Natalie Harp, Donald Trump’s executive assistant, is at the center of a growing scandal involving the suppression of media access and potential insider trading. According to leaked reports, Harp orchestrated the ban of major outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House, using her position to influence Trump’s public statements and social media posts. She is implicated in a $100,000-a-month program that allegedly allows Trump to access confidential information through Truth Social, raising serious concerns about corruption and the erosion of press freedom. Critics argue that the mainstream media has misunderstood the situation by refusing to cover Trump, despite his aggressive attacks on the press and repeated claims of media corruption. This inaction risks allowing a dangerous narrative to take root—namely, that Trump is no longer a significant political threat—potentially influencing midterm outcomes. The speaker urges journalists to reengage with Trump and directly question Harp’s role, emphasizing that her actions threaten both democratic accountability and the integrity of independent media. The broader context reveals a deeply corrupt White House environment, where Trump’s administration appears focused on profit and power rather than public service. With growing evidence of insider trading and corporate influence, Harp must be held accountable by Congress. The media’s failure to confront these issues signals a systemic failure in journalistic integrity, and only through rigorous scrutiny can the public be properly informed.
We need to talk about Natalie Harp and it's not just because still the mainstream media won't give Donald Trump's executive assistant the attention she deserves, but also because they're not allowed to anymore and it is because of Natalie Harp. After mainstream media outlets like Politico, MSNBC and CNN, which were barred from the White House, sued Donald Trump to return their press credentials, the story started coming out and one of them, the one I want to talk about today, is Natalie Harp's involvement in this whole plot, in this whole scheme, and why the media needs to take this as an opportunity, not to protest Donald Trump and pretend he doesn't exist, but to actually start doing its job. There is so much I want to talk about in this video, as it relates to Natalie, as it relates to the mainstream press, as it relates to independent media and so much more as we head into these midterms, but really, I just want to say this woman needs to be held accountable. She needs to be brought before Congress, she needs to be asked questions, and when the journalist at MSNBC, CNN, and Politico get back in the Oval Office, when she is standing there, they need to ask her questions directly to her face. Because her involvement in this plan, in this plot, to suppress the media, to make sure they cannot ask questions of this administration, it is coming out. Now, we are going to get into that, I do although want to start with the most recent post from Donald Trump, talking about his banning of the media, then we'll get into Natalie's involvement, how she's part of this lawsuit, and why she's really fucking up Trump's life. So the most recent post from Donald Trump, about his media ban, reads his following, the White House is not instituting in assault on the free press, something which I cherish, that's just a ridiculous sentiment, it is instituting in attack on the fake news, something that has grown like cancer and are beloved United States of America. It is corrupt, purposeful, pervasive, fully coordinated, and totally out of control, it is a threat to our national security and must be stopped now, thank you for your attention to this matter. I am going to say something that without the proper context, which I'll add, might sound crazy. I agree with Trump, that the media is completely corrupted and broken, and I agree for different reasons than he does. Donald Trump is saying the press that covers him and asks real questions, they're the ones that are broken, they're the ones that are the cancer. I see the cancer is, maybe I don't know, our news being bought up by billionaires, the Warner Brothers and Paramount merger, about to go through, cleared in California, which is an absolute disgrace in disaster. The fact that the Washington Post does not print stories that it should, the fact that they didn't endorse in the 2024 presidential election, hmm, I wonder why, is it maybe because Bezos ended up sitting behind Trump at the inauguration, the problem with our media is so much of it is owned, is driven for what is the most profitable, and what is most beneficial to the larger corporation that owns it. That is, that is the point of so much of our media now, and the growth of corporate media owned by billionaire oligarchs, instead of the growth of independent media, which we do see, and of course local journalism that we see shutting down across the country, that is the cancer in our country, but that is not what Donald Trump is talking about, what Donald Trump is talking about, is any media that will ask him questions, that will report on his failures and push back on his lies. And Donald Trump hates that, it is why he is desperate at all times to live in this little, live in this little echo chamber, and which everything is quite frankly fantastic and that everybody loves him, it's the reason Donald Trump uses AI so much, because it is the alternate reality that he craves, an alternate reality that Natalie Harp helps build, and that's what this