Trump Goon's Secret Meeting with Dems Leaked as GOP Prepares To Lose Power
16m 39s
A report of a private meeting between Democratic House Speaker-elect Hakeem Jeffries and Jared Kushner sparks widespread alarm over potential political collusion between the incoming Democratic majority and the Trump administration. Critics argue that Kushner’s ties to Saudi money, foreign diplomacy, and alleged corruption make such a meeting a dangerous overture. The conversation is framed as emblematic of a broader pattern of political corruption, where prominent politicians—including Ted Cruz and Mike Rogers—accept funding from foreign powers or corporate interests, effectively making them "prostitutes" in the eyes of the public. Despite some cautious optimism about political shifts in the House, the primary message is one of resistance: the public must remain vigilant and demand accountability. The rising distrust in corporate PACs and foreign influence is seen as a key factor in the Democratic Party’s declining approval. Advocates stress that the people’s power in the upcoming midterms can push out corrupt leaders and demand transparency, especially in areas like affordability, foreign policy, and democratic integrity. The call is for the election of progressive, non-corrupt representatives to counter the influence of powerful, unaccountable interests. Ultimately, the narrative emphasizes that while the Trump regime may be signaling retreat from direct power, the real threat lies in the normalization of corrupt partnerships—something the public must actively resist.
(upbeat music) All right, some reporting coming out that Hawkeam Jeffries has met with Jared Kushner privately. So much to unpack here. Number one is the Trump regime by asking for this meeting, acknowledging that the Democrats are going to win and Hawkeam Jeffries will be the speaker of the House. There's some positivity in that. Mind you, I'm still hearing reporting that Donald Trump is doing everything he can to declare a national emergency, but at least the people surrounding him are like, let's go ahead and start testing the waters with Hawkeam. Secondly, why is Hawkeam meeting with Jared Kushner? Why, who leaked to this? Where did this information come from? Was it the Trump regime that leaked this? Because I read over the weekend that a lot of propaganda out of this regime is to make people feel like nothing matters, feel nihilistic, if you will. And that's how I felt after I read this article. I thought, Hawkeam Jeffries is meeting with Jared Kushner, Jared Kushner, who clearly is engaging in conversations with all of these oil country for bribes for Donald Trump. Jared Kushner has a $6 billion fund from the Saudis, the same Saudis that funded 9/11. Let's pop up this story here. Jeffries and Kushner met privately discussed how Democrats and administration can work together per the New York Times work together. I don't wanna work with fascists. I don't wanna collaborate with fascists. There isn't a working with criminals. We have to have an opposition party. Hawkeam Jeffries needs to come out and speak to the people, the Democratic base wants fighters. You know, who's number one right now in the 2028 presidential estimates on the markets? John Asuf, why? Because he's calling out, why is Trump flying around with Natalie? Why is he such a corrupt criminal? He is an opposition speaker at the moment. Every time he gives a speech, he is opposing the corruption of this administration. We need to hear from future speaker Jeffries immediately. Why are you meeting with Jared Kushner? Why is Jared Kushner at the center of everything in this government? This is why the Democratic party's approval rating is so low. What I would prefer, Hawkeam Jeffries, say to Jared Kushner, is there's gonna be billions of little investigations into you, Mr. Kushner, one for every dollar that you have used the United States of America, working class people to enrich yourself. What the hell's going on with this island? You have all of Albania protesting. What's going on with all of these Saudi funds? Why are you in the middle of all of these meetings with Putin? Why are you in the middle of all these meetings with Netanyahu? Why did you drag us into this war? Do you even have a security clearance? That's how we're gonna work with you, Mr. Kushner. Your ass is gonna be drug to the house. So don't think that this is we think for a second that the Trump regime gives a shit about affordability. This is a time where we cannot collaborate with these people. We have to be in opposition. So a little positivity in there that perhaps people in MAGA know, the blue tsunami is coming, but not a lot of positivity for potential speaker Jeffries. I think those in the house right now, if he doesn't answer for this and talk about this publicly and talk to the people in the house, there needs to be a, if we win, there needs to be a new speaker. 