Go back

Wannabe working royals: Harry and Meghan cosplay in Nottingham

24m 27s

Wannabe working royals: Harry and Meghan cosplay in Nottingham

The discussion centres on Harry and Meghan's Nottingham engagements, which closely mirrored a traditional royal visit, complete with walkabouts, crowds, and charity stops. The panel noted the couple revisited organisations with genuine personal connections, including a youth charity Harry previously supported and a food bank linked to Meghan's Grenfell community cookbook work. The visit was framed as a reintroduction to Britain, echoing Meghan's 2017 Nottingham debut. However, the engagement appeared to contradict a letter on behalf of the King clarifying that the Sussexes are private individuals, not working royals. Sources close to the couple reportedly claim they never agreed to a "half in, half out" arrangement, disputing the official account of the Sandringham Summit. Commentators highlighted the confusion this creates, especially given the couple's stated focus on entrepreneurship, parenting, and Meghan's acting career. Concerns were raised about the commercial implications, with fears that charity appearances could be monetised through fashion links and brand promotion, something working royals cannot do. The panel questioned whether the visit was a pitch to the King, a bid for public relevance, or an attempt to forge a "rival court." They noted the Sussexes' need for proximity to royalty to maintain relevance after a series of failed American projects. Ultimately, the discussion concluded that the couple's ability to enjoy royal privileges without royal duties raises awkward questions for the monarchy.

