Sydney Sweeney Nude Ad Scandal Exposes a Bigger Problem

Wow, this Sydney Swinney nude ad scandal, it exposed a lot, but you've got everyone missing the biggest problems. So you go inside Trump lying to you about his $5,000 B.S. midterm promise because it's worse than you think. And why it's been one year since Charlie Kirk was killed, but his assassination striker to conspiracy war that's tearing the right apart while you've got people meme in on the background. We're talking about all of that even more. On today's brand new, Philip DeFranco show, "You Daily Dive Into The Dew" is, but first, we can outspin. If you are in or around San Francisco, Phoenix, or Denver this Friday, Saturday, Sunday, I'd love to see you. The second leg of our crashing out live tour is underway. And we've had such an amazing time, you know, breaking out of the heaviness of the PDFs and just doing something with, like, the feels really special together. And there's eight more shows to go though. Chicago is already sold out for everyone else. You can still get tickets right now at crashingouttour.com. And easily click link to that in the top of description, top comment. But that said, there is a lot to talk about today starting with this. So Sydney Swinney, she just got bare ass naked to help push a new prediction market on people. And with that feels, like, just such a 2026 sentence, not only did she expose herself in this, she exposed that they could even bigger problem for a lot of people that were maybe not as focused on it. And it's created this larger debate and fight and backlash around celebrity brand deals with these platforms. And so as far as specifics, her partnership is with an app called Novig, and it's pitching itself as a sports-only market. Which is also something that Sydney really hits on in the ad, where she's relying on carefully play sporting equipment to cover herself. Thank you, no sports. Prove it. Novig is just sports. Nobody on wars, or deaths, and no politics. Or with that, clearly being a shot at Kowshi and Polymarket, which have faced endless backlash for waders on wars and visions, elections, bills, and congress, and more. And actually, in addition to being the face of Novig, Sydney is also an equity partner, and according to the Wall Street Journal, she's the one who reached out to them about an investment opportunity. But they're also serving as a creative director for the sad campaign and message, which actually includes another ad about trading responsibly. Or which is less naked, but still suggestive. Trading on sports, takes balls. You know what else does? Taking a timeout, setting a limit, need a pay. And so with all this, like pretty much everything Sydney, Sweden, except actually the acting part itself, this is generated a ton of conversation with some thinking that this was an effective ad campaign. You also had others condemning the choice to use sex to sell gambling. And while the criticisms and the concerns around this, I think are very important to hear out and talk about in the debate around this, I think it is important that that people have it. It also feels incredibly important to point out that Sydney, Sweden, is far from the only person doing this. And in fact, there are levels to why these partnerships should be concerning. Right just a few days ago, Polymarket released a celebrity field ad with LeBron James as its main star, with his king nickname even being used as part of a promo code. And because LeBron himself is a fucking athlete, and his sport is a major part of what Polymarket users can trade on, this sparked way bigger concerns in Sydney, Sweden, get naked in the name of sports betting. And so many accusing LeBron and all these other celebrities who participated in the ad of being sell outs. And among those who had investigated reporter coffee zilla writing, is there anyone who says no to these gambling companies, saying every major celebrity is lining up to take the check? And for some, LeBron specifically stood out because he is just so rich. Or with people saying this is just a different level of greed. Or people arguing things like it would be one thing for someone who needs the money to take it from Polymarket. But arguing that it is genuinely disgusting for a billionaire like LeBron who doesn't need the money to just run to the bank. And that is what others are saying, potentially the most famous athlete ever is promoting gambling to kids. Don't care what you say is gambling. And then with this, you had some op-eds noting that this is a major ethical gray area. Or because he is still in the NBA, and there are a ton of questions about whether or not active athletes should be promoting platforms so easily swayed by insider trading. Or because LeBron is an insider, and while we don't know the terms of his deal with Polymarket, if he is a spokesperson for them, it is reasonable to assume that he stands to financially benefit from their success, at least in some capacity. Though I will say it doesn't seem like the backlash or you really even shame these days is a deterrent. You've got all of this coming as prediction markets are starting to really spend big on