Secret Service Agent: Never Label Someone A Narcissist! This Habit Makes People Hate Talking To You!
81m 36s
Desmond O'Neill discusses the essential aspects of engaging in difficult conversations, focusing on effective communication and understanding human behavior. He stresses the need to avoid labeling individuals, such as calling them narcissists, to foster genuine understanding. O'Neill introduces the P.L.A.N. acronym, emphasizing the purpose (P) and goals of a conversation to guide interactions and maintain control, especially during emotional discussions. Drawing from his experience in law enforcement and interrogation, O'Neill provides insights into building connections and handling challenging dialogues with individuals, even those exhibiting antagonistic behavior. By prioritizing understanding and staying true to the mission of the conversation, O'Neill exemplifies the power of communication in navigating complex interactions and fostering genuine connections.
Transcription
16505 Words, 88035 Characters
I've got a difficult conversation I want to have with someone there and they might be a narcissist.
So let's stop there because if you just blatantly label somebody as being a narcissist,
you're not going to be able to really understand who this person is and why they are the way they are.
But when you need to go into a dark conversation to make things simple,
there are four things that you can do because we all have those conversations.
We have a supervisor who we feel is overlooking us in a promotion.
Maybe our spouse we got in a fight with, your friend who's betrayed us,
and they're cloaked in so much emotion or so much tension that you don't know how to handle that.
But there's also three things that you should stop doing,
such as stop telling people you understand.
-Telling them you understand. -Yep, why?
This is what we're going to talk about.
For over 30 years, former Secret Service agent Desmond O'Neill has used science-backed
interrogation techniques against some of the world's biggest liars.
He's trained elite teams from the FBI to the CIA.
And now, in his first public conversation, he's laying out the frameworks you need to communicate
effectively, how to lead, and how to get anyone to open up.
When it comes to being able to communicate with somebody,
they're ready to realize the little things that you do, so you need to have a plan.
P is for purpose, so why are you there?
What is the goal of the conversation?
Because, especially in emotional conversations,
it becomes really easy to get distracted.
And if you lose your cool, you lose control.
And then there's the A's to ask.
Because most of us think we know what our partner is thinking, right?
But the research shows we're only accurate about 40% of the time.
And if that conversation gets emotional,
that 40% can go down as low as 15.
It's called empathy accuracy.
And so the power of asking questions is important.
But when you fail to do that, you are going to have a really hard time
having a deep, honest relationship with somebody.
And then there's the L in the end.
Most people do wrong, and we'll go into that.
And then what about body language?
Can you tell if I'm being deceptive by how much I look at someone?
So there's a few indicators of somebody telling the truth.
And we'll talk about them.
And what about leadership principles?
So I learned the true essence of leadership.
When I was on a SWAT team, from situations like when you're
hunting someone and they're hunting you as well.
So let's get into the details.
Just give me 30 seconds of your time.
Two things I wanted to say.
The first thing is a huge thank you for listening
and tuning into the show week after week.
Means the world to all of us.
And this really is a dream that we absolutely never had
and couldn't have imagined getting to this place.
But secondly, it's a dream where we feel like we're only just getting started.
And if you enjoy what we do here, please join the 24% of people
that listen to this podcast regularly and follow us on this app.
Here's a promise I'm going to make to you.
I'm going to do everything in my power to make this show as good as I can
now and into the future.
We're going to deliver the guests that you want me to speak to
and we're going to continue to keep doing all of the things you love about this show.
Thank you.
Desmond O'Neal.
For those people that have just clicked on to this conversation,
what are they going to walk away from our discussion with?
So I've been a law enforcement for 30 years and I've served a lot of different roles in that.
And above everything else, one thing that I've learned is
when stress is high, when emotions are strong, when it matters,
how do you authentically connect and communicate with somebody else?
There's something to be said about when a conversation is easy, right?
When it's fun.
When everybody wants to be there, you can focus on your handshake.
You can focus on the eye contact.
How great your posture is.
What about the dark conversations?
What about those conversations that kind of
they live in the shadows of your mind because you don't want to face them.
You don't want to have those, right?
They're cloaked in so much emotion or so much tension that you just,
you don't know how to handle that.
We all have that, right?
We have a supervisor who we feel is overlooking us in a promotion.
We have, you know, a family member who we feel that we're just no longer getting along with.
Maybe our spouse we got in a fight with.
Maybe a friend who's betrayed us.
So how do you have that conversation?
Like, what does it look like?
Because it comes from, you know, for the 30 years that I've been doing this,
most of the people that I talk to didn't want to talk to me.
And my job was to connect with them to find a way to get them to open up,
to find a way to have some type of understanding and get the information that I need it.
So this is not about interview and interrogation.
This is, this is human connection.
If your audience cares to understand how to have a dark conversation where
you can deepen that relationship or at least come to some type of understanding.
Or at the very least, not walk away,
ruminate on everything you said, trying to figure out what went wrong.
What could you have done different?
If you've had that and you're interested in knowing, then this is what we're going to talk about that.
And to summarize in, I guess, 30 seconds, why you're the guy that is best place to deliver this
information. What are the reference points, the experiences, the variety of experience you've had
that feeds into the answers and the actionable advice you're going to give to my audience?
My initial career started as a corrections officer,
became a police officer and I was a SWAT officer as well.
From there, I went to the federal government, so I went to the secret service.
With the secret service, I also started a polygraph career.
So now I have people that are giving me either deepest, darkest secrets.
And just for context, polygraphing is a lie detection test.
Polygraph is a lie detection test, so it gives you a psychological or a physiological response
in terms of how somebody answers a particular question.
Where else did your career take you after that point?
I went into internal affairs, and so that is now policing the people within our organization.
So now I'm talking to men and women who have had some of my interrogation training.
They kind of know the questioning going on. They know the interaction. They've done themselves
interviews and interrogations.
Oh, okay. So this is law enforcement officers who have committed a crime or some kind of
misunderstanding issue reported for something, and your job is to investigate them.
Yes, but think about that for a minute. You are now talking to somebody else who
maybe a year ago you were out in the street doing work with.
And now you're asking them these questions or these for clarification on some type of allegation.
You got to be mindful of that. That's a big deal.
And the interview methods that were prevalent at that time, you felt were outdated.
They were. So there is in the US there's a very historical evolution of
interview and interrogation. You know, it started in the 1900s when policing came in.
In that circumstance, it was physical abuse. They called it the third degree, where you'd go in
and, you know, people would grind down your teeth or they would cause pain for you to talk to them.
As we've evolved as a society, that started to go away in lieu of psychological manipulation.
So it was less about hands-on and more about trying to get people to talk to you from a psychological
perspective. And right about 2014 when I went into internal affairs, I was like, Steven, I was like,
I just, there's got to be something different. Like we've had to evolve in some way in terms of what
that is. And so, you know, you have my thesis there, right? Right about that time, I was accepted into
the Naval Postgraduate School to pursue a master's. And because I was looking for a better way to
interview, one of my thesis advisors said, hey, have you ever heard of the high value detainee
interrogation group, which the acronym is HIGG had never heard of it. But the HIGG, when it was
created, was three-prong. Meaning that it had a research department, right? It had a practitioner
department. So the people that would do the interrogations. And then it had a trainer department.
Now the trainer department, we would do interviews interrogations. But we also understood the science
behind that. The reason that's important is because you could be a really good practitioner
and not understand why something is or isn't working. And so being able to cross the bridge between
the science and understanding that and being able to apply it in the room, that hybrid,
that connection, that sweet spot, that is what I did. So you did research and you continue to do
research on how to get people to give information, how to get information from people, how to get
them to offer up information. Is that the crux of it? So if I'm, you know, I've got a difficult
conversation I want to have with someone. This person is antagonistic, they often gaslight me,
they might be a narcissist. And I'm walking into that conversation, I'm overthinking it,
I'm thinking God, how can you tell this conversation? Where's the first place to start?
So the first place that I would start is don't label the people, how you just label them.
Okay. And that's a problem. So you just labeled somebody a narcissist. Why does that matter to you?
