School Closures, Big Questions, and What Comes Next: An Open Conversation with Dr. Eric Witherspoon District 65 Interim Superintendent
from The 602
1h 10m 9s
District 65 is facing a deep financial crisis rooted in years of structural deficits, declining enrollment, and underfunded infrastructure. Dr. Eric Weatherspoon, a former long-time superintendent with a deep connection to the community, has stepped into an interim role to help stabilize the district. He outlines a comprehensive financial plan that includes closing schools such as Dewey and Lincoln Wood Head Start to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and realign school sizes to better match enrollment. While these decisions are emotionally difficult and raise concerns about neighborhood ties and student displacement, Dr. Weatherspoon emphasizes that the plan is designed to end the cycle of annual budget deficits and provide long-term financial stability. The plan accounts for student needs, especially for marginalized groups, by ensuring transitions are managed with support. He also highlights significant capital needs—over $500 million in building maintenance—adding pressure to balance operations and infrastructure. A key element of future success is gaining community trust through financial transparency, potentially leading to a capital referendum to fund new schools and upgrade aging facilities. Ultimately, Dr. Weatherspoon envisions a district that moves beyond financial crisis to focus on student achievement, teacher support, and community growth, restoring stability and confidence in the system.
(upbeat music)
- Hi friends and neighbors.
Welcome back to the 602 for a very important extra episode.
I am Sarah Shaftle and I'm Maddie Burgers Gofield
and we are burning the midnight oil
to get this conversation out to you Thursday morning.
It is a back-to-back situation.
Yes, it is today on the podcast.
We have Dr. Eric Weatherspoon, District 65,
interim superintendent to talk to us
about the big picture changes happening in our schools
and why they feel so difficult.
And yeah, they do feel so difficult.
This whole situation sucks.
- It really sucks, it sucks.
And ultimately, what we do here at the 602,
our whole purpose, our whole reason for being
is to have calm face-to-face conversations
that are meaningful and connective.
And so while this is obviously a very tense subject,
we did our best to humanize all parties involved
and still ask the tough questions.
- I think for me, it was really interesting to hear Dr. Weatherspoon
speak directly to us because so often at the board meetings,
it feels like the public comments aren't in direct conversation
with the people who we are trying to make hear us.
And I just want to acknowledge,
I am totally not the perfect person
to have been asking him a lot of these questions.
But I did do what I could.
I asked questions from the heart,
which is what I know I can do.
And I was really just present and tried to stay curious
about how he would answer everything.
And I was genuinely very, very curious.
And yeah, this is not an endorsement of his plan
or the district's plan.
And we are so appreciative of all the people and organizations
that are doing the good work and the hard work
to kind of figure out the right thing to do
and to contribute to the conversation
that we're trying to have with him.
- Yeah, so we're just wanna make that super clear.
But we do think this offers a broader understanding
of what is happening,
why and where things are going from here.
- Exactly, yeah, we wanted to stay neutral,
but emotionally honest, if that makes sense.
- Yeah, he needs no real introduction,
but for those of you who are unfamiliar,
Dr. Wetherspoon has helped shape Evanston schools
for decades.
He served as the superintendent of Evanston Township High School
District 202 for 16 years from 2006 to 2022.
So I was one of his students,
we talk about that at the beginning.
Before coming to Evanston,
he was a superintendent of school districts in Des Moines,
Iowa and Indianapolis, Indiana.
At ETHS, he was known for his focus on equity
and for expanding access to honors and AP classes.
Now, after Dr. Turner's departure from District 65 last year,
Dr. Wetherspoon has come out of retirement
to serve as interim superintendent.
The District 65 Board of Education brought him in
to help the district navigate its financial challenges.
So yeah, without any further ado,
here is our conversation with District 65
interim superintendent, Dr. Eric Wetherspoon.
[MUSIC]
Yeah, this feels crazy because this has been such a tense topic,
especially at Dewey.
You know, I'm a Dewey, but I told you that.
It's been very, very intense.
And so it's a very emotional thing and the stakes feel very high.
So we want to just stay calm, stay collaborative.
This is a conversation where we can talk about things
and we really, really, really appreciate you being here.
Oh, no, glad to.
Because it's meaningful for us and for the community.
And we know you had a late night last night.
Oh, yes.
I had to, so there was a, for the listener,
there was a board meeting last night,
a board and community meeting last night
that started at five with public comments.
And I turned it off.
I had to, I had to protect my sleep.
I turned it off around 930, I think.
What time did you guys go into?
I would have been glad to go to sleep then.
Yes, yeah, yeah.
What time did you get?
What time did the meeting break?
So it was around 1030, which was actually about an hour earlier
than the meeting before.
But when you have something this big going on,
it does result in long meeting.
Yeah, there's no amount of time and it's understandable.
Of course, yeah.
So for our friends and neighbors listening,
we do have Dr. Eric,
where there's Boone District 65 superintendents,
interim superintendent on the podcast today.
And today is, we are recording this November 10th.
So the day after the community and board meeting
that took place Monday, Monday the night.
Thank you. Thank you.
So we have so much to talk about in terms of this proposal
of closing Dewey Lincoln Wood head start at J.E.H.
and the SACC, which was saved.
We were able to work closely with the union on that.
So that was really something very happy
that we could see how about that.
Yeah, that was good news.
That's the proposal we're talking about.
And what do you call the proposal?
Is it explained to us now?
So the comprehensive structural financial plan.
Yeah, structural financial plan.
And it will sometimes put them in the word structural deficit.
But it's basically dealing with the structural deficit.
Yes, it's a comprehensive plan closing those schools.
So we will talk about that.
However, as a guest here, every guest
that comes onto our show, we first want to hear about them
before personally, before all of that.
We want to know your Evanston story.
So what brought you here?
How did, you know, tell us a little bit about your background,
personally, professionally, how you landed in Evanston.
And what you love about this place?
Oh, my gosh.
So when I got recruited for the job at FSM Township High School,
and that's where I served as superintendent for 16 years.
And it's been now 20 years since I came to Evanston.
And so it's a deep commitment on my part
and understandably why.
I was recruited for the job.
And I was in a month, I was superintendent.
I'd actually been my whole career.
I was superintendent in four school districts in three states,
to an Indiana, then out to Des Moines, Iowa,
and then Indianapolis, Indiana, then to Des Moines, Iowa,
and then here to Evanston.
