The Framework for Leading With Both Care and Accountability
62m 5s
This podcast episode centers on a masterclass in coaching with ICO BATHEA, a respected senior leadership coach, who discusses her framework "Anchored, Aligned, and Accountable." The conversation begins with the host recounting a powerful live interview where ICO coached her through a leadership conflict, leaving the audience deeply moved. ICO’s framework focuses on self-leadership as critical in today's complex world, emphasizing the need to be anchored in personal values, aligned in actions, and accountable for the gap between intention and impact. A key theme is the challenge of building psychological safety in organizations without addressing power and identity. ICO argues that true psychological safety requires acknowledging how factors like race, gender, and tenure create uneven power dynamics, which affect vulnerability and truth-telling. She advocates for leaders to name these disparities and hold spaces accountable to ensure all voices are included. The host reflects on how ICO’s approach has been integrated into their "Dare to Lead" work globally, helping organizations transform by prioritizing winning over comfort through honest conversations about power. The episode also touches on the importance of attribution and learning from diverse scholars. It ends with a teaser for future content, including a podcast with Roger Bennett. Overall, the discussion offers a practical path to building trust and connection in leadership, partnerships, and parenting.
This episode is a lesson in vulnerability. It's an opportunity to see what lightning in a bottle looks like and feels like. And it's a very exciting opportunity for Adam and I to introduce you to ICO BATHEA. So I'll start here every now and then on stage when you're interviewing someone, you get this sense that the people in the audience are just, you could hear a pen drop. That's what happened earlier this year when I was interviewing ICO BATHEA, one of the most respected senior leadership coaches in the country. I was interviewing ICO at a, at the better up, uplift conference. And I was talking to ICO about her new book, Anchored Aligned and Accountable, which I'll tell you about in a second. And we basically got into a real life, real time role play while she was coaching me through a leadership conflict that was tearing me up at the time. And when our session at the conference was over, half the audience was in tears, and the other half were lighting up to talk to ICO about their, about their conflicts and leadership. But ICO BATHEA is a friend and mentor. She's an absolute partner for me in the dare to lead work. She's one of the most incredible coaches and facilitators that I've ever had the privilege to work with. She is just authored a new book called Anchored Aligned and Accountable, and she introduces a framework that focuses on why self-leadership is so critical in today's complex operating environment. In our conversation, we dig in to the difference between assuming positive intent and believing people that are, believing that people are doing the absolute best they can. And holding people accountable. ICO teaches me about the this powerful coaching practice of three levels of listening. And she talks about how our bodies and minds are the real machines that we need to master before we worry about AI or machine learning or anything else. I think at a time when many of us are struggling to find ourselves and to find each other, her Anchored Aligned Accountable Framework really offers a clear practical path to building trust in connection. As leaders, as partners, as friends, and I will say as parents, I use it with my spring work with my kids. I'm so proud to say that her framework has become deeply integrated into the data lead work and transformation work we do with organizations around the world. So welcome to this masterclass in coaching. It's a real opportunity to learn. I was going to say it might expense, but no, it's okay. I was worn out by the time it was over. I went back to my hotel room into the conference hotel room. I had a little bit of a good cry and equally powerful laugh and then took a nap. And just to remind her hiatus ends, this is the last hiatus podcast. And then we're back next week with, you can hear, yeah, I think you can hear me smiling with a new podcast where we are joined by Roger Bennett, one of my favorite people in the world to talk about lessons on love, laughter, and what the world cut meant to the world. So I'm glad you're with us. Thanks for hanging in our hiatus and we're excited to be back with you. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for $15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun if we made $15 bills, but it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com/switch. Up from payment of $45 for three months, $90 for six months or $180 for 12 month plan required $15 per month equivalent to taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only greater than 50 gigabytes me slow when network is busy. See terms. Welcome to the Curiosity Shop. A show from the Fox Media podcast network. Hi, I go, hey, I cannot tell you how excited I am to be here with my friend teaching partner facilitation partner, co-conspirator. What other words would you use? All the things. All the things. To talk about, and I think everybody got a copy, anchored aligned and accountable. Yeah. I thought it would be fun to tell you a little bit about our relationship and how we met to start there. So we were doing a dare to lead facilitation training and jump in and correct me if I get this history wrong because you know how history is. Yes, yes, subjective. Yes. And one of our senior facilitators reached out to me and said, if you can get ICO Bithia to come to one of your trainings, it would be amazing. We work together at the Bill and the Linda Gates Foundation and she is such a badass. You really want her in this community and even if she doesn't want to be in the community, you want her at least at a training. And I was like, okay, okay. So we reached out and you said, yes. Yes. What did you think? I was excited. I didn't know what to expect. So I was super excited. Yeah. I was just ready to learn. Yeah. That was the parent when she got there. So basically for three intense days, these trains or these facilitation creditations are super intense. I lead them. It's a lot of uncomfortable learning and unlearning and ICO was like the magnet in the room. Someone would share something and my instinct would be like, oh, hell no, that is not the way we're going to do this. And I would just be getting ready to form those words and ICO would say, I'm curious. Tell me more about what you're thinking. I'm like, yeah, I'm curious too. That person would share, at the end of it, it was a problematic thought but she's like, I really appreciate you. So honestly, I was like, yeah, me too. I chew whatever she said. And then I think something I would want to share too because I can be a skeptic and if you, many of you know my background, you know that I'm probably not the most, I have not always been the most open person all the time. So one of the things that Bernay did in this training, which is very unique, I think many of you might be able to relate to is that in the training, I think the composition is when you enter the room, if you're like the, if there are not a lot of women there, you probably automatically notice how many women are there, right? And you know where they are, what exit were to go. If you're any kind of the only anything, you recognize the other people who are like you, right, right off. So one of the things, so it was probably like what