Go back

The Golden Age of Scams

44m 37s

The Golden Age of Scams

The episode presents a sharp critique of modern political and economic power, framing it as a "golden age of scams" where money, influence, and corruption are deeply intertwined. Through personal anecdotes—like a dermatologist encounter revealing uncomfortable intimacy and a New York Times party where the host meets key political and tech figures—it illustrates the erosion of trust between elites and ordinary citizens. The narrative draws parallels between the dot-com boom and current AI valuations, noting how speculative growth is mirrored by opaque financial practices and delayed IPOs. Tech leaders are shown leveraging political access, such as meeting with Trump, to gain advantage, bypassing community engagement. A growing public resistance to data centers in rural areas signals a shift in civic power, as communities reclaim agency. The show also exposes predatory financial schemes targeting vulnerable people in faith-based settings, highlighting a dangerous contradiction: institutions meant to offer solace are being weaponized. Ultimately, the episode advocates for active civic participation, moral clarity, and faith in democratic institutions, arguing that progress requires not just criticism but real action to rebuild trust and ensure that power serves the people—not just the wealthy or powerful.

Transcription

7579 Words, 40887 Characters

English
Welcome to Pablo Torre finds out brought to you by Apple Card. I am Pablo Torre and today we're gonna find out What this sound is when they said do you think this administration has a corruption problem? They don't because they don't think it's a problem right after this Did I ever tell you about the time when I went to the dermatologist and it was my husband's girlfriend? Okay, wait, wait, are you ready for an amazing story? Like are you I don't know if I am but please do okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Many many years ago My oldest child had like a rash or something and we lived in Tribeca and I'm like how are we gonna find like a dermatologist a pediatric dermatologist And I knew that my husband's college girlfriend and like girlfriend for like a year or two was a dermatologist in Tribeca And I'm like, can you call our can you call our cuz we'd like Sierra on the street sometime and he's like yes He calls her on the phone. He's like sure of course bring him in so like the next day I'm at the dermatologist with my son and while we're in the waiting room I'm realizing that I have not been to a dermatologist in years so we're in there But while I'm waiting I say to the nurse like oh, like you guys see adults here and she's like yeah, totally I'm like oh great like can I begin appointment next week at this point? I've never had a skin cancer check and so I'm making appointment I come back the next week and I roll up and I'm sitting there And I'm waiting and clearly the doctor said to her nurses like that's my ex-boyfriend's wife like what the eff is she doing here, right? And they walk in and they're like, oh are you here for like Botox or this that I'm like no no no skin cancer check and they're like Skin cancer check and like they walk out and the other one comes in she's like skin cancer check and I'm like, yeah They like bring me a robe to like take all your clothes off and they're all looking me like what and I'm like what? So the poor doctor comes in and she's like skin cancer check and I'm like, yeah me not realizing when you get a full-body skin cancer check They're in there. I mean next to the person who is delivering your baby. No one is ever in such an intimate place where their eyeballs are in your darkest crevasses Okay, and so I'm now like laying on my stomach like spreading every inch of me as I'm turned around and I'm like oh my god I am so sorry like I didn't realize this was the exam and I'm sure you want to call all your girlfriends right now and be like My ex-boyfriend's wife is whack, but you can't call them because of the hypocritical than your doctor So you just have to take it to the grave the your ex-boyfriends crazy ass wife is buck naked on a table getting an exam from you You must think I'm crazy. I'm really sorry. I had not considered that Andy Yes, yes, that both Andy and the dermatologist in question would both have a similar intimacy with your body totally totally and Clearly, I didn't realize what I was getting myself into like I get home I tell him the story and the saddest part of the story is he was into it Like he was not into it One of my favorite parts of my friendship with you Stephanie rule and thank you for being here in person back on the show again Is he have no idea what I'm gonna say? I have no idea what you're gonna say, but inevitably it involves you in a Compromising position in a compromising interpersonal dynamic in which I learn a lot more than I bargained for yes And this happened not at the dermatologist's office in Tribeca no most recently with us But at the New York Times is 175th birthday party the greatest okay the greatest like How excited for you that you walk into a party and the you can tell them so I should say that part of the joke of this evening Which we're gonna highlight with this photo of me Standing next to NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Sadie next the publisher of the New York Times 80 Salisberger setting next to a Woman whose body is known to dermatologist throughout the Tribeca area apparently Stephanie rule is that this is the sort of mad lib That your life is like that by the way, it's my life every day and it was so good to just suck you into it Like I walk in and all of a sudden my eyeballs I see the three of you and I'm like poor Adam who is the nicest. I should say this. I should say this as a disclaimer I had only talked to Adam Silver in person Once before no way are you serious before this It was at the Board of Governors press conference. Are you lying at which he was speaking for the first time about the punishment levied by his league Wait the week before that was the first Days earlier actually you're lying. I Took the microphone asked him a question about due diligence incidentally about How to make sure that the NBA and its teams are not being used by bad actors to effectively launder the images and reputations of such actors And he gave I would say like it considered answer about something that he had not been prepped for I think ahead of time at that presser Many how I walk into this event which isn't Tribeca. Yes, and it's overwhelming I mean it was in New York who's who it was overwhelming to the point of I walk into the elevator and this is an episode as always about six degrees of Stephanie rule The person who is in the elevator is literally Kevin Bacon The patron saint of yes of what a small word. Yes, and the tour is open and the first person I see is Adam silver incredible and the second person I see out of the corner of my eye moving at us like a lion Size it up. Am I gonna