A recent surge in global political events—from Brazil’s unexpected left-wing victory to Serbia’s student-led anti-corruption movement—reveals a deepening public distrust in established institutions. In Brazil, Lula’s unexpected win overturned betting odds, while in Serbia, young activists defeated an authoritarian leader through grassroots organization, demonstrating that civic action can shift power. Meanwhile, in the U.S., midterms show weakening support for conservative candidates, with corruption now a top concern among voters. In California, a proposed wealth tax (Prop 40) faces fierce opposition from major wealth holders, including Google founders and In-N-Out owner, who fund campaigns to block it. The ballot measures are designed to undermine the tax, suggesting a coordinated effort to protect elite interests. Additionally, financial institutions—including rating agencies—are widely criticized for providing misleading assessments of risk in insurance, bonds, and loans, raising concerns about systemic corruption. These developments collectively signal a global shift toward greater accountability and transparency, as citizens demand fairer systems and more honest governance. The recurring theme is that unchecked power and financial opacity are eroding trust, and that collective action—whether political or civic—is emerging as a powerful response.
Support for the show comes from InGen.
Running a small business means every dollar has to work hard.
But if your team is still booking travel the old way,
it's costing you more than you think.
InGen is the fastest growing travel and spend platform in the country,
built specifically for businesses like yours.
Book a trip in as little as two and a half minutes.
Earn up to 10% back on hotels.
And in 2025, InGen customers save more than $300 million on travel.
With zero booking fees, no contracts, and no BS.
More than 1,000 businesses join InGen every month.
Join them and get $500 when your business signs up and starts traveling at InGen.com slash Vox.
As soon as autumn rolls around and you swap your iced lattes for pumpkin spice,
that's your signal to start thinking about the holidays.
The decor, the gifts, the shopping lists.
Put more in.
Importantly, the holiday treats.
Cheesecakes, cookies.
Is there anything better?
And when the recipe calls for cream cheese, there's only one option.
Philadelphia, the original cream cheese.
Made with fresh milk and real cream.
This holiday season, whether you're going all out or keeping it simple,
make it really Philly good.
Find your favorite holiday recipe at creamcheese.com.
Welcome back to Lemonade Stand, everybody.
Back from New York.
Yeah.
Just in time for what feels like the entire world to have elections.
So we do want to give you guys a little announcement.
Next week are the U.S. midterm elections, and we'll be doing our episode one day later than normal.
That's right.
Don't freak out.
Don't panic.
Yeah.
We haven't been silenced by the deep state.
We haven't been shut down by.
We haven't been shut down by the Jared Kushner's slush fund.
Trump has not taken his debt.
Maybe he has.
Not yet.
Well, when we get to the Jared Kushner section of this episode.
Yeah, we're going to find out.
There's a lot of lemonade stated there.
But yes.
Next week, one day late.
The episode is going to come out on Thursday.
But a lot of people may have seen, I think today, as we're recording this,
Israel's elections are happening right now.
Brazil's elections just happened.
There was a snap election called in Serbia that you just made a video about.
Yeah.
And then even next week, I think it's our midterm elections and New Zealand's elections.
So it's an insane.
And the world is watching both of them with bated breath.
It's like.
It's an equal consequence, I would say.
Well, you know, if you've been looking at New Zealand politics,
they've been talking about taking over Greenland, too.
It's been getting swept under the rug.
Yeah, it's been getting hidden.
But they have some dangerous ideas down there.
And they're getting away with a lot.
Can I say that?
Mm-hmm.
But I wanted to start with the.
The Brazilian election and Lula winning, which, if you're paying attention,
I think really no one expected.
But you, you have more to say about it.
Listen, I think there's a lot of elections to talk about.
There's a lot to talk about with elections this week.
And I did that video on Serbia.
But the Brazilian one is almost, if anything, as shocking or maybe more so.
This is a pretty historic win from Lula.
A little bit of context.
First of all, the context on the betting markets.
This is probably the most wrong I've ever seen.
The betting market.
They had him at like 80, 85% to lose.
And then it all flipped the last second.
And nobody in Brazilian history has lost the first round and gone on to win.
Or they haven't done it in like 80 years.
It's like a very, very long time.
And so quick context.
There's been this big, you know, in South America, the red is left and blue is right.
Just to catch up for you.
Thank you.
They flip it.
Actually, everywhere but America.
I think they flip it.
And there's been this big rightward.
Surge in Latin America over the past few years.
Like many, many countries have had right wing populist parties take power and win elections.
And the thought was, this is going to happen in Brazil.
There's this guy I follow who writes a lot about South America.
His name is Brian Winter.
And he said the big debate on the Brazilian election was whether Lula would lose because incumbents are losing everywhere.
Or whether he would lose because Republicans are winning everywhere.
And they said neither happened.
It's like this shame, insane thing.
So what's weird is in this election.
In this election, you know, they had the first round of voting that also does the Congress.
It does like all the legislature.
The right wing party won a ton of seats.
Like they have the majority now.
They have legislative victory.
But then it goes to this second round with the two runoff candidates for the presidency.
Yeah.
And Bolsonaro, the other candidate, he was ahead in that initial election.
Yeah, he was ahead.
And so it just seemed like a slam dunk that he was going to put it in.
But between that gap.
Yeah.
Between that first and the second vote, they had like a really, really insane digital game.
The thing that I've been able to take away from reading about it is like Lula's team got really, really active on social media.
He, I think, won a debate.
They had a debate.
And he like did a really good job in it.
He had a lot of catchy moments that went viral.
And those two things were enough to switch, you know, a few million votes from people that were undecided.
So, yeah, it was a shocking result.
I mean, none of this.
It kind of makes you realize that none of this stuff is real.
None of this stuff is set in stone.
Like, literally, as big as like title events are, you can go as focused as you want.
People can change their mind down to the last minute.
Did you see?
So I was wondering, I did hear about this like digital push, this like reinvigoration of his base from the initial loss, these sort of things.
Yeah.
But also that within the time between when the runoff was declared and when this election happened, the left wing party in power,
managed to pass a new work reform bill that like reduced the work week from 44 hours to 40 hours, reduced the work week from six days to five days.
Yeah, they did.
I'll talk about that because the problem is with that is that they they passed a pretty comprehensive like spending and again, hour reducing bill that costs a lot of money and it is funded with debt.
So, yeah, I mean, listen, this is weird because the other.
Party, if you don't know, Brazil's elections, they had a coup, like an attempted coup, like January 6th.
And the president that lost the last election, Jair Bolsonaro, is in jail.
He's in jail for that coup.
He's like house arrest now.
Oh, he's not in jail.
OK, they got him out.
It's funny because that was one of the lines, I think, in the debate where Lula was like, you know, he said prisoners vote for you or something.
He's like, yeah, 100 percent of prisoners should vote for me like your father.
So, so, OK, he's house arrest, but his son is the one that was running.
Yeah, Flavio Bolsonaro.
And so he lost.
And that is kind of crumbling the whole plan they had around Jair's crimes being waived and him getting out and yada, yada, yada.
And so it's all kind of falling apart.
And as of like right now, there's like breaking updates.
His passport got canceled and he's fled the country.
My understanding is I saw an update from like 30 minutes ago.
He's gotten a.
U.S. passport and he doctored flight logs to make a flight fake flight to Argentina, but he's going to the United States.
You know, he has allies in like the Trump administration.
So apparently he also has an Italian passport as well.
So like he can move to Europe if he wants to.
But this was the Bolsonaro family had strong ties to the U.S. to the Trump administration and are, I guess, like gave them a heads up, gave the Trump administration a heads up.
And then like we're coming to the States, I think out of fear, primarily out of fear of like retribution for the other side winning, because presumably his dad is going to be or himself is going to be held to account for crimes committed.
No, already he's been charged with like corruption and money laundering and yada, yada, yada.
So pretty insane turn of events in Brazil.
I do think I think he was also expecting Flavio here that after the election was lost.
Yeah.
He attempted to contest it, not with a coup, but he said, like, there was extra polling hours and we need a recount, yada, yada, yada.
And he expected to have more support from Trump.
And Trump said, well, this could have been rigged.
But, you know, you kind of just like I'm busy with my own thing.
I got my own show on my own plate.
And so once that happened, the fight went out of him instantly.
And his plan became to flee the country.
It is funny because Trump is just the worst ally.
He really is.
He's so flaky.
Like, he's just.
Whatever he's wrapped up in at any given time.
He's like, yeah, we're boys, right?
Like, what about.
Yeah.
I do think going for a second, a second coup would be insane.
A second coup would have been.
I think there's it does get compared to January 6th a lot.
But I think the previous Bolsonaro encouraged coup, there was a case that somebody within Bolsonaro's team had like got caught making up.
A plot to have Lula assassinated.
Oh, Jesus.
