Go back

The New Way For Ordinary People To Build Wealth - Tony Robbins - #1153

90m 23s

The New Way For Ordinary People To Build Wealth - Tony Robbins - #1153

Chris Williamson shares insights from years of financial observation and interviews with top investors, including Ray Dalio, to reveal a new framework for investing. He argues that the market is rigged, with wealth concentrated among a few, and that most people are at risk due to over-concentration in public markets like the S&P 500. The core principle he highlights is asymmetric risk-reward—investing with disproportionate upside for minimal downside—ensuring long-term survival. Diversification across non-correlated assets, such as private equity, real estate, and sports franchises, reduces risk by up to 80% while boosting returns. Private equity has consistently outperformed public markets over three decades. Recent regulatory changes now allow ordinary people to access these opportunities through funds as low as $2,500, even via retirement accounts. Williamson emphasizes that investors must move beyond traditional models—like the "magnificent seven"—which are highly correlated and volatile. He urges a shift in mindset: using percentages, not dollar amounts, and prioritizing downside protection through diversified, non-correlated assets. He also stresses that true wealth-building comes from resilience, not just growth, and that access to private assets—like sports teams or space tech—is now available to all. These changes, driven by both market evolution and policy, offer a pathway for ordinary people to achieve higher returns with lower risk, aligning with the growing trend of private, diversified investing.