get to is you I was amazing. It was amazing for me my left eyeball is Adam my right eye Balls you and I'm like, oh my goodness YouTube must know each other like clearly you've been saying one in other's names a lot over the last 18 months a lot and I reach out my hand and he shakes it and I Unfortunately, I don't think it's proper to share The contents of the conversation that I had with Adam that you were there for a bunch of I was really happy to be there, but even that picture one of the reasons that picture is so good like Somehow like the depth of the picture Adam who's a really tall guy does not look tall in that picture like you look By far like the biggest person there and AG is just like wow shut up shut out to AG Feeling what all five foot ten of me is like in this frame. Okay, but my point is you literally you look like six three here I think and there's Adam who had to be psyched to see you well and you so I should say that part of what our Relationship is like is that you know Everyone not everyone you know so many people in the world of sports ownership You know the commissioner of the NBA better than I do you are somebody who is constantly someone I'm asking do you know this person and the answer is maybe I was at a pool party and I was doing a cannonball and Often the distance was this billionaire. I happen to love cannonballs and I like a pool party I do know a lot of people. I've lived in New York City a long time. Well, also I'm not a young woman. Well I've lived here a long time could have fooled your dermatologist But here's one of the fun back of the baseball card things that it's got to remind people of beyond the fact that you host a show on MS now That in its coverage of money power and politics is something that I personally enjoy and sometimes appear on But your background before television it involves this operative 70 rule was the highest producing credit derivatives salesperson in the United States. I was I was What the f*** does that mean? Yeah, I mean credit derivatives are basically a levered corporate bond and when I was very very young in my career I was a young girl on a corporate bond sales desk and The people who sell corporate bonds to our huge money managers and insurance companies and hedge funds and I met a couple of real nerdy guys who were kind of like originators of when credit derivatives began They taught me how credit derivatives worked and I went to these big corporate bond sales guys I worked for and I said I'm really a little person here and I don't have my own clients But if you let me sell credit derivatives to your clients, you can get all that business They let me do it. I ended up turning it into a business We would all go out to nightclubs three nights a week and then in the morning we'd wake up and I'd be their salesperson And as hard as people say, you know, oh my gosh, it's really hard to be in a business that's all men It's not always it's sometimes great to be the only girl doing it. I think that I need to explain a couple of things Just like so a bond is basically a contract for a loan Correct and I think in that way we're speaking now the language of what the f*** is happening in the American economy broadly And this is the thing. Okay, so let's let's fast forward to where we are now And let's even compare the dot com bubble to where we are with AI Because the funny thing is when I first started in in banking I desperately wanted to work in equities to sell stocks because it was 1997 1998 like the really exciting time for internet companies When at the time like all you had to say was dot com at the end and you were like hot hot hot And now here we are and I don't mean to be doom and gloom About the economy or the markets because obviously the markets have been extraordinary right trump Just said yesterday to a group of reporters. You all have 401k's I don't have to know anything about you. Your 401k is doubled in a short period of time it's doubled Your twice as wealthy as you were a short time ago every word of you And that's because of me - Have a good time, everybody. - But what's happening in the world of AI, on some level is so reminiscent of.com, and let's be clear, the internet was the future, but the internet wasn't ready to be the future in 1999, it was ready to be the future in 2005. So now here we are, okay? And when everyone says the stock market is booming, I invite you to look under the hood, because-- - Let's spread it open. - On a dermatologist in Davenure. - Break out the white paper and lay the US economy right across. - Okay, so here we are. - Yeah. - And if you actually look at the stock market, or if you actually speak to Fortune 500 CEOs that run businesses that are not connected to AI, they are struggling, okay? Go to a sporting goods store in Texas. Look at a retailer, anywhere. Look at tons of more traditional businesses. Their stocks are booming. And think about your last two years, you've spent no time, no money on innovation, 'cause you've had a war room focused on supply chain and the trade war. And so now here we are with AI. You now have these AI behemoths quietly delaying their IPOs, and they're saying, we're gonna delay our IPO, because things are moving too fast. - What's the term? It's uncertainty in the IPO market. For that reason, we're gonna just put it on impulse. - So going public is basically spreading it on that doctor's table. That is when every analyst is going to actually examine your financials. Not just say I'm buying into this AI with in a dream, but they're actually saying explain your business model. How are you making money? How are you going to make money in the future? Because you don't necessarily have to be making money today, right, like Amazon back in the day. But you need to lay out your case for if we invest in you now, how you're gonna grow in the future. - So I gotta say that the very process of going public does have some sort of similarity to like discovery in a trial. - Not some comparison, it's a direct parallel. There are data rooms, there are documents, there is all of the stuff that companies fight to never let the public see. Because it means that you get to see who we really are. But you just described something that I've been wanting to do on the show for a while, which is talk about what kind of multiple AI companies have been getting because I launched into this when I was talking at first about sports team valuations. - Yes. - 'Cause with the Lakers bought by a couple of guys that you are also familiar with in the world of business. Mark Walter, for instance, and Guggenheim partners, Todd Bowley, who they've been-- - You know very well, yeah. - The Dodgers together, you know, these guys I wanna get to that in a second as well. But the whole point being, you know, 12 and a half billion for the Lakers was like 20X. And it's like, that's crazy except also, that's what's happening in AI. Like the multiples. - But AI to an even greater extent. - And so that's why I wanted to have you explain-- 'Cause