Sarah Longwell: Dems, Go on Offense FFS

Hello and welcome to the Bulwark Daily. I'm your host, Tim Miller. It is Friday. As promised, we got a mailbag and I'm here with the publisher of this year, Bulwark. She has a book out. I do. September 8th. How to Eat an Elephant, One Voter at a Time. We'll put the link to the show notes. If you haven't bought it yet, I don't know what you're doing. Please pre-order it now. Also, the show notes, a friend of Miriam Tomasebi, whose just horrific story I talked about on the podcast earlier this week, reached out with a GoFundMe for her and her family. They've been in the Dilley internment camp for like four months, even though they're legal residents. So we'll put that in the show notes as well. Appreciate any support you have. Double duty today, girl. Thank you for doing this. I just finished a long slog secret pod. Secret pod with JVL. Actually, it was a great secret pod. Go listen to it. I mean, this is what you're getting as a Bulwark Plus member, the secret pods. You might as well take advantage of it. I have one overlap topic just because we have to do it with the secret pod. But besides that, it's all freshies for people. Okay. That's what we call it. Freshies. Yeah, skiing. When you're skiing, when you go on the mountain, you know, if it snows a little bit overnight, you get freshies. I never heard that. No. It seemed like a little Colorado slang for you. Gotcha. The Kennedy Center, there were some announcements. The board of trustees, which is Trump and his pals, approved a resolution calling for a new inscription beneath the center sign that would read restored and renovated by President Donald J. Trump. It also voted to close the venue for two years of renovations and rename the center's grounds President Donald J. Trump Plaza. This decision faces some legal obstacles for people to pay attention. Trump had added his name to the building already. The court said that, not allowed. The judge, I think, said the law makes crystal clear that the center is to be named for President Kennedy. They've had a tarp over it, I guess, since then? Yes. Do you ever drive by? I do. The tarp is up? The tarp is up. They don't want anyone to see the building without Donald Trump's name on it. And because people, including our people, went and camped out there when they were supposed to be taking his name down, they didn't want anybody to see that, right? Because the only thing Trump cares about is his sort of fragile, little ego. And so, yes, they've tarped it. And now they basically, they clearly went back to the drawing board and said, how do we get his name on this? And one of the things that this is the board's doing, but if you remember, they stripped, they took, kicked everyone off the Kennedy Center board when Trump came in, put Rick Grinnell in charge of it, I believe, and then stacked it with a bunch of other sort of Trump toadies. So their big goal has been shutting down the Kennedy Center and figuring out any way possible to get Trump's name on it. Yeah, that was Rick's consolation prize. After he lobbied to be Secretary of State. And like, you know, I think we'll put the gay over the theater. One of the things I promised people after Trump won, was that I was like, not going to pretend to be outraged about things. You know, like, we all only have so much, you know, kind of room in our heart for rage, if we're not going to stroke out. Like, this has been a story that I've struck, you know, I'm not a theater queen. It's just, you know, it's one of my weaknesses, you are. Should I be really mad about this? I mean, aren't we just going to take his name off the fucking platform? As soon as we win again. And so it's kind of like, this is stupid. Or is there a reason for me to be really more mad about it than I am? So I think all of the reflecting pool, the ballroom, the Kennedy Center, they all sort of don't matter substantively, but they matter a great deal, sort of metaphorically, because it is, this is the example of how we are all being dominated by Trump's ego. He pays attention to these things, he doesn't pay attention to the material. He doesn't pay attention to the material needs of Americans. He walks us into a stupid war. He will go on the record and say, yeah, I don't care if Republicans lose. I don't care if inflation is up. Like, I don't care. I love the inflation, he says. And so he won't pay attention to those things that matter. He does pay attention to this. So I think it matters in that regard about where Trump's attention is. Yeah, I think it matters politically. I cheated on you a little bit and monitored a focus group that was not one of yours. Whose was it? A friend works for a campaign and was going to just give me a readout of their focus group. In one of the House races. And this, this notion really has broken through. Yeah. Like with Trump voters, with swing voters, like the idea that he cares only about this shit. Right. And I do think that that is, that's meaningful, right? And I think that like this stuff, if the economy is good. If he hadn't done the stupid war. Yep. Maybe, you know. He'd get away with it. Yeah, he'd get away with it. You know, the resist libs on Substack would be mad, but maybe that would just be it. But I don't, I do think this, this has, there's more resonance for that reason. I mean, this is where the contrast, I talk a lot about contrast because I think that when you hear this in my focus groups all the time, where people are like, I expected to have the economy of Trump's first term and the fact that they aren't, and the fact that there is this war, and I cannot stress enough, I just did a bunch of focus groups in Florida. So when we were on Nicole, she played some sound from the Florida focus groups. I was genuinely a little surprised at how angry these voters were at Trump right now. Yeah. Yeah. It is the war and it is the tariffs. And it is the fact that he is not paying attention to the economy. And that is why these things now matter. And then there was the one Cletus who was mad that we're not deporting enough people. But he was mad about both. That's it was funny that she, she played that clip of a guy being like, they're not doing enough mass deportations. And also the war is really stupid where his, and he was like, I want to give Trump an F because he's not deporting enough. And he got us into a stupid war. Those people are meaningful because it's like, is that guy going to vote? Very possibly not. Yeah. I mean, this is where the enthusiasm gap gets real going into 2026 is like the, when these Republicans are just frustrated with Trump. If you're a Republican and you love Trump, you're like, well, I want to protect his agenda. But if you hate his agenda, you're much less motivated to do it. Speaking of things we're mad about yesterday. Um, you know, when I think of order to chat about on the pod, I asked you kind of like what you're upset about. And you, you mentioned the max Miller situation simultaneously yesterday for people who are not on x.com. I created a little bit of a stir, which when I did the thing I do about once a year, which is remind people, Mike Lawler, the Congressman from New York, uh, when he was 18, even still, I mean, I did some weird stuff when I was 18, but nothing like this. He traveled from New York to California to go to Michael Jackson's trial where he trolled the parents of the children that were alleging molestation. Yeah. He also is dressed up in Michael Jackson, blackface. That's pretty weird. So, um, the, these two topics, they did when she, when, uh, Mike Lawler was on Dana bash, uh, yesterday. And, and I wanna play, uh, a little bit of their conversation. I am not making the allegation. His ex-wife is his ex-father-in-law. And I am asking you a purely political question. It's a purely political question. Why not just give it back? It's only $10,000 because this is, this is the typical Washington. This is the typical Washington media game where it's always an allegation comes up. You must return the money. It's it's the typical game everybody plays and it doesn't actually do anything to further the situation. If there's evidence that max did something, then obviously there should be a thorough investigation of that. But thus far, there's been nothing to verify any of the claims that have been leveled. I think it is a tragic family situation. We all know, uh, people who have gone through nasty divorces. Do we, do we all know people? People who have gone through nasty divorces where the wife says that the husband scalded her and there's domestic violence and the husband kidnapped the child's beloved bunny. And there are two other women that say that the husband has roughed them up or, or done other kinds of domestic violence. I don't know. I don't think that's typical divorce. I don't know anybody who's been in a nasty divorce like that actually. No, plenty of people who've gotten divorced. I've never heard anything like this. I really wanted to talk about the max Miller because it is an example of a bunch of things