Transcription

19633 Words, 105089 Characters

English
People of the UK and Ireland, I'm coming to you live. Imagine that, me on stage in your city. Dublin is completely sold out, but everywhere else has got limited tickets left, and you can get yours now at Chris Williamson.live. This is a custom-built live show. I absolutely adore it. I've spent over a year working on it. So if you're a fan of everything modern wisdom, come and see me on stage this October around the UK and Ireland. Chris Williamson. Live. Despite being just 4% of the global population, Americans made up nearly 50% of the world's new millionaires in 2025. You've written three books in this area. Why another one I'm finance? What hadn't you said already? Good question. I never even write the first book. In fact, I had written a book for almost 15 years. I don't enjoy writing books. I like the variety and the aliveness of interaction and what happens. But when 2008 happened, I was really annoyed because I worked with Paul Tutor Jones, one of the greatest financial traders in history. I've coached him for almost 30 years. So I had some insights for what was going on. At the end of it, I thought, somebody's going to get punished. Something's going to happen because of small number of people basically almost destroyed the world economy. And what I saw was their reward or their punishment was we gave them more money. And so about 2010, 11, 12, I started saying that some things got happened here. And I was mad because it's like, right now, the game seems like it's rigged. And the average person thinks that they can't win. And I went to a good day. And so since I've got access, I said, I'm going to interview 50 of the smartest financial investors in history, the most successful, the rate of values, the car icons, the warm buffets, all of them, Paul Tutors. And I'm going to find from them whether the game is really winnable still. And so I wrote this book, Money Master the Game. I want to write a book that my billionaire clients will be blown away by. But I could also, someone just starting the journey would do it. And we were successful. The number one New York Times bestseller, really great. But then people are not prepared for what happens. And while I didn't know COVID was coming, anyone can anticipate the changes in the market. And so I run unshakable because I want to people not to lose when the markets change. And people that apply that got tremendous value. But then along the way, so many people, Americans are behind. Like there's so far behind in terms of their investments, in terms of their retirements. And so how do you get there? Well, you've got to get better returns, but usually requires bigger risks. And one of the people I became really good friends was Ray Dalio, who's the greatest investors in history. They call him the DaVinci. And one of the days I met him, I was supposed to have a 30 minute interview and four hours later, when we left, that's part of how we became friends, because I studied everything about him. But one of the final questions I asked him was, what's the single most important investment principle that you know of? If there was one principle to guide people, what would it be? Because I'd now gathered all these brilliant people. And I'd come down to like these core four things that everybody needs to do. Everybody needs to protect downside risk. And that's not what most people think about, right? The best investors on earth are all about don't lose money, which is so counterintuitive. But they do it by asset allocation. They don't ever put all their eggs in one basket. They know how to allocate well. So when they lose, they can still win. They know if you lose 50%, you've got to make 100% return to get even. Most people don't do the math properly under head. But the biggest thing I saw was asynmetic risk reward. Then when they went to risk a dollar, like Paul Tudor, his goal is, if I think I'm making investment, I got to believe I'm risking a dollar and make five. Now, if I'm wrong, I can risk another dollar still make four. He could be wrong four out of five times and be in good shape. Whereas the average person doesn't think that way. I met some people that did some investments like Kyle Bass, who you know, Kyle from Texas. Kyle has followed my work. He took $30 million and turned in $2 billion in 2008. How do you do that in a year? And the worst year of economics, he saw real estate and saw everybody thinks it's going to go up. And it's not. And so he risks basically $0.15 on every dollar. He could be wrong 15 times and still make money. And he made money. So I asked him at the time, just for a way down, he said, how do you teach somebody, you know, this idea of, you know, thinking that you're taking huge risks to your huge rewards is not how you win. It's disproportionate. I need asymmetric risk reward. How do you explain that to somebody who doesn't understand? He goes, well, trying to seriously say that. I wouldn't explain it to my kids. So he said, I was trying to figure out how to teach it to him. So one day I asked a question, what is a riskless investment? And I said, riskless investment is really such a thing. He goes, no, most people don't ask that question. So they don't find the answer. He said, there is one, nickels. He said, if you buy a nickel, you can never lose the money. It's always worth a nickel. But he said, let me explain to you how I taught my kids this. It cost nine cents for the American government to make a nickel, that's how we run our government. He said pennies used to be full of copper, 95% copper. And then we turned it out to 2% copper. And those pennies in the past are with twice as much money, right? He said, it's going to happen. And he said, but also I can melt the down. The meltdown value is worth 20% more than I'm buying it for. So he or 36% excuse me more than I'm buying it for. He said, so I could melt as well, you can't do that legally. He goes, well, that's true. But somebody goes outside the country. He said, but let me be clear. I called the failed reserve and said, how many nickels do you have? And I bought all the nickels they would sell me. And he said, he bought like 20 million nickels, what the number was. And he goes, if I could push a button and put all my money in nickels, they do it tomorrow. I have a 36% return end day one. I'll virtually guarantee a 100% return at some point in the future, because you can't keep making things for nine cents, but you charge in five cents for. And he said, and I have no downside. He said, so that's a symmetrical risk reward, right? So in that area, that's something that's hard to get. But I knew that was valuable. Then the third thing I found they all talked about is you've got to be tax efficient, right? Because your net is based on taxes. And then the fourth is the one we all know, diversification. But diversifying accounts, different assets, different asset classes, different time frames, and different countries, different currencies. But Dalio said, when I asked him this question, he goes, Tony, I have thought about this for the last 15 years. And I have now what I would tell you is the holy grail of investing, which is the title of our book. And he goes, it's simply this. I found out that if you can find eight to 12 non-coilated investments and the things you believe in, you reduce your risk by 80% and increase your upset. Now when I heard this, I was like, wow, it's hard to find eight to 12 uncorrelated investments in the world of rent today, right? Even stocks and bonds are not supposed to be correlated. But if you look at what happened in 2008, 2020, they do, they both go down, right? They correlate. And then your broker says, I don't know what it is, right? So he explained in me more detail about that. But the simple understanding is you have to go to private equity, private credit, private real estate to have that diversification. And last year, a trader has sophistication synthesis that you can use, synthesize type of investments. And so that set me on. Looking at it, I was invited to go down to speak at the Alternative Investment Conference for JP Morgan. It had to be a billionaire to get in there, right? I've been there two, three times now. And who speaks right before me is Ray Dalio. And they do his full interview with him and the last question, they ask him a very similar question. That's the most important thing you've learned in 50 years investing. He says, the Holy Grail, everyone in the rooms with billionaire plus, nobody written notes the whole damn day. Everybody goes down, writes this down. 'Cause it's such a simple principle, but it's the core. So I started saying, how do I get to that? How do I help the average person to get that? 'Cause you know, I've got a name, you got a name. We all have access to a certain extent. Private equity is an extraordinary result. But here's what I found out. In the last 39 years, private equity is out-produced every stock market in the world for 39 straight years. Average private equity. Now, in this book, we interviewed 13 of the best in the world, right? Average is average 15.7% returns. The S&P 500 of those 39 years is 9%. 74% better per year compounded for 39 years. So if you put a million bucks in the S&P, you're pretty happy right now. You got just under 29 million, 28.7 million. If you put it in basic private equity, it's $293 million. The same money, same time, 10 times the return. So now the question is, how the hell do you get access? 'Cause there's a big difference between the big boys and average boy, right? So, again, if you're famous, you might get it. I got access. I know people, but that the slice they give me wouldn't change my life, right? It's nothing really huge. And I was lamenting about this to a friend of mine who used to be partners with Paul Tudor Jones and really great guy and I helped him a lot. He said, Tony, I'm gonna make your day. I'm gonna tell you where I put most of my money and I'm gonna change your life. He said, you've done so much for me. It's my time to do for you. I said, really, I'm leaning for you. And this is a very sophisticated guy. He goes, there's a company that can allow you to come in and not just try to get a little piece of these investments, but you become an owner, a general partner in these firms. Not a limited partner. You make the two in 20. You're on every single asset that they have, every so investment they have. So really, I said, where's this firm? And I thought he was gonna say, you know, New York, Connecticut, London, Singapore. He goes, they're in Houston. I said, Houston. He goes, yeah, they're away from the beaten path. And they do this better than anybody I've ever seen. He said, they have the majority of my money. You gotta come meet him. That's how I met my co-author here, Christopher. Because I went and sat down and turned out Christopher had been through my program 25 years ago, started his business based on it. He has, I got a brag on the moment. He has a 96% profit ratio on the investments he's made for 25 straight years. We joined forces about five years ago. He's got about 2.7 billion. We brought it to 13 billion, just in the last four and a half, five years. And so I got, I came in investor initially, that I became the owner of the company, partner of the company. And we've grown the company to have that kind of impact. And it's because we're able to bring people, general partnerships. It's like, do you want to own the race horse? one on the race track. That's it. that's what the opportunity is. And the richest people in the world, if you look at the four and four hundred, are all people that are in private equity. This is where the largest is not real estate. It's not technology. Look at the list. You'll see who they are. There's a reason. This is one of the most unique opportunities. And now the reason we have the book is the average American has not had access. If you look at the ultra high net worth people, 52% of their money is in private equity, private credit. It's private. It's only 29% in the public markets. There used to be 8,000 companies. 30 years ago. Now there's only 4,000 in the public markets. 87% of all companies are private today. 100 million to three billion. There's 200,000 of them. And that's a whole lot more to be able to do. New old idea of private equity is you go in, you take over the company and you sell everything off. It's not like that today. It's about added value. They have to be. So it's a new industry and the way it's been operating and it's producing results unlike anything else. You can't be all your money because you need liquidity and there are even some answers to that today. But we went all in and figuring out how to help people be able to grow a much higher rate so they can get to their goals, but with even less risk if they manage effectively. Do you think ordinary people are making a mistake by putting all of the money into the S&P then? This is kind of old school, wisdom, dollar cost average in, but it sounds like there's other returns to be made. - Yeah, it's so funny. I had a conversation with somebody a little a couple of months ago and they say, you know, Christopher, I understand this diversification thing, but I really don't need that. I own like six out of the seven and the magnificent seven. I'm like, dude, you are not diversified. They all move together. If one is zicking, the other is zicking as well. So they all get hit together. People don't think back to where the magnificent seven, literally in 2002, during the sell-off that we had there, that group of stocks dropped by almost 50% in less than a year. So people might want that upside, but they have to be able to tolerate the downside. So do I think it's a mistake to put money in the S&P? No, but it can't be everything. They need to have diversification of other things that will zig and zag at different times, which is the whole point of the whole girl of investing, is if you have certain things that are making money when others are losing money, and I know it's a silly example, but for everybody who's a golfer out there, they'll get it, right? If you stock a golf shop and all you sell in there is sunscreen, well, on sunny days, you're gonna sell a lot of sunscreen. If all you sell is umbrellas, well, then on rainy days, you're gonna sell a lot of umbrellas. But the key is to have both. So on rainy days and sunny days, you're still making money. And that has been so hard. Here's another fun statistic. In 2005, just literally 21 years ago, if you had an average allocation that looked like most of the brokerage accounts, including alternatives, your average correlation was about 0.15, which meant they correlated about 15% with each other, 85% they're removing different directions, okay? Today, literally with no change in an S allocation, it is 82% correlation. Globalization is a hell of a drug man. It is, but it's also indexation. Because if everybody's buying the same stocks, just all in or all out every single day, they tend to all move together. ETFs don't discriminate. No, they don't. And what happens is in stressful environments, it actually gets worse to where it goes all the way up to about an 89% correlation when you have a down market, because what happens? Everybody insurgently sells everything at the same time. And that means they're getting hit from all sides, which is why 2020 in the early part of that year was so tough for people in 21-22, everything basically out hammered. - And think about it right now. The magnitude of the seminar 32%. - Can you explain the magnificent seven for people that did what that is? - Absolutely. So magnificent seven is basically the big names of people know. The NVIDIAs, the Netflix, the Facebooks, or MetaNow, Google, Amazon, et cetera. Those are the Microsofts, including in that. That's something that's been said. And to what Tony was about to say, okay? Right now, that mag seven is 38% of the S&P 500. - Well, it's actually under 32 today. - That's right. - It pulled back quite a bit here lately. And so what that means is 493 stocks make up the other 68% and so seven make up 32%. - And the highest percentage in history before this has been 17% of any group of companies. So it's twice with more than twice what we're doing. - It's a consolidation of risk, even inside of the S&P 500, which is supposed to be spread across 500 companies. - Completely. And very volatile companies to as well. - I want you to know, they're complimentary. We have things in the S&P as well. But you gotta have, you gotta spread your risk. You can't do it all. And when you look at also, if you look at pension funds, you look at, you know, university funds, if you look at what's happening with high network people, the majority of their investments are in private equity. Because that's where they're getting the returns. You can't, they have to be able to provide for the future and providing income for the future. And so that's where they are. So he and there just isn't more, there's none of volume. Think about it. To go from 8,030 years ago to 4,000 stocks, roughly, little less than that actually now, in the public markets, you've got more dollars chasing a smaller number of items and you know what that's right. It's inflation that isn't necessarily based on value. - Okay, lots of stats, lots of complex numbers to be able to understand to you. Imagine that somebody doesn't understand investing, doesn't know where to start. How do you explain what diversification should look like just from first principles and where should that go? - So what I always try to tell people is exactly