four or five brown people in this room of, I don't know, having people two, 50 or 150 or something. And what was magical that had not really seen somebody do before, a white person do before, was that Bernay talked about within the first, this was about her work, her dearly-to-lead work, and was throwing out the names like Bell Hooks, Audrey Lourd, when they were saying these, as if everybody in the room should know these people. And automatically she did something which like flipped the room almost where if you were one of the only or others, you felt like this was your room. And I don't know if you know the power in being able to do that, where people who are not usually seen all of a sudden in a room of that many people feel like I belong here. And so when we did meet like during a break, I said, I was there's like some pre-reading or something I missed because I don't know if everybody here knows who Bell Hooks and Audrey Lourd is and you're kind of surprised or what happy, but the idea that all of these other voices and people you brought into the room as a part of your regular vocabulary and speaking of them as they are teachers and they are people who taught you, it flipped the room. And that is not an easy thing to do is to create equity into a room where just an identity, not because something weird is happening because sometimes when you walk into a room, you automatically know that you might be at a deficit and not a story you're telling yourself because that's how rooms work sometimes we're not speaking about things and you're able to flip the room. Without even doing, I don't know, I don't think you were doing it intentionally because you kind of were a little bit surprised when we talked about it but that power of being able to do that. And if you do it in a way this almost like a second nature is what we need more of what people should be able to do. And that's what stood out for me. And I thought, oh, she's kind of dope, she even did it on purpose. It wasn't that, oh, this is Renee Brown. It was like, damn, this woman really flipped the room. So that's what stood out for me. Wow. I don't know if I ever told you that. No. I thought that was important to say. I was scared about what was coming. She's like, was she really easy? I was wondering why you're posing for a minute. What's happening? Yeah. Yeah, I wouldn't have my career without to be honest with you just very specifically the black female mentors and teachers and scholars that shaped my thinking. Yeah, so maybe what I should do better, I'm taking the feedback from that, maybe what I should do better, which I cannot do well sometimes, is make assumptions about, you know, bell hooks and stop capitalizing her first and last night and she doesn't do
like I should invite people more into the scholarship that framed my life maybe. And you do that and even if any of you have strong ground, even naming people as teachers who are with us now, and being able to say that, I'm happy to be amongst those folks too, but and always being so mindful of attribution. Because attribution very seriously. Yeah. Yeah. I have to say that that's tough in our business. Yes, I've already seen two LinkedIn posts that started with I have a really good idea for building psychological safety. We should get anchored aligned and accountable. I was like, yeah, dude, yeah. I said, oh, I agree. Ico's work has really changed me. That's Ico Bia. A.I.K. Yeah. Like, so attribution is really to me very important. Yeah. Yeah. So we became friends. And we spent a lot of time kind of learning together, challenging each other, laughing, inappropriately, and appropriately. And we got into really hard conversations about the gap between great research and our experiences on the ground trying to do with that research said. Psychological safety is a great example of that important research, validated, huge contribution. We are both embedded deeply. So she is a senior dare to lead coach and a senior dare to lead facilitator. When I say senior, I would say if we're involved deeply with a company, she's often the coach for the CEO or someone in the C suite as part of our transformations. She's doing the facilitation of the senior leaders going through the dare to lead curriculum. And so we're embedded together and our conversations often sound like, damn, this is a good idea. This is tough when you're in front of people. And so we, one day in Houston eating seafood from good company, we asked, are you, we're like, is it going to be possible to actually build psychological safety? The way that the majority of companies are doing it right now, which I'm not sure are unsure whether Amy intended this, but Ico is like, we'll never build it without a conversation about power and identity. You just can't. And I said, I agree, I've never seen it done. And I said, maybe this is something that will struggle with the rest of our careers. And then the next thing I know of talk you to her, she goes, I have a framework. What do you mean? And she said, I have a framework. I think, I think we can do it. And I was like, and she said, I think people need to be anchored in their values. Be very clear about what they are. Get anchored in their values. Make sure intention and impact are aligned. And create teams where people are accountable for their anchoring in their values and accountable for the gap between intention and impact. I think we need anchored, aligned and accountable cultures. Because we went back and forth a lot, right, on safe spaces. And just about why safe spaces don't work, why brave spaces don't work, why psychological safety could work better. And it's hard to create equity into a room when you're not acknowledging where power sits, right? And power isn't just about your label as you're the CEO of a company. Like there are other ways that power shows up. Even if you're the team that has the largest budget, you have longer tenure. But we also know power shows up just in the systems we navigate in terms of gender, some faith-based. What's your first language? Do you have accent or not? The size of your body? How attractive you're considered to be? Your race? All these things have signposts and impacts in terms of power. So how do you tell somebody that you're going to be psychologically safe here? Because I'm going to invite you to tell the truth because the truth is really important. And we really need it without understanding that the implications of telling the truth is also connected to how much power you're perceived to have. I feel somebody who automatically has a system exercises power over you based on your identity by default. Because obviously, just because you go into the doors of Acne Company, it doesn't mean you're divorced from society, right? All those things are with you. If you're a mom and even if you're at a very high level in organization, it feels different. If you have to leave early to go and do something with your kid or your kid is sick, then it does, if you're a parent who's a male gender, male identifying, and you say, "I have to go take care of something at home." One gets, "Oh, that's so great." Another one is like, "Oh, again." And we know all of these things follow us because we're in a system. So if I don't name it and I don't say, "Hey Beth, I noticed X, Y, and Z, I want to hear your voice more." I know that these things may be difficult for you to say because of what the room has made up, but I want to hear your voice and super important. And if you feel like there's a limitation or barrier, let me know we can figure out. Or don't have Beth fix it and say, "Figured out, I'm going to tell the whole room, I want to hear everybody's voice." That means I want to hear Bob's