I think it allows me to blame them, I guess. It allows you to, but tell me, tell me in your perspective,
what's a narcissist? They are, they are low empathy, they are self-centred, they are a little bit
aggressive maybe. Okay. So let's stop there. Do you think, personally, that there are times in your
life where you lack empathy? Yeah. Okay. So empathy is very situationally based. So meaning that it's
also subjective. Meaning that if you feel this person is not giving you certain empathy. Okay. Maybe
a bit self-centered, a bit aggressive. The reason I ask you these things is because if you just
blatantly label somebody as being like this person as a narcissist, you've just, you've just made
it easy for yourself. You've just put blame on them and you're not going to be able to really understand
who this person is and why they are the way they are. So the first thing that I would do is I would
take away the labels as how you define them as you're going into that. What was the other thing you
said in terms of what they were? They were a narcissist, they were something else. They gaslight.
So second thing, which is interesting because we actually within our training program, we just did
a big class in gaslighting because it's important to understand what is gaslighting and when is it
not gaslighting? So for you, because you said this person gaslights you, what are the gaslighting you
about? When I bring something up, they make me feel like I'm to blame. When I bring up high
feel, maybe they make me feel like I'm to blame, like I did something wrong. Okay. Does that always
happen? We're often they're not. Okay. More often than not. So it's something that it sounds like
that when you go in and you're talking to this different person, whatever the circumstances is,
they are trying to discredit you or make you feel like maybe you don't know really what happened.
They're not listening. They're just always throwing it back on me saying that I did something to
deserve it. And what was the third thing you said? It's a little bit like aggressive and
antagonistic. Okay. Their emotions go up and it kind of makes me shut down. Okay. They kind of flood
the zone. So when you need to go into a dark conversation, here are the fourth things that you can do
to stay engaged and involved in what's about to happen, right? And how this is going to hopefully go
through. And what we say is you need to have a plan. And there's the acronym about that P,
right? L-A-N. So the P is for purpose. And the purpose is why are you there? What's the reason?
What's the mission? You have to understand your mission because your mission is going to drive your
tactics. Your mission is going to determine if things get off track, if this person becomes aggressive,
this person starts to be insulting. If my mission at that moment is to deepen my conversation with
them, deepen my relationship in some way, and this starts to get ugly in the middle, your mission
should keep you on track because you can get pulled from that very quickly. There's something called
multiple goals theory. And multiple goals theory is the understanding that at any given time we will
pursue simultaneous goals. And typically those goals would be something task oriented. You know,
I want to I want to finish a task and I want to get something done. There's going to be a component
of identity in there, meaning that how do I feel? What are my emotions going on during the course of
this? And then there's going to be relational. So it's going to be my relationship with this person
at the time. Now, a lot of times within multiple goals theory, those things can align. So, and I'll
give you an example, like if you're playing a sport, you're on a team. The team goal, your goal within
that team, the task is to win, to put on more points than the other person. That's the task.
The identity aspect of that is, am I a good player? Do I want the ball? Do I get the ball? Am I
contributing? Am I the superstar? Is there some type of identity in how this makes me feel about
myself being a sports star in some capacity? And the relationship part of that is, how do my
teammates feel about me? Am I a good teammate in terms of what there was? Those things can align.
You can see when that is misaligned when all of a sudden somebody would call a ball hog,
somebody who takes the shot all the time or they won't pass it around and you're like,
"We're not there." What are you doing? Right? And it's one of these things where like, you are more
concerned about your identity than you are about the team winning. That's a problem. That's when
you can see there's a misalignment of goals. Or something that's even more simple would be,
let's say you're in a meeting with a boss or a colleague and it's a pretty important meeting.
You're trying to close a deal and your boss is something that's wrong. Now, you have to make a
decision. You could either correct your boss in front of everybody or you could preserve his or her
dignity and address them at a later time. You have to decide which one of those is most important.
You have to understand your purpose of being in that meeting because maybe I could let this go.
It's not that big of a deal because if I correct my boss, this may affect my relationship with
them at a later time. This could ruin my career in terms of being transferred or not being on a
project. So when you're looking at goals, you have to understand what the overall objective is.
It becomes, Stephen, it becomes, especially in emotional conversations, it becomes really easy to
get distracted, really easy. So I go into that conversation with my colleague who is problematic.
My goal with them, let's say, is to get them to stop. I'm actually thinking about earlier in my career
when I used to work in call centres on the phone. And there was one particular lady that's that
next to me that was always a little bit rude and always put me down a little bit, but patronising.
So I in hindsight wish I could have taken her aside and had a conversation with her and said,
"Listen, the way you're speaking to me is very disrespectful. You're putting me down a patronising
me. Please can you stop doing that?" My goal would have been to get her to stop.
It is to get her to do that, but the crux of that is to understand why she's doing it because
that's going to allow me to fix this in some way if it's fixable. I'll share the story with you.
In 1991, an 11-year-old girl named JC Dugard was kidnapped by a man named Philip Gerito
and his wife Nancy. And Philip and Nancy kept JC Dugard for 18 years. He fathered two children
with her when she was 14 and when she was 17. And in 2009, they found her and him at Berkeley.
They arrested him, arrested his wife. 2011, he was, you know, tried convicted. Three years prior to that,
there was a young girl named Michaela Garrett who had gone missing, never been found,
in a county over west of El Dorado and a county named Alameda County. There was a lot of suspicion
that Philip was the one who did this as well. And one of my colleagues was the prosecuting attorney
for El Dorado County, California's name is Vern Pearson. And Vern said, I'd like to close this or get
some type of understanding, can you go and interview Philip? So I looked at all the informational Philip,
he had written a manifesto in terms of how to cure pedophilia. And I went to Vern, I said, all right,
I'm, let's go do this. And he goes, what do you need? Like a day, a couple of hours, and I said,
I need four days. And my goal was to do a deep dive into the things he had done. He was a serial
rapist, a serial kidnapper, and to understand his life in the time frame by which Michaela Garrett
went missing. And so this was the evolution of what I was trying to do. So I show up, he walks in,
says, who are you? I said, well, I'm special agent on Neil. I'd like to talk to you about your history.
I read your manifesto, and I had some questions. And he said, you know, when they told me I had a
visitor, he goes, I wasn't going to come in, and he goes, but the angels on my shoulder tell me
that this would be a good, good talk. So he said, let's do it. We talked in detail every day,
for probably eight to nine hours, they brought him food. And the end of each day, I would say, Philip,
I will be here tomorrow. If the, if the angels on your shoulder tell you to show up, please do,
if not, then it was nice to meet you. And every day he showed up, why did you say no? There's a,
there's a depth of understanding in terms of the headspace that he is in. And so when you can connect,
like genuinely connect with that, you truly try to understand it as a person, and there's power with
that in the course of those 36 hours. Multiple times, he was very aggressive. He was very condescending.
He called me a liar, things he accused me of. I don't believe you are who you say you are. I don't
believe you're here for the things you're saying you're here for. I don't even know if you work for
the federal government. And he's essentially questioned my integrity. Now, my purpose is not to make
him feel that I'm smarter than him is not to belittle or berate him or have a question of, you know,
integrity, because I could have said, you kidnapped an 11 year old girl and kept her captive for 18
years, father to children with her the first one at the age of 14. And your question of my integrity,
I didn't do that because that's not why I was there. And so despite the fact that he got upset,
despite the fact that he called me and accused me of all these different things, I stayed on my purpose,
I stayed on my mission. And when we were done, when we finished, I went back to the prosecuting
attorney and said, he's not your guy. And he said, you sure? And I said, I bet my career on it.
How did you know? There's a lot of things in regards to when you're looking at people from the
perspective of telling the truth in terms of the way that they talk and engage with you.
Our conversation on Tuesday and our conversation on Wednesday and our conversation on Thursday and
our conversation on Friday all stayed very consistent. And if I'm asking him for further clarification,
he's providing for further clarification. If I'm talking to him about something and there's
some type of spontaneous correction where he's like, wait a minute, this happened before this,
those are indicators of truth. And if there are things that he talks about in terms of things
that are of complication, nobody's day goes perfect. And there are many times when he was telling me
about the things he had done because he was a serial rapist and a serial kidnapper and he would
drive around and pick up women and hitchhiking and he would rape them and let them go. Oftentimes,
we would get into the details of when those didn't go well. And when all of a sudden the girl would
fight him off and run away. And so there's all these different complications and different things
that he would talk about. He handled the complications consistently as we were saying. When complications
are introduced to a story, right? People who lie don't do that, right? It's truth tellers will
often do that because it's just like this is just what happened. Like these are the things that
happen. This is my life in terms of where things were going to go. Overall, in terms of how that
conversation went, there are those type of indicators that just made it trend more truthful than not.
