The Great Fire of London: Passive Voice (English Grammar Lesson)

Moi, jääpät ja tunteet potkesten ja valjopolareinen kuuden jaks on sisältösaades, mykeiskustellaan rohkeasti siitä, mikä on vahvutta. Uusimassa jaksossa vieran koristella ja Sean Hopkins. Vöinnämään ollut ihmisten mielyttä, mutta nyt on se tilanne, että minun vahvuus on se, että ma osaan olla oikeasti rehellisesti omaitsin, kun mä vihdoin tiedän, kuka mä oikeesti oon. Seanin sekä muut yhdessä vahvempia jaksat löydet kaikissa suosituimista suora toista palveluista. Tervetuloa vahvuusmatkalle. Tämä on tosi, että minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, että minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, että minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, että minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, että minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, mutta minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, että minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, että minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, että minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, että minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, että minun vahvuusmatkalle on tosi, sairaavat k projecta kuusin el 我們m boardi sa meiner Urssoulisuiden Passembi olemme l contraceksia - koska hieman valikotus squatta Wh-opka pun الفiasi Sangat scratchodipakas constanta Ding! Tuttaa etkä Tonight In micro nota, jossa on eri konst drown Tu어� Carloogio абoltarite koko kekeivät - omilla kia produit הש硬 Whisté kova20 Dienst記uarωittaa ja j happen не kien castence pol und älkössä [musiikkia] In English, a sentence usually has a subject, does the action, a verb, the action, and an object receives the action. If we make a sentence using this order, we call it the active voice. The teacher explains the lesson. The teacher is the subject, explains is the verb, lesson is the object. The passive voice changes the focus. The lesson is explained by the teacher. Now the object, which was the lesson, becomes the subject of a passive sentence. We use the passive when, number one, the action is more important than the person doing it. My wallet got stolen yesterday. We don't know who stole it, but the action is important. Two, we don't know who does the action. English is spoken in many countries. By who? Millions of people. So it's not important to say who speaks it. Three, the person doing the action is obvious. For example, the criminal was arrested, obviously, by the police, so we don't need to say the police. Four, to sound more formal or polite. Your request has been approved. The formula to make a sentence passive is subject plus b in the correct tense, plus past participle of the verb. Optionally, you can also say by the doer. So if you want to say the person who did it, we make negatives by adding not after the verb b. In the present simple tense, active, people make cars in Japan. Passive, cars are made in Japan. Past simple, active, they didn't repair the road last year. Passive, the road was not repaired last year. Future simple, active. The company will release a new phone. Passive, and new phone will be released by the company. [MUSIC PLAYING] Let's go back to the UK in the 17th century. London was the largest city in England, with a population of around half a million people. It was noisy, busy, and growing quickly. It was also dirty, filthy, and crowded. I recorded an episode about the history of London a few months ago. If you have listened to that, you will know London is an ancient city. Because London is so old, the streets were very narrow and unorganized. It was also very unsafe. Most of the city was made of wood. The houses were built close together, and the streets were narrow and dark. The roofs were covered with fatch, which is made from dry straw or reeds. Fatch is, unfortunately, for London, the perfect fuel for a fire. Even though fires were common, proper safety rules were not followed. In fact, the famous writer Daniel De Foe once wrote that London's buildings looked as if they had been formed to make one general bonfire. Life in 17th century London was a challenge for almost everyone. Just one year before the Great Fire in 1665, the Great Plague had swept through London. Tens of thousands of people died, and the city was still trying to recover. Many families had been destroyed, and many businesses had been ruined. And when it came to fire safety, the city was dangerously unprepared. Today, if a fire starts, fire engines and firefighters arrive quickly. Water can be sprayed at high pressure, and the fire service has a variety of different tools to prevent fires from spreading. But in 1666, no fire service was organised. Instead, buckets of water were usually used by the people living on the street. If a fire spread too quickly, entire streets were pulled down to create fire breaks. But this was often done too late. In other words, no effective system was available to protect London from fire. This was the London where the Great Fire began. A crowded, wooden city that was almost completely unprotected against disaster. The Great Fire of London began in the early hours of Sunday, September 2, 1666. The fire started in a small bakery on Pudding Lane, owned by a man called Thomas Farina. Later at night, a spark from the bakery oven caught onto fuel nearby, and within minutes flames began to spread. At first, it seemed like a small accident, but very quickly the situation grew out of control. The fire started in the bakery, but soon flames were carried by the wind to surrounding houses. The buildings in London were made of wood and had thatched roofs, so they were set on fire almost immediately. Unfortunately, the authorities in London, the people in charge, didn't act quickly. The Lord Mayor of London, Sir Thomas Bloodworth, was woken and asked to give permission to pull down houses to stop the fire. But the problem was underestimated. The fire was ignored at first, and orders to destroy houses were not given in time. Strong winds from the east made everything worse. Sparks were blown across the city, and flames spread from rooftop to rooftop. What had started in a single bakery became a firestorm that threatened