that bother me in the moment. But Lawler's really highlighting one of them, which is we have like six weeks out from the platinum discourse. Cause he, like every other Republican, when the platinum thing was happening, uh, and the accusations were coming out, condemned platinum, condemned all his supporters, condemned anyone who was backing him. And so Democrats did the right thing and they tossed platinum overboard when he was credibly accused of rape. Republicans in extraordinary close proximity to that same thing happening, who you may remember, Tim, our friend, Kevin McCarthy and Kellyanne Conway going on TV regularly to say, we don't defend abusers in our ranks. Now at the time it was already absurd because of course, Donald Trump renders all of that stuff. The hypocrisy is already there, but to then just weeks later have this max Miller situation. Right. And. Republicans basically be like, no, we're gonna stick with him. And for somebody like Mike Lawler, who likes to pretend like he's one of the good guy moderates to say, oh, this is just divorce. The hypocrisy is staggering. They, and they, they are willing to brazen these out. This is a difference between Republicans and Democrats. And it is not just Lawler and the elected officials. It's the entire sort of right wing Twitter brigade who came for us over a platter, who came for everybody over platinum. That's right. And. And they're all heads in the sand Max Miller, which brings me to the second thing that really bothers me about the Max Miller thing. I get some likes. I do want to tell you, when I criticize Max Miller, I do get some likes from Republican World. I believe Harmeet Dhillon. Oh, they don't speak out, but they're willing to signal to you. Yeah, they don't like him. And so, you know, and likes are private. I should probably out them. I probably should have done that already. You should. Anyway, Harmeet Dhillon is the one that comes to mind. But, you know, I was making fun of Max Miller because they all hate him. He's a douche. And he fucking beat up a Republican senator's daughter and the spokeswoman for Trump. Stephanie Grisham. Yeah. So it's like they don't like this guy. And they know he's a scumbag. Yeah. You and I did a take one point where we laid out all of the times Trump was willing. Interestingly, Michael Jackson came up in that one, too, where Trump goes to bat for any abuser who shows up. Mike Tyson, Michael Jackson, you know. Eric played with Michael Jackson. Yeah, he talks about how his kids played with Michael Jackson all the time. Yeah. Weird one. Okay. That's one part of it. Then I want to talk about Democrats. And offense. So one of the things that is driving me crazy right now is that in light of this hypocrisy, right, the way that the right came together around Graham Plattner to go on offense not just against Plattner himself but against everybody who might have tacitly supported him. They came at me even though I wasn't tacitly supporting him. Like they may try to make a tie everybody to their behavior around Plattner. That was my dad's retirement party. You know, some family members that are MAGA, you know, were like asking me about Graham Plattner, like quizzing me about Graham Plattner. And I was asking them I was like, do you know who Mary Patola is or Roy Cooper is? And it was like, no, I never even heard any of these other names, right? Because, to your point, because the right is really good at like surfacing, you know, these bad examples of Democrats and going on offense, forcing Democrats to have to defend it. The psychology of this is they hide from themselves their own disgusting acquiescence to Trump and all the immorality that comes with that, right? They don't want to tell themselves that story. So what they focus on offensively is any Democrat who behaves poorly as a way to say what about, what about, and to inoculate themselves, right, from that criticism. But it is wild to me in this moment when they are so close to the Graham Plattner situation, Republicans are standing by Max Miller, and Democrats aren't in a brigade themselves. Going on offense against Republicans for doing this. They should be hanging it around Eric Erickson's neck. They should be hanging it around every Republican who has made the Plattner thing such a big deal. But they can't because they're fighting with each other. Yeah, that's right. And Lawler provides a good example, you know, and this is an easy opportunity and I assume Kate Conley and her campaign will take this opportunity but it's like, you can tie it back to the Epstein issue. It's like all these guys, except for what, MTG and Nancy Mace are like four of them, like all of them, and blocked the Epstein files, release. So you've got Mike Lawler, who's so into Neverland Ranch that he went, like flew to defend. This was brand new information to me. Flew to defend Michael Jackson and troll the victim's parents. So, big defender of Neverland Ranch, Epstein cover-up in favor of running, you know, cover for Max Miller, who is incredibly accused of domestic violence by Republicans. Like, there is a good story to tell against these people. And like, Mike Lawler I mean, who is, who was on CNN, I guess, you know, doing the humina humina, like, this should continue to nag him. And that is replicable, I think, in other situations with the example that I don't know that anybody else is that huge of a fan of Michael Jackson's pillow fight parties with the children. I know people have very strong opinions about the Michael Jackson stuff. Oh, yeah. And let's just say, forget which side of that maybe you're on. How? I don't, I don't, why would we forget? Well, I just, because you're neutral? Oh, no, I'm not neutral. No, no, no. Uh, I'm not neutral. But I, I still think that, my only point is, is that even if you were neutral, the idea that you would put on blackface and go down there, now, granted, he was 18, but like. These are two separate incidents. One incident he put on blackface, we'll put the picture up on the screen for people. Oh, okay. Oh, oh, it's not the same thing. No, two things. He just was a big Stan. He's big into Stan culture. So, one time he did Michael Jackson blackface, which is kind of weird, because Michael Jackson kind of did whiteface. Well, he had, I think, he had a disease. I saw it on Oprah when I was young. Oh, okay. Okay. Well, even still, you would, you could dress as Michael Jackson without darkening your face, given how Michael Jackson looked. But anyway, he went the extra mile and did the blackface. Right. That was for a party, and then also went to the trial. Okay. Uh, I, well, I didn't know any of that until I saw your tweet, and that was fun. My point is, is that that is a wild thing to do, to like, go down to a trial. That is an intense, uh, thing to do, regardless of, of how you feel. I want to see Democrats, like, guys, mail Mike Lawler a million blue bunnies. Like, put the blue bunny in your Instagram profile. Like, can we not, can we not make this a huge issue? Can we not discover what offense looks like and go after the bad guys? Yeah. Look at that Michael Jackson blackface photo. Katie just put that up on the screen here in the studio. What a, look at that, what a look. What a, he's doing the dance. Yeah. August is the perfect time to hit reset before the autumn rush begins, and honestly, I can't think of a better place to start a reset than the closet. No, we're not, we're not talking about Lindsey Graham. I, I mean, the clothes in your closet. Uh, with Quince. That's who you're gonna reset with, naturally. We all know and love Quince. Their clothes are made with premium materials. They're built to last and designed to become the ones you reach for day after day. Quince specializes in everyday staples that work harder. If you're still hanging on to the same worn-out basics, Quince makes it easy to upgrade. They have premium denim and tailored chinos from just $60 with the kind of perfect fit structure and high quality fabrics you'd expect from a luxury designer brand. Everything at Quince is priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands. They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middlemen, so you're paying for high quality, not brand markup. Y'all know I love my Quince linen shirts, which are needed in New Orleans in August. Uh, but producer Ansley, like any good lesbian shirt, she shops in the men's section sometimes. She's wearing by the organic comfort stretch chore jacket. It's a nice little light layer as the evenings start to get cooler. Upgrade your everyday. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers or go to quince.com slash the bulwark. Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns now available in Canada and the UK, too. That's quince.com slash the bulwark. There's another clip I saw yesterday of Manosphere stuff. Shane Gillis, who's always like, people don't know, he's like probably the best of the bro comedians, really. Um, you know, he did, and he's been photographed with Trump. He's a little, you know, he's a little more Trump-curious than me, than us here at the headquarters of, of, you know, Trump derangement syndrome, but, like, compared to some of the other guys out there. Rogan has him on, and there are a bunch of interesting clips, like, they're talking about how great socialized healthcare is, for example, and, like, there are a bunch of interesting things, but there was one that particularly caught my mind, because Shane, Shane is telling Joe about the corruption. Yeah, the corruption that's happening, but he particularly tells him about the example of, of Trump selling for $100,000 access to his tweets early, uh, so people can inside your trade on him. Let's watch, like, a little bit of that exchange. I don't know what's happening here at the beginning of the clip. Looks like a man is drinking out of a American flag boot. We should get one of those. No, I think it's an eagle's butt. It's an eagle's butt? I'm not sure. Isn't he selling his, uh, truth social tweets to people, and then they can bet on it? What? I think, yeah. What? He's selling access to what? He's selling faster access to his tweets, and then he can bet on it. On the markets, because it's literally insider trading. It's cashy, though. You can bet on everything. You can fix. Wait a minute, is that real? You get access to a tweet before he makes it, and then you can bet on that tweet? How is that legal? What is this? Trump sued over true social advance access sale. I'm online in the Oval Office. Who's telling him this is a good idea? Who's failing Donald Trump? I know, it couldn't be Trump himself. The corruption couldn't be coming directly from Trump. It's not as if he hasn't been a scam artist for a fucking half century. Who is, what is the incoming news that Joe Rogan is receiving? Listen, this clip is also a perfect example of a phenomenon that I need people to get their heads right about. Okay. Okay. Which is, people are like, the left needs a Joe Rogan. And I'm like, guys, to be a Joe Rogan is not to be on the left or right. To be a Joe Rogan is just to live in total blindness to the world. You sit at your computer, you get really high, you lift a lot of weights, and you don't actually tap in to the news much, which is why they keep failing, because they keep bringing up people who are of the left but who are consumed by politics. I don't know a lot about politics, but we'll talk about it. And argue a lot about it. That's not what Joe Rogan does. Joe Rogan sits there like a pure little baby, just getting this information as it comes to him. And he's like, that news about Trump selling access to his truth socials has been out there for weeks. And it was big news. Rogan, brand new information. Top of drudge. Yeah, I would like to learn a little bit about Rogan's kind of media diet. I'm a little bit less a care on fire about, like, sometimes I feel like the rhetoric, the anti-manistee rhetoric can be a little bit overblown. It's like, it's a comedian's podcast. Right, totally. And I always felt this way about this. like Theo Vaughn my Louisiana guy it's like we have a mutual friend and I said to him we pass on to Theo maybe we can clip this now you can send it to him like his podcast is hilarious like when he has on like an Amish kid and he like wants to ask the Amish kid what's life like as an Amish teen yeah he's funny he's funny it's like the problem is when you have the Vice President of the United States on because you don't know what's happening in the news that's right so the Vice President of the United States comes on and starts just fucking gaslighting you and lying to you and you're like oh really oh and like your fucking huge audience listens to that like that's the problem and like that's like the Rogan thing it's like okay like if you're gonna talk about aliens great that's fine but it's like if you're gonna talk about the news if you're gonna go to the White House like Rogan has done multiple times do free PR for Trump you would think that you should at least like I don't know know what's happening know what he's up to do I like what he's doing because actually every time Joe Rogan as best I can tell gets a new piece of information about what Donald Trump is doing in this administration he's like boy that's really not good I don't like that at all you're like yeah man Trump's bad Lovett does this thing where he's like it's annoying that like the Democrats are the only people who have any agency in the world like it's a terrible thing happens out there and it's like why aren't the Democrats doing something to resolve it like that is an accurate critique that said we all do have agency in the world and it's like do you have any thoughts as a communications professional about like like if Joe Rogan doesn't know that Trump is selling insider trading tips to Wall Street I assume that lots of people don't know right your focus group people don't know so like what do you have thoughts on how to address that problem yeah this is where when people say we need a left wing Joe Rogan I'm like no what you have is a Joe Rogan who is an uninformed dude but who likes to dabble in these political issues right and he basically wants to talk to people who will talk to him go talk to the Joe Rogan that exists right he clearly likes getting this new information he takes these inputs and so if I were Hakeem Jeffries or okay fine but I'm just I mean well this is the problem right I mean the problem then comes down to do you have people that can go on Rogan and I think this is where the Democratic Party does struggle a little bit it's like J.E. Vance for I find him you know repellent as a person talking but lots of Democrats could say like yo Joe Rogan I want to come on and talk to you about whatever and think about how you go on talk about aliens talk about the way that Donald Trump is betraying us they keep saying they're gonna they're gonna they're gonna show us all the UFOs where are the UFOs I mean just whatever just do that and like Theo Vaughn is funny but so this is why it's not just look I think that Donald Trump Democrats do need to build their own communications infrastructure the way that the right has but I also think they need to avail themselves of the existing infrastructure that is not political that's the key the key is that it's not political I'm gonna do the positive first and then a critique this is just another thing that Zoran's good at I had a big laugh this morning in the New York Times let me actually just pull this up because it's funny enough to read it our friends in the New York Times they sponsored the episodes but sometimes we can make fun of them too happens to the best of us in the media business here it is this is a headline in today's New York Times Mamdani's bro culture in City Hall sports memes nicknames as much as Zoran Mamdani's team runs on leftist idealism and social media hits its style of governing also relies on humor and sports references and pop culture it's like so they're guys they're just they're just straight guys sorry not even guys not even guys I have multiple women run companies me being the woman and like you can talk about sports and pop culture we also like sports and pop culture we also like we also give each other nicknames and it's like so Mamdani can do this he could go he should you know he can go on these shows and he's fine he's great and he's super talented able to kind of mix it up you know get his universal health care and free grocery stores or whatever government run grocery stores mix that in and talk about other stuff like this is doable but it is I just think it's telling that it's like the fact that Mamdani can do it and that he has a staff that is fluent in all this stuff the fact that that is like surprising enough to merit a story in the New York Times that kind of tells you that is that is telling that the other part of it is that that they identify that specifically as bro culture as opposed to just culture like people people like to tell jokes they like to give each other nicknames they like to treat each other like human beings raz each other a little bit have fun you may have noticed this happens on the Bulwark podcast they like the nick they like and so like that's not bro culture it is how normal people just engage with each other and this is this is when you think about democrats and their stiff talking points and I think that the Thanksgiving thing now has been sort of done to death but like that sounds alien to people right that is somebody being like this thing that you love that you celebrate in culture which is part of your vacation when you see your family is like a bad thing and you should feel bad about it that's just a weird thing to say where joking about sports and like liking comedians is just how people want to exist yeah so yeah so that's part of it being able to do that just being a part of the actual culture sure is part there is it's the thing that leaves me a little bit wanting and I feel bad for the comms people I used to be a comms person and it's like kind of easy to sit here