Go back

Undermining the Post-WWII Order

13m 11s

Undermining the Post-WWII Order

The U.S. has conducted over 70 military strikes in the Caribbean, killing more than 230 people, with no public evidence of drug trafficking or legal basis for the actions. A controversial legal memo justifying these strikes has been widely criticized for its expansive scope, raising concerns about the erosion of international law and human rights. The American Civil Liberties Union and a federal judge have demanded access to the memo, highlighting growing legal and ethical scrutiny. The United Nations has concluded that these strikes violate international law and may amount to crimes against humanity. Concurrently, the Trump administration has redirected funds meant for Ukraine to support right-wing regimes in Latin America, expanding U.S. military presence in the region under the guise of anti-drug operations. This strategy is seen as part of a broader shift away from post-World War II international norms, including the prohibition of force against state sovereignty and protection of human rights. Legal arguments underscore the difference between overturning Roe v. Wade and Obergefell, with Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito noting that the latter has deep societal reliance and tangible impacts. Critics, including historical and legal figures, warn that such actions align with authoritarian ideologies that reject democratic governance in favor of centralized control, echoing Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 1941 warning against dictatorships that seek to dominate through force and racial hierarchies. The move reflects a systemic departure from principles established in the UN Charter and Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signaling a troubling reversion to pre-WWII global order.