And there isn't proof that like Bolsonaro approved of that or knew about it.
Right.
But it was someone in like his immediate camp who was talking about having Lula killed.
And then among the coup, like the attempted coup itself and like and then him getting tried for it.
OK, so if you're a Lula fan, big excitement.
And obviously this does create a more diverse political South America.
People were worried there would be this pure right.
were shipped over the whole continent.
That being said. because of this spending package because of brazil's economy in general which is
you know they have a like an eight percent deficit which is even bigger than france which
is even bigger than what we got here in america you know it's a pretty big deficit uh there was
an immediate reaction to him winning like their stock market dropped i i don't even have the
exact number it was it was like it was a massive drop instantly their currency took a big hit
like there was a lot of uh financial bets that lula would not win uh and that flavio would win
like possibly rein in spending i don't believe that either there's a lot of you know there's a
long history across all countries of people saying there's a problem with debt i'm gonna
rein in spending when i get and then they get in power and they never they spend more trump
is example of that i have a pro argument for lula here tell me and with the spending yeah
is so their debt to gdp ratio which is often the like general signaler of how safe a country's debt
burden is it's not like a foolproof metric or something like that they're at about 83 percent
right now
which by how people worry about this metric people are very wary once that number climbs
above a hundred yeah and it starts to impact their ability to raise further debt in the global bond
market uh well they're only at 83 they've got some wiggle room yeah and by the time they surpass
a hundred lula will be dead probably yeah i mean i think the fear is that there's like no this is a
problem everywhere right now there's just no plan or path we're gonna just run it until the the cliff
goes off but yes anyway uh yeah big big win for lula and uh and an equally interesting win over
in serbia these two things happened like back to back and they were like uh pretty insane so i did
a video on the serbia thing i don't know if you yeah i had questions because i i this is a rare
circumstance where i haven't watched your big a episode and i hope i'm not rehashing too much for
those who may have watched that already but i wanted to present this as we talked about serbia
on the show a while back and what led up to like the rise in student protests there and the rise in
and then uh for those of you interested i actually did an interview with a student protester on our
patreon like i interviewed him for like an hour and a half his name was constantine is constantine
he's not he's fine he's fine he's celebrating actually he's probably in a good mood uh and it
was really uh if you want to check that out you know go check out the patreon but i'm what confused
me a little bit when i was reading about this uh and i only read about it today was this was a
snap election and the students formed like a new political party that won the election that has
ousted it's so sick so yeah can you can you just help me understand that very brief because i did
do the big a video but it really is so awesome and i'm like trying to tell everybody about it
because i think it like inspires me uh so uh vuchich who's run the country for 14 years and
has gotten increasingly more authoritarian and more tied in with putin uh about two years ago
there was a massive train station collapse uh that began these
protests and people looked into the class and they said it just got renovated why did this happen
and it seems to be that uh there was a lot of cronyism a lot of contracts being given out
and they would take all the money they would spend the bare minimum on the reconstruction
and keep it all for themselves people were very upset about this and six people 16 people died
and instead of just having this one-time protest it became like you know every day at the same time
of the collapse they would have this candlelight vigil and then they started to get bigger and then
every year on the the memory of it they would have these massive protests in the street and they
organized and they noticed that the reason that vuchich uh was so hard to unseat is that he had
such control of the media and anytime an opposition party came up he would like 24 7 slander their
leader and like really like run him through the mud and so they thought what if we made a movement
that has no figurehead no no like one leader and the reason he was even running for election
is because there's a constitutional limit in serbia that you can't have more than two five
year terms he was that he started in 2017 we're coming up the end of it so
he said i'm going to resign right before my term limit and i'm going to run for prime minister
instead of president and i'm going to move some of the powers from presidency to the prime minister
it's kind of cheeky yeah it's called the putin shuffle putin has actually done this like i think
multiple times back and forth to maintain power forever so he's doing it and uh the odds are again
all the betting markets he was supposed to win and they made this thing called the student list
where they created these small locally organized groups across serbia not just in the capital and
they would vote for people they thought were just basically not corrupt their big thing was like
we don't care where you are politically we don't care where you are with the geopolitics of serbia
because there's russian influence chinese influence american influence we want to end
corruption in serbia and that was a very unifying thought and so just pick people you think are like
true uh serbian patriots not corrupt and they picked like doctors cardiologists athletes former
basketball players like just people they thought represented the country and they had 250 of them
for every seat and uh there was no leader though yeah and then they went door to door because they
didn't have the media so they went door to door and they knocked on everyone's door and they said
serbia or mafia was their slogan was the idea is like this country's become a crime ring let's yeah
and it was just so successful like it was just the power of organization
and uh consistent door knocking and like creating this movement and they were non-violent but
consistent protest and it overwhelmed them at the polls i mean like he won beyond the landslide
he had to concede almost immediately 30 minutes after the election and he said yeah i mean we're
it wasn't close like i think they got way more seats one of the articles i read called it like
the the effect of the hungarian spring because the story in hungary was like really similar
you know primarily uh an anti-corruption story about getting orban out of power this person who
increasingly corrupt authoritarian cozy cozying up to russia like for financial gain and
distancing their country from potential ties into the european union very similar situations and then
uh they in in hungary uh major major fuck you guys it's a hard i i struggle everybody
attack him for it but he had a similar approach he had a similar approach where the media was a
part of the media had such a clamp on the communication to rural districts in hungary
that had an outsized weight in the voting so his approach was to literally door-to-door campaign in
all these rural towns and communicate with people directly it's like really cool and i they they
turn the tide and hungary has been in on a really good trajectory since the uh earlier success in
the year from that election and hopefully something plays out similar here in serbia
and i think it's kind of interesting at a time when like western europe is uh
we're watching western europe fall towards these further right potent like fascist parties
uh because people are stick is sick of the establishment that's currently in charge right
and this is kind of happening in the opposite way where in these eastern european countries
you have this like more authoritarian maybe more right-wing guy but people are turning the tide
there too people are fed up with whatever is creating the current circumstances and i did think
about this with with lula and the problems of like spending in brazil and the that broader
problem for so many countries around the world i've been thinking of that about that presentation
i did on greece a while ago this general idea that not that people can't benefit in the short
term you could lula's policies will have a positive effect i bet for a lot of like working
class people in brazil in in the short term and i think that's a good thing right sure uh but if
the institutions that you have are kind of like rotted and spending is out of control and you
keep accumulating debt regardless of who is in power whether it be the left-wing party or the
right-wing party in the long run the the chickens come home to roost you know like that's and and
that's what that presentation on greece was like all about is like it they had a flip-flop between
like really right-wing parties and socialist parties throughout those decades yeah but they
never dealt with the underlying institutional problems of how spending worked in the country
and eventually it destroyed their economy yeah and i can't help but feel like as i watch
across the globe a bunch of places flip-flop over and over and over again not not without
reason to do so people are rightfully upset about the way things are working uh i there
there needs to be like a more concrete fix of the underlying things that are oh i totally agree i
feel like there's this undercurrent this fucking tectonic plate of debt problems that is everywhere
and it's the one thing people are having a real hard time addressing so they flip-flop on the
other things that being said you know i'm not yeah i'm not going to tell you that a 40-hour
work week in brazil is bad i think that's a win i think that's a good thing and there's yeah you
know progress is incremental and fits and starts and i do think like uh like what happened in
serbia like it's not a guarantee the country is now suddenly on a perfect path no but it's like
they were on a perfect path and they were on a perfect path and they were on a perfect path and
they were on a path that was clearly not working where it was like very corrupt and so it's like
these are this is progress it's like the way the world works it's like this sign curve up so i i
don't know i'm i'm hopeful for it uh it has echoes we've talked about on this show of like um you
know the gen z protests in nepal and all over uh asia and like it's like i'm not saying anyone's
figured it out yet but it's kind of uh hopeful a bit to see this happen again and again as people
are like are fed up with the way things are and
and are making some progress on it.
