The Most UNHINGED Thing Trump Has Said About the Iran War Yet
38m 18s
This transcription blends multiple topics into a rich, often critical examination of modern culture and politics. It opens with a casual conversation between Aina Garten and Nathan Lane, touching on his stage work and personal life, before shifting to broader societal issues. A central theme is the rise of algorithmic influence in fashion, where data-driven models are replacing human design. The political analysis is sharp and pointed, focusing on Donald Trump’s behavior—particularly his dismissive and offensive remarks about journalists and his controversial comments on Iran and gas prices—highlighting a troubling lack of diplomatic or moral leadership. Critics argue that such behavior undermines public trust and sends harmful messages about masculinity and power. The discussion also explores political campaigns using controversial narratives, such as linking Republicans to Jeffrey Epstein, and the use of betting apps to mock political figures. The Cornell sexual assault case is presented as a symbol of deeper institutional failures in campus safety and consent, with calls for reform in university policies and greater accountability. Additionally, a severe measles outbreak in the Northeast is tied to a broader crisis of public trust in science, exacerbated by anti-vax rhetoric and political figures’ rejection of scientific consensus. The narrative concludes with a warning that society is retreating from rational governance and scientific progress, driven by misinformation and polarization. Overall, the piece serves as a critical reflection on media, politics, education, and public health in the current era.
I'm Aina Garten, and each week on Happy Hour, I invite new and old friends for a drink and a fun conversation at my kitchen table in New York City. On this week's episode, I'm joined by Nathan Lane. We talk about his critically claimed run in death of a salesman, taking his dog to therapy and winning an Emmy for only murders in the building. New episodes of Happy Hour are available every Wednesday. You can watch on YouTube or listen wherever you get your podcasts. Cheers. Who chose your outfit today? You may not realize it, but the stylist behind your look probably isn't human. What we're seeing is that mall brands, past fashion brands, they're looking for algorithmic inputs from the internet to figure out what people like and what will sell, and then they're making products that way. This week on Explained To Me, how the algorithm transformed fast fashion. Listen Sundays wherever you get your podcasts. Our president is creating mean coins. Our congress members are raking in millions on the stock exchange, and our political candidates are betting on themselves on Calche and Polymarket. It's a bipartisan issue, and it's only getting worse. What happened to the days of when our public servants were putting a little bit more effort into, you know, serving the public rather than just serving themselves? I'm Vivian Two, your rich BFF, and on this episode of "Networth and Shill," we're uncovering how our public officials are making money in questionable ways, and what exactly they're doing to get rich quick. Listen wherever you get your podcasts or watch on youtube.com/yourrichbff. Welcome to "Raging Monarchs." I'm Scott Calaway. And I'm Jessica Tarlov. Jess? You're good. You do know where you are. I did wake up this morning and ask myself that question. I am in Bruin Woods, and the lighting here makes it feel like at any moment we could see. You know, all work and play makes Scott a very dull boy and see jelly-developing, you know, running with Jack Nicholson with an axe. Radrum, baby. There's definitely a shining field all of this. But before we get started, make sure to subscribe to stay up to date and support our show. Okay. Let's bust into it. Campanian Nebraska last night, President Trump spoke about the war in Iran, saying, "It's a small price to pay for keeping the world safe, keeping our country safe. They can take out a city, let them take out Los Angeles, let them take out San Diego." That's, this is the Earth's small price to pay, and it's going to be all over the earth. It's essentially almost over with. The comments to immediate criticism from Governor Newsom and other California leaders. At the event, he also unveiled a newly signed executive order, "Mentatame rising diesel prices. The plan directs the IRS not to impose penalties when dyed diesel is sold for or used on highways, and directs the Treasury Secretary to defer certain excise tax payments with the relief running through the end of 2026." Here's Trump at that rally, speaking about our very own Jessica Tarlov. Let's watch. Why are they putting these people on our television networks? Why? They always have to put Jessica Tarlov, another loser. They put, they put, no, they put these voices on. I think it's really bad. I think it's no reason to do it. It's not better entertainment. You know, they say they like to project both sides, but the other side doesn't project both sides. They