you could say the valuations on these teams are insane and they're insane when you look at the number. But when you actually then understand the value of sports right now, when you think about how much people care, how they figured out to monetize it, how they've up premium the sports experience so the average fan can't afford to ever go to a game ever again, but they're monetizing it. So when you see that number, you're shocked and it's horrible. - 'Cause revenue is not nearly that big. - Correct. - But sports teams are over here in that category. What's happening in this AI space is so reminiscent of.com of just like, that's the future, let me jump on. And the scary thing about the financing is, all of these giant companies are now just investing in one another. - It's the meme that I keep on thinking about that someone posted where it's a surge protector plugged into itself. - That's what it is. - And it's like, look at how protected we all are. - Yes. And so, listen, I do think AI is the future. I'm not wishing ill on any of these companies, but just the, he's a Svengali genius, isn't enough when fidelity comes in and says, walk me through this because you want me to buy this company. - So open AI has postponed their IPO. That was gonna be a historic event. That is not happening anymore. Andthropic obviously led the charge in which they want the federal government to cooperate with them so that they can get antitrust exemptions, so they can figure out how to protect everyone. - Now they're saying, I want you to regulate us. How do they really want to be regulated? Because if you look, they're just looking for regulations that are gonna protect them against getting sued. Or they're looking for regulations that will basically create a regulatory capture or a mode. So if you're the biggest AI company, if you're open AI, if you're anthropic, you can afford to pay for these regulations, but no one else can. And I would like in that too, after the financial crisis in 2007, 2008, they said, we gotta regulate these banks. And they regulated them in a way that if you were a small bank, if you were a community bank, if you were a midsize bank, you couldn't afford those regulations. But if you're JP Morgan, if you're the 800 pound gorilla, you might not like hiring another 500 compliance officers, but you can afford to in your sleep. But if you're this tiny little midwestern community bank, you can't, and we saw those little businesses just get swallowed up in this regulatory capture. And so these behemoth AI companies are like fine, regulate us. But the thing that I think is the most interesting or maybe inspiring is this. We talk all the time about power, and we assume that power is the wealthiest people on earth, the biggest businesses on earth. But look at what has happened in AI in these data centers. Okay, all of these AI companies, they deeply understand business and they deeply understand communications. If they wanted to build data centers here, there and everywhere, they knew that they needed to go to those towns, meet those communities, build a school, build a library, make their case to those communities. Instead, they're like, I don't feel like doing that. I'm gonna write a big fat check to the White House. I'm gonna write a big fat check for the ballroom. I'm gonna sit next to Trump at the inauguration. There's a bunch of those tech leaders having lunch with him today. And they thought, I'm gonna skip over winning over the American people 'cause I've got the bat phone to the White House, right? And up until just a few months ago, they thought that play was gonna work. And it seemed like it was. And by the way, if you talk to the president, it sounds like it would. I mean, even to this day, Trump is like, if you don't want an AI center in your town, that means you want to be poor and you want the Chinese to win. But look what's happened, all across this country, people who love politics, hate politics, never gonna vote have said, I don't understand AI, or more importantly, I do not want this data center in my backyard. The fact that Greg Abbott, who two years ago was like, this will be the home of data centers. Currently has a moratorium on data centers in Texas. Yes, in Texas. And mind you, I have a strong feeling that that moratorium is gonna end after the midterms. But this should give the American people hope that power can mean many different things. And on all these communities, people have said, no, no, no. I have the power to say, I don't want this here. Well, this is the thing that we're always reckoning with on this show, which is that sports, of course, gets shaped by politics, which uses sports for access to voters, for ways to launder its own image. We're talking in the same week that the Senate just passed, the Protect College Sports Act, which is going to also head to the house after the recess is over in which these elections can take place in which we will see the reshaping perhaps of the electoral map and the power dynamic behind what is only describable as unprecedented corruption. Correct. Correct. When it comes to money going to White House from the most esteemed leaders of business in the world. But maybe six months ago, I would have said, this is a one-way train, I don't know how it ends, but now here we are. We're 35 days away from the election. The president has a massive multi-hundred million dollar war chest in his super PAC that he could be writing these checks to these people running in the midterms. And it's diminishing. I don't, at this point, what are you going to do? Give Ken Paxton running in Texas against James Talariko. You're going to send him another quick $50 million. He can pepper Texas with campaign ads. I don't know that just having the most money is making a difference. And I just think we're seeing it and how the American people are pushing back against data centers and lawmakers are responding. And this is where we have been deliberately speaking the language of money because we want to always follow the money on the show whenever possible. And also because I think that is a far more winning political strategy than anything else that I might personally care about when it comes to philosophy or ideology or anything else. This is a story about people, it seems, voters who are recognizing how they are getting poorer as the people who are posting memes as if they're starring in home alone, pushing a hotel-- Oh, Dan Scovino. Dan Scovino, White House deputy chief of staff, also perhaps known as like guy posting memes. So Dan Scovino? posted over the weekend, this shot of basically, I mean, it looked like he could have replaced himself with Leonardo DiCaprio in great Gatsby, you know, just surrounded by glamorous popping champagne. Gold everywhere. It's Eric. I think it's Eric Trump behind. Is that? But it's just sort of like pushing it. Read the ruins on the go. And listen, I don't, I don't disagree. Champagne. The wealthiest Americans have become exponentially wealthier in the last two