celebrity partnerships. So I will say none of this should be surprising. One, because the checks these companies write, I can't even imagine for them, they're huge for fucking everybody. My sales team is not a fan of me saying no to these deals these days. And two, there have been more of these conversations going on around, hey, if the sports companies themselves write these leagues, are fully embracing betting. Why shouldn't the players be able to grab a piece for themselves as well? Though that brings us to three, most people using these services just lose money. It's part of the reason they're able to pay these celebrities or any of these influencers so much money. Studies have come out saying 96% of gamblers lose money. And I think it's very important to know that we are existing in a time where so many people feel like they don't have a chance at the future, that they are taking these large bets and swings in a hope for kind of a yolo payday. That feels like the only possible way to get out of a world and a life that's constantly shitting on it. Of the soapbox, sorry about that. This is just an area where my thinking around it has evolved greatly over the past two or so years. And so it's always top of mind. But the controversies around these deals are also likely the least of many people's worries. Right, that's because with the midterms just around the corner, there are a lot of eyes on what role these markets are going to play. And in fact, a new report from the anti-corruption data collective just found that $183 million is already been bet on the 2026 midterms, even with two months left in the game. And to put that in perspective, I give you a little context that is around double a boat was spent in the entire 2024 cycle. And if we just see the same betting spike leading up to election day, the 2024 hat, it's projected that over a billion dollars is going to be spent on these midterms. Or with some races, drawing more attention than others, right, the Texas Senate race that has the most money wagered so far. And very interestingly, even with all the money at play, 10 while it's alone are controlling 17% of all congressional volume on polymarket. And so it doesn't actually even take that much money to move these markets. Or you could wager the maximum personal campaign contribution allowed and you could move nearly every single midterm related market by $0.5 or more. And on average, it only costs $23 to double an underdog's implied probability. And as far as why these markets are so easy to move, the report claimed that, quote, "radiction market platforms have opened far more election-related markets than demand would appear to support." So 77% of markets have less than $1,000 in volume. But they then also note, a manipulated price can ripple through the information ecosystem as if it reflected real momentum. Especially as you have news people or news networks, whether they have a deal or not, touting these numbers is if they mean something. And it's been noted that all of this can be especially helpful for people that are far behind because, quote, "Prediction market prices are now frequently cited in news reporting and by campaigns." For underdog candidates that might be struggling to attract media attention and are looking to signal viability and attract donors, almost any news story about their candidacy can have significant publicity value. And so it ends up not being that surprising that polling from earlier this year found that 44% of Americans think that betting on election outcomes should be illegal compared to just 30% who supported. And so while I understand why there was such a big reaction to the city-sweeny ad, like for a number of reasons, it does shed light, or at least off of the opportunity to shed light, on all the other big issues at play right now. Especially because so many of the people in power right now seem so anti-regulation, and so there are a lot of concerns and really not a lot of answers or solutions at play that at least have viability. And while we're looking to the future on this, we also have to look at the present because today, it marks the one-year anniversary since Charlie Kirk was fatally shot while speaking at Utah Valley University. Right, and with it now officially being a year, there's been a lot of discourse about Kirk both online and in mainstream media. You had a lot of people posting memorials to him, praising the legacy that they say that he's left, but then also at the same time, you had a lot of people criticizing Kirk, slamming his controversial beliefs, and accusing him of spreading hate and divisions. So then with that, you had some going as far as to celebrate his death or claim that it was deserved, though others, they just circulated clips of some of his most inflammatory comments. You will never live in a society when you have an arm set is inry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of unfortunately some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. Native-born Americans, you better buy weapons, everybody. Have a lot of guns at your disposal. I would never leave your home without a weapon. If I see a black