Transcription

4950 Words, 26429 Characters

English
Speaker 1Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's Harry and
Speaker 2Meghan cosplaying as working royals on the streets of Nottingham. Is this
Speaker 1a pitch to the king that they can have their royal cake and eat it or are the Sussexes setting up their own rival court?
Speaker 2Welcome to The Royal Tea with me, Tim Stanley.
Speaker 1Me, Hannah Furness.
Speaker 3And me, India McTaggart.
Speaker 1Are they just playing at this for a little while and then they'll get their photos, maybe they'll get a photo with the king at some point soon, then they can go off again and sell some more jam? Or do they want a serious return? And is this a pitch to the king to say, look, we can do this, we can be great ambassadors for you, and we're taking this really seriously?
Speaker 2I am joined on today's Royal Tea by India McTaggart, the Telegraph royal correspondent, and by Hannah Furness, the Telegraph royal editor. Thank you both for being here. Now, when I looked at my TV screens this morning, because as we speak, this is happening. India, I saw something very strange. I saw Harry and Meghan walking around Nottingham as if they were working royals. Now, when people hear slash see this, it'll be the next day. But just describe as if it's happening right now, what it is you've been
Speaker 3watching. So right now, they are visiting three grassroots organisations in Nottingham, ones that we're told they have very close personal connections to, ones that they've been involved with when they were. The first stop was the Community Recording Studio, which is a youth charity that the Duke visited last year and actually donated 1.1 million to last year. So this time he and Meghan met with Ja Digger, musician, poet and youth mentor, who received support from the charity as a child. They spoke with children while there and the Duchess joined young girls for a confidence building bracelet making session, where they discussed self belief, resilience, handling rejection, etc. Handling rejection. That was part of the brief, yes. So Prince Harry first visited this charity in 2013, has since returned on several occasions privately and sort of, you know, on official engagements should we call it, most recently last September. So he said at the time when he donated the money, he said, "I continue to stand with you. Nottingham has my respect. It always has my commitment and a permanent place in my heart." Then they will visit HIMA, which is the largest independent food bank in Nottingham and a community kitchen that tackles poverty, racism and social exclusion. There, the Duchess was reunited with women affected by the Grenfell Tower fire with whom she worked on the hub community kitchen cookbook, which Hannah will remember because she covered it at the time, which has raised just over £900,000 since its release in 2018, and was arguably her most successful contribution in her short time as a working royal. I think you would probably agree with that.
Speaker 1Yeah, I mean, this is like we've gone to sleep and woken up nine years later and everything's exactly the same. We're living in Royal Groundhog Day or ex-Royal Groundhog Day, maybe.
Speaker 2But to be fair to the Sussexes, Hannah, they do have a connection to these charities. It's not random.
Speaker 1It's not random. We keep being told they love Nottingham. Why? I asked exactly the same question. What is it about the people of Nottingham that is different, the people of London or Liverpool? Anyway, it turns out that they've kept in touch with a lot of these charities over the years. So they do feel like they've got a real friendship and a connection. So it's nice to go back. So if we go back nine years, they're so ancient that I was there on this day. This is where Harry introduced Meghan to Britain. So they haven't got married yet. They were just engaged and they took, he took her to Nottingham. What a romantic. It's so romantic. The Venice of the North. And it was cold.
Speaker 2It was December.
Speaker 1Everybody was bundled up in their coats. But it was just this mad, quite joyous day. An elderly gentleman brought his pet barn owl along and then told her daughters. Oh, yes. We've got we've got the rota here. This was Frank's children. We've got the rota here.
Speaker 2This was Frank Shelton, 79, brought his eight-year-old barn owl Kim along for the day and said, "I thought Harry's bringing his bird, so I brought mine."
Speaker 1Best of British. Brilliant. It's the best of British. So it was this really jolly day and I had a look over how we covered it. Like, obviously, in through the lens of the British media, the Sussexes have spoken extensively about how terrible we are over the years. And then I look back at this copy and it's just glowing. It couldn't be more positive. You know, Miss Markle has won over the British public. She's flawless and so on. And she very much endeared herself to people there because she introduced her - you'll have to do the American accent - with, "Hi, I'm Meghan. Hi, I'm Meghan. I'm thrilled to be here."
Speaker 2"I'm so happy," she said at one point. "It's just such a thrill to
Speaker 1be here in Nottingham." And we've heard exactly the same thing this morning. So we're hearing her. It looks exactly like a royal engagement. They've got the barricades up. They've got schoolchildren kind of aligning the walkway into this first engagement. So they can effectively do a walkabout. And we're hearing her saying the same things. It's so great to be back in Britain. You've got, you know, members of the public who have come to see them as well. They're not enormous crowds, but they're not embarrassing crowds either. There's a good amount, a respectable amount of people come to see them. And it feels to me like if we're using the 2017 Nottingham to introduce Meghan to Britain, this is a reintroduction. This is their first engagement, as they still call it, back on home shore.
Speaker 2Okay. So India, there's no controversy here, is there? They've moved back. They are public figures and they're out and about. It's romantic. They're going back to where they met and they're visiting charities that they feel a connection with.