like the business example. No single company really wants to sell one thing. So you want, in your portfolio, you want things that are going to do well in lots of different environments. Good economies, bad economies, high inflation, low inflation, high interest rates, low interest rates. In order to accomplish that, you have to diversify across lots of different asset classes. And most people hear private investments and they get very intimidated by that. You're like, I don't know what a private investment is. Well, most people are in the private markets. They don't really realize it because they own a home. Anybody who owns a home owns a private asset. It's not priced every single day in the newspaper. You can't look it up online to see exactly what it's worth. You can get a guide, but you never know for sure what it's worth until you sell it. Well, that's a private asset. The same with the dry cleaner on the corner or the subway sandwich shop that they might go shop in. Those are all private businesses. And obviously anyone who owns those is going to make money or lose money based on the success of that particular business. Not because the fact that the Fed raises interest rates or lowers interest rates for all the other complex things that try to intimidate people or tend to intimidate people. So getting people to understand it's just simply good diversification, good business practice to not have all your revenue streams tied up in one single product. That's true also for your investments. Let your return streams come from lots of different sources. And here's a piece that's different today. And it's about to change because we're interviewing Secretary of Labor, Sondaling right after the interviews coming into the house. There are new laws. One of the reasons we wrote the book is it's great to know this, but most people can never have access. So we're good as it. So what's happened though is the Congress and Senate actually passed a law initially when through the Congress not yet the Senate that said that look, you should not be barred from having these types of investments because you're not an accredited investor with a million dollar net worth or a $5 million net worth rise, a qualified purchaser. The best investments have been reserved for people with the most money. It's completely unfair. Now the ideas were protecting them from things that are unsophisticated. Well, think about it. A lot of great business people are not great investors or a lot of people inherit money. They're not great investors, but they get to go there. So what they came up with is we're gonna create a set of questions so you can educate yourself. And if you can answer these, you're qualified. You don't have to have an economic qualification just to have to understand what you're doing, which makes so much more sense. But even since then there's some new laws that are coming up and maybe you can address them that are happening. There are right now being reviewed as we speak. That's where having the interview with later with Secretary of Labor Saundering. - So two things. Number one is last June, a year ago June, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC, just literally with the stroke of a pen, said people do not have to be an accredited investor anymore to invest in certain types of funds which own alternative assets. Funds that own things like the law of Los Angeles Lakers that just sold or the Golden State Warriors or, you know, Formula One teams, et cetera. SpaceX before it was an IPO, right? Those kinds of funds were never available to investors unless they were already wealthy. So now anyone in the world, literally for a $2,500 minimum, can invest in those funds. That literally changed last June and most people don't know that. The second thing that Tony's referring to is the Labor Department has put forth a rule that would enable it to be much easier for 401(k) plans to allow alternative investments to be available to every single person who has a 401(k) or a 403(b) or any kind of retirement account. That is a total game changer for the industry to be able to allow people, for the first time, to be able to invest in so much of the economy that they've been prohibited from before. - Unless they're wealthy. - Tell me if this sounds familiar. You train regularly, you eat reasonably well, you feel fine, but you're just kinda going off vibes. Most people have absolutely no idea what's going on inside their body and that is why I partnered with Function. Function gives you access to more than 160 advanced lab tests, spanning hormones, heart health, kidney function, and even detects early signals linked to more than 50 types of cancer. To put that in perspective, your typical annual physical might test 20 markers, Function runs over 160. It's huge. Best of all, you test twice a year and everything lives inside of a simple dashboard. So you track trends over time, make sure you're moving in the right direction. And this level of testing would usually cost thousands, but with Function, it is $365 per year, just $1 a day to actually know what's happening inside of your body. And right now, we can get $25 offering it down to $340. Get the exact same blood panels that I use and save $25 by going to the link in the description below or heading to functionhealth.com/model. that's functionhealth.com/bottom wisdom. - Can you, let's get specific. What are some of the investment opportunities, asset classes that people don't think about? Everybody understands, and you guys agree. S&P, that's probably a good place to have some, et cetera, et cetera, right? We can take away with that. What are the more exotic? - Well, I'll give you one that's fun, and it's not exotic, 'cause everybody knows about it, but they think it's probably impossible sports, is he just related? Sports are an uncorrelated investment. They have nothing to do with the markets going up or down, what's happening with interest rates. And the last 10 years, they've had an 18% compounded return, but if you look up through history, through wars, World War One, World War Two, sports have always done well, and they're non-correlated, so you wanna find assets. - So sports are recession-proof. - Yeah, they are. - And you know why? Today, they don't just sell hot dogs, which by the way, they have a unique relationship. They have a monopoly in their cities, a legal monopoly. No one else can go compete with them. And by the way, their fans are called fanatics, that's where the fan comes from. They're multi-generational, and they come, and when inflation goes up, they charge more for hot dogs, we all know, and everything else you can imagine, but now they don't just sell tickets and hot dogs. Today, these are modern media organizations. So, we own a piece, I own a piece of stuff. I took me, what, 20 years of my life, to be able to own a sports team and a qualified, they have a microscope to you. I helped us start the soccer team that we have, you know, in Los Angeles, the LA football club, and put the whole thing invested, went through the whole nine yards, but then the rules changed, and they made it so certain firms were able to make investments directly into these firms. And now, they did a Major League Baseball, they did it in the NBA, they did it in Major League hockey, and now the NFL has just done it. And the returns are unbelievable. So, I just give you an example. We have a piece of the Dodgers, on a piece of the Red Sox, a piece of the Lakers, excuse me, the Lakers, the Golden State Warriors, all these firms have grown. So, Peter Goober, one of my partners in business, we did the LAFC together. He was one of the guys that bought the Dodgers. In 2012, he paid 2.2 billion for the Dodgers. Every article said, he's insane. These people are never gonna make money. This is the most ever paid for a sports team. Now, Peter's my partner, and I'm like, Peter, I know you're no dummy. What are we doing, the right thing? Here he goes, Tony, you can trust me on this. You know me well enough, but he said, I'm not even gonna tell you, I'm gonna get an announcement the next week, and then you come over and we'll have a little party together. So now, here's what you need to understand. When you're on a sports team, if it's like the NBA, you're one-thirty-second of the league. You have 32 teams, or the NFL. NFL's even better example. All the national international advertising get one-thirty-second out. So, if you're on an NFL team, you get a $400 million check to start the season. That's your piece. But you also own your local TV advertising yourself. So Peter bought them for $2.2 billion, and then announced he just sold the rights for local television rights for $7 billion and made $5 billion in a day. Right? So, he's done quite well in this area. That I've done quite well with him in this area. You know, today, he took on a Golden State Warriors. They were the worst-place team. They had paid only $450 million for it. Now, they're the second highest valued sports franchise in the world behind the Yankees. You have no excuse me, behind the Dallas Cowboys at this point, right? $11 billion that he's built to do. So, these are enterprises today that are not just selling sports. They're every aspect which you imagine, and they are an incredible return and they have nothing to do with the absence of the stock market. Sounds great. How do I invest? There's lots of different ways that somebody can do it if they have the right knowledge and the right information. But because of the rule changes, now there are funds that are available literally that people can get into for $2,500. And on a piece of all of those funds-- We've just got to prove for this to give you a sense. - Yeah, I mean, so that was June of '25, was the first time that the rules changed to allow everyday investors to be able to do it. But so, collectively, as a firm, we have exposure of over 30 different professional sports franchises and we have ways that every single investor in the world can invest with us and own a piece of all of those firms, right? - Diversified, so it's not just one team. - That's right. So, you've made an index fund on ETF of a variety of sports teams. - You know, I'd love to say that it's better than that, right? And I believe it is because it's not just beta, it's not just the market itself for the index fund, but actually really, really curated specific teams and specific areas that have specific opportunities for growth that we believe we bought at very attractive prices. - What's the category of firm that has access to this? Someone wants to go onto the internet right now and say, "This sounds great, I love sports, "I want to get in, I need to diversify." Like, what do they put into the internet? - They just put in cashinvestments.com. - That's what they would do, that's the easiest way. But I mean, there's very few firms that are permitted to be able to invest in multiple teams in the same league. And that's what the rule changes were from 2019 to 2024 for somebody to be able to do that. It didn't exist before 2019. So, we were very early in that theme. And for one of the things I think would be really helpful for the audience because I'll be like, "Okay, sports teams are trophy assets "and people just rich people want to own it "because it's a cool thing to own." It is a cool thing to own, but it's about court cutting. It's about people getting their content differently. Watching your podcast is not something that really existed 20 years ago. So in 2005, 14 of the top 100 watch programs that were live in the United States were sports, 14 out of 100. In 2025, 96 of the top 100 watch live programs were sports. Why? Who watches a live program when you can go on Netflix or Amazon or any other, and not have to watch commercials? So you're gonna watch the movie. - Sports teams and love island fans. That's all it's like. - I mean, we own a, along with our partners, we own a stake in Liverpool and we own a piece of Paris St. John. - Sorry to hear that. - Yeah, well, yeah. I figured you might because of where you're from, but in several others that you might be more familiar with, that the opportunity to be able to own those dominant franchises around the world and all different types of sports is something that most people didn't ever think of. And that was your question. What do people not think of? The other thing they don't think about is early stages of venture capital because like why can't get access to it? Seronic got great attention earlier this summer because they rescued those two pilots that were shot down in the Strait of Hormuz, the helicopter pilots. It was an autonomous boat made by a company in Austin, right? That literally went out there and saved these two people with no other people being put at risk. That didn't exist a couple of years ago, but that is an example of a company that actually is available to everybody in the world now at a $2,500 minimum if they know where to go. And obviously that's a big part of what we wanted to write the book for to be able to help people understand. These opportunities do exist. And they've got to do their own homework and they've got to make sure that they're comfortable with it. But ultimately, that's what something, that's something that people really just were never able to do. And now the world has changed and they have the ability to adapt with it and get exposure that they couldn't before. And if these final pieces that Saundering's working on, they've had the final comment period. So shortly there'll be a final decision, but that means people could put it in their 401k as well. So now it's tax advantage on top of everything else that you're talking about here. But the world has changed. Think about what the war has happened in Ukraine and how that's changed the world. We no longer can start sending these multi-million dollar missiles to take out these crappy drones. It's a system that doesn't work. And so now there's all these private companies that are gearing up to take on this. And now the G7 and this group has gone in and having put 5% of their money and they're almost doubling what they're spending. So you're talking about literally a level of spending that's going into the military side, but it's now companies that are based on technology who can come and do things at scale. - Guys, I can't drill. - Yeah, those are ones that we've invested in, right? And so we have access to those. So those are all against ways to diversify. So you have different asset classes, right? Think about space and military. These are going to grow. Unfortunately, we're going to need them to grow geometrically. I'm happy about space. Space, good, military. That's a good thing. - Military, and we got to protect ourselves, right? So it's a combination of two. - And that's something to wear. Literally the headline was, you got to stop throwing Ferraris at Frisbee. - Yeah. - Okay, you can't use a Tomahawk missile to shoot down a 30,000-hour drone. So you have to come up with other ways to protect your people and to be able to protect your country. And then space is just such, it truly is the, no pun intended, the new frontier. And to be able to do what we're doing in space and what SpaceX has done to be able to open up the commercialization of space to such a dramatic effect to be able to deliver things that were never able to be done before, to places that were never able to be done before. There's another company as an example called Armada. They literally have a box. It looks like a rail car. They can drop that in the middle of nowhere, Africa. And because of Starlink, they can have a completely fully operational data center as long as they have power and access to the sky. - I saw a video of this. It's like an industrial shipping container thing. Yeah, I've seen this before, that's wild. - Very early investors in the company, because what it did, it's solving a huge need. What they refer to as being on the edge to where things in the middle of Alaska or things on a ship in the middle of the ocean, right? You're not gonna be able to have a data center there that's secure. So we have one of the gentlemen that works for us. He's a former Green Beret, right? He can't tell the exact story for obvious reasons, but literally they were in a jungle somewhere south of, you know, in South America. And literally they were able to use in our mod a box connected to a local natural gas facility, connected to Starlink and save their butts, right? He got a chance to meet the CEO and he said, "You saved my life, thank you." And he's like, "I didn't do, no, your business saved my life." That's the kind of use case, or icon, another Austin-based company that you may know. Jason Ballard and his team at icon, or they do the 3D printed homes. Yes, I have seen this as well. Okay, so they are literally able to print homes or now barrack, or any other kind of industrial facility, two stories, and they can do it faster and cheaper than you could ever do it with physical labor. And obviously it's concrete, so it's very durable and it's very sustainable. Well, I mean, look, this is crazy. Coming from the UK, America's a fantastic country, but you guys insist on making your houses out of wood. It's fucking wood. Everything's made out of wood. I'm like, build it out of brick. There's this ancient technology that we're doing here, some fatched roof that you've got. Tell you what, I had David Friedberg on the show a couple of months ago. He's so great. And he was explaining to me, talking about crazy new technologies. He was explaining to me one of the reasons that the moon is going to