in the big comfy chair and say what I'm about to say I get that like you get in an organization there's always reasons not to do stuff but I just feel like Trump is so bad and there's so many opportunities that like I want some more more stunts yeah I want some more big stunts and occasionally I will say it's not the first time I've offered this and I think some of our we're going to get to a mailbag later some of the negative feedback we've received sometimes it's like the Democrats will do a stunt and it'll be bad and then I'll complain about it that's a risk of stunts for sure okay like just because I like stunts doesn't mean that every stunt is a good stunt okay but like I don't know I just I do feel like there's something there's like a limit on the creativity on the creativity of how to get these stories about Trump's corruption to break through or I was I don't want to pick on Seth Moulton you know good guy and I hope he wins in his primary against Markey and I was talking to Bill about this yesterday and I was when we had lunch and I was like I want Seth Moulton like almost chaining himself outside the ICE facility in Massachusetts right like I want really dramatic gestures and rather than what you were saying earlier kind of the nitpicking within the party like nitpicking I want very over over the top gestures going after Trump I am still left a little wanting on that front just kind of across the board basically yeah I think that look not to reference my book I'm sorry that I am in the phase of you know as I say in my book but it is true that a bunch of what's in my book is about communication narrative dominance the way that Trump practices narrative dominance and the way that Democrats can go on offense to push back and a lot of it I think that because the line between a stunt and cringe is like a you never know where you're crossing that one but I do think that Democrats should spend a lot more time even if it's just be serious about it but like call a press conference alright you're in the middle of a contested election the press will come if you call a press conference to say I want to lead the charge against Max Miller my colleague Max Miller who needs to go he's a lousy guy like pick up the mantle of something stand for something it doesn't all have to be sort of performance art I go back to my blue bunny idea I like the blue bunny idea that's one off but like think about what are the things that you can do that harness people's attention and they like they don't it's like they flounder in that space the line between performance and cringe is is thin a little cringe isn't bad though you know what I mean this is something that Trump learned right like if like your people like it and the opponents are making fun of you yeah then more people are seeing it right because everybody's talking about it that's right and so you know I think that that is like the advantage of like shooting more shots on this right here's an example of the thin line between performance and cringe this was Abdul El-Sayed a couple weeks ago it's a video trying to get people to send in their mail-in ballots and Fox was making fun of him for it yesterday let's play a little clip here's the mail it never fails it makes me wanna wag my tail when it comes I wanna wanna wail mail this is him doing a blues clues riff uh-huh a little cringe but Fox is making fun of him and it like this works right I mean A this was a couple weeks ago people were learning about the mail ballots but also it's like I don't know on the one hand Fox wanted to call him a terrorist a very scary jihad I think Trump called him a jihadist in the White House and then like the next minute Fox is showing a video of him like doing corny dad jokes first of all that is the most that I have liked Abdul El-Zayed since I've become acquainted with him because most of what I've seen from him right is comes from the primary where he's like you know crapping on Haley Stevens who was like my who I had a preference for but I watched that and I'm like I think he's adorable first of all he looks great in that shirt he does and second of all maybe he should wear more colors he's always in that black V yeah he does it it did it looked nice on him there's something about him he's doing like a civic action which I love a good civic action I love right that's the way you get to my heart, like telling people to send their ballots in, he's taken a swing. It's funny. He's appealing to like, I'm a little old for blues clues, but like, you know, it was a cultural thing. My younger siblings liked it. And so I think that that backfires on Fox and that that is a good thing to do. Yeah. There's a lot of this with him in particular. And actually, maybe I should kind of revise and extend my earlier point where some of my frustration on the failure on the performance side is like with our people, like the center left Democrats and like the establishment Democrats, because the left candidates, at least a handful of them, are pretty good at it. We mentioned Zoran and Abdul. So that's a more, you know, kind of cheesy version of it. But his really passionate arguments, you know, going after money and politics, going after what's the Middle East, going after the health care executives, like the actual policies are probably not like exactly what you and I would want, you know. But like, he's defining a clear foe. Yeah. You know, and you can tell he's passionate about it. It resonates with where Democratic voters are. And then it creates this response, I think it's so funny, from the right, where they are like, you know, calling him names, being like, oh, Abdul El-Sahed hates Israel so much. And I'm like, this is a little bit reminiscent of, for me, of the mistakes we made as like in the Jeb campaign and everybody campaign, Marco, Scott Walker, where we were like, Trump is a racist with his Muslim ban. And it's like, well, that was true. Right. But like, was that a good message? Just looking at this strategy wise, not morality wise, because like, that means the voters heard about it more. And the voters, the Republican voters were like, hell, yeah. Yeah. And like, in this case, whether it be whatever, single payer health care, less money and weapons for Israel, et cetera. It's kind of like, they're like, they're calling him a socialist. They're calling him anti-Israel. It's like, I think this is helping him. Actually, I think that there's like a Trump element to the, like, it's a reverse, right? Trump is in the Jeb shoes and El-Sahed is in the Trump shoes that, you know, I guess I'm not comparing them at a moral level, but like, just, just from like their role in the discourse. And it's like, they didn't learn what worked for themselves. Yeah. And this is where, look, if, if what voters learn about you as you are getting your profile raised is that, you're anti-Thanksgiving. And I got to tell you, people are going to be like, Sarah, stop talking about that. But I'm telling you, that is the thing that did her in, right? With voters where they're like, well, that's too weird. But so that's one example where like, not all press is good, right? If it's too far out there. But the fact is, there are a lot of Republicans that are anti-Israel right now. There are a lot of people that will suddenly go, oh, I'm, I'm, I'm interested in you. You don't want us to get in this stupid war. That's right. And that's why this is in part, there's a different game afoot now, which is about the attention economy overall. And it can work for you or against you. But I do think you're right that there's a bunch of these issues that are broadly more popular than the Demp, than the Republican establishment thinks they are. Yeah. Kinzinger yesterday, right here, sitting in the chair you were in, was, was saying he's getting socialist healthcare curious. So am I. Not, not so, but I, I do think. Single-payer healthcare. Or some version, Medicare for all who want it. Some, some version. Yeah, I think, I think that there is, I, I won't go into like a whole policy thing, but if you ask me one of the main things that I have shifted on, I think that look, presidents, there's not that much they can do to like lower inflation. Like these are big economic forces. I think that we are at a point where healthcare is so complicated. And, uh, I think that there is a grand bargain somewhere between securing the border and offering every American when they are born comes into a healthcare plan. Um, and you can purchase additional services, uh, as you need them or additional layers. Um, but that a basic access to, to healthcare is both where we should be going as a country. And I think where we are going. All right, guys, got an announcement for you. Fall tour is happening. If you're in the Confederacy, save the date, cuz we're coming for you. Uh, the Borg is headed to the Southeast in October for our good fight tour. Uh, we want the community to come together before the 2026 midterm election. Sarah, JBL, Sam, and I will be headed to the Carolinas and Atlanta in October. It's