Go back

Trump's Done For After This Bomb Drops

16m 56s

Trump's Done For After This Bomb Drops

The new Democratic Party is responding to a clear public mandate for accountability, transparency, and justice after the 2024 election. Leaders like Robert Garcia and Jamie Raskin have unapologetically called out the Trump family and corporate-linked figures for misconduct, asserting that no one—regardless of name—is exempt from investigation. Critics argue that established Democrats such as Chuck Schumer and Jeffries have betrayed the public by prioritizing donor loyalty over principle, particularly in their ties to Big Tech and private meetings with Jared Kushner. The movement highlights the growing voter demand for money-out-of-politics, with Michigan’s 81% approval of a utility contribution ban serving as a powerful signal. Figures like Abdul El Sayed represent a new wave of inclusive, morally grounded leadership that challenges both partisan hypocrisy and corporate influence. The public is calling for bold, uncompromising governance that reflects the will of working Americans, not special interests. A nationwide petition urges Democrats to reject appeasement and instead elect leaders who stand up to corporate power. This shift marks a fundamental redefinition of the party’s identity—no longer a centrist compromise, but a true reflection of public values, accountability, and justice.

Transcription

2906 Words, 16086 Characters

English
All right, the new Dems are here and they have a mandate and Americans want deliverables. We want you to deliver for us materially and we want you to hold MAGA in this horror show. We want you to hold every single one of these criminals to account. We are the party of law and order. We do not elect convicted felons and Robert Garcia, friend of the show, incredible American, credible congressman, chair of the Oversight Committee says none of the Trumps are off limits. Enjoy, play the clip. >> Through the list that you and the Oversight Democrats put out this morning concerning. Good morning to everyone except first the Trump crime family. Is anyone with the last name Trump, his kids, his wife off limits? >> No, I mean, look, if you are part of that family, you have been involved in grift and we've seen that, right? I mean, think about everything from Don Jr.'s red wedding, getting an oligarch to pay $100,000 of dollars for the wedding. Sun sitting on boards of companies are getting essentially contracts from the Pentagon. Trying to buy private islands, two billion from the Saudis, right when you walk out of the White House from Jared Kushner, the crypto schemes. I mean, the list goes on and on and so there are serious issues here. There are serious allegations of what they've been involved with, paid a play, and so we've got to investigate, we've got to have real hearings, and we've got to demand there to be justice. >> Josh. >> Hey, Hakim, Chuck, that's how you answer a question, okay? I mean, I love that. That's music to our ears. He answers it unequivocally with no denial. There's no side stepping, no bullshit. It's just if you've got Trump in your last name, then it's free game. Everybody's an open target. And as they should be, I mean, reporting on the grifting of the family goes on and on and on. It's unprecedented. Trump's net wealth has increased like 300%, 400%, I don't know what it is, but that is how you answer a question. As it should be, for anybody, if you break laws, it doesn't matter who you are, you're subject to being investigated. And there's been enough reporting, I mean, just diagnoses him day in and day out. So kudos to Robert Garcia, kudos to the answer of that question. I want other politicians to take note. That's how you answer a question. >> That's exactly right, that he, nobody is off limits. We are all sitting here being traumatized, watching all of this stuff go down, and Chuck Schumer and Hakim Jeffries, we have to do everything in our power to remind the new Dems, you were elected, and we want you to vote these people out of leadership positions. This is an historic moment that people will read about, that after this fascist takeover, the new Dems came in, and you can either be the Democrat that voted to Neville Chamberlain, to merit Garland it, and just be an appeaser, and you voted for these two losers that can't stand up to their donors. Before you said, I'm a new Dem, I saw the mandate, I saw that we turned deep red states blue. I heard the agony of Americans that wanted affordability and accountability. And I voted to oust these compromised leaders, and I voted to oust and end the era of prostitution politics. And so we're going to put pressure on every single one of these new Dems, be bold. The election results were bold, therefore your leaders need to be just as bold. The leaders need to match the blue NAMI and Jeffries and Chuckles do not even come close to that. Jamie Raskin does, though. I love him. Jamie Raskin completely destroys Dan Crenshaw in a debate over corruption. I just want to remind everybody, it's probably a rough time for Dan Crenshaw. He's from Texas. Play the clip. Stop insider trading, funny because that corruption was a major campaign issue. Very effective. It happened. Let's stop there. You see that. Why did the Senate Democrats block the Stop Insider Trading Act then? I bet they're willing to work with Trump on this after the midterms, but let's be very honest about that. You think Donald Trump wants to stop insider trading in the executive framework? I think he'd vote for it. Yeah. Look, it passed away willingly from Republicans. Let's mark that down. Let your shirt. Sure. Because their vote administration is about it. You were missing the point. The point is, no, you're missing the point and you guys lost the election because you missed the