Speaker 3I mean, I think the controversy depends on who you are and how you're looking at it. But I was saying to Hannah this morning, if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, this is a royal engagement. Yes. For all intents and purposes. That's what I thought, yes. Yeah, completely. And I, you know, if we who know what we're talking about, if we know all the nuance, can't really tell the difference, then the public certainly not going to be able to tell the difference. And I think for them, after the letter that was sent, you know, on behalf of the king, which made it very clear that they are not public figures, they are not undertaking charitable engagements on behalf of the crown, that they are private individuals with their own charitable interests. This is very confusing. And this is going to give the public whiplash again, because what do they want? That's what is so unclear continuously, because they leave the royal family. They leave as working royals. They sort of want to pursue their own charitable interests in the US. They then actually go on to pursue purely commercial interests, as we know, and don't need to rehash. It's well trodden ground. Then they return and Meghan wants to go back to acting, but actually now they're doing joint public engagements. They're worried about security. She can't go to two jobs with Harry in July, but can go on this one and they can announce it ahead of time. See, that was interesting.
Speaker 2And security is not an issue. They wanted people to know they were doing it.
Speaker 3Right. So, I mean, you tell me. The lack of coherence in all of this is what is so extraordinary. And even in the source quotes that we've been told from sources close to the Duke and Duchess, that she is not going to be undertaking these quasi-royal engagements, whatever you want to call it, more than let's say twice or three times a year, that actually she's going to be focused on being an entrepreneur, on running as ever, on being a mother and on returning to acting. And we literally have a quote that's saying, you know, she's very busy. Reading a lot of scripts right now. So, you know, when she has time for charity work, she might be able to do it, but this is not going to be her priority. But then, you know, it looks today as if this is really deeply important to them. So again, it's just these messages are so conflicting constantly.
Speaker 1Yes. There was a really fascinating briefing this morning to Hello Magazine, actually, whose royal editor has a very long relationship with Harry. So we trust that this source is close to Harry. We trust in this case where it has said that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex never agreed to not be half married. They never agreed to not be half in half out royals. It doesn't trouble them. This idea that the King is still saying they're not allowed. They never agreed they wouldn't be half in half out. That was decided and foisted upon them. They're just living their lives and they can because they're financially independent. So we're getting a real sense here of, well, the King might be sending a letter to the Lord Lieutenant saying they're not official working royals, but we don't really care. Well, let's just break that
Speaker 2down because there are two points of confusion here. One, India. I thought they were unsafe in this country, but here they look very safe and very happy. Now that they've come back, all those concerns seem to have just disappeared like a lawsuit in the wind. But the other thing, Hannah, that you raise, if I read the key part of the letter that was sent on behalf of the King regarding Harry and Meghan, it says, "It is well known that in January, 2020, the Duke and Duchess stepped down from undertaking representative duties on behalf of the sovereign. And on behalf of the King, it was said that they are no longer working members of the royal family." Now, saying they stepped down, it suggests they left this role. But what you're saying, what's being reported by Hello, is they feel very differently, that they didn't agree to that. Well, we know this
Speaker 1is all going back to the Sandringham Summit. So this was the reign of Queen Elizabeth II, Harry's grandmother, whom he respected. They discussed five possible options for how they were going to exit the royal family, or indeed how they could stay in the royal family in a way that was acceptable to them. What they settled on in the end, what we now call the Sandringham Summit Agreement, was that the late Queen said, "You cannot be half in, half out. If you want to be financially independent," which they did, that was a key part of what the Sussexes wanted, "You have to sort of make your own way and do that. You can't appear to be working royals and also have commercial activities that are linked to it." She'd known all along that there was a lot of disagreement at the time. They didn't like this process, but the Queen is the boss. You can't negotiate with the Queen. You can talk to her as a member of the family, but wasn't an equal negotiation and the idea that they didn't sign up to anything is this slightly american perspective that there should have been a summit document point by point that there should be a florid calligraphy megan on the bottom of it doesn't exist because that's not how it works in the royal family
Speaker 3they're not legally beholden to this it's not a
Speaker 1legally binding agreement it is i suppose it's it's a royal version of a gentleman's agreement this is what we've agreed you're free to go you found your freedom you're you're you can be financially independent but you can't also call yourself working royals appear to be working royals and the the difficulty is and you're right it's as long as they're behaving themselves they're going to these engagements doing a good job they're boosting charities the kids there will have a wonderful day they will have a wonderful day the complication comes will make and give an as ever gift basket to the him a food bank right are we going to have a wonderful day going to see as we did in australia the outfits that she wore to these charities then being uploaded to a platform where you can buy them and it generates commercial revenue it is just not as simple as it looks and also what of how does
Speaker 3this reflect on the actual working members of the royal family who cannot you know commercially benefit while representing the crown as it's very clear you know it it makes it look as if you can have your cake and eat it too and i think that's going to be kind of problematic going forward for them and i understand why that would really ruffle a lot of people's hearts because you know they have been duty-bound all their lives and get on with it without complaint and then harry and megan seem to be able to do exactly what they want at any given opportunity and and still have the trappings of of being a royal essentially yeah so that's going to be a huge problem and also coming back to you know their negotiation let's call it with the late queen they also expected to negotiate with the king on this letter saying you know we didn't get this in advance that we wanted to possibly make amendments and you know they spoke of their surprise through their spokesperson having received it you know without notice and then it going to the press so quickly it is always this attitude of we expect to be consulted and be able to make changes and it's just no you are not setting the agenda for this it is not your role to do that it is you know the monarch the boss is what i