pilot, I'm going to be like, "Boy, I hope he's qualified." So if you had a daughter and she was 10 and she got ripped and she was going to give birth and she would know when she was going to give birth and she was going to live, would you want her to go through that and carry her with baby. That's awfully graphic. It's no, but it's a real life scenario that happens to many people. The answer is yes, the baby would be delivered. And then of course on top of all this, there are the countless Kirk memes that have just really never stopped, but also they're back even more today. But then also, this is especially true when you look to Twitter, a lot of the top posts that the platform is promoting, they're all sharing various conspiracy theories. You've got a lot of people claiming that Israel was actually behind Kirk's assassination. You also had some arguing that Trump and or some unnamed shadowy forces in the US government killed him because he was speaking out about the Epstein files. So I also think it's important to point out that one of the last things he said about the Epstein files was this. I'm going to trust my friends, the administration. I'm going to trust my friends and the government to do what needs to be done, solve it, balls in their hands. I've said pull any this last weekend. So I will say it's not the most surprising thing that these are the top posts that are popping up on Twitter. One, because this is Elon Musk's version of Twitter. And in many ways, it feels like it's just become a nightmare household. But also two conspiracy theories around Charlie's death. They've been swirling since the second that he got killed. But also a lot of those theories, they've really been allowed to flourish because they've been pushed by some of the biggest voices on the far. Right. We're talking about people that have millions and millions of followers and daily viewers. And like we've talked about many times before, Candace Owens has been one of the single biggest promoters of these conspiracies. And honestly, it feels like she may be one of the key reasons why Republicans were not able to come together after Kirk was killed. So I will say that I'd be giving a singular person too much credit. And while she is spread or at least mentioned a lot of different unverified claims, the most recent one that you settled on is that Tyler Robinson was actually just a patsy. Or with the theory being that the assassination was really orchestrated by some combination of Israel, the feds and or people working inside a turning point USA. And in my opinion, it is definitive proof that Tyler Robinson is a patsy. The feds are just putting this on him. And I do mean the FBI. I don't think Tyler Robinson was there. You don't think he was there? I think he's a total patsy. I think they get look alike. Some they got everybody wearing the same outfit. I do think that at the end of this, we are going to find that Israel was involved. I do. It reeks of an inside job. It becomes clearer and clearer that somehow at some layer, some stage turning point USA is involved because they're giving us no clarity. - You've also had Tucker Carlson, echoing the idea that Israel was somehow involved? - He was, I believe, and most people who knew him well as I did and was friends with him as I was, believe he was most likely murdered for his evolving views on Israel. - But also, Candace's ideas specifically have had a massive reach. We've even talked about it recently. You had huge names like Joe Rogan starting to buy in more recently. - The more time goes on, the more I'm leaning towards Candace Owens. - What? - Lay, whoa. - He's got some very interesting theories about it. Look at that. - And also in addition to convincing who knows how many people in believing these conspiracies, the theories that Candace has spread, they've had other real world impacts. So according to a recent study by the Network Contagent Research Institute, Candace Owens caused a measurable statistically significant surge in death threats and calls for violence against Charlie Kirk's wife, Erica Kirk. And while Erica Kirk and TPUSA, they've been unsuccessful in the repeated attempts to get Candace to back down. At a period starting point, they believe that the impact of the conspiracies that that's now fading with a spokesperson telling why. The conspiracy theories have much less reach and potency now than they did six months ago. And I think I'll say the same six months from now, claiming the people who spread these ideas or just doing it for the money and quote, their influence and credibility has collapsed and will continue to do so. But as you have TPUSA saying that, you also have plenty of experts believing that the conspiracy theories, they're here to stay for a long time. You had one even arguing that they could escalate even further as the criminal trial against Tyler Robinson plays out. But the lingering conspiracies, they're not the only thing that's clouding Charlie's legacy as we look back a year later. There are also the major divisions you've gotten, a mega that is death and the conspiracies themselves have caused. So on one side, you have what we'll call