video is about today, Natalie Harp, her involvement in this, in this assault on the media, and why it's going to come back to bite Trump in the ass. Natalie Harp's role in Donald Trump's media meltdown is leaked, the timeline behind the president's Friday tantrum has been revealed. Donald Trump's loyal aide, Natalie Harp, played a critical role in the shock meltdown that saw him dramatically ban media outlets from the White House, Harp 35, or in the nickname human printer, for shadowing Trump 80 and printing out positive articles about himself to read, as well as suggesting potential flattering social media posts he can share online. A new report revealed Harp's involvement just hours before the president banned CNN, MSNOW, in Politico, from the White House effective immediately in a Friday truth social tirade. Harp had specifically played Trump clips of anchors on MSNOW criticizing his administration before his social media tantrum, sources familiar with the matter, told the Wall Street Journal. Privately, the president has informed his aide he doesn't have enough political allies defending him on television or praising his achievements in his second term, I don't know what those achievements would be though. Harp, who earns a $150,000 a year salary as an executive assistant, is a constant presence at Trump's side. An intimate letter, she sent him in 2023, she said, "is unworthy of him. You are all that matters to me," Harp told Trump in the private messages, adding, "I don't want to ever let you down." While Trump has previously floated banning media, who have annoyed him from the White House, his aides have persuaded him to adopt less aggressive measures according to the journal. That has included blocking certain reporters from attending Oval Office events, or cutting back their involvement in situations deemed too small to accommodate the full press corps. A Politico report claimed that even senior White House staffers were blindsided by Trump's media ban, and suggested the shock moved, while his influential chief of staff, Susie Wiles, was out of town. So White House insiders and top aides were stunned that Donald Trump posted on Truth Social without anyone knowing that he was banning media outlets. Now, who is influential, and Donald Trump's White House, who was probably keyed in on this? Well, according to this report, it's Natalie Harp, that Natalie Harp pushed for it, that maybe Natalie Harp herself wrote the post that went out saying, "no more MS now, no more CNN, no more." For Politico, Natalie Harp has already been named in a lawsuit for Donald Trump's $100,000 a month early access Truth Social Insider trading corrupt scam, she is going to be named in this next lawsuit, saying that Donald Trump needs to return media access to MSNBC to CNN into Politico. But what has really bothered me through all of this is I think the mainstream press has already learned the wrong lesson, and they're already acting on that wrong lesson. You've seen several media outlets come out and say, "Well, MSNBC and CNN in Politico cannot participate in White House events. They will no longer be giving Donald Trump TV coverage." Now, I understand that this is a person obsessed and I mean obsessed with attention. It is all Donald Trump cares about. He is a broken person. He always has been. He's always been desperate to get on TV to have a quote in a newspaper to have his picture taken. You are learning the wrong lesson now. We learned this lesson the wrong way, again, after Donald Trump left the White House in 2020. We said, "We're going to ignore him, we're going to kick him off the Instagram, we're going to kick him off the Facebook, we're going to kick him off the Twitter, we don't want to hear from Donald Trump anymore." And what was allowed to happen after that? People forgot. People forgot how bad shit crazy he is. They forgot the horrible way that he speaks about the press, that he speaks about Americans. How fucking stupid he is. They forgot all of that. And so, Americans showed up to the polls in 2024 with kind of a reverence for the Trump years, for getting about COVID, for getting about the press conferences, for getting about, maybe you should inject bleach in yourself. And they reelected and president once again. If we allow this to happen over the next six weeks, if we completely ignore Donald Trump before a midterms about Donald Trump, we are going to be fucked. It is going to be a problem. Not that Democrats won't win in huge margins, they will, but they won't win big enough. Because, sure, this isn't just the midterms about holding Donald Trump account, but also what the future looks like. But, no, it is the midterms about Donald Trump's screw-ups. So, the media absolutely cannot just ignore him. This needs to reinvigorate a press that will go in there and ask real questions, understanding they haven't been living up to the highest form of journalistic integrity, and this needs to reset the dialogue about where the media is actually failing. And it's failing in corporate overreach. It's failing in the fact that the independent media is picking up the slack, which this is also only going to reinvigorate independent media, but the press should not ignore Donald Trump, and I hope that they will come to their senses and realize that that is a mistake, but they need to cover him more. He also need to cover Natalie Hartmore. Maybe she was a little worried about what would happen if the press started asking questions about her involvement, which is why the Congress needs to do it