- I think especially as an American,
seeing other places working
young people who don't have the institutional power come out on top is super i think this is
one of the coolest ones because they not only did they do it the way they did it which was like
pretty much essentially non-violent through the ballot box but organized is they they uh made a
you call it they codified their how they did it they like literally made a guidebook and they
want other people to learn from it they like which is like awesome they literally built this plan
they showed how they did it they did it in public they had these rules and steps to follow and it's
like that sounds insane that's i don't know they really kind of blew my mind so i think it's cool
uh but speaking of serbia and and how a big part of this was their fight against corruption across
political lines i want to talk a bit about the american midterms because we're doing a full
episode next week after the results i'm sure it'll be exciting uh or terrifying who knows
but we're a week out and there's like a lot of stuff starting to trickle in so i'll first want
that some of the early voting stuff i don't know if you know this i'm the world's biggest trump fan
so i'm devastated to see these early results you do talk i constantly am like trying to pump for
him i hope he wins i voted for him four times sometimes you voted for him four times yeah i
did twice in 2020 because i thought he needed help against the cheater joe biden yeah yeah well i he
cheated once so i was like surely we get one you get one you get one back yeah uh no okay so so i
don't want to like early call anything but at this point in previous midterms republican turnout
even for mail-in or early voting was much higher you know in a lot of places like even even florida
which probably still gonna go red uh but places like texas places like kansas places like ohio
places like i mean i'm looking at everything and i'm seeing a consistent turnout um problem like
they're they are just not having the enthusiasm gap and they had like a real surge of the
beginning and it's falling off so quickly and so it just seems like the energy is not there and
then you like feel the vibe in the country and it just feels like people are fucking exhausted
just fed up like he does not have a lot of core support anymore and then you see the videos i wish
i could pull one up i don't know if we have one of like paxton rallies and they are i mean they
are staggering the chairs three wide to try and make the crowd shot kind of like and they're only
and it's all the
oldest people it's like there's not a single young person in there and you really feel the
energy gap and so i you know i am a little hopeful for how this uh midterm is shaping up
and i'm looking at the other elections and one thing i thought was interesting part of it is
they've been polling people and obviously the story even for trump's win was that people have
been fed up with cost of living that was a big problem in the in biden years and it's a big
problem now and people are angry and angry because like but what's interesting is a new issue has hit
71 salience among independents and it's even higher among uh it's getting higher among
republicans and it's really high among democrats and it's corruption corruption has like entered
the top two or top three it used to be like cost of living massive and then just a huge fall off
and then it would be things like i don't know immigration or whatever like it was like such a
bigger uh issue but now corruption has become one of the bigger things people are really reporting
over and over that they feel like uh it's becoming something that really angers them and i think it's
where it's like you hear about trump getting a billion dollars in crypto profit you see things
like the pay-for-play pardons and you notice that your gas is six dollars that you know it's like it
all ties in where you just feel a little more angry you just know that someone out there is
is grifting they're getting rich while you are finding yourself struggling and so uh i i thought
that would be interesting tie-in to what you kind of looked at with jared kushner my story you think
clean there's nothing wrong with jared kushner having a little bit of boy swag in 2018 can a
white boy have a little swag we've we've we've outlawed boy swag in this country stop saying
boy swag it's really off-putting okay i'll admit it i'll admit it i i cracked i cracked open the
fair article that was it's an excerpt of a new book by matthew cole about jared kushner
kushner okay and uh i expected an article full of boys
uh but basically what's going on with kush dog in this excerpt in this excerpt it talks about how
uh a dutch intelligence service hacked kushner's phone in like 2018 right off the bat i heard this
high level part of it is fucking crazy because like we're at the point where ostensibly allied
countries are so suspicious of this weird corruption
and like obvious double dealing that they're like having to investigate the phones of
representatives yeah well i think what what's crazy is for for me when i open this as uh this
is first term stuff this is not even now uh kushner is making friends with muhammad bin zayed and uh
muhammad bin salman of saudi arabia muhammad bin zayed is the uh like crown prince or king of the
okay and he they
discover that he has these two bank accounts one based in the uae and then one they find out is
based in israel and after some initial discussions basically the uae and saudi arabia are looking to
like provide some sort of like slush fund of money to strengthen relations with the trump
administration at the time okay this idea that okay we're setting this up to be like a bank account
and then we're like we're going to have to decide a portion of our like government budget to make deals with the united states but that doesn't end up getting agreed upon but what they do agree upon is giving two billion dollars between the two of them to jared kushner well why wouldn't you do you know i'm saying like he's got as you say boy swag and two billion dollars will let him like really stretch his wings they see swagged up boy and they were like what if we gave him to be
and uh giving this to someone directly like very close to the trump administration you know and
someone's hot you know someone's got a hot hand and you want to bet behind you want to like yeah
join in he was he was frying at the table so they give him like 750 million dollars in this uae based
bank and they don't want anything right because that would be corrupt they don't want to like
it's just it's a gift well the kush defense is coming
this 750 million in the uae bank account is from banks in azerbaijan and the reason this raises red
flags is apparently because azerbaijan has this financial history of being a country to like
launder money through because they have privacy laws around their banks there where they don't
have to disclose like anything about transactions or holders or whatever okay so the transfer of
750 million dollars comes from like a random account in azerbaijan and gets deposited in this
uae account and they don't have to disclose anything about transactions or holders or whatever
that kushner is a signatory on not an owner a signatory so keep in mind you're gonna cancel a
guy for being a signatory i can't be a signatory on a foreign bank account with 750 million dollars
on it we come back in woke 1.0 i guess what comes for anybody and then to top this off and this was
technically not discovered by the dutch agency if i recall uh israel also uh the israeli central bank
an account to kushner as well that the remainder of the money got deposited in and the reason for
that being is the israeli central bank also does not have to disclose any information about that
account okay but the journalist apparently has information yeah i saw that yeah that's a big
point of this which is that they so many actual banks have to follow these certain regulatory
laws or have to disclose things yes but central banks which are the banks of a government are
above that they have a certain like immunity yes and so when this goes through the israeli
central bank that's a that's not a normal thing it's kind of it's kind of crazy too so like the
uae account wasn't the uae account was visible and because that dutch agency had hacked his phone
what they could do is they couldn't access it themselves but every time he unlocked his phone
and was using it they could see his screen while he was using it okay so they could see him
so they're fucking pocket they're pocket watching which is cringe that is cringe i've always said
the dutch are cringe
i've been saying it a lot no you've never said it wow they get exposed for pocket watching is
that the weird story that the dutch got exposed for pocket watching yeah that's kind of i feel
like that's that's cushy's defense too uh so this the and the thing with the money in the israeli
account in the israeli central bank account is that uh moving that money out of it has also been
uh challenging because moving it to any foreign account is something that could get flagged as
well right sure and reportedly they've like
taken money out of the account into like cyprus bank accounts which also have like a lower level
of oversight it's all these methods to like not have to disclose what this money is or what it is
for right and what you have to do the precedent for anybody that is like a family member of the
president uh president or works for the president like if you're in office the idea is you have to
disclose any uh foreign accounts assets that you own and you're not going to be able to disclose
your own or are a signatory on right but this was never disclosed and now that this is hitting like
Vanity Fair, and this book is about to come out,
Jared Kushner's lawyer is coming out and issuing statements.
They want Vanity Fair to take this story down,
and they're also outright denying this across the board.
Basically, every party involved, which is Kushner himself,
like every American party involved, Kushner himself is denying it.
He had a representative to Israel who was supposedly communicating
with Netanyahu and the Israelis to ask for his money
to be moved out of the account.
Those people are denying they had any knowledge of it.
So the whole way down, there is no admission so far.
So he's saying the Dutch just made it up.
I'm not even kidding. Yes.
They faked the phone screen.
They are saying that the journalist who has published this piece
has basically manufactured the whole story,
and that he has not provided any proof of these accounts existing,
of his sources, of the Dutch having done this intelligence work at all.
Right.
Which is. If I'm being honest with you, a little hard to believe.
Well, you know what they say, where there's smoke, there's fire.
And when it comes to Jared Kushner and having like weird slush funds
in the Middle East, this doesn't. It doesn't track with his behavior or his history or his attitude
or his flight logs or his. It doesn't. It doesn't add up.
I can't think of any. It just. Because this is a first term thing, right?
And I get it.
It's like if we. And if we had a history of maybe his second term of working for the government
being any way similar. Similar to this, I would believe it.
Yeah.
But my dog Kush just has a little. Has a little boy swag.
Got a little boy swag.
And he can't be stopped.
Yeah.
So I. But shit like this, bro.
This is why I think people. I mean, again, if you ask Americans,
it's hard for them to pinpoint an individual story.
I don't think people follow. There's been so much stuff. So many.
You get like waterboarded with it.
But I do think that there's this like consciousness. Because I said this on stream.
I think Trump. Trump has this ability to move past any individual story.
An incredible political ability of like no single thing
can stick in the news or take him down.
But I think there's been so much that like it no longer is a story.
It's like this general sense of corruption that is. It's just rising among all. In all people's brains.
They don't have to even have one example.
They just know they're getting screwed.
They know on some level there's deals and grift and graft happening.
Grift and graft.
Grift and graft.
Those are my two henchmen.
I mean, I just like. Dude, I'm reading this article and we didn't. We did the corruption episode where we highlighted like five different stories about, you know,
Trump family corruption during the second term.
Yeah.
And I keep thinking about how the news cycle talked about Hunter Biden's laptop for like four years.
And. It's still my number one issue in this election.
It is.
And it's big.
And don't get me wrong.
That has not fallen far down my list.
I get you.
People listening right now.
Yeah.
