Trump is 'lustily booed' in New York City attending NBA Finals

I'm really happy to have you here. So much going on right now, really busy night. Do you want to see the warm, warm welcome, the president of the United States got tonight when he decided to pretend to be a basketball fan? Because he wanted to go to the NBA finals in New York tonight. Do you want to see how much New Yorkers appreciated Donald Trump making them all come to the game hours early, forcing everyone to go through tons of extra screening, forcing New York City to cancel the public-free viewing parties they had planned outside Madison Square Garden, just specifically so Trump could be their in-person, even though he's only ever talked trash about the NBA and doesn't appear to have been an actual fan at all at least for decades. Do you want to see the big, warm New York welcome that actual Nick's fans gave him when he arrived at the venue tonight? (no audio) When they're waving at you with just one finger, it doesn't mean the same as another kind of wave. Big New York welcome tonight to president Donald Trump at the Nick's Spurs NBA finals game. Trump likes to claim that New York loves him. New York does not. In Manhattan for the record, Donald Trump and JD Vance got 17% of the vote in the presidential election in 2024, not 70%, 17%, which means given the choice between Donald Trump and allowing yourself to be puked upon by the big drops of greasy water that drip out of the back of window-mounted air conditioners onto the sidewalk in the summer. I think New Yorkers would have to think hard about it, not sure which one seems worse. Do you want to see him arrive at the garden one more time, just one more time? Here it is. Donald Trump being lustily booed when he arrived at the venue tonight in New York. This was him being booed inside at the venue when people spotted him during the national anthem. Just kind of smile through it. Let's maybe they have a nickname for me. That has an ooh sound in the middle of it. Maybe that's what that is. That happened tonight. What a sports fan, what a bad other people. For his 80th birthday, which is this weekend, President Donald Trump's super PAC accepted a million dollar donation from the owner of an online casino that's considered in many states to be an illegal gambling operation. President's PAC took that donation from the online casino, the President himself and the White House have since repeated the promoted that legally iffy gambling operation as part of this White House event. Trump is forcing taxpayers to pay for for his birthday this weekend. The President bought stock in the parent company of UFC, the mixed martial arts company. And he bought that stock right before he's having the White House host a UFC match on the White House loan for his birthday from which UFC will obviously financially benefit and so will the President himself since he just bought stock in the company. But you and I will all pay for it. A taxpayer's of the country will have to pay to put it on so that he can personally financially benefit. I'll have more on that in a moment. This weekend was the anniversary of D-Day when US troops braved impossible odds to launch the largest seaborn invasion in history. They stormed the beaches at Normandy so they could liberate France and ultimately liberate all of Western Europe from the Nazis, turn the tide against the fascists in World War II. Here's how that anniversary looked this weekend in Decatur, Alabama. June 6, D-Day Vets fought fascism. Here's how it looked in Dallas, Texas. Honor D-Day Vets resist fascism. Here's how it looked in Vancouver, Washington. Vets beat fascism. We can too. Here's how it looked in Hampton Falls, New Hampshire. This is a good one. D-Day heroes, the OG Antifa. Similar idea in Lake Mary, Florida. World War II Vets first anti-fascists. Raleigh, North Carolina. D-Day heroes fought fascism. Here's Los Angeles. Honor D-Day, fight fascism at home. Literally hundreds of communities across the country doing things like that this weekend for the anniversary of D-Day. Also, we just saw another set of targeted protests. A whole day of targeted protests against citizens' bank for funding Trump's immigration prisons. Citizens' bank, for its part, they say they follow the law and they apply their standards consistently to all their clients. But that bank, citizens' bank, is based in Rhode Island. They have branches all over the Northeast and all over the Northeast this weekend. We saw protests in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Maryland, Massachusetts, all over the Northeast people targeting citizens' bank for their financial support of Trump's prison camps, trying to get citizens' bank to drop that support. In Los Angeles, people protested this weekend to mark one year since Trump's federal agent started attacking that city and particularly attacking immigrants in that city. In Charlotte, North Carolina, and bluffed in South Carolina this weekend, they saw protests against ICE and against ICE prison camps. Tomorrow, we're expecting another