when they take power. And that is what I talked about with Jamie Raskin a few weeks ago. Well, I want to ask you before I let you go about that corruption because you and I have both been, I think, focused on a lot. Maybe too much, unfortunately, on the posting of Donald Trump, because the posting of Donald Trump is no longer just the mean tweets as Republicans for so long love to frame it. This is a money-making opportunity not in just the fact that Donald Trump shapes markets, but also because you can pay him $100,000 a month for insider information. What I think is an underlooked part of kind of all of this is the Natalie Hartfactor, which is that she has great control over Donald Trump's phone. And earlier this week, there was some great reporting by Zateo about the influence that Natalie Hart has. One advisor in the Trump administration said, "I wanted the president to post something about crypto, so I asked Natalie, and it worked." That sounds like insider trading within the White House to me. Do you think that Natalie Hart needs to be subpoenaed and answer questions around everything having to do with Donald Trump's phone? how truth social is used for insider trading.
in this $100,000 a month program that he's running for as much profit as possible? - Well, I don't know the specifics of what you're referring to, but I'm very interested in it, and I'll follow up on it. But look, the bottom line is everybody knows that the entire White House is a get rich, quick scheme, money-making operation. Donald Trump has made more money in a year and a half in office than every other president in the United States combined, made both privately and publicly, and he's made more money than all of us in the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate have made from our government salaries in two years. I mean, there's nothing that comes close to what he's done. It is just a gangster state operation. You gotta check out the report we put out, Jack, last week from the House to destroy Democrats called Parton's Inc. about the cash for clemency operations, not just the more than 1,500 proud boys, oath keepers, other fanatical extremists who attacked our police officers and hospitalized them and drove many of them out of police work because of their disabilities. It's not just them, he then went on to engage in another money-making capitalist operation putting up for sale, Partons. And we name names about the people who can get you a pardon, if you're willing to put up enough money, millions of dollars to go to different Trump enterprises, political or commercial. And then those people have been pardoned, and we counted nearly 1.8 billion dollars in fines and restitution that were owed by these criminals, that they were canceled by Donald Trump. I mean, he literally said, every other president had said, well, if you've done your time, or if you've done most of your good time, and you've demonstrated contrition, you've demonstrated rehabilitation, and importantly, you've paid back all the money to your victims, then we will consider a pardon. For Donald Trump, it's quite the reverse. People want a pardon, so they don't have to pay back hundreds of millions of dollars, like this guy, Milton Trevor, who ripped off his investor's hundreds of millions of dollars. He was on his way off to prison for four years, pardon him, so he didn't have to spend a day in prison. And he relieved him of all the fines, meaning those hundreds of millions of dollars, which the US Attorney recommended he owe, and he repay to his victims, in fact, stays with Trevor Milton. And it's like the former president of Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernandez, an international narco trafficker, who brought in thousands of pounds of cocaine to the United States, and said, we're going to stuff the cocaine off the noses of the gringos. He was given a pardon when he was about to go off to prison for 45 years, Trump pardoned him, and relieved him of all other civil liabilities, and restitution, and fines. And now they're trying to set it up for him to go back to become president of Honduras again. So, I mean, this is now a rages situation. Again, just a small emblem of the corruption, which pervades the entire government. Now, when you've seen it with crypto corruption, we've seen the military industrial complex, and we see it, of course, in the Trump family, where it's just like Mardi Gras. The corrupt Natalie Hart needs to be brought before Congress and seriously questioned. As it relates to her, eating Donald Trump and his attack on the First Amendment, and these journalists at these three outlets, Donald Trump's corruption and insider trading, all of it. She needs to be asked questions about whether or not she's carrying around diapers in her big bag. We need to know, but it is only going to happen if Democrats have that spine that I believe they will, because I trust in Robert Garcia. And if the mainstream press starts asking questions, which we always will on this show, and if you want to support that as always, you can hit that subscribe button, leave a like on this video. If you stuck around to the end, drop a blue heart in the comments. and to keep on fighting y'all, don't let 'em silence you. And until next time, I'll see you soon.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Natalie Harp, Donald Trump’s executive assistant, played a central role in the media ban by pushing for and allegedly drafting the post that banned CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House.