voice, I want to hear Beth's voice. I want to make sure that we are creating the space for that. I mean, it puts a little bit of a warning out in the air of, "We're all here together and this is what I need from all of you." And when you see that being breached, what does accountability look like to hold that space and to keep that fidelity to that commitment that you made? Because you can say it all day, right? But if you're actually not holding yourself and the space accountable, it was a matter that you said it. Because Beth is still going to be ridiculed or not get that promotion because she dared to say X, Y, and Z. So there is accountability for the person who does hold the space, which has a lot to do with power. That may not even be the person in front of the room, right? It may be the person who has the most influence even outside of the room. But making sure that you're naming that you're aware of what the different variables are for folks and vulnerabilities because we know that vulnerabilities are not the same for everyone. And what makes it different? It is in a landscape and other lived experiences, but it's also our identity and where power sits. And we can't ignore it. Yeah, I have to say that I have never seen a company come successfully through a transformation if they're trying to transform from playing not to lose to playing to win. I've never seen a company successfully do that without honest conversations about power. And the CEOs who are fearless about doing that are the ones who are putting winning ahead of discomfort. You know, privileging comfort over winning is not going to work in this environment. I mean, I just have to go back to this because I'm such a space girl. But if you look at Artemis and you look at those pictures, like I put up on LinkedIn, a picture of them hugging and said, we're crying and cheering because this is what it looks like when smart kind people from different lived experiences come together to face challenges together. We need every voice in the room. We need every different lived experience in the room. And so I don't think without a conversation about power and identity, that happens. That's right. That's right. And it works in so many ways, like we have mutual colleagues who are running huge companies. And we know people who are women over huge companies. And even that part about them being able to own and say, hey, there's some spaces that are going to be barriers against me because I'm a woman in this field. And for them to say that, what does that mean when that person names that? That means that they're not only willing to be vulnerable enough to name what we already know to be true instead of acting like it doesn't exist and doubling down. But you're also inviting and recruiting people to do their part to support your success and to not be able to look away and act like they don't know that this deficit exists not because I'm any way less but because of what a system is. And that helps them. And you look them dead in the eye that, well, so I want you to know this. So you can't walk around at like, oh, I didn't know. I didn't see that happen. But for me to be able to say, hey, I know it's going to be different for me because I'm maybe the only brown person in the room. I mean the only first-gen person in the room. I'm the only person who doesn't have this or that. And I want to name that. It doesn't mean I'm saying I'm any less but I need you all to know it so that people can't at like they don't know the trap door. This always existing there because sometimes you do need people to be able to step into the fold and into the gap so that whenever that impact happens, they can't say, I didn't know that's what would have happened or there's just so much more vigilant of holding the space. It's not just holding the space and service to you, but holding the space so that it can be the best that it can be. So that it can be impactful. And so that we are all awake at the will. So you can't just walk away and tell you exonerate yourself from accountability because you can say you didn't know. I'm naming it now because I'm naming how I know I'm walking into this room and what could possibly happen so that you're awake and on the will to at the will to. We all need to hold it because we all want to have a certain impact. Running a business shouldn't feel like surviving a software group project. One app for accounting, another for inventory, another for sales, and somehow none of them talk to each other. That's where Odo comes in and all in one business management software that brings every part of your business together. From sales and accounting to inventory and marketing, all in one powerful platform. No messy integrations, no bouncing between tabs and best of all, no spreadsheets. Stop managing software and start managing your business with one unified system. Try for free today at odo.com/box. That's
O-D-O-O dot com slash box. I'm Stand Up comedian John Marcos Sarrazi, and I'm actor penis model Russell Daniels. The downside is our podcast where we bring on guests to talk about how miserable their lives are, because let's face it, things are not getting better. Every episode we talk about what's wrong with our lives, our guest's lives, the world, but in a fun way. The bottom line is you're going to walk away feeling better about your life. We've had so many cool guests Caleb here on. Busy Philips. Stavros Halkias. Laverne Cox. Hassan Piker. Alana Glazer. I promise you're going to have a good time. Now in the Vox Media podcast network. This is the downside. I love the metaphor, the awaken at the wheel. Any web, the futurist who studies AI and technology when we were talking last year, I said, you know, in her future predictions about AI and technology. I mean, this is a person that sells my Southwest. They line up at two o'clock in the morning to get into her session because her futureing and her strategic futureing is so accurate, especially around technology. And I said, what is happening right now? And she said, we have hit a huge, dangerous piece of ice. And what people don't know is that you had that if you weren't raised where there's a lot of ice, you flame on the break and steer out of the ice, which really is deadly with AI and what's coming. Keep your foot off the break. Use the gas and steer into the ice, steer into the slide. And when you say we need everybody's hands on the wheel, everybody awake and accountable. We are steering into the ice right now because of the level of uncertainty and complexity I think in the world. We need everybody there. And without naming what's happening in rooms around power differentials and identity. We are excluding hands on the wheel at a very fraught time. Okay. I have some questions. So I go, gives me her framework. I'm like, oh God. I think this is going to work. And now we're teaching as part of Dear To Lead. So thank you for letting us do that. Thankful that you embraced it. No, it's huge. I got a chance to use it the night that she told it to me with one of my kids. I have two Gen Z kids in their 20s, adulting hard. It's exhausting for me. Because we know how the story ends, right? You know, perspective is a function of experience. But you can't do that. So my therapist tells me. So I had a call from one of my kids who said, I'm in this real dilemma with my roommate. And I'm so pissed off. I don't know what to do. And I was like, and go to line, accountable, and go to line, accountable. And I said this to my roommate, he got really pissed off. But that's not what I meant. And I said, let's go through this new framework. And we spent 20 minutes going through the new framework. And he was like, I don't think I'm taking