The Truth About the Inflation Crisis and the Psychopaths Lying to You About It

Perustin pyöräilyvää teitä valmistavan ornotin vuonna 2013. Mielestäni parasta Shopify saan se, että voimme harjoittaa liiketoimintaa ilman teknistä osaamista. Voimme hallinoida yrityksen taustajaristeelle mien ja front-endia sekä myydä verkossa, vaivatta. Jos Shopify olisi pyöräilyvaruste, se olisi mielestäni itse polku pyörä. Sillä asiat hoidetaan ja meidän liiketoimintamme hoituu Shopify'sssä. Aloita ilmainen kokeilu, Shopify piste kom sivustolla. Mielestäni polkka-analysisi on tosi sivustapa. Mielestäni, että minä olisi ymmärtää kohdalla perustin pyöräilyvää. Minä ymmärtää kohdalla, olisi ymmärtää kohdalla, kohdalla, se olisi ymmärtää kohdalla, se olisi ymmärtää kohdalla. Täällä on tullut, että se on tullut. Se on tullut, että se on tullut. Täällä on tullut, että se on tullut, että se on tullut, että se on tullut. Täällä on tullut. Täällä on tullut, että se on tullut, että se on tullut, että se on tullut, että se on tullut. Täällä on tullut, että se on tullut, että se on tullut. Täällä. Kuverssupporters knew just like any awake person would know that economic concerns are the core concerns of voters and ignore them at your peril. And by the way, there was a socialist candidate that year in 1928. Norman Thomas, who by modern standards was totally moderate. By the way, he was a Presbyterian minister. He was kind of a wet liberal. He was hardly a transgender activist or an anti-white hater or anything like that. He didn't want to ban Thanksgiving, but he wanted to make sure that people's material needs were met, and that's not a crazy goal. So to keep him from getting into power or people like him, the Hoover campaign promised that they would pay attention to food prices. Doesn't mean that they were tools of socialism. Actually meant they were opponents of socialism, because they knew that if they didn't pay attention, you could conceivably get a socialist. Norman Thomas didn't do very well that year, probably because Herbert Hoover took the threat seriously. So this is not a new idea at all. It's the oldest idea because it's the most obvious idea. If you don't attend to people's actual concerns, they will go elsewhere. In a purportedly democratic system, they have a whole range of options, by the way, most of which we haven't been presented with in recent history, but it could get pretty radical here, why wouldn't it? And so you probably shouldn't ignore those concerns. That's all Matt Walsh was trying to say. He works with a daily wire. He's not a wild-eyed radical. But you would have thought he was reading the communist manifesto on air and burning an American flag given the response from his fellow conservatives, other elements of the mega coalition. Rather than just, while ignoring him, if you disagree with someone, you always have the option to ignore him. Didn't hear what you said, sorry. Rather than just ignoring him or maybe even smarter, paying lip service to agreement, yeah, no, Matt Walsh makes a smart point. Like people care with their groceries cost, normal people care. Maybe you even find out what groceries cost and then play a more elaborate role. And oh, I was at the grocery yesterday, and boy, prices are high. We're going to do something about that. You would think they would do that, but that's the opposite of what they did. And by they, I mean the Neocons, the people who are in charge of the Trump administration, not the people who came in with Trump, but the people who somehow took control of the Trump administration and turned it in a totally different direction from the one most of us voted for. Those people attacked Matt Walsh, and not just Matt Walsh, but the idea that it is legitimate, that it's allowed, that's within bounds to complain about food prices. What's wrong with you? Complaining about food prices? We're going to play you a clip from someone from whom we try to play a lot of clips. It's Ben Shapiro. We're going to play it just a sec. But before we do just a caveat, we're not playing this to suggest that Ben Shapiro was like a shaper of history, a mover in American politics, he's not. He's an employee, like most everybody else, he's doing what he's told. He represents larger interests, obviously. So why bother to replay and then rebut something that Ben Shapiro said? Well, in an effort to speak to the people who put him up to it. So the whole point of Ben Shapiro, and there is a point to Ben Shapiro, this is not like some organic phenomenon. I'm like, Ben Shapiro is just so charming and brilliant that he somehow got into Harvard Law School and then eyebrows and all emerged as a social media titan. No, of course not. Ben Shapiro had a deal with Facebook. A deal to know what else got. And so the point of Ben Shapiro was, here's a way to send a very specific message to outline, and sell a very specific worldview to young people. Ben Shapiro is an old person's idea of a young person. He is a spokesman for a group of older people, aimed at younger people. I have an idea. Let's get Ben Shapiro. This guy Ben Shapiro, he's brilliant. He's a really promising young kid. And we'll get him to sell free market economics and a robust Reaganite foreign policy to the young folks. And by the way, it kind of worked for a while, thanks to the trans movement, which you suspect they also kind of concocted this same group, but whatever, wherever that came from, for a while, Ben Shapiro seemed like he was on the side of common sense, and he's for free speech, and he's against the trans lunacy, et cetera, et cetera. But always from day one, the point was Ben Shapiro is going to sell this very specific version of economics, not capitalism. There's no resemblance to anything Adam Smith advocated for, but the kind of modern American monopoly arrangement where six countries, companies can behave like countries have sovereignty unlike our own nation and control every part of your life through debt, which is kind of broad, but fairly accurate definition of our current economic system. So sell that and then sell the even harder-to-pitch idea that it's unpatriotic to oppose wars for Israel. Like, first of all, it's obviously anti-Semitic. I mean, it's just an expression of hate if you don't want to regime change some country. You can't find out a map. Obviously, you're a bigot. You're basically a Nazi. In fact, you must be for Hitler. You probably are opposed to the Second World War, too. Probably a problem with Churchill. It's literally immoral to oppose Ben Shapiro's employers foreign policy, but it's also un-American. Like, this country was founded to fight wars for Israel. That's why we're here. I mean, our founder said explicitly, America exists as a Judeo-Christian country to support Israel. Okay? So whatever, whatever prime minister of that country wants, we're doing. I mean, that's why we're here. So if you're against it, you don't believe in America. You're against America. Why don't you just leave? Maybe we'll revoke your green card. Don't have a green card. We'll strip your citizenship. And that's what ICE exists to do now. In any case, you should know watching this. These are not just Ben Shapiro's opinions. They certainly actually has opinions who knows. But these are the opinions of the people who prop up Ben Shapiro, who created Ben Shapiro. And this is what they think. This is the argument they sincerely believe apparently is going to appeal to young people who are worried about the price of burritos. Watch this. Unfortunately, this has become the mode for a lot of young people. Why can't I afford what my parents could afford when they were my age? Spoiler alert. When it comes to groceries, you can. And in areas, by the way, for housing where deregulation has been the rule, you still can. In fact, you have today more restaurant options. Your food costs less of your disposable income. And it is probably significantly better here in the United States of America. We are fatter, richer, have nicer houses, nicer cars, and the food we eat is much, much better than it was for our parents in general. Our parents probably would have considered a 450 burrito at Del Taco, a gourmet meal. Your parents would have considered a 450 taco at Del Taco at deal, because your parents were pros. They were pathetic. They were disgusting people. And anything was enough for them. You don't want to use a term goiselot, but it does seem kind of appropriate in this specific instance. They would be grateful for a Del Taco. What are you complaining about? It's hilarious, but it's the first line that really does catch your attention. He says it is fashionable. This mode among young people to complain that life is more expensive than it was for their parents. So here you have this whole new generation, this entitled fat, lazy tattoo, drug addicted, screen mesmerized generation that has no idea what's good for itself, but is all about entitlement, whining and entitlement. And the main thing they think they're entitled to is a life as good as the life their parents led. Who gave them that idea? Of course, that used to be, I think it was referred to, euphemistically is the American dream. And the American dream was the idea that your children might have a better life than you had. And yes, not just spiritually, but