be incredibly important. It means that once you've got something there and you can von Neumann probe, use the materials on the moon to make stuff that you send from the moon because the launch velocity that you need to get off of there is way lower. That was cool. But he explained to me how the mass ejectors on the moon work. So I was thinking you've got a small factory that finds materials, turns it into kind of a 3D printing style thing. And then from there you send out into the rest of the solar system and the galaxy what it is that you need. He explained to me the way that you get it off, you need about 4 kilometers or so of track and you use a mag leave thing to send it. But what was so fucking cool, this is my favorite thing, two things. First off, the gravity on the moon is so low that you don't actually need to send something up. If you send it fast enough flat, it reaches escape velocity just like throwing a ball really, really hard and it just gets out of, that was the first thing. The second thing is that you use the orbit of the moon to aim. So you're waiting, you're waiting and you send it and it's like, I'm just going to use the way that the moon rotates to like fire it in the direction, I was like, this is the coolest shit I've ever heard. I thought it was something. By the way, icon is building out of the materials of the moon, they're building the facilities for them there. They've got to practice facilities that they've been building. So NASA has hired them to effectively make this possible. And so those are the kinds of things. We were seed investors in the company of icon, we've watched it grow up. That's an example of things that people would never think to invest in. They would just observe like, oh, that's cool. Well, this is a David Friedberg to know that it's happening. That's right. But you don't anymore. Yeah. It's available to everybody in the world, literally at 25 in our bucks. What about the other side of this? What is an investment that maybe millions of Americans currently believe is safe or reliable, but is actually riskier than they think it is? It's hard because everything has its purpose, right? Some investments should lose money 90% of the time, but 10% of the time they make a lot of money and that gives you negative correlation or things moving opposite direction. So that doesn't mean anything is bad. I mean, somebody could say that Bitcoin is a bad investment. It could be a phenomenal investment. It can be higher risk though, right? Something that's higher risk than people anticipate. And that's -- What would you put in that category? There's so much that fits into that category. So many people don't understand that, you know, the risk level is what we refer to statistically as volatility, all right? Standard deviation. What I put is your gut. How much does your gut have the ability to tolerate? If you can't see it turn into 50 cents overnight, you don't belong in it. So you got to make sure that whatever it is you own is not going to create the panic that you get out of it and then you dramatically underperform the investment itself because you can't stay in the seat, right? That's one of the reasons why leverage is so dangerous for most people is leverage gets them blown out with a margin call because the fact that they don't have stang power. Stang power can be economic and it can be gut. And the vast majority of investors don't have nearest stuff -- a tough gut as they think. Citadel comes along and eats you along. That's correct. And that's exactly what happens and that's what makes them market. So it's too soon. No, no. It's okay. It's just the reality of the world. And obviously good for Citadel, not great for the other party. But that's what most people have to do is not over-concentrate. And like Bitcoin is a perfect example, young people go for Bitcoin like crazy and the idea was it was going to protect us in inflationary areas, but you see what happens and when all of a sudden the tech investors lost a lot of money, guess what? They also, they're Bitcoin to cover themselves, right? So they're correlated still. And so it's a lack of understanding. I'll tell you what's more scary. I just read a statistic there of the day that generation Z and millennials, the combination of the two, 52% of them in the last year have taken money that they would have used investment to put into sports betting. And that 26% think that sports betting is their way to build their financial future. As to financial experts, are you telling me that's not the truth? Definitely not. Hell no. Bad idea. Come on. Now, you may be good for a while, but I wouldn't plan on fewer times. You're just praying for luck in that situation. So who wants to invest in the sports team themselves, only invest in whether or not this guy's going to touch gloves with the gold people before even. I mean, let me invest in the horse and not on the racetrack. That's the opposite mindset. That's what a billionaire mindset you went on the racetrack. I've learned from over a thousand podcast episodes, the easier that you make your health routine, the more consistent you'll be. It's like golf, right? You want to keep it simple and not make a bunch of pills. You want the eye of the tiger, not the DUI of the tiger. That's why I'm such a huge fan of AG1, one scoop contains 75 vitamins, minerals, probiotics and whole food sourcing ingredients in a single daily drink, and that's why I've been taking it every single morning for nearly five years now. And they've taken it a step further with AG1 next-gen, backed by four clinical trials. And those trials that was shown to fill common nutrient gaps, improve key nutrient levels in just three months, and increase healthy gut bacteria by 10 times, even in people who already eat well. Plus, if you're still unsure, they've got a 90-day money back guarantee, so you can buy it and try it every single day for three months. If you don't like it, they will give you all of your money back. Right now, you can get 20% off a welcome kit and that 90-day money back guarantee by going to the link in the description below, heading to drinkag1.com/modern wisdom. That's drinkag1.com/modern wisdom. Talking about the psychology, I think this is an area I already want to talk about. Is there a personality type that shouldn't be an active investor? Is there a type of person who just isn't built to be in the market at all? Well, how would you advise people who are significantly more risk of us to put up with the bad days, to put up with that time? It's such a beautiful thing because they don't ever have to have a bad day if they're properly diversified. Yeah. Oh, boy. The most people like, okay, I'm going to put, you know, the old 60-40, right? 60% stocks, 40% bonds. For decades, that worked until it didn't. And then all of a sudden, people realized that they actually were more correlated and they didn't make money on their bonds and they got hammered on their stocks. That doesn't mean there's not a place for bonds and it doesn't mean there's not a place for stocks. But they need to build it out with the rest of it. So the more risk of us, somebody is, the more diversified they should be. If somebody's going to go out and, by the way, this is the biggest mistake that I see people make every single day and I've seen it for 35 years of my career. People make investment decisions based on dollars. That is crazy. No professional investor does that. It has to be on percentages. So a million dollar investment sounds like a lot of money and it is, unless you're worth a hundred million dollars in which case it's just one percent. So ten thousand dollars or a million dollars, if it's one percent, it's one percent. And somebody says, I'm going to go put 50% of my money into this. They'd go, that's way too much. That's risky. Or if they're going to say, I'm going to go put 50 grand in it. Well, now all of a sudden they go, that's not that much money. Well, if you only got a hundred grand, it's a lot. So the more that they diversify and properly diversify across all of their assets and percentages are properly weighted, they don't have to worry about volatility because that's the whole point of the whole area of investing is just by adding eight to 12 different non-correlated investments. You can reduce your risk by 80 percent. 80 percent. You don't have to wait. You do it. 80 percent reduction in risk and you can usually get still the same return or even a better rate of return. Well, I think what is as impressive maybe is getting, reducing your downside risk is what it does to the level of stress that you've got. Yes. Something's working. How many people get stressed when something is working? And in the loss, the upside joy versus all the studies on psychology versus the ceilings of loss, they don't compare. The loss that people stay with much longer. I think one of the most important things is if people can get in a position where they have this kind of diversification and if they're in things like private equity, the great thing about private equity is not always at out producing every market in the world for 39 straight years, but also it drops are shorter and they don't have to do it. Think about it. When the market drops, you're in the general market, you open market, all those prices go. If you're private equity, you hang on to what you got, you don't sell it, right? You buy things during that time. So that's how they're making money. Think about they're not making money just hoping they're going to get the right price right now. They're buying something of the best price they can to business and if you had to improve it, they're bringing a new CEO, they're bringing an AI, they're bringing a new manager team. They're putting a new marketing and they build that company up and then they sell that for a multiple either taking it to public or very often to another private company. So they have a, I love that time, this thing is this how I've made all my money as a human in my businesses. I have now under 21 companies. We do $22 billion in business, just my group together. And all of those companies we've done well because we found a way to add more value in that marketplace. We figured out what to do that no one else is doing more better and we found that edge and then the business grows geometrically. That's how these guys invest. It's not like the old days when they find something cut it all up and sell off its pieces. That was the original kind of private equity those days are over and now they got to put their own money in. That's one of the reasons that we have the opportunities that we do to be able to be investors as a general partners because since 2008, when everything dropped, Bane had approved to everybody. "Yeah, that's what we're doing." He said, "Okay, we're gonna put our money in." As we've done in ours, you might give him a sense about that. - So like, Bain was the first one that really did a very large GP commit. Okay, that means the general partner who manages the fund puts in a bunch of their own money to show alignment with the other investors in the fund. - Skin in the game. - Skin in the game, okay? So they literally coming out of the global financial crisis, everybody's like, "Eh, I'm not sure what I want to invest in." So Bain said, "Okay, we're gonna among our partners, we're gonna put a billion dollars into our own fund." Well, that got every's attention like, "Oh, well I guess you're aligned with us and so that gave people comfort and confidence." That's very much the standard. Now, typically two to five percent of all of the money in a fund is put up by the people managing that fund of their own capital. So that way there is that alignment. And so as you think about a firm growing from a billion dollar fund to a five billion dollar fund to a 10 billion dollar fund, they've got to have very significant $200 to $500 million of their own money to put into that fund. But they may not have harvested their billion and their five billion dollar fund yet. So they will sell a stake to firms like ours where we have the ability to then provide them with the balance sheet that they need to go raise bigger funds, show more alignment. And they obviously have to sell a piece of their company to us to be able to do that. But if they sell 12% of their company, they still own 88. So everybody wins from that growth that comes from that capital. - Just sitting on the psychology piece for another minute, the scarcity mindset, abundance mindset, when it comes to the way that people see their financial future, how does, how do you guys see a scarcity mindset show up in someone's investment decisions? - Well, I was interviewing, not even 50 of the greatest investors of all time, but I also interviewed Mary Calhan Erdos from JP Morgan. It was basically overseas, 2.2 trillion investments. And in everybody's case, I asked them, you know, what's the biggest advantage? They all talked about asset allocation. Every single investor talked about it. And she said, Tony, the way I look at it is, if I get something that's super risk-adverse, I look at it, my partnership, they got crazy. It goes up with them in treasuries because my goal is to make sure they get what they want emotionally as well as financially. If it takes them longer, that's okay. Some people, they're just, they can't handle it. And you gotta understand that, because if you're investing so that you can eventually feel good, that you feel secure, that's-- - And you feel miserable during your investment on the way to feel good. - Yeah, so you destroyed your life. She goes, so that's what I do. I'd be like, she said, I'm not dumb. I still get them some balance. But I think it was like buckets, thinking of this way. There's a security bucket, kind of a peace of mind bucket. That's investments that have a fixed return, right? Those are, you know, bonds. That's going to be a variety of things insurance. It might be your home. It's a place where things are going to go very slowly. There's very low risk. So it's not high returns, but low risk compounds over time. It looks like grass growing and boom, boom, boom. We all know what compounding does, right? If I play, we would game a golf and say, let's play 10 cents a hole, and then right before you swing, I say, well, all we double each holds is make it more interesting. You know, 10 cents first hole, 20 cents a second hole, 40 cents 80 cents, you go, yeah, there's 18 holes. Yeah, okay, you know, a few bucks, no big deal. But the last hole's worth $13,000, right? And the first beginning, it's 20 cents 40, looks like nothing. And the last five holes, it goes like this. That's what compounding is. So even in the security bucket, you can get financially free. The risk bucket, growth bucket, risk growth. Most people think it was growth. That's the places where you don't have a fixed return, where you have unlimited upside and unlimited downside. That could be everything from real estate to stocks, to bonds, to private equity, anything you're talking about. Trading, you can lose way more than what you put in. You got to be careful, obviously, what puts. So the balance between those depend on a couple different things. Number one, when do you need the money? If you need it three years now, you know, you can't be able to take too much risk because you don't have time to make it up, right? If you were 30 years old, you can make some big mistakes. You could have a lot more in your growth bucket, risk bucket, lose, and you got time to make it up, right? So that's the first thing, winning the money. Second thing you get to look at is, what is your real risk tolerance versus what you think it is? You know, I have a game we play in one of our wealth programs that we do, and I'll say to people in the middle of the thing, I'll say, stand up, I'm trying to be amazing. I'll make change with everybody. I'll go, what? I should make change. Can we play this little money song? And people walk around and start taking money to their pocket and they're exchanging money and then the song ends. I said, okay, sit down and then I go on like something else. And it always, one or two people are really fuming. And then they'll finally raise their hand, I'll say, excuse me, excuse me. And I said, what is it? They go, that was not fair. So what are you talking about? They go, I mean, that person, I gave them a hundred dollar bill and they gave me a five. And I want my money back. And I said, well, who said it was your money? And I said, who said the game was over, right? And I said, and the real lesson is, if a hundred dollars stress you out and you're going to be an investor, you're going to lose. The greatest investors on earth are not wires. They will tell you, I'm going to lose. What I want to do is make sure when I lose, I don't lose very much because I've got enough diversification in what I'm doing. So people got to understand what their real feelings are about things. And then the third element that affects it is access to cash flow. If you are making a hundred thousand dollars a year and spending 110, you don't have a lot of extra cash flow. But if you're making a hundred thousand dollars a year and you're saving it, you know, $50,000 of your money, yes, you got more cash flow. If you got a business that's putting more cash than you need it, you can take more risks, right? So how much you put in that security bucket? How much you put in that growth bucket? That's really an important philosophy because what everybody does is, they think they're putting the security bucket and then somebody goes, oh, Bitcoin. Somebody