The Babes in the Wood Murders | The Case of Rachael, Karen & Nicola | UNSEEN
38m
In 1990, seven-year-old Rachel Watts was kidnapped and severely abused by Russell Bishop after a brief interaction while roller skating. She survived the attack, remembering being strangled and sexually assaulted before being abandoned in the woods. Rachel, traumatized and fearful, initially withheld key details from authorities, contributing to the perception that she had no memory of the event. In 1986, Bishop had been acquitted of the murders of two schoolgirls, Karen Hadaway and Nicola Fellows, due to insufficient forensic evidence and the double jeopardy law. For over three decades, the case remained unresolved, with Bishop living freely and even participating in a protest to improve his public image. Years later, new forensic evidence—specifically DNA from the girls' arms and a blue sweatshirt—provided a compelling case for Bishop’s guilt. In 2018, after a retrial, he was found guilty of the 1986 murders and sentenced to an additional 36 years. Rachel, who developed long-term trauma and agoraphobia, found some peace in the justice served. Her story underscores the devastating consequences of wrongful acquittals and the enduring impact of childhood trauma on survivors, while also highlighting the resilience of victims’ families and the importance of re-examining cold cases with modern science.
He put his hand there, and it squeezed quite hard.
Did that hurt when he put his hands under your foot?
What do you think he did?
This is 7-year-old Rachel Watts.
Just hours before this footage was recorded, Rachel was found wandering alone by the side
of the road with her clothes missing and covered in bruises.
The woman on the right is Rachel's mom.
She was told by police not to show any emotion because it could cause Rachel to shut down
and they need her to talk.
Can you tell me what happened when Meryl stopped the car?
He took me out and then took me into the clearing in the wood.
Did he say anything to you when he opened the lid up?
He just said goodbye.
Did he carry you straight to the clearing, or did he take you somewhere else?
Did he put you somewhere else?
He just came straight to the clearing.
Notice how, for the first time,
Rachel is looking down, dangling her legs nervously.
That's because she's hiding something, something she doesn't want anyone to know.
Yesterday, when we were talking in the hospital, you said that the man got you in the back of
the car.
Do you know the man?
Did the man touch you at all?
For the first time, Rachel's mom is hearing the details of what happened to her daughter,
which makes keeping calm incredible.
Rachel, however, is too terrified to talk,
and what she says next is not the full story.
When you put his hand on your mouth, can you show me how you did that, Michelle?
I see something.
And then you said he put his hand round your throat.
My head just dropped so I couldn't stand it.
Did that hurt when you put his hand round your throat?
Can you show me on me how he did it?
He put his hand there and it squeezed quite hard.
Rachel is afraid that the man who tried to kill her will come back for her.
The problem is, she will have to face him again.
February 7th, three days after the attack, Rachel is standing behind a one-way mirror just a few feet away from a line of suspects.
And I'm going to ask you in a moment whether the person whom you saw on that day is here.
But Rachel has no idea that someone in this lineup has already killed two other girls,
and if she can't point him out, he will strike again.
The year is 1990.
In a suburb of Brighton called Whitehawk on the southern coast of England,
seven-year-old Rachel is living a happy life with her loving parents, Jenny and Peter.
On that particular day, Rachel is out roller skating while her dad is working in the front garden.
She asks him for money to go buy a chocolate bar at the local candy store.
It's around 4pm when Rachel rolls away in her white roller skates.
Just a little over an hour later, Rachel's parents are beginning to worry that she hasn't
come home yet, when suddenly there's a knock at the door.
It's the police.
Rachel is in the hospital.
She was found by a couple on Devil's Dyke Road, over 7 miles from her home.
I saw her come out from behind this bush.
she was completely naked kind of hands like this and crying her hair was all disheveled there was
blood in delicate places that i couldn't care to mention i jumped out of the car and ran towards
her and she said to me are you gonna kidnap me and i said to her no we're here to help you you're
going to be okay it's clear to the couple what happened to her and they're horrified they rushed
rachel over to the closest house and called the police when the police officer came she just said
my mom i said yes that was when she said rachel was in the hospital
sorry it's still raw now even after all these years
Rachel's mother, Jenny, rushes over to the hospital in Brighton
Where she's met by police officer, Deborah Wood
Before she's allowed to go see her daughter
Jenny is asked to do the impossible
She's told she cannot show her daughter she's upset
Or it may cause her to shut down
And for now, police still need to interrogate her
Debbie said to try and be strong
Try not to show any emotions
she was sitting there in bed with a coloring book
and i just sat there with her while she colored
and i'm going to ask you in a moment whether the person whom you saw on that day is here
Three days later, Rachel is asked to identify her attacker.
