Trump's HISTORIC Greenland Deal | Germany's Right Does It AGAIN - HUGE Wins For AfD| CNN Gets Kicked To the Curb

Imagine setting your makeup, then forgetting it's even theirs. Meet new groupie setting mist from Mavily New York. Gel to mist technology locks in your look for up to 24 hours, with flexible all-day comfy grip. No tightness, no stickiness, no residue, just plump, dewy, hydrated skin that still feels like your skin. Try new groupie setting mist from Mavily New York. Maybe it's Mabelane. You know about Greenland, right? Huge, huge win. It broke on Friday when I was live on the air, massive win for the Trump administration. So I want to talk about that, but there's another thing happening today, and that's overseas in Germany. What are you seeing? The AFT crushing it again, you guys, just absolutely crushing it once again in Germany. This is the right wing, as they call it, the most conservative part of Germany, kind of taking over. What does this mean for Mertz? You know, Fred, Friedrich Mertz, you might have to say, "Uff, it is saying right about now. We're going to talk about those election results." Plus Donald Trump is going to sit down with Ma'am Damien tomorrow, really? There may be a method to the madness. I have some more on that, but first, I just got to say this is one big, massive win, huge win for the Trump administration. I mean, just absolutely unbelievable to see. We got that news, of course, on Friday with Donald Trump, posting it on to social. In fact, I was just coming to air with you, and I was like, "Wait, what? We had a whole block planned on Greenland." And I saw this, and I'm like, "Are you kidding me?" So this is just a massive, massive, amazing bit of news. The president putting this out, saying that we have this permanent agreement, if you would, with Greenland now in place, thanks to some negotiations going on behind the scenes with Denmark. The whole idea here is you're going to reshape America's presence in the Arctic, the president breaking the news. Again, on Friday with his two social posts saying, "You know what, this arrangement is going to give Washington permanent security rights, and a say over adversaries, China, Russia, and anybody else who wants to get in there, any kind of military presence, they're not going to have it, right, as well as any kind of investment that they want to do there." The New York Post printing this over the weekend, and you can see, wow, the president actually retweeted this as well, so he kind of liked this cover. U.S. military gets forever rights to Greenland. It's a big deal. You had Hegseth? Secretary of Defense, Secretary of War tweeting on Friday that we are about to mobilize all of those resources, if you would, developing a large military presence in the appropriate part of Greenland, of which there will be many. So he's retweeting what the president put out. I'm telling you, this is just a really big win and a really big deal. So we get the permanent access, right, we get adversaries, you know, enemies basically locked out. You've got the golden dome, right, that access to those satellites for the golden dome was a really big deal, and then you've got this sovereignty question, which is actually going to remain unchanged, because they really wanted to hang onto it. Greenland, I guess, just didn't want to get bought out, and you had, you know, Denmark that was just unwilling to budge on this one. And so there kind of was something in it for everyone. Don't forget the president has long wanted this. I mean, he wanted it back in his first term, right, and everybody was laughing. They thought, oh, you know, isn't this funny. Isn't this crazy? Well, he wasn't kidding, right, and he came back pretty darn determined, and all we've heard about since he got there, well, we've heard about a few different things. But there's been a pretty consistent theme if you would on Greenland. We need Greenland very importantly for international security. We have to have Greenland. It's not a question of, do you think we can do without it? We can't. If you look at Greenland right now, if you look at the waterways, you have Chinese and Russian ships all over the place, and we're not going to be able to do that, we're not relying on Denmark or anybody else to take care of that situation. No, you better believe it, you know, and why did he want it? Now, I want to go back to this map, because this is a really good explainer. Not everybody in the media seems to understand this nor in the Biden administration nor those that came out of the Obama administration. But if you look at this map, I'll tell you who understands it, and that would be the President of the United States as well as Marco Rubio and the entire team there, you've got Greenland kind of smack dab in the center of the Arctic, right? And the Arctic is pretty darn important because it contains all of these very important missile approaches, right, for North America, if you would. I mean, we're kind of like sit in ducks. Look at Canada and the USA there. So we needed it. We needed it because we needed that early warning system in the Arctic that would give our American commanders the information they need in order to respond if you would to an attack. You have a Pacific air space there or space base, which is already supporting some missile warnings, missile defense and some space surveillance. But hey, you know what, we needed more and let's face it, warfare is changing, technology is changing, missions depend on access. So we needed this. I want to go to a sound bite from actually Ambassador Walt speaking about the importance of the security issue on CNN this weekend. Here we go. For attacked by any type of intercontinental missiles, they'll come over the Arctic. Our radars, our sensors are incredibly important up there. They need to be defended. We need to have full access. Full access indeed, right? So think about space. Think about space force. You know, they laugh at them for that too, right? You know, that was supposed to be a big joke. Another Trump venture that they thought was just a whole lot of laughs. Kind of important because satellite support navigation, the support communications, military operations. And I get to tell you, this is very relevant if you would for warfare in the future, right? We're not living in the past. I realize a lot of people are still living in the past, they're terrified of AI. They're terrified of taking over Greenland, they're terrified of, you know, they're terrified of everything, right? Terrified of everything. But let me just point out, you can be scared, but you better be a realist, right? You better be a realist because things are moving and they're moving fast. And security for all of us is very dependent, if you would, on these changes and us being out at the forefront of them is as Dan came, was warning about actually this, I believe somebody came out on Friday. Today my brothers and sisters, we must be clear eyed about the environment ahead. Future conflicts will demand that we operate without the assumptions of uncontested access, secure rear areas, or uninterrupted or uncontested sustainment. Our task, my friends, is to adapt right now. So the joint force is prepared to fight, endure, and win in global contested environments from the seabed to cis lunar space. The demands right now on our joint force are not theoretical. We have- Yeah. In other words, the demands are serious, and Greenland is an important part of this, right? We need to be able to detect missile threats and track objects in space. I'm Greenland. So we had to get it. I mean, look, we've known forever that Greenland was important, if you would. We've always known that it was very valuable, if you think back to even a hundred years ago, go all the way back to 1867 after the Alaska Purchase. You had the Secretary of State William C. Wards Administration considering acquiring Greenland. Or if you go back to 1946 and the Trump administration has talked about this, President Trump has talked about this a lot. He had the Tumon administration offering Denmark, I guess $100 million in gold, but they turned it down, Denmark declined. They've been clinging to that thing ever since, right, in 1951 Defense Agreement subsequently providing framework for America's military presence, and we've been kind of just dealing with that. But we've had 160 years of interest, and no one could get it done. No one could