This BBC Podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. I'm Alex Ritson and in the early hours of Saturday, the 22nd of August, these are our main stories. A Russian drone attack on a shopping centre in central Ukraine has killed at least 16 people and injured 130. Donald Trump wins the latest round of a legal battle over his plans to build a huge White House ballroom. The Netherlands has fined the US Tech Company Uber hundreds of millions of dollars, one of the largest ever penalties issued under Europe's technology privacy rules. Also in this podcast, the United Nations says the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo is the deadliest in the country's history and it is growing exponentially. The epidemic is spreading to an area that is bigger than France and the outbreak is growing faster and wider than the Ebola response. And a collection of handwritten notes by the Indian Independently the Mahatma Gandhi has been sold at auction. It's not known what the strategic value of a Ukrainian shopping centre was to the Russian military, which used drones to attack the building, killing at least 16 people. But it's in a privy re in central Ukraine, which is President Zelensky's hometown, in his nightly address, he condemned the attack. A rescue operation is currently underway. This is an absolute atrocity committed by the Russians. There's nothing but beasts. We will definitely respond. It's crucial that we have everything we need to protect lives. It's important that the world doesn't remain silent about all of this. This Russian war must come to an end and the world must help us achieve that. The authorities said that around 130 people were wounded more than 20 of them, children. Svetlana worked at a store in the shopping centre. I thought my earbuds had burst in my ear, then mirrors started falling. I went out, thought it was all over and started walking back and forth. Then I saw my friend who was covered in blood. I took a bottle of water, he was moving on his own, but had lots of shrapnel wounds. I laid him down and an ambulance arrived and took him away. I got the latest from our Ukraine correspondent, Dan Johnson. The search and rescue operations are still ongoing there, we're told. And so the death toll keeps rising. The number of wounded has been increasing. More than 100 people who were hurt in this, as well as those killed. It looks like a classic example of the worst kind of double tap attack, as it has called. We've had footage from the scene, verified, which shows the first drone hitting the shopping centre, an explosion and a fire. And then President Zelensky said it was half an hour later that a second drone hit the centre once the first emergency responders were there, trying to treat those who'd already been wounded. The video of that shows another, what appears to be a Shahed jet-powered drone, diving from the sky towards the centre. You can actually hear Ukrainian soldiers or air defence units trying to shoot it down with machine gun fire, but they were unsuccessful. So that second drone has hit, causing more deaths and more injuries. The President, who is actually from Krivyry, the city where this happened, said this was a cynical attack, and that he's been talking to the UN Secretary-General. I think that was a call that was set up anyway, but he's used the opportunity to highlight what he said was the Russian targeting of civilians in such a clear and cynical way. Trying to shoot a drone like this down with machine guns doesn't sound ideal. I mean, are there better ways and does Kiev have the technology that it needs? Air Defence has across Ukraine have been overstretched, particularly in terms of incoming missiles. The record in shooting down drones had been better. We know an air raid alert had gone out in Krivyry, the city where this shopping centre was. There's actually been an investigation launched. The regional head of government has said into why that centre was still open, and some of the stores were open despite the air raid alert. That's an indication of how relaxed some Ukrainians have become, because after four and a half years of hearing those sirens, not everybody reacts suddenly as perhaps they would have at the start of this. But this is a jet-powered drone. We understand at least that second one that we've been able to see on video. That is a relatively new innovation from the Russians. They've taken the old propeller-powered motor-powered Shahid, which was relatively slow-moving. They've put a jet engine on that instead, which means it moves much faster and is much harder to shoot down, and by the time they're effectively firing at it with a machine gun from the back of a 4x4, that is really a last desperate effort to try to bring down a drone to save people. But by that point, it was already heading for its target, and there was very little chance of actually stopping it doing the further damage that was inflicted. Dan Johnson in Kiev. Donald Trump has won the latest round in an ongoing legal battle over his plans to rebuild the entire East Wing of the White House. The U.S. Supreme Court says work can temporarily resume on a massive 8,400 square meter ballroom, a key part of the president's plans to extensively reshape the U.S. Capitol. The decision allows judges more time to weigh up an emergency appeal by the Trump administration, after a lower court