point. Oh my God. We're on war, aren't you? Listen, listen for a second. Listen for a second. Listen for a second. Listen for a second. You're unconstitutional. Stop interrupting me. Love it. Love it. Love it. Love it. Josh. How far is CNN falling? That's the first thing I, when I watch this clip, I love Jamie Raskin. Don't get me wrong, but watching that give Dan Crenshaw a platform to talk and it's just like a circus. It's a zoo. Letting a guy like that get on there and he can't, he's not capable of having any meaningful debate with Jamie Raskin. It just ends up being a circus. It's like when you're on the panel with Scott Jennings, it's just a goddamn pre-forall of just bullshit and nonsense and it platforms these people that would otherwise not have any voice or opinion. The last time I was on CNN, Dan Crenshaw was there and it was after that that I decided I'm never doing this show again and I love Abby. But he was sitting there lying and lying and lying and lying and lying and he was filibustering and hogging all the air time and I just thought this is not good. This person should not be, everybody should stop him immediately and say you are lying and we don't allow lies on this show. It's why people are turning to independent sources of media like your podcast, minus touch and others because watching that, that's just garbage. It's just total garbage and so anyway. All right. And Abdul El Sayed goes on morning Joe this morning and shows moral clarity and Abdul is really smart. He's a politician like Rocana that goes everywhere. They go on Fox, they go on conservative podcast, they go on liberal podcast, they go on corporate, they go everywhere. And if you remember back from the 2024 election, Kamala was very choosy about where she went, Trump went everywhere as well. And so here is Abdul going on morning Joe, play the clip. Other when it comes to rights, so that if they come for your rights, they're coming for all of our rights because our rights are rights are rights are rights. It's not about how you use your rights, it's about whether or not you are sent to government trying to take your rights. If we're committed, that government should be about providing you the basic means of a dignified life and protecting your rights, let's all come together around that center temple and fight together. That's what I think this new iteration of the Democratic Party is doing. That's why this party looks like America, but that's also why we have a chance to actually govern on a real mandate that can solve problems for people. He said some very important things there. He's echoing that the new Dems, the new Dems have arrived. And he said, you have a party that looks like America. And that's what's so threatening to the people over at Fox and to a lot of these bigoted Republicans because we do have Muslim Americans here and they are welcome. And Abdul represents the people of Michigan and he won by seven points. And he understands such a basic thing that corporate media tries to say doesn't exist. Universal human rights, none of us are free until all of us are free. And that includes little Palestinian kids that we don't want to send our taxpayer money to kill. And by saying that, and by criticizing Israel for killing children. It doesn't make us a bigot. It makes us morally sound people that are brave enough to look at APAC and look at people within our own party like Chuck Schumer and Hawking Jeffries and say, how dare you? How dare you claim to care about human rights? And then vote for that horrific regime, Israel that kills little kids. How dare you be a hypocrite? We're not in a cult. We're not stupid. Take that shit to maggot. Works better over there. We deserve politicians like Abdul and people in our own party, Chuck Schumer and Cory Booker. Cory Booker, somebody called and told him to tweet to endorse him. But I don't think Chuck Schumer ever really endorse him. It's just like a tepid little tiptoe in tweet. They weren't on the campaign trail with him. Why? Because APAC people like, we can't have a Muslim that throws off all of our propaganda. Yeah. And when you don't take Israel first, super PAC money, which Abdul El Sayed doesn't clearly, it gives you the freedom, the ability to be transparent, to go on any show that you want to. You talked about Kamala Harris and others that were guarded about places where they would go. Because they're afraid of questions that they're going to get asked. And so when you're a candidate like like Abdul El Sayed and others that aren't leveraged, we've used that word a lot leveraged, then it allows you to have the freedom to go anywhere and everywhere and discuss your policies and your platform for people. And that's a huge part of this because these other candidates, they won't go to places. You mentioned also the podcast that before anyone comes on your podcast like Cory Booker, you wanted another questions. When you're free and not leveraged, you don't care what the questions are. You're going to show up and you're going to discuss your policy, your platform, your plan for America, induce so with freedom because you can give any answer you want without fear of retribution or punishment. You don't have to change your answer based on what you're talking to. That's right. There's freedom in that. I would imagine that Hawkeem, who wants to be the Speaker of the House, who's already taken victory labs, I would imagine his conversation with Jared Kushner is completely different than his conversation. he has with the people in his district. I would argue that his conversation that he has with Big Tech, who for sure had been calling him like crazy because now they know we can't get money to mag anymore, we gotta go buy off the Democrats, is a completely different conversation than what he has with the American