Go back

We found an app that lets you buy anything for $0

0m 0s

We found an app that lets you buy anything for $0

The podcast episode begins with a humorous critique of South Korea's viral trend of "dopamine websites," where users engage in fake online activities—browsing menus, filling carts, tracking shipments, or taking virtual smoke breaks—without real purchases. The hosts mock this as a strange cultural phenomenon but use it to pivot into broader business discussions. They reflect on Asian market strategies, citing TCL's evolution from cheap, low-quality TVs to competitive products at stable prices, and Kevin Ryan's analogy of "Hondification," where companies start mediocre and improve over time without raising costs. This leads to an analysis of Nick Sleep's investing framework, focusing on "shared economies of scale," where firms like Costco and Amazon reinvest savings into customer surplus, creating unstoppable loyalty and scale. The hosts then share anecdotes about Lloyd Blankfein's frugal billionaire habits and David Rubenstein's rise from a tax loophole scheme to building Carlyle Group, alongside his passion for historical artifacts. A major segment highlights PSA, a card grading company that dominates as a trusted third party in collectibles, solving the "credence good" problem with a massive backlog and network effects. The episode concludes with lighter talk on vintage denim, Japanese craftsmanship, and potential niche grading markets, blending humor with investment insights.

Transcription

11975 Words, 63261 Characters

English
Sam, we've been doing it all wrong. This whole business thing, this building thing, we've been doing it all wrong. I feel like I can rule the world. I know I can be what I want to. I put my all in it like no day's off. On the road, let's travel, never looking back. See, we thought you have to build a product, that product has to do something, has to add value, solve a problem. And here, I will read you this tweet. This is from NextaTV. They say, dopamine websites are the new trend in South Korea. These services let users endlessly browse food delivery menus, read reviews, fill their shopping carts, and even track their shipment. But the only catch, none of it's real. You're not really placing an order for anything. There are also virtual smoke breaks where you can join anonymous people in chat rooms to recreate the feeling of taking a smoke break without having to smoke a cigarette. The idea is simple. Give people the familiar dopamine hit without them having to actually spend any money, leave the house, smoke, or do anything else along those habits. And these are becoming incredibly popular in South Korea. Is this the same country that's having a massive birth rate issue? Unrelated. It checks out if they're going to create virtual smoke groups and fake buy stuff. What the heck, guys? So the trend started, you know, this year, and it's basically Korean Gen Z. They sort of realized that a lot of the fun in online shopping is just browsing. It's just putting things in the cart. It's hit and check out. You know, getting the actual product is, you know, sure, maybe that adds some value, but there's a lot of fun in online shopping. But there's a lot of fun in online shopping. But there's a lot of fun in just the other side of it. And so you can see here, I can pull one of them up. Let me open. And so this is a app called Food Never Comes. And all right, so check this out. So you open up the app, and you can select rabbit or turtle delivery, so fast or slow. Do you want to, should we pay for fast or slow? I guess we should pay for fast. I want to get my fix up quickly. Let's treat ourselves. Okay, so now there's a fried chicken, restaurant, so we can have the half and half crispy chicken, the cheese balls, got to go with the cheese balls, maybe the soy glazed chicken, we'll go spicy, we'll add a cola, add to cart. And then we can go ahead, we could check out, we put in our info here, and then we could watch this delivery, make its way to our house, never actually come. And that's it. It's the blue balls of entrepreneurship. Sam, are you in or are you out? Dude, how can this group of people who have brought us such amazing things, like the Kia Telluride, or Samsung. K-pop demon hunters. Yeah, like go and do something so stupid. The Koreans, you guys really are like the barbell strategy of life. They're bringing us such amazing, wonderful goodness and such silliness. I guess I don't get this. Why are people doing this? On behalf of our huge, I'm sure, South Korean followership, I will defend this by posting a picture of the White House this weekend where there was a giant motorcycle, a motorcycle doing a backflip in front of the White House. In preparation for UFC 250 to celebrate the birth of America, the two dudes in their underwear beating each other up in the White House lawn. Yeah, you don't think that a fist fight on the White House lawn is appropriate? An organized fist fight? Where a Frenchman beats up a Brazilian? Yeah. America. Yeah. Dude, look, I didn't say that we both can't be stupid. I'm just saying that this is wild. Are these things actually popular? No, I can't tell. So, obviously, this makes for an amazing headline. There's also a reason that I open up the show with it, because it's just funny to talk about and make fun of. But there's not a lot of Korean people on Twitter, so we can't exactly refute this. It feels like Japan and America have separate internets. Have you ever gone to a Japanese website? They kind of do. It's kind of challenging to use, obviously. Even if it's just translated, it's still totally separate, and it's quite hard. And so, are there any proper Korean people on Twitter to refute this story, or can we just make up falsehoods about this? I think we just make it up. It's like the good version of the Hunter Biden laptop story. It's the South Korean fake DoorDash story. Have you ever studied, like, Eastern Internet? You know how people study, like, Eastern philosophy? Have you ever studied Eastern Internet? Yeah, like Masa-san from SoftBank. I believe he's a Korean guy who lives in Japan, or is he Japanese who lives in Korea? Anyway, yeah, I've studied him, and then I've studied, like, some of the Chinese websites or the super apps. So, like, Mega, that it's quite hard to understand what they're about. Yeah, there's so many crazy apps and sites. So, just for example, I remember when we were looking into live streaming. So, my first company that sold Bebo, it was in the live streaming space. We sold to Twitch, which is the big American player. But live streaming is far more advanced in Asia than it is in the West. And if you go look at, like, I forgot which ones it was, yy.com or whatever, there was a whole bunch of these where you would see somebody on video and then horizontally from right to left streaming across the screen would just be the entire chat. And it was the most bizarre experience ever because you would see that 7,000 people are watching this girl eat noodles while text flies across the screen and people are spending thousands of dollars sending her virtual roses. And we were looking at this, studying it. Like, you know, it's like, you know, when you study, like, a tribe and you're like, so, they just eat it? And you're just like, yeah, this is exactly what they do. And then we tried to recreate as many of those variables as we could because these sites were incredibly popular. Isn't there one where it's, like, fat people eating? It's, like, bang, bang? Or isn't this, like… They don't need to be fat. Oh, I thought there was one guy, like, named Nico Avocado or something like that. He got really fat doing it. And then he lost a lot of weight and came back. He's kind of a weird guy. But, yeah, mukbang is basically watching other people eat just like you watch other people play video games, you watch other people play basketball. It turns out people want to watch other people eat, and they like having that high-definition sound, watching them slurp and chomp on their food. I get joy from that, by the way. I always—I buy candy and sweets that I want to eat for other people, and I just, like, I'll hand it to them. For other people? Yeah, I'll hand it to them, and I'm like, "Eat it. Tell me how it feels." Like, I definitely can get, like, secondhand, like, sugar highs from other people. Okay, so you're in. So we started out, and now you're in. Dude, there's this whole genre of Indian barbers who shave people's heads who have dandruff, and you could, like—it's, like, the oddly satisfying of, like, "Oh, we found it. Let's wipe it off the head." Yeah, the oddly satisfying stuff is crazy. There's other sites that I think are, like, the kind of the current trend of, like, what's big in the East that's not yet big in the West. So before, there was live streaming. That was obviously a huge one. Mobile gaming, so internationally, the biggest, the most popular games were all on your phone. There weren't Xbox, PlayStation. They really didn't have, like, big console or PC culture. And so games like Free Fire or PUBG Mobile were huge, and then Fortnite became the version of that in the U.S. soon after. And so you could sort of see these trends moving over. Live shopping has been huge in Asia for a long time. Now, whatnot. The U.S. equivalent of live shopping worth $10 billion. And so you