materially. They might have the things that you wanted, but couldn't have. That's why you work hard to give them opportunities. But Ben Shapiro was telling you, what? We never said that. Who told you that was a real promise? How dare you want what your parents had? Who do you think you are? Eat your Del Taco and be happy for 50 for a Del Taco? What a deal. And you know how we know, it's a good deal. You know how you know America's thriving? Because it's fatter. By the way, if you live in China during one of the recent famines during the cultural revolution, obesity was a sign of affluence. But of course, we don't live in China during a famine. We live in late-stage empire in the United States, where obesity is not a sign of affluence, but instead, a sign of discouragement and poverty. That's the truth. It's a sign most of the time of sadness, not of a thyroid condition, but of depression. So people who are depressed get fat. So if you want to know how your population is doing, measure there'd be a mine. So a little weird for Ben Shapiro to say, we're doing great. We're fat. But what is actually going on here is what is happening across our society on so many different issues, which is a rewriting of history in real time. You just saw something happen. You saw, I don't know, let's just pick an example, Israel pushed Donald Trump into a war that hurts the United States that we cannot possibly win. There's all downside for us, but potentially upside for Israel. That would be the war with Iran. The regime changed war that no one in America supported. And you watched that happen at the end of February of this year. But within days, they were telling you what are you an anti-Semite that didn't happen? Israel didn't push Trump to war with Iran. Who are you saying Trump has no agency? Are you saying Trump's weak? Well, obviously, Trump is weak. That's why he allowed the Israelis to push him to war. I mean, who doesn't know that? Of course he's weak. But it doesn't matter. Weak or strong. That's what happened. And they admitted it happened. And we saw it happen. And anyone who paid any attention or all had no doubt at all because it was true that that's what happened. Israel pushed Trump to war with Iran. It's like there were critical American interests at stake. There weren't. There are now. But what's interesting is that almost immediately after every big news organization in the United States started telling you what you just saw is not what you just saw. And if you thought you just saw that, the problem is you. There's been wrong with your brain and with your heart. You're a hater. You must hate Jews. Well, no, we don't hate Jews at all. But that just happened. Shut up. And by the way, we haven't seen polling on it, but it's probably been pretty successful. If you scream at people long enough and persistently enough and tell them lies consistently enough, after a while, they kind of give up and believe those lies. You can change the collective memory about an event pretty quickly after that event occurred. And then you can encode it forever in what we used to call the history books that we now afford to as AI, which is our collective consciousness. And forever after something that didn't happen will be recorded as historical truth. That can happen. We're watching it right now. So one of the things that Ben Shapiro's employers are trying to tell you is that actually your life is way better than previous generations. You've got it so good. You don't know how good you've got it. And if you can't see that, the problem is you. So stop complaining, bitch. You little whiner. Get to work. Retirement? What? That's for ungrateful people. Get back to work. Eat your Del Taco. They're only 450. Your parents would have been grateful for a 450 Del Taco. Getting out after 18 hours in the spinning mill, they were only nine years old. They didn't have Del Taco then. That's what they're trying to tell you your parents generation live through. But did it? You know, we could make a detailed case based on the statistics, which are still publicly available from, say, two generations ago. Let's just pick the biggest generation in American history, the baby boom. And we could tell you everything about their lives. You know, the average age at which people had babies in, let's just pick a year. I'll pick the year I was born 1969. Women had babies in the United States on average the age of 20, 20 years old. How'd they do that? How could you afford a baby at 20? You can't afford a baby at 20. Child care is so expensive. Do you know what you'd cost to hire someone from Central America to watch your child while you work as a bank teller? It doesn't make any sense that couldn't have happened. Oh, but it did. It did happen. And it's provable, but maybe a more telling picture of what life was like. And let's just pick that same year. 1969 is an actual picture from 1969. Let's pick the biggest event that year in the United States. Certainly the most celebrated and lovingly cataloged event. Not simply of that year, the summer of 1969 is same year as the Moon Landing. But of that entire generation, the baby boom, the famous baby boom that everyone loves to to despise and for good reason. People born between 1946 and '90s. 1964 right smack in the middle 1969 was the year of the Woodstock music festival in Woodstock, New York and numbers kind of vary about how many people went 400,000, 600,000, hundreds of thousands of Americans went to that event. And there are a lot of pictures of it and they're all in the internet. We've got a couple not great pictures of it, but take 10 minutes tonight and look at the pictures, not of the performers, lie in the family stone in the grateful dead and Richie Havens and all the rest, most of them long dead. But take a look at the crowd. There it is right there. That's the crowd at Woodstock. That's a that's a that's a faraway shot. So you kind of get a sense of the scale of it, but you kind of get a sense of the demographic composition of it. So in 1960 and this country was about 90 percent white, 89, 88, 89 percent white, about 10 or 11 percent black. And interestingly, or maybe not surprisingly, the crowd at this massive end is about that. It's probably a little more than 90 percent white, maybe 95 percent white, but then it was at least 5 percent black. So it was on some basic level, representative of the American population, 90 percent white, 10 percent black. But zoom in a little bit. What do you notice? That's not a great shot. They're more on the internet and you should definitely look them up, but those are shirtless people. And if you look carefully, then they're leaned over. The first thing you notice, what's the first thing you notice? Well, the complexion of the skin. Again, 90 percent white. But after that, the first thing you notice is you can see the ribs on almost every single person at that event. These are thin, fit people with muscle definition and not a single hint of what we call now a love handle. These are people like triathletes. And this is a broad cross section. In fact, it's probably not even the healthiest cross section of American society in 1969. These are the drug users of 1969. These are the party people. They're sleeping outside for three days in a field in upstate New York. I mean, these are not probably the captain of every track team on the Eastern Seaboard. These are like the stoners. And yet even the stoners in 1969 looked well fit, trim and happy. Of course, they were dippy and they had stupid ideas and they were running around naked in the field and it doesn't sound entirely bad. But they were misguided and dumb and probably had opinions that were maybe even malicious. But they certainly looked happy. They looked cheerful. They looked like they thought the future was going to be great better than today. They had not been lectured by their leaders to be grateful for a del taco. In fact, they weren't eating del tacos and you can tell by the way they look. And so you can't look at those pictures and thousands more like them on the internet of this country before this era that we're living in now and say the people are better off. They're gravely worse off and you can see it in their faces and in their tattoos and in their piercings and in their demeanor and they're not all failing. Of course, they're amazing young people who are bright eyed and hopeful, optimistic on it. So impressive. But you can't say they're more confident about their future than their parents were because they're not and they're right not to be. So if you cared about them, you would consider that a tragedy. As a matter of public policy, you consider it a disaster. It's exactly the opposite of what you're charged with doing. Your job, if you run the American government or if you seek to influence the running of the American government, your job is really simple. Help the people thrive. That's it. And by the way, once again, if you don't do it, someone else will. Maybe someone with an economic program that doesn't work. Maybe someone with deep racial animus that's going to split the country along racialized, maybe someone who hates white people or thinks that men can become women or something crazy. That person's going to win anyway. Why? One reason. Because he at least pretends to care about the people who live here. And not just their material well-being, but their spiritual well-being. Are they happy? Can you imagine four or 500,000 American 18-year-olds plucked at random from cities across the country in a field this summer, this month, August? 