big protest in Hakerstown, Maryland against a possible Trump prison camp. They've been trying to put in just outside Hakerstown and a big warehouse in Williamsport, Maryland, another big protest scheduled around that. Tomorrow morning, 9am in Hakerstown, Maryland. We're also expecting tomorrow at 10am in Chicago, a bit of a courtroom showdown. In this still unfolding debacle that's happening in the city of Chicago, in which Trump's appointed prosecutor in that city just absolutely botched an effort to bring federal felony charges against people who had protested in Chicago against ICE. That federal prosecutor's office not only ended up having to drop all the charges, first they dropped all the felony charges, then they had to drop even misdemeanor charges they had tried to bring. They not only had to drop all the charges, they are now facing possible legal sanctions, sanctions as lawyers. Because the judge in that case found out just how badly that U.S. attorney's office had broken the rules in their conduct before the federal grand jury. So that hearing's been called tomorrow by the judge in that case, 10am in Chicago lawyers for all the defendants and the prosecutor's office have been ordered to all be there in person tomorrow at 10am. So given what has happened in this case so far, everybody is sort of standing by for fireworks there. There's a real question as to whether or not that U.S. attorney is going to find himself either forced out of the job or potentially forced out of the legal profession based on the debacle that has unfolded in Chicago. But you know, it's not just Chicago. This is turning out to be one of the most reliable, consistent and consequential failures of the Trump administration, of Trump being back in office. It turns out they just cannot lawyer their way out of a paper bag anywhere in the country. And that has bad consequences. And in some cases, I think arguably good consequences for the country, it's just turning out to be a profoundly consequential thing. I'll give you an example. Just a few weeks ago in Wyoming, less than a month ago in Wyoming, there are three federal judges who sit in Wyoming and those three federal judges had to go intervene in a whole bunch of Wyoming criminal cases that had not yet gone to trial. The judges had to intervene because Trump appointed as the top federal prosecutor in Wyoming a January 6th guy who had never before been a prosecutor. His main work experience was apparently working at a televangelist TV channel. And this guy, shockingly, so botched the grand jury process in Wyoming for normal criminal cases that the federal judges who sit in that state had to wade in and intervene and throw out nine different felony indictments that had been screwed up by this guy. And these were on serious cases. This is everything from child pornography to first degree murder. They had to throw out all the cases because Trump's hand picked prosecutor, again, a January 6th guy, so screwed up all of these cases and the entire process for getting people criminally charged in Wyoming. Incredibly, perhaps the most incredible thing about all of it is that Republican senators in the United States Senate then voted to confirm that guy as US attorney right after all that happened. They didn't mind, apparently. [BLANK_AUDIO] pornography and first degree murder. I'm just saying, just astonishing. But it's really happening every road island. The Trump-appointed federal prosecutor there just had attorneys referred for disciplinary proceedings for botching its cases in Rhode Island too. That referral was made on Friday and the referral was made by a federal judge who herself was appointed by Donald Trump. I mean, as I mentioned, Trump's appointed prosecutor in Chicago was the one who's going to be back in court tomorrow potentially facing sanctions from the court after botching his attempted prosecutions in Chicago too. I mean, there have just been consistently really big problems and really big embarrassments from Trump's U.S. attorney picks, from Trump's federal prosecutor picks, all over the country in Nevada and Minnesota. I mean, everywhere. California has been a particular disaster for Trump right from the start. To get a prosecutor in California, Trump, it's not like, you know, California has any shortage of experienced lawyers, but Trump didn't want any of them. He instead took a mag a guy from the state assembly. He had very little relevant experience. And almost immediately this guy as the new U.S. attorney appointed by Trump, he was attracting headlines like this one in LA. Quote, Trump's top federal prosecutor in LA struggles to secure indictments. Or this one, quote, amateur hour at the U.S. attorney's office, LA prosecutors face more losses. This was earlier this year. The federal public defenders office in Los Angeles is 5.0 against the U.S. attorney's office, winning every case brought to trial in the central district of California, highly unusual for the perpetual underdogs. Again, this is about public defenders winning their cases, meaning public defenders