Trump Hit with TERRIBLE NEWS Moments Before Republican Midterm Convention
20m 54s
The Republican Party's decision to hold a midterm convention in Dallas during the start of the NFL season is widely criticized as a misstep in campaign strategy. Polls show that 60% of Democrats are highly motivated to vote, while a significant portion of Republican voters—particularly those who disapprove of Donald Trump—are disengaged and unlikely to attend. The timing clashes with major entertainment events, with football dominating viewership, especially among non-partisan audiences. Critics argue that the event will fail to energize the base it aims to reach, especially given Trump’s dwindling approval (down nine points in Iowa) and a string of controversial policies. Furthermore, the convention appears to prioritize Trump’s image over voter engagement, with candidates spending large sums to align with him, while many young female aides receive substantial cash gifts—raising ethical concerns and potential violations of federal ethics rules. These payments, including $45,000 to Natalie Harp and others, are seen as inconsistent with presidential conduct and reminiscent of past scandals like the Stormy Daniels payment. The narrative is further undercut by hypocrisy from administration figures, such as Jeanine Pirro, who promotes crypto enforcement while the administration’s allies have profited from crypto schemes. The episode also highlights a broader trend of right-wing influence in media, with shows like Jimmy Kimmel's reportedly at risk of cancellation due to political pressure. As linear TV viewership declines and media becomes more ideologically aligned, the need for independent, progressive media like Potsayv America grows, offering a counterbalance to right-wing dominance.
Brian, the Republicans are about to begin their midterm political convention in Dallas, and here is CNN's polling expert, Harry Enten, explaining why it might be a terrible idea. You know, this idea is so ill-conceived. You can just see it by the fact that they're doing it when the football season is starting. Who does that, my God? 60% of Democrats are extremely motivated to vote. 59% of that hardcore Trump-based, mega-republicans, 59%, the same as attempts. The ones who are not motivated to vote are the non-mag-republicans, the people who are far less likely to approve of Donald Trump, the people who think that Donald Trump's Republican party probably should be the end of it. That's where the problem is. It's like, oh, let's focus in on Donald Trump. But in fact, the people who are the least motivated to vote are the folks who are the most likely within the Republican party to disapprove of Donald Trump. So no, it is not, in fact, the hardcore Republican base that needs that motivation. It is other folks that this convention simply won't be reaching because they'll probably be watching football like most Americans. Lizard's might be thinking, don't we only have to suffer through endless political conventions once every four years? Yes, normally. But when the world's biggest narcissist is the head of the Republican party, you have a midterm convention that's two days long where he speaks twice. I'm like struggling to decide whether this is just irrelevant. No one is going to watch. No one decided voters will care. Or whether it could actively hurt Republicans in the midterms, if you use Trump's approval is so far underwater. Do you have a theory of the case here? I think it is both of those things. I think it won't help, but it can be neutral, or it could hurt the people who are tying themselves to Trump at the exact moment when they want to be running away from the guy. So there are a bunch of reasons that this is a bad idea. As Harry Enten explained, we're going up against the opening game of the NFL season. Patriots, Seahawks. Patriots Seahawks, you've got this. It's weird. It is weird. There's a Thursday night game. There's a ton of Sunday night games. Then of course, there's Monday night, football. And if you look at the list of, sorry to catch up, but if you look at the list of top rated 50 to 100 broadcasts every single year, it's all football games. It's all NFL games with a couple of the things sprinkled in between. So this is like a huge, a huge event, viewing event to go against, like the opening of the NFL season. Correct. So you've got that. You've got the fact that a lot of these Republican candidates had to pay for the privilege of being able to walk in the door a lot of money. Trump has like $450 million, that he won't spend on anybody, but you have candidates who cannot raise money if their lives depended on it, who can't get earned media if their lives depended on it, scrounge together what cash they can and their small districts in God knows where USA. And then they have to give Donald Trump in the RNC like $25,000 to $100,000 just to be there so that they could again align themselves with the guy who has a 33% approval rating. So there's that. There's the fact that we're less than two months out from the midterms. And these people should be on the campaign trail talking to their actual voters, not genuinely flexing at the altar of Trump. And then of course, as I alluded to before, this is basically going to be a Trump worship fest at a time where his approval rating is so low that the only thing these candidates should be doing is figuring out ways to distance themselves from the guy who is responsible for