people. And sometimes it slips out a little bit 'cause I think, and this is just my opinion, I think Jared met with him and said look, y'all are probably gonna win and it's gonna be a butt, blood bath. If you promise to tone down investigations and stuff, we won't claim election interference and I'll get the old man to not say cheat and cry foul and all this stuff, but tone down the investigation, so it's not impeaching. It was not about affordability. Hawking Jeffries, in my opinion, lied to the American people when we said why the fuck are you meeting with Jared Kushner? What can Jared do about affordability? All he's doing is about, Jared is about taking American taxpayer money for himself. It's just not even believable and I want accountability, not only from these Republicans, I wanna know what the fuck was said between Hawking and Jared. I want an investigation into that. That's how into investigations I'm in. - I'm sure it related to Kushner telling his story about how he lifted himself up from his bootstraps and really had to work hard. Really about affordability, really. - So yeah, I agree with you, like the whole thing. - So let's move along here. Haley Stevens, who was hand picked by Chuck Schimmer, Chuckles, who wants to be our leader. The same Chuckles who dicked over Angie Nixon because Angie Nixon criticized Israel. The same Chuckles who refused to go down there, refused to endorse or refused to send her big money. And she could have won. He endorsed Haley Stevens. I'm gonna suck it too, Mom, that gal. Let's suck it 'til I see Israel and my dreams. - You sound like her. - Not even Jewish. - Thank you. - It's a good imitation. - Maybe, thank you, maybe. Okay, Haley Stevens responds to Abdul-winning Michigan pop this up. Haley Stevens doesn't directly congratulate Abdul-Elsaid on winning the Michigan Senate race and says she has no regrets over voting for microaggers. And to that, I wanna say, shut the fuck up, Haley. Shut the fuck up. I mean, you, your MAGA, you have no regrets on voting for a complete war-hawk anti-women homophobe bigot who has noncy sympathizers according to reports on his staff and you see Israel in your dreams. You're a weirdo. I am so grateful that you expose the centrist game that you have more in common with MAGA than you do a progressive that doesn't take corporate money. Thank you for exposing that 'cause that's gonna help our progressive movement moving forward. From this day forward, we will look at centrist and we will say, I'm getting Haley Stevens vibes from this candidate. And that is a very important gift that you gave us is we build a people-powered new-dim movement. - I wonder how much money APEC will give Haley Stevens now. When she, and what is her profession? I don't know if she's a lawyer, but if she's in the private sector, is she of any help to APEC or any of these super PACs? No, she's not. And Chuck Schumer endorsed her. So what's the common thread there? Well, it's APEC. She just, like you said, she just needs to go away. Every time she talks, she digs the whole deeper and deeper and deeper. There's no defense for supporting microaggers zero. None. Anytime you talk about that, you're digging your own grave, deeper and deeper. - Right. All right, and then finally, Americans showed us that they want money out of politics, pop this up. Another big deal for getting money out of politics, Michigan voters have by 81% approved a ban on campaign contributions from electric and gas utilities. Companies whose profits depend on government decisions will no longer be able to bankroll the politicians making them. So Michigan, we have a Canary in the coal mine here, 81%, by partisanship support of money out of politics. How came and chuckles, we don't want this. We do not want politicians that have to answer, have two different sets of answers to the electorate. Because honestly, it makes us feel like you're kind of Haley Stevens-esque. And so that's the biggest gift Haley Stevens gave us. She can be a verb and she can be an adjective moving forward as we identify compromised Democrats. For example, how came Jeffery's donors being big tech in A-pack and his private meeting with Jared Kushner make me feel like he's giving Haley Stevens vibes. And what that means is that on a dime, you can just switch and vote for a Republican. And I think that she did end up giving us a gift and it shows us how dangerous moderates and centrist that take a shit ton of corporate PAC money are for everyday working Americans. Final thoughts Josh. - Well, I read something recently. The state of Montana is trying to pass a state law basically to eliminate citizens united and super PACs in their state, which is interesting. You would see a decision on a state law versus the Supreme Court ruling. But I mean, there are other people that feel this way. Everybody feels this way. For the obvious reasons, we don't have to regurgitate over and over. But it takes the heart and soul away from politicians and it takes the will of the people's voice to politicians in a sense that they don't follow the will of the people. They follow the money and it just needs to go, needs to go. - Completely. But let's keep, I can go to change.org. There is a petition with about half a million signatures the last time we checked to send to all of the new Dems that we do not want Chuck Schumer to be, sorry, Hockim Jeffries to be Speaker of the House. The same goes, contact your senators and tell them a vote for Chuck Schumer the way we see it is a vote for MAGA and we want no part of any sort of Neville Chamberlain style appeasement in this mandate that we have given them. We want a fighter that is not beholden to corporate interest and that's what we deserve. Make sure you like and subscribe and we will be back later with more news. (upbeat music)