getting acquittals. Quote, fewer than 1% of federal criminal defendants were acquitted throughout the U.S. in fiscal year 2024. And a system where acquittals are statistical outliers. Experts say the federal public defenders offices recent wins raise questions about prosecutorial decision-making and the credibility of the cases being brought by federal prosecutors in California. Yeah, you think? California's just been like a uniquely, not even, I guess it's not uniquely 'cause there's so many of these jurisdictions where things are going so terribly wrong, but California has been sort of a paragon of failure. In this category of failure where Trump has really been distinguishing himself in this term. And the U.S. attorney, the sort of failed prosecutor, Trump put in charge in the central district in California, his name is Bill Asale. This is the guy he pulled out of the state assembly to go get this job. And Bill Asale, I have to tell you, technically isn't even the U.S. attorney. Technically what his job is is he's robbing to the U.S. attorney's Batman. He's the first assistant to the U.S. attorney. The reason he's acting as if he's the U.S. attorney is because they've been holding the U.S. attorney job vacant so that he, as the first assistant, can do the U.S. attorney's job instead. It's basically a ham-handed workaround. So this guy, Bill Asale, can hold this job on a de facto basis, even though he has no chance of being officially confirmed to the position. It's a real vote of confidence from the start, right? That they have to sneak him in the surface elevator in order to get him in the place. But then, I mean, how's it been going? His time and office has basically been a series of press releases about all the real tough guy things he's doing, but then he just consistently then loses all of those cases in court. Literally to the point where people are questioning whether it is even statistically possible that Bill Asale is losing so much. Well now, today, said it's a busy day, today, that signature failing, that signature categorical failure of the Trump administration meets the signature goal of the Trump administration, which is, as you know, to make sure that Donald Trump and Republicans stay in power even when they lose elections. California is a lot bigger than New York City, but California's elections kind of feel the same. In California, Donald Trump lost to Kamala Harris by more than 20 points. In Los Angeles County specifically, Donald Trump lost to Kamala Harris by more than 30 points. But somehow, despite that track record that he himself has racked up in California, somehow Donald Trump is not trying to convince Californians and the nation that it's somehow impossible, somehow unbelievable that a Republican has not made it to the runoff in the Los Angeles Mayors race. And it's somehow impossible that a Republican might not make it to the runoff in the governor's race either. Tonight, the Associated Press projected that in addition to the incumbent LA mayor, Karen Bass, the other candidate who will advance to the runoff election in November for the mayor of Los Angeles will be the Progressive City Counselor, Nithia Raman. And not the right-wing reality show guy endorsed by Trump, whose name is Spencer Pratt. Spencer Pratt will not make the runoff Nithia Raman and Karen Bass will. And Republicans are losing their minds over this, but they are not just complaining. This is important. Trump and other Republicans are now trying to problematize that result. They are trying to tell you that result can't possibly re-real. They're trying to undermine it and falsely claim that there must be fraud in this election somehow. And how are they doing it? They're doing it by citing the authority of Bill Isaley. Trump's appointed federal prosecutor in California who isn't even technically the U.S. Attorney. He's the first assistant who they want you to think of as de facto the U.S. Attorney and whose track record in that de facto job is best represented in a series of headlines of people exclaiming and wondering, earnestly, whether or not his unprecedented string of failures is even statistically possible. Once these Republican Trump and Doris candidates started looking like they could lose, in California's marquee election contests this past week, it was Bill Isaley in that U.S. Attorney's office who announced vaguely that his office had multiple election fraud investigations open into looking into something voting, something, something. No specifics, no actual cases seen anywhere in terms of official legal proceedings. No, even like less than vague allegations of anything that they could characterize even for the press let alone for the courts. But Trump and other Republicans are now citing these supposed federal criminal investigations as their justification for telling people that nobody should believe these election results. And again, just keep in mind the big picture here, right? I mean, the scandal here as Trump would have you believe it. The scandal here is that a city where he was barely able