
In this podcast, Keith Mittnik challenges the common undervaluation of slip and fall cases in grocery stores, arguing that initial reactions often wrongly assume poor chances of winning. He contends that stores are responsible even when spills are recent because they are on notice of danger before any incident occurs. Mittnik explains that stores choose non-porous, low-grip flooring that turns hazardous with even a small amount of moisture, creating an ultra-dangerous condition like ice. He notes that customers cannot protect themselves because they are trained to look up at products, and shopping carts block their view of the floor. Additionally, stores know spills are inevitable and frequent but unpredictable, yet they rely on inadequate policies, such as floor checks every 45 minutes, which are rarely enforced. Mittnik recommends suing for an unreasonably dangerous floor rather than focusing solely on notice, using the store’s own defenses against them. He suggests proving policies are ineffective through video evidence and questioning corporate reps about whether they have considered safer flooring or better monitoring. By exposing that stores prioritize profits over safety, Mittnik believes these cases can be won and that this approach can change industry practices.