some other board folks are coming to, uh, make sure you subscribe to be a board plus member to get your pick of seats while they last. This is important. First seats got to board plus members. People get very excited. They get the seats down at the front. If we do audience participation, you know, if there's call and response, they're right there. If you're not a board, plus member, you're gonna, you might be up in the nosebleeds. Who wants that? Okay. Become a board plus member. Come hang out with us. Tickets go live, uh, for the presale for subscribers on Tuesday. They go live for everybody else on Friday. Uh, we are gonna be in Columbia, Charlotte and Atlanta, Columbia, Charlotte and Atlanta. It's Columbia, South Carolina, not, not Medellin, Columbia, South Carolina. So excited to be back. Love Cola. Hope you all come and hang with us. Keep an eye on the bulwark.com slash events for the latest information. All right. I promise you pull a mailbag. Let's do it. Well, before we get to the mailbag, actually, why don't we play Abdul one more time? Why don't we have Abdul take us into the mailbag? Here's the mail. It never fails. It makes me want to wag my tail. When it comes, I want to wail. Mail. Adorable. We have a lot of actual emails that I got. Um, I, I did use the best one yesterday. Thanks to Tyler who about his explosive diarrhea. Yeah. I felt like that was more appropriate for Kinsinger. I'm going to get to specific mailbag questions, but there's a more general piece of feedback that we got from the next level that was everywhere in my inbox and Reddit and comments that I, that I want to address first before we get to the specific mail questions. And that was, uh, this question about woke one. So crazy. And, um, we'll just a little behind the curtain here. I, I do a lot of prep for this show. You do a lot of prep for the illegal news and for the focus group. TNL sometimes we're just kind of shooting from the hip. We are, you know, it's just like, Hey, like whatever, what are the topics today? Like let's spit ball. We're hanging. We're friends. That's why you guys like it. Like the negative side of that is like, sometimes, you know, I, I, I am giving opinions that are, that are more secret podcast rules. They're not fully, fully formed. And so I just wanted to revisit the woke thing for a second. Cause there were a lot of people that were like, why are Tim and Sarah so mad about woke one? Like it wasn't that big of a deal. Like, so people said latinx, whatever, who cares who was hurt by that. And I hear that. And so I wanted to kind of explain myself, but do you want to go first or do you want me to? Well, why don't you go first? Because I think we feel pretty similar. Yeah. Um, here's my view about this. And for people who do really care about this, I've now had Ta-Nehisi Coates on the pod three times. And each time we've done woke one revisited. And I've had a lot of people say, well, I don't know, I don't know as part of the conversations. I think you could learn a little bit more about my, my kind of quibbles with it, um, from, from those conversations, but like, just to sum it up, I think that like, there are some really good parts of it. Like, I think that like the idea that we should have more visibility for, you know, different marginalized groups, like is like, yeah, like obviously, right. Like we shouldn't just be like fucking white ballerinas, you know, in the store and like having different, you know, characters that more reflect the full country and kids. And I think that's, I think that's a really good idea. I think that's a really good idea. Like all this sort of stuff at, in the C suites, it's like, I kind of think we're not even really there yet. Like some of the DEI stuff in office and HR stuff is stupid, but like, I laugh at like the tech guys that are like, woke is so stupid. Like we're, we're, we're past racism. And I'm like, okay, well then why is every CEO of a tech company, a white guy or an Indian guy? So, you know, there is, I think good progress that could be made both when it comes to race and gender. And I also like, as somebody who was long time kind of an ace ACAB on cops, I was never a big cop guy. I was more of a libertarian on the Republican side. I think a revisiting of the relationship between the police and the, and the populace is also positive that that got overboard. Here's my, like, here's my main issue with it. I just think that fundamentally, like, I'm a moderate, balance in all things. And I think that when it comes to identitarianism and identity politics, like, making everything about that, like making it the central part of assessing every person's character, every decision that is made in an organization is like pernicious and it's not how our society should be. Like, I don't want to, like, we're going to like, whatever, people are going to cringe and this is corny, but like the idea that people should be judged by the content of their character is like fundamental to the country. And that does not mean that we shouldn't like address structural racism and all that. But like, if we move away from that framework, where we're not judging people by the content of their character, it becomes problems. And I still see to this day, like people like throwing around things like attacking, like I saw this on Twitter just this week, somebody was like, I don't want to hear what a white woman thinks about that. And like, it's like, that's a bad thing to say. I get a lot of, I get a lot of white women. Yeah. I'm sorry. You cannot use white woman as a pejorative. Like, that's not okay. It's, it would, it would not be okay if you said, you know, I don't want to hear what a gay has to say or what a fucking Asian person has to say. You know what I mean? I get that one from the right. Yeah, sure. Like, that is not okay. Like, that is not in the spirit of liberalism. And, and it has a negative impact on society. It also creates a backlash, you know, like it also strategically stirs stupid. I was always like, okay, you want identity politics? Well, that's interesting. We'll see how you like white identity politics. And we've seen that. I think so. I think it's morally wrong and strategically wrong. And the last thing I'll say is all that is a little bit up in the clouds, esoteric, cultural, and that is not a substantive harm like we've seen for Trump's policies. And there's nothing to compare all of this. Obviously, that's why we're doing this. It's why we started an entire media company devoted to trying to- Going out the right way with authoritarianism. But there also were tangible issues. Crime did skyrocket during the period. And part of that was COVID, but part of that was the changes in policing and prosecuting. And there were victims of those crimes. That's just true. That's a real consequence. The school stuff, we can all debate. COVID was hard. I know JVL doesn't like when we do this, but kids not going to school for a year for no reason was bad. That's just bad. And I lived in Oakland at the time in California, so maybe I was more into this. And the example I gave on TNL was kind of stupid. But a more serious example is people in our community that I was friends with that were not as well off, who have both parents working or have single parents and they work. What were their kids doing? Rich people's kids, they paid a nanny or somebody to come to their house and sit with them on their class computer while the parent did their laptop job. That wasn't positive. It wasn't possible for regular people. So that's my answer. I think that to not acknowledge that there were real harms is bad. And to not acknowledge that just fundamentally it's illiberal to be so extreme on identitarianism is also, I think, not acknowledging reality. I agree with all that. But I'm going to talk about some different things. Because one of the things that I think happens is that we all have a kind of survivor's bias I don't mean like we all lived through, but I mean, we've all like, we only remember the things that really bothered us. And we've let a lot of the things go that perhaps were the excesses of our side. And so I think when people look back at COVID, a lot of people don't maybe realize or remember. But if you think about it for one second, you'll be like, too many businesses went under during COVID. Like a lot of people lost their livelihoods. Now, it was a once in a generation pandemic. And I think that like the attacks on Fauci and all this aren't seen. Everybody was trying to do their best. But every single- There's also bad stuff on the right. I just want to say really quick. Like more people died in Florida after the vaccines because they did anti-vaccination stuff. And like those are lives lost. So like that, so that's true. And so, I mean, part of this, I think my overall point is that like grace sort of needs to be extended across the board at some of these times when it was really- Difficult. But there are certain flashpoints that come up over and over again from voters where they decided that they hated the