Go back

Table Stakes Matter More Than You Think with Dr. Chuck Bamford

10m 31s

Table Stakes Matter More Than You Think with Dr. Chuck Bamford

In this episode of Revenue Builders, hosts John Kaplan and John McMahon speak with Dr. Chuck Bamford, a strategy professor at Duke and Notre Dame and founder of Bamford Associates, about why leadership teams get strategy backwards. Bamford explains that companies become obsessed with finding the next big competitive advantage while customers walk out the door over broken billing, poor support, and slow responses. He calls these fundamentals "table stakes"—the basics every company must get right just to stay in the game. Until table stakes are at or above the competitive median, innovation and differentiation do not matter. Using analogies like a bank branch or a restaurant with dirty silverware, he shows that customers judge companies on fundamentals first, and no amount of excellence elsewhere compensates for failure there. Bamford also notes that leaders enjoy generating ideas but avoid the hard, unglamorous work of implementation and ongoing customer support, which is especially dangerous in subscription and consumption-based software models where frustrated customers simply churn. To fix this, he advises companies to identify their "bump competitors," understand why those competitors win deals, start strategy from the buyer journey rather than inside a conference room, validate findings with real clients, and limit the competitor list to five or six strong proxies to avoid analysis paralysis.

Transcription

1760 Words, 9610 Characters

English
Speaker 1Welcome to Revenue Builders hosted by John Kaplan and John McMahon. Dr. Chuck Bamford teaches strategy at Duke and Notre Dame and has written plenty of books on the subject. He founded Bamford Associates, a strategy consulting firm that's worked with some of the world's largest companies and after all those years advising executives, he's learned something most strategy conversations miss entirely. Companies obsessed over the next big competitive advantage while their customers are walking out the door over broken billing, terrible support, and slow responses. Chuck calls these table stakes. They're the fundamentals every company has to get right just to stay in the game and until you do, your innovation doesn't matter. In this clip, Chuck walks through why leadership teams get this backwards and what actually separates the companies that scale from the ones that don't.
Speaker 2Let's dive in. Where do people go wrong with strategy just at the top level and they'll give us good grounding for the rest of the conversation?
Speaker 3You know, I think, John, they just, they, they, they use kind of their past or face validity and just decide on to do something. I think that every new idea that comes across the table looks like it's fun. And so let's go invest there and then, oh shoot, it didn't work. Or it's more fun to kind of put stuff together and it's not fun to actually implement it and get all the employees and the organization focused around it. So I think that it's just viewed as a, not a process. It's viewed as just something that you're endowed with. There you go. Oh, we're on event. Oh, that's the worst, right? We're going to have our strategy event and then thank God we're done with that. And we can get back to work for the other 363 days.
Speaker 4Hey, Chuck, we, a lot of listeners here, you know, are in the software world and, you know, the software world was once perpetual licenses. Now it's software subscriptions soon move into pure consumption, just like a utility. And, you know, what you said is half the strategy is not frustrating customers while the other half is your competitive advantage. And a lot of these companies, as Johnny knows, focus heavily on competitive advantage, and then what happens is they don't focus as much on client success yet. They expect to get the renewal for the subscription. And because they do frustrate customers, because they don't put enough attention on client success, the turn numbers rise, you know, they start losing customers. And as much as that happens, you know, I still don't see the type of attention that I think you should have in this world on client success. And you see it in the everyday. services that we use, whether it's a cable company or some of the other service companies that, you know, we all use. You get so frustrated, even though you like the service, you get so frustrated with the, you know, customer support or client success. You want to change just because of that. Hey, Chuck, let's, Johnny's on
Speaker 2a huge point here. And it's, this was a big takeaway from me, Johnny, when we worked together with Chuck and he called this, I wanted to dig into it, you know, you're talking about the table stakes versus the unorthodox. And basically, he's going to talk about the table stakes. But Johnny, what you're talking about is, you know, we're out there thinking we're killing it. And there are some basic expectations, table stakes that we were lacking, but we had some really good competitive advantage in other areas. But until we went and, as you said, really kind of got eyeball to eyeball with customers, we found that the table stakes are the big gap in the orthodox. So, Chuck, I don't want to give away the punchline or whatever, but could you talk about what you mean by orthodox? And this one was, this one was a big epiphany for me because, you know, I'm looking for competitive advantage, unique innovation, and you got us focused on, you know, where, how do you know you're not frustrating your clients? Could you talk about how you came up with the concept of orthodox and unorthodox?
Speaker 3Yeah, I wish, thank you very much. I wish, I could claim that I came up with it. But it has been, it's been one of the foundations of a lot of the strategy researchers that strategy has got to be so much more than just cool new things. It's got to be making sure we're doing all the things that we're supposed to be doing well. And so, it's a problem when our competitors are above us, when we're below the median relative to our competitors on just fundamental things like how we do billing or how we do invoicing or how we respond, how fast we respond to the customers. I always say, when you walk into a bank, you expect to see a teller back there behind a thing and you expect to have a box and you expect to have carpeting in there or tile and lighting. And there's all these things and none of it is why we chose that particular bank. But if it's not there or it's done badly, we get frustrated. And there's a line that goes that in a restaurant, I think I'll probably use this with you, John, right? The line to go to the restaurant that if the silverware is dirty on your table and you didn't get your drink for 20 minutes, it doesn't matter whether Bobby Flay himself delivers the food to your table, you're frustrated and you may not come back. So, table stakes things are relative to our competitive set, who we're being compared to, but those table stake things all have to be relatively at median for us to then have cool things that'll really separate us.
Speaker 4But Chuck, in your experience then, why do so many companies focus on selling the product, but not, you know, supporting the customers? Why is that? I think it's hard, John.
Speaker 3I mean, you all, you all with what you do, you, you deal with this all the time. I find that a lot of leadership wants to come up with these great ideas, but they don't want to implement it. And then once you already said it, once you have your customer, you're like, oh, good, we've got them. No, right. The customer, the client is sitting out there and they're comparing us all the time to our competitors and to what else they could do as substitutes. And I think that it's just, it's hard daily work that people just don't want to, they don't find it fun and they don't want to do it.
Speaker 2Johnny, I have a hypothesis and thinking about this, um, with the world that you and I live in and technology and so many of the great technical minds, like they, they came to their company, they came to their product with great technical innovation. Um, and so the, you know, the first thought is, you know, having that innovation, having that innovation, having that innovation innovation, innovation, innovation. And, you know, what we find in the work we do at force management, as you well know, John is, you know, most times you have to change that customer's outlook from inside out, you know, it's all about the product and then from outside in and what's the buyer journey, what is the customer experiencing? And I know it sounds trivial, but even the work we did with Chuck, we had to go back to the basics and, uh, and get close to our customers. So Chuck, how do you, how are you, um, how do people actually do this? You know, how do you suggest they do this? So, so first you got to make sure you're not frustrating your customer. First, you have to understand the buyer journey. What are some ways that you've seen companies do that really, really well? Um, I, I
Speaker 3like to start with the, with the company people in the company first and then go validate what they find. So I always, I like to pull everybody together and say, who, whom are we being compared to? So I always start with what we call bump competitors, right? That is if we win the deal, who did we lose? Who lost the deal? Or if we lose the deal, who won the deal? Who do we bump up against all the time? And then whom do we see as proxies for doing something unique or doing something special? And then I send them out and I say, let's go find out as much as we can about these companies. And, and John, you and I've talked about this before. I'm, I'm stunned and felt little executives know about their competitors and why their competitors win. And I told him, I said, I don't, I don't care about how many employees they have or what their revenue figures are. What I care about is why do they win business? What, what do you think they're doing that helps them win business and really analyze what that's going on in the competitive set? I think my take is generally, we cannot do strategy by sitting in a room. We have to start out where the customer starts and they start by seeing all the possibilities and they, all the substitutes are not doing it at all. They see all those things. And that's where we have to start in our comparison. And then it's got to be validated, right? I've got to go validate this with clients. I've got to, I got to make sure we're not kidding ourselves, but rather than start broadly and go, you know, oh my gosh, it's everything. I want to narrow that list down. And I always tell people don't get more than five or six competitors in your list. Make sure they're good proxies for things because you'll kill yourself with analysis.
Speaker 5Thanks for listening to today's episode. If you enjoy the content, please subscribe, rate, and review the show to help us reach more people. This show is brought to you by Force Management, where we help companies improve sales performance, executing the growth strategy at the point of sale. Check out forcemanagement.com for more information. you