Police have arranged a lineup consisting of one suspect and nine lookalikes.
One of them is a man named Russell Bishop, someone police have accused of murder before.
But in 1987, after being acquitted of all charges against him, Russell Bishop walked free.
It all starts on October 9th, 1986, the day Karen Hadaway and Nicola Fellows go missing.
Over 150 police officers and neighbors of the families have been searching the large
She's just gone. And Nicky, they're both.
The only way they've gone is if someone's picked them up.
Come home, darling. Please. Daddy's not going to tell you off.
Just come home. Please, now.
It's 4pm, October 10th. Police officer Paul Smith is walking towards Wild Park,
just a few streets down from where the two girls live, when he has the strangest encounter.
I was doing house-to-house inquiries, and as a result of a radio message,
I went across to the other side of the road, which is Wild Park.
This voice behind sort of showed, oi, what are you doing?
The voice is that of Russell Bishop.
Russell lives in Molescombe and is close to the families of the two girls.
He's part of the search efforts and has been walking around with his dog.
And he said to me, we've been tracking all day, but it's getting late now and we're going to give up.
So I said to him, no, no, we've got to keep looking.
And he said, well, if I find them and they're dead, I'll get Nick, won't I?
And it was quite strange.
I mean, why did he say that? What made him say that?
Bishop is known by the police for his petty criminal history.
Car theft, shoplifting, everyone around the estate considers him to be a bit of a joke.
But his comment doesn't go unnoticed.
As the men are walking back into Wild Park, they hear two boys screaming the words,
we found them, we found them.
Russell Bishop runs off toward the voice, faster than Officer Paul Smith can catch up.
I said to Bishop, look, you keep them away from the girls and you keep away from the girls.
I was right behind him.
And I got there and stepped between him and the two girls.
And they were there as if they were sunbathing.
Nicola Fellows was on her back with one knee up.
And Karen Adway was laying on her stomach with her arm around as if she was asleep.
They were deranged like that.
I went across to them and I took their pulse.
Sorry, that still gets me.
I took their pulse and they were stone cold dead, like pieces of marble.
One of the police officers come and tell me that, yes, she's been found.
And I said, oh, great, great.
And I said, has anything happened to her?
And they said, no, she's been found.
And I said, well, what's the problem?
And they said, well, what's the problem?
The crime has a devastating effect on the community.
Everyone is terrified for their own children.
Detectives interview over 10,000 people in what will become the largest murder hunt in Sussex.
One name keeps coming up.
Russell Bishop was always a person of interest.
Everybody was saying, why is he doing this? Why has he done that?
Bishop is known to both families, so the girls knew him very well,
which means it wouldn't have been hard for Bishop to convince them to follow him into the woods.
There were multiple sightings of Russell Bishop in and around the area at the time the girls went missing.
What's more, one witness says they saw Bishop wearing a blue sweatshirt that night.
The description matches that of a blue sweatshirt,
which was found discarded on a trail close to where the bodies were found.
And that trail leads to Russell Bishop's house.
On the blue sweatshirt, there were ivy spores that were consistent with where
the girls were hiding.
The girls had been found, but inconsistent with where it had been dumped.
There were traces of fibers from the girls' clothing on the sweatshirt.
It became very clear that whoever had murdered Nicola and Karen
had been wearing this sweatshirt at the time they did that.
In order to confirm they have the right suspect,
detectives have to connect Russell Bishop to that sweatshirt.
But in 1986, DNA science is still in its infancy.
However, forensic analysis reveals the red stains
on the sweatshirt are not blood, but a very specific type of paint.
The same red paint Bishop was seen using on two of his friend's cars.
This could indicate it was in fact Russell Bishop's sweatshirt.
But they need to be sure.
As Russell Bishop is being interrogated by police at the station,
officers take the blue sweatshirt to his house,
where they're greeted by Russell's girlfriend, Jenny Johnson.
The first thing she says when she opens the door is,
Oh, you've brought Russell's sweatshirt back.
Jenny has no idea.
She has no idea that she has just incriminated her boyfriend.