maybe more mainstream mega. So Trump, Vance and their allies who have painted Kirk as a heroic martyr for their cause. Then you also have this growing bucket of prominent defectors who argue that the administration, they actually betrayed the America first ideology that Kirk championed. And you have many specifically pointing to the Iran war. Are you that Candace consistently claiming that Charlie, he was moving toward a break with Israel right before he died? And that's actually exactly why she says that he was assassinating. He also had Steve Bannon making a very similar point telling Newsweek, that what the Israel first crowd says. Charlie Kirk was adamantly opposed to a regime change war against Iran, adamantly opposed. And you had Tucker too, echoing that claiming that he and Charlie, they warned Trump that an extended operation in Iran, it would be terrible for the United States. And then also arguing that Charlie did not like Netanyahu and viewed him as a very destructive force. But then you had people like Senator Ted Cruz pushing back on that saying that his very last conversation with Kirk was about the rising toxic wave of anti-Semitism on the right. And he's not alone, right? Ben Shapiro has also been highly critical of this particular faction of MAC. You had him repeatedly slamming them for spreading conspiracy theories and during a speech at TPUSA's America Fest back in December, he named Czech Candice Tucker and Bannon while just tearing them apart. - These people are frauds, they are grifters, and they do not deserve your time. And they are something worse than that. A danger to the only movement capable of stopping left from wrecking the country wholesale. - But also the reality is that Kirk's views on Iran, they were more complex, we'll say. But for years, he warned against American intervention abroad, but he also supported Trump strikes on Iranian nuclear sites in June of 2025. So there's also an argument like we saw with that Epstein clip that he would end up just going along with whatever Trump wants. But with all of this, one, you end up starting to deal with just hypothetical after hypothetical. And two, it's not just the highest ranks of the party that have become fractured since his death. Right, many young voters who were part of TPUSA and Kirk's broader movement, they've started to sour on Trump amid rising frustrations with the Iran war, the costs of living, and the administration's handling of the Epstein files. And Kirk, he was widely regarded as one of the single most influential voices within the conservative youth space. And plenty of people, they'd give it to him in the credit for turning out the young voters who were essential to Trump winning a second term. And for many on the right, he was seen as this direct pipeline for his followers to share their feelings with Trump, as well as a unifier who held the movement together despite division. And so then also with that, no one's really filled that particular power back here. And so without someone being seen as a strong leader who can keep people glued together, bring people in, you've actually had some student organizers questioning the future of TPUSA as a whole without Charlie. With that said, you've had TPUSA hitting back, claiming that they saw unprecedented expansion in the 2025-26 school year, or with over a million high school and college students involved. With that, some campus leaders say they've seen waning interest and growing fractures. Meanwhile, you've got Trump just continuing to tank in the polls with younger voters. And well, of course with this and really anything today, we talk about, I'd love to know your thoughts in those comments. And we'll say where things are right now, it is drastically different than where I thought things would be in the week after Charlie Kirk was killed. And of course, one of the ways where we're going to see where things really stand outside of vibes or us getting information in whatever bubbles we go in algorithmically, it's going to be the midterms, everything's building towards that. And then, who the hell knows what's going to happen. And then, there's even more we get a dive into in just a minute at first, let me thank a sponsor. It's amazing how easy it is to give someone else career advice. And then it's your career, and suddenly, every decision feels too massive. Right, because when you're the person actually living it, it's hard to separate what you want from what you used to do it. And that's why today's sponsor, strawberry.me, can be incredibly useful. Strawberry.me gives you one-on-one access to a real career coach. You can look at your situation without all the baggage you can actually bring to it. Generally, I was skeptical about career coaching at first, but having someone objective focused specifically on your situation, it could be a huge shift. And you start getting specific about what you actually want, because something different is not exactly a career plan. Right then, you identify what's getting in the way, including blind spots that can be incredibly difficult to recognize on your own. From there, you and your coach turn that clarity into