The podcast explores a wave of global political upheaval, from Brazil’s rightward shift under Flavio Bolsonaro to rising far-right movements in Europe, including France and Spain. In Brazil, a narrow electoral win for Bolsonaro signals a dangerous alignment with authoritarian policies, especially concerning environmental degradation in the Amazon. Across Europe, protests in France and Spain reveal public fury over education, housing, and corruption, with far-right parties gaining ground. In Germany, the arrest of a top intelligence official for espionage signals deep institutional vulnerability and raises questions about intelligence integrity. Meanwhile, reports of a plague outbreak in Russia are met with skepticism due to government denial and lack of transparency, prompting concerns about biological weapons research and global health governance. The recurring theme is a systemic breakdown in trust—between governments, institutions, and international cooperation. This erosion of trust is amplified by populist leaders like Trump and Bolsonaro, who exploit fear and nationalism. The episode concludes that without a renewed commitment to transparency, accountability, and international collaboration, such crises will only deepen, threatening both democratic stability and global security. The underlying message is clear: global challenges require a reinvigorated, united, and trustworthy system of governance.
Pod Save the World is brought to you by HIMS.
If you're not fully satisfied with your sex life,
there's something you can do about it.
HIMS makes it simple to access personalized treatment plans
for better intimate experiences.
HIMS combines personalized treatment plans
and 100% online process.
There's no office visit, no pharmacy line,
no awkward conversations.
You just connect with a licensed provider
who can determine if treatment is right for you.
Not every guy needs the same thing.
Some want daily support, so they're ready whenever.
Some just want it when the moment strikes.
HIMS works with you to find the best option for you.
And if a provider decides it's the right fit,
your treatment plan is prescribed online
and ships discreetly to your door.
Ready to build a better sex life?
Visit HIMS.com slash world for a personalized plan
for sex, hair, weight loss, and more.
That's H-I-M-S.com slash world.
Prescription products require an online consultation
with a licensed healthcare provider
who will determine if a prescription is appropriate.
Restrictions apply.
Individual results may vary.
Based on a survey of HIMS customers,
visit HIMS.com for full details.
Welcome back to Pods Day of the World.
I'm Tommy Vitor.
I'm Ben Rhodes.
Ben, I take back everything bad I said
about Drake May and the Patriots.
And I also take back everything good I said about the Red Sox
because that was a very quick series.
We're out.
Yeah, fortune's kind of flipped there.
Yeah, the Yankees are cruising.
It feels like. Well, now they're. Well, now they're. They run into the Tampa Bay buzzsaw.
They're down 2-0.
Weird.
Yeah.
Weird.
I'll take it.
Someone has to beat the Yankees.
That's all I care about.
Yeah, that's all we're asking for.
Also, like, I guess we live in one of the two cities
that Trump wants Iran to target with some sort of attack.
We'll play that clip for you guys later.
But that was fun to wake up to.
Yeah.
Curious to have the president of your country
desire your nuclear annihilation.
I assumed it was nukes too.
It's kind of a new thing.
He didn't specify.
But I assumed it was. Los Angeles and San Diego.
Right.
We take a lot of conventional weapons.
Anyway, that's our president.
Big fans here.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Big fans.
Today, we're going to talk about
some very important recent elections.
Speaking of terrible presidents,
we're going to talk about what happened in Brazil
and the right-wing surge across South America,
what it means for us here,
what it means for the Brazilian people.
Nothing good.
No.
Doesn't mean anything good.
We're going to talk about political turmoil in Spain,
a major protest movement in France,
which also is coinciding with the budget crisis.
We'll talk about. About separatists in Quebec,
a crazy story about espionage in Germany
that we woke up to this morning.
Very severe German man is seemingly in a lot of trouble.
Yes.
We're going to dig into what we know
about reports of a plague outbreak in Russia.
That's a fun one.
Never a good thing.
What we know, what we don't know,
what to worry about,
what's just hype and fear-mongering, we think.
Finally, we're going to talk about the latest from Iran
and a strange story about Chinese President Xi Jinping's
visit to the U.S.
and potentially his health.
Ben, then you did our interview today.
What did you talk about?
Yeah, I talked to Evan Gershkovitz,
who people may remember was a Wall Street Journal reporter,
still is, but was detained by the Russians in prison
for a year and a half.
Ultimately, he was part of a spy swap
negotiated under the Biden administration.
He's got a new book out,
This Cursed Beautiful Land, which is really terrific.
We'd talk about, you know, his book,
obviously how he got picked up in kind of the sting operation,
you know, whether the Russians were just trying to grab him
as a pawn or whether they actually thought
he was conducting espionage.
What life is like in a Russian prison,
what he learned about Russians in a Russian prison.
I guess it's not fun.
No, not great.
What the attitudes are he could kind of get
about the war in prison.
So it's great.
We cover an extreme experience
that hopefully none of us will have to go through.
Yeah, God help us all.
I mean, so my understanding is it's about his time in prison
and his experience, but also about like other people
he feels like have been imprisoned by the Russian state,
right, in various different ways.
Yeah.
He kind of covers his own imprisonment
like a journalist, which is interesting.
Like how does the FSB operate?
How does the judicial system operate?
What are the experiences of these other prisoners he meets?
Some of whom are like in for politics.
You know, they spray paint and sign against the war.
Some of them are just common criminals.
So you get this kind of tableau of who is in Russian prisons
and what is that like?
It's really interesting.
Well, check that out.
Subscribe for that interview and also buy his book.
Yeah.
The dude did some really hard time
and the least we can do is purchase it.
Yeah, and it's a great, you know,
sometimes you read these memoirs
and they're kind of like, oh, you know,
we just, here's the record of what happened.
And this is like a literary memoir.
It's really well done.
Cool.
All right.
Let's start in Brazil, Ben,
because they held some elections over the weekend
and the results are not good at all.
The headlines are all about the presidential election.
And so we'll start there.
That pitted the leftist 80-year-old incumbent Lula da Silva
against the right-wing 45-year-old Senator Flavio Bolsonaro,
the son of the disgraced former president Jair Bolsonaro.
Flavio got about 47%,
which is a little more than anticipated in opinion polls.
Lula got about 45%.
We're going to play some clips
and then we'll explain the results.
Here's Trump and Rubio commenting on the election.
A little clip from one of Flavio's events
to give you a sense of what it was like on the ground.
Well, it's a big victory.
Close, but very, very big victory.
Amazing.
Excellent.
We're going to a second round.
I think everybody expected that it would.
So.
We'll see how that plays out.
I want you to know Anisha tried to cut
like a better clip from Trump.
That incisive commentary was the best he had.
Well, it's like he's describing the results from like a,
you know, house race.
Wow.
Loads.
I will say the Brazilian far right
still manages to look like a better time
than anybody else's far right.
It looks fun.
They're rocking out there.
So the way this works is
because neither candidate got 50% of the vote,
they go to a runoff on October 25th.
But Flavio is widely expected to win the runoff
because there were other right-wing candidates.
In the first round, they got about 5% of the vote.
Those votes are likely to go to him.
Lula's best hope is that enough of the 33 million or so
Brazilians who did not vote decide to re-engage
and show up in the second round
or that one of the many rumored scandals about Flavio
kind of explodes into the press.
There's already lots of reporting about his corruption,
but there's other things rumored to be out there
that are a little more titillating.
I'll put it that way.
So the key issues in the campaign were the economy,
like anger, the status quo, crime, and corruption.
But the presidential results do not capture
how bad the totality of the results were.
In the Senate, the Bolsonaro,
the Bolsonaro's party and its allies,
got nearly 47% of the seats.
Then the traditional conservatives got around 18% of the seats,
while the centrists and the left got 17% each.
In the Chamber of Deputies,
which is like our House of Representatives,
Bolsonaro's allies got 34%.
Traditional conservatives got 25%.
The centrists got 17% and the left got 23%.
So what that means is that Flavio,
if he's elected president,
will start with like 60% of the vote on most issues
and he can get up to two-thirds majority.
And that's what you need to do stuff like impeach officials,
like a Supreme Court judge who just prosecuted your dad
and threw him in prison, for example,
like Justice Alexander de Moraes.
So the right-wing candidates also won
like most of the governor's races.
So it's a terrible night for Brazil,
terrible night for democracy.
If Flavio wins,
we should expect more alignment with Trump generally,
more draconian law and order policies
like we saw in El Salvador with mega prisons
and people arrested without,
the trial.
And then potentially most catastrophic
is what Flavio Bolsonaro could do to the Amazon
and the impact on climate change.
I think with him as president
and with a right-wing parliament,
there's going to be no check on permitting
for oil and gas or minerals
or whatever other like logging industries.
And some experts already think the Amazon
is at a tipping point
where it could turn into a dry Savannah,
which would be bad.
That'd be bad.
So Ben, with that really depressing setup,
thoughts on the results so far?
Yeah, it's not great.
And it's a very steep mountain to climb
for Lula to even have a chance here in the runoff
for the reasons you said,
like most of the smaller parties
were right-wing to begin with.
There is something eerie,
like everything is apples to oranges,
but still like it does feel a bit like Brazil's
just like living our lives two years behind us.
I know.
Because like 2016, Trump's elected.
2018, Bolsonaro, this kind of Trump-like figure
is elected on very similar message.
2020, he's elected.
2020, the older well-known commodity,
Joe Biden's elected.
2022, Lula comes back and he's elected.
And then we have 2024 election.
And now there's an 80-year-old incumbent
running for reelection in Brazil
who's seen as like representing things
people are pissed off about,
shitty economy, high cost of living.
There's a lot of common threads.
And we had January 6th
and they had their own version of it.
They had their own version of that.
So like we are in a strange like relationship with Brazil.
I love Lula.
I think he's done extraordinary things in his life.
