The Basement: Diana Pasulka | Angels, Vatican Archives, and a Government Email

There's something about summer that makes me not want to think about what I'm wearing. I just want to grab something comfortable, throw it on, and go while still looking put together. That's why I keep coming back to quits. They focus on well-made essentials that naturally become the clothes you live in all season long. Their 100% European linen pants and shirts are breathable, easy to throw on, and the summer upgrade you rotation needs, all starting at $34. The teas are soft enough to live in all day, and when those summer nights cool off, the lightweight cotton sweaters are exactly what you want to throw on. It's the super soft cotton modal blend. Lightweight, breathable, I wear it on its own or throw it under something as a base layer. It's my favorite hands down. Quince works directly with ethical factories and cuts out the middleman, so everything is priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands. And it's not just clothing. Quince has become a trusted favorite for everything from home to travel to everyday essentials. Make your summer wardrobe easier. Go to quince.com/thewifiles for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's qunc.com/thewifiles for free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com/thewifiles Today I'm talking with Diana Walsh Pesilka. She's a religious studies professor who spent years and archives most people never see, including the Vatican's. Reading sworn testimony about saints who levitate in front of entire towns. Then the government noticed the research, and she ended up blindfolded in the New Mexico desert, taking for debris at a legit UFO crash site. "It blindfolded and drifted out to the desert with a shovel. Sometimes I miss the old bagids." By the way, this is a woman who won't set foot in a haunted house. The blindfold was fine, apparently. Today we're covering the flying saints through recruitment, and why she believes a new religion is forming around UFOs, with somebody already writing its Bible. Her new book "The Others" just hit the New York Times bestseller list. "The Times list is radio and controlled by big publishing." "And let L.A. She's on it." "Then it's a very prestigious idea." "Congratulations, Pesilka." And her leading candidate for the Antichrist? I didn't see that one coming. "It's a cat, isn't it?" "It's not a cat." "Yeah, it's exactly what a cat would want you to think." Stick around after the episode, I'll pop back in and untangle the conversation. Let's go down to the basement. Did you start your career in, in death? I know that you teach the museum a death in dying sometimes in Brooklyn. Yeah. Okay, so what was it that drew you to death? Death. Yeah, I know. Okay, so I've been studying religion my whole life, and I'm in religious studies, so I just have to explain what that is. So, because a lot of people don't know. They think that if you're studying religion, you're like a minister or a theologian. And I definitely, I went to school with priests and formation, people who are going to be priests and nuns and so forth. So I have that background. But I took an academic track. So I was interested in religion from a perspective of, I just didn't think I was good enough, frankly, to be a theologian. Like, in order to be a theologian, you have to like, kind of walk the walk, right? And I was like, "Oh, I'm not, you know, I'm probably not that good, but I'm really interested in religion." Well, what's it's assumed to three of theologian and the clergy? Yeah, they're the same. So in order to be a clergy, you have to have a theology degree. And so I had the same background as a person who has a theology degree, but I went extra and got a PhD in an academic field. And I'm super happy I did. So I'm in this field called Religious Studies, which looks at religion. I mean, most of the world are religious practitioners. It's really an important thing to know about. And so I study, but not from a belief perspective. So I'm not advocating for any belief. I'm not advocating for belief in Christianity. I'm not advocating for belief in Buddhism. And I don't advocate for people to believe in UFOs. But, you know, that was the second part of my career with studying UFO belief. And so how did I get into death and things like that? So it was, it wasn't really a choice, it just kind of happened. So I was looking at the ways in which my field is looking at technology and religious belief and the interactions that technology has on how people practice their beliefs and, you know, what they believe in. And so, but I was really interested in extraordinary events and how people describe them. So what would that be? That would be like looking at angel contact events in the historical record for Christians. What did they believe or Jewish people? So I started to look at that invariably crossed over into people having near death experiences and things like that because a lot of people who have extraordinary events also have brushes with death or something like that. And so that's how it happened. It was very on accident kind of. And one of my first publications in the first publications when I was a young assistant professor was looking, and by the way, I also spend a lot of time in archives. And archives are old libraries. So archives, so this is for young people out there. Believe it or not, there is non-digitized information. Information that is not on the internet. Information that is, you know, not on your phone. That chat's GPT doesn't know about. And this is all contained in archives. So I spent a lot of time, like years and years, in archives, old archives, Vatican archives, archives all over the place. And these, you know, we're talking about like manuscripts and books and even stones that have picked, picked a grip, black weight. Like, like petroglyphs? Yeah, yeah, thank you. Yeah, pictograms, petroglyphs, right. So I've, I've seen Aztec petroglyphs, yeah. And so you, so your, so it's comparative religion? It's everybody. Oh, yeah, yeah, it is. It's comparative religion. And so the first publication that I wrote was about near death experiences of children from the 1800s. And there was, believe it or not, there was a whole genre of writing about children who died and came back and said what they saw. Or just before they died, they were in a state where they could see people who had been dead and then tell the, you know, tell their friends. I was so and so, it was okay. Or, you know, I saw so and so. And this is what they want to say to you and so forth. And so I thought this was really interesting. So that's what really got me into looking at death. And why actually I became, I'm part of the American Academy in religion, which is an international group, or mostly American, but international, of people like me who study religion. And I co-chaired the death session of that for like 10 years. And now it's co-chaired by my, by a former student who's now a professor. So children, death near death experiences is interesting because they're not, they don't have enough time on the earth to be primed for what to see. Yeah. And yet they're seeing the same things that kind of everybody sees. Yeah. Yeah. So, near death experiences are interesting. One of the first recorded near death experiences happened, well, was recorded about 2,500 years ago. And that's with Plato, actually. So in his book, The Republic, he talks about a soldier who dies on the field, you know, the, I guess, the front. And everybody thinks he's dead. And then he comes back to life. And he says, wow, look what I saw when I was dead. And it's really interesting. And so that's, so they've been around for a long time. And they look similar. The patterns are similar. Are you seeing the same patterns in other cultures and religions as well? Yes, you do. You see the same patterns. There are inflections, cultural inflections that are different. But, but for the most part, it looks, uh, it looks pretty consistent. So what you see when a, when a, I know it sounds strange. When a person dies and they come back and talk about it. And it's not strange in this room. Okay. Good. Good. All right. So often what happens is they have like what is called a life review. And in ancient Egypt, there's the same thing. There's this god Osiris. He's looking at, you know, if your soul is not, he weighs your soul. Against the feather. Yeah, exactly. And if it's not, if it's heavy, uh, there's a demon that, you know, so there's always a sense of judgment that you get, um, after a really kind of okay experience of meeting a guide, right? And the guide can be like an aluminist being or it could be if your Christian Jesus or, you know, so there's always that cultural inflection of that helps you frame what you're, what you see. Uh, and then if the person, well, the person has to come back to explain that they went through this, but this was a whole genre of literature for Catholics of the medieval era. And that, you know, European, basically the European continent, right? Where these people are having these experiences and then monks are writing about it and they're called other world journeys. And so I got into the other world journeys. And that was, my first book was about purgatory, which is a, a dogma of the Catholic Church that describes when souls are not good enough to go to heaven, where do they go? It's this place called purgatory. And so purgatory was, I spent a lot of time in archives to write that book, so that was my first book. Why did Catholicism kind of abandon the idea of purgatory? Well, okay, so they haven't technically abandoned purgatory, so that's still a dogma of the church. What happened was that there was a big, like, almost like an internal reformation for Catholics in the 1960s, between 1961 and '65, and this is called Vatican II, and what they did was they determined that a lot of people were falling away from the Catholic church. Why? Right? And they thought it was this emphasis on, well, you know, we tell them when there's, when they die, their soul will go to hell or purgatory. It looks pretty bad, right? And that's not a good look, right? So they reformed how they taught their priests and they taught their priests in seminary to downplay this idea of purgatory. And so in that sense, so when churches in, you know, pre-Vaticant II churches were built with a place where people would pray for the souls in purgatory, though, that's not done now. That devotion is still done by believing Catholics, right? Many Catholics don't know about it, though. No, no, young Catholics aren't. I mean, if they're traditionalist Catholics, by the way, this is a source of contention. Every time I talk about it, Catholics email me and they're very upset and they say, no, we know about this, Diana. What are you talking about? And I'm like, well, you know about it. But like the Catholics that come into my class, those young people, they don't know about purgatory. So it is a thing that they downplayed that for those Catholics. But there's a comeback right now happening with Catholicism. And those ideas that were downplayed in Vatican II are now being embraced by young Catholics. That's funny. So whether it's Vatican II or 367 or Carthage or the Council of Trent, it's all about marketing. Yes, it is. Yes, yeah. How does the idea of purgatory and Catholicism track with Dante's work? By 3 p.m., I'm usually four coffees deep. My heart's doing that weird flutter thing. I'm jittery and somehow I'm still tired. Then an hour later, I crash. And of course, all that caffeine means my sleep that night is garbage. That was basically my routine for years. Caffeine, spike, crash, sleep terribly, wake up tired and start the whole thing over again. So that's when I decided to swap that fourth coffee for an ultra-pouch. I just took one in at my desk and keep working. No jitters, no racing heart, no weird anxious energy. And about 20 minutes later, I'm just focused. Steady, not wire buzzing, just clear. What's great about ultra-pouches is there's no nicotine or caffeine. They're partnered with neuroscientists to build these with clinically proven neutropics. Infinity Px for a cleaner, smoother energy boost than caffeine, LTHNN for calm focus, alpha-GBC for mental clarity, and B6 and B12 to keep things balanced. So you get the lift without another cup of coffee and the crash that comes with it. No more counting how many coffees I've had by lunch. No more negotiating with my own nervous system at 3 p.m. Just one pouch, steady focus, and a sleep score that isn't actively judging me. Ultra is the ultimate guilt-free pouch, delivering instant focus and mental clarity without nicotine or caffeine. New customers can use code basement to get 15% off at TakeUltra.com. That's TakeUltra.com for 15% off with code basement. After you purchase, they'll ask you where you're heard about them. Tell them the basement. Okay, so Dante's describing, so Dante, allegory, right? So he's in the 1200s rights of the divine comedy, which is basically about his journey, his soul. You know, he's in love with this woman named Beatriz, and he's had a pretty terrible life, right? So he's been ostracized, and you know, so he's he's upset. But he writes this beautiful epic poem about his journey that his soul takes through the various levels of the afterlife. So there's the purgatorio, there's heaven, and then there's hell. And I think everyone knows the inferno, but they don't know purgatorio or parodieso. That's right, they don't. That's that's right. And so what happens though during this is he's like, he has a guide. So, you know, it's a classic kind of near-death journey, but like, upgraded, right? Yeah. So it's not a couple pages, and it's also beautiful, but he also describes in depth the punishments of the people in the various places like in hell, the inferno, and it looks brutal, right? And he, in some people that did him wrong in life, you see them there in the poem. So, but it's really beautiful when he gets to, so Virgil, by the way, is his first guide and is a what he calls a good pagan, right? So a pagan being a non-Christian, and he's not allowed to go into heaven. So he has to stop at some point. And then of all people, Beatrice becomes his guide. And when she ascends, it's quite beautiful, actually. And I recommend it as excellent reading. It is. Yeah. And the political commentary is entertaining in it. It is. It is. Yeah. So, but your question was, does he get it right, right? Yeah. So, I mean, that's the thing is we don't know, right? We don't know. But I think that he, you know, he follows the template of the medieval other world journey. And he has all the elements there, right? So, and he, you know, I don't know if he gets it right, but I kind of, there's a part of me that thinks, especially when you get to how he describes the heavens, which bring in like the imagery of the stars in the imagery of space. And I mean, that's pretty cool. And, you know, he's writing, like, so long ago, how could he know those things, like the Imperium? And so forth, he's talking about a center of the universe in space where God, you know, attracts and pretty amazing. It's almost like he read the book of Enoch before he wrote that. So, we know that Plato influenced Catholicism. Was there influence? What about Osiris and the Duat? Is there influence there as well? Gosh, that's a good question. I can't say authoritatively. I don't know. I only one guy knows. Yeah, yeah, right, right, yeah. No, I do not know that. I'm asking more academically, if you see, if you see that. Because I see the connections between when they go from polytheism and to Akhenaten and monotheism and then it dovetails very nicely into the story of Moses and Exodus. There's a throughline there that I think you can follow through history. I was just curious if early Catholics were aware of the Duat and how all that worked. Because you see something? I would assume so. I would assume so, but I can't see. My position is if I don't know it specifically and can give you the evidence for it, but I can tell you off record. Now, yeah, okay, off record, I think so. But let's just say that that's not my academic self saying that because I don't know authoritatively. So everything you're saying today or you're speaking for UNC or the spokesperson out today? No? No, no, no. I'm speaking as a private individual. Fair enough. Okay. Yeah, but I do agree that when I went to seminary and did that training, we didn't learn about Socrates and Plato and their influence. So although it's truly there. You didn't? No. And that's what I think is so amazing was that in a sense, I had one of the best educations you can have in that field, but so many things I learned on my own by reading, you know, theologians that did have that training. So that training kind of got cut off and thank goodness for, I mean, this is the good part of technology, you know, you can learn a lot, right? Today. Just doing your own stuff, right? What was you call it? Like armchair PhD or something like that? And you can definitely do that. And also another thing, though, which I like about the work I do is that I have a lot of friends who know a lot about different things. So if I don't know the answers, like Hebrew Bible information or something like that, I could just go to them and say what does this say in the Hebrew, right? And we can work it out. And that's a part of the reason I went to school, by the way, is so I could have an extended network of people who, because you can't know everything. Right. But you and your friends can know a lot. So when you read Plato, when you read the Republic, and he talked about the immortal spirit, you were just like, wait a minute. Well, you see, I was exposed to that as an undergraduate. And even as a high school kid, right? And so I just read it like they taught me, which was sadly kind of boring, like the boring version of Plato, which by the way is really hard to do because it's so fascinating. Yeah. And so I read it and didn't take a lot away from it. Actually, I just thought it was political. And it wasn't, yeah, it wasn't until after graduate school, actually, that I started to go back. and even after doing really good. UFO research. I started to go back and think what like he was he was talking about the simulation theory. Yes. You know, he was talking about the bad guys. You know, he was talking about so many things that are relevant today. And wow, he was even talking about externalized memory, externalized memory. Where do you talk about that? In fadres. So in fadres, Socrates is having a conversation with fadres and fadres is like these. He's a young guy from Athens. He's like into the newest technology, which is writing. And he's all about it. And he's like, this is going to be cool. This is going to take over, you know, kind of like AI guys today, right? So that's fadres. And so Socrates is like, let's talk about this. And he goes, what are the repercussions of you losing your memory to this technology? That's what he says. I mean, he doesn't use that language. But he's talking about memory. He uses that language. And so he's talking about the externalization of memory and how it's going to change you. It's going to change how you access knowledge. And you're going to lose the capacity to do that. Somebody just asked me recently if Socrates would, in fact, it was a student. It was a graduate student. And she said, I'm asking everybody this question. I want to ask you. And I was like, okay. And she said, what would Socrates think about AI today? And I was like, oh, he would like, he would just die, right? He would, he'd bring him back to life, show him AI. He'd probably die. And she's like, ah, are you sure? And she's kind of disappointed. And I said, yes, because he warned about if we, you know, think about it. Culture was oral, you know, orderly transmitted knowledge. And many cultures today still like indigenous cultures. No way. They're not going to do the writing thing. They're not going to externalize their memory because they have a lot of knowledge. They don't want to mess that up. Okay. So that's going to be something that probably a lot of your viewers won't understand. But I'm going to try to explain it. And that is that, you know, in favoris, what's going on is that Socrates, the reason why he knows so much is because he doesn't know anything. And that's what he said. He says, I don't know anything. But then how does he know things? He knows math. He knows things that we just figured out using technology today. These things called the solids, the platonic solids, the real, right? But they're not in our dimension. And we're using, you know, professors at UC Berkeley are now figuring out how to identify these things and what they are. And like the tetrahedron and so forth. Well, how did he know that, right? How did he know that? He was using his brain and his body in a different way. And he said, writing is going to mess this up. We don't really want to do this. And he called it an amnesis. So it's a form of retrieval, like memory retrieval knowledge. What's the problem with writing? Because it would be corrupted. The oral tradition would corrupt it as well. You would have your own sort of your own leanings would leak into that. So he did have the hope that there was a form of writing which could be helpful. There was a form of technology which could be helpful. This would only be, though, for people who were already in contact with the ability to retrieve knowledge in this way that he's talking about. And there aren't very many people that could do that. No. Because he had to train them, right? They had to be trained. Yeah. So my grad student here, there you go. He's not going to be happy about AI. Don't we sit with every technology, whether it's video games or comic books, any kind of new way of communicating as always? What are the repercussions of this? Yeah. That's absolutely true. I do think that he's right that we can have it. But we just have to have it in a way that's helpful. And I always present to my students when I give this talk to them. Because right now what I find is that young people know what's happening. They're also upset. They're like, "Oh, how could you have given us a world like this?" And I'm like, "Oh, sorry." You know, what do we do now? I lost the train of thought that I was going down. That's okay. We'll pick up the train at some point. That's the Boomer generation. Gen X is fixing it. We're fixing it. I don't know if it's compatible in ancient Egyptian. But what about reincarnation? How does that work with Catholicism? Is it compatible? No. It's not compatible. No, even though there are references in, you can see, Hebrew Bible references and so forth. And even in the New Testament, there are things that are like, "What does that mean?" But for, no, it's not going to be compatible though. With Catholicism is an interpretation of the Bible and, you know, the extra biblical texts and so forth, that went into influencing the early church. So it's not the only Christian religion. There are Christian denominations in which reincarnation is compatible. But those are different interpretations. But for Catholicism, it's not. How do you feel personally in your in comparative studies? Okay, so that's, yeah, so is an academic looking at that. You know, there are a lot of things that the denominations hold as tradition and dogma that when you look at, this is why it's important to make this distinction to students, especially when they come in and they have their tradition, their Jewish or their Christian, you know, you don't want to upset their ideas. But you want it present that, you know, what we have over here is religious studies. We're looking at it historically. You know, some of the things that we get from the Hebrew Bible is that it looks like, you know, it's not monotheistic in the beginning, right? And that, you know, there's an idea of other gods and so forth. But that doesn't have to challenge their faiths and interpretation. They just have to go back and figure it out. Like, what does their faith say about this, right? And I think that's why I was interested in religious studies because I thought all those challenges you can't then for me, it's not okay. Like God gave me a brain, right? I'm supposed to use it. So I'm not going to say, oh, that is not compatible. I'm