57 years after Woodstock, can you imagine what they would look like with their shirts off? Which is not to make fun of their lumpy physiques. That happens to a lot of us over time. But can you imagine what their faces would look like? Would they look as cheerful as the kids you see in the pictures of Woodstock? You hope so. Probably not. So maybe the last thing they need is to be lectured by people who are clearly the beneficiaries of unearned privilege, like Ben Shapiro, who somehow got into Harvard Law School. Despite a middling IQ, how did that happen? Never asked. People like that have no standing at all. To lecture the rest of America's young people about whether or not they complain about their clearly declining standard of living and their future prospects. They have no standing at all, but they do it anyway. Now, why do they do it? Well, there are two reasons they do it. First, because they feel it. Now, the second Matt Wall sent that tweet out, there was a chorus of people making exactly the same noise as Ben Shapiro made. Shut up. Burritos are enough for you. A $20 burrito was a good deal. It's your burrito and be quiet. It's your burrito and be happy. No chalupas for you. So there was that. So it was clearly coordinated. But it's not just coordination that gets us to a talking point like that. There was deep feeling behind it. And that feeling was contempt. That was loathing of the people complaining. That was loathing of the population. And that is part and parcel of this whole program. And this ultimately is the reason that the Neocon worldview is a cancerous worldview. Not simply because it's wrong about which countries we ought to invade, which leaders we ought to topple, which democracies we ought to erect in countries whose languages we don't speak. Okay, that's obviously all wrong. But that's not the worst thing about it. The worst thing about it is not just its inattention to the fortunes of actual Americans. It's its hostility. It's hatred of Americans because there's no other way to describe the kind of feelings it could get you to give a lecture like the one Ben Shapiro gave. If someone you loved turned you and said, you know, man, I'm overwhelmed by the cost of food. If you love that person, you know, you might ultimately explain, well, maybe you're buying the wrong food and I have like the solution for you. But would your first impulse be to tell the person to shut up and be grateful for a burrito from Del Taco? Probably not. That's the way you speak to people you hate, who you resent, whose degradation pleases you. That was the most revealing moment because it showed you the true motive of Ben Shapiro and people like Ben Shapiro. They don't like you. And if they did, they wouldn't talk like that to you. They would show compassion. But they don't ever. It shouldn't surprise you. By the way, anyone pushing for a war like the war with Iran clearly hates you. Clearly, no matter what they say and keep in mind that every attack on your interest always comes guised as a liberation. We're going to liberate you, liberate you from the fear you doubtless feel from his loving she had. You're probably worrying about his bala a lot. What? No, has but what? You worry a lot about his block. We're going to save you from that. You know, the Iran nuclear program is a massive threat. Where's Iran? It is. Trust me. They've killed thousands of Americans. What? Who? Shut up. They have. And so they tell you, of course, that whatever they're doing is to save you from something you probably didn't feel a threat from before. Like, I don't know, marriage or cheap food. Think of all the liberation movements, decent schools, safe neighborhoods. We're going to liberate you from that. The name of civil rights. We're going to liberate you from marriage. It's really a prison. Yeah, big prison. We're going to set you alone in an apartment by yourself with your cat, order your food online. We've got 450 burritos. You're going to feel a lot better. You're going to be free. Finally, okay. So of course, you say that because that's kind of what liars tell you, whatever they're doing to hurt you is actually in your interest. No, it's medicine. Just take it. You won't get COVID. But behind the lie is what? Why would you lie to someone like that? Why would you tell them that? Why would you tell them what's killing them is saving them because you hate them? Obviously. Now, in the question of food price is something so fundamental, something every single human being deals with because everybody has to eat. It's out in the open. It's all revealed. You can lecture me about the Iranian nuclear program or the threat of his below. But if you're lecturing about food prices at my grocery store, you clearly hate me. And they clearly do. You should know that. And as if we need more evidence, well, here's Mark Levin. On the internet, something very weird happened last week and I was watching this the price of a burrito. Now, I'm not really into burritos every now and then. I'll go to Taco Bell. I'm not have one or two pretty cheap. If you ask me, that is the price. Now, all that said, this debate was about affordability. Now, he doesn't have to pay $20 for a burrito. You can make it for a lot less. But I'm thinking what the hell has happened to our society? Where is our hand do it? Mentality. We sit here with a war in Iran. against an enemy that has killed thousands of Americans, mean thousands of Americans. I remember at time when America would say, let's go, let's destroy that country, destroy that government. You don't get to kill thousands of our fellow citizens, military or civilians. You don't get to try to assassinate our president. You don't get to threaten us with potential nuclear weapons either. Now it's a debate. Should we take them out, shouldn't we? Are you a neocon or a warmonger? Is this a war of choice? We don't even have a draft. But a draft even work with young people today, I wonder. Could we even fight World War II today? We're whining about a dollar, a gasoline, 12 percent of the United States population served in the military during World War II. Over 16 million Americans joined the armed forces out of a total national population of about 130 million people. Roughly one out of every eight Americans were uniform. We don't have that today and people are still whining and complaining. It's getting embarrassing to be perfectly honest with you. It's embarrassing. Your unwillingness, your reluctance, your hesitation in the face of fighting for Israel, it's just embarrassing it's disgusting. Huge percentage of Americans served during World War II, of course they had no choice because there was a draft. Why aren't they serving now? Let's a question actually, Mark Levin ought to ask himself a man who didn't serve, who could be serving now, by the way, it could be in the front lines in Kiev, or for that matter and the Gulf, but isn't. But why aren't Americans serving 80 years after the great victory of World War II? Well, I don't know. Maybe they look around at the country that won that war, and they ask the obvious question, is this what a victorious country looks like? If we won, why are we living like this? If we won, why aren't things getting better? Why are they getting worse? Why are we so in debt? Why does the federal government spend 7 trillion a year, but only takes in 5 trillion in tax revenue? What's the plan there? How do we get there? This is what victory looks like. Just for fun sometime, you ought to fly from Kennedy Airport in New York to Nareed Airport in Tokyo, spend a day wandering around New York, to do the whole city. How about just Manhattan? Just washing in heights to Tribeca. Just walk it. You can do it. It's not very long. It's a day walk, and then go to Tokyo, one of the biggest cities in the world. Now, Tokyo is the city that lost. Actually, we dropped two nuclear weapons on Japan, so they really lost. They actually vaporized them, all their kids, too. No countries ever lost, like Japan lost, in the summer of 1945. But walk around Tokyo, after a day of walking around New York, which city looks like it lost a war? It's not Tokyo. So, in order to convince people to go die for a cause, probably you should convince them the causes worth dying for. But which cause has been worth dying for? Honestly, dying, like actually dying, or how about getting your face blown off? How about your ears melted off your head, losing all your fingers? How about having your genitals shredded? What causes worth that? Well, if it's worth it, tell me how. Tell me how it's worth it, because we don't speak German. A lot of Americans don't speak English at this point. These are tired and stupid, in fact, nonsensical talking points, but they're also more than that. They're deeply insulting. You are lecturing a population that you personally have taken advantage of, whose total destruction you have overseen. And you've done nothing to stop it. You did nothing when the Sackler's flooded. Appalachia, the part of the country