Trump U-Turns On Immigration, Neocons Refuse To Learn, And The Tyler Robinson Trial Date Is Set.

All right, you guys. Welcome in. Welcome in. Welcome in. We finally have a trial date. We've been waiting for, I don't know, over a year. Finally, have a trial date. Is everybody happy about it? No. The defense didn't get what they want. Erica didn't get what she wanted. The prosecution didn't get what they wanted. Nobody really got anything that they wanted. But the judge, I guess, got what he wanted. Maybe one person got what he wanted. So we'll talk about that. We also have a lot of fallout that's continuing to happen from this election last Tuesday. I kind of thought it would be over by now. We'll go through some of that allegations Laura Loomer might be on the payroll. Maybe does it sound kind of sound like it? We'll also look at just a couple of clips from Trump's 60 minutes appearance that continued freak out over the role Israel played in the absolute decimation for the Republicans the other night. And we even now have a tech titan who's allegedly in bed with a Chinese spy and articles of impeachment filed against Pete hex at the big day coming up next on canvas. I know once everything happens in the news everybody on X becomes an expert on it. Everybody on YouTube becomes an expert. That's the same thing that's happened with the Tyler Robinson case all of a sudden everybody's a death penalty lawyer. Everybody knows the suggested timelines for how long a death penalty case should take. But the reality is the wrong. I mean, almost all of them are wrong. The president the other day said this thing should be started immediately. The case against Tyler Robinson started immediately started immediately. Everybody knows he did it. Mr. President, that's not due process. Now we have people at TPSA lashing out once the judge has finally set a trial date. So let's take a quick look. What is the trial date? We now have a trial date. The judge has set the date of July 31st July 31st. Judges set the trial date for Charlie Kirk's accused killer for summer of 2028. Yeah, July 31, 2028. Now a lot of people look at that and say, but man, man, that seems awfully long. That seems awfully long. Didn't Charlie die in the summer of 2025? That's that's three years. Well, I mean, yeah, yeah, he did. But we're talking about a death penalty case. We're talking about a case in which the state of Utah is seeking to put to death one of its own citizens. A lot of times when that happens, you have voluminous evidence. The state needs to really get it right. Once you put someone to death, there's no oops. We got it wrong. How do we fix this? And so we will kind of look through a couple of things relative to that. But that wasn't the only thing decided today. I want to back up a little bit before the July 31 trial date. And the judge actually set a hearing for January. The judge said a hearing for January to have oral arguments on a motion that was filed last January. Now do you see why this stuff takes so long? Last January, the defense filed a motion so that the prosecution would not destroy critical evidence. There was a motion pending so that the prosecution would not take the bullet jacket fragments and destroy them while trying to analyze them to put a case together against Tyler Robinson. For most of us, that seems outrageous. That anybody would try to destroy evidence in a case. But the prosecution and the defense and the state and the FBI has determined the only way to do additional testing on this bullet jacket fragment that was allegedly pulled from Charlie Kirk. The only way they can get better evidence to try to determine whether or not it actually came from the the 30 out six rifle owned by Tyler Robinson is to actually take it and destroy it. So the defense comes in and says, hey, you can't destroy evidence without us ever having had a chance to take a look at it. So they file a motion to stop it. And for the time being, it has paused. It's paused. Nobody's touching the bullet jacket fragment. The FBI and the prosecution are not tearing it apart. The judge will have a hearing in January, January 14th. Now again, that's more than two months from today. The judge will have a hearing in January to determine how to proceed on this very critical piece of the case. Once you destroy that, there's no coming back from that motion. There's no coming back from that. You have in this case bullet jacket fragments. These fragments are very, very fragile. They're very fragile. And think of a bullet jacket fragment this way. You have a piece of lead. And around that piece of lead is a little piece of copper or brass or whatever. And it goes around that piece of lead. And that's what goes down range. Then you have the casing and the casing stays in the rifle or gets spit out beside the rifle. That fragment, that jacket fragment is what is it issue? Because what happens is as that fragment goes through the barrel, it will pick up unique markings that they tell us are unique to each individual rifle. And a highly trained expert would be able to look at those markings that are on that bullet jacket fragment and make a determination. Did that bullet jacket fragment come from that particular rifle? You can see how critical that is in this case. And you can see how critical it is that the defense is able to take a look at it before it is destroyed before it's destroyed. So the defense, I mean, the defense last January filed a motion. Don't destroy the evidence before we have a chance to look at it. And the prosecution, rather than saying, well, why don't you guys just come join us? You guys can take a look at it. No, they didn't want the defense to have anything to do with it. So it's been on hold now for over a year. It's by the time the judge hears it. It will have been on hold for over a year. That's just one piece of this evidence. That's just one piece. Not to mention other things we have that are holding this thing up. The FBI has not turned over the underlying data on things like DNA, any other rest of the fingerprint data, any of the rest of the rifling data that comes with the bullet jacket fragment, anything about the rifle that's unique to this case. They're not turning over the evidence. The question becomes, what happens if the FBI refuses to participate? Does a Utah state judge have the ability to compel the FBI to turn over this evidence? A lot of people, myself, included think this might be a multi-agency cover-up. If it's a multi-agency cover-up, one of the worst things you could do is turn over evidence that would reveal that Tyler Robinson didn't do it. And so there is an incentive, you might think, for the FBI. Let's just assume for the sake of argument they were involved in the cover-up. I know that's nonsense to some people, but let's just assume the FBI was involved in the cover-up. And this evidence will prove that Tyler Robinson didn't do it. Does that FBI have any incentive to hurry the process of getting that evidence into the hands of the defense? I would argue, no. I would argue, no. They have no incentive, whatsoever, to speed along that process. In fact, the FBI has been dragging their feet every step of the way on DNA evidence, on fingerprint evidence, on bullet jacket fragment testing evidence. It is the FBI that's causing the slowdown, not the defense. Frankly, not even the prosecution, to the extent that the prosecution is not demanding the FBI hurry up. So those things have already been set in stone. We have a trial date. Allegedly, have a trial date. I would argue it's probably a soft date. That trial date is not guaranteed. Why? Well, because starting in January, this year, January 27, they will begin a monthly pretrial process. That was ordered today, a monthly pretrial process to determine how things are going. That's going to be scheduled for the last Friday of every month. I would probably warn you, those are going to be pretty boring. There's very little that you're going to learn in each of those. I know people are rushing to get into the courtroom and they want to be there when certain things are decided. Those monthly pretrial hearings, at least the early ones, are