ruling demanded a halt to construction by Friday. Oliver Conway asked our White House reporter burnt to boost men for his assessment of the latest ruling. With the action as known, it's called an administrative stay, and it really gives the justiceist time to consider the administration's broader request to let work continue on the ballroom. But President Trump will certainly be very pleased. In recent days, he's really been framing this not only as a ballroom as it was initially envisioned when it was announced last year, but more as a national security complex. He says it's kind of vital to protect presidents and their families and important guests in the future. From where I'm sitting just outside the White House, I can see the two massive cranes over what used to be the Eastern of the White House. Last week, the administration's attorneys said that the work was about 65 percent done, and since then, reporters have been seen and hearing very much work continue, sometimes for much of the day, 20 hours a day in some instances. So it's very much a work in progress, even as this whole legal battle has been playing out in the U.S. court system. Can is it an issue that American voters actually care about? I think many Americans that are kind of purists in the sense that they think that these historical sites should be kept in place. They certainly bought the argument and the initial lawsuit that this process requires a more formal review process with public comment invited. On the other hand, many of the president's supporters certainly are supportive of the ballroom being built, especially now that it's been framed from a security perspective, especially given that there have been multiple attempts on President Trump's life. And does this suggest that the ballroom will ultimately get completed? The fact remains that the Eastern of the White House is gone, and much of this project is already built. Whether or not it continues, the fact is the White House has already been transformed for the future, and there's, I see very little possibility of it going back to the way it was. Burnt Debouceman, and in the last few hours, President Trump has said he's grateful for the Supreme Court's decision. The Netherlands has found the U.S. Tech Company Uber $966 million in what amounts to one of the largest ever penalties issued under Europe's Technology Privacy Rules. The Dutch Regulator says the Ride Hailing Group used automated systems to deactivate driver accounts without giving them adequate warning. It's the latest, huge fine issued by European regulators who've imposed billions of dollars in penalties on U.S. Tech companies due to privacy, competition, and digital market rules. The BBC's Pete Ross has been investigating the story. This particular case began with complaints from drivers in France and relates to events between 2020 and 2022. Uber temporarily suspended the accounts of some drivers when its systems concluded without human intervention or oversight that drivers were guilty of fraud. Now, when we say fraud, examples of that could be drivers taking a longer route than it was necessary, so in order to inflate fares or so-called ghost rides that involve drivers accepting a trip, then sitting still without moving the motivation being that whoever's hailed that ride would get frustrated cancel and then the rider gets a cash payment without actually having to do any work or perhaps crucially using any gas. Now, Uber says that under the automated detection system, suspensions for those suspected of these sorts of scams were usually brief.
However, the Dutch regulator says that drivers caught by this system who also had a low rating, found themselves permanently locked out by computer. And that's in a breach of his rules. Essentially, Uber drivers would perhaps open up their account to find that they could no longer access it. It means that they couldn't go out and earn a living. And that contravenes these GDPR, these European general data protection regulation rules, which essentially say amongst many of them that say that automatically deciding or computers automatically deciding making decisions that would impinge on someone's employment is against their rules. Now, Uber disputes that this happened and it's going to appeal this latest fight. Yes, an enormous fine and an interesting case, but Uber is far from the only big US tech company to have full foul of European regulators. Yeah, absolutely. Some of the biggest players in the tech game, Meta, Google, Apple, Amazon, the all-face multiple fines, all of them being appealed. The biggest of which, back in 2023, privacy violations under Ireland's Data Protection Commission, Meta, the company responsible for Facebook, amongst other things, Instagram as well, of course. I hate without $1.3 billion fine and the US group is currently appealing that penalty, too. And one person, briefly, who's not happy about these fines, Donald Trump? Yeah, Donald Trump's administration has frequently clashed with Europe's general data protection regulation of GDPR. It says that it impacts the American tech industry from being able to thrive. And recently he wrote on his truth social network that the United States of America is not a piggy bank for Europe, nor will it be allowed. Pete Ross. Argentina won few friends with their post-match antics at the World Cup, unfurling a banner after