Social Identity Theory: Your Group Rules, Others Drool

This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human. Guys, we got to talk about your secret late-night internet searches. You know, the ones, bumpy leg rash, hair loss, itchy bum. Trying to figure out your body by endlessly searching for answers. We all do it, and it never works. Thankfully, there's Amazon Health AI. It can connect your symptoms with your medical history to offer personalized care 24-7. So call off the search. Amazon Health AI is here. Healthcare just got less painful. Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's odoo.com. Introducing Voices of VivGuard. VivGuard is also known as its generic name, FGuard Tigamod Alpha F-Cab. And this new show features firsthand stories from people living with a rare disease. Hosted by Andrew Stratton, these perspectives highlight that life is more than a moment, a condition, or a tough day. Living with a rare disease can be challenging, but it does not define the voices of VivGuard. In these episodes, they share their stories. From diagnosis. To working with their care team on their treatment plan. Listen to Voices of VivGuard on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's Chuck, and Jerry's here too. And we're just a super cool in-group looking down on your out-group here on Stuff You Should Know. That's right. Did you hear that thunder? Can you hear that? No. It was a little too delicate, the sound was. Yeah, it just started raining, and it's thundering pretty good, so maybe people can hear that. It might add a little mood. That's nice. Because, yeah, I think we could use a little mood on this one. This is a very rigid look at what I think is a very interesting social psychology theory. Oh, yeah? Yeah. Do you not find it very interesting? I didn't find this one super interesting. This, you know, like a lot of social psychology, this one I filed under, like, yeah, I guess you're, you know, you're observing something that happens. That's about where it ended for me. I get it. I get it. To me, yeah, I mean, I sense what you're talking about. Like, there's just something. I feel like we're talking people out of listening to this episode right now. No, no, no, no. Well, we'll just clue everybody in. And you can make up your own mind how you feel about this, guys. Well, what we're talking about is social identity theory, which you probably gleaned from the title. And in a nutshell, social identity theory basically says that we get a sense of self and belonging and, well, we help develop our identity from the groups we belong to. And that is very different from the idea that we just develop as individuals through normal developmental psychology. In fact, the guys who came up with the idea of social identity theory, they were the ones who came up with the idea of social identity theory. In fact, the guys who came up with the idea of social identity theory basically say it's the group that's the thing, not the individual. Like, that's where we really develop most of our identity is from interacting with other people. Yeah. You know, I think, I don't think anyone will be talked in or out of liking or thinking this is interesting because I think it'll be whether or not you're into social psychology generally as a whole or not. I bet. Yeah. Because for a lot of social psychology, for me, I'm like. Sort of like I was saying, I was like, a lot of this stuff to me is like, well, yeah, duh. But like, what's the point? Sure. Well, here's the point. This is this is the point as far as I can tell. Like the point, the part I just said is definitely duh. Yeah. But the reason they came up with social identity theory is to explain stuff that heretofore and still some people are like, I don't know about social identity theory, although it's the dominant framework for explaining this stuff. Yeah. Explaining things that. Are tough to explain, like, why do normal people become fascist, get swept up in fascist movements? Yeah. Why do sports fans get in fights with sports fans from rival teams? Alcohol. Like these things. Sure. I mean, yeah, you can't really deny that. Yeah. But but they're like they don't quite make sense. Sure. When you step back and look at things. And so social identity theory says all of this can be explained with this with this theory. And I think that's where it gets interesting for me, especially the idea that this is so ingrained in our our evolutionary history that we basically can't do anything about it. Like even being aware of this can only help to to such a degree. Like you're still innately attracted to being a member of a group. Yeah, I think that's my deal. And I promise I'm not going to say duh like a hundred times because I do think some some of the social psychology stuff is fairly interesting. I'm just. More of a person who's like sort of a what like where does that get us in the end? You know what I mean? Yes, I totally get that. We should also give our caveat because we make fun of social psychology and the studies involved so frequently it would be it would be pretty rich to just be like, yeah, this is super cool and proven. A lot of the studies, just like any other social psychology field or subdivision discipline. Is there like 30 people who are grad students or undergrad students that were getting extra credit? That's that's what the study found or that's what the study used. And then whatever they found, that's now just universally applied to everybody. And in a lot of cases, that's that's just not correct. But this one is so like you said, duh, that it seems like, yes, this is very true. Yeah, for sure. And I guess we should start. We should start with conflict, intergroup conflict, which is not intragroup conflict. So in this case, we're talking about conflict between two different groups. It's sort of like if you just think of like us versus them for a lot of this, you're along the right track. And in this case, it's, you know, if you develop an intergroup conflict, it's developing some sort of prejudice or bias, maybe against another group. Like, you know, like, let's say you're the end group. Everyone thinks you're the end group, but an end group versus an out group. And for a long