get it done. Until now, so just think about that. That's a pretty remarkable accomplishment, and I'll tell you, it had to happen. Now it had to, because Europe wasn't taking any of the defense issues seriously. I mean, you just look at NATO, for example, and they're refusal to even pay their tab. It's pretty darn clear. JD went up to Greenland last year, and he made this point watch. There's a lot of criticism from Denmark. A lot of attacks at the Trump administration, at the President, at me, at others in our administration for saying the obvious, which is that Denmark hasn't done a good job at keeping Greenland safe. So it's kind of important when you think about it. I think we need to emphasize, you know what, this administration got it done. So congrats to the President. Congrats to Marco Rubio. Others tried, and they couldn't get it done, or maybe they didn't take it seriously enough, right? Obama was working on something. He actually issued an Arctic strategy, whatever that was back in 2013, but nothing happened. And Biden's administration, I mean, they didn't really bother with Greenland now. Did they? I mean, I don't know if they bothered with much in the Biden administration. Better than worrying about all of us, and worrying about Donald Trump. But they did, at some point, come out with an icebreaker partnership with Finland and Canada. In '24, I guess right before he left, again, whatever that was, anyway, the Trump administration, they certainly made Greenland a big, big, big priority, a big one, because they knew, right? And we hear it. Let me go back to the UN ambassador. Who's going to have a busy week ahead, right? With all the UN stuff going on. We'll talk about that. But here is my Guards talking about Arctic security and the importance of spending on Arctic security. And clearly, the Europeans weren't willing to do it. I can tell you with certainty that our NATO allies were not spending what they need to, now President. President Trump has an icebreaker deal in place with Finland. He has the spending that he's driving coming out of NATO and will now have the full access and basing that we need for Iron Dome, access to critical minerals, access to the energy reserves that are up there. Yeah, right, I mean this kind of needed to get done. And someone was like, are you going to sleep easier knowing that we own Greenland? Well, we don't technically own it, right? They still contain their sovereignty, et cetera, but we have a lot of rights. Shall we say in Greenland? And I was like, yeah, I'm definitely going to sleep better. I think it's important. It's critical, actually, for our future. And his Donald Trump thinks about his legacy. Remember Biden was so worried about his own legacy, and it was so important to him. And he brought all these economists into the room and historians into the room and said, how can I really, how can I be the next FDR? Well, you know, he really didn't leave much behind, frankly, in terms of his legacy. And I look at this administration. And this is massive. So you're talking about space force, you're talking about getting Greenland, you're talking about changing NATO and finally getting them to pay. I mean, it is a massive legacy he's living behind, not to mention the border itself, right, and cleaning up that. So there's some economic dimensions to this as well. Don't forget critical minerals. Don't forget shipping routes, all of this matters. Secretary Besant knew it. If there were an attack on Greenland from Russia, from the other area, we would get dragged in. So better now, peace through strength, make it part of the United States, and there will not be a conflict because we're the hottest country in the world, we're the strongest country in the world, the Europeans project weakness, the US project strength. We're starting to see shipping flow through as the ice retreats. Yeah, that's another one, right? Look at all that ice. I mean, it is a big giant block of ice. So you've got ice conditions, creating shipping opportunities, and additional demands, right, for surveillance, and rescue services, and infrastructure, and this all matters, guys, it all matters. So now, a lot of the question becomes, oh, I love, remember he was putting this one out, that was actually just in May, while these negotiations were going on. And so now there's some other questions out there, I mean, I get it, we've got a lot of them, I'm going to put some of them here, because I have questions up on the screen. And in the coming weeks, I would imagine we're going to get more details on all of this, but for example, you might say, well, which missions are authorized in advance? I would hope, and judging by what the president said, but we'll have to see the fine print, all of them, right? We want all of our missions authorized. We don't want anything that has to go in advance. I mean, if we have to ask permission, we're going to be back in the same situation we were in with Spain, rota and moron, can we please, pretty please, pour favor with a cherry on top, can we please go and use our own bases? And when they say no, you know, imagine setting your makeup, then forgetting it's even theirs. Meet new grippy setting mist from Maybelline, New York. Jelly mist technology locks in your look for up to 24 hours, with flexible all-day comfy grip, no tightness, no stickiness, no residue, just plump, dewy, hydrated skin. That still feels like your skin. Try new grippy setting mist from Maybelline, New York. Maybe it's Maybelline. We're going to be kind of up a creek without a paddle. So before we invest a ton of stuff, into Greenland, we want to make sure that we're coming out clean on the other side, whole on the other side. So I don't want to have to notify. I don't want to have to consult. I don't want to have to obtain any approval. And again, if I look at what the president was saying in his two social posts on Friday, I don't think we're going to have to do any of that. I think that this was kind of part of the deal. Yes, they're going to maintain sovereignty, however, we've got free reign when it comes to protecting them. So this is kind of, you know, these are the things that we're going to want to see in the quote deal, the contract that is actually signed. We're going to want to ensure that that access cannot be suspended nor the agreement terminated at any point in time. Again, I think about Sigonella and Georgia Maloney. And we have that nice little base down in Sicily and we just wanted to stop over, a little pit stop on our way over to the straight or her moves before we did the blockade. We just wanted to, you know, refuel and refresh and they wouldn't let us. So we don't want a situation like that. I want to be really clear. It's going to have to be ironclad in that agreement that we really do. Okay, they maintain sovereignty, but we really are the protector and chief. Apparently, we're not going to pay for it either. That's going to be a NATO thing, maybe European thing, Denmark, Greenland. We'll see. Again, I can't wait to see this agreement because it is very big news. So can access be suspended or the agreement terminated absolutely positively, not we are being told that this is in perpetuity, which is what makes this so exciting and so good. So we want to ensure that that is indeed in perpetuity. And finally, what happens if Greenland becomes independent, right? What if they say, you know, hey, we want to be out on our own? What is that going to mean for this agreement? So these are things, right? I'm not a lawyer, but I'm just thinking through all the possible holes in a deal because, you know, it's a deal. We want to make sure we really have an in perpetuity. We really want to make sure that we are there for good up there. So these are the things that we're going to be looking at in the coming weeks as we get details on all of it. We will find out more, but I just get to say, you know, hats off to the team there. It is wonderful, wonderful news. And now, you know, I'm like, okay, what's next? What's next? My friends in Alberta, I'm looking at you, right? Canada is joining the EU, you know, I'm just thinking if they can be an associate state for country, I guess, the EU, want to be an associate state of the US. Alberta, 160 billion barrels of oil that they're sitting on there, approving oil reserves. Amazing. I've been out there. I've actually traveled and did a story when I was a journalist at