The transcript critiques Donald Trump’s political rhetoric and behavior, portraying his rallies as incoherent, demeaning, and designed to humiliate supporters rather than serve the public. It highlights how Trump mocks economic realities—such as making a $5,000 “guest” fee for a hamburger—while claiming to represent the working class, exposing a deep contradiction. The narrative centers on everyday Americans, like a Michigan hairdresser, who point to soaring living costs and systemic failure as their primary concern, demanding policy focus on affordability over ideological purity. Figures such as Senator Rafael Cruz are shown as emotionally dependent on humiliation, suggesting a broader pattern of submissive, self-deprecating behavior among political figures. A key moment involves grand jurors rejecting an indictment of Cassidy Hutchinson, symbolizing resistance to politically driven prosecutions and affirming that ordinary citizens possess moral power to challenge authority. Additionally, the defamation lawsuit against CNN’s Scott Jennings is presented as evidence of media manipulation and political risk-taking. Ultimately, the piece argues that true democratic strength lies not in elite power, but in the collective courage of ordinary people to speak out, resist, and vote—emphasizing that civic action is essential to countering authoritarianism, economic failure, and misinformation.
Every single day the president of the United States wakes up, applies this makeup, allegedly probably puts on a diaper, goes out in the lies, rips people off, and then does these rallies where he says gay stuff. This is the Republican party's closing message before the midterms rally after rally after rally after rally. Play the clip of the meat. Ah, I love it. Look. We know we get it. We understand that this is something you are laser focused on Mr. Trump. You watch that clip. I feel like I get dumber every time I have to report on this literally by watching this and then seeing the people cackle behind him when he just makes no sense. He's like that, you know, relatives that you have over the holidays that's drunk and old and can't remember stuff, except it's our president showing up speaking and people these seals as you refer to them as are back there clapping laughing instead of looking at each other. If you and I were at that rally, we'd be like, what fucking planet are we on? How did we get to this place? How do we get out of this place? Yeah. And, you know, they all have been melting down since Barack Obama through shade at Donald Trump's Oval Office decor and referred to it as the cheesecake factory. And they have just been, I mean, the stage five meltdown over at Fox. And what so hilarious about this is they're acting like Trump is the working man's president. He is the he is the champion of the working class. But speaking of all the clapping idiotic seals, watch this video. This is the same rally where he's doing the gay stuff with loving meat and simulating, putting meat in his mouth. Here he is mocking his own supporters yet again, straight to their faces, play this clip. Even come to Mar-a-Lago, I said it the other night. You'll be my guest at Mar-a-Lago. The problem is that for $5,000, the most you'll be able to buy is a hamburger and maybe a small dessert. I don't, I'm not even sure you could buy that. No, don't go there. That's not a good place for your price. You'll be my guest, but I'm also going to gouge you $5,000 for a hamburger. And they go on about, this guy is the working class president. I mean, that is just utter disdain. And Ruth Bengea, an expert on autocrats says they despise autocrats despise their supporters. They have disdain for their supporters. And he shows this time and time and time again. Yeah, and you can see he's looking out there thinking to himself, and he kind of says it out loud that none of you people, none of you idiots, could afford to come there, so don't come. I mean, that's clear. And, you know, how many times do we have to watch this? I mean, how many rallies do we have to see? And just in a broader context, it's good for the Democrats, because his message is so plot and garbled and mixed. And he's just all over the place he makes no sense. And it's really helpful for Democrats, for the American people to have to see the president of the United States every night get up and speak like that. It really is. Even though it's painful for us to have to watch it and report on it, it's helpful. All right. So here is a hairdresser in Michigan. And she's interviewed by a new station. And this is what everyday Americans that don't die hard political junkies. This is what they're truly laser focused on. Play the clip. It is a bit too lengthening to win in Michigan. At this point, what do we have to worry about? Anything but what we have? We're on our way to Hill. So at this point, socialist, socialized, social, don't matter to me, lower my cost of living. That is the push right there. And for people to think that this president and this Republican Congress that have done the tariffs that exacerbated inflation that started a war, which has just skyrocketed gas prices, Donald Trump says, I