probably going to be pretty boring. It's going to be a lawyer stand up on one side and a lawyer stand up on the other side and say, yeah, judge, everything seems to be progressing nicely. We are on pace or we're not on pace. Why aren't you on pace? Well, this is happening and that's happening. That is wholly different from all the discovery disputes that are going to pop up. All the expert witness challenges that are going to pop up. Those things will be in addition to those monthly pretrial conferences. So there's still a lot of litigation ahead of us. That's why I get frustrated when people who don't understand how law practice works, don't understand how criminal defense works, and certainly don't understand how death penalty litigation works. Way in and start telling people what is and is not right as far as how long this thing's taking. And we're seeing a lot of it. I don't want to sit here and pull up tweet after tweet after tweet. Erica Kurt got into it. Blake Neff got into it. Andrew Colvat got into it. A lot of these people are getting into it and saying, this is unbelievable. I can't believe they're waiting this long. Well, I can. I can. I've long been an opponent of the death penalty. So I am a little, you know, more in favor of the criminal defendant when the death penalties on the line. I accept that it's the law of the land. And sometimes, you know, states do try death penalty cases. It's very rare in Utah, by the way. Very few people on death row in Utah. So those things will start in January of 2027 in December of 2027. So we're looking more than a year from today. More than a year from today, they will begin the process of hearing challenges to venue. And also hearing challenges to the jury questionnaire. There will be a lot of people that receive a jury questionnaire, a lot of people. It's going to be very difficult to find a jury of 12 people and probably anywhere from four to eight alternates who have really no opinion on this case. It's going to be very difficult. This case has been exceedingly covered, probably in real time, one of the most covered cases I've ever encountered. I've ever followed along with at home. A lot of times when you see these cases, I know Lindsey Clancy, a lot of people watch that trial and and some other cases that pop up along the way. People watch the trial. All the pretrial stuff's already happened. They swear in the jury and then everybody tunes into court TV and says, "Yeah, I want to watch this." How often do you remember the day someone passed away? The day the crime was committed. Before the assailant, the alleged assailant was even apprehended. How many times do you recall hundreds of thousands may be millions of people tuning in every single day, constantly hitting F5 and refreshing X, constantly looking at podcasts and different YouTube presenters who are covering different aspects of the case. And doing it for the entire duration leading up to trial. It's almost unprecedented. I think this is probably the first time it's ever happened. And you guys are have a front row seat to it right here. Lots of podcasts, lots of different people on X are covering this in great detail. So on December 22nd, they will get together and argue over what those jury questionnaires should say. My guess is they're going to be a lot of arguing over what podcast do you watch, what social media feeds do follow, what social media programs do you participate in. They're probably are going to be questions about particular individuals. I would be shocked, frankly, if Candice Owens name is not on one of those jury questionnaires. And because of that, you are going to see a judge have to make a very, very difficult decision. This is going to be kind of a game time decision. He's going to have to make a very difficult decision. He may already start thinking about what he wants to have in mind on those jury questionnaires. What a jury questioner is, it goes out and the people receive it in the mail, they fill it out, they send it back in or they may do it online now, I don't know. But what you're trying to do is get an idea of all the thousands of people who receive this, how many of them should we call into the courtroom and start asking questions? They just, they determine today. I think they, they, I don't know if they gave a firm number that they're going to stick to. But I think the number that was floated was something like 3600 jury questionnaires. That's 3600 households in Utah County, who will be affected, at least in the initial stages by this trial. That number I think is astronomical. I'm sure there are other cases that have approached larger numbers of jury questionnaires. But I mean, typically you're talking 50, 80, 100, maybe a couple of hundred in a bigger case. 3600 is an astronomical number. It's going to take a long time just to go through those. Someone's going to have to sit there and read all those answers. Someone's going to have to sit there and digest all that information. So these things take time. These things take time. After they decide what's going to go onto the jury questionnaire, then they're going to have yet another hearing in April of 2028. This is going to determine, I think, if the trial date's going to stick. This April hearing, the judge is going to have to look that's counsel for the state, counsel for the defense and the eye and say, listen, can you hold to this trial date? Because once we send out the trial notices, we're going to trial. We got experts that are going to have to be scheduled to come in, we've got lay witnesses that are going to have to be scheduled to come in. We're going to have to disrupt all these jurors' lives for months. So don't come to us at the last second and say, oh, we didn't realize we weren't going to be able to get through everything. No, no, no. By April, they're going to have to have a good idea if they're going forward or not. And if the judge determines at the April hearing, April 11th is when he scheduled it, that they are going to go forward, then jury selection will begin in June, June 21, 2028. That's where they will have jury selection begin in an ideal scenario. Again, all of this, I believe, is tentative. I do not think the judge will hold them to this if either the state or the defense can't be ready by that date. And all out of that is going to determine how well does the FBI turnover information, how well does the Utah County attorney's office turnover information? What other witnesses need to be run down? The judge actually made a really good point today. I'm beginning to like Judge Graffin in a lot of ways. He made a really good point about what it takes to successfully try a case for a criminal defendant, particularly one on death row. And he outlined what I think is a pretty good outline that you don't hear judges go through a lot, where he said, they don't have to run down every avenue. They don't have to run down every single lead, but they better have a good strategic decision for choosing to run down an avenue or choosing not to run down an avenue. We're talking about the effect of assistance counsel. People in this country are entitled to a right to a lawyer. And your lawyer better be effective. Zellis representation, that does not mean that every one of those documents must be run down in its entirety. We're talking millions and millions of documents, millions and millions of records, terabytes and terabytes worth of data. Not every single line of every single document must be run down its entirety, but it is incumbent on the defense to provide a thorough defense, a thorough defense, a lawful defense. And to the extent people want to rush this, that's what causes these cases to get kicked out. That's what causes these cases to get reversed. Think of a worst-case scenario. Tyler Robinson gets convicted. And then 11 years later, a court determines he didn't do it. Well, you've lost 11 years on trying to find out who actually did it. That's a nightmare scenario. Evidence gets even more stale. Memories get even more stale. Things get lost. Things get destroyed. People forget where they were. They've all got all new phones, all new calendars. It's a nightmare