the fine is it's worth it but i do have to ask though i
and i say this as a as a marvel fan isn't it kind of a dick move to say because essentially isn't
this marvel going say saying we're above the rules like we're not even going to ask i mean yes it is
easier to ask forgiveness than permission but i mean to just take a city's landmark like that
and deface it even if it's for something cool without permission it belongs to the city and
then the city says hey take that down and you say f you we're marvel we're not going to take it down
fine us whatever peasant amount of money you want to fine us well i'll write the check right now i
mean it's it's a little bit of a dick move so i am torn i am on the one hand i think this looks
awesome and i loved it but at the same time i kind of thought it was a dick move that they
were told by the city not to anyway sean uh you weren't at comic-con this year so you didn't have
a chance to see this firsthand but you hear about this story what what's your first response to it
yeah it it sounds kind of like the celebrity that gets a speeding ticket for 200 yes it feels like
it's just like it's nothing whatsoever something that's a deterrent for a normal person it's just
nothing for them i mean like 160 000 is what one-tenth of one percent of the marketing budget
for this movie so it kind of puts a gross taste in your mouth when it feels like disney's just like
we can do whatever we want we could like like the idea of like wait a minute disney threw up
decorations without permission and actually was told not to it just kept doing it what like you
could do that it sounds like someone should be in much bigger trouble than just a slap on the wrist
to an enormous corporation rob uh i mean you were
at comic-con this year i'm certain you walked under this very impressive avengers arch oh i have
a great photo on my instagram of me with it oh it's it's it listen everything else we may say
about this it did look awesome i mean there's no no taking away from that but you then saw you
probably were like me where we just assumed they got full permission and everything to do it i don't
know what do you think about when you hear this story okay i gotta call a little bs on this
only because
well a month earlier than comic-con started they were hanging on every lamppost in right as they do
every year as they do every year but they had their avengers doomsday because the lampposts
are green they had a whole campaign designed over promoting doomsday at comic-con and we were
seeing it on social media and all of this and what they put on that the gaslighting
lamp arch they didn't come up with it yesterday they had to take measurements they had to design
it they had to fit it onto that that actual structure this was not something somebody just
decided to do at the last minute this was designed from the very beginning look at that
that is that is designed to work with a structure that already exists marvel has advertised in san
diego for comic-con for the first time in a long time and they didn't come up with it yesterday
they had to take measurements they had to design it they had to fit it onto that that actual structure
for decades i find it extremely hard to believe that no one knew anything about this because they
hung it on this they didn't hang it like the day before i call bs on this i think somebody did not
cross their t's or dot their i's and got caught and now maybe they didn't want who doesn't love
this how much money does
does comic-con bring into downtown san diego every year hundreds of millions of dollars
i think this is bogus and look i am no disney shill but there is no way that this wasn't
thought about months in advance and you cannot tell me that somebody in san diego didn't know
about this because someone had to call and go can we get the measurements for the gas lamp arch
to make that i call bs well i liked it i thought it was awesome i thought it was a great way to set
off comic-con and when you walked into the gas lamp which san diego makes how much money i'll
tell you how much money i spent there i can't because i spent so much and all that tax revenue
goes right into the government and they're they're giving marvel a hard time when when
marvel put up banners on every single lamppost yeah but that's a
greed that the lamppost thing is an agreed upon thing done every year all right but let me read
the quote let me read the quote the exhibitor knowingly created a safety risk and refused to
address it uh city of san diego spokesperson richard burke told the san diego union tribute
and it was cited and fined accordingly the city initially hit the exhibitor with a ten thousand
dollar fine on tuesday before a comic-con officially began the penalties
were then they were informed would be raised each day after the display remained reaching ten
thousand again on wednesday twenty twenty thousand on thursday thirty thousand on friday
forty thousand on saturday and fifty thousand on sunday bringing the total to 160 000 the exhibitor
still did not respond or act accordingly so they're saying this they notified them every single day
and this isn't being whispered this is on record this is a city official saying on record and
disney disney has not been able to refute it disney's not saying wait a minute they did give
us permission you know what i'm saying they all they also hung banners from every single but that's
standard that's standard every year and and given permission for i get it but i can't imagine that
disney just decided to do this without permission but there had to be some reason why they decided
that i agree i think there was probably somewhere along the lines but if the city they put
remember the city is saying on public record we told them tuesday and they didn't address it but
we told them wednesday tuesday was the day before comic doesn't matter if the city
tells you to take it down are you not and then we told them again wednesday and we took but but i
would i would ask when did that i don't know when the display went up i know those banners went up
weeks before comic-con right but again that's done every year you and i have never seen them
due to the arch we i've also never seen the permissions i i call i i want to see i think
someone needs to do a deep dive on this and find out who did what because you have to design and
make that thing and to design yeah but you don't need the city to to design it they just didn't
you can't tell me that somebody like a corporation like disney who's who's paying for putting up
those things on all of their all of those those lampposts just randomly decided you know what we
should do i mean i would have done that if i was just like you know what we should do i did that
when i was in high school i
changed the the mural for my home i was in charge of the homecoming mural and i put it on a
different wall and i begged for forgiveness because it was awesome and they had to they had
to give it to me but disney i can't believe that they would do something like this and not because
that's built that's designed that's that isn't made in a day or a week that's okay here's the
thing though if if they did and everything was done right then they could sue san diego for going
on record publicly and saying they didn't have permission to do this so well yeah if they don't
i mean i don't but here's what i think probably happened what probably happened what probably
happened my guess and it's just theoretical i'm just theorizing here is that they probably
pitched an idea of hey what would you think about us also doing something on the arch right and then
maybe something and somebody's saying well that's cool but never getting what they put on their
approved i maybe that's what happened i think you're right about that
but you know what it was awesome it was and it was awesome and now after the fact it's like what
does san diego i mean they already jack up the hotel prices and they make so much more tax on
people you're gonna get mad at disney for a couple of days putting smiles on people's faces
because how many selfies were taken in front of that sign it i again i was one of them i
understand the spirit of it because i thought it was awesome too but if you don't have if
everybody else has to follow the rules then marvel has to follow the rules too but it's going to be
interesting to see if anything more comes out of this maybe john maybe it was it would it could
have been an incursion maybe marvel didn't do it all right guys the 828 with that down question is
for you what do you think about this that awesome arch display that they did over top of the gas lamp
was looked awesome but apparently they're saying they were told to take that down several times and
they just refused to do it and now they're getting fined pocket change for marvel but
i don't know what do you think about it whatever your guys thoughts are jump down to the comment
section below and let us know your thoughts all right guys with that down let's move on to this
shall we you know when the dc
universe was coming out they pitched out a whole bunch of different ideas for shows and movies we
could see coming up now of course we've already seen a few we've had uh the creature commandos
we've had peacemaker we've had superman we've had supergirl they'll rather not talk about supergirl
and we've got a couple more coming out this year we got lanterns starting up this week which i'm
extremely excited about and then of course we've got clay face which looks just absolutely
phenomenal so that's all coming to but there were a bunch of other things mentioned we've heard
whispers and reports that their booster gold series was probably pulled and canceled uh so
that's there but there's also the potential here of the idea that maybe some other things are
getting canceled too and that comes to us in a report from the ankler the ankler put out a report
talking about dc's tv trouble lanterns not that lanterns is in any kind of trouble arise but two
big shows die and basically the reporting is saying that the shows the ankler is saying that
the shows waller of course from peacemaker and and the dc universe and the island of themascara
series paradise lost have both been canceled now this has not come from anybody um at dc this has
not come from uh you know any of the actors involved or writers involved
but it is the ankler and and the ankler is usually pretty right on with their stuff and they're saying
both waller and the paradise lost city have you can't really say canceled if they never actually
got going but at least let's say their development has been ceased the development has been ceased at
least that's what the report is saying if this is true i have a couple of thoughts the first thought
that man considering that the dcu has not been around that long we're starting to get into
kathleen kennedy level cancellation of projects i mean we've already had the aforementioned
booster gold i don't know what is happening with the swamp thing that they pouted now we're hearing
about waller paradise lost i mean i don't know what's going on with the swamp thing
again it happens like you have things that you put into a development process and if it's not
coming together then you don't do it not a big deal kind of standard thing it's not the same
thing as say what happened with marvel and blade because they literally announced the project on
the stage at comic-con marched out their lead star and all that kind of like gave it a release
date and everything a couple of times if i'm not mistaken so this is a bit of a different situation
but still it's a bit of a different situation and i think it's a bit of a different situation
still only about four years in and we seem to have a lot of projects falling by the wayside
listen as a big dc fan as a big fan of james gunn i gotta say that's kind of concerning
now the other hand though i'd have to say that i don't mind the idea
of say a waller and paradise lost being put on the back burner
i don't mind that idea because one of my criticisms of the current state of the dcu
has been listen i love the idea of peppering in lesser known smaller ip and not and not have
every movie be superman wonder woman batman i i like that like i like that we had peacemaker
i love that we have lanterns coming although you could argue lanterns is a big hit or two
i really i'm excited to see clay face but is now when we're getting into four years since all the
announcements and we still don't have any definitive direction on a batman at all we
still don't have wonder woman anywhere to be seen and there hasn't even been mention or whispers
of other core justice league members whether it's flash or aquaman or whoever else
you want to mention is now really the time to be doing a jimmy olsen gorilla god garage show
is this really the time like don't get me wrong i'm not against the idea of a jimmy olsen gorilla
garage show but is now the time to do that when we are years into this now and we don't even have
batman on the roadmap anywhere is now the time to do that and so to me to me if and this is a huge
if if this is all true and waller and paradise lost have been put on the back burner for now
like maybe they'll come back into being a year down the line three years down the line five
years down the line but if it's true that these have been put on the back burner i would like to
believe and again this is just me as a fan theorizing i would like to believe that the
we've got to get we've got to realign a little bit we have to start reprioritizing some of the
bigger hitters now because so far all due respect to the supergirl character she is a derivative b
level character all due respect and i was super excited about the movie but even when i was
excited about the movie before watching it and being disappointed by it but even when i was
still in the very excited about it for a stage i was like but supergirl is a derivative b level
very powerful one but a derivative b level character nonetheless we have we are years in
and really all we've had is superman good starting point but that's all we've had so if we find out
two things one that the report is true and two that the i wouldn't doubt it if the reason for
them being sidelined right now is to just get a little bit of focus on some of the bigger higher
profile ips because guys to me
these smaller things a paradise lost a jimmy olsen a waller the
Guys, we want to take a second to thank a sponsor of today's video, Ultra Pouches.