beating England in the semi-final and then lashing out when they lost to Spain in the final. Now, football's world governing body FIFA has fined Argentina a total of $321,000 of breaches of discipline and handed out lengthy suspensions to several players. The details from our sports presenter, Lizzie Greenwood Hughes. The FIFA disciplinary committee have taken their time with this case, and they've come down hard. It has to be said, because there are two separate issues here. Firstly, the Falklands banner, which the Argentina players carried after the World Cup semi-final when they won over England. And the second one is that the fight and the racist comments after the final against Spain. Well, let's look at the banner first of all, which Argentine players brought out after beating England in Atlanta. The banner said the Malveenas are Argentinus, which is obviously politically very sensitive, controversial, and incendiary, particularly, of course, following the conflict there in 1982, during which many lives were lost from both sides. So the banner clearly breached FIFA's rules, which say no team's individual or spectator are allowed to use a FIFA sporting event for demonstrations of a non-sporting nature. And it's also not the first time Argentina have been in trouble over Falkland banners in 2014, ahead of the World Cup. In Brazil, their players displayed the same slogan before a friendly match. Now, then, FIFA only fined them $27,000, but we don't know how much of this fine is for the banner because of the $321,000 fine, which is what FIFA have given to the Argentina FA. It also relates to the Argentina player's behavior after the final against Spain when they'd comfortably won the match and a fight broke out on the pitch. Now, FIFA deemed that the Argentina Football Association broke rules relating to team misconduct, discrimination, racist and discriminatory chance, and gestures by its supporters. And lastly, failing to keep order and security. So I think this is where most of the fines have come from. Now, $100,000 of that $321,000 are suspended, but interestingly, FIFA are insisting that about a third of the overall fine must be invested into a plan to combat discrimination. So they're trying to do something good with this punishment that they're giving out to the AFA. And as well as that, Argentina will only be allowed 50% capacity for their next two home matches, although one of those matches is suspended. So you'd imagine that if Argentina behave for the first game, then they will be allowed a full contingent of fans for the second. But the strongest punishment is actually for the players themselves with lengthy international bans handed out to five of the Argentine players, including Leandro Paradez. He will have to sit out the next 10 Argentina matches and a fine of $90,000. Now, 10 matches is a very long time for a 32-year-old footballer. Spain's Gary has also been given a one-match ban and a $30,000 fines. So strong punishment from FIFA. Lizzie Greenwood Hughes. Still to come in this podcast. It can be quite challenging to deal with such a large patient. Choose 15 foot and weighs just under 50 kilos. A cancer treatment normally used on humans has been used to successfully remove a tumour on a snake for the first time. [MUSIC PLAYING] This is the Global News Podcast. The Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo was only confirmed in May, but it's already the deadliest in the country's history and the second worst ever in the world. More than 2,500 people have died, half of those in the past 20 days. And the United Nations says the outbreak is now growing exponentially. Julian Hannes is the UN's Senior Ebola Coordinator. The epidemic is spreading to an area that is bigger than France. And the outbreak is growing faster and wider than the Ebola response. And all of this is happening in an area, which has had three decades of conflict and is generating huge humanitarian needs. The conflict which has been going on in various forms since 1999 has displaced a million people in Italy. The lower north is undermined. And the basic social services, particularly health, have been fragmented. The operating conditions are brutal. I heard more from our Global Affairs reporter, Richard Cigoy, who's covering the story from Nairobi. We've been seeing an increasing number of people who have been infected, which is now slightly over 5,000. And the disease has been detected in six provinces across East and DSE, especially in regions that do border neighbor countries within the East and Dacentral Africa region. So basically, the rate of transmission, the pace is a major concern because it has outpaced the response by health workers. Yeah, why is it spreading so fast? Part of the reason it's because this outbreak is taking place within a region that has not got a very significant presence of the government there. So what happens is that this very not-so-developed infrastructure to support the health crisis. So if you're talking about facilities that can be used for diagnosis and also the number of health workers, it's at a very expansive region, which is quite underdeveloped. And so even transportation is really a huge challenge. Also the banking system, it's become very difficult to actually process wages for the health workers in that region. That's why we saw some of them really going on strike about