that disproportionately fought the wars that you called for, and destroyed them with opioids. You said nothing. You said nothing when this country was invaded, and it's trillion dollar military didn't stop that invasion. And for you to lecture the rest of the nation about a can-do attitude, what do you make my freaking burritos then? It's too much. And then to cap it off with the lie that you and every other person in media is now repeating that Iran is trying to assassinate President Trump. As a statement of fact, that is not true. So they're now telling us that Donald Trump was the target of an assassination attempt by a guy with a man pad, a surface terror missile inside the security perimeter in Ankara, Turkey, during the NATO summit. That's that true. That's factually untrue. And they'll lie about it. You don't have the intel. Well, you know, actually some of us have called around untrue. So why are they reporting that? Well, of course, like so much that you read and see on television or on the internet, it is the product of a propaganda campaign designed to change the course of events on the ground. A propaganda campaign designed to convince Donald Trump that he has to restart major combat operations against Iran because they're trying to kill him personally. And so they tell him as they have been for more than a year ever since the butt was shooting a Ron did it. You need to get in a separate aircraft. You need to be moved on the tarmac inside a drink cart because they're going to assassinate you in any second. And why are they telling Trump that who apparently believes it? It's not true, by the way. That is a lie. They're telling him that because they think that if they can make it personal, the Trump will have a stake, an emotional stake in continuing this war against Iran, which the United States to restate cannot win. How do we know? We can't win it because we haven't been able to open the straight of our moves, despite having a fleet of vessels that can't even approach the Iranian coast. So rather than pausing and ask why are we spending $1.5 trillion a year on a defense budget or now a war budget that is unable to beat what we were told is a second rate or third rate military, a third world country run by primitives who murder gays by throwing them off the roof. And we can't even open a piece of water to 20% of the world's energy can flow through. How's our military doing? Shut up. Not one moment of reflection or self-awareness even. Not one moment of asking the obvious questions about our own failures. There's that the rest of us paid for have gone on to debt for one of the reasons you can't buy a cheap burrito unless Mark Levin makes one for you. And we hope you will. We hope he has that can-do attitude that gets him in your kitchen rolling you a burrito for free. But in the event he doesn't do that, it's going to cost you more than it used to to buy a burrito. Why? Because the country's too in debt. Why? Well, the main driver of debt for and worse. That's a fact. The main driver of debt for and worse are discretionary budget. It all goes to war. Worse we don't win. Worse that are being waged not because the public wants them, but because Mark Levin is calling for them on behalf of the interests of a foreign country. That's a fact. And to continue that, they're now laying this lie, this head trip on the president. Oh, they're trying to assassinate you in the tarmac that are getting the drink cart and sneak on to another aircraft. And a lot of Americans are just like believing it because they're telling him that. Oh, Mark Levin, y'all shattering the president. Okay. Killed thousands of Americans. Okay. You must have missed that part where they were sending opioids into Appalachia. I don't think that was the Iranians who did that. In any case, it's worth at this point taking a step back and assessing really the root problems here. So inflation is real. No one wants to admit it because the policy makers caused it. It's not something that just naturally happens. Inflation is what happens when you mistreat the currency that you don't own. It belongs to the American public. You're in charge of it and use it for your own benefit and not theirs. And you have shortsighted thinking that in the end destroys nations and it's destroying ours. So if you've got a small business, you know, that cash has to keep flowing or else you go out of business. And sometimes you just need capital to buy inventory repair equipment, hire employees or just take advantage of an opportunity when it comes along. You're not in charge of that. It just happens and you have to have access to cash. And that's a challenge if you need it quickly. And that's where our friends at Cardiff can help. Unlike the big banks, Cardiff's application takes three minutes. There's no hard credit pull and you can get approved and funded within one day. Process is fast, simple and respectful of your time. You're running a business after all. They've been helping businesses get capital for more than 20 years. They've lent over $12 billion to companies throughout the United States. They are totally real. And unlike Citibank, they're not going to lecture you about Pride Month as they loan you money. If you've been in business for at least one year and make at least $20,000 a month in revenue, you can apply right now for up to 500 grand in same day business funding. Cardiff.co/tucker. Cardiff, C-A-R-D-I-F, dot co/tucker real-growth fast funding. Cardiff. So wait a little bit. Olen Schennen-Maldenado, a member of the Artesan Institute of Technology, has been working on the field of business. He's been working on shopping and testing for the first time in a year. He's been working on the field of business. He's been working on the field of business for more than 10 years. He has been working on the field of business for more than 10 years. So most people don't wake up in the morning and decide to feel horrible, exhausted, foggy, disconnected from themselves. But it does happen and it happens slowly. You're working hard, you're showing up, and your energy disappears by midday. Your focus is dull, your weight won't move. A lot of people are told that's just getting old. That's what it is. But that's not actually true. For many men and women, these are not personal affairs, they are signals tied to your material. tables in your hormones and nutrient in balances that go undetected for years, you don't even know you're deficient. And that's why we're happy to partner with Joy and Blokes, a company that was built for people who were all done guessing and ready to figure out what exactly is going on. And that starts with comprehensive lab work and a one-on-one consultation with a licensed clinician. An actual human being explains what's happening inside you and builds a personalized plan which includes hormone optimization, peptide therapy, targeted supplements. So don't settle, go to Joy and Blokes.com/tucker, use the code Tucker for 50% off your lab work and 20% off all supplements. That's Joy and Blokes.com/tucker, use the code Tucker, 50% off labs, 20% off supplements. Join Blokes, get your edge back, better. We have great news for our listeners and viewers. Hallows Next Prayer Challenge has arrived, the 40-day St. Michael's Lent Prayer Challenge begins August 12th. In a time when pressure, ambition, the iPhone and that's constant beeping are all pulling your attention in various directions, there is a way to re-center, slow down to get your mind on God and that way is Hallow. The journey takes you through one of the great Christian works ever written, Augustine's Confessions. Written more than 1600 years ago. It's a kind of autobiography and it's a masterpiece. Still powerful because Augustine's struggles are ones that we can relate to. He searched for meaning, success, and happiness. It's incredible that something written 1600 years ago could feel like it was modern but it does because it answers the deepest questions. But this challenge is more than a history lesson through daily prayer and reflection. You will walk with Augustine and discover how God is working in your life. God offers healing, freedom and transformation. Everybody has something that he or she is fighting. Maybe it's fear, it's probably pride. St. Michael's Lent creates space to bring those struggles to God and allow his grace to change us, to solve those problems which are unchangeable without God. Hallow is amazing. We love it. It's a nightly dinner table conversation in my house. Download the Hallow app today to get started. So there's no one we can think of who's got a clearer handle on this or a more longitudinal view gained over many years beginning at the Treasury Department on this question than Catherine Austin Fitz. And she joins us now to explain why burritos are 20 bucks. Catherine Austin Fitz. Catherine Austin Fitz, thank you so much for doing this. I have a lot of questions. I'll keep them short. Are we experiencing inflation in the United States? Do you believe? Yes, we are experiencing inflation and there is a reasonable chance that the inflation at least the increase in household goods is going to get much, much worse. Why? So it is because we've been going through a restructuring of the economy for many decades. This has been building