going to put it over here and not even think about it. But everyone wants to while it creeps in, right? Sure does. And so yeah, so religious studies allows you to think about those things and, you know, deeply. And what I find is that Catholics in the, you know, a lot of Catholics think about those things. Of course they do. Yeah. I mean, when you read some of the stories about about children who come back or children who are remembering past lives, I think most of it is bunk, but some of the stories are really compelling. Have you ever read about like James Lannager and some of those other stories? Yeah. Yeah. I've read so many near death experience stories. Yeah. And as a Catholic, how do you dismiss it? No, no, no. I believe that people have near death experiences. I have students throughout the past life experiences though. Yeah. Okay. So I'm not, I don't know. It seems amazingly compelling, like you say, that, you know, when young children, you know, talk about you know, their lives and you can corroborate that. There's that Virginia University of Virginia archive, right? That is there. I forgot the Navy's archive. So part of me for the folks who do do that work. There's a bunch of people there who do that work. You should have them on by the way. That would be really interesting. Yeah. And they can talk about their archive and all the near death children's near death experiences that they have in that archive and that work that they've done. So there's room in your belief structure to allow for that? Oh, for sure. Yeah. Yeah. So the thing about me is you know, if it's data that you can't explain is data, you can't explain, right? So I'm not going to dismiss it, especially if people are having these experiences. Of course. And since they're so similar. I mean, I don't consider myself very religious, although I'm moving more that way. I think a lot of people are, but I've said very often that, you know, after I die, if Jesus is there, the first thing I'll tell him is thank God, right? Yeah. So I'm open to it. Yeah, for sure. For sure. I like data. Yeah, that's right. That's right. Me too. But as you get, as you get older, you start to become a little more open minded about what comes next. It does happen. Yeah. And how do you feel about that? Do you worry about your mortality? I don't worry about it, but I do feel this way about it. I feel that first of all, I kind of feel like Socrates that, you know, this is where he's, well, he sadly had to kill himself. I'm not going to do that. But you know, Athens wanted him to take him lock. Right. And he chose it. He did because he didn't have to. He didn't have to. Yeah. Yeah. So, but he, this is what he said to his friends who are upset with him. He said, look, I've let a life that I examined and I feel good about. So if I die and there's an afterlife, I'll be hanging out with people I like, right? And he goes, I'll have great conversations with them. If I don't, if there's nothing, then it'll be like the best sleep I've ever had. You're not going to care. Yeah, exactly. So like, why fret about it? But what I do feel is that I am happy that I am alive so that I can do things I think I should do. Like, the things I think I should do, I have kids. I'm going to make sure that they're set up. All right. You know, that's my, I feel that I need to do that. I have students. I feel like I have an obligation to my students to do the best I can for them and to help them Learned the things they need to know and even to help the ones that I'm in direct contact with do well, you know, outside when they're done, right, kind of post graduate. So I have these things that I feel like I should do. And I'm glad I'm alive so I could do that. And you know, maybe I want to be able to, if I'm, if I know when I'm going to die, you know, if I'm like really old and I say, okay, it's going to happen any day now and I feel okay about that, like Socrates, right? Yes. But I don't feel that way yet. So I feel like I'm not, seriously, so, you know, being transparent, I would like to have more time to do, to do as much as I can to, like, to get to the point and not in any way that I'd like selfish, like I want to feel good about what I've done in my life. I mean, that's not really that selfish. The things I want to do aren't like, you know, make a million dollars, make a billion dollars or whatever, you know, that's great for the people who want to do that. But I guess I'm people oriented. Every diet trend has the same thing, readjust your whole life overnight, new meals, new gym schedule, new willpower, you didn't know you needed. Weight loss by hymns does the math differently. One prescription, one app, and a provider who actually just your dose with you. hymns gives you access to an affordable range of FDA-approved GLP1 medications, including the wagovie pill and the wagovie pen, lose up to 20% of your body weight when combined with diet and exercise. Wagovie helps regulate your appetite to eat less, and it's the first GLP1 pill for weight loss. No needles needed. Everything happens online. You talk to a licensed provider who figures out if treatment is right for you. And if it is, your medicationships straight to your door, no insurance needed. Your care team is on call 24/7 through messaging, and the app backs you up with meal plans, fitness videos, recipes, and sleep content. Those changes are unlimited so your plan keeps adjusting as your body does. Ready to reach your goals? Visit hymns.com/thewifiles to get a personalized, affordable plan that gets you. That's h-i-m-s.com/thewifiles. hymns.com/thewifiles. Weight loss by hymns is not available in all 50 states. Wagovie is the registered trademark of Novonordisk AS to get started and learn more, including important safety information. Wagovie clinical study information and restrictions visit hymns.com. Where your new book is going to make a million dollars, congratulations, by the way. Thank you. And your time's been a seller list. Yeah, amazing. I can't believe that. Hasn't been two weeks yet. No, it hasn't. Yeah, I feel really shocked. Do your students know how, like, famous you are? I don't think so. I mean, some of them do, but so I'm not famous, okay. But when they, like, you know, some of them are really happy about what I do, some of them send me notes and say, "Wow, cool. I saw you on this podcast. They're going to say that after this podcast." So my kids love this podcast and, yeah, so that's kind of cool. I do like that. Yeah. And being well known doesn't have to be a bad thing because these are ideas that more people should hear, even if they don't agree with them. Yeah, yeah. I believe that. Yeah. So, you're on an assignment translating Latin and Hollywood calls, and it's the conjuring. That's right. Yeah. What happened there? That was great. I loved that. It happened in 2011, and I'm doing all my normal work, right, just kind of like doing the professor's stuff. And I get a phone call, and by the way, when we to North Carolina, we have movies, it's called like Hollywood East, so we have like big movie studios and so forth. A lot of things get filmed there. And so I get a phone call and one of the people, they got a phone call and they said, "We need someone who does Latin," and I was like, "Latin." I'm like, "My Latin is horrible." I go, "But most likely it's going to be an exorcism movie about exorcism because why I'm sorry if they're going to want somebody helping them with their Latin." Of course. So I said, "Well, I'll go." "Oh, no, actually what I said was we do have a person who does Latin." And I said, "You should talk to her first. She didn't want anything to do with it." She said, "No, I'm not interested. I'm way too busy." And I was like, "Okay, I'll do it." And I go out to the studio, and it's, I don't know, it's actually in Wilmington. Okay. They're filming in Wilmington, and they let me in, and I meet Chad Hayes and Kerry Hayes, and they're the screenwriters, and they bring me back and I see James Wan on set. And the reason I know about him is because my husband really likes his movies, and so I'm like, "James Wan, you know, I don't see him," and then I see some of the famous people that are on set. And they're on Vira, Farmage, and so forth. And I was like, "Okay, this is going to be a cool movie," and they tell me what it's about. And I could help them because they were translating the Latin right, which is an exorcism prayer, which is the exorcism prayer, but they were translating the instructions. They weren't actually translating. Oh. Yeah. So I said, "At least I know this much." Right. So they brought me on to help them, and I had a really fun time doing that, and I still know those guys, and I still work with them. That's funny. Did you consult on other movies? Yeah. I consulted on a bunch of movies. And Netflix? Yeah. I did a series that was nominated for an Emmy, and it's an ambulance series, which is great. And it's about encounters, which is strangely the name of my book. That was an accident. But my book comes out, and then their documentary comes out, and it's about UFOs. And so that was fun to work on. Yeah. So I've been doing that. I'm doing that now. I can't say what I'm doing. I can't. No. But when it does happen, I'll tell you about it. Okay. But it's really exciting. I bet it is. All right. More about death. I want to know about Cosmism and Fedoroth. Fedoroth, right? Okay. That sounded like a wild period of time. Yeah. Okay. So you're talking about a movement in Russia that is called the Russian Cosmist Movement. And the Cosmist Movement was a movement started by Nikolai Fedorov, but also Konstantin Chikoski was part of it. So he's the guy who did the rocket technology for Russia, right? So Fedorov was this guy who is a librarian and really just totally into what he was like his books and thinking about writing science fiction and thinking about getting the next iteration of human beings. They were going to be close to being like angels, basically. They were going to take the place of fallen angels because fallen angels, this is his idea. These are his ideas. And he inspired all of the next generation of rocket technologists, actually. And so it was this belief system that incorporated Christianity because part of the task, so they had a task, a mission, okay? And so he thought that the next iteration of humanity, what we needed to do was not only become space-faring, but we also needed to resurrect all the dead. That all? Yeah, all the dead. That would be the good thing to do. That would be, if we could do that, we must do that. And so it became like a moral imperative. And there are now, there are Russian billionaires who are set on 2040, being the time when we'll be able to do that. And human beings kind of like the singularity, right, when human beings will be immortal. So this was, so Russian, that's Russian Cosmism and it happened between 1880 to the early 20th century. Well, how did Fedorov think that that was going to happen? What would the technology be? Well, he didn't know, actually. Okay. Or else he would have done it. He would have done it. Oh, 100%. He was bent on doing this. How do you resurrect someone who's been dead for a thousand years or two thousand? I mean, how to think about it, though, AJ, like, how do we make it into space, you know? So those kinds of things that we think are like back in the day, they thought the space travel was for nutty people back in the day. Right. I know people thought that they were crazy. And, but now we're doing it, right? Even airplanes, like, they're like, even electricity, you know, all of these things. Now we can do these things. So he thought, and by the way, this is a, this is a really interesting idea. If we can think it, we can do it. Okay. And I realize that a lot of the history of our country and Russia has these people in them who are like thinking on the very edge and they don't doubt that we are going to do this. Okay. And it's kind of interesting because then it looks like it's happening. This is happening. That's happening, right? Obviously, resurrecting the dead isn't happening. But this is what, this was their moral. They believe that this was a moral thing to do. So if we start resurrecting the dead and things start to track, like, first the salonians. I know. Yeah. I don't know. Is that a good thing? Well, I mean, that's the thing. It's like always, you know, who brought up the idea of, it's the Jurassic Park kind of ethical dilemma, right? Should we do it? Well, we could do it. But should we do it? Right. Right. Right. With technology was Mary Shelley. Mm-hmm. Frankenstein in 1800. She was only 18, which she did. that by the way and that was her idea was that is this really a good idea because we could do it like you know Frankenstein is the scientist who basically resurrects takes these bodies puts it together uses a little bit of like techno electricity and boom there's this monster and it's a monster it's not like you know I mean we could call it a good monster or a complicated monster right complicated yeah yeah complicated but you know she's basically putting the ethical dilemma out there yeah she did yeah yeah that I mean I wonder does is better off a contemporary of Jules Verne at that time is that okay Jules Verne is going to be is that 1880s I think it's a it's got to be close I'm just I'm just wondering because because Jules Verne kind of made all saw I mean he was basically hard sci-fi yeah a lot of that stuff has happened I know I know I think so actually so the Russian version of you know because they're because there are a lot that the people who were really intelligent were hanging out with each other yes the Americans and the the Russians you know and they had their communities that they were mutually you know discussing these kinds of things um maybe it's hard to say he I mean if Jules Verne was writing at that point I would have to assume that Fedorov knew sure I mean because everybody did yeah so of course he's going to impress he's into sci-fi right right that's right um see this is how this this is exactly how academics think they're like they're like you know even if they can't like uh you know give the resources evidence they're like this person had to have been influenced by course of course but we can't prove it yeah but they were but they must have been yeah exactly yeah yeah um yeah who is an influenced by Michael Crichton or you know Christopher Nolan everybody knows who they are and their their stories that's right um it's interesting that whether it's Russia or America the rocket scientists are always involved in the esoteric and all these weird things yeah yeah is it accident okay is this an accident so that's a good question uh I was surprised when I found out that this was the case so when I moved from Catholic history into looking at UFOs I decided the first thing I needed to do was look at the space the history the space program so I started to read everything I could and I also realized that I had to read about the Russian space program too because each of those were the viable programs that goddess actually offered right and what I found was that at the basis of those were the scientists who were into the esoteric right um maybe the Christian esoteric on the Russian side and then the cult esoteric on our side um and the thing is is that so I had friends at this point who were in the space force and it were you know it wasn't called the space force then and we're like look if you need to go to the Air Force archive just let me know and I'm like yeah of course I do I do you know CNN LA this and that and he's like I I can get you in there and so they were like yeah I knew a problem you have a friend who's an academic writing about the history of space and what you know at that point I had given a conference I had given some information like a belief system of UFOs and they could google that and find out as soon as they figured that out they were like no she can't come oh really yeah yeah I'm not surprised and there were a lot of things though that so I went over everything I could that was digitized right about the American that they released and their historians were really transparent they were like a lot of this history has to be written by future historians because it's still classified and we can't write it and I was like wow at least they're honest yeah take us to the Vatican archives I mean I still call them the secret archives but I know they're the epic stock archives yeah how many times did you go there um so I went there for two weeks once to the archives yeah the archives and the the library the archives the secret of archives and the observatory archives so how did that all start okay well it was again it's wonderful things often happen truly by accident they do so um I was working I'm working at my university and I work with a sister there uh for Catholic students we kind of do things but she wants to invite the current director of the Vatican observatory which is an observatory owned by the Vatican um to come talk about what they do there the space research and so forth for our students and other people who want to come community members and so forth so she said um can you pick up brother guy he's going to be at the airport and you know I'm always kind of the go-to person to do all these things and I'm like sure in the problem you're the go what you're the airport run yeah yeah so you know for sister you know Rose I'll do that you know sure so I'm like yeah so I'll go I go pick him up and I take him to Father Joe Father Joe has this really beautiful house next to his church which is on the ocean so we take brother guy that I take brother guy there and they they invite us to have some sweet tea we're in in the south so we're on the porch looking at the ocean and just talking about random stuff and it occurs to me to ask him about you know I'm starting this UFO research and it occurs to be to ask him where in the Vatican because I haven't gone yet um I can find some of those books about you know space stuff and so I just ask him oh I'm writing something about you know belief in the rise of UFOs and so forth he knows I'm totally academic so he's like oh all that stuff that comes into that it can actually comes to my archive in the space of his erratory in Castle Gandalfo he goes we have a place you can stay you're welcome to come for as long as you need to and I was like I'll do that yes you'll do that of course so I did that yeah so that but that's the that's different than the archives right the observatory it is but you get downstairs yeah okay so the archive itself it is okay so there's the Vatican archive which in the secret archive and so the secret just means that it's the Pope's archive like he gets to decide like you know all about it and so forth and so um that was cool so it's it is there is a basement area right and there are various places to go um on site at the Vatican and that was definitely an interesting place to be well take us through the day the first day what do orges you walk through the guys with guns the security okay you know about that okay yeah so that was really shocking um so I was really well shocking you didn't think there'd be security there I just didn't I just didn't realize how scary they would look out yeah these aren't Swiss guards no they're not these are actual yeah yeah they're guards who yeah they're like you know they look like an army guys like you know with everything they have these big guns and so forth and these Swiss guards are badass too they just wear fun of you of course those guys are serious yes right so um it just so happened I went there with a person that I knew from the uh he was affiliated with our government working in space force okay and he suggested early on that he come with me because he would be able to identify stuff that might be of interest and since I was doing that research I thought okay that's probably a good idea so I said I didn't think he'd be able to get in all right so I can take you through that first day yes okay so we go on two separate flights okay um the reason is is because I have flight anxiety and I really couldn't get on the first flight yeah yeah yeah yeah I just it's really I do fly all over the place but I have flight anxiety so going to Italy was you know scary for me but I did it and so um but I couldn't get on the first flight so he went out there and I I told him how to like try to get into the okay okay what do you do you just go effort I can't do it like you go home no it's like a struggle I'm telling you call a doctor get some Xanax get on there no that doesn't even help wow I know it's pretty bad it's pretty bad I don't really like to fly either but I mean I'll go if the batting in calls I'm there well yes so I did go so the next day I made it of course okay of course I knew I had to go you have to you know it's it's not like okay it's not so easy all right it's not it's not all right so so he gets there first and he's like doesn't know what to do he can't get in because it's hard to get in you have to have a PhD in Catholic studies or something like that and you have to have a need to know right you have to have legitimate reason to go and get in and for people who don't know you can't just go there and browse like to do a decimal system you need to you need to say this is what I want to see yes way beforehand because it might be something that they have you know there it there are miles and miles of five three miles that's right of archival material so they need to know so they could go find it okay and so so there's all that and so there's the library which sometimes people can get into but this is not that this is not the library this is the archive there are by the way there are books written about how to study at the archive so books written about it I could yeah think you would need that. Yeah, so I read those books and I also got in touch with the authors. And I was like, I'm going here. Things probably have changed and every all the correspondence I had to use Google translate because it was all in Italian. You know, so all right. So anyway, so the person is Tyler, that's a pseudonym. Are we not naming him yet? Because we know who that is. I know, but listen, I can't name him because I in my field, it's an ethical imperative. Fair enough. Okay. I talked about on the show for the people who are upset that can go listen to the show. We talked about it. Okay. So Tyler's going and he's there already. And good things happen in that guy. And you know, and so he meets an insider. He meets the American priest there who's an insider, takes a liking to him and says, I'll help you, whatever you need. I'll help you. And so he's like, well, he can't help him get into the archive, right? So, um, but he can help him with anything else. And, but he does get in. And the reason he gets in. So as I'm traveling on the plane, I'm going, you know, and we're texting back and forth. And he goes, what can I just show them my credentials? Because he's got special credentials, right? You weren't in airplane mode. You're going to crash the plane. No, I wasn't airplane mode, but you can, you can still certain certain plane flights allow you to be like, I'm only teasing you. No, no, no, no, I wouldn't do that. My goodness, I'm on the plane. Okay. So, uh, yeah, so it's Wi-Fi that allows you to text that is, you know, whatever it is. So I'm texting him. And he says that, um, he wants to show his credentials. And I'm thinking, that's a bad idea. Because I, it would be like the Air Force thing. They'll like kick us out, you know, if they know anything about UFOs or anything like that, you know, um, and I said I was there to do research, which I was there to do about these saints that are by locating saints and flying saints and so forth, right? And look at their records and so forth. All right. So, um, so he's trying to get in. And finally, he can't get in. It's like two hours later. And so he, he asked and I said, just show him whatever you need to show them. See, see if it works. Like last stitch effort. And apparently, uh, it worked. Okay. His face came up on their screen and they're like, you're in. And I was like, wow, that's incredible. He knew that he would be able to get in. He was just waiting for me to give him the okay. So, um, so he was in. And then I finally got there, met him and met the