to clear 30% of the vote in that city. It's somehow unbelievable that they wouldn't be electing a Republican mayor right now. But look, Bill Isaley has said there's gonna be charges or something. So, lock on on in the news right now. We are gonna talk tonight with the member of Congress who may have saved the Kennedy Center. Thank you very much. We're gonna talk with the lawyer who may block Trump from using the White House law and for that UFC fight that he personally will benefit from this weekend if he's able to do that. But we're gonna start tonight in Los Angeles where Trump and Republicans are raging because Trump's endorsed mayoral candidate in LA didn't win. And where even though Trump's endorsed candidate for governor might yet advance the general election in November, we don't know yet. They're nevertheless doing their best tonight, today and tonight to undermine the election results and say these election results shouldn't count unless Republicans win. Let's bring on our colleague, Jacob Soberoff, who joins us tonight from the LA County Ballot Processing Center. I should mention Jacob is the host of a new show launching this weekend, this Saturday 10 a.m. on MSNOW. It's called Connect with Jacob Soberoff. Jacob, congratulations on the new show. We're all super excited about it. And thanks for doing double time and being here tonight, I really appreciate it. It's an absolute pleasure, Rachel. And there's no place I'd rather be, honestly, than inside this counting center here in the largest election jurisdiction in the country to show people what's actually going on. So tell me about your ability to be there. You don't have special permission, as I understand it, as a member of the press, literally anybody can go and watch what's happening there. There's open space within the ballot processing facility so that people can observe it, right? That's exactly correct, and I guess that extends evidently according to folks who work here at the LA County Registrar's Office to the US Attorney, Bill Isaley and Robert Renner, one of his deputies who was evidently here again today. On Friday, the US Attorney's Office walked exactly where I'm standing right now in the public area that is available for anyone to come and observe the elections here. And it is an extraordinarily transparent process that I will show you in a second. They showed up on Friday, they showed up again today. They have not taken documents for these so-called investigations. They have not gone digging through stacks of ballots. They have looked at publicly available data and stood exactly where I am standing and walked through this area, this hallway, to watch the process unfold. And what is that process, Rachel? Let me watch. you through it. When I say it is transparent, it could not be more transparent here in the largest election jurisdiction in the country. When ballots come into this facility, they first enter everything is labeled very clearly, Rachel, the incoming ballot area. They go through signature verification and everyone who registers to vote signs a document that their signature is checked against when they vote in an election in Los Angeles County by the workers that are in this room. Let me show you that process once the signatures are verified. And by the way, if there are any problems, Rachel, with the ballot, they go to this area called remake where they actually match vote by vote, the actual tally of the ballots of a ballot is ripped if a ballot is stained so that that vote can be counted. All of these folks, 300 or so of them who are here at any given time, not quite around the clock, but in two shifts in the morning and in the evening are extracting ballots from the envelopes that Donald Trump would like you to believe are not ballot ballots. Those ballots are all being put through the regular process, which includes, by the way, Rachel, after they are extracted, moved over from the extraction area into this room here. Again, literally transparent walls where anyone in Los Angeles, including Spencer Pratt or Donald Trump, if they want to come here, could come and look through the window to watch the ballots being tabulated. And the last thing that I want to show you, Rachel, is down at the end, there's a there's a little marker that says canvas. One percent of the ballots that come through here are randomly audited under state statute to make sure that the votes are what they are represented to be by the people who say they actually cast those ballots. There are cameras in here 24/7 that are live streaming to the internet by partisan election observers have been here around the clock. The idea that anything is anything other than transparent in this building is belied by anybody who wants to come in here and look at it with their own eyes. And Jacob, one of the, I mean, the thing that's happening in terms of the national discourse about this is that, you know, the the expectation that California takes a long time to count its votes because a lot of people vote by mail because you can postmark stuff to the day of