Transcription

1759 Words, 10649 Characters

English
(upbeat music) October 5th, 2026. Last night on October 4th, U.S. Southern Command posted that it had struck another small boat in the Caribbean, killing another four people it called Narco Terrorists. This brings the number of strikes to more than 70 and the number of people killed in the strikes that began a year ago to more than 230 people. The administration's justification for the strikes has not been made public. It has claimed, without evidence, that the men on the boats were trafficking drugs but such a charge would normally be handled by the legal system. The Office of Legal Counsel and the Department of Justice produced an opinion providing legal cover for the strikes and some of the members of Congress who have seen it are alarmed. Senator Adam Schiff, a Democrat of California, saw the memo in November and said, if that opinion were to be adopted, it would not constrain any use of force anywhere in the world. I mean, it's broad enough to authorize just about anything. In December, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights sued to gain access to the memo after the government denied their requests to see it under the Freedom of Information Act or FOIA. On September 21st, a report from the United Nations concluded that the extrajudicial killings broke international law and may be crimes against humanity. Last Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmeyer of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice to show him the memo and let him know who else has seen it in order to evaluate whether to release it to the public. On October 1st, John Hudson of the Washington Post reported that the Trump administration has taken $52 million Congress appropriated for countries impacted by Russia's war on Ukraine and re-rooted it to right-wing governments in Columbia, Ecuador, Panama, and Peru. On Saturday, Defense Secretary Pete Higgseth told reporters the U.S. could move U.S. military personnel from Europe to the Western hemisphere, saying, "Well, we're definitely expanding our presence "and our footprint in Central and South America "with partners and because of the bold move "the president made in Venezuela, "referring to the U.S. capture of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro "and his wife in a nighttime raid in early January. "We have a whole new suite of options economically "and militarily with partnerships." While the administration is billing its intervention in Latin America as a battle against drugs, the comparison to Venezuela, where Trump has claimed control over the country's oil fields and says he has taken billions of dollars out, although there's no public acknowledgement of where that money has gone, is instructive. On Saturday, Jan Crawford of CBS News published an interview with Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, in which Alito said one of his first thoughts after he learned that a draft of his DOBS versus Jackson Women's Health decision overturning the 1973 Roe versus Wade decision had been leaked was that this would endanger the people on the court. Alito went on to say that he does not anticipate that the court will overturn the 2015 Obergefell Vijaj's decision recognizing the right to same-sex marriage. That case is different from Roe V Wade, he said, because people have come to rely on Obergefell as they organize their lives. One of the most important factors we take into account in deciding whether we should re-examine a past decision is the degree to which there has been reliance on the decision. Alito said, obviously a great deal had changed in the country as a result of Obergefell. There was a lot of reliance in various ways on the decision in Obergefell. In fact, all but one of the justices who overturned Roe, Thomas declined to answer, said in their confirmation hearings that they considered Roe settled law. Crawford pointed out that people thought Roe was settled law and had organized their lives around it. Justice people had organized their lives around Obergefell. After a Obergefell, people of the same sex got married and entered into contracts. It was much more concrete, Alito told Crawford. Whereas with Roe, the argument was made that it had an effect on people's ideas, women's ideas about the kind of society that they were going to live in, that this would have an effect on the society. It was much more abstract than what would have been involved had we'd been asked to overrule Obergefell. These are the same story. The deliberate destruction of the post-World War II order, those who had lived through the horrors of World War I and II put into place to prevent another World War. Even before the U.S. entered into World War II, U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and their advisors laid out principles for an international system that could prevent future World Wars. In the 1941 Atlantic Charter, they declared that countries must not invade each other. In April 1945, 850 delegates and their staff and advisors met in San Francisco, California, where they wrote and adopted unanimously the United Nations Charter prohibiting the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. Troppin's loyalists reject this framework in favor of one favored by those like Russia's President Vladimir Putin. One that looks much like the world did before 193 nations signed onto the United Nations Charter. In their worldview, strong nations exercise spheres of influence, taking political and economic control of neighboring nations. Part of the post-World War II attempt to prevent future wars was an insistence that all human beings had certain rights and must be treated equally before the law. In 1948, the United Nations General Assembly announced the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, or UDHR, which provided a common standard of fundamental rights for all human beings. Eleanor Roosevelt, widow of former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and much beloved defender of human rights in the United States, led the commission that wrote the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, figuring out how to define the violation of human rights not only internationally, but also within a nation, and how to protect the rights of man all over the world. Drafted over the next two years, the final document established that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth, or other status, and regardless of the political, jurisdictional, or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs. Those rights included freedom from slavery, torture, degrading punishment, arbitrary arrest, exile, and arbitrary interference with privacy, family, home or correspondence, and attacks upon honor and reputation. They included the right to equality before the law and to a fair trial, the right to participate in government, either directly or through freely chosen representatives, the right of equal access to public service. After all, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights noted, "The authority of government rests on the will of the people, "expressed in periodic and genuine elections, "which shall be by universal and equal suffrage." Under Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the U.S. has abandoned the U.S. prohibition on violating the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, as well as the human rights of the people in the small boats, not to mention migrants. As Alito's statement that the right of women to have control over their health care was simply an abstract idea that didn't have to be protected, suggested, undermining the post-World War II order has been a long-term project. In his place, Trump and his allies proposed a dictatorship. Binance Finder Chang Peng Zhao, who was jailed in the U.S. for money laundering but pardoned by Trump, worked with the Trump family to establish the crypto startup, World Liberty Financial, which put $799 million in Trump's pocket last year. Zhao now lives in the United Arab Emirates. In a recent interview with David Yalfe Bellany of the New York Times, Zhao explained, "Democracy has been hailed as, like, the holy grail [BLANK_AUDIO] last couple hundred years, but democracies are inefficient. If you get a benevolent dictator, it's actually extremely efficient. There's very little debate going on. You don't waste time on a lot of frivolous stuff. It's a model for which Trump repeatedly has expressed admiration. In March 1941, eight months before the US joined World War II, Franklin Delano Roosevelt noted that Nazi forces are not seeking mere modifications in colonial maps or in minor European boundaries. They openly seek the destruction of all elective systems of government on every continent, including our own. They seek to establish systems of government based on the regimentation of all human beings by a handful of individual rulers who have seized power by force. These men and their hypnotized followers call this a new order, FDR said, but it is not new and it is not order. The rallying cry of the dictators, they're boasting about a master race will prove to be pure stuff and nonsense, he said. "There never has been, there isn't now, and there never will be any race of people on the earth fit to serve as masters over their fellow men. The world has no use for any nation which, because of size or because of military might, asserts the right to goose step to world power over the bodies of other nations or other races," he said. "We believe that any nationality, no matter how small, has the inherent right to its own nationhood, and that the men and women of such nations, no matter what size, can, through the processes of peace, serve themselves and serve the world by protecting the common man's security, improve the standards of healthy living, provide markets for manufacture and for agriculture. Through that peaceful service, every nation can increase its happiness, banish the terrors of war, and abandon man's inhumanity to man. Never in all our history have Americans faced a job so well worthwhile," he concluded. "May it be set of us in the days to come that our children and our children's children rise up and call us blessed." Letters from an American was written and read by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dead of Massachusetts, recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The U.S. Southern Command has conducted over 70 strikes in the Caribbean, killing more than 230 people, with no public justification or legal evidence linking the victims to drug trafficking.
  2. A legal memo from the Office of Legal Counsel has been criticized for granting broad authority to use force globally, raising alarms among lawmakers and civil liberties groups.
  3. The ACLU and Center for Constitutional Rights sued to obtain the memo, and a U.S. District Judge ordered the Department of Defense and DOJ to disclose its contents and who has seen it.
  4. A UN report concluded that these extrajudicial killings violate international law and may constitute crimes against humanity.
  5. The Trump administration has redirected $52 million originally pledged for Ukraine to support right-wing governments in Latin America, linking military expansion to drug warfare narratives.
  6. Justice Samuel Alito emphasized that overturning Roe v. Wade would be riskier than repealing Obergefell, citing widespread reliance on the latter in daily life.
  7. The U.S. under Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is abandoning post-WWII principles, including the prohibition on force against state sovereignty and human rights protections.
  8. Binance founder Chang Peng Zhao, pardoned by Trump, advocates for a "benevolent dictator" model, praising efficiency over democracy, echoing Roosevelt’s warnings about authoritarianism.