for many decades. When we start off with a model where we have a debt-based currency and that debt-basing forces huge expenses that you don't have to have, that's number one. But number two, we've run our fiscal economy in ways that I would describe as a financial coup d'état. And as we've pulled resources out of the economy, we have consolidated ownership and control in a way that forces expenses or it lowers the income for the general population and it raises their expenses. And this has been a intentional consolidation of ownership and control. And now you're seeing the results that resulted people being squeezed in a variety of ways. So I'm describing a change in the financial model, the centralization of power and economic control, and it involves many different things throughout the economy. But the important thing to understand is it was a plan, it's intentional. And if you look at where we are, it's going to take many, many things to change it. Because it comes with tremendous and explosive changes in technology which can be used to create great prosperity but can also be used to consolidate control in a way that benefit the few and destroy the many. So as I hear your big picture description of this transition through which we're moving, the first thought that comes to mind is boy, that sounds a little bit like what happened after the Soviet Union collapsed in the summer of 1991 and all of a sudden Russians woke up 10 years later and all state industries were owned by a small group of people. Correct. That's kind of what it sounds like. Well, if you, generally, I mean, I'm grossly oversimplifying, but if you look at the people who did the, it's called the rape of Russia, you know, it's a similar group and I'll give you a story. I was in the city of London making a presentation in 2001 and I've been asked to speak about what I call prioritization in the United States, the consolidation of the real estate and housing market. So I've been the assistant secretary of housing and I gave the presentation and two presentations followed, one by Ann Williamson, who had been covering Russia for the Wall Street Journal during the rape of Russia. And she got up and gave a presentation and then John Lockland, who's a remarkable British commentator now in Paris stood up and did the same on what had happened in Eastern Europe and the three of us went into shock as did many of the investors in the room because we realized it was the same firms, the same law firms, the same intelligence agencies. And, and what they were doing in Eastern Europe and in Russia and in the United States was a very similar game. We have a big presentation, a story called plunder, but they were basically going in and plundering and it was one plan, it wasn't three different plans or three different groups. It was a process of consolidation of the economies in all three places. And basically a privatization of the nation's resources. Well, here's the thing, privatization Tucker is when I transfer an asset or involve corporations in a service at a market price, prioritization is when I transfer an asset to a private party at ten cents on the dollar. Yes. So at a below market price and what we've been watching by and large around the world is prioritization, not privatization or plunder. They're looting and thank you for that distinction because it seems important. So it's not simply a matter. So I think many of us on the right were sold on the idea that government is inefficient, which is an easy case to make because it's true. And in order to make the system, the government more efficient, we need to privatize things and the public benefits and the market rules apply. And so it's fair and transparent and it just works better. That is the case, I think, that free market economists made throughout the 80s and 90s. So it's so funny. I wrote a piece about this sort of prioritization at the time. And it later became an online book I wrote called Dylan Read in the Aristocracy of Stock Profits. And when I first sent it to the, I was working with this firm in London, the head of research just started laughing. And he said, I've always believed that government is inefficient and the solution is to bring in more private, you know, more private capacity needs that I'm reading this and what it realizes, you know, what is going on and so private guys are just using the government to pay themselves huge and hideous profits above market in a way that's destroying markets. So we have these public private partnerships that involve huge corruption, huge grift and aren't productive at all. But the spin they use is the way you just described it. Boy, it's a very effective argument and it certainly fooled me, definitely fooled me. So how does that trend that you just described cause inflation? So for example, and there are thousands of different examples, but one of the things that drive prices up is when you have consolidation into monopolies or duopolis. And so if the Department of Justice is simply not enforcing antitrust, you're going to get consolidation and monopoly pricing. The best example of course is the bailout. So according to the Levy Institute, there were $29 trillion on the bailouts. And what did we see? We saw a group of financial institutions engage in massive mortgage fraud and financial fraud. As a result, we had $29 trillion of bailings, which does run up the debt quite a certain amount. And then what happens, they get the benefit of more access to the federal credit, special, sorts of special dispensations, and coming out of the financial crisis, they have a major much bigger market share, right? So not only did they get $29 trillion of bailouts, but suddenly they shifted their market share up dramatically in a way that gives them monopoly pricing power. Okay. And so, you know, and that was combined, for example, in the financial area, with changing the laws in '79, '80 to allow essentially userry. So, for example, when I, as I told you, I went for a process of being a multi-millionaire, having a very rich cash flow every month, having to live on $2,000 a month and run my -- and bring down my companies and run my companies with that on the $2,000. And when things are really desperate, I used to always get a credit card in the mail from JP Morgan Chase for $300. With a $50 sign-up fee and then 30% interest rate. And it was you're in the corner, you know, according to the Department of Justice, you have to be in Washington in two days, and suddenly you magically get this credit card, which will finance your trip for 50% interest rates when you combine in the fee. So this is when you were being assailed, prosecuted by the Department of Justice after you left government yourself? Yeah, so I had a company Hamilton Securities Group, which was working as the lead financial advisor to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. And we were essentially responsible for making sure portfolio strategy was done properly, as well as doing well sales. And we were essentially stopping money from disappearing out of the back door of HUD. And so to get rid of us, we were targeted in this process. And interestingly enough, after they did care rid of us in the public officials, we were working with suddenly massive amounts of money started disappearing from the HUD financial systems. And you know, it's it's typical in government. You've got to get the honest people out if you're going to grift in a major, major way. And that's what happened anyway. But we had 18 audits and investigations, 12 tracks of litigation, a smear campaign and physical harassment. And the goal, of course, was to catch us doing something was to prove that we had done something wrong. And it got very it went on for a long time because they could never prove anything. And they tried to falsify documentation. We caught them, you know, and then it turned into a very long process. So and ultimately we won the big litigation. So we were able to win. And one of the reasons I refused to settle and insisted on going to, you know, because they try and keep you out of court, I couldn't get into court. It really started in 95. I couldn't get into court on the main case until 20 2004. So, you know, so they try and keep you out of court because of course they have no evidence of any wrongdoing. And it was very funny. Tucker, I wish I had a video of it on the three times they canceled on the eve of trial. So my lawyers for the most over-prepared people in the world, they were being paid by the insurance company. And so we got to the final, the first day of the final trial. And I wouldn't have settled. And I kept, you know, insisting. And they constantly, I was poisoned many times when I wouldn't have settled because they wanted to sort of exhaust me. Anyway, I come in on the last trial on the first day. And essentially the other side has nothing. They have absolutely nothing. And all the lawyers on the other side are fighting. It's the whistle blow attorney in the Department of Justice attorney and the HUD attorney. They're all fighting. And at the end of the day, my attorney turns to me, and he's white as a sheet and he says, "Oh my God, they had absolutely nothing." Home ownership has always been at the center of the American dream. It is an actual asset in