left on COVID, like the backlash. And it was things like during the Black Lives Matter protests, all the scientists who were telling them they had to stay in their houses suddenly gave a dispensation to go protest. That broke a level of trust with a lot of people between them and sort of the scientific community. And that's where I had to woke because like that was the point. That's right. Right. It was because it was, you know, people felt like during that period that they had to make these kind of racial identitarian concerns like prime. Prime. Right. Rather than one thing to be concerned about amidst, you know- So if you've lost your business or you couldn't go visit your dying parent in their home, their sort of, you know, their elder care facility, things like that, like the level of anger, and this is the thing that I lived through. I remember being in my basement doing focus group after focus group after focus group going to like during the pandemic. And the pain that I heard across the board from people who were being robbed of like every milestone of life, whose parents died and they couldn't go to their funeral, whatever. And look, I think that, and I think part of what people were frustrated by, so there's the scientific community, but then one of the reasons that I think Gavin Newsom will never be president is because people don't talk about it anymore, but they will if he runs, which is him going to the French laundry. Yeah. Right. And eating with his friends while everybody else was being told they couldn't go anywhere. Like it is those kinds of things that I think really did. And Mark Marin has this great set around how like we are annoying people into fascism, which goes to the sort of backlash effect and the strategic part of it, which is, and I think that on every spectrum, right? So when you think about woke, you've, you laid this out, so I don't need to re-litigate it, but there's like this part of the spectrum that is like the good heart. Right. The part where people's intentions are both pure and righteous and in a, the right place for humanity. And then there's the excesses, right? Where it goes too far, right? The idea of we need a police department or we need police departments that are more, that aren't shooting people, you know, in the streets or whatever, that are better trained or whatever, versus defunding the police. Do you know who the main people against defunding the police are? Black people. People in dangerous neighborhoods. They thought that was insane, right? And so like those excesses created a backlash that I think allowed Trump to come back. And so I think to me, there were a lot of harms done. I don't like dismissing it just as like, oh, people are annoyed that there's like a barista with a nose ring in Starbucks and- They, them, brown rounds, whatever. To the mailbag question. This one is from Anonymous and they say, growing up, my dad's conservatism largely shaped my politics while my mom was a conservative. She was a conservative. She was a Democrat who tried her best to expose us to her values. Now that my views have changed, how do I reconcile who I was politically with who I am now without feeling ashamed of my past? Oh, buddy, don't feel ashamed. You know, I think sometimes people think that it is a mark of a bad character or something to change your mind. It is not. It is a mark of good character. Oftentimes people think of something like regret as a negative emotion, but regret is a positive emotion because it is you saying, this thing from before was wrong and I've re-evaluated it in light of new information. Taking in new information and changing your mind, like that's what we did. We were like, no, Trump, like this is a bad thing. And re-evaluating things in light of new information is a sign of intelligence, not something you have to be ashamed of. Free yourself of this, baby. I'll give you one little therapy note. This was useful from when I was in therapy. Shout out to Dr. Sharp. He told me that, do you know the difference between guilt and shame? No. According to Dr. Sharp, I don't know. I guess I've never actually really like looked into the psychological literature. Basically summed it up as like guilt means you feel bad that you did something bad and shame means you feel like you are bad. Okay. Yeah, sure. And so like shame is an emotion that you should work through in therapy because, you know, assuming that I assume this person, the type of person that would send this email is not somebody that is fundamentally bad, right? So, you know, guilt is something that everybody deals with about a bunch of things. And of all the things to feel guilty about, the fact that before Donald Trump, you had different political views than you do now or different values is not one to feel guilty about. So, or shame, of course. So anyway, free yourself of anonymous. It's great. Growth is great. This is something that I really value in people, actually. Like I connect and resonate with people who don't get stuck in their ways, you know? Me too. And whenever somebody says like, I have no regrets. I understand that they meant they're meaning to be like, look, I'm wheels off and whatever. I actually think it is so weird if you have no regrets. It means that you have never reevaluated a thing in your life. I'm going to get it wrong. There's like an Avett Brothers lyric that was like something to the effect of, I want friends that love me for the man that I've become, not the man that I was. Yeah. I think that's the line. Yeah. Always moved me. Yeah. That's good. All right. More mail. Okay. I asked these questions to Jane Koston about Crooked Media Universe. Okay. So we're going to turn this on to you or us. We'll see if I want to weigh in. It's from Sarah in Portland. Which board podcaster is most likely to run for office and win, run for office and lose, most likely to appear at an event wearing sunglasses at night and showing off their biceps? That's something Abdul El-Sayed did. Board podcaster most likely to be appointed to serve in the next Democratic, yes, Democratic administration? Am I the answer to all of these? All of them? I think definitely most likely to run for office and lose, lose. Yeah, that's right. Who has bicep? Oh, you know what? Will Summer has biceps. Sneaky fit. He is. He was in a t-shirt yesterday when we were driving around town for a video that's coming out next week that you people are going to like. And I was like, Will Summer. He's got big guns. So I think if you put sunglasses on him and showing off his biceps, yeah. That's a good pick. But that could also be you wearing sunglasses at night. Showing off my biceps. I don't know about that. What do you think? Most likely to serve in the next Democratic administration, I think is Bill. I think Bill deserves to be the ambassador to something or the undersecretary of something. Yeah. To like Barbados or I don't know, somewhere. Yeah. Not in the Department of War. But give Bill Kristol his flowers and let him be a late in life ambassadorship. But wait, who do you think is the podcaster most likely to run for office and win? Is this you? Are you any of these? No, I don't think so. I don't I'm much more likely to kind of force Tyler Taylor Toulouse to run for office is a stalking horse for me than I am to actually run for myself. Run for office and win. Do we have any winners around the office? I mean, we got a lot of great folks. But, you know, I don't know that many of us have the right temperament. I don't have the right profile. Please know that my— Maybe video editor Rupert. Yeah. Rupert is a— He's a cheery guy. He is a cheery guy. He lives in Arkansas, though. It's not going to be a good match. Maybe like mayor. As much as I like that some of these sort of never-Trumpers are going and running as Democrats for office, I'm not sure that I think that's a real viable lane long term. While we mention Bill Kristol, I want to go to one of my favorite emails. This was from Jusso, which is a cool name. Jusso says this. I remember hearing Sarah say that Bill Kristol likes to bumble around the office with his shoes off and his socks. WTF is that about? Some sort of eccentric power play. Didn't the old guy in Mad Men do the same? He did. P.S. Love Bill. First of all, I love Bill with like the heat of a thousand suns, okay? But he does, and he's wonderful, but he's in the office. And now that you're in the office, you see, right? He does sort of walk around and he grabs the young guys and he's like, not working here, you know, whatever. He does that. But sometimes he does. He'll take off his shoes. He will sit and tweet. He'll take off his shoes and then he'll get up and do his walk around thing. He's like the mayor of the office and the young guys love it. But he wears Bombas socks. He doesn't do it all the time. But every now and then when he's just getting comfy cozy, he'll walk around in his Bombas and chat. Bill is working hard. Bill is the best. I love Bill. Like, if I had to rank, which maybe I should do at our next all-staff