actual attainable steps forward. That can be in preparing for a promotion, negotiating your salary, changing industries, or figuring out what direction actually makes sense for you. The point isn't having someone make the decision for you, it's having someone help you make the decision with more confidence and direction. Hey, Skannock, you are going to go to strawberry.me/defranco to get 50% off your first session. That strawberry.me/defranco, you're going to love it. But then, Devon, right back into the news, we've got to talk about how Trump and his enablers have screwed the Republican so bad this midterm season. But they invented a whole new convention to convince their base that, hey, don't believe your lie and eyes, everything's great. Because who even cares about Trump's worth of honor, decision after decision being made, connected to skyrocketing costs to living for you. Right, and a lot of the craziness we saw go down happened last night with Republicans gathering in Dallas at the American Airlines Center for the opening night of their inaugural midterm convention. And you know, this two-day event being dubbed Trump a Paloza because it was the Trump show. You apparently had pictures of Trump all over the arena, walls, and the elevators, and a bunch of Republican candidates and lawmakers thanked him in their speeches. Though, clearly, Trump still remains his own number one fan. And you had that on display in this nearly two-hour speech where he was bragging about the economy of all things and asking people to keep him in mind when they cast their ballots this November. But then also, he shamelessly seemed to throw in a bribe. The man has actually said, "Vote for me, I'll give you five bans." Because of our economic, tremendous economic success, like in history, we've never had anything like what's happening. But because of our tremendous strength and success economically, I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000. So I'm asking you to pretend that I'm on the ballot. I'm on the ballot. I'm on the ballot. Just one more time. And I will say that is a very enticing offer if you forget that he is just a constantly lying bastard. Right, personally, I can't wait to stack this. Imaginary made up $5,000 with the other imaginary made-up money that he promised in the past, which was why, of course, connected to the doge cuts, the apparently, the tariff surplus money that we were going to have. And I think there are others, but this is like, this is like an alcoholic dad that's like, "Hey, I know that I said that I was going to take you to the zoo the last seven times," and I didn't. But daddy promises he's going to stop putting out lit cigarettes on you. And we'll definitely take you to the zoo this time. Maybe we'll even get ice cream. But yeah, regarding this seemingly bribe money, he didn't have to mention where the money from these dividends would come from. According to census data, the payments would cost $8 trillion or more. So definitely doable and legal. Oh, wow, the national debt is now over $40 trillion. And actually, even the US debt for this year is approaching $1.8 trillion. Also, in addition to that, you had some other headline making moments where you hit as usual talking points, tariffs, destroying Iran's nuclear program, limiting voter registration, et cetera. Also, while he described the rate as packed and claiming that there were people outside that could even get in, that story doesn't appear to match reports that there were large sections of seats. There remained empty. And, notably, there were some key Republican leadership voices that were missing. Rassus and Collins, a main dance elephant of Alaska, and key, important Senate races, you know, you want to get the votes, you can get, they notably did not speak at this event. And it's before mentioning that there were a number of house members that are facing difficult re-election campaigns that decided to skip it altogether. Though we should also note that might partially be connected to according to a GOP source. Lawmakers were asked to pay $25,000 a ticket. But also, I think, another element of the seemingly lukewarm response to the convention is that the focus on Trump was risky. Trump's approval ratings right now. If they're not just dog shit, they are smearing diarrhea dog shit. Like the kind you cannot get out of carpet. And, in fact, they just reached a record low at a new focal data financial timespull released over Labor Day weekend. His approval rating is 32%. And even his approval rating among Republicans reached a new low, dropping by 2% to 72%. And that's as only 17% of respondents approved of the president's handling of inflation and the cost to live. I'm guessing because ignoring your constituents and saying that affordability is a Democrat hoax is not a winning strategy. So you've got a lot of people asking, is Trump hurting Republican candidates more than he's helping them? And actually in a new video from Reuters, reporter Steve Holland explained why some Republican candidates are so frustrated with Trump right now. Republicans want help on, they want to see gasoline prices go down. They want to