Speaker 1think we'll find today as we're seeing on the tv as you said is this looks like a working royal engagement there will be a lot of column inches dedicated later to how brilliant it was this is my prediction aren't they great at royal engagements isn't harry brilliant with kids doesn't she listen so well it's going to look great and seem great the difficulty is we always knew that they were always fantastic at engagements there's no issue that they were bad at their job they were very good at their job and we all said at the time they are excellent on engagements where it falls down is they didn't want to do them they didn't want all the boring bits that come with monarchy so they've now managed to spend their time away and come back again it's like a cameo royal appearance as it were so they get all of the benefits all of kind of the love and appreciation and the praise and the hugs and the photos and the kind of ego boosting joy that comes with all of this stuff yes with
Speaker 2none of the boring bits they're also doing things which are quite young youth orientated they feel current yes and fashionable which is all good they're very very good causes don't get me wrong but they're not opening a cat home they're not doing the sort of rubber chicken stuff one associates with poor old princess anne exactly
Speaker 1it's not unveiling a plaque it's not cutting yes it's not a wet new car park exactly exactly it's the glamour it's the glamour and stuff and i think that if you are princess anne although a princess anne has better things to do let's face it all the edinburgh's all the grosters who spent their lives doing a lot of very boring jobs along with the very fun royal glamorous stuff i find that a very interesting position that they can watch this and see do you know what as you say have your cake and eat it somebody told me years ago that the thing that megan loved the most in royal life is the competition winner style engagements where you can surprise people and you get that oh my goodness it's harry and megan it's so exciting and she she loved that response from people and they're now managing to cure the virus and they're now managing to cure that for themselves to pick and choose what they want to do the causes they want to do and you've kind of at a point you've got to hold your hands up and say well
Speaker 3done like you've kind of won this is what i was going to say so at what point are we going to sort of address this as like a rival court almost to the one we have at what point is that going to be the perception that the public have you know in sort of challenging all the norms that we know about what a working member of the royal family should look like and should act
Speaker 2like and inevitably contrast is going to be made with williams and the royal family and the royal family and the royal family and the royal and kate right yes how will they be thinking how will they be feeling about this
Speaker 3i mean as i said previously i wouldn't be surprised if it ruffled some feathers because it's it's you know megan's able to be an entrepreneur to have this financial independence to sort of carve out the time that she wants for her children to be able to do all the things that she wants to do and you know be a celebrity and read scripts and potentially star in the gentleman or potentially you know start you know becoming a working actress again not that catherine wants to do any of those things apart from you know of course being very passionate about her early years uh initiative and of course very very passionate about her children and raising them in the right way and being very present as a mother um but then naturally comparisons will be drawn between the two and i think it will be a situation whereby you know you start to question whether you can commercially benefit and represent the crown at the same time it's it's a confusing one and i think it will be slightly jarring for the public in a way i think the whales is trying
Speaker 1extremely hard to not think too much about what the sussexes are doing and you know people in studios like us we need to take a step back this is a today issue this is what's happening on television today these are the pictures we're seeing today if you're william and catherine you need to be thinking 10 years in advance 20 years in advance they're going to be the king and queen the long game the long game they're going to be the king and queen and i think they try very hard to sort of keep their eyes on that and not be pushed and pulled by people like us in their opinions one way or another to just keep their heads down do what they're supposed to do you know the royal family needs to be about duty and service yes of course yes to fly with the british public they need to stick to that and they cannot be knocked off course by trying to do something sexy in order to compete with people who are one day out in nottingham and another day india you wrote this at the weekend doing a documentary
Speaker 3about racism in britain yes a newspaper's lawsuit with harry um is doing a documentary for the bbc about the death of her son stephen lawrence in 1993 which was a racially motivated knife crime and prince harry is going to take part uh we've been told that he has taken part we don't know exactly what that looks like yet possibly you know an interview about race relations in the uk we expect largely will be about the press um and his complaints that he's already been quite outspoken about and how they his perception of how megan was treated um when she became a working member of the royal family so i mean tbc and he and baroness
Speaker 2lawrence were both involved in that case against the daily mail which they lost which they lost yes so there's you know that's that's very interesting i guess harry and megan because they walked away from the family their existence is always an implicit comment upon the working royals so i'm just really interested in this point about what will there is this alternative of people who walked away and who said some things about the royals and the way that they work so long as they are there in this country and they are visible it always feels like an implicit contrast is being drawn with the very stuffy and choreographed and well orchestrated royal family right this is this is something we're going to have to get used to they're here now and we'll always be watching them and thinking how does
