The Growing Backlash Against Google’s AI Tools in Schools
16m 4s
The Trump administration is intensifying efforts to address public concerns about healthcare affordability by launching a Medicare drug pricing initiative and distributing $500 checks to policyholders. These moves come amid rising voter anxiety over living costs, particularly health insurance, which ranks as a top policy priority. At the same time, Senate Democrats have challenged the administration’s proposed investment in Venezuela’s oil sector, citing legal and democratic risks. In energy, South Korea is advancing a major Alaska pipeline deal, while European luxury automakers are pivoting to larger SUVs in the U.S. market to recover from China losses. A deeper concern arises from Google’s widespread use of AI tools in American schools, where declining test scores and reports of emotional dependence have sparked a parent-led backlash. Educators and counselors warn that students are increasingly relying on AI for both academic and emotional support, undermining critical thinking and social skills. Despite Google’s claims of educational benefits and safety, many schools are now restricting AI access in response to evidence of harm. These developments highlight a growing tension between rapid technological integration and the need for student well-being and academic rigor.
The Trump administration rolls out a program to lower drug prices in Medicare, plus Europe's luxury car makers want a piece of the US gas guzzler SUV market. And with falling test scores, the widespread use of Google's AI tools in American classrooms faces a backlash. The kind of broad takeaway we're getting from talking to all these parents, teachers, clinicians as well, counselors, is that these AI tools in the classroom have not helped students learn it and in fact have taken away from their abilities to learn it. It's Thursday, October 1st. I'm Daniel Bach for the Wall Street Journal, filling in for Luke Vargas. And here is the AM edition of What's News, the top headlines and business stories moving your world today. President Trump has started sending $500 checks to nearly 1 million healthcare policyholders just a month before the midterm elections. The checks come with a sign letter touting the administration's record on lowering healthcare costs. The payments are being drawn from surplus user fees collected under the Affordable Care Act. And come as the Trump administration is rolling out a new Medicare program that matches the cost of high-price prescription drugs to what people pay in other developed nations. But after carve-outs with major pharmaceutical firms, the plan applies to just four companies, flashing projected savings from nearly $12 billion down to $440 million for the next seven years. Journal editor Joshua Jamerson says both moves are an attempt to shore up voters worried about affordability. The context for this is that voters have felt for months that the cost of living was getting too unavoidable in the United States. And the administration, especially as the elections get closer, some Republicans have said that some of the president's priorities, such as focusing on the Kennedy Center or a new ballroom at the White House, have proven to be distractions away from the issue that voters keep saying is most important to them. And we've seen this in our Wall Street Journal polling that health insurance was the second biggest cost strain for them right after groceries. Just in the last couple of weeks, new polling from the Wall Street Journal has found that among the top 10 policies with the highest support among both Democrat and Republican voters, other issues around healthcare. For example, the number two issues that voters from both parties agree that the government should focus more on is the requirement that health insurance companies cover services and medicines prescribed by doctors. I think the question with just a little over a month until election day is whether these policies that the president has rolling out are coming in enough time to really change voters minds about which party they feel like they want in control of Congress next year. The term years are historically a really bad year for it to come at president and with approval ratings as low as this president. Conventional wisdom would say that his party has a long way to go. We're exclusively reporting that Senate Democrats are challenging the legality of the Trump administration's plan to take a stake in Venezuela's second largest oil producer. As we mentioned earlier this week, North American blue energy partners is hoping to ramp up production on oil fields said to contain 65 billion barrels of oil. But according to a letter from four high ranking Senate Democrats sent to President Trump's top lieutenants, the Pentagon's deal to take a pass of 35% stake in the firm stands on shaky legal ground and undermines the Latin American country's pursuit of a democratic transition. The Trump administration has said the agreement would lower fuel costs for Americans and the oil would be used to boost the strategic petroleum reserve, which is now at its lowest levels since 1982. Meanwhile, in an attempt to shore up fuel elsewhere, President Trump has announced that South Korea plans to invest about $54 billion in a natural gas project in Alaska. The pipeline is around 800 miles long and connects Alaska's north slope to an LNG export terminal. The colossal package of investments we are announcing today is a major step toward securing our critical energy supply chain, ensuring American energy dominance and making our partnership with South Korea and the entire Pacific region stronger than ever before. But according to a South Korean government official, the deal has not yet been finalized. Trump didn't describe the project as pending, but the announcement was made in the Oval