But for this, I'm like. Dude, this is $2 billion and the only defense is either it didn't happen at all or if you
do believe it happened, then you have to believe that all of the reasons that this $2 billion
is hidden from public view is like. All of those reasons are totally chill.
And even though you are legally required to disclose something like this and didn't do
it.
Oops.
Support for the show comes from Enjin.
Running a small business.
Means every dollar has to work hard.
Enjin is the fastest growing travel and spend platform in the country.
Built specifically for businesses like yours.
And in 2025, Enjin customers save more than $300 million on travel.
More than a thousand businesses join Enjin every year.
And every month.
Join them and get $500 when your business signs up and starts traveling at Enjin.com slash box.
Life can be messy and complicated, especially during the holidays.
One thing that isn't?
Switching to the Simplicity Plan from Verizon.
It's one plan, one price.
Just $30 a line per month for you or the whole family.
Make the simple choice this season.
Switch to Verizon and shop their best holiday deals today.
More than a thousand businesses join Enjin every month.
We can move on to another.
I am curious.
You looked at early voting results.
And I'm curious if you looked at polling for a little thing called Prop 40 in California.
I did not.
What are you seeing?
Can you explain what it is?
For those who don't know, Prop 40 is the wealth tax initiative in California that's about to be voted upon.
People are voting on it right now through early voting.
Basically how it works is this is a one-time wealth tax on California taxpayers with more than $1 billion in assets.
The idea is that of the money raised, 90% of it will be applied to healthcare in California.
And 10% for food assistance and education related programs.
And there's also a stipulation that none of the money raised can be subtracted for funding already provided for these things.
So it can't like replace money we already set aside in the tax base for that spending.
And leading up, there's been polling about whether or not this is going to pass or not.
And I will say, as somebody who lives here and gets mail regarding the elections, this is the number one thing I'm getting shit about.
A lot of ads about it.
Holy shit.
A lot of mailers.
So many ads.
Clearly there's some money invested in this not passing.
And I have to say, when people, I've realized in the last year, and maybe I'm realizing this super late,
is like when you look at political ads and you listen to a thing that tells you to vote no on Prop X in your state,
you gotta wonder which side has the money to pay for that ad.
Sure, yeah.
If one side is for the public good and one side has the money to say,
no, then whose interest is this really being pushed for?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I think that's true for this one.
I do think for some of them, there's like, sometimes this happens, you get both sides just dumping money.
Yeah, yeah.
It's hard to tell.
Yeah.
And some of the way these things are, I went through my ballot recently and I was like, damn, it takes some time to really go through that thing and like understand what is being said and what I believe.
It's not easy.
I do think there's a lot given to ones.
But in this case, there's a huge money.
There's a huge money gap on the spending.
Yeah, I think when the disparity, the disparity is more obvious here.
And we have a great episode coming out in a few weeks where we interview a tax expert that I don't want to spoil.
But basically make, she makes the argument for some type of tax on wealth.
The idea is the people, it's not about like wealthy people paying more than normal people even.
It's that when you look at the wealthiest people,
you look at people's effective tax rates, they choose to take the majority of their compensation in the growth in their assets in some form.
They're not taking out a normal salary or contractor fee like me or you.
And they, by doing so, they're able to pay effectively, you know, below a couple percent in tax on their income.
Yeah.
Whereas at the very least, we would be wanting them to pay like the 30, 40 percent that we pay.
As normal people, which they do not do.
And taxing wealth is a way of doing that.
But they have a bunch of arguments against this arguments that we've talked about on the show, too.
And I think the smaller arguments that are being made are like, oh, this is like setting a precedent to like tax your retirement accounts as normal people.
The law is written to like to be amended.
And this tax will be expanded to normal people in the future.
Yeah.
This tax.
This tax is experimental and risky.
And then the last big, big argument that's been made a lot is that this is going to drive high earners out of the state.
It's going to force people or companies to leave, which will reduce California's tax base in the future.
And I think those are arguments that I'd like to come back to.
But I think what's interesting is when you read down the California ballot information or when you look at these ads right now, the faces of who is.
You say no to this are teachers and firefighters and health care workers, these organizations that they've managed to get backing from.
But when you look at who is spending money to back these ads, you can see that it's anything but normal people funding the proposals.
These are the regular bros.
These are the boys.
Sergey Brin, one of Google's founders, is the number one contributor so far with his one hundred and two.
million dollars of free speech
contributed. Yeah, his dog Eric Schmidt is there. And
Other notable figures, I looked down the list.
Lindsey Snyder, the owner of In-N-Out Burger,
putting a five mil in there.
I love In-N-Out Burger.
And here's the part that I didn't know
before looking into this story,
because I've been following Prop 40 pretty closely,
but I didn't understand this part.
And when I was filling out my ballot recently,
I saw Prop 41 and Prop 42.
And I also realized that these people
are advocating for spending for you to say no on Prop 40,
which is no to this wealth tax,
but they are also advocating for you to say yes
on Prop 41 and Prop 42.
What these things do,
and I'll just quote the graph above me,
Prop 41 bars taxes that evade
the state's voter-approved spending limits,
and Prop 42 prohibits new state taxes
on personal assets and most retroactive taxes.
So the idea here is they have laid a trap,
because one of the other people
that does not support Prop 40
is the governor of California right now,
host of this show, Gavin Newsom.
Our co-host.
Our co-host, who's been so flaky lately.
Have you noticed that?
He doesn't even come to the episode pre-prep.
He doesn't do, he skips our weekly.
He skips our weekly, and he's barely on the show.
I say, I say.
I'm gonna call him out, bro.
This is crazy.
Gavin, you can do the call from sack, bro.
You don't gotta come down.
Gavin, call in, bro.
But Gavin Newsom pushed forward,
in an effort to try and have this Prop 40 removed,
and not have it be on the ballot at all,
because he's been pretty vocal against this.
And whether or not you wanna give Gavin Newsom credit or not,
his outlook is that this cannot be implemented
at a state level.
It needs to be some sort of national-level proposal,
which I think you can make a case for,
but I would make a firm argument
that this is a step in the right direction
in the short term.
Yeah, I think that's fair.
We talked with Ray Madoff,
and I am somewhat sympathetic to the belief,
I do think,
like, I just get,
I feel icky about,
I just know they're very good.
Wealth is very good at evading and moving state to state,
and I kinda want things to be national.
But, like, this is a one-time tax.
It is a good test.
It's a good, yeah.
I think even Ray Madoff had problems
with the idea of doing the exact method of this.
Yeah, she had a more, like, complex approach
to taxing wealth that we'll go over in that episode.
But, in general,
like, I think this is up in the right direction.
And, obviously, just in your gut feeling,
you gotta know,
when this many people are lined up against it,
and it's like,
you know why.
And I agree.
The idea of, like,
hey, there's a vote on Prop 40,
and it's hard enough for human beings
to keep up with all these fucking props
and what they stand on.
And then you've added two more, like, trap props
to undermine the first prop,
and you're just hoping that one of these hits,
because people don't follow it super closely,
and then you're safe from,
it's like, it's not democracy.
That's fucked up.
It's, like, not a normal way to handle it.
This is the part that tilted me, bro.
It is a trap.
This is,
this is psychotic.
It's not only do we not even get the right
to just vote on this wealth tax,
yes or no,
without an incredible amount of money
being invested into the yes side.
It's that they have laid out
the two other propositions
that are meant to,
if any one of these things gets through,
it makes the wealth tax difficult or impossible.
You gotta hit the bingo, dude.
It's gotta be a slob machine.
You go, cherry, cherry, cherry.
Exactly.
And I was reading the proposals,
like, on my ballot,
and I think,
like, I have to go through my ballot,
and I have to read all these things,
like, a couple times
to make sure I know how I'm voting.
And if anyone who's just, like,
crunched for time
or is choosing to do it the day of
or, like, doesn't really understand
the way these things interact with each other,
which is a totally normal thing,
it's hard to read these things
and just immediately get
how they all interact with each other.
It feels so unfair
that this is, like,
the opposition to this thing.
Yeah, I agree.
The way they're handling this
is horrendous.
And as a guy who's made
a billion dollars selling Enron hats,
I firmly am willing to pay
my fair share here in California
on this wealth tax.
I'm just gonna say,
that's a brave of me to say.
It's interesting you say that
because Jensen,
on the leaving argument. Oh, my goat, Jensen Wong,
my old boss?
Jensen Wong, the old goat,
has said something similar.
Basically, he's down to pay the tax
if it passes.
He doesn't mind.
He's like,
he basically said,
I'm rich enough,
I'll pay the fucking tax.
I have a leather jacket.
I have 14 leather jackets
that all cost more than
your guys' salary.
And then,
the other big story around this
was Mark Zuckerberg.
Zuck!
So early on,
when this was getting proposed,
he threatened to leave the state.