CNBC years ago. And what, I mean, it was cold. I remember I, we took a little plane right up into the Arctic region there. And I was there reporting on these oil sands and it was just breathtaking, right? It was just amazing. And, you know, it's, it's not as dense or thick or tar-like as say something like Venezuela or an Oco region down there were also obviously establishing a big presence. And I've also traveled to, but I would still say that, you know, I mean, it's much thinner. It's better than that, but it's a big deal. So if we could have this better relationship with Alberta, it would be fantastic for us. So a lot of stuff going on right now. And this weekend, we got some really big news overseas. And you may think, well, why does this matter for us? I think it matters because it really shows you how the tenor of the world is changing right now. This is a big win for the right. They like to call it the right wing. They think they're extremists. I disagree. But the AFD is taken over in Germany and I'm telling you, Merz is going to be out. Friedrich, Merz, I mean, you don't have to speak German to get this one. Listen to him here. This is, I'm disaster. Yeah. A disaster. A big disaster. He's saying, you know, because the CDU did not have much of a showing. Again, this is Friedrich Merz, and if you watch the show, you know, I have a little nickname for him. My nickname is Fred Martz, you know, like I love Lucy. He's easy to remember that way, right? Anyway, he said, and I'm giving you the translation. You cannot talk up the result of mechelberg. It is a disaster. Pomeranian. It is a disaster, he said, right? You didn't, I guess the words the same in German and in English, disaster. The CDU has fought hard, but it's at the end of its rope here. It's just been absolutely positively crushed because they claim they're conservatives, but they haven't done a darn thing to really combat the massive migration challenge that you've got in Germany, nor have they been willing to push back on Brussels and say, okay, enough is enough. And so the people in Germany are dealing with mass inflation. It's almost like stagflation, if you ask me, because their economy is not growing enough to support it on top of which they've got a housing crisis that's extraordinary. And why do you think they have a housing crisis, guys? Why do you think? They have a housing crisis because they have a migrant crisis, 15% of the population being directly from some other part. They say as much as 30% of the population because of all the youth that have been born to the migrants are from other parts. And so, yeah, you can't find housing. And there's a culture shift going on as well. That's not, that's not flying. Certainly not in mechelberg, western Pomerania. Let's take a look at these numbers here. Just coming into us, again, this was just printed. So I don't know if they're calling it full-on official, just, yeah, but take a look at that. These are the numbers. Hot off the press is 38.3% AFD, that's the alternative for Germany. They're coming in there in northeastern Germany at 38.3%. The social democrats are at 35.4%. And if you go all the way down, take a look at CDU. You see one, two, three, four, one, two, three, no, the fifth place down. These are the Christian democrats. That's Merchist Party. They're coming in at 5.9%. I mean, they're not even clearing the five. 4.9%. We'll see how it all shakes out in the final. moment. But that is not a good showing. AFT has taken over. This is Alice Vidal, right? Her party has completely taken over. They are projected to win here with more than 38% of the vote. And don't forget, this comes just what two weeks after the AFT's huge victory that we saw in Saxony on halt. That was just a couple of weeks ago. Yeah. So, I mean, they're on a roll, I would say. This is quite a roll. And they're really, if you would know where the energy is, and it's because merch is just not listening. He just isn't listening. And he's, you know, at every turn, he kind of tries to put the AFD down. He's effectively called them the equivalent of the deplorables. They believe the AFD to be associated with such right-wing, you know, stuff like Nazism. It's actually not true because it's basically a bunch of academics. In fact, Alice Vidal is a former Goldman Sachs banker who worked in China for years. Okay. She speaks fluent Mandarin. And she's actually gay for whatever that's worth. It just kind of, I think, is an important point to mention because it refutes some of the nonsense that they've been saying about her and the party. She's married to another woman or lives with another woman. I don't know. I haven't gone into detail on that one, but they're raising two kids together. So, I would just say, like, she doesn't really fit the Adolf Hitler thing. But you know what they're doing in Germany and the same thing they were doing here, right? Nobody paid any attention to the fact that President Trump's daughter is Jewish, right? She converted. She's married to Kushner. He's got Jewish grandchildren. No, they just go out there and they say, he's, you know, the worst, the worst most heinous leader in all of modern history. And that's what they're trying to do in Germany. And what happens? The voters say, yeah, I'm not buying that. And they vote for AFD. So they are now projected to win there in this particular region. It's northeastern part of Germany. So this comes on the heels of Saxony Unhult. And I want to show you another really important, really important region where they are gaining. Okay? These are numbers that you need to see as well. I want to go to Berlin because Berlin, you know, Berlin, that's like, you know, going to New York City or something. You get the big cosmopolitan center there and there's a lot more lefties than there are sort of, dare I say, normal people in Berlin. And so when you get to Berlin, what's amazing here as well is look at AFD. They got 16.3%. I mean, that's a big deal. Now the left has got 25.3%. CDU still held up. Okay. CDU supposed to be the conservative party that's, I guess, not really conservative or at least not conservative enough for the people of Germany these days. But you look at AFD there and they're at 16.3%. I believe that's more than double what they actually were a few years ago. So there's just a lot of cheering and a lot of excitement and people are just absolutely thrilled right now. I'm trying to see if I have any video here of just how excited, excited they are in Germany. We have the the chancellor there saying it is a disaster, but there's a lot of cheering that's been going on as well. So we'll come back to that. But just look at those results, guys. 16.3%. In Berlin. Okay. And when you put it together with Saxony on halt, I mean, you're talking about a sweep. I mean, AFD 140, what was it? 44% basically of the vote back there. And and CDU had something like 17.2. And then two weeks later, you go out to Western Pomerania in Northeastern Germany and take a look here in Mecklberg 38.3% with the CDU coming in at 4.9%. I guess this is not what I expected. Actually, I was watching a lot of the press this morning and I was looking at the writers because, you know, like, you know me. I'm such a news hound and I knew that if AFD actually had a big showing, I wanted to come on and talk with you about it tonight. But I thought maybe it won't happen, right? Everything that I read, article after article after article said the AFD is not in advance. It was like one after another and I thought to myself, gosh, you know, I remember seeing some stuff like this before. I remember with Brexit. I actually had gone all the way into the studio. I was at Fox Business at the time and I was on my way in. I had a conversation actually with my producer that evening as I was getting out of the car, heading into the studio and all indications were that there was going to be no Brexit. And I remember saying to her, we shall see because we went through that in 2016. There was no way that Donald Trump was ever going to win, right? Hillary Clinton was all set and sure enough he pulled through and sure enough. What did we see? But Brexit. And now what did we see today when AFD was not projected to see much of a gain here and sure enough they did. And then the kicker being that even in liberal liberal liberal Berlin, you're seeing a rise as well. I mean, that's a big gain, 16.3%. Let's go to Elise Videll who's