scenario. When you're talking about criminal defense, you want to get it right. When you're talking about the death penalty, you want to get it very, very right. So I would caution those people. All those people out there, complaining about how long this is going to take, complaining about the timeline, complaining about all this is going to go on for another year, year and a half, two years. Yeah, yeah, it is. It is. And it's going to go on that long because we want to make sure we get the right answer. All that's leading up. So June 21, they start jury selection. All of that is leading up to a July 31, 2028, expected trial start date. Now, I'm a little confused on one aspect of this ruling. I'm interested to see the written ruling come out tomorrow. And admittedly, I was only listening with one of your, and I have bad ears to begin with. So one of the things he said is he was reserving 105 trial days, 105 trial days. Well, if you have 125 trial days and it starts on July 31, to me, that runs into late December. But for some reason, they're saying that the end date is supposed to be in October, which I don't know how you do that because 21 weeks is 21 weeks. And it's always going to be 21 weeks, regardless of how you calculate it. So I'm very curious to figure out, but maybe they're talking about adding the jury selection and the jury charging and all that into it. I don't know, I don't know. So I'll have to wait and see the written trial report when it comes out tomorrow. But it's a, you know, that's the best we have going on today. The best we have going on today. But please, by all means, stop telling people that this is taking too long. Stop trying to rush due process. Yes, I understand under Utah law, Erica Kirk and the Kirk family have a right to a speedy disposition. I get that. I totally 100% understand that. But overriding that is the societal interest we all have in making sure if we put a young man to death, that we didn't screw it up, we have to get that right. We have to get that right. Okay, switching gears. Laura Lumer back in the news. Why? Because she looks like that. No, no, that's not why she's in the news. That's not why she's in the news. I apologize, ladies and gentlemen, that was out of bounds. No, she's in the news because Washington Post says she's getting paid to make X tweets. She's getting paid to make X tweets. Here's the headline, Trump ally, Laura Lumer paid thousands for political tweets, people familiar. Say, now I want to pause here for a second. We have shown montages of hundreds or thousands of tweets. Laura Lumer has made about Candace Owens in particular. It's an obsession. It's like she wakes up at two in the morning and thinks I haven't tweeted in the last 30 minutes. I should wake up right now. I should forego beauty sleep, which I desperately need. I should forego all beauty sleep and I should bang out yet another tweet about Candace Owens. We played a montage the other day or collage the other day of where she said America is over about 20 times in a few hours. Only slept three hours the middle of the night and was right back at the tweet machine again. I will say this. I asked Grock, I know Grock isn't the end all be all, but I also dug through the X terms of service. I think it's a violation of the X terms of service to be paid for political tweets. I know there's an argument on the other side. I argued with Grock about it for a little bit. I tried to defeat my own argument in my mind when I read through it, but there are a couple of provisions in the X terms of service that I think are very, very difficult to overcome. This is happening at a ridiculous rate. This is happening, I believe, at a ridiculous rate. People are not in control of their own X feed. They are leasing out their voice. And I don't think that's the spirit of X. I don't think that's the spirit of X. I don't think that's the spirit of American political discourse. We like to believe when someone says something, they believe it. Why are you saying that 273 times a month? Well, because you believe it. But if you're being paid for it, you should be kicked off the platform. I believe that thoroughly. The allegations came from a guy named Alex Bruceowitz. Alex Bruceowitz has been an advisor to the Trump campaign and to Donald Trump himself for quite a while. There were other people who spoke on condition of anonymity and they said they paid Laura Lou Amosette Larry, and it's hard not to say it. They say they paid saw tens of thousands of dollars. In fact, there was a Washington Post investigation into this where they saw wire transfers and emails confirming upwards of $60,000 paid to Laura Loomer and to King Breaker Media, which is her, I guess in her media company, the side note, King Breaker is a stupid name. I mean, I've heard of King Maker. What's a King Breaker? You're admitting that your entire existence is to tear people down? What a miserable life. But they paid all this money and I'm here to say, I don't think this is isolated because over the weekend, over the weekend, there was something else that looked like political propaganda. There was what I call copypasta gone wild. Check out this montage of tweets here. These are people saying this is like data Republican who we know as a Department of War asset for a while, the persistence up there on the top left, Scott Pressler who we know allegedly turns out voters and then when you go look at the data and you can't really support it. But go through here and look at these word for word. There's only one of these. I think that has any difference and that's the one on the lower right hand corner down there. And it just provided a little parenthetical reference to one of them. But these are blue check mark people writing the exact same thing over and over and over. There's only six of them. What's the big deal? Well, check this out. It's not only six of them. What's this role that we put together of all blue check marks writing the exact same thing over and over and over and over again. This is not just two or three or four or five people. This is not six people. This is not 60 people. This is dozens and dozens and dozens of people writing the exact same thing over and over and over again. Now, why is that bother me? This is not how political discourses supposed to work. This is mocking bird media run to social media. We always like to make fun of mocking bird media. We like to make fun of the fact that our intelligence agencies put people into mainstream media outlets to make sure they had approved talking points and they were saying the right thing. I'm here to tell you this is happening now on social media. This is happening on social media. Laurel Lumer may or may not have gotten caught doing it because Scott, Alex Brucewood, excuse me, blew the whistle on her. But this appears to be a common thing. This appears to be something that's happening time and time and time again and I don't understand why the people who criticize the intelligence movement in mainstream media aren't looking at posts like these and saying, guys, can you guys shut down these accounts? Can you take these accounts down? Can you banish them? Can you demonetize them? Can you move them into lower priority distribution? Because we don't need a department of war propaganda now flooding social media. It seems to be happening. We may or may not have evidence of it with Laurel Lumer, but this is out of control. It's bad enough. People like data Republican were working as special government employees and not telling anybody, Graham Allen, allegedly working as a special government employee and not telling anybody who knows how many other special government employees were working for the federal government and posting on social media and not telling anybody about the apparent conflict of interest. And so I encourage you guys, as you see these things, the ex terms of service allow you to report them. They allow you to report them and say, this looks like a propaganda campaign. This looks like a paid tweet and if you have evidence that these things are paid, I encourage you. I'm a, hey, I'm a fan. Rat on them. Rat on them. People should not be taking