He's also 80 years old.
He's too old.
And definitely is representative of
some version of the status quo that people don't like.
Whether they don't like just the state of the economy in Brazil,
whether they associate Lula with some corruption scandal or another,
or whether they just think this guy's 80
and like things aren't great and let's try something different.
I mean, there's any number of factors.
And also like, you know,
there's an innate conservatism to part of Brazil.
There's a growing, you know, evangelical population.
There's some things that are happening
society that are moving it to the right as well. But I think we have to reckon with the fact that
this same disease of kind of right-wing nationalist politics has infected all parts of the world.
We're not the only ones going through it. Latin America is going through it in a big wave right
now. You had a bunch of left governments that were in charge. People don't like incumbents.
And now we've just seen a huge wave of right-wing governments. Some of that, again,
is anti-incumbency. But some of that is like these concerns about crime in Latin America
are kind of akin to the concerns that we had about immigration here in this country,
a sense of disorder, a sense that the institutions don't work anymore. They're not responsive.
Maybe this strong man will at least punish some people I don't like and bring some law and order.
Flavio is a little less like maga-pilled than some of the rest of the Bolsonaro family. By the way,
we should note, Tommy, so many Bolsonaros got elected, I can't even keep track of it.
We all celebrated Brazil for prosecuting Bolsonaro and for doing what Merrick
Garland couldn't do. I still think that was the right thing because that guy deserves to be where
he is. But it didn't stop a lot of Bolsonaros. Didn't solve all the problems. Yeah, just to give
you the full count, Ben. So Jair Bolsonaro's wife, Michelle, and his son, Carlos, both won Senate
seats. And then Jair's brother and his other son won seats in the Chamber of Deputies. So it is a
Bolsonaro family affair. Yeah, it is. The Don Roderick doctrine is well alive and kicking
in Latin America. I mean, what does that mean for Trump? I mean,
what's strange about it is it means this kind of neo, not even really neo, this imperial view of
Latin America will somehow be validated by an increasing number of far-right leaders down
there. You've got Mille in Argentina. You've got potentially a Bolsonaro back in Brazil. You've got
Bukele in El Salvador. Keep on going to Colombia now. Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador,
Paraguay, Peru, Venezuela, obviously. The Latin American left is going to have to regroup. And it's
going to need a different kind of message. And it's going to need a message that, as in this
country, cannot just be about protecting social progress, protecting social safety net, how bad
the far right is. They're clearly going to need, as Democrats in this country need, an alternative
vision to reach people where they are. Yeah. Yeah. And obviously, Brazil is the 10th biggest
economy in the world by some measures. It's the biggest kind of, it's the political heavyweight
in South America. But to your point, I think in December of 2023, you had three right-wing
seven left-wing to kind of other. Flavio will make it eight right-wing governments,
three left, one other. So it's quite bad. Thanks, by the way, shout out to Nick Zimmerman,
who's at the Wilson Center and used to work with us in the Obama administration for talking to me
through a lot of it this morning. I mean, I think to your point about Lula, like we, I think he is
a lion of Brazilian politics. He's an icon. He's a legend. The Brazilian left needs a total reboot.
Yeah. You know what I mean? And it has for a while. It's been too dependent on Lula for a long time.
It's been decades of Lula or Bolsonaro. Yeah. You know, back and forth and back and forth.
And Dilma Rousseff was Lula's chief of staff. Right, his chief of staff. And I think he seemed
out of touch. He seemed like he can't shake these corruption allegations no matter what happens.
I think there was some concern, Ben, understandably around the Brazilian insurrection about whether
Brazil would return to a military dictatorship. But if you look at the political kind of status
quo now for Flavio, if he wins, it's like, why bother? He's got the presidency, the parliament,
he can reshape the Supreme Court. Yeah.
Like, it's kind of got a bird in hand. I think there's also been kind of chatter online about,
was this U.S. interference? Did the U.S., you know, the CIA do something? It's like,
I don't know that they needed to because Trump slapped, you know, the biggest tariffs on anyone
in the world besides the Chinese on Brazil for absolutely no reason, despite, I think,
us having a trade surplus with the Brazilians. So the coordination has been happening in plain sight.
Yeah. Yeah. And look, some of the tech people like Elon Musk have, you know, backed Bolsonaro.
But clearly, you know, as in this country in 2024, like, clearly the election is telling
us something about people's openness to this kind of politics. They know who the Bolsonaros are.
Just like we lived through one term of Trump and then we elected him again, like,
they know what that's like. I think the two other things that highlight are like,
so what's in it for Trump? Like, what does he really want down there beyond someone who, like,
welcomes his weird Venezuela, you know, colony? I honestly think it's just going to be corruption.
Right.
Because there's a. And minerals. There's like a lot of critical minerals and a lot of these things that Trump
and his associates are constantly circling. Like, I just kind of look for business deals
between the Bolsonaros and the Trumps. Like, it's not something that's going to, like,
benefit Americans if we're aligned with, like, the potential far-right leader of Brazil.
I do think that as much as we might say, well, this is a cycle of politics and,
you know, we're just going to weather this. Your point about the Amazon is probably the
most important, which is, like, this could be an irreversible verdict for the Amazon. Like,
if these guys continue to open things up to permitting, logging, you know, this could have
a devastating impact on the rest of the world. And so that's something that I think, you know,
the last time around when Bolsonaro was president, like, the Europeans were, like,
considering different kinds of sanctions just to protect the Amazon. I don't think that's in the
cards. But that's something that we should pay careful attention to. And then the last thing
that's kind of crazy to think about, Tommy, is that, you know, we could do everything right in
this country and win the midterms and elect a Democrat.
That Democrat may be dealing with, like, a completely far-right alliance in Latin America.
And in Europe, they could be dealing with, like, a French far-right government.
So it just reminds you that this is not all about Trump, what's happening in global politics. Like,
Trump, you know, that's just one piece of a much bigger puzzle of the far-right having
a lot of resilience. Yeah. I mean, there's, like, 90% chance that Don Jr. starts,
like, a drone company based in the Amazon that also does, like, logging or something with someone
named Flavio. Yeah.
Speaking of Europe, let's turn to Europe. So there's political turmoil and protests that
we want to talk about. Let's start in Spain. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez announced
a snap election on November 29th. The decision was driven by anger about the cost of housing.
So there was this crazy story, this 87-year-old disabled woman named Mari Carmen. She was
forcibly removed from her apartment in Madrid. She had lived there for 71 years. But then in 2018,
a developer bought the building. They checked up her rent. They made her some, like, completely
affordable offer for her to buy the place. She couldn't do it because she's a pensioner.
Then they forcibly evicted her, which led to this dramatic scene with protesters and cops and people
getting tear gassed. And it was just, like, a huge thing. And so Sanchez's party has tried to pass
legislation to address the problem. It failed last week. So we called the snap election to try to use
anger around the issue to get the legislative majority. Victory in that race is far from
guaranteed. Spanish voters are upset about immigration. Back in July, we talked about
the situation in Ceuta.
Tens of thousands of migrants passed into this city of Ceuta.
All of them were, basically, all of them were expelled soon after.
The city is in northern Africa, not continental Europe. But those scenes kind of exacerbated
tensions around immigration in Spain. Sanchez is also dealing with corruption allegations that have
not been made about him personally, but it's touched on a former top official in his party,
the former prime minister, his wife, his brother. So it's all around.
And then in France, students are now protesting in more than 40 cities.
Those protests started late last month near Paris over a lack of school funding.
This is a clip from TikTok of a French student named Rx explaining why students
have been hit in the streets. Let's watch.
The learning conditions right now in France are getting worse day by day. We're 35
in most classes. We lack teachers enough for people to fail their exams.
My school has water dripping on the power outlets.
The walls are so damaged. It cannot be heating up during the winter.
Basically, the French students are right now protesting against a government that doesn't give a single fuck about them.
The media are calling us lazy. They're saying we're protesting because we don't want good classes.
Well, what we're asking for is actual good education and for us to not fail all classes because of the way the government works.
The problem is that we're walking that much without any teacher to actually teach us.
And the fact that our environment where we're learning in is actually dangerous.
So these protests started with just kids like that, and then they've grown to include labor unions, activists, teachers, many more.
I think the Interior Ministry estimated that on Tuesday, the day we're recording this, there were like 256,000 people on the streets.
Some of the protests got violent.
Twenty four schools were burned or damaged.
Six thousand arrests.
A 15 year old kid got his hand blown off when he picked up some sort of like police grenade and it exploded.
And this is happening in the midst of this bruising budget fight.
France's debt is now at three point five trillion euros, which is one hundred twenty percent of GDP.
It's well above the eurozone average that interest rates have spiked.
The current government proposed this package of tax increases and spending cuts, including changes to pensions and civil service salaries that will be very, very unpopular, which could lead to more protests, the government getting toppled.
So like the Macron government is squeezed between a pissed off French public.
And then bond markets that are worried about France's debt.
And this is all happening in the midst of an economic slowdown, higher borrowing costs.
And, you know, there's a presidential election next year, which is likely to see the far left against the French far right.
So pretty scary stuff, man.
I mean, it feels like there is a non-zero risk that the Spanish election leads to the Vox far right party gaining a lot of ground.
And then in France, as we've talked about many times, like twenty twenty seven, we could see Marine Le Pen as president of France, which is not fun.