The two officers take a sworn statement from her,
which she signs without hesitation,
proving that Russell Bishop owned the sweatshirt that was worn by the girl's killer.
And we thought this is it.
He's guilty of having killed these two children.
Thought that there was sufficient evidence to convict.
Bishop was the murderer.
No doubt whatsoever.
On December 4th, Russell Bishop was charged with the murder of the two girls.
Since that time, he's continued to deny both killings.
I thought, it can't be him.
Why would it be him?
He comes to the house every time.
I play football with him on Sundays.
Never think somebody who you knew would actually come along and do such a terrible thing.
November 1987, more than a year after the murders,
Russell Bishop's trial begins.
The entire country is watching.
Everyone wants to see justice for the girls they call the babes in the wood.
And the prosecution is convinced,
they have a strong case.
But there's one thing they couldn't have accounted for.
When Jenny Johnson, Russell Bishop's girlfriend, takes a stand,
she changes her entire story.
Jenny Johnson made a statement to the police
that that sweatshirt was owned by Russell Bishop.
And in court, two men said, "Russell Bishop never owned that sweatshirt."
She said to the court that she was forced to sign this statement.
The police forced her to sign it.
The prosecution knows Jenny Johnson is lying under oath
to protect her boyfriend, but they have no way of proving it.
Because the blue sweatshirt can no longer be linked to Bishop,
the defense argues that almost anyone could have killed the two girls.
The case falls apart.
After four weeks of trial, the jury is asked to deliberate.
The man who had been accused of murdering two schoolgirls from Brighton
has been found not guilty.
Not guilty, ladies!
Yay!
Everyone was just stunned.
What could possibly happen?
What could possibly have gone wrong?
We knew that it was Bishop.
Everybody knew that it was Bishop, yet he'd walked free.
In 1987, there's a law called "double jeopardy",
which states that a person cannot be tried twice for the same crime.
Once acquitted, Russell Bishop can never be tried again
for the murders of those two little girls,
even if police could find irrefutable proof that he is the killer.
As Bishop leaves the courtroom,
he puts his hands in the air and shouts, "I'm innocent."
He then rushes through the line of reporters,
to go celebrate at the pub across from the courthouse
with his brothers and his girlfriend.
The Hataway and the Fellows families are devastated.
They know they will never see justice for Karen and Nicola.
You feel like everyone's laughing at you, you know?
You feel like they're looking at you and thinking
that those little girls' lives were worthless.
I was so angry.
I thought, "But who the hell could have done it then?"
It's less than four months since Russell Bishop was cleared
of murdering Karen Hataway and Nicola Fellows.
Since the trial, Russell Bishop has been trying to readjust to family life.
As months pass, a wrongfully accused Russell Bishop takes the spotlight
while the country forgets about the real victims.
The Sussex police are convinced that Russell Bishop is guilty
and that they had the right man.
But with the double jeopardy law,
there's no use in them continuing the investigation.
This angers the public, and everyone is demanding answers.
The parents of Nicola and Karen are determined
that the case shouldn't be dropped.
There's two little girls in a cemetery up in Brighton,
and if only for them, we've got to get to the bottom of it.
Fifty people set off in a march from Brighton's Wild Park.
As part of the protest, a petition was handed to the police
calling for the case to be reopened.
I'm adamant that my daughter's killer should be found.
I won't rest until this man or people are brought to justice.
August 19, 1989.
The parents organize a march to force Sussex police to reopen the case.
Among those who participate in the protest is Russell Bishop.
I suppose some people might be surprised that you're now linking up
with the parents of the two murdered schoolgirls,
having been accused yourself of their murder.
People are very surprised.
People keep asking me why do I keep on and on and on.
The fact is I want to see this case reopened.
My name isn't Claude until someone else has brought the justice to real purpose.
Everybody that knew anything about the case
was sickened by seeing him behave like that.
If he had any sense of decency, he would have shut himself away,
but he had to put himself front and center.
Everyone can see that Russell Bishop is using the protest,
organized by the families of the victims,
as a platform to improve his public image.
Seeing the smirking Russell Bishop,
seeing the parents of the kids who had been murdered
and knew that Bishop had done it,
it was horrific.
After his acquittal, Bishop received £15,000 from the tabloid News of the World
to publish his version of the story as a victim of this miscarriage of justice.
In the article, the Bishop family explicitly frames Barry Fellows, Nicholas' father,
as being a better suspect.
