Go back

Trump’s Global Strategy Raises Questions About a New World Order

22m 42s

Trump’s Global Strategy Raises Questions About a New World Order

The silence from global powers—Russia, China, and Europe—after Donald Trump’s Venezuela oil deal signals a deeper geopolitical realignment rooted in spheres of influence. The meeting between CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Russia’s intelligence chief appears to be a strategic exchange on shared power dynamics, particularly concerning Venezuela, Cuba, Ukraine, and Taiwan. Trump’s actions—such as undermining NATO, withholding defense support from Ukraine, and pursuing unfeasible oil deals—are viewed not as isolated decisions but as part of a broader effort to shift global power toward a multi-polar world. The Venezuela deal lacks economic viability due to poor oil quality, infrastructure gaps, and legal inconsistencies. Similarly, U.S. military moves, like relocating carriers to the Middle East, signal a weakened global presence. Coordination is also evident in regional tensions—between Israel and Turkey, and in the BRICS and SCO summits—where alliances are being restructured to counter U.S. influence. Figures like Marine Le Pen and Marco Rubio reinforce this ideology, promoting the idea of fixed regional spheres. The analysis suggests that Trump, Russia, and China are engaging in a calculated, behind-the-scenes alignment to reconfigure global power, with the U.S. appearing increasingly isolated and reactive. This shift reflects a world where sovereignty and regional dominance are prioritized over traditional alliances or multilateral cooperation.