Yeah.
the Spanish thing, I just, I love Pedro Sanchez. He's been the vanguard of progressive politics
globally. Some of this is he's just been in power for 10 years, you know? And so, I mean,
even like you mentioned the corruption scandal, like when your party's been in power for 10 years,
like somebody did something stupid, probably, you know, hopefully he can weather it, but it's
going to be a tough one. I think that to offer a theory of everything that addresses the French
piece too, America is symbiotic with these other places. Like to take what I said about Brazil and
turn it inside out. Yes, what's happening to us is happening in the world, but also what happens
in America matters to the rest of the world. And one of the things that is not coming from America
yet, and it could, is some kind of model for progressive politics. Like the example I'd give
is like Obama, after he was elected, you know, you had some kind of copycat in a good way, like
Renzi in Italy and Trudeau.
And in Canada, like people taking the kind of Obama model of a campaign and having it work in
their countries. Then Trump comes along and, you know, Bolsonaro is impossible without Trump. It's
like, oh, I'll do that act, you know, I'll use social media and I'll bludgeon my opponents. And
I think part of what you're seeing on the kind of, you know, and I should say Biden comes along and
then you get Lula, who's kind of like, and you get Keir Starmer, like this kind of cautious
brand of more returning to something. I think that there's, if you look at where
the energy is going on the right, it is able to flow to these personalities, right? It's able to
flow to the Bolsonaro family in Brazil. It's able to flow to Marine Le Pen in France. And then you
look at this left-wing energy, like among these students, and there's just doesn't seem like
there's anywhere for that to go. There's not like a French political party or politician
that is kind of capturing this sense that, hey, wait a second, the basic bargain of society is
breaking down. Because, you know, if you look at what the French students are going through,
yeah, like they're. Their shit keeps getting cut. Sounds like here, like schools, we can never find the money for
that. Oh, what is, and we should take this seriously. What does Macron spend a lot of
time talking about? Like Ukraine and defense spending and foreign policy. And he's constantly
flying off. If I was a French student, I'd be like, you know, and this is not to say that the
Ukrainians don't merit our support, but I'd be like, what the fuck, man? Like I, you know, you
can't even heat the school in the winter. There are no teachers. Like you're making cuts to my
education.
There needs to be like a political argument on the left globally about taking that seriously
again. Not just about like defending against the far right or defending against the Russians,
but fixing the fucking schools, you know, which Macron has never seemed to care about. You know,
like he cares about macroeconomics. He cares about geopolitics. Like he's calibrating some
centrist position. There's just this kind of giant vacuum that, and hopefully the Democrats can begin
to offer some kind of. Or some blueprints for how other people can fill it. Because if not, the far right will capture all
the populist energy and the left will just kind of be unmoored and angry.
And weirdly in France, you have a situation where like Marine Le Pen is seemingly more
responsible than Jean-Luc Mélenchon from the far left. Like she's proposing 140 million in euros
in budget cuts over five years, like national debt limit at 60% of GDP. But also she's saying,
we're going to lower the retirement age for some and cut the VAT tax.
So she's talking out of both sides of her mouth. But Mélenchon is like, we could take the French
bonds and throw them into the fire. So it's like the bond markets are spiraling, right? The spread
between the yield on the French and German debt is getting higher and higher. It's close to like
financial crisis levels. And then, you know, people are talking about like an ECB bailout.
It's like, it just feels like a very dangerous setup and an election that is going to yield
some sort of extremist outcome in some way.
And it feels like a recipe for the far right, because it's like the fiscal situation is
unsustainable. There's societal divisions. The one thing I would say, Tommy, just to take a
passing shot at our far right, is I see all these people from Trump on down, like Trump himself,
like posting that what's happening in France is a sign of like the radical Islamic takeover of
France. So stupid.
If you didn't have YouTube, like the French kid we saw is not like trying to impose Sharia law.
He just wants his school to. To be funded.
Yeah, it's, yeah, I hate when the Trump people try to like give themselves credit for some movement
or like blame everything. It's like, just shut the fuck up. One other weird thing we want to talk
about in terms of kind of political ruptures, Ben, is there was the Canadian province of Quebec
held an election earlier, I think last week, earlier this week, where the separatist Quebecois
party for the first time in 12 years won. They got 59 out of 127 seats. It's not a majority,
but it's a big victory.
And they promised to wait until Trump leaves office to call for a referendum on independence.
But in the past, like the kind of independence referendum question, I think was much less of
a focus in the election. And in this round, there was an overt promise to hold a referendum on
independence for Quebec. It's not popular. Like there have been, there have been past,
I think it's like 30% of the population supports it. And they only have a minority in the legislature.
They need to get other parties on board to actually get a vote. But it's just another
example of where the like center-right coalition that won the last two elections got literally
wiped out and decimated. And you're seeing these more sort of extreme parties get support.
Yeah. And it's a vulnerability for Canada. I mean, we talked about how
in these trade negotiations, like, you know, Carney's stood up for French language and
Netflix algorithms and things like that. But this is why, right? And at the same time, if you're
Trump, this is not helpful for Canadian unity, because you're just like, what can I do to create
more fissures between Quebec and the rest of Canada? Like, if they were smart about it, and
maybe not Trump, but maybe somebody over there is smart about it, they will just do whatever they
can to poke the bear of like Quebec separatist intentions. Like they've been doing in Alberta,
which has basically a referendum on whether to hold a referendum on October 19th.
Thank you so much for joining us.
Thank you.
The results for that shoe itself was the Quince alternative version, exact same shoe,
looked identical, but it was literally one sixth the price. So I bought the Quince version of the
shoe. I wear them all the time. They're these super comfortable, like white Italian sneaker
things, but they were literally one sixth the price of this main brand. So that is why I love
Quince. You get super high quality stuff. It's way, way, way cheaper. It showed up right away.
Just cannot recommend it enough. That's the experience with Quince,
clothes. I know that the bedding experience will be the exact same. You're going to get quality
stuff. You're going to get a better price. There are amazing options. Check it out. Make your bed
your favorite place to be this season with Quince. Download the Quince app for app exclusive offers,
or go to quince.com. Get free shipping on your order and 365 day returns now available in Canada
and the UK too. And when Quince asks where you heard about them, please let them know it was
Pod Save the World. It's the best way to support the show. Pod Save the World is brought to you by
Helix.
How long have you had your current mattress? Can you even remember? Maybe it's time for an upgrade
with Helix. Helix mattresses are the best. They are super comfortable. They are great places to
read. You can watch movies. Obviously you sleep there as well. And the great thing about the
Helix mattress is you take the little quiz. It figures out exactly the one you need. They build
your custom mattress based on your sleep needs. Again, it's just like literally a two minute
Helix sleep quiz that determines your best fit. And then they deliver the mattress right to your
house with free shipping in the US. A long time ago, that would be seen as a miracle. The fact you
can deliver a mattress to somebody's house with free shipping, but that's what Helix does. And you
can rest easy with seamless returns and exchanges and a 365 night sleep trial. Part of their happy
with Helix guarantee. Helix is the most awarded mattress brand for a reason tested and reviewed
by experts like Forbes and Wired. Helix mattresses are great. You, they're super comfortable. You
will not regret it. And also if you upgrade your mattress, you're probably just going to sleep a
little better. You're going to sleep better. You're going to be a little more comfortable. You spend a lot of time in your
bed for God's sake, treat yourself, get a new mattress, go to helixsleep.com slash world for
27% off site wide. This offer is exclusive to pod save the world listeners. That's helixsleep.com
slash world for 27% off site wide. The weird story out of Germany that I mentioned. So this
morning we woke up to reports that someone named August Hanning, who is the former head of the BND
BND is Germany's Federal Intelligence Service.
He was arrested Tuesday for, quote,
treasonous espionage and attempting to pass along state secrets to foreign governments.
So the BND collects foreign intelligence like the CIA from human sources, but also they run
Germany's signals intelligence like the NSA. So they have a lot of authorities. They don't have
all the covert action shit that our guys do, but a lot of authorities. So Hanning led the BND from
1998 to 2005. He also served as the top civil servant in Germany's interior ministry from 2005
to 2009. German law enforcement also arrested his former chief of staff, who I guess was in
government and was basically paid to give Hanning documents since 2010. It's been going on for an
awfully long time. They estimate that 2000 documents were taken in total. Hanning reportedly
provided information to at least two separate foreign intelligence services. The Financial
Times said Russia was not currently part of the investigation. The word currently is doing a lot
of work there though. Yeah. Apparently some of the documents,
were found in Hanning's office in 2025 in a search that was part of a different investigation,
but that led to his arrest. The previous search was about an attempt by a German steakhouse heiress
to kidnap her children from their dad when they were living in Denmark at the time. Crazy story.
Bunch of dudes ambushed the dad, beat him up, threw like the 13 and 10 year old kids into a car,
took them back to Germany, and then ultimately like it got unraveled. But anyway, like we don't
know who Hanning was selling secrets to. I think there's been speculation that it was Israel. He
has a relationship with the Israelis, but this is a disaster for the German government and for any
other intel services that have like a liaison partnership with them.
We'd shine a lot of light on the story if we knew who it was. I saw speculation from Israel,
I saw speculation from Azerbaijan. Interesting.
Which is also close to Israel. And you know, so look, bottom line is,
it's never good if the chief of a major Western intelligence service is literally excelling
secrets to foreign governments. Like that's not good. And it does suggest, you know,
like a degree of kind of corruption inside of, like when you see something like this,
you wonder, is there more to this? Are there other people doing this? Is this something
that has become kind of wink-wink, something that happens? We don't know.
Also, what is your counterintel if this is happening for 16 years?
Well, that's what I mean. It's like, how does someone not see this if like this stuff is just
walking out the door? And the US shares intelligence with them. I mean, this is
like a John le Carré novel of like moles and, uh, and actually like, it'd be interesting if,
because if it's not Russia, it could be some backdoor, by the way, to Russia. It could be
to Russia via some other intelligence service. But let's say it is Israel or Azerbaijan. Like,
what are we doing here? Like, like major world power, like putting yourself up for sale to some
smaller country because you just need the money that bad? I mean, it doesn't feel that ideological
to me. You know, it feels like it's for money. Yeah.