He said that during the police inquiry,
nine people appeared to be suspects,
and Barry Fellows was one of them.
He said it was not unknown for a father to kill his daughter.
Has it been more hard to stomach in the sense that you've been accused
of possibly being involved in the whole affair?
To think that anyone could think that I killed my little girl.
No way.
No way.
No way at all.
I deny it emphatically.
I love that girl.
However, after a full investigation by Sussex Police,
they find the accusations to be baseless.
Barry Fellows is completely innocent and cleared of all charges.
But the damage is already done.
The house, it was covered in graffiti.
Murderer, we don't want you here.
Get away.
Despicable people.
Nicholas Fellows' father, Barry, felt moved to make a statement
as to rumours and suspicion about him.
There are various people out there who have accused me of various crimes.
This not only hurts me personally,
but it hurts my wife and son even more.
Russell Bishop got what he wanted.
He's no longer the villain of his community.
And on February 2nd, 1990,
the Sussex Police send Bishop a letter confirming that the case of the Babes in the Wood
is officially closed,
which means someone has gotten away with murder.
February 4th, 1990,
two days after Bishop receives that letter,
is the day seven-year-old Rachel is kidnapped.
We were just going to talk about
what we talked about yesterday at the hospital, okay?
Can you move on?
Yes.
At around 4pm, Rachel is out roller skating
while her dad is working in the garden.
It was really sunny.
It was really warm.
My dad gave me a pound
to go to the local sweet shop.
But because we'd been living there not very long,
I got lost.
What did you want to buy?
I wanted to buy a trickster and mud bath.
Did daddy say anything to you?
What's he say?
Be careful.
I saw a man,
and he was fixing his car.
And my dad's a mechanic.
So, because he was a mechanic,
just like my dad,
I asked him for directions.
Rachel has no time to react.
Without a word, the man sneaks out.
snatches her off the street, and throws her in the trunk of his car.
Then the car speeds off.
Rachel is terrified, but her mind remains sharp.
She looks around the trunk, illuminated by the brake lights,
and finds a can of WD-40 and a hammer.
She starts hammering on the lid of the trunk as loud as she can,
screaming at the top of her lungs.
I screamed that I would give him money
because I had the pounds that my dad gave me.
And his only response was, shut up or I'll kill you.
She then starts to untie her roller skates and takes them off,
because she knows that without them, she stands a better chance of running away
once the man opens the trunk.
He took me out, and then took me to the clean in the woods.
And did he carry you straight to the clean?
Or did he take you somewhere else to us?
Or did he put you somewhere else to us?
He took me to the clean.
Do you know that?
No, he didn't touch me.
But you put me in the car, and you took me out of the car.
With her mom sitting next to her in the interrogation room,
Rachel omits parts of the story.
She says nothing about what happened in the back seat of the car.
And to investigators, it means she doesn't remember.
I have a big secret.
It's been in my head for the last 30-odd years.
Everybody. Believed that he strangled me before he sexually assaulted me.
I don't know whether I knew at the time.
I do know the reason why I didn't talk to my parents and tell them about it earlier
was because I was ashamed.
When we got to Devil's Dyke,
he took me out and threw me on the back seat.
He told me to take off all my clothes. And I just complied. I was conscious when he sexually assaulted me.
The man then puts his hands around her throat. Rachel can't breathe, but before she can say anything, she blacks out. He then carries Rachel into the woods and abandons her, convinced that she's dead.
When she comes to, Rachel is alone and unable to stand.
She fumbles her way out of the bushes, but she's dizzy and keeps falling over.
I just remember it being really cold and knowing that I had to find help.
I saw some headlights.
My first thought was that it was him again and that he was here to finish me off.
But she quickly realizes that if she doesn't approach those headlights, she's going to freeze to death.
When she finally sees a shape in the dark, it's a young couple offering a blanket and their help.
After being admitted to the hospital, Rachel is reunited with her mom.
I was worried that she'd be cross because I'd lost my brand new jumper.
That's what I was afraid of.
Rachel just didn't want to go to bed when she came home.
And I remember Rachel was sitting on the sofa, picking the thorns out of her feet.
It just doesn't bear thinking about.
As a father, you think that you can protect your family, your children,
but you can't.
And you can't blame anybody except yourself,
because that's what you're there for as a parent, isn't it?