meeting, based on my perception, the people who are working the hardest here. Yeah. Like, Bill wouldn't be number one. Like, we've got some 24-year-olds that we're really kind of cracking the whip on. Yeah. But, like, he would be in the top six, I think. I mean, he gets up early in the morning and writes morning shots and teases people on the Slack. The socks thing I'm fine with. Some of the people might find that weird. I think it's great. I don't think it's an eccentric power play. I think it's adorable. I think it's just Bill being Bill. I'll tell you this. I did something the other day and I was worried about his minor notable in New Orleans, which is Toulouse and I were walking around barefoot. In our neighborhood. And then we got, like. Like, on concrete? Yeah. Okay. I don't know. Sometimes I like to be barefoot. And then she got the notion that we should go get a treat. Uh-huh. But then I was teaching her about no shoes, no shirt, no service. But she was, like, adamant that we get the treat. So, I did. We did walk into a store in our neighborhood barefoot. And I did get spotted by somebody. Like, immediately. Somebody was, like, love the podcast. Oh, not spotted by somebody who was, like, hey, put on your shoes and get out of the car. Shoes. Yeah. Yeah. Go to the store. No, I got spotted being. Got it. And I'm just kind of like, I live in New Orleans. Just everybody be themselves. Okay. What's next? Hi, Tim or whoever is screening these. Tim is screening these in this case because producer Ansley is on vacation. Your friendship with Sarah notwithstanding, is there any truth to the stereotype that gay men and lesbians don't get along? If so, what do you think the reason is? Best, Jessica. Great question. Here's the thing. Take all of the things you know about women, then take all of the things you know about men, and then there's this, like, men diagram of overlap where, like, men and women come together to share a bunch of things, not the least of which is, like, they make babies together and their nature has suited them towards each other. Gay men and gay women have none of that. We are not drawn together by biological necessity in any way, which I think takes away some of the imperative of getting along, and so culturally, we often don't share a lot of affinities. Yeah. That being said. Gay men and lesbians are also just people, and so oftentimes, you know, people decide they like each other, and it can be a solidarity piece. Yeah. That's what I was going to say. I think gay men and lesbians might be coming back together again. Yeah. I think we might be having a moment right now, and here's why. I always used to say that, and this is true, that gay men and straight women are natural allies. Right. Like, in nature, like, they are natural allies. And I think straight men and lesbians are often natural allies. Okay. Here's the problem, though. Like I said earlier about Woke One. Woke One, everything in moderation. The straight women have gotten a little too into us, the gays, and they've taken over our bars like locusts, and, you know, sometimes gay men want to be in a gay bar with other gays. Right. That's the point. Sure. You know? There's a big gay party, or it's actually a straight gay party called Red Dress Round in New Orleans. It was last weekend, and it was like, the gay bar was like half wimping. And there was a woman that, a straight woman literally came into the gay bar and looked at all of us in our red dresses, me and my friends, and, like, pointed at us and said, do a circle. You guys are looking so cute. I'm like, get out of here. Yeah. And I think that the revulsion against the straight women overstepping into our spaces is kind of giving us a new appreciation for the lesbians that would never do that to us. Yeah, we don't want to be there. Exactly. And we don't want to be in a red dress. I know. And so it's kind of like, I do feel like maybe as queer spaces are starting to dissipate, it's like, maybe we might be coming back together now. Right. In community with one another. That's a very interesting take. I will say, I never go to lesbian bars anymore, which is why lesbian bars don't survive, by the way, is because, you know, women, the second they're sort of like, oh, now we're together forever, and we're going to have kids, and we're never going out again. But I went, this is probably still a couple years ago, and I was like, there's all these straight couples in here. Like, it was like men with their, like, braided belts. Horrible. Like, with their girlfriends. And I was like, where did they all come from? And everybody's like, oh, well, this is now everybody's so accepting or whatever that. Too much allyship. Yeah. I'm like, but there's a gajillion bars on 18th Street where all the straight young people can go. Why just, I just let all the lesbians be here. Get out of here. Okay. We're just kind of veering. I'm drunk driving all over the course between fun questions and serious questions. Here's Jordan. This is what happens when producer Anzi's gone. Probably could have organized these and like serious to silly, but we're just. Oh, yeah. It's going to be a vibe shift here. Hello from Southern Oregon. What happens to ICE when Trump loses the House and Senate or in 2028? I assume abolishing ICE isn't realistic or ultimately desirable. What do you think about that? So, this goes back to our woke conversation a little bit where one of the problems, I think, sometimes with the excess is that you get to the excess part too early before people are ready, and then it diminishes the opportunity when that thing is really necessary because I actually think that when a Democrat, God willing, wins in 2028, one of the things they should do is probably dismantle ICE and reimagine our border security. I think abolish ICE in the early days led to some of the kind of backlash that was seen as an overreach, but at this point, a culture of an agency that has masked agents in the past is one of the agencies that has to be totally revamped. I would say we did our critiques with the wokes earlier. Shout out to wokes and woke one. Abolish ICE. Correct. Absolutely correct. They should abolish ICE. This is the easiest one, actually. There's so many tough challenges. It's like ICE started during the W administration. Like, this is not a necessary organization. Homeland Security is like brand new, basically, in this kind of thing. We can have Border Patrol do Border Patrol and fund Border Patrol. We can, through all of the other federal law enforcement agencies, do any necessary interior enforcement of violent criminals. And everybody else, if you're here legally, we can have INS take care of you. There's a whole agency called that. INS, they can send you a letter. Limited government, guys. Limited government. INS can send you a letter. It's like, sorry, you've overstayed your visa. You need to go home. If they're not, if in six months you haven't gone home, they can knock on your door and say, sir, you really have to go home. If they don't go, you know, then the third time we can, like, there are other, there are just humane ways to deal with this if these people aren't violent criminals. We do not need fucking ICE. All right? Abolish ICE. Yeah. So do your kids get what you do in any way? What do they think? Or do they just kind of know you're a podcaster? I always enjoy you guys caring. I think my kids know that I don't like Donald Trump. Same. And they also know that people recognize me places and they find that odd, right? That people just come up to me. That's interesting. So it doesn't care about that at all. Like, it happens, but it doesn't seem like. It even registers in her brain as unusual or something she has to reflect on in any way. Well, that's it. So my kids, like, my kids have belatedly come to realize, and I think part of it is I take my kids to the No Kings protests and not the sort of ones downtown, but kind of the ones up here where it's a lot of older people. So a lot of people say things to my kids like, do you know that your mom does? Like, it's really great. It is really sweet. And so they are at an age now where they understand, they seem to be like, they don't know what they're proud of, but they're proud that people seem to think that what we do is nice. That's cute. Yeah. Yeah. No, to those that I hate Trump and did with my dad in the car recently was like, I want him to die. Oh, no. And I was like, whoa, whoa. Okay. So, you know, maybe over over corrected on that one a little bit. But kids are going to be kids. But she doesn't, I don't think really like get it beyond that. It was really funny. She told me, you know, we're at the phase where you have a different. different thing that you want to be you grow up every week. Sure. And recently, to Tyler's chagrin, she was watching, when I was in charge, when there are less rules around the screens, some streamers who do video games, like for kids, like kids games, streamers. And she was like, I want to be a YouTuber. I want to be a streamer. And I was like, oh, you mean