Summary:

S. has conducted over 70 military strikes in the Caribbean, killing more than 230 people, with no public evidence of drug trafficking or legal basis for the actions. A controversial legal memo justifying these strikes has been widely criticized for its expansive scope, raising concerns about the erosion of international law and human rights.

The American Civil Liberties Union and a federal judge have demanded access to the memo, highlighting growing legal and ethical scrutiny. The United Nations has concluded that these strikes violate international law and may amount to crimes against humanity. S.

military presence in the region under the guise of anti-drug operations. This strategy is seen as part of a broader shift away from post-World War II international norms, including the prohibition of force against state sovereignty and protection of human rights. Legal arguments underscore the difference between overturning Roe v.

Wade and Obergefell, with Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito noting that the latter has deep societal reliance and tangible impacts. Critics, including historical and legal figures, warn that such actions align with authoritarian ideologies that reject democratic governance in favor of centralized control, echoing Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 1941 warning against dictatorships that seek to dominate through force and racial hierarchies.

The move reflects a systemic departure from principles established in the UN Charter and Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signaling a troubling reversion to pre-WWII global order.

FAQs

The administration has claimed that the individuals on the boats were trafficking drugs, but this charge would normally be handled by the legal system, and no public evidence has been provided.

More than 230 people have been killed in the strikes, which have totaled over 70 actions since they began a year ago.

No, the legal opinion providing cover for the strikes has not been made public, and the Department of Justice and Defense Department are under court order to disclose it.

The UN reported that the extrajudicial killings broke international law and may constitute crimes against humanity.

The administration claims it is expanding its military footprint in Central and South America, citing actions like the capture of Venezuela's president and his wife as justification.

Justice Alito stated that while the Roe v. Wade decision could be reconsidered, the Obergefell decision—recognizing same-sex marriage—is deeply relied upon by people and should not be overturned.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.