years, the president and his family extraordinarily wealthy, which is why lots of wealthy people right now, while they don't necessarily like Donald Trump or support Donald Trump. The problem is, millions of people in the United States and abroad are saying, I want to break the system, because there's been lots of surprising elections in Europe too, where we're seeing more extreme candidates win. And you're saying, oh my god, what's happening to the electorate? Are people like really going extreme? People are not going extreme. They're senior citizens who are saying, I'm panicked. I can't afford to retire. I don't know if I'm going to have health care coverage in the last quartile of my life, or they're looking at young people getting out of school who cannot find jobs or who think who can't even envision when they'll ever buy a home or people in the middle level of their life who cannot afford to take their kids to a Steelers game. Take those three groups of people. Are they extreme when it comes to political motivations? No, but why would any of those three groups vote for the status quo? But where are the creep of communism? While, by the way, literally the f***head of the CCP is at the table with you. It's as though they are banking on the ignorance of the American voter. As always. So what you're saying, you're threatening, you're panicking the American voter saying if you don't vote with us, communism is coming. While the people having dinner together lead the Chinese Communist Party, it is the new group of tech American oligarchs and politicians and some media personalities. And the threat is if you don't vote for us, communism is coming. It's not coming. It's pop and champagne in the White House with you boys. Yeah, I want to describe the table, which is not a metaphorical table, but a table with a photo that we will show. It's like a wedding. And who's at the table at the center? Who's table number one? It's Donald Trump. It's Melania. It's President Xi Jinping. It is his wife. It is good old Tim Apple. Tim Cook still making it at the table. It's Jensen Wong. They had an Nvidia. You go around the list. I mean, it goes on, but also nearby is Sam Altman of Open AI and Sundar Bashay of Alphabet, slash Google. Elon Musk is there, of course. Jeff Bezos is there, of course. This is not vague. No, this is not vague. And listen, is it great to have business leaders working with the government? Absolutely. We don't want to have our business and our government having an adversarial relationship. But the disconnect between this group of people and the American people is so massive and they're panic. They're like, we have to protect the status quo because they're coming for us. And I guess I would argue as somebody who deeply loves free markets. I love the catalyst. As someone who is the highest producing credit derivative. I know. I mean, that's a sexy career. The answer has to be guys somewhere in the middle because people who are saying, this system doesn't work for me. It's also why you're seeing Democrats who are incumbents who are losing, even if they have a decent record in DC, just because people are going, nothing's happening in Washington. The current paradigm doesn't work for my life. I want something else. And many of those people voting aren't saying, I'm desperate to have the police defunded. I'd love for the borders to be open. They're not thinking about either of those things. And the American dream is no longer something you can contemplate, then American democracy falls into some level of fragility. The story of this election and this administration to me and our time, frankly, is that we are living in the golden age of scams. For sure. I don't know if there's a better, by the way, like little case study in this than when Scott Jennings from CNN goes on this podcast, The Fifth Column, which is not like a leftist or lefty thing. And they ask him, point blank, do you think this administration has a corruption problem, which is just like the most elementary question that describes what we're going through? Does Donald Trump and the Trump administration have a corruption problem? That's a very generic question. I mean, is there something pretty simple? I give it easy as possible. What if I get specific, pardons, pardon finance guy, for instance, world liberty, financial coins, Russian guys paying for weddings, et cetera. Well, I think they paid him back. But I, yeah, covered by the media, right? No, I don't think they were like, we'll get you next Tuesday. It became a news story. And then Trump was like, they paid them back. I don't think it was going to be. It was a gift. I mean, all of it at a minimum. It's kind of gross, right? Like there's some, there's some taint to it. I'll be candid with you. This is not my social world. I don't necessarily exist in that world. I'm generally, I'm just a, I'm just a son of a garbage man from that. Scott Jennings just can't bring himself to say the obvious thing. And so he's like ice skating through this, of course, unpersuasively. My point is that guy's got Jennings, these surrogates, these administration members, they're not fooling the American people anymore. I'm going to say here's where I disagree with you. Ready for the question? When they said, do you think this administration has a corruption problem? They don't. Because they don't think it's a problem. That's the issue. And they're doing it right in front of your face. And they don't think it's a problem. Look no further than Don Jr's wedding. Don Jr is currently worth between three and four hundred million dollars. Yet despite that, the wedding celebration, despite that, he's still like, sure, let's have a Russian crony of Vladimir Putin pick up the tab for my wedding weekend to the tune of a hundred and fifty grand. And you know, it had distinct to the high heavens because even the president was like, I think he's paid him back. And this is where we got to remind people that there is the money going in and the money going out. And there is also this power, which we've covered on this show in the pardon economy, in which the president literally has this super power in which he can keep people from going to federal prison. And so what explains all of this? What's the end game? Is what I always think about, right? Like what's the end game for all these people that are allegedly committing crimes and engaging in corruption and scamming the American people? What's the end game? Money, power, politics. They're using their political power that they currently have and they're monetizing it. And that's why I think everyone is kidding themselves when they think, well, Republicans are turning on Trump. And we're going to, you know, when when John Corneon loses his primary or when Bill Cassidy loses his primary, Bill Cassidy, who is a doctor? It's going to be so mad when he lost his primary. And so disappointed that he voted to confirm RFK, he's really going to speak out. In Louisiana. Yes. And then when they don't and we're all