'Cause I just, I'm, we cannot have any collaborating with these criminals. Moving along, this is hilarious. So little Moses Mike Grindr Johnson, you know, he just, he has completely, he is all chips in on MAGA. The most submissive tradwife Donald Trump has is Moses Mike Grindr Johnson. And here he is responding to the Kushner Jeffries meeting 'cause mind you, this would mean he's no longer speaker and has to hand over the gavel, play the clip. - Does any part of you think that the White House might be trying to figure out which Democrats they can work with if Democrats make, when the House, and that is why they would send Jared Kushner to meet with Jeffries? - I don't know what that's about. I know Jared has interest in lots of other things going on. He's not really directly involved in the admin, at least in the day-to-day in the White House. - Yeah, you don't know what that's about, did he, Mike? Because you're just a useful idiot. You're just a little puppet for Donald Trump. They use you, spend you, and they will kick you to the curb. And then JD Vance is entering the fray. He is trying to attack Abdul El-Sahed during a kickoff to the midterms campaigning. Let's see what our little smoky-eye sociopath is up to. Play the clip. - El-Sahed, this guy running for Senate and Michigan. He once argued, not too long ago, that criticisms of Sharia law were rooted in white supremacy. I'd love to go back in time and tell my papal that there's a man who claims to stand for working people who says, "Not only should we have Sharia law, "but if you criticize it, you're a white supremacist." That's not my papal's Democrat party, my friends. - So that's not his papal's Democratic party. I mean, are we for real right now? Come on. All right, so first and foremost, Abdul El-Sahed is not advocating for Sharia law. This is all they have. Abdul El-Sahed is advocating for healthcare. He is advocating for the working class. He is actually advocating for affordability. He is not as deep with Peter Teal taking money, having Peter Teal have to buy your Senate seat to Ohio, which you barely want. He is not bought and paid for. Abdul El-Sahed is not a prostitute like you are, JD Vance. And more than anything, he can stand up for his wife. Let's hear his response, play the clip. - Would you heard in these comments? - Well, I'll tell you this, every time JD Vance opens his mouth, the first two things I can think is, man, that guy is boring. And second, Peter Teal had to spend a ton of money to get that man elected barely in the state of Ohio. Now, all right. And, you know, I think there was another clip that I saw this weekend where he said, or maybe it was a tweet, where he said, is he going to take, is JD Vance going to take his wife to meet his papah? You know, because JD Vance's wife is an Indian, which I completely support. I love the diversity in America. JD Vance, ironically, does not, because he will not condemn racist, Nazi, anti-immigrant, group chats that are incubating in the youth of the Republican Maga party. And then, Trump, you know, his whole thing, he won because he was America first. No wars, groceries. Remember, he did the whole press conference where he had groceries on a table, and he was just amazed. Groceries, you know, that's just kind of an antique word. We don't really use that anymore. Affordability, you know, all of these things are very new to the president. Meanwhile, 77 million people thought that some trust fund silver spoon dipshit would understand about affordability. But that's another podcast with some psychiatrist and historians at another day. But let's do a little check-in with where Trump stands on his America first policy. Play the clip. - What do you have to say to U.S. farmers, you feel that the deal is benefiting Argentina more than it is them as they are. - Argentina is fighting for its life, young lady. You don't know anything about it. They're fighting for their life. Nothing is benefiting Argentina. You understand what that means? They have no money. They have no anything. They're fighting so hard to survive. If I can help them survive in a free world, I happen to like the president of Argentina. I think he's trying to do the best he can. But don't make it sound like they're doing great. They are dying. All right, they're dying. - What do you mean by that? - I wonder why they're dying. I wonder if it's because their president is as corrupt as I'll get out and like you doesn't give a shit about working class people and like you can be bought, paid for, manipulated. This is utterly insane. The Democrats need to chop this clip up. This is not America first. This is a man who is placating to the worst leaders around the world. They are trying to create a new world order. Our only saving grace will be that the leader of this new world order is an 80 year old aging OB senior citizen who is dumber than a box of hot rocks and is breathtakingly incompetent surrounded by people equally as breathtakingly incompetent. But here he climbs that his endorsements are stronger than ever. Pop this up. My endorsements are stronger than ever. Not to mention the fact that good people are getting elected that have never had the chance. Here is an accurate list of the last number of seasons. There has never been anything close. It is an honor that I take very seriously. He goes on and on. I can't even read all of it because it's so stupid. Donald Trump and Maggie, you guys, it is a fading star. Even Jared Kushner is looking forward to figure out how he can keep the investigations surrounding all of them at bay by trying to suck up to Hawkeam Jeffries. Why is Jeffries doing this? Because Jeffries has a lot of the same donors that Maggie has. That's the problem with the Democratic Party. And you're going to hear a lot, a lot, a lot about