father who would take us in. Now, I would not go anywhere in the Vatican without this father because of these guys, these, um, you know, guys with the guns and so forth. Because if you're not, and I'm not looking like I'm a part of the Vatican, mostly they're guys and they're all wearing black, and you know, they look a certain way and I'm not looking like that. And so I'm easily identified. And so there was a point when the father was not near me and the mean guys were like, get out of here. You know, they're going to escort me out and the father comes back and says, no, no, she's with me and they let me go. So, every, all after that, I'm like, I'm was hanging onto it, you know, like following him around. But in the archive, um, he didn't come with me. So I was able to go. I'm a researcher. So, uh, they take you in. They, there's a rickety elevator that's kind of scary or hoping that you don't get, you know, stuck in it and it takes you down. And then there's a bunch of stairs that you go down and then there's a beautiful, beautiful room and you have to ask for what you came for. Right. And they get it and they bring it to you and you have to wear special gloves and you sit down on your own table that kind of looks like this and they'll, they're there to help you with anything you need. Um, and then you sit there and you're with the book, you're with the book, the manuscript or whatever it is. And probably there were about 10 people in there and you're not, you shouldn't talk. Okay. Tyler didn't abide by those rules. Um, he doesn't know. And so, um, he did a bunch of things that I was like, stop doing that. You know, uh, but I'm glad he did actually because there was a lot, there was a lot of information that we got from there. Like what? Okay. So, um, part of what we got was information about the canonization record. So part of it was that we were looking into especially Maria of Agrida. So she, this was a saint in the 1500s. Oh gosh, I hope I got it right. Maria, who? Maria of Agrida. So she's a Spanish. Yeah. So, um, you might have to fact check, um, because I haven't talked about it in a long time. Um, maybe say, I'm sorry, it might be the 1600s. It most likely is. Let us know in the comments. Okay. Okay. So anyway, so she is the lady in blue. And we do know about her in the American Southwest because, in fact, after I came, after I wrote American cosmic in which this is described, um, people from the, uh, tribe that had seen her, right during that time period, you know, calm, they reached out to me and they were like, we want to know about your research, which I thought was really interesting. Um, so she's this woman who was in Spain while the missionaries were here from Spanish missionaries, uh, evangelizing indigenous people in the American Southwest. Um, some of them didn't need to be evangelized because they had already been evangelized. And the missionaries were like, what? Who was here? Right. And they said this lady and they were like, so they had actually, uh, not a photo, obviously, but they had like a drawing of a nun and they showed them the drawing of this lady and they're like, does no younger, but, but she's wearing the same thing. And so that was weird, right? Yeah. And so, uh, you still see their churches to her now here in the American Southwest and so forth and all kinds of things and communities that still, uh, hold during reverence. Um, but she believed that she, I've read her books and her diaries and she believed that she was traveling over the earth and she could see the spinning earth between, uh, under her on the wings of angels and she would come down into the American Southwest and teach these people about Jesus is so forth and then go back. Where did she travel from? She traveled from herself. She's a nun in, uh, Spain. Whoa. Yeah. Yeah. So she flies across the planet. Yeah. She flies across the planet and her, in her diaries, she discusses everything. She discusses the people that she met, one of whom didn't have like sight in one eye and this is corroborated by, uh, this, the Spanish missionary, whose name escapes me at the moment, um, who describes the same guy. Um, anyway, so a lot of people won't believe this story, but the story so fascinating and fascinated me. So I was there to look at her story and strangely, it was in the same area that Tyler had taken me to when we went and looked for UFO debris. And so it didn't occur to me until I was actually there in Nevada, Kin, and then I thought about it and I was like, she was there. She was in that same area and I thought it was a strange coincidence. So I remember looking at Tyler at the time and I said, do you realize that she was, and he just didn't want to talk about it. He was like, he had his face got like, his face got, I'm not talking about that. I bet that whole section has very interesting stories in it. I think so. Yeah. So, um, so there is a book that I don't have, uh, by her, which by the way, I met a person from the CIA who, who has a copy of that book, which is weird if you think about it. Yeah, because how do you get that? In 1979, inflation was running above 13%. And the Fed was pushing interest rates into double digits, trying to bring it under control. In the middle of all that chaos, Silver went from around $6.00 in ounce to nearly 50 in less than a year. That's the last time inflation, a weakening dollar, and heavy industrial demand hit the same metal at once. Back then, it was cars and electronics. Today, it's solar panels, EVs, and AI data centers, all silver hungry, all scaling fast. Layer that on top of $39 trillion in debt, and a Fed that's missed its inflation target five years in a row. All that lines up with the 70s a little too close for comfort. History doesn't repeat exactly, but it's already given us the playbook once. Golden Crest Metals helps everyday investors move part of an IRA or 401K into physical gold and silver, tax and penalty free, or buy directly with cash. No pressure, just a straight conversation about what you're holding. Right now, Golden Crest's free investor kit walks you through it, plus a free portfolio review and up to $25,000 in bonus silver on qualifying purchases. Go to GoldenCrestMetals.com/TheWiFiles or text the word "files" to metals. That's 63825 to receive a free investor kit, a free portfolio review with no obligation or hard sell, and a qualifying purchases up to $25,000 in bonus silver. All that when you go to GoldenCrestMetals.com/TheWiFiles or text the word "files" to metals. I know you have to go to Spain, and you have to get a copy of it. So, I mean, that entails a lot of money, in my opinion. It sounds like it. Yeah, so that's a weird story. In her diary, does she talk about who approaches her to get on? Is there a craft? Is this like a. Merkabah? Yeah, this is really interesting. Yeah, it does sound like Merkabah. So Merkabah would be chariot terminology for those who don't know. These listeners know Ezekiel very well. Okay, okay, good. So, in my opinion, that's what it looks like. You know, she describes the wings of angels carrying her above the earth. So she's kind of like in the stratosphere or somewhere near, you know, the edge of space and the earth's atmosphere. She's flying across, you know, I guess the Atlantic. - Does she, I mean, is this Uriel? Is this Elijah? Does she name who they are? - No, the angel? - Yeah. - No, no. - 'Cause the stories, we see that story a lot. - You know, it's really interesting, that's right. So it tracks with all the stuff that I've read, and that's why I thought it was so interesting. And the, so, you know, I mean, when historians and when people generally in my field work, there are some great analyses of Maria of Agranda out there. But they're never gonna be talking about the paranormal or the kind of extra weird stuff. They see it as kind of like a story to initiate conversions, that's how they see it. Kind of perpetrated by the Catholic Church. I don't really see it that way, because once you get into the actual documents, they just don't, something just doesn't make sense. Now, that doesn't mean that it couldn't be that, 'cause I can't explain why, you know, this kind of thing would happen. But I can say that it tracks with the other world journeys, you know, kind of thing that I study. You were there to see the flying saint. Was that Cupertino? - Yeah, Joseph of Cupertino. - What's his story? - Okay, so, all right. So Joseph is a saint at the same time as kind of they're around the same time period in the 1600s. - I think that's important. - It is important, yeah. - You know, it's almost like the angels are on mission. - Yeah, it does seem like that. - I'm taking people around like, hey, while we're here, let's go check out and see what Joseph is. - Yeah, it's really interesting. So, you know-- - His story's clustered, don't they? - Yeah. - And historically? - Yeah, so there's a great book out there called "They Flew," which is by Carlos Ayer, who's an academic at Yale. - And-- - That's a good archive. - Yeah, so his book talks about the worldview of that time period, of Joseph's time period, but he didn't have access to Joseph's trial record, which I actually strangely have. We got that translated 'cause I don't translate 17th century Latin in Italian, which is what this big archive is made from, is written in. And the first thing you notice, first of all, it's huge. It's like, if you were to print it out, it'd probably be like, the Vatican sent me the printed out one, by the way. And it was like, I don't know, four feet, just-- - What? - Yeah, yeah, it was crazy, I have it. And I also have the digitized version. - Wait, you have the original one? - No, no, not the original one. No, they digitized it, and gave it to me. To translate, to get it translated. And so I had to get a team to do that, 'cause I couldn't do it. And it was a team, 'cause not one person can do that. So it's an incredible document, because it talks about not just his-- First of all, the document itself had-- this is during the time period of his Spanish inquisition. - Yes. - And if you said you saw someone levitate, you were under suspicion. Now, so all these people, though, said, oh, no, he levitate, I saw. And, you know, all, all towns. And so what you see is you see maybe thousands of signatures on this document, the first, like just kind of corroborating that. He did do this and all these people saw it. And not just their signatures, but who they were. - That's really sticking to your neck out to sign that. - Yeah, yeah, it absolutely is. Yeah, yeah. - So he was levitating, what's his story? Why did he levitate? - Okay, so Joseph is an interesting person, because he's described as a person who's not particularly intelligent, okay? So he's, these are the descriptions. He wanted to be a priest, but he couldn't hack it because it was hard, but he became a priest. And how he did that was by pure just determination of wanting to do it. And so after a while, people, the hierarchy were like, he seems to have a vocation to do this. Let's just let him, you know, let's let him in. The problem with him, though, was that he could discern things. And when I say discern things, this is like the Catholic version of, I can read your mind, right? He can discern your soul. And he seemingly could. So if you read through the document, there are so many places where a person will say, I was on my way to church, and I was thinking about this. And when I got there, Father Joseph said this to me, Padre, Joseph said this to me, and that was what was in my mind. And I don't know how he could have known that. - They burned people for that. - Yeah, that's right. So a lot of things happened. By the way, Teresa Avila has some, she's another doctor of the church. She's a sister who, or none, I'm sorry. And she also had levitation experiences. - Didn't they censor her story? I know her story. - There were certain parts of it that they censored, yeah. But I mean, she had people who were her editors. Let's call them editors, not her doctors, right, editors. So they edited certain things, yeah. - What did Joseph say? Why did he levitate? - Okay, so he would levitate when he, certain things would initiate his levitation. They would always be ecstatic. He would go into ecstatic transes. And so those kinds of things would be like, marry the mother of God. - Yeah. - And so he would just, if something initiated this, he went to church and they were seeing a certain, him to her, he would go up into the church. And people would try to hold him down. He would be, he would embarrass the parish priest, you know. So he, the thing is that most of these people did not want to levitate. Even Teresa did not want to levitate. - Of course not. - Because it was like weird, right? You're hanging out and all of a sudden you're like, boom, but you know, going up and doing these things and people would try to hold them down. The strange thing is that, now this is what I find fascinating is that because once you read enough of these accounts, you can actually see recurring patterns that are weird. And one of these is this idea of a private gravity. That's Arthur C. Clark's term, by the way. This idea that, and if, you know who pointed it out to me, this man named Michael Murphy, who's ahead of this institute called the Esland Institute. He was very interested in this information. 'Cause he noticed that people could do these extraordinary things in sports. He was like, how could they do that? That's superhuman. He goes, "Diana, you need to figure this out by looking at the saints." And so, when a person would touch Joseph, they would fly up with him. - Not hanging on. - No, no, they would just fly up with him. - 'Cause they're in his-- - Yeah, they were in a microgravitation universe, of sorts, which is weird. But same thing with Teresa. People would try to hold her down, but they would go up with her. - Why do you think whoever they is, or he has wanted them to levitate? - Okay, so the case that I studied, that's the most recent one where we actually have video and so forth of this would be, I write about it actually in the others called, it's a marion apparition site in a place in Spain, an autonomous region in Spain called Garibondal. It's Sansa Bastion Garibondal. And it's between 1961, I think, in 1964, and these four girls also have these, like, levitation, experiences where they also have this kind of same gravitational, I don't know what you call it, space around them. Okay, so you ask about the intelligence behind it. That's what you're asking. - Yeah. - I don't know. - Speculate. - Okay, speculate. Okay, so what I can ascertain is that, these are happening within, this is my field, so it could happen in Buddhism, and I just don't know about it, could happen in Hinduism, I just don't know about it. - There are stories of Buddhist levitating. - Yeah, so those I don't know about, but I can speak about what the intelligence behind the Catholic cases wants and what they ask for, which is really interesting to me. So they're asking for very ordinary things that people don't do, fasting once a week. Fasting happens to be super good for you, okay? They want you to fast, okay? Why? They also want you to lead a good life, like not be mean, right? Basically do the 10 Commandments, treat, and the other Commandment, treat others like you wanna be treated. Basic stuff, pray, okay? Another thing that you see in every traditional religion, this idea of praying, why? What's up with the same praying? So that's what I started to focus on, was that what is it about these practices that changes the community, changes the human being, and it does change human beings, actually. So there's so much now on the internet about intermittent fasting, and you know what? Well, that's what this Virgin Mary is asking people to do. Intermittent fast for once a week, right? - Well, I mean, if you fast long enough and you're deep in prayer or meditation, then that kind of opens up certain channels in your brain to experience different things. That's right. that's what's going on. So she asked the whole community in the 1960s to do this and they did. They were a community that had no technology. So they had been living in a medieval lifestyle up until the 60s. So they were in the mountains. They hadn't been touched by television and that kind of thing. They were very Catholic. So they were doing rosaries every day and so forth. So when this happened to the girls of their community, they believed. And it was when these girls had these apparitions, all the people would come out. So there were like 300 people. They would all come out and this went on for years. For years? Years. Yeah, years. It wasn't covered by the media. It was. It's very covered. So in Catholic cultures, a lot of Catholics know about Garamondal. And a lot of Catholics believe in it. People do pilgrimages there. The church has not approved it, you know, because it takes a long time for good reason for the church to approve things like this. But it's not against. It just says be discerning if you go there. If you do a pilgrimage there. At what point did you realize reading all these accounts that it sounds a lot like a close encounter? Four knocks. Everybody's heard of it. Supposedly it holds over 400,000 tons of US gold. But the thing is the last full independent audit of that vault happened in 1953. Since then, we've gotten photo ops, supervised walkthroughs, and a whole lot of trust us. Never in the outside auditors. No full inventory count. We're no way for anybody outside government to actually verify what's down there. That's not a conspiracy theory. Nobody's checked. And when the backbone of the world's reserve currency rests on a promise nobody can verify, it's worth asking why your own retirement should rest on paper too. Physical metal in your name doesn't need an audit. You can just hold it. Call golden press metals and get their free investor kit. A walkthrough moving physical gold or silver into an IRA or 401k tax and penalty free or buying directly with cash. You'll also get a free portfolio review. No pressure, no hard sell, just a straight conversation about what you're holding. And right now, golden press running a bonus of the $25,000 in free silver on qualifying purchases. Go to goldencressmetals.com/thewifiles or text the word files to metals. That's 63825 to receive free investor kit, a free portfolio review with no obligation or hard sell and on qualifying purchases of the $25,000 in bonus silver. All that when you go to goldencressmetals.com/thewifiles or text the word files to metals. Yeah, this was shocking. So I'd spent my formative years as, you know, a professor and a grad student and so forth studying these, right? And being really immersed in studying these kinds of events and contact events and so forth. And, you know, most of that work was done in archives. And I wrote my book, published it, it did well, and I got tenure. And so I had being in archives, what I noticed was that there were instances where people back in the day, like 500 years ago, you know, Catholics in France or something, you know, would see aerial phenomena. And they would be shocked, just like people are shocked when they see something and they rule out drone and airplane and that kind of thing and they're like, what's that? And so they had the same experience. And then they would interpret it. They would say, oh, it must be a soul from purgatory. We should pray that soul back in the purgatory, things like that. So I took note of all those things, not knowing what they were thinking. They were strange. And I thought, maybe someday I'll study those, but you know, I had this book to write. And afterwards, after I finished with my book, I was going to be on to writing about this, this really cool priest in the Carolinas named John England in the 1800s. I was going to write about him. And, but I never did. And this is why. So I showed that list to a friend of mine. And, you know, just randomly, we were having coffee and I said, you want to see this list I have. And I showed it to him. And I said, what do you make of all that stuff? And he said, this is like, this looks like Spielberg films. These are UFO events. And I was like, I thought it was crazy. You know, I was like, get out of here. So that week, though, this is how this stuff works. That week, there was a, a, a move on, like a mutual UFO network meeting of experiences in my town or close to my town. So I went to that and I saw people talking about their experiences. And I thought, okay, yep, these definitely sound like that. They do. And that's when that was my first shock. But I still, I didn't believe in UFOs. Okay. So that was my first shock, though. So did you get a move on just with your arms folded, like look, these cooks? No. Okay. No. I went to understand like what was going on. Because something happens to some of these people, not all of them, but some of them. Yeah. Yeah. I wasn't going to discount it, but I wasn't going to be a believer. I, you know, it takes a lot of evidence, right? To make a person a believer in this. So, so that was shocking, though, when I, when I saw the continuity, because the historical continuity was what shocked me. And then I was, I was talking about it at American Academy or religion conferences, right? Of course, they all know about that. Like, they're like, yeah, yeah, that's, that's a good project. Diana, you should do that. Oh, they didn't try to dissuade you? No, no, no, American. No, people who study religion, they're, they think it's cool. Okay. They're used to that. Like, think of what we study. We study angel things. And, you know, like, aren't supposed to happen. So, they thought that it was a good idea. And it within religious studies, it's, it's been done many times, right? What, what made it different, though, was that I started to get correspondence and visits from people who were from aerospace companies and the government. And they were interested in my research. And they were like, we want to see the data that you have. And I thought, why, why do you want to see the data that I have? And so I showed them, you know, and that's when I realized that our government was actually studying this as believers, not as what my position was. Let's take a break there. We'll come back. We'll talk about what the government wanted you for. All right. So before we, we get into your, your recruitment, tell me the story about the bitter sweet. The bitter sweet. Yeah. Where my dad had. Yes. Okay. Wow. Wow. Gosh. You've got like some awesome questions here out of the blue, right? That I would never have anticipated. Okay. So my dad was in the Coast Guard in the 1950s. So he was, you know, high school grad, 18 and listen to the Coast Guard. And so he became the sonar person. Like, he learned how to do sonar. And he was, we just more found out about this by the way, because of Admiral Tim Gallaudet, who is an admiral in the right to Navy. And so he's doing this really interesting work where he's going back through the logs of people in the Navy, like, and people in the Coast Guard, like my dad. And he's basically identifying UFOs in that, you know, or USO's, right? So, you know, UFOs at sea. So this is when I'm a kid. So I'm a kid, and I'm really young. Like, I first hear about it probably when I'm like three or four. And my dad is is an attorney. So first before that, though, he was, I know, it sounds weird. He went to medical school. So he's this educated guy who doesn't. I have friends like that medical school. I know it's crazy. Yeah. So I guess he just, during medical school, he didn't really want to do that, right? So it seems kind of depressing to him. So he came a lawyer. And he's a guy who doesn't speak very much. He's like one of those guys who just doesn't talk that much, right? But when he does say something, you pay attention to it because it's a rare time when dad talks. So I remember growing up, hearing this story probably about three times. And my dad says that he was on the ship he was on. I just learned that he was on two different ships. So the bittersweet is one of the ships that he was on. And I guess it's like a cutter. Okay. And the other one was also a cutter, but I don't remember the name of it. So he's on probably the bittersweet, but I'm not sure. And he's in the waters near like Alaska. And they're looking for probably Russian