A lot of people use nicotine thinking it'll give them a little extra focus or even help
before a workout. But nicotine is a vasoconstrictor. It narrows your blood vessels and can actually
work against that pump and recovery that you're looking for. That's where Ultra Pouches come in.
What you're really going to like about them is that they're 100% nicotine-free and caffeine-free.
They're designed to give you smooth energy and focus without the nicotine crash. Pop one in
before a workout or when you're sitting down for a long work session, and it's an incredibly
convenient little boost. Ultra is the ultimate guilt-free pouch, delivering instant focus and
mental clarity without nicotine or caffeine. New customers can use the code CAMPIA to get 15%
off at takeultra.com. That's T-A-K-E-U-L-T-R-A.com for 15% off with the code CAMPIA.
After you purchase, they'll ask you where you heard about them. Please support our show and
tell them that Ultra Pouches are for you.
Our show sends you.
G'day, I'm Justin Wolfers, host of the Platypus Economics podcast. If there's one thing I've
learned from a career teaching economics, it's that your life is shaped by economic
currents you'll never see. A single price tag can explain things a thousand experts can't.
People who understand economics, they make better decisions in their careers, their finances,
their relationships, and their communities, and I want that for you. Listen to and follow
Platypus Economics, available now wherever you get your podcasts.
these are great projects to have to pepper in with the larger ips to give more depth to the universe
and to give more variety to the universe and that can be used really really well i'm all for it but
it seems like we're having three of these lesser things for every one major thing we're getting
addressed so i don't know about this anyway rob you you've heard the stories going around that
they might be shelving these or just putting them on the back burner for a few years or whatever
number one what's your first thought about hearing that and number two what do you think
the reasons behind that might be well john first of all i mean
the dceu under james gunn and peter saffron came out guns a blazing i mean they said here's the
gods and monsters plan here's what we are doing we have an aggressive way to take the entire dc
pantheon and turn in uh what has turned into something mundane or mediocre into a brand new
universe with a plan okay we're all excited about this plan fantastic i'm very excited about a
lanterns tv series with two actors that are marquee names uh and damon lindelof maybe my
not my cup of tea but he obviously did the watchman series for hbo he's not a stranger to
hbo i'm thinking great dude the showrunner of the show was uh the guy from ozark unbelievable
talent associated with lanterns i can't wait to see it i have been extremely disappointed
in what dc has done in terms of their application of these um
grand plans and i think that it's it's it's really a missed opportunity because if i was
james gunn i would come out guns a blazing and all we've seen is peacemaker second season
of him and superman what we haven't seen and then supergirl i mean craig gillespie was a
good choice to direct based on what he'd done before but supergirl was a huge monumental
face plant on every level and i was perplexed by this i'm like you didn't even you didn't even
you adapted a comic series how about the color palette of that comic beautiful unbelievable
um wow and then you decided to make it you you made space and you made the dc universe mundane
by making every planet seem to have one bar on it and a bunch of bikers like where's where's the
awe and wonder that dc comics have provided me my whole life i am very very very very very very very
disappointed by what's going on and when we when we hear about a jimmy olsen series i mean
i understand superman's pal jimmy olsen the comic that jack kirby did that's where they
introduced all of the fourth world and they introduced apocalypse and they introduced
new genesis and the entire new gods but is that the way to go i think we all have to wait and see
maybe at the end of this week we can think wow man lanterns rules i can't wait to say that i hope i
can say that because they've replaced the third season of house of the dragon that ruled with
lanterns so good and i'm hoping dude there's no one more than me i love green lantern i love green
lantern my whole life i want to see this aaron pierre and coach taylor from one of my favorite
shows of all time friday night lights and i'm hoping that they're going to be able to do that
the actual star trek of west texas football or east texas football well and you know it's funny
i always say on on this show winning cures everything right like it's funny how winning
changes your perception of things and so does losing right because like with supergirl it was
the first real trip up but it's painted our entire i include myself in this it's it's painted our
entire perception of what's going on and it's painted our entire perception of what's going on
it will be interesting to hear our own donkey mouths talking if we could jump ahead okay four
months into the future and we and that's a future where lanterns absolutely ruled and clay face was
awesome to hear then how we're looking at the general state you know what i'm saying i'm
including myself in this i hope i hope like a shawshank redemption hope it's that good hope
it's so dangerous anyway sean uh you saw this
so the same two questions to you what's the first thing that pops into your head or your first
response when you hear that they may be shelving or at least delaying inevitably at some point
waller and paradise lost and then what do you think the rationale behind that might be
yeah i mean you mentioned kathleen kennedy earlier and kind of that star wars problem
of announcing all these projects a little bit too soon and then canceling them
and this has that same flavor to it of
i love star wars i love dc and when you get to a point in time where i'm not excited when you
announce things because i no longer trust that it's actually going to happen there's a sense of
loss in that and there's this isn't quite there yet but we're moving in that direction of like
this is a lot of projects that you announced that have gotten backburnered authority swamp thing two
tv shows in other things as well so that's concerning and just kind of to the point of
because supergirl was not so good and it
had the same air of what previous dc eu movies had issues with of studio interference pulling
it away from the director and so it's like are we just doing the same thing again as james gunn
repeating the same mistakes and then projects announced but don't happen you just kind of get
that sense of like oh man i really want there to be two back-to-back wins in the back half of this
year that would make me feel a lot better because i only want the dcu to to win but to the question
of whether or not it's going to happen or not it's going to happen and i i think you're right of
they're just refocusing and waller being the kind of third spin-off from the suicide squad after
creature commandos in peacemaker season two yeah like that's a weird thing to do that many spin-offs
of something that's not a-list and then doing a wonder woman spin-off prequel thing before you
do wonder woman once again it's like i don't know that we're heading in the right direction let's
let's focus on the heavy hitters that really move the needle make a big splash and have are very
broadly accessible and i think that's something that we're going to have to work on and i think that's
going to have to work on and i think that's going to have to work on and i think that's going to have to work on
you know um mcu didn't announce guardians of the galaxy until after avengers like let's take that
big bold swing once we have our big win now we can take risks and i think they need to learn that
lesson it if you want a good example of how our feeble little idiot brains can work i you all know
how huge i and this is not hyperbole i am a huge james gunn fan i love james
gunn
but even i am to go back to the kathleen kennedy uh comparison when kathleen kennedy was hand-picked
by george lucas himself to lead lucasfilm on paper i was like that is a great pick like other than i
don't know maybe steven spielberg nobody else knows the mind of george lucas better nobody
knows steven spielberg himself
calls kathleen kennedy the greatest producer of all time she has an unimpeccable first ballot
hall of famer resume arguably one of the top two or three producer resumes in the history of
hollywood she just does if you don't recognize that you're kind of an idiot she just does but
what we found out was just because you're great at one job doesn't necessarily mean
even if on paper it looks like a good fit doesn't necessarily mean that when you get into
this other job that it's going to work out as well and we clearly found out that being a hall
of famer producer didn't necessarily mean she's going to be a great executive for
studio my fear right now and again you're looking at one of the world's biggest james gunn fans here
my fear is that this might be kathleen kennedy 2.0 that maybe james gunn um who knows more about
comics than any of the rest of you watching this show right now knows more about the history of
comics and all that kind of stuff maybe james gunn who has yet to make a movie i don't love
um yet maybe just because james gunn has all that doesn't necessarily mean he was the right
guy to be the head of a studio i'm not saying i'm there yet i'm not yet pronouncing this to
be kathleen kennedy 2.0 yet i want to see what happens with lanterns and then i want to see
what happens with clay face and then i want to see what happens a little bit after that
but i have to admit as one of the biggest defenders of james gunn and as one of the
biggest defenders of james gunn and as one of the biggest defenders of james gunn and as one of the
fans of james gunn i gotta say i'm starting to wonder if a year from now i'm not going to be
thinking about this as kathleen kennedy 2.0 again i'm not there yet can't wait to see lanterns and
winning cures everything because we could be singing totally different harmonies uh this
point two months from now but it's just kind of interesting to see where we're at anyway guys
question is for you what do you think about all this these waller and paradise lost series apparently
maybe scrapped maybe just put on the back burner for a few years whatever it's more things announced
that are now getting either axed or delayed or whatever and it seems to be a growing collection
of them which is a little concerning when we're only this far into a new cinematic universe
i'm still going to carry the torch and i'm still going to remain optimistic but
my optimism starting to get a little bit shaky whatever you guys think about all this
jump down into the comment section below and let us know your thoughts okay guys
with that down let's move on to this shall we you know it's become a trend since the odyssey
started it about putting these imax tickets on sale for these big movies like ages before the
movies come out we saw odyssey do it obviously we've now been talking about endgame doing it
recently but you guys might remember a few months ago that doom 3 also did that imax put on sale
some limited 70 millimeter screen selection tickets on sale and they sold
out instantly as a matter of fact they sold out so fast that within a few days people were literally
not just selling but buying those tickets on ebay for thousands of dollars uh some people
charging eight hundred dollars whatever a few people bought pairs of tickets for twenty five
hundred dollars for a pair uh one guy put his seats up for 1500 bucks and sold a whole bunch
i mean it it was
crazy scarcity apparently creates demand and hysteria so people were buying those tickets
for literally thousands of dollars on the second market well for those of you who don't want to pay
2500 for a pair of tickets to see dune 3 in imax on that opening weekend imax says they've got you
covered because imax put out a new uh thing today they sent out an email to a bunch of people who
are in the imax email list
and they said this they said dear imax fans you showed up in a big way when the first dune part
three tickets were released we've heard you uh and know you want more access to tickets and more
time to plan so here you go the opportunity to get dune part three tickets will arrive in one
week on tuesday august the 18th at 9 a.m pacific standard time the tickets uh the ticket drop will
unlock more opening week tickets and more tickets will arrive in one week on tuesday august the 18th
dune insider screenings in both imax and imax 70 millimeter i believe the first round of tickets
they released were just for set for some 70 millimeters so mark your calendars and make
your plans to get ready for the return to arrakis long live the fighters so we apparently have some
more tickets coming uh for dune part three it reminds me a lot of when the first dune part three
first op but not oppenheimer the first odyssey tickets went on sale and they dropped and they
just got sold out within again not hours but minutes they got sold out we saw an incredible
response for when endgame uh dropped their big advanced ticket sales of course we've got more
on the way now coming this friday reportedly and when dune did their official offering a few months