And when I was recruited here, this is actually,
in terms of student enrollment, by far,
the smallest school district that I'd ever been a superintendent.
- 202 was. - 202.
- Yes, the high school district.
- And it's not a typical career path, normally, superintendents,
kind of stay in that same size or get go to bigger ones.
I was actually in the largest school district in Iowa.
It was the Des Moines public schools.
And actually, it was the largest educational institution
in the state, larger than the University of Iowa.
- Wow. - This is a big district.
- Yeah. - Yeah, big district, I had--
- And is that a consolidated district?
- Yeah, it's correct. - That's correct.
So it's a K through 12 district.
Several high schools had over 70 schools,
44 elementary schools.
- Wow. - You know.
- That's pretty wild, that's huge.
- A big school district and located in the state capital
and the biggest public school,
and actually just the biggest school system in the state,
it was really very much a center of attention in the state.
I loved it there.
So just to make a real quick, when I got the call
from the recruiter, who said, you know,
would you be interested in--
I was in township high school.
And I was in the kind of position in my career
where I got those kind of calls pretty regularly,
not unique to me, superintendents who are successful
in those kind of places, you know, get those calls.
But this was the first time that I said,
"Evids in township high school."
Yes, tell me more.
- No. - I love that.
And we were just saying, before we started recording,
I was like, I got to be one of your students at ETHS.
- Yes, for two years. - Two years, full circle moment.
- For two years. - Yeah, and I remember,
for the listener, I already told Dr. Brothers from this,
but every day he would come on the loudspeaker
and he would say, "It's a great day to be a wild kid."
And I do also remember of your tenure in Evanston
while we overlapped, you were very present.
I remember seeing you in the halls every single day.
I felt like you were a very, very present person.
I was not paying attention to the politics of it all
or the academia of it all.
But as a student who had--
- You were just being a 16-year-old.
- I was just focused on myself and socializing,
basically, but as most of you are,
some kids at ETHS are quite engaged.
- Engaged, I'm sure. - Academically.
And there's a range of kids, but Sarah was just--
- I wasn't slacking off, I was a great student,
but I was definitely more focused on social and having fun.
- Yeah. - But that's great.
But I do remember those two things,
and I know you.
have been like you were a very I feel beloved person during your tenure at two.
I was blessed with that. You know, the students gave love to me and and and I just loved them all.
Yeah, totally. And that presence was was just so fortunate because all my other superintendencies,
I was in in the district office, our central office. And now I the higher administration,
the non building administration was all located as you know, in the high school. In the high school.
Yeah. And when I got the job and I and I of course realized that immediately, I thought,
this is wonderful because you know, as a superintendent, you don't really don't get to spend your days
in the environment with the students and and and and the teachers. I do think it gives you a
special perspective, really special. Oh, yeah. It's amazing. Quite an interesting perspective.
And so I was determined to well, first of all, I wanted to do it, but I was also determined to
really immerse myself in the school. I mean, I mean, I realized it was a special opportunity.
Yes. And and the response from the students, you know, we have so many great people and so many
great students here in our community. And and and and and it was exciting for me to be in that kind
of a environment. Well, it is interesting too now. I do think the young people are the heart and
soul of Evanston, like there are such engaged, enthusiastic, bright, capable kids here that are
so inspiring. It does make me think about, I don't want to rush into this, but I'm like, I do
want to touch on having the kids at the board meetings. That must be an interesting thing to have
happened. It's very touching for me. Of course. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They are very invested in saving
their schools. Yes. Yes. They are. And and and it speaks so highly too of because I thought of
in the high school kids, how how engaged young people in Evanston can be with which just simply
is not universally true. That's right. Well, Evan, we always say Evanstonians care a lot about a
lot of things. Yes. And so the kids of Evanstonians are also curious. Follow, follow that path.
What ward do you did you move to when you came to Evanston? I would lived in the first ward.
The first ward. Yep. And and just loved it. Did you have a family of your own? Did you bring
your family here? Well, we we had just become empty nesters. Okay. Right. Right. Right about the
time we came here. And but it's interesting. So I have three children. I have two sons and
and and then a daughter and they're they're ten years span from oldest to young. Wow. Okay. Yes.
But but but the the fun part for me. So my middle child son, he was just starting his career
with the Bureau of Labor Statistics. He's an economist in Kansas City. And so when I got and
which was only we could drive down there like a three hour drive to go see them pretty regularly
from Des Moines. And of course we moved up up here to Evanston. And and and they came to visit
and they so fell in love with it. He put him for a transfer to the Chicago office. So they ended
up living. So we had just purchased a condo. Could be three bedrooms, but really originally we saw
it as two bedrooms and an office. And all of a sudden for nine months, they were living with us
while they transitioned and tried to get their home sold and get a home by a home and all of that.
So that is fun though. So so the question did it bring my family? Well yes. Sort of. Yeah.
Or my or my family decided to bring themselves. Yeah. Wait. So does your son still live in the area?
Oh yes. Yes. They they own here in in Evanston. They have kids who are in district 65.
And and and so they they they have kids who went about the king art went went to nickels went to
ETS and and the youngest of the two sons is now a junior at the high school. Okay. And what was
really fun is my oldest grandson, my oldest grandchild was a freshman at the at ETS my final year
there. Oh my god. That is very special. That's very sweet. And so you just you just never know how
the symmetry in life, you know, that's really that has been very very special. Yeah. Very special.
That's so cool. So fast forwarding a little bit. Yeah. Tell us how you landed in this current
role as interim superintendent. And you know, how you see your role because it is kind of a unique
thing. Right. You're in. And I think there's a lot of disagreement about what this role should
do. Yeah. What what is your job? How do you think about that? And how did you decide to take this
role, you know, and to kind of jump into this, given the kind of craziness of everything going on?
Yes. You know, I had I had never expressed an interest in the role. Yeah. And I was very
happily retired. And I'll be very happily returned retirement. I'm sure.
And one of those retirees who often wondered how do they ever have time to work go to work because
my calendar is full every day and so many fun things going on and and and you know, learning
opportunities, all the things that that that should come with that. Absolutely. So of course, I,
you know, you know, I'm online and I get Evanston news. And I was in Europe this past summer.