Oh my gosh, the progressive left. You know, I don't wanna be a part of that Democratic Party. FDR, which Democratic Party would he have been a part of? The progressive non-corporate left that regulates capitalism, that taxes the rich, that provides a social safety net, or would he be a part of the corporate Democratic Party, that services corporations and has private clandestine meetings behind the back of all of the constituents? Well, Mike Rogers, who is running against Abdul Al-Sayed, this is really interesting, because A-PAC has become a central point in all of these elections. And he is asking A-PAC to shelve its campaign ads on his behalf. So I think what we're seeing is a bipartisan support on both the Republican side and the Democratic side, that people don't like politicians that take corporate money. Pop this up. Scoop from Axios, allies of Mike Rogers, Michigan's GOP nominee for the US Senate have asked A-PAC not to advertise on his behalf, triggering a rupture with the powerful, but polarizing pro-Israel group. I also read that a lot of these politicians that are on the ballot are asking for a moratorium on data centers. So as you can see, Democrats, as you can see, Hawkeam Jeffries, the energy behind opposing these tech oligarchs, the energy behind opposing corporate PAC money, the energy behind opposing a state that is very aggressive Israel and displacing people and killing people. The American public doesn't have an appetite for that. Moreover, the American public still has a bit of moral clarity in us, despite all of the toxicity and the debauchery that's come out of this regime. The American people are standing up and saying, "No, we don't want politicians that are prostitute." Now the problem, the difference between Mike Rogers and Abdul Al-Sahed is Mike Rogers, JD Vance, Donald Trump, Jared Kushner, you name it, any of them. They are prostitutes. They might for campaigning purposes say, "Oh yeah, we're not taking corporate PAC money." But make no mistake. There's a conversation that, "Hey, don't give me any money right now or find a different way to give it to me." But once I get in, although however you want me to vote, I'm still your hooker. That's the conversation that's being had in private. And then of course, he hasn't been in the news that much. So I'm gonna bring you back up, Ted Cruz. Ted Cruz is literally being paid by Israel, pop this up. New, the Israeli government is paying for ads on Ted Cruz's podcast. Cruz can't take the money himself, but under an unusual licensing deal, those foreign funds can go to a super PAC dedicated exclusively to Cruz. So here we are in a situation where these politicians are bought, paid for complete prostitutes by these horrific, morally deranged pimps, whether it's APAC, whether it's big oil, whether it's big pharma, whether it's the military industrial complex, whether it's big tech, which is probably one of the most evil forces we have right now in the United States, because these people are on the record of wanting to do away with democracy. And so we have all of these politicians that are on the tit of all of these evil entities. And of course, Ted Cruz is the ringleader finding some loophole. But I wanna leave you with this. It is so important that we not feel deterred in the midterms, despite the clandestine meetings between Jeffries and Kushner. It is important for us to remember that we have the power to push Jeffries. Should he be the speaker or to push the other members of Congress to not vote him in a speaker? Because all of these prostitutes that are paying all these people off all the time, when they see the power of the people, they see the power of their profits, they see the power of their dollars. And all of a sudden, they shift a little bit. Oh yeah, we're gonna have Pride Week again at meta or at whatever. These people believe in nothing. So we have to elect the most progressive, non-botten paid for politicians that we can, but we're gonna get some corporate Democrats in there too. And that's better than a MAGA every day, all day, and twice on Sunday, but it means our work in letting these corporate botten paid for Democrats, no, we're not gonna tolerate it. Is that much more worthy and is that much more important? All right, that's all I have. Please pre-order my book, Not Today Fascist. The link is right below in the show notes. I'm even doing a little tour at i've had it podcast.com. You can get a ticket, and we'll be back later with more news. (upbeat music)
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Reports suggest a private meeting between House Speaker-elect Hakeem Jeffries and Jared Kushner, raising concerns about potential collaboration between Democrats and the Trump administration.
