The giant factory town that might be a giant mistake
26m 59s
A century ago, countries like England, Germany, and the U.S. grew rich through industrialization, leading many poorer nations to believe they could follow a similar path. Brazil’s Manaus serves as a case study: in the 1960s, the military government created a special economic zone offering tax breaks to attract factories, transforming the region into a manufacturing hub. Initially, this led to explosive growth and thousands of new jobs. However, over time, the factories remained dependent on government incentives and imported high-tech components, failing to upgrade locally. This reflects a broader global economic challenge known as the "middle-income trap"—a phenomenon where countries stagnate after achieving moderate wealth, unable to transition to innovation-driven growth. Economists like Homi Karandah and Mayara Felix argue that such traps are not inevitable. Brazil’s potential lies not in manufacturing, but in other sectors: advanced agriculture, which has made Brazil a global leader in soy and coffee, and the beauty industry, which drives innovation in cosmetics and medical procedures. Notably, a startup in Manaus is developing biodegradable plastics from Brazil nut shells—highlighting a uniquely Brazilian innovation path. The lesson is clear: economic growth doesn’t require copying the industrial blueprint of the past. Instead, countries must identify and build on their own unique strengths, adapting to today’s global competition through innovation, sustainability, and local expertise.
This is Planet Money, from NPR.
A couple hundred years ago, some countries suddenly got rich quick.
They started growing at rates never before seen in history.
Countries like England, Germany, the United States.
What these countries had in common were smokestacks, were steam engines and factories.
They had all industrialized.
And for a long time, a lot of other countries thought,
OK, that is how you get rich. There's the blueprint.
Some of them went to extraordinary lengths to follow that blueprint.
A couple of months ago, Planet Money producer Luis Gallo and I
went to get a better look at what one of those countries tried.
We started down a dark jungle path.
Do you like snakes?
I don't love them, but. What about spiders?
I don't love them either.
I like dogs.
There were no dogs in the rainforest.
But our destination was a big steel observation tower.
Ooh, is there an elevator?
And after climbing ten flights of stairs, we reached the top,
where we saw rainforest stretching all the way to the horizon.
Except. I hear it. I hear buses.
Just to the south, there was this bright line running through the jungle.
So on one side we have. the vast Amazon forest.
And then on the other side, it's a bustling metropolis.
Everything turned into squares and right angles and dark roads and white concrete high-rises.
We were looking at the city of Manaus, one of the biggest cities in Brazil.
Over two million people live here.
That is like San Francisco, Seattle, and Boston combined.
The city is a manufacturing powerhouse.
Nearly every TV that is sold in Brazil.
Every microwave, every motorcycle is built right here, right in the middle of the Amazon rainforest.
And that is because, 60 years ago, the military dictators of Brazil embarked on an ambitious economic experiment
to get Manaus to grow as quickly as possible at nearly any cost.
It was part of a bigger plan to get Brazil to grow as quickly as possible
by following that blueprint, by industrializing.
And for a long time, this worked. until it didn't.
Hello and welcome to Planet Money, I'm Jeff Guo.
Once upon a time, many economists believed that poor countries could very quickly catch
up to rich countries simply by following in their footsteps.
By building schools and roads and factories.
Lots and lots of factories.
Nowadays, economists are a lot less optimistic.
And if you ask them why?
A lot of them will point to Brazil.
Today on the show: How do poor countries become rich countries?
And what went wrong with that original blueprint?
When you first get to Manaus, the city looks like an economic success story.
There's the old town center with cobblestone streets from when this was a big rubber town.
Now there are stores selling cell phones.
Soccer cleats.
Oh, 80% discount at the outlet.
There are high-rise office buildings and gated communities.
And then you cross a little bridge, and all of a sudden, you are in the industrial zone.
There are rows of corrugated tin workshops, shipping containers stacked behind barbed
wire.
It smells like fried fish and diesel.
Hundreds of companies from all over the world have set up factories here.
Our Uber driver Claudio told us he is always driving foreigners around.
Some of the companies have set up these huge, walled campuses here.
There's also Honda, BMW, Whirlpool, Yamaha, Foxconn.