can kind of look for these products that are over there and try to see when and how will they translate. So right now, the big one is—we've talked about this before, but the short drama. So serial drama. So basically, it's Netflix, but you watch on your phone vertically. Each episode is, like, 30 to 60 seconds. And it's basically soap operas of all different types of genres that people get incredibly addicted to. Huge in Asia. So huge in kind of, like, the China, Japan, Korea area. Now getting big in India, only a matter of time until it's also just as big in the U.S., is my guess. I just pulled up these notes that I have from, I think, 2016. So there's this guy named Kevin Ryan. He's been on the podcast, front of the pod. And he founded a bunch of companies, the biggest one being MongoDB, multi—tens of billions of dollars company. But he also famously was the co-founder of Business Insider. And so I called him one time, and he, like, gave me some tips on, like, how to start a media company, because I, like, didn't know anything. And I emailed him so many times that he relented. And I have these notes. And I—something always stuck with me on this framework. So he said, "On this show, we have spent hours talking to some of the best investors alive. Well, lucky for you, the team at HubSpot, they have pulled out the principles that matter most and turned it into a very simple, easy-to-read wealth guide. It's 35 principles. We're talking guys who have been on the pod, like Howard Marks, Manish Pabrai, Morgan Housel, Cathie Wood, and a ton others." So these are all their frameworks, their mental models, their rules, basically how to play the long game and how to avoid ruin. You can get it in the link below. He didn't—he didn't use all these exact words. This is me, like, typing. This is before Grinnell existed. So he goes—he's like, "The Business Insider strategy is sort of what Honda did in 1985 versus General Motors." He was like—he didn't say this, but this is my notes: "Start with shitty quality and get traffic to our website and improve." "Shit quality, but we'll improve." He said it in his own hands, inspiring all of his employees. He didn't say it that way, but he was like, we're—he said, like, "Honda in 1985 versus GM." Honda was considered sort of a joke. GM cars were these, like, big, like, heavy cars. Like, heavy-duty vehicles that made a big thunk when you, like, shut the door. And Hondas were, like, rinky-dink. But the difference is, is that with Honda, as well as with Business Insider, the quality of car that they were— were making increased but their cost they stayed the same which is why honda eventually won and business insider we make content a lot cheaper than wall street journal but we think that our quality is just going to continue to rise and that was like his whole strategy and i always thought that was really interesting i thought that was a really cool analogy which is you could start like kind of like so so and just slowly get better while keeping your costs the same and he always referenced he referenced in our call he was like honda did this toyota did this and i started thinking about this and i've always thought about this like um strategy that a lot of asian companies did if you remember do you know tcl tvs i've never even heard of that no so tcl if you were to go to amazon six years ago and buy a tcl tv they were the worst they were like maybe 10 years ago they were junky tvs but you get a 65 inch flat screen tv for like literally 200 and over i'm like a gadget nerd and so over time tcl is now a baller tv company and you can still get a 65 inch highest def fanciest tv for 200 it's actually i don't even know how this is possible and i've always thought about this strategy of like asian businesses and i've noticed i don't know if it's particularly an asian thing or because i he referred to asian car companies now i always think of it that way they'll offer something where like the quality is so so but just good enough but over time like it's sort of like hyundai or kia or genesis like particularly you know asian car companies that's how i think of like crappy at first but they just get so much better and then the prices stay the same what i like about this is it's the opposite of the normal white guy referencing asian culture thing or normally we take these like amazing zen practices we're like the japanese use the word kaizen for the continuous pursuit of perfection and that's what we do here at our company or it's like wabi sabi the beauty and imperfection it's like always like these high and mighty things that like we're borrowing and in the end it's like oh my god i'm like oh my god i'm like oh my god i'm like oh my he's like we use the term hundification where you start with shit and it stays shit for quite a while but eventually the shit becomes a little less shitty and that's what we do it's like the first honest white guy it's like we give him a reward for like he's doing all of the like the tone and the hand gestures but he's just saying the truth and we didn't stop there we took the shit that we had and the year after just a little bit less shitty because they don't know the difference there should just be like a whole service which is like honest business translation you know like google translate but just like corporate translation it's like take any company put their mission values and earnings calls into this the generator and it just tells you the truth yeah that's so funny uh one of the greats kevin ryan probably no longer a fan of the pod no longer friend of the former friend of the told you that in confidence sam um there was a statue of limitations on notes by the way uh once it's been 10 years i can talk about it so like anything that happened it or you know from pre-2016 i'm allowed to bring it up all right so i was nerding out on something kind of related so i'll segue to that so um you were talking about how for the tvs thing they're like they just kind of a shitty tv but eventually it's kind of a great tv but still for 200 bucks which is different than i would say most companies which assume you know over time the goal is to raise our prices increase our margins increase our profits so i was studying this investor called nick sleep and those who weren't there ever since you brought him up i've been on him yeah so you know his story in short is he was an investor basically raised money was an investor about 15 years average more than 20 percent of the time he was an investor and he was an investor for compounding billions of dollars he won the game shut down the fund and moved on and most of the fund was concentrated in three positions costco amazon and bursar hathaway for the longest period of time he was just holding those and so the interesting part isn't oh wow here's a guy who picked right you know it's kind of like oh i'm a lot i'm interviewing a lottery winner to ask how they how they guessed the numbers like this is daughter's birthday it's not not really that it's if you ask what is nick sleep's philosophy his core investing strategy he had this idea of consumer surplus so his his main realization was look there's many ways to invest uh you could do what buffett and ben graham are trying to do which is buy a company that's trading for less than it's worth or you can look at some of these companies that today look overvalued like amazon at that time and you know the 2000s is like wow this thing's got a crazy price to earnings ratio and he realized that the best predictor of long-term value for him was something that he called shared scale economies all right so what do those mean so scale economies is usually when let's say you're amazon you have a large customer base you're able to open warehouses in a bunch of different places and you get what's called economies of scale which is that over time your cost to serve each additional customer go down because you've you're serving so many customers you're able to like almost like amortize the the investment costs across a large customer base now what he what nick sleep identified was called shared uh economy sales was that a word that he did he make this up yeah so he i don't know if he made it if he invented it but he was really bet on it you know and he really like made it the foundation of his investing strategy so he realized like let's take costco so costco's goal is to basically get economies of scale meaning they buy in bulk they have tons of locations so they have a lot of pricing power they're able to buy things in bulk at cheap prices and instead of what most retailers do which is they buy wholesale sell retail right they buy cheap and they sell it at a markup costco's goal was to make savings of buying in bulk to the customer so he did the math and he realized like okay let's say that a costco membership costs a hundred dollars let's just use round numbers right and he realized that if for the average person who shops groceries at costco they're gonna save on their grocery bill let's call it a thousand dollars a year on just by buying costco because costco is passing on all those savings of buying in bulk to the customer so the customer saves a thousand dollars they spend a hundred dollars and so the surplus that they they've generated this thousand dollar surplus and then they're only charging a hundred dollars for it's a no-brainer proposition