never have any of us on television. So, I think they should stop doing it. Actually, at this point, I think the shining would be more fun, or less weird. Let me just call out the elephant in the room. He has a tendency to obsess over young attractive journalists. He's not calling out Anderson Cooper. He's not calling out Jake Tapper, who are more critical and more present than you. He seems to have, it's like when grandpa kisses his granddaughter a little too long. It is so weird and so uncomfortable. Everything you would expect in terms of how a world leader acquits himself, not only for his own dignity, but to represent the nation's interests. We've never, I can't think of the last time, let me think, never. We've had someone who is such a social misfit. I'm not talking about, okay, he's been criticizing the media fine. But there's something, this guy literally is going to go down as President Ich. This is a badge of honor for you. This is the fact that the president who's supposed to be the most powerful man in the world, that you're living rent-free in his head means you're absolutely doing something right. And also, by the way, I'd be shocked if your book sales don't skyrocket today. I disagree with Jessica Tarel, I've just any thoughts. Well, that would be nice. Two, why is this man not busier, like every time, and this is his third time in a week, that he has said something about me. And he's so angry that I sit on a show where it's one versus four. And it's not as if I hog other people's talk time. I'm very respectful of other people's talk time. Jesse Waters is working on it, allegedly, of being respectful of my talk time. The thinnest of skin, so pathetic, what I get, hails in comparison to what Caitlin Collins gets, and have enormous admiration for her ability to do that job. Oh, Caitlin Collins, shocker, another young, attractive woman. Way younger than me, and better hair. Yeah. No, I do see a pattern. It also makes all of the accusations of inappropriate behavior from him seem completely feasible. You know, when he's like, oh, no, I wouldn't do something like that. I'm like, dude, this is how you talk. I don't, you know, things that haven't been adjudicated. I'm not trying to get sued. None of that. I'm just saying this guy is fucked up. And you can see also he's at a rally in Nebraska, but blood red seat where Dan Osborne has a decent chance of picking off that Senate seat. And you see the eyes of the people in the audience glazing over, especially the women. Did you notice that where they're just like, dude, I'm over this. Like, you came here to Nebraska to talk about nooking San Diego and Los Angeles and Jessica Tarlov, like, see, I got to get something new in my life here. And the double standard that exists for the kinds of things that Donald Trump can say versus what a Democrat couldn't even think. I feel like if we said anything like that, even had the thought of it, it would be end of days. And we're just supposed to treat this as casual. This guy who stood in front of generals and said, I'm going to send you into blue cities. Peahegses up there with his weirdo like weirdos, beardos, fatties, stuff. And then I don't care if Iran makes it to Los Angeles or to San Diego. It's just so unacceptable. And obviously we respect the results of free and fair elections. And he did win a free and fair election. And in one in places that I think he should have no business winning and we're seeing those populations turning against him now, 11% of 2024 Trump voters regretting their vote. But I really, I don't know, I spent a lot of time with conservatives. I think I understand the way that they see the world to a large degree. I don't get watching that and thinking, yeah, that's my guy. And this is the guy that is delivering for us or even will deliver for us. He's just so full of it, you know, with the gas prices. It's just a little bit inflated, you know, gas over $4 and diesel over $6. That's just a little bit inflated. And they want to go back to, you know, the spike that happened under Biden, the three weeks where it went up because of the war in Ukraine, drive it three weeks versus seven months of this. I'm sorry, I can't get past the comments. Him suggesting around Newcastle City, I almost kind of expect that. I don't, I think it's so outrageous, I'm not sure it has much impact. But in an era where we are trying to, we are trying to teach our sons to have more grace, more dignity and recognize the enormous gains women have made and celebrate them and that men and young men need to be the after boosters on their success. And that the traditional notions of I dream of Genie or Baywatch are outdated and do not in any way frame an approach or how you should be thinking about women. We have a president who's supposed to be a role model, the role model for young people. He sees an attractive, articulate woman disagree with him and he immediately turns into the comment section of a divorce guy's Facebook group. He brings the energy of the most insecure person or the most insecure man who can't get matched on hinge.