And it, it does kind of play into the, the, the feeling that there's something
vaguely corrupt about all of this infrastructure that's been built up over so long.
And I think Friedrich Merz is trying to get the BND more authorities to do like
offensive cyber operations more in line with the US kind of version. I bet this kind of pumps the
brakes on that a bit. And then in 2023, there was another top BND official who was arrested
for selling secrets to the Russians as the war in Ukraine is, is ongoing.
Yeah. Yeah. There's something rotten in the house over there. You know, no, like, you know, they're
not the first. It won't be the last we've had our own share of like moles, but this guy was at the
top of the thing. Yeah. Well, you know, the, the BND is, um, you know, not the most, uh, celebrated
history. I do believe it was set up by an ex Nazi. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It was with us. We gave him a
pass to be in the, on the team. Yeah. Good shit. Everybody. Uh, all right, Ben, because all of the
existential dread about artificial intelligence, wasn't keeping you up at night enough. Uh, let's
talk about reports of pneumonic plague in Russia. I'm sure our, most listeners have seen this by now.
It's like articles or social media posts about potential pneumonic plague outbreaks in Russia,
potential coverup, trying to figure out what to make of them. Here's what we think we know,
uh, a 28 year old female lab worker at the Irkutsk anti-plague Institute of Siberia in
the far east. She died last week. The Institute was created in 1930s as an anti-plague research
facility and later expanded to researching other diseases like cholera, anthrax, et cetera.
The inpatient facility where this worker was treated is under quarantine and 200
people who came in contact with her are under medical observation. The Russian government,
uh, of course is denying it all. They said, quote, no microorganisms linked to her professional
activity were identified in the patient samples and quote, no health changes related to infectious
pathology had been identified among her contacts. There's a lot of reasons not to believe that
official story for us. Just Putin's, you know, government lies about everything. There's also
the history of the Soviets lying about health disasters, Chernobyl. There was an anthrax leak.
There was a smallpox outbreak. It's a long list. Um, second, the local government officials keep
saying the opposite of what like Peskov is saying in Moscow. Yeah. The Irkutsk regional governor
said he had a meeting with Russia's top official in charge of disease control about some sort of
dangerous infectant in a resident, uh, and that the person's contacts were put under quarantine.
There was a local mayor who said that a hospital was closed for quarantine. The governor of a,
the governor of a neighboring region put out a statement referring to, uh, a quote woman who died,
who died of plague in the Irkutsk region. So, uh, a lot of those statements get amended or taken down,
but you know, notable, um, Ren TV, a Russian media network reported the lab worker had research plague.
A local news outlet has reported on the closures of this clinic and the hospital and that the young
lab assistant broke a test file and then died. Right. So there's a lot of smoke here. Um, Trump
and Rubio, uh, secretary of state, Marco Rubio were asked about these reports. Here's what they
had to say. Well, looking at it very strongly, we just heard about it and pneumonia,
you know, uh, years ago, you could treat pneumonia easier. The, the microbes and the germs have
gotten stronger disproportionately, but we'll help them. We know what we know, obviously about
whatever the Russians have provided. Um, there's very limited travel between the us and Russia,
obviously. Uh, but like anything else, something like that gets out, it could quickly spread. So
we're watching and monitoring it closely. I don't think it's cause for alarm, but it is cost for
focus and a cause to just keep an eye on it. And we're doing that cause for focus. Uh, okay. So,
so interesting, Ben, that, uh, the crew that was once very hot and bothered a potential lab leak
from China is a little less hyperbolic about this one, but what, what do you make of what you've read
and, and kind of the reaction from the Trump administration so far?
We talk a lot about things that are, you know, concerning on this show. Like plague is not
something that I thought I was gonna have to worry about. Um, but here we are. I mean,
cause what I take from it, look, first of all, uh,
you don't trust anything that the Russian authorities say, and that's always worrisome,
you know, like in any kind of, as we learned in COVID, like transparency is your only friend when
you're dealing with these types of things. And if you have these discrepancies between local
authorities and the Kremlin, like it just makes you wonder like what on earth you can trust. Uh,
and that's concerning. Also, I, it makes you wonder what kind of biological weapons programs
and research Russia continues to do. Correct. Because it's kind of not the most normal thing
in the world for people to go to work and study plague. You know, like it's, it's, you tend to
be studying plague if you're like, you know, I don't know, developing plague, uh, as some kind
of crazy biological weapons hedge. So I, I, the, the need to kind of revitalize the anti-biological
weapons, cause AI is part of that too, right? We don't want the AI to be developing biological
pathogens to make it easier for bad actors to develop biological weapons. So, so, so, so, so,
so that, that's a piece of this too. And again, I, I think this is just highlighting once again,
that when you have a breakdown in any kind of geopolitical trust or cooperation or organizations
like the World Health Organization are discredited, you just kind of feel like stuff like this
happens and you just hope it doesn't get worse because you don't feel like the people in charge,
Donald Trump and Marco Rubio, the World Health Organization, the Russian authorities,
whoever it is, are all going to like share information and figure out a way to make sure
that this thing is like kept in a box. Like it feels like we're just, you know, not like everybody
else. I'm like researching how, you know, contagious plague is. Thankfully it doesn't
seem to be as contagious as airborne flus, uh, uh, and COVID viruses are, but, uh, you know,
that, that's, you know, cold comfort here. So I, I, and Rubio and Trump, like they just,
it is like just so notable the extent to which they, they just don't want to call out Russian
behavior, you know? Not anything ever. Trump's a goddamn idiot. He's like, we're, we're, we're
strongly. Why can't you just say like, like, yeah, like, like if this had happened, honestly,
this had happened in a Western European country. It was in Germany. He would be slamming Mertz and,
you know, boosting the AFD or something. Yes, exactly. Yeah. So like I, I scrolled past this
like you did and I'm like, God damn it. You know, like, do I have to worry about this?
Is this clickbait? Like, what is it? So I reached out to an expert named, um,
Haley Ann Severance for like a gut check. She's currently the deputy vice president
for the nuclear threat initiatives, global biological policy and programs team
previously worked at the Pentagon doing a bunch of counter WMD and biological weapons stuff. So
scary shit, long titles. Um, here's some reasons not to worry, right? And then I'll tell you some
things to worry about or what experts are worried about. I'm ready for this. So not to worry. Uh,
if it's standard pneumonic plague, we have antibiotic to treat it. Uh, and you can cure
it pretty easily, but you got to cat it, catch it in like 24 hours. I know. Um, Russia actually has
seen, we didn't develop the vaccine. Cause I think that we didn't think it worked very well. Um, but
there's lots of like public health tools to deal with something like this. It's not like a novel
virus. Um, transmitting plague requires long, a prolonged face-to-face contact for it to spread.
measles, or COVID that was kind of like airborne and fast. Also, this is morbid, but the mortality
rate is really high. And it happens pretty quickly after symptoms start. So there's not like a long
incubation period where you're traveling around giving it a bunch of people to spread the thing,
like you're just fucked if you get it, basically. So that's part of the good news.
That's the good news section, unfortunately. Here's the bad news section, things experts
are watching and kind of thinking about. An outbreak like this in Russia raises more
questions because as you said, they had and have a biological weapons program. If this was in
whatever, name a country that doesn't have one, you'd be like, oh, someone ate a marmot or
something. Some natural transition. In Russia, it's reasonable to ask, did this come from a
biological weapons program research facility? And if yes, was the bacteria enhanced or altered in
any way? We have no evidence that it was, but that's the kind of thing you'd be very worried
about. Yeah.
Where this incident occurred has been linked to Russia's broader biological weapons program in
the past. It's probably like defensive research. Like you make the new pathogen over here and then
at this place, you research ways to defend against it. But none of that is good. And then, as you
said, there's just like the general lack of transparency for the Russian government. Like
if Peskov, the spokesman, says the sky is blue, the sky is red that day. And then also, it's not
great that we don't trust our own government. We don't trust our own government. We don't trust the Trump administration. And then, as you mentioned,
they've been pulling out of these international organizations like the WHO and organizations that
deal with global biological threats and weakening them, or at least flirting with pulling out of
them. So, I don't know, man. I think we're probably going to be okay here, but who knows?
Yeah. It just speaks to the need that there's something not sustainable
about a global political system where you can't trust anybody about something as basic as like
plague, you know? And like you don't trust your own authorities, you don't trust their authorities,
nobody trusts the WHO anymore. Like we are going to, at a certain point, have to put aside
all of our neuroses and kind of rebuild these systems so that they can work again. Because
otherwise, every time these things pop up, like, yeah, you're just sitting there and like you're
you're just sorting.
You're like parsing information on the internet and you're like parsing Dmitri Peskov's statements.
I mean, like this is why we built an international system, so that there would be like trusted
sources of information when things like this happen. And I think part of what is so
disorientating about the last few years is to suddenly realize we don't live in that kind
of system anymore. Yeah. And just like, it would be great if we just had trusted experts
telling us, not Bobby Kennedy Jr. Like I was gonna say, I was just about to say like,
our trusted experts at HHS, like Bobby Kennedy. What happens if like we have some leak and Bobby
Kennedy is the voice of that? Yeah. And he's like, you know, Kid Rock's gym benching shirtless in
jeans. Like, you know, he's scalping a bear or something. Yeah. He probably got, he probably
killed the marmot and ate it and got the goddamn plague in the first place. Speaking of places you
could get the plague, Ben, Crooked Con is happening in Washington, D.C. from November 5th to 7th. I'm
kidding. No one's gonna get any diseases. You're just gonna get some hopium. We are very excited
that we're recording a live show. We're recording a live show. We're
recording a live episode of Pod Save the World on Saturday, November 7th at Crooked Con. Come see
me and Ben. We're gonna have a great time. We're gonna talk about oversight and corruption and
what we want Democrats to do when we get power, knock on wood, hopefully. So get your tickets
to Crooked Con. Get them now. Come see us there. Go to crookedcon.com to check out the lineup
and get your tickets.