You bring them up, you protect them, and you're failed.
And they'll go with me to the end.
At first light, over a hundred officers began the most intensive search undertaken by Sussex police since the Wild Park murder inquiry.
With the details given by Rachel, police are quickly able to start the investigation.
They're looking for a white male with a mustache driving a red car.
As the information is shared with the unit, detectives are informed that someone they know all too well was seen driving a red car that same night, Russell Bishop.
A couple of officers drove up to his house and saw him scrubbing, as if his life depended on it, his car.
When we opened up the boot lid, we saw the WD-40, we saw the hammer, we saw the chip marks in the lid of the boot.
There was clothing fibers, which later matched up to the ones that the little girl was wearing.
There was blood and there was semen, immediately linking the little girl to Bishop.
Bishop is immediately put under arrest.
In an effort to make sure Bishop doesn't escape justice, Rachel is asked to face her attacker once more.
I remember the lineup. I did ask, would he be able to see me?
and I'm going to ask you in a moment to look through the window at the line of men who are sitting there.
I shall then ask you whether the person who you saw on that day is here.
I don't think I let go of my mum's hand.
Where's the piece number nine?
You think it's number nine?
The man Rachel points out is, in fact, Russell Bishop.
On December 13th, 1990, Russell Bishop is found guilty of kidnapping, indecent assault, and attempted murder.
Here, a man who was acquitted of murdering two girls in Brighton three years ago has been jailed for trying to murder a girl of seven.
The judge sentenced Bishop to life imprisonment for attempted murder, ten years imprisonment for kidnapping, and ten years imprisonment for sexual assault.
And while everyone is relieved that he finally got what he deserved, there is no celebration in the courtroom, no cheers.
Because everyone in Brighton is convinced Bishop killed Karen and Nicola in 1986, and that he should never have been allowed to walk free.
The parents of the two Brighton schoolgirls who Bishop had been cleared of murdering three years ago were among those in court.
It's no less than what he deserves. And it don't stop there, I'll tell you that now. My fight for justice for my daughter don't stop there.
Justice prevailed for that little girl.
But the unfortunate thing is it wasn't justice for Karen and Nicola.
I say life goes on, but it's still there.
It hasn't gone away from me.
Do you know what I still do?
I still go in shops and look for clothes for her,
thinking, oh, that looked nice on her.
And while the families of Karen Hadaway and Nicola Fellows
continue to fight in their daughters' names, Rachel returns to her family life. She is granted
anonymity by the court and is hoping everything will go back to the way it was. And for more than
a decade, she has managed to live a normal life. Until one day, the phone rings. Russell Bishop
is up for parole. I thought a life sentence is a life sentence. Then I found out that life
in Russell Bishop's case
meant only 14 years
just because he didn't actually kill me.
It's 2004.
Rachel is now 22 years old
and the news is terrifying.
Bishop, who has been in jail for the last 14 years,
is due to be released at any moment.
She's convinced Bishop will come back for her.
It's 2005 and finally,
there's hope for Rachel
and for the Fellows and Hataways.
The Double Jeopardy Law, an 800-year-old law preventing anyone from being tried twice for the same crime, is repealed.
This means, with new evidence, Bishop could be retried for the 1986 murders of Karen and Nicola.
But they need to act fast before he gets out on parole.
The key thing that they need is new and compelling evidence, and they only get one chance to present that evidence.
A new investigation is opened on the 1986 murder case,
but gathering new and compelling evidence proves to be harder than expected.
I used to have nightmares that he would climb up a ladder and get through my bedroom window
and come and finish me.
Ever since that phone call, Rachel has been terrified of Bishop being released.
She's developed a condition called agoraphobia, which prevents her from ever leaving the house.
As years pass, Bishop's parole continues to be denied.
But until he's put away for good, Rachel will never feel at ease.
Finally, in 2013, there's a break in the case.
The sweatshirt was still central to this investigation.
Bishop had always denied any knowledge of the shirts at all.
And Roy Green decided that he would test the inside of a tear on the cuff of the sweatshirt.
and it came back with Bishop's DNA.
The discovery is huge, but there's just one problem.
Scientists can't say for sure that the sweatshirt was not contaminated back in 1986.
This means that any new DNA found on the sweatshirt is inadmissible.
However, when the bodies were found, forensic pathologists had taken tapings from the girls' arms and kept them under seal.