submarines. Sure. Okay. So he's, they're doing that work. This is a 50s. Yeah. 57 probably around 57. And I didn't know where he sees on radar something giant at the bottom of the ocean coming toward the ship. How big? Big like a football field or something like giant, right? And so he freaks out, right? And as it comes to the ship, he said that a lot of the ships, I guess it was electricity. I'm not sure, but a lot of the ships function stopped working. They just stopped. And the ship couldn't, they, it stopped too. So they had, they, I guess they put like an anchor down or something. And whatever it was made the ship stop. And they were stopped for four hours. And they were horrified. Like they didn't know if they were going to continue on. They thought it was a Russian submarine. But the biggest one they'd ever heard of. Yeah. They couldn't really imagine what it was. So they just assumed it was a Russian, some kind of Russian ship, some, you know, submersive ship. And then it just left. It just went away. And all functions came. back and then they were able to to resume. Now he never said anything like it was a UFO. He never said anything that it was a USO. You know he didn't have that terminology. He just said what he saw. He just gave us the data points, right? And of course we were all like what was that? You know we don't know what that was. And so I remember that as and so then I meet Tim Galadette and I realized that my dad had been one of these people that had seen something at sea. So Tim reached out to me and he said can you tell me about you know about his experience and what ship anything you know. So I so my family knows a lot apparently. So they knew a lot of things like my mother knew where he was stationed and the ship and everything like that. So we gave that all to Tim and now he's looking for it. He's looking for it because there's records of that. That's right. That's he should be able to find it. And didn't like your brothers remember the story and everybody? Everybody remembered the story. Yeah we all remembered it because it's like kind of family lore. Yeah did your dad eventually come around to think it was a USO? No. I don't think so. So my dad died pretty young but he he did have experiences so his father had had a cabin in the Redwoods of California. Oh that's Bigfoot Country. Yeah and so my dad said that there was a big like crevice or something some kind of like you know and my my grandfather would say now okay I'm gonna give you another family lore UFO story right but it doesn't it doesn't start off as a UFO story. So it starts off where my grandfather's he likes to tell stories he's he and my dad are completely different. So my grandfather likes to tell all these stories right and we love to hear them. So he apparently told because I never heard it from my grandfather heard it from my dad. So my my dad told told us that my grandfather used to go hiking in the Redwoods right in Northern California and in that area of the gorge and I can ask my brother by the way so you can you know tell your viewers where it is. He used to see UFOs come out of the mountain right and we were like aha granddad saw UFOs come out of the mountain that's funny right. Okay so that's the story so years later one of my brothers becomes sheriff and then he becomes like a homicide detective and so he's on this homicide and it's in that area okay and so it's it's a minor so there it's a minor who's who they don't know what happened to him he disappeared they said and so the people that said this were minors who were on the river and they had you know how to camp and so they gave a missing report and they said we think you know something bad happened to him so it was up to my brother and his team to go looking for him and to find out what they could find right and so part of the data that they collected was that this guy was on a mission to go get photos of the UFOs that were coming out of the and my brother was like I've heard that somewhere before and then he came and told us he was like look at this and I thought that was a really interesting connection did he ever find anything no no no there was a mission I've heard that story before about these guys that go into the woods and disappear or something happens and it turns out they've from the intelligence community and all of that is not interesting yeah it sounds like an extraction not a missing persons yeah um so you're comparative religious studies and then what you get a call from aerospace yes it was so weird yeah not just from not just from a diff there are a few aerospace quite few people from various of these right and but it's government it's not it lock he doesn't call you not to my knowledge well I guess kind of they did but it's government yeah so it's it's well there are yeah it's different aerospace companies right and so honestly I think that it's really difficult to pinpoint like because the the credentials are so you know what would you call it slippery yeah when you ask them you know what what do you do exactly you know it's slippery so I mean that's just how they presented themselves so they were interested in the data they were interested in the data on angels and they were interested in the data on the aerial phenomena that I had recorded are you recorded well no I'm sorry not in the video oh okay this is old school old school yeah yeah that's right I'm an archivist you know I'm like old school recording this stuff how do they find out about you I think because they must this is what I believe and I and I pretty much have evidence that is true is that there are certain people from who are who are who are tasked to troll the internet for anyone who's doing any kind of research in this area and they want that data so I had been doing really low key American academy religion talks here and there on the rising belief in UFOs and leaking it to kind of historic list compare it to historical contact events with angels guys this sounds like a fun thing to do right and then they saw that and so they were like Diana you know so they reached out to me and they reached out first they just emailed me at my account my university account and you didn't believe the email did you well I wasn't sure my email's got to be weird do they want like do we want to we want to talk to you we want to buy a coffee or is it more aggressive like we want to interview you here at this day well okay so at first it was first you have to understand that as a university professor I would only receive emails from students and faculty and so when you get an aerospace person saying you know and then you're like you do your due diligence and you check them out you're like is this person real and then they look real so you answer them back they were just asking for my written records so they wanted to see the data that I use for some of the publications that I did which by the way those publications are free on academia edu right and they know that yeah yeah okay I guess you're right so they wouldn't know what's not in there yeah they want to know like the what's the data used so I'm happy to give that to them why well because at the beginning I wasn't quite sure why I treated them like an academic so with academics you show your sources okay that's what we do we say I got this information from this source and then that person looks at it says yeah that's a genuine credible source we believe you right so that's what we do we share our sources with each other we don't hide them right so it was really shocking to me when I realized that like they wanted to see this but they were looking at it like it was real what was what year is this first average this was like 2015 2016 before Leslie keen so yeah yeah yeah that's another thing it was my research was parallel to the government disclosure soon disclosure what are we getting I don't know but that was not a thing yet so my research was already well underway and it was on a track that was parallel to the governments whatever they were up to right and so we kind of crossed over and that's when I got the term now was so misused but I got redpilled right on what was going on with the government and it was shocking so I had first been shocked to see the historical continuity between religious events and UFO events and I thought okay seems like something's going on I don't know what but let's do some research here and then to see the government doing it now is like okay and then to see the extent of what was going on was very eye opening so that that was a period of re they call it ontological shock now yes they do yeah so I went through that effort like a year did they communicate with you just through email a woman would you know no I started to meet them and there were a few different types of people like depending on where they worked so this is around so I think it was around two I can't exactly remember the year maybe it was like 2013 2014 where I met Tyler who is a person who's associated with these kinds of this kind of work but worked for the government in various capacities so this is before the email yeah I met him before before well how did he come across you um he came across so he did reach out to me and he learned about me through this is I think as part of his job was he trolled the internet right or he had people who did because he actually probably couldn't and so he figured out who I was reached out to me it took me about a year before I actually met him in person because I wasn't you have to understand just a super conventional boring professor here having this conventional boring life and this kind of stuff with the government weirdered me out I was like, I'm not sure I want to meet anybody like that. - Why did he want to meet? - Because I wasn't quite sure with the motivation for wanting to know all this information was, like why? And they were affiliated with like CIA, FBI, and I didn't really want that in my life, still don't. So yeah, so I just kind of wanted to keep to my lane. I was in my lane and I didn't really want to come out of it. I intruded danger. - I think it may be correctly. So he said, what do you, let's get coffee or. - Okay, so he wanted to me, invited me to Cape Canaveral a couple times, you know, to see a rocket launch and stuff like that. But I declined to go. Okay, even though it sounded cool, right? And then. - I mean, that's an approach is, come down to your rocket launch. - Yeah. - I'm a cool guy. It's all good. - Yeah, exactly, exactly. Yeah, no, I didn't go for it. So what happened was that when I did finally meet him, it was, I bring up the American Academy of Religion a lot. I hope that they're okay with that. But this is like a meeting. So I would attend these meetings every year. And this one was in Georgia, Atlanta, and he lived near there. And so I said, look, if you happen to be around, I'm gonna be at this conference, maybe we could have coffee. And then he said, yes, I'm gonna be there. And so I thought, oh, I better tell my friend, Jeff, that I need to meet him with Jeff. Like I didn't want to meet him by myself. - Good call. - Because I wanted somebody else to like, get a read on him, right? Is this Jeffrey Criple? - Yes. - Okay. - So we did, we met. And it was a really funny meeting too, because it was the American Academy of Religion. There's a bunch of religious studies people. They're all kind of like, they're similar. It's kind of like a conference for sci-fi people. Or we have our thing. So you can identify them, but there's many of them. There's like 6,000 of them there. And we couldn't find a place to eat. And so he said, well, I'm at this fancy hotel. And why don't you come and I'll buy you lunch, right? And so he just called and got us a place. And so Jeff was like, wow, that's kind of out of my price range kind of thing for me too. And he's like, no, I got the, I'll cover it. Yeah. And so immediately Jeff liked him. And I was like, come on, Jeff, keep up the, you know, you got to, you got to be suspicious here, right? We don't know about this guy. He's kind of nice. He's charming. Oh, he was taking in by him. Yeah. So that was the first meeting. I picture like an empty red strut like, oh, I bought out the whole place for us. It's just us here. It was kind of like that. And that's when I first realized that he was wearing all kinds of like surveillance devices. Like he was wearing stuff on him that took video. And he said, and he said that to us too. So as we were done with lunch, we had a great lunch. We were going back to the conference. Wait, what is he wearing? Like a body clothes. I don't know, all kinds of stuff. You could even tell, though. And he said, anyway, we were walking across the street. It was really windy. And he kind of grabbed part, you know, like where maybe one of these devices was. And he's like, oh, well, I'm all decked out with this, you know, this video and stuff. And I'm thinking-- [NON-ENGLISH SPEECH] I took notice of that. Like, I think that's weird, right? I have to-- He didn't mention that during the lunch. Like, yeah, I'm recording all of this. He probably was. Like, he seemed to record everything. No, he was. And yeah, I know. All right. So he was, yeah. Oh, he should disclose that. I don't like that. I think so. Yeah. But well, he did, right? Get with the wind. No, I don't. I know. So I told Jeff that as we were walking out. And that, you know, he went his way and we went ours. And I said, Jeff, like, didn't you hear what he said? And he was like, no, what do you say? He's really nice. We should invite him to this conference. And I'm like, oh, maybe he'll take us out for dinner. Is that when Tyler invited you to go to the desert? Yeah, so there was a kind of like this standing invitation to the desert, which again took me a long time to say yes to. What did he say was out there? OK, so he was-- he noticed that the way I studied this topic was not from a belief perspective. That's why you're interesting. Yeah. And so he wanted me to be a believer. And so he said, and I believe people were having these experiences, isn't that enough? No. He wanted to show me physical proof, right? And of course, at this point, I had read all of Jacques Velay's work. I know Jacques. You know, I was all-- and he was so helpful to me. He was like, don't believe anything, Diana. You know, he was telling me this all the time. He's like, people will show you a body. Do not believe it, right? Jacques? So early on, like 2012. And so I had the Jacques Velay kind of framework going into this. And so I was like, he's going to show me something, but no way am I going to believe it, right? But I'll go out. But I'll only go out with someone. I'm not going out on my own, right? Seems kind of creepier, really. You know, like he wanted me to wear-- like this is a legitimate place that he was talking about. He-- this-- a place that he excavated, right? With people over many, many, many years. And it was-- this is what he told me about it. He said it was-- and I believe that this is the place that Jacques talks about in Trinity, because it was after he met him and went out there that he wrote Trinity. But I don't know. I don't know for sure, OK? Because a lot, of course, a lot is being said about the place and so forth. Yes. And also, I got information from various people that said, yeah, just don't talk about that, please. But how can I not? I wrote about it just in my book. So, yeah, so he did take us out to this place that he said was a crash retrieval-- you know, UFOs crashed there in the 1940s. Hold on a second. Oh, OK, sorry. See, do you get on the plane and where you landed in Albuquerque? Yeah. And when-- when does he say we're going to blindfold you? OK, so he described the whole process to me. And I decided to bring Gary Nolan with me. At the time, Gary, his name was James. He since come out as himself. But you invited Jeff and said, no. No, I invited Jeff, yeah. But it was outside of his comfort zone. Well, yeah, I mean, I've read that you won't go into a haunted house, but you'll be blindfolded by a government official to go out into the desert. Your line is weird, man. Yeah, that's right. Well, I didn't think anything was haunted out there. Oh, you can't blindfold me? We'll be blindfolded. That's crazy. I didn't think it was that weird. Did he at least give you a heads up or is this like another recording thing? Like, oh, when we get there, you're going to have to persecutority. Oh, no, he gave us a heads up. OK, so it wasn't like a surprise. Like, here, put this on. I mean, I had to go through like two years of like getting-- you know, having my getting numb to the weirdness of it, right? So he invited me early on. How persistent was he during those years? Oh, no, he'd just bring it up every once in a while. You know, say, remember, we could go out here. It's, you know, these people have been out there and, you know, we get-- this is-- this will make you believe because you'll see evidence for it. Did he tell you what you'd see yet or just evidence? He said it would be physical material. OK, so-- And I-- I mean, I'm clear in my book. I basically say, I don't believe this, but these two guys believe it. And they're really smart. Yes, they are. So you're out there with Gary. The blindfolds are on. They come off. So you're out in the desert at a crash site. An alleged crash site. And this is all alleged. Yeah, yeah. Because as we were talking about earlier, I was wondering how you don't know if you're not being used by-- Oh, no, I put that in the book. Yes. Because part of what happens to people I see happening now is that they're shown stuff, right? Yes. There's a lot of people and they're shown stuff. Now, they haven't read Jacques Bellet. They haven't read the whole history of Epology. You have to do that before you endeavor on any of this or you will be fooled. Yes. You will be fooled. So I think people hear my story, but they don't read the-- they don't actually read what I say. So I honestly am writing an academic book. And this is for people who are in academia. And I'm talking about this as a rising belief system. But I know that this is a curious rising belief system because there's so much real disinformation in it. So my position is it's all data. Like if he's trying to disinform me, this is also data about this rising belief system. So I had to completely shift. the normal way of doing religious studies. I had to incorporate known unknowns, right? I had to incorporate the idea that I'm being actively targeted for disinformation all the time. And this could be that. But, you know, who do I have? I've got Gary Nolland, and he can figure out if this is real or not. He's going to bring it back to his lab. I've seen a stuff in his lab, I've been to his labs. He's legit. Well, when you're on the site, what do you see on the ground? What do you, I mean? Okay, sure. Is there a UFO under a tarp? Okay, no, no, listen, listen, okay. So, all right, so we, so we, I introduced Gary to Tyler. Tyler takes him to that Air Force place, right? And they have some really amazing things there. And kind of shows him all this stuff that makes Gary recognize that this guy is hardcore. Like, and Gary's like, okay, you know, he's got their scientists there that are better than these scientists, you know, and he's like, okay, what's going on? So he's beginning to see a bigger picture. And so, and Gary would know. He totally would know. Yeah. So then, so good. I'm glad that Gary wants to go and do this with me because he's the right guy to do it. Okay, so we go out there and we take the, we put the blindfolds on and stuff is funny. We make jokes and stuff. And we go for like 40, 45 minutes. We could tell us kind of rocky territory. And once we get there, he's like, okay, you could take your blindfolds off. So we take the blindfolds off and we get out of the car. And by the way, we have to wear like, there were like rattlesnakes out there and so forth. So we have to wear like sunscreen because it's high desert. We have to wear these boots. So we're like, outfit it out. We look pretty ridiculous, right? So we get out there and I look around because it looks kind of familiar to me. And so he notices that and he says, does this look familiar to you? And I was like, well, yeah, it does. And he goes, that's because it was on the one of the seasons of the X-Wiles. And I was like, what? And so that's when it started to make sense to me as a scholar. Because then I was like, all right, this is like real life. You know, this is what this in a lot of ways religion is like this. It starts with kind of like an event that you can't prove, but then it gets reinforced through media. Religion has always been this way. It's been either images you see in church or books or stories. And so I was like, okay, this is ground zero of this new UFO belief, right? And I'm on it right now. And so then what my job was was basically to watch these two scientists who are complete believers. And I, Tyler's a believer. He's not, honestly, I've known it, I knew it for so long. And I got to see parts of his life that were so, you can't make up kind of stuff, you know, like phone calls he'd take and stuff. And I could tell like he's totally a believer. And so is Gary. And so they were both like so we had metal detectors configured for the area. And so we spent like all day looking for this stuff part. There were parts buried under things. And so we got this stuff that to me looked like a frog skin, right? And so a bunch of that stuff. And they put it in bags and they labeled it and everything. And they we were going to take it back with us. You're wondering why it wasn't already collected and taken somewhere. It had been collected. So the thing is is that they couldn't get everything. So when we got out there, what the first thing I noticed was that there was rubble everywhere. And it looked like kind of rusty rubble like red colored. And I didn't know what that was. And Tyler said that this was just disintegrated cans from the 1950s when the government was out there getting everything. And then they wanted to put that down there. So people with metal detectors couldn't go out there and get this stuff. And this was actually something that my editor wanted me to take out. So I described it because my editor, she's from Oxford, right? So he's an editor with Oxford University Press. And she goes that doesn't make sense because this is you're out there in the middle of nowhere. Why would the government put a bunch of cans out there just letting them disintegrate? Is it obvious? Well, I mean, I told her I said, listen, I don't know. But that's what I saw. I saw this rubble. And this was the explanation that Tyler gave to me. So we have to keep that in there as data. And she went with that. She was so wonderful, by the way, because I had a lot of weird things to describe, right? And so she was okay with it. Well, no, she wasn't with everything, but she was like, okay, all right, we could keep it in there. And I'm glad we kept it in there. No, that's, I mean, that's, I think it's important to keep that in there because it shows an act of cover-up. It shows something. I've since had people tell me that it was just something that the government did, but it had nothing to do with UFOs. And that was, you know, I've had other people tell me things about what it was. It doesn't matter, really, because again, from my perspective, from a religious studies perspective, documenting a rise in belief in UFOs, it doesn't matter if it's really what Tyler believed it was or not. What matters is that's how it fit into his narrative. Yes. And that's what I was describing. So the frog skin, did it look strange or did it just look like more pieces of metal? No, it looked strange. It looked like, um, it looked shiny and iridescent. Iridescent? With pebbly stuff on it. I mean, it literally looked like frog skin, you know, a frog that has that kind of skinned, kind of rough pebbly skin. I've talked about this in podcast before and then I've had like, and I've heard that there were endless like discussions with Gary about this. We finally put it to rest on a podcast with Chris. I forgot his last name, but there's a podcast out there that where we meet and discuss it. Maybe Chris Ramsey? No, no, um, he's an air, he's a pilot, ex-pilot. He's in a Portugal now. Okay. So did Gary ask to take the material or did Tyler offer it? All along we knew that