baffled, I don't know why we're baffled because the thing that's different in this administration than any previous time in modern politics is the money element. The people in and around Donald Trump's orbit, besides having political power, are now making tens of millions of dollars through all different ways. And so even if you're no longer going to be in office, you don't want to get off the money train or you want to get on the money train. And so that's why we're seeing people still say nothing. Well, and we're seeing ways to make money in the case of the president reportedly more than $1.4 billion dollars from cryptocurrency ventures. In his first year back in office, this according to his official 2025 financial disclosures, that beyond that very basic fact and thank God for the paper trail that even gives us that beyond that we know of that we know of because the whole idea of get on the table, we're spreading it open. You're not actually seeing anything anymore, right? Because you're now dealing in the world of crypto. You're now dealing in the world of all of these secret ways to hide where the money is going. But what you do see at the White House, as we've talked about on the show before as well, is the Los Angeles Dodgers going to celebrate their world series victory with the president and Mark Walter breaking out the world series ring for Donald Trump. Because this is the world that we're currently living in. It's if you can't beat them, join them. And can you say, well, Donald Trump is going to smooth things over for him. No, we absolutely cannot say that. But boy, oh boy, if you are any person in these power spheres, it has made business and financial sense for you to cozy up to this president because you may not be in hot water today, but you could be too tomorrow and you want to have the people in power in your pocket and Donald Trump is willing to do that. And in the case of Mark Walter under federal investigation currently for all the things that have been alleged with self-dealing and Guggenheim partners, his partner when they bought the Dodgers together was Todd Bowley. What is Todd Bowley's political sort of position right now with this whole thing? Most of these guys, I don't think they have long term political positions. I think all of them, no pun intended, play ball. And so I think it doesn't matter who's in the White House. Every person who's in his position of power wants to make sure they can be as close to power as possible if they need it. The difference now is that it's just so readily available with this administration. And an administration shouldn't be worth a business administration or the anti-business administration, right? So in the last administration, people would argue that Lena Khan was anti-business. She was pure academics and she wasn't practical. And I'm not for against Lena Khan, but I think in all of these examples, we should want strong, successful, prosperous businesses in the United States of America. At the same time, our biggest CEOs should not have a secret bat phone to call president. I do think increasingly that I am like a Lena Khan Democrat. And I say this in this way, I think that we're living in this golden age of scams. And the idea that there was a Biden nominee who was going to regulate all of these corporations and therefore validate the continuing credibility of capitalism in the process. Pablo, we keep simplifying it until like, are you pro-regulation or anti-regulation? And that's not the answer. The answer is good regulation, right? I don't necessarily think we need agencies on top of agencies. You could streamline our agencies, but what you can't do is do away with them, right? Like the whole idea like, oh, maybe the way we're regulating crypto doesn't make sense. So let's get rid of it. No, that's not the answer. And I actually think that the answer is collaborative. You should bring in industry experts. You should have task forces. But what you shouldn't do is say, hey industry insiders, why don't you guys write the regulation, give us a check and we'll just do that thing. I actually think the answer is somewhere in the middle. I just pray to God that someday we could find that middle. And I think that politicians don't ever find the middle because it doesn't make for a good political slogan. The other thing I've been meaning to talk to you about, the other thing we often talk about, whether our audiences appreciate this or not. I hope you're going to say faith. Is our Lord and Savior because I'm thinking about all of the costumes politicians wear and that scammers wear and they wear the costume of sports, they wear the costume of religion. This one hurts me the most. And this one brings us to the story of life surge, which we reported on earlier this week and the alleged predatory financial classes that have extracted at times tens of thousands of dollars from financially desperate people in many of these cases, who by the way were convinced to take out multiple credit cards at the same time to pay for these classes in which they would get rich to take out a loan against the equity they had in their home. This one makes me the saddest. For those who don't know, that's about as fatal a blow as you could deal yourself. That you're going to take out equity against the one thing that has value in it's your literal f*** house. Yes. For these classes. Okay. And so let's just start with, like you, Jesus is my home boy. So I'm going to start with, I am a person of faith. There have always been scams, but when you see people get taken advantage of who are participating under the guise of faith or at religious forums or conventions and they're tying it together, come to this faith convention. And while you're here, we're going to tell you, Jesus, he wants you to be successful. And the way you're going to be successful, right? God will love you more if you are a success. And you're going to take these classes to become more successful. And if you don't have the money, you can have a Jesus plus credit card where you can pay for these classes. Like, to me, did we not forget, like, blessed are the meek when people turn to faith, oftentimes, when they are desperate, when they are alone, and to take advantage of people in those moments, and the thing that's kind of amazing about these scams right now, they've always existed. But now, thanks to the media, thanks to social media or cell phones everywhere, people are getting caught. Right? There have always been famous actors, famous athletes, famous people, speaking at lots of these multi-marketing conventions, and nobody realized it. They're getting paid a giant check to speak at some cock-a-may-me convention. And then they look the other way and nobody knows. Now, when they try to do it, everyone knows. So, I'm not sure if we're living in the golden age of scams, I think scams have always existed, but they're getting exposed, and I like that. The thing about the sort of faith-based scam in particular that reminds me of this