Back then, they didn't have the science to examine them for DNA.
When we examined those tapings, we recovered a mixed profile of DNA of Russell Bishop and Karen Hadaway.
This was massive for us. This was Russell Bishop's DNA on Karen Hadaway's arm.
This could be the new compelling evidence investigators need to win this case.
In May 2016, Russell Bishop is taken out of his prison cell.
He is convinced his parole has finally come.
I'm listing you on suspicion of murdering Sir Nicholas Tellers, Karen Hadaway, on or around Thursday, 9th of October, 1996.
Tell us what happened to Nicola.
I've got no idea.
Come in.
I've got nothing to say.
I'm not responsible for this.
I've got nothing to do with it.
I mean, it's some fucking stuff genied up 30 years later.
This case has nothing to do with me.
Nothing to do with me whatsoever.
I cared my name.
After his interrogation, Bishop is arrested and sent back to his cell to wait for his third trial.
With his DNA on the girls' arms, the prosecution is convinced they have a strong case.
But they have no idea that Bishop has a plausible explanation for that, and it could destroy the case once more.
Russell Bishop arrived in a prison van for the start of the second trial he's faced accused of murdering two schoolgirls 32 years ago.
Their families were in court for the start of the trial.
It's been a long time coming, but I am smiling.
We're grateful for the first time that someone's actually not slammed a door in our face.
32 years, I think.
But then we did say that we'd come to this park every year until we got justice.
That's right, justice.
October 16th, 2018.
Russell Bishop's retrial for the murders of Karen Hadaway and Nicola Fellows begins.
When the prosecution shows the evidence to the court, the defense insists the sweatshirt was not Bishop's.
And they explain why his DNA was found on Karen's arm.
According to Bishop, he claims that when the. bodies were found, he went to check their pulse.
Something, apparently, he had told Detective John Morton back in 1986.
I got a call asking me to come to the park where some local lads had found the bodies of the two girls.
They had their heads down and were absolutely deflated.
I was totally amazed when I saw the other guy who turned out to be Russell Bishop.
It was strange because he was standing there shuffling his feet.
And what was he doing?
Whistling out loud.
So I asked him what happened and he said to me,
I jumped over the tree and went to the girls and I felt both of their necks repulse.
I thought, well, that's really strange because from what the other two had said,
I knew Russell Bishop had not gone to be in 15 feet of those girls on that afternoon.
Russell Bishop's argument cracks in front of the courtroom.
The truth is far more disturbing.
After he strangled the two girls to death,
on October 9th, 1986,
Russell Bishop participated in the search the next morning.
He wanted to be the first on the scene to check their pulse
so he could explain why his DNA was on the girls.
The problem is, he never got the chance to get close enough.
Bishop is furious.
He knows he's about to lose.
This is when the prosecution reveals one last bit of evidence against Bishop.
Letters written by Bishop while he was on trial in 1987
sent to a 13-year-old.
The letters are read out loud to the court.
And they were incredibly sexually suggestive.
And clearly, he didn't want those letters to be read out of court.
And he started shouting from the dock that he wanted a retrial.
But, in fact, those letters were read out.
On December 10th, at 12.30 p.m., the jury is sent out to deliberate.
In less than two hours, they come back with a verdict.
A convicted pedophile has been found guilty of murdering two schoolgirls,
found strangled.
Strangled and sexually assaulted near Brighton 32 years ago.
Russell Bishop is finally convicted for the murders he committed in 1986,
and for which he escaped justice for 32 years.
He is sentenced to an additional 36 years.
This is a moment to remember the two girls.
We should also acknowledge the courage, persistence, and dignity
of Karen and Nicholas' families.
I sincerely hope the families can now find some peace
and move forward to the next chapter in their lives.
I've said that I'd never stop fighting for justice.
And now them little girls can rest in peace.
I used to go into the bedroom where her stuff was in the chest.
When I opened the chest and all her stuff was there,
and I can just smell her.
When the court case finished and we got the verdict,
I said, well, now she can go to her angel bed and go to sleep.
She hasn't got to worry about anything now.
And I know she's around.
You can't see her and you can't feel her,
but she's there in spirit.
If I could have a wish come true, a dream that'd come to pass,
I'd ask to spend a day with you and pray that it would last.
I'd run to you and hold you close.
We'd laugh and smile again.
We would talk about the old times and see how we've both been.