don't give a damn about gas prices. We're making it, you know, a shit ton of money. And this is an everyday American who said, all of you pundits and all of the bickering in the consultant class, I don't care what you call. If somebody's a DSA, if somebody's a socialist, if somebody's not a capitalist, I don't give a shit because the system we have right now is broken and it's not working. And we need for people to reign it in. That's right. And what she's saying there should be the slogan really for Democrats. Like, call us whatever you want to, whether you want to pick a trans issue, whether you want to be a muslim hater, whatever it is you want to say, say it, but how is that making your life better? Because that's kind of what she's saying. She's like, I don't give a shit what you talk about. The cost of living for me is just too high. I need help. We're drowning. We're all going to hell. That's what she said. And that's kind of the way everybody feels. Like all this hate and rhetoric that they spew against candidates and how their pro-trans or your kid's going to wake up, Johnny, he's going to come home a girl and all this stuff. Literally, what's that going to do for your pocketbook? How is that going to help you pay your bills? How is that going to help you fill your car up with gas or afford to send your kids off to school? Well, it doesn't at all. And that is the thing. That's why people are pissed. And a Democratic socialist ran on this. Laser focused, his name is Zoraan Mamdani. And he took on all of the billionaires. He beat the Democrat Cuomo twice. And he was laser focused on affordability. And nobody gave a shit that he was a DSA candidate because capitalism works for very few. And it works really, really well for them. Look at Donald Trump. Look at Elon Musk. Look at Jeff Bezos. But for the overwhelming majority of Americans, it has failed them because capitalism is always going to favor profits of these border directors on these Fortune 500 companies. But I want to just go back to the people that are fixated still on Trump. And I have always said and guessed that there's a humiliation kink involved with this, that people that hitch their wagon to Trump inherently like to get humiliated, that they are masochists, that they like feeling humiliation. And nobody really exemplifies this as much as Rafael Cruz, the senator from Texas. And Rafael was at this rally where Trump was eating the meat and mocking the supporters. And he floats nominating Ted Cruz to the Supreme Court. Let's play that clip. Have to worry about. I wouldn't even have to make a phone call. The Democrats will 100% vote for it because they hate the guy and they want to get rid of him. And the Republicans would 100% vote for it because they can't stand him. They would like to get rid of him. So I'd get 100% of the vote. And he would be a Supreme Court justice and he'd do a great job. Okay, so I thought to myself was Rafael there when he said that. And I'll be god damned Kylie pop this up. Look at him right there smiling with his arm up waving like a clapping seal over there. Like you're right, everybody hates my guts. And thanks for pointing it out that there's bipartisan support that all the Democrats hate me and then vote to get me out of the Senate. And every single one of my Republican colleagues hates my guts. And they would vote to get me out of the Senate. He is smiling, enjoying the humiliation. And the way these magma men cannot stand up for themselves, cannot stand up for their wives, cannot stand up for their a better life for their children. And to base themselves for that man that wears a full face of makeup that's like I like meat. You know, it's really a study here in just the humiliation that these submissive tradwives around Donald Trump engage in and put Rafael back up again. Look at him, Josh. Yeah, he's frothing at the mouth to sort of jump over that rail and chase Trump down and literally it's so embarrassing and Cruz is one of those guys like he fits right in the mold of Donald Trump because he would nominate him for a Supreme Court justice because he knows that he would have the biggest political whore in his pocket for the rest of Ted Cruz's life on the Supreme Court. He would know that because that's who Ted Cruz is. And yeah, it's like you said, like Ted Cruz, I don't know how that guy wakes up every morning, sits down and looks at his children in the eyes. With what he does every day. I don't know how any of these guys do. If you're trying to set an example for your kids, the guy can't go anywhere without being booed. We showed him an F1 race in Austin and just literally got booed off. He was only there for 10 seconds trying to hand someone a trophy and people hate him so much. But like you said, it begs the better question, why does he get off on it so much? Why does he enjoy it so much? So many of these men just love getting humiliated. By Trump. And you can because they sign up for it time and time again, we're a normal person. That's just an ounce of self-confidence, self-respect would be like, you know what? Fuck you. You might be president or you're not going to be president forever. Fuck you.