place people work their entire lives to build, a place of stability and security and real value. Right now, though, too many homeowners are stuck sweeping credit cards to cover groceries. There's basically a survival tax of 20 percent interest or more. So why keep handing your money to the banks when you could keep it for your family? Interest is what kills you. Our friends in American financing have a better way. They're helping homeowners use their hard-earned equity and their supporting Americans look and fulfill the dream of owning a home with mortgage rates currently in the fives. American financing saves its customers an average of $800 a month. That's about 10 grand a year. It's not just a loan. It's a true financial reset. We recommend American financing. They're called America's home for home loans for a reason. So get out of credit card debt. I mean, it is just crazy to borrow money. No judgment, but it's just making any sense to borrow money at that rate. If you want out, call 800-685-5696-800-685-5696 or visit Americanfinancing.net/ Tucker. We pray that the war with Iran ends immediately, but the truth is it doesn't seem to be. If you're the head of household, you need to think through what this could mean for you and the people you're in charge of. Don't wait for disaster to strike to ensure that you have the basics covered. Food, water, light, energy. And that's exactly why we started a company called Last Country Supply. It's our store. It carries the same preparedness products that we have, well, in this barn, for example, the products that give any head of household peace of mind, knowing that if something bad happened, you could take care of the people you're responsible for. So continue to pray for an end to war and violence, but also at the same time make sure that your family is ready. Stock them in the products that we trust at LastCountrySupply.com/talk. Well, you probably have heard about the van man company's amazing toothpaste. By the thousands, Americans are ditching traditional toothpaste in favor of van man. The switch is like pivoting your diet from candy packed with red dye number 42 organic strawberries. It is always better to stick with real ingredients. Today's big news is that van man makes more than healthy toothpaste. This launched a body wash made from the finest oils available in vanilla grapefruit and no scent at all. Van man's body wash can optimize your shower experience without all the sketchy chemicals that, well, who knows what they're doing to you? Other body washes cannot say the same. Their ingredient labels would shock you if you could pronounce them. You can't. Some of this stuff is very bad for you. One of them is a carcinogen. It's appeared in tons of body washes, but it's not in van man. Make the switch. Visit vanman.com/tucker. Use the code Tucker for 15% off your first order. vanman.com/tucker code Tucker 15% off. No weird ingredients. No exceptions. Great toothpaste. Awesome body wash. So, but at the depth of this when you had no money and you're trying to run everything your life and business on $2,000 a month, you're getting credit card offers from JPMorgan Chase. That's kind of a metaphor for how the entire economy works. It's people profiting off desperation. So, I live in one of the first things I did is I sold my big mansion in Washington and bought a country home in Hickory Valley, Tennessee. And I moved to Hickory Valley, Tennessee. I have cousins or con farmers in Hickory Valley, Tennessee. And I moved to Hickory Valley, Tennessee because I knew that the cost of living was much, much lower. And so the county of living in Tennessee has a per capita income of $24,000 a year. Yeah, very, very low income. And one of the things when I, as soon as I moved there, what I realized is we were targeted for predatory lending by all the big banks and lenders. And so, one of the ways I used to entertain myself, you know, I was trained on Wall Street. And I was trained by the top, some of the best lawyers on Wall Street had a negotiate. It was really fun for me because I would pick up the phone and they would just assume I was another person with $24,000 a year income, which, you know, in $2,000 some of that was. And so, I would start to ask them about their offers and negotiate with them. And I learned all their tricks. And what was amazing to me is the people in my county were targeted by some of the smartest legal strategies I've ever dealt with in my life. You know, but it was, it was war. It was a financial onslaught of trying to trick people into debt. Of course, debt is one of the greatest ways you can destroy a family's finances, addiction and debt. And if you look at the targeting of American communities during that period, they were specifically targeted with both addiction and debt. And it was an onslaught and I got to learn a lot about it living there. What do you think the purpose was? Why would any American want to destroy an American community and kill people and enslave them with debt? So, if I want to change the economy and I want to change it from a democratic republic to a essentially an oligarchy, then what I need to do is I need to consolidate wealth and I need to reduce the general population to a group of people who are much easier to control. So, let me go back. In 1995, there was an effort made by the people who I would describe as leading the financial system to try and put the country on a financially sound basis. And it failed and ended up at the end of 1995 in a three week shutdown of the government. I don't know if you remember that during the Clinton administration. And it was described to me by the president of the largest pension fund in the country several years later. He said, you don't understand, they've given up. They've given up on the country and they're moving all the money out, starting in the fall. And that was when the 21 trillion dollars started to go missing, you know, compounded by the 29 trillion that went out on the bailouts. I think what happened was when they failed to achieve a real fiscal, a fiscally responsible approach to the federal balance sheet that they decided to do two things. One, they decided to do a financial coup. In a process where instead of the bankers just running monetary policy, they could then run fiscal policy. And I think the second thing they decided to do is if you can't balance the budget with financial responsibility, you can balance the budget by lowering life expectancy. So if you can't fund the pension and retirement system with enough money to meet your obligations, you can meet your obligations by lowering life expectancy. And I think a conscious decision was made to do that. That literally right after the budget deal sort of busted, two decisions were made. One was to approve oxycontin and open the pill mills. The second was all sorts of policies that permitted HUD and other mortgage predatory lending. And that happened right as they also made the decision to do the private prisons and they kept flooding the neighborhoods with drugs. And if you look at the combination of the pill mills, the predatory lending, narcotics trafficking coming in, again, this is all covered in my online book, you know, it dramatically started to steadily reduce life expectancy, particularly in the lower income groups. And I knew it was coming. One of the reasons I kept talking with everybody about the missing money is I knew that it would hit the middle income groups. It was just a matter of time. And I remember I always tell the story of talking to Dr. Mark Skidmore, who had worked with me on the missing money up. We were sitting, I was sitting in a car in Boliver, Tennessee, I was doing errands. And he kept saying to me, why do you keep bringing up all the money that's going missing from the federal government? Why don't you give up on this? And I said, don't you understand, Mark, if we don't do something about this, they're going to take radical steps of lowering life expectancy. And that was in 2018. And of course, you know, COVID hit in 2020 and what did we get? We got a whole series of actions that continued to lower life expectancy. But this time in the middle and upper middle class groups. It's so obvious to me that reducing population, either through shortening their lives or preventing them from being born in the first place. I mean, that's official US policy, of course, abortion, euthanasia, drugs. But I've always sort of wondered why. And you think it's because that's the only way to get the country solvent? So I think it's a combination of things. First of all, you have, again, we have this explosive new technology. And I think you have a lot of people in the leadership who believe, first of all, it's very difficult to manage people, particularly if they get their hands on this technology. But they also believe they're going to live for a long, long time. You know, Jared Kushner, when he left the first Trump administration, did a podcast and said, I'm the first generation to live forever, the last generation to, you know, not live forever, Sean Parker, one of the co-founders of Facebook said, I'm a billionaire, so I'm going to live 245. If the oligarchs are going to live 245, one of the things they know is not everybody can do that or you're going to have