administration to go big picture as well is that it is so antithetical to the religion that they are preaching to do the thing they are doing allegedly. There reminds me of how bad an actor our president is when it comes to even plausibly giving a sh*t about the God that they are all at these faith-based meetings praying to. He's not even really trying. He's never really tried. Pablo, it's worse than that, okay? If you think about the phrase, the term, family values, and how it's been co-opted, family values are about come as you are, right? They're about love by neighbor. When you think about how the Pope has been villainized, right? The Pope was a boy from Chicago, okay? Who devoted most of his professional life to serving the poor in South America. And now he's one of the most important religious leaders on the planet. Talking about AI and writing about it in incredibly significant ways. And parts of our government are villainizing him. And I just think it's crazy and sad all of these people who are seeking community and who are doing it in terms of faith because that's where their community lies. And they're being hustled and taken advantage of. This is also not something that breaks down super obviously along party lines, by the way. Like the way that I've been thinking about this and explaining to people is that we should disclose this as well. I went to Catholic school, K through 12, you know? That's how I learned about the world was in high school at Regis by the Jesuits who taught me to choose to live a life and service of others. And to make sure that you read what people who are not a part of the church also are thinking and finding out and researching the idea of scholarship beyond just like let's just not drink our own cool aid, make sure you go and study, right? Like that's the very basic premise of why. But lack of studying, right? It's David Rubenstein from Carlyle talks about the dangers or the perils of a literacy, a population that no longer reads, right? Just because we consume self-affirming media does not mean we are an educated country. And you need to understand those other than you to actually live in a well-rounded society and I fear that we're not. Right. David Rubenstein by the way, the owner of the Baltimore Orioles, which is a separate, a separate story that I'm going to have time for at the moment. He just wrote a book as well about all of this. But to your point, Liz, my wife grew up in the church, grew up Catholic, all that stuff. But in Boston, so guess what happened during her childhood, massive sprawling f***ing molestation scandal in which not to speak for her entirely, but that made her less enthusiastic about Catholicism, totally understandable. We get married in the church because I am the son of two Filipino immigrants. And for us to do that, of course, Liz had to finish the sacraments. Oh, she wasn't confirmed. She had pulled out of confirmation in, you know, great school. Seven years ago, yeah, yeah, yeah. And so got confirmed as an adult, like she must have really liked you. Oh my God. And so one of the things I had to reckon with was like, why am I making my future? Why do this? And of course, it speaks to the reasons why I personally still have an affinity for the religion and for the faith and for the God that I grew up relying on, worshipping that my parents passed on to me, that the Philippines itself. By the way, it is no small irony to me that Tim Tebow was born and raised in the Philippines. His parents, Baptist preachers were missionaries over there, gave birth to Tim, but the Philippines otherwise is one of the most Catholic places on this planet. Like that's the place where sometimes you'll see videos of people nailing their own hands into the cross freestyle. that level of Catholicism. - That intensity often. Anyhow, for me, why do I bring up all of this? It's because I am not trying to investigate as has been alleged in numerous places online that I'm gonna start targeting all the God-fearing people. It's the abuse and the scamming of this whole. - So the reason it's the most upsetting is because in life we're skeptical. And the one place where you see people let their guard down and literally have faith is in a house of worship. So when people are scammed there, I think it's the cruelest. - And my hope is that there is a version of being religious that is effectively not obvious that everybody that you as a worshiper might meet. There is the sort of Catholicism that is personal and more private and not ashamed, but just like not trying to convert everybody. And the thing that I'm running into is the particular blend of vulnerability around and evangelical, we wanna convert people as our prime sort of like goal here. When combined, with the scam, that part feels allegedly predatory beyond what can ever make sense to be. - So if somebody loses all their money, going to Vegas this weekend, buyer beware, you knew what you were getting into. But to me, to watch potential predatory financial scams, tied to faith is truly awful. And to you sort of questioning the, what does this look like and what does religion look like? One's relationship, like faith is the most personal thing. For so many people who don't necessarily have the benefit of parents or community or siblings or friends, it is that. And so it really should be protected that it should be the last place where people are targeted in terms of financial scams. There's the famous, there's a special place in hell for women who don't help women, yeah, put that one over here. There's a special place in hell for those who are targeting people coming to religious institutions to find community. Like you're a whole new level of bad news. - And that's what brings us back to the top of this whole hierarchy of a country that is managing always line between church and state is being presided over by a president who is only pretending to care about any of that stuff. But not for the reason of wanting to make everything more Christian, but wanting to profit off of everything, period. - Then I would just turn and say yes. Saddle Trump, the president of the United States is he the leader of the free world, sure. But I'm just not gonna be so doom and gloom. We can be the change makers. We have to choose to stand in the light. And people who want things to break are the ones convincing you that this place sucks and everything sucks and tune out. Don't tune out, tune in and choose to make this country what you want it to be. But have faith and stand up and don't just complain. Do something about it. Create the country you want to live in. - Stephanie Rule, you have restored my faith for at least. - I think you're making fun of me. - No, I'm not. I think that you are somebody who is incredibly genuine about how this all can get better. And I want to agree. - Then you can choose to be part of it. - Touche. (laughing) (upbeat music) - This has been Pablo Tore Finds Out, a metal-lark media production. And I'll talk to you next time. (upbeat music)

