Despite a 100 basis point rise in U.S. Treasury yields this year, global equities have risen by about 13%, defying conventional valuation theory. This resilience stems from robust corporate earnings growth—particularly in the S&P 500, where profits have grown by 30% over the past year—offsetting the negative impact of higher required returns. The dividend discount model shows that rising growth rates reduce stock valuations’ denominators, counteracting yield-driven pressure. Equities remain relatively attractive due to stable equity risk premiums and strong forward earnings expectations. Market flows indicate no significant shift from stocks to bonds, with both asset classes showing positive daily correlation. Large technology firms continue to view current yields as viable for financing AI investments, maintaining demand for equities. While valuation differences are only modestly predictive in the short term, they become more influential over three-year horizons. Ultimately, equity performance is sustained by investors' willingness to bet on future growth, not just current valuations. This resilience, however, creates a higher bar for earnings performance, demanding consistent growth to avoid a valuation correction.
Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Andrew Sheetz, Global Head of Fixed
Income Research at Morgan Stanley. Today, thinking about equity resilience in the
face of rising bond yields. It's Friday, October 2nd at 2 p.m. in London.
The benchmark US 10-year Treasury yield has risen about 100 basis points this year.
Global equities at the same time are up about 13%. And those two facts
sit in uncomfortable tension. After all, higher bond yields give investors
better return options elsewhere. And they also make future corporate profits
worth less today, which in theory should push stock prices lower.
But there's a wrinkle here. That valuation theory actually has two moving parts.
What we're referring to here is what we would call a dividend discount model or a Gordon
growth model, where the value of a company today is worth the value of its dividends divided
by the difference of its required rate of return and its growth rate.
The higher the required rate of return, which interest rates push up,
hurts a stock valuation. It increases the denominator. But a higher growth rate,
well, that works in the opposite direction. That decreases the denominator.
It makes the company worth more. Hopefully, this is intuitive. If a company has to
meet a higher return hurdle, it will be worth less today. If a company's growing faster,
all else equal, it's worth more. And that, we think, goes a long way to actually explain
what's going on in markets today. Because corporate profits are growing quickly.
Over the last year, profits for the S&P 500 are up about 30%. And the earnings growth
for the median company, well, that's still up in the mid teens. Growth in Europe, Asia,
and emerging markets have also been historically strong. Indeed, if you told me on January 1st,
that the S&P 500 would be up about 13%, and at the same time, US Treasury yields would be
up about 100 basis points, I probably would have told you with reasonable confidence that stocks
would look more expensive relative to bonds. But they don't. The valuation of the equity market,
the PE ratio, has fallen significantly as yields have risen. But because earnings have risen
so much more, stocks are still higher. And the so-called equity risk premium, the difference
between the earnings yield and the bond yield, it's pretty stable year to date.
Now, there's another way that higher yields could hurt the stock market. They could simply
cause people to sell their stocks and buy those higher yielding bonds. But so far, we're not
seeing evidence of that. The flows that we track continue to show money flowing to both stocks and
bonds. And the two markets are moving in the same direction day to day. They're showing positive
correlation, which is not the outcome you'd expect if people were shifting money from one to the other.
There's also an interesting way that companies have a say in this debate. Investors every day
look at the market and decide if these yields are high enough that they want to buy them. But companies
look at the same yield and say, is this low enough that we would want to sell? And so especially
for the companies that are funding the AI build out, these large technology companies with so much
AI spending to do, many of them, even at these higher yields, are still saying these are
attractive levels to issue at and are more attractive than, say, issuing more stock.
The other factor that's always important to keep in mind, whenever we're debating long-term
valuation questions between stocks and bonds or really any asset class, is that valuation
is a slow moving force. It is often not terribly predictive of the next six or even 12 months.
Indeed, if we think about the difference between the earnings yield on the equity market,
the inverse of the PE ratio, and what the bond market yields, that difference.
Well, that difference only explains about 10% of returns between stocks and bonds over the next
month. Now, valuation is more powerful, the longer you give it. And so extend that horizon out
over the next three years and that valuation gap between bonds and equities. Well, explains
about half the three year outcome. Markets are not equations that are solved once a quarter.
They are ongoing arguments about the future. And when growth is strong, investors are simply
more willing to give growth and that future potential the benefit of the doubt.
We think this goes a long way to helping to explain the equity market's resilience despite
treasury yields moving well above 5%. But it's also raising the bar. Higher yields simply
leave less room for earnings disappointment. Those profits need to keep growing quickly.
Thank you, as always, for your time. If you find thoughts the market useful,
let us know by leaving a review or a review. Listen and also tell a friend or colleague about us today.
The preceding content is informational only and based on information available when created.
It is not an offer or solicitation nor is it tax or legal advice.
It does not consider your financial circumstances and objectives and may not be suitable for you.
(upbeat music)
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Higher bond yields increase the required rate of return in stock valuation, which should lower stock prices according to traditional models.
Strong corporate earnings growth—especially in the U.S. and emerging markets—offsets the negative impact of rising yields by increasing the numerator in the dividend discount model.
Despite rising Treasury yields, the equity market’s P/E ratio has declined, reflecting investor confidence in future profitability and growth.
The equity risk premium has remained stable, indicating that the relative attractiveness of stocks compared to bonds has not diminished.
Market flows show continued investment in both stocks and bonds, with positive correlation, suggesting no significant shift from equities to fixed income.
Large technology firms continue to view current yields as attractive for financing AI expansion, even at higher rates, reinforcing equity demand.
Valuation differences between stocks and bonds are less predictive in the short term but become more significant over longer horizons, like three years.
Equity resilience stems from strong growth expectations, not just valuation, and requires sustained earnings performance to maintain.
Summary:
S. Treasury yields this year, global equities have risen by about 13%, defying conventional valuation theory. This resilience stems from robust corporate earnings growth—particularly in the S&P 500, where profits have grown by 30% over the past year—offsetting the negative impact of higher required returns.
The dividend discount model shows that rising growth rates reduce stock valuations’ denominators, counteracting yield-driven pressure. Equities remain relatively attractive due to stable equity risk premiums and strong forward earnings expectations. Market flows indicate no significant shift from stocks to bonds, with both asset classes showing positive daily correlation.
Large technology firms continue to view current yields as viable for financing AI investments, maintaining demand for equities. While valuation differences are only modestly predictive in the short term, they become more influential over three-year horizons. Ultimately, equity performance is sustained by investors' willingness to bet on future growth, not just current valuations.
This resilience, however, creates a higher bar for earnings performance, demanding consistent growth to avoid a valuation correction.
FAQs
Even with rising bond yields, equities are rising because corporate earnings growth has been strong, which boosts stock valuations. The higher growth rate in the dividend discount model reduces the denominator, increasing stock value.
The model shows that higher required returns (from rising yields) hurt valuations, but faster earnings growth offsets this by reducing the denominator, making stocks more valuable.
No, market flows show continued investment in both stocks and bonds, with positive daily correlation, indicating no significant shift between asset classes.
Many tech firms, especially those investing heavily in AI, find current yields attractive compared to issuing more stock, making debt financing more appealing.
The equity risk premium is the difference between stock and bond yields. It has remained stable year to date, despite rising yields and strong equity performance.
Valuation explains only about 10% of monthly returns between stocks and bonds, but about half of three-year returns, showing it's more effective over longer horizons.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.