Like there wasn't this big gap or this big weird moment when we're talking about McKayla Garrett
to where all of a sudden it's like missing pieces that I have to put in there. There are no cues
to deception. There are things that all of a sudden seem different and require you to do more
questions more asking, but that didn't occur around the time that we were looking for with that.
Okay. So we finally, when we finished and then they went back and they looked at the evidence,
they found a new fingerprint and were able to charge and convict the person who did that.
The reason I bring all of that up is because for the purpose aspects of what we're talking about,
not losing sight of what your mission is, being focused in terms of what that is.
The power of communication and staying online as it relates to what you want to accomplish
is really powerful because it keeps you on track and it keeps you engaged and reminds you of why
you're there. Not every relationship deserves that. Like there's just some relationships you're like,
this just isn't worth it for me. If it matters to you, that mattered to me. It mattered to me not because
for me. It mattered to me before that family. And there is a difference between having a profession and
being a professional. Having a profession is what you do. Being a professional is the culmination
of everything that you've done at that moment, at that time for a specific purpose. That's what I had to
bring in with that because that was what was at stake with us. So you have these full cards in front
of you. We've done the P, which is staying focused on your purpose when you go into conversation to
fend off the emotion, which might distort you and take you off. And I'm so guilty of that.
Everybody is. So guilty of that, especially with conversations with my partner where there's
emotion involved in this. Sorry, it's where blame might be prevalent. So the L that you have there.
So the L is, listen, this becomes the thing that people are
worst at because it's a lot to do. Think about right now. Think about my conversation with you at
this moment. I'm speaking. So internally, my internal vocabulary and the conversation that I'm having
in my head is running about 800 to 1000 words a minute. I'm speaking to you in about 120 to 150 words
a minute. There's a lot that's being edited. There's a lot of things that I think that I'm saying or
I want to say I'm trying to engage with you. There's also something called theory of mind, which is me
watching you and trying to understand is what I'm saying on point with what Stephen wants to hear or
wants to hear for his audience. Do I need to change anything? Does this land on him? And then if you're
nonverbal change in your verbal change, then I have to readjust maybe what I'm editing and my theory
of mind will readjust to because I'm like, oh, I just lost him here. I have to readjust.
Simultaneously, you are listening to me and you're listening to the 120 to 150 words I'm giving you,
but your brain can process this at like four to 600 words per minute. So you have too much cognitive
bandwidth. You have the ability to listen to me and then do multiple other things, which is often
times why people will drift out or you'll start thinking something else or you'll think of your
your notepad because you got it. You got to figure it out. And this is when it becomes really easy to
be convinced and not curious because you're like, I kind of know where this is going. And so you check
out. So you actually have to do something called cognitive inhibition. You have to kind of narrow that
bandwidth to stay fully engaged with me. That's why when you hear people say like active listening,
it's hard. It's hard to do because you have to be attentive to the other person. You have to listen.
You have to look. You have to pick up their verbal and their nonverbal behavior. And then you have
to do something with that. Stephen Covey says, most people don't listen with the intent to understand
they listen with the intent to reply. And if you are simply just waiting for your turn to talk,
then you and I are not are not connected.
Controlling conversation comes from listening, not talking. So if I'm trying to, if I'm trying to
get some information out of someone, I should have a bias towards just letting them speak at me.
You should. You know, you hear about this, like, always let the other person talk more. That's great,
but if both people are doing that, then the conversation is not progressing. The conversation is an
extension of what you and I are speaking with. And when we've gone from listening in terms of what
that looks like, the next thing you have to do, which gets into this is the A, which is, which is
ask, right? So the A being this, if you are paying attention to me and you're picking up on things
that I'm saying, the changes in my body language. And there's something you don't understand.
You need to ask, this is where you're going to deepen the conversation. This is where you show
somebody that you're active listening, you're curious and you're open and you're trying to understand
them. If you look at empathy research, we typically think that we can understand our significant
other or different people at a much higher level than we actually do. For a stranger, it's called,
it's called empathy accuracy. For a stranger, your ability to understand their headspace is like 20%
for a friend, somebody close to you, it's like 30. For your significant other,
it's no higher than 40%, which means that despite you thinking that you know what she's thinking,
you got a four out of 10 chance of being right. And if that conversation gets emotional,
that 40% can go down as low as 15 because you start to pull in to be like, I'm guarding myself here,
I'm guarding my ego. When your ego is on the line, your ears go offline because you stop hearing
what she's having to say and you start protecting yourself in terms of what you're trying to do.
So your ability to be empathetic when things are hard becomes harder and you have to be very
mindful of that. Let's say you come home from early morning workout and your spouse says,
hey, Steven, how was it? And you say, that's pretty tough. It's a lot that you can do with that.
This is what she could do. She could say nothing. So now maybe you understand that maybe she doesn't
want to talk about this or she's not interested in it. That's one. The second thing she could say to you,
be like, well, sweetheart, that's why you look the way you do. She has now made the assumption,
right? Her empathy accuracy that she knows what you meant by the word tough. And so if she says
to you, well, that's how you look and that's not what you meant. Now you feel that there's a separation
between what you're hoping she would pick up on and what you actually said. The third thing she could
say would be like, what do you mean by tough? Because the ambiguity of that is the word tough.
Who knows what that means? It could be a lot of different things. She's now showing you, I'm into
you. I'm tuning in in the power of something like that. When you talk about deepening relationships
and increasing that connection, that's how it happens. The same thing with your nonverbal behavior,
right? You look at nonverbal behavior at 66% of what we give is nonverbal. And so if I through the
course of my conversation with you, if all of a sudden we're talking and you're just like,
folding my arms. So folding your arms could be a sign of just your folding your arms. It could be a
sign of you not liking my question if you roll your eyes. So if I see that and it matters to me,
then I need to say something to the effect of it seems like versus I think because I think is
the pronoun saying it's about me and it's just like, I don't care what you think. It seems like what
you just did maybe was because you didn't like what I had to say because I saw you cross your arms
or roll your eyes. Do I have that right? So now you have a choice where you can either say, yes,
you got that right for these reasons or no, I just followed them because I was comfortable and
whatever the case may be. But it is a matter if I see you and it's in harmony with the conversation
that we were having that seems like it's something that shows that it could be potentially a problem.
I need to ask about it. You and I have a conversation right now and you folding your arms isn't
going to be like a red flag that I'm like, oh, I just saw you folded your arms when I said that.
But if it's something that there's some emotion to lay it around that and it's important and I'm
trying to express something to you when I see you roll your eyes or cross your arms. Hey,
Steve, and I noticed when I brought up this thing about our family, you kind of lean back and
cross your arms and roll your eyes, it seems like you didn't approve of that. Do I have that right?
So now it's on you to explain that or not. On this point of body language, as someone that sits here
and I guess interviews people for like four or five hours at a time sometimes,
over the last five years I have come to learn certain body language patterns in my guests.
One of the most obvious ones is when I ask the guest a question that is causing them some
potential discomfort in some way. And when I say discomfort, I should probably define that as
maybe it's a difficult question for whatever reason. Sure. What I tend to see is I tend to see
them cross their arms. That's like a really consistent pattern. It's almost like it's almost as if
they're telling me that this is a little bit difficult and it holds to be true. Do you ask them?
Notice when you cross your arms, you know, when I ask you that question, is it something with this
question that bothered you? Or do you just let it go? I let it go, but they've already told me.
Okay. So I don't need to ask them because I now know that there's something there where there's
emotion. Sure. It's kind of the way that I see it. It's what it is. More than likely it's what it is.
And I think there's power to that because your perception, right? So you bring this back like
your pattern recognition of all the guests that you've done and the association or the connection
of that in terms of the question that you ask and they cross your arms like that's where that comes
from. That's where that all of a sudden that thing where you're just like I feel it but don't really
know it. It's just like you don't know that to be the case because it could be a number of different
things. But because of the pattern recognition you see it all the time, that gives you the chance
of saying this is there's some emotion here. So either engage it or tread lightly depending on
which way you want to go. Yeah. And that's what happened. So instead of saying like, you know,
why why did you cross your arms? I will ask them potentially how how that memory makes them feel
like they feel about that and and that tends to be just it's so you know because people always talk
you know they say does body language matter? Does it count for anything? Can you interpret
someone's body language to understand if they're telling you the truth? Is any of this stuff true
in your in your view? No. You should you should look at body language because it is a language
in terms of what somebody is is showing you. You look at body language and if you see something that
is a change just like the cross in your arms, then you need to be curious about it. So it's really
about a change in state. It's a change of it's a change of what somebody is doing and the timing of
that. So you just said like when I asked something that is personal or emotional, they'll talk about
it. They'll cross their arms because maybe it's it's now like the psychological thing where I want
to guard myself a little bit. Maybe I want to kind of close up a little bit. Who knows? But if it's
something where you're just like a notice it and you don't need to use it like you could ask them
if you wanted to, but you're just like, oh, they already they already told me so I don't need it.