accountability for how my stuff is landing. I was like, I go with the year, 2026. It's been so helpful for me personally and professionally. Would you agree or disagree? Maybe these are actual questions that we have not rehearsed. We haven't rehearsed anything yet. That your whole framework is driven by curiosity and generosity. Yes. So it actually only works with those components. And a couple of things. I have an assumption. So we're talking about generosity. How do you define generosity? You have a definition. Oh, I have a general. I was like, oh, we, generosity, we always say, it's the assumption of positive intent. So we talk about generosity as part of big. What boundaries need to be in place, to be in my integrity, to make positive assumptions about your behaviors and your actions and your thoughts. So for me, it's the assumption of generosity. Yes. And you have a more specific definition, you use often, which is this idea that people are doing the best that they can. Oh, that one. So one of the things I want to say is that it's a difference in a nuance in saying that I believe that people are doing the best that they can, first of saying I'm assuming good intentions. Yes. I do think, yeah, I'm not feeling like that this week. That's why it didn't come to me. Okay. Yeah. I'm like, fuck people. Yeah. Yeah. Just to be honest with you. But it's not a healthy place to work from. It is the hardest part of my research that confronts me every day is working. They're so good at it. It's irritating. Some days, oh my God, days. But this idea of knowing that believing that people are doing the best they can with what they've got, what they've got in a minute. Yes. And that it's not that they're not capable of doing things better or learning, but to assume that people are doing the best they can. I just want to give you a quick primer on how that came up. I called bullshit on that. I did not believe that people were doing the best they can. I spent a year doing a qualitative study on who believes that and who doesn't. And basically, just from a research perspective, the assholes do not believe people are doing the best they can. And generous, grace giving people believe that people are doing the best they can. And my favorite question actually came from my husband, where I said, do you believe people are doing the best they can? And this is after I came home from a focus group of people in prison who were mostly in recovery who was like, yeah, I think people are doing the best I think I'm doing the best I can with what I got right now. And I was like, do you believe it? And Steve was like, I'm not sure, but my life is better when I assume people are doing the best they can. Yes. Yes. So what? Yes. So I want to say there's a nuance here about why that's different between assuming the best intent. Yes. Say it. So when I am assuming best intent, or you ever go into a meeting and they say like with the norms, what we're going to do is we're going to assume everybody's best intention about everybody. Now there's a power playing that because if someone says something, you know, something really off, like Anna says something that's really off in this front, if I have to default to, I'm assuming, they're best intent. She has the best intention. Now I don't really hold her accountable for what she said. And instead I swallow whatever it is that I notice that impacted me because the first thing I say, wait a minute, I co, let's assume that Anna's doing, she's got the best intentions. She's doing, you know, it's very different from saying she's doing the best she can right now because now I have permission to actually hold her accountable. God. Say it again. And then the curiosity part comes into play because part of holding people accountable, haven't you ever knew when you hear the word accountable? You think, yes, accountability, or when you hear accountable, you think that's scary and about me put on a pit. I'm on the first one. I saw a lot of hits on that second one because accountability sounds scary because the way we do it, an exercise there have been learning, condition to do is it feels punitive. Yeah. There's going to be shaming, et cetera. So accountability can be done with generosity. And that's why those two go together. And with that one, by my just being curious and not assuming best intentions, but my being curious and asking Anna, hey, when you said that, what was it that you met? Tell me a little bit more because I feel like I didn't understand that. By having Anna go back and replay and think about what the hell did I mean when I said that, that's holding her accountable in a way that's really out of curiosity so that she can actually think about it and she's like, oh, okay, well, this is what I think I met. And then I can say, oh, okay, well, this is how it landed because this is what this word means for us, blah, blah, blah, but I understand what you met. So now I get to share with her. I don't say, you know that thing that you say, it was blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, where you're not necessarily assuming best intent, but I also not thinking she's doing best she can right now. I'm not being curious and curiosity actually is a result of reflex care. Because to be really open and curious about something somebody's saying, now I'm a recovering attorney, litigation attorney. So I had to learn to ask questions in a way that weren't a yes or no, because your training don't ask a question that you already know the answer to. For me to be fully open and curious, it feels really different because now I'm listening for connection. Now I'm listening to really know that I don't know what she meant, totally different person from me. And now I'm going to be open to what Anna actually says and I'm like, oh, okay, I get it. And now we're actually in greater connection because I gave a gift of this critical care of curiosity. I say, curiosity is care because you take time to listen right. You have to take a beat. You have to suspend the stories that you're telling yourself. You have to be open. You have to have a degree of emotional agility to be able to do that. Especially in some way I was activated or landed in a certain way. Curiosity is care. And generosity believing somebody's doing the best they can doesn't mean I'm not going to hold them accountable. A lot of times we think with words like empathy and generosity, it means that I can't hold somebody accountable. But they're not mutually exclusive. And the way of how to carry them both so that accountability is not a scary thing. It's actually a thing that we do to grow. I'm getting smarter. And I also
