The greatest punishment ever inflicted on Trump: Andy Burnham
0m 0s
This week's podcast covered a range of political and cultural stories with characteristic irreverence. The hosts began with Andy Burnham's meeting with Donald Trump, suggesting it went poorly and that Burnham's regional references likely went over Trump's head. Trump reportedly praised Burnham over Keir Starmer, though the hosts noted this was a low bar. The Chagos Islands deal also came up, with Trump dismissing it and Burnham having to reconsider his position.
The conversation then shifted to Earl Spencer's controversial new book, which contains explosive claims about the King's reaction to Diana's death and has drawn threats of legal action from Piers Morgan. Prince Harry's upcoming Diana documentary was discussed, with the hosts partly defending him while criticizing his memoir's oversharing.
Other topics included a viral photo of William, Kate, and Tom Cruise, Wes Streeting's awkward interview about a military space squadron, Singapore's strict public behavior fines, a six-year-old Rubik's Cube record, and Ed Miliband's mediocre solving time compared to Justin Bieber. The episode closed with lighthearted banter and a podcast promotion.
The Telegraph
Hello and welcome to The Weekend Tea with me Poppy Coburn
And me Michael Deacon
It's big news this week
We have just inflicted the greatest international punishment on Donald Trump imaginable
For his many, many crimes against humanity
He's had to meet our new Prime Minister
Oh, I'm terribly sorry to hear that
I'm terribly sorry to hear it
I don't think it went particularly well
From the clips that did come out of the meeting
Because Andy Burnham, you know, we're always being told here in the United Kingdom
That he's got this personal appeal
He can cut through to people
He's a former mayor
He can shake hands
He's not like the robot Keir Starmer
But it does seem like an awful lot of Andy Burnham's charm
Relies him making references to Oasis
And what you call a bread roll
And I can't
Kind of think for a New York real estate developer
Those things can kind of go over his head a little bit
That is true
I thought it could have been a lot worse for Andy Burnham
Because, you know, Trump does have a habit of really embarrassing people
Very often you'll see him next to a world leader
With the cameras on him
And just anything can happen
You remember earlier in the year
It was him and the Japanese Prime Minister
In front of their cameras
And within moments Trump's making jokes about Pearl Harbor
And poor woman doesn't know where to look
So it could have been a lot worse
I mean, yeah, Burnham probably
Beforehand
I was thinking, my God, what's he going to say?
Something like
What's your name again?
Burnham?
Sorry, I don't normally bother
Learning the names of you guys anymore
You're always changing leader
And some other guy will probably replace you next month
So
I always think that
When world leaders do have to go up and do this
They must just be thinking about Zelensky
Like, as long as I don't have a worse meeting with Donald Trump
Than Zelensky had
And I'm like, okay, make sure
I'm right, I'm wearing a suit
And I've got a tie on
So that's number one
He can't have a go at me for my clothes
Like he did last year
For Zelensky
So that's been sorted
And is he got life or death decisions
About the future of my country
Which is currently being invaded by Russia?
Not yet
So, okay, we've already won
We're already on a good footing here
That's how low the bar is
I think Andy Burnham's probably
You know, in light of that
He's probably quite happy with it
And also, there was a bit where Trump
Effectively said
Burnham's a better Prime Minister
Than Keir Starmer
Although I appreciate
It's not the highest bar
I mean, it's a bit like being told
You're a better childminder than King Herod
But it's something
He'll take that, won't he?
Well, you can still see
A bit of Burnham's regionalism come through
So he did mention
Donald Trump had made
One of his many throwaway comments
Like, you know
We should reunify Ireland
This one was like
What's Manchester?
He didn't really care about
Manchester, funnily enough
And Burnham did try
And get a little dig in
And Trump just looked
Completely like
What?
Who?
Where?
Manchester?
Where's that?
You could just tell
He's thinking about
The next meeting he's going to have
With like Netanyahu
Or some other great
You know, statesman
From across the world
He's like
Which one's this again?
Burnham?
Burnham?
Oh, right, OK
Manchester
Is that next to Birmingham?
Burnham?