ago but the fact that they sold out so fast and the fact that they sold out so fast
that they are now putting even more tickets on sale i am going to be curious to see how fast
these sell out because when the first round of dune three tickets went on sale guys it was was
for a very limited number of screens i mean imax 70 millimeter themselves are pretty limited and
the number of showings you can have per day were pretty limited but so it was limited only so many
tickets available sold out instantly now that they're expanding it to even more screenings on
70 millimeter and the wider imax offerings that are out there i'll be curious to see if these sell
out too because if they do sell out are you going to want to be anywhere within 20 miles of any movie
theater that's playing dunes day like it like dunes day we already know that dunes day which
is of course december 18th when both avengers doomsday and dune part 3 comes out on the same day
i still can't wrap my head around that they're coming out on the same day we already know how
big doomsday is going to be but i mean if these tickets sell out as fast as maybe we think they
might exactly how big can dunes day be like we were just talking you guys will remember we were
just talking the other day about the fact that spider-man and the odyssey spider-man spider-man
brand new day's opening weekend and odyssey's third weekend
so that one weekend that was spider-man first and odyssey's third
combined to make guys you remember this the biggest single weekend in box office history
and a lot of people think well doomsday won't be able to break that
yeah i think it might i'm starting to think it might so sean let me start with you on this and
ask you these two questions i guess when these tickets go on sale on tuesday what are you
are you expecting yeah sold out quickly maybe not so quickly i don't know what you're expecting from
that and if they do the second question if they do sell out rather quickly how ridiculous is this
doomsday three gonna end up being i don't know what do you think about all this
yeah uh i mean i'm getting the impression that it probably will sell out i i don't really like
this thing where we're more and more selling tickets earlier and earlier in small batches
almost fabricating demand or a scarcity because we're only selling the extreme one so it sells
out and then we have something a little bit more i don't like that because it's creating such extreme
things where we're you know people are buying tickets for thousands of dollars for movies
um and starting to feel like what they're doing with concerts where everything the prices are
just getting insane for everything um but it feels like people love going to the movies again
and after what just happened with the odyssey
people like they want to repeat that and denny volneva is the guy that's in that nolan category
of you know he's going to make something truly cinematic something that is worthy of being seen
on the biggest and the best screen and so in its its own way really dune 3 is the follow-up to the
odyssey for the cinephiles wanting that imax experience and so yeah i think they're gonna sell
really fast um and
i think it's very likely that we're going to have two different days this year that break the record
for biggest box office weekend or break those records um because this is just looking to be
mammoth i mean odyssey was in week three and so of course dune is going to beat that and then
we're talking about an avengers movie which of course it's going to be massive so i think it's
very likely that it'll break the record again and this is only one more movie that we're going to
more reason that's going to happen by the way just to be clear sean's not saying that obviously
dune 3 will beat odyssey what he's saying is that the weekend one of dune 3 will be weekend three
of the odyssey um anyway rob you and i were at to this point rob you and i yesterday were having a
discussion about whether or not dune 3 could also be a billion dollar film and and all this kind of
stuff we were talking the other day or it might have been christian i was having that conversation
with either way um that that could dune 3 also be a billion dollar film while dune's day or
doomsday is coming out at the same time so the same two questions for you i guess is number one
when tuesday comes and 9 a.m hits are we going to see ticket sites crashing again like are these
things going to sell out incredibly quickly maybe not so quickly and how big can dune's day actually
be will it beat that spider-man odyssey weekend i don't know what do you think
well i have to echo my esteemed colleague sean's sentiments i mean what we are seeing you know it's
funny
two years ago people like oh my god the theatrical business is dead yeah and now and now like i've
always said every franchise is one great film away from being reinvigorated well you know um
say what you want i like thunderbolts i like fantastic four first steps spider-man even
though it's a sony movie the mcu is back baby theatrically it is it is back and i think that
the thing about dune is like a movie like interstellar dune is a generational franchise
it is like i love it but i got dune in 84 then i got it on tv but what denise villeneuve has done
with dune has galvanized a a new generation that has been shown what is possible cinematically and
by the way it wasn't possible when i was younger i would say for this old gen x or not
boomer
for this gen xer i watch denise villeneuve's dune and i think to myself i am seeing something
cinematically i'd never seen before i have seen literary sci-fi writ large on the big screen
in a way i couldn't even conceived of in 84 when lynch's dune came out which i loved and i reviewed
my high school newspaper we are we are now seeing gigantic talents creating
massive massive tableaus on the big screen and it's like one right after the other i mean who
would have thought we would get the odyssey we would get dune three which is a combination of
maybe dune messiah and children of dune and doomsday the avengers i mean we're getting
gigantic amazing i mean these are like seeing the rolling stones or led zeppelin or you too
in giant arenas and you have multiple generations galvanized by what we're seeing on the big screen
it it is john it is the the what you've always said since we've started streaming 11 years ago
you've always said when i first heard this when you said movies are experiential events i was like
i like going to small theaters and seeing art
house films i know what you mean we are now getting experiential events writ large in the
way we've never seen them before and they're not just movies they are public cultural social
events and it's amazing and i think that doomsday i mean look okay barben heimer you had very
different kinds of movies but doomsday appeals to the geek in me the old school nerd from my
elementary school days you know when people made fun of me for playing star trek when i was in
kindergarten i'm like oh really well it's 2026 and we're gonna see dune three and doomsday in one day
who won we did and i think it's gonna be huge
question is for you what do you think about this they are now putting more tickets on sale this
tuesday for dune 3. the last time they put bunches of tickets on sale they sold out instantly and
then were not just being put on sale for because who cares what you put something on sale for if
nobody buys them they were being bought for like 2500 a pair fifteen hundred dollars for single
tickets it's crazy how big of a sales rush do you think dune three's gonna have on tuesday you think
they're gonna sell out maybe not and how big exactly is december 18th going to be with doomsday
happening whatever you guys think jump down to the comments section below and let us know your
thoughts all right guys with that down let's move on to this shall we well maybe not on the level
of avengers doomsday and maybe not on the level of dune three but there's a little film calling
coming called coyote versus acme and you know this at some point they're gonna have to make a movie
about this movie's path and journey their their odysseus-like journey to actually get onto the
big screen because of course as you guys know uh the movie got made but then the folks at warner
brothers looked at and said we don't know what's going on with this movie we don't know what's going
on with this movie we don't know what's going on with this movie we don't know what's going on with
this movie we don't know what's going on with this movie we don't know what's going on with this movie
we don't know what's going on with this movie we don't know what's going on with this movie we don't know what's going on with
we don't know what's going on with this movie we don't know what's going on with this movie we don't
think this thing can even make back the money it's going to take us to market and put it out in
theaters so we're just gonna shelve it then they decided to you know a lot of people said we want
this thing released and warner brothers unlike batgirl warner brothers thought the movie was
really good they thought it was good they just thought we're gonna lose money if we put it out
so to give it a chance to get into theaters they put the movie on sale to all the other studios in
town and they all passed
none of them wanted it because even though they thought the movie was good
none of them thought the movie could make any money well then along came
ketchup entertainment and ketchup decided we're going to take a chance on this and and they
picked it up now you guys remember we talked a few weeks ago that the first reactions
to coyote versus acme were amazing like through the roof amazing so good which again warner
brothers thought the movie was good too so there you have it but now the full reviews are out and
as of this recording a little bit earlier it was at 95 percent but right now as of this recording
it's at 94 percent coyote versus acme is sitting at a 94 percent critic rating let's go over and
see what some of the critics are having to say about coyote versus acme they're saying this
daily b says they liked it a clever and madcap underdog saga that in light of
real-world events now resonates as a case of art foreshadowing life then a geek liked it they said
despite caveats and quibbles it's a compelling testimonial that earns its day in the sun for once
it feels great to see the little guy catch his roadrunner screen international did not like it
they said the lackluster screenplay proves as faulty as acme's crummy contraptions okay that's
actually kind of clever the way they wrote that all right indie wire they liked it they said the
truth is the film is good clever and snappy fresh and silly a winning combination of classic looney
tunes gags and contemporary concerns variety didn't like it they said it cut it could have
been called remembrance of rube goldberg bomb's past yet there's a certain way that coyote versus
acme next to those cartoons feels neutered and tame polygon did like it they said the
first thing to love about coyote versus acme is that it's funny like really funny
wow the jokes in the film vary from big physical gags background jokes sharply written one-liners
and easter eggs for looney tunes fans ign liked it they said it's a savvy mix of absurd humor and
satirical meta subplot and just enough emotional weight to make us care about these short-form
animated punching bags for a full feature-length runtime deadline hollywood liked it they said
the delightful gem it's a delightful gem of a movie for me at least ironically or uh not
not only the best warner brothers film released so far this year it also is hands down the best
animated live-action hybrid since robert zemeckis classic who framed roger rabbit
the hollywood reporter liked it they said it's a pleasure to report that the film is a hilarious
delight one of the best live action animation films ever and will be treasured by looney tunes
fans and who isn't one and then we'll end off with uh the film verdict who wrote who also liked it
wrote amid the pervasive wackiness which never gets tiresome uh birch skillfully weaves in both
a legitimate mystery it's real life ramifications bring to mind another todd haynes film dark waters
and some genuine character moments and and it goes on again as of this recording the movie is sitting
at a 94 percent which is just great now again i want to like re-emphasize that as many people
try to draw the um the comparison between you know what happened with batgirl and this the big
difference was that warner brothers essentially said batgirl is just isn't good and we can't put
this in theaters that wasn't the case with coyote versus acme it was a matter of we just don't think
this thing's gonna make money to that point about them think uh saying that let me see if i can pull
this up the uh earth blew up um so in comparison though to like that there's something you have to
keep in mind the last looney tunes movie that came out was also really loved the day the earth
blew up a looney tunes movie had well not 94 only eight percent
off it had an 86 percent critic rating and an 88 audience rating right very well received
super well received here was the problem the movie made 15 million dollars
Not on its opening weekend, not domestically, total worldwide, despite the fact that it was rolled out in a full, full theatrical release of over 2,800 screens.