money to post on ex, not political opinions. If you have a political opinion, post it. Post it. If you want to sell a brand of sneakers, put a little paid promotion partnership on there and send it on. But taking money to prostitute your political opinion is, is anti-American. It's not who we are. It's not who we are. Donald Trump spent the last 10 years focused primarily on one issue. But I mean, if you had to sum up Donald Trump's political campaign since the time he walked down the golden escalator back in 2015 to last Monday, and you said, I can only do it with one issue. What issue are you going with? You're not going with the Iran war. That's new. You're not going with, I don't know, whatever else he's been doing lately. No, it can be summed up in one issue, immigration. Donald Trump has been the most anti illegal immigration president we've ever had. Probably one of the most anti illegal immigration presidential campaigns that has ever been run. So check out this little montage. We kind of narrow or kind of added a little detail here for you, but give you an idea just a quick little minute or two montage of how Donald Trump has approached this issue over the years. You're going to have a deportation force and you're going to do it you mainly and you're going to bring the country. And frankly, the people, because you have some excellent, wonderful people, some fantastic people that have been here for a long period of time. There will be no amnesty. Our message to the world will be this. You cannot obtain legal status or become a citizen of the United States by illegally entering our country. You repeatedly supported mass amnesty for illegal immigrants. The Biden's plan for mass amnesty would bankrupt your social security system. We will use all necessary state, local, federal and military resources to carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history. One day, one of my new administration, we will begin the largest deportation operation in American history. We have no choice. But is it your plan to deport everyone who is here illegally over the next four years? Well, I think you have to do it and it's a very tough thing to do. But you have to have rules, regulations, laws, they came in illegally. And we will begin the process of returning millions and millions of criminal aliens back to the places from which they came. Or you can defeat the Democrat Communists and vote for more money in your pockets, bigger paychecks for your families, lower taxes, less crime, a roaring New York economy and no amnesty for illegal aliens. Or you can defeat the Democrat Communists and vote for more money in your pockets, bigger paychecks for your families, lower taxes, less crime, a booming Iowa economy, no amnesty for illegal aliens. But you have to vote. And that's what I voted for in 2024 and 2020 and 2016. If I'm being honest, I will let my anti-illegal immigration flag wave. I voted for that. That's who I voted for. That's the policy I wanted. We've never gotten it. We had Trump 1.0 for four years. We got very few deportations. In fact, one of the highest months of illegal immigration in American history was during Trump 1.0 towards the end of 2019. It's frankly not played out the way we were promised. It never happened. It never happened. I don't know why we all fell for it again in 2024. I don't know why we all showed up thinking maybe this time, I feel a little bit like Charlie Brown. You know, Charlie Brown, he would go kick the football and every single time the little gal would pull away, losing every time Lucy would pull it away. And Charlie Brown would go spinning around and fall down and he, that's what I feel like. I'm bearing brown, bearing brown, I'm falling down. I'm trying to kick the football. The ultimate football pole happened on 60 minutes last night, the ultimate pole of the football. In fact, I think she deflated the football and threw it away. She shredded it. She shredded the football because last night on 60 minutes, Trump comes out, now he says it's not amnesty, but it sure sounds a lot like amnesty to me. We also took people that had good jobs, that created one violation, we're breaking of the law. That was it. They came into the country illegally. Now, there is a large part of the country that think that they should be put out and there's a large part of the country that think that they should be allowed to stay. If they're good people working in a landscaping company or working in a hotel or doing something, right? And in some cases, paying taxes, and there's a large group of people think that they should be allowed to stay. That's, I mean, being allowed to stay, that's amnesty, right? I mean, there's a difference between amnesty and citizenship. Amnesty is, you, you get to stay. But in a lot of people say, well, that's not too bad, but I mean, you know, they're not a citizens. I can't vote. You know what people do who stay? They have kids. They have kids. Lots of kids. Lots of kids. They will have not one or two kids, maybe three or four or five, I have eight kids. So I know what it's like to have a large family. I know it's possible. You could do it on a shoestring budget. You don't have to be rich and famous to have eight kids. So if you have, let's say, 10 or 15 million people and you're like, all right, you guys get amnesty. Congratulations. You might have upwards of 40, 50, 60 million new citizens that are born in the United States over the next 10, 15, 20 years. That's going to change the nature of the American electorate. It just is. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. It's not all about politics. But those people are also going to be competing for things like a gallon of milk, a gallon of gas, a seat at your local university. University, your job, your house, all that comes more expensive, the more people you have in the United States. Now, the corporations, the big billionaires, they love it because an increasing population is an increasing economic pie, they believe. But at what cost, at what cost, at what cost do you sell your integrity? Because you campaign for 10 years on this issue, 10 solid long years. You campaigned on this issue. And my gas ladies and gentlemen, we're talking about a lot more than 10 or 15 million people. Probably talking in the neighborhood of, just in terms of people who've been here 10 years, tens of million, maybe 20, 30, 40, 50 million people. So you're looking at 100 million kids, 200 million kids. It's a different country. It's a totally different country. And I just don't know how you resent a promise like that, how you change just overnight like that. What's the only thing you had to say about it? He also said that the deal was too tough, the deal was too tough, and he could work with the Democrats on this. So you think your deportation policy went too tough? I think it might be too tough, yeah. What does the deal look like with the Democrats? Ultimately that hurt me. Then there's also people that are more modified on that. In other words, get the killers out, get all the rough ones out, get the drug dealers out, but let the people that are here, and in some cases here for 10 and 15 years, work a deal for them. You think the Democratic Party right now has people in it who would be interested in this kind of deal? I think so, yeah. People have already called me. I notice how he started with what he started with hotels and landscaping. My guess is that the Trump golf courses around the country, there are a lot of landscapers and hotel workers. I don't know. I'm not saying he's doing it out of self-interest. That's not what I'm saying. I'm not saying this is self-dealing, but I find it interesting that that's the examples he comes up with. He didn't go to plumbers and pipe fitters and automobile workers. Now he goes to hotels and landscaping, obviously two major employees, two major groups of employees that his company has. I'm sorry guys. I'm not buying it. I'm not buying it. I refuse to buy it. This is not what I voted for. I didn't vote for the Iran War and I didn't vote for Amnesty. I don't care what you call it. You can say it's not Amnesty when you let someone stay legally who is