Special Message from the Office of Approved Opinions Regarding the Ceuta Incident - Konstantin Kisin
5m 13s
The transcription is a satirical, fictional message from an "Office of Approved Opinions" responding to a real-world incident in Ceuta (misspelled as Seuta), where thousands of migrants entered Spain from Morocco. The message parodies bureaucratic, progressive responses to migration crises by dismissing public concerns as "misinformation" and "offensive language." It presents six "false claims" with absurd justifications: that Ceuta isn't really Spain due to geography (comparing it to Pearl Harbor), that most migrants left so it's not trespassing, that migrants are climate refugees despite moving to a similar climate, that boat crossings are impossible despite millions doing so, that amnesty policies don't encourage migration (comparing to rewarding screaming children with sweets), and that foreign organization negates the term "invasion." The tone is ironic, mocking the idea that authorities would police public opinion and punish dissent with police visits. It concludes with promotional plugs for a website and gold dealer, reinforcing the satirical nature. Overall, the text critiques how governments and media can manipulate language and logic to downplay crises, while highlighting the absurdity of denying visible realities. It’s a sharp, comedic take on political spin, not a genuine official statement.
This is a special message from the Office of Approved Opinions regarding the seuta incident. We are aware that over the weekend many of you have expressed concerns at scenes from the Spanish city of Seuta, where according to the BBC's initial reports, several hundred doctors and engineers seeking asylum were seen to enter the country to facilitate further cultural enrichment. It was subsequently confirmed that the real number was over 60,000. Obviously, this is not a problem because diversities are greater strength, but it has allowed the far right to weaponize the issue of irregular migration. Some of the language used in relation to the incident has been completely unacceptable. Terms such as Invasion, which accurately describe what you saw with your own eyes, are offensive and hurtful. In view of these concerns, we have compiled a list of fact checks to address misinformation being spread by nefarious online actors. False claim 1. The borders of Spain were breached by 60,000 illegal immigrants. This claim is false because the city of seuta is not located in mainland Spain. As people who have received the correct progressive education, you will be aware, if a piece of land is not attached to your country, it's not really your country. Pearl Harbor, for example, is not American, and the Isle of White is not British due to their being a stretch of water between them. False claim 2. 60,000 illegal immigrants coming into the country in a single day is unacceptable. This claim is false. It's true that 60,000 illegal immigrants breached the Spanish border in a single day, but a lot of them have now left. Think about it like this. If 60,000 men enter your house without your consent, and then most of them leave, is that really trespassing. False claim 3. The economic migrants not asylum seekers. This claim is false. Yes, when asked why they were coming, the migrants explained that they wanted to get money and welfare. But that is because they haven't yet been coached by do-getting immigration lawyers to claim that their gender-queer LGBTQ activists fleeing persecution. Many are also fleeing the climate crisis, which is why they've gone from North Africa to North Africa where the climate is much better. False claim 4. These illegal immigrants will travel to other European countries. This claim is false. The city of Ceuta is on the other side of the Mediterranean Sea, and as we have seen over the last decade, there is no way people can cross from Africa to Europe on boats. According to official estimates, only 3 million people have crossed into Europe in this way since 2015, so there is nothing to worry about. False claim 5. This incident is the result of the socialist government of Spain offering an amnesty to up to a million illegal immigrants earlier this year. To suggest that there is any connection between government policy and people's behavior is wrong and offensive. Studies show no link between rewarding behavior and encouraging it, which is why we give children sweet every time they scream. False claim 6. This was an invasion. This claim is false. There is considerable evidence that the migrants were encouraged to enter Spain by the government of Morocco. How can it be an invasion if it is deliberately organized by a foreign country? Finally, we would like to assure the public that appropriate action is being taken. Individuals who have shared any of these false claims will be receiving a visit from specially trained police officers in order to check their thinking. Thank you for your attention to this matter. And remember, if you would like to get these updates earlier, head over to constantsandkissend.com where you'll be able to see them days, weeks, sometimes months ahead of time. A couple of years ago, I bought some gold and it is now nearly doubled in price. If you want to use my gold dealer, go to the puregoldcompany.co.uk/consentin-kissend.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The Office of Approved Opinions addresses the Seuta incident, where over 60,000 people entered Spain, initially reported as hundreds.
The message rejects terms like "invasion" and "illegal immigrants" as offensive, offering fact checks to counter "misinformation."
Fact checks claim
The message warns that spreading "false claims" will result in visits from police to "check thinking."
It ends with promotional content for a website and a gold dealer, suggesting the message is satirical.
Summary:
The transcription is a satirical, fictional message from an "Office of Approved Opinions" responding to a real-world incident in Ceuta (misspelled as Seuta), where thousands of migrants entered Spain from Morocco. " The tone is ironic, mocking the idea that authorities would police public opinion and punish dissent with police visits. It concludes with promotional plugs for a website and gold dealer, reinforcing the satirical nature.
Overall, the text critiques how governments and media can manipulate language and logic to downplay crises, while highlighting the absurdity of denying visible realities. It’s a sharp, comedic take on political spin, not a genuine official statement.
FAQs
The BBC initially reported that several hundred doctors and engineers seeking asylum entered Spain, but it was later confirmed the actual number was over 60,000.
They claim that Ceuta is not part of mainland Spain, and argue that if a piece of land is not attached to your country, it's not really your country, citing Pearl Harbor and the Isle of Wight as examples.
They argue that since many have left, it's not really trespassing, comparing it to 60,000 men entering your house without consent and then most leaving.
They claim the migrants are economic migrants because they sought money and welfare, but argue they haven't yet been coached by lawyers to claim asylum, and also mention climate crisis as a reason, despite moving to a similar climate.
They claim that since Ceuta is across the Mediterranean, and only 3 million people have crossed from Africa to Europe since 2015, there is nothing to worry about.
They deny any connection, stating that suggesting a link between government policy and behavior is wrong and offensive, and claim studies show no link between rewarding behavior and encouraging it.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.