saying, look, buddy, boy, March, Fred, handwriting's on the wall. You know, you're not going to be able to lead Germany anymore. The AFD is clearly the new people's party in Germany. Here she is right now. And I am. She says, as I read the translation to you, she said, we have overtaken this CDU and people want a change of policy. The CDU with Friedrich Meritz, with a weak chancellor, the strong results that you're seeing right there in Berlin is because they're expropriating people. We have rent caps, meaning strong socialist steering instruments that run counter to a free market economy. One has to accept that. But in Berlin, that is, as I just said, a consequence of the firewall, the CDU's so-called firewall policy. And that is the result. And that is why the CDU is called to abandon the firewall policy as quickly as possible in the interest of the country as quickly as possible, so that we can make sensible, she said, policy. How badly is Friedrich Meritz damaged as a chancellor? She said he is strongly damaged. And I believe the CDU with Friedrich Meritz cannot continue. Cannot continue. So again, big wins here for the AFD. I did see a Bloomberg headline cross earlier saying that he would not be continuing. I want to be cautious with that because when I clicked on the article, it wasn't there. So I don't know if they were just getting, you know, they were just getting it ready if you would there, guys. But I don't think that they're going to be able to continue like this. Again, everybody's made this point that they get to ignore the firewall. You know, he's going to have to just plug his nose and go for it and actually join forces, perhaps, with the AFD because otherwise there's no hope for any of them, although I think at least Vidal in that particular case might be taking over. But this is really just remarkable to see. And it's to be expected because, yeah, it's just to be expected if you would because you cannot, you cannot continue to ignore the people as they have and think that that's going to fly because it's just not right? It's absolutely just not. I want to pull up some of these AFD sort of celebration videos if you were because people are just absolutely ecstatic. However, not everyone, I mean, I'm looking here and you've got people saying this is a threat to democracy. They cannot stand the AFD. They're calling it pro-russian because they are not in favor of the war and they don't want to keep spending on the war. You have merch, of course saying we cannot talk up the result. There's nothing to talk up, right? They're in Mechelberg and in West Pomerania. It is a disaster he's saying. She, at least Vidal, is calling on Mertz to no longer continue because you cannot lead Germany as such a weak leader. This is massive. And again, the right is just, I mean, they're calling them the far right. I think they deliberately, if you would use those kinds of connotations to try and scare people, et cetera. And you know, you think about Germany and their history, of course, they get kind of scared on some of those allegations. Here we go. They are just, is this the right now? Well, we're going to get it drastic and unlawful changes to our country's public charge rule. Yeah, he might, he might fit in just great in Germany with the, with the socialists more on him in just a moment. But again, I want to show you some of these celebrations because they are just so excited to finally see their party gaining like this. And it really is, it's just tremendous. So it's, it's a, it's a huge win. And I think to be expected in light of everything that has transpired, we showed you the other day we were talking about the immigration challenges in Germany. And I told you that, you know, they're at 15% migration population. And this is something that I think so many people, you know, have said, okay, enough is enough. And that's in part the reality of what transpired, thanks to, thanks to miracle, right? Going back to Angela Merkel. And they thought they were doing the right thing, bringing everyone in from Syria. But it turned out to be politically any, anyway, very, very damaging for them. And economically, I would say very damaging for Germany. And then I would add to that, given what we've seen on welfare, et cetera, and even the crime rates, the people are so frustrated, because if you're 15% of the population, why are you accounting for nearly 50% of violent crime? Meet new grippy setting mist from Mabelie, New York. No tightness, no stickiness, no residue. Just plump, dewy hydrated skin that still feels like your skin. Try new grippy setting mist from Mabelie, New York. Maybe it's Mabelie. I mean, that's a number that's kind of hard to get your head around, right? And that's what the people are so frustrated with. Here we go. Big celebrations in Germany. Okay, you see Alize Vidal, the blonde woman there in the back, hugging everybody so excited because this is a big deal. It is a really big deal, guys. And I think that we're going to see a lot more from the right in Germany. And look, it's happening all through Europe, right? I mean, you think about what's been going on in Spain and in Saeuta and the disaster there. It's out of control. And you have this rise and this, they like to also call that when the alt conservative right movement there in Spain, it's actually a lot of young people, a lot of young professionals that are saying, listen, we need to look out for our economy, we need to look out for our future. And realistically, right, all of Europe, just like we, is going to have to come to some kind of solution for this, right, immigration problem. You cannot have an open border society because with immigration comes an increase in the cost to living. It comes with an increase in the cost on entire communities, whether that be on schools, whether that be on housing, whether that be on hospitals. And that is not something that communities are willing to take on nor can they, nor should they, right? I mean, you have countries in sovereignty for a reason. So this has got to change. And we've started to change it here. It's a big part of why Donald Trump was elected. And he's very proud that he has sealed that border shut. But this is what's happening all around the world. They're looking and saying, well, we need to do what the U.S. is doing. And they don't have any confidence in their leaders because their leaders have not been running their countries for the people of those countries. They're running the countries, I guess, like globalists who just want to open it up to the third world. And so what happens all the people that are still there, you know, from Germany, from Spain, from Italy, from France, from the UK, you cannot assume that they're going to be perfectly fine with just more and more people pouring in. I mean, you've got to get that under control and you've got to fix it. And so the AFD is actually a big believer in what they call, it's a, gosh, I'm, I'm blanking on the term, but it's relocation, basically, it's a deportation and a remigration, there we go. That's what it is. Remigration, they call it, where you remigrate back home to your own country. So if you do not have German citizenship, you can't be there anymore. And that is something that other, you know, folks in the political circle, if you would, like Mertz, find absolutely unacceptable. And they equate that with a form of racism, et cetera. And the AFD is saying, no, no, like if you're here illegally or if you've committed a crime, then you've got to go. And that is not racist, that is not unfair, that is just sort of logical, right, logical. But now what's going to happen is we've got to watch to see whether or not AFD is going to join forces with anyone else because they can finish first and actually still be kept out of government because this whole system that they got, that requires all this parliamentary support. And so what happens is other major parties have refused to form coalitions with the AFD. They call it the firewall. And what could be happening right now is this firewall could break. Georgia Maloney has been telling Germany, listen, you've got to do something. You cannot continue with this firewall because it is just, it is just, it's going to annihilate you, right? You are just not going to, I mean, you may actually wind up with an outright majority because everybody's going to just start voting for anything other than the socialist and