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. Dr. Chuck Bamford argues that companies chase the next big competitive advantage while neglecting fundamentals like billing, support, and response times, which he calls table stakes.
  2. Table stakes must be at or above the competitive median before any innovation or differentiation can matter to customers.
  3. Strategy is often treated as a one-time event or something leaders are naturally endowed with, rather than an ongoing process of implementation and organizational focus.
  4. Leaders tend to enjoy generating ideas but avoid the hard daily work of implementing them and keeping customers satisfied after the sale.
  5. In subscription and consumption-based software models, frustrating customers through poor client success drives up churn and threatens renewals.
  6. Companies should identify their "bump competitors"—those they win against or lose to—and understand why those competitors win business.
  7. Strategy cannot be done sitting in a room; it must start with the buyer journey and the customer's view of all available options and substitutes.
  8. Findings should be validated with actual clients, and the competitor list should be kept to five or six strong proxies to avoid analysis paralysis.

Summary:

In this episode of Revenue Builders, hosts John Kaplan and John McMahon speak with Dr. Chuck Bamford, a strategy professor at Duke and Notre Dame and founder of Bamford Associates, about why leadership teams get strategy backwards. Bamford explains that companies become obsessed with finding the next big competitive advantage while customers walk out the door over broken billing, poor support, and slow responses.

He calls these fundamentals "table stakes"—the basics every company must get right just to stay in the game. Until table stakes are at or above the competitive median, innovation and differentiation do not matter. Using analogies like a bank branch or a restaurant with dirty silverware, he shows that customers judge companies on fundamentals first, and no amount of excellence elsewhere compensates for failure there.

Bamford also notes that leaders enjoy generating ideas but avoid the hard, unglamorous work of implementation and ongoing customer support, which is especially dangerous in subscription and consumption-based software models where frustrated customers simply churn. To fix this, he advises companies to identify their "bump competitors," understand why those competitors win deals, start strategy from the buyer journey rather than inside a conference room, validate findings with real clients, and limit the competitor list to five or six strong proxies to avoid analysis paralysis.

FAQs

They treat strategy as a one-time event or a fun idea exercise rather than an ongoing process. They chase new ideas without implementing them or getting the organization focused on execution.

Table stakes are the fundamentals every company must get right just to stay in the game, such as billing, support, and response speed. Until these are at least at the median relative to competitors, innovation and competitive advantage don't matter.

Leaders enjoy coming up with big ideas but dislike the hard daily work of implementation and ongoing customer care. Once they win a customer, they assume the customer is secured and stop paying attention.

Companies that frustrate customers over billing, support, or slow responses see higher churn and lose renewals. Failing to focus on client success raises turnover even when the product itself is good.

Understand the buyer journey and identify whom you are being compared to. Start with your "bump competitors"—the companies you regularly win or lose deals against.

Focus on why competitors win business rather than their size or revenue. Narrow the list to no more than five or six good proxies to avoid drowning in analysis.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.