and having greater connection with Anna. And one of the things with Bernet and I, when people are asking about even our friendship and this idea of don't people get it wrong? Sometimes don't they not, but my way of weighing it with some might is are they willing to learn in the moment and listen and give me the care of being curious. And Bernet is probably one of the most curious people I know where she's like, huh, okay, but she's also gonna call bullshit and say, I don't think I agree. Like I don't want you to fold like a folding chair. I want you to actually bring some rigor to it so that I can understand you better. And in that it's not always gonna be roses, right? Because if I understand that somebody has this value that is like the antithesis of mine, I might realize I need to reset boundaries. I'm not just gonna say, oh, we're really curious and she said some shit, she said some stuff that, I'm touching. I mean, I don't even know why you're trying 'cause you're, I'm gonna win that thing. So yeah, I just do, I'm not recognizing you with those language shifts, but give that a head. We're trying to have any more code going on. So I'm trying to have this, but lawyer. So it's really great that understand somebody better and to be in connection versus them having to cover or hide. For me to just feel like I have to take whatever somebody's serving me, but I wanna at least be clear on what are they serving me. And as a story, I'm telling myself, how do we hold this relationship? So yes, the framework presumes generosity and curiosity, which require emotional agility, they require the ability for you to slow down, they require you to be curious about the other person, they require you to self-interrogate. And those aren't things that are easy to do and we're woefully under-skilled at that. You know what, I think is so, yeah, sometimes when I just listen to you talk, I just wanna cry. You're really, you've been really important to me. Yeah. (audience applauds) I get real mad real fast. And you can get real mad real fast too. But I think this idea of curiosity and generosity as acts of care and acts of connection that also don't exist without accountability is kind of the heart of how I experience you as a person. It's how I experience you professionally as a coach and a facilitator and it's the heart of this. I wanna say it one more time, because you and I talk a lot about, we talk about woefully unskilled. One of the things that really came out in strong ground, which I think people struggle with the most right now, not one of the things, is paradox and the ability to hold the tension of seemingly opposite things. But I think when I think you are just like a bull in a paradox China shop, like you're not really care whether people do it well or not, you're like, look, you gotta understand curiosity, generosity or care and care does not exist without accountability. Like think about that for a minute. Like that is, that's hard work. When you think about, when you said woefully underskilled, which I really like that framing, I'll be using that, I'll give you a quarter every time I say it, 'cause it's so nice compared to like, we suck ass at this. (audience laughs) But, woefully underskilled, give me a yes or no, or a way in any way you want, on the following. Self-awareness is that one of the woefully underskilled things that are required? Absolutely. Emotional regulation, absolutely. Nervous system management? Yes. Mindfulness, yes. Anything else that I'm missing? Like these are hard, these are big skills, right? I think in practicing all of those, the ability, they all require the ability to pause. And when you were talking about with Amy Webb and what she was saying, like the, with it, like the more complex we get, the more complex we there is in society, the higher the requirement is for us to pause. And the only way that you can move from reactivity to responsiveness is to have self-awareness. The only way you can have self-awareness is to understand how your body responds to things, which is the nervous system regulation, it's the semantics aspect of it. It is what your breath is telling you. It's where you sweat. It is also then this cognitive part of, who is this person to me? And one of the things I talk about in the book is the different levels of listening. So most people understand like listening to hear. Oh gosh, thank you. Okay, if you're a note taker, warm it up. Like get your pen ready. Is this where you're gonna talk about third? Yes. Okay. This is, this is your book, y'all. You don't need to take this as wild. But we have the channel one, which is like the listening to hear, right? We have channel two, which is listening to understand. But channel three is very different and it's listening for connection. Because what I notice in coaching and facilitation is that, wifly, prep the person to think about, how do you want it to be? Not like the outcome, but how do I want it to be for me and Anna? I want to still be in relationship with Anna. I don't want to hurt her. I want to understand her like this idea of listening for connection. What I notice is that people have a whole different choice of vocabulary words they use when they're thinking about connection. Some things I'm not gonna say to somebody when I'm thinking, or words I'm not gonna use. The eye contact is longer. The pausing is more substantial. 'Cause I'm creating space for that person to enter. I'm no longer centered on me, but I'm centered on that person. Which means everything changes about the energy and the conversation. So when you said the degree of self-awareness, my mindfulness changes, it almost comes in right away. And if you're in a moment where I've got two changed boys where you're not like, ugh. And if I look at them, I'm looking at them like when they were babies or young and I'm that nourishment and that care, I voice everything about how I hold them in the conversation changes. And so this idea of the care that you give people when you're listening for connection changes everything. And I don't think I've ever seen it not shift the way a leader or person shows up or a person talks to their partner or spouse when I say, well, we're going to go to channel three listening. So almost like you see their whole body shift. Now it's not like I have to win. I need to know how I'm gonna respond. They're not gonna get up on me, all the bullshit that I need in the book. And now you're just with that person. And you're being who you really hope to be in your most aspirational form. And that good. I mean, let's just pause. Like yeah. (audience applauding) Okay, so what I've called you before, and I've said, I mean, I have to have this really hard conversation with someone we both know and can we talk about it for a minute? You would say what? How do you want it to be? Yeah, and I was like, I want to freaking win is what happens. I want to win. I want to be understood. I want full disclosure from the other person about their sucking choices. And then you say what? And then I say, how do you want it to be with that person? So it's never really about the issue, right? I can't even start the issue. Anybody's a coach knows it. It's never the issue. It's all these other things and when you go back to, well, how do you want to be? So yes, person, you know, in this, it wouldn't have been applied in this case with the idea of like, how do you want to be as a leader? And if they keep talking about these transactional things, I want to be the best. We want to have the highest production and blah, blah, blah, blah. How do you want to be? So I would say to you, I want to be clear, kind, and I don't need to be liked, but I want to be clear and kind. Yeah, so I would ask you, okay, how do you feel right now as you're talking about it? Just I want you to go to the issue that's at hand, how do you feel when you think about that? I don't want to talk about how I feel. Just tell me what to say. What I will say may be really different from what you're going to say. This is exactly what she does. Is this helpful? Yeah, so I don't want to talk about how I feel. Just could you just, could you text me what to say? And I was like, yeah, let's go on phone right now because what I say is not going to necessarily work. It's not my relationship. I don't care about the relationship, I just need to know what to say. Okay, and I think that you know exactly what to say. But let's walk through it. Why do you think you, I know what to say? Because I have unconditional positive regard for you and I know that you are unconditionally resourceful. (audience laughing) Yeah, that I just start crying. You're like, I don't know, I'm, yeah, so this is really, one of the things I just have to like, you know like when you're in a role play.