time before these two, Henri Toshfell and John Turner came along in the 70s, there were people, other social psychologists explaining it and in a different way and mainly in a couple of different ways, starting with 1950 with Theodore Adorno and his publishing, along with his colleagues of the authoritarian personality and trying to, you know, trying to sort of describe like, hey, what's the deal with Nazis and like the aftermath of Nazis and like what kind of person is going to get swept up in that kind of thing? Right. So Adorno basically said that it's the people who are getting swept up that are essentially causing the sweeping in the first place. That if you put a bunch of what he called authoritarian personalities who aren't, that doesn't describe somebody who aspires to become an authoritarian leader. Those are people who feel most secure when submitting to an authoritarian leader. So you put a bunch of those people together, say, in a Nazi party, that fascism is just going to take off and attract more like minded people. It makes sense, but it's I don't think anybody was like, that's it. That explains fascism. Yeah, for sure. And so the other one that I mentioned, you know, before the other two guys in the 70s that we're going to get to was. In the 1960s, there was a social psychologist named Muzaffar Sharif, who he again, these little like small experiments. This is at a Boy Scout camp. He'd separated two groups at Boy Scouts at camp. And he said, all right, you know, you're just in two groups. Get to know one another. Get to know each other. And everything was going pretty good. And nothing was unusual until all of a sudden he introduced the idea of competition for prizes. And that's when it became Lord of the Flies. Yeah, for sure. He was like, one group gets blue ribbons, the other gets participant ribbons. And it was on from that point, you know. So he came up with something called realistic group conflict theory, because once the prizes were introduced, there was all sorts of conflict that came out of it. Right now, all of a sudden, group A was discriminating against group B. And maybe they would get into like little fights or something like that stuff that was completely outside. And he basically said, OK, that stands in for resources. Like if you switched out, you know, first prize with access to dwindling water, now you have a true general universal explanation for why groups get in conflict. It's over material scarcity. I'm not going to say duh. I promise. But even that one, realistic group conflict theory, people are like, yeah. That sounds kind of good, but. Still, it just doesn't smack of like it doesn't smack of duh, as Chuck will eventually put it. And that's when Taj fell and Turner came around. Yeah. So Henri Taj fell. He was the first part of this this twosome. He was a social psychologist at the University of Bristol. He was born to a Jewish family in Poland and immigrated to France in the 1930s and lost most of his family to the Holocaust and World War Two. And so he changed over from chemistry to social psychology. I guess the inference there is in maybe some bid to try and understand what the heck happened. Yeah. Which was I mean, he wasn't the only one like that's where Adorno and Sharif were like Nazi Germany just came out of nowhere. Yeah. And then, yeah, the idea that his family had perished at the hands of the Nazis. I could see that's what the reason was. Yeah. So he. He hooked up with John Turner. They met at University of Bristol. He was a Ph.D. student and as an undergrad, as far as his interest in this kind of thing, he dropped out of college a few times, ended up working just sort of, you know, regular old blue collar jobs. And through those jobs, had dealings with unions and things. And I guess just became kind of fascinated about the social dynamic and group dynamics within a union. So when he met Taj fell, I guess love was in the air and they said, hey, let's get together. And work on this stuff together and ended up writing sort of the watershed paper or the initial one, at least on this from them. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, which is like basically their statement to the world of like, here's what we think about all this. Yeah. This is where his social identity theory came from. This is the paper it was proposed in. And should we take a break now or dive into to the nuts and bolts? No, no, no. I think it's a good. A good break time. OK, everybody, you're going to have to wait for the nuts and bolts after these messages. We can eradicate food deserts with this technology. Hey, everybody, it's Chuck from Stuff You Should Know. And that was Jaleah Hemmings. She and her husband created Nourish and Bloom Market, a fully autonomous grocery store. You can scan a QR code to enter, pick up what you need. And just walk out. Or as Jaleah puts it. Tap, grab and go 24-7. We started to get flooded with folks saying, hey, I need you in my city. It became their mission to develop a store that could open within three months, even without any infrastructure. And just when we were like, how are we going to accomplish this goal? We won the AT&T Small Business Contest Grant. That $50,000 got us over the finish line where we built the first AI-powered grocery shipping container in the country. For Jaleah, it's about. It's about building a legacy to show the world that you can solve any problem when you work together. Having the support of AT&T, the city of Atlanta, is huge. Look at how many people we've been able to help. Connecting changes everything. AT&T. Hey, everybody, we have a very important question for you. Is there anything that reflects who you are more than your home? We don't think so. That's the answer. Everything in there says something about you. It's your home. Well? Wayfair gets that. That's right. They got stuff for every style and budget, so it's easy to find exactly what you're looking for to fit into your home and to fit you. You can trust what you're buying, too, because Wayfair verified products undergo a 10-point quality inspection, everybody. Yeah, you don't get 20 million verified five-star reviews unless you're doing something right. Plus, Wayfair makes it easy to find