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The show highlights a growing "golden age of scams" in American politics and business, where power, money, and corruption are intertwined through opaque financial practices and political influence.
  2. Personal anecdotes reveal deep contradictions in political and social trust, such as a dermatologist’s office encounter where an ex-boyfriend’s wife is scrutinized, illustrating uncomfortable intimacy and power dynamics.
  3. AI valuations and corporate behavior mirror the dot-com boom, with major companies delaying IPOs due to uncertainty, revealing a system where innovation is being monetized without transparency.
  4. Tech giants are using political access—like meeting with President Trump—to gain influence, bypassing community engagement in favor of elite financial and symbolic power.
  5. There is a widespread public backlash against data centers and political influence, showing that ordinary citizens are asserting power by rejecting uninvited infrastructure and corporate encroachment.
  6. The administration’s alleged corruption, such as foreign payments at weddings and pardon power, reflects a system where money, power, and politics are being monetized openly.
  7. Faith-based financial scams exploit vulnerable individuals, using religious institutions as trusted spaces for predatory lending and misinformation.
  8. The ultimate message is that true progress requires vigilance, faith in institutions, and active civic engagement to counter exploitation and rebuild trust in democracy.

Summary:

The episode presents a sharp critique of modern political and economic power, framing it as a "golden age of scams" where money, influence, and corruption are deeply intertwined. Through personal anecdotes—like a dermatologist encounter revealing uncomfortable intimacy and a New York Times party where the host meets key political and tech figures—it illustrates the erosion of trust between elites and ordinary citizens. The narrative draws parallels between the dot-com boom and current AI valuations, noting how speculative growth is mirrored by opaque financial practices and delayed IPOs.