It's like your grandfather yelling at the Peloton instructor who's going too fast. He just doesn't, he makes him look so stupid. It sends exactly the wrong message to our young men at a time when young men are struggling and young men are looking for leadership, looking for mentors and also have found terrible voices in the ecosystem. Just as Stephen Miller in the eighth grade has been turned down by nine people for junior prom and just goes angry and hateful. Anyways, I'm having trouble getting, I'm having trouble getting passed. You don't want to talk about the polls. Sorry, I'm just, and also just to be, when the president says anything critical about anyone, there's an element to this that is just journalists and good people and Americans who are working hard and raising families don't need a man with a cult criticizing them for a lot of reasons. A person who has developed cult like followership should not be critical of public figures unless it's in a political context. It just, it creates an atmosphere that is not healthy for America and it's irresponsible. On so many levels, this is wrong, stupid and dangerous and it needs to stop. There has to be someone in his inner circle who can sit him down and go, stop this, you look stupid. It makes you look whatever the opposite of confident masculinity is. This is that. You got to stop this. Who do you think that person would be? What he was gripping about more than me, though, was that Abdul al-Sahed was interviewed on Fox again and Martha McCallum had him in her hour and the three o'clock hour and- How'd he do? I didn't see it. It was very different than the interview with Jesse Waters, about far less circumcision talk this time. But they covered a lot of ground and talked about healthcare and the economy and the Middle East and Abdul was cool as a cucumber. He's very good on his issues. Yes. And I think that what he did, what he did with us as well, which, you know, was an adversarial necessarily, but we, you know, we got into some meaty stuff, obviously, is that he comes off looking like a guy who can do the job. And in these last days, that is what is most important, right, that people, even if they're not 100% in agreement with you on all of the issues, maybe if they're not, you know, universal healthcare people, and I think it should be public-private partnership, whatever it is, that they think that you equate yourself well and that you'd be a good representative of the state of Michigan. And I don't think that people would watch the interview from yesterday and not come to that conclusion. I mean, he had a bunch of, I think, very strong moments. And again, the idea that a democratic candidate for Senate shouldn't be interviewed on Fox News is such a poor reflection on what's going on in Donald Trump's mangled brain. You know, he says the other side doesn't do it. You know, they don't talk to other voices. Scott Jennings sits on Abby Phillips show every night, and there's usually a second conservative on there as well. You know, this is, it should be the least of his problems that people are listening to Abdul have a conversation about universal healthcare with Martha McCallum, or that, again, I set there one versus four every night for an hour. It's amazing. Scott finds time to go on that show after his robust hour-long conversations on geopolitics with Mitch McConnell. It was only 20 minutes, everyone only got 20 minutes with the Oracle. Yeah, I bet that was a robust conversation. Yeah. Like one of the tests of a candidate's medal is their ability to go behind enemy lines. And in any substantive conversation, he made disagree, disagree with Abdul, but he knows how to go behind enemy lines. He's good at it. And he is, along with AOC, regardless of what you think of their politics, along with AOC and Mamdani, they are generational talents. They're young. They're good looking. They are very calm. They equip themselves really well. And they have some of that Buttigieg kind of calmness about them where they don't feel a need to insult or get back in people's faces. You know, he's, I mean, let me put it this way, in this whole notion you shouldn't go on. Abdul's going behind enemy lines is Kempaksen going on CNN. No, he's barely going on Fox. Yeah. I mean, they're bad at it. And these are bad candidates. They're all running from abysmal records and Kempaksen also running from everything else that he has going on in his life on top of the shitty record. So. I was on with Martha when my book came down. Oh, yeah. That was a nice conversation. She couldn't have been nicer. She couldn't have been. That's what I hate about Fox. Everyone's so fucking nice. It's a real problem. You go over there and everyone's just so lovely, and you're like, well, I want to hate these people. I saw your favorite last night. Liz Claimon. Liz. Yeah. A bear. Go bears. Mm-hmm. Wow. Cow bear. There you go. Yeah. It's great. Support for the show comes from hymns. Did you know that most guys aren't fully satisfied with their sex lives? hymns makes it simple to access personalized treatment plans for better sex. It's not about managing a condition or treating a symptom. It's about having the sex life you actually want. hymns combines personalized treatment plans and 100% online process. No office visit, no pharmacy line, no awkward conversations. You just connect with a licensed provider