And it only made $15 million.
I think that was always the point to which Warner Brothers took a step back and said, we don't think this thing can make enough money to even justify a marketing campaign.
Because remember, a marketing campaign can run $50 to $60 to $70 to $150 million.
They would never spend $150 million marketing this one, obviously, but still.
So that was their basic conceit.
So I was like a lot of people, guys, in the sense that, man, I would have liked to have seen it, but I totally get it.
I mean, I totally get it.
I totally get why you shelve this thing and not lose more money.
But then I saw the last trailer.
And man, that last trailer was great.
It was so fun.
I still, every, like, even just yesterday, there was something came up and I remembered John Cena saying, what did you tee?
What did you taw?
And I just start, like, I'm just sitting there doing something, right?
And I just start giggling because I just, I just think of that line.
It looks so good.
So look, I still don't know that this thing's going to make any money.
I really don't.
I have no idea if this thing's going to make any money, not even enough money to justify whatever they spent on the marketing campaign.
I don't know.
I think at the end of the day, Warner Brothers will probably end up being proved right that it would have cost them more money to release it than to just shelve it.
I hope not, but I think that's what will happen.
But I also know this gentleman.
I can't wait to watch this movie.
I cannot wait to watch this movie.
But unlike the Odyssey or Dune on IMAX, I don't think I'm going to have a problem finding tickets.
Regardless of that, I'm real excited to see it.
Anyway, Rob, you know, we've been covering this Odysseus-like journey of Coyote versus Acme for years now.
We've been talking about this whole thing.
It is now nigh.
The reaction.
The reactions were great.
Now, full critic reviews are extremely good.
Two questions, I guess.
Let's start with the first one.
Where's your anticipation level like for this movie?
Are you excited to see it?
Not so excited?
Whatever.
And the number two, despite the great reactions and my excitement and the really great reviews, is this movie going to be a moneymaker?
I don't know.
What do you think?
Well, first of all, you know, I read the original essay.
That this whole concept was based on.
And I thought it was hilarious.
I've wanted to see this movie since I knew it went into production.
I thought the idea is hilarious.
I mean, here's the thing.
This movie relies on a cultural memory of Warner Brothers Looney Tunes cartoons.
Yes.
It is literally based on our collective memory.
The problem is how many people in the 20s.
21st century remember Looney Tunes cartoons and understand what this is.
That's one thing.
Unfortunately, because of the transition of of the rights or who had to buy what.
No one has done a really great job explaining why this movie matters and why you should see it and why it's funny.
Because it's it's literally based on something everybody who grew up in the latter half of the 20th century understood.
We all.
Watched Looney Tunes cartoons and even Animaniacs.
So the whole premise of this movie is kind of been lost in the last 20 years.
So you needed a marketing campaign to kind of explain what this is.
I think a lot of the audiences today just don't know.
And unfortunately, because of that, it's not going to do if this movie came out in 1995, it would have been huge.
It would have been gigantic because everybody grew up with Looney Tunes and they would have understood Wiley e Coyote's plight.
They would have understood because we all are the coyote.
All of us are the coyote.
Our entire lives are spent that way.
That's the whole point of the thing.
Chasing that chasing our own individual roadrunners.
Every one of us is chasing the roadrunner.
And.
You know what meep meep is exactly the sound effect of when something went south.
When I did poorly on a test in high school meep meep I would hear it and and and look I can't wait to see this film but nobody's going to go and the marketing hasn't been they haven't explained they haven't they haven't contextualized what this is which I think is a problem.
But that last trailer was great and I will be there with bells on opening day.
I can't wait to see this Friday, maybe Thursday, Friday, but I'll be there.
So the thing is, along with these studies coming out recently, Sean, about how everybody's going back to the movies again, we've started going back, but one of the key things in every one of those data points and studies and articles has been gender equality.
And I think that's what we're going to be talking about in the next couple of weeks and I think that's what we're going to be talking about in the next couple of weeks.
I I just don't and this is the part where I'm like, I think both things can be true.
I think number one, Warner Brothers is going to be proved right that if they try to release it, they were just going to lose money.
But at the same time, the movie can be awesome and completely funny.
I don't know, Sean, you've been following this story.
So I guess the two questions are, where's your anticipation level?
Are you looking forward to this?
And secondly, can this thing make money regardless of how good it is?
What do you think?
Yeah, I I was interested in it just on.
A conceptual level because of its bizarre history, getting it to the big screen.
So just as a curiosity, I was interested, but generally speaking, I'm not like running out to go see a Looney Tunes movie.
And then I watched the trailer and I was like, this is a really clever premise.
Yeah, this this the jokes are funny.
I'm really enjoying this.
And I showed it to my kids and they're like, OK, that's I guess I was good because they've never watched Wile E.
Coyote. They've never watched these classic Looney Tunes cartoons.
That hasn't been a part of the popular culture.
It hasn't had anything to revitalize it.
And I think Robert phrased it really nicely that this project is built on a cultural memory that young children or even people in their late 20s or in their 20s have not experienced.
They don't remember it.
It's built entirely on something from the last century.
And when you're trying to make something that is clearly family.
Entertainment, you need a franchise builder or rebuilder in this isn't the premise.
That's a franchise rebuilder, even if it's great.
It's not a franchise rebuilder because it's built on already having an understanding of the property.
And it's it's a shame the projections don't look optimistic.
It's like opening like 15 million dollars is what it looks like when it costs 70 million dollars to produce it.
So in that regard, yeah, it looks like Warner Brothers will probably be proven correct.
But.
Um, also, it looks like they've made a good movie.
Yeah, and this is going to be one of those things where, man, I hope I hope it does.
Well, if it's as good as it looks like it is, I hope something happens.
I hope a movement gets pushed behind it.
Like maybe we could see an obsession effect where it just maybe doesn't have the biggest opening in the world, but it just keeps going and going and going.
So here's hoping guys question is for you.
What do you think about this?
So reviews now have come out for Coyote versus Acme, not just the first reactions.
And they're really, really good.
Are you planning on seeing it?
I know I am.
I just don't know if we're going to have any problems whatsoever.
Coyote versus Acme isn't going to be crashing any movie ticket sites, I don't think.
Anyway, whatever you guys think, jump down to the comments section below and let us know your thoughts.
All right, guys.
With that.
Let's move on to this, shall we?
Well, you guys might remember that on yesterday's John Campion show, we talked about the fact that in the midst of the lawsuit going on, and let's not forget, there's two different lawsuits.
But in the midst of the lawsuit going on between all the different states that are suing to stop the Paramount merger, David Ellison, who had been walking around and telling everybody that would listen to him.
We're going to win this lawsuit.
We're going to win.
We're going to win.
No problem.
We're going to win.
Showed his real thoughts that he has no belief that they're going to win when he decided to publicly issue a threat and issue a blackmail statement, basically saying, hey, you guys back off, give us what we want, or we're going to pull Paramount out of California, to which, of course, I said to the five
to 8,000 employees that Paramount Studios has in California. Hey guys, David Ellison just put you
on the wall like the children in House of the Dragon. He sees you as expendable and as bargaining
chips, nothing more. And no matter what happens in this lawsuit now, whether Paramount wins,
the states win, the merger goes through, the merger doesn't go through, whatever happens,
I need all of you 5,000 to 8,000 employees of Paramount in California to remember that moment
and remember exactly what David Ellison thinks of you. Just keep that in mind. But the thing is,
when he came out and made that assertion, there was another group. That group was the Writers
Guild of America. The Writers Guild, who are themselves engaging in their own lawsuit against
the Paramount merger. Now,
there is a big significant difference, though, between the two different lawsuits, okay? We've
talked about it, but before we go into what the Writers Guild of America said here, it's important
for us to revisit this, to lay this as a foundation. So follow along with me here for a second.