Yeah
Yeah, sure
I thought the only bit
Actually that didn't go so well
For Burnham
Was the stuff about
The Chagos Islands deal
Because for some insane reason
Burnham wants to revive
Starmer's deal
And Trump just shot that down immediately
So that was a terrible deal
Terrible, terrible
And then since then
Basically
Burnham's having to
Row back on it
And reconsider
And where's streeting
Is sort of
Mitted over
And so
Maybe it's not
Such a good deal
At the moment
That Americans aren't so keen
Now some people might think
Oh, well, this just shows
You know
How pathetic Britain is nowadays
We just, you know
We let ourselves get pushed around
By the American president
Just like that
I'm thinking
Yeah, OK
But actually in this case
The American president is right
I'm glad he's pushing
Our prime minister around
Because our prime minister
Is totally wrong
Why on earth?
Still, after two years
Still have not adequately explained
Why is they want to give away
Vital British territory
To an ally of China
And not only that
Pay them loads of our money
Into the bargain
What?
You know, Trump's track record
On Ireland hasn't been great
So not great on Ireland itself
Not great on the Falklands
Greenland, I suppose
Had a happy ending in the end
But it was pretty tough
Going up until that point
But on the Chagos Islands
I think he has basically
Been correct
Which is he's like
This is the worst trade deal
In the history of all trade deals
Forever
But it's another example
Where, you know
There's a spectre
That's halted the feast
This is all Keir Starmer
Yeah
The long Keir Starmer
Keir Starmer government
So he's already having to deal with
Restoring the relationship
With Donald Trump
Which was ruined by Keir Starmer
Even though he was rolling over
On his belly and going
Well, do you really think
You like Donald?
Here's a letter from the King Donald
Please don't stifle me, Donald
And then he also has to
Defend this insane deal
But nobody can see him
To make work
Yeah
Oh, sorry
Apart from Powell
Powell obviously thinks
This is a fantastic deal
Of course
Because I don't think
He's really working
For the United Kingdom
But there you go
Well, anyway
This is rather depressing
So why don't we
Cheer ourselves up
By talking about
Something a little lighter
Which is the
Frankly treasonous
New book by Earl Spencer
This is my telegraph
There you go
I mean, you know
They always say, don't they
There's no such thing
As bad publicity
But Earl Spencer
Is putting that to the test
With his book
Because, you know
He is currently making
Harry's memoirs
Look like some kind of
PR triumph, really
Isn't he, at the moment?
Yes
I actually saw
A very funny thing
On social media
Where Bella Mackey
Has a new book out
With its title
Claws Out
And the bookstore
Had put it in the window
Next to Swan Song
By Earl Spencer
As a funny little dig at him
So, yes
29 years
After the event
Of his sister dying
He suddenly realised
That now
Is the opportune moment
To tear up
These very, very
Personal family disputes
All over again
As if the king
Isn't already suffering enough
From having Harry
Moving back into the country
And starting another war
With William and Kate
So, yeah
It's quite unpleasant
Some of the details
That have come out of this
The one that I found
The most incomprehensible
And surely someone
In the memoir business
Must have gone
Can we actually
Stand this up
Is the idea
That the king
Was giddy with excitement
When he heard
That Diana had died
You know
The mother of his children
He was giddy with excitement
Not only was he
Giddy with excitement
He decided to
Give this away
When he was talking
To her brother
And we're supposed
To believe
That that apparently
Happened
Do we think the king
Is Patrick Bateman
On the whole
Probably not
No
And Spencer's
Getting in trouble
From other quarters
As well now
Because he's got
Piers Morgan
Threatening to sue him
Because he says
Parts about him
In the book