He says Samsung is bigger.
You think that's big?
Every year, these factories produce millions of cell phones and motorcycles.
And microwaves and computer monitors.
The story of how all this arrived in the Amazon goes back to the 1960s, when Brazil's military
dictatorship was following what most countries thought was the blueprint for getting rich:
industrialization.
Manufacturing.
And they wanted to bring manufacturing to the Amazon as well.
So in 1967, they turned Manaus into this special economic zone, where companies could get a
lot of tax breaks.
It's called the Free Zone, the Zona Franca.
And it's in the heart of Manaus.
All right.
This looks very official.
Shall we?
"Obrigado."
The Zona Franca is run by this government agency.
Their headquarters are in a swooping, concrete, modernist building at the edge of town.
In the lobby, there is a wall with 27 framed portraits showing every past head of the Zona
Franca, including the one we were about to meet.
Oh look, there he is.
His portrait right there.
Bosco.
Wow.
It's the only one in color.
Bosco Sarraiva talked to us in his office, with his colleague interpreting.
He told us he actually grew up in Manaus.
He watched all the factories come in, got some of his first jobs in those factories.
What kind of products were you making?
"Na época, televisor, videocassete."
"Television and videocassete, I don't know how we called it."
Bosco said all those factories came to Manaus for one big reason: the tax breaks, those
tax incentives for the free zone.
They brought thousands and thousands of new opportunities to Manaus.
"There were thousands and thousands of opportunities."
Over the next decade, the population doubled.
From the point of view of the residents, the Zona Franca has been a huge success.
It took a fading rubber town in one of the poorest parts of Brazil and gave it a whole
new economy.
And Bosco is like the number one hype man for the Zona Franca.
It changed his life.
Family's life.
And he's seen it change so many other people's lives.
"I don't know, I'm calm, I'm happy, I'm happy, I'm really part of it.
I saw the Zona Franca being born, I was able to work."
"He's so happy to be a part of it because he saw the Manaus Free Trade Zone like born
to get started and now he lead it."
"For sure, hope and certainty of development, which is what has happened.
He says it's better than hope, it's certainty of development."
And Manaus was just one example of Brazil's original mission at the time, which was to
use the power of the government to follow that blueprint, to quickly kickstart industrialization
and economic development.
This approach has a name: economists call it developmentalism.
Back in the 60s and 70s, other countries with authoritarian governments were trying this,
too.
For example, South Korea and Singapore and Taiwan.
They were like, "Bam, we're going to put a school here, bam, we're going to put some
roads there, bam, bam, bam, bam, bam, bam, we're going to put a bunch of factories
here, there, and everywhere."
And the dream was that those factories that came for the tax breaks would stick around
and eventually start to level up, to make more advanced products.
So eventually they wouldn't need so many tax breaks.
But in Manaus, that hasn't quite happened.
Bosco told us that still today, the companies in Manaus are growing.
Manaus depend heavily on government subsidies, the tax breaks.
Without the incentives, what would happen to Manaus?
"Without the incentives, what would happen?"
"Nothing."
"With Manaus?"
"Porto de Leia.
Porto de Leia."
"Well, we would be broken."
"We would automatically lose the pole because it would be economically impossible.
Impossible."
"It's not economically possible to do this stuff here without the incentives."
"All dangers would go away."
And one way to understand why Manaus still can't live without its subsidies is to look
at what comes into the city versus what goes out.
Because what you want for economic growth is for the factories to import low-tech components
and turn them into high-tech components.
After our meeting with Bosco, we headed to the port to look at the reality.
"Going through some security doors, some x-rays.
Some metal detectors."
Pretty much everything in Manaus arrives on big container ships.
They travel almost a thousand miles up the Amazon River.
Most of them unload here, at a terminal called Port Xibatau.
When we got through security, we saw this huge floating pier with more than a dozen
red and orange cranes.
The guy in charge of all of this is Johnny Fidelis Santos.
Johnny told us these days, like 70 percent of the cargo arriving in Manaus comes from
Asia.
We were standing in his office, looking at hundreds of shipping containers stacked in
the yard.