and they basically take the so what happens is instead of increasing their prices and increasing their their profits and increasing the money for the shareholders they pass the profits to the customer which makes a juicier value proposition which attracts more customers which gives them more scale which allows them to create even more surplus and so what he realized was that the company that would do this that would start early on and pass on the the savings to the customer they would run away from the competition because they would have such a such a juicy value proposition they would build so much trust with customers and have such a incredible offer to the customers that they would pick up all the customers and so costco for example they make no money essentially on any of the food that they sell they make all their money on the membership which is like pure profit is the membership uh how much um i'm just looking this up i knew that they were a hundred billion a year in sales how much in uh subscription in the membership sales do you know five billion five billion yeah so so what he realized at that time was he said wow everybody just looks at i think let's just say it was a billion dollars at that time is like when a traditional analyst will look at this company they'll just see a billion dollars of profit but what i see is five billion of surplus that they're passing on and they passed on four billion last year five billion this year it'll be seven billion next year ten billion the next year and they're just going to pass on four billion next year and they're just going to pass on so much surplus that it's going to run away from the competition and it'll create so much trust and so much loyalty that they'll never have any problems attracting customers and so he's like that's an invisible metric that doesn't show up on the balance sheet it doesn't show up on the pnl you have to sort of manually calculate the shared economies of scale how much of the surplus they're giving to the customers and if you track the growth rate of that the what you want is companies where that growth rate is increasing he said amazon was the same way for 20 years bezos basically did not try to extract profits he just reinvested all the capital to give people wider selection faster shipping and lower prices and he realized that every year they're investing more money in giving people wider selection faster shipping and lower prices the three things that consumers care about the most and they have the prime membership just like the costco membership and so he invested heavily in that and i just thought oh wow this is a pretty brilliant insight a way a way of looking at businesses that i've never thought about yeah that's actually it sounds stupid but that's sort of like a i don't know if i need a lesser word but a groundbreaking like stat you know that's that's like a that's actually very interesting i've never ever have heard of a company that measures that like just how much savings we are passing on to you that's pretty interesting hey let's take a quick break you know that feeling when strategy is done the brief is written everyone's aligned and you realize someone still has to sit down and actually create all the content that someone is usually you and it's due tomorrow well the breeze assistant from hubspot can help it works right inside hubspot you can brand voice all using your actual customer data so you don't create just content you create content that converts check out hubspot.com the agentic customer platform for growing businesses but who else does that you you have to do it with a company that's huge and where mass appeal or mass and then you need like a membership right like a prime thing well it doesn't have to necessarily be a membership there's other ways to do it but you know the two biggest examples he did was the membership because it's the beautiful way to monetize right it's like i'm going to give you so much money and i'm going to give you so much money and i'm going to give you much value in the thing you're buying that giving me an annual recurring revenue membership is a no-brainer for you. And that's what Prime is. That's what the Costco membership is. And so it worked out beautifully for those two cases. But it's not, it doesn't have to be that. It's just that. So for example, like I was talking to AI today and I was trying to say like, well, what other, study other companies. If there's these thousand companies, which other companies would Nick Sleep see as having a high surplus and how would he look at it, right? And so it's a, AI is not great at doing analysis like this. But one of the examples it brought up was SpaceX. And basically it's like, look, SpaceX is going to lower, it has already lowered the cost to orbit by 100X. So it's reduced its cost by 100X, but it didn't keep the same prices to the government or anybody else. It also lowered, it passed on the savings to the government, which is why it now takes like 80% of all payloads. It like, it took all of the business. It took all the market share by doing that. And they're trying to reduce another 100X and they're putting up all these satellites and they're trying to, again, pass the savings on to the subscribers for Starlink internet. And so here you're going to have, again, recurring annual membership, a no-brainer value proposition to a mass market of people. Everybody on earth wants the internet and they are getting economies of scale because as they improve their launch costs and their launch rates, they're not going to raise prices. They're going to pass it on and they're going to create a membership. So it's like SpaceX would be in a weird way, like again, same thing as Amazon today, looked at as highly overvalued, but potentially undervalued. If you could figure out how to measure the surplus and see that the rate of the surplus was growing every year, it might look like one of those businesses. Now I'm not, again, I'm a noob at this stuff. So like, I'm just sharing kind of like my beginner, my learnings with this, just with you. I'm not saying that this is, is or is not the case, not financial advice or anything like that. But I do find this idea to be pretty interesting. It's an idea I hadn't really heard popularized before. This guy is so interesting to me. He's, he's got everything, everything that I want. And does he have like long hair, nice calves? Yeah, like he, you Google his name. Is he alive? He's got a beautiful set of hair and only one photo. If you Google him, it's the same headshot used for everything. Nick Sleep, come on the podcast. I mean, how many times are you going to let me podcast, make out with you before you just finally get on here? Okay. Yeah, do you want to break decades of being anonymous? Come on the pod. There's literally only one photo of him. I'm for real. Um, it's like, uh, I got to this hotel and I paid like, uh, disgusting about a buddy, but they had free snacks when I walked in. And I was like, honestly, love this place. Great value. They gave me this, they gave me like, you know, cake pops for free when we walked in. This is incredible. My kids are so happy. And I feel like that's our pitch to Nick sleep. It's like, yes, you've been anonymous for 20 years and you value your privacy and you've turned down, uh, you know, every opportunity under the sun, but we got peanuts and snacks. If you want to come on our pod, it'll be great. He, uh, he's 58 years old. He's, he's not old. This guy's cool. There's an article, um, called how to retire at 45 and it's about him. So I guess he's taking it easy, but I would love to have this guy on. That would be so fascinating. Him and Paul Graham. It's just, there's something so mysterious about people who, who claim, uh, I've had enough. And they like opt out. I think that's interesting. Um, one of the other takeaways real quick is you only need one or two. Forget the word inside. I'll call it secrets in the Peter. Teal terms, right? You only really need to understand one or two secrets in your lifetime to become fabulously rich. And this is one of them. For example, this is a good example of one. I think Peter Teal did this with a network effect businesses. So understanding, you know, PayPal, Facebook early on, and just understanding like the power of a network effect and how unbreakable those, those monopolies become. And then, you know, the other, uh, you know, another example is, you know, Buffett, for example, he doesn't invest in network effect tech companies or, or anything like this. What? He looks at is what's not going to change. And he's basically like the moat, which is the pricing power. So, you know, he gives an example of, I don't know if you saw this exchange, but Elon was talking about how lame moat sorry. He's like, oh, I don't like the idea of moats. If you need a moat, that's lame. You should be innovating faster than everybody else. That's how you win. If you think a moat is going to protect you, that's not what protects you fast. Innovations protection. This is Elon. You're like, you're like Elon. I don't think the word moat means what you think it means because you definitely have a moat. Buffett replied. And he was like. I don't know. He's like, let's say you go to a corner store and you ask for a Snickers and they say, Hey, I got a Musk bar for 10 cents less because I don't think anyone's