Are grossly inaccurate
And defamatory
For example
He says that
Spencer claims
That when Morgan
Was editor of the Mirror
He'd run
You know
Sort of
Certain photos
Of Diana
At the gym
Working out
On a leotard
And Morgan says
Well actually
Those photos
Were published
Two whole years
Before I even
Joined the Mirror
So that's nothing
To do with me
Various other things
Like that
I don't think
It just makes me wonder
You know
What's going on
In the publishing industry
Don't they hire
Fact checkers anymore
You would think
A book like this as well
Quite a sensitive subject
Really making
Explosive claims
About the actual king
I think we might
Get a fact checker
To have a good look
At it first
I mean even
In the bits that aren't
About the king
I think
Let's check the dates
At least check the bits
About Piers Morgan
Famously litigious
Piers Morgan
He's not exactly
Going to take it
Lying down
And it's very interesting
Anything that's ever
Been written about him
He's definitely
Going to seize on it
The first person
And he knows a story
When he sees it
So he thinks
Right there's a story
And it's about me
I mean everything
I could dream of
Great
He did make a very good point
Which is if you've got
The facts on this wrong
Something that would have
Taken you literally
Ten minutes
To figure out
The basic amount
Of due diligence
Where else have the
Recollections
May vary
Aspect of this story
Gone slightly awry
So I do think
He has quite a strong
Point there about
What is actually
Being done with the book
And what's the purpose
Yeah and how much
Of this book
Can you trust
If you can't
Get a
Date right
Well he's not the only
Person cashing in
On the Royal Family
Legacy and Royal Family
Internal Drama
Harry is writing
A documentary about
Diana
Yeah I've seen a lot
Of people being quite
Critical of him
For doing this
I'm actually going to
Defend Harry here
Okay because when he
Brought out his memoirs
Spare
I thought at the time
This is a very bad idea
Shouldn't be airing
All this sort of
Dirty laundry
In public about
His relationships
With his brother
And his father
And his stepmother
And all the rest of it
What I thought was
If he's going to
Write a book
At all
He should just do
Just a really
Poignant and moving
Book purely
About his mother
His memories of his mother
And he should just
Make it you know
And people will probably
Find that very moving
I think you know
If he's saying you know
Here's my memories of her
And here's how I felt
After I lost her
And you know
People would sympathise
With that because my god
You know she was killed
When he was what
Twelve years old
I think if it had
Just been about that
And not been about
The rest of his family
I think people would
Have been sympathetic
To him then
I think that would
Have been a better idea
Although I will say
One thing
Because in his book
Spare
There was one particular
Story he told
In relation to his mother
And let's just say
I think he should
Have left that out
I don't know if you
Know this story
But because I am
Burdened with this knowledge
I don't want to have
To suffer alone
So I'm going to
Inflict it on you
And you're never
Going to be able
To forget this
By the way
I'm sorry about that
Quite frightened
You're looking at me
Very intensely
It's coming out
I don't know whether
You know this story
Okay so Harry's
Talking about how
As a grown man
He and some friends
Had made a journey
To the Arctic
Circle
Do you know the story
Do you know where I'm going
No I do not know
Where you're going
Keep going
Be ready for this
It's going to hit you
Okay he comes home
And he's in
Let's say some discomfort
Because he discovered
That he had
Frostbite
On his penis
Now you might say
That's quite enough
Information already
Harry
Please don't
We didn't need to know that
But no I'm afraid
There's more
He goes on
Because in an attempt
To soothe
The frostbite
On his penis
He started
rubbing it with his late mother's favourite face cream.