Yeah. For most of June and and and I did see that a Dr. Turner Turner was leaving and I knew all
of that never gave it much thought. And then while I was on a cruise ship on the Roan River,
I got contacted by the board asking if I would come and help out. Wow. And
that's pointed to position. And I knew enough of the situation, you know, how difficult it is
right now in in District 65. And and so I did agree to do it. And in our state, if you do an
interim, it's limited to 120 days. So so I knew that, you know, it would be for a fixed
amount of time. And and I did agree to come back and do that. Is that one school year? Does that
cover one school year or will that not even get you to the end of the school? No. So a school year
would be like, you know, 175 student days, 180 days. Okay. Or whatever. And and I'm fact because
and again, I was starting before the school year, starting July 1. Okay. And so because of that,
we knew already that I that I, you know, I would only be able to stay basically for semester.
Right. Right. So when does your time officially? So I'll be ending around the middle of January.
Okay. So it's coming up and and and the board and all of us have known since the beginning that
they would need to get another interim superintendent to finish out the year. Okay. Because when
you hire a new superintendent, it's almost a given that that person's going to be have a job
somewhere else. Of course. And and and so they would and and June 30 to be able to start July 1
here. Got it. Got it. So what do you in this interim role? Do you did the board say we are looking
for you to do this or no? Did they just say we need leadership? Please, we know you're amazing.
Please come come help us. Well, to the extent that you're comfortable. They were they were pretty
clear that that that that that they understand that they're really in a financial crisis. I mean,
you know, we we have a good board and we have you know, very engaged in smart people. And and so they
already understood that that that the financial situation was was really not good. And and so
they did ask me to come in and and help them get the district position so that the next the real
superintendent would would be able to be set up for success. Okay. And not hand the new superintendent
a financial crisis. Right. And and so and and I understood that and I really believe that that's
what any in-arms should be. It might not be financial, but any interim. What whatever the needs are
should try to position the district so that when when somebody comes in new and fresh,
they have a real good opportunity for success. Okay. And so the it wasn't under the assumption or
wasn't under covert or not covert to say like, we want you here. We need to close schools. We need
your help with that. No, no, no, no, but you know, there's a long history as of SDRP. And what
is SDRP? The structural deficit reduction plan. Right. Okay. Okay. And there's iterations of
SDRP one two. Right. Sure. Yes. Yes. Yes. But but but basically as you know, it had been going on
for years, numerous financial consultants in here. Yes. So so you know, there weren't a lot of surprises.
Yes. But no, it was simply, you know, help us work through the financials. Okay. Okay. To that
point, I know there are a lot of people that are extremely deep in all of this, but there's also
maybe people listening that aren't as familiar with how we got here. Like in your own words,
can you help the listener maybe understand how we reached in, you know, it's simplified,
obviously, how we reached this point. Like how did we
get here to point where we're in such a difficult financial position, like, what are the,
what were the, you know, things that led us here?
To that point really quickly before you begin with where this one, I think a lot of people
when they hear that we're in such financial trouble are so surprised. Like a lot of perspective
parents who would, yes, think Evanston is an aspirational place to live and want to move
here, sort of people in our peer group are so surprised to hear that in Evanston where
property taxes are so high and we have such a, you know, diverse and wonderful population
here. How could we have gotten to this place?
It's a hard question. And that we could have a whole podcast just on the
history. I can speak to that. Yeah. But that's the real question. Yeah. How can this happen
to a school district in a community like ours? When we have a high school right down the
street with the same tax base receives the same students and is one of only 84 out of
over 15,000 school districts in the nation with a triple A bond rating. By the way, we
earned that for the first time in my early years, early 10 year and we maintained it throughout
my 16 years and Marcus Campbell, who has succeeded me, has kept it going.
So here we are right down the street, the same everything. One is actually a glowing
example of school finance and the other isn't. Yeah. It goes way back here, way back.
In around 2017, there was actually a referendum. It was an operation referendum. And the reason
that we're given is because the school district had a structural deficit and was having serious
money issues. Even then, 10 years ago. And they appealed to the community for a eight-year
referendum to give them a runway to solve the structural deficit. And it never got solved.
It never got solved. So the structural deficit goes back even before
2017. To the point that the district was just really struggling financially. I can't put
my finger on all the different decisions and who would have been involved in them and
why and all of that. Part of the reason why I think we ask is because I think people are
angry in general. And I think it's so easy to want to blame one person. Right. Or blame
an administration. Right. And I do think it is important to remember that this has been
a problem that we have been sort of talking about in circles for dealing with and dealing
with for not dealing with me. Yeah. But right. But for a long time. For a long time. And
it's too bad to see when that happens in any community. Much less our community. Yes.
Do you think it's mostly people, not any one person, but administration after administration
a whole team of people, maybe not managing well, maybe not having the foresight, maybe
not. That could be it. I think I would have to be part of the
ingredients. Sure. But you know, I think it was a whole combination of, you know, the
communities, number one, probably willingness to believe the depth of the financial problems
even though when you go out for a referendum, you're kind of signaling. Yes. We got a problem
here. Yes. But but you know, I think I think it's hard to come to grips with in a community
like our wonderful Evanston. Yes. And and so I think that and I think that led to the
in many ways, a little bit of kick the can down the road, like well, it'll work itself
out. Yeah. What we've been doing for years now is really incrementally almost every
single year, having to make cuts in order to just get the budget balanced that year. But
then we end with a deficit the next year. Right. Right. Right. So that's what the structural
plan is trying to get us out of that cycle. Yeah. So the plan that I put forward, which
is really a hard pill to swallow. And and I know that. And and to think that we need
to cut $20 million out of our budget, which is about 10% of our budget. We know things
like like, you know, we are overstaffed. And when you say overstaffed, do you mean the
administration? Do you mean teachers in individual schools? Do you mean grounds workers? Do you
mean everybody? Probably like labor is too high. Yeah, probably less grounds workers. But
yeah, we know that we for a district, our size, you know, we have much more FTE in and
certificated that would be like teaching positions or or or psychologists or social workers
or whatever that's got license positions. And and also in our support staff, we just know
that because they're the state board of education has all sorts of comparable and everything. And
they look at districts, our size and and and our budget. And and they just, you know, can
say, well, you know, you're way above the norm in these areas. So we know that this is
the part that you don't want to hear. Nobody wants to hear. But because of our declining
enrollment over the years, this, this same footprint district was accommodating a close
to 10,000 students. Not that not that many years. And now we're at about 58 hundred students.