the left. So politically, they're going to have their challenges, but it could come. It really could. Speaking of Italy, Italy is also dealing with these exact same immigration issues, as you know, and Georgia Maloney is getting out in front of these immigration issues today in a very big way over the weekend. She came out with some very big news in Italy. They're going to be outline the Berca and the head scarf. No, no more in schools, that is, you must go to school, Georgia Maloney said in a speech over the weekend with your face uncovered and in Italy, no one in the name of a real or supposed tradition can decide that a young woman must hide herself. Thank you. It's like somebody is finally standing up for women, right? For whatever reason, everybody wants to hide, oh, it's their culture, it's their culture, it's their culture. I'm like, I'm sorry, I'm not going to be okay with the culture of the treats women like that period full stop, all right? That may be their culture, but that's not legal, where we come from. That's not legal now that they're here. That may be legal in their country, not legal here, and this is what she's finally coming out and taking a stand on, especially as it results to women. You are not going to suppress women or tell them that they need to be covered in a country like Italy. I mean, especially in Italy, where it's Chabella, Chabella, right, all day long, and she's also going so far now is to say if there are too many migrants in a classroom, they're in Italian public schools, they're going to have to reject or things because they cannot have this many kids in the school system that do not speak Italian. Here we go. She says, if there is only one child in a class that doesn't understand Italian, that child will likely be able to learn the language and integrate quickly with the help of classmates and teachers. However, if the number of children who don't understand the language becomes large or even the majority that is no longer integration that is neglect. Thank you, Georgia. It's an important way of phrasing it here because in actuality, you're not doing those kids any favor. The ones that don't speak Italian and by the way, you're certainly not doing the Italian kids any favor because how the heck are they supposed to learn when they're surrounded by people speaking Arabic, right? I'm just saying, if 80% of the class is speaking Arabic and you're one of the only ones speaking Italian, then what happens in those classroom situations? I mean, we've seen it, right? In Minnesota, go out to Minnesota and you see in many of those public schools there where those kids are from. And so I'm just saying, there are some things here that they're doing in Europe that we might want to be taking a close hard look at because I think she's spot on with this. The Italian kids aren't going to learn and by the way, the kids that don't speak Italian are not going to learn in that kind of situation in terms of what the numbers are. I mean, obviously, certain communities are going to be much more heavily migrant than others. But the overall number in Italy is that nearly 12% of the students in the public school system right now in Italy are migrants. We're just talking about Germany. 15% of the population in Germany is migrant. When it comes to young people, 40% of the population, I mean, these are astounding numbers, right? Just astounding. And if you go to certain communities in Italy or in Germany, yeah, everybody's going to be speaking the same language and it's not Deutsche and it's not Italian, it is Arabic. And so this is something that they're trying to confront. I mean, and can you blame them? Going back again to her point that you're not servicing anyone, that this is actually a form of neglect. So I wonder if we're going to have a chance to be looking at some of these issues right here at home in places like Michigan or Minnesota. It might depend on who actually wins in some of these places, you know, I'll tell you, if Elsaid takes it in Michigan, I just, I mean, that can't happen, guys. That just can't happen. That cannot happen. But, you know, stranger things have happened. For goodness sakes, ma'am, dummy. One New York. Hmm. Well, now Donald Trump, Donald Trump says he's going to meet with ma'am, dummy on Monday. Oh, boy, he's going to sit down with them on Monday because he's going to be there for the General Assembly meeting anyway. So might as well make a pit stop at Gracie Mansion and talk to this guy. What do you think of that? I have some thoughts. There's a method to the madness, believe it or not. But don't forget, this is the guy that's doing them right now because he, along with a bunch of other states are saying, how dare you? How dare you make immigrating to the United States conditional on whether or not you need assistance in the next few weeks. Now nobody's gonna be able to get welfare, no. Because, you know, you really shouldn't come here, right? If you're gonna be a burden to the community in which you are joining. That's kind of the whole idea here. We don't want more economic burdens. Here we go, mandami saying totally unfair. - Drastic and unlawful changes to our country's public charge rule. A rule that makes it possible for someone to be denied immigration status based on the likelihood of their need for public benefits. Set to go into effect this coming Friday, September 18th, the new public charge rule expands the list of public benefits that might count against green card or visa applicants. If you are a citizen or an individual seeking humanitarian relief like asylum, these changes will not affect you. The new federal public charge rule not only sweeps aside more than a century of established law. It is intentionally vague as a means of creating uncertainty and fear to isolate immigrant New Yorkers, to force them to make an impossible choice between meeting their own basic needs and continuing to live in the city that they love. Make no mistake, this is an undisguised effort to strip New Yorkers of the services they rely on. The public benefits they are entitled to. Families, including those with children who are U.S. citizens have already begun to forego essential services like SNAP, Medicaid and affordable housing out of the fear that if they use these programs, immigration officers could use it as justification to deny them a future in our country. The toll of this new rule cannot be overstated. It is estimated that up to four million people from across the country could unenroll from their health care alone, including 1.8 million children. None of this is abstract. People could die. As a result of these changes, the rate of premature mortality in immigrant communities in New York City could increase by up to 10.6% within just the next five years. The data is clear. Denying people services does not erase their need. It compounds it, generating a greater cost to our system that will be placed on the backs of working people for years to come. Nothing about this rule will reduce waste or keep Americans safer or improve New Yorkers' lives. It is simply a vehicle for confusion and a vehicle for cruelty. Here in New York City, however-- Cue the violence, right? Cue the violence. What about the cruelty to all the people that get stuck, right, with not having the same access to housing, talking about housing inflation like we were just seeing in Germany and discussing, or what about people who don't have the same benefit of the school system, right? Because everybody's suddenly speaking another language. Anyway, there is a public charge provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act, Section 212A4 codified at 8 USC 1182A4. And it makes a person generally ineligible. Ineligible for a visa admission or a green card if Immigration authorities determine they are likely at any time to become, wait for it? A public charge? Imagine that. So what are you suing on? Mamdami, dummy, whatever your name is? What are you suing on, Zohran? I'd like to know. Because we have a law that says you can't-- you're not supposed to-- if you're going to become a public charge, if there's any suspicion about you becoming a public charge, then we don't need to allow you into the country. Anyway, the president has made this decision to go meet with Mamdami at Gracie Mansion. So you might be wondering, why is he doing that? Why? And part of me is like, because I can't even stand looking at the