And it's whether it's the tech oligarchs, Ted Cruz, the way they've been the need to him is just a master class and how to be a beta male. And yet they are like we're so alpha. It's just every accusation is a confession with these people. All right, completely shifting gears. Israel had their election yesterday and the results are kind of in, pop this up. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ledged past opposition leader Gotti Eisenkott in the country's tight election with more than 70% of the votes counted, though neither yet has a clear path toward forming a government. I read that this probably won't be in until the end of the week. So we'll be keeping an eye on that. And now I want to move to the weaponization that Donald Trump is doing with the DOJ. Pop this up. Breaking news, a grand jury rejected the DOJ's attempt to indict former White House aide, Cassidy Hutchinson, for the account she gave lawmakers of President Trump's actions during the January 6th attack on the US Capitol, according to police familiar with the matter. Josh, you're in a criminal defense attorney. I have always heard that grand juries would indict a ham sandwich. How significant is it that they're not getting indicted? Well, let me frame it in this context. Before Donald Trump became president the second time, I've never heard. It's so rare that a grand jury would not move or vote for an indictment of a defendant once presented by a competent US attorney. And here we read about it all the time. It's a common practice. And that shows you right there that they're bringing cases that have no merit. I mean, it just never happened, but the bigger picture, and this is something I wanted to focus on. So grand jurors are everyday citizens. They're summons by the court. They live presumably in that district and show up every day or a certain number of days each month for a fixed term and less into evidence and work under the supervision of the US attorneys and the court clerk's office that are there. And they're everyday people. Some may be janitors, some may be doctors, some may be plumbers. And so I want to think about this. When we talk about stepping up and doing the right thing, you don't have to be powerful. You don't have to be important. These grand jurors showed up every day for their job. They were pressured. I'm sure by this US attorney's office to move for an indictment of Ms. Hutchinson. And they looked at it and they had the courage to stand up and say, we're not charging her with a crime for her testimony to Congress. She didn't lie, we're not charging her with a crime. All of us hold that same power to stand up and resist. This is about resistance. And recognizing those people, they're heroes. They didn't go along with the Trump DOJ and just say, hey, we're going to rubber stamp this indictment, make this woman have to get a lawyer, spend a ton of money, have her name, disparaged in the media. We're not going to do that. We're going to stand up and we're going to do the right thing. I might get mad, might get pissed. So what? We're going to do it anyway. So the moral of this story for all of us is no matter where you are, what town you're in, what state you're in, if you see something that you don't think is right with the policies and arguments and rules made by this administration, stand up, stand up. You don't have to be living in a big city. You don't have to be an executive or a policymaker somewhere. It can be every day. If you hear something, call it out, resist. Because if everyone does that, it starts to change. It changes the fabric of this country. And the biggest thing that we can all do to resist is vote. Early vote, they're going to probably do a lot of stuff, a lot of shenanigans on Tuesday. So make sure everybody is early voted. If you have to vote on election day, make sure your phone's ready to record any sort of shenanigans. But this is, if you take the hairdresser and then you take all of the, in Michigan and you take all of these grand jurors, it is only we will save us. And that's the way this country was designed. We, the people, we have to remember that because that's what Trump, that's what these tech oligarchs, that's what Raphael, Ted Cruz, that's what they're terrified of. Us, we, the people. And as cheesy as that sounds, it's very, very true that we, the people have the power to resist this. Yeah, it has a ripple effect. I want to say it has a ripple effect. One person does it and you keep doing it. And the impact is much bigger. And then Hassan Piker is suing Scott Jennings. He has filed a federal lawsuit in, I believe, DC. Pop this up. Hassan Piker filed a defamation lawsuit against CNN commentator Scott Jennings in a federal court and once more than $72 million in damages. Jennings falsely accused Hassan of advocating for the lynching of black Americans. He used some out of order clips from Hassan Stream where Hassan was quoting what a commenter said in the comment section. And Hassan has hired the same lawyers that won the $780 million lawsuit in the Dominion suit against Fox News, Josh. Well, and there's merit to this claim. So Scott Jennings should be concerned. I mean, what he did isn't him expressing his first amendment right, his opinion. What he did was he manipulated clips to suggest and claimed that Hassan said certain things that he simply didn't do. And the fact that I think Hassan sent him a cease and desist or a retraction letter asking him to take it down. And he refused to do that. So that again, can show malice on his part. He knew it was incorrect. He knew what he did was wrong, but yet he leapt it up. And I think the video has like 2.8 million views or clicks. And so Scott Jennings is going to have to lower your up and he's going to have to explain why he did this. Again, from what I understand, Hassan was saying what someone else said. And Scott Jennings doesn't show that. He just he attributes that quote to Hassan. And that's not what happened. It was manipulated in a way that presented Hassan a saying something he simply didn't say. And Scott Jennings knew that. And that's a problem for him legally. Lawyer up, go to court, tighten up that go T. Put a good suit on because your ass is getting sued. I wonder if this being in the works is why he was not appointed White House press secretary. When I first read this last night, I thought, oh, is this why they were vetting him? And he's like, well, I might be getting sued for defamation. - Yeah, but think of it like this Trump would reward to get like that. So he would put Scott Jennings first on his list of people to consider how he known that he was going to be in a lawsuit with Hassan. There's no moral deterrent for these guys. They cannot have conduct that's bad enough to scare them away from a Trump job. I mean, you could literally be a pedophile. I mean, literally, I'm not just saying that. You could be a pedophile and you get nominated to be in the cabinet. - Yeah, yeah, it's really something else. All right, that's all we have for this episode. Make sure you have ordered my book, Not Today Fashes, subscribe to this channel. But more than anything, vote, vote, vote because all of our lives literally depend upon it. (upbeat music) (upbeat music)
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Donald Trump’s rallies are criticized for being incoherent, humiliating, and deeply offensive, with supporters clapping and laughing despite the lack of logical or empathetic messaging.