i think it's elizabeth arden is that the name of the brand yes i think it was yes why he did that
i don't know but also why did he tell us why would you put that in a book that's inevitably going to
be read by every journalist practically every human being on earth i mean i think it's you
know it's one of the biggest selling non-fiction books of all time by the way and you know it's
going to sell why did you let us know this harry why steps involved i mean first of all i wouldn't
tell someone i had frostbitten genitals that's not just me but okay fine he's made this brave
choice he's exposing all literally uh thanks harry why then add in the fun little detail
it's your late mother's favorite face cream as a little tidbit there for fans just a little tidbit
uh the elizabeth arden cream which you're now going to always think of harry's yeah private
parts alongside with so i mean maybe he is going to make a really moving and wonderful documentary
but if he's assisted by other people i'm not i did
just don't include that bit yes and i would strongly advise against doing a demonstration
for the cameras yeah no i don't think uh offcom allows that sort of thing anymore yeah wait wait
it's gone mad well anyway that is uh enough about the duke of sussex's penis um shall we perhaps
move on there's one more royal story now this is to do with uh william and kate and they've been
to a premiere and they've met tom cruise and the reason i want to talk about this is because of
the wonderful photo of the three of them standing together now there's a very
old um comedy sketch a classic one very famous i don't know if you know because it's sold as in
black and white this may be a bit before your time even before your time it is actually before
my time i do know okay there's three famous comedians they're standing in a row john cleese
he's very very tall ronnie barker medium height ronnie corbett tiny and three of them standing
in a row and you see this photo of william he's about six foot three or something kate very tall
for a woman five foot ten but sort of average you know compared with a man and then this little tiny
tom cruise little tom thumb there beside him now tom cruise i get the impression he's normally quite
careful you know not to show the right angles getting the heels on the shoes yeah that sort
of thing not to show that he's actually a little bit shorter than average for a man but in this
photo there's no escaping and i guess uh when you're standing next to uh the royal couple you
can't just whip out a box or something and try and pretend you're taller than they are that might be
against royal protocol no you're not allowed to to suggest that you are somehow taller than our
future king how dare he's i don't know but anyway
well here's a suggestion for harry and megan if you want to win the pr war if you want to get all
the a-list celebrities back on side you know which might be a little bit difficult now that you've
left hollywood but you're back in the united kingdom what you need to do is you need to
approach tom cruise on your knees just pretend just pretend you've always been walking like that
and just go up to say have you grown tom you're looking very tall and handsome today and that's
how you're going to win the pr war very good even better and if you if you want to repair your
william and kate on your knees brilliant we've just sold the royal that's that that's the photo
we're all looking for if we can get the exclusive photos your majesties your highnesses sorry
yes please they're gonna have to lose a couple more lawsuits before they're gonna do that one
okay all right there you are well that's that's the last resort
well speaking of people who have been uh maybe humiliated themselves this
week wes streeting had a classic nightmare scenario where you can imagine some poor special
assistant has got sacked for this uh he was in an interview and he realized as he was actually
being questioned by the journalist that he didn't have the figures about the new military space
squadron what's the number of personnel deployed what's the level of investment sector of state
so for good reason we don't comment on uh operational detail but we're talking initially
in terms of this new unit and tens of people and that's what we
tens of people to defend space and that's and that's what that's that's what's required to to
to run the command uh and that's and that's that's a good um wise level of of resource we i suspect
we'll see this grow over time there'll be tens of people tens of people involved um which is which
is a great number it's really vague tens okay well it sounds like you're really across your brief
wes um but one of the reasons this is so great is because it will remind people of an even better
hearing out that number story which is of course the brilliant diane abbott um so how much would
10 000 police officers cost well um if we recruit the 10 000 police uh men and women over a four
year period we believe it'll be about 300 000 pounds 300 000 pounds sorry 10 000 police officers
what are you paying them no i mean sorry how much will they cost
they will cost they will it will cost um about
about 80 million pounds about 80 million pounds i mean this was all over this place amazing fact
the interview was so amazing she was doing a media round that day all of her other interviews that
day were about the interview she'd just given and how she'd screwed it up that was incredible god
bless her well if only we'd listened to diane abbott you know we would have a quarter of a
maybe we wouldn't be in a position where we're releasing all these early i mean it would be a
bit starship troopers a little bit frightening to have a a police state under the labour government
but you know maybe she was she was a genius all along oh god bless you maybe she wore two left
shoes one day it was actually because she was seeing into the future and that was going to be
a big style so hold on 2030 yeah diane abbott it's a theory totally vindicated now there's no doubting
about the meme of the week on social media and that is a video of rory stewart now this is taken
off now was this was he on news night is that it was on news he was on news night and there's uh