The basis of the state's lawsuit against Paramount is a question of a monopoly.
Now, in a monopoly, you have one or a very few concentrated number,
of sellers on the market, and yet have many buyers. The seller has the power over price.
Example, one company is the only provider of a product or service. Think of it in the terms of
a kingdom of turnips. Follow me here. A monopoly says you have a kingdom full of people that are
desperate to eat turnips, but only the king sells turnips. That is a monopoly.
All right, well, let's go back to this thing here.
What the basis of the WGA lawsuit is the complete opposite, actually. They're suing on the basis of
a monopsony, not a monopoly, a monopsony. And it's the opposite. In a monopsony, they're saying there's
one buyer, but many sellers. One buyer, but many, many sellers. The buyer has the power over what
it pays. Example, one major employer buying labor in a small town. Going back to the example of a
kingdom of turnips, instead of being a kingdom full of people who want to eat turnips and only
the king provides them, think of it in reverse. All the people in the kingdom are turnip producers,
but only one person in the land is allowed to buy them, and that's the king. So the king can
set whatever price he wants, all that kind of stuff, what he'll get. Now, the reason that's
important to understand with the WGA,
is the WGA just came out and put out a statement that basically says,
see, this is exactly, they're saying David Ellison's statement yesterday proves their point.
Because their point is that if this merger goes through, you're still going to have all these
writers, but now you're going to have an even smaller amount of people who can hire them.
And if David Ellison,
they're going to have all these writers, but now you're going to have an even smaller amount of
They say has more power. He will mistreat the writers. He will, you know, screw us on setting
wages because if you don't like it, I'm sure I'll find somebody else more desperate than you to take
it, that he will essentially screw them over. And this was the WGA's statement to, in response to
what David Ellison said yesterday, the WGA said this, by threatening to leave the state because
it doesn't want the government to enforce the law.
Paramount further proves the danger of its outsized power over the industry and what that
will mean for writers and the creative community. The guild said on Tuesday, this type of behavior
is precisely why the merger should be blocked. In other words, the WGA is saying, you see how
Ellison just acted. That's how he's going to act against all of us. That's how he's going to respond
to the writers guild.
That's how he was going to respond to the actors guild. That's how they're going to respond to the
directors guild. That the moment there's any legitimate pushback for real reasons, he's just
going to pull out the take it or leave it. I'll find somebody more desperate than you card. This
is it. Exactly this. He just proved why we're bringing this lawsuit because that is how he acts
and that's how he will act. That's basically the WGA's statement here. You know, guys, I don't
know. I haven't played lately. I'm thinking about starting up again, but I've spent a good 10 years
playing World of Warcraft. I don't know if either of you guys ever played world, but I'm a huge wow
player. I've dabbled. And then for those of you who have dabbled like Rob, there's this moment in
the story of World of Warcraft that reminds me a lot of this situation. And I just, just a show of
hands in the live chat. Who of you recognize the name Sylvanus Winchester? I don't know. I don't
know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't
Just, just say if you do or don't. But anyway, there's this moment in, in the story. It might
have been a battle for Azeroth expansion, maybe one that came before it, but basically
Sylvanus Windrunner took over the horde. Okay. She became the leader of the horde. The problem is
there was a bunch of people in the horde, including some of their more senior people
who realized she's not taking the horde in a good direction. So basically one of the big war chieftain
who has like gone outside of the horde now because of what Sylvanus is doing to the horde,
he challenges Sylvanus to a one-on-one duel, right? And before they start their duel,
he starts to bait her talking about how the horde is more important to you. The horde is strong,
blah, blah, blah. And he tricks her into yelling out the horde is nothing to which everybody in
the horde kind of looks at her when she says,
that like, this is the leader of the horde. And she's saying that, right? He got her kind of like
the way that Tom Cruise baited Jack into saying, you can't handle the truth. God damn right. I gave
the order. For those of you who understand that reference, basically what the WGA is saying,
this is that moment. This David Ellison is Jack in that stand. David Ellison is Sylvanus Windrunner
standing in front of the horde.
He basically just tipped his hand and revealed exactly who he is and revealed exactly how he's
going to handle things and just proved why we feel the need to bring this lawsuit because he
is going to horribly misuse this new power and authority to trample on writers. They might be
right or wrong, but that's what they kind of take away from all this. Anyway, Rob, um, you know,
you and I've been following this story for, for a long time here. We talked about it a bit,
yesterday, but you know, what do you think about the WGA's response to them? They're basically
saying, Hey, he just proved our point. Are they right in saying that? I don't know. How, what do
you make of their statements? Well, John, last night I talked to a friend of mine who's an
executive at Warner brothers about unrelated things, who's doing great work and, uh, their
divisions killing it. And he expressed kind of in a, in a sideways sort of a way, but all of a
All of this great progress we're making, we have no idea where we're going to be in a year.
And this whole merger, forget what's going to happen in the future.
You have two companies full of thousands of people that are in a state of flux.
They can't do their jobs right now.
They don't know what's going to happen.
They don't know, like, while we talk about these mergers, what two guys have done, a father and son have done, and what there has put thousands, if not tens of thousands of people on notice.
And everybody, some of these people have worked at studios, Paramount, Warner Brothers, for years, decades.
And they're all running around going, what are we doing, man?
What's going to happen?
Where are we going to be?
And they look to Disney and Fox, or what Fox was, and they look at the fact that, dude, L.A. Confidential is owned by Disney.
Where is it?
Can you get it on 4K?
Can you see it?
I mean, we have an entire cultural legacy that can be suppressed and absconded with.
So when the Writers Guild comes out.
And what they are fighting for is the continued vibrance of an industry that we look at right now that is making more money this year than since, I mean, pre-pandemic.
We're at pre-pandemic levels now.
We see an excitement, a great excitement, being whether it's Obsession for $750,000, Back Rooms for $10 million, The Odyssey for how much that costs, Spider-Man.
We have a vibrant industry that's making money.
And then everybody is worrying because there's now, what, four major studios that might become one?
There's no, the Writers Guild is correct.
I mean, everybody wants to.
to know what's going on what are you going to do with our cultural legacy this is a boondoggle
that a family has caused that has what's your plan what do you want to do you want to consolidate
all these different things how is that going to benefit anybody but your family are we going to
get better movies better stories better tv shows better news better home video from my perspective
what's the answer i mean i want to know what they're going to do and the writers guild
wants to know what are you going to do for our business are we going to make money are all of
these talented people going to continue to make great stuff that by the way this summer proves
how vibrant cinema is
i don't see any of it happening with this merger it's turning into more folly as the days go by
show me are you going to benefit us are we going to get better news are we going to get better tv
shows are we going to get better movies are we going to get better culture i don't know i don't
see it yeah and and you know to the writers guild they're going to get better culture
their question is are we going to get better opportunity and better options and better pay
if you merge this in and their point here sean seems to be when david ellison gets any pushback
his first reaction is take it or leave it i'm going to take my ball and go home that's how
he's going to treat us as writers again maybe the writers guild is right or wrong in saying that but
that is their perception and that's what they're saying here in their response to him what do you
think of their response did anything
in their response stand out to you what do you make of this whole thing
yeah i mean their response makes total sense to me that this feels like as robert said it's only
good for one family everyone else in this creative ecosystem in this business ecosystem has serious
concerns everyone government writers everyone is going hey wait a minute i don't think we're
going to have as many good opportunities here they keep raising concerns and the
response isn't satisfying answers it's not a plan it's trust me bro or this court response which is
the the spoiled kid response like well if you don't i don't want to share my toys so i'm going
to go to georgia like it just has that spoiled kid energy to it rather than a collaborator
trying to create a robust ecosystem that's good for everyone where he's working with them he's
listening to their feedback he's listening to their concerns and trying to build bridges
no no this just feels like he's storming out of the room which right that's everyone's concern
that the whole thing feels like it's entirely motivated by selfishness not based on what is
best for the companies for the industry as a whole and so right of course they're seriously
concerned yes somebody's put a great comment in the live chat they said david ellison is sid from
toy story all grown up uh and i guess uh
i guess yes that is that is the case anyway guys question is for you what do you think about this
the writers get of america who is you know engaged in their own lawsuit against paramount to stop the
merger they came out and said david ellison's statements yesterday just exactly proved our
point about why we're bringing this lawsuit because that is who he is i don't know whatever
you guys make of all that jump down to the comment section below and let us know your thoughts
all right guys with that all down it is time for us to get on to the most important part of our show
which is of course taking your live comments and questions i just you know i had to turn off the
super chats like a good half hour ago they they all filled up but we're going to get to those
questions now but before we do we're going to bid good afternoon to writer director producer
robert meyer burnett great job as always rob we'll talk to you later thank you sir i will see you on
friday and of course sean chandler brings his talents to south beach thank you for joining us
you so much for being here sean we'll talk to you next week always a pleasure looking forward to
next week all right guys that down let's now get over to your live comments and questions shall we
you guys sent in a bunch like i said i had to turn them off a while ago and i will do my best here
now to get through all them as i take my headphones off so let's get into it here shall we we're going
to start off with yakoff who writes did disney acquiring fox run into the clayton act also my
k o v yakov oh interesting like we go v i met you at the new york meetup and it was awesome oh thank
you for coming to our new york movie meetup man i appreciate that so yes you know i'm going to be
doing an editorial video in the next day or two about because a lot of people bring up this quite
totally fair question to ask absolutely fair which was why did the disney fox merger not face a lawsuit
i mean not to this degree and why did the disney fox merger not face a lawsuit i mean not to this
degree and why did the disney fox merger not face a lawsuit i mean not to this degree and why did the
disney fox merger not face a lawsuit i mean not to this degree and why is the paramount warner
brothers one doing that well it really comes there's a bunch of different things and i'll go
into it in the editorial but to simplify it it basically comes down to the clayton act
the clayton act particularly section 7 of the clayton act basically lays out this uh notion
of what does or does not constitute a monopoly now the clayton act says that
says and i'm going to read this because i happen to have it up on my screen here
the law the text of the law prohibits mergers or acquisitions where the effect of the merger
acquisition may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly so the law says that
it is prohibited to acquire a monopoly
to allow a merger or an acquisition where the effect may be to substantially lessen competition
or tend to create a monopoly well then the question comes up all right but who's to say
whether the paramount merger may tend to lessen competition or may tend to lead towards a monopoly
well the supreme court a few years later made a ruling on this where they basically set a threshold
i know this sounds like boring technical speak but follow me here it's it's actually quite
important the supreme court set a threshold ruling that if a merger or an acquisition
means one company takes over 30 percent or more of the space in a particular industry
that triggers the clayton act rule it's they set that it's about 30 30 is the line
merger or acquisition means one company is taking over 30 percent of an industry that constitutes what
the clayton act says lessening competition and may lead to a monopoly and therefore can be stopped
back to your question of did disney acquiring fox run into the clayton act
and the answer to that is no because at that time fox acquiring or disney acquiring 20th century
did not constitute 30 or more control of the industry therefore it dot it did not run a foul
of the clayton act the reason the lawsuit is being brought by the states today
is because paramount taking over warner brothers does they argue represent a greater than 30
concentration of market control and a greater than 30 percent of market control
into one company and when they presented their arguments to a judge trying to get a restraining
order to temporarily stop paramount from merging with warner brothers the judge said yes it looks
like when this goes to trial you are likely to succeed in proving that this new merger does
constitute more than the 30 threshold therefore this lawsuit blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
so to answer your question no disney acquiring 20 cent remember disney did not acquire fox fox
still exists as its own thing fox news fox sports it's still its own thing disney just acquired a
number of their assets including 20th century but that merger did not run a foul of the clayton act
because it fell below what the supreme court said was the threshold which is 30 i'm oversimplifying
it a little bit but you understand you get the point of what i'm saying so
there you go that's right and again i'll explain it more in a full uh in a full uh editorial breakdown
anyway later all right next up uh we've got gary mayor who writes uh do you think that if netflix
had won the wb bid that we'd still be in this mess of multiple lawsuits no and the reason why we
wouldn't still we would we the reason we would not still be in this mess is because netflix is not a
a uh
theatrical movie company
netflix right now has zero control over
theatrical movies? None. So one of the arguments I've made about preferring Netflix taking over,
say, Warner Brothers, I mean, I'd rather nobody take over Warner Brothers, just to be clear. But
the reason I would rather Netflix take over Warner Brothers as opposed to Paramount
is because if Paramount takes over Warner Brothers, one studio disappears.