environmental problem, right? Right. So part of it is that, but I also think with robotics and automation, they think they don't need a lot of people and a lot of people are hard to manage. They, you know, they, if you look at what they're doing to build a control grid, clearly they think if they can accomplish that, it's going to make it much easier to manage a lot of people. But frankly, they don't necessarily want them around, they don't need them. And so I do believe that many of them feel they would be much better off with much lower populations. I think I, if that's obviously true, me ask though about what role a global war would play in that. So like on the one hand, obviously, war reduces population. If you wanted to clear the Ukrainians out of Ukraine, leaving only the resources and Indian immigrants, you would do what they are doing. I get it. But once you start pushing up against the possibility of a nuclear exchange, a total war, a global war, then don't you, and which they are doing knowingly and I don't know if it's reckless or intentional or what exactly it is, but they know they're moving toward global war and they're not slowing down at the Trump administration and all the people who support it. Right. Don't you kind of risk your own plans by doing that? That seems very much like a dice roll. So there are a couple of theories and I think there's some people who, you know, do want to bring on Armageddon, that's a cultural and religious cross-section of some of the people involved. But the other thing is if you've been responsible for the dollar system and you know how dangerous an improper or a difficult unraveling of the dollar system could be for most of the countries around the world, you know how an unraveling could, could, could kill and hurt name, then you will go to extreme lengths and kill many, many people to avoid that. You know, and part of it is if you're used to having power, you do not want to convert to a meritocracy. I mean, the way to solve, you know, I told you, I just told you the thing you just did on how to save America. I think it's one of the best things you've ever done. And if, in theory, we all woke up tomorrow and followed your 10 principles of, you know, in our own lives and our own family and our own community, we could see an unbelievably explosive wealth creation. I mean, one of the things I want to stress is tyranny is very, very wasteful and the potential for wealth explosion, if we could somehow, you know, behave like we were in advance civilization is an extraordinary opportunity, but it's going to result in a meritocracy. And if you look at the people running things, they have no interest in competing in a meritocracy because they're going to lose, right? Yeah. And the nature of their situation is, you know, when people in their situation lose, they get killed and their families get killed. So, so, you know, they, they are at the point where they would do control. And remember, one group telling me about the, a group during the 80s when the Iran counter was really getting out of hand talking about they had started to make plans about dropping a suit, you know, exploding a suitcase new in the middle of Chicago, you know, just to distract. Remember, one of the goals of war is to control the domestic population. And we are now approaching a time where, whether, whether you get that, you have a war, you get the control grid, controlling the domestic population is getting, is going to be very difficult. So, won't, won't that control grid make it easier? Yeah. If they can get it, if they can put it into place. So, I mean, let's look at what they're hoping to do. What they're hoping to do, first of all, is to use stable coins and digital tokens to bring 4 billion people around the world. And, and this is the retail market into the Treasury market and into the US stock and bond market and, and literally take the US market share. For example, in the stock market up from 70% to 90% of the global stock market. So they're hoping to essentially tender for all the citizens in the world and bring them into our financial system, you know, that what they said is we're going to do 24/7 trading on the, on the global stock markets using digital tokens and we're going to offer 20 times margin. You know, everybody right now is really worried about we're in a bubble. If you look at the tools that are being amassed to bubble using crypto, I mean, arguably if they succeed and I'm not saying that they will, but if they do, it'll be the biggest bubble I've ever seen. And I've lived through a lot of bubbles. So, you know, you bring another 4 billion people into the US currency, the US bond market, the US stock market, you know, and, and you do it with 24/7 trading with 20 times margin. It's going to be extraordinary because those are networks you can also pump out more debt on. Yeah. Right. So, now what's interesting is the Clarity Act, it appears it's not going to pass this year, which is one of the sort of legal infrastructures they wanted to do this. So, I find the sort of the potential crash and burn this fall of the Clarity Act to be quite remarkable. Okay. So, so they think through these mechanisms, they have tools that can consider this wave and this bubble going forward. Now, if you look at what they want to do, what they want to do is put on your current currency, your bank deposits, and your stocks and bonds, what I call a manual, an automatic third lock. Do you know what a third lock is? No. Okay. Let me describe this. If you and I do a transaction, and I want to buy a Tucker Carlson hat, and you want to sell it to me, I give you cash, I get the hat, that's a two lock transaction. You have a lock. I have a lock. If one of us says, no, it can't happen. Okay. Let's say we have money in the bank And I want to buy the hat and I'm going to transfer money out to an ACH to you for the cost of the hat. The bank has rules from the Treasury Department. It has sanctions, it has to know your customer rules, it has other regulations. And it has the ability to intercede and stop the transaction for those reasons, okay? And that's sort of what I call a manual third lock, so the bank gets a third lock implementing the government regulations. And so if you look at what happened to the truckers in Canada, they had all, not all, but most of the banks exercised that manual third lock under the direction of the government. What the government wants to do and what the Treasury and the Central Banks want is they want an automatic third lock, so you don't have to go through the bank. And not only can you apply sanctions and know your customer and money laundering laws, you can apply a full-blown social credit system, right? So I can make up a hugely complex rule system for Tucker and his kids and his grandkids. I can customize it for each one of you and I can give you incentives and I can give you rules unless you do exactly what I say, I can turn off your money or I can apply negative interest rates to your money or positive interest rates, I can raise your taxes without anybody having any say about it. So let me give you an example, go back to the pandemic, if I say you're locked down and you and your family can't leave your house, your money won't work outside your house, if I have an all digital system with an automatic third lock. And let's say I freeze your bank account, you can't go to your bank and talk to them, it's above their head, they won't be implementing it. Okay, that gives them, that's what the data centers are for, that's what the AI is for, at least in North America, you know, the goal of that, because if you, if you look at spatial control, it involves a tremendous data, because of the videos and the cameras and you've got lots of video footage. But then you can imagine financial transactions all over the world, if they're going to bring four billion customers from around the world into the dollar markets or the our stock market. That's a huge amount of data for spatial and financial control and, and but with AI, what is AI graded? AI is fabulous at processing enormous amounts of mathematical information, which is most of the information the data we're talking about. And so, if they can put a manual third lock in a social credit system for every individual, and, and, and essentially automate the whole process with AI, then, then they have the ability, in fact, to control many, many people now, here's the question. Why would four billion people want to come into that system? It's very interesting. The Secretary of the Treasury during the, as I think about a month or two ago, said, you know, they'd seized a billion dollar of Iranian wallets, and he was bragging about how easy it was to do it. I thought, well, you know, I'm not sure if you're going to go out and try and persuade four billion people to come into our markets that you really want to. Have them realize that we can seize their wallets with that kind of speed news. No, that would be a disincentive participation. There's no doubt about it. I think so. May I ask you, just since we're on markets and I don't want to get sidetracked, but I think you might be able to answer this. I'm baffled by the behavior of various commodities markets. Since this war began, they've moved in the opposite