The presentation highlights how Trump mocks his supporters, especially by referencing meat-eating and mocking affordability, revealing a disconnect from working-class realities.
Everyday Americans, like a hairdresser in Michigan, emphasize economic hardship and demand policy changes focused on affordability, not ideological labels.
Figures like Rafael Cruz are shown as emotionally vulnerable and deriving pleasure from humiliation, reflecting a broader pattern of submissive political behavior among conservative figures.
Grand jurors rejected an indictment of Cassidy Hutchinson, demonstrating resistance to politically motivated prosecutions and affirming the power of everyday citizens to resist authority.
Scott Jennings is legally challenged for defamation after falsely attributing quotes to Hassan Piker, exposing manipulative media practices and potential political risks.
The central message is that ordinary people possess the power to resist authoritarianism, whether through civic action, voting, or speaking out.
The narrative ties together political dysfunction, economic suffering, and moral courage, arguing that democratic resilience lies in public resistance and accountability.
Summary:
The transcript critiques Donald Trump’s political rhetoric and behavior, portraying his rallies as incoherent, demeaning, and designed to humiliate supporters rather than serve the public. It highlights how Trump mocks economic realities—such as making a $5,000 “guest” fee for a hamburger—while claiming to represent the working class, exposing a deep contradiction. The narrative centers on everyday Americans, like a Michigan hairdresser, who point to soaring living costs and systemic failure as their primary concern, demanding policy focus on affordability over ideological purity.
Figures such as Senator Rafael Cruz are shown as emotionally dependent on humiliation, suggesting a broader pattern of submissive, self-deprecating behavior among political figures. A key moment involves grand jurors rejecting an indictment of Cassidy Hutchinson, symbolizing resistance to politically driven prosecutions and affirming that ordinary citizens possess moral power to challenge authority. Additionally, the defamation lawsuit against CNN’s Scott Jennings is presented as evidence of media manipulation and political risk-taking.
Ultimately, the piece argues that true democratic strength lies not in elite power, but in the collective courage of ordinary people to speak out, resist, and vote—emphasizing that civic action is essential to countering authoritarianism, economic failure, and misinformation.
FAQs
Trump mocks his supporters by making absurd or offensive statements, such as eating meat or mocking affordability, which reflects a pattern of disengagement and disdain. This behavior suggests a lack of genuine connection with his base and may indicate a deliberate strategy to provoke reactions and maintain attention.
The term 'clapping seals' is used to describe supporters who applaud or react enthusiastically to Trump's antics, often despite the content being illogical or offensive. It highlights a sense of collective resignation or absurdity, showing how some followers accept and celebrate his behavior.
The public reaction reveals deep frustration with economic conditions like high inflation and rising gas prices, showing that many Americans are more concerned with cost of living than political ideologies or identity-based issues.
The grand jury's decision not to indict Hutchinson signals a potential pattern of political bias within the DOJ, undermining the integrity of the justice system and raising concerns about the administration's efforts to suppress dissent or criticism.
Hassan Piker's lawsuit alleges that Scott Jennings misrepresented his words to falsely imply support for lynching, demonstrating a pattern of misinformation and potential defamation. This highlights the dangers of spreading false narratives without evidence.
Figures like Ted Cruz express a desire to remove Trump from office because they believe he is divisive and ineffective, and they may derive personal or political satisfaction from the idea of bipartisan opposition, even if it's politically motivated.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.