Gary would be taking the material to study it. What did Gary find? He found, uh, for that particular material, uh, right now, well, in the beginning, there were stages of what Gary found, okay? So in the very beginning, he found that the isotopic ratios were really crazy. And, and he and Jacques had lots of communication about this and I was privy to that. Some of it at least. And then, uh, later, they were like, uh, like that. When I asked him about they were like, they didn't want to talk about it? I don't know. Let's just say, I don't want to say like, it just was kind of odd. So I just kind of like, okay. Gary is probably obviously available. Certain isotopes won't occur here. Yeah. Uh, and so that's why in the end, like that's why when I talk about it in the book, I, I quote him where he says, this could not have been made in this universe. And I was like, are you sure you want to say that? He's like, yeah. But there's universes on this planet. Um, well, he's, well, he's since said other things about it. So it's ongoing research, I guess. Okay. I'll just put it, I'll let him talk about that because I don't want to have any disagreements or anything. I'm just talking about what I put in the book and what I experienced. That's okay. And if you get some details wrong, just go read the books because they're great anyway. Do we, do we get a, um, um, like a metallurgical analysis of, uh, yeah, yeah, for sure. Well, of course, Tyler already had all this. Yeah. He already knew all of it. Yeah. Well, no, not all of it. So there were certain things that Gary could provide that he did not have the equipment to figure out. Tyler didn't have the equipment. I'm pretty sure that's why he was opening it up like to, like, probably, well, let's just say like other types of scientists and the kind that he was utilizing to figure out what it was. Because maybe they hit a roadblock. I don't know. This is all speculation. Of course it is. Do you remember the, the components? No. If I were a scientist, I would remember, but I am not, I'm not a scientist. So it doesn't stick in my memory. It's interesting that you talk about a belief system. Was it young who said how interesting it is to be a part of an emerging belief system? Yes. Yes. Absolutely. Yeah. Oh, absolutely. A hundred percent. It's not going away. So who are the apostles, the disciples? Who is Pontius Pilate? Who are the Romans in this story? Well, right. So I would say that we all know who the Romans are, right? Who do you think they are? Give me. I don't know. What's what's Rome? The military industrial complex. Rome is the empire. Yeah. Yeah. The empire based on old beliefs. Yeah. They're still, by the way, in order, certain things stuck stuck out to me. And this is in order to answer that question. I noticed that in the rocket launches that Tyler would do, like he's a mission controller, that's one of his jobs. They would use on their rockets, they would put up Roman gods and goddesses, and they would utilize a first century land. And I was like, because you know, I would notice that. And so I asked him once, they said, why are you utilizing land? He didn't even know was Latin. He's like, what? No. He didn't know it. And I said, this is this is not medieval Catholic Latin. This is like, first century Latin. And, and so I wanted to know. Um, so that indicates that's an answer to your question. Well, it is. I mean, if you look at the end of our mission patches. Yeah, yeah. There you go. It's, yeah, it's all Latin and Roman gods and esotericism. Yeah. Yeah, it is. So, who are the disciples? I think that I don't know, but I think that disciples would have to be like the experiencers, people like the experiencers today. That's what makes it a different religion because a different form of religion, because we have different architecture now that we live with and we live within digital architecture. So a person who sees, uh, you know, UFO or something, will video it and they'll put it, they'll upload it onto Instagram or something like that, right? And then, you know, you have all that you have many disciples. You don't just have like 12, you don't just have this many, you have, I don't know, millions. So it's a different kind of belief system. It's a different kind of religion. It is, but it might be compatible with some of the older ones. Oh, there's a continuity. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I know we don't want to get too specific about Tyler. I think you've basically named him over the years, but we're not going to do it today, but I would like to hear about what it's like if you're Tyler trying to go through an airport. How is that different for him than it is for the rest of us? Yeah. So he has, um, abilities, right? So he's conferred these abilities. And one of them is that he just is able to go through airports, uh, because of what he does. I don't, uh, you know, um, okay, I don't know why, but he, he does have that ability. That idea is magical. Yeah. It is. It opened doors. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So, uh, I witnessed this many times and one of which was when we went back from Albuquerque. So we were, we were in New Mexico at the alleged crash site. We did the thing we were supposed to do. We got the stuff. And then he told us what was going to happen. Okay. So he said, um, we're, first off, I did not want this stuff. I was like, you take it, Gary, he's going to take it anyway, but he's like, okay, so he says, I'll put it in my backpack and I'll put it, you know, wrap it up and everything. And so Tyler says it's going to be identified. And the alien metal is going to be identified. And they're going to take apart your backpack and they're going to let you go, but you know, you're just going to have to go through that. And it'll be all right. And so we were like, you know, Gary and I were actually talking like when we were out there, we would kind of confer. And I was like, do you think this is just some information, Gary's stuff like that he's got, it could be, yeah. And he goes, but you know, I'll be able to find out, right? And I'm like, yeah, yeah. Well, okay. So anyway, so the same thing, we're like, is this going to happen? I don't know if it's going to happen. And so we get back to the airport. And he goes to the other side. He gets a glass of water and he sits down and he's just going to hang out there and wait. And so Gary and I are both going through, uh, Gary gets identified. But it's not just your normal kind of, it's like some kind of like thing that goes off like, like a alarm. And so they take him to a room. And apparently they do exactly what he said. They take everything out and ask him what he's doing and where he's coming from. You know, you know, and so I get through, I find Tyler, I sit down and I'm kind of worried about Gary, you know, like nervous. Was Gary nervous? Gary was super nervous. He was super nervous. So we were, I was nervous, Gary was nervous, but Tyler was not nervous. So Gary gets done and he's like really shaken up and he sits down and I like get something to drink. So he gets something to drink and he, he kind of describes the situation. And yeah, so that's that anyway. So yeah, he can get through airports easily. He wants asked, um, where you were concerned if you were the siop. There, I mean, the reason that's interesting to me is Tyler could have just brought that material through and nobody would have, he doesn't get searched. You know, he doesn't go through the, the conveyor belt. That's right. He made Gary do it. Why did he do that? Yeah. Well, let's see. Hmm. You think that, I mean, it could be that. So absolutely, it could be, you didn't see Tyler go through a met up detector. No. He was waiting for you. That's right. That's right. He goes around the other way. So they wanted, he wanted the spectacle. Yes. One of the spectacles. Of course. Of course. Yeah. Yeah. Any idea why the purpose of the spectacle? Well, I mean, it could possibly be that, obviously he wants to raise, you know, he's interested in having people because many times I asked him why are, you know, you know, that I'm writing a book about this. I mean, so many times I said both to him and Gary. And they were like, yeah, you know, Gary's okay with it. And he was okay with it too. And so I was like, okay, you know, they're okay with it. And honestly, I thought maybe 10 people would read the book. I didn't think it was going to correspond with this, but correspond with what the government is doing right now. And so, you know, I, well, that's the thing, AJ, is I wrote the book with recognizing that it's that possibly this is, and I write it in the book. And I say, look, this is possibly miss info. In the first paragraph, I say whatever you read about this is not what it is. Like the first paragraph, I say, what you're going to be subjected to in media is not truly what this phenomenon is, is about because there's so much misinformation. I want to ask you about that. First is the spectacle of, so he goes through the metal detector. We've all done that. We've all been stopped. We've all had our bags looked through. But you said an alarm would off that that was unusual. Yeah. That spectacle to me is, it's suspicious. Of course. It's almost like Tyler saying, I'm going to prove to you that this is weird. You're going to, the metal is going to go off. You know, it's real metal. You're going to hear an alarm. You've never heard before. That's right. You can be taken to a room. You never did that before. And through all of that, it's going to be fine. That's, I mean, that's really selling it. Yeah, but you have to understand that that's what he told me he wanted to do. Yes. Was he wanted to convince me that it was real? Well, that won't convince me that it's real. No, but it convinces you the, the tire is real though. I was already convinced of that. But yeah, you're right. I mean, it's going to convince the people who read the book. Yes. Yeah. But he is real. He is real. Of art, I mean, I know you hate to name names, so I don't want to put you on the spot. But, but you have written that there is an active disinformation campaign. Yeah. Where do you stand on like Richard Dodie? Well, he's, he's transparent about being an active disinformation campaign. No, hold on. Let me, let me, let me push back on that. Okay. He's, he's transparent that he was active. Yeah. And now he's since come around and said, well, most of what I told that it was true. I was just like he, he's, he's been mudding the waters now for 50, 60, 50 years. Yeah. Yeah. We're now he's saying most of it was true and I don't know if we can believe what he says though. That's what I mean. Yeah. Who do we, who do we believe? So do we have any modern Dodies coming out of, I mean, we have a lot of Air Force intelligence guys at Congress. Yeah. Yeah. I think we need to be really so. Okay. Listen, people, you're, are you addressing the folks now? Yeah. Okay. Go for it. I listen. Okay. I've been super clear in my books. You have that disinformation like so is Jacques, by the way. Right? Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. He even calls like one of his books, messengers of deception, right? So, okay. So the thing about the problem with a government backed disclosure is that the problem with it is that first and foremost is that you'll get, so my work is, I always say, is parallel to that development. It was totally autonomous, organically motivated, right? Based on what I saw. And then once I got, once I recognized that, and this was after 2017, the Leslie Cain Ralph Blumenthal. Yes. And it was Haley and Cooper. Once, and I got phone calls from people. My book was not even published yet, but a group of people associated with this disclosure effort really wanted me to give them the names of the two scientists in the book that hasn't been published yet. And I was like, I can't do that. I got, this was something that happened continuously for like three or four weeks. Which book was this? American Cosmic. Oh, okay. It was before it was published. Okay. And no, I'm not going to do that. Okay. So they know about that. No, that's what I'm saying. Like, I started to get this idea. That's, this is all coming down. And so, Alright, see you. So in each of my books I basically say, be careful, look what's happening, but then why work gets appropriated, not just by the disclosure advocates, because I'm not really a disclosure advocate. I believe this is real and it's happening, but the way it's happening with the government, that's not my story, okay, and I'm telling people, be careful, but people don't read the book. They see me on a podcast, and then it gets edited in certain ways, and people are like, oh my goodness, she's a disclosure advocate. And I've also made it pretty clear to the disclosure advocates, many of whom I know, and I'm friendly with, that I'm not going to do that, I'm not going to be a part of that press conference, not going to be a congressional person, I'm not going to do any of that stuff, right? So that's what I'm trying to say here, is that this is good. This is a good time to be able to identify a narrative before it becomes authoritative. That's my position, just exactly what Carl Jung said, but this time we have the millennial generation, we have our generation who's already suspicious. We have the millennial generation, and then we have my kids' generation, right? They don't even pay attention to it, they're like, yeah, whatever, aliens exist. You know, okay, tell me something new, okay, so they're not buying it, so the people who are buying it, they shouldn't, right? But they're going to, but I don't think the majority of people are going to buy it. And so, yeah, it's real, but it's just like Christianity, right? So Christianity is really vibrant and amazing in its incipient form, and then it becomes institutionalized and changes, okay? There's a core that you could get to, but boy, do you have to study to get to it. And boy, do you have to unlearn a lot of stuff in order to get to it, but it's still there, and it's still in some of the institutional forms of it, but it's buried in there. I think the same thing is happening with the UFO narrative that's being spun right now. Because why is it all military stuff? Really? Yeah. So, that was what my second book was about, and that's why in my second book, I went back and talked a lot about indigenous ideas of, you know, basically I went back to the experiencers, and I said, what do they have to say, right? And then what does history have to say? And then I went back to Plato's allegory of the cave, simulation hypothesis, and I was like, okay, it really looks like this is that, and that's what we have to be careful for. Why does simulation hypothesis play into your warning? Because, um. See, the whole, so the coming into contact with a very powerful group of people that are. of which, this new belief system is being advocated, who are advocating for this belief system. When I say very powerful, I'm talking very powerful. So all of the, when I say we're living in a new environment, an architecture, a digital technology that my kids just take for granted, because they've been born into it. You and I know the difference, okay, and even millennials know the difference, okay? So that architecture now is propaganda, everywhere, everywhere. Whether we want, and by the way, American Cosmic was a lot about propaganda, and how we are inundated by this, and whether we like it or not, it's going to influence us. So that's exactly what the allegory of the cave is about, Plato's allegory of the cave. So when I, after American Cosmic was published, there were other people who showed up who were just as like Insider as Tyler, but worked for a different, they were different. And they were, you know, they kind of gave me an insight into the extent of this control. And that was really depressing. I was so depressed. Why? Why is that depressing? You were surprised? Well, I'd always known about it on an abstract level, that we were, you know, we were, like propaganda kind of, you know, taught us about the food groups and, you know, everything pretty much, you know, that was propaganda. And we could get out of it by thinking about it, right? We can just use our critical faculties. No, not anymore. Our critical faculties are even being performed now. They are. You know, seriously, and so just thinking is not a form of resistance anymore. You have got to, so that's when I became there, because it used to be my last kind of holdout. I could teach critical thinking to my kids, to my students, and that will help them in this maze of disinformation that they're going to live in. No, that's not going to be the superpower anymore. Let me, let's use one of your anecdotes to help people understand this more, because we talked about the allegory of the cave. And my audience knows what that is. I think you tend to believe that the public is generally still in the cave, right? This is the rally we're seeing our shadows on the wall. I'm, okay, yeah, okay. So we could use an anecdote, but I want to say that I think that I have hope now, because disclosure day came out, and nobody bought it. Nobody bought it. And that gives me hope that, oh, and also the books that are being sold, the UFO books in that category, William Cooper's Behold the Pale Horse is one of the top ones. And I'm thinking, you know, because that's, you know, that is basically showing you everything, you know, even if he gets something's wrong, like, you know, the spirit of it was right. And so that to me is hope when I see that people are actually, they're not buying the government sponsored books. No, they're not. And they're going for the stuff that's old but good, right? Like the Bill Cooper thing. Now, if the viewers go out and read that, be careful, because there are things that are not entirely, factually correct, but the spirit of it is right. It is. And a lot of his predictions came to ruin. Yeah. He said he was going to be killed by the government and he kind of was, kind of was, but you wanted to go to an anecdote. I did. And it may not, it's your anecdote, it may not be related to the cave, but it's related to being manipulated by propaganda, but not even really being aware of it is a story you told about talking to parents, maybe it was talking to the sisters, kids on their phones who were kind of bullying each other on their phones. Remember that story? Yeah, it's really sad. Please tell it. Yeah. Okay. So, I'm at a conference and it's a conference for Catholic teachers and Catholic people, parents and so forth. So, I'm in high school and, but I want to stare so, okay, so I'm there and all of us professors and so forth. We give our, you know, talks and so forth. And so I gave a rundown of the developmental stages of the brains of kids. And when, if they receive social media via their phones at certain stages, what this does to their brains, okay? And so afterwards, there was a break and some teachers came up to me and they were very unhappy, they were like shell shocked. And so, one of them said, I really need to talk with you, and I was like, okay, you know, so a bunch of teachers kind of surrounded me. And they said, we, we need some help, like we need like, you know, this is a conference where a lot of the talks were actually really intellectual and stuff. That wasn't helpful, that wasn't helpful. And so I kind of broke with that and talked to the teachers and they could, they wanted me to help them, they wanted me to intervene. And they said, we can't do anything because we have students who are, we have a lot of suicidal students because they're being bullied on social media and we try to tell their parents, the parents of the kids who were with the bullies and the parents are on social media too. So they don't even see the problem. Well, you should take away their phones. That's right. And they said, we can't do that. Yeah, they can't take away their phones. So a lot of schools will have, they don't have the policy where, you know, the kids have their phones in the classroom. No good. I think that's terrible. I just can't understand why you would do that. They have their phones 24/7 then, right? Because their parents can't push back because generally they're just trying to make ends meet, you know? So there's no, it's not like I'm blaming anybody. But we definitely need regulation in schools, you know? So yeah, so there was really a sad, that was really sad to see and I don't allow technology in my classroom unless the person needs it for whatever ability they have. And the students, a lot of the students have issues with that like it's really hard for them just to go the 50 minutes or the hour and 15 minutes just that time to kind of like it's hard for them to concentrate. No, they can't do it. I mean, the dopamine turns off so it's like a withdrawal. So it was like, you said, well what do the parents have to say about it and the parent and they said we talk to the parents, they don't understand. They do not understand because they're within the same cave. Right, the millennial parents are in the same cave. Yeah, and they can't get out of it, they can't even help their kids get out of it. So that's kind of what I felt by propaganda is like if you're really studying and looking beyond the mainstream narrative, you might be someone to say, I can't be fooled by propaganda. It's like, you don't know if you are or not. That's right. Because you're in the cave. Yeah, that's right. That's exactly right. And the way that what I showed in American Cosmic and some of my papers are on academia, they're just the straight research that shows this and it's that when we are subject to this stuff, it goes into our brain, it bypasses our critical faculty of discerning whether it's real or not. We can't even tell anymore, by the way. And so it goes into parts of our brain that then we believe it's real. So our body's act as if it's real. For all intent and purposes, it's real to us. Yeah. I have faith in the in in Gen Z. I'm a Gen Z fan. Yeah. Millennials not so much. Let's see, I think it's turning around because you're seeing a lot more people going back to religion. Oh, for sure. Gen Z, yeah. Yeah. And you're seeing younger parents now saying, I'm not letting my kids have a phone in school. That's right. That's right. Didn't you have, um, how about the chess club story is interesting. That's pertinent here. Yeah. Okay. So the young student who came about the chess. Yeah. Okay. This is really, um, very hopeful, um, it's a touching story. Yeah. So, uh, you know, I was really, you know, I get upset about this stuff to tell you the truth. And, um, and I was, you know, thinking, what could I possibly do to like get the kids off their phones? Like, what could I do? And I thought I need to create something like a space for them. So I thought maybe chess, my kids play chess, by the way. And so I was like, I, but that was just a thought I had. A week later, a student shows up, asks if he can meet with me in my office hour and he's not in my major and he said that he had played my daughter in chess and that she had won him. And so she thought, he thought then that her, her, her moms of professor here, she would be the person to create this chess club at the university. And so this is an incredible young student who created the chess club. All the kids came. We had all these, uh, tournaments and they were able to hang out not, they know, by the way, this, this group of students, these young people now, they know there's an issue. They, he specifically said, my generation, we can't even be together and talk to each other. We can't do that. And I want to stop that. And I want to try to stop that. And so he asked me to help him out with that. And I thought it was a weird coincidence that I had just thought to myself, chess. So of course I was all on that. So now, um, we do have this thriving chess club at my university. No phones there, right? Well, if they have phones, they're not using them. Right. They're probably in their pockets. And it fills me with so much hope and like, I will do it 100% like, yeah, so. I think you said if there's a leading candidate for the antichrist to be social media, I did. Yeah. That was in, um, response to Peter Teel's excellent talk on the antichrist. So he's been talking about the antichrist and he's had, you