Wow. It's a pretty serious decline. Yeah, we've had a massive decline. And and and again,
I know this is really tough to have to grapple with. But but our our elementary schools are
are our only utilizing about 66% of capacity. Right. Now that'd be wonderful if we could afford
it. You know, why not? Right. But but but our problem is that, you know, that means you spread
the staff out more. We do have classes that are what we call deck. That's our our our teachers
contractor teacher here. And we have guidelines for class sizes and like by let's say 21 to 23.
And we do have classrooms in that range, which which is really what you aim for for affordability.
But we also have many places where we have classrooms in single digits or or certainly
in double digits, you know, 13, 14, whatever. It's nice. But but if you if you spread your
staff all over and and and you can't fill up your classrooms, what happens is you end up
with more staff that than than you can afford. And of course, you also have more principles
and and and more counselors and and more librarians, not district wide, but but those those are
schools where where you have them because you're simply keeping schools open that are only
two thirds full. Can I ask you a question about the $20 million cuts that you are suggesting
that we make. There has been a lot of this financial reporting by all these data groups in
the community that have been brought to the board and to the administration. They've
done amazing work. There's so many like, yeah, for a writer Evanston. What was the the
Legion of data nerds? I love that. So shout out to those people doing that amazing work
for the community. So when those when all those big numbers were found like the $27 million
error telling you talk to our listener about why that doesn't change the financial plan.
Like when we find those errors, what happens? Because it seems like such a massive number
that it should make some dent, right? It should make some change. Yeah, absolutely. I mean,
that's just what logic or common sense would tell us. That $27 million is what is anticipated.
It's not new money. Yeah, but there was an error and it was very unfortunate. It was a double
entry. And so so it was it was escalating our expenses twice as fast as it was supposed
to be doing very unfortunate. You know, you'd never want to see anything like that happen.
But in fact, so that $27 million is calculated for five years. We will have a billion dollar
budget over the next five years. It's just like a fraction of the real budget. You know,
if it were all in one year, yeah, wow, you know, 27 million a month year. And if we're
going to get that every year, that's a lot of money. But when you think of the accumulation
of 27 million or five years and we will our total budget, our budgets will all total
about a billion dollars in that time. Then you start to realize it's it's nice. Yes.
It's better than 27 million less. Right. Yeah. But but but but it really, it doesn't do,
It doesn't solve the deficit.
this and that's the problem.
- So then when we go to closing schools,
which I understand you're saying
the district has this many kids
and based on this evidence,
a district our size needs ex-Mano schools.
It makes sense to close, take some of that away.
But the kids in the district will still need teachers
and staff and the empty buildings
will still need maintenance.
So it is a lot of damage done to the kid.
- You know, a certain amount of damage
will be done to the kids with a transfer.
- No, it's hard.
- Is that balance worth it?
Is it, if we're still gonna have to retain teachers,
if we're still maintaining the facilities, is it worth it?
- No, good question.
Well, first of all, it's not needing exactly
the same teachers because there is truly an economy
of scale and this is part of the plan.
If you can get all of your elementary schools
up to four sectioned elementary's,
all up to what we call the class enrollment guidelines
of like 21 to 23 students.
Then you don't need nearly as many teachers
as when they're spread out in classrooms all over the district
and so many of the classrooms aren't even close
to that enrollment.
So actually, there is a real economy of scale
that you still have teachers in every classroom.
The classrooms are not overcrowded,
but you have the right number of students.
So when we talk about right sizing the districts,
it's not simply the right number of buildings,
but it's right sizing them for just good utilization
and good bang for the buck is what it amounts to.
- But does it really, I guess we talked about
kicking the can down the road a little bit, right, too?
Like, and you know, there's so many different data points
like Sarah said from the different groups and everything.
One thing, too, is like, how do we know
we're not just kicking the can down the road again, right?
Like how do we know that this?
- At the expense of these kids, yeah.
- At the expense of us, right?
Like last year, we closed a few schools.
This year we're closing more.
How do we know that we're done after this?
And how do we know that this is like really
what it's going to take to solve the problem?
Yeah.
- Yeah, no, that's really, you know, very logical to ask.
So first of all, we got to go back a little ways
and know that in the last several years,
you know, like let's say four to five years,
it was really becoming clear
that we were bleeding our fund balance.
That we were ending every year in deficit.
- Right.
- And our fund balance was,
and we showed this, it's craft.
But you can just see the declining line
every year, steadily, year after year after year.
Because, you know, when you have a deficit budget,
you gotta come up with the money somewhere.
So you take a fund balance, of course,
is another way of saying rainy day fund.
It's our savings account.
- Yes.
- But in the more general sense to go back.
So because of the deficit problem,
more than one highly qualified financial expert
has been in to review and make recommendations.
Every single one of them has said,
you've got to write size the district.
And they recommended a few years ago
that we really need to ultimately reduce
three to four schools to be able to afford
our district.
We had a net of one last year
because of adding foster.
We had a net of one.
I'm recommending two, not three more.
And we can balance this budget,
not just this year,
but for the foreseeable future with the three reductions.
And still have room for growth
so that as more students come,
or whatever, we'll be at about 70%,
70%, 74% utilization even when we do this.
Which is good.
I mean, I would like to keep it certainly under 90.
- Yeah.
- But in the 70s, we can afford it.
We can afford it.
So that, but anyway,
so it has a long history
of what has been taking us into deeper and deeper debt.
- So my biggest fear as a Dewey mom
is that my son will go to Washington next year.
And then of course,
Washington will close next.
Like what happened to the Kingsley Lincoln word kids.
And I think that trust is what so many people
are struggling with to say like,
okay, if these hard, really hard things need to happen,
how do we, how do we trust
that then our kids school won't close again next year?
- That is really.
That's something that we absolutely need to address.
- Yeah.
- And I couldn't show you
and I have been showing in public meetings and calculation
that this will stabilize the finances.
And when I say stabilize,
we will be out of deficit funding.
We will have revenue to cover our expenses.
And that can be maintained forever.
- Right.
- If a few years down the road,
good decisions continue to be made.
No question, it'll last several years.
But like anything else,
you start over spending,
you start committing to things where your expenses
are way more than your revenue is
or is going to be and you're right back in the same suit.