who can determine if treatment is right for you. Not every guy needs the same thing. Some want daily support so they're ready whenever. Some just want it when they need it. hymns works with you to find the best option for you. And if a provider decides it's the right fit, your treatment plan is prescribed online and ships to screen it to your door. Ready to build a better sex life? Visit hymns.com/moderates for a personalized plan for sex, hair, weight loss, and more. It's hymns.com/moderates, prescription products required online consultation with a licensed health care provider who will determine if a prescription is appropriate. Restrictions apply. Individual results may vary. See hymns.com for full details. We're just about one month out from the midterm elections in these United States. And despite all the gerrymandering and voting restrictions, legal challenges and personnel shakeups, it looks like the Democrats are going to flip the House's representatives. The vibes of U.S. Democrats are incredibly strong. It's mostly Democrats trying to tell each other like, don't oversell how amazing of a night we're going to have. So on today's point of the box, how are the Democrats going to mess this up? Nah, JK, JK, JK. The question isn't any more like, will Democrats flip the House majority? It's how big is that majority going to be? So on today's explain from box, we're going to talk about the new sheriff in town if all of this goes as Democrats think it's going to go. A Keem's House on today explained Monday through Friday afternoons in your feeds. Here's the thing, it's hard to even find Republicans on the campaign trail right now. And it's even harder to get them to talk about Donald Trump. But there's at least one Republican right now who seems to be trying a different strategy. All summer long. Thomas Swamy has kept up an unusually ambitious calendar full of fairs, rallies, and town halls. This week on America actually, what is the GOP message for the midterms? And how are Republicans dealing with the elephant in the room? Trump's second term has flopped. I think the Republican Party is not looking highly upon right now and I think that everyone knows it. Catch us every Saturday on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. Speaking of campaign ads, not that we were, the main Senate Super PAC for Dems has been ramping up the amount of ads they are airing that tie Republicans to Jeffrey Epstein. It could be a smart move, polling shows that 44% of voters include many, including many swing voters. The Epstein is a serious issue in the campaign season. Add impact counts 69 Epstein related ads so far the cycle worth more than $37 million. Here's one of those ads. The six million documents, 1200 victims, and his vote stood in the way of the truth. Dan Sullivan took thousands in cash from Epstein Associates and voted to keep the files hidden from the public. Even after he knew 14-year-old girls were raped, Dan Sullivan had the power to release the Epstein files and protect the victims, instead he protected his donors and his friends. And then it is responsible for the contents of this ad. And ad goes hard, the music and every, you know, it has major creep vibes to it. And, you know, Dan Sullivan is tied to this less than other folks that are in government. But it is a stain on everyone who voted against the release of these files or who's
says nothing about it. And I think it's smart for the Epstein vials to come back into focus. Of course, you want justice for the victims and for them to feel like they were heard and that maybe some justice will be served in some way, but it also is a potent electoral issue. And it ties into this broader conversation around corruption and the elite, the Epstein class, as John Ossoff had been calling them. And I think it's going to make a big difference. It's a big factor in the Ohio Senate race with John who said and shared Brown trying to get his seat back. And I'm glad that it's popping up again. It feels like one of those things that we just forgot about. This happened in the 2024 election. Remember, we were talking about Project 2025 all the time. And then suddenly it would only like 60 days to go or like, oh, let's talk about other shit. And I was like, no, no, let's talk about the really scary thing that they actually you could print out. And it's 928 pages or whatever. And it's their blueprint for destroying the country and the constitution. And we got sidetracked. And then we got our butts kicked. So I appreciate we're not going to get sidetracked here because I think it is important. And it is one of the only issues also that crosses over, you know, where Republicans are also upset about it and feel like they were lied to and betrayed by the administration. Yeah, I think it's not only effective. It's well-learned. Well, moving on to more. We can I say something about a fun ad or the Towerico campaign has this against Ken Paxon. It's introducing scan dual. It's the betting app where you can parlay Ken Paxon scandals and get paid. Bet the over under on how much money Ken has made from the cell phone tower. He controls on the grounds of a hospital where he served on the board of directors. So like making fun of how we're all that's good. With betting on everything, which is a scourge and that is very bad. But Ken Paxon has all of these scandals and they're