what you're looking for, whether it's a new sofa or Halloween decor. So transform your space with pieces that hold up to real life. Join Wayfair Rewards today. And get 5% back on every purchase. Head to Wayfair.com or shop the Wayfair app for all things home. That's W-A-Y-F-A-I-R dot com. Wayfair. Every style, every home. Hey, everybody, you made it through summer. Or more to the point, your home did. So maybe show it a little love. Lowe's Labor Day deals can help with that. We're talking up to 45% off select major appliances and up to an additional $100 off select laundry pairs. Basically, they've got great deals on appliances. Lowe's hasn't forgotten your lawn either. Grab three of the.75 cubic foot bags of Miracle-Gro Garden Soil just for $10. Get to Lowe's for the Labor Day deals. Your home will thank you. Valid through September 9th while supplies last. Selection varies by location. See Lowe's.com for more details. Soil offer excludes Alaska and Hawaii. We should know. Word up, Jerry. All right, Chuck, so where we left off, we're about to dive into this seminal paper from 1979 by Taj, Phil, and Turner, an integrative theory of intergroup conflict. And it sounds dry and boring, but it basically changed how psychology, but also people outside of academia, see the world, you know? I wonder if one of the reasons why it seems so duh is, is because this paper was persuasive and became pervasive. That now that we're living today in 2026, it just seems, of course, to us. But at the time, it didn't necessarily. I wonder about that. You were eight years old. Do you remember if people were walking around already thinking this was duh? I didn't know at eight. By the way, that's the most Snoop Dogg way you've ever described something in your life. What did I say? Pervasive and persuasive. Or shizzle. Uh, yeah, I don't remember that, of course. But in that paper, they proposed a few different basically processes that they think explain how people form into groups and group behavior. Yeah. And then get into conflict with others and have prejudice against others. And they started that with social categorization, which is basically you have to form into a group to begin with if you're going to have conflict with another group. Or compare yourself to another group. Yeah. And then so within categorization, so what Tashfell and Turner seem to have done is they took some other existing ideas in social psychology that hadn't necessarily been applied to groups or whatever and put them together to kind of form social identity theory and apply it to groups. But categorization had already been around. There's something that had been identified as the category accentuation. And it is basically like once we start identifying ourselves as members of groups and other people as members of other groups, in groups and out groups, we start, we go, we get busy categorizing. And when we get busy categorizing, what we're doing is using a very ancient process, which is heuristics, right? Like our brain loves to take shortcuts. So it does away with all the nuance and details and just basically does this. This big lumpy thing that's good enough. And when we categorize people into groups, it goes through that process. So we start seeing them differently. Yeah, for sure. And the reason we've formed groups to begin with is kind of twofold is one, they think evolutionary is that we've always wanted to just sort of classify the world around us by seeking patterns and things. And then the sort of the obvious thing, which is that it's a benefit, especially early on when people were evolving. But then the other thing is to form a group for pulling resources and to divide up the hunting and gathering and co-parenting and protecting one another from either predators or other, what would end up being, you know, competitive groups outside your tribe or whatever. And so for like defense purposes, that kind of thing. Yeah. And I mean, it's no fun to watch knots landing by yourself. It's much better with a group. That's a very good point. So because of that, the heuristics that our brains just innately. To kind of take these shortcuts and use less energy. When we start categorizing people and ourselves, the variability within our own group, the in-group starts to go away. So we start seeing other people say other Falcons fans, right? As similar to us, right? Like we're all Falcons fans and everything else that makes us different just kind of vanishes because we're Falcons fans. And that's what we identify as. At the same time. It does the same thing in the out-group, but in a much less positive way. Those are Steelers fans. They all suck. They're terrible people. And then the differences between the in-group and the out-group are boosted as well. So all these things just basically go through this very distorted lens when we start categorizing people into groups. And that's where trouble starts to come. And that's just one point of social identity theory. For sure. And by the way, we don't mean that against. We don't mean that against Steelers fans because I have a strong feeling that Josh has no idea that the very first game of the season is Falcons versus Steelers this year. Of course I knew that. Who doesn't know that? No, we don't. If you were, you certainly weren't trying to say Steelers fans are bad people because you would have said Eagles fans or Patriots fans probably. I think all three. It applies to all three. Oh, wow. Okay. Standing by it. I love it. You always get so much guff for talking about. Any Philadelphia fans. Yeah, I know. It's funny. Because people get really mad at you in the email. It's because they're bad people. That always reminds me of that Onion teacher that said, my local sports team is better than your local sports team. Oh, that's funny. Yeah. I love fans of all stripes, people of Philly. No, I'm just kidding around. I love the city of Philadelphia. I love to visit there. Don't have the best time when our teams play each other. And that's not my fault. I'll just say, I'll just leave it at that. But look, you just did something that I think is worth pointing out, right? You went from being a Falcons fan, which you remained, which is your in-group, and then