So it is going to depend in the future
for future boards and administrators
to continue to make decisions.
And this is what I've just used in high school
'cause it's the same community.
This is what we do every year.
And that's why the high school's never in this kind
of a difficulty.
Because there are a lot of things you might want
or wish we could do, but you always have to see
what of those things can we afford.
If we add expenses,
are there other places we can reduce expenses?
Or are we seeing enough revenue
that we can do it and cover?
But regardless, you have to have the revenue
to whatever expenses you commit to.
- So you don't think Washington will close next.
(laughing)
- I can say this with every and I won't even be the one here.
- Yeah.
- Washington will not close, I don't think ever,
but I can say for years,
because this plan positioned,
it's sort of stabilizes the finances of the district
that you really have to come in here
and start trying to deliberately go back to the desk.
- Well, this is the conspiracy theory.
Can I tell you what the conspiracy theory is?
Because of the redistricting lines,
Washington's title one status will get taken away.
And then that'll be reason to close that school next
because the facilities are quite old there.
- It'll never happen,
and not only would it never happen for that reason,
- Okay.
- That'll be a reason to close,
but it'll never happen because we want to be the right size,
we don't want to be too small.
And right now,
the projections are still for declining enrollments.
And ours have been much more rapid
than surrounding school districts.
However, it is a national trend just with birth rates
and the like that the school enrollments
are going down across the country.
We have kind of a double whammy here
to just be honest about it.
- Right, I was going to save this to the end,
but since we've talked about declining enrollment
a few times, I do want to talk about that.
And I'm curious on your take on how we fix that problem,
because it feels to me like it's a little bit
of a chicken in the egg, right?
Like it's like we have the declining enrollment,
but then we're closing schools,
and then more people are like,
oh, I don't want to say,
you know, I'm not going to send my kids to D65
because, you know, it's like a vicious circle.
- It's a mess, you know, that's what you hear.
And it feels like it's a vicious cycle.
And I, as a parent that plans to send my kids
to D65 schools, they're just all too little right now,
they're going to go next year.
But I want to see enrollment.
- Go up.
- Go up, yeah, like that is the best thing for everybody.
And I know that obviously there's declining birth rates
and all that that goes into it.
But like you said, it's at a much higher clip
than nationally and than other districts.
So what do we do?
Like how do we come back, come back to this issue?
- Well, I'll tell you my vision for that.
- Yeah, I would love to hear it, yeah.
- And I don't control that.
- Yeah.
- But it is a very doable vision.
- First of all, we don't fill our schools
up more than this 70, like 77% or 70 or five somewhere
in that range because we want to have space
for more students, base for more girls.
- Right.
- That's number one.
- Right, so you don't want to over-close
and then be like--
- You never want to over-close.
- Right.
- That is a concern.
- And, and, and, and, and,
would never recommend that more schools should close, except for this. And that's where I've
articulated, I would love to see us become so financially well-managed that the community would
actually believe in us. And we talk about a referendum. That is not a magic answer right now,
because I wouldn't vote for a referendum. Well, can you talk more about the referendum too?
That's something. Yeah, I'll talk about how that works. Yeah, can you talk about how that works
and what that looks like? I'll quickly finish just this idea. So we first of all have to prove
to the community. We're not going to squander their money. There are many people in the community.
I voted for the 2017 referendum. Right. And now the districts in serious deficit again. And people
say, what we're not going to keep throwing money at that school district because they cannot.
How many taxes are high enough? Exactly. So the first thing we got to do is prove that we're now
solvent and stable and well-managed. And this plan does that. I would love to see us use that
Washington site because it's a beautiful site and located right there on the crowd. It's a gorgeous
school. Oh, my gosh. Yeah. And some of that facade could be kept to build an elementary that would
house let you know, more students. Yeah. And of course, that's what the foster model. And I would
encourage I don't know how this happens because you can't just have people trading through it.
But I wish more people when they when they have an opportunity could see foster and see the
difference. It's not just that it's new. It's built for a different delivery system for today's
education. And so we could build a larger but not a too large school. Let's say a capacity of 500
and normally you don't fill them right up to the brim. But we could build that on the Washington
site and then back to attracting my I am coming full circle. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. When you asked
about the enrollments. Yeah. But when people see their stable. Yeah. They're they're they're
they're building new schools. Yeah. They have more space for schools. And of course, I'd like to see
the same thing happen up on the Lincolnwood site. Beautiful site. Yeah. Lincolnwood. And then
there could be the equivalent of some consolidation because what's now do we and Washington,
you can consolidate that and serve serve the the area. Right. And so I really believe
if two things, if the district could get excited about visioning something like that,
well, three things. And the district would be very well managed and and financially stable.
Then really envision and get behind a referendum. So let me tell you how a referendum works.
Yeah. Yeah. I didn't lose track of that question either. There's so much to talk about. Yeah.
A lot of questions. Yeah. So a referendum is a ballot issue. Right. And in case in this case,
it would be what we call a capital referendum. That is to go for for buildings to facilities.
Capital investments. That's different than an operating referendum, which is what the 2017 one
was. That was actually to do the the annual operating balance. And that and that, by the way,
is what has dragged us down into the deficit. Although I need to add and we might come back to this,
we were given a plan for the next 50 year, not a plan, but an assessment of our buildings.
But in fact, in the next 20 years, our professional architects, professional engineers,
have already been able to identify that we are going to have to do over a half a billion dollars,
over a half a billion dollars of investment in our buildings. For example, we have 11 buildings
in our school district that the boilers are well beyond their life expectancy. I got to tell you,
we had to replace my furnace at my house. Exactly. Yeah. We weren't expecting that bill,
Dr. Weatherspoon. And that's what I'm worrying about. Seriously. No, it says no, I understand
what it looks like. It was winter and our furnace went in turn on. Yes. And we were we.
And it's not in the budget. I mean, all of a sudden, even one of those boilers goes out,
it's between 300,000 and 500,000 dollars. You can't go for a little bid. So you pay more
because it's an emergency. So those are the kind of things. And you think about a half a billion
dollars in building needs identified today. And that won't go lower. Think of our own houses.