Tech leaders are shown leveraging political access, such as meeting with Trump, to gain advantage, bypassing community engagement. A growing public resistance to data centers in rural areas signals a shift in civic power, as communities reclaim agency. The show also exposes predatory financial schemes targeting vulnerable people in faith-based settings, highlighting a dangerous contradiction: institutions meant to offer solace are being weaponized.

Ultimately, the episode advocates for active civic participation, moral clarity, and faith in democratic institutions, arguing that progress requires not just criticism but real action to rebuild trust and ensure that power serves the people—not just the wealthy or powerful.

FAQs

AI companies are delaying IPOs due to uncertainty in the market, and they are seeking regulatory exemptions to protect themselves from legal challenges, raising concerns about unequal regulation and potential monopolistic power.

The author compares the current AI boom to the dot-com era, noting that both were initially seen as the future, but neither was ready for success at the time—AI, like the internet, is still maturing and facing similar market and valuation challenges.

The author uses this phrase to describe how political, financial, and religious scams are now more visible and widespread, especially as people are targeted during vulnerable moments—like financial hardship or religious faith—using misleading promises of success.

The author argues that powerful business leaders and politicians are forming close ties, using political influence for financial gain, and that this creates a disconnect from ordinary citizens, who feel increasingly ignored and exploited.

The dermatologist visit highlights how people can be placed in uncomfortable, intimate situations without realizing it—mirroring how power and influence often operate in unexpected and personal ways in politics and business.

The author expresses deep concern that financial scams disguised as religious teachings exploit vulnerable individuals, especially those seeking community and faith, making it one of the most harmful forms of predatory behavior.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.