know, you can find this online. So, uh, you can, you know, listen to him talk about it and he's on a road tour. He did a road tour. Yeah. Yeah. That's right. So he's the antichrist guy. It's cool because, you know, he's kind of uplifting that conversation, right? He's bringing some credibility to it. He's a, you know, a smart guy who's talking about this that has been a stigmatized topic. And so of course, I took notice. And so I listened to him. I attended a conference that he, where he gave a talk on the antichrist. And I was thinking, you know, I was really surprised because, you know, he's the found, like, he's founders fund. And he's the guy who funded the social media, the big social media we have. And so it occurred to me that he's missing something really important. And that is that AI super powered social media, but even social social media, without AI, is what is stopping young people from having the capacity to have what we call like this interior life, which is really important because it's actually part of our body, it's part of our physical makeup. All human beings are born with the capacity to have this, this is called a spiritual science, a capacity for this. But we're taking it away. We're making it inaccessible to young people now because when it changes their brain chemistry, so they're no longer taught. And by the way, lots of people are not taught this, but we all have this capacity. That's what religion is for. And so I thought, you know, the anti-Christ in the book of Revelation is actually being, there's the false prophet that actually powers the anti-Christ. Well, it seems like that something that's powering like the anti-Christ would be like this social media because it's eradicating that part of what makes a person spiritual. It's just getting rid of it, right? I think it's doing that physically. It's physically doing that. Physically destroying your brain. Yeah, yeah. I was surprised that he didn't consider that because he was reading the same, I was reading the same books he was reading. I think it's Howard Benson, and I might get his first name wrong, The Lord of the World, which is about the anti-Christ. And so basically his, he's writing in the early 20th century and he's talking about what's going to happen when the end times come. And he basically says, what's going to happen is that we're going to have an infrastructure powered by technology that's going to eradicate the knowledge of the spiritual sense. It's going to just get rid of it. You won't even know you have it. And I'm thinking that's it. Right. And so I wrote a commentary to kind of, and he and I had the same, one of the same professors by the way, which is René Jarrard. So I was not just like, come on, Mr. Teal, you would have known this. So I kind of pointed it out, and just like the first two chapters of the others, where I point out that if I were to say that there's an anti-Christ, I would say that social media is a contender for that, like powered by AI, because it's eradicating the spiritual sense. I tend to agree. There's a few ironies with Peter's talk. I think one of his contenders for the anti-Christ was an over-regulated system and a lack of privacy from the guy who helped found, Palantir, is an interesting irony. So it was like Jarrard's work didn't make it into his talk. It was Jarrard. The one who talked about post-biological. No, no, that's Stephen Dick, who's a NASA, yeah, he was a NASA historian for many, many years, and founder of Astrobiology, one of the founders, co-founder. He's a super amazing intelligent person. Have you spoken to Peter about your disagreement? Okay. Because you've done it a couple of times, haven't you? I've been invited a couple times, I went the one time. So I've met Peter, and I did ask him about that, and I asked him about Jarrard. He's a very intelligent person, and very obviously he's who he is. I, you know, but I did ask him about that. Well, he's a huge fan of Jarrard, but he didn't make it. I haven't read it in his posted talks. I haven't read him draw on Jarrard and the scapegoat mechanism in his anti-Christ talks. He may have, though, he may have integrated that. It just wasn't in the talk that I saw. Okay, well, let's take a quick break, and when we come back, I'd like to talk a little bit more about memetic theory and post-biology, that kind of thing. Yeah, yeah. You're up. Well, let's start. We can start with your questions. You have notes? Oh, wow. Yeah, I do. Okay. All right. Cool. Take it away. Okay. All right. I've got to move this thing up. No. Okay. I'm good. I'm good. Okay. I was very interested in the podcast you did about the man who sees the future. There's a few. It did. So Amadeus Dinock. That's right. That's right. And what really interested me was not just that he could see the future, but that he described the evolution of a spiritual sense. Mm-hmm, so can you say a bit about that about about what about that story sense and what he saw Dinock um, so that story is George Pazas I think comes from Who is a Greek academic? The so the Amadeus Dinox stories not true But George's point was there that mankind is evolving toward a Consciousness sort of a unified consciousness is our next stage of evolution Is what Pazas was getting at is that kind of what you mean? Yeah, but he also said that part of the reason we make it And we don't kill ourselves is because of the development of the spiritual sense right right so which we talked about Before the break. Mm-hmm. We talked about that and how social media could influence that in a negative way yes So what I did when when I was like Horrified by how we're so conditioned by propaganda and so forth Um, I decided that to go back to visionary literature of the Catholic tradition And look at the people who got it right okay who kind of predicted stuff that actually came true Because I thought that would be really interesting and it was quite a journey So this is what the others is mostly about is this journey where this idea of the spiritual sense so your guy right Isn't the only one who describes this so you can see this also in the literature of this priest named Teyar Deschardin and he lived in the early 20th century so he was born I think in 1880 and So he was actually part of the Russian Cosmic scene so he had a front a lot of friends who were Russian and what's really interesting about him is that first he he predicted that our time the early 21st century would be a time when human beings are going to Change in a way that he described he believed in evolution so he was a his work by the way was was suppressed not suppressed But yeah, I mean it was basically the Catholic Church told him not to talk about this stuff So they like he was a paleontologist so they liked his science his his science on you know rocks and stuff like that It's geological work, but they didn't want him to talk about what he thought was gonna happen like his visions of what he thought was gonna happen Wasn't he a daily mass guy? Yeah, he was a completely very without Catholics So he was really Devastating when the Catholic Church told him not not to do this I was gonna ask you that to be admonished by the church must have been devastating for it It was very devastating and he was really upset about it and we could talk about that. Yeah, well I'll talk about it after I say what he was actually what he saw So he was a really devout person and he always had a bins from a child, okay, and what's really interesting about him Well, there's so many things that are interesting about him But one of them is that everything that he wrote about in the early 20th century He believed he saw Through his spiritual sense he believed in this physical sense that he had and he said it was a sense literally like our senses like hearing or sight So you and I can see what's on this table, right? To him his spiritual sense was that obvious and I'd been through a lot of his his work, right? I'd read like everything and what I noticed was that he would use the word astonish Only when he was talking about how he was astonished that other people didn't have the sense So he felt like the sense was was going to evolve he thought it was going to evolve, okay? So what was his vision? So Some people have heard of this thing called the newest fear So the newest fear is something that a lot of people in tech and AI talk about yes, it's it's I mean, it's looks really like the internet and supercharged internet, but this is what he saw So he was he went to the war so he was French and he went to world war one and he worked on the front And he helped people who were being who were injured he helped bring them to the medical person, okay? So his job was to help Get them on the stretcher and then to bring them to well, what he saw during this devastating war Was he said he saw humankind soul all right? Well, what does that mean humankind soul? He said that there was something about the environment of war that was so incredibly charged that Helped him identify like through a spiritual sense humanity's future And he called it the newest fear, okay? He says humankind is evolving toward what he called like this omega point this Newosphere so that's like a sphere of thought where I'll have this a unified thought yeah, okay, yeah, so he saw He saw humanity merge into through their basic cognition like he called it Cerebration and what it was was there's the biosphere right, so this is gonna be above the biosphere and it's going to be a Space that humanity is going to connect with each other Through like a network to mind. It's like a global brain So he was projecting a mass global brain that human beings were going to be a part of and we were going to Share insights share art share entertainment have economic things happen in this fear This is the newest fear. He didn't coin the term by the way or he may have coined it I actually don't know exactly who coined it, but it was it was being utilized by Russian Cosmists and he utilized it too So he described this as the newest fear that people now talk about today It very much looks like when the internet started to happen, you know many years ago I remember looking at it and thinking this really looks like Teyard's idea of the newosphere, you know taking shape And now it really looks like that and so you know especially with AI and AI maybe You know could it be AI even I don't know so that's the thing It's like when you get into these guys who are doing this projection Into the 21st century It's really interesting to kind of parse out What could it be that they're talking about looks very similar to the internet but it looks even more Like um aware self-aware so that could be a form of like AI perhaps or human beings merged with AI I don't know but he he projected that human beings were going to evolve into this and He was Catholic so he believed it would be a Honestly, he believed that it would be apocalyptic He thought it was going to either be really good or or the end of human beings Apocalyptic really just means to reveal what isn't known, right? It is yeah, I'm using it in the sense of not necessarily It literally means to be revealed, yeah But people utilize it today to mean like maybe an apocalyptic event would be like a catastrophic event So it has you know it has that meaning also The teard um believe the newest fear you would retain individuality or is it more toward your analysis of like Children's end where it's not so great. Oh, okay. Yeah, so all right. So the childhood's end is the book by Arthur C. Clark who It looks like was influenced by teard. Yes. In fact, it looks like a lot of people were influenced by teard I know Kurzweil who wrote about the singularity talks about teard as well But secularize is it so you know um he did think teard thought that we would retain our individuality But still be connected Um, he thought it would be he actually thought it would be good right that's but there were occasions in his Discussions where he also thought it could possibly be bad, but it would be our choice It would be our choice. Yeah, it would be our choice But he was a believer. So listen what happened to him. Okay, so he couldn't not write about this. Okay, right So of course he's writing about it and these are circulating through um What do they call the kind of precursor to okay, like mimeograph, you know um and people are reading it and he's influencing lots and lots of people He's like he's a very charismatic thinker and people love him All right, so he's influencing people But the Catholic Church is telling him, you know, stop, right? We we think you're crazy You know what you're talking about makes no sense to us Um, they now like him by the way and they've lifted that ban on him But he did he was under that for a long time. Why didn't the church like it? Um, I think part of it was that they were grappling with how to integrate the idea of evolution Because they're you know, they're they believe that god created everything. So Because this is pre-Vatican 2 or yes. Yeah, it is pre-Vatican 2 but but but come and close No, no, Vatican 2 is in the 1960s, but so he's writing in the earth in the 1920s and 30s So he died to be that's pretty close. Oh, well, he dies in 55 I think okay, and one of the things that's really interesting is that He obeyed the Catholic Church, you know, and he uh He did he didn't his friends said this they said that he used to say If I god if I'm right Take me on resurrection day right take me on the day of resurrection, which is Easter Sunday And he did die on Easter Sunday. He did yeah. Yeah That's why that's why I don't talk about what day I'm gonna do because that always happens. Wasn't your book encounters going to be named Resurrection? But I read that. And you had talked to your editors and changed it. - It could be. It sounds like it's something I would do. I can't remember, though. - It was something I read, I thought it was interesting. So the church now is okay with his theory. - Yeah, because it looks like, you know, something of that sort has happened. - Yes, it does. - We do have a global brain of sorts, right? And it looks like it's just gonna ramp up. Where it's gonna go? That's why I think it's interesting to follow the work of these people. So it's not just him. So he influenced other people who tweaked his ideas a bit, one of whom was Marshall McCluen, who's another guy who talks about the spiritual sense, and credits his spiritual sense with his insights into technology and how technology is gonna change humanity. - Is McCluen the media guy? - Yeah, the media is the message guy. - Oh, so he's a propaganda guy. - Yes, he's a propaganda guy. Yeah, he's fascinating, really interesting work, way ahead of his time. You know, he, well, think how ahead of his time, Tariah is, right? So that's why I say, when you're ahead of your time, you're ahead of your time. No one's gonna know that, right? And so you're gonna be misunderstood and it's a bummer, right? It's a bummer. Boy, I wish that he would know what happened since he died, you know, Tariah. Even McCluen, like McCluen has some amazing things. So these guys, they're Catholic, and they're looking at the 21st century. Each of them has an idea that human beings are going to shift into something completely different. Tariah thinks it's kind of like a singularity type thing, like a global mind, but he sees that as spiritual. He calls it the omega point. And Marshall McCluen doesn't really have that idea, but he definitely thinks that it's, well, he's hopeful, right, being Catholic. But he also is apocalyptic, in the sense that, he could go wrong, you know, but he's hoping that it doesn't go wrong. But he sees it as technology shifting human perception kind of like Socrates said it would, right? So he's soocratic in that way. - That's right, right? Whether it's writing or AI. Technology's always going to change us physically. - Which, it was one of these thinkers talking about technology who said, the principle of our world will certainly be a great electrical engineer. - That's right, yeah. - Forget who it was who said that. It might-- - I don't know. - Was it McCluen? It was one of those guys talking about technology. Talk a little bit about childhoods' hands and why Arthur C. Clarks went the dark way. - Yeah, okay. That's a good way to put it. - Yeah, well, I mean, others is probably your darkest book, I would think. - I think so. - So, I mean, at some point you went from sort of academic documentarian to believer, to now you're a herald. Now you're warning us. - Well, I guess I felt like the other books didn't warn enough because people, you know what I mean? I was like, listen, this is, you know, this is going, this is happening. - This is happening. - Let's pay attention. Yeah, yeah, this is kind of a scary book. I have to admit it. - It is, so Arthur C. Clark went dark. - Yeah, he may have always been dark. I don't know, let's talk about him. - Yeah. - Let's talk about him. Okay, so Arthur C. Clark, brilliant guy, right? One of these, okay, so another person you lived in the early 20th century, once, like, throughout the century, died in the 2000s, I think, like 2007, maybe, anyway, brilliant. - Yeah, yeah. - Yeah. - Thinker, I started out, not just writing about super interested in space travel, okay? So he was part of the British interplanetary, I think, it's called society. - The P.I.S, yeah. - Yeah, and so those guys were interesting. So in order to do this book, I had to go back and read about those guys and this is in the early 20th century when space travel's weird, okay? People think people who are interested in space travel, they think they're weird, okay? So now we just think it's cool. - Yeah, it's pre-sputnik. - I mean, a child who's a pre-sputnik. - Yeah, yeah. So, okay, so Arthur C. Clark is writing about, like, writing about space travel and, you know, he's not doing sci-fi yet. He's kind of just doing writing for people, lay people, like, trying to get them to onboard with everyone, we're gonna have a pretty cool future if we can, like, just get, you know, space-faring and this kind of stuff, right? And what he's doing is, it's almost like a laboratory. Like, he and the other science fiction people, they're not, they begin to write science fiction. They're writing it with the understanding that what they're writing is gonna happen. Like, they're gonna help make it happen. By writing about it, it's really interesting. I didn't know that they were so conscious about what the intentional, right? About what they were doing. So, I start with him there. In my opinion, he's very influenced by Teyard's work of the global brain and the end of humanity in a way, you know? So, he's, so, but he doesn't credit him in child who's end. He does talk about him in his later work. Like, in the 2000s, he actually writes a lot about Teyard, but he doesn't credit him early. So, I can't honestly say that he was influenced by him if he's not crediting him. But, how could he not be? Because, childhood's end is about a net, like an overmind, like a global brain. And, it's being ushered in by these beings, right? That look really curious. - I'm not gonna step on your punch line. I know they're revealed in the story. - But I don't wanna tell people if they haven't read it. - You don't, no one's gonna read it. - You say, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay. - We have to tell 'em because it gets into retro causality, which is so interesting. - It does, it does, yeah. So, Clark was so smart, right? Okay, yeah. - He was so smart. - All right, we'll tell the story. - All right, so we'll start with-- - The premise of childhood's end. - Yes. - Okay, so the premise is that humans are hanging out, right? And then all of a sudden-- - Well, we're fighting with each other. - Did normal things that humans do? - That we do. - Yeah, yeah. And it's in the future, okay? So, is it our time, our time, you know? Maybe, like, you know, Taird was, and Marshall McCleum, well, Marshall McCleum was very clear. We're talking like 21st century, this new human. He called it the Old Three Human. Taird called it the, no, Taird called it the Old Three Human. Marshall McCleum called it the super terrestrial, right? - John Keel called it the ultra terrestrial. - That's right, that's right. And, but what is Clark call it? Okay, Clark calls them humans, but what's gonna happen to them? Okay, so what happens is that all over, you see in the sky, you see like an alien invasion, right? So these ships come around in the sky, and they stay there for a while and freak us out. And people kind of go about their day 'cause, you know, what do you do? You know, they're just there, we can't get rid of them. It's scary. - But they're not doing anything? - And it's intimidating, right? They're basically saying we're here. - Yes. - Intimidating first contact. And then, they're a representative contacts us, but we don't get to see them. They just talk to us and they basically say, we mean you know harm. - Mm-hmm. - All right. - Cool. - Yeah. - We're here to help. - That's right, we're here to help. And of course, people aren't stupid. So there are a lot of people who are like, no way, this is uncool. We don't like these guys. But they're there and they're saying, we're not gonna reveal ourselves for 50 years, right? And people are like, why, you know? And so during that 50 years though, they're utilized, they're there. And they're making people aware that they're gonna help us and they're gonna do these things. And you know, they're gonna bring some wonderful technologies to us that we could utilize. - They eliminate disease, war, poverty, hunger, it's all gone. - And they're very, so Clark makes them very aware and they're smart at using propaganda, right? So they use propaganda and they say it's the best weapon. They say there's better than any kind of bomb. It's better than anything. - Yeah, they said that you don't even need much power. It's how you use it. - You just need a radio. - Just need a radio. - You're just being written in the 50s. - That's right, you just need a radio. - So TV isn't ubiquitous yet, so the radio is the thing. So they're utilizing radio to basically get people used to this. And then they are going to show them. themselves. Okay? And this is interesting, for various reasons that we've talked about so far in this podcast, okay? One of which I'll get to, okay? So what happens is that the main guy, Karellen, right, is going to show himself. And so he announces it, he goes, I'm going to meet you all finally. You know, now you all are ready to meet me. And so millions of people all over the world are ready for this. So they are going to televised it, you know, hundreds of thousand people show up. And then he shows himself. And he says, well, before he does that, he says, I'd like some children to come to me. Right. And so a boy and a girl go, they walk over to him as soon as they get to where he is and nobody sees him yet, the girl and the boy flip up into, like, they start to float. So he has this kind of gravity that we've been talking about. He's got a private gravity. And that's what, that's what Arthur C. Clarke calls it. He said, this being had its own private gravity, right? And so he comes out and he looks exactly like a demon. So he's got horns, he's got scales, he's got, he looks red, you know, he looks like a demon, right? He's got the cloven hooves, the tail. That's right. Yeah. Exactly like what we think of as a demon, the classical demon. And no one, no one is really that upset except for some people who, who faint, right? Right. He's like one or two people out of like a hundred thousand. So he's already acclimated people against religion because they got rid of religion. And they made, they made it seem like it was, you know, not rational. Remember in the story that people in New Athens are saying these are demons and the younger people are saying you're just old and superstitious. That's right. Archaic. Archaic. Yeah. So, okay. So then we see that the real thing that's going to happen though is not, he's not going to take them over. He's ushering in this like giant network mind that goes around the galaxy and usurps whole civilizations into it and they become like networked up. And so they're targeting humans, the human children. So the, the grownups are literally the last human beings. The children start to show psychic powers and