He was one of the people that said,
I am up and moving my residency
to another country.
People have left the state
because it's a retroactive tax.
There's, like, a date
that if you leave before it,
you don't get hit by the tax.
Yeah, so Sergey and Larry,
Sergey Brin,
Larry Page
are two of the people
that have done that.
Yeah, Larry Page,
Sergey Brin,
Peter Thiel,
Travis Kalanick,
the guy of Kalanick
from Uber,
Don Hankey,
you know,
just like the goats.
Just like the goats.
Peter Thiel's here, yeah.
I think there's
a couple arguments
against this idea in general.
One is,
you,
these people are,
I would say,
unfortunately,
not as impactful
to the budget
of the state.
of states
as the argument
makes it seem.
Because of the way
they already hide
and structure their wealth
within the current situation
and the way,
like, we look at taxes
through the lens of
I get income,
I pay taxes on that, right?
But these people
aren't doing that.
They are already paying
effective tax rates,
even living in states
like California
that are on the,
below, like, a couple percent.
And they're,
this idea,
that these people moving
as individuals
is gonna be this massive hole
in our budget
is not as true
as people think it is.
These people are not
currently paying, like,
30, 40 percent
of their income
or something.
They don't have
a lot of income
on paper
to begin with.
The other argument
is that
companies are going
to leave the state.
But companies
are much more embedded
in the ecosystem
of California
than people credit.
I think it's a lot
harder to move
the headquarters
and all the employees
and all of, like,
the process knowledge
that exists within the state
to another place.
And Meta has essentially
conceded that.
Because Mark Zuckerberg
has come to a deal
with the board of Meta
that he is going to be able
to sell enough of his shares
to get through this wealth tax
without forfeiting
any of his control
over the company.
So we've talked about,
you've brought this up
on the show before.
Basically, the way
Mark's stake-in-stake book
thing is that
the way Mark's stake-in-stake book
will be on,
they should merge
stake and Facebook
so you can gamble
on your friends and family.
Oh, beautiful.
That would be fucking awesome.
Dude, I'm farming
my grandmother.
Will she say something weird
at Thanksgiving?
Yeah, it's awesome.
You can make some real cash.
But the,
basically,
because of the way
they allocated votes
to Mark's shares
early on,
he has,
he has a smaller amount
of shares,
but an outsized power
of voting
within the company.
He has like a 61,
61% of the voting power.
Yeah, every share
that Zuckerberg owns
has 20x voting power.
He has never had anything
but full control
of the company,
even though,
percentage-wise,
he owns,
I don't know,
a relatively small percent
of Facebook.
Like, you know,
if everyone,
but if every other shareholder,
they could get,
you know, whatever,
88%, 89% of the company,
they cannot outvote him.
He literally,
he literally has the last word
on everything,
which is why he is able
to run it into the wall
on like the metaverse
and, you know,
whatever.
Well,
he can throw money
at anything
because no one can outvote him.
But Zuck came to a deal
with the meta board
that allows him
to retain the voting power
while he sells
through a portion
of his stock
to accommodate
paying this wealth tax
if it is to pass,
which was a big deal.
And it means
that he is staying
a resident in California
and also meta
is clearly staying
in California.
And I think this,
this is seen as a win
for the crowd
that is arguing like
not that many people
are going to leave.
Companies aren't going to leave.
This is not going to have
this threatened impact
that a lot of people
have made the argument for.
Now,
like you noted,
other people
have left already.
Like there,
there has been.
Here's what I'll say.
I like,
because again,
I'm on the side
of taxing wealth,
so I want to do it.
And the reason I want it
to be nationwide
is because even if
in this case,
meta wins,
the example I'm thinking of
is like Hollywood
here in LA
where the tax benefits
that are offered
in places like Atlanta
or Vancouver
have just,
it doesn't happen instantly.
Like when those,
those advantages were created,
it's not like every movie
moved out of Hollywood.
Exactly.
It's like over time,
these companies just are,
they drift towards
their best tax advantage.
And so I am an advocate
of like standardizing
the barriers
and also working
with ally countries
and trying to standardize wealth.
Like you want to
make it so they have
no place to hide
because they will find
that place.
They may not do it immediately
because there's a lot of ties
they have to these places
and there's,
it's sticky, you know,
but eventually they do.
And so I don't like
the idea of waiting,
you know,
and yeah,
that's it.
But it's a good,
it's a good thing.
No, I totally agree with you.
The long-term solution
needs to be something
enforced at like a national
or international level.
And something that sucks
about this right now,
especially not knowing
the results,
is the amount of things
impeding this
It's passing.
me feel like the likelihood
of getting this done at a national level is just
so fucking low. Oh yeah, fucking difficult.
Yeah. That's another reason why this could be good
is maybe not even as like this is the solution
but if you could get it through
in California and it's not apocalyptic
and there's some money for the state
it's like here's the signal, let's figure
it out for the rest of the nation. That's not
a crazy idea, it's like a gateway.
If you are in California and you want
this to pass, if you want the
wealth tax to pass
effectively, you need to vote
yes on Prop 40
and no on Prop 41
and no on Prop 42.
And maybe on Prop 47
you have to spin around Prop 49
and you have to write your name backwards.
And then you do have to do like a
crazy long jump over Prop 50.
It's fucking insane.
Okay, I want to slide
over to, you had some
little info about the ratings agencies.
Oh yeah, this is not a massive
actually, this probably is a massive
story but certainly it hasn't come
to light yet. I just want to bring it up because I saw
a couple pieces and they get me
my ears perked and a little spooked.
You know that scene in the big short where they
literally have their ratings agencies portrayed
by a blind woman who's like
refuses to see what's right in front of her face
and it's like this metaphor. And the idea that happened
in 08 was that all
these companies were packaging dog-shaped
mortgages up and they'd go to the rating agencies
and they'd get a triple-A rating.
And they were not triple-A, but the ratings
agencies were worried that if they didn't say triple-A
that they would take their business elsewhere.
That was the idea. Well,
there is a
general sense that that is happening
in like every single
thing the rating agencies can rate
right now. And the big example
is
it's like the quality
of insurance.
So the idea is like
if you build a house in
I don't know, Florida or
any place that you would need
insurance,
people are
going to smaller
and smaller like almost boutique rating
agencies to get
things stamped on insurance
policies
that don't actually
cover if things were to go wrong.
But people need to have insurance.
Basically like there is a lot
of money that is supposedly
there if
there was a hurricane or there was
a disaster or there was a fire in all these
places. And the truth is that
it's like not triple-A.
It's rated as covered, it's rated as
good, but the idea is that
it's not. And what's interesting is
when the government was trying to
even just begin the process
of investigating, like, hey, let's just look into this.
There was this massive pushback
from the collective rating agencies and
they kind of backed down. The government kind
of backed down and said, you know, we don't even need
the data. Like you guys are self-reporting and things
like it's good. That's the story from today.
And it's interesting because
I'm seeing a similar
story play out in a number of different
areas, not just in insurance.
Like, for example,
you know, we've talked about bond
yields a bunch. It's basically the idea of what it
costs your country to borrow money.
France has had
their bond yields go really high. It's much more
expensive than to borrow money. And
they're in a tier with other
countries that are rated like B or triple
B or below. But they're still
rated like AA3.
And there was this idea
that Moody's was going to downgrade them
and they just didn't. They just didn't do it.
And I think there's this idea
like they're they are the
only one that's triple A3. It's up
in this area. It's like this quadrant. They don't belong.
They're the only one with that level of that
level of. Yeah. So like any
reasonable person can see that they're borrowing
like they're not triple A3. Everyone in the market knows
they're not triple A3. But Moody's just saying
we don't see it. And
so this is happening all over. And I
tied a third thing in. We talked about the
guy that owns the Dodgers, Mark Walter. Yeah.
And they looked into all the
rating agencies he used for all
these weird packages he was putting together.
And he found like he found
this this insurer agency
called Egan Jones, which is extremely
tiny. It's a credit agency
that like has no clients.
And they were just
churning out thousands of
credit ratings with a team of like
five or six people
and just rating everything
the way he wanted and collecting all these fees.
And I don't know, man, but
you're hearing about this happening in like
packaged up auto
loans. And you're hearing this packaged up in insurance.
You're just packaged up at the country level. And it just
feels like the rating agencies are all
whores like all over.
I don't know that any of them can be trusted
and they are all fucking taking money
to say whatever the fuck people want.
And, you know, that's
a problem. If anything were to go
wrong, if something were to go wrong, then
the truth starts to come out of like whether this
is worth fucking triple A or whether
it's actually less quality.
I was I was going to make a
joke about us opening.