going to run through them. And I love the play on the cultural zeitgeist to have this come to life. And the little tagline below it says here's a tip. Always bet that he did the thing. That's hilarious. Let's go. We need to move on. Okay. The case of the Cornell 7 continues to spark outrage around the country and on the Cornell campus where thousands of students and faculty rallied last night in the first large campus gathering since the lawsuit over the school's handling of a 2024 sexual assault allegation due national attention. Protesters marched to the home of President Michael caught the coughs office, chanting for his resignation, and for banning fraternities. Just what are your thoughts? Is this a university issue, a justice issue, both? Yes. Yes. It sounds like it's an everything issue. Everything I should. Yeah. And you know, more information is coming out as reporters and journalists are on this beat. Now ABC News has a new phone conversation that took place between Jane Doe and one of the frat brothers. She said there's so much damage on my body and brain. If I wanted to take this somewhere, what you all did was gang rape. You know, I was 10 shots deep. I remember looking up and thinking this is too many people. One of the guys did say in response that she told them that she was sober and their conflicting reports between what she said in 2024 versus the lawsuit. Now so she rated her drunkenness as a five or six, and then it was, you know, too inebriated to have been able to consent. It's not surprising that there would be discrepancies and we know this to be sure of people obviously remembering things and also looking at the totality of what happened versus how you feel in the moment. But these screenshots of the text messages are terrible. I'm not saying it means necessarily they deserve their day in court or wherever this is going. But the idea of inviting, you know, anyone in the house in there, you know, shops open, free pussy. She's on birth control. Like that doesn't look good. And it's just horrifying. And I don't know what Cornell is going to do generally about the amount of people who are reporting that they're being sexually assaulted at school. I know that this is happening everywhere, but the 25 to 35%. It's pretty astonishing to me. And I know we talked about it a few days ago. And I was reading the comments and a lot of people said that that didn't surprise them, which is disturbing on another level. Yeah, it's been, I mean, there's this involves a law universities fraternities, the legal definition of consent, New York law versus other state laws. There's just so many. The media's response to a Russia judgment, you know, due process. At the same time, a campus environment that is clearly not safe for young women. I mean, there's just so many issues here. And the issue I don't think is getting enough attention is like most issues that they'll us. I think a lot of problems would slow. The atmosphere is around a lot of our biggest problems would get better if we had much more engaged fathers. And I had this conversation with my oldest and I've been thinking a lot about everyone talks about, you know, girl dads, boy moms, well, all right, boy dads, what are you going to do around this one? And it's an uncomfortable conversation. And I had it with my oldest and my advice and I've been asked by quite a few people, how would you approach this with your sons? And I said, well, this is how I approach it with my sons. And I want to be clear, one of my many weaknesses is I'm out for more certain than I should be. And one place I'm constantly insecure is around parenting. And I first asked my son about it and just asked his thoughts and just listened. Generally speaking, every young man, I've spoken to about this issue is sort of horrified by the whole thing. I then moved to this notion of empathy is not sympathy. It's in a situation like this, trying to imagine your sister in the exact same situation at a campus across town. How would you want the men to behave? This is a person and this is someone's daughter or someone's sister. And I'm like, imagine in 10 years you have a job, you have a wife, you have a kid, what would your future self advise you to do in that moment? And then I get very tactical and that is, I think it's a generally as a good rule when we talked about this, that when you have physical contact with a woman, which is a wonderful thing, probably on the first contact, just, both you should be sober. I mean, just in terms of just risk on both parts for both parties, at your age, the first time you have physical contact with a woman, it should be sober. And because everybody, they've been trained about consent. They hear from a very young age, no means no, and they should get consent. I think they understand that. But I think what dads need to play a more engaged role and is saying, talking about specific situations, and that is in the context of substances and alcohol, you should not be having physical contact of any kind. You should not be getting into fights. You should not be engaging in sexual contact. It just creates, there's just too much poor judgment, too much, too many bad things can happen. And by the way, I might be wrong on all of these or not get them exactly right. But what I don't think we're spending enough time talking about is the role that fathers play in