Office alongside Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan, who is facing a tough re-election race in the state. Trump praised Sullivan for pushing the deal forward. The announcement was the second time in recent days that the president promised big projects to help elevate Senate candidates. On Monday, Trump made a similar announcement about a steel plant in Iowa. U.S. Treasury yields hit a fresh high last night adding to sky-high mortgage rates. House buyers now face a double whammy of mortgage rates above 7 percent and higher home prices. Normally, increasing the size of the down payment would help offset the monthly mortgage bill. But since 2019, home prices are up more than 50 percent, and many buyers are struggling to find cash to boost their deposit over the typical 10-15 percent. And as real estate reporter Nicholas Miller explains, that scrambled the usual playbook for adjusting to higher borrowing costs. When mortgage rates rise, sellers often have to cut prices to keep buyers in the market willing to buy. But over the last few years, a lot of homeowners have opted to stay put rather than sell in order to preserve the 3 percent or 4 percent mortgage rates that they secure after the pandemic. So the situation now is if they can't get the price they want, prospective sellers will just stay in their current homes. And that's really weighed on available inventory. So it's a unique situation where both supply and demand are down. And even though buyer demand has lagged in the face of high rates, economic uncertainty as well, home prices have continued to rise. And that makes things really hard for buyers. And so down payments have increased modestly this year, but the many buyers are already stretching as far as they can to put as much money down as they possibly can. So whether that means getting help from family or tapping their 401k's to afford a larger down payment. According to economists, creative mortgage structures, which allow a lower fixed rate before resetting to market rates are expected to gain traction. But Nicholas notes that while more buyers are willing to gamble on future rates in a high rate environment, hesitant lenders may mean many people will struggle to qualify. After a sales collapse in China, Europe's luxury car makers are planning to go big in America, and by big we mean giant SUVs. Detroit currently dominates the big SUV category, including luxury models. It's a style of vehicle rarely seen in Europe, but with share prices of the big European names trading at multi-year lows. Journal Otto's reporter Stephen Wilmot says higher margins are looking attractive. This week we've seen BMW tell investors in Munich that it's looking at an even bigger SUV in the US. It's not already has, it's larger to the X7, currently made in Spottenberg, South Carolina. And now it's looking at making an even larger SUV. Just a few weeks ago Volvo said much the same thing. And Audi actually this summer launched the Q9, its first full-size SUV, it called it. It's a small but very profitable category, the rule of thumb is the larger the vehicle, the larger the profits. It really is about making up for lost ground in China, wherever they can. And the US is the second largest luxury car market in the world after China, so it's the obvious place to go. The other reason is emissions rules, so President Trump has rolled back the previous framework for regulating emissions in the US, which meant that car makers used to have to balance their gas guzzlers essentially with smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles. Now they still have to do that a bit, but nothing liked the same extent, which just strengthens the business case for rolling out these bigger vehicles. There are currently few details on new Volvo and BMW models, but both companies have factories in South Carolina. Audi makes the Q9 in Slovakia. Vehicles imported from the European Union are subject to a 15% tariff imposed by President Trump. Deliveries will start in November. Danish dairy giant Arla is trying to capitalize on booming consumer demand for protein-rich dairy items, investing millions in sites producing skier and cottage cheese. Maha influencers and new diets promoted alongside weight loss drugs have led to a surge in demand for protein-heavy products, prompting major food retailers like Nestle and Denone to invest in things like protein drinks. Apple's recent launch of a folding smartphone is driving demand for cheaper foldables in China. In the four days after the release, sales of Huawei's Purex Max phone jumped 77% from the same period a week earlier. And Xiaomi's 18-fold, another passport-sized folding phone, notched record of first week sales. Antiband for semiconductors, push South Korea's monthly exports above $120 billion for the first time. Samsung and SK high-necks both posted record earnings and revenue in the second quarter, and are expected to extend that streak through the end of the year, fueled by the insatiable demand for chips to power artificial intelligence. Growing up, Google's push into schools has created a huge launch pad for its AI tools to reach kids. But parents, teachers, and even the companies own researchers admit the potential for cognitive and emotional harm. That story, after the break. No tech giant has been more aggressive in putting artificial intelligence