election day and then you got seven days when they can still come in. The way it works, the fact that they don't expect to certify the vote until 30 days after what counts as election day, despite the fact that that's all everybody knows that in advance, nationally Republicans from the president on down are now describing that as if that's a problem, as if that indicates that there's something wrong, there's some sort of glitch in the system that needs to be investigating. Is there anything that's happening in the, in the count in Los Angeles or in California more broadly that is going in a way that is unexpected or that has that has indicated any sort of problem in the process. No, it's, it's going exactly by the book, as it relates to the tally of the vote, as you pointed out, we're three to one registration Democrats to Republicans. And just like I saw online, when I talked to you on Tuesday night, those late breaking voters were voting for Nithya Rahman, that's what they were telling me. So they showed up and maybe at the end of the process, they filled out mail and ballots towards the end, as long as they were postmarked by election day and show up here by tomorrow, those ballots are going to be counted. And that, that, that, that sort of logic extends the entire process. This is exactly how all of this is supposed to work when you hear that the vote count is happening too slowly. It's because there are a lot of voters in Los Angeles at in California. The idea that the vote center system that we use here in Los Angeles is somehow some democratic plant. It was an idea that was pioneered by Scott Doyle, a Republican in Larimer County, Colorado in 2003 and exported to different jurisdictions around the country. Universal vote by mail, which is in more than a handful of states in this country, the only state with a disproportionate democratic to Republican registration is California. Everywhere else breaks about even or in Utah, there are more Republicans than Democrats. This, this constant drumbeat of vote by mail somehow favors Democrats is just not accurate. The electorate favors Democrats in California, not the process of the way that we count and tabulate the votes. That's exactly right. Jacob Soberoff, it's great to have you there. It's great to see that process unfolding literally in a literally transparent way. As you said, I really appreciate you being with us tonight, Jacob. I'm really looking forward to your show this weekend. Thank you so much, Rachel. Thanks as always. All right. Just a reminder to tune into his new show. Connect with Jacob Soberoff. It's going to air every Saturday and Sunday from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. It premieres this weekend. You will not want to miss it. All right. Much more ahead here tonight. Stay with us. I'm not sure I know what what things look like in the capital of Albania on a normal Monday, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't usually look like this. This was today. Look at that. Thousands of people gathered outside the parliament building in the Albanian capital. This is the eighth consecutive day of huge protests in this country against the corruption of Donald Trump and his family. Wow. For over a week, demonstrators have been gathering in massive numbers to protest a real estate project that's planned by Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner. Jared Kushner's private equity firm, which is mostly funded by the Saudi government. They plan to build a resort on the site of a national treasure ecological preserve in Albania. And it turns out the Albanian people feel quite protective of that. These protests started when barbed wire fences first started going up at the development site, cutting off public access to the local beaches. Then crowds started gathering at the coast, including using their bodies to spell out their protest about saving this ecological site. Protests in the capital city have been filled with images of flamingos because among the other things that Jared's project threatens, it threatens flamingo habitat. So all the flamingos at the protest have got some people calling this the flamingo revolution. And oh my god, am I down with that? And you know, you might not think a protected ecological preserve and its flamingos would be the spark for a political revolution. But these protests are really about corruption. And they might turn out the government of Albania. The people of Albania want to know why their prime minister appears to be selling off their most beautiful coastline to the sun and law of the American president and his Saudi investors. That's our country. I don't want it to be sold to somebody else. It's dirty money. They discovered this island. What do you mean? It's been discovered. It's always. It's just it's bull crab honestly. Albania's special anti-corruption prosecutor's office has now opened an investigation into this development. The European Union is now warning that if the country moves forward with Jared's project, it could put Albania's application to join