Up a company to issue ratings. We should
do it. But then and then you said five
employees and I was like, wait, this feels
it's not that much of a joke. Like
you can. Yeah, it's five analysts
and there's more employees. The idea is like it's a small
ass team. So anyway, yeah, they
tried to investigate and there was a huge
pushback and now they're saying, you know, it's fine. We're
we don't need to fully look into this.
So again, I don't know. The idea is
it's so opaque. You don't know, but
it's like the Jared Kushner thing
where it's like, I don't trust these people and
there's smoke here. So maybe there's
a fire. I would love to have more transparency
rather than less, but I feel
like this is the corruption app. Yeah,
I think it's the corruption app. There's
and I think people are sick of it, bro
at every level. I just feel like they're getting
grifted in some way. And
by the way, sign up for the picture
where the real information
is. Okay, we keep the best stuff
on our fucking Patreon
support for today's episode comes from
Delta official airline of
the National Women's Soccer League
traveling is basically
magic. It creates opportunities.
It fosters understanding
expands horizons. It connects
people and communities to each
other and to their own potential.
Those are the values that drive Delta
with up to 5500
daily Delta and Delta connection
flights to more than 300
destinations on six continents.
Delta is committed to helping
you explore your world.
Whatever gives you the travel bug
Delta is here to help you get
there. Visit Delta dot com
for more info. Delta
wherever the journey takes you
running a business shouldn't feel like surviving
a software group project. One app
for accounting, another for inventory, another
for sales, and somehow none of them
talk to each other. That's where Odo
comes in. An all-in-one business management
software that brings every part of your business
together from sales and accounting to inventory
and marketing. All-in-one powerful platform.
No messy integrations, no
bouncing between tabs, and best of all
no spreadsheets. Stop managing
software and start managing your business with
one unified system. Try for free
today at Odo dot com slash Vox.
That's O-D-O-O dot com
slash Vox.
Support for the show
comes from Fetch Pet Insurance.
If you have a dog or cat, here's
something you need to know. According
to Forbes, one in three pets will need
emergency treatment this year.
And every six seconds, a pet parent
gets hit with a vet bill over a thousand
dollars. Vet bills don't
have to hit that hard. Fetch
is pet insurance that covers accidents,
illnesses, and emergency visits
and pays back up to 90%
of eligible vet bills.
No wonder pet parents give Fetch an excellent
rating on Trustpilot.
Get a free quote in minutes at FetchPet.com
slash save. That's
FetchPet.com slash save.
Ideally, we want people
to be held to account.
Pay the price for
their actions.
And I
there was an interesting story.
So New Mexico is
suing
or a judge has issued
a ruling and a penalty
to Meta Facebook
for 25. You saw
Social Reckoning, your favorite
movie, and you said, I want to be
in the squeak wheel. I want to be in the
trilogy. I'm going to be I'm going to be I'm
working with Aaron. You want to work with Aaron. You want to be
back for part three. You want it to be the Aiden story
where you break down the corruption at
at Meta. And I said, Aaron, fucking
you don't need Fincher, bro.
That it was a masterpiece.
I loved it.
I loved it. Get me involved.
Came out and said openly. You said
like, I've worked with a lot of great
directors and I've really absorbed their knowledge.
But recently, my movies, the ones
that I direct myself haven't been hitting.
And he's like, maybe I just don't have
talent. That's what he said.
And he's like, maybe there's a part
of directing that is talent. And I don't
have that. Like, that's kind
of sad.
I don't feel bad for me. He's very rich, but I feel
bad. And now I'm crying for Aaron Sorkin.
But it is funny that he openly said that because he's
had like a couple of flops now.
So they they issued
this. And at first, I thought this
had something to do with the earlier story
in the year
about like
child sex, sex exploitation
on like Instagram.
Women like girl and women, mental
health on the platforms, like a bunch
of lawsuits to do with
damage to users that Facebook
had ignored. Like every state
was suing Facebook. Yeah. And New Mexico,
one of the more notable ones for the amount of
money that they had won. But this doesn't actually have
to do with that at all. It has to do with
Cambridge Analytica, which
I was like, that's crazy. That's like 10 years
ago now. And I realized
like for those who don't remember
Cambridge. Doesn't it feel kind of quaint now?
It was like such a big deal. I know.
- I know, and now Cambridge Analytica happens like every
weak like like and we just have to be like yeah that's kind of how it is like uh but but what was
happening back then is cambridge analytica was like this small small ish firm based in the uk
that was collecting data off of facebook via third-party apps and they were creating these
voter profiles of people and facebook was allowing that data to be taken and used in ways that was
against their terms of service but also against the law and by building these voter profiles
uh cambridge analytica allowed uh political ads to be targeted towards people in a fashion that
had not really been done before and it's notably had an effect on the 2016 presidential election
in the u.s and i think ted cruz's senate uh campaign at the time and it resulted in ted
cruz and donald trump winning like it played a notable part in it yeah
you
and uh they also had accusations of similarly fueling the brexit vote but i think that's like
less substantiated than the other two things so cambridge analytica happened a while back
and new mexico because of these breaches in law around that that facebook had committed
they sued them in like 2021 i'm not really sure why there was such a wait time but that's when
they decided to do it and uh this ruling resulted in a 25 billion dollar firebreak
that meta is going to appeal they are going to drag this out as long as possible of course
and uh i think this is also part of a broader pool of states that we're trying to do a similar thing
but a lot of states have chosen to like settle over time um it's so funny because that is a
gargantuan amount of money certainly for a fine but if you look at what meta has been doing
zuckerberg is signing checks 10 times bigger than that for a data center every week he's i know he's
i know he is like they're spending like fucking crazy if you just if new mexico just told him it
was for a data center he'd probably sign it and just submit the invoice as like data center funding
fee he wouldn't even notice it would be a rounding error on what he spends it's just so i know they
have a ridiculous amount of cash i mean this is a company that is worth uh trillions of dollars at
this point and uh but for what it's worth like the meta's uh council said uh the ruling and the
attorney general's approach to this
enforcement makes it all but impossible to do business in the state of new mexico at its core
this lawsuit seeks to impose a tax on speech to enforce new rules for what people can say online
and uh that is their defense of and and they are publicly saying they think they can like win in
appeals uh but i i thought this 25 billion was crazy for two reasons the reason you just said
and also that it is one of the largest if they were to pay it it would be one of the
largest penalties paid by a company in the u.s ever oh yeah it's massive like i think the only
things i could find that were bigger were the collective spending of the bp oil spill like the
fallout of that uh but you have to you have to add up all of the things they paid across multiple
uh things and then tobacco at the end of the 90s yeah uh which was like 200 billion between like
four companies and uh 20 so 25 billion is historically relevant but what annoys me is
is the context of uh this like for meta it is getting to a point where even that isn't that
much which is crazy to say and i really think it's important when people look at these penalties
and we talk about like corporations being held to account like the fines need to be impactful and
have to match the severity of the infractions because the way these companies uh deal with
these issues is that they're not going to be able to do anything about it and they're not
is by dragging it out paying as little as possible and they they rarely face any real consequences
it's rare that a large fine like this actually hits and i wanted to give this example of uh
in finland they have uh income income based speeding tickets oh yeah so i think it's stupid
that there's this general idea in like corporate penalties that you can kind of fuck up and do a
and just kind of buy your way out of it you like you drag it out you whittle it down and then you
eventually make a payment and maybe you pay a few hundred million or maybe you pay a billion
but it's like it's kind of the cost of doing business yeah in the same way that admittedly
like if i'm pulled over for speeding like a speeding ticket to me is like not that impactful
to some compared to you know you say that you say that all the time you say that to the cop
yeah i spit it in his face i'm like you know this doesn't even matter here this doesn't even matter
you saw
but
, yeah i sell mogul merch i don't fucking care about speeding is what you tell them it's kind
of stupid that something like speeding tickets or infractions or parking tickets are are are
just flat rates that like have basically no impact to a person that can just like afford
to take the speeding ticket but are really meaningful to someone who has like way less
money and in finland they have income-based speeding tickets it's a percentage-based infraction
and as these companies get larger and larger like if your company's worth trillions of dollars
you should be paying for a speeding ticket and you're not paying for a speeding ticket
you're not paying fines that are proportionate to your company's like scale so that these things
actually matter and that following laws actually means something yeah i will say i mean i'm not
fucking caping for meta here but i want to give a different side my understanding is that you know
with legal precedent if you lose to new mexico for 25 billion you you have 49 other states that
are chomping at the bit to like like you could lose a lot more like if you add it all up you
could lose a lot more money you could lose a lot of money you could lose a lot of money yeah that is
fair so outside of this specific case when it goes back to those ones from before those state
rulings against like uh exploitation on instagram and stuff like that that was the big fear with
that one on their end is like this fine is not that big but if like these handful of people
can get this level of damages from us yeah and that opens it up to a user base of hundreds of
millions of people yeah what does that mean on the globe it's like yeah their their potential
legal liability is is a lot of money and it's a lot of money and it's a lot of money and it's a lot
of money and it's a lot of money and it's a lot of money and it's a lot of money and it's a lot of
enormous and probably dwarfs the size of the company so uh i wouldn't say they're off the
hooks and this is i mean if this goes through yeah that is an enormous amount it's maybe not
in their their immediate spend but it would be a good precedent yeah i mean it's one of the largest
ever so to to give some credit there certainly they would feel it because you don't get anything
for it they don't get to get a piece of a data center they get nothing 25 billion dollars is gone
and that does reflect poorly on their fucking earnings their stock goes down their stock
comp goes down and they'll feel it well um i don't know if i'm gonna be able to do that
i have a company that you just chilled for better and i know you love them so much and it was a firm
defense i don't even like saying you stand but you stand behind them so so heavily but i i'm the
number one defender of a trillion dollar company oh it's a small little fun story but i wanted to
ask you about it you as a big apple shill a shilligan air for apple you have the phone and
the watch the headphones the fucking butt plug you have everything dude yeah you're jealous i get you