to destroy the entire city. By the morning, panic had already begun. Families were forced to leave their homes, carrying what little they could. Carts were filled with furniture and clothes and food, but in many cases people had to abandon everything. This was only the beginning. The fire would burn for four days and change London forever. When Johann Roel received the letter on Christmas Day 1776, he put it away to read later. Maybe he thought it was a season's greeting and wanted to save it for the fireside. But what it actually was was a warning. Delivered to the Hessian colonel, letting him know that General George Washington was crossing the Delaware and would soon attack his forces. The next day when Roel lost the Battle of Trenton and died from two colonial boxing day musket balls, the letter was found, unopened in his vest pockets. As someone with 15,000 unreadies, emails in his inbox, I feel like there's a lesson there. Oh well, this is the constant, a history of getting things wrong. I'm Mark Chrysler. Every episode we look at the bad ideas, mistakes and accidents that misshaped our world. Find us at www.constantpodcast.com or wherever you get your podcasts. Once the fire had started on pudding lane, it spread faster than almost anyone could imagine. By Monday September 3rd, entire streets were destroyed. Houses were set a light one after another, and because the buildings were so close together, flames were carried easily from roof to roof. Some of London's most famous landmarks were also lost. The famous St. Paul's Cathedral was destroyed, even though many people thought it could survive because it was built of stone. But the wooden scaffolding around the church caught fire and soon the entire building collapsed. Libraries, shops and warehouses full of paper, books, cloth and wood were also consumed by fire. As the fire grew, panic spread, crowds were forced to flee, and thousands of people were made homeless. Possessions were thrown into the river Thames to be saved or loaded onto boats to escape. Those who stayed tried desperately to fight the flames, but water was not available in enough quantity, and the fire engines were not organised well enough to help. The government eventually stepped in. King Charles II gave direct orders. Houses were pulled down to create fire breaks, and in some cases gunpowder was used to blow up buildings before the fire could finally reach them. These extreme measures slowly began to work. Finally, after four long days, the weather helped. On Wednesday September 5th and Thursday the 6th the winds dropped. Without strong gusts of wind carrying sparks through the city, the fire was brought under control. After almost destroying the entire city, the flames were finally stopped. It was reported that the ashes, the left over burnt building, stayed warm for days, and some parts of the city were still smoking weeks later. When the fire finally ended, the scale of destruction was almost impossible to believe. Around four-fifths of the medieval city of London had disappeared. More than 13,000 houses were destroyed. 87 churches were burned down, and thousands of shops and businesses were lost. But surprisingly, very few deaths were recorded. Only a handful of deaths were reported officially, although historians think many more people may have died, especially the poor, whose lives were not carefully counted. The survivors faced enormous challenges. Tens of thousands of people were made homeless. Camps were built outside the city, where families were forced to live in tents and temporary shelters. Food supplies were interrupted, and the rebuilding of London would take years. But the fire also changed the city in positive ways. New building regulations were introduced by the government. Houses were rebuilt with brick and stone instead of wood, making them much safer. Plans to completely redesign the city were submitted immediately by famous architects at the time. The further rent, for example, drew up detailed plans to completely rebuild London in just a few minutes really. While the full plans were never realised because they were too expensive, London was changed. Streets were widened, buildings were made from better materials, and the monument to the great fire of London was built. The city that was destroyed in 1666 became stronger and became a more modern capital. The disaster also shaped London's identity. The great fire was remembered as a national tragedy, but also a turning point. Out of the ashes, a new city was created. So here is today's final thought. The great fire of London was one of the most dramatic events in English history. In just a few days, most of the city was destroyed. Thousands of people were made homeless, and an entirely new London had to be rebuilt. Throughout this story, you've heard many examples of the passive voice. Remember, we use the passive when the action is more important than the person doing it. When the doer is unknown, or when it doesn't really matter who exactly was responsible. Listen again to these sentences. St Paul's Cathedral was destroyed. Thousands of houses were burned to the ground. New building regulations were introduced. The city was rebuilt with brick and stone. In each case, the focus is on what happened, not on who did it. By making your own passive sentences about history, your culture, or events in your own life. Using the grammar you've learned from this episode is a powerful way to practice grammar while also telling stories. But what do you think? Leave a comment, practice using the passive, and comment on Spotify, YouTube, or if you're a Patreon subscriber, comment on Patreon or Discord. I've actually made a grammar study pack to help you practice passive grammar with this episode. It includes a bonus episode on passive questions, the interrogative, passive voice if you want the technical term. Go and check out that study pack. You can either buy it or become a Patreon subscriber for £5 a month and get it for free. So I would recommend becoming a Patreon subscriber because you'll also get access to other study packs, bonus episodes, and much more. Thank you all so much for listening. I hope you enjoyed this episode and I'll speak to you next time. Goodbye!