Critics argue that Kushner, with ties to Saudi funding and global political dealings, represents a corrupt, undemocratic force, and the meeting signals an effort to normalize ties with figures accused of exploitation and foreign influence.
The Democratic Party faces declining approval due to perceived ties with corporate donors and foreign powers, especially through PACs like A-PAC and tech oligarchs.
Public skepticism grows over politicians’ claims of neutrality, with many accusing them of being "prostitutes" paid by corporate or foreign interests, including oil, tech, and Israel.
Figures like Ted Cruz and Mike Rogers are criticized for accepting foreign or corporate funding, undermining democratic accountability.
The speaker-elect is urged to publicly reject alliances with such figures and to defend democratic principles, especially regarding affordability, anti-corruption, and opposition to militarism and displacement.
The broader message is that the people’s power in midterms can push out corrupt politicians and demand transparency, even amid covert political negotiations.
Summary:
A report of a private meeting between Democratic House Speaker-elect Hakeem Jeffries and Jared Kushner sparks widespread alarm over potential political collusion between the incoming Democratic majority and the Trump administration. Critics argue that Kushner’s ties to Saudi money, foreign diplomacy, and alleged corruption make such a meeting a dangerous overture. The conversation is framed as emblematic of a broader pattern of political corruption, where prominent politicians—including Ted Cruz and Mike Rogers—accept funding from foreign powers or corporate interests, effectively making them "prostitutes" in the eyes of the public.
Despite some cautious optimism about political shifts in the House, the primary message is one of resistance: the public must remain vigilant and demand accountability. The rising distrust in corporate PACs and foreign influence is seen as a key factor in the Democratic Party’s declining approval. Advocates stress that the people’s power in the upcoming midterms can push out corrupt leaders and demand transparency, especially in areas like affordability, foreign policy, and democratic integrity.
The call is for the election of progressive, non-corrupt representatives to counter the influence of powerful, unaccountable interests. Ultimately, the narrative emphasizes that while the Trump regime may be signaling retreat from direct power, the real threat lies in the normalization of corrupt partnerships—something the public must actively resist.
FAQs
The meeting may reflect efforts by the Trump administration to assess potential cooperation with Democratic leaders, though critics argue it signals collaboration with figures linked to controversial foreign funding and policies.
Kushner has been linked to significant foreign funding, including from Saudi Arabia, and has participated in high-profile meetings with global leaders, raising concerns about political influence and transparency.
Yes, several politicians, including Mike Rogers and Ted Cruz, have been accused of accepting or being funded by corporate interests, raising concerns about political independence and transparency.
Yes, reports indicate that groups like A-PAC and Israel's government have funded political campaigns, including Ted Cruz’s, through super PACs, suggesting political actors are influenced by external financial interests.
Many Americans are increasingly critical of politicians accepting corporate PAC money, viewing such ties as unethical and undermining democratic accountability.
Critics suggest that shared donor bases between Democrats and Trump-related figures may undermine ideological integrity and create conflict of interest.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.