And you have to pause it when you're facilitating to tell the room what's happening. Like one of the things that I can't just taught me the most of that's in this book that is I can never unsee and I'm really not good at but I'm working on it is transformation and change requires expansiveness. You changed me with that. And even right now what you're doing is I'm just trying to push you faster. Just tell me what to say that's great. I don't need, I mean my body's like, man, but who cares? Like just can you tell me what to say? Look at her right now. She is not engaging. She's going like this. What are you doing? What's happening? So I do, can we go back to the scenario because I want to, I do want to go back to that and I'll tell you why afterwards. When you think about let's just call this person Beth. This conversation you want to have with Beth. Yeah. And the thing that happened. Yeah. I want you to go back to that. How did you feel in the moment? How when it happened? What I would probably say is pissed off. Okay. Yeah. Pist off and how did it feel? Was your heart beating fast? What was going on? Yeah. I mean, I get like my armpits were tingling. My heart was beating fast. I couldn't swallow. I was getting tunnel vision. Yeah. I know that was hard. I want to just take a beat. And let's think about how do you want to feel when you're with Beth. I don't think I can do this without crying. She's not moved. She's not laughing at my jokes. She's just not, she's like, yeah, she's just, she's not moving. And it's, it's, what's bouncing off of her onto me is I'm not going to do this with you. I'm asking you a question. So how do I want to feel with Beth? Like ideally, like what would be my vision, my pie in the sky? I want to become, I want to be thoughtful. I want to work from a hypothesis of generosity. I want to be generous. But I also need to be clear. And I want to hold someone accountable in a way that facilitates change, not fear. That's probably what I really would like the most. You believe you can do both? I'm not sure. Not right now. So what does it take for you to get to the place where you'd be able to? Honestly, I'm going to need to work out. I'm going to need, I'm going to need to work out. I'm going to need to go walking or pick up all, I'm going to need to sweat and move my body. I'm not going to be able to do it right now. Okay. It's good. You know yourself well. What you need? Yes, I do know myself well. But I'm feeling time pressure to do this right now while I'm mad. And I would ask you about what's the driver behind that time pressure? We will go through that because we do know that one of the things we fall into is false sense of urgency. So I would ask you about what is the driver behind this? This is the hardest stuff you've ever said to me in a friendship. Is my false sense of urgency. I want to get out from underneath these feelings that I'm having right now. So it's driving. I'm telling you what you taught me before I would have said, I don't know, I just need to do it right now because I'm coming out on my skin. I think what I've learned from you is probably first born daughter with undiagnosed anxiety kind of things. And I feel like I'm coming out of my skin and if I do it now, I can be calm again. So you can get that initial relief? Yes, I need some relief. Yes. And it may be at the expense of what? Being aligned in my values. So just this is the reason why we don't fix and we don't jump in because a lot of us when we're jumping in and we're being the fixer is for our own dopamine head. It's not in service to the person in front of us. I mean, was this like a, I mean, like, yeah, yeah, I mean, I got to say that like you are so embodied in this work that it's so scary to sit across from you. When you're in it, I want to make a, I want to talk about Ben and Wes or like her kids or my kid, you know, but like, yeah, this is hard for me. Right. This is, can you tell it's hard for me really? I thank you. That's yeah. So I'm having, I'm having a hard time. So I just want to say, as much as we talk about AI and how fast things go into complexity and it's so complicated blah, blah, blah, the thing that is the hardest is managing this machine here. And I would rather jump into a system and be like, we're going to do this. This is going to be done yesterday. They manage the most complicated system we have on earth. But we want to take about AI and all these other things. But we don't want to learn how to manage and embody ourselves. And most of us live from here to here. And if we actually had to be in our bodies all the time, how different would the world be? But we would be dealing with something that's so much more complex than AI and the strategy and strategy. It's called right. It would be so much more complicated and we're more willing to do that externally than managing this here, which is what we are accountable for. We give up that accountability so that we can just jump on the chapter. That's what it told me to do. That's what my coach told me to do. That's what my mom told me to do. Because guess what? When people tell me what to do and they give me the answers and the fixing, guess who doesn't have to be accountable? It's all right. Because I can be like, they told me. And we're scared. We talk about how it's hard to hold other people accountable. A lot of us don't have the fortitude to hold ourselves accountable. So I'd rather go to chat, GBT or call my coach or not there, or piss or yell at my mom or do whatever. Are the kids or drive me crazy versus managing this right here. So the book, you know, this book is really about self leadership. And we want to read an HBR article or MIT Sloan review to tell me how to be a better leader, but I don't want to live in this body, hold myself accountable for my inner landscape and what happens when I'm in live on a spaces. The most complicated thing to lead is yourself. And it's easier for me to read. I'm going to read what Washington, you know, Wall Street Journal said today about being a leader and doing that. So if it's that easy, we would just do one through three of what HBR tells us to do all the time, right? But the idea, I have to live in this body and hold myself accountable and slow myself down and understand what are my thoughts, what impact is that going to have on the insert spaces I might not have power, it doesn't matter how many credentials you have. Our own and other spaces I do have power and now I'm accountable and I can't say no, I don't have power and now I have to be awake at the will and be responsible for what I'm doing and how I'm impacting people in a room. I can't pass that off. How much scarier is that than saying, oh, hey, I was coming to get us and we've got it. It's a complex world and so we'll, you know, it's easier for me to do that than to manage this. Damn. Yeah. Yeah. I don't, I don't, there's something, have you noticed? Is it just me? But did you notice the slowness? It is so antithetical to the world. Because we're actually the ones who get you, we get to pump the brakes, right? But do we have the mindfulness and presence to be able to pump the brakes? Or is it easier to say, it had to be done yesterday versus asking, oh, what's the driver for that? Does it really have to be, what would we, what would the trade off be? It's easier to be in the frenzy of X, Y, Z. We like to feel I, my worth is based on how much I produce, how quickly I produce it and I make that, give the answer into all these other things versus was it take to pump the brakes and knowing that we're all the metronome for our own system. And if you're leading team, you're the metronome for that team and you give people permission to slow down. With my kids, I'm the one who gets to show up and be slower so they can slow down and give them that permission. But many of us don't self-regulate and take accountability for that. And instead, we go get on the program, this NPC program of kind of do it, kind of a little bit more without asking the questions or creating any type of friction or rigor in a system. Or even imagining what would that be like if I did. It's interesting. We took your framework of anchored aligned and accountable, and not only are we trying to do it individually in our organization, but we're trying to build what we're calling an above the line anchored aligned and accountable organization. So not just at a micro level, but at a macro level. And the productive challenge.