other people on the panel they're having a discussion there's people either side of him
and they're they're talking and the clip just consists of him constantly just turning his head
from side to side and some anyway this this this this little clip has um gone viral and someone
very cleverly uh i think it's like mark wallace of total politics give him the credit because it
was very good he basically added the noise of tennis players grunting and hitting the ball so
it looks as if um rory stewart's just watching a tennis match and he's like oh my god i'm going to
this is really really fantastic so it's um alvaro he's the political editor at the new statesman
um i think the host throws to her you know what do you think here's your 30 seconds to say what
you think about the big issues of the day and i think rory stewart someone must have told him
i assume because he's now such a you know famous respected podcaster failed politician but we can
let bygones be bygones make sure that when a young woman is speaking that you listen and make sure
that people know that you're listening i just think rory took it very seriously because he looks at
her like that it's like his neck protrudes he comes out to get even closer it's he is actively
listening he is really really listening to this poor lady as she's about to speak i mean i've
never seen body language like it before anywhere it's always stewart actually from the united
kingdom is you sure he's not from space and he's just come down in the mothership it's it's worth
considering that's not the first time actually i think that's been suggested i feel like it's
there may be other clues but i i think on this occasion i know everybody else is laughing at it
i'm i think i'm gonna have to defend rory stewart i know first i defend prince harry now i'm defending
rory stewart i know i might as well move to the guardian but on this occasion i'm gonna have to
defend him because i don't know it's people either side of you and they're having an argument like
that you can't help looking at the person he's talking because what's the alternative should
he just be staring out straight ahead of him like that or should he only be staring at one of them
the entire time like that
while the even while the other one's talk is now i'm just gonna stare i'm just he's staring at you
i'm not going to embarrass myself by moving my head from side to side constantly i'm just going
to do this what i'm just looking around all the cameras what makes you feel most uncomfortable
weekend if i just stare or would you prefer if i was like ramrod there's only two of us
looking at each other but there's several of him they're on the side of him so he's looking around
i don't know um moving away from uh rory stewart into people that actually do a good job in this
country i really love this story and he's already been getting some flack from this so there was a
judge who was hearing a case from bed because he was recovering from an operation so it was an
achilles heel situation where he couldn't actually walk right it was surgery on his heel um and so he
was dealing with the court cases and this was the case of an optometrist who'd been struck off and
this was still upheld so he did his job properly but he was doing it from bed so he he was doing
a video interview for the case and he was overseeing it from his bed now that has got a bit
of flack particularly from the person who was actually involved in the case who said um i at
least want to have a judge and i want to have a judge and i want to have a judge and i want to
have a judge who's actually physically there and not horizontal uh which i can understand why you
might be a little bit concerned about it but i think there's something wonderful about someone
not taking the time off sick which he obviously could have done you know he's just gone through
an operation and then you know what i'm gonna keep working even if i have to work in bed it
reminds me of mps and the stories of mps being dragged in where they had to do a really important
vote you know some of them being pulled in on stretchers they're like giving birth yeah
this is how society operates so even if you are recovering from major surgery you just stare on
zoom that's not work from home laziness well exactly you know we're often very critical of
work from home well obviously i'm not because i work from home but as an organization sometimes
we run uh articles uh knocking people who work from home but here it clearly is evidence of
someone who's working from effectively one thing they're actually working that's the thing i mean
this judge was not definitely not sitting there watching this morning or something like that
lorraine kelly or would have been a problem homes under a hammer right on his phone you know playing
clash of clans that would have been offensive well i've
I believe that there's worse things that people do on cameras
during Zoom calls, but let's not go into that.
I know nothing of it.
It's just something I've heard about.
Let's not dwell.
This is a story that's going to appeal to you, Michael,
because you've written about it in your columns before.
And it's something that I care about too.
People play loud music on public transport,
which I'm sure is a bane of everyone's life.
But here is a serious country that has come in and has said,
if you play loud music on public transportation,
which is an antisocial act, we are going to fine you.
It's a very significant amount of money.
It's, of course, Singapore.
Singapore, yes.
Famously liberal and democratic country, Singapore.
Well, I think that's great news, very sensible.
But having said that, given this is Singapore,
I would have expected it to be a tough one.
I mean, they are incredibly tough on law and order.
I'd have thought it would be like public execution
or something like that by their standards.
Chopping people's hands off.
There you go.
So I think, actually, if you're a sodcaster in Singapore,
you're getting off lightly with a fine.
But I will say they've got some very, very strict rules over there.
And there's one I want to point out to you here.
Did you know, if you're in Singapore,
if you use a public lavatory and fail to flush it properly after use,
you can receive an on-the-spot fine of $150.