guy. And ever since he got up there and was laughing his head off with AOC, Alexandria Casio Cortez, at the 9/11 funeral, my gosh, I'm really done with the guy. Really, really, really done with the guy. But the president sees him. I would imagine as someone who is maybe a threat, maybe courting the likes of a lot of New Yorkers that are going down a very, very bad path. And so instead of just dismissing him, he's raising him up. And I think it's a really interesting kind of tactic. I don't think that Donald Trump does anything without thinking through-- maybe he doesn't really think through it, maybe it's just his instinct and his political instinct on this one-- is to actually raise Mamdami up. Now, why would he do that? Maybe it sends a message to the rest of the country. There's Sofran Mamdami in New York City. That's a nut job socialist that's from Uganda and just became a citizen like seven minutes ago. Oh, forgive me, seven years ago, who is now advocating for all this socialism and the redistribution of wealth and wants to tax everyone who owns a home in New York City while simultaneously publishing a list of, what was it, 900,000 names, ultimately, they found? Because God's darn it, if you have a home of a certain valuation in New York City, which believe me, valuations are pretty inflated there in New York City, although perhaps not for long. You're going to be on the list. And he's singling people out. It is a dangerous move. He is in my estimation, a dangerous man. But Donald Trump is choosing to meet with him. And so it could be like one of a couple of things. One, Donald Trump figures, hey, you know this guy, the more I bring attention to him, the more the rest of the country sees who he is and hopefully sees through what he is. Could also be a part of Donald Trump that's saying, look, you know, I get it. People are hurting. I mean, he's talking about his $5,000 check. He wants to give everyone if he keeps the house and keeps the Senate. You know, that would probably be pretty inflationary. And I'm not so sure we could afford it right now because it would cost somewhere around $1.2 trillion. We're going to $40 trillion, right? And that's a big ask. It's kind of what you might hear from a guy like that. But maybe he's saying, you know, people are hurting. And I've got to find a way to connect and find some common ground so that I can help these people. Not the migrants that Mamdame wants to come here and have a vote for him and live high off the hog off of your taxpayer dollars. But I think that, you know, you shouldn't discount anything that Donald Trump is doing and just say, oh, well, that's stupid, right? People did that on Greenland. They, oh, you know, it's so stupid. But actually, it made a lot of sense. Or right now, you know, he's coming up with this AI consulting border, whatever. He's got to do that in part because he's trying to be responsive to the hysteria out there. I would say, I would be hysterical if I thought that China was going to get ahead of us in this AI race. I mean, it is, and it's like an arms race. It's like a space war. It is like, you know, who's first to the moon? I mean, you just cannot let this one go. And Donald Trump gets that. But you've got the left running all the way they can with all these fears. And so they're, you know, so now he's got a panel, like some kind of group that's going to come on board and try and put, I guess, some parameters around this, although he's saying he just wants them to go full steam ahead, full charge ahead. The Democrats are trying to scare the living daylights out of everyone. And I would just say, you know, China has a role in that too. We put a piece up on this just last week. Actually, I encourage you to go and read 76research.com. It's my financial research company. And it was all about how China and some groups on the left that want control over AI are actually trying to feed this narrative of fear, fear, fear, fear, fear. And they want to sort of bury their heads in the sand, regarding progress. And I would just say, my fear comes from thinking that China would get ahead of us on something like this. Meanwhile, speaking of China, Xi Jinping is heading to the United States of America, we think. We think we're going to find out for sure on Thursday. Apparently, there's a lot of back room meetings going on at Treasury and Treasury Department is working to come up with some big announcements for us, big announcements when Xi Jinping comes, we think, to the Rose Garden on Thursday. But not everybody sure he's going to show up, OK? So there's these rumors going around the web. And we talked a little bit about them before. But my friend Gordon Chang, actually, he's been kind of all over this. And he says there's reason. He's a China expert. He says there's reason to pay attention to this. So I want to-- I'm going to show you what Gordon's saying. But I want to first tell you what people are saying. This is a guy named Wang Zhu-ji. And he's here in the United States. And he's part of the opposition for China. And he said rumor has it that Xi Jinping fainted at the brick summit hosted by India, forcing him to cut short his visit to India and return home early. It has said that a team of experts from Beijing's 301 hospital made the diagnosis. Xi suffered in a scheming stroke, commonly known as a transient, excemic attack, with the fifth plenary session of the CCP's 19 central committee approaching. She's contracting such a severe illness. Good mean he is unable to continue holding power once the CCP regime loses control. China will face fragmentation in civil war. And the regime will be liable to shatter at any moment. This got picked up by a reporter over at Washington Times, Bill Gertz, who covers China. And he said rumors are flying in China over Xi Jinping taken ill during the visit to India. They include claims that he suffered a minor illness to experiencing a stroke worsened by failure to treat early. Some wild claims say rival group armies are mobilizing for civil war. confirmation from Treasury Secretary Besent, which, you know, Treasury Secretary Besent would be meeting with his counterparts. He's actually the other day, when this news first surfaced. He was already meeting with the counterparts. He's still meeting with the counterparts. And we'll see whether or not the September 24th summit is still on. And then Gordon, as I said, wrote that there are these sensational rumors that the Chinese military is freed too of Xi Jinping's most powerful enemies. And if these rumors are true, then she will not feel safe leaving China. He does point out that they're kind of wild and almost hard to believe. But let's go to Gordon, because he was on Fox on Mark Leven's show over the weekend. And he had this to say for the, I don't, I don't understand why it's the best for it a little bit here. Let's go to Gordon. He's talking about AI, saying probably some similar stuff to what I just said. But let's go forward here to, okay, here we go. You know, he got sick. It was in India and so forth. At the opening ceremony of the bricks in New Delhi, he apparently either fainted or was showing signs of severe illness. Prime Minister Modi, who was speaking at the time, actually stopped mid sentence to ask how Xi Jinping was. Xi did not attend the closing dinner. And there is speculation of stroke. There's speculation just of feigning, but clearly something is occurring. But this is also occurring at a time when we're hearing these extraordinary rumors out of China. They're probably or not true, but the point is when there are rumors, it means something is definitely up. The most recent rumor and the one that has taken people by surprise is the thought that the Chinese military has actually freed two of Xi Jinping's most important adversaries. Whether that's true or not will only know later on, but it does mean that people are trying to destabilize the Chinese leader. And that means, you know, if Xi Jinping doesn't show up in Washington on Thursday, it means those rumors are probably true. Look, just, whoa, okay, so we get a watch for Thursday and we're going to be patient here, but I would just say, like, sometimes the devil, you know, is better than the devil you don't know. All these people that are wishing for Xi Jinping to go away or Putin to go away, I'm kind of like, alright, so what's the alternative, right? Jell to mist technology locks in your look for up