launching a trade war that's at the cost of everything surging, engaging in a foreign war after promising no new wars, and suppressing all of the Epstein files because he's named in them tens of thousands of times. And yet here we are. It is. It's so delicious. Also, when they first announced this thing, he was going to speak on one night and JD Vance was going to keynote the second night. Oh, no, can't have that. It's so funny that he is now key noting the facto of both nights. Yeah, I look, I think you're right. Look, it is the event is happening in Texas where there is one of the biggest most closely watched and targeted Senate races. I mean, look, even the fact that they're doing it in Texas is a tacit admission that they're in big trouble, like there is no world where the Republican should be holding an emergency, emergency convention just unto itself, but an emergency convention in, in like their big red passion, not a famous, not a swing state for a while. But yeah, again, like there's a poll out today that has Trump nine points underwater in Iowa. That is a state he won by 13 points in 2020. All right, Anne Seltson, we've been here before. No, nine points underwater. Like if he that is a signal that he's an anchor around the neck of like all these candidates. And so, like, I mean, the case for Republicans is there are a bunch of voters who are Trump fans. They don't turn out in the midterms. Maybe this crap will motivate them, motivate the base to turn out. I think that nothing says non-political viewership like going up against, you know, the sea hawks. Yeah, look, I think that political partisans and obsessives and junkies are the people who watch conventions. Now, it gets clipped up and shared on TikTok. It's like, right, there's a million other ways we're consuming content. These days, I don't want to sound like this is some like 1980s view of what a convention is. But mostly, I think that normies are going to be focused on anything else in their lives, the NFL, their families, whatever. And they'll be pissed that gas prices are up again. Like the price of Brent crude hit $97 today. And there was a massive like volley of missiles fired between the Iranians and the US last night. Like, all the things that Trump would want to kind of calm down right in ahead of the midterms are getting worse. And this dumb convention is not going to solve that problem. Right. It's only going to, it's going to inject them right into the front and center of the zeitgeist because I mean, he is the, he is the person responsible, his administration, his White House is responsible for doing all of these things. So it's only going to increase coverage of the very things that Trump wants to, wants to, you know, should want to suppress five minutes before an election. Yep. Uh, by the way, if you want to get news and analysis from people that will never make you suffer through two day long conventions, please subscribe to Potsayv America here on YouTube. Please subscribe to Brian Tyler Cohen's channel. We're trying to build independent progressive media channels to help push back on all the right wing crap that floods YouTube. When you subscribe, when you like these videos, when you share them, it really helps us grow. And it's free. So please do. Liberals here is brought to you by PDS debt. If you feel like you're working too hard, but are still losing money every month, PDS debt can help. They can reduce up to half of what you owe on credit cards, personal loans and medical bills and it starts with a free 30 second assessment at PDS debt.com/rank minimum payments aren't designed to get you out of debt. They're designed to get keep you stuck. PDS debt is the way out. They can reduce up to half of what you owe on credit cards, personal loans and medical bills and it starts with a free 30 second assessment at PDS debt.com/rank. Potsayv America listeners who enroll are saving an average of $29,800. So people are actually doing something about their debt instead of just treading water. You could stop juggling multiple payments and roll them into one lower monthly payment with saving starting the day you complete the free 30 second assessment. Checking your options is fast free and won't impact your credit and there's no minimum credit score required. If you're carrying a balance on your credit cards, it's costing you money every single day. PDS debt is the industry's top rated company with thousands of five star reviews and an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau. Visit PDS debt.com/rank to get started. All of us have had that experience when you find yourself in debt and you just don't know how you're going to get out of it. Whether it's a credit card bill that was just way bigger than you expected and the interest payments keep adding up or maybe you overdrew your account and there's fees after fee after fee and you just don't know how you're going to pay it off. PDS debt can help you find a plan and figure out a way to consolidate your debt and pay it off. Get your free 30 second personalized assessment today at pds debt.com/rank that's pds debt.com/rank. All right, Brian. The other story I want to talk to you about was this story of Trump's relationship with his close personal aid, Natalie Harp. It keeps getting weirder. People watching probably remember the kind of Natalie Harp weak plus long news cycle boom lit that was kicked off by Georgia Senator John Ossoff like mentioning her name