see things more affordable. They feel like the economy is dragging down their campaigns. And that Trump is less focused on that. And more focused on building a ballroom and cleaning up the reflecting pool. It's an addition to a number of Republicans kind of scrubbing Trump from their websites. Some Republican leaders have realized, hey, focusing on Trump's performance, that might not resonate. So let's go on the offense. And so that meant their theme was that Democrats are scary, radical communists, right? That was the theme for the evening. Representative Brandon Gills, Senator Tim Scott, House Majority Whip Tom, Emma and more speakers at that convention, really leaning into the culture were in the fear-mongering content. It's the mainstream versus the extreme. Now we're debating whether Todd can become transgender, whether men can get pregnant, and whether your daughter should have to share a locker room with grown men. >> This is a battle for those heart of our nation, I said the heart of our nation. The Democrats, extreme candidates, won't rip that heart out of our chest. They hate our culture, they hate what it means to be American. >> This is an election between common sense and communism. The Communist Party, excuse me, the Democrats, have no leader, and they have no message. The only thing they can agree on is their disgusting hatred of America. >> And really, as things continue to get worse and without the Republicans in Trump having things in go, hey look, we crushed it here. You should expect them to continue to try to push just ridiculous, embarrassing culture war stuff, whether outright lies or distractions that affect 0.01% of people instead of the things that are actually impacting everyone. The spiking prices for the gas to put in the car, the electricity bill, your insurance, the people enabling flock in all these companies to just completely eliminate your privacy. The president and his enablers lashing out at you saying essentially you're stupid and you're going to be poor if you don't put these AI data centers in your backyard. Upend your communities so that he can pat his billionaire buddy's pockets. >> But also, no, it wasn't just Republicans that were speaking at Trump Palooza day one. Are you also at Dino Senator John Fetterman? And I don't mean prehistoric monster, though I understand why you might think that. I mean, Democrat name only. Because he made a surprise appearance to support Pennsylvania Republican Senator Dave McCormick. >> Yes, I'm a Democrat. Why am I here talking to you today? Because well, I'm a common sense Democrat. I'm always going to stand with America. I'm always going to reject the extremes and socialism in that anti-American way of life. >> Dave McCormick is the kind of senator that gets the job done. >> And of course, these exaggerated warnings about candidates on the left. They come after a wave of progressives winning Democratic primaries. >> But candidates like Abdul Al-Sayed, Angie Nixon, who have focused on affordability really hard, as well as anti-war messaging. But hey, with all that said, we are getting closer and closer to election day, November 3rd, the midterms are here. If you do pull something from the opening of Trump Palooza, it was very obvious that Republicans are worried. And it does seem like they have reason to be. But for now, while they're not offering solutions to make what's actually happening now better, we're going to have to wait to see if this bribe offer and scary communist messaging works out for them. But then also, while you have this playing out, and there's just a million other concerns. Right now, you have the Trump administration seemingly laser focused on late-night TV. Right now, I'm saying that to you because late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel. He announced last night that his interview with Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Tylerrico. It's going to have to get posted on YouTube rather than broadcast on ABC. But with Kimmel saying, you didn't thank Trump and his FCC for it, saying they're stomping all over along established tradition at talk show host interview and political candidates. I've interviewed a lot of political candidates from Hillary Clinton to Ted Cruz to Donald Trump himself. I interviewed Donald Trump when he was running for president in 2015. And at that time, when he was on sitting next to me, he seemed to have no problem with the idea of talk show host interviewing candidates. But for some reason, and I can't seem to figure out what that reason is. Something has changed. Now that he's president, his FCC is threatening me, threatening our show, threatening our network ABC, our affiliates, our local stations based on simple traditional editorial decisions, guest bookings, it would seem they don't like. It's unsurprisingly, this sparked a lot of backlash online. And some of that came from big names like California Governor Gavin Newsom, who responded to the news on Twitter with, quote, "Putin must be so proud." And also, if you're like, didn't this already happen, this is happening again. Because about six months ago, Stephen Colbert said that lawyers for