here illegally. It's Amnesty. Don't tell me we had these massive mass deportations. I think you deported around a million people. What's that? Maybe 1% up to 5% depending on how many people you think are here. Not to mention all the other people who've come across in the meantime. I'm not buying it. I'm very disappointed, obviously, in what President Trump is making out of Trump 2.0. I was obviously very disappointed in Trump 1.0, but I thought I'd give him another shot. Starting to regret that vote more every day, we'll be right back. Let me tell you about our friends over at PDS debt. You feel like you're working harder than ever, but still falling behind every single month. Between grocery prices, bills, and credit card debt growing, it can feel impossible to get ahead. Minimum payments aren't designed to get you out of debt. They're designed to keep you stuck. PDS debt can help. They can reduce up to half of what you owe on credit cards, personal loans and medical bills, and it starts with a free 30-second assessment at pds.com/candis. Stop juggling multiple payments and get one lower monthly payment. If you're carrying any balance on your credit cards, it's costing you money every single day. There's no minimum credit score required. PDS debt is the top-rated company in the industry with thousands of five-star reviews and an A+ rating on the BBB. Checking your options is fast, free, and won't impact your credit. Get your free 30-second personalized assessment today at pds.com/candis. That's pds.com/candis. I also want to tell you about our friends over at ProLife across America. What if a billboard you pass on the highway could change someone's life? Candice and I want to tell you about ProLife across America, they're known as the billboard people. The only pro-life group doing national billboards changing hearts and minds one message at a time. Their signs feature adorable babies and share messages such as the fact that a baby's heart starts beating at just 22 days after conception. Their billboards educate the public about life before birth, while at the same time reaching women who may feel scared, alone, or pressured to have an abortion. And they don't stop at sharing messages like these through their 24/7 hotline for help. They connect women with local pregnancy help centers, offering ultrasounds, pregnancy tests, baby supplies, and so much more. They offer real help and make a real difference, taking hundreds of calls every single month. Better? More than 98% of your donation goes right back into their mission. Head to prolifeacrossamerica.org today to help change hearts, save baby's lives, or even sponsor a billboard in your area. That's prolifeacrossamerica.org, prolifeacrossamerica, changing hearts and saving baby's lives. Assuming you're not operating heavy machinery or driving a car, I want you to do something. Close your eyes and picture something. Close your eyes and picture that you spent the last 35 or 40 years dreaming of a political position. And that's the only thing you want accomplished. You're a one issue type person. That's all you want. And you've spent 25, 30, 35, 40 years going all the way back to the 80s, talking about the same political position day in and day out, dreaming of it. And finally, in the last year, you're starting to get your way. Things are starting to break in your favor. That political position that a lot of people have been dreaming about since the early 80s, certainly since the early 90s, is a total war against Iran. Is a total war against Iran on behalf of Israel, led by the United States because we have all the money, we have all the machinery, we have all the ammunition, we have all the technology. But there are people who have spent all day, every day dreaming about this position. That's all they think about. And over the last year or so, they've said, yes, finally, we finally doped somebody into doing this for us. We finally convinced somebody. They actually are two weeks away from getting a new year weapon. Well, that position came crashing down on Tuesday. And some people are having a lot of trouble with the realization that the American people did not support their dream of the last several decades. Here is Donald Trump on that same 60 minutes interview. Last clip, I think we're going to play from that. But here is Donald Trump on that same 60 minutes interview talking about and finally admitting the reality that people don't want to go to war with Iran. They didn't like the war. They didn't like the fact that gasoline went up because I had it down at a low. Then Iowa was 185 cents a gallon, $85 a gallon. And when you look at 185 and you go up to three and a half four dollars, it's still lower than Biden, lower than Obama. But the war was blamed for that and they didn't like the war. I think mostly for that reason because I think everyone agrees that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and they will have a nuclear weapon. They won't have that. But and there's a great dislike, incredibly for Israel. What an admission. I mean, that guy's that is one of the biggest admission 60 minutes has ever gotten out of a sitting president that people did not like the Iran war, but he didn't stop there. He could have. He could have. He could have stopped there and said, man, people didn't like the Iran war. We miscalculated. We'll, we'll, we'll regather the troops and figure out how to proceed. But he went one step further and said, and frankly, a lot of people don't like Israel. Well, Mr. President, the reason we don't like Israel is because they keep dragging us into these wars and you keep telling them not to and they keep doing it anyway. It's an amazing admission. It is an absolutely amazing mission. It was in some ways refreshing to finally hear a sitting president in the United States admit the obvious that the wars, the decades of wars, we've been at war in the Middle East, basically nonstop since the early 1990s. The decades of wars have finally eroded our support for the people pushing us into it. And it's just gotten over the top and it was very, very refreshing. Well, a lot of people, I mentioned those people who this has been their dream for decades. A lot of people are not accepting this very well. Check out Mark Leven over the weekend. This is his tweet. Now we had to make it small. We had to make it small. This is the Tucker Carlson network. They tweeted about Mark Leven tweeting about Israel 120 times over the weekend. That's two days, two days, the 60 times a day on average. Well, you were enjoying a peaceful weekend with your loved ones. Mark Leven was obsessively rage tweeting about imaginary Nazis, what a sad man. Sad man indeed, but can you imagine the heartbreak of a guy like Mark Leven? This has been his dream for decades. This has been Ben Shapiro's dream since he was learning how to write a bike probably. This has been the dream of all these people for many, many, many years, including people like Randy Find, who's not accepting reality well either. There's a clip of Randy Find talking about how JD Vance reminds him of 1930's Germany. I think Marco Rubio would be a great candidate. I think Ted Cruz would be a great candidate. We have a lot of great candidates. I will tell you, I definitively will not be supporting the vice president in that in that nominated. contest. I bought his message that he put out the day after the election was a warrant and frankly smacked of the kind of thing you would read in 1932, Germany. So he's out in my book, but I think we've got a lot of great candidates to consider moving for pulling the 1932 Germany card. It's not overplayed, I promise. Um, so if you're not a Nazi, like he's obviously pulling the Nazi card, let's say, let's say you're not a Nazi. What other thing might we be able to blame a lack of support for the war in Iran and Israel in general? Uh, my cock could be ways in. It says, maybe it's not Nazis. Maybe it's this. Oh, sorry. I went too quick. It should have happened that when they saw what happened at Diego Garcia, that there was suddenly a wake up and, but there isn't. There wasn't. And they're still thinking, Oh, America shouldn't have gone in