Transcription

2964 Words, 16692 Characters

English
The complete and utter silence from Russia and China following Donald Trump's announcement of this purported deal with Venezuela tells us something deeper is going on, and I believe it relates to spheres of influence, and I believe that CIA director John Ratcliffe's visit to Moscow to meet with his counterpart there, the head of the intelligence community there, had to do with spheres of influence. The Trump regime has always viewed the world as being divided according to three spheres of influence. The United States controls the western hemisphere, Russia controls Ukraine and all of Europe, and China controls all of Asia with the Middle East and Africa up for grabs. Marco Rubio at the beginning of this Trump regime said as much, he said the old world order where the US was the only superpower and led organizations like NATO. He said that is done. We are in a multi-polar world, then he said the polls include United States, and includes China, and it includes Russia. And so when this trip happened by CIA director John Ratcliffe this past week, I believe that he tipped off the Russian head of intelligence about what was going to take place with Venezuela, and furthered a pact that existed of you stay out of our hemisphere. We're going to do our part to stay out of your hemisphere. And Donald Trump, as you've seen, continues to attack NATO. He continues to tap Zelensky along. I'm going to give you interceptors. I'm going to give you interceptor licenses, but then that never happens. And I also think that the message was delivered at this time as well because it was before the Venezuela deal was announced. And also it's before the Shanghai cooperation organization is set to meet in Kyrgyzstan, which is about to take place in the next day or two. And then there's going to be the BRICS meeting that's going to be taking place several days after that in New Delhi, India. And so I think you have this coordination at play. I also think that what's going on between Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, and Erdogan, the President of Turkey, is also part of this broader spheres of influence campaign that's taking place. Netanyahu being the proxy of the Trump regime. And I believe that Erdogan focusing more closely on bringing the Muslim countries together, the Arab countries together, with a potential leaning in a direction that would obviously be counter to the Abraham Accords, which was Donald Trump and Jared Kushner's initiative. And so I think we have this dynamic at play. Someone who agrees with me, and I want to share it with you, who I think that she's been spot on a few times is Patricia Marins. She says the quiet around Venezuela is especially unsettling. Not a word from European capitals, from Beijing, from Moscow, from Brazil, from anyone. The silence feels like indifference and more like a negotiated pack. One that ties Taiwan, Ukraine, Venezuela, and not far behind Cuba in the same unspoken bargain. And so I think that was also what was discussed in a spoken bargain, if you will, when Ratcliffe went over there to Russia. I think one of the main topics as well was Cuba, because obviously Cuba is being helped by Russia and China. And I think the broader discussion was not Ratcliffe delivering a message to Putin, saying, you need to stop bullying NATO and you need to stop bullying Ukraine and stop the invasion. Okay, if you've been following the Trump regime, you know that everything Donald Trump has done was attack NATO and undermine Ukraine. So why would you think that Ratcliffe would be there to deliver that message when Donald Trump's out there attacking NATO and deceiving Ukraine on a daily basis? I mean, come on, it's pretty obvious, I believe, that Ratcliffe was there saying, look, spheres of influence. Here's how it's going to go down. We're going to do this deal with Venezuela, where we're going to say we get 65 billion barrels of their oil. That's what we're going to do. Next, we're going to look to Cuba. We're going to try to unwind this catastrophic and unlawful war in Iran, although they're not going to phrase it that way. Iran is going to be showing up at the BRICS meeting as well as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. You have Bessent holding off, although he's too scared to do this anyway, sanctions against China or other allies of Iran. Donald Trump knows that this catastrophic and unlawful war in Iran is crushing him here at home. There's a lot of other reasons why he's being crushed at here at home. He's by far the worst president in American history as trade war against the world has been another disaster. Ice and Border Patrol, Gestapo, killing people, other disaster, covering up the Epstein files. I can go on and on and on. But Donald Trump wants to act like he's doing deals and he's getting wins. So he did this thing with Delcy Rodriguez. We get 65 billion barrels of oil. It's going to immediately fill our strategic petroleum reserves. And it's going to be great. And gas prices are going to go down. I've debunked this like multiple times, but just to go over it one more time. There's no infrastructure in Venezuela at this point to be able to actually extract the 65 billion barrels. It's hypothetical. Also, it's very sour and viscous and dense crude that doesn't go into our strategic petroleum reserves. Like the blend literally doesn't work. You'd have to make billions and billions of dollars of investments that will take multiple years to even allow the Venezuelan oil to even get into our strategic petroleum reserves. And then to make that oil accessible more broadly and start to get them into refineries, you're going to have to build refineries and infrastructure. And that's going to take years and years and years and years. And also it's likely unlawful or definitely unlawful in the United States without congressional authorization. And it's unlawful in Venezuela as well under their constitution. And this whole idea that the Pentagon is creating its own Pentagon Trump company that's going to own a stake in a Venezuelan oil company. And already there's discrepancies. But what Trump said, we have majority control. Delcy Rodriguez says it's 35% control given to the United States. It's not written down in any event as Michael Paulberg explains China is owed $10 billion in loans from Venezuela that they never paid back. Russia is owed $3 billion by Venezuela and paid for decades to keep Cuba afloat. She and Putin are happy with this spheres of influence model because they made bad bets and got burned. Trump has yet to figure this out. And so Xi Jinping, he'll be coming to the United States end of September for a day or two. What do you think he's going to be talking about? Of course, he's going to be talking about Taiwan. And what do you think the discussion is here? Why do you think the CIA directors flying in on a military plane to meet with his counterpart there? What do you think is being discussed here? You think it's him saying you better be careful. You better be careful. We're not out of our weapons here in the United States. We're going to strike back. No, that's not what they're discussing. I think they're discussing these deeper issues. Here's what we're doing in Venezuela. We know that Ratcliffe had been to Cuba. It's about it's about Venezuela and Cuba. It's so freaking obvious. It's staring us in our face and spheres of influence. He's he went to Cuba recently to threaten Cuba and Cuba's being helped right now significantly by Russia and China. So he's delivering the message. Those are ours. This is my opinion. Of course, you know, China will not be helpful in Taiwan. Look, we've already moved away the USS George Washington, the main aircraft care, the only remaining US supercarrier aircraft carrier in the Pacific has now been moved to the Middle East. And for the Trump regime, I mean the horrible conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln was also the perfect cover for them. They also don't treat our military service members at all with the respect they deserve. And don't give them the basic supplies and services. But then the Trump regime can say, aha, the USS Abraham Lincoln, we have you all wanted us to move. It's a we move that away. And now we're bringing in and now we're bringing in the George Washington. And