"If I just, like, pick the container like that one, probably what is in it?"
"Electronics.
Components, electronics."
Yeah, these high-tech electronic components, they get unloaded here in the terminal and
whisked to the local factories in Manaus, in the Zona Franca, where the workers are mostly
just assembling all this stuff.
Assembling them into TVs and air conditioners.
and notebook computers. So on the surface, Manaus is a tremendous economic success story. It's what
a lot of countries dream of, a magnet for foreign investment, a manufacturing hub filled with high
tech companies creating jobs for hundreds of thousands of workers. But underneath all of that,
a lot of the manufacturing is not actually very advanced or globally competitive. Now,
in recent decades, the government has been trying to upgrade the factories here. Bosco's agency has
negotiated these complicated deals where if companies want to qualify for the tax breaks,
they have to do some of the higher tech work here in Brazil. Take TVs, for instance. These days in
the Zona Franca, workers are soldering components onto circuit boards. They are making the power
supplies. But when we went to see these TVs on the shelves of the department stores, even the
salespeople knew that the most important components, the actual fancy OLED or LCD panels,
those are from somewhere else. Those are mostly coming over on the container ships from Asia.
He says they are assembled here to be sold in Brazil, in the U.S.
So despite all the government's efforts, the factories in Manaus, they've had a hard time
leveling up and creating better jobs. And you could say maybe this is just a Manaus problem,
that it's not a good idea to try to manufacture stuff in the Amazon. But this problem is not
isolated to Manaus. It's not isolated to Brazil. It's not isolated to
Manaus. It's happening all over Brazil. Starting in the 1980s, Brazil's strategy of rapid
industrialization kind of hit a wall. Brazil went from one of the fastest growing countries in the
world to one of the slowest. And you could also say that maybe this is just a Brazil problem.
But in fact, a lot of countries that rapidly grew and industrialized in recent decades,
countries that achieved what the World Bank calls middle income status, they have also
found that their economies just aren't growing like they used to. These middle income countries
seem stuck. The name for this phenomenon is the middle income trap. It was coined by two
economists at the World Bank. One of them was Homi Karas. Even though neither of us are golfers,
we kind of thought of the middle income trap as a, with a golfing analogy.
Oh, like a sand trap. There are these sand traps.
And if you're not a very good golfer and you go into one of these sand traps,
it takes you a lot of time to actually get your way out.
Yeah, it can be pretty hard. Homi, who now works at the Brookings Institution,
the think tank in D.C., has basically spent his entire career studying if and when and how
poor countries can become richer.
Well, I come originally from a developing country, so that had always been one of my interests.
Homi was born in Pakistan.
And by the time he got to grad school at Harvard in the 1970s,
economists were talking about this kind of utopian-sounding idea. It was a theory called
convergence, which said that in the long run, if they made the right decisions,
poorer parts of the world should be able to catch up to the richer parts of the world,
or at least get pretty close.
Because there's a blueprint in front of you.
Yeah. Step one, build roads and schools and infrastructure. Step two, industrialize. You
know, get workers out of the fields and into factories, where they would start out by making
simple stuff like T-shirts.
The essence of the low-income country strategy is to take advantage of low wages.
By having low wages, you can be very competitive.
And from there, once you've built up that manufacturing base,
steps three, four, five, 11, 22, is you start upgrading those factories, teaching workers more
and more advanced skills.
The economy grows, people start earning more money. And, you know, like, this was the blueprint
for countries.
And then as they developed even further, they would move into services like, you know,
banking and finance and insurance.
Because as an economy gets richer, more people need those things.
The United States and the UK and Germany all followed this path,
where more and more people went from farms to factories to eventually where some were enjoying
desk jobs and three martini lunches.
In the 80s and 90s, a lot of countries had managed to accomplish just those first couple steps.
They built a manufacturing base. That got them from low income to what the World Bank calls
middle income, which is based on per capita national income.
And in the late 80s and 90s, some of those middle-income countries broke through again.
South Korea and Singapore and Taiwan officially became high-income countries. Some people called
it the middle-income countries. Some people called it the Asian miracle.