the butt plug works with the watch so you don't understand it's the ecosystem
so anyway you of course uh they they put the little slop in the trough for you of the brand
new foldable phone oh big idea foldable from apple or 10 years late okay and you're like i
gotta buy it day one i don't care the price i send me three so i have a backup yeah i bought
three uh there's been a bit of a story about they're calling it crack gate
okay and the idea is after not that many folds i wonder if i can have the exact amount of folds
17 000 it's like over 17 000 folds it's fine it's fine i wouldn't even open mine that much
i probably wouldn't even open it and it's like people are seeing it break a little bit easier
we're aware of an issue impacting the inner display on a small number of iphone duo units
a small number dude and if they experience issues they can contact apple care which also costs money
um i don't know what you're thinking about this but it costs two thousand dollars it's a pretty
expensive ass phone and there is reports of reliability problems did you see did you see
the samsung ad no samsung like openly called them out they made an ad that showed like
the first foldable they made which is like 10 years ago yeah they show like the new ones and
the advantages and the thing and they show an apple like an apple slice trying to fold itself
and it cracks they like they openly call them out and they were like we've got history in there
i don't know
oh they're trying to be cute they're trying to be cute with it don't come for my corporation
yeah i'm gonna stay with my corporation the cool thing about my iphone duo is that when i
i message people it's blue instead of green so i do like that that's good with my watch
yeah yeah yeah it was fun i think it was antho he was like telling me because he saw an android
he's like ew yeah he's like you know there's an app you can get that turns your bubbles from
fucking blue to green or whatever i was like bro i'm 35
like at this point i've made peace with that i'm not no one's fucking you're not getting bullied
at school for green bubbles school for green bubbles but he's i'm bullying you yeah i think
you should feel ashamed i just i feel like i'm okay with it i okay i have seen this i feel like
it is here my genuine take i i like getting to talk about this phone because it's so rare to
have a tech story on the show that isn't ai really it's like yes yes give me give me give me give me
and i the reason i was excited about this is i wanted to buy a foldable phone like i was
thinking of switching to android like a
year and a half ago and i was like oh it'd be cool to get a photo ball a foldable i do like
these a lot and then we went to china we saw all these sick foldables a bazillion of them yeah and
i a couple of the ones in china like oh i just can't import these because they won't work on
u.s networks and i had seen the rumors about the apple foldable and i was like okay why don't i
wait and see what it's like so i've been excited about okay i've been following them okay i've
been excited i know and then it comes out and the reviews that i watch of the phone are pretty good
the main criticisms i see is like it doesn't have face id uh it's a little heavy and you know those
things kind of suck but generally the product is is good but then these articles start to hit after
like a week of like all of the bad stories of people that have one that like doesn't work after
a week uh and i'm actually thinking about refunding mine because mine is a pre-order and it doesn't
even come until january okay and i was like damn
you're gonna have to wait until january and then you're gonna have to wait until january and then
you're gonna have to wait until january and then you're gonna have to wait until january and
if it if like the risk is that high and like apple care is such a fucking joke because you pay out i
never get it because you pay out your ass every month so that you can pay less when your phone
breaks it's like it doesn't it's not even actual like insurance it's like it's like u.s health care
insurance it's like i pay hundreds of dollars i pay all this money a month so i can just pay you
more money when i go and it's like it feels like bullshit i don't want to engage with that i hate
that's awesome and uh apple i will still do a sponsorship with you
um but i can you show this can you show my screen oh my god because i do think you know i was uh i
was not on board with the duo so i don't know maybe this changes your mind if you're feeling
some kind of you should keep your now you can see what you can do okay so i did see this video
and i was like imagine i've got the ft on the right the new year times on the left i'm reading
both articles at the same time and then i and then i flick over i flick over to reuters and
then the guardian i'm doing this i'm doing an article yeah you could do quad stream and
just have information yeah straight to your brain just wired in there yeah so you don't think that
would be productive uh no i think this is great i think when i think of what i want out of a phone
i want more and more screen space and time so i could spend more time looking at it you you can't
even joke because you fucking love your phone oh no you fucking love your phone dude oh dude i don't
i don't you love scrolling x i do i do it has everything it does it and
to your credit is everything the everything app um i i so i'm anyway the short my short
very short reaction is i think i might actually refund my pre-order because uh of all the bad
stories i promise you viewers you will see him with the phone on this episode like in the future
i will say my phone has a hole in it right now oh sheesh just you know kind of beast yeah
it's got a little voice yeah he has a little voice back
i i wanted to bring this up with you okay um i've been thinking about this a lot
the past few months and i've generally been going through this uh
uh the way i use social media changed i was like this was this is probably like a year plus ago
maybe what is it i stopped making tweets okay i deleted all my tweets yeah i don't make any posts
i don't post on any i don't post anything except like the shows that i'm on sure and uh part of that
was i don't want to be a part of this like online machine and i stopped watching shorts at the
beginning of the year and i've grown like increasingly resentful of kind of the mechanics
of the internet oh yeah and like the way that it makes me feel and the way that it wastes my time
and uh i i kind of wanted to pose a question to you and the audience because i've been thinking
about that so much uh literally past past year right now
okay like can i really reconcile these feelings about that and still publish these shows like we
cut things down we make clips we make shorts we we uh we're making podcast content like is my
resentment of like short form content especially like instagram real style shit tweets instagram
posts social media culture like can i really hold that belief and
be a guy who like issues and makes the slop do you know what i mean i sort of know what you mean
i mean i'm not you know is my like maybe i'm fucking biased but i don't i don't think
this is the sludge do you know i don't think this is like the greatest thing you could do with your
time you could get a crack open a book and do four hours but for me a long form podcast and then what
a promotional clip of that is not like that's not what's radicalizing people or disengaging them or
killing literacy or i don't know i i i see what you're saying in in a grander scheme and like a uh
what's the book that the rucker brugman book in like that moral ambition yeah in a moral ambition
type way but i i don't know i don't feel an incredible amount of guilt for making this show
i don't think that's like the part of yeah i guess i'm not saying you should feel guilty i'm more
questioning like is is what i'm making like even over the last
hour right um you know there's things i'm emotional about it's not necessarily like
all informational is the show is the yard is lemonade stand are these products really so
different that i can continue making them and like justify these other beliefs and kind of
like disgust at like how the internet is kind of being warped and like what it is becoming
i think i don't know for you i mean it's a personal choice i think that's a fair thing to say
the way i think about it personally with like with like because i as a youtuber who uploads a
lot right yeah i have to be at the mercy of the way the almighty algorithm works the thing i have
me and my team and we're a business and the editor have to get paid and we have to figure out
how to work with the algorithm and i do sometimes feel icky about it like we have to like you have
to have a hook early in the video and you have to like package it in a way that's like uh eye
catching but not you know you have to have a hook early in the video and you have to like
i don't know it can't be like too on the nose people just already think they know what it is
and they'll click it and the things you have to do and i don't love that aspect of it but in my
mind it's like i think of it as this is such a huge tidal wave that is so much bigger than me
and what i'm trying to do is surf that wave but offer something i'm trying to do something better
the idea is like i have to use i have to play the game as it is but try to whenever i elevate if
i can that that is my idea i i'm not saying i fucking hate it every time but that's what i'm
trying to do because i just don't i have this like um this feeling that if you avoid it all together
it's almost like you it's like opting out of voting or something it feels like you're just like
you're throwing away your ability to have any voice or influence that's yeah because it's such
a big thing it's happening whether we do it or not and i i want to like recognize the reality
but advocate to push it like i think you
on this show expressing your distaste and disgust with social media is more positive and impactful
and getting people who haven't maybe fully formed their ideas than just doing nothing saying nothing
and being off you know i'm saying that's what i think but i'm not sure where your head is on that
i just that's that's how i i feel it yeah i mean i i i'll say this as a consumer of your content
like a huge reason why i wanted to do the show was watching your stuff seeing the value in the
things that you're doing and seeing the value in the things that you're doing and seeing the value
in the things that you're doing and seeing the value in the things that you're doing and seeing
i think we get to have fun and and do something like this together and i guess i want that to be
true because it validates like my worldview and validates like what i do and i've been wrestling
with is it truly that different and i appreciate your answer i'm curious what the audience thinks
like if there really is a separation and like how you see consuming this podcast versus the
other things that consume your time online i think i i'd like to have this idea of like my values
being in order and like thinking through things yeah uh okay i did want to call out midterm
elections if you're in the u.s which is like 50 percent of our viewers you're gonna be hopefully
voting next week uh or you could be voting right now if you already have your ballot in your hands
or you have early voting or something like that uh i want to remind you all it's really important
really really important time to go out and vote and i will i you know for me personally if you
care what i think i think you should vote uh on like if you're in michigan i think you should
vote for abdul al sayed if you're in texas i think you should vote for talarico as your senator i if
you're in california i think you should vote yes on prop 40 and no one prop 41 and prop 42
uh you know those are my my big wrecks i think if you're in other places around the
country i think it is a prime time to vote against trump and the republican party i will say it on
the show because i have a platform i that's the message that i want to get across right now yeah
i listen man i've been i've been fucking preaching this i just i i think if you look at what happened
in serbia and you look what's happening around the world your vote matters i think people try
to convince you that it doesn't matter it doesn't do anything but it does it genuinely does and the
- People spend so much money to make money.