two, three weeks ago. But then, of course, there is the perception amongst the local communities who still think that Ebola is a conspiracy. So we're seeing a lot of members of the communities really not going to treatment center. Some of them only going when they're critically ill. And some of them have actually even been attacking ambulances. I held workers and that's really complicated the response. It's not also just the fact that there's an armed conflict that is taking place in that region. So the multiplicity of factors that have really made it so difficult to contain this outbreak. And has there been any progress in terms of vaccine to prevent people getting it in the first place or treatments for those who do have it? Yes, there has been quite some bit of progress that has been made on that. And so currently we have vaccines that are candidates for trials which have been ongoing for the past one month. And just on Thursday, the World Health Organization helped to approve the release of about 70,000 doses. About 20 of those doses will be used for clinical trials, a later stage clinical trials phase three. And about 50 will be used just to support health workers, just to reinforce other response. Based on the WHO's assessment and projections, it looks like possibly we might have an approved vaccine maybe in about six months or so. Richard Kegoi, a collection of handwritten notes by the Indian Independents Leader Mahatma Gandhi has been sold at auction for $1.7 million. The sale in Mumbai sets a new record as Joana Keene explains. This isn't the first time items belonging to Mahatma Gandhi have gone on sale. Six years ago, a pair of his distinctive round spectacles were found sticking halfway out of the letterbox of an auction house in the west of England. They were bought by an American collector for $350,000. But his latest auction in Mumbai has fetched a record sum for an Indian historical document. Perhaps it's because these handwritten notes offer a personal insight into the political leaders thinking during the decade in which India gained independence from British rule. The notes were written by the man known as the father of the nation over a period of two years between 1944 and 1946 to close associate and freedom fighter Arnon Tihingarani. Mahatma Gandhi offers personal guidance saying non-violence is not a negative state of harmlessness but a positive state of love.
of. Truthy says is not merely a concept to study but a living reality. There are also reflections on grief and self-restraint. The collection was later compiled into a book called A Thought for the Day. The identity of the buyer hasn't been revealed, but the auction house says the notes will remain in India. Although the messages were the highlight of the sale, dozens of personal items went under the hammer, including manuscripts, photographs, and Hamagandis' portable spinning wheel, alongside two letters about the spiritual discipline of spinning. Joanna Keene. A python has become the first snake to be given a cancer treatment normally used on humans. The four meter long reptile, named after the actress Judi Foster, was given electrochema therapy to remove a tumour at Chester Zoo here in the UK. The BBC's Halena Burke has the details. Two decades ago, a young python arrived at Chester Zoo, with the letters JF on her paperwork. While officially the initials mean juvenile female, zookeepers decided it should instead represent the snake's new moniker, and so she was named Judi Foster. Years later, zookeepers noticed that Judi was eating less and wasn't her usual snakey self. The keeper team noticed that she was starting to get a little bit of a lump on her lip, so we removed that lump, but unfortunately when we sent off the tests, we found that it was a cancerous lesion. Charlotte Bentley, a veterinarian at the zoo, says that although the cancer was removed successfully, 12 months later, it grew back on Judi's jaw. So we decided to go a little bit to the drawing board of what we were going to do, and that's when we came up with the idea of doing a surgery and combining it with electrochymotherapy to give her the best outcome. Electrochymotherapy has been used to treat human cancer patients since the 90s. It combines a low dose of chemotherapy with short intense electrical shocks on the tumour site to help the medicine enter the cancer cells and kill them. The veterinary team had to use two operating tables to fit Judi's long body, but aside from that, Dr. Bentley says the surgery works mostly the same as it does for humans. She's 15 foot and weighs just under 50 kilos. We have to use anesthesia to get her completely still to look in her mouth, but actually from that point onwards, the technique is very similar, so it's all about making sure that the drugs and the electrodes are placed in the affected tissue, and by sending those little pulses, no matter whether it's a dog, a snake or a person, the treatment should work the same way. The team hopes the surgery will encourage other vits to try the technique on a wider variety of animals. Electrochymotherapy has been done on other mammals, and also there's been a few cases in birds. From what we could see, this is the first time it's been done on any reptile, so hopefully it means that it's kind of expanding its use a little bit further, and we can even start thinking further afield with our