goes, oh, oh, something, I don't know. I'll take my security bucket and I'll put it over here in my growth bucket. And then when I make the money, I'll put it back over my security bucket. What we do tell people is when they grow in their growth bucket for people like that, we say, take a third and put in your security bucket so it keeps growing even faster. Put a third back. You can take a third and you can use that for other forces that we talk about as well as one example. But it's an individual process that people need to make based on the criteria that we just talked about. What about on the other side? Someone who has an abundance mindset? Like, can that make you a better investor or just dangerously optimistic? I've seen both. I've seen both. I've seen both where people think they're bulletproof and so they're just fearless and they make investments with no fear about the downside and ends up working out for them, which is usually the most expensive thing that can happen because then they believe that's going to happen every time. Oh, they're lost in the sauce. Yeah, they're totally. Somebody gets blackjack the first time they sit at the table. I mean, they're terrible. I'm a genius. Exactly. I'll give you a perfect example. I have a friend who went through my programs, my business programs and he bought a taxi-top business in San Francisco and he was one of the first people to take a digital. Previous to that, the old things advertised was tobacco and naked bars and things of that nature. Now he was doing movies and everything else. Well, he built it up and sold the thing for $200 million to big advertising for him and so I said to him, I said, how much are you going to put in your security bucket out of that? How much are you going to put back in your growth bucket? He goes, Tony, I give you so much credit. I tell everybody, I make $200 million based on everything you taught about a grow business. That's the only thing. It's like, I don't need a security bucket. He goes, I'm going to make these new investments. I'm going to Vegas and he started buying advertising space in the air above spices in advance. It was actually a very brilliant strategy. And he goes, I'm going to be a billionaire. I said, I bet you will. I said, you know, take a little bit off the table because if you're going to Vegas, that should be the first lesson you take a little bit of table. He goes, Tony, I love you dearly, I'm not doing that. So, sure, if he calls me up about three years later, he goes, I'm making a killing on some of that advertising. I'm doing so great. Now, this is 2006. He goes, now I'm building buildings in Vegas, condos. And I got, he told me the names of the celebrities I'll mention, so his name stays private. And he goes, I got these celebrities in. And he goes, I'm going to sell out this first building up front using everybody else's money, just like Donald Trump, like everybody else. He goes, I'm going to be worth $600 million. I said, I'm proud of you. How much are you going to take for it? I'm scared of it. I'm the same conversation with it, right? He goes, you just don't give up. I said, you know why? I've talked about this for 30 years. And I meet people come back 20 years later, 10 years later, and say, holy shit, I wish I would have listened. He goes, Tony, I'm doing great. And to the story, 2008, real estate and Las Vegas drops, 70%, 70% right? I talked to him the second tower. I really want some money back. People walk away from it. The second tower is there. He's upside down $400 million. Trying to avoid bankruptcy. I'm not mentioning his name because he says, you can share my story, but I want more assets. He's starting all over. And all because he just didn't understand this basic piece. So the answer to your question is, most people, it's a mistake. The smartest people who take risks are doing an asymmetrical risk reward. Where do I have the least amount of risk with the greatest amount of upside? That's what makes people wealthy. That's the discipline that makes them wealthy. - Well, and the abundance my set is great because it means they're also not living in fear. And they're not afraid of taking risks. So we've had a saying for 25 years of our firm, what's the worst case scenario? If we live with that, the upside will take care of itself. We have an abundance my set. When we invested in an icon, we knew that it could very well go to zero. And we were willing to take that risk because we knew that if it worked, it could be completely game-changing, not only investment-wise, but also for society. That is the reason why we could do this because we have an abundance my set. But we always respect risk. And we're always afraid of not respecting risk because we know the risk will just whack you upside the head if you don't respect it. - And the risk rise as a partnership with Feeling Nice, 'cause I see the opportunity, he sees the risk. And so, I'm the skeptic. I think you're in the yang. But it's so perfect, right? We bring things together to each other. You'll look at how many we'll be looking at any year and now it's more now. It's over 2,000 investments a year. And out of that will make maybe 20 or 30 in a typical year. 2,000 opportunities, many which are extraordinary. But that's why there's a 96% profit ratio of all investments over 25 years. So you have to have that kind of discipline. The supplement industry is full of products making claims that they come back, which is why I'm such a massive fan of momentas. Their co-founder, Jeff Bayer, has played in the NFL and saw firsthand just how wildly the quality of supplements can vary. So he built momentas around a higher standard. Every product from momentas uses evidence, backed ingredients, transparent doses, and independent third-party testing. Everything is NSF certified for sports, so what's on the label is actually what's in the tub. So why momentas is trusted inside all 32 NFL locker rooms? It's why I've trusted them with my own supplements for years. Best of all, momentas offers a 30-day moneyback guarantee so you can buy it and try it for 29 days. If you don't love it, they will give you your money back. Plus, they ship internationally. Right now, you get up to 35% off your first subscription and that 30-day moneyback guarantee by going to the link in the description below. We're heading to livemomentas.com/modernwisdom and using the code modernwisdom. At checkout. It's l-i-v-e-m-o-m-e-n-t-o-u-s.com/modernwisdom and modernwisdom. At checkout. How do you think about taking some off the table for you to use in your life? I'm aware that much of this is what's your personal tolerance for risk and how much do you need and so on and so forth. But there's a certain archetype of person and Bill Perkins wrote a book about this die with zero, which is fucking fantastic. There is a certain archetype. There's sort of more misery person. Maybe there's someone that didn't come from money but as opposed to, I now have it, I'll blow it. It's, I now have it and I'm terrified of losing it. How do you think about advising people who are investing in the market? It's like, all right, you've done well. It's time for you to actually take some of this and-- This is so personally critical. I teach this. I kind of alluded to it. I said two buckets. There's a third bucket. I call it your dream bucket. And what I have people do is the dream bucket is all the things you call investments that really aren't, but they make you feel good. Like a hyperbolic oxygen chamber. Yes, like a hyperbolic oxygen chamber. Like that SP3 Ferrari that, yeah, maybe it goes up from three million to five million. Maybe it goes down. I can be bad. Do you want? Yeah, it's your, it's your jet. It's your island. It's those things or it's a little condo you have, you know, to me, where your economics are. It's $50,000 of walking around money. It's what you do for jewelry. It's those things. And I people create those. And the reason I'm great those is, if you don't enjoy it along the way, most people, if they own a business, they learn how to create more when they experience more joy from what they're doing as well. But you keep the same disciplines. But instead of only having those two buckets, we'll say when you have a big hit, put a little piece in your dream bucket as well. Or you get a big growth expansion on your growth bucket, put a third in your security, put a third back to reinvest and put a third in your dream bucket. And so what happens is I find people, different types of people, that type of person gets excited. Like I fortunately was around some brilliant people. Peter Goober, one of my dearest friends in the world for the last 35 years. I mean, he is a lifestyle guy. And he's like, he got me. I'll never forget. I was 30 years old. He invite me to come to his place and ask me a 1,000 acre ranch in Asmond, to give you a sense of the value. Quite highly sought after real estate. $100 million for five acres, right? It'll give you an idea, that's the thing. So I go out his ranch and talking to him, and he calls me up, he says, you gotta come to this meeting. And I'm not a networker. If I can't add value, I don't want to just go talk about stuff, right? Because Tony, most influential people, I'm telling you, I need to put you in front of these people, proximity's power comes out. So I live in San Diego. So I fly to LA, right? Because that's first leg. Then I fly to Denver. Then I fly from Denver to Asmond. And they lose my luggage in Denver and I get to Asmond. By the time I'm done, it takes nine hours to get there. I arrive as the dinners end it. - With no clothes. - With no clothes, with clothes in my back. And Peter said, the F is wrong. I said, what are you talking about Peter? I've got here, I've left it six seven this morning. I went from here to there and then he goes, you thought commercial? And I said, Peter, I'm not a billionaire like you. He goes, are you an idiot? You don't need to be billionaire. You could charter and be here in two hours. He said, you gotta buy some crappy bull, get a lear jacket. It's $2,500 an hour, $5,000 you'd be here. And another $5,000 back, $10,000 in my ticket was going $1200. Yeah, and you weren't here. And he goes, you should come up with a budget. The amount of hours you fly per year. You should come up with a budget and just charter. You don't need to own a plane. He said, it will transform your life. And so I still didn't do it. And one night it was doing an event in Los Angeles and two events had collided. Somebody screwed up on schedule. I finished it one in the morning. I gotta be an Edmonton Alberta, the next morning at 830 for 5,000 people. And there are no flights. So I said, and I need to sleep. I've been going on for four straight days, 12 hours a day. So I called my team. I said, he gotta find a jacket. Buying the cheapest, smallest, little lear jet. Whatever you gotta do. And I said, I gotta sleep. They go, Tony, there's no room to sleep on those things. I said, if I was dying, if I was dead, what would you do? You'd put me on a gurney. Get a gurney and that thing. They go, it'll never happen. We pulled it off. I arrived there at two in the morning. First time I'm on a private jet. I climb in this little thing. It's such a small jet. I can touch the captain, right? I strap into this thing. We lift off. We turn on the angle. We look down at Santa Monica Bay. Look up at the moon. I'm all strapped in. I fall asleep for four hours. I get up on one stage in time. I do the event. I go, this is the way to live. (laughs) So it changed things. It changed my ideas like, okay, I'm doing all this business. Most of that is half right off anyway. Here's what the real dollars are. And I figured out it earned more. So there's a mindset that comes if you experience a certain lifestyle. If you have ever had to prove to just someone else cleaning your toilets and you don't like that, you probably won't do that again. You'll probably find someone who's really good at that. Enjoys that and provided them an income and give yourself free to do something else. Having lifestyle is critical, I believe. But it's different for everybody. Some people measure. But it's like, there's a story about this. This couple that saved all their money and they went on this little trip. They saved up forever and they didn't want to spend their money and they go on this cruise and let they bring cheese and crackers 'cause they don't want to spend any extra money. And so every day they go on the trip. They meet everybody and at the end of the day, they go out there, cheese and crackers. And on the last day, they finally said, "Look, let's just splurge." 'Cause these trips, they have these huge amounts of food and desserts and they went for everything and they got the wine, everything else. And then they asked for the check at the end. And you know how the story ends, right? - It was all inclusive. - It comes out, it goes. It's all inclusive. It came with a trip. And they look at each other and go, this is how we've been living our lives. That's how most people live their lives. They're so miserly. What will make you do that more is if you actually get into giving. 'Cause one of the things that made me grow more than anything else was when I started to type. 'Cause I interviewed multiple people, but I read interviewed Templeton. And at the time, he was the first billionaire investor. He's a brilliant man, such a good-hearted guy met him multiple times, interviewed him. And he said, Tony, I assume what's the secret to wealth? He said, "You teach it." I said, "Well, it's just a lot of things." Which says, "He goes his gratitude." If you're grateful about anything, you're gonna be rich. If you have a billion dollars and you're not grateful, you're unhappy. If you've got three beautiful kids and a wife, you're not grateful, you're not a life. Gratitude's the secret. But he said, "I will tell you this. If you really want to be wealthy, I don't know anyone who's tied the least 10%. It doesn't have to be too religion to something. For more than a decade, it didn't become incredibly wealthy." So I'm proud to say I've done 17%. I've gone way above my pay grade, but the rewards have made me a bit unbelievable. And I started out feeding two families, then I figured out about 12, 2014, I said, I found out that in 37 years, I'd fed at that point 42 million people. It was pretty exciting, but I was like, what if I fed that many people in one year? What if I fed 100 million people in a year? What if I did 100 million people a year for 10 straight years, a billion meals? And I teamed up feeding America to deliver the food and I did it in eight years. And when I started, it seemed impossible. Then I said, I'm gonna do 100 billion meals around the world 'cause I travel on the world. You see people start uping, right? And I recruited Governor Beasley as the head of the UN, the world food program, he won the Nobel Prize. When he started, there are 85 million people starving, now there's 385 million people. I said, we'll put together a strike force. We'll do this better, but we're gonna make it measurable. I said, like, what's the number of meals you need for the next 10 years to be able to feed most people in the world? And then during those 10 years, we gotta find the sustainable solution 'cause you can't do charity forever. He goes, Tony, I don't know, 40, 50, 60 billion meals. I said, we'll do 100 billion meal challenge for the 10 years. He goes, Tony, you never get 100 billion meals. I said, I did a billion meals. I wasn't a billionaire when I started. I've been blessed when you bless others, you get blessed. And I said, if there's at least 99 pork people, they like me. So we went to the Forbes philanthropy event. I brought him to speak, he's amazing. I spoke, people were in tears. I thought, we're gonna get 50 out of the hundred. We're gonna do half of it right here. Five people signed up. But in the last four years, by changing our approach, I started this year at 62 billion meals. Right now I have commitments for 295 billion meals in four years and 63 billion have already been delivered. So scaling, that has changed things. I said, I'm a private jet. It burns fuel. I don't want to be in congruent. How do I replace one more than what I put out here? I burned 5,000 trees a year. Yes, what? I planted 100 million trees. I not only just planted them, but then showed the people there how to build crops every single month and build the forest farm for them in West Africa, but the program is there. We've got more. My wife and I have like saw what's happening with some friends of ours and trafficking happen if children no one wants to talk about it. So I said a goal. I said, we're going to free 30,000 children. I went on and won these missions myself undercover with scars all over my face of those terrific thing I've ever done. I do not want to be faced by you and a dark alley. Well, you want to be faced by the people I dealt with in a dark alley, but I have with a group of seal team six guys that are brilliant and undercover operation. Someone never get as long as I live, but when those kids were freed, it was one of the greatest gifts of my life. We've now freed over 100,000 children and I've got a target of a million. When those are your goals, you build businesses in different way. That's why I'm doing 22 billion dollars. Miss, I wasn't doing numbers like that before I didn't have all these companies. It's like, I have a higher purpose in building them. All those businesses serve people. They provide things that are life changing in terms of value for people. They provide jobs, but in addition, all