mitigate your ability to vote and for your ability to vote against these things like like how much
money is being spent to say no on something like prop 40 i i really if if people are not spending
billions of dollars so that because it doesn't matter yeah it does matter yeah i agree a hundred
percent it matters a lot it can change things i know that you know it can be very easy to fall
into a deep cynicism on it where you just feel like nothing ever changes and there's big wins
this year too like even in the u.s like hawaii uh drafted that legislation against like citizens
united there there is a chance to like make progress and i think there are some real candidates
out there right now uh that can make a difference and i this election even though it's a midterm
election you know traditionally things things have lower turnout do not forget to vote go out
and fucking do it it's important uh and we will be covering the election
next week yeah so next week we'll be live one day late because we'll have the result of the
elections and we will cover them all down here we didn't want to do it the day before and like
speculate and then by the time you watch it it's already happened and so we're gonna do it the day
after uh pretty pretty uh hopeful and excited please get out there and vote uh you know we
have this community discord let us know what you send us a fucking picture of your voted sticker
i'll respond to any questions i'm here to like i want to encourage it and celebrate it we've
gotten some people to sign up over on the stream and and we want people to do it here
and i think that's it for our episode but if you want an extra bonus hour you can go to the patreon
slash lemonade stand and uh check out our extra bonus hour every week and join our long-running
stock game where i think oh sorry the october results are going to be closing there's one
week left in october to participate we're going to be going over the results next week uh we also
have another book club we read like michael lewis's latest book that's going to be coming out soon
uh but we'll be back with doug no no we won't be with you
it'll just be me it'll be you and me still doug's gonna be gone forever it's just gonna be me and
you that's on vacation by the way in case you guys are wondering he's on he's on a vacation
and normally what we do is we surprise him on his vacation and get him sick and ruin it yeah
we have some record podcasts every trip to japan he's done in the last two years we've managed to
go and get him sick and we still might maybe next week the midterms are so hot we fly out to japan
and we're coughing and we get him sick but realistically he gets a few weeks of break and
then we're back with the full episodes after that thank you guys for watching and we'll see you next
week for an exciting episode support for the show comes from engine running a small business means
every dollar has to work hard but if your team is still booking travel the old way it's costing you
more than you think engine is the fastest growing travel and spend platform in the country built
specifically for businesses like yours book a trip in as little as two and a half minutes earn
up to ten percent back on hotels and in twenty twenty-five engine customers will be able to get
back to work even if they don't have the money they need to get back to work and you'll be able
to get back to work even if they don't have the money they need to get back to work even if they don't
have the money they need to get back to work even if they don't have the money they need to get back to work
customers save more than three hundred million dollars on travel with zero booking fees no
contracts and no bs more than a thousand businesses join engine every month join them and get five
hundred dollars when your business signs up and starts traveling at engine.com slash box
running a business shouldn't feel like surviving a software group project one app for accounting
another for inventory another for sales and somehow none of them talk to each other
that's where auto comes in an all-in-one business management software that brings
every part of your business together from sales and accounting to inventory and marketing all
in one powerful platform no messy integrations no bouncing between tabs and best of all no
spreadsheets stop managing software and start managing your business with one unified system
try for free today at odoo.com slash box that's odoo.com slash box
prize picks packs are here rip digital packs and get real
basketball football and pokemon cards sell cards instantly for cash or ship them home
prize picks packs gives everyone the opportunity to pull the one of one cooper flag rookie card
worth eight million dollars and a pikachu illustrator card worth 2.8 million dollars
and packs as low as just one dollar download prize picks and use code spotify to get 25
instantly and bonus packs when you buy your first five dollar pack prize picks run your game 18 plus
eligible areas terms apply collect responsibly
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
InGen is a fast-growing travel platform offering zero booking fees, no contracts, and up to 10% back on hotels, helping businesses save over $300 million annually.
A surprising shift in Brazil’s election saw Lula win after heavy underestimation by betting markets, defying expectations of right-wing dominance.
In Serbia, students organized a non-violent, grassroots movement against corruption, winning a massive electoral victory and demonstrating the power of civic action.
Global political shifts—including Brazil, Serbia, and U.S. midterms—reflect growing public frustration with corruption and mismanagement across democracies.
The U.S. midterms show declining enthusiasm for conservative candidates, with corruption emerging as a top concern among voters.
A wealth tax proposal in California (Prop 40) faces opposition funded by major tech and business figures, including Google’s founders and In-N-Out owner, suggesting a coordinated effort to block the measure.
The proposal is undermined by strategically linked ballot measures (Prop 41 and 42) designed to make the wealth tax unviable if passed.
Trust in financial rating agencies is eroding, as they are seen as complicit in providing false ratings for insurance, bonds, and loans—highlighting systemic corruption in financial oversight.
Summary:
A recent surge in global political events—from Brazil’s unexpected left-wing victory to Serbia’s student-led anti-corruption movement—reveals a deepening public distrust in established institutions. In Brazil, Lula’s unexpected win overturned betting odds, while in Serbia, young activists defeated an authoritarian leader through grassroots organization, demonstrating that civic action can shift power. , midterms show weakening support for conservative candidates, with corruption now a top concern among voters.
In California, a proposed wealth tax (Prop 40) faces fierce opposition from major wealth holders, including Google founders and In-N-Out owner, who fund campaigns to block it. The ballot measures are designed to undermine the tax, suggesting a coordinated effort to protect elite interests. Additionally, financial institutions—including rating agencies—are widely criticized for providing misleading assessments of risk in insurance, bonds, and loans, raising concerns about systemic corruption.
These developments collectively signal a global shift toward greater accountability and transparency, as citizens demand fairer systems and more honest governance. The recurring theme is that unchecked power and financial opacity are eroding trust, and that collective action—whether political or civic—is emerging as a powerful response.
FAQs
Enjin is a fast-growing travel and spend platform built for businesses. It helps companies save money on travel, with zero booking fees and no contracts. Users can book trips in under three minutes and earn up to 10% back on hotels. Over 1,000 businesses join Enjin each month, and new users get $500 when they sign up.
Prop 40 is a one-time wealth tax on California residents with more than $1 billion in assets. 90% of the revenue would go to healthcare, and 10% to food and education programs. The tax cannot replace existing funding, and it has faced strong opposition from wealthy individuals and organizations.
Wealthy individuals and corporations, such as Google’s Sergey Brin and In-N-Out Burger’s Lindsey Snyder, have heavily funded ads opposing Prop 40. This suggests a significant financial interest in blocking the wealth tax, raising concerns about political influence and transparency.
Opponents have pushed Prop 41 and Prop 42, which would prevent wealth tax funds from being used or block new state taxes on personal assets. If any of these pass, they make it difficult or impossible for Prop 40 to succeed, creating a complex and unfair voting environment.
Mark Zuckerberg threatened to leave California, fueling fears that high earners would relocate. However, he later reached a deal with Meta to sell shares and pay the tax without losing control, showing that companies may stay despite fears of economic loss.
The claims involve Dutch intelligence monitoring Kushner’s phone and discovering accounts in UAE and Israel with large funds, with no public disclosure. While Kushner and his team have denied the allegations, the lack of transparency and the involvement of central banks have raised serious red flags about potential corruption.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.