so now the US isn't going to have a aircraft carrier really in the region that's capable of projecting power. And so, you know, China, Taiwan, Russia, Ukraine, Russia's gearing up for its big winter offensive against Ukraine right now. And then I think you see these battles taking place amongst the kind of midpowers as well. And, you know, you have escalation of Netanyahu's rhetoric saying as it relates to Turkey, I mean, you know, and saying, you know, Turkey's the enemy. We're going to, you know, we're not going to hesitate to strike Turkey. You have Erdogan and Turkey, who just announced the involvement of Turkey and the Mecca pact with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, saying that, you know, look, we're going to, of course, defend ourselves against Netanyahu. You have Netanyahu striking the airport in Syria, which they claim was being built by Erdogan. And so this is what's happening. throughout the world right now. And you want to know who speaks this way of spheres of influence. Basically the French Maga candidate, Le Pen, Marine Le Pen, and she's back. And her quote that she just gave in an interview is, Ukraine is part of Russia's sphere of influence. It's a fact, just like Canada is part of America's sphere of influence. And Le Pen, Marine Le Pen, is the Maga candidate in France. She was previously barred from the 2027 election on appeal of her. She was convicted in March 2025 of embezzling European Parliament funds. She was banned from office for five years, but that was reduced. So she was actually allowed to run. And so her guy, Jordan Bardella, who is going to run in her place gave her the spot. And that's what she's saying. And Donald Trump's attacks of Canada's 51st date. This is the spheres of influence being accelerated. And I also don't think it's a coincidence that this followed and that Donald Trump's acceleration of the attacks on Canada also followed that meeting in Russia. I think this is all being choreographed together and amongst Trump and Putin and Xi. I will remind you that back in February of 2025, Rubio spoke about his views of spheres of influence playing this clip. It was again, so it's not normal for the world to simply have a polar power that was an anomaly. It was the product of the end of the Cold War. But eventually, you were going to reach back to a point where you had a multi-polar world, multi-great powers and different parts of the planet. We faced that now with China. And to some extent, you know, Russia. And then you have rogue states like Iran in North Korea you have to deal with. So now more than ever, we need to remember that foreign policy should always be about furthering the national interest of the United. In February of 2026, before the US got involved in the catastrophic and unlawful war in Iran. But after the US invaded Venezuela, Rubio says, the old world is gone. We live in a new era of geopolitics. And this language is exactly the language that Putin uses. And the kind of Orban, Le Pen, that whole right wing, far right wing leaders, the magas style around the world, they all speak like that. I mean, here's what Rubio said. - The world is changing very fast right on average. The old world is gone. Thank you, the world is high grew up and we live in a new era of geopolitics. And it's going to require all of us to reexamine what that looks like and what our role is going to be. And it's not many of these conversations that fight with many of our allies. They are allies. And even continue to have those conversations. And I think Saturday, hopefully in the media, why are there when we'll continue then? - And then Rubio also said a few days after that. February 15, 2026. We in America have no interest in being polite caretakers of the West managed decline. And again, this is the approach. This is exactly, these are the words that Putin uses. Here, play this clip. - For we in America have no interest in being polite and orderly caretakers of the West managed decline. - Because previously right around that time period of March of 2025, Lavrov basically said the following. He said Rubio recognizes multi-polar worlds where countries power is defined by its strength. Smaller countries are second rate. We will want other Ukrainian territories where ethnic Russians live. You gotta pay attention to what all these people, you know, what they're saying, how they're behaving, what international meetings are taking place, and that's what leads me to believe. That's what Ratcliffe was actually doing there in Russia. Should also note, when Donald Trump was asked about what was going on there, Trump's like, yeah, I hate to let people down, but it was just fairly routine what was going on. Fairly routine here at play this clip. - Can we put something to rest here because the speculation is crazy. The CIA director, ours is in Russia. Rumors are saying Putin is going to test NATO resolve all the way to speculation that is crazy. He's going to strike England all the way to, this is maybe the US telling them about the Iranian sanctions saying we're serious about them. Can you tell me why our CIA director flew in the middle of the night to meet with the Russians? - Well, none of the above, he's there, you know, very sort of semi-routine, I hate to disappoint people. - And obviously, you know, Trump lies about everything, but I do believe these were part of conversations to say, hey, let them know. Here's what we're going to be doing in Venezuela. Here's what we're going to be doing in Canada. Obviously, you know, the US can't, so obviously go after, you know, Ukraine, but I think this is part of a plan that Trump and Putin have had for some time. I think this idea of tapping Zelensky along further about these interceptor licenses when Putin called Trump on July 4th. In my opinion, that 90-minute phone call focused on that plan as well. Putin's going to Putin summoned Lukashenko, the leader of Belarus recently, and I believe that there's a high likelihood that you may see a northern front open in the invasion of Ukraine as we head into the winter. And I think the US has set this up for Putin so that it's been choreographed in a way that Putin has what he wants right now going into the winter. Zelensky doesn't have the interceptors, doesn't have the licenses, out of a lot of defensive capabilities. We've seen movements right along the border, and in other areas that Russian control, that Russia controls, of building out the ability to project deeper and deeper strikes into Ukraine, lots of more ballistic missile launchers. You know, we've been seeing that set up. Russia's really ramping up its Shahidron production, really ramping up its ballistic production for this winter. Ukraine doesn't have a lot of resources to defend itself. So that's what I think Trump delivered for Putin in my opinion. On the other side, Venezuela, Cuba, I think that's being set up as well, and then as it relates to China, you have Xi stopping by for really only one day right there. And I think that the US attack on South Korea and saying, we support Trump saying I support Kim Jong-un. Trump's refusal to give Taiwan weapons that they need over there. I think that's the delivery for Xi. If you follow how Donald Trump has basically did what he did to Ukraine, but he's doing that to Taiwan right now, that's the gift over there. I think the silence from the European countries and the midpowers over what Trump's doing in Venezuela is acknowledging that what I just described is really what's at play right here. But they're doing everything they can to cement. Their relationship with Canada and elsewhere for them to unite and prepare for what they see is coming in the coming months, which is a real, this idea that you have this world that war. And so you have Prime Minister Karni. He's going to be speaking in front of the European Union Parliament for their state of the Union. He'll be there the next day. He's their honorary guest. So that's the dynamic to me. That's at play at these meetings. You tell me would you think, hit subscribe. Let's get to 7 million subscribers. Thanks for watching. Before you go, our book WTF America is available for pre-order now. It's the story of how we got here and how we find our way back to pre-order, scan the QR code, or click the link in the description. Let's do this. [MUSIC PLAYING] [MUSIC PLAYING]