buying the Musk bar. And he's like, in fact, if you go test this, if one place doesn't have a Snickers and they have an unbranded unlabeled chocolate bar with, with peanuts in it, but the place across the street has a Snickers bar, the customer will just walk across the street and go buy a Snickers. And he's like, so yeah, he's like, I look for Coca-Cola, Snickers, you know, Gillette. American express. I look for these brands and French apple, I look for these brands and franchises where you'd have to pay someone to switch. And even then they wouldn't want to, um, he's like, he's like, that was his core insight of like, you just need to find these great American franchises and invest in them. Did you see, I want to bring up a person who we talked about somewhat recently, but we didn't dive into, but really quick, did you listen to the Lloyd Blankfein interview that we did that I did with, uh, and he talked about like his family finances and stuff like that. No, I. I only wish I've, I've listened to the first five minutes, but I'm on vacation. So I hadn't, hadn't had time to like get my phone and, uh, and listen to it. Why? What did, what did he say about his family? By the way, did you know this guy before? Am I dumb? I never heard of this person. And then I knew all about this guy suddenly. Well, when you and I were younger, probably in high school, uh, that was like his peak prime. And so like during the wall, you knew him back then or only now I knew him as a famous, like he was like the face of banking. He was like the Jamie diamond of, uh, Oh wait. And he was like, he was like the face of evil because like the name Goldman is like, and, and, and there was this funny line that he told me where he was like, yeah, they like protested outside of my house and everything. And I was like, how does that feel? He's like, well, two things, like one, like go and try to get a mortgage from Goldman. Like you can't, so like, I didn't cause the mortgage crisis. So I don't know why they were so angry at me. And second of all, they, you know, we're camping outside of my house protesting, but like, that's what doorman are for. And I was like, I shouted out from the window on the fifth, fifth balcony in my house. We wouldn't give you a mortgage. Even if you tried, that didn't seem to help. No, dude, he was super likable. He was so charming and charismatic. Basically Lloyd is, um, I like, you could look up his career earnings at Goldman because when Goldman went public, he was like 43 years old. And I think at that time he told me, he told me, uh, his shares were worth like 160. $60 million. And this was when he was 42, he's 72, I think now. So 30 years ago. And then he, the course of his, his earnings are all public while it was public and it was many, many, many hundreds of millions of dollars a year. And so presumably I would have to imagine he's worth like 2 billion plus, but he grew up in a poor Brooklyn family and he somehow, and he's very self deprecating. His father was a post office worker. His mother, I think was a stay at home mom. He's like a pretty, like he calls himself the blue collar CEO. And he was like, I wasn't even. That's smart. But somehow I got into Harvard and they paid for my school. And he's like, one time when I went to Harvard, I had to go to the, like the office or whatever they call it, the, the financial aid. He was like, I don't have any money to eat. Like, can I please have money? And then they're like, they gave me $500 back then. And it like changed my life. Cause I had food. And so he goes to Harvard and he gets a job as a lawyer. He's like, this sucks. I don't want to do this. And so he gets a job at a rag tag, like subsidiary of Goldman. And he's like, I don't even know what Goldman is. I don't know what banking is, but they thought that I was this like hard nose. Blue collar guy who went to Harvard and they were like, you check the boxes because he, um, was a commodities trader at this little like rag tag group, which at the time was considered a very low brow thing. And so he slowly over the course of many years worked his way up to eventually become partner and then CEO of Goldman. And when he was in my office, he had this very blue collar vibe where I could tell that he, it was, it felt very authentic. He like looked me in the eye and like knew how to like riff on like silly stuff. But also I'm like, dude, you're like acquaintances with Putin. Uh, like, you know, like he's like, like I could see in your phone as pootie, pootie call, like I can see how this guy is charming and how he worked his way to the top. And can you imagine being the shark in the sharks? Like how, how much, how insane it is to work your way up at Goldman amongst all the sharks and become the CEO. Can you, what does that even take? Like that's sort of mind boggling level of difficulty. Like I know people that, that have made more money just building a company, but that's actually not. Not as hard as playing the, the, the like corporate game inside Goldman and rising up amongst all those kind of like corporate sharks. He, he's wild, but he, he came off. I like during the podcast, I told him, I'm like, man, you are making Goldman seem likable, which like, it's not easy. Like you're making it seem relatable and likable. That's a very hard thing to do. And for some reason, after talking to you, I'm like, oh, I can do this. Even though obviously I can't, he told the story. I asked him about personal finances. I was like, Hey, who, how does your personal finances work? Because he told. The story about how he grew up poor and he's still cheap. He was like, I buy the, is there like a cheaper tier of Netflix that has ads? He's like, I won't even pay for that. Um, I do the cheap one because there's something about it that like, because I grew up poor, it still bothers me. He was like, when I, uh, he, he said, um, I, I think he said 80% of his net worth is in public equities of which 90% of that 80%, something like that. He still day trades. And he was like, I day trade. I'm obsessed with it. I love the game so much. And I want to check my phone. all the time, but when I do research on different stocks, I'll get to like a Bloomberg publication or Wall Street Journal or something like that. And I don't buy the subscriptions because like it kind of hurts me to like pay for it. And I just thought that was incredibly fascinating to hear like how a billionaire manages their finances. How a billionaire mismanages his finances is what I heard. Well, he did the right thing. None of that makes any sense. I wasn't there so I could talk shit. If I was there, I would also be like blushing and saying how great he is. But, you know, just hearing it from the outside, just to be the outsider for a second, you're day trading a billion dollars while not paying for Netflix because you're cheap. Like, I don't even understand what you're talking. You don't pay for premium news. The point being, it's not a logical thing, but it was like, he was kind of like saying like, here's all like how I'm messed up, just like the average Joe. And it was so fascinating. And at the end of the interview, did I tell you what I tried to do with him? I was like, hey, like I have this like Instagram, do you want me to like, I was going to do this like- Like a secret handshake? Well, I was like, I have an idea. Like, I can like act like I'm reviewing your book and I'll just be like, ah, screw it. I'll just bring Lloyd in. Lloyd, just tell him what your book's about, will you? And he was like, he goes, I'm too old for that stuff. I'm not acting cute on Instagram. That's the most likable thing you've said so far about him. I was like, oh, Lloyd, it's not like cute. None of the like billionaires, they're just like us. But just that one of like, I'm not going to do that. I was like, I wouldn't do that. I wouldn't describe it as cute. I mean, it is cute, but it's more like fun. You don't like fun. He goes like, that's too cute, dude. I'm not doing that. And I was like, yes, sir. I'll walk you to the elevator. It was pretty good, but he was fascinating. And then another guy who we had a guy on the other name, Barry, who talked about David Rubenstein. Had you ever heard of him before David or Barry told you about him? From Carlisle Group? Yeah. Do you know anything about this guy? Only surface level stuff, yeah. I want to fill you in on a little bit about his story because I've actually always been a fan of his, but I mostly knew him as an author of history books, not particularly of like a business guy. And I was researching him. It's pretty fascinating. And he's kind of like my new man crush a little bit. He kind of like got his foot in the door because when he was in his 20s and 30s, he was a lawyer, but he quit being a lawyer because he wanted to work for the Jimmy Carter administration. And he like made a joke where he was like, when I joined Jimmy Carter, he was up by like 31 points. And then he eventually won by one point. And Jimmy Carter went to David and was like, so what contributions did you make? And so he like has like this kind of like funny, self-deprecating humor, but he like worked for Jimmy Carter. And it eventually Jimmy Carter was a one-term president. He doesn't get reelected. So David Rubenstein, he's 31 years old. He's like, well, what do I do now? And there was this amazing article that I found