Pod Save the World is brought to you by Sundaze.
In some ways, our pets are just like us. They need a healthy diet and regular exercise
to feel their best. Feeding your dog genuinely well is one of the best investments you can make
in their health and their happiness. That's why Sundaze for Dogs is different from other pet food
brands. It's human-grade real food. Made with 80% plus all-natural meat and nutrient-rich
ingredients like kale, ginger, and blueberries, Sundaze is air-dried and contains zero fillers,
synthetic additives, or chemicals. No fridge, no freezer, no prep, no mess. Just scoop and serve.
You'll get the quality of a home-grown dog.
With the ease of kibble. Over 100,000 dogs are now eating Sundaze, and many dog parents notice
the same things. Shinier coats, better digestion, more energy, and finally getting excited at
mealtime, even for the pickiest eaters. I can confirm that dogs love Sundaze. Whenever we bust
it out here at the office, my dog Luca sprints for the Sundaze. Leo loves Sundaze. Pundit loves
Sundaze. Every dog loves Sundaze because it's made with real ingredients. They just love the taste,
and they will be happy and healthy, and give it a shot.
Sundaze. Go right now to sundaze4dogs.com slash world and get 50% off your first order,
or you can use the code WORLD at checkout. That's 50% off your first order at sundaze4dogs.com
slash world, sundaze4dogs.com slash world, or use the code WORLD at checkout.
This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. If you've ever thought about trying therapy with
our long-term partner BetterHelp, there's never been a better time to follow through.
Insurance options may now be available nationwide with an average copay for eligible members of just
$23.
October 10th is World Mental Health Day, which is a great time to be reminded about the importance
of your emotional and psychological well-being. But mental health issues don't operate on a neat
schedule, so prioritizing your peace of mind is something you can do all year round. Therapy isn't
just for the big life choices or major crises. It can be a place to talk through smaller things.
The work situation taking up too much mental real estate, a relationship dynamic you can't quite
name, or simply the persistent sense that something feels off. It's a scary world out there. There's a
lot going on.
There's terrible political news. There's all this AI stuff. There's day-to-day, you know, just family
stuff. Work tensions. There's a lot of reasons to see a therapist. There's a lot of reasons you'd
benefit from seeing a therapist. And if you've been waiting to start therapy, BetterHelp works
with more than 125 health plan networks, and eligible members have an average copay of just
$23 per session with insurance. If you don't have insurance or don't live in the United States,
you can still get 10% off your first month. Visit betterhelp.com slash crooked world to
explore your payment options. That's betterhelp.com slash crooked world.
All right, a couple of Iran updates. So listeners probably remember the story from
last month where a bunch of dudes were arrested near an airbase in the UK that the US uses to
fly B-1 bomber missions, including missions that hit targets in Iran. Over the weekend,
the US just immediately, just like very quickly and suddenly,
pulled all of its B-1 bombers from this base. The New York Times reported that the planes were
moved so suddenly that some, quote, left while aerial refueling aircraft were still being
scrambled to support their flights back to the United States. So it sounds like it was a pretty
sudden decision. The Wall Street Journal reported that the decision was made over fears of a possible
drone attack on the base ordered by the IRGC, which would target the aircraft and the pilots
and obviously attempt to kill them. Again, here's what our president had to say
about this decision to make you guys feel good. Let's watch.
Out of a base when like a Democrat was president, like the right-wing media would be like,
it's weakness. I mean, remember that Chinese balloon flew over
like during Biden's administration. It was like a two-week standoff.
Like people lost their fucking mind for a week. It is kind of nice that he'd be like,
yeah, we moved. There's an abundance of caution, whatever. However, lest you think that the B-1
bombers moving from this airbase back to the US means the war is winding down. Last week,
the Journal reported that 10,000 more US service members are going to the Middle East and a third
aircraft carrier strike group. Maybe that means they will.
Rotate one of the aircraft carriers that are already there home. Probably they will. But I
think we should take very seriously these reports that Trump is planning to ramp the war back up
after the midterms. Speaking of that war in Yemen, the Yemeni government announced a military
operation to recapture areas taken by the Houthi rebels. That's going to be done in concert with
the Saudis, but also according to the New York Times, about 200 US military and intelligence
analysts are embedded with the Saudis working with them. So we are very much a part of this
mission too. But finally, Ben, Trump seems
to have settled on a closing argument about the war just in time for the midterms. This is from
a campaign rally on Monday night. It's a small price to pay for keeping the world safe, keeping
our country safe. They can take out a city. Let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San
Diego. This is a very small price to pay, and it's going to be over very soon. It's essentially
almost over with. So was that a threat, a recommendation?
It landed like a laugh line in the room.
Yeah. It almost feels like his heart's not fully in the bit, though, you know? Because he keeps
trying to find some formulation that can land with the audience at these rallies. Every week,
there's some new, different way to either declare the war over or threaten to annihilate Iran. And
he's just kind of not landing the applause lines. Right. The war is so unpopular that his new
is well, maybe we could kill a bunch of liberals.
We support it now.
- Yeah, yeah, I mean, it's like--
- That's good, that's cool.
That's right, he's just groping around for something that can, like, fire up a crowd.
For Natalie? Oh, yeah.
It's like that's what his—all he's thinking about is, like, he's, like, road-testing material,
like a stand-up comic who's, like, trying out different things in clubs.
When, in fact, like, what he actually has to do is solve, like, the fucking war that he started,
which he can't solve because he doesn't have answers.
Also, I know we're a bunch of libs here in L.A., but San Diego is, like, a big military town.
Yeah, no, but, I mean, that's, like—
Like, okay.
Like, they no longer cheer for the annihilation of Iran because they've heard him say it so many times.
So now he's threatening to kill us, you know, because maybe they'll cheer for that, you know.
Like, it just shows you how he's just, like, unmoored.
Like, he has no place to land on Iran anymore, you know.
Yeah, it's so unpopular.
It's so unpopular that, like, it might be more popular for him to argue for the annihilation of Southern California
than for, like, you know, maintaining his war in Iran, you know what I mean?
Yeah.
That's depressing.
Anything about these other stories, the Air Force base, the carrier movements, the Uthis jump out at you?
Yeah, I want to say something about the bombers because I think I have a theory about what's happening here,
as strange as it seems, right?
So, and we talked about this in other contexts, but I'm going to do the callback to the second Obama administration.
There was, like, this plot that was uncovered about, like, an IRGC operative
who was going to—
Who was going to come to the United States and assassinate the Saudi ambassador at Cafe Milano.
Oh, yeah.
Remember this?
Yeah, yeah.
And, you know, Preet Bharar announced this case.
Look, I'm not here to—I wasn't down in the weeds of this thing.
I remember feeling like, at the time, there was probably some, like, distant Iranian aspiration to do something like this.
But I had a hard time believing that they were actually going to, like, in a movie, like, shoot up Cafe Milano.
Like, at the Saudi ambassador.
I think part of what happens to the Trump people that's interesting is they get these whiffs of Iranian intelligence
and they, like, just take them as something that's happening, right?
So, you remember the reason that Trump was, like, rushed out of Air Force One in, like, a food cart
was because there was some intel reportedly passed by the Israelis
that they were going to, like, shoot down Air Force One with, like, an RPG or something.
Right, right.
Out of Turkey.
It just feels like—because what do we—
What did we see?
We saw them detain those guys who were casing the airbase and then release them as if, well,
those guys clearly probably weren't hard on Iranian terrorists, so they wouldn't have released them.
It feels like they have, like, some whiff of intelligence that, like, Iranians have discussed, you know,
drone attacks on bases, including this U.K. one, and they're, like, just freaking out.
And the point is it doesn't, like, suggest that you have a lot of confidence in what you're doing.
You know, like, we're not confident.
We can defend B-1 bombers in an airbase.
So that's the weird thing.
Are there no—I mean, I guess it's a base in the U.K., so you would think it's relatively safe,
but there's no air defenses on the base to speak of.
I mean, like, maybe what they were worried about is some sort of IRGC operative in the U.K.
that, like, launches a quadcopter drone that hits the planes.
Like, I don't know, but you can't put a bunch of cops around the base to prevent that from happening?
Yeah, I mean, because it just feels like the Iranians could almost, like, do psyops with us
and, like, talk to each other in open lines about all the things they want to do,
and then suddenly we're moving military equipment.
Right.
And Trump's in a food cart.
You know, like, it does just feel like he's—these people are in his head.
Like, we've been rattled by the Iranians, you know?
Because, like, it's not a small thing to be, like, yank B-1 bombers from the U.K.
Like, it suggests, like, an empire that doesn't feel safe anywhere.
Yeah.
That Iranian assassination plot, that was 2011.
The target was Adel Al-Jubeir at Cafe Milano.
Was that 2011?
Yeah, I remember I was there for this.
Because I remember it was like—like, the IRGC reached out to some naturalized U.S. citizen.
He was, like, a used car salesman, literally, from Texas,
who then tried to hire someone he thought was in the Zetas cartel,
but that guy was a DEA informant.
So the whole thing just unraveled.
It just—again, it felt like, you know, some guy had a, you know, no bad idea and a brainstorm.
Right.
You know, like, let's take Adel Al-Jubeir at the Cafe Milano.
But, like, I just think sometimes we overreact to bits of intelligence.
You know?
And that's kind of what it feels like this is all about.
Yeah.
It was quite rushed.
They certainly freaked the fuck out.