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The silence from Russia, China, and European nations following Trump’s Venezuela oil deal suggests a coordinated, multi-polar spheres-of-influence arrangement.
  2. CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s covert meeting with Russia’s intelligence chief likely involved a strategic exchange on geopolitical boundaries, including Venezuela, Cuba, and Ukraine.
  3. Trump’s actions—such as attacking NATO, undermining Ukraine, and pursuing Venezuela oil deals—are framed as part of a broader strategy to shift global power dynamics, aligning with Russian and Chinese interests.
  4. The Venezuela deal is economically unrealistic due to lack of infrastructure, oil quality, and legal issues in both Venezuela and the U.S., undermining its feasibility.
  5. Geopolitical coordination is evident in upcoming meetings
  6. Figures like Marine Le Pen and Marco Rubio echo the "spheres of influence" doctrine, signaling a global shift toward multipolar power dynamics.
  7. Trump’s rhetoric and actions—such as withholding weapons from Ukraine and Taiwan, and moving U.S. carriers to the Middle East—suggest a deliberate weakening of U.S. global reach in favor of strategic deals with Russia and China.
  8. The U.S. is perceived as strategically disengaging, while Russia and China are consolidating influence in Cuba, Venezuela, and Taiwan, indicating a deliberate realignment of global power.

Summary:

The silence from global powers—Russia, China, and Europe—after Donald Trump’s Venezuela oil deal signals a deeper geopolitical realignment rooted in spheres of influence. The meeting between CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Russia’s intelligence chief appears to be a strategic exchange on shared power dynamics, particularly concerning Venezuela, Cuba, Ukraine, and Taiwan. Trump’s actions—such as undermining NATO, withholding defense support from Ukraine, and pursuing unfeasible oil deals—are viewed not as isolated decisions but as part of a broader effort to shift global power toward a multi-polar world.

The Venezuela deal lacks economic viability due to poor oil quality, infrastructure gaps, and legal inconsistencies. S. military moves, like relocating carriers to the Middle East, signal a weakened global presence.

S. influence. Figures like Marine Le Pen and Marco Rubio reinforce this ideology, promoting the idea of fixed regional spheres.

S. appearing increasingly isolated and reactive. This shift reflects a world where sovereignty and regional dominance are prioritized over traditional alliances or multilateral cooperation.

FAQs

The visit likely involved discussions on spheres of influence, particularly regarding Venezuela and Cuba, and coordinated actions among major powers to manage geopolitical tensions without direct confrontation.

The silence indicates a negotiated understanding among major powers, signaling mutual agreements on spheres of influence, including Venezuela, Cuba, and Taiwan, rather than public opposition or intervention.

The deal is not technically feasible due to Venezuela's lack of infrastructure, the oil's poor quality, and legal issues in both Venezuela and the U.S., which would require massive investments and congressional authorization.

Trump's undermining of NATO and failure to provide Ukraine with interceptor licenses align with a broader strategy of reducing Western alliances, reinforcing a multi-polar world where power is defined by influence, not alliance structure.

China is seen as a key player in the Asia-Pacific sphere, with strategic interests in Taiwan, Iran, and BRICS, and it is likely engaging in coordinated diplomacy with Russia and other powers to counter U.S. influence.

These meetings signal growing coordination among non-Western powers to challenge U.S. dominance, especially in energy, trade, and security, reinforcing a multi-polar world order focused on regional sovereignty.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.