Either for me or people on my team around tell me about the urgency is is fundamentally Creating breakdowns that we're having a hard time recovering from We have built such a mental model You know, and a mental model is not only how you see the world But how you assess your value in the world and at work We have built such a mental model around urgency. I have built. I mean, I'm the founder, right? So I have built I have built and then surrounded myself with like-minded people who have helped me build a mental model of urgency and when I've taken your coaching and done some of my own work around can we take a breath for a minute and Get curious about why we're doing this so quickly People are having to excuse themselves and leave a meeting Like there's a real nervous system reaction to your framework Yeah, yeah, but we're not used to silence one It's really uncomfortable anybody feel like they have to feel in the silence every time it gets quiet Like I got to jump in there. So we're not used to silence Not used to pauses We're not used to somebody actually asking us something and waiting for the answer and being really curious about why X Y Z We're not used to that And so our nervous systems there is a requisite of a reset You see there you're gonna try something new and get different results We're gonna stay on the same train and burn out real fast and still be pointing at everybody else about why Or you're going to do have a reset to think about how you want it to be And aspire to that I will say because there's practicality in businesses to you about sometimes things do you have to be done? Yeah at a pace and One of the things I do know about the framework is when you have done the work of being anchored into your values and really Understanding what they are what drives you what are the behaviors actually helps you to make decisions more quickly Oh, I agree it helps you to make our decisions Quicker knowing that hey, this may not be how I wanted to be out love it, but this is how I know it has to be It helps you to understand and be intentional about the compromises you might make because it's really a privilege to be able to Every moment be like I'm in my values and I work at this company I'm still in my values because you do have some trade-offs, but it helps you to understand recognize what they are More quickly and for you to be a negotiate and say I don't like it But I'm gonna do it at this moment for this reason that's conscious if I'm coached to me they're like I can't leave the job So I'm doing this and making this decision and being in the space Even though the friction with who I want to be is here because I need to pay for my insurance for my kids Because I need blah blah blah blah, but that's really different and just staying on a train and being reactive and not taking a beat about why? Because I'm being intentional. I know what my values are this so I'm doing that trade off and this is why I'm Showing up like this right now. I talk about some of the stories and look like I don't I believe in people showing up as they are in the moments when I have not I know exactly why I didn't do it exactly Yeah, I know what the cost is and I've done the calculation, but I know I'm doing it And that's how you live life. This not a life of regrets because you know why you did that You and I together have taken probably thousands of leaders through values exercises and we do the same values exercise And one of the things that you and I talk about a lot that is I think you've helped me see it clear than anyone that I've done that work with because we facilitate together often Is we'll start the values exercise we we know from the research 20 years of data from because we've taken 170,000 people from 45 countries through their data lead we have a ton of data We know that when you're going to work from values having 10 values is not helpful having Around two values is really helpful and we were generous in the in the invasillation you get to pick 10 But then you have to back into two What what two are the places where all the other eight are forged right so from my two values are faith encourage What are your values you want to share just the son loyalty just as in loyalty So one of the things that we're always struck by is how many times in fact it happens most times when we're facilitating this People will say do you want our personal values our professional values And we did an article together recently about the book and can you talk a little bit about your answer when because I said you Why why do you think That's a question and because of the way the derelict is kind of set up we're mostly facilitating with the C suite and their direct reports And there are other facilitators that work across the organization. That's usually where we are So these are people with a ton of experience, you know 25 years 10 year, you know working And I asked you why do you think people ask that question and can you share your answer because I thought it was Really connected to what you're saying right now This idea of we've learned how to bifurcate ourselves right So you're at home Stephanie and then you're at work Stephanie right you put your war paint on about a time you get into the door You're somebody totally different But the reality is you're the same person in the same body and that gap the bigger that gap is between who you Are and show up at work as and at home The more you're going to be in the doldrums and it contributes to the burnout and all these other things But this idea of knowing that you are the same person And giving yourself permission when I get home when I get to work I'm not all of a sudden um Not at home. I go who kind of panic three times when there's a police officer who was driving behind me And I'm wondering what's going to happen next I'm that same person when I get to work and I open I turn on my laptop Right and the idea of giving ourselves not only the reality recognition of that's we're the same person But also giving ourselves grace to make sure that those both those people That one person but both the um identities of at work at home can be folded together And when you have folks who are saying are my values different but about my values at home and at work You know how much contortion that requires and the exhaustion And the acknowledgement that we ask people to do here is knowing what those top two are And how they drive how you show up in all spaces Knowing that you're not always going to be able to defer To what your choice would have been but knowing why in this moment I might have to make a different decision I'm the same person and I reconcile I understand why I'm doing this But uh the can you imagine I just want you to think about the pretzel people are contorted into to say I have a Different set of values between when I'm at home and then when I get to work And I can just tell some madly from your experience. You all see that some real bullshit And it's hard And one of the reasons why I asked in Brene earlier about the our scenario was how do you fill in your body your body is not going to lie Oh, I hate that part That's a hard part. Yeah, it's not going to lie And how do you want it to be and the relief people get so if you need