To Viktor, no spoils: Hungary’s new start

[MUSIC PLAYING] The Economist. Hello and welcome to the Intelligence from The Economist. I'm Jason Palmer. And I'm Rosie Blore. Every weekday, we provide a fresh perspective on the events shaping your world. Britain's dairy farmers are suffering from too much of a good thing. Milk production is through the roof, even as demand is declining. We ask why, instead of turning it into cheese or yogurt or milk powder, many farmers are simply pouring it down the drain. And decades on, Cambodia is still strewn with landmines and unexpoded bombs from the Vietnam War and Khmer Rouge era. Destroying them is dangerous and time-consuming. Now, it's found a novel method. [MUSIC PLAYING] First up, though. [CHEERING] Last night, duvelation on the streets of Budapest. Victor Orban, whose corrupt and increasingly autocratic Fidesh party, has ruled Hungary for 16 years, lost yesterday's election. The result is painful for us, but clear Orban said in his concession speech. The opposition Tisha party, under charismatic leader Peter Maggiar, won a thumping majority. [SPEAKING SPANISH] This is an election with consequences far beyond the country's borders. And Hungarians have overwhelmingly voted for change. This is an extraordinarily significant election. And people in Hungary who backed the opposition are elated. Matt Stineglass is the economist, Europe editor. Victor Orban has been running this country for 16 years. And there was no certainty as of yesterday, as to whether he would actually lose the election. He did. They have a new government led by a young upstart. And people are extremely excited. Matt, you're in Budapest. Give us a rundown of the election results and how it feels to be there. Turn out of this election was 77%, which is the highest it's ever been since the end of communism. The city of Budapest feels like a weight has been lifted off of it after 16 years. Victor Orban won four consecutive elections. The city has always leaned towards the opposition. It's a liberal city. Orban is famously a liberal. It pronounces himself so. In the countryside, it wasn't certain until the last minute how the vote was going to go. What we've seen is that people in rural areas seem also to have been fed up after 16 years of Orban's rule, particularly with corruption shipped towards Russia. I think what people all over Hungary can agree on is that this election means the possibility of change after 16 years of the same party and the same man running the show. Magyar is one thumping majority. Just explain the significance of that and what it means he can do what he stands for. Hungary's electoral system is very complicated and it's complicated in part because Victor Orban made it that way in order to give his own party advantages. And that means that you can't tell necessarily what the size of the majority is just by looking at the percentage of the vote. Magyar is one way it looks like 54% to 38%. In Parliament, it looks like that will give him a 2/3 majority and it's crucial to have a 2/3 majority because it means you can change the constitution. That may sound worrying to people who don't like the idea of a country who can change the constitution too easily, but Victor Orban has been changing the constitution for the last 16 years to give power to his own party. And in order to govern effectively, you need to be able to override some of those constitutional changes that he's made. One of the analysts I talked to said, the constitution is full of poise and pills. There are officials who have the ability to veto your program. Feed us has control over the courts. All of this kind of stuff needs to be rolled back in order to enact your agenda. And everybody was conscious of this in Hungary. When I was going around after the win last night in Budapest, one of the chance that people had was 2/3, 2/3. Because that was the target they had set themselves to change the country. When we spoke last week, you talked about the fact that Hungary's economy was in trouble. And that was one of the things potentially shifting people's views. So was it the economy that ousted Orban or was it an actual rejection of his corruption and autocracy? At the beginning of this campaign, we thought that the big issues were going to be poor eaglet performance, deterioration of social services. Those were the issues that Victor Magiub's concentrating on because he wanted to avoid seeming like a cosmopolitan foreign liberal who was all concerned about things that don't really matter so much to ordinary voters. But over the course of the campaign, things really started to shift. Corruption has been a major issue from the start. That's the reason why Peter Magiub is a huge personality. He went viral with videos denouting the corruption of the regime. You used to be a member of Videsz, and he turned against the party and told the inside story about how corruption works. What we found talking to people around the country over the last couple of weeks is that people were much more concerned than we had thought about the country's shift towards Russia. They were concerned about eternal way from the European Union. And that really resonated more than I expected. I was hearing from people who you wouldn't expect to hear it from. That what they cared about was that the country was trying to be part of Europe and not towards Russia. Mr. Oban told before that who is not with us is already the reason why we are talking about the enemy in the same country. In a country that we're struggling and waiting for decades to have the opportunity to rejoin the best and part of Europe. I think that it wasn't as much of a pocketbook election as anybody had expected. I think it really has a significance for the country's place in the world. And what is the significance of Hungary's place in the world? What will the ousting of Oban actually mean beyond Hungary? Hungary has become a thwart inside of the