Over time, right now, nobody says you need a new roof in 11 years. Well, now you need a new roof,
except, you know, more things get added to the list. Right. And so it's just it's just a terrible
problem that we have an operations budget problem and we have a capital problems. So we really have
the double what double whammy here in district 65. Yeah. I guess if we are trying to so we're
talking about like we are trying to serve the children. You had you went through school closures
in Des Moines. Yes. And equally as painful equally as painful. Okay. And did you feel if the
goal of the district is to have, of course, the goal of every district and every business and
every thing is to have a balanced budget. Of course, we want healthy finances. But the goal of a
school district is to have academic achievement for all populations. And of course, we talk a lot
about the achievement gap here in Heavenston. That's so real. And we want all of our students
black, white, brown, any color to achieve their potential. Does consolidating the schools do that?
It will. And let me speak a little bit for what our assistants who pretend for academics,
the Maggie Gordon has been sharing who is far more articulate at this than I get.
Okay. Okay. But I'll do your best. So first of all, when we have, you know, four section
school, that means there are four second grade teachers, for example, who can all be collaborating.
If you get up to fifth grade, where maybe one brings more expertise in the mathematics or the
science or the literacy, you know, you can kind of draw on the expertise of the team. That already
gives opportunities to just draw out and build more on the talent of the teachers in the school.
If you're in a two section school or even in some cases of one, so, you know, you're the only third
grade, you not only don't have that collaborative opportunity yourself, because yes, we can say,
well, collaborate with all the third grade teachers across the district, but the fact is,
you're not all together every day. Right. You know, and even with two, certainly better than one,
but again, it's more limited than when you can build a team around, of course. Yes.
And Maggie would would say that there's a lot of evidence that that really does enhance
delivery of education, otherwise so. And is that more so with not older kids, but like kids that are
like you said, fourth, fifth grade, maybe that are, you know, a little bit more specific in their
needs? Probably so. Yeah. Probably so. Yeah. I'm going to throw something in that is totally off
the track and irrelevant, but I got to say this. So when I was coming up as a young superintendent,
there was a mentor superintendent, and I had had a lot of respect for him. Yeah. And he was a very
successful superintendent. And I say, because the students in his district were successful. Yeah.
One of the things said to me is he said, Eric, always put your best teachers in the first grade.
Really? I just had to throw that out there. And you know, before I came here, all my
districts were unit districts, all all K through 12. Yeah. And it was only a THS that changed.
But his rationale was, you know, kindergarten is a good chance to socialize and get started
in school. But first grade is where you really start, they're going in on that academic work.
Kindergarten is like pre K 2.0. Yeah. I will say with the kindergarteners come a long ways though.
It's quite academic. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. That's it. This was years ago when it was probably less
academic. Less sold. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Just be honest about it. Yeah.
Because I haven't agreed. I mean, I mean, you know, our kindergarten teachers have built
wonderful. No, they all know how to read. They all know. Yeah. I mean, what they are doing in my
son's room 110, Mr. Boot, do we? What they are learning in that classroom? I think that's also why
this is so hard is amazing. Yes. Yes. Yes. We have at Dewey amazing teachers who are and I can
tell you that that may not be 100% but that is abundant across our district. Yes. That's what we
hear. We keep hearing from everybody. And I think
that's why I always say to people who are considering private school because of the district 65
mess. I say the district is a mess and that is we can't pretend it's not. But day to day our kids go
into these schools and they are with the most passionate, energetic, smart, generous teachers
that are making a difference in their lives every day. You are exactly right. I mean, I can't believe
how wonderful this school in the classroom and and there is just fantastic teaching and learning
and growth taking place. And I want to highlight that too because this is really something important
to say about our district 65 and I love this district and it is so good. We're just being dragged
down by the finance. So we have among the highest paid teachers in the region and what that does
is gives us the ability to attract the cream of the crop. And district 65 has been so successful
at attracting really among the finest teachers because, you know, if you're getting two offers and
and there's this, well, first of all, it's in Evanston, Illinois and who wouldn't want to,
you know, my family calls this half and stunning. Yes, exactly. It is. But but you know, it's located
you're located in Evanston and you're among the highest paid teachers in the state or the region.
I mean, of course, I want to teach there. Right. Yeah. And so we are fortunate and we do have
really just I know. I think what makes this this district so special is the teachers in the community.
And I don't know, you know, the the administration, I think, is doing their best right now to really
move forward with the plan that they think is best. But what's making a difference in the in the
lives of the children every day is certainly their friends, the kids in the classroom, which are
generally very diverse, interesting, amazing, bright kids. And they're incredible teachers who,
yeah, they are. They are amazing. And and and I'm seeing that firsthand now. I've known that about
District 65. And I watched that firsthand at the high school because what you just said just
carries all the way through. It does. So why is him good? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. I do have one more
personal question to ask. And this is hard. Why do we? And not another school. Right. Is it
its proximity to foster? Not particularly. You know, you certainly look at how you can distribute
students. But but actually, if you look back at the score cards that were used last year,
the first school on the list per closure was, well, it was Lincoln when it kingsley, but
but now it's Lincoln would. Right. And and and again, all this factor and they came up with this
whole score card of what the better. The next one was Washington. And the next one was Dewey
by only three tenths of a point. They were literally right together. But what happened is
when we when we put in the new information this year, it flipped the score card. And I'll explain
the number one thing that flipped it. Yeah. But then also a criteria that really
became highly important. The first thing that flipped it was what made Washington more
recommended was because the property is worth more money. And they were factoring in selling which
property when we sell it will get more money for the district. Right. But that's gone away because
I've already said we should not sell Dewey or Lincoln would. Right. Right. And I and I think the
district will hold to that. I really they understand that you know. So so so the minute we took that away,
all of a sudden it flipped. But the other thing is that we really because of of the distribution
is we had to look also at equity. And we would have moved more students if we closed Washington
and more marginalized students if we closed Washington. And so when you factor in more students,
more marginalized. And now it's flipped because of the resale value of the property. That's what
happened. So it actually was only three tens of a point different from Washington. Right. Okay.
When you say marginalized, what do you mean? Well, this would be any of what we used to call
at risk students. Okay. So that could be race. That could be socioeconomic. That could be
disabilities. Any of those kind of special special needs programs or or just
things that that in our society marginalized. Sure. So then what about the J.H. kids?
Are though are they considered marginalized too by the same standards? J.H. is a total different.