written by Michael Lewis. You know, Michael Lewis, the famous author. He wrote this amazing article in 1993 called "The Access Capitalist." And it's a 10-page or so article written about David. And it's from a while ago. And I love that. And he said, David got his start using what people are calling the Great Eskimo Tax Scam of 1987. Tell me more. So the story is basically David had this amazing Rolodex. He was really well connected. In Washington, D.C., he was known as being likable and like a really good networker. And reliable. And so he just like knew a little bit of everyone. And so he's out of work at the age of 31. He's like, what do I do now? And he hears about this like weird tax loophole where if you were a native of Alaska, you were given a certain amount of tax losses automatically. I don't know why. I think it was like to incentivize people to live there. And so what he did is he organized a bunch of buyers and sellers. Meaning if you want it, you could. They could sell $10 million in tax write-offs to willing buyers for $7 million in cash. And thus the buyer got a reduced taxable income of $3 million. And David like heard about this and he's like, that's interesting. And so him and a couple of friends organized roughly $2 billion in these like in like organ and transacting these tax losses. And after doing that for two or three years, they had made something like $20 million and that's the money that they used three years later to eventually start Carlyle Group, which is now one of the largest PE firms in the world. I believe they have $500 billion in companies that they own. And David was like, I thought I had a pretty good IQ myself, but I was seeing a lot of people make a lot more money than I was who I thought maybe weren't as smart as me. And so I decided to try this PE firm. And so he raises a little bit of money, uses the money that they made from the, uh, the, the tax savings scam, scam, sorry, no longer, I guess he just canceled his booking with us. Scheme ever friend of the pod, scheme, I meant to say scheme. It was cold outside. I meant to say scheme and he used this thing and he started in the PE business, which at the time in the eighties was like, like just killing it. Like it's felt like that's when all the big PE firms were built because this idea of a leveraged buyout was brand new. And so he raised a little bit of money and he like did a couple of deals. It didn't really particularly work that well, I think he said his first deal that they tried to buy was a Mexican restaurant called chichi's and he's like, yeah, like it wasn't going so hot. He went from the Eskimos camp to chichi's, right? Yeah, he's like not doing so hot. But then he had this idea where he was like, well, like I know everyone in DC and I know that like a lot of jobs in DC are pretty cyclical, like after four years you're like quit and you're like, what do I do and I know a bunch of interesting people and I know those interesting people know a bunch of interesting and powerful people, but you don't want to like. Sell access to these people that would like be borderline unethical and sometimes illegal and he's like, well, what if I just like got all of these like powerful people who no longer have jobs at the government to come and like work at this PE firm and we start or when we start buying companies where it would help to have like friends in government so you can get meetings to like big powerful companies and so Carlyle eventually specializes in defense contract style companies. Um, and so that is sort of how it took off, but the more interesting part about all of this. Is what he's done while he was building the company. So he has like five or six books, which is how I've met him or know of him. So he's got a book called like the American stories about like where he just interviews math, um, historians. He's got a book called how to lead the American experiment, how to invest the highest calling, which is conversations about different presidents. He has a show on Bloomberg called the David Rubenstein show. He's got, uh, yeah, that's what I've seen. His interviews, all this amazing thing, but listen to this shit. He owns all this amazing stuff. He owns one of the, um. I think it's one of the last privately owned copies of the Magna Carta, which is the historical, one of the most like historical documents of all time for $21 million. He bought it. He owns one of the last pieces, uh, one of the last, uh, uh, bits of the declaration of independence. He owns a Lincoln signed emancipation proclamation. He, uh, funded the Washington monument when it needed to get rebuilt. He funded the Lincoln Memorial need when it needed to get rebuilt. He funds all these amazing things. So like the Kennedy center, he helped do, he helped produce, he helps produce a lot of Ken Burns. Documentary. He funds them. He's just like this crazy guy that does all of this interesting stuff. And what, and his side hustle is basically like buying these documents, meeting the people who are like around the documents, writing books about the documents, becoming board on the board of the museum in which he loans the documents to. And he just has this like crazy, like fascinating. I mean, that's an epic charcuterie board career. You know what I mean? Like just a little bit of this, a little bit of that. They work well together, you know, he's kind of like the white knight of Washington. DC, I kind of love it, you know, like I, I always love people who are not sort of one dimensional and the way they operate, uh, you know, uh, the one dimensional people I appreciate for their laser focus and obsession. And I take inspiration from it, but I don't take guidance from it. You know, I, I take more guidance from people like this, who I think have a more interesting, varied career. Personally, I, I find that like just really, really. I love this guy, Google or go to his Wikipedia page and like, look at the things that he's contributed to. I, I mentioned just barely any of them, but it's like David Beckham's wisdom teeth. Like we just play a game things, you know, two truths and a lie. Rubenstein's collected collectibles. Dude, it's, it's so awesome what he does. And I just think that guys like this are really cool. And he's actually coming on the podcast, um, in August. And, um, so, you know, sorry, David, I didn't mean to, I didn't mean to insult you if I got any details wrong, but he's coming on. Okay. I'm so excited now. That's amazing. Yeah. It's amazing. I think that he's been doing this kind of like baller giving philanthropic stuff and like history stuff. I think he's been doing it along the way and not just like in the end of his career, which I find really fascinating. And he like makes this joke where, first of all, he says like my whole shtick is I love self-deprecating humor because it disarms people. And like, he's kind of like a, a self-deprecating guy, which makes him very likable. But he was like, I'm not really like that good of an investor. I just like work pretty hard and I know kind of everyone and I'm pretty good at connecting people. And I also have really good business partners who helped me start Carlyle. And that's one of the reasons why it's the way it is. And I thought that was really fascinating. I like that a lot. It also sounds like he had a, you know, a cool second act to his career, maybe a second and a third act to his career. Today's podcast is brought to you by my friends at Mercury. They make the world's best banking product. I think you know this already. I use Mercury for all of my businesses. I think I have like maybe seven or eight businesses. We use Mercury as our business banking across all of them. And now they actually just launched a personal banking app. personal bank account. So I have my personal account there. I moved off of Wells Fargo and Chase. I'm just all in on Mercury. Why? I like products that are easy to use. I like products that get me and the problems that I have. So like very easy to make a joint account with my wife, very easy to spin up virtual cards. One click and I get savings yield. It just has all the stuff that I need in one place. So if you're looking for the best banking product on the market, it's definitely Mercury. I will fist fight anybody who disagrees with me on that. Go to mercury.com slash personal and learn more. Mercury is a FinTech, not an FDIC insured bank. Banking services are provided through Choice Financial Group in column NA, members FDIC. Can I tell you about a business that I think is really cool that is someone's second act? And I think you know, I think you know the person, but I don't know how much time you spent thinking about this business. And so the business is PSA. And PSA is, if you ever want to go buy a rare, you know, Charizard, well, you'll want to know the PSA grade of that card. Dude, we got to get this guy on. Yeah, so Nat Turner bought this, this business and Nat Turner, I think he, I think his last company was like in healthcare, something he sold to Roche. And he's always been a nerd, a collector. And he raised some money and he took private or he bought this company. I think it's called Collectors Universe or something like that. They own PSA. And I just found this category of business to be pretty fascinating. So let me, let me tell you a little bit about this business. Here's, here's one way of