to 24 hours, with flexible all day comfy grip. Just plump, dewey hydrated skin. What is the alternative? You're going to have civil war in China and don't forget, you know, the population is very male heavy, right? Because for years, you can only have one child and we know what happened to a lot of the girls that were born in China. So there's been a lot of concern in some think tank papers, which I happened to have read over the years about whether that population that is so charged with men would actually become very challenging down the road. I don't know, but I just kind of, I look at China and, you know, it's under control, right? It's the devil we know, we understand it, we think. If Xi Jinping were suddenly to take ill and you're dealing with some kind of civil war, Gordon is saying, you know, Zheng Lei and Zhu, forgive me on the names. Sorry. I'll work on the pronunciation before tomorrow. But anyway, you know, if you have these enemy groups coming forward, who are they, what's going to happen? Is there a power vacuum? Does it result in much more chaos? And so, you know, you have to consider these things. I want to point out that there's a video that was released of that very dinner where apparently Modi from India said, is it okay? And some people think he said, is he okay? A lot of people that do not like Xi, like this guy right here. No, not bill. Let me go to the opposition guy. Here we go. One Zheng Xi has suggested that this video I'm about to show you is actually just Russian propaganda and that they created it via AI to try and temper some of these stories. But, you know, I don't know, like is it conceivable that somebody could get food poisoning in India? What do you think? I've actually never been to India. But I know a lot of people that have, and most of them have told me at some point, they made the ill timed error of eating outside the hotel and they paid the price, okay? So I'm just saying, it's not implausible that you could have gotten food poisoning and made the decision to hi-tail at home as fast as he could, right? I'm just saying. But anyway, there is this video that's going around and it shows him apparently struggling with his IFB which he would have needed for translation. Let's watch it together. Okay, so you see him and they're playing with the IFB which is the earpiece that he would be using for the translation and at some point they're cutting away to Modi and as Modi says, is it okay? Is it okay? And so somehow this is it okay just got completely transferred into something else. Now again, this is according to the opposition, not a real video. So it looks kind of real to me, but who am I to say? I would also add that I saw this video of Xi Jinping getting on the plane as he was leaving India and this actually looks legit. To me, it doesn't look that sick, although I saw in the comments. Some of you guys have been saying, hey, you know, his left side seems quite weak which to you is indicative of perhaps a stroke. Here we go. Okay, you see him climbing the stairs and again, I am not enough of a professional on Xi Jinping's gate to know whether this is really unusual for him, but he is waving goodbye and some people are saying that yeah, his left side wasn't able to move quite as freely. So again, you know, he seemed to be alive when he was leaving India and we'll find out I guess very soon whether or not he's okay once he gets back to the United States on Thursday for that Rose Garden ceremony. I'm looking forward to seeing it. You know, who won't be there in the Rose Garden? CNN. No, CNN got kicked out on Friday along with Politico and Ms. Now, MSNBC, which goes by a new name these days called MS. Now, anyway, they're really in tough shape over at CNN. They've been forced to head out to the sidewalk where they're doing their White House reporting these days. Watch. I put my stuff through essentially what looks like airport security conveyor belt and then I tap my badge onto a card reader. I type in a four digit pin. I did all of that today. The only difference is that there was a group of cameras waiting outside that gate to watch me walk in and also there was a military band practicing ahead of a China state visit expected later this week playing battle him of the Republic rehearsing from the White House north grounds. So I walk in, I tap my badge and it beeps a couple of different times. It turns red, blue and green and it didn't accept my pin number. The Secret Service agent in the guard house with whom I have been friendly in the past asked to see my badge and I handed it over to him. He told me that it had been deactivated. I asked him if he could provide an explanation as to why it had been deactivated. He said he had no further information. I asked him once more if he had any more details he could share with me and he said that I should be referred to the White House press office to the Wranglers for more information. Trump has been suspended from Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and even Snapchat. But don't worry Mr. President, there are still plenty of apps you do have access to. You still have. All right, I want to go to that in a second. So you see a bunch of late night comedians on the screen and that takes us back to right after January 6, when the President of the United States, who was then still at the time, President of the United States actually was prevented from being on all of these various different apps. And I think it's kind of relevant to see and relevant to hear only because one of CNN's criticisms other than the fact that they're you know out on the sidewalk and the girl seems a little distressed that she get her badge seized. But one of the criticisms that they keep making is that this is somehow unconstitutional and against the law and against the first amendment. And I would just say I have a hard time on that. Let's go to actually stelter. Stelter is their media reporter guy. I guess he was there and then he got fired and somehow he came back. Anyway, he still not so hot on TV. But anyway, here he is talking about the first amendment violation, how this is unconstitutional. And I really don't think it is. I'll explain in just a second. But I think he's kind of out over skis on this one. Brian Stelter at CNN. This is a direct threat to press freedom in the United States as this happens in all CNN. But I'm trying to zoom out here and recognize this is a free speech test in America. Trump came out in his second term and said he was going to be the most transparent president with the most transparent administration defending free speech rights. But many of his actions sense have contradicted and undermined that promise. If you haven't subscribed, please make sure you do right now. So he thinks that this is unconstitutional. And I would just say, so I've been to the White House. I've been to the press briefing room. I've been doing this job for many, many years. Okay, I've been a correspondent at Network Television, Anchor and Cable Television and I've worked for a lot of different networks. There's really actually nothing you get from the White House briefing room. I'm just saying, okay, like the White House briefing room, you know, a bunch of people ask me a bunch of questions. You can actually also, they're very good about this. You can actually email the press secretary and ask the question over email. You can call the press secretary, in this case you can call the president. You know, most reporters actually have a lot of access to him and they can call him and they can talk about these things with him directly on the phone sometimes. So you know, this is a very, very transparent administration. I'm not sure that like being in the White House is the be all-end all. I don't think that you have to be in the White House in order to do this job. I should point out I was very, just a couple of days ago before any of this news, they actually invited me to come down and be part of that press pool in Washington. I think that's actually for this coming week. I owe them an RSVP. I can't actually make it because of a family commitment. But the point is I wasn't getting that invite from the Biden administration, right? I would have been too extreme for the fact that they kept, they kept Fox there because they kind of had to, right? But they got rid of, didn't they get rid of Breitbart and a whole bunch of Breitbart or had access and a whole bunch of other