But Homi, he writes this paper that's like, um, countries like South Korea might actually be
the exception to all of this, not the rule.
There have been lots of countries that thought this is going to be their century and that
they've had a history of decades of rapid economic growth that they thought would
automatically translate into decades of future economic growth. But history teaches us otherwise.
So you were kind of, you know,
just kind of a wet blanket, it sounds like.
I was a bit of a wet blanket.
And this wet blanket idea, the middle-income trap, it has now become a big deal in economics.
Homi's co-author is actually now the chief economist at the World Bank now. And a couple
years ago, the World Bank published this big, important report all about the middle-income
trap. Literally, the title was The Middle Income Trap. And the basic gist of it is that this
blueprint for going from poor to rich,
seems to have a big hole right in the middle. Most economists now pretty much agree on those
first couple of steps, you know, to get countries from low to middle income.
What I would call get the basics right. That does really well for a pretty long period of time.
They also agree on how rich countries like the U.S. are supposed to grow.
It's through inventing stuff, developing new technologies.
Once you're high income,
there's closer to one path again to continue to push the frontier. And that path is called
innovation.
But for middle-income countries, there doesn't seem to be just one path. Like,
South Korea went big on heavy industry and high-tech electronics like microchips.
In Poland, the economy got a big boost from joining the EU. It got a lot of investment
from Western Europe and became a manufacturing hub for a lot of European supply chains.
Homi says middle-income countries are,
not in this weird situation, where there are actually a lot of different ways to grow your
economy. But you don't know which is going to be a good fit for you.
I guess it's like, what sport do you want to play?
Yeah.
Are you going to be good at volleyball or soccer?
Yeah.
Basketball?
Yeah. You're unlikely to innovate the frontier because you don't have the, let's say,
the quality of universities and other kinds of things. And you can't compete in garments because
you've got Bangladesh.
You don't want to have low wages because the whole idea is, how do we raise wages
so that people are better off? So you need to move to a different strategy.
And what is that strategy?
That's to be figured out.
After the break, how does a country find its way without a blueprint?
As a kid growing up in Brazil in the 90s,
Mayara Felix remembers this phrase that she would always hear people say.
Brazil is the country of the future. That's what we say.
It's something people in Brazil have been saying for a long time, for decades and decades.
There are songs.
Because it seems like we have it all, man. And of course, it becomes the joke because
the future never comes.
Growing up, Mayara did not have it all. Far from it. She was raised in Brazil,
in a poor community in northeast Brazil.
There was lots of chickens on the streets. And I remember a very vivid afternoon.
My sister and I are in our living room, just like, I think, watching TV in an afternoon.
And then the neighbor's gigantic pig runs in front of us. And it was like a surreal moment.
Mayara says as a kid, she didn't really know she was poor.
Until, like, you know, we get to go on the bus to the city next door and then
realize that the streets are paved and there's buildings and things like that.
But there were no streets.
There was a path for her to follow, to get her out of that poor neighborhood.
She did well on her tests, got selected for a special public school farther from home.
Eventually, she made it to college, then grad school. And now she's an economics professor
at Yale, where she teaches about the different paths that developing countries have followed
and why some of those paths might not work anymore for countries like Brazil.
I think the remarkable successes we can count in our fingers. It's Singapore, China, South Korea,
Taiwan. That's it, man.
Mayara says what those countries did that worked was to manufacture stuff for wealthier countries.
We experienced post-World War II this remarkable opportunity for developing countries to grow
by accessing rich people, demand from rich people in rich countries.
And East Asia has been able to really do this brilliantly.
But somehow, Latin America, Africa didn't quite manage to do that.
And OK, there are all these different. theories and explanations for why a country like
Brazil couldn't quite make that path work.
For one, Brazil is a tough place to do business.
There's tons of government bureaucracy.
The country is still struggling with a lot of crime and corruption and political turmoil,
with the legacy of colonialism and slavery.
Especially in countries with history like ours, in Brazil and Latin America,
where there's so much baggage that we carry.
I don't think we can ignore that baggage.
Also, in Brazil, you had factories that mostly focused on making stuff for Brazilians.