to, to deal with Iran. I'm thinking, okay, is that a mental? What is it? I think it's a spiritual issue. You see, I know it sounds a little funny for an ambassador to be talking like this, but look, I see this as spiritual darkness, spiritual blindness. How else can you explain? Yeah. Very delusion, because Satan has blinded the minds of those and has captured their thinking. I really do believe that there is something deeper than just the obvious geopolitical issues at bay. So if you don't want to annihilate an entire population, push them into starvation, destroy their economy, destroy their infrastructure, bomb their schoolgirls, if you don't want to do those things, according to Mike Huckabee, who is an employee on behalf of all of us, an ambassador to Israel on behalf of the United States, you are blinded by Satan. You're blinded by Satan. God would want those things. One more thing I'll notice about that last clip. The guy he was talking to is a guy named Amir Sephardie. Amir Sephardie. The Amir Sephardie, the same Amir Sephardie. I'm told was the very first person to tweet that Charlie Kirk had passed away. Former IDF soldier, Israeli national. So I don't know, you know, if those things are connected in any way or not, but it was worth pointing out after I heard that not to be outdone. So we've heard from Mark Levin, you know, right wing media hack. We've heard from Mark Levin. We hear from Randy Fein said somehow, somehow a sitting member of Congress and sitting is a key word to that. I don't think he does a lot of standing or moving around much. He's a big fellow. Then we hear from Mike Huckabee, frankly, also sitting around a lot, but that's not he's the sitting ambassador for Israel for the United States to Israel. But we got to hear from one more person. We got to hear from at least one more person because Doos Bigelow wants to be heard on this issue. For some reason, doos Bigelow, male Jigalow wants to be heard on the issue of the war in Iran and JD, JD Vance's response to it. Hey JD Vance. Not one word about the Islam, Marxist revolution, ravaging America. Palestine first just got elected and you're complaining about Israel. You can't make this stuff up. Do you think Americans didn't care about the Islamic takeover happening in real time? Are we going to just still cry about Europe? Why is Doos Bigelow weighing in? I mean, I will never understand why some of these Hollywood actors think we are entitled to their opinion or think we are required, required to have their opinion on all this stuff. Doos Bigelow actually though might be more connected than we think. Might be more connected than we think because Doos Bigelow somehow, I don't sure how, received a briefing on the Iran War. Check this out. The war in Iran was and is necessary. Someone said, not sure I understand the joke here. He says, this is Doos Bigelow. After I was briefed, I was wrong about the Iran War. We could not wait another hour. Briefed where, Mr. Bigelow? Briefed by whom? Mr. Bigelow. Who is briefing Rob Schneider? Who is briefing Rob Schneider and why? Why are we briefing washed up delist actors? On the Iran War and the intense necessary preparation and current timeline that must be met, lest we all face extinction. Why doos Bigelow? Why doos Bigelow? All right. Push that aside because we are increasingly, I fear, being ruled by these tech titans. And I'm not sure all of them have our best interest in art. But what they're doing is creating in America a, I don't know about a spy network or a technological revolution that could, many of them believe or at least they put a percentage on it, maybe 10%, 25%, some of them say 50% or more. Destroy all of humanity. Put us all out of work, starve everybody to death, to empty our bank accounts, delete our lives from everything we know. This is this AI revolution. And I'm not sure I'm on board. I'm not sure I'm 100% on board with it. Believe it or not. I think, you know, I feel a little bit like when they were testing the atomic bomb. And nobody really knew they were doing it. And they were like, well, we need to go up and test it first. And one guy was like, hey, wait a minute. You know, this could set the ionosphere on fire. And cause humanity to face extinction. And somebody in the room was like, really, you're not sure that won't happen. He's like, I can't say it won't happen. They said, well, should we do the test? He's like, well, if we don't, the Germans are going to do it. So, well, you know, maybe, maybe let them, maybe let them, maybe they won't get the capabilities before the end of the war. So I feel a little bit like that with AI technology and the AI revolution in this advanced security state that's going up all around us constantly. And I wonder to what extent the right people are leading the charge. And what I mean by that is we are constantly told the president tells us and all these tech titans tell us if we don't get out ahead of this, the Chinese are going to beat us to the punch. I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean. I feel again, a little bit like the nuclear bomb test. Okay. So the Germans beat us to the punch. Maybe they won't get there. Maybe they won't beat us. And we don't all end up with an extinct, extinct humanity. Maybe the world doesn't have to end after all. But we're told China is the reason we must go crazy and build all these facilities. We're told China is the reason we must develop all this technology. We're told China is the reason we must spend so much of our nation's GDP that we must destroy the electrical capacity in these individual small communities that we must destroy the water capacity in these individual communities that we must contribute to the noise pollution and the air pollution that these things cause. We're told it's about China. But one of the tech titans leading the way for this AI revolution is a guy named Jensen Huang. Jensen Huang. Jensen Huang is a weird little fellow. He dresses strangely. He's got a little bit of Kim Jong-Un, like itching to get out of him somewhere. He, you know, everybody else shows up in business suits and he shows up in like weird blazers, almost like Hillary Clinton used to show up in those weird A-frame dresses. She always wore. But Jensen Huang, weird guy, weird guy. Now we're told, again, we're having to race to this potential extinction of humanity to beat China to the potential extinction of humanity, I guess. But now we're told through the New York Times that NVIDIA has opened an investigation into Jensen Huang's relationship with a suspected Chinese spy. So we have to beat China. We have to beat China. We have to take all this technology and we have to develop it here in America. Less China get ahead. But nobody vetted the guys in charge to make sure they weren't corousing around with Chinese spies. You can't make this up. Hold this picture for a second because I'm going to point something out that I think is very relevant to everybody. It's something we decided here today. If anyone is more than one number above you on the scale, stay away. Especially if you're a rich billionaire, right? If you're a rich billionaire and they're more than one number ahead of you on the scale, stay away. Like if you're Jensen Huang and you're a solid five and a half and somebody comes up to you and they're like an eight, they're a spy. They're a spy. They're not interested in you. They don't think you're hot. They don't want to, that is the definition of a spy. Easy to spot. Very easy to say. If a 10 ever approaches you run, turn around and run. Don't just say no, leave, leave. If someone that hot is after you and your Jensen Huang, stay away. It reminds me a little bit of Eric Swalwell. You guys remember Eric Swalwell. He was the congressman from, um, from California. Eric Swalwell decided he wanted to run for governor of California, but not until he got caught with someone named Fangfang. You remember Eric Swalwell and Fangfang. Look, look, Eric Swalwell looks like he just walked out of a, a special needs class or something and, and Fangfang looks like she just got out of the Miss Universe pageant. That's a good indication, Eric Swalwell. She's a spy. She's