If Netflix took over Warner Brothers, you'd be bringing a new company into the theatrical
business, right? Warner Brothers would still be there. Warner Brothers would still be operating.
It wouldn't disappear. And this big, huge company with all of its money, Netflix,
which is not in the theatrical movie business, would now be coming into the theatrical movie
business. So them taking over Warner Brothers would not have created them controlling more
than 30% of the movie industry. So if they took over Warner Brothers, they would not have created
them controlling more than 30% of the movie industry. So yeah, it wouldn't have had the
same problems. It could have had other problems. Don't get me wrong. It could have run into other
problems, but no, it would not have run into this particular problem, especially when it
pertains to the Clayton Act. Anyway, let's see. Next up, Sam Fisher writes, I bought my tickets
for Coyote vs. Acme for the 27th because I go away on the 28th for a week and I wasn't sure it would
still be in theaters. So excited. Yeah, I don't know how long it'll be in theaters. I don't know
how many tickets it's going to sell. I might be alone when I go to see it at the movies,
but I am still going to go, Sam, and I'm still really excited to check it out.
All right. Tundi writes, oh, okay, John, that cabby lame screensaver is priceless. You probably
mean the thumbnail I put on the thing today. I got my popcorn ready. Yeah, that's the first
thing I thought of. When Warner Brothers came out, Warner Brothers, when the Writers Guild came out,
and said that, hey, what David Elson just said and did proves our point. The first thing that
came to my mind was him doing his little hand gesture saying, see? That was the first thing
that came to my mind. So I'm glad you liked that, Tundi. I was very happy with that thumbnail I
made, actually. All right. Next up, Christian writes, in Fast Forever, what are your hopes
with seeing Brian appear? A brief cameo at a family barbecue at the end, or
fully interacting with the cast like an F7? I don't have any hopes. And when I say I don't
have any hopes, what I mean is I don't have any expectations. I'm totally cool if they want to try
a quick cameo. I'm totally cool if they want to have one of his brothers taking over the role
and fully integrating the character. I'm totally cool with whatever, as long as the movie's good,
because their movies haven't been good lately.
Let's just be honest. Their movies have not been any good lately, at least the last two ones. I
haven't liked it all. But whichever they decide to do, I'm okay with. My first concern is that
the movie's done well. And if the movie's done well with a quick cameo of Brian, or having Brian
more fully integrated into the movie, I'm good with it either way, as long as the movie's good.
But I'm not going into it, Christian, with any expectations. All right. Curtis Lopez writes,
did you appreciate the Lord of the Rings reference in
Brand New Day? If you're talking about the incident with the dragon, I was barely involved.
Yes. I always appreciate a good Lord of the Rings reference. All right. Keep your secrets. It was
very, very well done. And you know what? It was perfect for that moment in the movie,
because it showed, even though Ned doesn't know who he is or remember him at all,
that their natural personalities make them best friends. And I love that in it, not just
because it was a Lord of the Rings reference, but it was a great reminder to us as the audience,
is that the two of them are just naturally best friends. And I really like that part of it.
All right. The Fergus Review Channel writes, what do you think will be 2026's sixth billion dollar
movie? So right now, 2026 has five billion dollar films. The box office is coming back.
And so we've got Michael, we got the Mario movie, we got Toy Story, we got Odyssey, and we got
Spider-Man. It is possible that we end up with seven, but I think the reality is that it's going
to be six and the sixth one will be Avengers Doomsday. I mean, I think, I think Dune 3 has a
shot. I think it's got a shot at a billion, but if I had to put a dollar on it, my guess would be
my dollar would be on, um, would be on, uh, it not reaching a billion.
And the, it will end up with $6 billion films this year, which is great, which is absolutely great.
All right. Next up, we've got Amin and Amin writes, what was your favorite part of watching
and following the world cup? And what's something you learned about the sports slash fandom you
didn't know before? I think my favorite part of it was just the quality of the games. The quality
of the games were amazing, particularly like all the Argentina games, like we're just like nail biters
and great. That game against Cape Verde was just amazing. Like just absolutely amazing. I don't
think I learned anything more though, that I didn't already intellectually know about the sport
and about, uh, the fandom behind it. I've always known how passionate the fandom is when it comes
to that. I have, but what I really just loved was the quality of the games. Cause not every Stanley
World Series, not every big UFC, not every big Olympic finals end up being great matches,
but the world cup this year was filled with great matches, great matches. Um, anyway.
All right. Next up, Mike T sends in a $20 super chat. Thank you, Mike. Appreciate that, man.
Very, very much. And Mike writes, Hey, John, regarding the paramount stuff, let's assume
everything goes their way with the U S based lawsuits before they kill before the kill.
Super chat. Thank you, Mike. Very, very much. And Mike writes, Hey, John,
could the UK and EU legal stuff add more delays to get to that deadline? And, or am I wrong? No,
because the UK and the EU, this is like, when I remember I made this statement a couple of months
ago and people for some reason got upset with me for saying it, but I think it's because they
didn't understand what it was I was saying. I said, look, the UK and the EU stuff is not
really important. It's not a big deal. It's the state's lawsuit. That's going to be the important
one. And people saying, John, why don't you think the EU matters? Why don't you think the UK matters?
That's not what I meant. What I meant was that the problems that the EU had with the merger
and the problems that the UK had with the merger were totally different than the problems that the
states have with the merger, because the problems that the states have with the merger does not
affect the UK or the EU. The UK and the
EU was only concerned as far as monopolies and less competition when it comes to EU broadcasting.
That's it. So to address that, Paramount said, okay, we'll give up these properties and we'll
give up these channels. So that way we don't interfere with your regulations. And the EU
and the UK were okay. Great. Because the stuff that the states are concerned about is none of
their concern at all. The EU and the UK stuff is basically all the same. The EU and the UK stuff is
all settled. That's not a problem. The Paramount merger with Warner Brothers doesn't really present
a problem to the UK and the EU. Hence, that stuff got resolved quickly. So no, that stuff isn't going
to add to any of the delays. In theory, it's not going to add to any of the delays. All right. Good
question though, Mike. All right. Next up, we got final cut by Chris writes, do you think Avengers
Secret Wars or Doomsday will be bigger at the box office? Well, it depends. If Doomsday is really
good, Secret Wars will be bigger. If Doomsday
sucks, less people will go out to see Secret Wars. So it really all depends. I think Doomsday will be
really good. So I think Secret Wars will end up being the bigger one. We'll find out in a year
and a half final. All right. Next up, Blake Dieters writes, Papa Iger and Kirshner bought
the Lakers. Yep. We talked about a little bit earlier in the show. Again, really look, it's not
the guy who bought the Lakers with big Papa Iger is not related to Donald Trump. He is the
brother of a guy who married Donald Trump's sister, or daughter, I should say, which I still
is interesting because like Iger and Trump do not like each other at all. So it's kind of funny that
he's in business with that guy. All right. Next up, uh, Corey Liu writes, how to train your dragon
two comes out next year. Uh, you read that correctly. Yeah. I mean, listen, how to train
your dragon one was so surprisingly good. I mean, the live action version, so surprisingly good.