looking at it. So it's a business that controls something like 70% of its market. Okay. Absolutely dominant in its market. They have $400 million of orders just sitting in the queue. Haven't even got to it yet. 400 million. What? If I'm wrong, we'll fire our researcher. But that's, that's what we, that's what we have here. What are you going to cancel your Claude subscription? Don't give Claude a nasty talking to. Basically, they, they, they've dominated this space of, of grading cards. And if you think about what that is, the broader category of problem that they solve is something called credence goods. And so I was kind of nerding out on this. And what a credence good is basically, it's a good that even after you've consumed it, even after you have it, you still don't really know the quality of it. So like medical care is a good example. You have surgery. Oh, how'd you like your surgeon? I don't know. I have no idea. I have no way to assess the efficacy of my surgeon. If they were, if they were, you know, I could probably tell if they're terrible, but I can't really tell the difference between good, great and world-class. And the same is true and same was true for collectibles. So let's say somebody had a original, I don't know, Sammy Sosa rookie card and the big kind of home run boom was happening when him and Mark McGuire were hitting a bunch of home runs and people were buying up these cards. And the problem, you know, the problem without a third party, a trusted third party here is that one, you know, the owner says it's an excellent condition and then they show it to a buyer and the buyer says, I don't know, it seems fair. And then the buyer owns it. Then he says it's mint condition. And there's all this arguable, and you don't, and that's just the condition, let alone, is it even authentic? Is this real? Was this actually a first edition? Is this a second edition? Does this actually have this? Does it have actually have that? And so you need third party trust in these systems where there was no structure. And so coins was like this, cards was like this, Pokemon cards, sports cards. And so there was this like entire like industry of collectors who were very passionate, but they had no structure and it needed third party trust. And this exists in many industries. So for example, if you ever go through an M&A process, you'll have to go get a QOE or you'd have to get a third party audit. You know, Deloitte, Ernst & Young, they built multi-billion dollar businesses just doing an attestation, just saying, yes, this company's financials are sound so that the seller and the buyer can do a trusted transaction because the buyer knows that they don't have to go and verify themselves that the company's books are actually what they say they are. And so attestation, credentialing, these are huge businesses that are just some of the most beautiful business models because you become basically a trust tax on an entire industry. You don't have to be the best buyer or seller. You don't have to own anything. It's super capital light. All you have to do is become the trusted third party. And that's hard to do. But once you do it, it's an incredible position to be in. And I think what Nat Turner did buying this company is absolutely brilliant. I think they bought it for 800, 900 million. This is going to be a multi-billion dollar company because. Being the dominant market share and there's a network effect, right? Like if I have a card that I think is valuable, am I going to go to the third rate greater because I can save a little bit on grading my card? No way. I'm going to go to PSA because if it's PSA certified, PSA 10, that makes my card more valuable. And so the trust sort of compounds and it becomes the known unit of account on the street. You see everywhere you go, you're just going to keep seeing PSA, which means when you need to get your cards graded, PSA 10. And then they add it on top of grading. They have a vault. So they store a million cards in their vault because they're basically like, you know, a hybrid. It's like, you know, one part Moody's where they're grading an asset class. And on the other side, they're Fort Knox where they have this giant vault storing a billion dollars worth of cards or whatever it is in their vaults. With this business, so I'm just looking it up. So like it's called collectors.com now. It's like a portfolio. I think they own like the ones you mentioned, plus like three or four other ones. And the, like they have this cool Jackie Robinson card like on their photos and it's created by Topps, Topps cards. And I was like, you know, I bought so many of those. And Topps is owned by Fanatics. Because it's not like a regulated thing, it's not like money or gold or anything like that. What's to stop Fanatics from making more, like it's not like a limited supply. Do you know what I mean? And it's not like, it's not like Topps. Incentives is what stops them. So yeah, it is a limited supply. If Topps can't be trusted to not flood the market with more cards, people will stop buying Topps. The more supply there is, the less valuable each card is. So Topps has an incentive to control the supply tightly, to manipulate the supply artificially. And so Topps has an incentive to do that. That's in line with the incentives of the buyers and the holders, because they need scarcity for this to be valuable. And then PSA sits as a, a player underneath both, which basically grades and authenticates that this is real, it's not a fake card, and that it's in good condition and it's valuable. And they also, because they see so many cards, they know the absolute scarcity. So they know how many of these cards really are out there circulating in the market. They know the liquidity of each card market. So there's like a market cap for like Charizards. There's a market cap for Jackie Robinson cards because they know how much liquidity there is. How much circulating supply there is. They know the relative value of a card because they know, wow, this is in mint condition versus this is in good condition. And so they're all kind of in cahoots with each other and in a way that is symbiotic. It's sort of like, have you ever like seen how McDonald's does the, the like Monopoly game? Like the way the Monopoly game works is there's only like four or two winning pieces and like they guard it like kind of like crazy. Although they were scammed once. There was a whole documentary where they were like one of their like janitors, something like, they like took, they like took them. And so it would be very interesting. Like they found the, like the corner of the office where they kept them and they're like, you know, yoink, it's mine. I would have loved to know like when they're making these cards, they must know in advance which ones potentially might be valuable and how they place them in a pack. Cause they're just like in little like bubble gum, like $5 or a five card packs, right? Yeah, I would love to see that. Yeah. Dude, Nat Turner was 35 when he did this. So he had recently sold Flatiron Health. I think that's what it was called for, I think like two, $2 billion in 2018. So he must've sold. So I think he sold one company for $40 million when he was 23. He had like a media company. Yeah. It was an ad tech company. I forget what it was called, but it was like a cool thing, whatever. He sold it for 40, I think 40 billion to Google. Then he starts this cancer thing. Cause someone in his family, I think was sick. And him and his partner, I think his partner is Zach. They're like whip smart. Like you could, I could just tell by the way, Zach is like kind of a feisty guy online. And he like, he's very sharp with his words. Or you see guys talk like this and you're like, that's not someone I want to argue with because not only is he sharp, he's argumentative and he won't back down. Yeah. He calls bullshit. Yeah. And so this guy, Nat seems like a little bit more of a nicer version of that, but still has it. They, they, he seems so smart and wise at a very young age. I've been very fascinated by him as well. And I also thought when he did this, I was like, huh? Like it was like totally like, I don't like that's, and then you go to the website and you're like, this is, this is awesome. This is good for the soul. I mean the, the math on the, just the Q. Loan, right? 