Philly's or Eagles fans are an out-group to you. But then you kind of rose up. Your altitude increased, and you went to like the 10,000-foot level. And you included Eagles fans in the in-group with yourself as just fans in general. Yeah, because if it was up to me, all rivalry like that would be just very good-natured and fun. And like, hey, let's just— Let's just go have a good time at the game and maybe rib each other. So it's when, like, people take it seriously and curse in front of children and throw beers. And that's when it gets to the point where I'm like, well, that's no fun. Well, that brings up the next point or the next nut or bolt, I guess, depending on your view of social identity theory, which is social identification. I think that kind of explains what you just described. I think you're right. That's when you start to identify with— with my group, let's say Falcons fans. And then that becomes part of my sense of self. But, you know, we're influenced by the values. And, you know, when it comes to sports, maybe it's values and stuff don't come as into play. But the opinions and values and maybe behaviors of the larger group. Behavior, for sure. For sure. Yeah. And I mean, everybody, I'm sure, has met somebody who's like, wow, your whole identity is tied up in being a Falcons fan. Like, this is your life, right? Well, not me, but yeah. No, not you. But there are people out there. I'm sure you've met them just from being a Falcons fan. You can't help but rub elbows with people who you're like, wow, this is really important to you. Like, you can tell that this person identifies throughout life as a Falcons fan, I think. That's true. But, you know, the problem with Falcons fans is that we're not as like that as much as a lot of cities. Well, that's Atlanta for you. Exactly. No support for anybody. Yeah, for sure. I do feel like we should— At least acknowledge and give a hat tip to Anna, who helped us with this. Yeah. Every single example she used was the Mets. Mets Yankees. She's very clearly a Mets fan. She tried very hard to get the Mets in there, so go Mets. That's pretty funny. And then the final of the third would be social comparison. And that's when—and we've kind of been doing this a little bit with our joking around about sports—is comparing our group or whatever, you know, what we think is our in-group to the out-groups. And, you know, it can be a lot of different things because we've just been doing just that, like you said. Sometimes it's a favorable opinion. Sometimes it's unfavorable. Sometimes it's neutral. But, like, we're incentivized in a way to make, obviously, favorable comparisons between our in-group and the out-group because that helps your own self-esteem and the self-esteem of a group overall. And what they called positive distinctiveness. Yeah. Like, we're different from the out-group in the best possible way. And, you know, best possible way can mean all sorts of things depending on the context of the groups. Which is what I was just doing. Like, we don't curse out in front of kids and throw beers and stuff. Exactly. Falcons fans don't do that. That seems to have kind of adopted a pre-existing theory called social comparison theory from 1954 by psychologist Leon Fetzinger. Yeah. And Fetzinger was applied. He was applying this to individuals, basically saying that our self-worth is very commonly determined by or generated by comparison to others. It can be, you know, comparing ourselves to somebody we think is above us and then maybe that motivates us to do better. More often than not, we compare ourselves to people who are, say, below us. I made scare quotes just now. Yeah. And that that generates attitudes of, like, superiority, prejudice, bias, all that stuff. So what Taj fell in turn. What Turner did was they seem to have taken social comparison theory and made it a component of social identity theory and applied it to groups rather than just individuals. Yeah. And, you know, comparison, that can be tricky because when you're talking about comparing sports fans, it's not that big of a deal. But if you're talking about comparing, like, you know, an ethnic group that you're in or a social socioeconomic group that you're in. Right. That's when it gets really kind of sticky and gross. And that's when or why you hear, I think, famous sayings like comparison is the thief of joy from Roosevelt or Twain's comparison is the death of joy. Because that's when, you know, if you're really sitting around comparing yourself to people of a of like a higher financial class or something like that, that is truly the death of joy because it can consume you, I would imagine. Yeah. I mean, that's what makes Instagram in particular so toxic. But pretty much all social media is it engenders comparison like that's the that you can't help but do that. Yeah. You know, so, yeah, it's a it is the death of joy. Here's the thing about Taj, Fell and Turner, though, is and this is kind of an important point. Like, they don't think that like in the case I was just talking about with what like your socioeconomic status, that's obviously something that has like a material basis at its root. Yeah. But it doesn't have to have that. And that's what. And I agree that conflict doesn't need a material basis. It can be you know, there can be a situation like back in the days of Tuk Tuk where they're very, very limited resources and incompatible group goals, maybe within a group. And like it doesn't necessarily have to do with the material thing. So I disagree with that. I think that if you look deep enough or if you expand your definition of resources widely. Oh, yeah, maybe there always is one. So dominance is is probably a pretty common one. One group wants to dominate the rest and have say over what you know, where the society that all the groups form goes. That's a big one. Good point. You can say winning is a resource like there's really only one group that can win unless you're playing soccer and then everybody wins. So, yeah, if you start to get more, you know, less tangible and more esoteric or ethereal. One of those ethereal, I think, then then to me, there's always some sort of resource at stake. OK, so you disagree because their idea is