Harp is involved in a $100,000 monthly insider trading scheme through Truth Social, where she allegedly provides Trump with access to confidential information, raising concerns about corporate corruption and misuse of power.
The mainstream press has failed in its duty by ignoring Trump’s actions, leading to a dangerous public misconception that he is no longer a threat, which could undermine democratic accountability during the midterms.
Summary:
Natalie Harp, Donald Trump’s executive assistant, is at the center of a growing scandal involving the suppression of media access and potential insider trading. According to leaked reports, Harp orchestrated the ban of major outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House, using her position to influence Trump’s public statements and social media posts. She is implicated in a $100,000-a-month program that allegedly allows Trump to access confidential information through Truth Social, raising serious concerns about corruption and the erosion of press freedom.
Critics argue that the mainstream media has misunderstood the situation by refusing to cover Trump, despite his aggressive attacks on the press and repeated claims of media corruption. This inaction risks allowing a dangerous narrative to take root—namely, that Trump is no longer a significant political threat—potentially influencing midterm outcomes. The speaker urges journalists to reengage with Trump and directly question Harp’s role, emphasizing that her actions threaten both democratic accountability and the integrity of independent media.
The broader context reveals a deeply corrupt White House environment, where Trump’s administration appears focused on profit and power rather than public service. With growing evidence of insider trading and corporate influence, Harp must be held accountable by Congress. The media’s failure to confront these issues signals a systemic failure in journalistic integrity, and only through rigorous scrutiny can the public be properly informed.
FAQs
Natalie Harp is Donald Trump's executive assistant who has been involved in promoting positive media coverage of Trump by printing articles and suggesting social media posts. She is believed to have pushed for and helped implement Trump's ban on media outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House.
Sources, including a report by the Wall Street Journal, indicate that Harp played Trump clips of media anchors criticizing him before his social media tantrum and reportedly pushed for the media ban. She is also believed to have authored or influenced the post on Truth Social that declared 'no more CNN, no more MSNBC, no more Politico.'
Yes, Harp has already been named in a lawsuit over Trump’s $100,000-per-month Truth Social insider trading scheme. She is set to be named in a new lawsuit demanding the return of media access to MSNBC, CNN, and Politico.
The mainstream media has been criticized for ignoring Trump's actions and narratives, which some argue is a failure to uphold journalistic integrity. Harp’s role in suppressing media access is seen as part of a broader pattern of media suppression that the press should investigate and report on directly.
There are concerns that Harp has significant control over Trump’s phone and social media, and may be involved in insider trading by accessing and sharing confidential information, such as crypto updates or policy details, before public release.
The speaker believes Harp has undue influence over Trump’s messaging and operations, and that her involvement in media suppression and potential insider trading warrants a formal investigation and congressional questioning.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.