Final story we wanted to flag for Ben's interview.
So listeners probably know that Chinese President Xi Jinping was just in D.C. for a state visit.
They accomplished nothing.
The Wall Street Journal, though, had a report over the weekend about some unusual requests that Xi made while he was here
and what it might say about his health, what the bunch of requests and sort of the observations of him might say.
So, first of all, they reported—
The Wall Street Journal reported that, quote,
a private room in the West Wing for Xi Jinping and his wife was required to take breaks between events.
No one else was allowed to join or go in the room.
Not even Xi's chief of staff.
They called it the hold room, which is just, like, hard to think of any other time that's happened
or why you wouldn't let your own staff in the room.
Also, Xi just had, like, very limited schedule.
So there were no activities the night he arrived.
And then on the last day he was there,
he was supposed to go to the—
He went to the National Archives with Trump, but spent only 10 minutes inside,
which was way less than the Trump team had planned.
One of the days he was in D.C., there was a five-hour gap in the summit agenda.
I think it was, like, Trump meeting with Xi.
There was no working lunch.
He just, like, peaced out for five hours and then came back for the state visit,
which is just weird.
Like, when you're on the ground for 48 hours, you flew 14 hours to be there.
Like, usually you make the most of it.
And then there was this incident at a summit of the—
six countries earlier last month, earlier in September,
where Xi skipped the dinner that was attended by Putin and others
because he was feeling sick.
So, Ben, this could be nothing.
There have been health rumors about Xi and other leaders before.
But if he's really sick and he dies,
it's, like, a huge succession question that will have global ramifications.
And also, I think, like, my big takeaway was surprise—
well, maybe not surprise—
probably a bad idea for all the Trump people to leak this.
Yeah.
So, that was mine, too.
It's, like, wildly sensitive.
Yeah.
Because, look, on Xi's health, we don't know.
There's a bunch of smoke.
Like, he travels far less than he did.
He's out of sight a bit more.
He's getting older.
He's gripping his wife's hand really strong, going up the stairs and stuff.
I mean, he's also just getting older.
But, like, there's enough to suggest maybe there's something happening there.
It's a—and to your point, it's just a reminder that he is so wildly consolidated power.
Like, he's turned that system from, like, a party system into, like, a one-man-one-rule system.
That, yeah, like, there—
it's worth thinking about the fact that there could be, like, a real power struggle if he just drops dead.
You know, it's just one more variable out there.
However, to me, the headline was, wow, crazy thing to leak.
You know, the Chinese are going to be fucking apoplectic that the Trump people are leaking out stories that had to come from them.
It's like the Chinese delegation was leaking this out.
Right, no.
That she needed rest, that it was peculiar.
Also, like, talk about whiplash.
Because if you're Xi Jinping, you come over here, Donald Trump is just kissing your ass.
Like, he's meeting you at the airport.
Carrying your bags.
He's just carrying your bags.
He's talking about how handsome you are, all this stuff.
Like, you know, the White House chief of staff, you know, Dan Scavino, is, like, tweeting out, like, weird AI videos of, like, a wild party at the state dinner.
Remember that?
Yes.
And then other White House staffers are leaking that you're, like, an old man who had rest.
You know, like, what is your guy's fucking approach to this country?
Right.
You know?
Because, like, you can't do a charm offensive and embrace the guy and then leak that he's, like, you know—
An old weak man.
An old weak man.
Like, that's—like, it just—it shows you how undisciplined this whole thing is because this is going to really piss off the Chinese.
I mean, that's the only practical result of this.
Remember that there was, like, 2022, the party congress, when Xi's sitting next to Hu Jintao, previous leader, and all of a sudden, he just gets frustrated.
Frogmarched out of the room.
They fucking dragged the guy out, and I don't think—
And then they, like, erased him from history.
I'm not sure we've seen Hu Jintao since, you know?
Like, that was one of the strangest things that's happened in the last decade.
Really weird.
It's an underrated thing for—when you, like, basically frogmarched the former chair of the party and president of the country out, you know?
And then I think all of his, like, all of his faction within the party was just purged.
Yeah.
I mean, it's just—it's, like, it's a parable about what could happen to Xi if he's perceived as weak or if he gets sick or incapacitated in some way.
I mean, it's just—there's a lot going on.
Well, remember, he—
He also replaced the chief of the military not too long ago.
I mean, there's clearly machinations happening in that Chinese system.
And one of the things that maybe is, like, potentially hopeful, too, we have to remind ourselves, as much as we've been talking about, like, the shitty leadership in the world, like, Putin's fucking old.
Like, Trump is fucking old.
Xi Jinping's old.
Erdogan's old.
Like, at a certain point, just by Mother Nature, like, there's going to be a lot of turnover here in the world.
And, like, that's—
And that can go for better or worse.
Hope springs eternal.
Okay.
We're going to take a quick break.
When we come back, you're going to hear Ben's interview with Evan Gershkovich about what it was like being in a Russian prison for way too long and about life in Russia under Putin.
So stick around for that.
This podcast is sponsored by Squarespace.
Squarespace is the all-in-one website platform designed to elevate your online presence and drive your success.
Squarespace gives you—
you the tools to claim your domain, build a professional website, expand your
brand and facilitate payments all in one place. With Squarespace's collection of cutting edge
design tools, anyone can build a bespoke online presence that perfectly fits their business.
Start with Blueprint AI, Squarespace's AI enhanced website builder to get a fully custom website in
just a few steps. Using basic information about your industry, your goals and your personality
to generate premium quality content and personalized design recommendations. Every
dream needs a domain. Squarespace domains makes easy to find the best name for your business at
one fair all inclusive price. No hidden fees or add ons required. Squarespace provides everything
you need to bring more of your dream to life. Whether that means building a website or adding
a professional email service. Don't wait to claim your name. Invest in your dream domain today.
Head to squarespace.com for a free trial. And when you're ready to launch, go to squarespace.com
slash world to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain. That's squarespace.com
slash world.
All right, I'm very pleased to be joined today by Evan Gershkowitz. He is the author of the really
extraordinary and beautiful new book, This Cursed Beautiful Land. He is a reporter for the Wall
Street Journal. He was, of course, detained in Russia for a year and a half and released as part
of a swap that makes up for a good chunk of his memoir. Evan, thanks so much for joining us.
Thanks for having me, Ben.
So, you know, I've had a chance to chat about this book before. I just want to reiterate for
our audience.
This is not just, you know, you check the box and wrote the memoir. This is like deeply insightful
into Russia, deeply reflective personally. It's got literary flourish. It'll take you inside of
a Russian prison. So I really urge everybody to pick up this book. But I want to begin where you
start in the prologue, which is kind of the anatomy of a sting. You know, you travel on a reporting
trip thinking you're meeting with the source to get information about Russia's military,
military complex. And you quickly find yourselves in the middle of a sting operation. He's trying to
give you documents that essentially play to a narrative that you're a spy. I want you to just
take people into in that experience when you realized you were being set up. And then share
a little bit about how you spent a lot of time in the book unpacking how what to you is, you know,
traditional reporting, whether it was clearly just a setup,
whether some people might have actually believed that you're engaged in espionage.
Yeah, so when I moved to Russia in late 2017, an American foreign correspondent or a foreign
correspondent at all hadn't been arrested for espionage charges since the late Soviet period,
since the late 80s. And so when we got there, when I got there, the Russian press was feeling
some pressure, but the foreign press was allowed to report on whatever it wanted. And we were
treated as kind of quasi diplomats. The worst, you know, that would happen, and it happened to one
person before the full-scale invasion in 2022 was getting kicked out. And when the, you know,
the reason really is just that the Kremlin wanted to control the information environment, censor it
for a domestic audience. But for a global audience, you know, it didn't really matter what
the global audience knew. And it gave the Kremlin cover, you know, it's a regular functioning country,
regular economy, if the New York Times, the BBC, the economists and so forth are reporting on it.
When the war, full-scale war starts, obviously the ground had shifted. But we were trying to
read the signals the same way we had always done of whether the rules applied to us. So Russia
passed these draconian censorship laws, which criminalized calling the war a war. They were
calling the war a special military operation. And you could land in prison for up to 10 years. The
Russian press at this point completely flees the country. I was reporting in London at that point
when the war started, just happens.
Stance happened to be there, decided I'll wait to come back. Over the months, some Russian
journalists are targeted in absentia. And we took that as a signal of the Russian state saying,
do not come back. And the foreign press left alone. So my bureau chief had stayed,
you know, other journalists had stayed. I came back, the Washington Post came back,
the New York Times, the Financial Times, the Guardian and so forth. We start reporting more
and more sensitive stories, so to speak, because, you know, it's a war and it's the most
that that is the topic. It is basically all there is to report on, really. Not really sort of, you
know, a museum opening in Moscow, but the war effort. I reported a story on how Putin was
getting information from the front and making decisions about the war. Went to Pskov, which
hosts the 76th Division of the Russian Airborne Forces, which had occupied Bucha in Ukraine and
committed a series of war crimes. So I was doing stories that, you know, we would consider
probably, you know, either brave or reckless, given the sense that the war was going on.