EU. Oban has used his veto in the European Council to try to block European Union sanctions on Russia and stop aid to Ukraine. Things like that have become an enormous hassle. And if Oban had retained power, people in major EU countries were saying they were going to have to change the EU system to figure out how to get around him. So from that perspective, just a pragmatic level. This is very important in international relations. But I think there's also a tremendous significance for the symbolism of Orapon as the most important international figure in the international, national, conservative populists far right, maga-esque types of movements that we've seen coming off over the last decade. Orapon is a hero to them. And his loss is both a blow to that movement and to some extent a blueprint for how you can beat those kinds of politicians. So what will this mean for Hungary going forward? Can they overthrow all the changes that Oban has made? Everyone in Tisa is going to spend the next few weeks absolutely obsessed with trying to answer that question. We have our first round of meetings with Tisa in a core today. And they're going to outline how they think they can unwind 16 years of basically autocratic governance. Petro Magyar has promised that he will unfreeze EU aid. The EU has blocked possibly up to 20 billion euros worth of aid over the last few years because Hungary keeps on violating the rule of law. And they're not sure that that money isn't being spent corruptly. A lot of it is being spent corruptly. So the first thing for the economy and for the country is to get that aid moving again. But that depends on a relationship between the new government and Brussels. And the new government has some people and to have plenty of experience in Brussels. What they need to do is try to make commitments that are sort of underlying and accept quickly so that the money can start moving again. That will be very big news for the Hungarian economy. Some of the people celebrating in Budapest were celebrating the end of corruption. There was a woman at Tisa's election rally who was holding a zebra balloon with a picture of Viktor Orbán on the front of it. And that's a reference to the fact that Viktor Orbán's father now owns this enormous Habsburg castle. One of his neighbors has a collection of zebras and other exotic animals that have been photographed running around. Everybody was laughing when they saw the zebra balloon. Everybody knew what it meant. I want to let this zebra go when we have the result. Just say goodbye for these years and for the struggle we had. Young people celebrating in the streets formed these kind of spontaneous cordons where cars would pull up, slow down as they went through, roll their windows down, stick their hands out, and slap everybody's hands. It was just this extraordinary scene of celebration. And I think the country is in an incredibly optimistic mode. Matt, thank you very much. Thank you, Rosie. (Multiple sounds) I'm Johnny Crickmore, dairy farmer and cheese maker at Fen Farm Dairy in Bungie and Suffolk, third generation dairy farm, of which we have around 300 milking cows, all are Montbelliard breed, this is French breed, most known for our chickens. cheese bar and by God. We've had many good farming friends over the years who've got out of chaos, out of dairy in our part of the UK. Farming is not easy. As farmers, we work seven days a week. We're affected by weather, which is completely out of our control. And you only need the commodity price of something to go up or your price of milk goes down and it's sometimes the final straw and people just get fed up with it. Dairy farming's always been challenging. It always probably will be challenging. My name's Kelly Seaton. I'm a dairy farmer from the Shropshire Teshaborder. Technically new to the industry, so I married my husband nearly 14 years ago and fell in love with dairy farming. Some of the biggest challenges are that we are always going to be price takers within the dairy sector. We get an email every month. That's the same whoever you supply your milk to telling you what you're going to be paid for your milk for the next month. So yeah, we are selling milk at a loss at the moment at about 30.5 pence per liter. Back in September, we're at 40.5 pence per liter. The challenge is always going to be that these difficult times seem to last longer than the good times. Britain is producing too much milk. About 13 billion litres in the year to the end of March, and that's about 5% more than in 2024-25. The problem with that surplus is that average prices for farmers have dropped by about 17% since September. And that really hurts dairy farmers some up or in the milk away because there's simply no way to take it and some are having to quit the business altogether. So why is there just so much milk around in Britain? It's a supply and a demand issue. So last summer prices for farmers were healthy, but there was a drought last summer and when that drought forced farmers to replace the grass that they normally feed cows with, with the nutrient-rich feed that they usually reserve for winter, their better-fed cows produced more milk. Cows are also much more efficient nowadays, believe it or not, than they used to be. So a cow today in Britain produces about twice as much milk as a cow from the 1970s. And there's a few reasons for that. Mostly technological. So robotic milkers are much more common nowadays and they're much more efficient than doing it by hand. So that means that the cows can visit the shed more often. It also means that between milking, they can relax more and more blood flows to the others. And that means that again, they can produce more milk. AI and wearable tech comes into it as well. So farmers increasingly using these AI systems that allow them to track the herd and to work out which cows are ready for breeding, which are the most efficient milkers. It also comes into kind