Speaker 1that compare with what they've done in the past few years since they've left is try to recreate this overseas on tours so they've done what we keep calling quasi royal tours where it has been more confusing because obviously the people of columbia even us even in australia where obviously they have the crown uh they have much greater knowledge of the monarchy there's no real nuance of are they working or they're not they're all way prince harry abroad is always princess diana's son yeah or the late queen's grandson and they they make very clear nobody can take that away from him that is his position in public life here there is a little bit more of an understanding i think the public have got the message that they're not working royals but the more we see them try to conjure up this perception of working royals the more confusing it will be but equally what are they doing with that if they wanted to do the duty what's so different now that they could they couldn't bear to do it then but they can do it now it's the same press it's literally the same individual members of the press yes that they're working with it's the same system it's the same institution it's the same it's not the same security but it looks like it is because they've got they've got the barricades up today they've got their private security so it's a question for them of are they just playing at this for a little while and then they'll get their photos maybe they'll get a photo with the king at some point soon and then they can go off again and sell some more jam or do they want a serious return and is this a pitch to the king to say look we can do this we can be great ambassadors for you and we're taking this really seriously can't you let us in a little bit and that's what's very interesting to me is where does
Speaker 3it go yes and you're right is this a pitch to to show the king that it can work but then again i feel they're always at odds and there's always this tension between them so i don't think it's a pitch so much as a pitch to the public saying see we can do both and i remember that line to the late queen saying the rebuttal anyone can live a life of service and i think that's kind of what they're showing now and as hannah pointed out these quasi royal tours in which their you know spokespeople after will quite openly say that through you know this will be a half in half out situation this can be this can work this format can work um so it will be really interesting as i said whether this will be a rival court and i mean we have the source quotes from today which suggested you know don't expect a lot of handshakes they don't have that same responsibility to do that kind of thing anymore that was a source quote ahead of today and what did we see when they arrived you know they were late into the appointment because of how many handshakes the water was flowing and they were not able to get to the point where they were supposed to be about it looks like a royal away day yeah it's the fifth in line to the throne with his wife meeting members of the public before they go and visit three charities what about that doesn't look like a royal away day this is
Speaker 2to go back to what i said at the beginning about feeling confused this is what i can't quite get straight in my head is what i am looking at here because in this country we do celebrity of course we do when actors leave the theater there's always a queue of people with books waiting to get signed right but we don't we're not like america where we have a sort of democracy of talent and beauty but it feels like they're trying to do that here they're both trying to be uh royals and also american style celebrities and there's a bit of me and maybe it's parochial and mean-spirited and english that just thinks you're now just a man and a woman um you're very good looking maybe very talented but i'm not sure why as someone for whom royalty is kind of part of my existence because i'm english once you step outside of it i'm not quite sure what i'm looking at anymore if you're an ex-mp i no longer have to listen to your opinions on things and likewise i don't know who these people are and i don't know why people are showing up to shake
Speaker 1their hand well i think you might have hit on the crux of it because this has been the issue while they're in america so they they began they departed england as members of the royal family they were so enmeshed you know the the headlines at that time were extraordinary the back and forth between the sussexes recollections may vary they were always the queen's grand son and granddaughter-in-law and over the years that has faded and in america they have become celebrities and they've had a lot of projects that have failed so they've become failed celebrities and so there is a sense certainly out there that they've needed to re-establish their connection with the british royal family to remind the world and their audiences as they are now exactly why they should be interested in it and i think this is what we are seeing this is a reminder to people in america and back home of oh yeah look we're royals we can
Speaker 3still do it you've literally just hit the nail on the head it is that reminder of the connection to royalty they need that proximity to the monarch and to the crown in general for relevancy we've seen that over the six years they've been away in the u.s that is how they have you know marked their career as celebrities or failed celebrities you know it it's it is their sort of raison d'etre at the end of the you know it's it's it's their calling card so without it what are they and it's you know as hannah pointed out kind of a series of failed projects i mean as ever maybe not and she's going to be a part of it but it's going to be a part of it and it's going to be a part of it and to launch that soon here so we'll see how the jam sells in the uk versus in the u.s and we'll see how her acting career takes off it doesn't seem to look good so far if the gentleman sort of for all ray was anything to go by but it's it's a blueprint that is sort of trailblazing in a way no one's done this in the royal
Speaker 2family yeah the jam is also quite expensive it's it's sort of it's in it's in competition with petrol now it's in India and hannah thank you both very much we will be back tomorrow for the week at 9 a.m that's with michael and poppy and on sunday there will be a showdown between camilla and chris bride you