But not something that we would consider to be espionage. At the end of 2022, Putin addressed
the FSB, which used to be the KGB, Russia's domestic intelligence agency, and told them
that they needed to catch a spy. Three months later, I'm arrested. I was working on a whole
bunch of stories at that point. But the story I'm arrested while doing is about, as you said,
basically Russia was switching to a complete war footing. The war wasn't going as well as it wanted
to. And Ukraine was telegraphed. And so, you know, I was working on a whole bunch of stories at that
point. But the story I'm arrested while doing is about Russia was telegraphing a large counteroffensive
for the summer of 23. It was saying it was going to drive to the south, split Russian lines between
Crimea and the east, and that way be able to get back to the negotiating table. The Biden
administration and European countries were backing that as a tactic. But nobody was really reporting
on or discussing the fact that Russia was saying, well, we're going to defend the land that we've
occupied. They were building four defensive lines. They were switching their economy to military
footing. And my colleague and I at the Journal were planning on doing a story about this. And so
we're doing this story. We're connecting with different sources. And he has a source who's a
union boss in the Urals for various factories and said that, you know, he'd be able to help,
you know, with this story. He had helped my colleague before and actually journalists from
NPR and other places. And he said he could meet in person. And so that's where the sting really
begins is that I'm the one who's lured to go to this meeting. At that meeting, we talk about
how we wanted to get a view into how Russia's main tank factory was basically increasing its
output. And so really what we were trying to do was get a sense of how much they were prepping.
So one of the sources I was talking to was a lawmaker in the region who was talking about
how students were being sent right from universities into all the factories. They
were working three shifts around the clock. You know, it wasn't just this guy. But this guy at
this meeting suggested that one of the things that would be interesting to me would be the
total capacity output of the factory would be interesting to us. And I say, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Turns out that is what Russia considers classified information because we don't have a sense of what
a tank factory could produce. And I, by saying, yeah, that does sound interesting,
have agreed to receive it. Second meeting, there's the actual sting. When we meet,
he brings papers that he's drawn official tables of production figures onto.
Hands them to me. And that's when masked men storm in and arrest me. Lo and behold,
from the FSB, the service that is responsible for espionage cases, they march in, tell me I'm
under arrest. And as I'm being, as they're approaching to drag me on the ground, I noticed
that the source is stepping away into the crowd. When I'm brought to the station, I'm simply handed
my espionage charges. I'm not interrogated. I'm not tortured. And so at that moment, I realized,
oh, this was a setup. This was a sting. And I,
I assume for a specific reason to, as the Russians call it, to stock up their, what they say,
their exchange fund. The Russians use journalists as cover for their intelligence operatives still.
We banned that practice back in 1977, codified it as policy in 1997, but they still do.
And I think, you know, where I basically landed on is, you know, they're ordered to catch a spy.
They're trying to find more Americans to swap. It turns out when I get out, I find that they were running a second
sting operation at the same time, which had to do with the story I was doing about Wagner,
the paramilitary group at the time. So I think they were looking for different ways to set me
up at that point. Yeah, no, I mean, you, clearly they wanted you for a swap. They may have also
not liked what you were doing and how you were doing it. You're a Russian speaker,
parents born in the Soviet Union. Maybe that raises other suspicions. You go to prison and
you're in this, this world where you're kind of reporting. It's interesting. You,
you get access to no reporter usually gets to FSB officers, to other prisoners, to prison guards.
The war is kind of a constant, you know, background noise, right? It's, it's on the state media
that is on television in your cell. Some of the convicts are debating whether to take the offer
to go to the front so that they can break their sentence, knowing that they might just be put in
the meat grinder. Obviously people are not being totally candid with you because they think the
police might be listening in prison. But what did you surmise about Russian attitudes about the war
and about what Putin has done, where he's taken Russia based on your conversations with everybody
ranging from, you know, FSB officials to common criminals to people who are in prison for their
war? Yeah. I mean, on the first part about the reporting exercise, just for, you know, listeners
who might've not gotten to the book yet or read anything about the book, I basically, I had wanted
to do a book already.
because
You know, I was one of the last foreign reporters on the ground. Rush of news gathering from, you know, reports to news analysis to blog posts. It's hard to capture how much Russia is really drastically going off a cliff in this sort of autocratic descent return to its kind of, you know, the normal way its government had gone about doing things after kind of like the blip of the 90s, so to speak.
And I was thinking of characters for a book to memorialize this period, follow their lives, how their lives had changed. And then I get arrested. Some of those characters have ended up in this book. But when I get arrested and realize that's for a swap, you know, I'm treated better than some other people there.
You know, the warden checks in on me before the U.S. ambassador comes to visit on state television. I hear news programs talking about how they had to replenish their exchange fund.
You know, it's. It all becomes clear that I'm not really being treated as a spy. That's not what they're concerned about. They just needed an asset, a bargaining chip.
And so I. A coping mechanism that I had was essentially, well, this place is interesting. There's nothing much I can do about this. Swap deals take a while.
Brittany Grinders, who some people might remember, the WNBA player, her swap took 10 months. But most take, you know, more than a year and a half. Some take two years, some take up to five. And so I thought, well, I'm going to be here for a bit.
And a coping mechanism was. Reporting on the place. Reporters don't really get to waltz into the FSB offices every day. Or like you said, Ben, you know, meet regular, you know, this many, you know, regular Russian criminals or soldiers who had fought in Ukraine and so forth.
I mean, the state of affairs when I got to Russia in 2017 was already then this notion of kind of apathy. I think Russians take umbrage with that word because apathy sort of makes. I think Russians take umbrage with that word because apathy sort of makes it seem as if they've checked out on their own volition. And some would argue that they've checked out because Putin's government made clear that they should check out politically.
And it's always felt like, you know, there's maybe a third of society is really tapped into what's going on and two thirds are not. And when it came to the war, especially, you know, when criticizing the war is criminalized, you can land in prison for 10 years for criticizing the war.
And I met a teenager in prison.
Who had spray painted for anti-war words on a government building in protest and ended up with a double digit sentence for defacing a government building and committing a terrorist act and so on.
That tells you the real fear that exists in Russia to really speak out. And so when a pollster calls you and asks what you think of the war, you know, you might not, you might reserve your better judgment.
And I think both from, you know, there's interesting kinds of pollsters working.
In Russia, Keith Gessner, the New Yorker, wrote about these different kinds of pollsters that spread it up, trying to really do it, do this more creatively through focus groups, asking kind of tangential questions.
To me, it seems like there's something like 15% of people who are really, really, really pro-war, 15% of people who are really, really, really anti-war and something like two thirds that are a silent majority that we can't really tell.
Maybe they like Putin, but they don't like the war. Maybe they are for the war, but they actually don't like Putin.
They just, you know, or maybe they don't want to think about it.
Or maybe they think the war is totally bad, but they won't speak out about it.
And that was the kinds of people I met in prison, too, including prison guards.
I got in a conversation with the prison guard and, you know, I asked him what he thought about the war.
And he kind of, you know, gave me a little smile and a nod.
And I said, I understand, you know, because he has to wear an audio recorder and a video recorder whenever he's moving a prisoner around.
And he had that on me and he can't speak out loud.
I hate that.
With another prison guard once, we were having a cigarette and there was a second prison guard.
And we started talking about Putin with the first and the second one just turned on his heels and walked off as far as he could because he didn't want to be anywhere near this, no matter what we were saying.
So I think it's a black box that's really hard to get a true view into.
But I think that silent majority is really key in terms of understanding what might happen after Putin eventually.
It doesn't necessarily have to remain.
Yeah, well, in going beyond even the war and Putin, you know, you're in good company.
You know, Solzhenitsyn was in prison in Russia.
Dostoevsky was in prison in Russia.
And you also clearly had some affection.
You create a composite of your cellmates at the prison you're at outside of Moscow.
But clearly you had some affection for this person or these people that you were forced into such intimate quarters with in a cell.
My question for you is like. As someone who, you know, has a Russian background, speaks fluent Russian, is fascinated by this country, what did you learn about Russians from being imprisoned with them?
Is there something you learned on the inside that you could not have learned, you know, in Moscow or even traveling on reporting trips?
You know, I have this dual kind of dual identity since when I was a kid.
I grew up in a Russian-speaking home with a Russian name at home, Vanya, which is Ivan.
Evan is the American name.
We step out.
You know, at home, it's Russian food, Soviet cartoons.
You step out into the world and there it's American pop culture and an American name, English.
And, you know, in prison, it kind of felt like it was my Russian side in prison, right?
I think it was also another coping mechanism.
You kind of became your Russian side.
You became Vanya.
Exactly.
I became Vanya completely, basically.
Evan was left somewhere out there.
You know, I'm watching the news, reading the news about him.
And a journalist is usually the one observing the news.
He isn't the main character in a story, the subject of the story.
And suddenly, my position in life is flipped upside down.
And I think I kind of was, you know, in the cell, we speak Russian.
I'm referred to by my Russian name.
The U.S. ambassador came once a month and I spoke one hour of English.
And actually, over the months, I started, you know, in the 11th month, the 12th month, I started being, it was hard to recall certain English words, you know, which is a total tangent on how insane language, you know, emigres, Russian or Chinese or Mexican will forget some, you know, some words.
Over the years, my parents don't remember all Russian words.
That's a kind of, you know, a total fascinating thing about the plasticity of language.
But so I become my Russian self.
And I, you know, one thing that I really felt was this kind of, you know, there's this sort of majestic terror of an autocratic regime.
It's immovable.
There's nothing you can really, you know, I couldn't do anything about my situation.
I'm there.
I can't change anything.
Obviously, my case is fabricated.
But 98%.
99.7% of Russian cases end in a conviction.
So you're sort of being passed along down the conveyor belt of this rubber stamping court.
And you have to, how you kind of handle it is with dark humor.
And my cellmates handled it with that way.
It's kind of resignation and dark joke.
And that's depressing, obviously.
But I think it's a kind of way to deal with this.
And, you know, I think one thing about Russians is that, you know, their history is much more tragic.
But they're a bit more, they're a bit more grounded and able to sort of swim with these various currents that go around them.
And there's something that I could really relate to about that.
And they try to keep living in a way.
But, you know, also interesting, you know, my cellmate, I thought sometimes it can be really, you know, some of these decisions can be really conscious.
So my cellmate, one of my cellmates was, had tried basically normal.