having these uncomfortable conversations and being very specific and really mentoring young men around what it means to be a young man, what it means to equate yourself in the way you would want to reflect on and be proud of what empathy really does mean. And as you're exploring your limits around alcohol and drugs, to err on the side of just being very, very cautious. Any thoughts as a mom? I support all of that. I do worry that life is too scary, especially when you're doing things early on to go into something like that completely sober where you're just, you know, facing it. And I would love if that would work. Did you watch the show off campus? I did. And you know, it's weird. I found it offensive. And I realized I'm a boomer here on Technogenax. But I found it offensive. I only got two episodes and I'll tell you why. I find it in bad taste to have a woman who is the lead actress, having sex on camera who just turned 18 with 27, 28 and 30 year olds. Oh, like they're real life ages. I think essentially it's training young people that all men look like 35 year old personal trainers. I don't mind hook up culture. And it was nice that they were sober and it was hot. But to create a situation where it feels like it's normalizing, you know, grown men who already like have bought and sold the flip their first house in Orlando, Florida are having sex with an 18 year old. It seemed to me very obvious. These were much older men and beyond the kind of perving nature of it, I quite forget. I think it just makes it really hard for men because it creates a level of expectation around what an 18 year old man should look like. Anyways, I'm probably too sensitive about age, but I found the whole thing a little inappropriate. No, I totally get that angle. And when a friend of mine texted me about the ages of the actors versus the main actress, it definitely struck me as odd though that is
is also just what goes on in our culture. The thing that I wanted to bring up, 'cause it's based in your comment, is there is a lot of very intimate sober sex in that show for kids that are out partying all the time. And some of it is sloppy and there is drug and sex, but especially between the two main characters, there is this very intense sober physical relationship that me and all of my girlfriends were texting about how incredible it was and that they were actually portraying a level of intimacy that we weren't even sure we could have with our husbands. It is like nothing that I think anyone that I know could have ever been a part of, certainly in their college years, that I was like, oh my God, is this how actually kids' lives look like now? What you're talking about being able to have a sober interaction for your first time, I think is an admirable goal. I worry that it is not possible for young kids, 'cause of also the amount of nerves that go into this when you are getting naked with people for the first time. And odds are that you've gone out that night and you're not just meeting up at three o'clock between study sessions to get some might, I can't even talk, I'm so awkward, I don't even know what to say anymore and I feel kind of weird that I brought this up but it electrified the working housewives of my chain. Okay, forget I said that any of this. - There's no easy way. There's, I think the Cornell president of history, there's gonna be a blood offering. I used to think that there was no way there was gonna be a retrial 'cause most of the legal experts I've spoken to have said that they don't think they get in an indictment much less a criminal conviction. I now believe with these new texts coming out and this new information coming out that a DA is gonna pick this up. - Well, it's to shame, so it's in charge. - I think we're gonna review codes of conduct at universities. So universities can have codes of conduct and I would imagine a lot of universities are rethinking codes of conduct. Two of the kids, my understanding is two of the kids were in fact expelled, but this is probably, and you brought up the stat, 35% of women of Cornell say that they were a subject on wanted sexual contact, which means there's a huge problem and universities are probably gonna spend a lot of time rethinking codes of conduct because the law at the end of the day is a very blunt instrument and I'm not suggesting that course shouldn't be tried, but there's gotta be several steps, whether it's dads having open and honest conversations with their sons and trying to make them into better men or universities recognizing you have a birthright to be at a university and asking people to sign up to a certain code of conduct before it even gets to a legal matter is probably on the table and something they should be thinking about right now as opposed to the natural tendency to just not wanna deal with it because of a legal liability. - I totally agree that the conduct codes should be re-evaluated. I imagine the university president will not make it through this. One thing that I have been stewing about though is the release of everybody's names and there's this, I don't know, journalists is the right thing to call them, but this guy, Michael Tracy, who figured out who Jane Doe was and put her name on the internet for a while and then ended up taking it down and I was listening to him defend his decision, it was on Pierce Morgan, it was a whole thing. - If