telepathy. Yeah. They start to become one mind. And they're speaking as one mind now, right? They are. Individuality. They're not just, they speak as one mind and they act as one mind. And if you read it, the descriptions of the children, it looks terrible, it looks like there's zombies. They don't keep that, you know, they're not into hygiene. So their hair gets like matted and they have their clothes, like their parents are now afraid of them, right? And so the children literally get usurped into this network and those people that they're the last humans. So that's why it's called childhood Zen. Yeah. Um, I think, didn't they tell, uh, it was Jan, I think it's his name on the way back where they say, whenever you think you're going to see, it's not going to be what you think you're going to see. Yeah. And he, and he's like, has to force himself to, he wants to look way that can't because the children are so horrifying. The horror, the worst in corpses. Yeah. They don't even seem like they have any kind of like, they're like blank. And then what happens? What's the happy ending to that? Well, it's a bad ending. Yes. So the ending is, is the end of humanity, the end of earth and these beings or what we think is like the, the end of earth. Uh, it could very well just be that earth changes, but humanity is completely gone. Now, the children absorb all the energy from the earth or something like that, right? Yeah. It's a little, it's a, for me, it's a, I should read it again, but it's, it's the end. It is the end. But I, what I couldn't get from the story was what, what Arthur C. Clark was trying to convey. Oh, okay. So this is what I noticed was that in a lot of, not just science fiction, but media that portray this topic of alien, you know, uh, contact with us, uh, often it replaces religion or completely, uh, discredits religion. Now I'm not trying to be a conspiracy theorist and say there's a bunch of these guys are doing this. Maybe that's true, but that's just a fact. So if you look at all of this, if you look at this, if you spend time reading this history, you know, the history of sci-fi and also what we see in the media, even with Star Wars, right? Uh-huh. You see real, we see traditional religions that get usurped under this, uh, new form, what I call this new form of religion, which is belief in extraterrestrials, replacing, because the belief in God is superstitious. That's how it's made out to be, whereas the belief in, um, in aliens, of course, that makes perfect sense, right? So that, so there's a, uh, there's that is happening. You can see it. There's, I'm not making it up, go and read these things. You'll see it, uh, case in point, like with, uh, Star Wars, the last Jedi, and then the one before that, I can't remember the Force Awakens, I think. In these two movies, you have the very beginning of Western Christianity, which is in, um, you know, not in Rome, but you see it in Ireland in this place called Skellig Michael, which is this really, these really beautiful rocks off the coast of Ireland. And this is where monks, uh, lived in the fifth century, sick, no, the 500, so it's pretty early on in Christianity. And they're going to, you know, spread Christianity, but they're, they're at this place. That's the, that's where Luke Skywalker is the, that's where he trains Jedi's. That's where Jedi's are trained. That's where they filmed was like the heart of Western Christianity is now the heart of the Jedi religion. And that is a religion now, by the way, the Jedi religion is a religion. Sure. So, you know, when you see this, you can't unsee this. You start to like look at the media and you're like, wow, okay, it's happening there too. And this is not anything I'm making up. Do I say it's on purpose? I don't know if it's on purpose, is it? But it's definitely something that's, uh, it's like a snowball effect. It's definitely something that's, uh, progressing. Do you think the people who, whoever they are in charge, like that analogy, maybe it's not an analogy that it's becoming a religion? Do you think they want that to be a religion? I do. Religion is very powerful. It's the most powerful thing, you know, like people in the name of religion will die for religion. That's true. It is very powerful. So, um, yeah, I think so. Sure. Don't create a belief, create a whole belief system, but they, they're controlling the system. They're writing the Bible. Yeah. I don't know if that's a great, I don't know if that's great for us. Um, okay, I'll tell you why I don't think it's great. I have a specific reason. And it has to do with how, when you look at Marshall McCluen and you look at Tayard's work, they keep the spiritual sense and in fact, if you read their work, you cannot get away from the fact that the spiritual sense worked in their lives. They see things that we don't see because of their sense, their spiritual sense. They cultivated it and it's a life for them, like seeing and touch and hearing as a life for us. That's absolutely absent in childhood's end, um, totally absent. In fact, there's a scene in childhood's end where he basically says that this is the worst part of humans, the spiritual sense, right? So it's a scene with a saiyan, so saiyans and this woman who is the one who's going to have the child, who's going to be absorbed first into the overmind, she's the mother. And she has a cultivated spiritual sense so that the overmind identifies her and what happens is that they're going to definitely like, they're going to, her offspring are going to be the ones that they're going to colonize, right? So they're going to colonize the spiritual sense and not just that, but he talks about it in derogatory terms. The spiritual sense is the worst thing in humans, right? This mystical sense that they have and they kind of think it's disgusting and don't like it. So yeah, so it's the spiritual sense that we're seeing again, um, changed, right? Do we all have that spiritual sense? Everyone is born with it, yeah. We are. Yeah, for sure. All people are. All the religions of the world, if you look at them, they are the traditional religions. They focus on the cultivation of the sense, like how do you cultivate it? Well, uh, you pray, um, you can fast, uh, you live a life that cultivates things called the virtues. And you can see this in all the religious traditions, Buddhism, you know, what meditation, what are they doing? They're cultivating the sense, right? And so, uh, all the religious traditions knew about this and cultivated it for the benefit of the social group, all of them, um, and so yeah, we don't want to get rid of that. And that's just, that would be, that would change human beings. Well, this is another argument for social media being the antichrist is because that's blocking that. Yeah. Yeah. It's interesting that, you know, the, all the, the tech bros are into fasting and meditation and it's all these like monastic rituals that they're doing. I don't know if they know they're doing that, that they're basically monks. Yeah, that's right. That's right. Who was it who talked about religion being a way to protect us from violence? Okay, so this is Renas Girard. Renas Girard is a French theorist who is contemporary with us. He died only recently, actually. And so he was an atheist or agnostic. He wasn't religious at all. At first. Yeah. Right. Yeah. And so he went through reading the traditions of the Bible, actually, reading the Hebrew scriptures and then the New Testament. And through that, he recognized that there was a mechanism at work and that this was the mechanism of nonviolence. And he saw this because, you know, if you do read the Bible, you'll notice that there are like sacrifices of like children and stuff. You're like, oh, goodness. You know, what's up with that, right? Does God require that? And so what you see, though, is that the Hebrew Bible, the Hebrew scriptures are pushing back against that, pushing back against that. You have Abraham, you know, the push back against his sacrifice of his son. And then when you get to. That's right. But it might have been the first one where a sacrifice is stopped. Yeah. By an angel, a messenger of God. Right. And so, so then, you know, so you have to understand that in history, a lot of cultures. So he. So sacrifice is at the basis for a lot of cultures, like, you know, human sacrifice and then animal sacrifice. And, you know, all right. That said, he sees Christianity as an answer to that type of violence. It's a specific type of violence that he thinks is bad, is really terrible. And if you're the recipient of being bullied, if you're the recipient of group violence of being canceled today, you know, you know that this is a bummer experience. Yes. And people seem to enjoy piling on. So there's like an enjoyment that people get from it, which I think is pretty sick, frankly. But, you know, people who do that shame on you for doing that, just stop doing that. You know, life will be better for everyone if you just don't do that kind of thing. I think we've turned a corner on a lot of that. Was Gerard with the. We see the one with the scapegoat theory? Yes. So this is the theory of the scapegoat. So what he came to understand was that this type of violence was at the basis of Christianity. And Christianity was the first. So he became Christian because of it, okay? So long story short, he converted and became super Christian. And then all of his writing was about what he called the scapegoat mechanism and how it functioned in culture. And he said that most religion, because people feel they'll kill, so his idea was this, was that a society tends to become violent. And they. In order to resolve that violence, they identify a scapegoat. And then they get rid of the scapegoat. The violence goes away for a while. But then the whole cycle repeats again. But they feel really guilty about killing that scapegoat. And that's where religion comes in. So religion comes in as a way to deceive people and to thinking it was a necessary, a justified, violent act. I was surprised to learn that, you know, Romans didn't consider themselves to be people who sacrifice humans. They looked at like people, other cultures, and they say those people are horrible because they kill people like they sacrifice people. We don't do that. But they did do that. Of course. So the gladiator games were literally religious events, right, to their gods and goddesses. That's what we don't understand now. We're like, those were pretty weird events that they had, right, with the gladiators and so forth. Well, they were religious events and they would invoke whatever god or goddess, you know, at the time, they were revoking Roman god or goddess. And they would take people that were vulnerable, like prisoners of war or gladiators, and they would dress them up as the gods. And then they would kill them. They would reenact their killing. And this, you could see even as texted this, okay, with, I mean, these cultures didn't know each other. So this shows that there's like this template to human sacrifice. Oh, it goes on forever. I mean Hitler did the same thing. Skateboarding is another form of propaganda. That's right. That's right. It's a terrible propaganda. So that's what Gerard identified. The basis of human cultures that aren't self-aware are like this. Well, Christianity came along to challenge it to basically say, this is what he believed. Christianity came along to basically say, stop doing that. Right? This is how you cannot do it. Jesus will be the last sacrifice. You won't have to do it anymore. Right? And so if that's what it became, it fought back. That's why it fought back Rome. So some of the early Christians who fought back were like Perpetua, who was a woman from Carthage, 20 years old or so, 21. And she refused. She was, you know, going to be put into the gladiator games, dressed up as series. I think that was the goddess. And she refused. She said, I'm not dressing up. You can kill me. I don't care. I'm dying for Jesus. But I am not going to be dressed up as your goddess. And she refused. And that went around like wildfire because people didn't like Rome. Rome was doing this all over the place, right? So they pushed back. And Christianity became a resistance movement to the empire's violence. About what year was Perpetua? Because we can read her diary from prison. That's right. Yes. You can. So I think she was like 200, 200, 200, 300. Oh, okay. Rome was already quite a mess. So I was wondering if it was first century, if it was after the Sacaja Jerusalem. It was almost, yeah, it was after that, after that. Her diary is very touching. It's very sad. Yeah. So she writes, so this is the first document that we have by Christian woman. And she writes about her own impending death. And just as she's just about to go into, to be killed in the game, her friends take over and write the diary. Okay. So it's a partial autobiography and partial biography with some, with parts of it that are what we call hageographic, like what you'd call political license, right? But it was real. It's actually a fact that she was killed for sure. And that her resistance became the Christian resistance, right? Yeah. I mean, her diary is very touching. It's short. Everyone should read it. It ends with the word Amen. Yeah. What? How does a magnetic theory work? That was new to me to learn about that. Okay. And I think it might be, it might be on to something. Yes. Yes. So this is the idea. And this is known by lots and lots of people who research like human development and so forth. You know, monkey see monkey do like human beings mimic in order to learn we first mimic, right? In order to learn top speech, we mimic and stuff. So it's kind of a built-in way in which human beings are, right? We're built that way. What happens though is that it becomes destructive when we want when we want something that another person has and we're willing to kill that person for it, right? And but we have to understand that the only reason we want what they have is because they want it. So in a sense, we're mimicking their want. Yes. And you can really see this in social media right now. So the likes, so if you go to, and by the way, a lot of those likes are bots. Okay. But that's a scary thing. Like we can now create the scapegoat mechanism and the magnetic theory. So this idea that we mimic each other's desires. So let's take, you know, let's take a YouTube channel, right? Okay. So this YouTube channel has, I don't know, a couple million subscribers. And we're like, that person must, we must listen to that person because there are so many subscribers, right? But what if like most of those subscribers are not real? So that's how it can be generated. So we can have our own taste generated. Look at, you know, I am a woman, I am subject to wanting nice things like purses, nice purses is that worth, right? And I know that. So I'm going along doing my work and so forth and ads pop up Gucci bag. This and that. And I'm like, I don't want that bag, all right? But then I do want it. But you do want it. Yes, I do. But what I have to do is I have to wait it out. So I'm being manipulated by everyone else wanting that bad. Wait two years and that bag will look ridiculous to you, right? It really will. You'll have the bag in a like, why did I even buy that bag? It's weird looking, right? And so your, your desire is cultivated, it's generated, it's constructed, it's created and it's created through clicks and likes and so forth. My wife has bags that might, yeah, more than cars, some of them. It's a matter with you. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I don't want to put, I mean, look, men have cars like, you know, everybody has their theme. I have my, we all have our thing. Yeah, I'm not going to judge it. I'm not for unstones. I'm just being like, yeah, I have, I have the bag, right? No, but you said that because it's kind of universal, we all kind of do it. But we have to, we have to understand that we do it. Yes. And when we can understand it, we can, because, you know, and we'll, we'll be enslaved by this. If we allow us, just, you know, we're a slave to our desires. But if we can, you can wait out the desire and that's all it takes. It just takes like three weeks or something. Sure. But most people don't. Don't we need all people to do this for a tour? Yeah, this, uh, I think we need a critical mass. I don't know if we need all people to do a critical mass. Yeah. So Gerard then says how, you know, know, what do we do? If human beings were wired this way, we're wired to hurt each other, we're wired for violence, you know, what can we possibly do? And that's where he says, that's where you have to examine yourself. That's what Socrates said, the exam in life. You must, if you want this world to change, you must change. You must do this. And if you don't, you know, if you say, well, no one else is gonna do it, you know, okay, then that's the world we have. That's world we live in. We all do that. Why should I make that sacrifice? No one else is gonna do it. Yep. Or just, you know, you could try, you could start trying. And then you're trying gets into the ability to resist. It's hard to, it's hard to do that. Do you agree with Jacques Vallet about UFO phenomena being subjective and created by our culture and being maybe more of a non-nuts and bolts phenomenon? Okay, so Jacques, I don't think he believes that it's created by our culture. I think that he believes this is what just, you know, from knowing him a bit. Sure. He's, now he, his idea of what it is possibly could be or his theory about it changes, right? So I've seen it change. Sure. But he, if he wasn't nuts and bolts, he's way more nuts and bolts now than he used to be, by the way. So he was definitely not nuts and bolts for a long time. But I think he thinks that there's something beyond the projector. There's something beyond. Oh, he thinks it's something. Yeah. He's described it as a, as a control system. Yeah, a control mechanism. Who? Who? He doesn't know. That's the thing he wants to find out. But he's, he's, you know, studying it enough to identify its characteristics. And that's why he wrote messengers of deception. He said, this is kind of a deceptive phenomenon. So speculate. Who's behind that? And why? Speculate? Yeah. Wow. I mean, it was, it was pie plates and nuts and bolts and saucers and now it's orbs. Yeah. Yeah. And who knows what it's going to be next? That's right. I mean, I, you know, I talked to Chris blood, so who you may, you may know Chris. I know, I know Chris. He can summon orbs. Yeah. And I wouldn't call myself a, a fanatic believer. I'm a skeptical believer. And I wouldn't think anyone could summon orbs. But I've seen it on video. My brother went out to the yard with him and they summoned orbs. And I asked Chris, is there anyone, anyone do this? He said, anyone can do this and nobody should do this. Like he, he doesn't think it's a good idea. Is he talking to something real? Okay. So all right. So yeah, in order to talk about this, I, this is another thing that I present in, in the others is I basically say, now that we know that there is something like how do we deal with it? And I said, I think the history of religions gives us some frameworks for this because if these things are deceptive, which it looks like they are. And if you do summon them regularly and they're in your life, your life's going to be pretty weird and not in some fun ways. Okay. And so if that's the case, then they look like what we've talked about in the religious traditions before. We just have different names for them or we haven't even named them yet. But what kinds of protocols do those traditions give you to deal with these? Well, in Buddhism, they might, if you meditate a lot, they might come into your life. And you just ignore them because that's not the goal. That's not the goal that you have a spiritual goal in Buddhist meditation and that's not it. So just ignore it. All right. So there's that. Within, I've talked about this before in the Catholic tradition, JD Vamps, you know, I said this publicly, you know, he believes that this phenomena is what he called kind of like demons. And I can fill in that with that means he's, he's referencing what's called the Praetor natural. So it's not supernatural. It's not from God. It's not natural, right? We can agree that is pretty weird. This area, this great area that Catholics think the fallen angels fall into and also angels. Like it's not a god thing, but it's like maybe kind of angelic thing or, you know, maybe something other than angels. But we probably shouldn't deal with it. We probably shouldn't mess with it. Now that's why I wouldn't go to like skinwacker ranch or, you know, the haunted places of us, why I do not want to summon things. So, no hitchhiker effect seems to be a real thing. It is a real thing. Yeah. You mentioned John Alexander. I mean, his wife didn't like him being there at all. Yeah. You know, she would wake up and there'd be stuff in the yard. So yeah. So if we already have information about that stuff, even from indigenous communities, right? Oh, yeah. Like, what are you doing? You know, don't summon that. You know, I guess my question is we already have information about that. We don't, you know, we should listen to it. Yeah. You definitely see the trickster at work because I've talked to a few people from skin walk with John or Travis Taylor. And it's like, how come there are not that many photographs of it? And the answer is always, it's photographed what it wants to be. And we can't control it. Sometimes it allows it. Sometimes it just doesn't. So it feels like, and Travis agreed that there's intention here. There's an intent to deceive. But nobody knows what the purpose, what's the reason for it? What does it want with us? Yeah. I don't know. I mean, yeah, I am not. Look, I do this study. I've studied this stuff right and written books about it. Yes. But no, I can't answer that question. You don't have an opinion of us. I guess. Well, my opinion is that this is my personal opinion. I don't advocate it for anyone. And it's just how I deal with it. Because it resembled so closely the traditions of religion. And I happen to be religious. I'm Christian that I look at this from that standpoint. And I, you know, I'm not going to summon something that I think is deceptive. Why would I do that? Totally. Grey. I'm not interested in going to skim walk or something or be doing any of that. Yeah. So I'm going to focus on the spiritual sense that I have. Try to cultivate it. Try to help my students. Try to help. You know, I'm going to do that. I'm not going to focus on on that other stuff. I think that's smart. It's just like four days ago. I had a nightmare about orbs. And I woke up like that was a message. Wow. Like doing this show maybe too long. I was, it was, it was pretty scary. So if we're going to be contacted by something else, especially from another world, it's probably going to be some type of AI. It's not going to be by lot. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. That's Stephen Dick's theory. Yeah. I think it's a really good theory. I agree. So let's walk Stephen Dick's theory backwards. Could the angel visitations that we see in Ezekiel and elsewhere? Could those be post-biological entities? Yeah. So remember that he's speculating. This is his theory. So he is his whole bibliography, by the way. He's been writing about theories of ET and the history of what's called the plurality of worlds because we're not the only ones who have thought about this. People from many, many years ago, thousands of years ago, have thought about this. Sure. So he's compiled this bibliography, which everybody should check out. All right. So with his idea, so he says that if we take where we are at now, and he has, this is an essay that's called the post-biological, oh gosh, how can I forget what it's called? I've read it a million times. The post-biological universe. And he's rewritten this a couple of times. Okay. So it's the most recent iteration I've covered that in the others, but it's also online in his bibliography. So the post-biological universe revisited is the most recent one. And this is what he says, just take where we're at now and apply what he calls cultural evolution. Okay. So where we are at now is that we are a technological civilization. All right. And if you take our evolution and you look at it in large scales, instead of scales of like, you know, thousands of years or even millions of years and you talk about like the age of the universe, he said, if there was a civilization like us or close to us and they've been there now a million years old, he goes, what does their technology look like? Right? Like look at our technology, how exponential it is just in the last five years. In this thing, thank you so well for magic. That's right. That's right. But it's it's not magic. It's technology. Right. All right. And so he says, let's just extrapolate what kind of life, what it will look like. And he wrote this in answer to the Fermi paradox, which is, you know, if there is extraterrestrial life, why? Where is it? Right. And he says, we won't even recognize it because it's so far ahead of us and it's most likely passed through AI and gotten to self-replicating technological beings that resemble deities because they can read your mind. Like all the things that deities can do, right? Read your mind, disappear, appear, right? The physics that we see, well, they can do that, right? They can do anything. The private gravity we talk about. So he suggests that post, he calls them post-biologicals because they've gone through the stage of biology. They've gotten into a technological or a biotechnological phase and they've exceeded that. So to us, they're going to appear to be like deities. So that's his idea. And I think he's right. Arthur C. Clark in late late in his career kind of got away from the mysticism, but he he believed telepathy was real and it was just technology. We haven't explored yet. That's right. Yeah. So Marshall McClure and believe that Arthur C. Clark believed that you know, Taird had some indication, you know, of that. And both, you know, Marshall McClure is an academic. Arthur C. Clark is just a super general amazing smart person, right? And yeah, both of them definitely believed in telepathy and believed that it would be augmented even by technology. Technology would make it even more of a real thing. And in fact, that looks like what's happening, right? So I have some friends who they are investors in technologies and one of the technologies that a friend is invested in is this one that actually can read a person's mind. So can read the image in their mind and project it on to a computer screen. And she saw this happen and this is technology that's real, right? So we're talking about like, I don't know if Neuralink does this. But I do know that there is technology that can like you can think of an image like she thought of her dog and then her dog appeared on screen. Like a dog that looked like, so that is reading our minds. It's reading our brain waves, right? And so forth. So that does happen. This is just the beginning of it. It's just the beginning. Yeah. Because she had to concentrate on her dog and that story, which makes sense to me. Where it becomes scary is when you no longer have agency over it. That's right. That's where it's like minority report type of thing. Yes. Yeah, that's Philip K. Dick. That's right. Speaking of Philip K. Dick and Arthur C. Clark. Something we talked about just a little bit with childhoods end. In that book, when they saw the demons, they were seeing the demons were from the future. That's right. It's a cool part of the book. Yeah. So in most of the book, the author of the book will obviously Arthur C. Clark. But the protagonists of the book, they're having conversations about what the appearance of the demon, why it's you know, it must have been from the past like a cultural memory. Yes. That, you know, humankind had come into contact with these, so that was the assumption throughout most of the book. And then later you hear at the very near the end of the book, Carolyn who's the the demon basically flips it and says, no, no, that was us from the future. Basically, you were pre-memoring us, right? Yes. It was like a pre-memory. From the future. And in the others, you talk about Eric Wargo's work. I mean, it was fun to see him mentioned in there, because I'm a big fan of as he's been in here. He's changed my thinking on how time works. Yes. Do you subscribe to his time loop theory? Mostly. Yeah, mostly do. Oh, absolutely. So when you read, I love his books. So his books are really interesting, because they're not only super theoretical, yes. So he's got these examples of things that couldn't have happened, because they happened out of time. Like the thing I just told you about about Arthur C. Clark. Sure. So he has real examples from history. Well, there's guys drawing 9/11 with planes flying into them. That's right. Yeah. So he asks then why, you know, what kind of information is that? What kind of knowledge is that? And so he's talking about getting that knowledge through dreams and through, um, I guess it's like a hippogodgic state. Yes. And so forth, and getting those in art, you know, which you're into that kind of state when you're doing art or writing, and things like that. So he says that during those states of mind, these images come into our consciousness from the future because of the block universe. I think that's what he says. I don't want to get him wrong. No, it makes sense. But your viewers need to read his books, because it's really accessible, and it will definitely blow your mind. It does. To boil down block universes, you know, people talk about the grandfather paradox. Can't go back in time. You know, if you meet your grandfather, kill your grandfather, you're never born, blah, blah, blah. And Eric says, that doesn't work because of the block. You know, well, why didn't I kill my grandfather? And the answer is because you didn't. Yeah. And that's it. That's the whole theory because you didn't. Because here you are. And that's it. We know you didn't kill him because here you are. It's just as simple as that. And that just kind of blew my mind. And he has so many examples of it. Yeah. Does the church have any theories or statements on time travel? It's not really the right word, but how time works. You know, see Arthur C. Clark and the overmind said, this is how time and space work. You just don't know it yet. This is just how it is. That's right. That's right. You know, it's a big, big, big space. And you know, it's a big space. Okay. So the church's idea about Marian apparitions. Yes. So there aren't very many approved Marian apparitions. Right. The reason, well, first off, do you want me to talk about Fatima? Yes. Okay. So Fatima is Fatima Portugal. And it's again, it's kind of like Garibondol. So it's a mountainous region where there's a group of people, a couple hundred people in this town. And there are, by the way, a couple of angel events that happen before the Virgin Mary comes along. Okay. So there are these children. They're playing. There's three of them. And an angel appears to them. And they're afraid, frankly, you know, what's that? Mm-hmm. And they don't even recognize really that it's an angel. They're like, what is this, you know? And then it kind of talks to them. It says you need to get ready, you need to start praying. Why, but they're going to do it. And then, at some point, they learn that the Virgin Mary is going to show up, right? And, but a question about whether or not she's the Virgin Mary arises, right? You know, who is this lady? She shows up. She looks like a doll. She's beautiful. And they experience kind of like a trance state while they're in. By the way, the animals around them do, too, which is really like the private gravity thing. Okay, so the animals kind of end their exhausted for days after she shows up, right? And so she shows up and she tells them to pray and do fasting. And pretty much that's it, right? There's an indication that there's like a secret, though. And so this drives the parish priest crazy. And people then believe because they just don't think the children are lying. And they can tell that the children are seeing something because of the way the children are looking up the same thing, like their eyes are focused on the same thing. And if you study Mary and apparitions, that's a feature of them, is that a lot of times people like doctors and skeptics will do everything they can to try to get them out of the trance, or to find out where their eyes are, you know, they're looking at the same thing. No one else can see it. Sometimes other people can see it. Okay, sometimes people can see it. And so all these people show up. So it becomes like a zoo in the town. And so the priest is trying to get the kids to like chill out, you know, don't do this. He kidnaps him, doesn't kidnap him. But yeah, kidnaps him. Okay, it takes him away. So that they can't make the date that the Virgin Mary is going to show up on. And the town's people, you know, death threat him. And they're like, let those kids go. So they show up, the townspeople show up, some stuff happens there, you know, where the Virgin Mary is going to show up, but the kids aren't there. So there's a lot of drama. Then priests come from the Vatican, they're like, "We need to figure out what the heck is going on here," right? And so they do, you know, they interview the kids and so forth. And they begin to see that it does seem like, you know, something's going on here. We don't know what, but it looks like she's in, you know, ask the lady what she wants. Ask the lady what her name is, they do all these things, they tell the kids, okay, the kids ask that, they give the answers to the priests. So the big. About what year is this? What's that? Okay, this is 1917. Right. So there are, I believe six apparitions each month on the 13th. The last one is October 13th, and I could be wrong on the 6th, but I don't think I am. And so at this point though, there are lots of people who are showing up, like probably 20,000, 30,000, 60,000. And so they, the Virgin Mary tells the kids, this last, I'm going to show up and this time it's going to be a big deal. I'm going to show you some stuff and tell that to the people, right? So they do. They tell the people and between 70,000 to 100,000 people show up, right? At this place, devastating the town, you know, I mean, but a lot of people see something called the miracle of the sun, and there's phenomena that happen. It looks really UFO-like, right? Circular spinning discs and things like that, and a lot of people see it. Some people don't see it. Some people see other things. They're all hanging out. They're all the people. And then rain comes and they're all soaking wet. And then what happens is that after the miracle of the sun happens, everybody's super dry, like completely dry. And this is all photographed by people there who were, you know, there to do, they're not there to believe. They're there to document it, it's photographed. It's people from miles and miles away see something in the sky and they're like, what's going on over there? There's some kind of solar event, right? And so people that are skeptics, become believers, a lot of things happen. And this is now known as the miracle of the sun. So it takes the church a long time to say that, you know, they have to interview the kids, the two younger kids pass away, the Virgin Mary said that they would, like they're going to be taken early, the older one, Lucia or Lucia. She becomes a nun and she goes on to write her diary and so forth. And it's now one of the biggest pilgrimages in the world. And so that's Fatima. What was the, what were the secrets? Okay, so that's a good question. So there is continuous dialogue and debate about the secrets because the secrets, I think one of the secrets was, well, first the kids had a version, they got to see hell, which was horrific for them, and traumatic. And they said that humanity really needs to like start living in a better way, right? Because we're headed for a dark season, okay? And so it's in that way apocalyptic, not in the Greek word sense, but in the normal sense that people use that word in. All right. So one of the secrets though is very debated. This is called the third secret of Fatima. And so what the children were told, you have the secret and give it to the Holy Father and open it in 1960, okay? Well, this was in 1917. So everybody goes along, you know, people are doing the best they can to be good Catholics and so forth. And they go to the Fatima and so forth. 1960 comes along and the Pope doesn't read the secret, right, doesn't read it to people. So people are very upset, like why, why, what are you doing? It comes along to John Paul II, he becomes Pope. He has the secret and again, nobody, he's not releasing the secret, why, you know? And then Pope Benedict says, well, okay, this is what the secret is about. But it's probably not the secret. I don't know, AJ. This is just-- This is in 2000, when it was finally released. Yeah. And is it the secret? A lot of people don't believe it is. Well, the secret is the Holy Father escaping the burning city, climbing over the corpses of his disciples. Yeah. It's a very end of the world type of-- Yes. And end of the Catholic Church type of-- I think the official statement was it was an interpretation of John Paul's assassination in '81. Yeah. That was what interpretation. Well, he was a huge-- I don't know. He was a huge Marian saint. Yes. I mean, yeah, he is a saint now. He is a huge Marian Pope, definitely believer. I didn't-- I don't really buy that from the church. It sounds like that's kind of a stretch, that Third Seek was very specific. I don't know. But I do know that right now, Virgin Mary operations are global and even non-Catholic. So there was a big Marian apparition in Zitune, Egypt, and that was the-- not the Catholic church there, but the Coptic-- I think it was the Coptic church. I could be wrong. It's the Orthodox church in that region. It was there of Marian apparition, right? And hundreds of thousands of people saw that, and they have photographs of it. So she has now become kind of like a global phenomenon beyond Catholicism. Sure. So what made Nassita and Bayside different that the church said this is-- and people still go there, right? Oh, yes. I believe. Yeah. So, okay. So Bayside, is it New Jersey? Queens. Queens, okay. And Nassita was constant. Yeah. Yeah. So, when Nassita happens in the 1950s and Bayside happens in the 1990s, I think I can't remember. Sorry, guys. So many version Mary apparitions. Yeah. I did have-- I worked on these two apparitions with some graduate students, and actually some former students for now, professors. And we did some new research on it, and-- okay. So the version Mary shows up to some women, both in each case, right? And at first, it seems pretty normal for Marian apparitions. She doesn't say too much. She says, do the good thing, like fast, pray, right, do the good works, and whatnot. But then they get kind of like very, very-- you wouldn't think the version Mary would say these things, like very specific about who in the Catholic church is going to hell. And you know, things like that. So that gives the indication to the Catholic hierarchy, no, these are not, you know. But then they get a lot of followers because there's push back against the Vatican council, you know, what's happening in the Vatican II, and not even started before the Vatican II, in the 1950s with Nassita. Now, what's really weird, though? This is weird. So the last time we looked into this, one of my associates who were working on this together uncovered in Nassita the presence of people that look like men in black. Wow. Yeah. He was freaked out by it, and he freaked me out, too. So he basically uncovered it in a primary source material where she's talking about her experiences. This is the woman who Mary and Huff, and she's writing her diaries. And she said, and then these-- now, this is the 1950s. These men show up, and they wear all black, and they show up in dark cars without their headlights on. And they come, and they tell me that I'm bad, and that I need to stop doing this, and they tell me that I'm a terrible person, and they hang outside my window, and they come at all hours, and they harass me. Pretty strange. It is. Yeah. It makes me want to go look at the photos of Fatima to see who's in that crowd. Yeah, because we have a ton of photos. Right. Yeah. Do you believe those second two sightings? I mean, I think we all believe Fatima, right? I do. I do, too. Um, I believe something paranormal is happening in those sightings, but I don't-- I don't think that it's the same type of thing that's happening in Fatima, or in Garibondol. I believe in Garibondol, too, even though it's not approved. What about Guadalupe? Do you believe that one? Absolutely. I believe that one, yeah. Absolutely. Yeah. I believe it. I'll tell you why, because first, the Tillma is weird. If you look into the Tillma, you know, the Tillma is the image of our lady that's in New Mexico. Do you study on that? And it's-- I mean, our historians have studied it, too. And a lot of them say, well, it's painting and stuff, well, some parts of it are painted. But it's still very, very odd. And I think miraculous. But also, if you read, it's called the Nikon Mahapua. And this is the original text written in the Wattel of the man who's Juan Diego, who has the versionary siding over this hill. And now, because I've read so many of these apparition accounts, and a lot of these people don't know each other, like, who's Juan Diego is going to know about any of this other stuff? No, he's not. It hasn't happened yet. He describes almost perfectly what these other children describe, and the way she talks, the way the sound of her voice is musical, and that he's entranced, and enchanted, and all of this kind of very, very interesting. interesting. I think absolutely it happened. But I'm a believer, I'm not advocating, okay? Even scientifically, it's hard to explain Guadalupe and Lestrata Torrance, very hard to explain. Yeah, very hard to explain. Yeah, mysterious. Yes. You mentioned enchantment. This is my last question for you. Then we talk about anything we missed. I think you wrote two sentences of two different books. I want to put them next to each other. Wrote that the UFO re-enchanted of the modern world. It re legitimized transcendence for secular people. That's true. And you wrote that whatever is behind it may not mean us well. So is re-enchantment a gift or is it bait? Okay, re-enchantment is an opportunity. So what I mean by that is that there was the secularization hypothesis that Max Faber and a lot of really smart people from 1800s on thought that religion was going to go away because people were educated and becoming more rational. Completely wrong. It didn't work out, right? So people are way more religious now, even. You know, people are super religious and rationality has nothing to do with it, okay? Maybe a little bit, but you can be rational and religious. Lots of people are. All right. So this is the idea. This is what Max Faber then called the disenchantment of the world. That we were going to live in a world that was committed sat, you know, in a sense, it's really happened. A lot of people became what are called, what is called secular non-believers. They don't believe in anything. They can't see. They can't touch. They can't, you know, with their tools identify. Therefore, it's disenchanted. But the UFO comes back. We have the government now saying that it's real. What does that mean? It means that we now live in a more enchanted world. Like the world for you is going to change. We live in an enchanted world. And then what does that mean? That gives us an opportunity to figure out how we're going to deal with this. Like, you know, if there is non-human intelligence, how would we then deal with it? And I think that's where traditional religions give us a head start on, you know, understanding like that last quote that you had, you know, you picked out from, I think it's encounters. It may not mean as well. Yeah. I mean, like, you know, I haven't heard that quote from Chris Blessow that you told me just in, you know, this podcast. Now he said it in here. Yeah. Yeah. So, you know, he says, don't do it if you know, don't summon. Don't mess with it. If you don't know what you're doing. Yeah. And that's what religious traditions say, too. I rude them. Anything else you wanted to cover for unless you go? Let's see. Oh, you've got your notepad. Yeah. But, you know, we pretty much covered every single thing. Okay. Plugs, plugs, books, websites. Okay. So, my book, the others came out. It came out last week, which was July 28th. And since then, it's made the New York Times bestseller list, which I was so shocked and happy about. It's at your first one on New York Times. Yeah. Definitely. So if people are interested in what we've talked about, it's a lot of it's in that book. Yes. Substack. Oh, yeah. So, I have a substack. It's a DW Pasolka at substack. And I also have, you know, on Instagram. I don't spend a lot of time on there. I mean, we just talked about why. So I don't spend a lot of time on social media. But I do have a DW Pasolka X profile, Instagram profile, LinkedIn profile, substack. I definitely like because it's writing. And I'm okay with that, you know, and, um, and then what else? Yeah. I have a YouTube channel. Again, I don't utilize a lot. So that's where I'm at. Right. That episode. Thank you so much for being here. It's a lot of fun. Yeah. Thanks a lot. I had a great time. We'll see you soon. Okay. Bye. Bye, everybody. That was Diana Walsh, Pasolka. We covered purgatory, Russian immortality cults, a blindfolded trip to a UFO crash site, where their social media is the antichrist. The saints, I checked first, the records are real. Whole towns signs weren't testimony. The Joseph of Cupertino levitated during the Inquisition, when that could get you burned. In 2023, Yale historian Carlos Sire published a whole book on these files. It's called Bay Flu, which is great. Now, her father, he worked sonar on a coast guard cutter called The Bitter Sweep, when something enormous stopped the ship dead for four hours. That ship is real, and it was out in Alaskan waters out of Codiac when he served. The four hours, well, we have to take your dad's word for it. But a retired admiral is searching for the log, so ask me in a year. And the men in black. In a condemned apparition case from the 1950s in Wisconsin, Diana's team found the visionary describing men in dark clothes and dark cars with no headlights, telling her to stop. UFO witnesses started describing the same men, that same decade. The stories never met, but there they are. Four nights before he sat down, I had a nightmare on bad warps, so I'm not a neutral judge. I can't tell you what this phenomenon is, and neither can Diana. That's why I trust her. The book is called The Others, and it's already a New York Times best seller. She's at dwphasoker.com, this P-A-S-U-L-K-A, and everything I mentioned is linked below. All the guy whose name she will mention? Tim Taylor, the dragon. More of him soon. Until next time, be safe. Be kind. And know that you are appreciate. Oh, oh, oh, oh, yeah. I believe Olivia's an area 51, a secret code inside the Bible, said I was. I love my UFOs and paranormal fun, as well as mirrors it, so I'm saying it like I should. But then another conspiracy theory becomes the truth, my friends. And it never ends. No, it never ends. I feel the crack at it, and got stuck inside my home, with an K-Out truck, I'll be in only two hours. Do you stand, look you've read, fake the moon landing alone? On a film set, I wore the shadow people there. The Roswellians just thought the smiling man, I'm told, and his name was Cole. Her act can't be agreed. I'm dancing with the fidget, and the fish are Thursday nights with AJT, and when I love the beat, I'll do the night. All I ever wanted was to just hear the truth, so the world knows I'm your face all through the line. The moth man's sight and van, the solar storm still come to a god the secret city underground. Mysterious numbers, stations, planets are phoned to, plastic stockade, and what the dark watchers found. When a simulation comes, you worry though, the black night's at a light and told me so, I can't believe. The fish are Thursday nights with AJT, and when I love the beat, I'll do the night. All I ever wanted was to just hear the truth, so the world knows I'm your face all through the line.