Office work was not making much money, wasn't able to move up in the career.
There's not, you know, the job market isn't that great.
After Crimea, the economy is sort of grinding to a slow stagnation with all the sanctions that have been imposed on it.
And he's like, well, you know, Putin and his regime are up to corruption and crime.
Why can't, why can't the rest of us?
And so he made a conscious decision.
Yeah.
And so he made this conscious decision to become a professional criminal because, you know, sort of.
If the big man is doing it, why do I need to follow the rules?
And, you know, I think, I mean, I hate these direct comparisons, but we're watching our administration in the U.S., the norms that are being violated on what, you know, what kind of money you're allowed to be making while you're in office and foreign deals and so on and so forth.
And we kind of become inoculate to that.
And you can, I think, you know, more and more people find it kind of comfortable.
You know, there's if the norms shift, so be it.
So I found that really interesting, too.
I think, like, you know, our norms are malleable.
And I think Russians have, you know, they've had this tragic, difficult history and they kind of find ways to exist in it.
Yeah.
It's interesting because you sometimes become more Russian.
I'm sure that allows you to see the experience of Russians through different eyes.
And then part of what you're seeing is people who are both coping and in some cases adapting to the kind of enterprise that they're living under.
There's one other thing I want to ask you that I actually.
I meant to ask you that, Dan, and I didn't get to it, which is you kind of allude to this at the end.
So you go through this extreme experience.
You weather it, but it's not obviously with that difficulty.
Then you're released in this dramatic swap.
But part of what you're realizing is, you know, one, you're leaving behind Russia.
You don't know if and when you'll be able to set foot on this, you know, cursed, beautiful land again.
Two, obviously, you've been to this extreme circumstance.
Of reporting in dangerous places and getting apprehended.
Do you do you think about as you've kind of processed this?
reentry, what and how you're going to find that kind of, I don't mean to be pejorative
about it, but that thrill that you probably got in reporting in a dangerous place and
taking risks, right?
Because you clearly like the, you know, every foreign correspondent I know likes to kind
of be on that line that you're on, you know, like I'm taking some risks, but it's worth
it.
Prison itself was an extreme experience.
Now you're back, I imagine, and kind of on the one hand, loving the mundane nature of
day-to-day life.
But do you think to yourself, like, where am I going to find that next act that is both
thrilling and rewarding for me after what I've been through?
Yeah, it's a great question.
I mean, there's really, I guess, two questions there and two points to make.
The first one about Russia is just that, you know, I am Russian American.
I moved there with no illusions about the Russian state at that point.
It occupied Crimea, Eastern Ukraine, murdered people like Boris Nemtsov in the street,
Anna Polakovskaya, a journalist.
When I was arrested, it was shock, not surprise, shock that they would cross this red line,
not surprise in terms of the logic of the regime.
And I, you know, I feel like somewhat part of the people, right?
I'm not a citizen of Russia.
I wasn't born there, but much of my family's from there.
I grew up in Russian culture.
I met some of the best friends.
I've ever had in my life there.
My girlfriend there.
I became an adult there.
And so I think a country is much more complex and greater than just simply
what its government might be up to at any given moment.
And so, yeah, you know, I don't think there's this change suddenly of,
oh, I never want to go back to Russia again.
I can't go back while he's alive, but, you know, we'll see what happens one day.
And it's a history is long.
And maybe we'll. Maybe there will be a moment where there's a free Russian,
like the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny was, you know,
dreaming of and a lot of other Russians and his supporters,
the tens of thousands of people who support him
and the thousands who came out to his funeral in Russia,
even amid, you know, the draconian measures that are going on there.
The other side in terms of, yeah, this sort of foreign correspondent nature,
I think, you know, foreign correspondents aren't the only ones that feel this way.
I mean, I think you and your job probably felt this way,
leaving government too after, you know, traveling the world,
being at the heart of things, making these decisions.
And suddenly we become what?
Reporters, podcasters, columnists.
Exactly.
That's probably the reason I asked the question.
Exactly.
Yeah.
And I think it's this kind of comedown.
I think what it is, is I think addiction in a way comes from the repetition.
You are used to that kick.
So people were asking me when I got out, what were you craving?
What did you want to eat?
And I'd lost my cravings.
Because I, you know, it's, I wasn't thinking about sushi
because I couldn't order it off Uber Eats every two weeks.
And so the craving isn't being satisfied.
Yeah.
Yeah.
You learn to look forward to other things.
So I was looking forward to when my lawyer would visit each week
to when I would go on my walk each day
to when my friends would send in fresh, you know, fruits and vegetables.
And, you know, I actually made guacamole in prison
because they sent in fresh avocados and red onions and whatnot.
And I was able to, that was like,
that guacamole was the best thing I had eaten in forever.
And so I wasn't, like the cravings go away.
And I think it's the same thing with this kind of work.
At the beginning, I was thinking about it a lot.
And I was exploring that in the book of sort of this,
wow, Hooton and, you know, the FSB stole this from me.
They stole this ability to work.
But where I've come to is like, I'm a journalist again.
I've got back to reporting at the Journal.
And some of the stories we were working on and that I was helping do over the summer
were fascinating in their own right, without having to go to the front lines.
We did a story.
We did a story on how actually the Biden administration was deciding
whether to give the UAE chips for its AI program,
which was a big debate given the UAE does work with China and Russia.
And should we cede this technology that we have to them?
Ended up being a CIA operation to make this decision.
It was a fascinating story.
Then we did a story on how the Trumps were building a new tower in Tbilisi
with the help of a sanctioned oligarch, U.S. sanctioned oligarch.
Anyway, the, I think finding,
other things that give you some sort of, maybe not thrill, but make life interesting.
- Curiosity. - I think reporting is interesting, you know?
- Yeah. - Yeah, yeah.
- Curiosity is like a. - Yeah, exactly. - A virtue that can fill a lot of space.
Yeah.
Well, look, Evan, it's been great talking to you again.
Everybody should read, I mean, like your glimpses of prison life
that you just mentioned are fascinating in their own right.
It's also like a detective story.
It's a prison story.
It's a story about what's happened to Russia.
So thank you so much for writing it.
And thank you for spending some time with us today.
Thanks again.
Ben, it was two great conversations.
- Glad to have a second one. - Yep, I really enjoyed it.
Thanks to Evan for joining the show.
And thanks to you all for listening.
And we will talk to you soon.
Pod Save the World is a Crooked Media production.
Our show is produced by Ilona Minkowski,
Michael Goldsmith, and Anisha Banerjee.
Our team includes Matt DeGroat, Ben Hethcote,
Jordan Cantor, Kenny Moffitt, David Tolles, and Ryan Young.
Our staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Brazil’s recent elections saw a right-wing victory with Flavio Bolsonaro advancing to a runoff, signaling a shift toward authoritarian policies and potential environmental damage in the Amazon.
The political landscape in South America is increasingly dominated by right-wing leaders, reflecting a global trend of populist, nationalist movements and a decline in democratic stability.
In Europe, protests in France and Spain reflect deep public anger over education funding, housing, and government corruption, with rising support for far-right parties like Marine Le Pen.
Germany’s arrest of former intelligence chief August Hanning for espionage raises concerns about internal corruption and the integrity of Western intelligence services.
Reports of a pneumonic plague outbreak in Russia are met with skepticism due to lack of transparency, raising alarms about possible biological weapons research and global health governance failures.
Political instability in multiple regions highlights a growing trend of distrust in institutions, with global powers like the U.S. and Russia engaging in strategic maneuvering that undermines international cooperation.
The rise of far-right governments globally is linked to economic anxiety, a sense of institutional failure, and a desire for strong leadership, often fueled by social media and nationalist rhetoric.
The intersection of domestic policy, geopolitical tensions, and public health crises underscores the need for transparent, accountable, and cooperative global governance systems.
Summary:
The podcast explores a wave of global political upheaval, from Brazil’s rightward shift under Flavio Bolsonaro to rising far-right movements in Europe, including France and Spain. In Brazil, a narrow electoral win for Bolsonaro signals a dangerous alignment with authoritarian policies, especially concerning environmental degradation in the Amazon. Across Europe, protests in France and Spain reveal public fury over education, housing, and corruption, with far-right parties gaining ground.
In Germany, the arrest of a top intelligence official for espionage signals deep institutional vulnerability and raises questions about intelligence integrity. Meanwhile, reports of a plague outbreak in Russia are met with skepticism due to government denial and lack of transparency, prompting concerns about biological weapons research and global health governance. The recurring theme is a systemic breakdown in trust—between governments, institutions, and international cooperation.
This erosion of trust is amplified by populist leaders like Trump and Bolsonaro, who exploit fear and nationalism. The episode concludes that without a renewed commitment to transparency, accountability, and international collaboration, such crises will only deepen, threatening both democratic stability and global security. The underlying message is clear: global challenges require a reinvigorated, united, and trustworthy system of governance.
FAQs
HIMS offers personalized, online treatment plans for better intimate health without office visits or pharmacy lines. A licensed provider assesses your needs and prescribes treatment that ships discreetly to your home.
Yes, prescription products require an online consultation with a licensed healthcare provider to determine if treatment is appropriate for you.
HIMS tailors your treatment plan based on your specific needs—whether you need daily support or just access when needed—ensuring it fits your lifestyle and goals.
Yes, the entire process is private and discreet, with no in-person visits and treatments shipped directly to your home.
Brazil’s recent elections saw a right-wing victory with Flavio Bolsonaro winning a runoff, leading to a strong right-wing majority in key legislative bodies and raising concerns about law and order, environmental damage, and democratic backsliding.
Spain faces housing and corruption protests, France sees widespread student-led protests over poor education and budget cuts, and Quebec’s separatist party won a significant election victory, signaling growing political fragmentation.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.