a spy. She's, she's not into you, bro. She is not into you, bro. I promise you. I promise you. Going back to Jensen Huang for a second, Nvidia said Sunday that they were going to open up an investigation into Jensen Huang. He is the CEO and co-founder of, uh, of Nvidia. Because he acknowledged to the company's board that he had been intimate with a business executive who US intelligence determined was a Chinese spy. Now, just because she's a Chinese spy, doesn't mean she was sent by China. There are a lot of people in the United States who would love to get Jensen Huang caught up with a spy Chinese or otherwise. So you can't, read this and say China's spying on Jensen Huang. But you can say she has some loyalty to China, if US intelligence is determined, she's a Chinese spy. She goes by the name Alice Huang, which Jensen Huang right there should have been like, well, that's my first indication I should stay out of this. But she became a US government concern after surveillance revealed she was feeding information directly to Beijing. So we have to risk the extinction of humanity because if we don't, China may beat us to the punch. But in the meantime, our tech titans are going to be back-doring information to China because they can't stay away. They can't stay away. All right, I think we're a break behind, right? We want to break behind. All right. Yeah, let's go ahead and take a break and we'll come back in just a second. Let me tell you about our friends at American financing. What if you could delay your next two mortgage payments? Imagine putting those two payments in your pocket and finally getting a little breathing room ahead of the holidays. That's very possible if you call American financing today. If you're feeling stretched by everyday expenses such as grocery bills, gas bills, bills piling up all over the place, guess what? You're not alone. Most Americans are putting these expenses on credit cards and the credit card rates are insane right now. American financing can show you how to use your home's equity to pay off that debt. Their salary-based mortgage consultants are helping homeowners just like you restructure their loans and save money every month. There are no upfront fees to find out how much you can save. Their customers are saving an average of $800 a month. That's like a $10,000 raise call American financing today at 800 795 1210 that's 800 795 1210 or visit Americanfinancing.net/oans. That's Americanfinancing.net/oans. I have one more story I want to cover before we get out of here. Representative Thomas Massey who Charlie Kirkdefined as one of his favorite congressmen, who TPUSA turned on and didn't support when he was being faced by a $40 million barrage from foreign interest. Thomas Massey has introduced articles of impeachment against defense secretary Pete Hegseth, the ultimate frat bro turned government official. GOP congressman introduces articles of impeachment against Hegseth, right? I have fallen in love with Thomas Massey since he got defeated and a Thomas Massey who's unleashed is a Thomas Massey who is a man after my own heart. Now I want to go back to that picture for you. I got to say I got to point it out. One more reason to love Thomas Massey. Look at the shadow behind him. Thomas Massey puts off a shadow that looks exactly like Ian Carroll. And if you can't love a good Ian Carroll shadow bomb in the background, I don't know. I don't I can't help you. I can't help you. I miss Ian. I miss Ian. Get back to making content soon, sir. Are are well wishes with you. I want to show you real quickly the eight articles of impeachment. It's it's you know that the titles don't really mean much to this, but the eight articles of impeachment when you take a look at them, you realize he may have a little issue here. Waging war in contravention of the war powers resolution. That's the first three there. And that is about the going past these congressional defined limitations on on military actions. Then he ignored laws that minimize civilian casualties. Well, obviously, you know, dropping a bomb on a 100 something school children on the first day of war in Iran is not ideal when you were facing a charge like that. In addition to others, extra judicial killings, suppressing free speech. This one will be interesting for me. This will be interesting for me to see how that one plays out. Kidnapping a sovereign foreign leader and unlawful war in Yemen. Now they're going to take a vote on this very soon. They're going to take a vote on this very soon. Do I expect this to pass the United States House so that that Thomas Macias. I mean, excuse me, Pete Hexeth has to face try and listen to no, but I will be interested to see everybody go on the record if they can actually force a vote here. I will be interested to see that now say this about Pete Hexeth. I saw Pete Hexeth speak. Gosh, it's probably been 10 years now. He was very young, very new. I think he'd just gotten started with Fox news. In fact, when he was announced as a keynote speaker at a Republican event, I was at, like I said, about 10 years ago, I'd never heard of him. I had to get on a computer in Google who he was and I saw him. I thought, who is this guy? He was a very dynamic speaker. He was fun. It was an engaging night. He gave an absolutely amazing speech. So I'm not saying Pete Hexeth is the worst human being that ever lived. I'm not saying Pete Hexeth is a terrible politician or Pete Hexeth is a terrible speaker or communicator. But what has taken place out of the Department of War since he took over? I think is out of bounds, pretty out of bounds, and it'll be interesting to see how he manages to defend himself. Now, Thomas Massey held a press conference. The first clip we're going to play very by the book, very, you know, you know, buttoned up just the facts Joe Friday. Take a look at Thomas Massey before he cuts loose towards the end of the press conference. There are eight articles of impeachment that I've just introduced. I'll be glad to take your questions on it. The one thing that I want to point out here is a lot of people are saying, well, I think Peter Hexeth's effective. He's good at his job. And so I don't want to vote for these articles of impeachment. Well, the reality is we're not indicting him for being bad at his job. In fact, he was very effective at killing school children in Iran. He was very effective at extrajudicial killings. There's no argument in these impeachment articles that he's ineffective. The argument here is that he's broken laws and he's violated the Constitution. And so that's the question put in front of my colleagues. Now, I understand that some of them may want to vote for this because they just want to see Hexeth gone. I'll welcome their vote if that's a if that's a reason and they choose not to read the articles of impeachment. But I would encourage people to take them very seriously. I don't think it'll get out of Republican House. We'll see. I mean, things may turn really gnarly against Pete Hexeth in the next couple of days. For those of you who say it's not a Republican House anymore. The Republicans lost on Tuesday. Unfortunately, we live in this weird in between period. And I wish they could constitutionally change this. They won't, but I wish they would. Once you lose office, you should no longer be voting on things that matter. There should be no 60 day grace period between a November election and a January three because that's when they get sworn in a January three swearing end of the next Congress. Once you lose, you should be out. I'm sorry. I even think if you lose the primary, you're not allowed to vote on anything important. You can do constituent affairs and all that kind of stuff, but you're out for the purposes of anything else. You have nothing to lose at that point. There's no accountability. We can't throw you out of office again. We've already thrown you out of office. We've already said we don't have faith in your ability to govern. So why are you up there governing on our behalf? But that's a story for a different day. Now they get to the Q&A portion and Thomas Massey starts feeling himself. Here's Thomas Massey, Massey, basically