I, I, I just, I just can't believe how much I enjoyed it. I'm not saying it's better than the
original animated one. I'm just saying I was completely shocked and surprised by just how
good that movie was. So you got the same director coming back to direct the second one. I know they
were already in production on the second one by the time the first one came out. So I can't wait
to see the new one. All right. Upside down rights. You've said your wife, Ann was a fan of the
having a good, but funny story. Do you think it could be made into a crazy movie? Yes.
I think you could make a fun, funny movie out of monkey Island, but I don't know that anybody
would care. And I don't know that anybody would go see it. It's an older property. Now I think
it could run into the same box office, uh, problems that, um, the same box office problems
that coyote versus Acme is going to run into. And so could you make that movie and could you
make it entertaining and funny? Yeah, I think you could, but would it be commercially viable?
Honestly, I don't know. I think if I was an executive at a movie studio and somebody came
in and pitched the idea, I would probably love the pitch, but then still say no. Cause I just
don't know that it would be a moneymaker, but I don't know, man, anything's possible upside down.
Anything is possible. All right. Next up, uh, Espinoza writes,
the Lakers got swept by the thunder so bad. The team got sold. Why couldn't the angels be sold
also? Well, yeah, but I mean, the thunder also swept the Lakers who were without their very best
player. I mean, don't go crowing too much about sweeping a team that limped into the playoffs
without two of their three best players.
And then their third best player only being at 50% and their real best player couldn't play at all.
Don't be too proud of that. And listen, SGA is from my hometown. He's from Hamilton, Ontario,
the hammer. So not only is he a good Canadian kid, he's actually from my hometown.
I mean, so obviously I'm very biased for SGA, but don't go crowing too much about beating a team
without its best player when you played them. That's all I'm saying. All right. Tomas writes, did you see that the people who bought Lord of the Rings extended
edition on Google play suddenly had no access to the Lord of the Rings movies
and weren't reimbursed? It was a rights issue. Yeah. And this is becoming a bigger and bigger
problem. Again, it's still a 0.0001% problem, but it's getting bigger.
And again, like as somebody who owns like a lot of movies, not as many as you might think,
but I own a lot of movies on digital. I've never once had any issue with any of my collection.
A lot of my physical movies, when I own physical things, a lot of things went wrong with those
easily get lost, easily get damaged, easily get borrowed, all that kind of stuff. I've never once
had a single digital movie I've ever bought ever go missing, get damaged, not know where it was or
wherever I was in the world. But this is something that's got to get addressed. All right.
Let's see. Mike sends in another $20 super chat. Thank you, Mike. And Mike writes in,
hey, John, I'm a big gamer and I'd like your input. Why does it seem that games with really
good stories can't seem to capture that same magic in movie form? TV seems to be doing good with video
game IP. Why can't movies do it? Because the problem is that, and I've had this argument with gamers
and gamers always disagree with me and they're wrong. It's often lonely being right.
The reality is 99% of games are not created to primarily be narrative story vehicles.
They're created to be great gameplay vehicles with hopefully good narrative thrown in along
the way. But it is good. Narrative is not, nor should it be the number one
priority of game designers. The number one priority is creating a fun, engaging game.
That's the number one priority. And then you add in good narrative too.
I've always believed there have only been a very select handful, few of video games that
truly have a narrative that could truly be translated to the big screen.
The other big problem I think a lot of movies have had, video game adaptation movies, is that
they've been trying to adapt to the game too much. You need to adapt. A game's a game. A movie's a
movie. You got to change it. You got to adapt it. And when you look at things like Fallout,
whatever, and you see some excellent adaptation being done, I think what you're seeing here,
it's not just TV. You're also seeing it improve a lot in the movies. You're seeing the movies
getting better because I believe studios, both on the television and the movie side,
have embraced that, hey, capture the spirit of the game, but your first priority is to make a good
movie. And that's what I think is important. And I think that's what I think is important. And I think
TV show start there and then it can work. But yeah, I still am of the contention that 99% of
games, even the best of them, do not carry with them legitimate screen-worthy standalone stories
without gameplay. A couple of them are exceptions. I think Red Dead Redemption 2 is an exception. I
think obviously God of War, I think is an exception. There are a couple that I think are exceptions,
but otherwise it's just adaptation, man. All right. Thanks for writing.
Thanks for writing that in, Mike. Next up, Raymond Vrata writes,
with Iger on board, the bus is not in control. Will they invite Magic back? I'm not, here's the
thing. I'm not sure the buses aren't in control anymore. I just don't know how the deal is
structured. Like the news literally just came out. We haven't seen the finer details of the news
because when the LA Dodger guys bought the Lakers last year, they bought it from the buses, but they
didn't. So I don't know if that's changed here. Right. So I'll have to find that out a little bit
later. All right. Next up, Thomas writes, you think since Steve carries the guilt of pulling
Tony into Endgame and that kind of leads him to kind of sympathizing with Dr. Doom? No, I don't
think that has anything to do with it. I don't think that has anything to do with it. Like at
all. I mean, they've, they've been fighting for a long time. They've been fighting for a long time.
They've been fighting beside each other with each other. All they know, they know the risks. They
know what they're in for. Um, Steve did not pull Tony into Endgame. He pulled him into the part of
trying to figure out time travel, but by the time Thanos shows up with his intergalactic army, uh,
then Tony's going to have to get involved anyways. Right. So no, I don't, I don't think that is that
plays. I mean, it's a fair question, Thomas, but I don't think that plays anything into, uh,
into the movie. All right.
Joe Adonis also sends in a $20 super chat. Thank you, Joe. And Joe writes,
Hey, John, uh, I'm in Anaheim for D 23 weekend. Do you have a recommendation for the best steakhouse
other than Morton's and Ruth's Chris? Nope. I listen, honestly, I really like Irvine and Orange
County. I don't go there a ton. Um, so I don't, I'm a half hour away from it, which is not terribly
far, but it's far enough that I don't just hang out there regularly when I'm in the mood for steak and
Irvine. I go to Ruth's Chris. That that's where I go when I'm in the mood for steak and Irvine.
Uh, another place I really highly recommend is there's, there's this iconic restaurant in
Hollywood called Roscoe's chicken and waffles. It's legendary. It's referenced in a lot of movies.
It's actually right around the corner from where David Zen or Dennis Zen lives. But anyway,
so sometimes Ann and I would literally drive into Hollywood park at Dennis's place and then just
walk to Roscoe's anyway.
They opened a location in Anaheim. So I would highly recommend going and checking. I know it's
not a steakhouse. I would highly recommend going and checking out Roscoe's chicken and waffles in
Anaheim. But if you get a chance to ever visit the actual real location in Hollywood, go check that
one out too. All right. Uh, let's see. Next up GK writes, you say viewer questions are the most
important part of the show, but it's always the part that gets cut off. If you have to cut out
early, what gives? Well, because the reason people tune into the show is for the most important part
news stories. I mean, that's, that's why people tune into the show. Generally speaking, people
don't come to the show to hear me answer viewer questions, right? So if there's a part of the show
that I need to cut off, it's going to be the viewer questions because this is a movie punditry
talking about the movie news. There's no, if we don't have the movie news stories, there's nothing
to talk about in Q and a right, right? So there would be no point to the Q and a, if the movie
news stories, we had like nearly 4,000 live viewers. Once we get into the live questions,
it drops a lot. Uh, because you know, most people are interested in the movie news stories,
not me answering questions. Why then do I say the most important part of the show?
That's really more of a philosophical thing. Like I think taking the input from,
the viewers is probably the most important thing that I do on the show, but it's not why most
people come to the show, right? There's a distinction. Both can be true at the same time.
Uh, so that's, that's what a fair question, but that's why I would, that's why I say that. And
that's why when there, I can only have time to do either topics or answer questions.
Well, there's no point in answering questions that there are no topics,
right? And most people come to the show for the topics. And yet philosophically,
it is still the most important thing for me to get to the questions, but I don't,
I'm not always able to because of my schedule. So.