the EU in jeopardy. I mean, if the protesters are right, if Albania's prime minister has done this to try to curry favor with Donald Trump by pushing through Trump's son-in-law's real estate project, I mean, he would have good reason to think that would work. For example, here's a headline, quote, ballroom donors won 50 billion dollars in contracts after giving to Trump project. More than half of the publicly identified donors to President Trump's White House ballroom project have one new or expanded federal contracts during the past six months worth more than 50 billion dollars in taxpayer money. The nonprofit public citizen found that several of those same companies have had federal enforcement actions over alleged wrongdoing suspended by the Trump administration since the start of Trump's second term. Yeah, kicking some money to the President's pet project, get taxpayer-funded contracts, and magically you find that investigations into your business disappear. I mean, that's what it looks like. The White House, of course, denies any impropriety. They're calling the allegations, quote, "fake conflicts of interest." I don't know, it kind of looks just like conflicts of interest. But there's an obvious pattern here, right? There was the tobacco company that really wanted the FDA to approve flavored nicotine vapes. They gave five million dollars to a Trump-aligned super PAC. Two days later, they got a meeting with Trump during which he called the top health officials in the federal government to push the company's complaints just over a week later. The FDA changed its process and approved the fruit flavored nicotine vapes. Days after that, the FDA commissioner himself was ousted. There was also the banker facing felony bribery charges who was pardoned by Trump after the banker's daughter gave millions to the same Trump super PAC. There was also the nursing home industry, which opposed a federal rule that would have required increased staffing at nursing homes to prevent neglect of patients. Nursing home executives wrote millions of dollars in checks to that same Trump super PAC. And then, wouldn't you know, it soon afterwards, the White House dropped support for the rule. There was the time when President Trump suddenly reversed his longtime support for a new bridge between the US and Canada. Why did he reverse his support? I don't know, but it happened shortly after an opponent of the new bridge, you guessed it, donated a million dollars to that same Trump super PAC. Then there were the revelations that Trump appeared to be buying stocks in companies that he was then publicly boosting as President. Buying some of these stocks on the same day, he publicly praised the companies. And there was the nearly $10 billion defense contract awarded to Dell computers right after Trump personally purchased more than a million dollars of Dell stock. The White House says Trump's stocks are in a trust and that, of course, all his policies are only for the good of the American People, when has he ever done anything that's for anything other than the good of the American people? None of this has anything to do with anybody paying any money. But while we're on the subject of stock purchases, there's also this, quote, "President Donald Trump purchased between $15,000 and $50,000 worth of stock in the parent company of UFC and WWE." He did so weeks ahead of a White House UFC event. Trump's financial disclosures, quote, "Do not specify how much stock Trump purchased, but say he acquired at March 25th, a little more than two weeks after the Freedom Fight's 250 Fight Card was publicly revealed in which he has been promoting non-stop." Meanwhile, UFC, which is helmed by Trump donor Dana White, UFC has been selling ticket packages to the event at the White House for $1,000,000 or more. Trump's super PAC is now hosting a fundraiser the night before at a million dollars per person. And that's not to mention the fees that Paramount Skydance will collect for streaming the event, Paramount Skydance, the media company owned by two other executives with ties to Trump, Larry, and David Ellison. And all those potential financial gains for Trump himself and for all those Trump allies. Those are part of the reason an anti-corruption organization has now filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the UFC cage match on the White House grounds. It's scheduled to be less than a week away. So if this is going to happen, it's going to happen soon. Joining us now is former federal prosecutor Brendan Ballue. He's founder of the Public Integrity Project, which is the group leading the lawsuit to stop this UFC fight on the White House lawn. Mr. Ballue, thank you very much for joining us. I know this is a busy few days for you. - Thank you for having me. - What are the grounds on which you're asking a court to intervene here? - Well, Sue, it goes to the fundamental corruption that you were just talking about. Let's walk through what is going to happen here. You mentioned the $1 million sponsorship packages for individuals who will undoubtedly