14 million cards in the queue. The price, the cost to grade a single card is, you know, 20 bucks on the low end thousand plus on the high end, let's call it like 30 bucks on average. So 14 million cards in the queue times 30 bucks is 400 million sitting in the queue. It's probably more if you, if you think the average cost of the card is higher. And so that's, if that's just their backlog. And by the way, this is one of the reasons he bought it was because there was a one-year wait to grade cards. He's like, dude, this is terrible. And so he bought it. To try to modernize it with technology, with efficiency, with just intensity and say like, we have to be able to do better than that. And I'll take it public again. Once we've implemented like a more tech forward approach to doing this. Cause you can't just have like a multi-year backlog and cards waiting to be graded. If you go to his Instagram, um, it's called Nat Turner's cards. And it's just photos of him showing off his card collection. Like he owns like what looks like a Yao Ming rookie collect, like a rookie card. And it's just him showing it off. This is so. Cool. I wonder what their office is like. This is awesome. The Yao Ming rookie card just, for some reason, got me. Yeah, I don't know. I don't know what their office is like. I don't know what any of it's like. I just think this is kind of an amazing move. No, I've never met him. I'd love to have him on. I think this would be really fun to kind of meet about. I also just think, this is my sickness, my disease, is anytime I discover a great business model, the envy in me is like, ooh, how do I have one? I want one. And so there's a question of like, where else are businesses like these? Or where could you build a business like these? And, you know, my brain goes into like human capital. So like, how do you, like, for example, could I create a PSA grading system for the top 1% of Ivy League graduates? Like, could I basically score them in some way? Could I do this for sports, right? Just like they do with the combine in the NFL or NBA. Like, could I do this for sports? Could you do this with youth athletes? Like, basically, where would there be an aligned set of incentives? The demand for it, they want to have structure and a sort of a scoring system that can be trusted by all parties. And where's the economy big enough? Like, you know, collectibles was a big enough economy. I think it's like a, whatever, 10 billion-ish industry. It was big enough to support these types of revenues. And so I wonder where else you could build one of these. Like, third point. Third-party trust, third-party grading systems. Dude, but there's also, I mean, you're just scratching the surface with different collectibles. So if you want to get really nerdy, I'm part of, like, all these, like, vintage denim communities online. And people will post, yeah. Look, if you're going to say this guy who's got an Instagram who's 38 years old, dedicated to his magic cards. For some reason, it was cool when he did it. But when you said it, I felt differently. You can't make it. What, you don't like Lee Jeans? From 1947? But there are all these, like, they do this for purses and handbags, too. When you appreciate denim, is it, like, with wine, you're tasting it. With, you know, colognes, you smell like it. What do you even do? Is it a feel? Is it a smell? Is it a look? What do you even look at? What is the, what traits do you even evaluate? The premium, the best stuff, or the worst stuff? Dude, there's all types of terminology. You want to look at the honeycombs, which is the, you know, the fading that's on the back of the knee. You want to look at the back patch near the butt. You want to see, does this patch, is it made out of cardboard and paper, or is it made out of leather? And has it shrank a little bit or not? You want to look at, are the copper rivets just a little bit green, so you know it's real copper? Are they hidden, or are they visible? Is there, like, a famous pair, like, of jeans, like the Honus Wagner baseball card, or, like, the rare Charizard? What is the most valuable collected denim? Yeah, so Levi Strauss was, um, invented, um, Levi Strauss was a man. He invented it in the 1800s to help, uh, gold miners in San Francisco, so California and Nevada. And so if you can find, it's called, um, uh, buckle back, so where they have the buckle on the back to, like, it's called, like, a cinch. If you could find any of those in an old mine, and assume that's, and you can date it to the 1800s, those could be worth 20 grand. Um, and so collectors, particularly Japanese collectors, love them. But then there's this, this whole sub-genre of people who make reproductions. Predominantly Asian companies, Japanese companies, they're the ones who make the best ones. Japanese replicate American shit so good. I'm wearing a pair right now of Levi's. Stand up. Stand up. Let's see it. Let's see him. Look at this high rise. Give us a twirl. Give us a twirl. This high rise. Look at the roping. The roping. This is beautiful roping fades. That's what you're looking for. You're looking for that chain-stitch hem. That's not made by a normal sewing machine. That's made by a union machine. They don't even make it anymore. You gotta find, you gotta, you gotta find these. Oh my God. Three men died hemming that. Yeah, you gotta find, that costs $70 to get hemmed, okay? You gotta find that good good, and it's actually quite challenging. Um, and so, like a 19- What, what is the most expensive denim artifact, art piece you've bought? Uh. Are you, are you a buyer, or are you just a casual, are you a voyeur? No, I'm, I'm a, I'm a voyeur, but I, like, $500 for, like, a v, a vintage jacket. Have you considered, have you been tempted to be like, ooh, 15, Sarah, do we need that 15 grand? Do we need to go on vacation? Yeah, I have. I have. So there's like, um, like a 19, a pair of 1947 Levi's that use, like, the green, uh, for the pockets, because back then we were, like, provisioning out materials, and so every material was green for the war, and getting some of those real deal, you know, the real deal Holyfield ones, yeah, I want those stuff. But my point is, is that there's this whole subreddit dedicated to two things. One, looking at the fade of your denim. It's called, uh, Reddit Raw Fade. It's what it's called, so it's raw denim that fades nicely. I swear to God. It's literally just photos and photos of photos of fades. I don't think you're lying. It would be hard to make this up. It's beautiful. But I do know there's people who do this for other types of clothings, which are far more desirable, like purses. So you're saying you could do niche PSA if you, if you, if you specialized in different, uh, clothing, you know, clothing and bags, yeah. Denim is too niche, uh, but like, uh. But maybe there's a long tail of things like denim. Well, particularly handbags. I've seen this all the time on handbags, uh, like on eBay and stuff. Like I bought my wife like a vintage one for like two or three grand and I'm just trusting the person's eBay profile that they have like five out of five stars. But yeah, there's like a bunch of like cool collectible, like, uh, genres that are still really, uh, prime for some of this stuff. Hmm. Yeah. So by the way, like I know it's amazing that like a woman has decided to marry me even though I'm still into this stuff, but we exist guys. Oh my God, I, Nat Turner, um, obviously we are nerds as well. If you'd like to come on, we would love to have you Rubenstein, Nat Turner. Come on the podcast guys. Don't we seem like a good hang? We've insulted ourselves just as much as we've insulted you. So it's like, we're good. Uh, um, that's something you should wear, um, a white tank top more often. I think that it brings out something special in you. Yeah. Should I just go skimpier and skimpier with each episode? I just saw the flex on the shoulders. Congratulations. Um, it seems like by the way, for the past two years, everyone is commenting about on your body every single episode. Yeah. That's great. Love it. Yeah. All right. So, uh, go to spot farm in India who is continuing to comment on how, how, how, how much better I look and how I'm getting in great shape and it shows, keep it up. PSA is going to grade you. They're going to give you a, they're going to give you a, uh, it's fine. Fair condition. Yeah. That's fair. That's fair. Um, all right. That's it. That's a pod. I know I could be what I want to. I put my all in it like no days off on the road. Let's travel. Never looking back. All right. Let's take a quick break to talk about a podcast because if you're listening to this, you like podcasts and what's better than one podcast. I'm going to give you a podcast. I'm going to give you another podcast and let me tell you another podcast you should check out. It's called success story. If you like hearing about different success stories and hearing Q and a sessions with successful business leaders or hearing keynote presentations or just checking out conversations about sales and business and marketing tactics, this is a great podcast for you. So check it out wherever you get your podcasts.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The hosts discuss South Korea's "dopamine websites" trend, where users browse fake food delivery menus, shop virtually, and take simulated smoke breaks for entertainment without real transactions.
  2. They explore Asian business strategies, like TCL's low-cost, improving quality model, and contrast it with Western corporate philosophies, referencing Kevin Ryan's "Hondification" concept.
  3. Nick Sleep's investment philosophy centers on "shared economies of scale," where companies like Costco and Amazon pass savings to customers, building loyalty and long-term dominance.
  4. The conversation covers Lloyd Blankfein's humble background and financial habits, and David Rubenstein's career from the "Eskimo tax scam" to founding Carlyle Group, plus his philanthropic historical pursuits.
  5. PSA, a card grading company, is highlighted as a "credence good" business, controlling 70% of its market with a $400 million backlog, and the hosts discuss potential similar niche opportunities.
  6. The dialogue includes tangents on vintage denim collecting, Japanese reproductions, and the hosts' personal nerdy interests, ending with a call for guests like Nat Turner and Rubenstein.