that prejudice doesn't require material inequality and you feel like it does. Yeah. Depending on your definition of material, I think. All right. Well, that makes sense. So Taj, Feld and Turner were on to something they felt. And so they were like, all right, what if we dig down a little bit deeper and we started kind of poking or not poking holes, but asking questions about groups. And one question they came up with is like, what if you don't feel good about the group that you're in? Right. And that could be a group that you're born into. It could be an ethnic group that you're born into or a financial strata that you're born into. And they said, all right, there's a few different strategies that you can employ if you aren't so happy. And the first one was individual mobility, which is this idea of like, let's say it's a high school clique and you're in the Dungeons and Dragons. And you're starting to not feel so great about that. So what you think the move to do is, is to, you know, to climb to what you perceive as a higher social status and become friends with like the popular kids or the jocks or whatever. And this is only the key here is this is only a thing if that's something that's possible to do. Like you can't change your race, in other words, but you may be able to elevate from the D&D group to the whatever. And that's where the perceived more popular crowd is. It depends if that if that high school hierarchy is so rigid that the jocks are like nerds need not apply, even former nerds. Then maybe, you know, you're now you're an outcast from both groups. You're just in the middle and you're you're up the creek. They make teen movies about this very thing. Oh, I mean, yeah. Every John Hughes movie almost is sort of has this as a basis. Right. And then the lesson that's learned is that that group that you originally felt superior to or thought were losing. Losers or whatever, that they are the ones that truly care about you. The jocks don't care about you guys. Let's let's just face it. Yeah. And in the movies, though, it's almost always possible to make that leap. Or if you don't make that leap to for someone from that upper group to peel away from them to recognize you anyway. Yes. You know what I'm saying? Yeah. What was the one with? He was like the hot guy on Grey's Anatomy at first. Mick Dreamy. Yes. Can't buy me love. Yes. I don't think it's ever been done better than that one. I love that movie. And we're kind of that one's a little too far along for Ruby. But we did have recently watched some kind of wonderful and pretty and pink, which also have sort of this nice idea. But but yeah, can't buy me love really nails it. I love all three of those movies. Like I have forever. Like it's just in my head that scene where he goes to the Italian pizza guy who's like this kind of like Don Juan. And. And he's like, what do you what what have you done before? Like if you're, you know, girlfriend's husband found out about you. He's like, I take a knife and I stab him a bunch of times. He don't bother me and no more. Oh, the 80s movies. All right. So individual mobility is one. Social creativity is the next one. If you don't feel about like great about how your group as a whole is perceived, you can maybe just start sort of changing the language about how you're comparing your group to other people. So the first subgroup of that is comparing your in group to the out group in a different way. So like, you know, the D&D group, like we may not be as cool of the jocks, but like we're a lot smarter. Smarter than them. Precisely. That's an excellent example. Yeah. Another one is you can basically change what attributes are focused on about your group. Right. So I guess going to the D&D one, say, I don't know, I can't figure out how to use that one. You got something for that? Well, it's sort of about how how changing how others perceive your group. So maybe the D&D group may not be looked at as as cool. But like we have the best like homemade like shirts. I guess so. That seems similar to the first one. It sort of does a little bit. But it's in it's in how like I think in the in the first one, it's like how they perceive themselves. Like we're smarter than they are and they'll just never know it. And the other one is, is we've got like these cool uniforms that we wear and everyone thinks they're awesome. Gotcha. Great. Great example. I'll bet D&D uniforms are awesome. Well, I was thinking of the in Stranger Things, the Hellfire Club and the cool T-shirts. Oh, OK. I only saw the first season. Yeah. You know, I liked it all. But it's first season was great. Have you seen the Devil in Silver? It's the third installation of the Terror series. I don't know about any of those things. Oh, well, just start watching the Terror. Well, yeah, you've told us about that. I remember that now. Skip over season two and then just go to season three. It was pretty good. OK. Season one. Like sailboats and frigates and stuff. Yeah. Pirates or something. It was based on, I can't remember which expedition, but a lost British Navy expedition in the Arctic. And it was like based on that, but also had like all sorts of fiction. OK. So seasons one and three? Yes. Just do not watch season two. All right. So the third way you can do that is change what out group you're comparing yourself with. So the D&D group would say like. Well, we may be D&D nerds, but have you seen the chess club? Right. Wow. You're just on fire today, man. And I love chess club. I love chess. I love D&D. I'm not slagging any of these. If anything, I'm anti-jock. There you go. Got to be anti-somebody, right? That's the whole in-group, out-group basis. Oh, man. I'm just getting myself in trouble to all our teen listeners. One of the things about the social creativity, too, is all three of those, they don't actually change. They don't change anything in the way of like the hierarchy. The jocks are still, you know, at the top. They rule the school. But things have changed. There's something has changed, right? Social mobility is like, like the group has changed because you've left. And maybe the hierarchy has changed because you joined this higher group or whatever. But social creativity does not actually