like me? And she was like, no, like not like that. Video games, the kids, YouTube. It's like she almost thinks there's two different YouTubes. Even like I'm on some other YouTube for boring people. And like she wants to be a YouTuber on the cool YouTube. So anyway. All right. I'm a 17-year-old who closely follows politics. That means I was born during Obama's first term and really only started following the news during Biden's term. Sometimes I feel like I lack historical context from before. Do you have any recommendations for things to read, watch, listen to? I'd love to get an understanding of the last 20 to 50 years that is deeper from when I get in school. I love the podcast and other content across the bulwark. Bring back FYPod, Luke. Luke was a 17-year-old listening to it. Luke in the minority of FYPod. Shout out, Luke. Give him some stuff. We have grownups, I think, that a decent number of people have decided that they should start caring about politics either in 2016 or 2024. So I think this is useful for even our non-Gen Z listeners. Look, if you haven't, young men, go watch Idiocracy. Because that was meant. As a joke. Like, that was a comedy with some slight, you know, cultural commentary. But I think if Mike Judge had realized he was making a documentary about 2024. But actually, the one thing I wanted to comment on is the, I want more than what I'm learning in school. I don't know what they're giving you in school. But I am begging you, actually, all people, go read the Federalist Papers. Go read the Constitution. Like, go read. Martin Luther King's I Have a Dream speech. Go read Letters from Birmingham Jail. There's a bunch of. The basics. Yeah, foundational texts that seem to have been lost to history. Those are the ones probably people read. But the Federalist Papers is a good one. I was going to do more modern politics. Okay. Our guy, John Halliman's book on the 2008 campaign. Game Change. Yeah, so good. Unbelievable. I love Game Change. Or you could just watch the movie. You go back to the 1984. If you want to really nerd out what it takes, it's probably the best political book ever written about. I think I've read that. It's unbelievable. It's really good. Richard Ben Kramer. Oh, now you're getting me going. A Face in the Crowd is a great movie that you should go watch. Sorry, keep going. No, that's okay. Our guy, Mark Leibovich's This Town. This Town is so good. It is really kind of a time capsule of the pre-Trump D.C. excesses, which I really loved. Another one that came to mind, I was going to suggest this because it's fake, but it's Bill Clinton, and it's just such a good movie. Primary Colors was so good. Primary Colors was the best. What a good movie. Man. Oh, what's his name from Landman? Billy Bob Thornton. Billy Bob Thornton. Great turn by Billy Bob Thornton as the Raging Cajun there. Primary Colors is an excellent movie. I've watched it over and over again over the years. We are very long, so we're going to skip through the Tim questions. We'll do a bonus Tim mailbag later. I will do two more, okay? Here we go. One is a music one. We've already been talking about our kids in the car. What's a family car ride like? Who controls the tunes? Do we have the same musical taste? Do the kids get to pick? Are they introducing us to artists or vice versa? What's your car ride like? I kept this one because I want to know what it's like in the Longwell family car. I will say we listen to a lot of Imagine Dragons, which is the boys. Although recently, my younger one, I got him at least into Zac Brown a little bit, and so we're on Zac Brown. The other thing I introduced him to is Newsies, and then I took them to see Oliver when we were in London. I see boys singing and dancing. My goal for them, I used to think I would want kids that were athletes, but what I really want is musical theater kids. So gays. Just, no. You want a gay. Whatever. That part doesn't matter to me. I just want them. I saw a stat the other day that was like with the gayest and straightest majors, and it was like business was like 98% straight and musical theater was 27% straight. Yeah, but I want them to, because my kid now wears the little Newsies paperboy hat. It's amazing. One of my proudest parenting moments is that we had a complete ban on kids' bops. Uh-huh. She doesn't even know that kids' bops exist. Okay. We succeeded in that front. So, you know, we're just listening to pop music, mostly, you know, and I'll put it on the show. She does like Oasis. But she's requesting lately Olivia Rodrigo's new record, and she likes Kesha's record, which has some cusses. Oh, no. She was singing. This is my second dad car story, which is so weird. She was singing. She also sang one of Olivia's songs. It has some curses in it. Yeah. And she was singing the lyrics with my dad in the car in the backseat the other day. Did Papa get mad? No. It was just, you know, he's trying to play it cool. Yeah. You know, it's a different childhood than mine. My parents were keeping a pretty tight leash on my incoming. Mine, too. Really tight leash. Whereas, you know, Zac Brown, got my toes in the water, my ass in the sand, is a favorite line. Kids like that. For the kids to say. Excuse to say ass in the sand. Final questions for you. Anonymous Kenyan alum. I had the great fortune. To argue with Sarah Longwell in quest for justice every day my freshman year at Kenyan. I thought she was deeply thoughtful. And I've always held her in high regard. I want to know what books, especially novels, have been meaningful to Sarah since we left. Gambier, or if any books we had to read at Kenyan still sticks with her. They made us read Things Fall Apart in so many classes. That's a great one. She knew how to chat. Yeah, but I still think about it. What books do you return to or find yourself thinking about? We love you. We love you all. So this, thank you, hey, hey, Quest for Justice. What was that? So that was our freshman. So, you know, I went to Kenyan thinking I was going to be an English major because I wanted to be a poet when I grew up, little known fact. And I took Quest for Justice, which was like the intro to political science class, had the most incredible professor, her name's Pam Jensen, and I became a political science major. And so, like, it changed my life. And the things that I read in Quest for Justice, there's a couple of things. One of them was the Federalist Papers. Like, it was a close. It's like one of the early things. So this was a class or like a club? It was a class. It was like a year-long entry to what political science would be. And it turned a lot of us into political science majors. This person from this class, I don't know if this person also stayed a political science major, but we did read Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart, read the Federalist Papers. Do you know what actually I remember from Quest was we read Francis Fukuyama's essay, End of History. And now I know Francis Fukuyama. Yeah, crazy. You know, like, he's like in our world of democracy people. Yeah. But that had— Much maligned essay, by the way. Read it. It still holds up. You have to read it again. It still holds up, actually. People—this is where— The headline's bad. The headline is bad. But if you read the whole thing, it actually is, like, incredibly prescient and thoughtful. It's kind of like Mitt Romney's op-ed, Let Detroit Go Bankrupt. There were some good points in that. The headline was not good. The headlines are important. Yeah. Any other readings? I'll tell you. I just read The Correspondent. If anybody has—this is just—now I'm just going to throw out fiction that I like. The Correspondent is wonderful if you haven't read it. I'm also reading Stoner right now by John Williams, which I'm loving. This is a dorky one. But if you haven't read History of the Peloponnesian War by Thucydides, that one has a— Thucydides? Yeah, go read some Thucydides. The Thucydides? It will give you some things to think about in terms of modern foreign policy. I wonder how the Thucydides trap has held up compared to The End of History. Speaking of books, How to Eat an Elephant. One voter at the— Last time. It's right there. I'm number three in the acknowledgments. You are number three in the acknowledgments. Number three, which was pretty important to me. Yes. It was outside the top five. We were bumping you from our cart like today on the podcast. Sure. I'm glad I'm in there. People should go pre-order the book. They should go pre-order the book. It's coming out soon, and we're going to be at 6th and I on September 3rd, and then we're going to be—JVL and I are going to be at New York. What is it? 92nd Street Y in New York, and there's still some room left in the balcony. Maybe I'll come. Maybe you should. All right, everybody. It's on Monday. I'll be back in New Orleans, and we'll be seeing you all then. Thanks for doing this, Sarah. You bet. Good to see you, Timmy. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. to Chico and audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.