some intrinsic motivation of showing up how you want it to be it's the next question for I would have have a Brene Well, what's the delta? What do you require to get to how you want it to be or what's getting in the way you have some reality checks around that What do you mean? So if someone says I don't know why can't why can't I do both I mean if I say why can't you show up like that with Beth now? And it takes forever because sometimes it's not that I don't know but I'm scared to say it Hmm because what if I do tell Beth and then she says this to me like the idea of possibility of hurt or rejection What if she goes and tells everybody what if globalized is all the things that get in the way of us being courageous leaders because it's not the fear It's the armor like all the what ifs But once somebody has named it now is there Can't change what you're not aware of But once I realize what the barrier is Like oh man, what do I have to do about and I'm unwilling to do it Once I realized what the castle and sky looks like how I want it to be with Beth How I want to feel I don't want to feel pissed off my shoulders are tight and blah blah. I don't want that How do I want to feel I had an idea of how I want it to feel so now I'll know it when I get to that place But I also can name what is getting in the way And most of us how do we jump right into this is what you need to do one two and three But not actually bringing the person back into what their solve is What their intrinsic motivation is because the answer I'll give the Bernay would have been like or shit right Because it would have been my fix and my thing and I would have felt great and walked off But you would have still been sitting with it, but you have now idea of this and how I want it to be And you realize for me to be able to get there I need to do this other thing because you know yourself well enough, but a lot of people don't know I need to work out I need to do this they don't know it So now we need to walk through that And all these gaps in how we don't know how to lead ourselves But we expect to read an article and to get it Or to call our friend and for them to fix it or for us to call our parent and ask them Or to ask chat GPT But we're the ones in this In this body and our account before it and have to live in it
But we want the shortcuts. Yeah. You're not good at the shortcut. I got to tell you. No. You are the long way around, which I-- Yeah. Like, you are the direct path into what's real. And I just-- we're out of time, can you believe it? I was going to take-- I was going to have ourselves some more of my problems. But is she amazing? [APPLAUSE] Let's give it up for ICO. Let's do it. Let's give it up. Stand, you know. [APPLAUSE] Yeah. Also, if you need a coach, don't call or she busy. [LAUGHTER] Thank y'all. [MUSIC PLAYING] Thank y'all for listening. I hope you took something out of this that was meaningful for you. Again, just blown away by ICO's coaching minds that her abilities to be present, to listen for connection, just a real mentor for me. We'll be back next week with a brand new episode. We have Fun Things planned, and we're grateful for you joining us. The Curiosity Shop is produced by Brane Brown, Education and Research Group, and Granted Productions. You can subscribe to the Curiosity Shop on YouTube or follow in your favorite podcast app. We're part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Discover more award-winning shows at podcast.voxmedia.com. Running a business shouldn't feel like surviving a software group project, one app for accounting, another for inventory, another for sales, and somehow, none of them talk to each other. That's where Odo comes in, and all in one business management software that brings every part of your business together, from sales and accounting to inventory and marketing, all in one powerful platform. No messy integrations, no bouncing between tabs, and best of all, no spreadsheets. Try for free today at odu.com/vox. That's oduo.com/vox.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The episode features a conversation with ICO BATHEA, a senior leadership coach, about her new book "Anchored, Aligned, and Accountable" and her framework for self-leadership.
The framework emphasizes anchoring in values, aligning intention with impact, and building accountable cultures, especially in complex environments.
Psychological safety cannot be achieved without addressing power dynamics and identity, as power varies based on factors like race, gender, and tenure.
The discussion includes a real-time role play on leadership conflict and explores the practice of three levels of listening.
The hosts highlight the importance of naming power imbalances and vulnerabilities to create equitable spaces where all voices are heard.
The episode concludes with a transition to upcoming content, including a podcast on love and laughter with Roger Bennett.
Summary:
" The conversation begins with the host recounting a powerful live interview where ICO coached her through a leadership conflict, leaving the audience deeply moved. ICO’s framework focuses on self-leadership as critical in today's complex world, emphasizing the need to be anchored in personal values, aligned in actions, and accountable for the gap between intention and impact. A key theme is the challenge of building psychological safety in organizations without addressing power and identity.
ICO argues that true psychological safety requires acknowledging how factors like race, gender, and tenure create uneven power dynamics, which affect vulnerability and truth-telling. She advocates for leaders to name these disparities and hold spaces accountable to ensure all voices are included. The host reflects on how ICO’s approach has been integrated into their "Dare to Lead" work globally, helping organizations transform by prioritizing winning over comfort through honest conversations about power.
The episode also touches on the importance of attribution and learning from diverse scholars. It ends with a teaser for future content, including a podcast with Roger Bennett. Overall, the discussion offers a practical path to building trust and connection in leadership, partnerships, and parenting.
FAQs
Ico Bathea is a senior leadership coach and author of 'Anchored, Aligned and Accountable,' a framework focusing on self-leadership through values, alignment, and accountability.
The practice involves listening at different depths—to words, emotions, and deeper meaning—to improve connection and understanding in coaching.
She emphasizes addressing power and identity openly, anchoring in values, aligning intention with impact, and holding everyone accountable to create equitable spaces.
Assuming positive intent focuses on motives, while believing people do their best acknowledges context and capacity, both requiring accountability for impact.
Naming power dynamics—like race, gender, or tenure—prevents denial of systemic barriers and invites collective responsibility for creating fair environments.
Leaders should explicitly invite diverse voices, acknowledge potential barriers tied to identity, and hold the space accountable to ensure all contributions are valued.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.