My wish go ungranted, but it always will be true.
I'd trade many of my tomorrows for one yesterday with you.
Since the trial, Rachel has been on a journey to get back control of her life.
She has built a beautiful family with her loving husband.
The reason I fell in love with Jay,
he made me realize what it was to actually be loved.
And he made sure that I felt loved.
I had my first daughter when I had just turned 22.
She's turned out to be absolutely beautiful.
All my children have.
I'm very proud of each of them.
I'm hoping by telling my story,
I will be able to put myself back in the now.
I don't want to stay a prisoner of my past.
And I'm hoping that I can stop hiding.
I want to be able to go out and spend time with my family.
And have dates with my husband.
And go to a pub and sit in a beer garden in the sunshine.
I'm willing to do whatever it takes.
I'm still here.
And I've still got a father.
And a fighting chance.
Good. Good.
That's it then.
That was very good.
Right.
The time's now 2.30.
And we're concluding the interview.
May you cheer me on to the camera.
That's that then.
Okay?
Thanks for watching!
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Seven-year-old Rachel Watts was kidnapped and sexually assaulted by Russell Bishop in 1990, with the attack occurring after she asked a man for directions while roller skating.
Rachel initially withheld details about the assault, fearing for her safety and ashamed of what happened, and later recalled being strangled in the back of a car before being abandoned in the woods.
In 1986, Russell Bishop was acquitted of murdering two girls, Karen Hadaway and Nicola Fellows, due to lack of conclusive DNA evidence and the double jeopardy law preventing retrial.
Despite being cleared, Bishop was later linked to the 1986 crimes through new forensic evidence: DNA found on the girls’ arms and a sweatshirt worn at the scene, which contained Bishop’s DNA.
In 2018, after a retrial, Bishop was convicted of the 1986 murders, having previously escaped justice for 32 years, and sentenced to an additional 36 years.
Rachel, who survived the attack, developed agoraphobia and lived in fear of Bishop’s release, believing he would return to harm her.
The case was reopened due to the repeal of double jeopardy, allowing a new trial with fresh evidence, leading to a long and difficult legal battle.
Rachel’s story highlights the dangers of wrongful acquittals, the resilience of victims’ families, and the long-term psychological impact on survivors of trauma.
Summary:
In 1990, seven-year-old Rachel Watts was kidnapped and severely abused by Russell Bishop after a brief interaction while roller skating. She survived the attack, remembering being strangled and sexually assaulted before being abandoned in the woods. Rachel, traumatized and fearful, initially withheld key details from authorities, contributing to the perception that she had no memory of the event.
In 1986, Bishop had been acquitted of the murders of two schoolgirls, Karen Hadaway and Nicola Fellows, due to insufficient forensic evidence and the double jeopardy law. For over three decades, the case remained unresolved, with Bishop living freely and even participating in a protest to improve his public image. Years later, new forensic evidence—specifically DNA from the girls' arms and a blue sweatshirt—provided a compelling case for Bishop’s guilt.
In 2018, after a retrial, he was found guilty of the 1986 murders and sentenced to an additional 36 years. Rachel, who developed long-term trauma and agoraphobia, found some peace in the justice served. Her story underscores the devastating consequences of wrongful acquittals and the enduring impact of childhood trauma on survivors, while also highlighting the resilience of victims’ families and the importance of re-examining cold cases with modern science.
FAQs
Rachel was kidnapped while roller skating and taken by a man to a clearing in the woods where he sexually assaulted her and attempted to strangle her before abandoning her.
Russell Bishop was a man accused of murdering two girls in 1986, but he was acquitted due to lack of conclusive evidence and the double jeopardy law. He had a history of criminal activity and was seen near the crime scene wearing a blue sweatshirt with fibers matching the victims' clothing.
Rachel identified Russell Bishop in a police lineup, recalling that he was the man who took her from the street and drove her to the woods, where she was abused and left.
He was acquitted because the blue sweatshirt found at the scene could not be definitively linked to him, and the prosecution lacked DNA evidence at the time due to the limitations of 1980s forensic science.
DNA found on the arms of the victims, Karen Hadaway and Nicola Fellows, matched Russell Bishop's DNA, proving he had direct physical contact with the girls before their deaths.
Russell Bishop was finally convicted of the 1986 murders, providing long-overdue justice for the families of Karen and Nicola, who had lived in fear and uncertainty for decades.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.