You know, like in Manaus, where the government used big tariffs to protect companies from competition.
Whereas in places like South Korea, the government really pressured companies to export,
forcing them to compete in the global marketplace.
But Maier says at this point, studying what countries like South Korea did in the past,
that will only get you so far.
Because, of course, the world is a lot different now.
Especially when it comes to. These days, a lot of economists aren't so sure about where manufacturing fits into the blueprint anymore.
Manufacturing technology looks a lot different than it used to.
It's higher tech and fewer people.
And also, there's just a lot more competition now.
It's very hard to compete on anything manufacturing with China.
It's very hard nowadays.
Like, the global competitive world is very, very intense.
And so you need to play to your advantages.
In fact, in recent years,
Brazil and. And many middle-income countries around the world
have gone from industrializing to de-industrializing
before they really got a chance to get rich.
Some economists call this premature de-industrialization.
Companies are closing down factories because they can't figure out a way to compete.
But Maier says that doesn't mean that all hope is lost.
It just means that countries like Brazil,
they need to find something else for people to do.
The key thing is, are you doing something more productive?
And that doesn't necessarily have to be manufacturing sectors.
Can we accomplish this with anything other than manufacturing?
Yeah, like in Brazil,
factory workers there are less productive than they were five years ago.
But Maier says there are places where the Brazilian economy
has been getting more productive.
One of those bright spots where Brazil is leading the world in productivity
is actually agriculture.
Just a more advanced kind of agriculture.
No one expected in the 80s that Brazil would have become the world's. biggest soy producer, orange producer, coffee producer.
And we say that, oh, these are just commodities.
Man, like, I think we need to update what our understanding
of technology and agriculture is.
Yeah, in recent decades, farmers in Brazil have invested
hundreds of millions of dollars researching how to grow more food
on the same amount of land, how to make farming more sustainable.
The research it takes to actually adapt seeds,
adapt varieties to Brazil's local environment
all of that is, like, really sophisticated things.
Another potential bright spot, Maiar says, might be the beauty industry.
Brazil has one of the biggest markets in the world for beauty products
and cosmetic surgery.
There is intense competition.
And that competition has driven Brazilian companies to develop,
you know, new types of skin care, even new types of liposuction.
And, you know, even in Manaus, we ended up finding people experimenting
with what might be the next big industry.
It's actually in a surprising place.
Great to meet you.
Are these snacks for us?
We were at this local company that made injection-molded plastic parts.
They were called Tutiplast.
When we walked through the plant, there were rows and rows
of these big white pods with Chinese lettering on them.
OK, there's, like, a robot arm that goes in and, like, takes out the finished piece.
And I have to say, this was kind of depressing,
watching these mostly automated machines pump out cheap plastic motorcycle bumpers and air ducts.
Is it still warm?
Oh, it's still hot.
But then our tour guide, Gabriel Santos, told us,
oh, let me show you the research lab.
And it turned out that Gabriel had a Ph.D. in material science.
She said, yeah, this is actually a new direction the company's going in.
Gabrielle is from Manaus, and she told us her team's big project
is to figure out how to take nut shells and turn them into biodegradable plastics.
She showed us one of her prototypes.
So is this made with Brazil nuts?
Yes.
Really?
Plastic made from Brazil nuts.
The Brazil nut shell?
Yes.
Wow.
Wait, can we get a sound of that?
It feels like plastic.
Yeah, it's a plastic.
It seems like normal plastic, but I can't eat it.
And OK, they haven't perfected this plastic yet.
But this is what economists like Mayara and Homi are talking about.
This is something that is unique to Brazil,
something that the South Koreas and Chinas of the world don't yet have.
Brazil, and Manaus specifically,
might one day, I don't know,
dominate the market of biodegradable plastics made from plant trash from the Amazon.
And then maybe Gabrielle's bosses at Tutiplast will hire more PhDs.
And so on and so forth.
This is how an economy might eventually grow out of the middle-income trap,
through thousands and thousands of little examples like this.
Guess what?
We have a new newsletter.
It's from our sister show, The Indicator.