change any, any part of like the larger structure, say, of society. Yeah, for sure. So those were the first two. The last one is very easy. It's social. Social competition. And that's when you choose to take on the group that you perceive ahead of you, like head on. So that's Revenge of the Nerds. Yes, it is. That or any, like if there was some greedy developer who's trying to shut something down, that's the basis of it. Whether it's a ski resort or a car wash or a hot dog stand. That's it right there. Taking it on. That's right. So one of the things these two guys talked about. One of the things that Tajfels and Turner, Tajfels, Tajfels and Turner wanted to point out was that like resource or material inequality or scarcity, they don't always have to lead to social conflict. So sometimes if you're like a low status individual or something, you might align with a new group identity or or try and redefine that group in a more positive light, like the things kind of we were just talking about. Yeah. But there's no. There's no difference in like your access to resources like it might just happen within the group and how you're perceiving yourself or having others perceive you. It's not like you went out and got like cooler clothes for the D&D group to wear. Right. That's a much better way of what I was trying to say. OK. Chuck, I say we take our second break now and then come back and talk more about social identity theory. Let's do it. We'll be right back. Hey, everybody. We want to talk to you about Quince because Quince focuses on high quality wardrobe staples made with premium materials like 100 percent Mongolian cashmere, organic cotton and merino wool. Yeah. You know, those pieces in your closet that you always find yourself wearing on repeat. Well, those are the pieces that make getting. Dressed easy. And that's what Quince does best. And Quince also makes premium pants, fitted tees and polos and breathable activewear. Quality basics designed to work across your wardrobe and hold up to everyday wear. Yeah. Chuck, in that 100 percent Mongolian cashmere sweater you mentioned. Uh-huh. They start at just $60. So you get the softness and quality you'd expect from a luxury brand without the luxury price tag. So find your next fall favorites at Quince. Download the Quince app for app exclusive offers or go to Quince.com. Slash should know. Get free shipping on your order and 365 day returns now available in Canada and the UK, too. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E dot com slash should know. Hey, everybody. We have a mnemonic device that's going to blow your mind. If your skin squeaks, your barrier is weak. CeraVe facial cleansers don't strip the skin. They work to give you a stronger skin barrier from day one. So your skin will never squeak. That's right. CeraVe facial cleansers gently cleanse the skin of dirt, oil, and makeup without disrupting the skin barrier. They're fragrance-free and won't clog pores. And get this. They were developed with dermatologists. Yep. And they have different products depending on what you need. There's the foaming facial cleanser, which gently removes excess oil, dirt, and makeup, formulated with three essential ceramides, hyaluronic acid, and niacinamide to provide long-lasting hydration, and 12-hour oil control. They also have a hydrating facial cleanser, which cleanses without disrupting the skin's protective barrier for 94% less dryness and a stronger skin barrier from day one. No matter your skin type or concern, CeraVe has facial cleansers perfect for you and your skin barrier. CeraVe is the number one dermatologist-recommended cleanser brand and offers a range of facial cleansers for all types. Find yours. Yeah, totally. And then self-worth, just having a sense of self-esteem from belonging to a group like the Falcons fans. Right. That, like, you can't buy that kind of self-esteem that the Falcons give you. Boy, it's so funny that we're using the Falcons because I don't know if there's a collective group of humans on planet Earth that feels worse about themselves. That's funny. The other one was the realistic group conflict theory. So social identity theory is probably a little closer to that one than Adorno's authoritarian personality theory or trait theory because it frames prejudice as a byproduct of an inter-group conflict. I think maybe one of the differences is that RCT, realistic group conflict theory, sort of frames it as, like, the resource scarcity that we're talking about in Toshfeld. Again, in Turner, they say that scarcity doesn't necessarily have to be a part of that or a precursor, at least, to that. Yeah, and, like, there's a lot of different nuances that are different between the two. I think social identity theory, like, really spreads out much further. Yeah. But that's the main difference between them. Yeah, agreed. So there's a lot of people who are like, yeah, duh, including you, Chuck. But there's also a lot of people who are like, have you guys proven this? Like, we're talking social psychology here. Somebody did, like, a study once. And everybody says, well, now it's proven. That's, um, maybe. So there's this thing that they use to test social identity theory called the minimal group paradigm. And originally, I thought minimal referred to, like, the fewest number of people in a group. Yeah, same. Which made me think of the special people club from Welcome to the Dollhouse. Yeah. Remember that with Don Wiener and the kid? Yeah, was it just, like, two people? Yes. Yeah. But they mean minimal. As far as, like, the minimum circumstances that the people in the group have in common. Like, what is the least amount of stuff that those people can have in common and still belong to a group together that where this behavior will develop? And using that as a test paradigm, I guess, that actually pans social identity theory out basically every time. Yeah. This is where I thought it got, like, a little more interesting for me. And that they, in 1979, they got together. They got together with another social psychologist named Rupert Brown for a study called Social Comparison in Group Interest and In-Group Favoritism. Part of it would help is if they just sexied up these titles a