But for anybody else, if you see that and you're talking and somebody crosses their arms,
don't just assume that's what it is because if you assume and you're wrong, you're going down the wrong
track. And so throughout this framework for having high conversations, we've covered the P,
which is stitch your purpose, the L, the list, which is listen, A, which is to ask.
Is there anything else in the framework? The N, which is the next steps. So
to have a plan means to understand all of these different things and the way that you approach that.
And the next steps is, how do you want to resolve this? Like what's the end goal with this? Is there
anything that I can do that we can, you know, further our relationship where both you and I can
be in alignment? Do you ask them? Would you propose? I would always ask them if I'm engaged, right? So
perhaps let's go back to the, the conversation that you may have with, you know, this individual,
you're just like this person's a narcissist and so forth. If you're engaging them and you're the one
who wants to really have this conversation and you're hoping that you can find some type of
resolution, you have to ask if there's resolution with that. So if something to the effect of,
do you think that you and I can find an amicable way forward when I, when you and I engage, you know,
we can really enjoy each other's time and this thing not go bad. Like do you see that in our future
at all? Yes or no? And then it's either yes, okay, what does that look like for us? Like how do we
have that? Because I am, I am having this conversation with you because my relationship with you
matters. But there are things that happen within that are, that are frustrating and that cause me not
to really want to engage. I do want to find a way to do that because that is most important to me.
How best do we do that? There is no magic bullet by which makes everything, every conversation go
perfect. There's none. You are, you are part of that conversation. The other person is part of that
conversation. You have your perspective. They have their perspective. You have what you think is
right or think is fair. Fairness is subjective because what you think is fair is just means what you
think is fair. And so the hardest part is to walk away and feeling like you should, there should
have done more you can do. The power becomes knowing how to address that. And if it doesn't go right,
then you walk away and be like, you know what? It just didn't go right. And I'm okay with that.
What if they start insulting you in the conversation? Okay. What's your purpose of being in the conversation?
I'm trying to get them to stop being so rude to me when we're at on the same bank of
telephones at the call center. So it is a matter of, if she's being rude to you, it's addressing
that at the moment, right? You know, I noticed that we're having this conversation that you're being
really aggressive, really rude, and really kind of sending. So you cool it out. Yeah. Be very specific
in terms of what it is. Like, you know, if she, if she calls you and she uses, you know, she calls
you a name or whatever the case may be, like, you know, what you're being rude and she's just like,
what are you doing? You're like, you're just being rude. That's unhelpful. Like, give her the context by
which you feel that she's being rude because maybe she does something outside of a name where you're
like you're being rude. And maybe to her, that's not rudeness. Maybe it's her directness, right? But if
she's like, you know what, you're, Steven, you're just an asshole or whatever the case may be. And
I would say, hey, it seems like either right now, like, you know, you're very kind of sending,
you've called me a name to include an asshole. Can you explain to me specifically right now why
that is? And make her back it up. Make her explain to you what it is that is there something about,
is there something about me you don't like? Is there something about my work ethic that you don't
like or maybe the way that I'm doing this? You've been here longer than me. So as perhaps there's
something else that I'm doing or not doing that you think is wrong because I am not understanding
your anger and your venom and your need to consult me. And I really try to understand what that is.
So you're having a very direct conversation with her. Very specific to what she's saying. It does not
mean that that's going to fix it. She could just be an asshole. And it's one of those things where
you have to be like, I am going to dress this. I'm not going to return in kind. I don't have to turn
into that person as well. I can walk away from that conversation and be like, you know what? I handled
that the best I could. It doesn't mean it's going to fix it. Are there any tactics that interrogators
are taught or that you teach interrogators for keeping your emotions in check? Because, you know,
we go to those conversations, someone calls you an asshole, you're cool as I'll start spiking,
you get into a big delay, you get stressed, you get emotional, you end up calling them an asshole
back. But is that, I don't know, is that breath work? What did interrogators get taught?
In the heat of the moment, at that time, you have no time to do breath work. This is real time
stuff in terms of what you're trying to do. If you go in and you understand your purpose,
and again, I don't mean to go back to the plan, but what happens is you become, you can be pulled out
very quickly. And all of a sudden, if you are trying to get information from somebody and
one of their strategies, because they maybe don't want to give you information, one of their
strategies is to insult you. And now you're insulting them back. One, you're not going to get anything,
two, you fell into their strategy. So, what you have to do is you have to address that. I am
something to the effect of, I see that when I ask you that, or all of a sudden, like it seems
like there's a change in our relationship to where now you're being really aggressive. Why is that?
So, you're continually cooling it out. Yes, because I am asking you to back up your emotions.
Because if it's BS, if you're just doing that because you're trying to hide the ball someplace else,
I'm going to call you out on it. It's all show showing me that I am not afraid to confront
this type of behavior. And I'm seeing it. And I am, I am really trying to engage with you in a very
amicable genuine way. And if you are going to treat me a certain way, I am going to understand
what it is. You're also showing that you're not doing it in a kind. It's part of this showing that
you're strong. It's less about being strong and more about being competent and confident in what
you're doing. Because if you allow in anybody, not just an interrogation room, in any conversation,
if you lose your cool, you lose control. You have to be mindful of that. I was overseeing an
internal affairs interview. And I was going to go in and talk to this person at the end. I was
thinking about doing a polygraph with them. But before that was going to happen, the case agent,
the person who had the investigation was talking to the subject. It was a road rage incident where this
agent had been accused of road rage and pulling his gun out on a civilian. So this was the conversation
they were that they were having. And I'm listening to this in an interview room, right? And in terms of
like a two way, two way mirror. And the subject is very aggressive. He's very angry. And he's very
angry to the point of like, he's like, I don't know why you don't believe me with this. I keep telling
these things and you keep asking me the same questions. I think this is a bunch of BS. The investigator
comes back and he's just like, because I think you're a liar. And you're not telling me the truth
in terms of what it is. And you're causing us to be in this room a lot longer. And this is a problem.
So now they're both yelling at each other, like yelling at each other. And it was one of these things
where I'm watching this unfold. And it wasn't the subject's job to maintain his composure. It was
the investigators because his goal is not to belittle this other agent. His goal was to find out,
did this or did this not happen? And he lost side of that. And he came out of the room to me and he's
like, what do you think? And I'm like, well, I'm not going to polygraph him. I mean, this guy's so
emotional right now. Like, that's not going to happen. And he goes, you know what? This guy's just
an asshole anyway. And I'm like, I don't think he's the asshole in the room. The other guy was the
asshole in the room because he allowed himself to get pulled out of what he should have been doing
because now he wanted to have the game of who's the bigger, who's the bigger jerk in the room.
You can do it. And again, if you want to burn that bridge, burn it. But if you want to maintain
a relationship or you want to maintain your profession or you are trying to get to some
resolution, you cannot lose your cool. I guess that's what it comes down to is most of the time.
We're not clear on the goal going into the conversation. So we, we have nothing to be anchored to.
So it's just, it's absolutely, getting into the washing machine. Absolutely. We just spin
around and around and around and walk away with its relationship. And the power really comes from
if this person is insulting you and they're angry and they're doing these things and you're
sitting there and you're asking good questions, you're keeping your composure, there is a lot of power
with that. And I mean power in a way that shows like I'm in control of myself. I am well aware of
what's going on as this relationship and this conversation is happening. I am not going to fall
into this because this matters to me in terms of this other thing. I've heard you say that you think
people suffer from me, me, me syndrome. What does that mean? So the me, me syndrome is everything
is about me, right? I mean, it seems obvious with that, but like you can even look at things from
like a cultural perspective. You can look at like here, you know, in the, in the US and Western
civilizations, like we are primarily like a dignity culture. Well, we are, it's all about us,
right? It's all about that internal, that internal feeling that we have. And so everything is predicated
on our job, our success, the things that we do. The external world doesn't really matter in terms
of our success or failure. So a lot of it is what is in your headspace? And how do you manage that?