Now, what I want to know is,
how exactly do the authorities monitor this?
How do they know that you haven't flushed
in order to administer this on-the-spot fine right there and then?
In every single cubicle in Singapore.
It's a guy I'm carrying over the top.
Is there an armed guard in there?
He's standing there the whole time, his whole shift, eight hours.
He's standing there all day.
Right inside the cubicle while you come in, do your business.
He's there, he's watching as he flushed.
Good.
Okay, he's flushed.
I think I get performance anxiety.
So you have not flushed, £150.
Or, I mean, maybe if there isn't a guard in there, do they have cameras?
Okay, are there security guards?
They're monitoring.
They've got all these monitors.
They're staring at them all the time.
That guy's not flushed.
They send in a SWAT team, pin him to the ground.
It's going to be the worst date of breach of all time.
Yeah, we have hundreds of videos of you going to the toilet
that have accidentally been hacked by, you know, some Russians,
some gangsters, and now they've been published everywhere on the internet.
Thanks, Singapore.
So, I mean, as I say, I don't know how they monitor this
because I've never been to Singapore.
But having read that story, I think maybe I'm not going to on the whole.
Yeah.
Okay, I'm changing my mind, which is a shame
because I've just bought a massive book of Lee Kuan Yew's aphorisms.
Yeah, yeah, what a delightful bedside reading.
There you go.
Although, you know, it could come in for other uses
because if someone is talking on my commute back home,
I could just bludgeon them over the top of the head
and that would keep them quiet.
Oh, they're playing the loud music?
Yeah.
There you are.
Yeah, last thing they'll ever hear.
Off it goes.
There you are.
Because this is pretty thick.
I think this is going to keep me occupied.
Standing ovation for the whole carriage.
So, that's why I'm getting more ideas from people.
Rightly so, rightly so.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Anyway, oh, there's one more story I want to talk about,
if we've got time.
Now, this is about Rubik's Cube.
Now, I don't know about you.
As a child, were you any good at the Rubik's Cube?
I wasn't very good at it, although I tried to be,
but always rubbish.
Don't have quick enough hand movements.
I can guarantee I was worse.
I hope I sound like I don't have a clue.
I mean, it's too much for my meagre intellect,
or certainly my meagre reserves of patience.
But in any case, the reason I mention it,
it's a six-year-old girl, six,
six-year-old girl from China,
has just set a new record by solving an entire Rubik's Cube,
not just a side, an entire Rubik's Cube,
in under five seconds.
How?
I don't understand it.
But you know what?
My son, okay, he's 12 years old.
When he was about eight or so,
he was quite into Rubik's Cubes.
Although, you know, he considers them beneath his dignity now.
Because he's a 12-year-old boy now.
He's just into violin.
Violin video games.
There you go.
So there you are.
I mentioned this to him last night.
I said, did you know this?
This girl in China, she just set a new record
by solving it in under five seconds.
And he said, that's not a record.
He said, 2022, there's a bloke from Poland
who did it in under three seconds.
He said, that record, that's just a new girl's record.
Oh, wow.
So there you are.
Well, that put me in my place.
So there you go.
It's quite impressive for a six-year-old.
Five seconds, yeah, pathetic.
Yeah, what a loser.
A six-year-old boy could probably do it in one.
There you are.
This is the problem.
There you are.
Funny enough, you know, when my,
shall I embarrass him by mentioning this?
Please.
I don't know.
Maybe I'll ask for it taken out.
I don't know.
He's not going to watch this.
Jesus.
Anyway, yeah, when he was about eight years old
and into the Roots Cubs, he used to get me to time him.
Just solving a single side.
Okay, not the whole thing.
I don't think he ever solved the whole thing.
But for a single-sided record, it was 6.95 seconds,
which, okay, is not quite up to the standard
of Chinese six-year-old girls,
but it's a hell of a lot better than me.
I don't think I've ever solved a single side.
I don't mean it's not like I'm doing it all the time.
But anyway.
Anyway, hey, I thought that was very good.
I want to tell you one more thing about Rubik's Cube.