amphibians or even fish patients in the future. And as for Judi Foster the Python, she's now cancer-free and back to her usual self. She has been a fantastic patient and she's gone on to make a really, really excellent recovery. She had very few side effects. We didn't see any problems with the chemotherapy, and actually she's now back to her feisty character, and is definitely not having any problems with her eating anymore. Charlotte Bentley from Chester Zoo, ending that report by Haleina Berg. The movie industry has been through a few turbulent years, cinema attendances in the US, are down by around a third on pre-COVID levels. It's perhaps not surprising that Hollywood has been having second thoughts about some of its projects. But one of the film's Warner Bros. decided to write off as a tax loss, has fought back. Fans, film directors, and even a US congressman have saved a movie from the scrap heap, and later this month audiences will finally get a chance to see the much-anticipated legal drama featuring one of the stars of Looney Tunes, Wiley Cooyote, taking on that American corporate giant, the Acme Corporation. David Cilito takes up the story. My name is Sammy Birch. I'm the screenwriter of Coyote vs Acme, which is. The comeback movie nobody thought we would actually get. Wiley Cooyote, cartoon hero. Tireless, ravenous pursuer, the profoundly annoying roadrunner, who is again and again let down by his mail-order purchases from the Acme Corporation. Have you been horribly interred by a product made by the Acme Corporation? He is now the star of a new movie based on a classic article about a courtroom confrontation. Me, me, me. Ian Frazier wrote a really famous humor piece for the New Yorker entitled Coyote vs Acme, which is a straight-faced court-transcript of a trial between Wiley Cooyote and the Acme Corporation. Have you ever said a big stack of TNT on the road hoping to blow up your nemesis, but the detonator itself explodes? Have you ever pulled the rip cord of your parachute and only a bunch of silverware comes out? It's not your fault. Acme is evil. And there had been, since 1990, people wanting to make this into a feature film. And eventually Warner Bros. gave the green light to Sammy and the rest of the team took out and make it. Mr. Coyote, how can I help you? But then came the plummet to the bottom of the canyon moment. Warner's decided they'd make more money if they rooted off against tax rather than release it. It was a shock. I mean, the metaphors have been very literal in this case because given what Wiley Coyote normally experiences, where things are really going to plan, and then something falls out of the sky. I mean, it really did feel like that. And it wasn't just the cast and crew who wanted to see it in the cinemas. I hate to be political, but release Coyote versus Acme. The campaign, release Coyote has gone far and wide. It was really moving, actually, to see big directors that came out against it. There were congressmen. congressmen. Yes, because that was mostly notable to me because that happens in the movie. You know, there's been a lot of barrel-outs. All of which ended with a company called Catch Up being allowed to take it on. Which means. The Looney Toon's legal comedy that got shout is officially back on the calendar. And you reassure me that this hasn't been a very clever guerrilla marketing campaign. I can. I think the people at Catch Up Entertainment who wrote the check to buy this movie, I'm sure, would make sure you would want to know that it wasn't just a joke. And now we've seen it. It's amazing. I think it's the best Looney Toon's movie ever made. Almost every time Coyote held up a sign, it got a laugh. And I just have to say, it lives up to the hype. And I'm still blown away that they tried to cancel this movie. The Rotten Tomatoes collated reviews has it at a startling 95% approval. When I saw the final movie, it was what was being called the funeral screening. And I was so proud of it. I think a lot of people thought, "Oh, well, it's probably sucks if we're in a throat away." And then to go, "This doesn't suck." The name of the case is Coyote vs. Action. The fact that it's getting to come out, that kids can be introduced to these characters, it's an amazing, only happy moment. And for Mr. Coyote, a rare moment of joy in a life of failure. It's one of the most hard-working people I've ever met. And they all do you get in the more you fail in life. Surely we're all supposed to be rooting for Wily Coyote, aren't we? Of course. Of course, the movie takes, I think, an anti-bird stance in general. And at the end of it, you won, haven't you? We haven't been splat yet at the bottom of the canyon, so we're taking that as a win. That's all, folks. If you want to get in touch, you can email us at
[email protected]. You can also find us on X at BBC World Service. Use the hashtag #GlobalNewsPod. This edition of the Global News Podcast was mixed by Martin Baker and the producer was Wendy Erkert. The editor is Karen Martin. I'm Alex Richardson until next time. Goodbye. podcast.
Where ever you listen. Be the first to listen to your favourite shows, like Evil Genius, Good Bad Billionaire and You're Dead To Me, with a subscription to BBC Podcasts Premium on Apple Podcasts. You can also enjoy a range of our podcasts, add free, with an Amazon Music subscription.
PodcastTranscript AI