Because the problem that I see and what I think comes within communication is we do a lot of self
reflection. We rarely do a lot of outward reflection on the other person. Some of the best negotiators
there will spend more than half of their time thinking about somebody else. So a very personal story.
When I was 21, my father passed away. And he had been battling cancer for three years. And so when
he passed away, I have four siblings and my mom was there. So when he passed away, he passed away at
home and all five of us were there. Several years later, I'm having this conversation on the day
that my dad died about the day of my dad died. I'm having this with my sister and my three younger brothers.
And we're talking about where we were and so forth. And my sister says, yeah, I can't watch the
Simpsons without thinking of dad. And I said, what do you mean? She's like, well, the TV was there
and the Simpsons were on. And she's like, I always just remember that. And I was like, there's a TV
in the room. She's like, you don't remember TV being in the room. And I'm like, I have absolutely not.
I have no idea that there was a TV in the room. I didn't code it. That wasn't the thing that was
important. Her perspective and the way that she saw that moment affected her differently than
everybody else in that room. And so to go back to the me, me, me, when you fail to take in consideration
that other people have other experiences based on how they pick up the world, how they do things
in the world. And you think that it's just about you, you're, you are going to have a really hard time
having a deep, honest, connective relationship with somebody. If it's just about you, you can do it.
And a lot of people do it, you know, they're looking for that that way to, you know, make people
drawn to them and make people connect to them. And that's fine. But if you are trying to,
I guess even if you just want to be like a genuine person and you want to have a relationship,
don't make it about you. I've just finished writing my third book. I haven't
found up the title yet, but I have started walking up some different designs. And I've been doing this
with Adobe Express, which is one of our sponsors. What I love about Adobe Express is that it makes
it so easy for me to obsess over the tiniest details, the typography, the font, the colour, the text
placement, the stuff that might sound petty to most people, but actually compounds to create something
that stands out, something that's one better than the rest. And designing my cover art has reminded me
of how many creative things I've learnt over the year. But it's also reminded me that there are so many
creative minds around me that are also sitting on their own secrets. So I've created the one better
guide in Adobe Express to bring those tips to you. And in it, you'll find principles from the very,
very best in their industry turned into quick and easy practices for you to apply. So you can train
yourself to create exactly like the best performing teams in the world do. Just head over to adobe.ly/onebetter
to download Adobe Express now and make sure you visit the Learn tab to discover how you can become
one better than the rest. I was thinking this earlier. I was thinking one of the things in this
podcast that I've learnt is if I want to increase the probability that someone opens up and tells me
something, one of the things I do is I share myself. So I might be asking someone about their childhood
and it's quite clear to me now that one of the ways, especially if they end up crossing their
arms and get it uncomfortable, is just a pause for a second and share my own childhood. So if I've
identified that one of your values is, I don't know, you ought to be a good family man.
Might you mention that you're a family man yourself as a way to build a bridge?
So if it's honest, so that's a great question, but this becomes a thing where you have to look at
things if you're trying to influence or manipulate somebody. If it's honest and it fits within that
conversation at that moment because this is what I based on a conversation, I think this person
needs to hear, then sure if it's real, if it's not, if I'm lying to him because I'm trying to say,
well, I'm a family man, you're a family man, like we're good. Now you're manipulating, now you're
manipulating the person. And that's a whole different conversation. So to go back to what you said,
if, if I understand this guy's values, and I understand that there is a sense of,
let's say a sense of honesty, maybe if there's a part of this person that's also honest or there's
also a sense of he wants to be, I don't know, he wants his kids to see him as a man of integrity,
right? Let's just say that. So maybe that starts to become a conversation that we have as it relates to,
you know, I can only imagine, you know, the difficulty that this has with you as you've told me,
you know, you're a family man. I'm not going to say you're a family man. I'm going to say as you
told me, you're a family man. And one of the things that you said about being a family man was
how important is your kids to kind of like lead by your model, your model, like your role model aspects
of that by honesty and openness and those type of things. So do you hear where I'm going? So I'm
trending in the direction by which that I am trying to bring online, still his father, but a
different value under what it means to be a father, because I don't want to talk about being present,
because that's probably going to go away. But if he is trying to teach his kids to own your mistakes,
then maybe that's the direction I go. But how am I going to get that? I'm going to get that because I'm
going to start off my conversation with him in a very honest, genuine way that I'm going to try to
understand who is this person across from me. And what's the difference between manipulation and
influence? Influence is about nudging a person in a certain direction at a certain time that's
beneficial for both you and them. That's influence. Got it? Manipulation is you nudging a person
in a specific direction because it's good for you. It's not good for them. And so you'll lie, you'll
do whatever you need to do to close the deal, to get them to do something, to give them to give you
something. That's manipulation, because it's often one of those things that it has negative
consequences to it in terms of the person who did it. You know, maybe they never know, but you
manipulated them. Which is interrogations, no? Because this guy's going to go, he's going to get life
in jail if he admits that he killed this child. So I'm, that's not in his interests, but it's in mine.
So I'm going to manipulate him to give me the secrets. If that's what you want to do and that's
the direction you think you need to do, then by all means you can do it. And here in the US,
it is legal that you can lie to objects. But so you're saying lying is the moment where it
becomes manipulation. Yes, that becomes the shortcut and that becomes a way not just within the
interrogation room. Like I think what becomes important, and I've seen this come up a lot, people
are all about like influence, like you hear that come up quite a bit. If you want to influence
somebody, this is how you do it. You're honest with them. You're clear and you're transparent.
Because influence is about how do I feel about you? Not about all the things that you're doing
at that moment, because if I don't, if trusted as he isn't even on the table, if I don't trust you
to begin with, or I think that to go back to what you said, there's this pattern recognition where I'm
like, I just think there's something wrong with this. You're not going to be able to influence me.
If I am honest with you in everything that I do, because that's how I carry myself,
not only does it lower your cognitive load because you're not lying to somebody else,
but it underscores who you stand for and who you are as a person. And with that, people are going
to see that and say, you know what, Steven's very transparent. He said, this was a good deal. And I
believe that for these reasons. It's a matter of you being honest with that. I always question now,
like, because I see it a lot and it came up in the questions that I was talking to your team about.
It's like, why does everybody want to influence somebody? Like, why do they, what is that? Do you know?
Like, why does it come up all the time? Because what do people try to accomplish?
Because they want to accomplish something. They have a goal for who, for themselves.
Right. So is that, is that influence? But it gets the job done for some, for some people, sure.
It does. But I think about that. Is it Carnegie? What's that book? It's probably behind me,
some were called influence. And it talks about the five pillars of influence, things like.
So it's, yeah. So it's Robert Chaldini. We teach that, right? It's one of those where you can
understand why influence works, the different strategies of influence, like what they all stand for.
And when they fit within the, within the conversation, you can do it. I do it. But I can,
I can tell you, Steven, being a, being a communication specialist, I don't spend my day walking around,
trying to influence people. I will be honest with people. I will be transparent. I will answer
their questions with the best information that I have. And if people are inspired by that and,
and that causes somebody to be influenced by the things that I said, that's, that's what I want.
Right? And I brought this up earlier, but the, the training academy that, that, you know, that I
instruct with, it is all about openness. It's all about honesty. It's all about trying to help people
based on why they've come to us. And it's not about manipulating people to, to come in and be a
member. It's about why are you here? And how can we help you? And this is the best way we can do that.
And that influences people and then it inspires people to, to listen to what you have to say. Why,
why is your podcast this successful? The first time you and I met, you said something that I disagreed
with. And it was, you were talking about fight story and you're talking about the different things you,
you know, with fight story and the success of the podcast. And you said, it's not because I'm a good
interviewer. It's because they're really good at marketing. You're a good interviewer because of
the vulnerabilities that you do. Every time I've been surprised on how vulnerable and open you are
in terms of sharing with yourself, like there's that story arc in terms of how that connection is.
Because of that, you influence me, not because you're trying to, not because your team reached out,
but because of the way you carried yourself in your podcast. And the questions that you ask and
the vulnerability that you're showing, there is a level of trust that comes with that. And so you,
in, you weren't trying to influence, you were being you. And there's a part of yourself congruence,
who you are, your ideal self, which is just like, this is just what I do. And my life's not perfect.