Are there famous people who are good at Rubik's Cubes?
Okay, Ed Miliband has claimed that he can solve
a Rubik's Cube in 90 seconds,
which I thought sounds impressive.
Wow, well done.
But I tell you what, Justin Bieber, the pop star,
has said that he can solve a Rubik's Cube in 83 seconds.
Get him in his foreign secretary.
In your face foreign secretary.
How about that?
That's really embarrassing for Ed Miliband
because he's such a geek.
He really should be much better at geeky things.
When he sees this podcast and he finds out about Bieber,
I mean, honestly, all he'll be doing is working on his record.
Honestly, which would be a good thing
because it would keep him off doing his day job.
I was going to say, it would stop us creating diplomatic incidents.
There you go.
Keep yourself well occupied, please, Ed Miliband.
Fingers crossed.
Well, that's all from us.
You'll see us again next week.
If you like our podcast, we think you'll enjoy
From the Editor, The Telegraph's free daily newsletter.
It's your essential guide to the day's top stories,
including our editor's pick of must-reads,
read features and opinion.
Simply click the sign up button now
and look forward to reading it every morning.
Thank you.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Andy Burnham's meeting with Donald Trump was awkward, with Burnham's regional charm failing to impress the US president.
Trump reportedly said Burnham is a better prime minister than Keir Starmer, though the hosts note this is a very low bar.
The Chagos Islands deal resurfaced, with Trump calling it a terrible deal and Burnham forced to row back on his support.
Earl Spencer's new book has drawn criticism for explosive and questionable claims about the King's reaction to Diana's death.
Piers Morgan is threatening to sue Earl Spencer over allegedly defamatory and factually incorrect passages in the book.
Prince Harry is making a documentary about Diana, which the hosts partly defend, though they criticize oversharing in his memoir.
A photo of William, Kate, and Tom Cruise highlighted the height difference, drawing comparisons to a classic comedy sketch.
Wes Streeting's interview gaffe about "tens of people" in a new military space squadron revived memories of Diane Abbott's infamous police cost blunder.
Summary:
This week's podcast covered a range of political and cultural stories with characteristic irreverence. The hosts began with Andy Burnham's meeting with Donald Trump, suggesting it went poorly and that Burnham's regional references likely went over Trump's head. Trump reportedly praised Burnham over Keir Starmer, though the hosts noted this was a low bar. The Chagos Islands deal also came up, with Trump dismissing it and Burnham having to reconsider his position.
The conversation then shifted to Earl Spencer's controversial new book, which contains explosive claims about the King's reaction to Diana's death and has drawn threats of legal action from Piers Morgan. Prince Harry's upcoming Diana documentary was discussed, with the hosts partly defending him while criticizing his memoir's oversharing.
Other topics included a viral photo of William, Kate, and Tom Cruise, Wes Streeting's awkward interview about a military space squadron, Singapore's strict public behavior fines, a six-year-old Rubik's Cube record, and Ed Miliband's mediocre solving time compared to Justin Bieber. The episode closed with lighthearted banter and a podcast promotion.
FAQs
The meeting was awkward, with Burnham relying on references to Oasis and bread rolls that likely went over Trump's head. Trump also seemed to dismiss Burnham's mention of Manchester and shot down Burnham's support for the Chagos Islands deal.
The deal involves giving away vital British territory to an ally of China and paying them money. Trump called it the worst trade deal ever, and even critics of Trump agree he is right to oppose it.
The book is criticized for making explosive claims about the royal family, such as King Charles being giddy with excitement over Diana's death, and for factual errors, including inaccuracies about Piers Morgan's career. Many question the lack of fact-checking.
Harry described getting frostbite on his penis during an Arctic trip and using his late mother's favorite face cream, Elizabeth Arden, to soothe it. This detail was widely criticized as oversharing.
The video shows Rory Stewart constantly turning his head from side to side during a Newsnight panel discussion. It was edited to include tennis grunting sounds, making it look like he was watching a tennis match.
Streeting appeared unprepared when asked for figures about the new military space squadron, repeatedly saying 'tens of people' and giving vague answers. It was compared to Diane Abbott's infamous police cost interview.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.