sort of right wing publications? They didn't allow any of those independent media types in or even not independent media types. I'm concerned if you weren't getting grandfathered in, I mean, Fox is lucky, I guess, to actually have that. I don't know if Newsmax was allowed in during those days. So I would only say that, you know, you don't have to actually have access to that room to do your job. And the first amendment doesn't guarantee access, right? Does it? No, it doesn't. It guarantees you're right to say something. So I'm not so sure that Brian and CNN and Politico and the rest of them are going to have much of a leg to stand on here. The other thing is this same exact crowd, the same exact one, you know, if you go back in time and you look at what was going on in 2021, and I've got this for you, actually, this is thanks to a Twitter account online called Maze and they take a look back. I think this is Maze actually, but they take a look back at a lot of these things. And if you go back to 2021, they were rejoicing over at CNN that the president no longer could tweet, no longer could say anything, basically online at all. I mean, that seems to me to be a much bigger violation of your freedom of speech when they actually take down your ability to say anything anywhere. And that's what happened, watch. There are, you know, these questions about Fox's, as Fox radicalizes and as it becomes even more and more of a political tool, Zurich, you wrote a column recently for the son about this same Fox should be viewed as a political tool and that raises a question. Should it be a part of the White House press pool, you know, should it be afforded the privileges to come with news gathering, even though they do have some news reporters at the White House, you're saying they're primarily a political tool show. So should that. Wow. Okay. I don't know if you're sure who's going to go on about how great it was that the president had lost access to all of these various social media platforms, but this is even worse than I thought guys. This is pretty bad. The same guy who just told you that this is unconstitutional and they couldn't kick, you know, they couldn't kick CNN out of the White House was actually arguing that Fox be kicked out. That is re, I mean, what a smell like what a hack, right? Like that is just pathetic anyway, let's continue listening to his rather poor and now that it comes back to haunt him, really indicted arguing reassessed, sir, what? And listen, I really do. I think it's a discussion we need to have. Look, you're not supporting democracy. You're not supporting the larger values of this culture. They don't even stand up as a opposition party, but there's nothing journalistic in what Lockwood Murdoch said. And you know what? I say, Hey, you know what? Let's take them at their word. Let's not let them on the plane. You want to let the proud boys on your plane on your on Air Force one? No, I don't think so. These guys are doing the same thing. Hmm. Whoa. Oh, my gosh. That's unbelievable. Okay, that's really, it just shows you. It just shows you, you know, they're just a bunch of turds really. I mean, these people, they're not out there defending the First Amendment. They're just trying to get a leg up on the competition. And by the way, that's some serious competition because Fox is like doing looped loops around CNN. CNN doesn't rate at all. I think we get better ratings than CNN for goodness sakes right here. Reminders subscribe. But this is the point that the late-night critics back when Trump was also taken off of every possible platform and couldn't say a piece of my, his piece of mine anywhere. They thought that was just great, right? I mean, the people that sit there and say, oh, free speech, free speech. And here they are. Trump has been suspended from Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and even Snapchat. But don't worry, Mr. President, if there are still plenty of apps, you do have access to. You still have Spotify to drown out the sound of millions of people cheering as you leave. Google, Apple and Amazon removed the parlor app from their platforms. Parlor is where all the right-wingers gather to post QAnon sense and misspelled the word parlor. Trumpers are complaining bitterly that they're being silenced. They, in fact, they won't shut up about being silenced. >> I love having Donald Trump off Twitter, not to mention all the other toxic racist and conspiracy theorists that have been booted off. >> Oh, damn, a lifetime Twitter ban has got to sting. They took away his precious. >> Twitter isn't the only social media site that wants nothing to do with our president. He's also been banned or restricted from a bevy of other platforms, including Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram, Reddit, and even Twitch. What are you waiting for, PornHub? It's not a coincidence. It's a consequence. I know it's hard for you to recognize it because you've never faced one before. Lifetime ban. These are Trumps, basically, the Pete Rose of social media. Right now Trump's phone is stuffed into a pile of rice after being drenched with tears. In addition to Twitter, Trump has been banned or restricted from Apple, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Google, Amazon, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit, Twitch, Dripe, Discord, and Shopify. Trump started this year thinking he should be on Mount Rushmore, now he can't even get on Instagram. >> However, our lives changed since Trump has been banned from Twitter. Well, I thought we'd take a quick look outside and see, has the world changed? Since our president has been banned from Twitter, let's just look outside and see what's going on. That was unbelievable. I mean, they took them off everywhere. It was such a crazy time. I remember I couldn't even say the word COVID on the air. I would be like, March to this day, like even in like normal conversation with family. It's so, I'm like March 2020, I have a euphemism for it, right? I mean, how crazy was that you guys? We can't go back to that. This administration is so transparent. They are so open. And they invite everybody to come in. He talks to everyone, including the left. I mean, he talks to everyone for goodness sakes, and they want to sit there and say that he's hurting their freedom of speech because they think they deserve a front row seat. The White House for goodness sakes? Forget it. You don't. We don't actually need CNN. You see, we've got plenty of people over there. And there's plenty of people that are rather, how shall we say, difficult, okay? There's plenty of them. And I really, I'm troubled, and I say that, you know, obviously, I support the First Amendment. That's why I was so upset back in the day when they did that to Donald Trump or forced me to have to say the words March 2020 instead of what it was, right? I mean, obviously, we don't want to be living in that kind of world. But I think it shows you, when you look back in time and you see that in 2021, CNN's media guy was actually calling for Fox to lose its credentials. And now they're flippin' out and saying, we can't believe we lost our credentials, and this is against the law. It shows you, does it not? The total hypocrisy and self-interest of that crowd, big time, big time. It's great to have you guys here on a Sunday night. I know this is completely outside our normal time, peace in my mind. I'm still nervous about midterms, too. I'm still nervous about midterms. I'm hoping the oil prices come down and come down fast. You know that we're getting 18 million barrels a day through the straight of Hormuz, so that's a big deal. We got Venezuela, but, you know, that's going to take a little while. We got Greenland, but there's no oil up there. Some natural minerals and stuff and some security rights. But listen, I'm with you, and I hope that we get midterms, too. We've got still a little bit of time, and a little bit of time is forever in politics. So we'll see. But thank you so much, guys, for all of you being here on candy. You made it. I see the last Boy Scout came back and a few others. A lot of names I recognize, including Clive Jenkins back in the house. Anyway, guys. Thank you. So much, please tell your friends, get them to subscribe, get them to watch the show, double check, and make sure you're still subscribed right here on the Trish Regan Show, and I'll see you tomorrow. (upbeat music)