in a speech. He said Trump wants to travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace. And boy did they pull out the fainting couches with that one. How dare you smear her. Republicans lost their minds. Because remember that Natalie was one of the handful of aids that hid from Iran in the catering cards. She got a front row seat and a catering cart. Yeah, just right next to the salad. Not the rest of the cabinet on the decoy. Next to the Moose Moose. Yeah, while all the serious people, Pete Hegseth was on the Trump plan. That I get. Marco Rubio was like, OK, buddy, you're going to hear the chaff that the missiles we're going to fire at. So the Washington Post this week broke the news that Donald Trump gave Natalie Harp a $45,000 cash gift. The money was described on Harp's personal financial disclosure form as cash gift for holidays. Harp is a 35 year old staffer. Her job is to just be with Trump at all times. Her colleagues call her the human printer because she follows Trump around with a printer and prints out positive news about him for him. Trump also gave 45 grand to a 31 year old communications advisor named Margot Martin. And then another young female aide named Chamberlain Harris who's his 26 year old executive assistant. And then Walt Nauta who was the director of Oval Office operations. He got 20 grand. So he had a little bit of a come down. Yeah. He was a co-defendant. Why is that one thing different from all the others? Because he knows where the skeletons are here. He's got the goods. Brian, that's all weird, don't I'll tell you what's weird is I here's what I got from Tommy and the team at crooked is a backpack. I got a backpack. And meanwhile Trump is get I do love the backpack. Trump is giving his
- That's a nice lot for your laptop, isn't it? (laughing) - Trump is giving his people $45,000. - $45,000? - Yeah, I mean, look, does it surprise you that the creepy old man who is also named 30,000 times in the Epstein files is giving out tens of thousands of dollars to his young female aides? - It is weird, man. It's also like, for what it's worth, Richard Painter, who is George Bush's ethics advisor at the White House, also a big Trump hitter now. He said that the payments are probably illegal. They probably break the law, because you are, there's a statute that prohibits federal employees getting outside money, but then like supplementing their income. So who knows? I mean, the Post also said there are no other public instances of U.S. presidents giving staff employed by the White House large cash payments. Government ethics, as Experts said, they were not aware of any other payments on this scale from a superior to a subordinate government worker. I think the story cites a fruit basket. (laughing) It's really like the next one down. (laughing) I think it's a fruit basket these days. I guess I've gotten one in my life. I mean, it's good fruit. - Look, I think the reason for this is like, who is gonna push back on this? Is Trump's DOJ gonna do anything about it? Is Trump's DOJ gonna investigate or prosecute? And so-- - But the statute of limitations is five years. - It's five years, and I think that's what's important. Barring some, I think everybody's just banking on this idea that they're gonna get a pardon before they leave the old office, but this is him testing the fence, and I think it's why we need some serious reform so that, because any inch they get, they will take. - But it's like giving them 45 grand for what? For silence, for something creepier. Like, it's just the whole thing is so weird. It's a famously cheap man. - Donald Trump. - Yeah. - But he's also a famously pervy man. - Yeah. - And most of these people, other than Walt Nauta, who is, again, as you said, his co-defendant, all of these people are just young women. So like, and he has a history of paying off young women. I mean, let's not forget that he started his presidency paying $130,000 to Stormy Daniels. And I'm not equating the two, or suggesting that he's done something untoward with Margot or Natalie Harp, but like, again, this guy has a preclivity, or Walt Nauta, but like, this guy has a preclivity to pay a lot of money. - To make problems go away. - Yeah, and you know what the ultimate irony of this is that just two day, Janine Piro came out and was harping on the virtues of this administration fighting fraud. - Crypto. - I mean, she talked about crypto, which like, the lack of self-awareness for the Trump White House to be beating their chest on crypto scheme enforcement. I mean, like, you would be surprised. Any less self-awareness these people wouldn't be able to see the reflections in a mirror. - Yeah, here's a quote, Brian. She said, "If you know somebody that thinks they've got an opportunity that's too good to be true, they've been contacted by someone who's got in on the cryptocurrency because none of us really understand cryptocurrencies as much as we like to. You gotta tell them, stop, do not send a penny." I mean, Donald Trump has built his followers out of literally billions of dollars. - Billions of dollars, and his mean coins, you know, the insiders had early access, they made a boatload of money, and all of the regular retail buyers got completely fucking fleeced. I think that they lost like 97% of their value or something like that, and meanwhile, you have Jeanine Pierrot here, like, from this administration, beating her chest as some champion for fighting crypto