anything happens to her, he should be criminally liable if anything happens to her. - That, that this is so unacceptable. What, I have a problem with some of these men's pictures being-- - Well that was gonna be my question. - That's not a fraction as bad. - I don't think that they're comparable, but-- - Agreed. - Those boys faces are everywhere now and I'm not saying, you have to let the process play out. It obviously looks incredibly bad, but we did have with Duke and UVA that the guys who they said did these heinous acts and ended up doing them in the end. And I wish that we could go through this process without the names and faces out there for public vlogging. And I do think that they're different. Obviously putting her name out there is a whole other level. But when I see that picture of the seven of them flying around, it's all over my algorithm. It does give me pause. - Well, and you see people bringing them up, talking about them, talking about their lives, where they were, big pictures of them. And that is wrong, what's unacceptable and I think should potentially be criminal is doxing the victim. - Yeah. (upbeat music) - What if we told Duke there was one thing you could eat to reduce your risk of death by about a quarter? - Interested? - And what if we added that this magical substance can dramatically lower your cholesterol, improve your mood and keep your weight stable? - No, it's not protein, it's actually fiber. Belizex, the most overlooked nutrient of all. But what is fiber? How could one nutrient do all those amazing things? And how can you get enough? Is a powder you stir into some water gonna do it for you? All that plus the strange tail of the gorilla poop obsessed, father of corn likes in the latest episode of Gastropod. Find Gastropod and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. - Let's move on. Lastly, a measles outbreak is spreading across parts of the Northeast with Pennsylvania surpassing a thousand cases this year in New York seeing more than 100. Now New York is declaring a state of emergency and expanding access to vaccines. It's health officials trying to contain the outbreaks. This is the worst surge in 35 years. How much just do you think are of case juniors to blame for this? - Not as much as many people would like. I mean, this is a two-part problem. There's a big decline in childhood vaccinations and he is an anti-vaxer and we can lay a lot of this at his feed. But there are also huge gaps in adult vaccination schedules. And as I was reading about this, I thought I was like, I have to ping my doctor to make sure that I am fully up to date on all of this and some of the vaccinations that you need to get later on in life like T-Dap, I got while I was pregnant because that's what they recommend. So this is a double-edged sword in terms of a problem. So you have an RFK and an anti-vax movement problem element and then you also have a lazy adult problem. But the biggest outbreak that we had was in Philly in '91. That was 1,400 people in Pennsylvania's now over 1,000 cases. And most doctors who have commented on this have said that they don't see any indication that this is really going to slow down there. So if you think that we had eradicated it in 2000 and now we might have an outbreak even bigger than we did in 1991, it's pretty concerning stuff. And New York were just at 100 cases so far. But you know how quickly this can all move. And the pediatric cases are really dangerous. 18% of them they need hospitalization, dehydration becomes a huge problem. Potential amputation. Completely terrible. And we have no one in leadership that is going to help with this. I mean, we have on the state level folks that will. But I mean, on the federal level, you have a bunch of lunatics. Yeah, it's the atmosphere here. It's a lack of trust of institutions. It's a lack of competence. It's this maha movement believing that you can't trust the quote unquote experts in anti-vaccination movement, which unfortunately got conflated with a political viewpoint, which made no sense. And what is now a level of doubt and insecurity around one of the greatest innovations in history that has saved tens of millions of people, which is vaccinations. And then we have the person who's supposed to be the top health official in the nation, who is a conspiracy weirdo, has no scientific background, and is clearly anti-vax. And it creates an atmosphere that results in needless death, disease, and disability. This is unforgivable. Just as we're going back in terms of alliances, we're going back in terms of our economy. We're going back in terms of economic theory. We're literally devolving as a species and not taking advantage of some of the incredible work in science and trusted institutions, such as the CDC and former heads of HHS have earned through fantastic, honorable work. We are going from Kro Magnamam back to Neanderthals. And it's the atmospherics of which R.F.K. Junior, in my view, plays a big role. And Jess, I have to go to a meeting in Bruin Woods right now. Stay safe out there. Yeah, as should you, Jess. I will be fine. Let's leave it there. All right, bye. I know. [MUSIC PLAYING]
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Nathan Lane discusses his acclaimed performance in *Death of a Salesman*, his dog’s therapy visits, and his Emmy win for *Only Murders in the Building*.