that's that although i do 95 of the time right 95 of the shows we do have time for the viewer
questions it's just very rare that once in a while maybe once or twice a month i'm not able to do
that anyway uh double rights regarding the avengers logo at comic-con feels like something the actual
avengers and tony stark would do and that's hilarious if you're talking about the arch
yes it does well yeah not something cap would do cap would say uh-uh you're breaking the rules but
yes it does totally feel double like something tony would have done all right fabricio writes
going to make two predictions here one the paramount wb merger does not go through and
two james gunn will step down as head of dc studios but will continue to make movies for them
but do more advising i agree with number one it's it's going to be it's not impossible it is not
impossible for this deal to still go through however it is going to be difficult because of
that july 4th deadline
date or that june 4th deadline even if everything goes well for paramount there's still a high
likelihood they're still going to run into that june 4th deadline and the deal gets killed anyway
so it's going to be tough not impossible but tough i've said for months that if paramount
takes over warner brothers i believe james gunn is going to leave he'll wait till his contract's
done in 2027 and then he's going to leave because i don't think he wants anything to do with paramount
so
if the deal gets
killed
i think james gunn stays i don't think he'll leave uh if the if the paramount deal gets killed i don't
think he'll leave now i don't know that james gunn obviously doesn't talk to me about this stuff
so i wouldn't know but my guess is that yes i think the deal doesn't go through but it's still
possible it could and if it does i think james gunn stays so we'll see we'll see we've got uh
a little while to figure that out to see how it all turns out but that's how i think it's going to go
it's going to go all right well said fabricio terence just sends in a super chat badge to be
supportive thank you terence appreciate that man mark branson writes john super excited for the next
leg of your movie meetup tour i know that a lot of us would love to have you in our various cities
would you have ah there we go would you have interest in submitting a 60 second video
explaining why our city might be a good stop like various highlights or food or landmarks or
or iconic locale no i don't think that's necessary i'm not important enough that people need to
compete to get me to their city i'm a fucking nobody okay i'm a nobody irrelevant zero uh
there there is no world that exists where people should put together pitches to try to convince
john campia to come to their town that that's no um i i simply base it on if i have enough
viewers there that i think like there's no point in me going to a town because remember
it's not nothing to go and do these i literally have to give up days away from home driving
um spending hundreds of dollars in gas and hundreds of dollars at campsites and rv parks
and stuff like that along the way and time away from home and all that kind of stuff
so there's really no point in me say going to a town where we have five people who watch the show
there like that that's if there's
only five people that are going to be able to appreciate and and do that then it's not much
of a choice so i basically just look to see you know which cities um have enough viewers to meet
each other and and hang out with each other and whether or not i think there's going to be the
infrastructure there like basically a big enough movie theater with a parking lot i can park my van
it's really nothing much more than that really isn't there's no point in having a competition
over it so the next um
i am starting to plan the next leg of the movie meetup tour i'm going to be getting back out on
the road probably in a month or so i know we're going to hit nashville i know that and i know
we're going to hit atlanta i know that so i'm just trying to figure out what other cities to be doing
and by the way to our canadian friends yes i will i will be doing a full canadian leg where i'm going
to go up to vancouver and then work my way across vancouver or work my way across canada so i'll do
vancouver probably calgary probably saskatchewan and then i'm going to be doing a full canadian leg
probably winnipeg and then and back up in the east coast so it's coming keep your ears open
all right thanks for that mark though very kind of you to say that though mark very kind of you to say
all right next up mike t writes in again he writes for magneto do you for so let me try that again
for magneto do you feel his backstory with the concentration camps is mandatory no absolutely
not uh and if so how do you think mcu will handle it unless magneto will be in his 70s maybe 80s no
the problem is magneto would have to be in his 90s now that's the problem magneto would have to be in
his 90s now i've actually said for a very long time mike that magneto who is my favorite character
in in comic books um and by the way that has not always been his background in the comics his
his origins have been different in the comics at different times just the way it is there it's not
like there's only one untouchable all holy or
origin story but i've said for a long time that you're going to have to change that background a
little bit the important thing wasn't the concentration camps the important part to the
character is that he experienced and witnessed and saw at a young age the absolute horrors and
worst of humanity that would forever turn his heart against humanity now in one era you could
make that oh in world war ii he saw the concentration camps that's great but you can't do that anymore
now it has to be something else because unless of course we want a 90 year old magneto which i
don't think is the way to go so they need to change now the story has to remain the same
that at a young age young eric witnessed the horrors and worst of humanity that does not change
that is the story that has to stay intact
but what that horror was that he saw that part has to change because we're living in 2026 now and
we don't want a 90 year old magneto anyway so there's that all right thanks for the question
mike next up we got mark who writes oh we already did that one uh christopher diaz writes thoughts
on nicholas holt casting for harry potter as gilroy lockhart i thought that was interesting
i really you guys know i really like nicholas holt i like him a lot but i mean
it's not going to be popping up in season one so that's probably going to be a season two thing
uh but yeah i hey listen adding great talent's always a good thing i love nicholas holt and
remember like gilroy never really had gilroy never really had a big role to play it's it's
not a major character uh so it's not that big of a deal but i love nicholas holt and i think
it's really interesting that they're adding yet another great piece of talent all right next up
um oh
sorry there was a third part to mark uh local theater history just something to make the stop
worthwhile for you and your crew traveling with you uh thank you for bringing your a game daily
to us we'll thank you again man i appreciate that all right connor writes at what point do
the paramount shareholders tell david allison to back out of the merger they have to be losing
money yeah they are uh i i mean i really don't know it'd have to be the major players
but i don't know what the
current nature is of the shareholders and who owns the most share i don't know what that
structure is for paramount right now um i mean maybe at the next annual meeting of shareholders
but i don't know when that would be for paramount so i mean yes theoretically that's a possibility
but i mean it's the board the board decides what they can do and you know becomes a mess but it is
possible at some point next time the shareholders get together they may just say to the
board of paramount cut this out maybe i don't know we'll see but it's an option connor uh double b
studio rights regarding the dc cancellations i think uh i think have everything to do with
money and contract negotiations for directors writers and producers then story i don't think
so i don't even think it has to do with story i think it has to do with the state that dc is in
as a whole i don't think it has nothing to do with actors
or director has nothing to do with that they they've never gotten to a point where they're
saying they're they're even casting right so no i think it has absolutely nothing to do with
contract negotiation because if that was a problem they just move on to another actor or another
director i don't think that's an issue at all i i think the what's really at the heart of it is that
they are reeval re-evaluating where things like these third tier level things like a waller or
a paradise lost fall when they still haven't got let alone an aquaman in their universe a flash
in their universe uh a wonder woman in their universe a batman in their universe like it is
like rob raised the point i think you raised it really well that there's something silly about
the idea of having a wonder woman spin-off property paradise lost when we don't even have
wonder woman yet like you're doing a spin-off of something that we don't even have in the universe
yet and that's
that's kind of silly at this point all right but you never know double b
you might be right i'm just saying i i don't think that's what it is
All right, Senior AJ writes, what will happen with the kid from the Fantastic Four? Well, I'm not going to talk about that. You're going to have to see Doomsday to know that. And all right, guys, that will do it for today's installment of the John Campion Show. Thank you so much for being here, guys, and making our little show part of your day. Big special thank you to the thousands of you guys in the live chat. Thank you for hanging out here and hanging with us all the way to the very end.
Also, big thank you to all you guys who sent in the Super Chats. Number one, because you gave us great fun things to talk about. But number two, you supported our channel as you did it. And all of us involved with the show, thank you guys so very much for your support.
Hey, guys, make sure you come back tomorrow. Of course, Chris Parker, the great 3C Films, is going to be on the show with me tomorrow. I'm looking forward to that. We've already got a couple of small things lined up that we're going to talk about. And hopefully you guys will be here to be a part of it.
That will do it for me for now, guys.
Thank you so much for being here.
And until next time, my friends, bye-bye.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Bob Eiger, former Disney CEO, has purchased the Los Angeles Lakers for $12.5 billion, marking a shift from film to sports and sparking debate over potential future movie connections.
The purchase occurred despite a previous sale of the Lakers for $10 billion just a year earlier, with a reported $2.5 billion profit, signaling strong financial performance.
While Eiger is no longer Disney’s CEO, he remains on the board as an advisor, but his move into sports does not directly impact Disney’s operations.
A major controversy arose at San Diego Comic-Con when Marvel installed an Avengers-themed arch over the historic Gaslamp District without permission, leading to a $160,000 fine and criticism over corporate overreach.
Despite the fine, Marvel’s design was reportedly months in advance and professionally developed, raising questions about whether the city’s objections were legitimate or due to miscommunication.
Reports suggest DC Universe projects like "Waller" and "Paradise Lost" have been shelved or delayed, raising concerns about inconsistent development and a lack of focus on major franchises.
Critics argue that this pattern resembles past failures like Star Wars, where announced projects were canceled, and suggest a shift toward prioritizing high-profile titles over niche spin-offs.
The simultaneous theatrical releases of *Dune Part Three* and *Avengers
Summary:
5 billion, a move that reflects his transition from film leadership to sports and raises speculation about future cinematic tie-ins. While Eiger remains on Disney’s board, his decision does not directly affect the studio. The segment then shifts to a controversial incident at San Diego Comic-Con, where Marvel installed an Avengers arch on a historic landmark without permission, resulting in a $160,000 fine.
Critics debate whether the action was a bold creative choice or a breach of public trust, especially given the meticulous planning and design involved. Turning to DC Universe developments, reports indicate that projects like "Waller" and "Paradise Lost" have been delayed or canceled, sparking concern that the studio is over-relying on minor spin-offs and neglecting flagship franchises. This pattern is likened to past studio missteps, such as Star Wars’ project cancellations.
Finally, the show highlights the growing anticipation around *Dune Part Three* and *Avengers: Doomsday*, set to release on the same day, with early ticket sales showing extreme demand and potential for a record-breaking weekend. Despite skepticism about market viability, the combination of cinematic prestige, fan excitement, and the rarity of such a dual release fuels optimism about unprecedented box office success. Overall, the discussion underscores shifting trends in entertainment: corporate overreach, strategic franchise prioritization, and the resurgence of theatrical experiences as a cultural phenomenon.
FAQs
Bob Eiger's purchase of the Lakers does not impact Disney, as he is no longer CEO and has stepped down from his role at the company. He remains on the board as an advisor but does not have active leadership responsibilities.
No, Marvel did not get permission from the city of San Diego to install the arch. Officials specifically told them not to do it, and they proceeded anyway, leading to a $160,000 fine.
The reports suggest that the Waller and Paradise Lost series have been put on hold or canceled, though not officially confirmed by DC. The decision may reflect a strategic shift to focus on major IP properties.
The arch was seen as a highly creative and visually striking addition that generated excitement among fans. However, its unauthorized installation and disregard for city rules have sparked debate over corporate ethics and respect for public landmarks.
Yes, the simultaneous release of two major films could create a massive box office event, potentially breaking records due to their combined appeal and audience demand, especially with strong theatrical demand and limited screen availability.
Yes, 'Coyote vs. Acme' has received overwhelmingly positive reviews from critics, with a 94% rating, and is considered a strong success in terms of quality and fan reception, even though Warner Bros. initially doubted its financial viability.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.