And I'll share the parts that are messy. And I'm trying to use this as a platform to help millions
of people. That's a big deal. And is this how you build trust with people? Or is trust a different
or adjacent point? So trust is about being vulnerable. Trust is about being open. And sharing
a little bit about yourself. So truly, Steve, and the question becomes, is what I've shared with you
in good hands? Because if it's not, that's a problem, right? Let me ask you a question. Do you have a secret
that maybe you've never told anybody or you've told just one or two people? Yeah. You do. You got one
in mind? Yeah. What is it? I can't. There's millions of people listening. Okay. But, but if these
millions of people weren't watching, would you tell me? Yeah. Okay. So the reason that you're not telling me
or in front of these millions of people is why? Why are you not, why are you not telling us your secret?
Because of consequence. Okay. Someone's going to clip it, someone's going to put it on the internet,
someone to fuck me up. There's a reason for it, right? There's a reason that you're not trusting in
in terms of what it was. Maybe you trust me just because of the relationship that we've built
to this point. But there's probably other things that you wouldn't trust me with. When you talk about
trust, if you look at concentric rings, you know, in terms of the trust around you, the center ring
should be self-trust. It should be you. You should be able to trust yourself more than you trust
anybody else. If you don't, you probably need to do a little bit of work, right? What does that mean
in reality, me trusting myself? Do you trust that you will do the things that you want to do or
you want to do? Do you keep yourself in that direction? Do you keep yourself accountable, right? That
becomes this thing where can you make decisions or are you a person like, I don't make any decisions,
I let somebody else make decisions or I run everything by everybody else because I don't trust
myself to make the right decision. Then you have to work on your decision making because you have
to find a way to build your trust up. Outside of that initial ring, it should be a ring of
a handful of people that have unconditional trust, right? And these are the people that no matter
what, like you've given them that trust. You believe in them. And it should be a small circle.
And this is where I think people go wrong. They're like, I share everything with people.
Then they're crushed when one of those people that they've given unconditional trust with,
break it. That's a problem. My siblings are all really close to me, so I have them. There's four of them.
Outside of that, I have my wife and I select few friends that I know if I call or like we're good.
Outside of that, you should everybody else should be conditional trust. People should earn your
trust. They should be honored to have it. Don't give it away for free. And if you have somebody's trust,
you should respect that if they've given that to you. But I think, and I've seen it, people give
away trust way too much because the person will be amazing in this one spot. And all of a sudden,
they get the halo effect. And they're like, well, they're great here. They must be great here.
It's this it's this arc of they're awesome everywhere. And so I'm going to trust them with these
other things. Then when again, they break it, they violate it. The way you feel is just this
violation of, you know, somebody took what you gave them and just destroyed it. It's hard to come
back from that. It's hard to once you read, once you lose trust, like if you lose somebody's trust,
it's really, really hard to get back. Is there anything you can do to get back? Do you think?
What I know that you can do and doesn't always work, you have to be accountable for why you lost
it. Whatever that is, very specific. It's going to take time and a lot of consistency.
To consistency mean in that you show them consistently time and time again, that you are a person
that, you know, can be trusted. On leadership principles, something I've heard you talk about as well.
What do you think of the most important principles as it relates to leadership? Because we've
talked about trust there and other things around communication and all these things. Is there
is there anything we haven't covered as it relates to being a great leader in your perspective?
Somebody who's calm under chaos, that would be my definition of a leader. However, and I say that
because leadership is a feeling, Steven, how do you make these people feel as it relates to my qualities
as a leader? Do I do the things that register with you as leadership? I can tell you when I was on a
a SWAT team, which is a special weapons and tactics. This is where I learned the true essence of
leadership because I had some amazing commanders and team leaders on that team were under
high stress, under a stress like that. If you have people around you that are keeping their
composure, that's leadership. One of the elements there, I guess, when you're in the SWAT as well,
is dealing with huge amounts of uncertainty when pressure is on. Sure, when your life's at risk.
I was reading about a study, which I think you mentioned some time ago, where they look at three
groups of people doing the same exam and sort of ascertain how people make decisions with different
degrees of certainty and information. Yeah, what the study showed was there were a group of students
that were taking a test in college and they were told that they had either passed or failed or they
had no idea whether they passed or failed. But prior to that, they were asked if they would take
a vacation. And the people who passed and the people who failed, there was a higher percentage of
them who chose to take a vacation after getting news that they had either passed college or failed
college. The group that didn't know, there was a third group that was just like, I'm unsure,
weren't able to really make a decision. So just to be clear then, on that third group,
they didn't have their exam results back. So they didn't take the action to book. They were told
they were told that there was some malfunction in ability to score their test and they would get
their results at a later time. And so then they were asked to, you know, if they would also
buy a vacation and a farther fewer percentage, I don't remember what it was, but a farther,
much less percentage of them would take it than the people who both passed. Because I think there's
like half the people who passed or were told they passed, like took the bought the vacation package,
it was like a vacation trip to Hawaii. Around the same percentage, I believe, who failed the exam,
bought the vacation trip, but the people who couldn't decide just, they didn't have the cognitive
bandwidth to really make a decision. So the ambiguity of not knowing really lessens our cognitive
ability to go in a certain direction. And so when we don't know where to go, we often don't go
anywhere. That is a whole mark of great leaders that they're able to decide even when there's very
low certainty. Sure. I would think that would come with, you know, the territory. I think if you're,
if you're only a leader when it's calm, then you're not really a leader, you're somebody with a
higher salary and a title. Like leadership really shows up in those type of circumstances when
things are uncertain. And so, you know, having the ability to manage things when not all the
information's there and doing the best you can with it because, you know, oftentimes the best decision
to make is the right one and the worst one is to not make a decision at all. And so if you have those
type of leaders who just can't think through that problem, then that's not a leader. I remember when I
spoke in South Carolina many years ago, Barack Obama was on stage and he said that as president,
like when he went and got Bin Laden in that compound in Pakistan, that they didn't know if Bin Laden
was there. They'd never visually properly ID him. So he had to make that decision to risk American
lives with, as he said, 51% certainty or a very low certainty. And he says that's the thing about
being the president of the United States. You make huge calls with very little certainty. And I've
always thought about that in terms of my day-to-day life and it all has made me conclude that
the most successful people that I've met do have that ability to be low certainty and make big calls
with the peace of mind that they've made that call with the best available information. And then
the sort of inverse of that is some people listening right now with even small decisions are
trying to get to 100% certainty when obviously 100% certainty only exists in hindsight.
You know, and that's a really good point. I think that's a lot of people struggle with that when
it comes to just own your decision, like own it. Like whatever you choose to do,
if you make it not under high emotion and you do the best you can with the information that you
have at that time, make a decision. Like, you know, as they say, it's, you know, if you make the
wrong decision, then it's experience, if you make the right decision, then it's confirmation.
I think about this a lot. I think about how maybe everyone listening could have a conversation
with themselves about their own relationship with uncertainty. Like how good are you dealing with
situations where you don't have much information? Are you the type of person that's able to make a
decision and not like sit in paralysis? And many people that come up to be in the street and say they
want a new life or a new this or a new that are choosing like the certain misery of their current
life versus the uncertainty they see as they look out into the void of like quitting the job
and going and playing violin and pretty or something. And, you know, you bring up something that,
so in one of our recent classes that we taught this month, we talked about owning decision,
right? And I shared the story with the community and it had a pretty profound effect. And so
I was as a police officer, I was on patrol, it was late at night. I'm driving down just this
two lane road kind of in the middle of nowhere. And I pull over to the side and I'm just kind of like
watching from it from an angle, just people driving up and down this road. This car flies by,
goes through a stop sign, doesn't stop. It's a very nice luxury sedan. So I turn on my lights,
pull them over and I said, how are you doing? He's like, I'm all right. I get out of the sky is just like,
he's flat drunk. And I shine my light into his passenger and he's just like, he's passed out,
like he is. He's not even coherent that I'm probably standing there. So I get his driver's license and
I'm like, look, you're pretty bad off. And he's like, you're going to call my dad. And I said,
why would I do that? He goes, man, he goes, this is car. He's like, he's going to be upset.