of genetics and breeding the best cows possible. And what's the demand side of the equation? Dairy consumption is dipping in Britain as more Britain's choose plant-based alternatives. Things like sugary cereals at breakfast, those of long being a vehicle for milk, those have become less common too. So even in a nation of tea and coffee drinkers where milk is the mixer of choice, there is a dip in our dairy consumption that affects the surplus because if there's no one to drink it, that milk's not going to go anywhere. And there really is nowhere else for it to go, no other way for it to be used? Well, of course milk can be turned into butter and cheese and all sorts of dairy products, but with a surplus you need the spare capacity to do that. And Britain lacks that spare capacity. It's cheese and butter makers are working at capacity and unfortunately that lack of demand and that surplus forces dairy farmers to kill Daisy. Beef prices are high and farmers need to make money. So there are ways I guess for the supply and demand to balance themselves out, but while that's being worked out on a farmer by farmer basis, where do you see the price going? Speaking to dairy farms, they're not optimistic going into the spring as cows head back outside and they're back on nutrient rich grass. They expect the price to fall further as more milk is produced. So that's bad news for dairy farmers. The dairy market is volatile by nature and surplus is abroad. Don't help. So this isn't a problem unique to Britain. There is a surplus globally and dairy farmers have a hard enough job already. Since 2019, the number of British dairy farmers has fallen by 20% to about 7,000. Will you see why that might be the case? It doesn't make dairy farming sound like such a great gig. The good news for the industry is that British dairy does have fans abroad. So last year Britain exported a record 2.2 billion pounds, mostly to Europe, of dairy 17% more than the year before. And some farmers like Johnny who we heard from before have found clever ways of insulating themselves from market fluctuations. So I think it was going back now like nearly 18 years ago. I think I got so frustrated with the dairy industry and how it's sort of so tied to commodity prices. And I think from that point onwards, we've constantly been looking at ways of removing ourselves as best possible from the world of commodity. So electricity, we've been busy working at putting solar panels on our cowshed roofs over the years. So electricity we've got down very low now. Then we look at things like fertiliser, we don't buy it. Instead we've worked at getting more species of plant in like clover and some herbs into the paddocks where the cows graze and that has all helped towards allowing the grass to grow without having to feed it chemical fertilizer. If Britain could find more ways to turn its milk into higher value products such as butter, cheese and yogurt, Britain would have even more to take to the market. The world will pay for British supercouse. Harry, thanks very much for joining us. Thank you, Jason. For decades, Cambodia's countryside has carried the scars of war. From relentless American bombing campaigns to the terror of the Khmer Rouge regime, millions of landmines and unexploded bombs have been left buried beneath the ground. Since the fall of the Khmer Rouge in 1979, landmines have killed and injured thousands of people, but finding these mines is slow and dangerous work. To locate a landmine, a D minor was sweep the ground inch by inch with the metal detector. It can take them up to four days to clear an area the size of a tennis court and any misstep can be fatal. Just last year, two D miners working with the Cambodian government were killed while attempting to remove an explosive device near the Thai Cambodia border. A popo, a Belgian NGO, has come up with a unique solution to make this work safer. It trains African giant pouch rats to sniff out explosives. These large rodents are fitted with a harness attached to a line and guided across the ground. When they locate explosive compounds, they scratch the surface to alert the handlers. The mine is then safely destroyed. For rats, the job is both easier and far less dangerous than for humans. They only weigh around 1 to 1.5 kg, which allows them to scamp her across mind ground without triggering an explosion. A popo began deploying what it calls its hero rats in Cambodia in 2015. Since then, they have cleared 40 square kilometers of land and helped destroy more than 8,000 landmines. But in all that time, one hero rat became a legend. His name was Magawa. He was born in Tanzania but spent his best years in Cambodia. During his six years in the field, he detected more than 100 landmines, clearing the equivalent of 20 football pitches. He died peacefully in 2022 as the only rat to have ever been awarded the PDSA Gold Medal, an international prize for animal bravery. And now, his legacy is being honoured in a more permanent way. Earlier this month, in CM Reep, invested Cambodia, a 2.2-metre statue of Magawa was unveiled. Proud officials gave speeches. The crowd was packed with excited schoolchildren, NGO workers, Cambodian social media influencers and even tourists. Many were thrilled to be photographed holding rats in front of Magawa statue. It's tickles! The tribute is also a call to action. For all the progress, hero rats have made. Between 4 and 6 million minds remained buried in Cambodia, concentrated in some of the country's poorest regions. Their presence, typhles farming, details investment and execs a human toll. A popo wants that funding for this vital work is dwindling. Last year, Cambodia requested its third extension to meet a UN deadline to become mind-free. Its new target is 2030. To get there, it will need more money. And quite possibly, a lot more rats. [Music] That's all for this episode of The Intelligence. See you back here tomorrow. (upbeat music)