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. Harry and Meghan carried out a day of public engagements in Nottingham that closely resembled a traditional royal visit.
  2. The couple visited a youth charity and a food bank, revisiting organisations they had connections with during their time as working royals.
  3. Commentators noted the visit echoed Meghan's 2017 introduction to Britain in Nottingham, framing it as a reintroduction to the UK public.
  4. The engagements appeared to contradict a letter sent on behalf of the King stating the Sussexes are private individuals, not working royals.
  5. Sources close to the couple claim they never agreed to a "half in, half out" arrangement, disputing the official narrative of the Sandringham Summit.
  6. Concerns were raised that the couple could commercially benefit from charity appearances, unlike actual working royals who cannot.
  7. The visit may be seen as a pitch to the King or the public that the Sussexes can combine royal-style duties with financial independence.
  8. Commentators questioned whether the couple's continued royal-adjacent appearances could create a "rival court" and confuse the public.

Summary:

The discussion centres on Harry and Meghan's Nottingham engagements, which closely mirrored a traditional royal visit, complete with walkabouts, crowds, and charity stops. The panel noted the couple revisited organisations with genuine personal connections, including a youth charity Harry previously supported and a food bank linked to Meghan's Grenfell community cookbook work. The visit was framed as a reintroduction to Britain, echoing Meghan's 2017 Nottingham debut.

However, the engagement appeared to contradict a letter on behalf of the King clarifying that the Sussexes are private individuals, not working royals. Sources close to the couple reportedly claim they never agreed to a "half in, half out" arrangement, disputing the official account of the Sandringham Summit. Commentators highlighted the confusion this creates, especially given the couple's stated focus on entrepreneurship, parenting, and Meghan's acting career.

Concerns were raised about the commercial implications, with fears that charity appearances could be monetised through fashion links and brand promotion, something working royals cannot do. The panel questioned whether the visit was a pitch to the King, a bid for public relevance, or an attempt to forge a "rival court." They noted the Sussexes' need for proximity to royalty to maintain relevance after a series of failed American projects. Ultimately, the discussion concluded that the couple's ability to enjoy royal privileges without royal duties raises awkward questions for the monarchy.

FAQs

They visited three grassroots organisations, including a youth charity and a food bank, meeting children and members of the public in what looked like a royal engagement.

Nottingham is where Harry introduced Meghan to Britain in 2017, shortly after their engagement, and they have kept in touch with local charities since then.

It resembled a working royal engagement, even though the King's letter made clear they are private individuals not undertaking duties on behalf of the Crown.

The King's letter says they stepped down in 2020, but sources close to the Sussexes claim they never agreed to give up being half in, half out.

The late Queen ruled they could not be half in, half out: if they wanted financial independence, they could not appear to be working royals while pursuing commercial activities.

It could ruffle feathers, since working royals cannot commercially benefit while representing the Crown, and it makes it look like Harry and Meghan can have their cake and eat it.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.