I said, all right. So I go back to my patrol car and I look at this kid in terms of he's had no
priors. He's 16. He has no prior driving record. So I make it. So what's my decision now? I can call for
a DWI unit to come and give this guy a feel sobriety test and he's going to fail just because I could
tell how drunk he was or I could call his dad. Now I have to make a decision because I have that
type of discretion. So I have to think, do I take this kid? Do I have this kid go to jail? And
tow his dad's car? Or do I call his dad in hope? That's the right decision because his dad will
find a way to make sure this doesn't happen again. So I had our dispatch give me his phone,
his parents phone number and I call his dad. It's 11 o'clock at night. And my mom answers and I'm like,
you know, you know, Mrs. Smith. This is, you know, deputy O'Neal. I'm out here with your son,
Jacob. Oh my god. How is he? I'm like, he's fine. And I'm like, I think he's been drinking too much.
And I want to know if you want to come get him. She's like, can you talk to my husband? I said,
sure, he gets on the phone. Same thing. And he's like, thank you. I will make sure this doesn't happen
again. I will be there in five minutes. I have no idea what happens at the end of this. But I made
that decision at that time. The reason I'm sharing this is because when I told that story in our community,
I asked everybody on the platform because it's very engaging. And I said, and Evie asked this question
actually. And she said, how many of you would do the same thing Desmond did? Probably should give
context there that Evie is your wife? Evie's my wife. I mean, a lot of people put it in the comments.
Like, I would do the same thing. Good for him. The kids shouldn't go to jail. And Evie was just like,
I would do the exact opposite thing. I would have taken him to jail. I would have towed the car
because I don't know if the consequences of what his dad would do is going to outweigh the fact
that he's going to go to jail. And she's like, what if I let him go and he does the same thing next
week because he's not, you know, he doesn't care what his father thinks. And she's like, that to me
was a decision that I would have made. So I bring that up for this purpose. We both made a completely
different decision. I made it for the reasons I did. She made it for the reasons that she did. Metaphorically,
mine was true. This is just what she said she would have done. The point was is that we both owned it.
And a lot of times I think what happens going back to what you just said is people are so afraid to
make a decision for a number of different reasons. And so they just choose not to. Now again,
people could look at this. You know, your audience could look at this and be like, he should have
taken them to jail. I understand all of that. I had the discretion and that's the decision I made
and I would make that decision every time. But it's it's it's less about that story and more about
when you decide on something with the information you have at the moment. Do you own it or do you
as you said, do you look back later and have hindsight bias and be like, I should have known. You can't
do that. So many people try to live their life in reverse like that and looking back. It's impossible.
It's impossible to know. So I do think in kind of a to expand on what you said. I do think when it
talks about owning your decisions and being being thoughtful as it relates to why you're doing
what you're doing and taking command of yourself and being being a self-leader. Decisions is making
that is what it is to go back to the uncertainty aspects. Protecting your businesses data is a lot
scarier than people admit. You've got the usual protections, backup, security, but underneath,
there's this uncomfortable truth that your entire operation depends on systems that are updating,
syncing and changing data every second. Someone doesn't have to hack you to bring everything crashing
down. All it takes is one corrupted file, one workflow that fires in the wrong direction,
one automation that overrides the wrong thing or an AI agent drifting, of course. And suddenly,
your business is offline, your team is stuck and you're in damage control mode. That's why so many
organizations use our sponsor, Rubric. It doesn't just protect your data. It lets you rewind your entire
system back to the moment before anything went wrong. Wherever that data lives, cloud, sass, or on-prem,
whether you have ransomware, an internal mistake, or an outage, with Rubric, you can bring your business
straight back. And with the newly launched Rubric agent cloud, companies get visibility into what
their AI agent are actually doing. So they can set guard rails and reverse them if they go off track.
Rubric lets you move fast without putting your business at risk. To learn more, head to Rubric.com.
Last month, I told you about our sponsor Function Health and their team. He've developed a way of
giving you a full 360 view of what's going on inside your body. They offer over 100 advanced lab tests,
covering everything from hormones, toxins, inflammation, heart health, stress, and so much more.
So Jack, who started this show with me, got his first blood draw done a couple of weeks ago. So
I thought I'd let him tell you a little bit more about his experience. This test really
has my eyes to personally what I should be doing with my health. I hear a lot of information in this
podcast. I sit in every single recording. So to know how I can relate each one to me personally,
it's super valuable. You sign up and you schedule tests. And once you're done, you get a little report
like the one I have here. I can see my in-range results, my out-of-range results, and there's
a little AI function too. So if I have any questions about my out-of-range results, I can just go in there
and ask you any question I want. And these tests are backed by doctors and thousands of hours of
research. You get an annual draw done and a mid-year follow-up. So if you want to learn more,
head over to functionhealth.com/duac, where you can sign up for $365 a year. I'll put the link
in the description below. It is just $1 a day for your health. Of that research you've done
on communication, is there anything we haven't talked about today that really surprised you in the
research that really caused a paradigm shift in what you thought communication was and now what
you think it is? Yeah. The research showed that your ability to build rapport with a person
is what gives you the most power in terms of that connection and different people. How do you build
rapport? Most people think that this is one of those things where you're overly kind, you're very
complimentary, you're talking about the weather, and now we've built rapport, and then we're good.
It's not how you build rapport. Rebuild rapport is understanding values in terms of a person.
rapport is understanding a person's presence and what they're needing from you. If I'm paying
attention to you, and I'm engaged with you, and I'm making you feel seen and heard and understood,
and by proxy, by the reciprocity of doing that, you do the same thing for me. That's rapport. When it comes
into building rapport with somebody, read the room. If I came in and I have a list of questions,
and I see you that there's some emotional state that you're showing. If I want to connect with you,
I ask about that. I need to put my stuff aside. Before I can have the conversation I want to have,
I'd probably have to have the conversation you want to have. At that moment, it may be understanding
what is going on in your headspace. I can say, "Hey, Steven, I'm Desmond O'Neill. I know you're
brought in this morning for these reasons. It's obvious to me right now that you seem really upset.
Can you tell me what's going on right now?" And you could say, "I don't know what's going on.
I'm super scared. I've never been in jail before. My mom's sick at home. I don't know if there's
anybody to take a tour." Now, how much information do I have by the way that I can connect with you?
Because if you tell me, "I am freaked out. I don't know what's going on. What do I now do? Do I go
back to be like, "Well, that sucks and go back to my list of questions?" Or do I say, "How best can
I help you with that?" And this builds rapport. Yes. Because what I'm doing is I'm showing
empathy. I'm listening to you. I'm giving you what you want. I'm listening to your ambiguity.
I'm orienting you in terms of the direction that you're asking me to take you. You're asking me for
clarity in terms of what's going to happen. I'm going to answer that. I'm showing them that I am
paying attention to them. I'm being authentic. I'm going to follow up with the things that I do.
Because I'm going to come back later and be like, "Hey, we checked in your mom. She was good. We
pulled your aunt in. Your aunt came and took care of her." If anything else comes up, let me know.
I do have some questions that I need to get to. This is an important part of the investigation,
but I can only imagine that there's a lot on your mind. If things come up through our conversation,
please ask me. That's rapport. In those situations, I'm hearing many of the things that I read in
that book, "Inference" by Robert Claudini. Childini. I'm hearing reciprocity. You've done them
a favor so now they're more likely to answer your questions. Reciprocity is giving somebody something
with the expectation that somewhere in the future they will give you something else. It's not a
transactional thing. It's not like the only reason I'm doing this is because I want something from
you in exchange. That's transaction. When you checked on that person's mum, that was reciprocity.
That was me falling up with a commitment of saying that this is what I'm going to do for you.
You can do with it what you want, but you know that doing that is going to increase the
probability that they answer your questions. No, I do that regardless. He could have said, you know what?
I appreciate you. Thank you for checking on my mum. I want a lawyer. I don't want to talk to you.