that, I have a higher purpose in what I'm doing. That will make you earn more, grow more, expand more, find answers you've never found before. It's like you need something compelling. If all you're trying to do is make a living or just cover your overhead, you're never going to find the answers. You're never going to push yourself to discover what's possible. All if the only reason that you're earning money is to reinvest the money, to never actually take it out to never actually enjoy it. I enjoy it. Yeah. I've got people to do that and they die that way and just pass the money on to somebody else. What do you think beyond the giving thing, which I know is probably the high oddly enough being selfless is the most selfish thing that you can do. Exactly. You get the most reward possible. Beyond that, what do you think for a normal person who's maybe not quite a, we're going to fix World Hunger or buy a jet? What are some of the areas where people can derive a lot of satisfaction, joy in life from spending money? Someone's being responsible, they're maybe doing some of the investment. They've got their one third and one third. That third third. What are some of the places that you think, hey, this is somewhere that you really should look at spending money to improve your quality of life, the people might not think about from the gap. I still think, here's what I want to say, I have a friend that was on an airplane recently, I'm not in 45, 44 years, and someone's reading one of my books and he said, you know, he thought, what do you think of that? But, oh, it was my energy book, right? I'm not your body. It's unbelievable the stem cells and all these things and, you know, what do you think of the author? He goes, well, he's a really good guy. Donate 100% of the book. By the way, we've done that with Holy Grail investing, too, and don't take a dime. We give it all to feed America. And he says, that's really cool. He goes, but, you know, he's rich, so it must be easy. And my friend, Mike, says to him, it's my case, he said, what if I told you I've known Tony for 45 years, I don't know when he's 17, and he had $20 in his pocket, and he didn't know where his next meal is going to give, and he gave half of it to God in the street that was begging for it. And Tony taught me something then, if you don't give a dime out of a dollar, you're never going to give 10 million out of 100 million. The first place you should start is giving. I have a friend that start out feeding two or three people, he's fed a million, he's fed a million people now in the last 10 years, they come on this little trip with me, just finding little ways to help him make a difference. So you can start small and do things. And then in terms of what are the things that people do that go in their dream bucket besides contribution? It's usually like little things. If you are at Starbucks, and then they prove this, because they can measure what happens now with the secretions in your mouth, the hormone changes, nothing comes close. The three things that give you the most joy are number one, experiences. Experiences are more than any toy or asset because those we get used to. But if you create experiences, people remember them. The second thing though is giving to someone else. If you go and you buy the next five people or 10 people at Starbucks, they're coffee, you don't even know. The transformation in your biochemistry, the level of internal joy that people carry is greater than people that spend millions of dollars on something that are doing it for positioning purposes. You go, I gave this money to charity type of thing. You can see a change in that area. Then what people do that gives them joy is all the little things. It could be just, you know, doing something special for your kids. It can be saying, we're going to do a first class ticket to Europe this time instead of a coach class just for this element. We're going to upscale something in our life that feels like a greater quality of life and brings us joy. If that joy and pleasure is there, you're going to have the desire to invest more, grow more, expand more, be masterfulness here at your life. It's really interesting to think about the positive reward that people get from investing their money, that nobody ever actually ends up withdrawing to improve their quality of life. I'm just continuing to put money and continuing to put money in and never paying it back down. I think a few areas that people will probably be surprised, getting a major, a cleaner for your house is 100% somebody to do the gardening. Some people like the gardening. Some people think that it is hell. Those, it is one of the first places that you can do, not just what is it that I want, is it that I don't enjoy doing and how is that sapping into you? And what gives me more time? Yes. Because probably the most scarce thing for human beings to be outside of money is time. Right. Because now so much of our time, we allow to control, I mean, we used to spend six hours on screens, then you know, people were stuck at home during COVID and went to 13 hours and it was not going back. People walked on the streets during it. So it's not that we have less time. It's just that we allow everything else to engage us. And if you can free up time with a small amount of money, it gives you a totally different experience. The other thing that's a beautiful thing about that is it's not just the time that somebody gets. It's the opportunity that it creates. So being able to allow someone else to be able to earn a living, to be able to do what they're really good at, what they enjoy, what's positive flow for them. And at the same time is also rewarding for us. That's a wonderful thing to be able to do, to be able to make memories for our family, to be able to make memories for friends, to be able to give them things that they might not ever be able to do on their own. And it doesn't have to be expensive, but to be creative. So certainly for somebody who's an investor and they've done well, to be able to harvest some of that and go, you know what, this was well-earned. I'm going to make sure that I pay it back either through charitable contribution or through making memories for friends or family, or to be able to provide opportunity for other people to earn a living and to be able to feed their family. Whatever that may be, that why, and I'll quote him, the bigger the why, the harder we try. Ultimately that is what delivers happiness for people when they are looking at something that is just a nebular number and keeping score. It has to be for a purpose. That purpose is what ultimately God's causes them to not only make good decisions, but also to have staying power to go, this is worth it. It's interesting, right? Money is a number on a spreadsheet or a number on your bank balance on your phone. And it's only when you actually end up trading it in for something in the real world, that it becomes anything, it's just a number. It doesn't, and it could be, like you could look at it as dollars, but it could be hyperinflation in South Africa money if you didn't know because until you end up trading it in, the number is kind of arbitrary. It doesn't make any difference. A quick aside, you've probably heard me talk about element before and that's because I've started every single morning the same way for the last five years now, which is a coal glass of water with elements in it. Element is an electrolyte drink makes with everything that you need and nothing that you don't. It's a science-packed electrolyte ratio of sodium, potassium and magnesium, no sugar, no coloring, no artificial ingredients. It reduces muscle cramps and fatigue, supports brain function, and helps to regulate your appetite throughout the day. I genuinely notice the difference when I take it versus when I don't, which is why I don't shut up about it and also why it's used by everyone from Dr. Andrew Huberman to Olympic athletes and FBI sniper teams, either the good sniper teams, not the bad ones. Also, there are no questions asked for refund policy. So if you don't like it for any reason, they'll just give you your money back. Plus, they offer free shipping in the US. Right now, you can get a free sample pack of elements, most popular flavors with your first purchase by going to the link in the description below, heading to drinklmnt.com/modernwiston. That's drinklmnt.com/modernwiston. Okay. You mentioned about AI earlier on. What are the, how are you thinking about AI as a future and what are the opportunities in AI that people aren't seeing at the moment? Well, we invested in Anthropic and CHEBT. I mean, Anthropic went in 2025, started a billion with 10 and now by April was 44 billion this year. I don't like it. It's unbelievable. But I think it's important to understand thesis for investing. I ask most people, if I said to you in the next 10 years, do you believe there'll be more change to humanity than in the history of all of humanity, what would you say? Depends how RSI goes, maybe, maybe. Most people would say yes, because I've asked millions, tens of thousands of people. Then I say to them that it's like, well, if I have a 10 year gold fee to billion people, it doesn't mean anything unless you pull it to here. And they say, like, what does that mean this year? Oh, I said 42 million people in 37 years, I get to do 100 million this year to get to a billion. That calls you to action. So what I've been doing with people is saying, so what if I told you in the next 36 months, there'll be as much change as probably you've ever experienced in your lifetime for humanity, almost everybody agrees, especially when you point out three things, AGI. We'll have AGI in the next 36 months. Some people would argue we already have it. That means one agent has more power in one category, chemistry, mathematics, whatever it is than any human being. Pretty much there. Ray Kurzwell predicted that this would happen in 1990, that we have this within three years and now back in 1990, right? And he's now interviewing the other day and he said, I was conservative, it's going to happen sooner. In five to six years, we'll have super intelligence. That means one agent will have the power of all human minds combined. When that happens, the world changes so radically. Second piece. Quantum. I was just with the vice chairman of IBM. We're talking about AGI and I'm concerned that, look, there's people, there's no safety because everybody's gone for the trillion dollar target and if they don't do it, there's the stick of China taking over, right? So there's not a look at this. It goes, well, if you're concerned about that, be more concerned about quantum. He said, because quantum, whoever gets quantum first, can basically make the other military defunct. We don't have to even have the missiles. We can get their codes and fire things off way. Right. It's all encryption. And you've been evolving here in quantum. It's 15 years, 70. He said, when I asked him, when's it going to happen? He goes between us and Google, where the two drivers China's a little bit behind, but not much. He said it's critically important, 36 months. You know, you go over and you see, if you bid up to, to see Brett adcock in his group up there and figure AI, you walk in this building and it is like you're in the future. There's nothing but robots ever doing everything. Not robots like you see in China, you know, they're robotic, and they do karate, and you know, they're running a program thinking robots that make things happen. It's happening right now as we speak. So all of this is happening. Now, maybe it's more than 36 months on the robots, probably for some of them, but at some point, there'll be more robots than humans, right? Between him and Elon, you can guess that for sure, not to mention what China is doing. So we're living in a time where there'll be more change than any time in history. So you have to say, what does that do? To me, I look at my thesis and say, that means if you don't have agents as a company in the next 36 months, your chances of competing are quite small. They're not getting implemented right now because there's a fear level. 60% of most CEOs think AI is going to be the greatest thing in the world. But if you see what Microsoft just talked about, 94% of these AI projects never get integrated. That's why they're not producing them. And yet, the ones that do, it disrupts it. You heard all the frontier companies were all talking about, hey, you know, it's going to disrupt jobs. You got to be prepared and that didn't go real well. So now they're going to create more jobs. They're right. They will create more jobs. But in the time period, they're going to disrupt those smaller jobs. And that's a mass number of people that are going to need re-skilling. So I look and go, we want to be in the position of helping companies bring on agents not to replace people to empower them. The way we get it, when we're going sales force, we just now, we have the people out here from the UAE because they want to make their entire government agentic. And so we're working with them. The reason they're working with us is we have a different approach. Our approach is we don't pick some giant AI in the sky when you put everything there because if something breaks down, you don't what caused it. We create these micro little AI's. And what we do is we look at people's workflow and you find out that 60% of what people do is busy work. And so they don't like busy work, but they're caught up in it. Your head of marketing is making a PDF. I mean, what the hell are you doing? Right? So now what we do is we give them an agent that is very assistant. We have a scanning device that shows all of where they spend the work. It shows it and you put them to work. It doesn't replace your job. It makes you more powerful. That's a way of integrating. We got to re-skill a mass number of Americans. That's a whole nother element, not only America, but the rest of the world. And then we got to give people prepared for a world of uncertainty. Most of us have been living with rented certainty. The certainty in what I mean by rented is we're certain because we have a certain job. We have a certain income. We have a certain family of a certain way of being. All that goes away when your house burns down or when all the sudden you lose your job or when all of a sudden somebody in the family gets injured or hurt or there's a disease or something of that nature. Well, we're going to see that certainty shattered by the pace of change. And so we have to prepare people for that. So when myself, I look at this as a triangle of impact. So I'm in the business of bringing companies to Gentick. I'm doing it with Salesforce. I'm actually doing the integration for them at their upcoming event in September here. I'm working on getting people debt-free college education. We have a company out there that's one of the biggest problems is how do you re-skill people rapidly? Well, traditionally you try to teach a mass number of people and not many people have the skills the teacher do that. So you get one sigma improvement if you can make the class size small. There's always been the two sigma problem that we've known for 40 years. And that is you take an average student and give them one-on-one mentoring. They help produce 98% of the class. But it's been too expensive. But with a Gentick AI, now we have it. So we take people now that just lost their jobs. We give them a guaranteed new skills, new life, no debt. Do you know what the largest debt in America is? Mortgage. You know what the number two is? Student debt, $1.8 trillion student debt. A four-year college education takes on average 20 years to pay off. President Obama, when he was a senator, was still paying off some of his college debt right before he ran for president to give you an idea. So we're going to create a solution in that area. And then I'm working with the guys that built calm, if you remember calm, the largest app in the world for meditation. These guys built it and sold it for a billion half a year was. I sat down with them and said, Listen, we need more therapists. And even if you're the best therapist in the world, there aren't enough. And people are now going to Chatchee BT. And I'm sure you saw there's all these lawsuits. 