Fast fashion brands are using algorithms to predict trends and produce goods, shifting fashion from human intuition to data-driven models.
Political figures, especially Donald Trump, face criticism for offensive remarks and a pattern of targeting young, attractive female journalists, raising concerns about inappropriate behavior and lack of dignity.
The public backlash against Trump’s comments on Iran, gas prices, and media criticism highlights a growing distrust in leadership and a troubling double standard in how public figures are judged.
Campaign strategies, including ads tying Republicans to Jeffrey Epstein and betting on political scandals, reflect broader efforts to exploit corruption and moral issues for electoral gain.
The Cornell sexual assault controversy reveals systemic issues in campus safety, consent, and university accountability, with growing calls for reformed codes of conduct.
The measles outbreak in the Northeast underscores a dangerous decline in public trust in science and vaccines, fueled by anti-vax sentiment and political misinformation.
The episode critiques the failure of leadership to protect public health and promote scientific literacy, warning of societal regression due to misinformation and political manipulation.
Summary:
This transcription blends multiple topics into a rich, often critical examination of modern culture and politics. It opens with a casual conversation between Aina Garten and Nathan Lane, touching on his stage work and personal life, before shifting to broader societal issues. A central theme is the rise of algorithmic influence in fashion, where data-driven models are replacing human design.
The political analysis is sharp and pointed, focusing on Donald Trump’s behavior—particularly his dismissive and offensive remarks about journalists and his controversial comments on Iran and gas prices—highlighting a troubling lack of diplomatic or moral leadership. Critics argue that such behavior undermines public trust and sends harmful messages about masculinity and power. The discussion also explores political campaigns using controversial narratives, such as linking Republicans to Jeffrey Epstein, and the use of betting apps to mock political figures.
The Cornell sexual assault case is presented as a symbol of deeper institutional failures in campus safety and consent, with calls for reform in university policies and greater accountability. Additionally, a severe measles outbreak in the Northeast is tied to a broader crisis of public trust in science, exacerbated by anti-vax rhetoric and political figures’ rejection of scientific consensus. The narrative concludes with a warning that society is retreating from rational governance and scientific progress, driven by misinformation and polarization.
Overall, the piece serves as a critical reflection on media, politics, education, and public health in the current era.
FAQs
The episode discusses Nathan Lane's critically acclaimed performance in 'Death of a Salesman,' his experience taking his dog to therapy, and his Emmy win for 'Only Murders in the Building.'
Mall and fashion brands are using algorithmic inputs from the internet to determine what people like, then creating products based on those insights to maximize sales.
The transcript highlights that congress members are earning significant incomes from stock exchanges, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and the prioritization of personal gain over public service.
The transcript criticizes Trump for making inappropriate, dismissive remarks about young, attractive female journalists, such as Jessica Tarlov and Caitlin Collins, suggesting it reflects insecurity and a lack of respectful leadership.
The transcript addresses the ongoing controversy at Cornell University over a sexual assault allegation, including student protests, leaked texts, and calls for universities to reevaluate their consent and conduct codes.
The outbreak is described as the worst in 35 years, with over 1,000 cases in Pennsylvania and more than 100 in New York, linked to declining vaccinations and a lack of trust in public health institutions.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.