fraud. - And also, like, the crypto industry has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into elections to support Republicans. They cannot be thrilled about these comments by Pierrot. We'll see if she gets scolded. - Well, Hunter Biden's doing his level best to even the playing field here. - Gross. - How much slap-top did you buy? (laughing) You were saying just before we got on? - Half a million? - Yeah, no, if you want to turn $1,000 into $30 bucks, it's a great investment. Speaking of Jeanine Pierrot, here's another clip from the US Attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeanine Pierrot. Let's watch. - No, I'm not going there. Don't even go there. That's why I didn't call you. You and I had this relationship, and I'm not going there. Anyone else? - So, Brian, you've got to ask about the reflecting pool prosecution. So, I guess it's okay for her to try and prosecute an innocent man, a former Olympian, David Herne, for doing nothing to just try to smear him, destroy his life before then finally having to admit that the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was falling apart because the contractor did shitty work, which everyone knew, but now you can't ask her about it. - Right, you can engage in a vindictive prosecution. You can try to take away someone's freedom, but God forbid you have to be held accountable for doing it. And look, she may not want to be asked these questions, she may not answer these questions, but there are complaints already filed with the DC bar, and so her law license may very well be at risk. So she can be all tongue in cheek about this, and act all cute, see about it, and say like, "No, no, I'm not going to answer the question that you asked "because I know what question it's going to be." But like, the reality is, this is yet another example of an administration official abusing their position of power to try and destroy somebody's life, and it's not even just-- - Just an innocent person. - An innocent person, 67-year-old former Olympian, David Herne, but it's not just-- - Biking by the Lincoln Memorial. - But it's swept up in this. - It's not just him. I mean, there's James Comey, there's Leticia James, there are-- I mean, the list of people who have been targeted by this administration-- - Comey was trying to kill people with those shells. - That is fair. - Go seashells. - That is fair, and I don't want to understate the gravity, the gravity of what those seashells could have done. She sells, she sells, sorry, sorry, sorry, continue. - But like, you know, I just think it's so crazy how these people think that they don't have to answer for anything, and for her, A, not to answer for it, but B, to think that she's being all cute and tongue-in-cheek in not answering. It just goes to show that these people view themselves as completely unaccountable, which is ironic, because that was the very thing that this administration was predicated on when they were campaigning, that there were two tiers of justice, and that there's a whole level of these elites who don't have to answer for anything they've done, and also this idea of a weaponized government at the hands of the Biden administration. Now you've got the Trump administration doing all of those things, and it's a big joke to them. - Every accusation is a projection. Finally, Brian, speaking of hypocrisy earlier this week, the New York Post reported that next seasons, Jimmy Kim alive on ABC will be its last. A source familiar with the situation told the Post, quote, "his contract is not getting extended," which means the show would end in May of 2027. ABC kind of denied it. I'll read this quote to you. This information is inaccurate in ABC entertainment spokesperson said in a statement to entertainment weekly. Any reports about the future of the show at this point are purely speculative. It's just like the kind of thing you say when no decision has been made now, but you're well aware, that's gonna be made later. Listeners to the show, our viewers right now, probably remember the Kimmel was briefly pulled off the air last year. He made comments with the murder of Charlie Kirk that led Brendan Carr, the chairman of the FCC, to threaten Disney to threaten local affiliates, to pull, you know, Kimmel off the air. It also comes after the late show with Stephen Colbert was canceled by CBS after a ton of pressure from the White House. They basically danced on Colbert's grave, the show's grave when it was over. So Brian, I mean, do we think Kimmel is gonna be the other casualty of Maga, cancel culture here. It feels like we're trending that direction. - Yeah, absolutely. I mean, as you said, it was Stephen Colbert. It's probably gonna be Jimmy Kimmel next. I mean, Trump has been really effective to his credit at kind of ingratiating himself into the leadership of these networks at CBS and probably soon to be CNN. You've got, you've got Ellison, who is a big Trump sake of fan, who installed Barry Weiss, and now look at what's happened. 