1.3 million people a week as Chatchee BT about suicide. The other day, there's another article about a woman committed suicide. And the Chatchee BT not explained how to do it, but it wrote her suicide note. Right? These are made for sick of fancy. They're designed to keep you online talking. They're not designed to actually help you to change. So I built something with them where we have now technology that reads your micro expression. So you're on screen, you see every emotion you're feeling. It's not just an LLM and it has auditory elements. It's spent $30 million spent to identify what auditory elements mean, what emotions you're having. So if you are sitting here and I say, how's it going? You go fine or you go fine or you go fine. The LLM just sees fine, but you and I see something completely different. So we can interact. And if it's something that's suicidal, it moves it up to 988. So think about this. There's 11 million veterans in this country. We have 2,000 therapists for them. It takes four months to see one. Most veterans don't want to talk to a therapist. They don't want to talk to a female therapist. They find a lot of the male guys don't. It makes them feel weak. They're not going to go spend four months in 17 or killing himself every day. For 90% less money, we can be there 24, 7, 365 helping them with something that's proven in as a track record. So I think you have to have a thesis like what's happening in the world and where is it going? Just like the thesis of there's going to be 5% more spending of the GDP of all these countries. Then that means you probably should be looking at something on the military side if you want to have a growth investment. What's your thesis for investing? That's mine for what I'm putting my primary time and energy. But we have a series of thesis of where if you can make a difference and so you might even touch on some of the other areas like energy. Well, I mean, when you think about the world of AI, it's touching every aspect of it. But one of the things that is absolutely incumbent is you have to have energy to be able to power it. If you don't have enough energy, you don't have the ability to do AI of any type, any form, any substance. Everybody's talking about that with data centers. But no one really wants to admit how far behind the production of energy we are. And to be very clear, we're for all kinds of energy. From traditional, to sustainable, to transitional, whatever you want to call it, we're going to need all of the above in order to be able to meet the enormous demand growth that's not just coming from AI. It's coming from the fact that billions of people are moving up in their economic situation. When somebody goes from lower income to middle income, they want a lot more power and a lot more energy. When somebody goes from middle income to higher income, they consume a lot more energy. So all of it is the same growth curve as far as demand, but what's not changed is supply. And the amount of supply that's out there is basically flat lining or growing very, very little. Those lines are expected to cross in 2028, where we will literally not have as much power as we need to be able to meet all the demand. You're talking about the data centers alone in this country will consume more power than all of New York City. Just the data centers, then that one city in literally three years to five years. That is something that we have to meet the demand of, but again, it's not just data centers. So we don't want to demonize data centers. It's the consumption of AI. And obviously, if the United States is going to compete in the world of AI, the AI arms race, if you will, then we have to have the power to do it because I assure you that China and other countries are going to be putting all the demand, all the supply out there that they need to be able to meet the AI demand. We need 50% more energy by 20, 35, 50% more than we're doing right now. So that means we're going to use all forms of energy and energy because of the way we've approached it recently has been a tremendous opportunity. Give a sense of what kind of changes we've seen. Well, I mean, we've seen to where there were so many people chasing energy as an investment asset class to where people decided for reasons that they have the freedom to decide that they didn't want to invest in fossil fuels and traditional energy. So we have a very simple metric that we follow called the reserve replacement ratio. And the book we talk about it, you know, anybody who's been a teenager or had a teenager, if they know that the milk is full at the beginning of the day, if they don't go buy more milk by the end of the day, it's going to be less full, right? And eventually they're going to run out of milk. Well, that's exactly what is with energy because this stuff doesn't last forever. It depletes. It goes away just like the milk cart. So somebody has to go replenish the milk. And so far in this decade for every one unit of energy that we're consuming, we're only replacing point two of that energy. So we're consuming it five times faster the rate than what we're creating new energy. And it's not like you can flip a switch. It takes years to get major energy resources online. So we are way behind. And unfortunately, that's going to cross which creates the opportunity to wear, you know, as an example, in some cases, because there's just not that many people investing in it. We're able to buy things at three times cash flow or four times cash flow. And we've seen enormous returns because we're willing to invest all across the energy spectrum. And that includes nuclear and other places where there's great opportunity. But it's going to take all of it and those that provide the capital. are going to be very well-rewarded for doing so. I want to mention that just to catch back also that anybody who's in a position like I have a brother-in-law that's 60 years old, he's a software engineer, Gary gentleman who's the vice chairman of IBM told me his daughter was crunching code and used to get a million dollars for a nine month project because she's one of the best in the world to crunch code. Now it's done by an agent in four days for free. He doesn't have a job but she's pregnant so she has a future and they have money so he's not worried about her. But people are being disrupted. The biggest challenge is how do they get reeducated. So we have an ability to do this and if they go to unitedcolleges.org, UnitedColleges.org, they can apply and see what type of jobs are actually out there in demand. What professions they could tap into to retool themselves and they can do it at their own tempo with an agent that knows everything about you, knows you love soccer, teaches you how to do that, adapts to your training capacity and gives you that skill. So I just want to plant that seed for people because so many people are being disrupted. Guys, six years old, he walks in, 650 people are let go of that morning. He's one of them and the company, 25 years, no economic plan to back him up, no, no sufferance. And guess what? They took the whole thing, agendas sold to the Swedish company. He's got two kids in college. He's got a wife that's a substitute teacher who makes $30,000 a year and he's got a mortgage. So he's going to do, he can't go, Frank gets a new education that that been paid for that piece and go further in debt. So we're solving that aspect to give you an idea. So while there's opportunity everywhere, disruption still means if you retool yourself, you can take advantage. Anybody can still do well in this world. People say, you know, is it possible really to do well financially is the game rigged? The game is still a game you can absolutely win, but you got to learn and you got to take a little bit of time to understand what's possible and you'll at least give yourself a short period of time, where you say, I'm going to find a diversification of eight to twelve uncorrelated assets and reduce my risk 80% while I'm working on my job or my career or whatever else I'm doing. So that's my other business that's going to protect me. The social security at this point is not probably going to be enough for anybody if it's even here later on for people to have a quality of life that they need. It seems like there's a lot of change happening in the world and that means that people are going to get scared. Lots of people get stuck thinking and overthinking a decision. It's spent so much time worrying about what decision to make that their life sort of turns into a relationship with the internal drama of the decision itself. Obviously, you've spent a lot of time thinking about human psychology, human nature and behavior. Have you got a framework inside of finance or outside of it generally in life for becoming better at the decision making process? How do you think about making decisions? I have a very specific process. It takes a little time to explain, but here's its essence. The most important thing in decision making is value clarification. When you know it's most important to you, you can make a decision. Most people are trying to hit multiple targets at once. I want to do this and if I do that and work, what if I do that, but then that works, and they do it in their head. The first piece is it's got to be done on your computer on paper outside your head. You got to start with, I call it O-O-C-E-M-R, real quick, O is, you start with the outcomes. What are the outcomes? What do I, what am I, what from this decision? What's the most, and then you got to rate them in order of importance. They're not all equal. I want a job that's going to do this, this, and this, okay, well, is it the money the most important? Is it the lifestyle it's most important? Is it the quality of who you're going to be around? You have to rate the importance because you may not get them all equally. We want to make sure what's most important to you get. Once I do the outcomes clearly, now I need to know what are my options. And the delusion is, one choice is no choice. Two choices is dilemma. There's at least three choices always, and if you live that principle, you'll find it. When you usually get three, you'll find four or five, and I get people to come up with options, they haven't thought of before, okay, don't judge them yet, right? So outcomes, O, O, okay, whatever option, C, what are the consequences? So now I look at each option and say, okay, what's the upside or downside of each one? And I make the list in paper, not in my head, you know, I've actually computer programed design for this. And so now I can see, upsides, downsides, okay, I've done half of it. Now EMR, now I need to evaluate it. I need to evaluate, okay, there's this upside and the downside, but what's the probability of it happening? Like you might say, oh, I can lose everything, okay, but what's the probability? Or oh, I'll make a billion, but what's the probability? Is it 90%, 10%, 5%, that starts for you to really evaluate what your better options are. And now what'll happen is, some of those options will be clear you, they don't make sense. So the M is mitigate. I might end up with two or three options here and I go, okay, well, how do I get the best of this one and this one? What could I do to combine? There was a new way to do this and I teach that process. And then BR is resolved, oh, oh, see, EMR, the resolve, this is what I'm going to do because in the end, everybody wants to make a decision they're certain about. This will get you about as certain as you can get, but at the same time, there is no absolute certainty. I mean, if you're a leader, you're paid for making difficult decisions. I was with General Swartzkopf years ago when the first, you know, that's all I am the first war we had in the Middle East there and when we're dealing with Saddam. And he was brilliant. And I asked him because he was very decisive guy and asked him, you know, how is it you make the tough decisions? And he said, when I was a private, he goes, I work for General. And this General was a tough guy, he was a four star general. And he said, one day, they found out that there had been a decision that the Pentagon had struggled with for 20 years, a very giant strategic decision. And the General was finally going to make the decision what to happen. So they sent leans of binders of information in to help him evaluate. And four days before they're getting all these centers and armies that are like five people helping to organize this for the General and summarize it, the General had to fly overseas and he didn't get back till the night before. So he said, General, we got to cancel the meeting. You're not prepared. He goes, no, the meeting goes forward eight thirty in the morning. Shows up at eight thirty in the morning. And he's freaked out. It's like, there's no way the General knows enough to make this decision. The General says, okay, give me what you've got your 15 minutes. They go. They give this recovery. Tell me your side. Give me 15 minutes. As soon as I've done it, he stood up and said, that's what we're doing. Never stood up. Solided to General. What? This is a decision not been made for 10 years. Really strategic decision. So Swartzkov tells me he said, he's freaking out inside. So whenever he leaves, he goes and knocks on the General's door and says, permission to speak openly. Said, Eddie's. General, I'm the chief of staff here. There's no way you know enough information to make this decision. You, you, I mean, there's reams more of information for you to know. He said, yes. He said, how could you make that decision? He said, because the decision need to be made. No one's done it for 10 years. I got enough information to make a decision. I made one. Now, for wrong, I'm going to find out quicker because we're going to do something and if we're right, we're going to move forward. He goes, I never forgot that. He said, then I got one more lesson from one time, General's leaving again. He said, you're in charge. I'm going to be on for 10 days. I mean, whatever decisions are necessary and he's freaking out, this is a private right. Well, but, but sir, but sir, like, well, why don't I know what to do because when you come, put in command, take charge, and he said, rule 13, what's rule three? Put in command, take charge. He's leaving. Go, sir, but, but I don't know what to do. He said, rule 14, what's rule 14, he goes, do what's right? Do what's right? You know, you build decision making muscles by making more decisions. Some people have a hard time deciding what they're after dinner. You've been with somebody and everybody else is already and they still can't decide, you know, they have a weak decision making muscles, decide, and the more you decide the stronger you get. But this OOCMR, knowing my outcomes, because that's what it's about, value clarification. Knowing my options, knowing the consequences, evaluating probability, mitigating to come up with a better solution and resolving, that's the six steps that I use and teach people. Can every single thing he just talks about applies to finances and investment management, 100%. So if somebody doesn't know what they're trying to achieve or they're trying to make a 30% return or a 3% return, if they don't know why that's important, if they're not willing to take the volatility that it takes, and then look at the probability adjusted outcome of that investment, then they can't make a good decision. Which is why going back to what I said earlier, it's all about investing based on percentages not on dollars. If somebody's like, it's a million dollars, that's a lot of money. It is a lot of money and that you don't want to lose it. But if it's 1% of your portfolio and it goes to zero, that's going to suck. But it's not going to be fatal, right? So it's a liberating and it's freeing for somebody to be able to be much more analytical, less emotional, and every single professional investor will say the same thing. Emotion is the enemy to investment success, period. So you have to be clinical and you have to remove the emotion and the only way to do that is have a consistent process that is based on percentages that say, okay, if this happens, I can live with it. But that worst case I can live with, the upside of take care of itself and all of that applies exactly what Tony just described. That can. Boys, I appreciate both of you. Where should people go to find out more about what's going on? So he's got a whole lot of different place. You can go to ours. It's simple. Casinvestments.com. That's where you can learn everything about what we're doing as a firm. And obviously he's got all the various things he's involved in. Honeyrabbs.com. And if you can see any business that we're involved in and we've got an event coming up shortly here. We do only a few events a year now, really large, and so we have 17,000 people here in Miami for four days called Unleashed Power then. So if anybody's interested in that, they can reach out to us as well. Well, I can just tell you this, having gone through the tape series in 1991 and not going to my first opportunity to go to a live event until 2013. Don't wait that long. Folks that like and follow Tony and have learned a lot from Tony, go to a live event. It's completely different than anything that you could expect to do. through the tape, it was life-changing for me and I know many other people. Well, take the same way. It's coming up in November, I think it's 4th, 5th and 6th. - Yes. - Boys, I appreciate both of you. - Thanks so much for having us. We appreciate you again.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. Chris Williamson has spent over a year creating a live tour in the UK and Ireland, emphasizing the aliveness and interaction of live events over written content.
  2. A major insight from financial history is that the game of investing is rigged, with the wealthy often rewarded despite systemic risks, leading to a need for better investment principles.
  3. The most important investment principle identified by top investors like Ray Dalio is asymmetric risk-reward: risking a dollar to make five, even if wrong 4 out of 5 times, ensures long-term survival.
  4. True diversification involves non-correlated assets such as private equity, private credit, real estate, and sports franchises, which can reduce risk by 80% and improve returns.
  5. Private equity has outperformed public markets like the S&P 500 for 39 straight years, delivering 15.7% average annual returns versus 9%.
  6. New regulatory changes allow everyday investors to access alternative assets—like sports teams or space tech—with as little as $2,500 and even through retirement accounts like 401(k)s.
  7. The "magnificent seven" in the S&P 500, such as Apple or Amazon, now represent over 30% of the index and are highly correlated, creating concentrated risk for investors.
  8. A key mindset shift is needed