And just like The Indicator, it is short, it is sweet, it's to the point, it's smart.
It's filled with links to the big economic stories of the day,
plus our commentary on why they matter.
My favorite part?
There's a listener mailbag section,
where we get to read the emails that you send us and answer your questions.
You can sign up at npr.org slash indicator newsletter.
This episode of Planet Money was produced by. It was edited by Marianne McKeown,
fact-checked by Sierra Juarez,
with some translation help from Sarah Robbins.
It was engineered by Robert Rodriguez and Jimmy Keeley.
Alex Goldmark is our executive producer.
A very, very special thanks to. from NPR's Rio Bureau,
and also to. I'm Jeff Guo. This is NPR. Thanks for listening.
you
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Brazil’s Manaus city became a manufacturing hub in the 1960s through a government-led industrialization experiment called the Zona Franca, offering tax breaks to attract foreign factories.
Despite initial success and rapid population growth, Manaus remains dependent on government subsidies, with most factories assembling imported high-tech components rather than producing advanced goods locally.
The economic model of rapid industrialization—known as developmentalism—once seemed promising for countries like Brazil, South Korea, and Singapore, but now faces a critical flaw: the "middle-income trap," where growth stalls after reaching middle-income status.
Many middle-income countries fail to transition from low-wage manufacturing to innovation-driven economies due to lack of technological capacity, weak institutions, and global competition, especially from China.
In Brazil, productivity has shifted from manufacturing to advanced agriculture and the beauty industry, with emerging innovations like biodegradable plastics from Brazil nut shells showing potential for unique economic growth.
The success of countries like South Korea and Singapore relied on export-oriented policies and global market competition, strategies that Brazil has lacked due to political instability, bureaucracy, and protectionist policies.
New economic thinking suggests that growth doesn’t require mass manufacturing and can emerge from niche, innovative sectors tailored to local resources and needs.
Long-term prosperity may lie not in copying industrial blueprints, but in discovering and scaling unique domestic advantages through innovation and sustainability.
Summary:
S. grew rich through industrialization, leading many poorer nations to believe they could follow a similar path. Brazil’s Manaus serves as a case study: in the 1960s, the military government created a special economic zone offering tax breaks to attract factories, transforming the region into a manufacturing hub.
Initially, this led to explosive growth and thousands of new jobs. However, over time, the factories remained dependent on government incentives and imported high-tech components, failing to upgrade locally. This reflects a broader global economic challenge known as the "middle-income trap"—a phenomenon where countries stagnate after achieving moderate wealth, unable to transition to innovation-driven growth.
Economists like Homi Karandah and Mayara Felix argue that such traps are not inevitable. Brazil’s potential lies not in manufacturing, but in other sectors: advanced agriculture, which has made Brazil a global leader in soy and coffee, and the beauty industry, which drives innovation in cosmetics and medical procedures. Notably, a startup in Manaus is developing biodegradable plastics from Brazil nut shells—highlighting a uniquely Brazilian innovation path.
The lesson is clear: economic growth doesn’t require copying the industrial blueprint of the past. Instead, countries must identify and build on their own unique strengths, adapting to today’s global competition through innovation, sustainability, and local expertise.
FAQs
The goal was to rapidly industrialize by establishing a manufacturing hub in the heart of the Amazon rainforest, using tax breaks to attract foreign companies and boost economic growth.
The Zona Franca offered significant tax incentives and government support, allowing companies to operate with reduced costs and greater profitability, which attracted thousands of factories and businesses.
Most of the high-tech components used in manufacturing are imported from Asia, and local factories primarily focus on assembly rather than advanced production, limiting technological advancement and competitiveness.
The middle-income trap refers to the phenomenon where countries grow rapidly to middle-income levels but struggle to transition to high-income status due to lack of innovation, competition, and suitable industrial strategies.
South Korea and Singapore focused on export-oriented strategies and pressured companies to compete globally, while Brazil protected local industries with tariffs and failed to create competitive, outward-focused manufacturing.
Brazil’s agriculture and beauty industries show potential, with advanced farming techniques and innovation in cosmetic products helping drive productivity and competitiveness.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.