60 minutes started hiring all of these right-wingers, and you have all of these actual journalists who've come out and kind of exposed the extent to which Barry Weiss had her finger on. - Editorial decisions. I know that we were talking about hypocrisy just a moment ago, but like, but like all of the things that conservatives complained about when it came to liberal media and activists. - I know, so yeah. - Like, liberal bias, I mean, they're doing all of it in real time. - Free speech absolutist, Elon Musk told us that that was why he bought Twitter, and that's why he loved Donald Trump so much. - Right, and immediately suppressed the accounts of any left-of-center content creators. So it's just like. - Celebrated. - As you said, like, it's all projection. It's happening all the time, and so long as he's able to continue using his government, using the FCC to block any mergers that are unfavorable to him and to encourage any mergers that are favorable to him and his political ideology, this stuff will continue to happen. And, you know, it's a shame. The only silver lining is that viewership is going down because it's just, you know, linear TV is just getting less viewership, which, again, underscores the need for everybody who's watching right now. If you're not yet subscribed to this channel, make sure to subscribe, because this is where it's at, and as we continue to watch, not only viewership in linear TV decline, but also linear TV continue to get more and more right-wing, it just increases the need for progressive media to get all the help and get. - Amen. All right, well, that's it for us. We're going to go watch 24 to 48 straight hours of convention, so can we put that? - That's it. - See you guys soon. - See you later. (upbeat music)
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Holding a Republican midterm convention during the NFL season is a poor strategic move, as most Americans—especially non-partisan viewers—will prioritize football over political events.
The convention risks alienating moderate and non-Trump-aligned Republicans, as those most disapproving of Donald Trump are also the least likely to attend or be motivated by the event.
Trump’s low approval ratings, combined with controversial actions like the trade war, foreign military engagement, and suppression of Epstein-related files, make the convention counterproductive and potentially damaging to Republican candidates’ credibility.
Summary:
The Republican Party's decision to hold a midterm convention in Dallas during the start of the NFL season is widely criticized as a misstep in campaign strategy. Polls show that 60% of Democrats are highly motivated to vote, while a significant portion of Republican voters—particularly those who disapprove of Donald Trump—are disengaged and unlikely to attend. The timing clashes with major entertainment events, with football dominating viewership, especially among non-partisan audiences.
Critics argue that the event will fail to energize the base it aims to reach, especially given Trump’s dwindling approval (down nine points in Iowa) and a string of controversial policies. Furthermore, the convention appears to prioritize Trump’s image over voter engagement, with candidates spending large sums to align with him, while many young female aides receive substantial cash gifts—raising ethical concerns and potential violations of federal ethics rules. These payments, including $45,000 to Natalie Harp and others, are seen as inconsistent with presidential conduct and reminiscent of past scandals like the Stormy Daniels payment.
The narrative is further undercut by hypocrisy from administration figures, such as Jeanine Pirro, who promotes crypto enforcement while the administration’s allies have profited from crypto schemes. The episode also highlights a broader trend of right-wing influence in media, with shows like Jimmy Kimmel's reportedly at risk of cancellation due to political pressure. As linear TV viewership declines and media becomes more ideologically aligned, the need for independent, progressive media like Potsayv America grows, offering a counterbalance to right-wing dominance.
FAQs
It coincides with the start of the NFL season, when most Americans are focused on football, reducing political viewership. Additionally, it may alienate moderate Republicans who disapprove of Donald Trump, and it occurs during a time when his approval rating is low.
His approval rating is significantly below 0 in key states like Iowa, indicating he is an anchor for many voters. A convention centered on him may backfire by reinforcing negative perceptions among voters who want to distance themselves from his policies and leadership.
Trump has given $45,000 to aides like Natalie Harp and Margot Martin, raising concerns about potential violations of federal ethics laws. These payments are seen as suspicious, especially given Trump’s history of paying off women to secure silence or avoid scrutiny.
Yes, federal ethics rules prohibit senior officials from giving large cash gifts to subordinates. There are no known prior cases of such payments from a U.S. president, and experts suggest these actions may violate the law, especially if intended to suppress dissent or influence behavior.
Officials like Jeanine Pirro have promoted anti-crypto fraud messaging, despite the fact that crypto industry groups spent heavily to support Republicans. This creates a conflict of interest and appears hypocritical, especially given Trump’s personal financial gains from early crypto investments.
Yes, the case against former Olympian David Herne appears to be politically driven, as it involved a false accusation related to the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool. Critics argue it reflects a broader pattern of using government power to target critics or opponents, not for legitimate justice.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.