You know what I'm going to do? I'm going to check on his mum. You know why? Because that's what I
said I was going to do. You know why? Because that's my self-congruance. That's what I do as a person
when I give somebody my word. I'm going to follow up with it. So in a situation like that, I will do
those things because that's what I've told him I'm going to do. Is there anything else on the point
of having difficult conversations that we haven't covered in your mind? Because I know there's loads of
people that they want to get better at having those tricky conversations and also just dealing with
what I think we see a lot is like people very keen to deal with difficult people. Is there anything
there that we haven't touched on? We've got the plan framework, but just I just want to check
it was nothing we've missed. No, I just think it was I just think it was a plan framework and it's not
about making things complicated. It's actually about you know there's there's things that you should
take out you know when it comes to communication. As opposed to always adding things in you know it
really becomes like extinction before acquisition. So I can I can tell you when it comes to better
communication there are three things that you should stop doing right now. One of them is to stop
trying to be right. One of them is to stop telling people you understand and the third one is stop
giving people your unsolicited opinion. Now to break those down stop stop trying to be right. We
talked about that one a little bit. The second one is stop telling people that you understand this is
what I mean by that. You can understand you can understand a person's words. You will never understand
their headspace in terms of the specificity of that. And so what you will see is if you're sharing
a story like if you shared a personal story with me let's say you know let's say your father had
passed away. And I'm like you know what Stephen I completely understand my dad passed away two
and I was young. So now we're connected. I have just I've just taken away a moment for you
because I made it about me because I thought that I understood something that you had experienced
in fact your experience of a death or your experience of your father at the moment is going to be
completely different than mine. But for me to tell you that I understand is is short-sighted.
My girlfriend tells me sometimes that she wants me to say that I understand. And I think what she's
saying is that maybe she wants to feel understood. And so she might be explaining how she feels. And then
if I say do you know I do understand. But do you? Sometimes I get to the point where I do understand
what she's saying. Do you understand what she's saying but do you understand how she truly feels?
No. Okay but that becomes because I don't feel that. You don't feel it. But she just wants me to
acknowledge. She wants you to acknowledge it. So the difference is in terms of it was being genuine
where you're like look I really understand how you feel. You probably don't. How do I make
I feel understood in that regard then without telling her I understand.
To feel understood is to listen to her to be like look you know I sounds tough sounds you know like
this is something really on your mind like and it kind of goes into our other thing we're like stop
giving people your opinion. You know if she's if she's expressing things to you and she's sharing
how she wants to feel she's probably not looking for you to tell her what to do unless she's asked
you for that. The first thing that we always do and it happens all the time is like let me tell you
what I think. Try to fix it. Try to fix it without having all of the the motions and the complexity
is of why it's not being done. And so go back to with your girlfriend it really is just a matter of
trying to understand seeing where she's going with it asking her you know if there are ways that
that you know we can we can work to make it better or help you with this. But it's seeing as she's
just like I want you to understand I would just tell her I understand just because that's what she's
looking for. You're not going to have it in there but if you generally went to somebody and you're
like oh I understand that's what I'm asking you not to do. That's what you shouldn't do. You shouldn't
generally think that you truly understand another person because then you're going like you're convinced
that you know and you're no longer curious in terms of how they actually feel. And on that last
point about giving the opinion a lot of time people you know when they're sharing something they
just want you to create the space. So I'm instead excited to me because most of the time people
just want you to sit in the mud with them and like I naturally shut up with like my toolbox
to try and fix the situation but a lot of the time especially with my girlfriend maybe she just
wants me to listen. Most people do right it becomes like this identity headspace where people just are
looking for the sounding board for you for your girlfriend like you're the you're the guy you're the
person and that's what she comes to you for that's your job in a lot of ways and I don't mean that
in a negative thing but it's just one of those things where if that's what she needs from you then
that's what you give her and a lot of people just want as Simon Seneca said where you said it like
just sit in the mud with them and that's what they're asking you. If she turns you and say Stephen
what would you do here then she's asking you but if not then don't give it. Something I need to work
on. Yeah we all do. Yeah because you because you know something about maybe the male brain but it's
probably not just men. Can I talk real quick or just about our training community before is that okay
with you? Yeah because it is one of those where like now what I spend all my time with is I'm
an instructor for beyond bullet proof which is a training platform that that every and I that
every and I host and it really comes down to three prongs of how do people helping people think
helping people act and helping people lead with purpose and I know we talked about those things but
the reason I bring that up is because there are so many people Stephen that just as you had talked
about they're they're looking for they're looking for some help they're looking for some clarity
they're looking for somebody to influence them in some way because they don't have good emotional
regulation and they're trying to get better in their relationships we've been fortunate to have
that and that's kind of where you know I don't I don't do a lot of social media you know I don't do
a lot of other other things because I spend my time here. As you know we have a closing
tradition of the podcast leaves a question for the next and the question that's been left for you is
what decision do you most regret and would things have turned out better if you had made it
differently? Ouch that's a spicy one. So I as much as this wants to be a spicy one I can I can
categorically tell you that there's not a decision that I have made that I wish I would have
made different and I say that because it kind of goes back to I own my decisions in terms of the
things that I have done I even went into the story that I shared about you know when I was a police
officer with the kid who was drinking like I own those decisions and in truth like all of those
decisions have manifested itself for me to sit down here with you today and have this conversation
and so I can't tell you that there's something that I look back to that I regret because I think
that there's things we learn from but I think for the most part I don't use hindsight bias I don't
look back to say I wish there's something else I use those things to to grow and to learn and be
better and you know had I made a difference decision maybe you and I wouldn't be sitting here so
none but you still I mean if someone asked me that I'd have loads of answers like what
just like ways that I handled situations in my life as an employer I shouldn't have said that
shouldn't have done that I don't want my girlfriend said that I should have just listened
and I wish I had because I think our relationship would be better or
you know some grudge I held or whatever you know like the messiness of being an emotional human
so let me let me ask this and I think you know I do question at times that that type of I wish
in our regret I think that also changes who you are as a person if you're like I would have gone
back and done we we can all do that in some and I don't mean that's petty but in all some petty way
when I was writing my my thesis I would always come to my thesis advisor and she'd be like no this
isn't good this isn't good this isn't good and so when I was done there was like I like 30 she's
like just put this in the parking lot like maybe we'll look at this maybe we won't so when I was
done with my thesis I had 30 pages that were in the parking lot and I went to her and I feel like
this is a lot of mistakes and she goes you had to have this to have this and so when when I hear
that when it's just like oh I wish I would have done these things different you would be a different
person right it's all those perspectives it's all those little things that you code and become
a different person you would be a different person if you had done those things differently I'm not
saying better or worse but I'm saying I don't I don't think that's a reason to look back or regret things
yeah I probably would still have those mistakes in my future if I hadn't made them in the past as well
so maybe maybe the very fact that I can identify them means that my self awareness grew based on them
I like I'm never going to treat someone like that again or I'm never going to say that thing again
because I learned the lesson so I'm a better person today because of that yeah that's man thank you
thank you thank you so much for doing what you do and this is your first podcast which is
exciting it's my first podcast thank you so much thank you if there's anything we need it is
connection especially in the world we're living in today and that is exactly why we created these
conversation cards because on this show when I sit here with my guest and have those deep
intimate conversations this remarkable thing happens time and time again we feel deeply connected
to each other at the end of every episode the guest I'm interviewing leaves a question for the next
guest and we've turned them into these conversation cards and we've added these twist cards to make
your conversations even more interesting and there are so many more twists along the way with the
conversation cards this is the brand new addition and for the first time ever I've added to the pack
this gold card which is an exclusive question from me but I'm only putting the gold cards in the first
run of conversation cards so get yours now before the limited edition gold cards are all gone
head to the link in the description below
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Desmond O'Neill emphasizes the importance of effective communication and human connection in difficult conversations.
He highlights the significance of understanding the purpose and goals of a conversation to stay focused and handle emotional discussions.
O'Neill shares his experience using science-backed interrogation techniques to connect with individuals effectively, even in challenging situations.
Summary:
Desmond O'Neill discusses the essential aspects of engaging in difficult conversations, focusing on effective communication and understanding human behavior. He stresses the need to avoid labeling individuals, such as calling them narcissists, to foster genuine understanding. N.
acronym, emphasizing the purpose (P) and goals of a conversation to guide interactions and maintain control, especially during emotional discussions. Drawing from his experience in law enforcement and interrogation, O'Neill provides insights into building connections and handling challenging dialogues with individuals, even those exhibiting antagonistic behavior. By prioritizing understanding and staying true to the mission of the conversation, O'Neill exemplifies the power of communication in navigating complex interactions and fostering genuine connections.
FAQs
Avoid labeling them and try to understand their perspective without blame.
Have a purpose, ask questions, maintain empathy, and avoid distractions.
Understand your goals, including task-oriented, identity, and relational aspects.
Labels can hinder understanding and prevent genuine connection.
Understand the gaslighting tactics and address the specific instances with clarity.
Maintained focus on his purpose, avoided confrontation, and stayed committed to understanding.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.