CBS blocked him from airing his own interview with Tyler Rico. And you know what I'm saying? At the FCC was threatening them at that time too. And reportedly, they were accusing Colbert of violating the equal time rules, meaning that he wasn't giving equal air time to views of opposing candidates. Which was also just a total whiplash change of enforcement, right? Because up to that point, late night talk shows relied on a 2006 ruling that suggested that they were exempt from equal time rules. And while CBS, they denied that they barred Colbert from doing anything. Either way, it ended up getting posted on YouTube. And it actually, maybe this is a silver lining. Maybe it's a bigger thing. I'm not sure. It ended up being an even bigger deal. Or because within 24 hours of Colbert saying that he could not air the interview, Tyler Rico's campaign reportedly raised $2.5 million. And just the main video of that interview on YouTube, it's gotten more than 9 million views. So while a crackdown like this, it is very concerning, arguably the attempt to stifle the ability for this guy to get out there, it completely backfired and earned him a massive weight of support. And so now, here we are six months later, and it appears that history is repeating itself at this time with Jimmy Kimmel. And it's going to be interesting to see how that video does, how the clips for it do, how much money is raised. Or because there are more and more eyes on this, Tyler Rico's Senate race against Ken Paxton every single day. And while they put no faith in polling, you had reporting from this week showing them kind of like neck and neck. And then also regarding Kimmel specifically, the timing here is kind of important. I guess he came back from a summer break on Tuesday, and that same day, Page Six released a bombshell report claiming that sources told them that his contract is not going to be extended after next May. While ABC, they've come out saying that it's bullshit, saying the report is not true and quote any reports about the future of the show at this point are purely speculative. It also, one, wouldn't be the most surprising because late night is going through a very hard time right now. And two, it would in no way be surprising if Team Trump was continuing to try to get Kimmel canceled. I mean, he even got suspended last year for a little bit after he made a comment about Trump's response to the death of Charlie Kirk. And actually, after Kimmel came back on the air, he casually threatened ABC about it, saying he was going to quote "test them out on this". And since then, it's gotten worse. Trump, again, calling for Kimmel to be fired after he made a comment about Melania Trump having a glow like an expected widow back in April. He also said that Kimmel was going to be next after Stephen Colbert's show got canceled. Oh, wow, you've got Kimmel, you know, trying to make the best of the situation and stand tall. Right, and part of that got showcased what he came out swinging at Trump and running car at the FCC when celebrating his 4,000th show. There are those who said we would never last this long. There are even those who use the regulatory might of the FCC to unconstitutionally try to make sure we didn't last this long. But we did it the hard way, Brendan, and we are still here. And ultimately, for now, you've got Kimmel's contract reportedly renewed through next year. He's still breaking ratings records, and he's up for six Emmys this year. And then there is even more. We've got to dive into today, but first, a quick word from a sponsor. Because I love when the weather app says there is a 0% chance of rain, and then you walk outside, and apparently, God has other plans. And nothing makes you question your morning decisions faster than realizing you picked the wrong shoes. And that's just one of the reasons I love today's sponsor, Vessie. They make shoes designed so that you don't have to plan your entire day around what might happen outside. Personally, I've been grabbing their weekend Chelsea, which has become one of those pairs I can throw on without really thinking about it. Slip of mango, no laces, no whole production. They're comfortable right out of the box. Plus, they're fully waterproof, not hopefully my socks survive this water resistant, actually waterproof. So rain, wet sidewalks, surprise puddles, all considerably less interesting when your feet stay dry. Somehow, they're also still lightweight and breathable, so you're not solving one problem by creating another. And they're actually versatile enough, you know, for travel, errands, work, or going out, which means one pair can cover a lot of territory, which is something I need to keep in mind as we're doing this crashing out towards. One less decision to make is fantastic when I'm going out that door. The main thing, Vessie makes fantastic shoes for people who would prefer not to consult a meteorologist before getting dressed. So, hey, go to vessie.com/pds or scan that QR code to get 15% off your first pair. And then for your final block of today's show, let's cram in some more news you need to know. And actually, it's a mixed bag starting with this. PlayStation