Summary:

The podcast episode begins with a humorous critique of South Korea's viral trend of "dopamine websites," where users engage in fake online activities—browsing menus, filling carts, tracking shipments, or taking virtual smoke breaks—without real purchases. The hosts mock this as a strange cultural phenomenon but use it to pivot into broader business discussions. They reflect on Asian market strategies, citing TCL's evolution from cheap, low-quality TVs to competitive products at stable prices, and Kevin Ryan's analogy of "Hondification," where companies start mediocre and improve over time without raising costs.

This leads to an analysis of Nick Sleep's investing framework, focusing on "shared economies of scale," where firms like Costco and Amazon reinvest savings into customer surplus, creating unstoppable loyalty and scale. The hosts then share anecdotes about Lloyd Blankfein's frugal billionaire habits and David Rubenstein's rise from a tax loophole scheme to building Carlyle Group, alongside his passion for historical artifacts. A major segment highlights PSA, a card grading company that dominates as a trusted third party in collectibles, solving the "credence good" problem with a massive backlog and network effects.

The episode concludes with lighter talk on vintage denim, Japanese craftsmanship, and potential niche grading markets, blending humor with investment insights.

FAQs

Dopamine websites are services, popular in South Korea, that let users simulate activities like browsing food delivery menus, filling shopping carts, and tracking shipments without actually making purchases. They aim to provide the familiar dopamine hit of these activities without the real-world cost or action.

They are popular because they tap into the enjoyment of browsing and carting items in online shopping, without the need to spend money or complete a purchase. This trend is part of a broader cultural fascination with simulated experiences.

Hundification is a strategy, attributed to Kevin Ryan, where a company starts with low-quality products but improves over time while keeping prices constant. It's inspired by Honda's approach in 1985 versus GM, where quality rises but costs stay the same, eventually winning over customers.

Shared economies of scale is an investing strategy where a company passes on savings from economies of scale to customers, rather than extracting profits. This creates a juicier value proposition, attracting more customers and compounding trust, as seen with Costco and Amazon.

PSA grades and authenticates collectibles like trading cards, acting as a trusted third party to verify condition and authenticity. It dominates its market with a 70% share, has a $400 million order backlog, and benefits from a network effect where PSA-graded items are more valuable.

A credence good is a product whose quality is difficult to assess even after consumption, such as medical care or collectibles. This creates a need for trusted third-party attestation, which businesses like PSA or auditing firms provide.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.