Summary:

Chris Williamson shares insights from years of financial observation and interviews with top investors, including Ray Dalio, to reveal a new framework for investing. He argues that the market is rigged, with wealth concentrated among a few, and that most people are at risk due to over-concentration in public markets like the S&P 500. The core principle he highlights is asymmetric risk-reward—investing with disproportionate upside for minimal downside—ensuring long-term survival.

Diversification across non-correlated assets, such as private equity, real estate, and sports franchises, reduces risk by up to 80% while boosting returns. Private equity has consistently outperformed public markets over three decades. Recent regulatory changes now allow ordinary people to access these opportunities through funds as low as $2,500, even via retirement accounts.

Williamson emphasizes that investors must move beyond traditional models—like the "magnificent seven"—which are highly correlated and volatile. He urges a shift in mindset: using percentages, not dollar amounts, and prioritizing downside protection through diversified, non-correlated assets. He also stresses that true wealth-building comes from resilience, not just growth, and that access to private assets—like sports teams or space tech—is now available to all.

These changes, driven by both market evolution and policy, offer a pathway for ordinary people to achieve higher returns with lower risk, aligning with the growing trend of private, diversified investing.

FAQs

Asymmetric risk reward means risking a small amount to achieve a much larger return. For example, risking $1 to make $5. Even if you're wrong 4 out of 5 times, you still profit. This approach reduces risk and improves long-term returns, unlike traditional investing where losses are often too large to recover.

Private equity has outperformed public markets for 39 straight years, with an average return of 15.7% compared to 9% for the S&P 500. This is due to better diversification, lower correlation with the market, and the ability to add value through management and operations.

People should consider investments in private sports franchises, space technology, military tech, and 3D-printed infrastructure. These assets are uncorrelated with markets, offer strong long-term returns, and are now accessible to retail investors through new regulatory changes.

Diversification spreads investments across different asset classes, industries, and geographies. This reduces overall risk because if one investment loses value, others may perform well. Research shows that 8 to 12 uncorrelated assets can reduce risk by up to 80%.

During downturns, most public markets move together, leading to high correlation. This means losses in one area often lead to losses in others. Private assets like real estate or private equity behave differently, reducing overall portfolio risk.

The SEC and Department of Labor have introduced rules allowing non-accredited investors to access alternative investments. Now, investors can participate in funds like sports teams, private equity, or space tech with as little as $2,500, and some 401(k) plans can now include such assets.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.