just had an Xbox, the biggest gaming win of the year after dropping Hideo Kojima's new action espionage game fizzin. With that Xbox, immediately picking up the slack. Are you PlayStation Studios issuing a statement shocking the gaming world, confirming that it made the difficult decision to step away from collaborating with Kojima Productions on this project. And that's a pretty big shock, because the two have had a nearly three decade history of working together on projects like the legendary Metal Gear series. So with that, there was also immediate backlash online. A lot of gamers questioning why Sony would abandon the spiritual successor to Metal Gear Solid after publishing both a Kojima's successful death stranding title. So yet many are saying this is just proof that PlayStation is losing its way and they're taking L after L. Or with one of the last big blobs being them canceling all physical media moving forward while arguing in court that players don't own the digital versions of their game, as well as them no longer porting exclusives to PC. All of which is then being contrasted by Xbox. Because you've got Xbox, seeming to be in the middle of a reticence after years of seemingly having no idea what they were doing. Which some feel is wild because their new head, Asha Sharma, she doesn't have a gaming background, but she does seem to know what players want. So far, she's cut down on AI and Xbox, picked up Kojima, is bringing back exclusive titles, wants to push a console for a strategy and a ton of other tiny moves that are resonated with fans. And the key thing is that this move to pick up Kojima, it could have far reaching implications. And he was supposed to be making a few PlayStation exclusives moving forward, but Kojima, he seems pretty mad, not only at Sony cancelling the partnership, but also pretending it was a mutual decision. So now Xbox, they're not only going to get fizzened, but other titles moving forward. Though, we're still years away from that title even coming out, let alone anything else from this partnership coming out. And then also, we've got to talk about the news that a 22-year-old who built a global cybercrime ring at a Minecraft just pled guilty in federal court to orchestrating a massive $245 million crypto highs. Or you've got Singaporean National, Malone, Lomb, now facing up to 20 years in federal prison and his story is crazy. And so this guy, he was known online by names like Anne Hathaway, King Grievey, or just some dollar signs before he started recruiting co-conspirators through Minecraft and Discord. And from there, you've prosecutors saying that they use sophisticated social engineering, tech support and impersonation, and even physical break-ins to drain victims' crypto wallets. With their most successful highs, being convincing a Washington DC man to hand over more than 4,100 Bitcoin in one shot, then that's the crime that actually landed him in prison. Right, but it's not their only highest, and the group of 13 co-conspirators has believed to have drained a lot more in total. With it also, not being hard to figure out that Lam had way more money than he should have. So you had to buy insanely expensive luxury cars, watches, spend $500,000 a night at nightclubs, you know, things a normal 22-year-old is not capable of doing. At the mention, Lam already had a spotlight on him for overstaying his visa by years, and ultimately, this case is being seen as a breakthrough for multiple reasons. First, it's hoped that by pleading guilty, he's going to be able to give more information about the other high-citizen's group conducted, leading to more arrests. It's also the first time that a RICO statue has been used to tackle crypto thieves, and so in the one hand, it is going to see that the DOJ is still going after actual blatant thieves in the crypto world. But on the other hand, it's also a sad reminder that being a crypto scammer is more protected than ever by this administration. And so seemingly where Lambs screwed up is by stealing other people's crypto directly rather than just rug pull in a project. But that my friend, you beautiful bastard, is the end of your Thursday show. Another daily dive into the news in the books. And actually I'll end today with a little housekeeping. One, all this next full of different shows not gonna be until this next Monday, I actually do post a lot when the show's not happening. So definitely follow me on whatever socials you use. I actually didn't realize more recently, a lot of the content there is stuff that's not included in the show. Two, if you're in the mood for a fun, cathartic, amazing experience, and they're in or near, I wanna go to San Francisco, Phoenix, Denver, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Paul, DC, or Pittsburgh. You should snack some tickets at crashingouttour.com, come out, hang. It's been so amazing that I feel like live shows are gonna be a big part of what we're doing moving forward. And three, for special access and updates, text me at 813-213-4423, if you're in North America. With that said, thank you for watching. I love you faces, and I'll see you right back here. Monday.