get access to the president. The exclusive streaming rights that Paramount is going to receive. Paramount, obviously very closely allied to Donald Trump. The individual advertisements that are going to be possible both at the White House and don't forget, there is actually going to be an event with a press conference with the fighters at the Lincoln Memorial with the potential for advertisements there for companies like Crypto.com and others, and then obviously the stock that Donald Trump himself has bought on the company. This is fundamentally the private profiteering of our national monuments, and that is ultimately what's violating the law here and why we're suing. - When they put up this gigantic multi-hundred tonne steel structure on the White House lawn, should they have had to ask somebody's permission for that? - They certainly were supposed to. There's any number of national park service regulations that they were supposed to comply with. There's an environmental review process that they were supposed to comply with. They did none of these things, and so that gives you the basic cause of action here, and it's what the sort of black letter of violation of the law is here, but I really want to make clear to your viewers that the problem here isn't having an event on the White House lawn. It's not even having a sporting event or MMA on the White House lawn at the Lincoln Memorial. It's the private profit that is going to be derived from this. And I think I just want to make clear, if this is allowed to go forward, and you have a press conference with ads for companies like crypto.com at the Lincoln Memorial, those pictures are going to be in every AP history textbook for a generation to symbolize the corruption that we're experiencing right now. So that's why it's so important that we try to stop this event. Brendan Balloon, founder of the Public Integrity Project, which has brought this lawsuit to try to stop this event. This weekend, thank you very much for your time. Keep a surprise this week. I know it's going to be an intense time between now and then in the courts. Thank you. All right, we've got more news ahead tonight. Stay with us. One of the things the historian Timothy Snyder has written about is that if you want to preserve democracy against its enemies, one of the things you can do is choose an institution to defend and defend it. That in fact is lesson two out of 20 from on tyranny, his classic guide to stopping authoritarianism. On tyranny, 20 lessons from the 20th century, lesson two is defend institutions. Tim Snyder writes, quote, "Choose an institution you care about, a court, a newspaper, a law, a labor union, and take its side." Well, this year, in our time, one veteran member of Congress decided that the institution she would side with, she would stand by, was the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Congresswoman Joyce Beatty is a Democrat from Ohio, along with her work as a legislator. Congresswoman Beatty sits on the board of the Kennedy Center. And when Donald Trump forced a vote to add his own name to that center, Congresswoman Beatty says she found herself repeatedly muted, literally muted, to keep her from registering her opposition. Even though they wouldn't let her speak to stop the vote, Congresswoman Beatty decided she would never the last keep fighting. She would find another way to defend the institution. She'd do it in court. She sued. And she won. A federal judge has now set a deadline of Friday, this Friday, for Donald Trump's name to come down from every part of the John F. Today, Trump's name was officially removed from the website of the Kennedy Center. And now the whole country is watching for his name to get shipped off the side of the building, too. All because one member of Congress decided she was going to pick an institution and defend it. And the country is benefiting from the fact that that was Ohio Democratic Congresswoman Joyce Beatty. Congresswoman Beatty, thank you so much for joining us tonight. I really appreciate you being here. - Thank you. It's my honor to be here. And as you said, fighting for an institution, but also fighting against someone who did something that was unlawful. And that's the number one thing. This is for the American people. It's for the arts. And it's also because it was an unlawful act in the best way to fight an unlawful act is to take it to the courts. And that's just what I did. And it's been a long journey. - I think a lot of people who feel thankful for your fight are wondering if they'd have the same courage, the sort of same foresight that you had in terms of waging this very much alone. When you set out to challenge this, when you decided that you had to go to the courts to do it, did you have confidence that you would win or did you know that you'd have to fight it regardless of whether or not you had a good shot? - I think it was the latter because it was against Donald Trump. And we know he doesn't play by the rules of law or the Constitution, but I felt it was worth it. It was worth it because