saying here's what we can expect from Pete Hexeth when he responds. Since we saw the Secretary of Scheduld, his own press conference that they're going to let him deliver a re-bottle. And to that point, I hope he addresses the eight articles and doesn't get up and misquote the Bible and Quentin Tarantino fashion and do some pull-ups and, you know, call everybody fat and gay like for being for this impeachment. Like, I may have just given you half his speech. I don't know. But I would like to see him go through the eight articles of impeachment. And just make the argument from a podium. You can use notes. Get the lawyers to help you. Tell us why you are not guilty of each of these eight articles of impeachment. I've heard of faking gay. This is the first time I've ever heard fat and gay, but I guess that's it. Oh, and one more thing on Pete Hexeth's pull-ups gets extension at the bottom of the rep, Mr. Secretary, extension at the bottom. Chen over the top is not really count if you don't get full extension at the bottom. But that's a different story for a different day. Guys, I want to go over some of the top comments from the last episode. We have Angela Brand, Angela Brand, Charlie Kirk. When he went to see President Trump about Iran, told him that if he went in and went to war with Iran, that he would lose mega people would walk away. You, President Trump should have listened. Indeed, indeed should have listened. Indeed, not to be outdone Beverly H. Alverson. I voted for Trump three times. Or maybe it's Beverly Halverson. I'm not sure. I voted for Trump three times, but after Charlie's death, I saw so much in Trump that made me regret those three votes. This election I just had to stand down. One of the biggest reasons was the way our government clammed up about the Charlie Kirk killing that sealed it for me. Candace said that. She said, I'm not voting for you clowns anymore, unless you tell me who killed Charlie Kirk, how and why. So I'm with you, Beverly Halverson. I think we will get back into the Charlie Kirk investigation in greater detail in the coming days. Personally, one of the reasons I've kind of pulled back a little bit on that is really twofold. One is there was a lot of news coming out of the election cycle, but second reason is with the judge, imminently deciding on what date he was going to set this thing for, I was curious to pull back just a hair and see how he was going to handle that. See how he was going to handle that. So I've had people People ask me, like, why have you pulled back on that? Well, I had a couple of reasons, a couple of reasons. All right, top comments from today's episode, U.T. Gramsciar, Go Max, Boba Barron. Do it, Candace style with your favorite headband on since you can't do the power bun, send it. I don't run upstairs and see if you'll let me borrow some of your headbands. I like when she wears the headbands. She doesn't wear them enough. Curious cat attack. I can't be the only one that's a little comforted that Lumer isn't doing all that spiral posting for free. Love ya be, crisis king indeed. Curious cat attack. We don't know which posts are being paid for and which are just born out of our own insanity. So we can't say that. We can't say that. But I'm starting to wonder if you're not more right than wrong there. Jolly, Jolly Lollipop? Jolly Lollipop. Comment on Katie Fangs, civil suit against the DOJ. She has economic standing because you're in money commenting on the Epstein files which are not being released. You and Candace can jump in and make it class action. I don't know anything about it. I'd have to look into it more. I wish I had the tales for you there. I don't. But it's not something where two random people can jump in and make it a class action. Classes are certified totally differently than that. But I understand what you're saying. And I will take a look at it. Zammett. Zammett writes, Tyler Robinson is in the Guinness book of records as the only high profile assassin that got away and then turned around and turned himself in. Amazing. I tried to think about that early on. Had there ever been a high profile political assassin who turned himself in to protect his safety? I can't think of one. Likewise, I can't think of too many long range political assassins. The only other one that really comes to mind is Martin Luther King. And there are a lot of questions about whether or not James Earl Ray actually pulled the trigger on that one as well. So, very unprecedented things in the Tyler Robinson case. No doubt about it. Terry Terrell, NV, first order of business, Mr. VP, did the principal leave chili out of your contract now, too? Or are we about to get a chili getty clause? Cause set for middle 2028 elections, hmm, how convenient? I didn't think about that. The, that's actually really interesting. The Tyler Robinson case is being set right in the middle of the presidential elections. The primaries usually are finished, wrapped up, sometime in junish, and then we have a presidential election in November and that looks to be about the timeline. They've set aside again, I'll do some more digging into the order once we see the written order come out and look at the actual timeline. Because I was, I fear my ears deceived me a little bit today. But yeah, no, as far as chili getty, if for those that don't know over on my channel the last couple of days, we've had arguments over whether spaghetti, noodles belong in chili. Those of you in Cincinnati and the Midwest around any NAPLIS and Columbus, Ohio are probably confused why anybody would be concerned about such a thing because it is perfectly natural for noodles to be in chili. The rest of the country is outraged over your idea of how chili's made. So, apparently that came up. I had no idea that was a thing. I posted a picture to my subscribers on X and they were horrified. They were absolutely horrified and I had no idea. So yeah, I don't know. The principal has not yet said anything about chili and noodles. So we'll see whether that gets added to the contract or not. You'll know by tomorrow. You'll know tomorrow. I have a feeling when I walk upstairs it's going to get ugly. Against the darkness, Baron, I'm still waiting on a Colombo impersonation in relation to the Charlie Kirk investigation. The fingers crossed, go Max, Christ is King indeed. You know what's funny? I used to watch Colombo as a kid a lot. Those were long episodes. They were over an hour. When you're a kid over an hour episode seems like you're watching a five hour movie. He was the one that carried the green cigar around. I never understood that. I've never seen a green cigar stored in stores. Maybe I'm just missing out. I don't know. Maybe I don't examine the cigar selection closely enough. I think that was Colombo. Wouldn't that green cigar guy? Maybe I'm wrong. I don't think I can do a Colombo impersonation. He's almost like he's trying to do a bad Sean Connery but with sort of an American accent. And I don't think I can pull that off. I could try, I could try. But this is not something I'm going to rehearse for the first time on camera. No, no Surrey Bubsky, not going to happen. Guys, I appreciate it. Don't forget to go over to Candace Owens.com for all the latest merch. We've got amazing merch over there at Candace Owens.com, including the Winter selection, the Winter selection. We've got six pointed snowflakes. Six pointed snowflakes there. Stop anti-candisism. Don't be an anti-candite. We do not need anti-candites in the world. You anti-candites. There needs to be a anti-candite league. An ACL, the anti-candite league. We got to get one of those. Also, you get some VP merch. I got some substitute teacher. We got Mug sweatshirts, t-shirts and more. Make 'em a hot dog. Make 'em a hot dog. What a way to start your day with a make 'em a hot dog mug. It's a latte mug, too, so it's fancy. You know, fancy mug. So lots of good stuff over there at Candace Owens.com. Check out her merch. I should be back. You know, Lord willing in the creeks, don't rise. Tomorrow evening, in the meantime, I hope you guys have a wonderful, wonderful, wonderful evening. And we'll see you guys tomorrow. (upbeat music)