The Head Start kids. Yeah. Totally different. Yeah. And let me explain why. Yeah. Okay.
That is actually Head Start, as you said. Head Start, yeah. And we do not get, we get our funding
for K8 education. Right. We do not receive money at all for Head Start. For Head Start.
There are Head Start grants that pay for billing. But we have been subsidizing that to the
attune of between $1.5 and $2 million a year in order to keep it going. Yeah. And that is $1.5
to $2 million that we we're not able to allocate to K8. Right. Which is where where are the state
funds us? It's not it's not so terrible for this reason. We relinquish the seats. But Head Start
keeps it in the community. Only 10% of all the Head Start programs in the nation are actually
run by a school district. Yeah. It's other providers. And we have other providers in Evanston
who are already providing Head Start. I see. So the fact is, if I you know, I'd really have
being cold sweats. If I knew that when we close that down, their families lose all of that.
Yeah. I guess that was my big concern. Yeah. Where do they go? You know, there's a plan for the
Dewey kids and where they're going to go. There's a plan for the Lincoln Wood Kids and where they're
going to go. Is there a plan for those kids at Head Start? And will they be left to their own
device? So here's the here's the plan best we can do. And you'll understand a minute.
It's a government run program. That probably says it all. Unfortunately. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
But and I've even even had personal conversations with somebody pretty high up in the Head Start
here in in in the Chicago area. And the way it works is we relinquish the seats. And then we have
no control over what provider they they contract with to take over the seats. So that's why we can
we know that there are providers in our community who are very eager to bid on those seats.
And we also know that Head Start knows that those seats are needed at Evanston. Yeah. Okay.
The reason we're giving notice so far in advance. Originally, we thought we'd give notice
and it would happen this summer. And they explained to us that Head Start the wheels apparently turn
slowly there. Sure. Yeah. But but but with that what they call short notice, they would actually
bring in their own, I guess they have professional transition teams to run Head Start for
for probably a half a year to a year before they would then identify a provider who who would
become the permanent writer. Because those are our babies. They are. And we didn't want why why have that
if day one, you know, we relinquish on one day, the very next day, the the kids start with their new
provider. And and and so that's why we've delayed it until the end of next school year. Sure. Because
they said if you give us that much of a notice, we don't anticipate we would need to bring in a
transition team. We could get all geared up in Evanston and literally those those those families
and those children would not miss one day. I had start. Just can't speak for Head Start.
Right. For sure. You know, and they're only going to commit so much to me. Right. Because
because you know, they're going to take over and they're going to do what they do. But yeah,
but believe me, anybody who is administering Head Start programs believes in the work
of Head Start, they believe in meeting the needs. Yeah. And if we're talking about, you know,
marginalized people, the head start, our babies, you know, our youngest people and people who are,
you know, who have a financial need, which is definitely a marginalized group. Now we also have
a preschool for all, which is part of a state funding program. And we're we're keeping preschool
for all right. And then the other thing is in in in whether the Head Start or whether it's preschool
for all. Any students with special needs, we do
pay for and provide the staffing and provide that. So the special needs will be met that's
required anyway, but of course we would do it regardless. So the special needs will be met.
The preschool for all will continue and there's just no doubt head start will continue and there
are eager providers and it just won't be by the district. It just won't be the school district.
Yeah, I want to ask one quick question, Maddie, and then I'm like, you finish out. Cool.
There was a speaker last night at the meeting who said making all these plans and then hiring
a new superintendent would be kind of like hiring Ben Johnson and saying, you have to use the
playbook of Matt Eberfluss. You heard that one. I thought that one was very succinct and funny. I
thought it was. What do you say to that? Really, the person is not inheriting locked into anything.
What we're going to do is stabilize the finances so that that person could come in here and start
from day one in a district that is financially healthy. It is stable. We're not facing all of these
decisions or everything and that person will develop the playbook and develop a strategic plan.
And again, this is all with the community. I mean, when I see that person, it'll just come
to. It'll be a collaborative thing. So actually, we're opening the door for that person to come
in and take the reins and and and provide the leadership that this is going to be reflective of
that leader and and and and and and and reflective of what the the that person's hearing from the
community. I understand. But it was clever. Go Bears. Yeah, I know. I know. I couldn't help
us. I know. It was a good one. It was a good one. All right, Maddie, go ahead. Yeah. So I we
talked a lot about the school closures, obviously, but we didn't talk so much about I think one of
the main reason that people feel so emotional about school closures is because people want to
be able to have neighborhood schools, right? They want to be able to walk to school. The kids want
to be able parents want kids to be able to walk to school, get there easily, have a community
in their immediate neighborhood that they can build amongst themselves. How do we think about
what that means and what the closures mean for Evanston, Evanston having neighborhood schools?
Well, to to to to have what what you're describing, we would really need 10,000 students again,
so that we could we could populate schools, you know, more densely around the community.
Yeah, however, we're fortunate, even though we are certainly a city in in in terms of our square
miles, we're we're still a fairly compact for a city our size. And so while it's it's certainly
not walkable like like we've been used to in in many cases, nobody is is like a 40 minute drive
from their school or anything. And of course, we we do have good bus service and and the buses move
pretty rapidly. And again, you know, I'm thinking like in rural areas or even out in the
western suburbs where they're spread out more, you know, kids can be on a bus a long time just
making making the rounds. That's not really how it works in Evanston. So it definitely changes
walkability from what some folks have been able to enjoy and and and and I understand why that's
so valuable. Yeah. Really do. But given you know, so what can we afford to do the idea that we're not
spread over over miles, the fact the fact that that whether it's it's a drive or or or a bus ride,
it's it's not all words either. I think it it is a big adjustment. It certainly is different
and and not preferable when when when folks have been able to to really experience and enjoy that.
Yeah. But but I think it needs to be workable. Yeah. And I think that that's what we do.
We make it workable. Last question for you. What does success look like for you right now?