in front of children than Google. Its Chromebooks and software are used in classrooms right across the country, putting its AI tools in the hands of kids. But according to our reporting, many students are becoming academically and emotionally dependent on AI. Journal investigative reporter Shalini Ramachandran joins me with more. Shalini, along with our colleagues, Georgia Wells and Molly Reinman, you interviewed dozens of teachers, school officials, parents, students. Tell us about what you found. What I found was that when students are in school they're being pushed Google's AI tools because they're so ubiquitous on their school devices. And what's happened is that Google Search has AI overviews and an AI mode chatbot that is sort of readily available in front of them. It's not something that school officials can turn off in their administrator controls. And basically what it's led to is that children are using it for putting in all their homework, their schoolwork, and they're kind of farming out their thinking and their work during the year, leading to declining test scores. In one of the sort of largest worldwide assessments of students, student scores fell to their lowest average in a quarter century when scores just released in US reading scores fell 14 points from the last time the survey was taken in 2022. And what the kind of broad takeaway we're getting from talking to all these parents, teachers, clinicians as well, counselors, is that these AI tools in the classroom have not helped students learn and in fact have taken away from their abilities to learn. As one Georgia teacher put it to me, she said that they no longer trust what's going on in their own brain. So that's the academic part. There's a really strong emotional part that a lot of the teachers and counselors have been telling us about. As an adolescent psychologist said that students loneliness and social skills are worsening as they can fight in AI tools and that can be particularly risky for vulnerable kids, particularly kids who are neurodivergent, who've had other diagnoses like ADHD or autism. And some of the observations we heard about talking to counselors around the country, they would say things like, you know, the kids, they first go to the tool for help on homework and then they realize, hey, this thing can help me with all kinds of things. Like, if I have a problem with my parents or if I'm mad at my friends, I can talk to it about the thing I'm going through and because it's pretty psychophantic, it validates their feelings and makes them feel like, yeah, I am right. Yeah, my parents do suck. So the counselors told us that it was starting to cause sort of rifts in the social fabric of adolescents as kids are confiding in these tools. You mentioned you spoke to current and former Google employees. The company's own research has raised concerns about the cognitive and emotional harm you've detailed there. What is Google saying now about how this technology can be used and how they're working to tackle these problems? Yeah. Google says that its studies show that AI tools paired with teacher-led instruction can help students learn more effectively. And they said that teachers around the world use AI every day because it helps solve classroom challenges and frees up their administrative burdens and they can focus more on the students. And they said that they've put in place particular scaffolds and training for their sort of education and pedagogy focused AI where they're saying that they believe it will encourage critical thinking and their specific protections for users under 18, including to prevent emotional dependence. And they said that in some of their studies that they funded that they didn't see that kids were in a broad way offloading their thinking that they are more focused on using the AI for learning. And what about from governments and education departments? What did you find there about the work that's being done to help shape safer use in classrooms? Well, what's kind of interesting is there's been the swinging of the pendulum backward. So I would say a year ago it seemed like a lot of the school districts had decided, you know, we have to embrace AI in our classrooms because we want our kids to be future-ready. And this is part of what the companies were also encouraging in their conversations with school districts and school officials. And Google, in fact, has a program where it courts, tops school officials and teachers and trains them on its AI tools. But what's happened is there's been a parent backlash that's kind of grown even stronger after bad test scores that were released in recent months. And that's really poor fuel on this parent backlash. And it's resulted in a number of city government starting to take really dramatic steps to close off AI access for students while they evaluate these tools effectiveness in learning. Right. And Google says these tools can be wonderful for children and for learning. It even markets Gemini as your AI study buddy to students. Globally, more than 170 million students and teachers have access to free and paid AI tools through its software partnerships. But how does the company respond to critics who say it's pushing its products to get people hooked on them? So they basically say that they reject any notion that they're trying to get people hooked on a product. And they say that their core educational tools are purpose-built for the needs and requirements of education contexts and not designed for engagement. And they say that they continue to update Gemini to provide more mental health support and that they work with academic experts, parents and teens to help ensure their models are safe and appropriate. Journal investigative reporter Shalani Ramachandran, thank you so much for joining us. Thank you for having me. And that's it for what's news for this Thursday morning. Today's show was produced by Hattie Moir. Our supervising producer is Sondar Kilhoff. And I'm Daniel Bach for the Wall Street Journal. We'll be back tonight with a new show. Until then, thanks for listening. [BLANK_AUDIO]
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The Trump administration launches a Medicare program matching drug prices to those in other developed nations, targeting only four pharmaceutical firms and projecting $12 billion in savings over seven years.