only the Congress could rename the institution. And in 1958, when it was first established, it was just two months after the assassination of John F. Kennedy that the Congress renamed it to the John F. Kennedy performing arts. And so I knew it was a fight that was worth it. And I was gonna take the fight to the courts. And while it was a journey, I'm very pleased that as you mentioned today, we've seen his name come off of letterhead. We've seen it removed from the wet site. We haven't to January the 12th for him to comply with removing his name actually from this cultural institution. - What do you think will happen in terms of Trump's plan for supposed renovations for the Kennedy Center, which I think after we saw the way he renovated the East Wing of the White House by bulldozing it, a lot of people worried might mean the total destruction of the Kennedy Center. I know the judge also temporarily halted his plans to close it for those renovations, but what do you expect to happen there? - Well, I took the tour when Donald Trump's the board's operation director, I posed the question specifically to him. Can we do the renovations and renovations need to take place, but can we do it and continue to keep the Kennedy Center open? And the operations director said, absolutely we could do this. Rachel, we kept the United States capital open and did not close it for major renovations. So I am very confident that we can do it. Now, that was the second part of the judge's court order to say that the center needed to have the renovations, but it also needed to stay open. We haven't to January the 12th on the naming. We also filed another motion with the court that we're seeking assistance in making sure that there is a compliance declaration, that the board outlines how we plan to keep the center open, how we plan to do the constructions. There has been a special meeting of the board called for June the 11th, one day before June 12th when his name must come off of the facility. - Congresswoman Joyce Beatty of Ohio, thank you for your service in Congress, but thank you also for fighting this defense of this American institution. You were in a singular position to do it, and you changed history with what you've done. I know it's not over yet. Please keep a surprise as this fight continues. But thank you for joining us tonight. Thank you so much. All right. We'll be right back. Stay with us. All right. I sort of can't believe this story, but um, here we go. March 5th, which is a long time ago now, um, a New Jersey Republican congressman named Tom Kane appeared on the House floor to take a vote. March 5th, he has not been seen since Tom Kane has not been seen in public in the last 95 days. Uh, he released a statement in April saying he's been dealing with a personal medical issue. Last week he followed that up with another written statement saying he will be back, quote, "within a matter of weeks." But I will say we're now well into June. Um, still nobody has seen him. We certainly hope congressman Kane is okay. We wish him all the best with whatever it is that he's contending with. Um, but that said in the meantime, there's kind of a weekend in Bernice thing that's going on with the missing congressman, at least if you look online. Here, for example, is a Facebook post from this weekend of team Kane's booth at a block party in Berkeley Heights. That is not Tom Kane. Uh, here's one from the last week promoting a chance to meet with team Kane in Bridgewater, New Jersey. Here's team Kane at the Hunterden County Senior Center. Again, not Tom Kane. Oh, and this looks like a fun day with team Kane at Bernard's Township Charter Day. Now, I'm saying team Kane and not Tom Kane. I am, are they hoping nobody will notice that the congressman is not actually there? None of the guys in any of those pictures is Tom Kane. Team Kane, yes, Tom Kane, no. Tom Kane's constituents are making their dissatisfaction known in the comments on these posts. Things like invisible Kane gets around and at this point, should this guy just run this guy in the pictures? He's the one showing up for every event. Is Tom Kane Jr. running for re-election or is team Kane running for congress? Also, the obvious one, there's no Tom in teams. I do have to give a shout out to Tom Kane's bearded stuffer guy, like this one dude in constituent services. He's team Kane everywhere. This guy takes a good selfie but has been put in kind of an impossible position. Congressman Tom Kane's unexplained abs just keeps dragging on. His Democratic opponent, Navy pilot Rebecca Bennett has the field all to herself, basically, in a seat that the Cook Political Report deems a toss up. Obviously, we all truly hope that whatever Congressman Tom Kane is going through, he gets well soon, but having your members of staff pretend to their you out in the world isn't going to cut it and the longer this goes on, the weirder it gets. Be right back. Stay with us. All right, that's going to do it for me tonight. By the time I'm back here next week, I'm going to try to find the rest of my voice.