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. Robert Garcia and other Democratic leaders have made it clear that no member of the Trump family is off limits for investigation, emphasizing accountability for alleged crimes and grifting.
  2. The new Democratic Party is demanding bold action to end the era of "prostitution politics" and to remove leaders who compromised on issues like corruption and accountability.
  3. Jamie Raskin's confrontational debate with Dan Crenshaw highlights the need for genuine political debate, criticizing the show’s failure to hold conservative figures to account.
  4. Abdul El Sayed’s moral clarity and willingness to speak freely on human rights, including criticism of Israel’s actions, reflect a new Democratic authenticity and inclusivity.
  5. Voters in Michigan have approved an 81% ban on campaign contributions from utilities, signaling strong public support for money-out-of-politics reforms.
  6. Critics accuse Chuck Schumer and Jeffries of hypocrisy, pointing to their ties with corporate donors and private meetings with Jared Kushner as evidence of loyalty to MAGA interests.
  7. The growing public backlash against centrist Democrats who accept corporate PAC money shows a clear mandate for a more transparent, people-centered political movement.
  8. State-level efforts, like Montana’s push to repeal Citizens United, reflect a national movement to reduce political influence from special interests and restore democratic integrity.

Summary:

The new Democratic Party is responding to a clear public mandate for accountability, transparency, and justice after the 2024 election. Leaders like Robert Garcia and Jamie Raskin have unapologetically called out the Trump family and corporate-linked figures for misconduct, asserting that no one—regardless of name—is exempt from investigation. Critics argue that established Democrats such as Chuck Schumer and Jeffries have betrayed the public by prioritizing donor loyalty over principle, particularly in their ties to Big Tech and private meetings with Jared Kushner.

The movement highlights the growing voter demand for money-out-of-politics, with Michigan’s 81% approval of a utility contribution ban serving as a powerful signal. Figures like Abdul El Sayed represent a new wave of inclusive, morally grounded leadership that challenges both partisan hypocrisy and corporate influence. The public is calling for bold, uncompromising governance that reflects the will of working Americans, not special interests.

A nationwide petition urges Democrats to reject appeasement and instead elect leaders who stand up to corporate power. This shift marks a fundamental redefinition of the party’s identity—no longer a centrist compromise, but a true reflection of public values, accountability, and justice.

FAQs

No, members of the Trump family are not off-limits. Robert Garcia, chair of the Oversight Committee, stated that anyone involved in grifting or misconduct, including Trump family members, is subject to investigation.

Allegations include Don Jr.'s $100,000 wedding paid by an oligarch, Jared Kushner's crypto schemes, private island purchases from the Saudis, and involvement in Pentagon contracts through board positions.

Democrats argue that these individuals have engaged in illegal or unethical behavior, and they believe accountability is essential to uphold the principles of law and order and transparency in government.

The 'new Dems' refer to the wave of Democratic politicians elected in the 2024 election, who claim to represent a mandate for accountability, affordability, and real change, in opposition to what they see as compromised leadership.

Jamie Raskin is praised for his boldness in challenging Dan Crenshaw on corruption and for holding powerful figures accountable, demonstrating a new standard of political integrity and courage.

Abdul El Sayed's win reflects a shift toward inclusive, morally grounded politics, showing that Democrats can appeal to diverse communities and stand for universal human rights without compromise.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.