The administration sends $500 checks to nearly 1 million healthcare policyholders, using Affordable Care Act surplus funds, aiming to address voter concerns over rising healthcare costs.
Senate Democrats challenge the legality of a Trump administration deal to take a 35% stake in Venezuela’s second-largest oil producer, arguing it undermines democratic transitions in Latin America.
South Korea plans a $54 billion natural gas pipeline to Alaska, aiming to secure U.S. energy dominance and strengthen regional partnerships, though the deal remains unfinalized.
European luxury car makers, including BMW, Volvo, and Audi, are expanding their SUV lines in the U.S. to compensate for losses in China, benefiting from relaxed emissions rules and high profit margins.
Google’s AI tools in classrooms are facing backlash after declining student test scores and reports of increased emotional dependency and social isolation among students.
Teachers, parents, and counselors report that students are relying on AI tools for homework and emotional support, weakening critical thinking and social development.
Google maintains that AI tools enhance learning when used with teacher guidance and emphasizes safety measures, but critics and school authorities are restricting access amid growing concerns.
Summary:
The Trump administration is intensifying efforts to address public concerns about healthcare affordability by launching a Medicare drug pricing initiative and distributing $500 checks to policyholders. These moves come amid rising voter anxiety over living costs, particularly health insurance, which ranks as a top policy priority. At the same time, Senate Democrats have challenged the administration’s proposed investment in Venezuela’s oil sector, citing legal and democratic risks.
S. market to recover from China losses. A deeper concern arises from Google’s widespread use of AI tools in American schools, where declining test scores and reports of emotional dependence have sparked a parent-led backlash.
Educators and counselors warn that students are increasingly relying on AI for both academic and emotional support, undermining critical thinking and social skills. Despite Google’s claims of educational benefits and safety, many schools are now restricting AI access in response to evidence of harm. These developments highlight a growing tension between rapid technological integration and the need for student well-being and academic rigor.
FAQs
The program matches high-priced prescription drug costs to those in other developed nations, aiming to reduce spending. However, it only applies to four major pharmaceutical companies and is projected to save $12 billion over seven years, with savings dropping to $440 million.
They are targeting the U.S. market to make up for lost ground in China, where demand has declined. Larger SUVs offer higher margins, and Trump's rollback of emissions regulations has made gas-guzzling vehicles more viable.
No — studies and reports show that students are becoming dependent on AI tools for homework, leading to declining test scores and weakened critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Students are confiding in AI tools about personal issues like family conflicts or friendships, which can worsen loneliness and impair social development, especially among neurodivergent youth.
Yes — four Senate Democrats have challenged the legality of the deal, arguing it undermines Venezuela's democratic transition and lacks proper legal foundation.
South Korea plans a $54 billion natural gas pipeline connecting Alaska’s North Slope to an LNG export terminal to secure U.S. energy supply and strengthen regional partnerships.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.