direction from what you would expect if supply and demand was real. Also, let's just start with oil prices, but Brent crude use that as a measure. They've not gone straight up and they've kind of gone up and down, but not very up in some cases down. And I think we can say part of that is because China decided to stop its energy imports, which is bizarre behavior. And then gold has also, I mean, since this spring is dropped to $1,000 an ounce at exactly the moment when the US dollars clearly headed to a much weaker position. So that doesn't make any sense at all. Is it possible? No, that makes a lot of it. It does. Tell me how. So let's look at oil first. So the Chinese have done a remarkable job of just cutting their imports in half. And to me, there's not a lot of reliable information about we know they built a lot of nuclear capacity and renewable capacity. They say the last time I look, they say they're not using their oil reserves, which are significant is my understanding, but. You know, it's hard to believe they haven't the Japanese had a fair amount of oil reserves. They've run down the reserves. My understanding is our reserves are now below the amount, you know, that threatens the whole infrastructure of the. Of the strategic reserve, which is frightening, but we've run our reserves down tremendously. So so part of what's been happening in the oil market is I suspect that the the shorting and the and the things they do to manage the price have managed the price down, but that's combined with enormous relief of pressure on the market because of what the Chinese didn't because of ours and the Japanese strategic reserve now. But if you look at the US strategy, the US strategy is designed to replace the petro dollar with what some people call the petro gas dollar and between bottle necking the trade routes and and sabotaging energy capacity all over the world. They're trying to build a much bigger market share for us LNG remember we're a net exporter now. And if you look at how much LNG, for example, we're selling into Asia, you know, our our oil and gas industry is making a lot of money. The question is now that the war is continuing and we don't have the Japanese and US reserves to run down a lot. There's a real expectation that the price could continue to go higher now here's the other thing Tucker when you shut down when you do what's been done to the global economy since. Since February you create a lot of inflation deflation because you you know you are shutting down I call this covid 2.0 you're wiping out a lot of little guys and again it consolidates into the big guys, but this is very depressing for the global economy. Right and that's deflationary now let me let me talk about gold. You know ever since I started covering gold and say 2000 and on whenever there's a war kind of situation you see gold drop. It's very typical and one of the reasons is people get short and they have to sell their gold but the other is people want liquidity so they you know they go into treasuries they go into the short term bond market. Even if the dollars week so so they're looking to go to cash so to speak and and and you'll see them leave gold. So it doesn't surprise me that probably a lot of people in the Gulf area and globally needed to sell gold but gold's in a long term bull market and this is just. You know this is the normal volatility of gold in these kinds of situations we ask why would China slash its oil imports and. And import as much gold as it has which is a lot why is China importing gold and that is an excellent question and I don't I don't know why I suspect they think they have. They have the nuclear and renewable and other capacity to do that for some period of time. I mean clearly Venezuela you know cut them and clearly the situation is cut them. But I think that's a big question mark and one of the question one of the reasons might be you know they understood that it was very important to. You know let that Steve out there helping the global economy tremendously if if the price was running up you know where where many people thought it would go the pain in the global economy would be absolutely enormous. Yeah I mean you could easily see seven dollar a gallon gasoline in the US and but it I guess what I'm saying is it seems like the Chinese government has done the Trump administration a huge favor by keeping things kind of status quo when they wouldn't normally be. Yes that is that is absolutely correct and if you look at the if you look at who's purchasing what in Asia the US is clearly making a lot of money exporting LNG to Asia. So so you know this is I mean this has been very very good for the US oil and gas industry. So my last question has to do with attitudes and I'm confused by this and you may have an answer so consumer prices have risen inflation is real it's the product of long term changes the ones you just described but it's also the product of this war of choice begun at the end of February. That's all it's obvious anybody can understand it with an economics degree prices of food have gone up that's detectable to everybody because everybody eats somebody notes this the other day and says gee was you know 20 dollar burritos or a lot. Immediately, the same people, many of them who advocated for this war of choice, attack anyone who complains about rising food prices. And what I see there is pure contempt if not hatred for ordinary people, like what else could explain that kind of response. But I also see a kind of crazy recklessness because normally in a functioning society with normal motives, the people in charge, the rich people don't make fun of the poor people for overpaying for food because that's dangerous, like they could rise up and bite you if you keep mocking them. They'll let them eat cake thing, doesn't work as a long-term strategy. Why are they doing that? Why are they showing contempt for the population? So I think they think the best defense is a good offense. And they're attacking people for lazy, being lazy or not working, and they describe how they made it to where they are and it's simply what psychopaths do. Yes. I mean, here's the thing, and I'll just be blunt, one of the things, we had many people on our network all excited about the new administration, and they participated in Maha groups, and worked very hard to do everything they could to get Washington to change its policies. And one of the great things about watching what has happened, because it's in most respects, it's completely gone the other way, is it's proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is a bipartisan commitment to depopulation, it's extraordinary. We had a wonderful scientist on the other day who has been very instrumental in trying to stop the liability shield for pesticides. And she got to the end of the show, and you could see she was frustrated, she's very careful scientists, very thorough, and she said, so she really wanted to get her point across. She said, you have to understand that if this liability shield happens and they do what they say they're going to do, if they get it, I consider that as a scientist to be an extinction level event, given the impact on female fertility. You know, it was, it was a showstopper. And so if you look at the policies coming through the sausage factory in Washington, these are, these are intentional policies to depopulate, and enormous effort has been made for almost my entire lifetime to come up with any strategy that can obfuscate or stop people from seeing the obvious, and something marvelous is happening, Tucker. And what is marvelous, and it's the first time in my lifetime I've seen it, that people are finally saying, oh, you know, they really do, they really are trying to kill us. And, and that's very free, because once you know it, you know to get as far away from them as possible, and protect yourself, and the thing that's very healthy about it, and one of the reasons I loved your, you know, 10 principles to save America, real solutions come when we let go, when we let go of hoping that there's some way we can go into that machinery and turn it around, it's not going to work. So we need to leave, we need to get away from the diseased animal and go do things that can work, and if enough of us do that, what is possible is absolutely fantastic. The little secret here is if you look at that machinery, it is so destructive of wealth at the state and local level, that if we could begin to reverse it, even 5% or 10%, you don't need everybody, the possibilities are enormous, particularly with the blessing of due technology. So it doesn't have to, it doesn't have to go bad here, it can be transformative. But what it requires is we've got to stop hoping, you know, that the people who would, you know, attack you for a $20 burrito, I mean, seriously, can anybody take Ben Shapiro seriously ever again? No. No. We need to laugh. We need to laugh. We need to just laugh and turn it off, right? It's a joke. It's not serious, it's not relevant. That is the most, that's the most hopeful thing I've heard in a long time. Catherine Austin Fitz, no, I think you have obviously deep knowledge, but also a beautiful perspective, so thank you very much for sharing it. Thank you Tucker, you have a great day. You too. Thank you.