little bit. For sure. But, again, they wanted to see, like, what if we just sort of arbitrarily grouped individuals together and then tasked them with some questions about something, which we'll see in a minute, and see what happens. And so, in this case, it was 62, 14, and 15-year-old students. And to group them arbitrarily, they just gave them a series of abstract paintings and said, pick out which one you like the best, and that'll be your group or whatever. And that they ended up in four separate groups, the triangle group, the circle group, the dichromatic group, and the polychromatic group. Here's what I don't understand is that she said, really, they were just all put in the triangle group? What does that mean? I think that, so, I didn't get that either. I went and looked. Essentially, they were arbitrarily. They were arbitrarily put into two groups that had nothing to do with what the kids involved thought they were a group member of. So, the whole triangle, circle, dichromatic, polychromatic, it was just to fool the kids into thinking they were a member of a group when, really, they were just arbitrarily assigned to one of two groups. One was the control group, and one was the experimental group, essentially. But those kids didn't think in those terms. They thought, I'm team triangle, or I'm team dichromatic. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I got you. All right. So, then they grouped them. And then they said, fill out these forms, and we're going to determine how much each group is going to get paid for the study. And they had, like, the forms were side-by-side with, like, a proposal for a dollar amount for each group. Some of them were equal. Some were not equal. And what they observed was, I think, fairly interesting, is that even when, like, one of the things they observed was that even when they had a chance for both groups to make a deal, they didn't have a chance to make a deal. They didn't have a chance to make $10 for themselves if the other group made $5. So, essentially, they wanted, they all chose to have a disparity between the groups. So, in other words, to make their group, like, get more money than the other one, even if there was an option to get paid equally, and it was more money. Yeah. So, to their own detriment, they wanted to, but essentially, the way that they explained it was that those, the people choosing that were trying to enhance the status of their group. Yeah. Yeah. They weren't trying to maximize their money. They're trying to maximize their group status by making twice as much as another group. Yeah. I mean, I think this is fascinating when you look at it in the terms of, like, the idea of, like, socialism versus capitalism and making sure everyone's taken care of versus, like, screw that guy. I want the most for myself. Right. These are teenagers. It's a little distressing. For sure. There's another one that we turned up in the Journal of Neuroscience from 2021. And it used a brain scan study. This was 34 people. I don't know how many were involved in the other one you just mentioned, but these people had their brain scanned, so they were figuring out what part of their brain they were using while they were doing this. But the thing that really has to do with social identity theory is that they showed people, like, a video of somebody doing something. This wasn't it, but, say, carrying a tray full of beer steins, full beer steins, right? Okay. And you were watching something. Somebody give it a shot, and then you tried it yourself. And if you saw somebody, say, like, lifting it with both hands and they were successful or trying to lift it from the bottom and it fell over, if you thought that person was a member of a rival outgroup, in this case Democrats or Republicans, you would not learn from their mistake or their successful way of doing it when you tried it. It's like you would refuse to learn from the enemy or this. Even if it would help you. Yeah, that's fascinating to me. It is. Like, super fascinating. And it really kind of jibes and makes sense. But a lot of people are like, there's some real criticisms we can level against this. And one of them is, okay, you guys are scanning 34 people's brains. You're studying, like, 16 Boy Scouts. You know, like, the stakes are really low here. If you take this and apply it into the real world at higher stakes. Like, say, expressing prejudice or bias against another group publicly and then potentially being ostracized or shamed or whatever in response. Like, are people still going to carry out these behaviors? Like, does it hold up in the real world? Yeah, for sure. And also this idea that, like, kind of what you were talking about earlier is sometimes with these studies, I feel like there's a lack of nuance. And so this idea that personal, that, like, the difference between personal identity and group identity. Is it just so cut and dried as Taj spell and Turner think of it or propose that it is right. And there have been other social psychologists, one in particular named Masaki Yuki, who says that, or at least he argues that, you know what, the social identity theory has its limits. If the society is a little more collectivist, like in East Asia was was his example. And I think that makes sense because, you know, again, if you're taking these like small groups. Of like 60 teenagers or these Boy Scouts, it's hard to extrapolate that to like, and this is true all over the world. It is. It is. And I saw someone say, like, it is universal people discriminating against outgroups in favor of their in-group. And you can make a case like there's a lot of rivalries between Japanese baseball teams in Japan. Oh, sure. You know, there's rivalries between China and Japan and Korea, South Korea and Japan. Yeah. Like it does exist in one form or another. I think that's probably what Tajfell and Turner would point to if they were both still alive. Yeah. They could be pointing from their graves right now. We wouldn't know, though. That's right. So back to the study with the kids choosing to pay the other groups less. Again, very distressed about that. They thought like, hey, we nailed that study, everybody, because that really bolsters this idea that bias can occur in the absence of conflict. Like there was no. There was no reason for these groups to, like, not want the other group to have as much money. Yet they still did. And this idea of the desire for positive social identity can lead to bias because the students chose those financial options that made them different from the other group, even to their own detriment. Yeah. And just to restate again, these kids had nothing in common. They weren't even in the groups that they thought they were in. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. And yet that immediate sense of. Group membership made them discriminate against people who they thought were in other groups. Yeah, for sure. Yeah. So I think Taj fell and Turner would be like, hey, we're still pointing. Let's talk about some of this stuff in in real world. Like you want some real world proof. How about some anecdotal proof, everybody? Yeah. One great example they came up with where a group particular group used social creativity to achieve like a positive distinctiveness. that they were talking about, which can be attained was the Black is Beautiful movement in the 1960s, when black Americans were like, you know what, we're sort of tired of hearing about how this idea of beauty is so Eurocentric and, you know, blonde hair and blue eyes is all that. Like, no, no, black is beautiful. Our skin color is beautiful. Our hair and our culture is all beautiful. And just the black aesthetic was like fully embraced and touted as a movement. And that did a I think that was a huge like cultural change in the 1960s. Yeah. And that was a great example of social creativity, right? Yeah. And then another example of social creativity is poor white racism, where a group, in this case, poor white Americans choose to discriminate against poor black Americans because they are capable of feeling superior of the other group rather than comparing themselves to wealthy white Americans. Yeah. And then kind of fast forwarding to today, there's also a lot. I mean, it's still very much going on, like in the United States, the more you identify with not just your political party, but like what your political party stands for, the more you take that on yourself as part of your identity, the more likely you are to view the opposing party as like bad people, as dumb, as not having any idea what you're doing. Yeah. And I think that's a really good point. And I think that's a really good supposed to do with the country, that kind of stuff. Yeah, for sure. There are people that argue that in order to like radicalize somebody into maybe an extremist group, it really helps when you appeal to them with a real distinctive identity for the in-group that they're trying to get you in. Yes. Another one is that products like domestic versus foreign made products. Yeah, yeah. That in-group, out-group predicts that, your sense of ethnocentrism or nationalism. Sure. And then musical preference. There was a study done by a guy named Daniel Shepard who found that the more strongly you identify with your musical preference, the more likely you were to say, say, other musical preferences suck. And that reminded me of Disco Demolition Night from 1979. You remember that? Yeah, for sure. Where all those rockers like rioted because they were like, oh, we're going to do this. And then they were like, oh, we're going to do this. Yeah. And then they were like, oh, we're going Yeah. And I guess that's about it. Like, yeah, duh, definitely sums it up. But to me, it was like the nuts and bolts of the whole thing that were so interesting. That and your all of your awesome examples. Well, I really did. I really enjoyed that study of the kids like choosing to pay the other kids less. I thought that was fascinating. And I think I think a lot of this stuff is fairly fascinating at the end of the day. So I think you I think it won me over a bit. Good. I'm glad. Well, since Chuck's been won over, you know, everybody that automatically triggers listener mail. I'm going to do the shorter one to round this one. So, hey, guys, in the Judy Blume episode, you guys were talking about we must we must we must increase our bust. That actually wasn't invented by Blume. She's the same generation as my mother. And they did that in junior high school. The rest of the rhyme, according to my mom, goes the bigger, the better, the tighter, the sweater. The boys are counting on us. Judy Blume and Beverly Cleary shaped generations of young mind guys. That is from Margo in New York City. And we had a few different people write in and tell us that. And I tried to find online like the origination of that. And almost everything says Judy Blume until you dig into Reddit. And then somebody has a pretty exhaustive list of like, you know, in the 1950s, it was used in this thing and it was used in this thing. But I don't think anyone ever nailed like the first person to say it. Good old Reddit. Good old Reddit. That was from Margo. That was Margo in New York City. Awesome. Thanks a lot, Margo. That was wonderful. And if you want to be like Margo and make us laugh and delight us, you can send us an email to send it off to Stuff Podcast at iHeartRadio.com. Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. You know how sometimes the end of the day calls for a little something? Not a whole event, just something that actually tastes great. Ghirardelli Premium Dark Chocolate is a great choice. It's one of those chocolates that's all about incredible taste. Because the first thing you notice is the flavor. It's rich, smooth, and has that satisfying dark chocolate taste that makes every bite worth slowing down for. Made with high quality cocoa beans and premium ingredients, it's the kind of chocolate that simply tastes really good. Pick up a bar of Ghirardelli Premium Dark Chocolate today. AT&T. Terms and conditions apply. Just visit att.com slash guarantee for details. Living with a rare disease can be challenging, but it does not define the reality of life. In these episodes, they share their stories, from diagnosis to working with their care team on their treatment plan. Listen to Voices of VivGuard on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Guaranteed human.