Mm hmm. So in my mind, uh, if we can move the comprehensive plan forward and we can start
stabilizing the finances, we will probably end this year with a deficit yet. But then start
realizing the savings next year and starting to build our fund balance back up. And if we can
do that, while at the same time, getting out of this vicious cycle of cuts and and school
closings and disruption of families and and and and and and and and a heartache for children,
if we can get out of that cycle, success looks like a district that is stabilized for many years to
come. A district that that that we can turn our attention not to financial crisis, but to to
the outcomes for students and and even more emphasis and more investment in their classrooms
and and in supporting their teachers. I think that we will see a district that is blossoming
and that is attracting young more young families again. And and I hope real success that we can
pass a referendum in a few years and be able to invest in in either I'd love to see a couple
new schools. I think we need them. Yeah, you know, even now when you add into the average foster,
the average school in our school district is 79 years wouldn't be bad because I've seen some
beautiful 79 year old homes. But but when they need a half a billion dollars worth of of work now,
so the referendum would not only get some some newer schools or new ones, but it would also then
allow us to spend our capital money on all of our other schools, getting them really taken care of
and and maintain the way they need to be maintained. And you don't think there's room for a
referendum before making the decision to close schools like. Well, based on my own opinion and many
people have talked to who have said I would never vote for a river and remember 80% of our community
doesn't even have students in our schools. Yeah, but there are taxpayers. And I can't speak for
all of them, but many of them I will say that that you know, I'm not going I could not vote for
that if I think you're going to squander the money. Right. Of course. Okay. Sorry. Sorry. Okay. We've
talked about this a lot on the podcast in a few episodes. So I just don't want to forget. But
what are your thoughts on consolidation D 6520 consolidation? Yeah. Yeah. You know, that comes up a lot.
Yeah. And I'd say we're 100 years too late. I really do. You know, I always lead unit districts.
And while this is more common in our area, it's separate K8 districts from a high school district
are pretty uncommon across the country. Yeah. But the decision was made over 100 years ago. Yeah.
And and the problem becomes they become two completely different entities. They have their own
school boards and governance. They have their own policies. Very important. And probably one
of the biggest issues is they have their own salary schedules. And the high school teachers are
paid more than the K then the district 65 teachers. Well, unit districts don't have two separate
teacher contracts. They have to negotiate one. It would be millions upon millions of dollars
to to negotiate up and and the high school is not going to negotiate down. Right. And so I don't
know why the high school would want to consolidate at the moment because you know, they're triply bond
reading. They're managing their finances. They're money. Well, and to take on all of the you know,
I've been talking about the capital liabilities to take on all the liabilities of of our beloved
district 65 at the same time that the community now has to come up with millions of dollars
to to equalize the salary schedules. It would it would be a a monumental leap for the community
to be able to do that. Yeah. Thank you. I just had to slide that one. I can't believe we forgot.
I forgot about that. Thank you very much for your time. We know you're an extremely busy man,
especially right now. It means a lot to us that you're here. Thank you for your time. It's
tough. It's tough out here. So it takes bravery to come sit down with us. So thank you. No, it's
tough and and it's it's very painful. Yeah. And I was my I'm whistling a different tune because I always
until when when it became my school that was closing, it changes your perspective. It really,
really does. Yeah. And it and it should. Yeah. Yeah. It changes your perspective. So
you know, to all the families out there. Yeah. Yeah. We're in it together. We are in it together. Thank you.
(upbeat music)
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Dr. Eric Weatherspoon, a longtime Evanston educator, stepped into an interim role to help stabilize District 65’s financial crisis after years of structural deficits.
The district faces a $20 million budget cut due to declining enrollment, overstaffing, and outdated facilities, leading to proposals to close several schools.
The comprehensive structural financial plan aims to reduce deficits by reorganizing school sizes for efficiency, ensuring classrooms are adequately filled and staffed.
The plan includes closing schools like Dewey and Lincoln Wood Head Start, with clear plans for student transfers and community support to minimize disruption.
A key concern is the potential for future closures, but Dr. Weatherspoon emphasizes that the plan stabilizes finances long-term, preventing recurring deficits.
The district’s financial issues stem from years of deferred spending, with over $500 million in building maintenance needs identified.
School closures are not driven by equity or demographics alone but by a combination of enrollment trends, property value, and operational efficiency.
Dr. Weatherspoon stresses that success is defined by financial stability, improved student outcomes, and the ability to invest in new schools and teacher support in the future.
Summary:
District 65 is facing a deep financial crisis rooted in years of structural deficits, declining enrollment, and underfunded infrastructure. Dr. Eric Weatherspoon, a former long-time superintendent with a deep connection to the community, has stepped into an interim role to help stabilize the district.
He outlines a comprehensive financial plan that includes closing schools such as Dewey and Lincoln Wood Head Start to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and realign school sizes to better match enrollment. While these decisions are emotionally difficult and raise concerns about neighborhood ties and student displacement, Dr. Weatherspoon emphasizes that the plan is designed to end the cycle of annual budget deficits and provide long-term financial stability.
The plan accounts for student needs, especially for marginalized groups, by ensuring transitions are managed with support. He also highlights significant capital needs—over $500 million in building maintenance—adding pressure to balance operations and infrastructure. A key element of future success is gaining community trust through financial transparency, potentially leading to a capital referendum to fund new schools and upgrade aging facilities.
Ultimately, Dr. Weatherspoon envisions a district that moves beyond financial crisis to focus on student achievement, teacher support, and community growth, restoring stability and confidence in the system.
FAQs
The comprehensive structural financial plan, also known as the Structural Deficit Reduction Plan (SDRP), addresses the district's long-standing financial deficits by proposing budget cuts, school closures, and a realignment of school operations to achieve financial stability.
Schools are being considered for closure due to declining enrollment and a significant structural deficit. The plan aims to reduce operational costs by reorganizing school sizes and reducing staff, while ensuring that students still receive quality education through better utilization of space and resources.
The district plans to stabilize finances by closing underutilized schools, which will allow it to maintain a more efficient structure. Long-term, it envisions attracting more families by building new, modern schools on underused sites like Washington and Lincolnwood, creating more space and opportunity for growth.
Students with special needs and marginalized populations will continue to receive support. The district ensures that special education services and preschool programs like 'Preschool for All' remain intact. Head Start programs will transition to external providers, but families will not lose access to services.
Yes, the district plans to hold a capital referendum in the future, but only after demonstrating financial stability and a sustainable plan. This would allow the community to invest in new schools and capital improvements, such as modernizing aging facilities.
The district has developed detailed transfer plans for students, ensuring they are placed in schools with similar academic and demographic profiles. Teachers and staff will be reallocated to maximize efficiency, and efforts are made to maintain community connections through shared educational programs.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.